Next Article in Journal
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Frail Patients with Primary Renal Cell Carcinoma: Preliminary Results after 4 Years of Experience
Next Article in Special Issue
Salvage Therapy for Relapsed Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Therapeutic Potential of Antibody-Drug Conjugate-Based Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Mesothelioma

Director Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Unit, Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori, Via Giacomo Venezian 1, 20133 Milano, Italy
Submission received: 9 October 2020 / Accepted: 11 December 2020 / Published: 23 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mesothelioma)
Malignant mesothelioma is a disease affecting serosal surfaces derived from the mesothelium comprising the pleura, peritoneum, pericardium, and tunica vaginalis testis. Peritoneal mesothelioma (PM) accounts for 7–30% of all cases [1]. The incidence of malignant mesothelioma varies widely geographically. The highest rates are reported in the UK, Australia, and New Zealand, while some of the lowest reported rates are from Japan, Slovenia, and other countries in central Europe. The United States has an incidence in the middle range of about 1.94 and 0.41 per 100,000 for men and women, respectively [2,3]. There will be approximately 15,000 cases of PM diagnosed between 2005 and 2050 in the US [1] and 300–400 new cases of peritoneal mesothelioma are estimated to be diagnosed annually.
The most common diffuse malignant form of PM (DMPM) is characterized macroscopically by thousands of whitish tumor nodules of variable size and consistency that may coalesce to form plaques or masses, or layer out uniformly over the entire peritoneal surface. Although there might be an association of asbestos exposure with DMPM, this disease’s pathogenesis is mostly unknown. Patients usually present with advanced disease that causes abdominal pain or distension. As the disease progresses, patients die due to intestinal obstruction or terminal starvation within a year. In most patients, DMPM remains localized within the abdominopelvic cavity throughout its course.
Two decades ago, encouraging data on a multimodal approach that combines cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) were reported. According to a recent International Consensus Statement, CRS and HIPEC is currently regarded as the gold-standard initial treatment in selected patients with malignant DMPM [4] as it extends overall survival from a median of 9–13 months in patients undergoing palliative systemic chemotherapy [5,6,7] to 34–92 months [8,9,10,11].
This monograph’s objective is to present a comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art data regarding the epidemiology, diagnostics, therapeutics, and pathophysiology of PM.
The current project brought together the efforts of the most prominent experts in peritoneal surface oncology and has the mission to provide clinicians and researchers worldwide with a piece of updated information that will serve to further optimize therapeutics, improve the prognosis, and deepen our knowledge of the disease’s biology in the years to come.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Moolgavkar, S.H.; Meza, R.; Turim, J. Pleural and peritoneal mesotheliomas in SEER: Age effects and temporal trends, 1973–2005. Cancer Causes Control 2009, 20, 935–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Bianchi, C.; Bianchi, T. Global mesothelioma epidemic: Trend and features. Indian J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2014, 18, 82–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Bridda, A.; Padoan, I.; Mencarelli, R.; Frego, M. Peritoneal mesothelioma: A review. MedGenMed 2007, 9, 32. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Kusamura, S.; Kepenekian, V.; Villeneuve, L.; Lurvink, R.J.; Govaerts, K.; De Hingh, I.H.J.T.; Moran, B.J.; Van der Speeten, K.; Deraco, M.; Glehen, O. PSOGI Peritoneal mesothelioma: PSOGI/EURACAN clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2020, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Jänne, P.A.; Wozniak, A.J.; Belani, C.P.; Keohan, M.L.; Ross, H.J.; Polikoff, J.A.; Mintzer, D.M.; Taylor, L.; Ashland, J.; Ye, Z.; et al. Open-label study of pemetrexed alone or in combination with cisplatin for the treatment of patients with peritoneal mesothelioma: Outcomes of an expanded access program. Clin. Lung Cancer 2005, 7, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Carteni, G.; Manegold, C.; Garcia, G.M.; Siena, S.; Zielinski, C.C.; Amadori, D.; Liu, Y.; Blatter, J.; Visseren-Grul, C.; Stahel, R. Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma-Results from the International Expanded Access Program using pemetrexed alone or in combination with a platinum agent. Lung Cancer 2009, 64, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Manzini Vde, P.; Recchia, L.; Cafferata, M.; Porta, C.; Siena, S.; Giannetta, L.; Morelli, F.; Oniga, F.; Bearz, A.; Torri, V.; et al. Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: A multicenter study on 81 cases. Ann. Oncol. 2010, 21, 348–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kaya, H.; Sezgi, C.; Tanrikulu, A.C.; Taylan, M.; Abakay, O.; Sen, H.S.; Abakay, A.; Kucukoner, M.; Kapan, M. Prognostic factors influencing survival in 35 patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. Neoplasma 2014, 61, 433–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Alexander, H.R., Jr.; Bartlett, D.L.; Pingpank, J.F.; Libutti, S.K.; Royal, R.; Hughes, M.S.; Holtzman, M.; Hanna, N.; Turner, K.; Beresneva, T.; et al. Treatment factors associated with long-term survival after cytoreductive surgery and regional chemotherapy for patients with malignant peritoneal mesothelioma. Surgery 2013, 153, 779–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Helm, J.H.; Miura, J.T.; Glenn, J.A.; Marcus, R.K.; Larrieux, G.; Jayakrishnan, T.T.; Donahue, A.E.; Gamblin, T.C.; Turaga, K.K.; Johnston, F.M. Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2015, 22, 1686–1693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Baratti, D.; Kusamura, S.; Cabras, A.D.; Bertulli, R.; Hutanu, I.; Deraco, M. Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: Long-term survival with complete cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Eur. J. Cancer 2013, 49, 3140–3148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Deraco, M. Mesothelioma. Cancers 2021, 13, 3127. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers13133127

AMA Style

Deraco M. Mesothelioma. Cancers. 2021; 13(13):3127. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers13133127

Chicago/Turabian Style

Deraco, Marcello. 2021. "Mesothelioma" Cancers 13, no. 13: 3127. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers13133127

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop