Next Article in Journal
Preemptive Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Applications of Neuroactive Steroids in a Rodent Model of Post-Surgical Pain: Evidence for the Role of T-Type Calcium Channels
Next Article in Special Issue
Cancer Stem Cells: Significance in Origin, Pathogenesis and Treatment of Glioblastoma
Previous Article in Journal
Current Advances in Burkholderia Vaccines Development
Previous Article in Special Issue
BR-BCSC Signature: The Cancer Stem Cell Profile Enriched in Brain Metastases that Predicts a Worse Prognosis in Lymph Node-Positive Breast Cancer
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The mRNA Distribution of Cancer Stem Cell Marker CD90/Thy-1 Is Comparable in Hepatocellular Carcinoma of Eastern and Western Populations

1
Fondazione Italiana Fegato ONLUS, AREA Science Park Basovizza, 34149 Trieste, Italy
2
Center for Molecular Biomedicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
3
Laboratory of Stem Cell Research and Application, VNUHCM-University of Science, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
4
Clinical Surgery Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliana Isontina (ASUGI), 34148 Trieste, Italy
5
Surgical Pathology Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliana Isontina (ASUGI), 34148 Trieste, Italy
6
Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy
7
Doctoral School in Molecular Biomedicine, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy
8
University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
9
Department of Pathology, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh, Ho Chi Minh City 700000, Vietnam
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 26 November 2020 / Revised: 7 December 2020 / Accepted: 10 December 2020 / Published: 12 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cancer Stem Cells (CSC))

Abstract

:
Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) showed a correlation between incidence and geographical-relevant risk factors. This study aims to compare the distributions of cancer stem cells (CSC) in two distant populations in Asia and Europe. We analyzed 52 and 43 selected HCC patients undergoing hepatectomy in Ho Chi Minh City (Vietnam) and Trieste (Italy). Each patient sample consisted of HCC, peri-HCC, and non-tumoral (distal) tissue. Demographic data were recorded together with clinical findings. The protocol for the collection of tissue samples and RNA was standardized in both laboratories and gene expression analysis was performed in a single laboratory with identical PCR conditions. Baseline data showed comparable laboratory findings between the two cohorts. mRNA distribution showed a comparable pattern of all CSC markers analyzed with the expression of CD90 progressively increasing from distal and peri-HCC to be highest in HCC (p < 0.001), confirmed by immunofluorescence data. CD90 mRNA distribution was related to HBV-related HCC and a tumor diameter less than 5 cm. Patients with high tumoral CD90 mRNA had a shorter time (p < 0.05) to tumor recurrence compared to patients with lower CD90. This comparative study showed that CD90 mRNA expressions are comparable between Eastern and Western HCC cases.

1. Introduction

Liver cancer is one of the most common cancers, being the second cause of cancer-related death worldwide in which hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for about 90% of liver cancer cases [1,2]. The incidence of HCC is closely associated with its known underlying etiologies, mostly due to liver cirrhosis caused by chronic viral hepatitis B and C infection, alcohol abuse, and aflatoxin exposure [3]. In Eastern Asia and Africa, the highest factor is a chronic infection of hepatitis B virus (HBV), whereas, in Western countries and Japan, chronic infection of hepatitis C virus is the highest risk factor [4]. Thus, the incidence of HCC shows a significant geographical distribution, with the highest number of cases in Eastern Asia predominantly being HBV-related.
HCC is a vast heterogeneous tumor, mostly caused by various etiological factors and oncogenic transformations, which lead to histological diversity, varied tumor progression, and distinct molecular signatures [5,6]. The search for a common biomarker that could represent hepatocarcinogenesis in diverse HCC cases will be useful not only in a basic study but also in the development of diagnostic tools or potential treatment.
In the cellular context, various cell types co-exist in HCC tissues with their specific functions. One of the most important cellular populations, the cancer stem cells (CSC), are the tumorigenic cells within the tumor mass with normal stem cell properties such as self-renewal and multi-differentiation into multiple cell types [7]. These cells are important not only due to their cancer-initiating capacity, but also because of their chemo- and radio-resistance behavior [8,9,10], and recently also their capacity to escape molecular targeting therapy [11,12].
Multiple CSC markers have been used to identify hepatic CSC, with the most common ones the CD90/Thy-1, CD133/Prom-1, and CD326/EpCAM. The combination of these markers determines additional subpopulations in one CSC population, resulting in a wide variety of hepatic CSC phenotypes, also within a single tumor [13]. In the clinical setting, high expressions of CSC markers CD90, CD133, and EpCAM in HCC tissues had been associated with cellular differentiation, poor prognosis, and metastasis [14,15,16,17,18].
Currently, available data was mostly based on a specific patient population, mostly in Asian studies. Since HCC is multi-factorial and geographically-specific, in this study we demonstrated that the mRNA expression patterns of CSC markers, especially CD90, can be used to study both Western and Eastern populations, showing their relevance in hepatocarcinogenesis.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Human Liver Tissues

We analyzed two distant populations of selected HCC patients undergoing partial hepatectomy, 52 patients from Vietnam, and 43 patients in Italy. From each patient, three different portions of liver tissue were collected, consisting of HCC, peri-HCC, and distant non-tumoral tissue (distal) for a total of more than 200 tissue samples. Demographic data were recorded together with clinical findings including histology, laboratory measurements, tumor parameters, and treatment outcomes. Informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from each patient or by a legal representative. The study was approved by the ethical committees of the UMP Ho Chi Minh City no. 240/DHYD-HDDD and the Comitato Etico Regionale Unico of the Friuli Venezia Giulia, Prot. No. 18854.
The protocol of sample collection (size, type of tissues, and storage condition) was agreed upon and standardized in both laboratories. Immediately after surgery, fresh liver tissues were collected and stabilized in RNAlater stabilizing solution (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) or snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. In parallel, liver tissues were fixed in formalin and included in the paraffin block. The fixed slices were subjected to Hematoxylin and Eosin (HE) and immunostaining. Two independent pathologists (UMC Ho Chi Minh city and ASUGI Trieste) performed histological analysis. The final diagnosis of patients was established in agreement based on international criteria together with its clinical findings.

2.2. Total RNA Isolation and Reverse Transcription

Protocol RNA extraction was standardized in both laboratories. Total RNA was extracted using the TriReagent (Sigma–Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) according to the manufacture’s protocol. RNA was quantified at 260 nm in a DU®730 spectrophotometer (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA, USA). The integrity of RNA was assessed using an RNA 6000 Nano Kit in BioAnalyzer (Illumina, Agilent Technologies, St Clara, CA, USA) or gel electrophoresis and measuring the ratio A260/A280 with appropriate purity values between 1.8 and 2.0.

2.3. Reverse Transcription—Quantitative Real-Time PCR (RT–qPCR)

RT-qPCR of all samples was performed in a single laboratory using identical controls, primer sets, and operators. Reverse Transcription (RT) was performed to obtain cDNA from 1 µg of purified RNA with the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kits (Applied Biosystem, Foster City, CA, USA) according to the manufacture’s protocol. Real-time PCR was performed according to the SYBR Green Supermix protocol (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). PCR amplification was carried out in 15 µL reaction volume containing 25 ng cDNA, 1 × iQ5 SYBR Green Supermix—composed by 100 nM KCl, 40 nM Tris-Hcl, pH 8.4, 0.4 mM each dNTP, 40 U/mL iTaq DNA polymerase, 6 mM MgCl2, SYBR Green I, 20 mM fluorescein, and stabilizers—(Bio-Rad), and 250 nM of gene-specific forward and reverse primers.
The primer sequences are designed using Beacon Designer 7.9 Software (PREMIER Biosoft International, Palo Alto, CA, USA) as follows: 18s-rRNA (5′-TAACCCGTTGAACCCCATT-3′ and 5′-CCATCCAATCGGTAGTAGCG-3′), ACTB (5′-CGCCGCCAGCTCACCATG-3′ and 5′-CACGATGGAGGGGAAGACGG-3′), CD90 (5′-AGAGACTTGGATGAGGAG-3′ and 5′-CTGAGAATGCTGGAGATG-3′), CD133 (5′-CATCTGCTCTCTGCTGAC-3′ and 5′-AACTTAATCCAACTCCAACC-3′) and EpCAM (5′-GAATAATAATCGTCAATGCCAGTG-3′ and 5′-CGCTCTCATCGCAGTCAG-3′). The reaction was run in the CFX 9600 or IQ5 real-time PCR system (Bio-Rad). Calculation of gene expression was based on cycling determination and was analyzed using the modification of the ΔΔCt equation, taking account on the efficiency of the reaction. Melting curve analysis was carried out to assess templates specificity.

2.4. Immunofluorescence

The immunofluorescence (IF) analysis was performed on the paraffinated tissues section used for histological analysis. The tissue of the paired tumor and non-tumoral control was subjected to CD90 staining. After de-paraffinization with xylene and rehydration with a gradual concentration of ethanol, antigen retrieval was performed by microwave heat in 10 mM sodium citrate pH 6.0. The anti-human CD90-FITC conjugated antibody (Stem Cells Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada) was added and the nucleus was stained using Hoechst 33342. CD90 protein positivity was observed by using a fluorescence microscope Leica DM2000 (Leica Camera AG, Solms, Germany).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables of CSC mRNA distribution as detected by RT-qPCR were given as a median (quartile 1—quartile 3; Q1—Q3). Graphics, survival curves, and statistical analyses were constructed using software GraphPad Prism version 5.01 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA). Differences within a cohort were calculated by non-parametric analysis with the Mann–Whitney test (two groups) and Kruskal–Wallis test with Bonferroni correction (three groups). For the comparison between two cohorts, a Chi-square analysis was performed. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves and the log-rank test. The cut-off value for the area under the curve (AUC) was defined by a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve plotting the true positive rate (sensitivity) against false positive rate (100—specificity). Statistical significance was set to 0.05 and presented as * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.

3. Results

3.1. Patients’ Demographic and Clinical Baseline

The demographic and clinical features of the HCC patients in both cohorts are shown in Table 1. Both groups were mainly male for around 77% and 83% of Italian (Western) and Vietnamese (Eastern) patients, respectively. In the Eastern cohort, the mean age was significantly younger (p < 0.001), and as for HCC etiology, as expected, it was majorly related to HBV infection as compared to HCV/metabolic in Italian patients (p < 0.0001).
Regarding the HCC class and tumor parameter, no significant differences were noted between the cohorts. Most of the patients were Child-Pugh-Turcotte class A (88% and 93% for Italian and Vietnamese HCC, respectively). Also, for tumor nodule characteristics, most of the tumors were single nodules with no vascular invasion. Regarding the Edmonson-Steiner histological differentiation grade, both groups were predominantly well- and moderately-differentiated ES1-2 compared to poorly-differentiated ES3-4 for 77% vs. 23% for Italian and 71% vs. 29% for Vietnamese HCCs.
For serum biochemical analysis, except for a significantly higher aspartate transaminase (AST) level in the Vietnamese group, no other differences were noticed for the levels of alanine transaminase (ALT) and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). Mentioned as a median (Q1–Q3), the level of AST and ALT were 28 (23–73) and 28 (19–62) U/mL for Italian samples and 39 (29–75) and 38 (21–69) U/mL for Vietnamese samples. As for the AFP level, 56% Italian patients had an AFP level lower than 20 ng/mL, 17% between 20 ng/mL and 400 ng/mL, and 16% with AFP level above 400 ng/mL, while 31% Vietnamese patients had an AFP level lower than 20 ng/mL, 31% between 20 ng/mL and 400 ng/mL, and 21%with an AFP level above 400 ng/mL.

3.2. High Expression of CD90 mRNA Expression in the HCC Nodule

The relative mRNA expression in human tissue specimens was analyzed by RT-qPCR and expressed in arbitrary units (au) with a control sample considered as 1 au. By RTqPCR, we screened the expressions of the most common CSC markers: CD90 (Thy-1), CD133 (Prom-1), and EpCAM (CD326). The specificity and sensitivity of primer sets were tested on HCC cell lines expressing these markers (data not shown).
As shown in Figure 1A, comparable trends of CSC markers distribution between Italian and Vietnamese samples were noticed, in particular for CD90. The CD90 mRNA expression was progressively up-regulated from distal, peri-HCC, and highest in HCC nodules in both Vietnamese and Italian samples (p < 0.001 for HCC compared to peri-HCC and distal). The values were 0.99 (0.47–1.87) and 0.34 (0.13–0.57) for distal, 2.00 (0.92–6.87) and 0.49 (0.14–1.56) for peri-HCC, and 11.3 (3.30–24.03) and 2.25 (0.96–4.99) for HCC, for Vietnamese and Italian cohorts, respectively, represented as the median (Q1–Q3). The average extent of the up-regulation of CD90 in HCC compared to distal tissue was comparable between the two cohorts.
In contrast to CD90, the CD133 mRNA in Vietnamese samples was down-regulated in HCC nodules compared to peri-HCC and distal portions (p < 0.001), while its distribution in Italian samples was highly variable. EpCAM mRNA expression was observed to be inconsistent in both groups and did not show any statistically significant values. The CD90 mRNA was expressed in all HCC nodules analyzed. On the other hand, the CD133 and EpCAM were absent in around 33% and 13% of samples, respectively.
Figure 1B showed the expression of CSC markers in six representative patients from each cohort. The CD90 mRNA expression was up-regulated from distal, peri-HCC, to HCC, compared to variable expressions of CD133 and EpCAM.

3.3. CD90 mRNA Expression Is Related to HBV Infection

Since the CD90 is a marker for several cell types in the liver, we then performed further analysis on the significance of CD90 mRNA expression in HCC nodules with clinical and pathological parameters. As shown in Table 2, CD90 expression was related to HBV infection (in the Vietnamese and combined cohort, p < 0.05) and poor-differentiation grade ES3-4 (in Italian cohort, p < 0.05). Further, a high CD90 mRNA level was significantly noticed in small tumors less than 5 cm in diameter (p < 0.05).

3.4. HCC CD90 mRNA for Diagnostic and Prognostic Value

When considering the diagnostic value of CD90 mRNA, the area under the curve (AUC, 95% CI) of the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.83 (0.76–0.90) (p < 0.0001), distinguishing non-tumoral distal to HCC from all samples in both cohorts. Comparing HCC to peri-HCC, the AUC was slightly decreased to 0.73 (0.63–0.83) (p < 0.001) (Figure 2A). By using an ROC curve of HCC vs distal, a cut-off value of mRNA expression of 3.8 au was defined with 91% specificity.
Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to associate the level of CD90 mRNA with HCC recurrence within one-year post-surgery in both cohorts (Figure 2B). We found that patients with HCC CD90 mRNA higher than 3.8 au had a shorter time to tumor recurrence compared to patients with lower CD90 with tumor recurrence mean (95% CI) of 15.4 (11.8–19.0) vs. 25.2 (12.6–37.7) months after surgery, respectively (p < 0.05). For the Kaplan–Meier analysis, even though no significant value was noticed, the difference between the two groups was noticed at around six-months post-surgery. The analysis of a separated cohort with adjusted cut-off values showed a similar trend (data not shown). This data indicated that HCC CD90 mRNA might have a positive prognostic value.

3.5. Positive Staining of CD90 Protein in the HCC Nodule

To investigate if the increased CD90 gene up-regulation was associated with an increased amount of protein, the CD90 protein content was assessed by IF in the paired tissue of HCC and its non-tumoral tissue. As shown in a representative photo in Figure 2C, CD90 positive cells were markedly present in HCC compared to the distal region. This confirmed the RNA distribution data.

4. Discussion

Due to its different etiologies, various risk factors, and long-term disease development, HCC tissue is vastly heterogeneous. Further, HCC, as other malignant solid tumors, exhibits a complex genetic diversity and genomic instability, driving tumorigenesis [19]. Heterogeneity of HCC is not only represented by the macro tumoral tissue organization and cancer cell morphology [20,21] but also in extensive –omics analysis. Extensive global transcriptomics studies identified subgroups of HCC associated with clinical and genetic characteristics, including HBV infection, host genetics, and aberrant molecular pathways [6,22].
Here we performed a simple comparative study on the distribution of most common CSC markers mRNA in two distinct populations, the Vietnamese and the Italian HCCs, representing the Eastern and Western cohort. The nature of HCC in Asian versus Western countries was different in terms of epidemiology and human genetics. From the disease management and therapy development, they approached different existing guidelines and consensus statements, and in clinical outcomes in clinical trials [23]. Thus, this information would be informative, not only in basic knowledge of hepatocarcinogenesis but also in the management of the disease.
From this study, we observed the CD90 as the most significant marker of hepatocarcinogenesis compared to CD133 and EpCAM. CD90 mRNA was detected in 100% of samples analyzed compared to 67% and 87% for CD133 and EpCAM, respectively. Its distribution was progressively increased from the most distant part of the tumor to the border of HCC and is highest in the HCC nodule. Further, CD90 mRNA expression seemed to be positively correlated with the disease outcome of the patients. Patients with low CD90 in HCC nodules had later recurrence of HCC compared to patients with high CD90.
CD90 (Thy-1) is a 25–37 kDa glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored glycoprotein expressed in many cell types such as T cells, thymocytes, neurons, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts. It plays a relevant activity in the regulation of cell–cell and cell–matrix interaction, apoptosis, adhesion, migration, cancer, and fibrosis [24]. Several functions of CD90 have been described in physiological and pathological processes, mostly in its CD90 interactions with ligands such as integrins αv/β3, αx/β2, syndecan-4, CD90 itself, and CD97 [25]. CD90 was extensively studied in various types of cancers, as a tumor suppressor or tumor promoter [26], highlighting the importance of this molecule in the progression of the disease. In HCC, CD90 had been proposed as an important marker of hepatic CSC in various studies [10,27,28,29,30].
We had reported the expression of CD90 mRNA in a smaller number of liver tissues of Vietnamese patients [31] and previously, in Italian patients [32]. Here, we expanded the sample size also by adding the peri-HCC portion to observe the progression of liver disease in an individual patient. To perform a direct comparison between two cohorts, we standardized tissue collection and performed the analysis of all samples in a single laboratory with the same protocol allowing a direct assessment between two populations. Our data confirmed the importance of CD90 in hepatocarcinogenesis, including its correlation to HBV infection, poor histological grade, and prognosis [14,17].
As for diagnostic and prognostic value, this study has a limitation due to the tissue materials obtained from hepatectomy. Further, a cut-off value for relative mRNA expression could be variable between laboratories, thus an exact value might be different. However, this study has its strength since the patients did not receive previous treatment, thus representing the real natural course of hepatocarcinogenesis, also in an individual patient. Previous studies showed the clinical significance of the presence of CD90+ circulating tumor cells and circulating CSC in HCC [27,28,30,33], indicating the expression of CD90 either in in situ or in circulation is related to disease outcome. It should be also noted that in prostate cancer patients, proteomic analysis of urine identified a CD90 variant. Inversely, CD90 was not detected in the urine of post-prostatectomy patients [34]. This evidence provides another non-invasive detection and analysis of CD90.
In summary, this comparative study showed that CD90 mRNA expressions are comparable between Eastern and Western HCC cases, suggesting a common indicator of hepatocarcinogenesis. A high level of CD90 mRNA can be associated with tumor recurrence, thus adding current knowledge for the development of future diagnostic and therapeutic tools.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.H.C.S., H.L.T.P., and C.T.; Sampling and data collection, A.B.L., P.T., D.B., L.D.C.T., T.P.T.D., H.L.T.P. and L.S.C.; Methodology, A.B.L., H.Q.D., C.B., L.K.D.C. and C.H.C.S.; Study supervision: C.H.C.S., H.L.T.P. and C.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This report was funded by a grant of the International Cooperation with Vietnam from the Regione of Friuli Venezia Giulia (“Hepnam”—DGR 2195 dd 20/12/2019) to the Fondazione Italiana Fegato. The cost of the study was supported by an intramural research grant of the Fondazione Italiana Fegato and Finanziamento per la Ricerca di Ateneo (project code U14SCFRA14, CdA dd. 19.12.2014). C.H.C.S. is funded by the 2020 grant of the Fondazione Umberto Veronesi, Milan, Italy, and L.K.D.C. by a fellowship of the Department of Science and Technology and the Philippine Council for Health Research and Development (DoST-PCHRD).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Ferlay, J.; Colombet, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Mathers, C.; Parkin, D.M.; Piñeros, M.; Znaor, A.; Bray, F. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int. J. Cancer 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Galle, P.R.; Forner, A.; Llovet, J.M.; Mazzaferro, V.; Piscaglia, F.; Raoul, J.-L.; Schirmacher, P.; Vilgrain, V. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 2018, 69, 182–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Global Burden of Disease Liver Cancer Collaboration; Akinyemiju, T.; Abera, S.; Ahmed, M.; Alam, N.; Alemayohu, M.A.; Allen, C.; Al-Raddadi, R.; Alvis-Guzman, N.; Amoako, Y.; et al. The Burden of Primary Liver Cancer and Underlying Etiologies From 1990 to 2015 at the Global, Regional, and National Level: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. JAMA Oncol. 2017, 3, 1683–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zucman-Rossi, J. Molecular classification of hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig. Liver Dis. 2010, 42 (Suppl. S3), S235–S241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Boyault, S.; Rickman, D.S.; de Reyniès, A.; Balabaud, C.; Rebouissou, S.; Jeannot, E.; Hérault, A.; Saric, J.; Belghiti, J.; Franco, D.; et al. Transcriptome classification of HCC is related to gene alterations and to new therapeutic targets. Hepatology 2007, 45, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Clarke, M.F.; Dick, J.E.; Dirks, P.B.; Eaves, C.J.; Jamieson, C.H.M.; Jones, D.L.; Visvader, J.; Weissman, I.L.; Wahl, G.M. Cancer stem cells—Perspectives on current status and future directions: AACR Workshop on cancer stem cells. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 9339–9344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Li, J.; Chen, J.-N.; Zeng, T.-T.; He, F.; Chen, S.-P.; Ma, S.; Bi, J.; Zhu, X.-F.; Guan, X.-Y. CD133+ liver cancer stem cells resist interferon-gamma-induced autophagy. BMC Cancer 2016, 16, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kimura, O.; Kondo, Y.; Kogure, T.; Kakazu, E.; Ninomiya, M.; Iwata, T.; Morosawa, T.; Shimosegawa, T. Expression of EpCAM increases in the hepatitis B related and the treatment-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma. BioMed Res. Int. 2014, 2014, 172913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Luo, J.; Wang, P.; Wang, R.; Wang, J.; Liu, M.; Xiong, S.; Li, Y.; Cheng, B. The Notch pathway promotes the cancer stem cell characteristics of CD90+ cells in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 9525–9537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Hagiwara, S.; Kudo, M.; Nagai, T.; Inoue, T.; Ueshima, K.; Nishida, N.; Watanabe, T.; Sakurai, T. Activation of JNK and high expression level of CD133 predict a poor response to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer 2012, 106, 1997–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Kim, B.H.; Park, J.-W.; Kim, J.S.; Lee, S.-K.; Hong, E.K. Stem Cell Markers Predict the Response to Sorafenib in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Gut Liver 2019, 13, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Sukowati, C.H.C. Heterogeneity of Hepatic Cancer Stem Cells. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019, 1139, 59–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lu, J.-W.; Chang, J.-G.; Yeh, K.-T.; Chen, R.-M.; Tsai, J.J.P.; Hu, R.-M. Overexpression of Thy1/CD90 in human hepatocellular carcinoma is associated with HBV infection and poor prognosis. Acta Histochem. 2011, 113, 833–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ma, S. Biology and clinical implications of CD133(+) liver cancer stem cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2013, 319, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sung, J.J.; Noh, S.J.; Bae, J.S.; Park, H.S.; Jang, K.Y.; Chung, M.J.; Moon, W.S. Immunohistochemical Expression and Clinical Significance of Suggested Stem Cell Markers in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J. Pathol. Transl. Med. 2016, 50, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, R.; Shen, Y.; Nan, K.; Mi, B.; Wu, T.; Guo, J.; Li, M.; Lv, Y.; Guo, H. Association Between Expression of Cancer Stem Cell Markers and Poor Differentiation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). Medicine 2015, 94, e1306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Guo, Z.; Li, L.-Q.; Jiang, J.-H.; Ou, C.; Zeng, L.-X.; Xiang, B.-D. Cancer stem cell markers correlate with early recurrence and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 2098–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Schulze, K.; Zucman-Rossi, J. Current issues on genomic heterogeneity in hepatocellular carcinoma and its implication in clinical practice. Hepatic Oncol. 2015, 2, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Edmondson, H.A.; Steiner, P.E. Primary carcinoma of the liver: A study of 100 cases among 48,900 necropsies. Cancer 1954, 7, 462–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Callea, F. Natural history of hepatocellular carcinoma as viewed by the pathologist. Appl. Pathol. 1988, 6, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Hoshida, Y.; Nijman, S.M.B.; Kobayashi, M.; Chan, J.A.; Brunet, J.-P.; Chiang, D.Y.; Villanueva, A.; Newell, P.; Ikeda, K.; Hashimoto, M.; et al. Integrative transcriptome analysis reveals common molecular subclasses of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 7385–7392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Choo, S.P.; Tan, W.L.; Goh, B.K.P.; Tai, W.M.; Zhu, A.X. Comparison of hepatocellular carcinoma in Eastern versus Western populations. Cancer 2016, 122, 3430–3446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Rege, T.A.; Hagood, J.S. Thy-1 as a regulator of cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions in axon regeneration, apoptosis, adhesion, migration, cancer, and fibrosis. FASEB J. 2006, 20, 1045–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Sauzay, C.; Voutetakis, K.; Chatziioannou, A.; Chevet, E.; Avril, T. CD90/Thy-1, a Cancer-Associated Cell Surface Signaling Molecule. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kumar, A.; Bhanja, A.; Bhattacharyya, J.; Jaganathan, B.G. Multiple roles of CD90 in cancer. Tumor Biol. 2016, 37, 11611–11622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yang, Z.F.; Ho, D.W.; Ng, M.N.; Lau, C.K.; Yu, W.C.; Ngai, P.; Chu, P.W.K.; Lam, C.T.; Poon, R.T.P.; Fan, S.T. Significance of CD90+ cancer stem cells in human liver cancer. Cancer Cell 2008, 13, 153–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Yang, Z.F.; Ngai, P.; Ho, D.W.; Yu, W.C.; Ng, M.N.P.; Lau, C.K.; Li, M.L.Y.; Tam, K.H.; Lam, C.T.; Poon, R.T.P.; et al. Identification of local and circulating cancer stem cells in human liver cancer. Hepatology 2008, 47, 919–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yamashita, T.; Honda, M.; Nakamoto, Y.; Baba, M.; Nio, K.; Hara, Y.; Zeng, S.S.; Hayashi, T.; Kondo, M.; Takatori, H.; et al. Discrete nature of EpCAM+ and CD90+ cancer stem cells in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2013, 57, 1484–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhu, L.; Zhang, W.; Wang, J.; Liu, R. Evidence of CD90+CXCR4+ cells as circulating tumor stem cells in hepatocellular carcinoma. Tumor Biol. 2015, 36, 5353–5360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Do, H.Q.; Luong, A.B.; Bonazza, D.; Bottin, C.; Doan, T.P.; Tran, L.D.; Truong, N.H.; Tell, G.; Pham, H.L.; Tiribelli, C.; et al. Differential capacity of CD90+ cells in autophagy activation following chemotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann. Hepatol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sukowati, C.; Anfuso, B.; Torre, G.; Francalanci, P.; Crocè, L.S.; Tiribelli, C. The expression of CD90/Thy-1 in hepatocellular carcinoma: An in vivo and in vitro study. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e76830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Bahnassy, A.A.; Zekri, A.-R.N.; El-Bastawisy, A.; Fawzy, A.; Shetta, M.; Hussein, N.; Omran, D.; Ahmed, A.A.S.; El-Labbody, S.S. Circulating tumor and cancer stem cells in hepatitis C virus-associated liver disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 18240–18248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. True, L.D.; Zhang, H.; Ye, M.; Huang, C.-Y.; Nelson, P.S.; von Haller, P.D.; Tjoelker, L.W.; Kim, J.-S.; Qian, W.-J.; Smith, R.D.; et al. CD90/THY1 is overexpressed in prostate cancer-associated fibroblasts and could serve as a cancer biomarker. Mod. Pathol. 2010, 23, 1346–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Distribution of CSC markers in the Eastern and Western cohorts. (A) mRNA expression of CSC markers CD90/THY-1, CD133/Prom-1, and EpCAM/CD326 in distal, peri-HCC, and HCC tissues. The expression of a sample was considered as 1.0. *** p < 0.001. Graphs are represented as median (bar) and 95% CI. (B) mRNA expression of CSC markers in six representative patients of each cohort shows clear up-regulation of CD90. Distal = 1.0, Pt = patient. The target gene was normalized to two reference genes ACTB and 18sRNA.
Figure 1. Distribution of CSC markers in the Eastern and Western cohorts. (A) mRNA expression of CSC markers CD90/THY-1, CD133/Prom-1, and EpCAM/CD326 in distal, peri-HCC, and HCC tissues. The expression of a sample was considered as 1.0. *** p < 0.001. Graphs are represented as median (bar) and 95% CI. (B) mRNA expression of CSC markers in six representative patients of each cohort shows clear up-regulation of CD90. Distal = 1.0, Pt = patient. The target gene was normalized to two reference genes ACTB and 18sRNA.
Cells 09 02672 g001
Figure 2. HCC CD90 mRNA expression for diagnostic and prognostic value. (A) Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve to distinguish HCC from distal (left) and peri-HCC (right) from Vietnamese and Italian cohorts. AUC = area under the curve. (B) Kaplan–Meier analysis of HCC recurrence in 12-months after hepatectomy. The graph represents 30-months of patient follow-ups. CD90 mRNA expression higher than 3.8 au is associated with a shorter recurrence time compared to lower expression. (C) Hematoxylin and Eosin (H & E) staining and immunofluorescence of CD90 in a representative paired HCC and distal tissue. CD90 protein is stained in green and the nucleus in blue. Magnification: objective 40×.
Figure 2. HCC CD90 mRNA expression for diagnostic and prognostic value. (A) Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve to distinguish HCC from distal (left) and peri-HCC (right) from Vietnamese and Italian cohorts. AUC = area under the curve. (B) Kaplan–Meier analysis of HCC recurrence in 12-months after hepatectomy. The graph represents 30-months of patient follow-ups. CD90 mRNA expression higher than 3.8 au is associated with a shorter recurrence time compared to lower expression. (C) Hematoxylin and Eosin (H & E) staining and immunofluorescence of CD90 in a representative paired HCC and distal tissue. CD90 protein is stained in green and the nucleus in blue. Magnification: objective 40×.
Cells 09 02672 g002
Table 1. Demography and clinical-pathological characteristics of the HCC patients in the study.
Table 1. Demography and clinical-pathological characteristics of the HCC patients in the study.
ParameterEastern CohortWestern Cohortp
n5243
Age (mean, 95%CI)58 (55–61)66 (63–69)<0.001
Sex (M/F)43/933/10ns
Etiology <0.0001
HBV (%)33 (63%)7 (16%)
HCV (%)9 (17%)14 (33%)
Metabolic/Alcohol (%)10 (19%)18 (42%)
Others0 (0%)4 (9%)
Disease scores ns
CTP score A/B/C43/3/038/5/0
Tumor parameters
Number (single/multiple/NA)36/8/837/6ns
Vascular invasion (yes/no/NA)10/42/010/28/5ns
ES grade (ES1/ES2/ES3-4/NA)17/15/13/711/19/9/4ns
Serum transaminases
ALT (U/mL) [median (Q1–Q3)]38 (29–75)26 (19–62)ns
AST (U/mL) [median (Q1–Q3)]39 (29–75)28 (23–73)<0.05
Alpha fetoprotein ns
<20 ng/mL1624
20–400 ng/mL168
>400 ng/mL117
NA94
Table 2. Correlation between CD90 mRNA expression in HCC nodule and demography and clinical parameters of patients.
Table 2. Correlation between CD90 mRNA expression in HCC nodule and demography and clinical parameters of patients.
Relative CD90 mRNA Expression in HCC (Median, Q1–Q3)
Parameter Eastern CohortWestern CohortBoth
Age<6510.5 (2.6–23.8)1.0 (0.9–2.6)7.3 (1.4–17.8)
≥6512.5 (4.5–33.7)2.5 (0.4–5.4)4.7 (1.6–13.1)
Sex M11.7 (4.1–25.7)1.5 (0.5–6.5)7.5 (1.3–16.3)
F9.4 (2.4–21.9)2.5 (1.0–3.6)3.0 (2.2–11.5)
Etiology HBV14.3 (6.3–34.5) *1.0 (0.1–8.0)12.9 (2.5–26.3) *
HCV12.1 (1.9–20.8)2.6 (1.1–5.6)2.8 (1.5–13.6)
Metabolic6.3 (2.5–11.5)3.8 (0.6–8.6)4.5 (2.3–11.5)
ES gradeES 1–212.9 (2.7–26.3)1.0 (0.4–2.6) *3.1 (1.0–15.3)
ES 3–48.6 (2.4–18.3)3.7 (1.4–13.3)6.9 (1.7–13.4)
AFP (ng/mL)<20 ng/mL12.1 (7.7–23.6)2.2 (1.0–5.6)5.8 (1.6–13.8)
>20 ng/mL11.3 (2.2–29.6)1.4 (0.3–4.5)4.8 (1.3–17.2)
HCC diameter<5 cm16.8 (10.8–46.8) *2.8 (1.2–7.2) *8.6 (2.3–16.8) *
>5 cm11.2 (4.9–19.8)0.5 (0.2–2.9)4.3 (0.6–13.5)
Differences within a cohort were calculated by non-parametric analysis with the Mann–Whitney test (two groups) and Kruskal–Wallis test (three groups). For the comparison between two cohorts, a Chi-square analysis was performed. * p < 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Luong, A.B.; Do, H.Q.; Tarchi, P.; Bonazza, D.; Bottin, C.; Cabral, L.K.D.; Tran, L.D.C.; Doan, T.P.T.; Crocè, L.S.; Pham, H.L.T.; et al. The mRNA Distribution of Cancer Stem Cell Marker CD90/Thy-1 Is Comparable in Hepatocellular Carcinoma of Eastern and Western Populations. Cells 2020, 9, 2672. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cells9122672

AMA Style

Luong AB, Do HQ, Tarchi P, Bonazza D, Bottin C, Cabral LKD, Tran LDC, Doan TPT, Crocè LS, Pham HLT, et al. The mRNA Distribution of Cancer Stem Cell Marker CD90/Thy-1 Is Comparable in Hepatocellular Carcinoma of Eastern and Western Populations. Cells. 2020; 9(12):2672. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cells9122672

Chicago/Turabian Style

Luong, An B., Huy Q. Do, Paola Tarchi, Deborah Bonazza, Cristina Bottin, Loraine Kay D. Cabral, Long D. C. Tran, Thao P. T. Doan, Lory S. Crocè, Hoa L. T. Pham, and et al. 2020. "The mRNA Distribution of Cancer Stem Cell Marker CD90/Thy-1 Is Comparable in Hepatocellular Carcinoma of Eastern and Western Populations" Cells 9, no. 12: 2672. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cells9122672

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop