Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Electrolytes on the Photodegradation Kinetics of Caffeine
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of Mg Contents on Catalytic Activity and Coke Formation of Mesoporous Ni/Mg-Aluminate Spinel Catalyst for Steam Methane Reforming
Previous Article in Journal
Microwave-Assisted Degradation of Biomass with the Use of Acid Catalysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Efficient Waste to Energy Conversion Based on Co-CeO2 Catalyzed Water-Gas Shift Reaction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced CO2 Methanation Reaction in C1 Chemistry over a Highly Dispersed Nickel Nanocatalyst Prepared Using the One-Step Melt-Infiltration Method

1
School of Chemical Engineering, Chonnam National University, 77, Yongbong-ro, Buk-gu, Gwangju 61186, Korea
2
Hydrogen Energy Laboratory, Korea Institute of Energy Research, 152, Gajeong-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34129, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 18 May 2020 / Revised: 4 June 2020 / Accepted: 5 June 2020 / Published: 8 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanocatalysts for Hydrogen Production)

Abstract

:
The Paris Agreement requires the world to put the best efforts to reduce CO2 emissions, due to the global warming problems. As a promising technology corresponding to this greenhouse gas treatment, the CO2 methanation process a.k.a power to gas (PtoG), which catalytically converts CO2 into methane, has been in the limelight. To develop an efficient catalytic process, it is necessary to design a low-cost and high-efficiency catalyst for high CO2 conversion and CH4 selectivity. In this study, we have developed Ni/γ-Al2O3 catalysts by the one-step melt-infiltration method, where both aging and calcination are done in one pot. For enhancement of the catalytic activity and selectivity, sufficient Ni content (>25 wt %) and a high dispersion (<10 nm) are simultaneously required. Thus, the aging conditions of the melt-infiltration methods, e.g., time and temperature, were optimized for the high dispersion with sufficient Ni content (15–50 wt %). The catalytic performance tests were carried out under atmospheric pressure, 275 to 400 °C and gas hourly velocity (GHSV) = 25,000 h−1. And the various characteristic analyses (Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET), X-ray diffraction (XRD), H2-chemisorption, temperature programmed reduction (TPR), etc.) were performed to confirm the effects on the catalytic performance. As a result, based on the experiments and the characterization data, the 30 wt %-Ni catalyst (Ni particles size = 11 nm) showed the best CO2 conversion at 300 °C and the 20 wt % one having the highest Ni dispersion (Ni particles size = 8.8 nm), which showed the best intrinsic reaction rate and CH4 selectivity in the entire temperature range.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

As part of the effort to ameliorate the problem of global warming, the share of renewable energy sources used to meet primary energy demands across the world reached around 10% in 2017 [1]. The increased amount of electricity generated from the increase in renewable energy in the power grid introduces issues of electricity infrastructure flexibility [2]. In countries, such as Germany and Denmark, where a large fraction of electricity is generated from renewable energy sources, various Research & Development, Business (R&BD) activities related to the power-to-gas technologies, in which excess electricity is converted into gas energy (hydrogen and/or methane) via electrolysis and methanation, are being carried out, to enhance the utilization of renewable energy sources, and the reliability of the power grid [3,4,5,6,7]. In particular, the CO2 methanation reaction, which produces CH4 via the reaction of H2 and CO2 over a catalyst, is being actively researched in Europe for the production of methane for use in automobiles and heating [7]. The relevant CO2 methanation process (the Sabatier reaction) is severely exothermic, and proceeds at 180–350 °C, at pressures of 1–100 bar. Therefore, managing the heat generated by the catalyst in fixed bed reactors and improving the reaction rate and methane selectivity are important in this reaction. As shown in Figure 1, CO2 methanation reactions can be categorized based on their mechanism. In the reaction pathway (1), direct CO2 methanation, CH4 is formed directly without any intermediates; however, the direct conversion of CO2 is very difficult, owing to its high activation energy. In indirect reaction pathway (2), CO2 is first reduced to CO or HCOO; CH4 is subsequently formed via the reduction of CO or HCOO by H2 on the surface of the catalyst. Most of the previous studies on the CO2 methanaton reaction have regarded reaction pathway (2) as the major CO2 methanation pathway [8,9].
In the CO2 methanation reaction mechanism, the rate-determining step is referred to as the CO decomposition reaction. To facilitate this step, H2 must to be quickly decomposed by highly dispersed metal particles, and CO2 should be easily adsorbed on the surface of the support [10]. Thus, a proper design of the catalyst to meet these requirements is important. First, the metal particles should be highly dispersed and have a size of 6–8 nm, and the metal loading should be higher than 30 wt %. Secondly, the surface of the support should contain oxygen vacancies to promote the adsorption of CO2. Metallic catalysts that can be applied to CO2 methanation reactions include Ni, Co, Fe, Ru, Rh, and +-Pd [11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Among these metals, Ni is widely used, because of its relatively high activity and low cost, which are important for the development of economically feasible commercial processes Supports with mesoporous structures are often used to increase the diffusion rates of the reactants. Metal-oxide such as Al2O3, TiO2, Nb2O5, ZrO2, and SiO2, can be used to improve CO2 adsorption via oxygen vacancy [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26].
Garbarino et al. investigated the effect of the Ni morphology of a Ni/Al2O3 catalyst on the CO2 methanation reaction. They suggested that the Ni content should be sufficient to cover the surface area of the Al2O3 support, and that CO could be quickly converted to CH4 via the strong interaction of cube-shaped Ni particles with the support [20]. Liu et al. reported that the high dispersion of Ni on catalysts synthesized via the deposition-precipitation (DP) method increased their CO2 activity and CH4 selectivity [21]. Muroyama et al. synthesized Ni supported catalysts on various oxide supports (Y2O3, Sm2O3, ZrO2, CeO2, Al2O3, and La2O3) to increase the CO2 adsorption using oxygen vacancies [22].
The melt-infiltration method has been studied for the synthesis of catalysts with both high metal content and good metal particle dispersion. The simple synthesis process used in this method does not increase the size of the metal particles, and the generation of unnecessary waste during catalyst synthesis is avoided, as this method does not require solvents that can dissolve metal salts. Melt-infiltration thus represents an alternative to the precipitation method, which has previously been used to produce catalysts with a high metal content and dispersion. It is applicable to catalysts for the Fisher-Tropsh reaction, nano-porous material, and template synthesis [27,28,29,30,31].
In this paper, we report on the synthesis of Ni/Al2O3 catalysts with a high nickel content and dispersion for the CO2 methanation reaction, via the one-step melt-infiltration method. Mesoporous Al2O3 was used as the catalyst support. The one-step preparation of the catalyst was realized in an alumina crucible without the use of polypropylene bottles or an autoclave, which were used in previous studies. After optimizing the aging time, aging temperature, and calcination temperature, Ni/Al2O3 catalysts with Ni loadings of 15 wt %, 20 wt %, 30 wt %, 40 wt %, and 50 wt % were prepared. Using this method, the Ni particle dispersion was maximized, and CO2 conversion and CH4 selectivity were analyzed at a relatively high gas hourly velocity (GHSV) of ~25,000.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Effects of the Preparation Conditions on the Ni Dispersion

The one-step melt-infiltration synthesis method was used to prepare Ni catalysts with a high Ni content and dispersion. In this procedure, the nickel precursor was melted and subsequently inserted into the pores of the alumina support. An overview of the melt-infiltration procedure is presented in Figure 2. The thermal treatment conditions applied to the nickel precursors, namely the duration and temperature of the aging step, were expected to affect the size of the resulting nickel particles. © melted precursors are absorbed into the pores of the support by the capillary force, so the Ni loading was also expected to affect the final size of the Ni particle.
The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analyses in Figure 3 show the changes in the nickel nitrate hexahydrate precursor with heating. All sample showed endothermic peaks at approximately 55 °C, 100 °C, 150 °C, and 275 °C. Based on the report of Brockner et al., [32] the peaks at 55 °C and 100 °C were attributed to water separation steps 1 and 2 [Ni(NO3)2·6H2O → Ni(NO3)2·4H2O → Ni(NO3)2·2H2O]. The melting point of nickel nitrate hexahydrate is 57 °C. The strong endothermic peaks at 55 °C can thus be assigned as the melting of the solid salts into liquids. The capillary forces, which are the driving forces for the impregnation of the active components, seem to occur during water separation steps 1 and 2. Thus, achieving the high dispersion of Ni particles by optimizing the aging temperature is important. It was expected that the nickel salts would be impregnated mainly into the pores of the support at a sufficiently long aging time. As the nickel loading of the catalysts was increased, the peaks in steps 3 and 4 became larger. The peaks in step 3 were assigned as the decomposition of the precursor salts [Ni(NO3)2·2H2O → Ni(NO3)(OH)1.50O0.25·H2O]. Finally, the nitrate salt was completely decomposed and converted into nickel oxides between 250 °C and 300 °C in step 4 [Ni(NO3)(OH)1.500.25·H2O → Ni2O3 or NiO]. Capillary forces drive the impregnation of nickel nitrate in the melt-infiltration method, so the water separation steps 1 and 2 (temperature: 55–100 °C) would seem to be the most important. Thus, aging temperatures between 60 and 90 °C were investigated.
The size of the metallic Ni particles was minimized by adjusting the aging time, aging temperature, calcination temperature, and Ni loading. The size of the metallic Ni particles was determined using H2-chemisorption, as detailed in Table 1 and Figure 4. The smallest Ni particle size was achieved using the following optimized conditions: an aging temperature of 80 °C and an aging time of 6 h with a fixed calcination temperature of 500 °C and a Ni loading of 20 wt %, as detailed in Figure 4a,b. To further reduce the particle size, the calcination temperature was reduced from 500 to 300 °C. The smallest particle size was obtained at 300 °C, as presented in Figure 4c. However, based on the DSC analysis, the calcination temperature should be higher than 300 °C, as the nitrate salts were not fully decomposed below 300 °C. Figure 4d shows the change in the size of the metallic Ni particles, depending on the Ni content (15–50 wt %); the catalysts were subjected to an additional “pre-decomposition” step, using the method of de Jong et al. [28] to further reduce the metallic Ni particle size. During the calcination step, the prepared samples were first heated at 100 °C for 3 h. The smallest Ni particle size of 8.8 nm was achieved using nickel loading of 20 wt %. However, based on the metallic surface areas of Ni (gcat) calculated using the total amount of adsorbed hydrogen (Table 1), the optimized Ni loading was estimated to be 30 wt %. The nickel surface area is closely related to the catalytic activity, with the higher gcat value corresponding to greater active sites area. Thus, the catalytic activity of the 30 wt % Ni catalysts was expected to be higher than those of the other catalysts, based on the number of active sites.
The variation in the Ni particle size was also verified from their X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns. As shown in Figure 5, the X-ray diffraction patterns of all the samples exhibited Ni peaks [44.7° (111), 51.7° (200), and 76.3° (220)] (JCPDS No. 04-0850) and their γ-Al2O3 diffraction peaks were observed at 39.5°, 46.1° and 66.9° (JCPDS No. 04-0850). Apparent metallic Ni peaks were observed for all samples, except the Ni/Al2O3 catalyst with 15 wt % loading, owing to its well-dispersed small Ni particles. As the Ni loading was increased, the intensity of metallic Ni peaks increased (51.7° and 76.3°). The sizes of metallic Ni particles were calculated using the Scherrer equation. The main peak of metallic Ni particle was located at 45°, but this peak overlapped with the nearby Al2O3 peak. Thus, the well-resolved peak at 55° was used in the Scherrer equation. The Ni particle size of the 15 wt % Ni/Al2O3 catalyst was calculated to be 7.3 nm, 20 wt %: 8.0 nm, 30 wt %: 11.1 nm, 40 wt %: 16.1 nm, and 50 wt %: 20.4 nm. These results were in good agreement with the sizes of the Ni metal particles determined using the H2-chemisorption analysis.
The metallic Ni particle sizes of the reduced 20 and 30 wt % Ni/Al2O3 catalyst were analyzed using a TEM. As shown in Figure 6a,b, the metallic Ni particles were suitably distributed over the supports. The sizes of the nickel particles were approximately 7–13 nm, which matched well with the metallic Ni particle sizes obtained using the H2 chemisorption and XRD.

2.2. Physical and Chemical Properties of Catalysts

The N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of the samples prepared by the melt-infiltration method are shown in Figure 7a. The surface areas and pore sizes of the catalysts were obtained using the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) and Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) analyses methods, and are detailed in Table 2 and Figure 7b. The isotherms were type IV with an H1 hysteresis loop according to the IUPAC classification, indicating that a mesoporous structure was maintained, even after a large amount of metallic nickel (e.g., 50 wt %) was incorporated. The mesopore volumes corresponding to pore diameters between 6 and 16 nm drastically decreased as the nickel loading increased. This indicated that most of the metallic Ni particles were likely located inside the mesopores. Among the five catalyst samples, the 15 wt %/Al2O3 catalyst exhibited the highest BET surface area The BET surface area decreased slightly with increasing Ni loading up to 30 wt %, and then decreased drastically at Ni loadings above 40 wt %. To increase the number of active sites by the formation of nickel particles with high dispersion, the physical surface area of the catalyst should be as large as possible.
Temperature programmed reduction (TPR) was used to investigate the reducibility of the catalyst; the results are presented in Figure 8. The free NiO particles, which were loosely bound to the support, gave rise to the first reduction peak at 200–220 °C [21]. As the temperature increased, NiO particles with medium-strength interactions, with the support formed second reduction peak at 260–400 °C. With increasing Ni loading, the area of the second reduction peak increased, and the peaks shifted to the lower temperature. The contact area of the metallic Ni particles with the support would be expected to decrease, as the size of the particles increased. The catalysts with low Ni loading (15 and 20 wt % Ni/Al2O3) showed a third reduction peak at high temperatures of around 450 °C. Thus, the high-temperature peak was attributed to the reduction of well-dispersed NiO particles, with strong binding to the alumina support. The catalysts with higher Ni loadings (30, 40, and 50 wt % Ni/Al2O3) did not exhibit distinct third reduction peaks, indicating the weaker interaction between the Ni particles and the alumina supports, owing to the larger size of the metallic particles. Additionally, the amount of adsorbed hydrogen was found to increase with the Ni loading.

2.3. Catalytic Performance in the CO2 Methanation Reaction

Before the catalytic performance test, a blank test was conducted in the reaction temperature range of 275–400 °C and a GHSV of 25,000 h−1; no CH4 was detected. As shown in Figure 9, the catalyst performance in terms of CO2 conversion deteriorated as the GHSV was increased from 5000 to 45,000 h−1, using the 20 wt % Ni/Al2O3 catalyst. To compare the catalytic performances of the given catalysts clearly, a GHSV of 25,000 h−1 was selected, which represented the maximum space velocity when the pressure drop was limited to less than 1 atm.
Figure 10a shows the changes in CO2 conversion at different reaction temperatures in the CO2 methanation reaction. The catalyst with a 20 wt % Ni loading (20 wt % Ni/Al2O3) was expected to exhibit the best catalytic performance, because of its smallest metallic Ni particle size and high BET surface area. However, the 30 wt % Ni/Al2O3 catalyst with a high metallic Ni surface area showed better CO2 conversion than the 20 wt % Ni/Al2O3 catalyst at 300–400 °C. This indicated that the catalytic activity was closely related to the Ni metal surface area. Thus, to maximize the catalytic activity to CO2 conversion, 30 wt % Ni loading was the best amongst the tested samples. The CO2 conversions of the catalysts with high Ni loadings (30 to 50 wt %) were almost the same in the higher temperature region (350–400 °C), approaching thermodynamic equilibrium. In the meantime, the reference catalyst was less active than the other catalysts over the entire reaction temperature region, because it was not optimized for CO2 methanation. The CO2 conversions, of all the catalysts, decreased at high temperatures, owing to the reverse water gas shift reaction [7,8,9]. The low-Ni-loading catalysts (15, 20, and 30 wt % Ni/Al2O3), in which metallic Ni particles were highly dispersed, showed high CH4 selectivity at low temperatures, as shown in Figure 10b. The 20 wt % Ni/Al2O3 catalyst especially, having the highest nickel dispersion, showed remarkably higher CH4 selectivity, compared with the other catalysts. The CH4 selectivity of all the catalysts also decreased with increasing reaction temperature owing to the reverse water gas shift reaction. In order to evaluate the intrinsic catalytic performance, the reaction rates for the conversion of CO2 to CH4 by the metallic Ni particles were calculated using Equation (3), and are presented in Table 3. The highest CO2 methanation reaction rate was observed for the 20 wt % Ni/Al2O3 catalyst; the reaction rates followed this order: 20 wt % (12.7 × 10−2 s−1) > 15 wt % (9.1 × 10−2 s−1) ≥ 30 wt % (8.8 × 10−2 s−1) > 40 wt % (4.4 × 10−2 s−1) > 50 wt % (3.1 × 10−2 s−1). These data provided further evidence that the intrinsic reaction rate for CO2 methanation should be optimized by both Ni content and its dispersion.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Materials

Unless otherwise noted, all chemicals were used as received without further purification. Gamma alumina powder (SASOL, Johannesberg, JHB, South Africa; mean pore diameter: 10 nm, BET surface area: 202 m2/g) was used as a support, and nickel nitrate hexahydrate (Ni(NO3)2·6H2O, 98%, JUNSEI, Tokyo, Japan) was used as the precursor. The prepared Ni catalyst samples were compared with the commercial Ni-based catalyst (48 wt % Ni, 3 wt % Ca, 6 wt % Mg/Al2O3). Based on its intended use in the CO2 methanation reaction, a commercial catalyst designed for hydrogenation was selected as the reference catalyst. This reference catalyst was originally designed for use at a low space velocity.

3.2. Preparation of Nickel Catalysts

The melt infiltration method was employed to prepare highly dispersed nickel catalysts, following the procedure detailed in Figure 2. The alumina powder was ground in a mortar and sieved to a particle size of approximately 100 μm. The appropriate quantity of nickel nitrate hexahydrate salt to give the desired Ni content (15 wt %, 20 wt %, 30 wt %, 40 wt %, or 50 wt %) was ground together with the gamma-alumina powder (1 g) in the mortar. When the powder became homogeneously green, it was transferred to an alumina boat. Finally, in the aging procedure, the sample was slowly heated at a ramp rate of 0.7 °C/min, to a maximum temperature of 80 °C for 3 h, and then at 0.33 °C/min to a maximum of 100 °C for 3 h. Subsequently, the sample was calcined for 2 h, using a heating rate of 1.7 °C/min, and a maximum temperature of 300 °C.

3.3. Characterization of the Catalysts

Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) analysis was used to confirm the melting period of nickel nitrate salt. This measurement was performed using a Q200 (TA Instruments, New castle, NW, United Kingdom), with a heating rate of 3 °C/min, and a maximum temperature of 400 °C under N2 stream (50 mL/min). The particle size of the nickel oxide was determined using X-ray diffraction (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). H2-chemisorption analyses were also conducted to confirm the size and dispersion of the metallic particles, using an ASAP 2010 (Micromeritics, Georgia, GA, USA); for these analyses, approximately 50 mg of the catalyst was reduced under H2 stream (200 mL/min) at 400 °C for 3 h, after which, H2 adsorption measurement was performed under Ar stream (30 mL/min) at 50 °C. Temperature programmed reduction (Micromeritics, Georgia, GA, USA) was carried out, to identify the reduction temperature and the total H2 consumption of the nickel catalysts. A 100 mg catalyst sample in a U-quartz cell was pre-treated with He gas at 400 °C for an hour, and then heated to 500 °C under H2 stream (50 mL/min) at a heating rate of 5 °C/min. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) analysis was carried out using N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms (Micromeritics, Georgia, GA, USA) to identify the surface area of each catalyst. Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) analysis was also conducted to determine the pore-size distribution and pore volume. A transmission electron microscope (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) was used to confirm the size of the Ni particles.

3.4. Catalytic Activity Tests

The catalytic activity tests of the prepared samples and the reference catalyst for carbon dioxide methanation were performed at atmospheric pressure, using a feed gas composition of CO2:H2:N2 = 4:1:5, and a GHSV of 25,000 h−1 over a temperature range of 275–400 °C. The prepared catalyst was diluted with SiC (sample: 50 mg; SiC: 250 mg), and loaded in a fixed-bed quartz reactor (inner diameter = 4 mm). Before the reaction, the catalysts were reduced at 400 °C for 3 h under pure H2 stream (200 mL/min), and then cooled to 250 °C. Subsequently, the activity test was performed at each temperature for 2 h to determine the stable activity and selectivity data. The product gas was analyzed using an online micro-gas chromatograph (INFICON, Bad Ragaz, Switzerland), equipped with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD). The carbon dioxide conversion and methane selectivity were calculated using the following equations:
X C O 2 ( % ) = F C O 2 , i n F C O 2 , o u t F C O 2 , i n × 100 ( % )
S C H 4 ( % ) = F C H 4 , o u t F C O 2 , i n F C O 2 , o u t × 100 ( % )
R e a c t i o n   r a t e = N u m b e r   o f   m o l e c u l e s C H 4 N u m b e r   o f   m o l e c u l e s N i     T i m e

4. Conclusions

Nickel-based catalysts with high metal dispersion and high nickel loading were prepared by the one-step melt-infiltration method. In this method, the aging and calcination process were conducted consecutively to simplify the catalyst preparation processes. To achieve both high nickel loading and dispersion in the catalysts, the aging time and temperature were adjusted. DSC analysis indicated that a pre-decomposition step was required to further optimize the catalysts. The catalyst synthesis time was drastically reduced by using one-step heat treatment, rather than typical melt-infiltration methods. As a result of the high space velocity (GHSV of 25,000 h−1), all the catalysts except 30 wt % Ni/Al2O3 exhibited inferior catalytic performances at low temperatures. However, at high temperatures of 325–400 °C, the catalysts with high nickel loading (30–50 wt %) showed high CO2 conversion. The 15–30 wt % Ni/Al2O3 exhibited high CH4 selectivity, owing to the dispersion effect of the small metallic Ni particles [14]. The 20 wt % Ni/Al2O3 had a higher intrinsic reaction rate than the 30 wt % Ni/Al2O3 catalyst, because of its small metallic Ni particles. However, 30 wt % Ni/Al2O3 showed the highest bulk reaction rate among the tested catalysts, because it provided the largest metal surface area (i.e., the highest number of active sites). Thus, 30 wt % Ni/Al2O3 was determined to be the optimum catalyst for the CO2 methanation reaction. The melt-infiltration method used in this study was useful for the simple preparation of metal-support catalysts with a high metal loading.

Author Contributions

Data curation, E.H.C. and W.K.; formal analysis, E.H.C.; funding acquisition, W.L.Y.; investigation, E.H.C.; methodology, E.H.C. and W.K.; supervision, C.H.K. and W.L.Y.; writing—original draft, E.H.C.; writing—review & editing, W.K. and C.H.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was conducted under the framework of the research and development program of the Korea Institute of Energy Research (C0-2406).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

References

  1. Carrington, G.; Stephenson, J. The politics of energy scenarios: Are International Energy Agency and other conservative projections hampering the renewable energy transition? Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 2018, 46, 103–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Götz, M.; Lefebvre, J.; Mörs, F.; Koch, A.M.; Graf, F.; Bajohr, S.; Reimert, R.; Kolb, T. Renewable Power-to-Gas: A technological and economic review. Renew. Energy 2016, 85, 1371–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Götz, M.; Koch, A.; Graf, F. State of the art and perspectives of CO2 methanation process concepts for power-to-gas applications, 2014-researchgate.net. In Proceedings of the International Gas Union Research Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, 17–19 September 2014. Paper Code: TO5-4. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hashimoto, K.; Yamasaki, M.; Fujimura, K.; Matsui, T.; Izumiya, K.; Komori, M.; El-Moneim, A.; Akiyama, E.; Habazaki, H.; Kumagai, N.; et al. Global CO2 recycling—Novel materials and prospect for prevention of global warming and abundant energy supply. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 1999, 267, 200–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rönsch, S.; Schneider, J.; Matthischke, S.; Schlüter, M.; Götz, M.; Lefebvre, J.; Prabhakaran, P.; Bajohr, S. Review on methanation—from fundamentals to current projects. Fuel 2016, 166, 276–296. [Google Scholar]
  6. Swalus, C.; Jacquemin, M.; Poleunis, C.; Bertrand, P.; Ruiz, P. CO2 methanation on Rh/γ-Al2O3 catalyst at low temperature: “In situ” supply of hydrogen by Ni/activated carbon catalyst. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2012, 125, 41–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Younas, M.; Kong, L.L.; Bashir, M.J.; Nadeem, H.; Shehzad, A.; Sethupathi, S. Recent Advancements, Fundamental Challenges, and Opportunities in Catalytic Methanation of CO2. Energy Fuels 2016, 30, 8815–8831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, W.; Gong, J. Methanation of carbon dioxide: An overview. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 2011, 5, 2–10. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang, W.; Wang, S.; Ma, X.; Gong, J. Recent advances in catalytic hydrogenation of carbon dioxide. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 3703–3727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Choi, M.; Yook, S.; Kim, H. Hydrogen spillover in encapsulated metal catalysts: New opportunities for designing advanced hydroprocessing catalysts. ChemCatChem 2015, 7, 1048–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, A.; Miyao, T.; Higashiyama, K.; Yamashita, H.; Watanabe, M. High Catalytic Performance of Ruthenium-Doped Mesoporous Nickel–Aluminum Oxides for Selective CO Methanation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 9895–9898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Garbarino, G.; Bellotti, D.; Riani, P.; Magistri, L.; Busca, G. Methanation of carbon dioxide on Ru/Al2O3 and Ni/Al2O3 catalysts at atmospheric pressure: Catalysts activation, behaviour and stability. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2015, 40, 9171–9182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Karelovic, A.; Ruiz, P. Improving the hydrogenation function of Pd/γ-Al2O3 catalyst by Rh/γ-Al2O3 addition in CO2 methanation at low temperature. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 2799–2812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kwak, J.H.; Kovarik, L.; Szanyi, J. CO2 reduction on supported Ru/Al2O3 catalysts: Cluster size dependence of product selectivity. ACS Catal. 2013, 3, 2449–2455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Park, J.-N.; McFarland, E.W. A highly dispersed Pd–Mg/SiO2 catalyst active for methanation of CO2. J. Catal. 2009, 266, 92–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sharma, S.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, P.; McFarland, E.W.; Metiu, H. CO2 methanation on Ru-doped ceria. J. Catal. 2011, 278, 297–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, F.; He, S.; Chen, H.; Wang, B.; Zheng, L.; Wei, M.; Evans, D.G.; Duan, X. Active site dependent reaction mechanism over Ru/CeO2 catalyst toward CO2 methanation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 6298–6305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Aziz, M.; Jalil, A.; Triwahyono, S.; Mukti, R.R.; Taufiq-Yap, Y.; Sazegar, M. Highly active Ni-promoted mesostructured silica nanoparticles for CO2 methanation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2014, 147, 359–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Du, G.; Lim, S.; Yang, Y.; Wang, C.; Pfefferle, L.; Haller, G. Methanation of carbon dioxide on Ni-incorporated MCM-41 catalysts: The influence of catalyst pretreatment and study of steady-state reaction. J. Catal. 2007, 249, 370–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Garbarino, G.; Riani, P.; Magistri, L.; Busca, G. A study of the methanation of carbon dioxide on Ni/Al2O3 catalysts at atmospheric pressure. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2014, 39, 11557–11565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, C.; Liu, J.; Wang, F.; He, S.; Chen, H.; Zhao, Y.; Wei, M.; Evans, D.G.; Duan, X. Enhanced low-temperature activity of CO2 methanation over highly-dispersed Ni/TiO2 catalyst. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2013, 3, 2627–2633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Muroyama, H.; Tsuda, Y.; Asakoshi, T.; Masitah, H.; Okanishi, T.; Matsui, T.; Eguchi, K. Carbon dioxide methanation over Ni catalysts supported on various metal oxides. J. Catal. 2016, 343, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Pan, Q.; Peng, J.; Wang, S.; Wang, S. In situ FTIR spectroscopic study of the CO2 methanation mechanism on Ni/Ce0.5Zr0.5O2. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2014, 4, 502–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pandey, D.; Deo, G. Effect of support on the catalytic activity of supported Ni–Fe catalysts for the CO2 methanation reaction. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2016, 33, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ren, J.; Qin, X.; Yang, J.-Z.; Qin, Z.-F.; Guo, H.-L.; Lin, J.-Y.; Li, Z. Methanation of carbon dioxide over Ni–M/ZrO2 (M= Fe, Co, Cu) catalysts: Effect of addition of a second metal. Fuel Process. Technol. 2015, 137, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Schild, C.; Wokaun, A.; Baiker, A. On the mechanism of CO and CO2 hydrogenation reactions on zirconia-supported catalysts: A diffuse reflectance FTIR study. J. Mol. Catal. 1990, 63, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jain, S.K. Density, viscosity, and surface tension of some single molten hydrated salts. J. Chem. Eng. Data 1978, 23, 170–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Eggenhuisen, T.M.; Breejen, J.P.D.; Verdoes, D.; De Jongh, P.E.; De Jong, K.P.D. Fundamentals of melt infiltration for the preparation of supported metal catalysts. The case of Co/SiO2 for Fischer—Tropsch synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 18318–18325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ciotonea, C.; Dragoi, B.; Ungureanu, A.; Catrinescu, C.; Petit, S.; Alamdari, H.; Marceau, E.; Dumitriu, E.; Royer, S. Improved dispersion of transition metals in mesoporous materials through a polymer-assisted melt infiltration method. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2017, 7, 5448–5456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. De Jongh, P.E.; Eggenhuisen, T.M. Melt infiltration: An emerging technique for the preparation of novel functional nanostructured materials. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 6672–6690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, X.; Khinast, J.G.; Glasser, B.J. Drying of Ni/Alumina catalysts: Control of the metal distribution using surfactants and the melt infiltration method. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 5792–5800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Brockner, W.; Ehrhardt, C.; Gjikaj, M. Thermal decomposition of nickel nitrate hexahydrate, Ni(NO3)2·6H2O, in comparison to Co (NO3)2·6H2O and Ca (NO3)2 4H2O. Thermochim. Acta 2007, 456, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Potential reaction pathways in CO2 methanation.
Figure 1. Potential reaction pathways in CO2 methanation.
Catalysts 10 00643 g001
Figure 2. Overview of the experimental procedure.
Figure 2. Overview of the experimental procedure.
Catalysts 10 00643 g002
Figure 3. Decomposition of the nitrate salt at ~300 °C as measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC).
Figure 3. Decomposition of the nitrate salt at ~300 °C as measured by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC).
Catalysts 10 00643 g003
Figure 4. Effect of various synthesis conditions on the Ni particle size. (a) Effect of aging temperature investigated, using 30 wt % Ni/Al2O3 aging time of 6 h and a calcination temperature of 500 °C. (b): Effect of aging time on 30 wt % Ni/Al2O3, using an aging temperature of 80 °C and a calcination temperature of 500 °C. (c): Effect of calcination temperature on 30 wt % Ni/Al2O3, using an aging time of 6 h, an aging temperature of 80 °C and a calcination temperature of 300–500 °C. (d): Effect of Ni content on Ni/Al2O3 prepared under the optimal synthesis conditions (aging time: 6 h, aging temperature: 80 °C, calcination temperature: 300 °C).
Figure 4. Effect of various synthesis conditions on the Ni particle size. (a) Effect of aging temperature investigated, using 30 wt % Ni/Al2O3 aging time of 6 h and a calcination temperature of 500 °C. (b): Effect of aging time on 30 wt % Ni/Al2O3, using an aging temperature of 80 °C and a calcination temperature of 500 °C. (c): Effect of calcination temperature on 30 wt % Ni/Al2O3, using an aging time of 6 h, an aging temperature of 80 °C and a calcination temperature of 300–500 °C. (d): Effect of Ni content on Ni/Al2O3 prepared under the optimal synthesis conditions (aging time: 6 h, aging temperature: 80 °C, calcination temperature: 300 °C).
Catalysts 10 00643 g004
Figure 5. XRD patterns of the Ni/Al2O3 catalysts.
Figure 5. XRD patterns of the Ni/Al2O3 catalysts.
Catalysts 10 00643 g005
Figure 6. TEM images showing the Ni particle dispersion and size on the 20 wt % (a) and 30 wt % (b) catalysts.
Figure 6. TEM images showing the Ni particle dispersion and size on the 20 wt % (a) and 30 wt % (b) catalysts.
Catalysts 10 00643 g006
Figure 7. (a) N2 adsorption isotherms, (b) pore size distributions calculated using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method for the different catalysts.
Figure 7. (a) N2 adsorption isotherms, (b) pore size distributions calculated using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method for the different catalysts.
Catalysts 10 00643 g007
Figure 8. Temperature programmed reduction (TPR) profiles of the Ni catalysts.
Figure 8. Temperature programmed reduction (TPR) profiles of the Ni catalysts.
Catalysts 10 00643 g008
Figure 9. CO2 conversion at different gas hourly velocity (GHSV) values (h−1) at a reaction temperature of 300 °C, using 30 mg (original sample weight for activity test: 50 mg) of the 20 wt % Ni catalyst + 270 mg of SiC.
Figure 9. CO2 conversion at different gas hourly velocity (GHSV) values (h−1) at a reaction temperature of 300 °C, using 30 mg (original sample weight for activity test: 50 mg) of the 20 wt % Ni catalyst + 270 mg of SiC.
Catalysts 10 00643 g009
Figure 10. CO2 conversion for the catalysts with different Ni loadings at different reaction temperatures (a) and CH4 selectivities (b).
Figure 10. CO2 conversion for the catalysts with different Ni loadings at different reaction temperatures (a) and CH4 selectivities (b).
Catalysts 10 00643 g010
Table 1. Nickel particle sizes of the catalyst obtained using H2- chemisorption.
Table 1. Nickel particle sizes of the catalyst obtained using H2- chemisorption.
Property/Sample15Ni/Al2O320Ni/Al2O330Ni/Al2O340Ni/Al2O350Ni/Al2O3
Metal dispersion (%)10.311.448.76.74.2
Metal surface area (m2/gCat)10.315.2317.2917.0113.9
Metal surface area (m2/gNi)68.976.1857.6344.7927.8
Particle diameter (nm)9.88.811.715.024.2
Nickel loading (wt %) a14.621.330.438.246.4
a Nickel loading was calculated by ICP-AES.
Table 2. Physical properties of the nickel catalysts obtained using the nitrogen adsorption method.
Table 2. Physical properties of the nickel catalysts obtained using the nitrogen adsorption method.
Property/SampleFresh-Al2O315Ni/Al2O320Ni/Al2O330Ni/Al2O340Ni/Al2O350Ni/Al2O3
BET surface area (m2/g)204.8176.9172.8160.9139.0125.4
Total pore volume (cm3/g)0.50.40.30.30.30.3
Average pre diameter (nm)10.59.27.77.08.08.7
Table 3. CO2 methanation reaction rate calculated using Equation (3).
Table 3. CO2 methanation reaction rate calculated using Equation (3).
SampleRate × 10−2 (molCH4 mol Ni−1 s−1)
15Ni/Al2O39.1
20Ni/Al2O312.7
30Ni/Al2O38.8
40Ni/Al2O34.4
50Ni/Al2O33.1
Reaction conditions: T = 573 K, GHSV = 25,000 h−1.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cho, E.H.; Kim, W.; Ko, C.H.; Yoon, W.L. Enhanced CO2 Methanation Reaction in C1 Chemistry over a Highly Dispersed Nickel Nanocatalyst Prepared Using the One-Step Melt-Infiltration Method. Catalysts 2020, 10, 643. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/catal10060643

AMA Style

Cho EH, Kim W, Ko CH, Yoon WL. Enhanced CO2 Methanation Reaction in C1 Chemistry over a Highly Dispersed Nickel Nanocatalyst Prepared Using the One-Step Melt-Infiltration Method. Catalysts. 2020; 10(6):643. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/catal10060643

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cho, Eui Hyun, Woohyun Kim, Chang Hyun Ko, and Wang Lai Yoon. 2020. "Enhanced CO2 Methanation Reaction in C1 Chemistry over a Highly Dispersed Nickel Nanocatalyst Prepared Using the One-Step Melt-Infiltration Method" Catalysts 10, no. 6: 643. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/catal10060643

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop