Next Article in Journal
Regulation of Acetylcholine Quantal Release by Coupled Thrombin/BDNF Signaling in Mouse Motor Synapses
Next Article in Special Issue
Trends and Challenges in Tumor Anti-Angiogenic Therapies
Previous Article in Journal
Neurological Enhancement Effects of Melatonin against Brain Injury-Induced Oxidative Stress, Neuroinflammation, and Neurodegeneration via AMPK/CREB Signaling
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dual Roles of the AMP-Activated Protein Kinase Pathway in Angiogenesis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Cells
Volume 8
Issue 7
10.3390/cells8070761
cells-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tumor Angiogenic Inhibition Triggered Necrosis (TAITN) in Oral Cancer

by
Saori Yoshida
1,
Hotaka Kawai
1,*,
Takanori Eguchi
2,3,*,
Shintaro Sukegawa
1,4,
May Wathone Oo
1,
Chang Anqi
1,5,
Kiyofumi Takabatake
1,
Keisuke Nakano
1,3,
Kuniaki Okamoto
2 and
Hitoshi Nagatsuka
1,3
1
Department of Oral Pathology and Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
2
Department of Dental Pharmacology, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
3
Advanced Research Center for Oral and Craniofacial Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama 700-8558, Japan
4
Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kagawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Takamatsu, Kagawa 760-8557, Japan
5
Department of Anatomy, Basic Medicine Science College, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150076, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Cells 2019, 8(7), 761; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cells8070761
Submission received: 27 June 2019 / Revised: 18 July 2019 / Accepted: 20 July 2019 / Published: 22 July 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Angiogenesis in Cancer)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
CXCR4 is a chemokine receptor crucial in tumor progression, although the angiogenic role of CXCR4 in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) has not been investigated. Here we show that CXCR4 is crucial for tumor angiogenesis, thereby supporting tumor survival in OSCC. Immunohistochemistry on human clinical specimens revealed that CXCR4 and a tumor vasculature marker CD34 were co-distributed in tumor vessels in human OSCC specimens. To uncover the effects of CXCR4 inhibition, we treated the OSCC-xenografted mice with AMD3100, so-called plerixafor, an antagonist of CXCR4. Notably, we found a unique pathophysiological structure defined as tumor angiogenic inhibition triggered necrosis (TAITN), which was induced by the CXCR4 antagonism. Treatment with AMD3100 increased necrotic areas with the induction of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α in the xenografted tumors, suggesting that AMD3100-induced TAITN was involved in hypoxia and ischemia. Taken together, we demonstrated that CXCR4 plays a crucial role in tumor angiogenesis required for OSCC progression, whereas TAITN induced by CXCR4 antagonism could be an effective anti-angiogenic therapeutic strategy in OSCC treatment.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The C-X-C motif chemokine receptor (CXCR4) is expressed in various hematopoietic cells such as peripheral blood lymphocytes, unprimed T cells [1], monocytes [2], pre-B cells, and plasma cells [3,4], and is also expressed in non-hematopoietic cells such as vascular smooth muscle cells [5], endothelial cells [6,7], intestinal [8], and alveolar epithelial cells [9]. CXCR4 can be bound with the ligand, stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), also known as C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12), and the SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling axis retains hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow [10]. It has been shown that CXCR4 involves proliferation, infiltration, and adhesion of hematopoietic stem cells [11,12]. CXCR4 is essential for the formation of large blood vessels that feed the gastrointestinal tract in the fetal stage [13]. Notably, it has been shown that CXCR4 was also expressed in various types of cancers including glioblastoma, liver cancer, breast cancer, and esophageal cancer [14,15,16,17]. CXCR4-positive tumors often grew faster than CXCR4-negative tumors [18,19]. It has been shown that lymph node metastasis and distant organ metastasis frequently occurred in CXCR4-positive tumor cases [15,16,17]; thus, CXCR4 is considered to be a factor of poor prognosis in cancer. It was shown that CXCR4 was expressed in 50–60% of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) clinical cases [20]. CXCR4-positive OSCC tumors metastasized to lymph nodes and to distant organs more frequently than CXCR4-negative tumor cases [20,21]. Consistently, suppression of CXCR4 reduced tumor volumes and metastases to lymph nodes and distant organs in mice transplanted with OSCC cells [22]. Despite the fact that OSCC cells express a considerably high level of CXCR4, neither proliferation nor survival of the cancer cells was inhibited by CXCR4 antagonists [20,22,23]. These studies suggest that peripheral and adjacent cells around OSCC cells might play important roles in the antitumor effects of the CXCR4 antagonist. We, therefore, hypothesized that CXCR4 antagonism could repress OSCC not by directly targeting cancer cells but by targeting peritumoral stromal cells. In the present study, we first aimed to clarify which type of cells could be positive with CXCR4 in OSCC and whereby focused on CXCR4/CD34 double-positive tumor vasculatures in clinical specimens of OSCC. CD34 was first characterized as a protein that is expressed by human hematopoietic progenitor cells and has been considered a definitive marker of angiogenesis in neoplastic lesions [24]. In the presence of pathological angiogenesis, at the sprouting tips of growing vessels, the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis was shown to play a fundamental role in endothelial cell invasion, mobilization/migration, extravasation, directional migration, homing, and cell survival [25,26,27]. We therefore examined the alteration of CD34-positive blood vessels under administration of the CXCR4 antagonist. Blood vessels generally supply oxygen and nutrients crucial for tumor growth [28,29]. Such tumor blood vessels could form a favorable tumor microenvironment for tumor growth. We, therefore, focused on the histological features of OSCC enriched in blood vessels between the tumor nests. Previous studies of CXCR4 in OSCC have focused on CXCR4 expressed on cancer cells and have not reported CXCR4-positive blood vessels in OSCC.
We here aimed to evaluate (i) the subtumor distribution of CXCR4 in human clinical specimens of OSCC and (ii) the effects of a CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100, so-called plerixafor, on inhibition of tumor angiogenesis and tumor growth in mice xenografted with OSCC cells.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Samples

Patient-derived OSCC samples were obtained from the Department of Oral Pathology, Okayama University. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences (Approval number: 1608-018). The well-differentiated type of tongue squamous cell carcinoma (10 cases) was examined in the retrospective study (Table 1). All excised tumor tissues were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 12 h. Tissues were embedded in paraffin wax, and sections were prepared.

2.2. Cell Line and Cell Culture

Human OSCC cell line HSC-2 was obtained from Cells Bank of Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources (JCRB) at the National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition (NIBIOHN) (Osaka, Japan). HSC-2 cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich) at 37 °C in humidified air with 5% CO2.

2.3. Reagent

AMD3100/plerixafor (ChemScene, Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA) (10 mg) was dissolved in 20 mL of physiological saline and stored at 4 °C before use. This concentration was the same as the concentration of the drug used in the oral cancer experiment using mice [20,22].

2.4. Xenograft and Administration of AMD3100 to Mice

HSC-2 cells were transplanted subcutaneously to backs and heads of 5 nude mice (BALB/c-nu/nu) at 10 × 105 cells per xenograft. A week after the injection, AMD3100 (50 μg/day) was administered intraperitoneally to HSC-2-transplanted mice every day for 21 d. As a control, 5 nude mice were xenografted by the above-mentioned method and administered intraperitoneally with saline. Mice were fixed by perfusion with 10% neutral buffered formalin. Tumors were excised, fixed by immersion in 10% neutral buffered formalin, dehydrated, and embedded in paraffin. Paraffin sections were prepared for hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC) and observed with a light microscope.

2.5. Immunohistochemistry

IHC was carried out using anti-CD34 (Histofine, Tokyo, Japan; no dilution), anti-CXCR4 (Abcam, Cambridgeshire, UK; dilution of 1:300), and anti-HIF-1α (Abcam, Cambridgeshire, UK; dilution of 1:200) antibodies. Signals were enhanced by the avidin–biotin complex method (Vectastain ABC Kit, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Detection was performed with 3,3-diaminobenzidine (DAB), and the staining results were observed with an optical microscope. Tumor tissue maximum sections were used for comparison of necrosis areas, tumor vessel structures, and HIF-1α-positive areas by using ImageJ, an image processing software [31]. For cell counts in human specimens, we counted the number of lumen structures in 5 randomly selected locations of 10 OSCC patient cases. For double-fluorescent IHC, the above-mentioned CD34 and CXCR4 antibodies were diluted with Can Get Signal (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). Anti-mouse IgG Alexa Fluor 488 and anti-rabbit IgG Alexa Fluor 568 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were used as secondary antibodies at a dilution of 1:200. After the reactions, the specimens were stained with 0.2 g/mL of DAPI (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan). The staining results were observed with a fluorescence microscope.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data were recorded and entered into an electronic database during the course of the evaluation by means of Microsoft Excel (Microsoft, Inc., Redmond, WA, USA). Means and standard deviations were used for normal data distributions. The database was transferred to JMP version 11.2 for Macintosh computers (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) for statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed to investigate whether there were significant differences between the mean values of the groups. Wilcoxon’s matched-pairs signed-rank test was used for non-normally distributed measurements, and t-tests were used for normally distributed measurements. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Investigation of CXCR4-Positive Vessels in the Stroma of Human Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

To investigate whether CXCR4 expression in vessels could be different between tumor and nontumor areas in OSCC clinical cases, we first defined the tumor and nontumor areas in the OSCC specimens. By HE staining, a typical morphology of squamous cell carcinoma was found to be surrounded by a subepithelial connective tissue (Figure 1a,b; tumor area). The tumor cells containing eosinophilic cytoplasm and nuclear atypia formed large and small tumor nests (Figure 1b). Abundant blood vessels and fibrous connective tissue were observed between the tumor nests (Figure 1b).
We next examined the expression and distribution of CD34 and CXCR4 in the tumor and stroma areas. CD34-positive vascular endothelial cells forming luminal structures were found in the stroma and connective tissues (Figure 1c). Tumor stroma CD34-positive blood vessels appeared to be smaller in structure than normal, while the number of blood vessels was not different. (Figure 1d). CXCR4-positive lumen structures were found in the stroma, although CXCR4 was distributed in both tumor and stromal cells (Figure 1e). Notably, CXCR4-positive lumen structures were found in the tumor area, although not in the nontumor area (Figure 1f). CXCR4-positive vessels were significant in the tumor area more abundantly than those in nontumor areas (Figure 1g). These findings indicated that CXCR4 was selectively distributed in tumor vessels of OSCC.
To ask whether CXCR4 and CD34 could be co-distributed in the vessels, we next performed double-fluorescent IHC. It was first confirmed that CXCR4 was distributed in both tumor cells and vessel-like structures in the stroma (Figure 2a). CD34 was distributed in endothelial cells in the stroma but not in tumors (Figure 2b). CXCR4/CD34 double-positive endothelial cells were found in the stroma (Figure 2c, arrowheads). CXCR4 was not uniformly distributed in all tumor blood vessels, but it was partially localized at the constricted and branched parts of the blood vessels. Conversely, nontumor areas with CD34-positive blood vessels were CXCR4-negative (Figure 2f, arrowheads).
These findings indicated that CXCR4-positive endothelial cells existed in OSCC stromata and prompted us to hypothesize that the CXCR4-positive blood vessels could support tumor progression.

3.2. A CXCR4 Antagonist AMD3100 Induced Tumor Necrosis in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC)-Xenotransplanted Mice

We next asked whether a CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 could alter the tumor status of OSCC using tumor xenograft mouse model. Macroscopically, the sizes of tumors were not different between the AMD3100 and saline groups. However, surface ulceration of tumors was notably found in the AMD3100 group but not in the control group (Figure 3a,b).
On histological examination, the transplanted HSC-2 cells formed tumor nests with keratinization and maintained the histological features of well-differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (Figure 3c). There was neither obvious vascular invasion nor perineural invasion. These findings indicated that the characteristics of HSC-2 were maintained well. Necrotic areas were broadly found in the center and periphery of tumors in the AMD3100 group (Figure 3c). Morphologically, in the necrotic areas of the two groups, nuclei of tumor cells were lost, cell cytoplasm was swollen, and eosin-stained debris was seen (Figure 3d,e) while concentrated or broken parts of the nuclei were barely found, indicating that the main manner of cell death in the tumor was necrosis, not apoptosis. The necrotic areas were significantly enlarged in the AMD3100 group compared to the control group (Figure 3f). These findings indicated that CXCR4 antagonism induced tumor necrosis in OSCC in vivo.

3.3. Pathophysiological Structure of Tumor Angiogenic Inhibition with Tumor Necrosis Induced by CXCR4 Antagonism

To investigate the pathological mechanism of tumor necrosis induced by the CXCR4 antagonist, we next investigated structures of vessels in the necrotic tumor. Tumor tissues were likely islands interspersed with necrotic tissue in the AMD3100 group (Figure 4a, left). With a higher power magnification, we found that vessel-associated tumor cells survived, whereas those away from the vessels were necrotic (Figure 4a, right). Tumor island-associated vessels expressed CD34 and, thus, were confirmed to be endothelial cells (Figure 4b,c). The histologically unique phenomenon of tumor necrosis associated with disorganized vasculatures was defined as tumor angiogenic inhibition with tumor necrosis (TAITN) (Figure 4a–c). (Later data prompted us to minor-change the definition.) The vessels located at the center of TAITN were CXCR4-positive (Figure 4d). Any TAITN-like structure was not seen in the saline group. In the saline group, CD34-positive tumor vessels did not infiltrate the necrotic area. TAITN significantly occurred in the AMD3100-treated group but was not found in the control tumors (Figure 4e).
These results indicated that the CXCR4 antagonist triggered TAITN in OSCC tumors.

3.4. Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α Was Induced in Necrotic Tumors under CXCR4 Antagonism

We next hypothesized that the TAITN triggered by CXCR4 antagonism could also induce tumor hypoxia inasmuch as angiogenic inhibition. The major regulator of oxygen tension is hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), a transcription factor complex stabilized under low oxygen tension to mediate cellular responses, which activates and binds to a large number of target genes [32]. The HIF-1 complex is composed of alpha and beta subunits. The alpha subunit of HIF-1 (HIF-1α) is rapidly inactivated and degraded by ubiquitination and subsequent proteasomal pathway, a process that is inhibited under hypoxic conditions [33]. These studies prompted us to ask whether HIF-1α levels could be altered in tumors treated with or without AMD3100. We found that HIF-1α-positive tumor areas tended to be larger in the AMD3100 group than those in the control group (Figure 5a). HIF-1α-positive cells spread in the whole tumor area to the tumor periphery in the CXCR4-inhibited group, whereas HIF-1α-positive cells were limitedly localized in the central area of tumors in the control group (Figure 5b). HIF-1α was increased in cancer cells in the AMD3100-treated mice compared to the untreated mice (Figure 5c,d). The number of HIF-1α-positive cells in the tumors was significantly increased in the AMD3100-treated group compared to the control group (Figure 5d).
These results suggested that intratumoral hypoxia was usually limited in the central area of tumors, whereas CXCR4 antagonism enhanced hypoxia occurring in the whole tumor.

3.5. Tumor Vessels Were Disorganized by CXCR4 Antagonism

We next hypothesized that CXCR4 antagonism-induced tumor necrosis and hypoxia could be mediated by disorganization of vessels, whereby oxygen and nutrition were limited. This hypothesis prompted us to prove a concept of TAITN to be tumor angiogenic inhibition triggered necrosis. We, therefore, asked whether and how CXCR4 antagonism could disrupt structures of blood vessels occupied by viable (non-necrotic) tumor cells. Tumor blood vessels in the AMD3100-treated group were fewer than those in the control (Figure 6a). The tumor blood vessels in the AMD3100-treated group were thinner, shorter, and poorly branched than those in the control (Figure 6b–e, Table 2). The total and average length of blood vessels in the AMD3100 group was significantly shorter than those in the control group (Figure 6c,d). The ratio of blood vessels longer than 100 μm was lesser in the AMD3100-treated group (1.8%) compared to the saline-treated group (6.9%) (Figure 6e and Table 2). The blood vessels shorter than 50 μm were more abundant in the AMD3100 group (86.2%) compared to the control group (76.7%) (Table 2 and Figure 6e).
These data indicated that the CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 exerted a powerful anti-angiogenic effect that disorganized blood vessels in OSCC tumors—a proof of concept for TAITN.

4. Discussion

Our studies revealed that the blood vessels existing in OSCC stroma highly expressed CXCR4 (Figure 1), and CXCR4 antagonism promoted tumor necrosis in OSCC (Figure 3). Therefore, it was conceivable that CXCR4 highly expressed vessels could support tumor survival by supplying nutrients and oxygen. CXCR4 distributed in the blood vessels in the stroma was thought to be involved in tumor progression and survival, consistent with the absence of CXCR4 in the stromal blood vessels of the nontumor area (Figure 2). Consistently, it has been shown that SDF-1/CXCR4 signaling is important in neoangiogenesis as well as infections and immunity [34,35]. Furthermore, the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis plays decisive roles in tumor progression, including the enhancement of migration and invasion, cancer cell–tumor microenvironment interaction, and angiogenesis [27,36,37]. These studies were consistent with our data evidencing the proangiogenic role of CXCR4 in OSCC. Moreover, the participation of the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis in tumor neovascularization through Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-dependent and -independent mechanisms have been reported [38]. It was also shown that CXCR4 upregulated VEGF expression through the Akt signaling pathway in breast cancer [38]. In addition, CXCR4 was reported to be upregulated under hypoxic conditions in glioblastoma, via HIF-1α and VEGF [39]. Several previous studies have demonstrated that HIF-1α plays a crucial role in the expression and regulation of CXCR4 [33,39,40]. It has been reported that hypoxia, particularly HIF-1α, may promote the expression of CXCR4 and activate the SDF-1α/CXCR4 signaling axis, contributing to tumor cell invasion and metastasis. Although a number of studies have reported HIF-1 to the CXCR4 axis, it has not been investigated whether CXCR4 antagonism could alter HIF-1 expression in tumors. Our study indicated that tumor angiogenesis was inhibited by antagonizing CXCR4, although this anti-angiogenesis approach could result in tumor hypoxia inducing HIF-1α. However, our data indicate that the increases in the HIF-1α-positive area can be an indicator of tumor hypoxia and TAITN.
It has been shown that AMD3100 acts as a specific antagonist that blocks the binding pocket of CXCR4 [41,42]. The first clinical trials with AMD3100 were designed for the treatment of HIV. Notably, an increased number of white blood cells was observed in healthy volunteers in phase I clinical trials [43]. These findings led to the discovery that AMD3100 mobilizes CD34-positive human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells from the bone marrow to peripheral blood [44]. AMD3100 was finally approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as a mobilizer of hematopoietic CD34-positive cells from the bone marrow to the circulation [45,46]. However, recent studies applied AMD3100 for cancer treatment [47]. The effective CXCR4-related anti-metastatic therapies may require the daily administration of AMD3100 to continuously prevent the migration of pre-metastatic cells to the metastatic site, which may cause chronic leukocytosis [48]. Our study was performed with the same dose and conditions, whereby no adverse effect of AMD3100 was observed.
Our data notably define novel anti-angiogenic pathophysiology, so-called TAITN. CXCR4 antagonism disorganized vessel structures and induced necrosis in the tumor xenograft mouse model (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Tumor necrosis generally begins at the center of tumor tissue due to intratumoral hypoxia and malnutrition. Such hypoxia and malnutrition occur depending on the distance from tumor blood vessels to the tumor, which inhibits neovascularization, keeping up with tumor growth [49,50]. In our model, CXCR4 antagonism induced tumor necrosis along with hemorrhage (Figure 3). The structure of TAITN was particularly found in the CXCR4-antagonized group but not in the control group (Figure 4). We define TAITN as a pivotal indicator of disorganized branching and angiogenesis of tumor blood vessels. TAITN was induced by CXCR4 antagonism and resulted in hypoxia and enhanced necrosis in tumors.
In this study, suppression of CXCR4 inhibited the formation of tumor blood vessels through reducing the thickness and length of tumor blood vessels (Figure 6). In addition, the CXCR4 expression site in tumor blood vessels was limited to a bifurcation or constricted part of the blood vessels (Figure 2). These results suggest that CXCR4 is involved in tumor blood vessel angiogenesis and branching. As a proof of concept of TAITN, the inhibition of CXCR4 caused angiogenic inhibition, whereby the surrounding tumor tissue was induced with hypoxia and became necrotic. TAITN is a novel, distinctive subtype of necrosis inasmuch as marked suppression of tumor vasculature resulted in the retention of an island-like tumor mass confined by inhibited vessels in the necrotic tissue (Figure 7). Hence, these data could open up CXCR4-targeted personalized therapeutics targeting CXCR4-positive tumor blood vessels.

5. Conclusions

CXCR4 plays a crucial role in tumor angiogenesis required for OSCC progression, whereby TAITN induced by the CXCR4 antagonist could be an effective anti-angiogenic therapeutic strategy in OSCC treatment.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/2073-4409/8/7/761/s1, Table S1: Stage classification, Table S2: Pathological classification of Tumor (pT classification), Table S3: Pathological classification of regional lymph node (pN classification).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.K., T.E.; methodology, H.K., K.N., and K.T.; formal analysis, S.S., S.Y.; investigation, S.Y., H.K, M.W.O., and C.A.; data curation, S.Y., H.K.; writing—original draft preparation, S.Y., H.K.; visualization, S.Y., H.K.; project administration, H.K.; funding, H.K., S.Y.; resources, H.N., H.K.; discussion and supervision, H.N., K.O., and T.E.; writing—reviewing and editing the manuscript, T.E.

Funding

This research was funded by Wesco Scientific Promotion Foundation Grant (H.K.) and Ryobi Teien Memorial Foundation Grant (H.K.). The researchers were funded by the Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI, grant numbers 18K17224 (H.K.), 18K09789 (K.N., H.N.), 19K19160 (S.Y.), 16K11722 (T.E.), and 17K11669 (T.E.).

Acknowledgments

We thank Hirohiko Okamura and Ryusuke Yoshida for critical reviewing of the manuscript and Mika Ikegame, Masaaki Nakayama, Kenta Uchibe, and Yuka Okusha for illuminating discussion.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

CXCR4C-X-C motif chemokine receptor 4
HIF-1αHypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha
IHCImmunohistochemistry
OSCCOral squamous cell carcinoma
SDF-1Stem cell-derived factor-1
TAITNTumor Angiogenic Inhibition Triggered Necrosis
TAITNTumor Angiogenic Inhibition with Tumor Necrosis

References

  1. Bleul, C.C.; Wu, L.; Hoxie, J.A.; Springer, T.A.; Mackay, C.R. The HIV coreceptors CXCR4 and CCR5 are differentially expressed and regulated on human T lymphocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 1925–1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Bleul, C.C.; Farzan, M.; Choe, H.; Parolin, C.; Clark-Lewis, I.; Sodroski, J.; Springer, T.A. The lymphocyte chemoattractant SDF-1 is a ligand for LESTR/fusin and blocks HIV-1 entry. Nature 1996, 382, 829–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hauser, A.E.; Debes, G.F.; Arce, S.; Cassese, G.; Hamann, A.; Radbruch, A.; Manz, R.A. Chemotactic Responsiveness Toward Ligands for CXCR3 and CXCR4 Is Regulated on Plasma Blasts During the Time Course of a Memory Immune Response. J. Immunol. 2002, 169, 1277–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Nakayama, T.; Hieshima, K.; Izawa, D.; Tatsumi, Y.; Kanamaru, A.; Yoshie, O. Cutting edge: Profile of chemokine receptor expression on human plasma cells accounts for their efficient recruitment to target tissues. J. Immunol. 2003, 170, 1136–1140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Schecter, A.D.; Berman, A.B.; Taubman, M.B. Chemokine receptors in vascular smooth muscle. Microcirculation 2003, 10, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Salcedo, R.; Wasserman, K.; Young, H.A.; Grimm, M.C.; Howard, O.M.; Anver, M.R.; Kleinman, H.K.; Murphy, W.J.; Oppenheim, J.J. Vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor induce expression of CXCR4 on human endothelial cells: In vivo neovascularization induced by stromal-derived factor-1alpha. Am. J. Pathol. 1999, 154, 1125–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gupta, S.K.; Lysko, P.G.; Pillarisetti, K.; Ohlstein, E.; Stadel, J.M. Chemokine Receptors in Human Endothelial Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273, 4282–4287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Dwinell, M.B.; Eckmann, L.; Leopard, J.D.; Varki, N.M.; Kagnoff, M.F. Chemokine receptor expression by human intestinal epithelial cells. Gastroenterology 1999, 117, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Murdoch, C.; Monk, P.N.; Finn, A. Functional expression of chemokine receptor CXCR4 on human epithelial cells. Immunology 1999, 98, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bonig, H.; Papayannopoulou, T. Hematopoietic stem cell mobilization: Updated conceptual renditions. Leukemia 2013, 27, 24–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Lataillade, J.J.; Clay, D.; Dupuy, C.; Rigal, S.; Jasmin, C.; Bourin, P.; Le Bousse-Kerdilès, M.C. Chemokine SDF-1 enhances circulating CD34(+) cell proliferation in synergy with cytokines: Possible role in progenitor survival. Blood 2000, 95, 756–768. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  12. Aiuti, A.; Tavian, M.; Cipponi, A.; Ficara, F.; Zappone, E.; Hoxie, J.; Peault, B.; Bordignon, C. Expression of CXCR4, the receptor for stromal cell-derived factor-1 on fetal and adult human lymphohematopoietic progenitors. Eur. J. Immunol. 1999, 29, 1823–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Tachibana, K.; Hirota, S.; Iizasa, H.; Yoshida, H.; Kawabata, K.; Kataoka, Y.; Kitamura, Y.; Matsushima, K.; Yoshida, N.; Nishikawa, S.; et al. The chemokine receptor CXCR4 is essential for vascularization of the gastrointestinal tract. Nature 1998, 393, 591–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Würth, R.; Bajetto, A.; Harrison, J.K.; Barbieri, F.; Florio, T. CXCL12 modulation of CXCR4 and CXCR7 activity in human glioblastoma stem-like cells and regulation of the tumor microenvironment. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 2014, 8, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Schimanski, C.C.; Bahre, R.; Gockel, I.; Müller, A.; Frerichs, K.; Hörner, V.; Teufel, A.; Simiantonaki, N.; Biesterfeld, S.; Wehler, T.; et al. Dissemination of hepatocellular carcinoma is mediated via chemokine receptor CXCR4. Br. J. Cancer 2006, 95, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Sun, Y.; Mao, X.; Fan, C.; Liu, C.; Guo, A.; Guan, S.; Jin, Q.; Li, B.; Yao, F.; Jin, F. CXCL12-CXCR4 axis promotes the natural selection of breast cancer cell metastasis. Tumour Biol. 2014, 35, 7765–7773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Goto, M.; Yoshida, T.; Yamamoto, Y.; Furukita, Y.; Inoue, S.; Fujiwara, S.; Kawakita, N.; Nishino, T.; Minato, T.; Yuasa, Y.; et al. CXCR4 Expression is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2017, 24, 832–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Salmaggi, A.; Gelati, M.; Pollo, B.; Marras, C.; Silvani, A.; Balestrini, M.R.; Eoli, M.; Fariselli, L.; Broggi, G.; Boiardi, A. CXCL12 expression is predictive of a shorter time to tumor progression in low-grade glioma: A single-institution study in 50 patients. J. Neurooncol. 2005, 74, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Bian, X.; Yang, S.; Chen, J.; Ping, Y.; Zhou, X.; Wang, Q.; Jiang, X.; Gong, W.; Xiao, H.; Du, L.; et al. Preferential expression of chemokine receptor CXCR4 by highly malignant human gliomas and its association with poor patient survival. Neurosurgery 2007, 61, 570–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Almofti, A.; Uchida, D.; Begum, N.M.; Tomizuka, Y.; Iga, H.; Yoshida, H.; Sato, M. The clinicopathological significance of the expression of CXCR4 protein in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Int. J. Oncol. 2004, 25, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Rave-Fränk, M.; Tehrany, N.; Kitz, J.; Leu, M.; Weber, H.E.; Burfeind, P.; Schliephake, H.; Canis, M.; Beissbarth, T.; Reichardt, H.M.; et al. Prognostic value of CXCL12 and CXCR4 in inoperable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Strahlenther. Onkol. 2016, 192, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Uchida, D.; Onoue, T.; Kuribayashi, N.; Tomizuka, Y.; Tamatani, T.; Nagai, H.; Miyamoto, Y. Blockade of CXCR4 in oral squamous cell carcinoma inhibits lymph node metastases. Eur. J. Cancer 2011, 47, 452–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Zlotnik, A. Chemokines in neoplastic progression. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2004, 14, 181–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Traweek, S.T.; Kandalaft, P.L.; Mehta, P.; Battifora, H. The human hematopoietic progenitor cell antigen (CD34) in vascular neoplasia. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1991, 96, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Izhak, L.; Wildbaum, G.; Jung, S.; Stein, A.; Shaked, Y.; Karin, N. Dissecting the Autocrine and Paracrine Roles of the CCR2-CCL2 Axis in Tumor Survival and Angiogenesis. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e28305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kioi, M.; Vogel, H.; Schultz, G.; Hoffman, R.M.; Harsh, G.R.; Brown, J.M. Inhibition of vasculogenesis, but not angiogenesis, prevents the recurrence of glioblastoma after irradiation in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2010, 120, 694–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Müller, A.; Homey, B.; Soto, H.; Ge, N.; Catron, D.; Buchanan, M.E.; McClanahan, T.; Murphy, E.; Yuan, W.; Wagner, S.N.; et al. Involvement of chemokine receptors in breast cancer metastasis. Nature 2001, 410, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Viallard, C.; Larrivée, B. Tumor angiogenesis and vascular normalization: Alternative therapeutic targets. Angiogenesis 2017, 20, 409–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yu, J.L.; Rak, J.W. Host microenvironment in breast cancer development: Inflammatory and immune cells in tumour angiogenesis and arteriogenesis. Breast Cancer Res. 2003, 5, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Brierley, J.; Gospodarowicz, M.K.; Wittekind, C. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours; John Wiley & Sons: Oxford, UK; Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2017; ISBN 1119263573. [Google Scholar]
  31. Schneider, C.A.; Rasband, W.S.; Eliceiri, K.W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods 2012, 9, 671–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Haddad, J.J. Oxygen-sensing mechanisms and the regulation of redox-responsive transcription factors in development and pathophysiology. Respir. Res. 2002, 3, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zagzag, D.; Lukyanov, Y.; Lan, L.; Ali, M.A.; Esencay, M.; Mendez, O.; Yee, H.; Voura, E.B.; Newcomb, E.W. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 and VEGF upregulate CXCR4 in glioblastoma: Implications for angiogenesis and glioma cell invasion. Lab. Investig. 2006, 86, 1221–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Loetscher, P.; Moser, B.; Baggiolini, M. Chemokines and Their Receptors in Lymphocyte Traffic and HIV Infection. Adv. Immunol. 1999, 74, 127–180. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kruizinga, R.C.; Bestebroer, J.; Berghuis, P.; de Haas, C.J.C.; Links, T.P.; de Vries, E.G.E.; Walenkamp, A.M.E. Role of chemokines and their receptors in cancer. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2009, 15, 3396–3416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Orimo, A.; Gupta, P.B.; Sgroi, D.C.; Arenzana-Seisdedos, F.; Delaunay, T.; Naeem, R.; Carey, V.J.; Richardson, A.L.; Weinberg, R.A. Stromal fibroblasts present in invasive human breast carcinomas promote tumor growth and angiogenesis through elevated SDF-1/CXCL12 secretion. Cell 2005, 121, 335–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Guo, F.; Wang, Y.; Liu, J.; Mok, S.C.; Xue, F.; Zhang, W. CXCL12/CXCR4: A symbiotic bridge linking cancer cells and their stromal neighbors in oncogenic communication networks. Oncogene 2016, 35, 816–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liang, Z.; Brooks, J.; Willard, M.; Liang, K.; Yoon, Y.; Kang, S.; Shim, H. CXCR4/CXCL12 axis promotes VEGF-mediated tumor angiogenesis through Akt signaling pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 359, 716–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Wang, X.; Li, C.; Chen, Y.; Hao, Y.; Zhou, W.; Chen, C.; Yu, Z. Hypoxia enhances CXCR4 expression favoring microglia migration via HIF-1alpha activation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 371, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ishikawa, T.; Nakashiro, K.; Klosek, S.K.; Goda, H.; Hara, S.; Uchida, D.; Hamakawa, H. Hypoxia enhances CXCR4 expression by activating HIF-1 in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol. Rep. 2009, 21, 707–712. [Google Scholar]
  41. De Clercq, E.; Yamamoto, N.; Pauwels, R.; Balzarini, J.; Witvrouw, M.; De Vreese, K.; Debyser, Z.; Rosenwirth, B.; Peichl, P.; Datema, R. Highly potent and selective inhibition of human immunodeficiency virus by the bicyclam derivative JM3100. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1994, 38, 668–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Donzella, G.A.; Schols, D.; Lin, S.W.; Esté, J.A.; Nagashima, K.A.; Maddon, P.J.; Allaway, G.P.; Sakmar, T.P.; Henson, G.; DeClercq, E.; et al. AMD3100, a small molecule inhibitor of HIV-1 entry via the CXCR4 co-receptor. Nat. Med. 1998, 4, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Hendrix, C.W.; Flexner, C.; MacFarland, R.T.; Giandomenico, C.; Fuchs, E.J.; Redpath, E.; Bridger, G.; Henson, G.W. Pharmacokinetics and Safety of AMD-3100, a Novel Antagonist of the CXCR-4 Chemokine Receptor, in Human Volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 1667–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Broxmeyer, H.E.; Orschell, C.M.; Clapp, D.W.; Hangoc, G.; Cooper, S.; Plett, P.A.; Liles, W.C.; Li, X.; Graham-Evans, B.; Campbell, T.B.; et al. Rapid mobilization of murine and human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells with AMD3100, a CXCR4 antagonist. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 201, 1307–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. DiPersio, J.F.; Micallef, I.N.; Stiff, P.J.; Bolwell, B.J.; Maziarz, R.T.; Jacobsen, E.; Nademanee, A.; McCarty, J.; Bridger, G.; Calandra, G.; et al. Phase III Prospective Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Plerixafor Plus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Compared With Placebo Plus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor for Autologous Stem-Cell Mobilization and Transplantation for Patients With Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2009, 27, 4767–4773. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Devine, S.M.; Vij, R.; Rettig, M.; Todt, L.; McGlauchlen, K.; Fisher, N.; Devine, H.; Link, D.C.; Calandra, G.; Bridger, G.; et al. Rapid mobilization of functional donor hematopoietic cells without G-CSF using AMD3100, an antagonist of the CXCR4/SDF-1 interaction. Blood 2008, 112, 990–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Feig, C.; Jones, J.O.; Kraman, M.; Wells, R.J.B.; Deonarine, A.; Chan, D.S.; Connell, C.M.; Roberts, E.W.; Zhao, Q.; Caballero, O.L.; et al. Targeting CXCL12 from FAP-expressing carcinoma-associated fibroblasts synergizes with anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 20212–20217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kuribayashi, N.; Uchida, D.; Kinouchi, M.; Takamaru, N.; Tamatani, T.; Nagai, H.; Miyamoto, Y. The role of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 on the stromal cell-derived factor-1/CXCR4 system in oral cancer. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e80773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ghezzi, P.; Dinarello, C.A.; Bianchi, M.; Rosandich, M.E.; Repine, J.E.; White, C.W. Hypoxia increases production of interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor by human mononuclear cells. Cytokine 1991, 3, 189–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Knighton, D.R.; Hunt, T.K.; Scheuenstuhl, H.; Halliday, B.J.; Werb, Z.; Banda, M.J. Oxygen tension regulates the expression of angiogenesis factor by macrophages. Science 1983, 221, 1283–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cells 08 00761 g001 550
Figure 1. Investigation of CXCR4-positive and CD34-positive vessels in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) stroma. (a) HE staining of an OSCC tissue for the definition of the tumor and nontumor areas. Tumor and nontumor areas are surrounded by dotted lines. (b) High-power magnification of tumor area stained with HE. Tu: tumor. St: stroma. (c) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for CD34 in tumor and nontumor areas. Borders between epithelia (Ep), connective tissue (Co), tumor (Tu), and stroma (St) are shown with dotted lines. (d) The average number of vessels in the tumor and nontumor areas in a representative OSCC case. p = 0.289, n.s., not significant, N = 10 cases. (e) IHC for CXCR4 in tumor and nontumor areas. (f) High magnification IHC for CXCR4. Arrowheads indicate vessels. CXCR4-positive vessels specifically existed in the tumor area. (g) The average number of CXCR4-positive vessels in the tumor and nontumor areas in a representative OSCC case. ** p < 0.0001, N = 10 cases.
Figure 1. Investigation of CXCR4-positive and CD34-positive vessels in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) stroma. (a) HE staining of an OSCC tissue for the definition of the tumor and nontumor areas. Tumor and nontumor areas are surrounded by dotted lines. (b) High-power magnification of tumor area stained with HE. Tu: tumor. St: stroma. (c) Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for CD34 in tumor and nontumor areas. Borders between epithelia (Ep), connective tissue (Co), tumor (Tu), and stroma (St) are shown with dotted lines. (d) The average number of vessels in the tumor and nontumor areas in a representative OSCC case. p = 0.289, n.s., not significant, N = 10 cases. (e) IHC for CXCR4 in tumor and nontumor areas. (f) High magnification IHC for CXCR4. Arrowheads indicate vessels. CXCR4-positive vessels specifically existed in the tumor area. (g) The average number of CXCR4-positive vessels in the tumor and nontumor areas in a representative OSCC case. ** p < 0.0001, N = 10 cases.
Cells 08 00761 g001
Cells 08 00761 g002 550
Figure 2. Double-fluorescent IHC for CXCR4 and CD34 in tumor and nontumor areas. (a) CXCR4 stained in stromal vessels and tumor cells (red). (b) CD34 stained only on vessels in the tumor stroma (green). (c) A merged IHC image of CD34 and CXCR4. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Arrowheads indicate CXCR4/CD34 double-positive tumor vessels in the OSCC stroma. (d) CXCR4 stained in the nontumor area (red). (e) CD34 stained in the nontumor area (green). (f) A merged IHC image of CD34 and CXCR4. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. CD34-positive endothelial cells were all negative for CXCR4 (arrowheads).
Figure 2. Double-fluorescent IHC for CXCR4 and CD34 in tumor and nontumor areas. (a) CXCR4 stained in stromal vessels and tumor cells (red). (b) CD34 stained only on vessels in the tumor stroma (green). (c) A merged IHC image of CD34 and CXCR4. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Arrowheads indicate CXCR4/CD34 double-positive tumor vessels in the OSCC stroma. (d) CXCR4 stained in the nontumor area (red). (e) CD34 stained in the nontumor area (green). (f) A merged IHC image of CD34 and CXCR4. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. CD34-positive endothelial cells were all negative for CXCR4 (arrowheads).
Cells 08 00761 g002
Cells 08 00761 g003 550
Figure 3. CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 induced tumor necrosis. Mice were injected with HSC-2 cells subcutaneously in the back and head. Seven days after tumor transplantation, AMD3100 or saline was intraperitoneally administrated every day for 21 d. (a) A schematic protocol of tumor injection and AMD3100 administration. (b) Representative photographs of subcutaneous tumors formed in mice. Necrosis and bleeding were observed only in the AMD3100 group. (c) Definition of necrotic areas. Top, HE staining. The areas closed with rectangles are enlarged in “d” and “e”. Bottom, diagrams defining necrotic areas in each tumor. (d,e) High-power magnification views of tumor necrotic areas in the saline-treated mouse (d) and AMD3100-treated mouse (e). The areas are enlarged from Figure 3c. (f) Box-whisker-dot plot of tumor necrotic areas with or without AMD3100 administration. * p = 0.0416, N = 5 mice.
Figure 3. CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 induced tumor necrosis. Mice were injected with HSC-2 cells subcutaneously in the back and head. Seven days after tumor transplantation, AMD3100 or saline was intraperitoneally administrated every day for 21 d. (a) A schematic protocol of tumor injection and AMD3100 administration. (b) Representative photographs of subcutaneous tumors formed in mice. Necrosis and bleeding were observed only in the AMD3100 group. (c) Definition of necrotic areas. Top, HE staining. The areas closed with rectangles are enlarged in “d” and “e”. Bottom, diagrams defining necrotic areas in each tumor. (d,e) High-power magnification views of tumor necrotic areas in the saline-treated mouse (d) and AMD3100-treated mouse (e). The areas are enlarged from Figure 3c. (f) Box-whisker-dot plot of tumor necrotic areas with or without AMD3100 administration. * p = 0.0416, N = 5 mice.
Cells 08 00761 g003
Cells 08 00761 g004 550
Figure 4. Pathological analysis of tumor angiogenic inhibition triggered necrosis (TAITN) induced by CXCR4 antagonism. (a) Representative HE staining of tumor necrotic area in an AMD3100-treated mouse. (b) Representative IHC for CD34 in the tumor necrotic area in an AMD3100-treated mouse. (c) Illustration of the structure of TAITN found in AMD3100-treated mice. Gray, necrotic area. Red, tumor vessels. Brown, tumor area. Islanded tumor areas are surrounded by necrotic area. The center of each tumor island is occupied by vessels. We defined this unique pathophysiological conception as TAITN. (d) IHC for CXCR4 in the TAITN. CXCR4-positive blood vessels were observed at the center of TAITN. (e) The number of vessel-tumor islands in the AMD3100 group and saline group. ** p = 0.0031, N = 5 mice.
Figure 4. Pathological analysis of tumor angiogenic inhibition triggered necrosis (TAITN) induced by CXCR4 antagonism. (a) Representative HE staining of tumor necrotic area in an AMD3100-treated mouse. (b) Representative IHC for CD34 in the tumor necrotic area in an AMD3100-treated mouse. (c) Illustration of the structure of TAITN found in AMD3100-treated mice. Gray, necrotic area. Red, tumor vessels. Brown, tumor area. Islanded tumor areas are surrounded by necrotic area. The center of each tumor island is occupied by vessels. We defined this unique pathophysiological conception as TAITN. (d) IHC for CXCR4 in the TAITN. CXCR4-positive blood vessels were observed at the center of TAITN. (e) The number of vessel-tumor islands in the AMD3100 group and saline group. ** p = 0.0031, N = 5 mice.
Cells 08 00761 g004
Cells 08 00761 g005 550
Figure 5. Distribution of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) in tumors treated with or without CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100. (a) IHC for HIF-1α in the tumor area under low-power magnification. (b) Illustration of HIF-1α distribution in tumors. White area, tumor. Blue area, stroma. (c) IHC of HIF-1α under high-power magnification. (d) The number of HIF-1α-positive tumor cells. * p = 0.02, N = 5 mice.
Figure 5. Distribution of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) in tumors treated with or without CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100. (a) IHC for HIF-1α in the tumor area under low-power magnification. (b) Illustration of HIF-1α distribution in tumors. White area, tumor. Blue area, stroma. (c) IHC of HIF-1α under high-power magnification. (d) The number of HIF-1α-positive tumor cells. * p = 0.02, N = 5 mice.
Cells 08 00761 g005
Cells 08 00761 g006 550
Figure 6. Tumor vessels were disorganized by CXCR4 antagonism. (a) Low-power magnification IHC of CD34. (b) High-power magnification IHC of CD34. (c) The total length of CD34-positive vessels. ** p < 0.0001, N = 25. (d) The average length of CD34-positive vessels. ** p < 0.0001, N = 25. (e) Rate of vessels sized 100~200 μm, and >200 μm.
Figure 6. Tumor vessels were disorganized by CXCR4 antagonism. (a) Low-power magnification IHC of CD34. (b) High-power magnification IHC of CD34. (c) The total length of CD34-positive vessels. ** p < 0.0001, N = 25. (d) The average length of CD34-positive vessels. ** p < 0.0001, N = 25. (e) Rate of vessels sized 100~200 μm, and >200 μm.
Cells 08 00761 g006
Cells 08 00761 g007 550
Figure 7. Graphical abstract: CXCR4 antagonism induced tumor necrosis through vessel disorder. Left, a CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 inhibited CXCR4-positive endothelial cells of tumor vessels. Middle, inhibition of CXCR4-positive endothelial cells induced vessel disorder and caused hypoxia in surrounding tumor cells. Right, necrosis was caused in the surrounding tumor cells through vessel disorder. Taken together, we propose a novel mechanistic concept of “Tumor Angiogenic Inhibition Triggered Necrosis (TAITN)”.
Figure 7. Graphical abstract: CXCR4 antagonism induced tumor necrosis through vessel disorder. Left, a CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 inhibited CXCR4-positive endothelial cells of tumor vessels. Middle, inhibition of CXCR4-positive endothelial cells induced vessel disorder and caused hypoxia in surrounding tumor cells. Right, necrosis was caused in the surrounding tumor cells through vessel disorder. Taken together, we propose a novel mechanistic concept of “Tumor Angiogenic Inhibition Triggered Necrosis (TAITN)”.
Cells 08 00761 g007
Table
Table 1. List of patient-derived samples.
Table 1. List of patient-derived samples.
Sex.AgeTNMStage
Male78T2N2bM0IV a
Male61T1N0M0I
Female76T2N0M0II
Female39T2N0M0II
Male30T1N0M0I
Male62T1N0M0I
Male52T2N0M0II
Female86T2N0M0II
Male72T1N0M0I
Male76T1N0M0I
Assessment of the primary tumor (T), assessment of the regional lymph nodes (N), assessment of distant metastasis (M), and Stage criteria follow the TNM classification defined in Malignant Tumors 8th Edition, published by Union International Cancer Control [30] and the detailed criteria of the stages are shown in Tables S1–S3.
Table
Table 2. Rate of vessels sized <50 μm, 50~100 μm, 100~200 μm, and >200 μm.
Table 2. Rate of vessels sized <50 μm, 50~100 μm, 100~200 μm, and >200 μm.
<5050≤, <100100≤, <200200≤
Saline76.7%16.4%5.8%1.1%
AMD310086.2%11.9%1.6%0.2%

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yoshida, S.; Kawai, H.; Eguchi, T.; Sukegawa, S.; Oo, M.W.; Anqi, C.; Takabatake, K.; Nakano, K.; Okamoto, K.; Nagatsuka, H. Tumor Angiogenic Inhibition Triggered Necrosis (TAITN) in Oral Cancer. Cells 2019, 8, 761. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cells8070761

AMA Style

Yoshida S, Kawai H, Eguchi T, Sukegawa S, Oo MW, Anqi C, Takabatake K, Nakano K, Okamoto K, Nagatsuka H. Tumor Angiogenic Inhibition Triggered Necrosis (TAITN) in Oral Cancer. Cells. 2019; 8(7):761. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cells8070761

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yoshida, Saori, Hotaka Kawai, Takanori Eguchi, Shintaro Sukegawa, May Wathone Oo, Chang Anqi, Kiyofumi Takabatake, Keisuke Nakano, Kuniaki Okamoto, and Hitoshi Nagatsuka. 2019. "Tumor Angiogenic Inhibition Triggered Necrosis (TAITN) in Oral Cancer" Cells 8, no. 7: 761. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cells8070761

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop