Next Article in Journal
Analysis of River Basin Management in Madagascar and Lessons Learned from Japan
Previous Article in Journal
Soil Water Erosion
Previous Article in Special Issue
Application of Natural Coagulants for Pharmaceutical Removal from Water and Wastewater: A Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Wastewater Treatment: Current and Future Techniques

by
Amin Mojiri
1,* and
Mohammed J. K. Bashir
2
1
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Graduate School of Advanced Science and Engineering, Hiroshima University, Higashihiroshima 739-8527, Japan
2
Department of Environmental Engineering, Engineering and Green Technology Faculty, Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, Kampar 31900, Malaysia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 27 January 2022 / Revised: 30 January 2022 / Accepted: 31 January 2022 / Published: 1 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wastewater Treatment: Current and Future Techniques)

1. Introduction

With the rapid growth in urbanization and industrialization, environmental contamination has worsened due to the incessant discharge of toxic substances into water bodies, which has become a worldwide problem [1]. Furthermore, the demand for water in domestic and industrial activities has significantly increased, which has accordingly increased the amount of wastewater that is released into sewage systems. Thus, the reuse and treatment of wastewater have become important concepts in the attempt to increase water availability [2]. The wastewater industry is in a state of transition [3] due to the recent wastewater effluent standards and emerging contaminants such as pharmaceutical and personal care products, and dyes in water bodies [4]. At present, several physicochemical methods (e.g., advanced oxidation process, adsorption, and membrane technologies), biological methods (e.g., activated sludge process, phytoremediation, bioremediation, and anammox), and hybrid methods have been developed to treat polluted water [1]. However, a treatment method with maximum efficiency in the removal of all kinds of contaminants is still far being realized. Moreover, the United Nations’ sustainable development goal (https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/water-and-sanitation/ (accessed on 25 January 2022)) emphasizes access to water and sanitation for all. All these issues led to the proposal of a Special Issue (SI) entitled, “Wastewater Treatment: Current and Future Techniques”. This SI discusses state-of-the-art wastewater and water treatment technologies that could be used to develop a sustainable treatment method in the future. On this topic, studies have focused on measurements, modeling, and experiments under laboratory and field conditions.

2. Summary of the SI

Original research and review papers (12 papers in total) on advanced technologies applied to the treatment of industrial wastewater, domestic wastewater, and sludge were published after the peer-review process. The studies presented in this SI include the following themes.
One of the current main concerns is the emerging contaminants in water bodies. For instance, widespread water contamination with perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) has become a great concern [5]. In this SI, Abunada et al. [5] monitored the concentrations of PFASs worldwide. Moreover, previous studies [6,7] have reported that conventional wastewater treatments have failed to remove emerging contaminants from water bodies. Therefore, researchers have tried to propose new systems with maximum performance in removing emerging pollutants. In a study published in this SI, 89.73% of the amount of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons was removed from water at optimal conditions using the ferrate (VI) oxidation process [8]. In another study, UV light and oxidizing disinfectants removed from 0% to 99.9% of the amounts of cetirizine, furosemide, diclofenac, losartan, venlafaxine, benzotriazole, and lamotrigine [9]. In addition, Alazaiza et al. [10] discussed the performance of several natural coagulants in eliminating pharmaceuticals and personal care products from water bodies. The use of these natural coagulants has been described as an efficient method of removing emerging micropollutants.
Furthermore, in recent years, water contamination with dyes, which are harmful organic pollutants, has become a serious issue. Consequently, the elimination of these contaminants from water is a global demand to ensure human and environmental safety. In one study, more than 80% of anionic dye reactive black 5 (RB5) was removed with hybrid hexadecylamine-impregnated chitosan powder-activated carbon beads [11]. In this study, adsorption data were fitted to the Freundlich and pseudo-second-order models.
Another toxic compound found in water bodies is ammonia, and ammonia contamination in wastewater and water bodies has become a major environmental problem [12]. Several techniques have been established for the treatment of nitrogen. Among these techniques, anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) has received researchers’ attention for nitrogen removal purposes. Anammox is a microbial procedure in which ammonia is oxidized to nitrogen gas, with nitrite as the electron acceptor [13]. Hosokawa et al. [13] studied the cometabolism of Patescibacteria with anammox in an anammox reactor. On the basis of their study, Patescibacteria might play an ecological role in supplying lactate and formate to other coexisting bacteria, supporting growth in the anammox reactor.
The discharge of heavy metals into the environment has significantly increased. The main source of heavy metal ions is the industrial effluents of various processing industries [14]. The toxicity of heavy metals has already been proven to be a major threat to humans and the environment [15]. Almost 75% of hexavalent chromium (Cr VI) was removed using rice husk. In the study by Bhattacharjee et al. [15], the adsorption data were more fitted to the Dubinin–Radushkevich and Langmuir models.
Wastewater and landfill leachate contain different organic and inorganic contaminants. Among the several techniques for removing a wide range of pollutants, membrane filtration could provide a suitable purification process [16]. By using a new polyvinylidene fluoride membrane synthesized by integrating powdered activated carbon, 35.3% of chemical oxygen demand, 48.7% of color, and 22% of ammonia were removed from landfill leachate [16]. In addition, different types of membrane techniques were discussed in terms of their performance in the treatment of poultry slaughterhouse wastewater [17]. Moreover, several treatment methods, such as membrane and biological methods, were discussed and compared by Gutu et al. in terms of their performance in the removal of organics and nutrients [18].
Finally, green and sustainable wastewater technologies (GSWTs) have recently attracted researchers’ attention. GSWT represents a term that denotes sustainable and environmentally friendly approaches to wastewater treatment [19]. Nanoremediation and microalgae-based systems can be considered important GSWTs. Alazaiza et al. [20] mentioned the advantages of using nanoremediation technologies for remediation. In another study, microalgae harvesting with biopolymers was described by Ang et al. [21] as a sustainable algae-based system.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, A.M.; writing—review and editing, M.J.K.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lin, R.; Li, Y.; Yong, T.; Cao, W.; Wu, J.; Shen, Y. Synergistic effects of oxidation, coagulation and adsorption in the integrated fenton-based process for wastewater treatment: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 306, 114460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sakr, M.; Mohamed, M.M.; Maraqa, M.A.; Hamouda, M.A.; Aly Hassan, A.; Ali, J.; Jung, J. A critical review of the recent developments in micro–nano bubbles applications for domestic and industrial wastewater treatment. Alex. Eng. J. 2021; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Soares, A. Wastewater treatment in 2050: Challenges ahead and future vision in a European context. Environ. Sci. Ecotechnol. 2020, 2, 100030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, S.; Show, P.L.; Ngo, H.H.; Ho, S.-H. Algae-mediated antibiotic wastewater treatment: A critical review. Environ. Sci. Ecotechnol. 2022; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Abunada, Z.; Alazaiza, M.Y.D.; Bashir, M.J.K. An Overview of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in the Environment: Source, Fate, Risk and Regulations. Water 2020, 12, 3590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mojiri, A.; Zhou, J.; Vakili, M.; Van Le, H. Removal performance and optimisation of pharmaceutical micropollutants from synthetic domestic wastewater by hybrid treatment. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2020, 235, 103736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ahmed, M.B.; Zhou, J.L.; Ngo, H.H.; Guo, W. Adsorptive removal of antibiotics from water and wastewater: Progress and challenges. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, 532, 112–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Haneef, T.; Mustafa, M.R.U.; Wan Yusof, K.; Isa, M.H.; Bashir, M.J.K.; Ahmad, M.; Zafar, M. Removal of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) from Produced Water by Ferrate (VI) Oxidation. Water 2020, 12, 3132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ikonen, J.; Nuutinen, I.; Niittynen, M.; Hokajärvi, A.-M.; Pitkänen, T.; Antikainen, E.; Miettinen, I.T. Presence and Reduction of Anthropogenic Substances with UV Light and Oxidizing Disinfectants in Wastewater—A Case Study at Kuopio, Finland. Water 2021, 13, 360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Alazaiza, M.; Albahnasawi, A.; Ali, G.; Bashir, M.; Nassani, D.; Al Maskari, T.; Amr, S.; Abujazar, M. Application of Natural Coagulants for Pharmaceutical Removal from Water and Wastewater: A Review. Water 2022, 14, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vakili, M.; Zwain, H.M.; Mojiri, A.; Wang, W.; Gholami, F.; Gholami, Z.; Giwa, A.S.; Wang, B.; Cagnetta, G.; Salamatinia, B. Effective Adsorption of Reactive Black 5 onto Hybrid Hexadecylamine Impregnated Chitosan-Powdered Activated Carbon Beads. Water 2020, 12, 2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Azreen, I.; Lija, Y.; Zahrim, A.Y. Ammonia nitrogen removal from aqueous solution by local agricultural wastes. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2017, 206, 012077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hosokawa, S.; Kuroda, K.; Narihiro, T.; Aoi, Y.; Ozaki, N.; Ohashi, A.; Kindaichi, T. Cometabolism of the Superphylum Patescibacteria with Anammox Bacteria in a Long-Term Freshwater Anammox Column Reactor. Water 2021, 13, 208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Francis Xavier, L.; Money, B.K.; John, A.; Rohit, B. Removal of cadmium heavy metal ion using recycled black toner powder. Mater. Today Proc. 2021; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bhattacharjee, T.; Islam, M.; Chowdhury, D.; Majumdar, G. In-situ generated carbon dot modified filter paper for heavy metals removal in water. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manag. 2021, 16, 100582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Abuabdou, S.M.A.; Jaffari, Z.H.; Ng, C.-A.; Ho, Y.-C.; Bashir, M.J.K. A New Polyvinylidene Fluoride Membrane Synthesized by Integrating of Powdered Activated Carbon for Treatment of Stabilized Leachate. Water 2021, 13, 2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fatima, F.; Du, H.; Kommalapati, R.R. Treatment of Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater with Membrane Technologies: A Review. Water 2021, 13, 1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gutu, L.; Basitere, M.; Harding, T.; Ikumi, D.; Njoya, M.; Gaszynski, C. Multi-Integrated Systems for Treatment of Abattoir Wastewater: A Review. Water 2021, 13, 2462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Paruch, A.M.; Mæhlum, T.; Eltun, R.; Tapu, E.; Spinu, O. Green wastewater treatment technology for agritourism business in Romania. Ecol. Eng. 2019, 138, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alazaiza, M.Y.D.; Albahnasawi, A.; Ali, G.A.M.; Bashir, M.J.K.; Copty, N.K.; Amr, S.S.A.; Abushammala, M.F.M.; Al Maskari, T. Recent Advances of Nanoremediation Technologies for Soil and Groundwater Remediation: A Review. Water 2021, 13, 2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ang, T.-H.; Kiatkittipong, K.; Kiatkittipong, W.; Chua, S.-C.; Lim, J.W.; Show, P.-L.; Bashir, M.J.K.; Ho, Y.-C. Insight on Extraction and Characterisation of Biopolymers as the Green Coagulants for Microalgae Harvesting. Water 2020, 12, 1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mojiri, A.; Bashir, M.J.K. Wastewater Treatment: Current and Future Techniques. Water 2022, 14, 448. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/w14030448

AMA Style

Mojiri A, Bashir MJK. Wastewater Treatment: Current and Future Techniques. Water. 2022; 14(3):448. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/w14030448

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mojiri, Amin, and Mohammed J. K. Bashir. 2022. "Wastewater Treatment: Current and Future Techniques" Water 14, no. 3: 448. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/w14030448

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop