Next Article in Journal
Treatment Strategy for Ultra-High-Risk Multiple Myelomas with Chromosomal Aberrations Considering Minimal Residual Disease Status and Bone Marrow Microenvironment
Next Article in Special Issue
Thyroid Hormone Withdrawal versus Recombinant Human TSH as Preparation for I-131 Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Comparison of Computed Tomography Scoring Systems in Patients with COVID-19 and Hematological Malignancies
Previous Article in Special Issue
Immunomorphological Patterns of Chaperone System Components in Rare Thyroid Tumors with Promise as Biomarkers for Differential Diagnosis and Providing Clues on Molecular Mechanisms of Carcinogenesis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparison of 1.1 GBq and 2.2 GBq Activities in Patients with Low-Risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Requiring Postoperative 131I Administration: A Real Life Study

by
Alfredo Campennì
1,*,
Rosaria Maddalena Ruggeri
2,
Maria Luisa Garo
3,
Massimiliano Siracusa
1,
Giovanna Restuccia
1,
Andrea Rappazzo
1,
Helena Rosarno
1,
Antonio Nicocia
1,
Davide Cardile
1,
Petra Petranović Ovčariček
4,5,
Sergio Baldari
1 and
Luca Giovanella
6,7
1
Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, Unit of Nuclear Medicine, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy
2
Department of Human Pathology DETEV, Unit of Endocrinology, University of Messina, 98122 Messina, Italy
3
Department of Cardiovascular Research, University Campus Biomedico, 00128 Roma, Italy
4
Department of Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Center Sestre Milosrdnice, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
5
School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
6
Clinic for Nuclear Medicine and Competence Centre for Thyroid Diseases, Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, 6500 Bellinzona, Switzerland
7
Clinic for Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital and University of Zurich, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 9 February 2023 / Revised: 6 April 2023 / Accepted: 21 April 2023 / Published: 22 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Thyroid Cancer: New Advances from Diagnosis to Therapy)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The aim of the present study was to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of low (1.1 GBq) versus moderate (2.2 GBq) 131I activities in a large series (n = 299) of low-risk differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) patients requiring postoperative 131I ablation. At the follow-up, according to the ATA criteria, an excellent response was observed in 96.9% of patients treated with moderate 131I activities versus 85.6% of patients treated with low 131I activities (p = 0.029). Conversely, a biochemically indeterminate or incomplete response was observed in 22.2% of patients treated with low 131I activities versus 1.8% of patients treated with moderate 131I activities (p = 0.001), and an incomplete structural response was observed in three patients treated with low 131I activities versus two patients treated with moderate 131I activities (p = 0.654). In conclusion, we encourage the use of moderate instead of low activities when 131I ablation is indicated in order to reach an excellent response in a significantly larger proportion of patients, including patients with the unexpected persistence of the disease.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the efficacy of low and moderate 131I activities in low-risk differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) patients requiring postoperative thyroid remnant ablation in a real-world clinical setting. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 299 low-risk DTC patients (pT1-T2, Nx(0) Mx) who had undergone (near)-total thyroidectomy followed by 131I therapy, using either low (1.1 GBq) or moderate (2.2 GBq) radioiodine activities. The response to initial treatments was evaluated after 8–12 months, and patient responses were classified according to the 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines. Results: An excellent response was observed in 274/299 (91.6%) patients, specifically, in 119/139 (85.6%) and 155/160 (96.9%) patients treated with low and moderate 131I activities, respectively (p = 0.029). A biochemically indeterminate or incomplete response was observed in seventeen (22.2%) patients treated with low 131I activities and three (1.8%) patients treated with moderate 131I activities (p = 0.001). Finally, five patients showed an incomplete structural response, among which three and two received low and moderate 131I activities, respectively (p = 0.654). Conclusions: When 131I ablation is indicated, we encourage the use of moderate instead of low activities, in order to reach an excellent response in a significantly larger proportion of patients, including patients with the unexpected persistence of the disease.

1. Introduction

Thyroid cancer is the most common endocrine malignancy, accounting for about 1% of all cancers [1]. Differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) represents the most common form (80–85% of all thyroid cancers), and its incidence has increased over time, especially affecting women with small-sized papillary histotype [2,3,4,5,6]. Thyroid surgery followed by risk-adapted postoperative 131I therapy and levothyroxine therapy personalized according to the patient’s risk of recurrence is considered the current standard of care, leading to an excellent response in most (>80%) DTC patients [7].
However, the 2015 American Thyroid Association (2015 ATA) guidelines recommend de-escalated treatment strategies for many DTC patients [8]. Accordingly, 131I therapy was indicated in DTC patients classified to have a high-risk tumor, optionally considered in many low- to intermediate-risk cases, while it was generally discouraged in patients affected by low-risk DTC, with the exception of patients requiring thyroid remnant ablation (i.e., to simplify the follow-up) and those with additional risk factors.
Considering the disputes on such guidelines and consequent differences in clinical practice [9,10], the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), the European (ETA), and the American (ATA) Thyroid Association organized a meeting in 2018 to discuss the use of 131I in the DTC management [11]. First, it was recognized that “the actual goal of 131I therapy can only be determined once the postoperative disease status has been assessed”, and the evaluation of multiple factors beyond pathology-based risk stratification was recommended. Accordingly, low-risk DTC patients may require adjuvant or even curative 131I based on additional risk factors (i.e., patients with additional risk factors or patients requiring maximal treatment) and postoperative assessment (i.e., high postoperative thyroglobulin levels). Similar positions were recently expressed by the European Thyroid Association (ETA) [12], the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), and the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) [13].
Additionally, when 131I adjuvant therapy is required in selected low-risk patients [8,11,12,14], the optimal 131I activity to be administered remains largely debated. In fact, two large prospective randomized trials [15,16] have demonstrated the non-inferiority of 131I 1.1 GBq compared to 131I 3.7 GBq for ablation. However, in low-risk patients with additional risk factors, an adjuvant aim should be pursued [1,11]. Indeed, while the administered 131I activity of 1.1 GBq for ablation is an accepted standard, the optimal activity for adjuvant treatment cannot be definitely determined from the published literature [11]. Accordingly, different activities are proposed in different guidelines, namely, 1.1 to 5.5 GBq (ATA), 1.85 to 3.7 GBq (SNMMI/EANM), and 1.1 to 3.7 GBq (ETA) as uncertainties remain regarding differences in clinical conditions (e.g., surgeon volume, quality of preoperative and postoperative assessment) [17,18,19].
Therefore, the present study aims to compare the efficacy of 131I 1.1 GBq and 2.2 GBq in low-risk DTC patients requiring postoperative 131I adjuvant therapy in a large series of patients managed in a real-world clinical setting.

2. Patients and Methods

2.1. Study Design, Subjects, and Data Collection

Electronic medical records of adult DTC patients (≥18 years) referred to the Nuclear Medicine Unit of the “G. Martino” University Hospital of Messina (Italy) were reviewed. Consequently, patients with low-risk DTC (pT1-T2, Nx (0), Mx) who had undergone 131I therapy from 2016 to 2020 were included. On the contrary, low-risk patients treated without 131I therapy, all patients with intermediate risk, high risk and poorly DTC, and patients with positive anti-thyroglobulin antibodies (TgAb) were excluded. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. In addition, the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the “G. Martino” University Hospital (Project identification code 1917; 17 March 2017). All subjects gave their informed consent for their inclusion prior to enrollment in this study. During the study period, a total of 669 patients with thyroid disease underwent surgical therapy; of these, 299 DTC patients met the inclusion criteria.

2.2. Patient Management, Response Assessment, and Follow-Up

All patients underwent (near)-total thyroidectomy ((n)-TT) and started levothyroxine (LT4) therapy (1.5–1.8 mg/kg body weight). Serum TSH, Tg, and TgAb measurements and neck ultrasound (nUS) were performed 1 to 3 months after surgery. Thereafter, all cases were discussed in our local thyroid tumor board meetings, and patients were managed according to multidisciplinary advice. Patients selected for 131I ablation underwent recombinant human TSH (rhTSH) stimulation according to standard protocol (i.e., intramuscular injection of 0.9 mg rhTSH daily for two consecutive days) [20,21] and received low (i.e., 1.1 GBq) or moderate (i.e., 2.2 GBq) 131I activity at the discretion of the attending physician. A post-therapy whole-body scan (PT-WBS), coupled with single photon emission tomography-computed tomography (SPECT/CT) (i.e., pT-imaging), was performed in all patients 2 to 5 days after 131I therapy, as previously reported [2,22,23]. In all patients, the first follow-up was obtained three months after 131I therapy by clinical evaluation and basal laboratory tests (i.e., TSH, free triiodothyronine (FT3), free thyroxine (FT4), Tg, and TgAb). The response to initial treatments was assessed 8 to 12 months after 131I therapy by laboratory testing (both basal and after rhTSH administration), nUS, and 123I diagnostic whole-body scan (123I-Dx-WBS) with SPECT/CT (i.e., 123I-Dx-imaging) as described below.

2.3. Laboratory Tests

Serum Tg and TgAb values were measured on day 1 (basal), day 3 (early stimulated Tg), and day 5 (late stimulated Tg) during rhTSH stimulation. Serum TSH and TgAb were measured at the Core Laboratory of the “G. Martino” University Hospital of Messina (Italy) by fully automated Access® TSH immunochemiluminescent assay (Beckman Coulter, US; functional sensitivity 0.01 mUI/L, reference range 0.4–4.2 mIU/L) and Elecsys® TgAb chemiluminescence immunoassay (Roche Diagnostics, Switzerland; functional sensitivity 40 IU/mL, reference range < 115 IU/mL), respectively. For the purposes of the present study, a sample of each patient’s serum was frozen and sent out to the Department of Laboratory Medicine of the Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC) of Bellinzona (Switzerland) to measure serum Tg on the Kryptor® Compact Plus platform (BRAHMS Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hennigsdorf, Germany). The Kryptor® hTg sensitive assay is calibrated against the BCR® 457 international reference standard, and its declared functional sensitivity is 0.15 µg/L (Instructions for Use, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA). To conform to 2015 ATA response criteria, Tg values below 0.2 were transformed into 0.20 ng/mL for statistical analysis purposes.

2.4. Imaging

Neck ultrasound (nUS) was carried out by expert ultrasonographers using a high-resolution ultrasound system (Logiq3 Expert, GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK or ACUSON 3000 Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) equipped with high energy linear probes (14 MHz);
The 123I-Dx-WBS with SPECT/CT (i.e., 123I-Dx-imaging) was obtained using a double-headed gamma camera (Xeleris, GE Medical System, Chicago, IL, USA) equipped with high-energy low-resolution parallel hole collimators (HELRPAR) and was performed as previously reported [2,24].
In particular, whole-body images were obtained from head to proximal thighs (anterior and posterior views, matrix 256 × 256, magnification 1, acquisition time 10 cm/min). Static images of the neck and thorax (anterior and posterior views, magnification 1, matrix 256 × 256, frame time 900 s) were also acquired. SPECT/CT imaging (i.e., hybrid imaging) was obtained in step-and-shoot acquisition mode (40 s per step, 6° angle, 30 steps per detector) while CT images were acquired under the following conditions: tube voltage of 120 kV, tube current of 80–210 mA, helical thickness of 2.5 mm, table speed of 37 mm/s, table feed per rotation of 18.75 mm/rot, tube rotation time of 0.8 s, and pitch of 0.938:1. All patients were required to drink at least 1.5 L of water and take laxative drugs 1 day before the examination in order to achieve a better target/background ratio.
Finally, patient responses were classified as an excellent response (i.e., stimulated Tg less than 1 ng/mL, and no loco-regional and/or distant metastases at morphological and/or functional imaging), biochemically indeterminate or incomplete response (i.e., negative imaging and stimulated Tg between 1 and 10 ng/mL, or more than 10 ng/mL), and incomplete structural response (i.e., evidence of structural disease regardless of Tg and TgAb results) according to the 2015 ATA guidelines [8].

3. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using STATA17 (StataCorp., College Station, TX, USA). Descriptive statistics were reported as median and range (minimum and maximum) for quantitative data, whereas relative frequencies and percentages were used for qualitative data. Patients’ age was also reported as mean and standard deviation given the normal distribution of the variable. For all quantitative variables, the normal or non-normal distribution was verified by the Shapiro–Wilk test. Comparisons between group A (patients with metastatic disease who underwent 131I therapy with low therapeutic 131I activity) and group B (patients with metastatic disease who underwent 131I therapy with moderate therapeutic 131I activity) were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test in the presence of quantitative variables, while Fisher’s exact test or likelihood ratio chi-square were performed in the case of qualitative variables. Stepwise-ordered logistic regression was performed to assess the probability of an excellent response as a function of the two different 131I activities (1110 MBq versus 2220 MBq). For this purpose, the dependent variable—response to initial treatment—was ordered in the following manner: incomplete structural response = 1, biochemically indeterminate or incomplete response = 2, excellent response = 3. Gender, age, histology, and histotype were included in the model as covariates and subsequently excluded. The significance level for variable removal was set at 5% (p < 0.05). The parallel regression assumption for the ordered logistic regression was verified. Statistical significance for comparisons was set at 5% (p < 0.05). A power post hoc analysis was performed using logistic regression results.

4. Results

Six hundred and sixty-nine DTC patients were managed in our institution from 1 March 2017, through 30 June 2021. Two hundred and ninety-nine patients with low-risk DTC treated with 131I therapy were enrolled in this study. Seventy-four TgAb-positive patients, seventy-one low-risk patients treated with surgery alone, one hundred and eighty-eight intermediate-risk patients and thirty-seven high-risk DTC patients were excluded from the present study. In the standard practice, our thyroid tumor board suggests 131I therapy in patients with aggressive histological variants (e.g., sclerosing variant, tall-cell variant, hobnail variant), cancer diameter more than 20 mm, isthmic cancer location, bilateral cancer, multifocal cancer with a total tumor diameter of more than 10 mm, and patients referred by low-volume surgical centers. Among the enrolled two hundred and ninety-nine low-risk DTC patients, two hundred and forty-six (82%) had a papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) (F = 190, M = 56; F:M = 3.3:1; mean age ± SD = 49.5 ± 12.2, median = 50, range = 20–88); forty-seven (16%) had a follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC) (F = 30, M = 17; F:M = 1.7:1; mean age ± SD = 51.5 ± 13.9, median = 53, range = 25–79) and six (2%) had a Hurthle cell carcinoma (HC) (F = 5, M = 1; F:M = 5:1; mean age ± SD = 47.3 ± 15.9, median = 49, range = 18–69). Finally, aggressive PTC variants were found in 11 out of 246 patients (4.5%). Regarding the treatment, 139 (46.5%) patients received low 131I activity (mean = 1.2362 ± 0.123 GBq; median = 1.236 GBq; range = 1.110–1.376), while in the remaining 160 patients (53.5%), moderate 131I activity (mean = 2.235.3 ± 0.888 GBq; median = 2.220 GBq; range = 2.220–2.812) was administered. As shown in Table 1, no differences were found in gender, age, cancer size, histotype, histological aggressive features, and postoperative Tg values.
At the time of pT-imaging, 246 (82.3%) patients (F = 185, M = 61; F:M = 3.0:1; mean age ± SD = 49.4 ± 12.8, median = 51, range = 18–87) showed thyroid remnants alone, while 53 (17.7%) patients (F = 40, M = 13; F:M = 3.1:1; mean age ± SD = 51.7 ± 11.5, median = 51, range = 26–88) showed thyroid remnants and metastases (i.e., loco-regional lymph-node metastases, n = 51; lung metastases, n = 1; lymph-node and lung metastases, n = 1). Among the 53 patients carrying metastases, 22 (41.5%) received low 131I activities, while 31 (58.5%) received moderate 131I activities (p = not significant).
At the follow-up (Figure 1), an excellent response was observed in 274 out of 299 (91.6%) patients, specifically, in 119 out of 139 (85.6%) and 155 out of 160 (96.9%) patients treated with low and moderate 131I activities, respectively (p = 0.029). A biochemically indeterminate or incomplete response was observed in seventeen (22.2%) and three (1.8%) patients treated with low and moderate 131I activities, respectively (p = 0.001). Finally, five patients showed an incomplete structural response, among which, three and two patients received low and moderate 131I activities, respectively (p = 0.654). The overall results are summarized in Table 2.
Notably, all patients having thyroid remnants alone reached an excellent response to the initial treatments at the follow-up, independently from the administered activity. On the contrary, twenty-five out of fifty-three (47.2%) patients carrying metastatic disease showed less than excellent response at the follow-up (20 out of 22 (91%) treated with low 131I activity and five out of thirty-one (16%) treated with moderate activity, p < 0.0001). No differences were found between these patients before treatment (Table 3).
On the whole, after a stepwise-ordered logistic regression was performed, the final model showed a positive impact of moderate 131I activity on excellent response rate in patients with and without metastases. Specifically, the probability to achieve an excellent response in patients who underwent 131I therapy using low 131I activity was 90%, while the probability to achieve an excellent response in patients who underwent 131I therapy using moderate 131I activity was 98%. Moreover, basal Tg levels positively affected the excellent-response achievement in the overall patient sample, while no effect was reported in patients with metastases (Table 4). Ninety percent of power emerged from a post hoc logistic regression analysis.
Finally, as per local protocols, patients with incomplete structural response were treated by surgery and cured in all cases (Vice versa, patients with a biochemically indeterminate/incomplete response underwent the second 131I therapy with ≥3.7 GBq at the discretion of the attending physician (cumulative activity ≥ 4.81 GBq). Among them, thirteen patients (75.5%) reached an excellent response, while a biochemically indeterminate response persisted in four patients (24.5%).

5. Discussion

Thyroid surgery followed by risk-adapted 131I therapy represent the treatment of choice for most DTC patients [13,20]. In the past, 131I therapy was routinely performed to destroy thyroid remnant tissue (i.e., thyroid remnant ablation) also in low-risk DTC patients with the aim to simplify the follow-up of such patients by increasing the specificity and accuracy of basal and/or stimulated Tg measurements [17,25]. More recently, the 2015 ATA guidelines underscored the role of 131I therapy, recommending its more selective use [8]. In particular, 131I therapy was certainly indicated in DTC patients having a high-risk tumor, while it was not indicated or discouraged in low-risk DTC patients (especially without aggressive features and/or vascular invasion) and in most intermediate-risk ones [8]. However, the 2015 ATA guidelines were not endorsed by EANM [10]. In consequence, a large discussion on this topic started among the main involved societies (i.e., ETA, ATA, EANM, and SNMMI) producing a shared document (i.e., the so-called Martinique report) [11] in which the aim of radioiodine therapy was better defined in ablative, adjuvant, or therapeutic treatment. In addition, also in low-risk DTC patients, the choice for or against 131I therapy should be always evaluated by an accurate postoperative assessment taking into account several local factors (e.g., quality of pre- and postoperative diagnostic course such as surgeon experience, patients’ preference) other than histopathological report [11]. In this light, a more recent ETA consensus statement [12] suggested a selective use of radioiodine therapy in low-risk DTC, while a greater use of radioiodine therapy was suggested by the SNMMI/EANM guidelines [13].
Although disease-specific mortality and recurrence risk are very low in patients with low-risk DTC, 131I ablation is recommended in selected cases (i.e., Tg levels greater than 5–10 ng/mL when the likelihood of finding foci of radioiodine uptake outside the thyroid bed is significant) [26]. To date, no consensus has been reached on the optimal activity of 131I ablation after near-total thyroidectomy or total thyroidectomy in low-risk DTC patients. While the role of low or high 131I activity in intermediate-risk patients has been extensively reported [27] as well as the comparative effectiveness of low or high 131I activity in terms of the disease persistence at 10 years in low-risk patients [28], the effect of moderate 131I activity is less clear. According to large randomized trials, low ablation activity is as effective (i.e. noninferior radioiodine therapy) as high ablation activity in low-risk DTC patients, with beneficial side effects, reduced radiation exposure, and overall improvement in the quality of life, without discounting the economic benefits in terms of financial costs to the overall health care system [15,16]. However, in the real clinical scenario, the approach to 131I activity seems to be more complex because of the presence of a series of confounding factors that could alter the recommended approaches.
Cancer molecular profiling was also proposed to refine DTC risk stratification and 131I indications [29]. In particular, BRAF V600E and TERT mutations are frequently reported in a subgroup of cancers with more aggressive clinicopathological behaviors [30]. However, the need for routine genotyping of DTCs has not been definitely established, and such data are not available for our patients [14].
Overall, our patients treated with intermediate 131I activities had a significantly higher rate of excellent response compared to the patients treated with low activities. Notably, however, incomplete structural response rates were comparable in both groups. A higher rate of biochemically indeterminate or incomplete response was found in patients treated with low 131I activity (22%) compared to those treated with moderate 131I activity (1.8%). Notably, thyroglobulin can continue to decrease for a long time after 131I therapy, and patients with an incomplete and indeterminate biochemical response can spontaneously reach an excellent response. Accordingly, a long follow-up is necessary before making a definitive conclusion.
However, a biochemically incomplete or indeterminate response may require a more intensive follow-up and, in selected cases, additional treatments, taking into account the associated patients’ distress and financial costs for the healthcare system.
Furthermore, preoperatively unknown metastases (mostly lymph nodes metastases) were detected by PT-WBS in 53 patients (≈18%) of our series. A significantly lower number of lymph node metastases was reported, of course, when prophylactic lymph node dissections were systematically performed [31].
The presence of cervical lymph node metastases does not affect the overall survival, but it may negatively influence the disease-free survival and the quality of life [2,31]. Whether an aggressive surgical approach is justified to avoid the adjuvant administration of 131I is debatable, and differences in local factors should be considered before translating the literature into clinical recommendations [32].
Our results are in line with the previous ones, showing a higher tumoricidal effect of moderate activities in low-risk patients with persistent lymph node metastases with a likelihood of an excellent response rate of 98% versus a probability of 90% in patients treated with low 131I activity [33,34].
By all means, some limitations of our study should be addressed. First of all, as this was a retrospective study, it was hampered by a series of intrinsic weaknesses, such as selection bias. Secondly, administered activities were decided at the discretion of the attending physician, thus allowing relevant differences between groups of patients. However, no significant differences in demographic and clinicopathological variables were observed in patients treated with low and moderate activities, making major differences unlikely. Thirdly, the power of the present study suffers from a very low number of non-ER events and incomplete structural responses, precluding us from performing a powerful statistical analysis. Conversely, however, any effect already showing statistical significance despite this very low number of events is likely to be not just statistically significant, but also clinically relevant. Nonetheless, considering its discussed limitations, the present results require to be further and, preferably, prospectively confirmed. Finally, the second 131I therapy was performed in patients with a biochemically indeterminate or incomplete response at the first follow-up, according to the local protocols. However, the actual need for such procedure in this setting is currently debated, with a growing trend toward a more selective use of the second treatments.

6. Conclusions

The incidence of lymph node metastases may be unexpectedly high in low-risk DTC patients in real-life settings. The use of postoperative 131I administration should be always considered taking into account local epidemiology, available resources, characteristics and preferences of the patient. When 131I ablation is indicated, low and moderate activities are equally effective in terms of structural responses, but moderate activity can quickly reduce thyroglobulin levels and produce an excellent response.

Author Contributions

A.C., L.G. and R.M.R., participated in study conceptualization, design, interpretation of data, and drafting of the manuscript; M.L.G. and P.P.O. participated in the analysis, and interpretation of data; M.S., G.R., A.R., H.R., A.N. and D.C. participated in the data acquisition; S.B. participated in critical revision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of the “G. Martino” University Hospital (protocol code 1917; date of approval 17 March 2017).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the work of the past and present members of our team.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Giovanella, L.; Deandreis, D.; Vrachims, A.; Campenni, A.; Ovcaricek, P.P. Molecular Imaging and Theragnostics of Thyroid Cancers. Cancers 2022, 14, 1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Campennì, A.; Ruggeri, R.M.; Siracusa, M.; Giacoppo, G.; Torre, F.L.; Saccomanno, A.; Alibrandi, A.; Dionigi, G.; Tuccari, G.; Baldari, S.; et al. Isthmus Topography Is a Risk Factor for Persistent Disease in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2021, 185, 397–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lim, H.; Devesa, S.S.; Sosa, J.A.; Check, D.; Kitahara, C.M. Trends in Thyroid Cancer Incidence and Mortality in the United States, 1974–2013. JAMA 2017, 317, 1338–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Davies, L.; Welch, H.G. Increasing Incidence of Thyroid Cancer in the United States, 1973–2002. JAMA 2006, 295, 2164–2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Horn-Ross, P.L.; Lichtensztajn, D.Y.; Clarke, C.A.; Dosiou, C.; Oakley-Girvan, I.; Reynolds, P.; Gomez, S.L.; Nelson, D.O. Continued Rapid Increase in Thyroid Cancer Incidence in California: Trends by Patient, Tumor, and Neighborhood Characteristics. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2014, 23, 1067–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. National Cancer Institute. Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2018—SEER Statistics; National Cancer Institute: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2021.
  7. Maas, O.; Forrer, F.; Maas, M.; Panje, C.M.; Blautzik, J.; Brühlmeier, M.; Engel-Bicik, I.; Giovanella, L.; Haldemann, A.; Kamel, M.E.; et al. Variations in Radioiodine Ablation: Decision-Making after Total Thyroidectomy. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2020, 47, 554–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Haugen, B.R.; Alexander, E.K.; Bible, K.C.; Doherty, G.M.; Mandel, S.J.; Nikiforov, Y.E.; Pacini, F.; Randolph, G.W.; Sawka, A.M.; Schlumberger, M.; et al. 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: The American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 2016, 26, 1–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Campennì, A.; Barbaro, D.; Guzzo, M.; Capoccetti, F.; Giovanella, L. Personalized Management of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer in Real Life—Practical Guidance from a Multidisciplinary Panel of Experts. Endocrine 2020, 70, 280–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Verburg, F.A.; Aktolun, C.; Chiti, A.; Frangos, S.; Giovanella, L.; Hoffmann, M.; Iakovou, I.; Mihailovic, J.; Krause, B.J.; Langsteger, W.; et al. Why the European Association of Nuclear Medicine Has Declined to Endorse the 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2016, 43, 1001–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Michael Tuttle, R.; Ahuja, S.; Avram, A.M.; Bernet, V.J.; Bourguet, P.; Daniels, G.H.; Dillehay, G.; Draganescu, C.; Flux, G.; Führer, D.; et al. Controversies, Consensus, and Collaboration in the Use of 131 I Therapy in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Joint Statement from the American Thyroid Association, the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular. Thyroid 2019, 29, 461–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pacini, F.; Fuhrer, D.; Elisei, R.; Handkiewicz-Junak, D.; Leboulleux, S.; Luster, M.; Schlumberger, M.; Smit, J.W. 2022 ETA Consensus Statement: What Are the Indications for Post-Surgical Radioiodine Therapy in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer? Eur. Thyroid. J. 2022, 11, e210046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Avram, A.M.; Giovanella, L.; Greenspan, B.; Lawson, S.A.; Luster, M.; Van Nostrand, D.; Peacock, J.G.; Ovčariček, P.P.; Silberstein, E.; Tulchinsky, M.; et al. SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline for Nuclear Medicine Evaluation and Therapy of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Abbreviated Version. J. Nucl. Med. 2022, 63, 15N–35N. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  14. Filetti, S.; Durante, C.; Hartl, D.; Leboulleux, S.; Locati, L.D.; Newbold, K.; Papotti, M.G.; Berruti, A. Thyroid Cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-Up. Ann. Oncol. 2019, 30, 1856–1883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Schlumberger, M.; Leboulleux, S.; Catargi, B.; Deandreis, D.; Zerdoud, S.; Bardet, S.; Rusu, D.; Godbert, Y.; Buffet, C.; Schvartz, C.; et al. Outcome after Ablation in Patients with Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer (ESTIMABL1): 5-Year Follow-up Results of a Randomised, Phase 3, Equivalence Trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018, 6, 618–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mallick, U.; Harmer, C.; Yap, B.; Wadsley, J.; Clarke, S.; Moss, L.; Nicol, A.; Clark, P.M.; Farnell, K.; McCready, R.; et al. Ablation with Low-Dose Radioiodine and Thyrotropin Alfa in Thyroid Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 1674–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Campennì, A.; Giovanella, L.; Pignata, S.A.; Violi, M.A.; Siracusa, M.; Alibrandi, A.; Moleti, M.; Amato, E.; Ruggeri, R.M.; Vermiglio, F.; et al. Thyroid Remnant Ablation in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Searching for the Most Effective Radioiodine Activity and Stimulation Strategy in a Real-Life Scenario. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2015, 36, 1100–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Du, P.; Jiao, X.; Zhou, Y.; Li, Y.; Kang, S.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, J.; Lv, L. Low versus High Radioiodine Activity to Ablate the Thyroid after Thyroidectomy for Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Endocrine 2015, 48, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Eilsberger, F.; Tuttle, R.M.; Librizzi, D.; Pfestroff, A.; Luster, M.; Verburg, F.A. Perioperative Diagnostics of Patients Referred for Radioiodine Therapy of Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma: Referral Center Experience in an Iodine-Insufficient Country. Endocrine 2021, 72, 721–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Campennì, A.; Ruggeri, R.M.; Siracusa, M.; Comis, A.D.; Romano, D.; Vento, A.; Lanzafame, H.; Capoccetti, F.; Alibrandi, A.; Baldari, S.; et al. Early Preablation RhTSH-Stimulated Thyroglobulin Predicts Outcome of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer (DTC) Patients. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2021, 48, 2466–2475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Torres, M.S.T.; Ramirez, L.; Simkin, P.H.; Braverman, L.E.; Emerson, C.H. Effect of Various Doses of Recombinant Human Thyrotropin on the Thyroid Radioactive Iodine Uptake and Serum Levels of Thyroid Hormones and Thyroglobulin in Normal Subjects. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2001, 86, 1660–1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Campennì, A.; Giovanella, L.; Siracusa, M.; Stipo, M.E.; Alibrandi, A.; Cucinotta, M.; Ruggeri, R.M.; Baldari, S. Is Malignant Nodule Topography an Additional Risk Factor for Metastatic Disease in Low-Risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer? Thyroid 2014, 24, 1607–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Campennì, A.; Giovanella, L.; Pignata, S.A.; Vento, A.; Alibrandi, A.; Sturiale, L.; Laudicella, R.; Comis, A.D.; Filice, R.; Giuffrida, G.; et al. Undetectable or Low (<1 Ng/Ml) Postsurgical Thyroglobulin Values Do Not Rule out Metastases in Early Stage Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Patients. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 17491–17500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Campennì, A.; Vrachimis, A.; Siracusa, M.; Baldari, S.; Giovanella, L. Usefulness of 123I-Spect/Ct to Assess the Response to Initial Therapy in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Patients. Endocrine 2021, 74, 193–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ho, A.L. Moving toward a Better Understanding of Radioiodine Action. Endocrine 2013, 44, 553–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Schvartz, C.; Bonnetain, F.; Dabakuyo, S.; Gauthier, M.; Cueff, A.; Fieffe, S.; Pochart, J.M.; Cochet, I.; Crevisy, E.; Dalac, A.; et al. Impact on Overall Survival of Radioactive Iodine in Low-Risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Patients. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, 1526–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Grazia Castagna, M.; Cevenini, G.; Theodoropoulou, A.; Maino, F.; Memmo, S.; Claudia, C.; Belardini, V.; Brianzoni, E.; Pacini, F. Post-Surgical Thyroid Ablation with Low or High Radioiodine Activities Results in Similar Outcomes in Intermediate Risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Patients. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2013, 169, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mäenpää, H.O.; Heikkonen, J.; Vaalavirta, L.; Tenhunen, M.; Joensuu, H. Low vs. High Radioiodine Activity to Ablate the Thyroid after Thyroidectomy for Cancer: A Randomized Study. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xing, M.; Haugen, B.R.; Schlumberger, M. Progress in Molecular-Based Management of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Lancet 2013, 381, 1058–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, R.; Bishop, J.; Zhu, G.; Zhang, T.; Ladenson, P.W.; Xing, M. Mortality Risk Stratification by Combining BRAF V600E and TERT Promoter Mutations in Papillary Thyroid Cancer: Genetic Duet of BRAF and TERT Promoter Mutations in Thyroid Cancer Mortality. JAMA Oncol. 2017, 3, 202–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Leboulleux, S.; Bournaud, C.; Chougnet, C.N.; Zerdoud, S.; Al Ghuzlan, A.; Catargi, B.; Do Cao, C.; Kelly, A.; Barge, M.-L.; Lacroix, L.; et al. Thyroidectomy without Radioiodine in Patients with Low-Risk Thyroid Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 386, 923–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Clerc, J.; Verburg, F.A.; Avram, A.M.; Giovanella, L.; Hindié, E.; Taïeb, D. Radioiodine Treatment after Surgery for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Reasonable Option. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2017, 44, 918–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Clerc, J.; Bienvenu-Perrard, M.; Pichard De Malleray, C.; Dagousset, F.; Delbot, T.; Dreyfuss, M.; Groussin, L.; Marlowe, R.J.; Leger, F.A.; Chevalier, A. Outpatient Thyroid Remnant Ablation Using Repeated Low 131-Iodine Activities (740 MBq/20 MCix2) in Patients with Low-Risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, 871–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Song, X.; Meng, Z.; Jia, Q.; Zhang, L.; Xu, K.; Tan, J.; Zhang, G.; Zheng, W.; Li, X.; Zhang, J. Different Radioiodine Dose for Remnant Thyroid Ablation in Patients With Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2015, 40, 774–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Study flowchart.
Figure 1. Study flowchart.
Cancers 15 02416 g001
Table 1. Demographic, clinical, and pathological characteristics.
Table 1. Demographic, clinical, and pathological characteristics.
Total Sample
(n = 299)
Low RAI Activity
(n = 139)
Moderate RAI Activity
(n = 160)
p-Value
Gender, n (%)
   Male74(24.8)37(26.6)37(23.1)0.286 §
   Female225(75.3)102(73.4)123(76.9)
Age (years), median (min–max)51(18–88)49(23–79)52(18–88)0.067 *
Size (mm), median (min–max)9(1–35)10(2–35)8(1–34)0.348 *
Basal Tg (ng/mL), median (min–max)0.20(0.20–3.30)0.20(0.20–3.20)0.20(0.20–3.30)0.348 *
Histology, n (%)
   PTC246(82.3)109(78.4) 137(85.6)0.662 ç
   FTC47(15.7)25(18.0) 22(13.8)0.084 ç
   HC6(2.0)5(3.6)1(0.6)0.088 ç
Histotype, n (%)
Nonaggressive #282(94.3)127(91.4)155(96.9)0.095 ç
Aggressive ##17(5.7)12(8.6)5(3.1)0.085 ç
Metastases pT-imaging, n (%)
   No246(82.3)117(84.2)129(80.6)0.444 ç
   Yes53(17.7)22(15.8)31(19.4)0.215 ç
131I RAI—radioactive iodine, PTC—papillary thyroid cancer, FTC—follicular thyroid cancer, HC—Hurthle cell. # Classical variant, minimally invasive FTC; ## sclerosing variant, tall-cell variant, hobnail variant. * Mann–Whitney U test, § Fisher’s exact, ç likelihood ratio chi-square.
Table 2. Response to initial treatment according to administrated activities.
Table 2. Response to initial treatment according to administrated activities.
Low 131I Activity
(n = 139)
Moderate 131I Activity
(n = 160)
p-Value
ER, n (%)119(85.6)155(96.9)0.029 ç
BIR, n (%)7(5.0)0(0.0)0.002 ç
BIndR, n (%)10(7.2)3(1.8)0.046 ç
SIR, n (%)3(2.2)2(1.3)0.654 ç
ER—excellent response, BIndR—biochemically indeterminate response, BIR—biochemically incomplete response, SIR—structurally incomplete response. ç Likelihood ratio chi-square.
Table 3. Comparison of demographic, clinical, and pathological characteristics of DTC patients with metastases treated with low and moderate 131I activities.
Table 3. Comparison of demographic, clinical, and pathological characteristics of DTC patients with metastases treated with low and moderate 131I activities.
Low RAI Activity
(n = 22)
Moderate RAI Activity
(n = 31)
p-Value
Gender, n (%)
   Male7(31.8)6(19.4)0.236 §
   Female15(68.2)25(80.6)
Age (years), median (range)49(32–68)52(26–88)0.539 *
Size (mm), median (range)8(2–24)10(2–21)0.589 *
Basal Tg (ng/mL), median (range)0.2(0.2–3.2)0.3(0.2–3.3)0.247 *
Histology, n (%)
   PTC21(95.5)25(83.3)0.226 §
   FTC1(4.5)5(16.7)
Histotype, n (%)
No aggressive20(90.9)30(96.8)0.563 §
Aggressive2(9.1)1(3.2)
Tg—thyroglobulin; PTC—papillary thyroid carcinoma; FTC—follicular thyroid carcinoma. * Mann–Whitney U test, § likelihood ratio chi-square.
Table 4. Ordered logistic regression outcome: response to initial treatments in patients with metastatic disease at pT-imaging.
Table 4. Ordered logistic regression outcome: response to initial treatments in patients with metastatic disease at pT-imaging.
Overall Sample
OR
Patients with Metastases
OR
Moderate 131I Activity 5.1 *** (2.9)22.5 *** (17.4)
Basal Tg (ng/mL)0.1 *** (0.1)0.2 (0.1)
LR chi-square53.6 ***43.12 ***
No. of patients 29953
p < 0.01—Standard errors are reported in parentheses. OR—odds ratio. The ORs were determined through a stepwise ordered logistic regression—a stepwise method for variables removal: gender, age, histology, and histotype were included in the model and subsequently excluded considering a significance level of 0.05 for removal. Covariates included in the initial model gender, age, histology, and histotype. ***: p < 0.0001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Campennì, A.; Ruggeri, R.M.; Garo, M.L.; Siracusa, M.; Restuccia, G.; Rappazzo, A.; Rosarno, H.; Nicocia, A.; Cardile, D.; Ovčariček, P.P.; et al. Comparison of 1.1 GBq and 2.2 GBq Activities in Patients with Low-Risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Requiring Postoperative 131I Administration: A Real Life Study. Cancers 2023, 15, 2416. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers15092416

AMA Style

Campennì A, Ruggeri RM, Garo ML, Siracusa M, Restuccia G, Rappazzo A, Rosarno H, Nicocia A, Cardile D, Ovčariček PP, et al. Comparison of 1.1 GBq and 2.2 GBq Activities in Patients with Low-Risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Requiring Postoperative 131I Administration: A Real Life Study. Cancers. 2023; 15(9):2416. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers15092416

Chicago/Turabian Style

Campennì, Alfredo, Rosaria Maddalena Ruggeri, Maria Luisa Garo, Massimiliano Siracusa, Giovanna Restuccia, Andrea Rappazzo, Helena Rosarno, Antonio Nicocia, Davide Cardile, Petra Petranović Ovčariček, and et al. 2023. "Comparison of 1.1 GBq and 2.2 GBq Activities in Patients with Low-Risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer Requiring Postoperative 131I Administration: A Real Life Study" Cancers 15, no. 9: 2416. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers15092416

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop