Next Article in Journal
Iron Ore Slimes Flotation Tests Using Column and Amidoamine Collector without Depressant
Next Article in Special Issue
Editorial for Special Issue “Mineralogy of Noble Metals and ‘Invisible’ Speciations of These Elements in Natural Systems, Volume II”
Previous Article in Journal
Pitfalls and Possibilities of Patinated Bronze: The Analysis of Pre-Roman Italian Armour Using pXRF
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Features of Native Gold in Ore-Bearing Breccias with Realgar-Orpiment Cement of the Vorontsovskoe Deposit (Northern Urals, Russia)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Types of Tellurium Mineralization of Gold Deposits of the Aldan Shield (Southern Yakutia, Russia)

by
Larisa A. Kondratieva
*,
Galina S. Anisimova
and
Veronika N. Kardashevskaia
Diamond and Precious Metal Geology Institute, SB RAS, 677000 Yakutsk, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 30 April 2021 / Revised: 24 June 2021 / Accepted: 25 June 2021 / Published: 29 June 2021

Abstract

:
The published and original data on the tellurium mineralization of gold ore deposits of the Aldan Shield are systematized and generalized. The gold content is related to hydrothermal-metasomatic processes caused by Mesozoic igneous activity of the region. The formation of tellurides occurred at the very late stages of the generation of gold mineralization of all existing types of metasomatic formations. 29 tellurium minerals, including 16 tellurides, 5 sulfotellurides and 8 tellurates have been identified. Tellurium minerals of two systems predominate: Au-Bi-Te and Au-Ag-Te. Gold is not only in an invisible state in sulfides and in the form of native gold of different fineness, but also is part of a variety of compounds: montbrayite, calaverite, sylvanite, krennerite and petzite. In the gold deposits of the Aldan Shield, three mineral types are distinguished: Au-Ag-Te, Au-Bi-Te, and also a mixed one, which combines the mineralization of both systems. The decrease in the fineness of native gold is consistent with the sequence and temperatures of the formation of Te minerals and associated mineral paragenesis from the epithermal–mesothermal Au-Bi-Te to epithermal Au-Ag-Te. The conducted studies allowed us to determine a wide variety of mineral species and significantly expand the area of distribution of Au-Te mineralization that indicates its large-scale regional occurrence in the Aldan Shield.

1. Introduction

One of the main sources of gold in Russia for many decades has been gold mineralization of the Aldan-Stanovoy Shield—the largest outcrop of the Early Precambrian basement of the Siberian platform. The geological structure of the area includes two structural stages: the lower, crystalline basement, composed of metamorphosed Early Archean gneisses, schists, and granites, and the upper, platform cover formed by the Vendian-Lower Cambrian carbonate and Jurassic terrigenous rocks. Two large gold-bearing provinces, Aldan and Stanovaya, are identified on the territory of the Aldan-Stanovoy Shield, located respectively in the geoblocks (shields) of the same name.
The main gold reserves of the Aldan Shield (AS) are concentrated on the territory of the Central Aldan ore District (CAD). The gold content is associated with hydrothermal-metasomatic processes caused by large-scale Mesozoic igneous activity of the region, involving the intrusion of massifs of subalkaline and alkaline high-potassium igneous rocks of the Jurassic-Cretaceous age [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Ore-bearing hydrothermal-metasomatic formations are represented by sericite-microcline metasomatites, beresites, gumbaites, jasperoids, and argillizites.
Tellurium mineralization in the area of the Aldan Shield was first recorded in the 1970s to 1980s. Epithermal gold-telluride mineralization was described by S. V. Yablokova (1975) and A. A. Kim (1982, 1988, 1990, 2000) in the Kuranakhsky ore cluster of the CAD (Bokovoye and Delbe deposits). In addition to the well-known tellurium and selenium minerals, new mineral types of tellurates have been established: kuranakhite [13], yafsoanite, kuksite, cheremnykhite and V, Si-dugganite [14,15,16,17]. Recently, new information has appeared on tellurium mineralization in the deposits and ore occurrences of the CAD in the ores of Lebedinsky [18,19], Elkonsky [20,21,22], Dzhekondinsky [23,24], Yukhtinsky [25,26], and the Nimgerkansky [27] ore fields, as well as a number of other gold ore objects outside the CAD-Verkhne-Tokkinsky [28,29], Verkhneamginsky [30,31,32,33,34], Tyrkandinsky, Guvilgrinsky, Altan-Chaidakhsky, and Verkhnealgominsky [35,36,37,38] (Figure 1).
The significance of the research of tellurides is proved by their important role as indicator minerals of the physical and chemical conditions of the formation of gold mineralization, as well as accessory minerals, containing a significant proportion of the gold reserves.
The purpose of the research: to systematize and summarize the scattered information on Te mineralization of the region, to clarify their typomorphic properties and conditions of ore formation, to typify and determine the patterns of their spatial position in the structures of the Aldan Shield.

2. Materials and Methods

Typification of tellurium mineralization of gold deposits of the Aldan shield is carried out on the basis of systematization and generalization of scattered known and original data. About three hundred and fifty samples were collected from mine working of the Verkhneamginsky, Nimgerkansky, Tyrkandinsky, Guvilgrinsky, Altan-Chaidakhsky, and Verkhnealgominsky ore fields. The polished sections made from the samples were optically examined using a Jenavert ore microscope in reflected light, with special attention being directed toward identifying sulfides, sulfosalts, tellurides and native elements. These minerals were analyzed on a Camebax-micro X-ray spectral microanalyzer and a JEOL JSM-6480LV scanning electron microscope with an OXFORD energy spectrometer, where the Back Scattered Electron images were taken at the Diamond and Precious Metal Geology Institute, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Yakutsk, Russia) (analysts N.V. Khristoforova, S. K. Popova, S. A. Karpova). The quantitative analysis was carried out using Software INCA Energy (Version 4.17, Oxford Instruments, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK) with XPP matrix correction scheme developed by Pouchou and Pichoir. Operating conditions included 20 kV voltage, a beam current of 1.08 nA and a beam diameter of 1 μm, measurement time 10 s. Analitical lines: Bi–Mα; Te, Pb, Ag, Sb, S–Lα; Cu, Fe, Zn, S–Kα. Standards: gold 750%–Au, Ag, Bi2S3–Bi (bismuthinite), HgTe (coloradoite)–Hg, Te, CuSbS2 (chalcostibite)–Cu, Sb, S, Tl (Br,I)—Tl, ZnS (sphalerite)–Zn, CuFeS2 (chalcopyrite)–Fe, PbS (galena)–Pb, FeAsS (arsenopyrite)–As. Element detection limits (wt%) X-ray spectral microprobe analysis: Au 0.117, Ag 0.061, Hg 0.083, Cu 0.031, Fe 0.019, Pb 0.066, Bi 0.095. Limits of element detection (wt%) scanning electron microscope equipped with energy spectrometer: Au 1.84, Ag 0.96, Hg 1.6, Cu 1.22, Fe 1.04, Pb 1.78, Bi 2.7.
Microthermometric studies of fluid inclusions were carried out at the Department of Mineralogy of St. Petersburg State University in a thermal chamber mounted on a POLAM P-211 microscope, and also at the “Geomodel” Resource Center Saint Petersburg State University on Olympus BX53F optical microscope complete with microthermometric system THMSG-600-ec with LNP95 liquid nitrogen sample cooling system at temperature range from −196 to +600 °C. The accuracy of temperature measurements is ±0.1 °C in the temperature range from −20 to +20 °C. The composition of the liquid and vapour phases of fluid inclusions in quartz was analyzed there on the Horiba LabRam HR800 Raman spectrometer at the «Geomodel» Resource Center SPSU (analyst V.N. Bocharov), an Ar laser with a wavelength of 514.5 nm and 488 nm, an exposure time of 3 s, the number of repetitions—5, the laser power-50 MW, and the magnification of the microscope-50×.

3. Results

3.1. Tellurium Minerals

The tellurium mineralization of AS is characterized by a wide diversity of mineral species. Currently, 29 tellurium minerals are found in the ores: 16 tellurides, 5 sulfotellurides, and 8 tellurates, of which 2 are unidentified (Table 1). They usually form micro-and nano-inclusions with a size of 1–20 µm, with the exception of the ores of the Bodorono and Khatyrkhay deposits, where the sizes of tellurobismuthite and/or tetradymite reach 3 mm. The shape of the grains is round-oval, elongated, needle-like, or irregular angular. Tellurium minerals occur both as monoinclusions and in ensembles of two or three tellurides.
Tellurium minerals of two systems predominate: Au-Bi-Te and Au-Ag-Te. The tellurides of the Au-Ag-Te system are characterized by the greatest diversity. Seven minerals have been identified. These minerals often form inclusions in pyrite, and are also found in calcite, quartz, bornite, and tennantite (Figure 2). Among the minerals of the Au-Bi-Te system, the most common are the tellurides of the tetradymite group (tellurobismuthite, tetradymite, tsumoite, sulfotsumoite, and hedleyite). Tellurides are commonly found in pyrite, galena, galenobismutite, chalcopyrite, pyrrhotite, and quartz (Figure 3).

3.2. Typification of Telluride Mineralization

The analysis of the species composition of Te minerals in the AS gold deposits allowed us to identify three mineral types: Au-Ag-Te, Au-Bi-Te, as well as the type, where the mineralization of both systems is combined and identified as a mixed one (Table 2).

3.2.1. Au-Ag-Te Mineral Type

The first type includes the deposits of the CAD–Kuranakhsky, Elkonsky, Yukhtinsky, and Dzhekondinsky fields, as well as the mineralization of the Upper-Tokkinsky cluster and the Khokhoy deposit of the Verkhneamginsky cluster. The Au-Ag-Te type is represented more often by petzite, hessite, and supergene Te minerals, and less often by coloradoite, altaite, and calaverite (Figure 2, Table 3, Table 4 and Table 5). Bi tellurides are absent, the exception is tellurobismuthite of the Podgolechnoye deposit, where it plays a subordinate role. The extensive and diverse list of associated minerals includes selenides (clausthalite (PbSe), naumannite (Ag2Se), tiemannite (HgSe)); sulfides (cinnabar (HgS), stibnite (Sb2S3), orpiment (As2S3), acanthite (Ag2S), uytenbogaardtite (Ag3AuS2)); Ag chlorides and bromides (chlorargyrite (AgCl), bromargyrite (AgBr)); emphasizes the epithermal of Au-Ag-Te type ores. This mineral type also includes the low-temperature thallium mineralization of the Khokhoy deposit of the Verkhneamginsky cluster, represented by thallium tellurates and telluroantimonates with weissbergite (TlSbS2), avicennite (Tl2O3) and thallium antimonates (Table 6) [33,40]. A characteristic feature of ores bearing Au-Ag-Te mineralization is the susceptibility to supergene changes. In the ores of the Kuranakh deposit, the largest in AS, tellurides are represented exclusively by Au and Au-Ag species (sylvanite predominates), Ag tellurides have not been identified. The minerals are characterized by a noticeable concentration of Hg and Se, as well as a certain excess of Te in the composition (Table 3). The sulfides associated with them are characterized by an impurity of Te and a deficiency of S [14].

3.2.2. Au-Bi-Te Mineral Type

The deposits of the Guvilgrinsky and Altan-Chaidakhsky clusters, as well as the Bodorono deposit of the Verkhnealgominsky cluster, are classified as the Au-Bi-Te type. Bi tellurides are developed here, mainly tellurobismuthite, less often hedleyite, and Bi sulfotellurides–tetradymite and sulphotsumoite (Figure 3, Table 2). The associated minerals are native Bi, bismuthinite, Pb sulphobismuthites–lillianite (Pb3Bi2S6), bursaite (Pb5Bi4S11) and cosalite (Pb5Bi2S5). Fe, Cu, and Pb impurities in Te minerals are often related to the capture of the elements from matrix minerals–pyrite, pyrrhotite, galena, and chalcopyrite (Table 7). Note the presence of Se-containing hedleyite and associated laitakarite and Se-containing galena in the ores of the Bodorono deposit, as well as Pb-containing tetradymite in the Altan-Chaidakh deposit. A large role of lead is generally characteristic of the Au-Bi-Te type ores, as evidenced by the composition of the associated minerals.

3.2.3. Mixed Au-Ag-Bi-Te Mineral Type

The mixed-type deposits of the Lebedinsky, Nimgerkansky, Tyrkandinsky, and the Khatyrkhay ore occurrences of the Verkhneamginsky and Dyvok of the Verkhnealgominsky clusters contain minerals of both systems, and there are also single grains of such rare minerals as merenskyite, rucklidgite, and melonite in the ores of the Dyvok occurrence (Table 2) [38]. The associated minerals are diverse: native bismuth, galena, acanthite, scheelite, tin, and Pb sulfobismuthides–lillianite (Pb3Bi2S6), bursaite (Pb5Bi4S11) and aikinite (PbCuBiS3), Ag sulfobismuthide–matildite (AgBiS2), as well as Bi-containing tennantite-annivite and tennantite. In the Te minerals of the Nimgerkan ore occurrence, Cu and Fe impurities are recorded, captured from the surrounding minerals–pyrite, tennantite, and bornite. A typical feature of the rare sulfotelluride Ag, cervelleite, is an impurity of Cu up to 6wt%. The relationships of tellurides of both systems in the ores of the Nimgercansky cluster demonstrate their syngenenticity, expressed in the spatial combination of angular grains of tellurobismuthite and hessite without signs of substitution or intersection, as well as the facts of intergrowth of tellurobismuthite and petzite (Figure 2c,d).

3.3. Gold Speciations

Gold in the ores of the AS deposits is present in three varieties: invisible gold in pyrite, native gold, and gold in the composition of tellurides.
Studies of invisible gold by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) were carried out in pyrite from the Lunnoye, Samolazovskoye and Ryabinovoye deposits (the Muscovitoviy and Noviy sites) [21]. It is noted that the primary ores of the Lunnoye and Samolazovskoye deposits belong to refractory ores due to the significant amount of gold associated with sulfides. It is identified that pyrite from fine-grained aggregates is enriched with gold, as well as with As, Sb, Hg, and Tl correlating with it, where its content at the Samolazovskoye field reaches 600 g/t, at the Lunnoye–300 g/t, which exceeds the Au content in the coarser grained idiomorphic pyrite by two orders or higher. The dynamics of ablation shows a relatively uniform distribution of impurities in pyrite.
The average Au content in the pyrite of the Muscovitoviy ore occurrence of the Ryabinovoye deposit is only 0.14 g/t, the Noviy ore occurrence in the porous pyrite is about 0.96 g/t, and in the massive one, 0.06 g/t. Cu, Pb, and Te are characterized by top-cut grades associated with inclusions of minerals that concentrated of the corresponding metals. The graph of changes in the contents of Au, Ag, and Te during ablation indicates that the noble metals are present as inclusions of native gold with an Ag impurity and Au and Ag tellurides. Gold in the porous pyrite of the Noviy site positively correlates with Ag and Te; no significant correlations were found for the pyrite of the Muscovitoviy site [21].
Native gold, which is associated with tellurides, is of a usually porous structure. Spongy and mustard gold is often found in Au-Ag-Te deposits (Figure 4) [14,33,41,42]. The grain size varies, and relatively large gold is typical for the Au-Bi-Te type. Native gold associated with Au-Ag-Te type minerals usually has a dimension from the dust to the fine class, while in the sypergene zone there is a noticeable increase in size of the gold. There are few data on the fineness of native gold, which is directly associated with Te mineralization (Table 2). The fineness of native gold ranges from 650 to 999%. The comparison of the fineness of different types of telluride mineralization is complicated by the fact that post-ore supergene processes are widely developed in Au-Ag-Te ores, where Au refinement occurs. Nevertheless, the lower limits of the fineness of native gold of mineralization of the Au-Ag-Te type begin with 700% [14], in the mixed type–range from 650 to 878% (excluding the ores of the Lebedinsky deposit, also subjected to the processes of supergene) and finally, in the Au-Bi-Te type, the fineness is 830–999%. Thus, we can state a decrease in the fineness of native gold from the Au-Bi-Te type to the Au-Ag-Te. The decrease in the fineness of native gold is consistent with the sequence and temperatures of formation of Te minerals and associated mineral paragenesis from epithermal–mesothermal Au-Bi-Te (830–999%) to the epithermal Au-Ag-Te (>700%).

3.4. Fluid Inclusions

There is not much information on fluid inclusions (FI) in gold-telluride ores of AS. We studied the FI in the Au-Bi-Te the mineral type ores of the Bodorono (Verkhnealgominsky cluster) and Lagernoye (Altan-Chaidakhsky cluster) deposits, as well as the mixed Au-Ag-Bi-Te type of the Dyvok ore occurrence (Verkhnealgominsky cluster).
Three types of inclusions were found in quartz from the gold-tellurium-bismuth-quartz association of the Bodorono deposit: Type I—monophase aqueous inclusions; type II—two-phase gas-liquid inclusions, according to Raman spectroscopy data they contain H2O liquid and CO2 vapour. The homogenisation temperature is ranging from 145 to 200 °C; type III—three-phase carbon dioxide-water inclusions (H2Oliq+CO2liq+CO2vap) sometimes with impurities of CH4 and N2 vapour. The temperature of homogenisation of liquid CO2 into gas was 28–29 °C. The density of liquid CO2 is 0.63–0.65 g/cm3. The pressure is estimated at 0.4–0.6 kbar. Composition of the vapour phase (mol.%): CO2 95.2, N2 2.9, CH4 1.9. The formation temperature of the earlier gold-polymetallic assemblage is estimated at 270–300 °C [37].
FI data on the Dyvok ore occurrence suggest the formation of the early auriferous mineral assemblage (arsenopyrite-pyrite-quartz) at temperatures of 300–335 °C and a pressure of 0.7 kbar. Studies of quartz from the middle gold-chalcopyrite-sphalerite assemblage showed homogenisation temperatures of 250–280 °C. The latest quartz-telluride association is characterised by an average homogenisation temperature of 210–230 °C.
Microthermometric studies of the FI of the Altan-Chaidakh ore cluster have determined that the formation of the gold-polymetallic assemblage occurred at temperatures of 300–331 °C from Mg,Cl-solutions, with CO2 and impurities of CH4 in the vapour phase. The gold-tellurium-bismuth assemblage was formed at close temperature values (276–365 °C) from Mg-Na-KCl- solutions with a predominant CO2 content in the vapour phase.
The ore mineralization of quartz-chlorite-feldspar metasomatites of the Khatyrkhay ore occurrence in the Verkhneamginsky region, represented by two assemblages, was studied by I.Prokopyev (2019). The first association represented by sulfide minerals: pyrite, chalcopyrite, galena, sphalerite, molybdenite, boulangerite, etc. is formed from highly concentrated (44–22 wt.% NaCl-eq.) of fluid CO2 ± N2 solutions at temperatures of 330–400 °C and at a pressure of 1150 bar. The late gold-telluride ore mineralization was formed from low-concentrated (3.3–9.2 wt.% NaCl-eq.) of fluid CO2 solutions at temperatures of 210–230 °C [34].
Pressure-Temperature (P-T) parameters of the formation of the Lebedinoye deposit were studied in quartz of different paragenesis of the first (tremolite-quartz-magnetite-sulfide) and second (quartz-carbonate-gold-bismuth-sulfide) stages (Orekhovaya and Vodonosnaya deposits) [19]. The results of studies of ore mineralization of the Orekhovaya deposit showed that the temperatures of fluid homogenisation in tremolite are 342–316 °C, quartz, which is in the same paragenesis with tremolite, 321 °C. Thom of inclusions in later quartz generations decreases: 284–223 °C and 195–157 °C. Pressure—570–440 bar. The study of fluid inclusions in quartz of ore samples of the Vodonosnaya deposit shows Thom of fluid inclusions of 500–484 °C, pressure—2040–1260 bar. Thom values of inclusions of later quartz generations are close to the quartz temperatures in ore samples of the Orekhovaya ore deposit, but the pressure values vary significantly from 450 to 3180 bar.
High salt concentrations (46.9–51.5 wt.% NaCl-eq.) obtained at Thom 186–162 °C and a pressure of 2250–2130 bar. In other samples, at Thom 339–310 °C, 231 °C, 177–136 °C and a pressure drop (1530–640 bar), the salt concentration decreases and is 10.9–6.2, 9.2 and 1.2–0.5 wt.% NaCl-eq. [19].
According to the results of the study of FI at the Kuranakh deposit, the temperature of formation of the early quartz-pyrite assemblage with fine-grained quartz 1 and finely-dispersed gold in pyrite is 350–200 °C, quartz-polysulfide assemblage with pyrite and riziform quartz 2 and visible gold-250–200 °C. The formation of Au-Ag-Te mineralization in quartz veins occurs at temperatures of 220–150 °C, and the Au-Te-Se and Au-tellurate mineralization in calcite veins decreases to 120–70 °C. Thus, there is a regressive regime of the ore formation process with temperature inversions in the range of 50–100 °C, as well as a change in mineral assemblages [14].

4. Discussion

The Aldan alkaline volcanogenic-intrusive complex was formed in several stages [5]. In the first stage (Late Triassic–Early Jurassic), sills of quartz porphyry, orthophyre, and nordmarkite were intruded into the platform cover, accompanied on the surface by domes and trachyte covers. In the second stage (Middle–Late Jurassic), concentric-zonal plutons of platinum-bearing dunites, wehrlites, and gabbroids were formed, followed by alkaline volcanic plutons, stocks, dikes of alkaline gabbroids and syenites, and their effusive analogues (alkaline trachytes, pseudoleucitic phonolites). In the third stage (Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous), laccoliths, stocks, dikes of monzonites, subalkaline syenites, and granosyenites were intruded. In the fourth stage (Late Cretaceous), the stocks of aegirine granites and regional dike belts of syenite-porphyry, orthophyre, minette, bostonite, and picrite were formed.
The formation of the Aldan alkaline volcanogenic-intrusive complex involved metasomatic changes in rocks. In the Central Aldan region, four metasomatic formations are gold-producing: gumbaite, sericite-microcline metasomatites, jasperoid and argillizited [5,11].
The gold mineralization of AS is diverse. The metasomatites of the gumbaite formation are represented by pyrite-carbonate-K-feldspar metasomatites, which are related to the main gold-uranium deposits of the Elkonsky ore cluster. Gold-copper-porphyry (Ryabinovsky) type of mineralization, including veined-disseminated sulfide mineralization in alkaline volcanic plutons (Ryabinovoye and Noviy deposits) is associated with the formation of sericite-microcline metasomatites. The jasperoid type of mineralization is represented by deposits formed in three geostructural settings: in the contact zones of the Mesozoic alkaline and subalkaline intrusions with carbonate rocks of the Vendian among hydrothermally altered dolomite marbles, magnesian skarns and syenites (Samolazovsky subtype); in zones of layered and transverse fracturing in the Vendian-Lower Cambrian carbonate rocks (Lebedinsky subtype) and at the contact of Lower Cambrian limestones with Jurassic sandstones (Kuranakhsky subtype). Gold-argillizited mineralization of the Nimgerkansky type is spatially confined to the intrusions of syenite-porphyry of Cretaceous age and is associated with crystal-bearing and amethyst-bearing mineralization [11].
The systematization of Te mineralization demonstrates its presence in all available types of ore-bearing metasomatites, that indicates a regional large-scale manifestation in the area of AS. The process of ore formation is long, multi-stage, but in general, three producing stages are distinguished in most deposits—the early pyrite-quartz assemblage with finely-dispersed gold is replaced by (gold)-polysulfide-quartz and ends with gold-telluride.
The typification of gold mineralization on Te minerals and mineral assemblages revealed a certain zoning in the location of gold deposits on the area of AS. In general, the Aldan-Stanovoy Shield is characterized by zoning in the distribution of the Mesozoic magmatism derivatives. The Stanovoy geoblock is characterized by granitoid intrusions, while the Aldan geoblock mainly by subalkaline and alkaline ones. When considering the position of objects with Au-Ag-Te and Au-Bi-Te mineralization, zoning is traced, which is consistent with the distribution of derivatives of the Mesozoic magmatism. Au-Bi-Te mineralization is typical for deposits that are close to the Stanovoy plutonogenic region in the areas of dikes and small intrusions of acid composition in the Guvilgrinsky (granodiorites), Verkhnealgominsky (diorite porphyrites), and Altan-Chaidakhsky (granodiorites, diorite porphyrites, dacites) clusters. Au-Ag-Te mineralization is developed in the northern and central parts of the Aldan geoblock, where massifs of rocks of mainly subalkaline and alkaline composition were formed.
Lateral zoning is also observed in the distribution of mineralization types in the CAD area: mixed Au-Ag-Bi-Te mineralization with predominance of Bi is developed in ores of the Lebedinsky cluster, located in the center of the magmatogenic structure, where the most intense magmatism in the CAD occurs, covering all 4 stages of igneous activity, and mixed and the Au-Ag-Te ores in the Kuranakh and Yukhtin jasperoids, the Elkon and Jekondin gumbeites are developed on the periphery at a distance of 10–30 km.
Available data on the temperatures of formation of Au-Te mineralization (Table 2), as a rule, show their epithermal. Thus, the formation of the Au-Te mineralization of the Kuranakhsky cluster in quartz veins occurs at temperatures of 220–150 °C, and in calcite veins it decreases to 120–70 °C [14]. Au-Bi-Te mineralization can classed as the epithermal-mesothermal, the highest temperature of ore formation is shown by the mineralization of the Altan-Chaidakhsky cluster—365–276 °C. The Bodorono deposit, judging by the presence of Se-containing hedleyite and galena, as well as laitakarite and the formation temperature of 200–150 °C, has features of epithermal mineralization.
High-temperature inclusions of the Lebedinoye deposit with mixed Au-Ag-Bi-Te mineral type probably belong to the period of scarification, which strengthens the argument in favor of the connection of the hydrothermal process with magmatism. At the same time, the high pressure of ore-forming fluids may indicate a significant depth of the source. The large range of variations in salt concentrations may be due to the presence of two sources of ore-forming fluids: one is associated with dilute solutions, and the other with brines, the concentration of salts in which decreases with a drop in pressure. The data obtained indicate the heterogeneity of ore-bearing solutions, their connection with magmatism, the depth of formation of hearths in each specific deposit, and different sources of ore-forming hydrothermal solutions [19].
Te ores of the AS are characterized by a number of properties typical for the epithermal alkaline gold-telluride type (A-type). This was previously shown by Leontiev for the Samolazovskoye and Podgolechnoye deposits [24,26]. The characteristic features of A-type deposits are a close spatial relationship with alkaline magmatism, and a typical “mantle” association of elements (Te, V, and F), an important role in the minerals of Au and Ag tellurides, fluorite and vanadium-containing minerals (roscoelite, descloizite, sulvanite, arsenosulvanite, cheremnykhite and dugganite) [43,44]. Examples of A-type deposits are world-class facilities such as Cripple Creek (Colorado, USA, 673 t Au), Acupan (Philippines, 500 t Au, ~500 t Ag), Emperor (Fiji, >120 t Au), Ladolam (Papua New Guinea, 680 t Au), Kochbulak (Uzbekistan), etc.
The Kuranakh and Khokhoy deposits have features of Carlin-type mineralization: they are located in the area of tectonic-magmatic activation, are conjugated with intrusions of monzonite-granodiorite series, and are of normal and high alkalinity, strata of carbonate rocks, stratoidal disseminated deposits, presence of jasperoids, low content of sulfides, finely-dispersed gold in pyrite, typomorphic elements—Au-Tl-As-Hg-Sb-Te-Ba-F [4,33,40].
Numerous studies show the presence of gold of three varieties: invisible in pyrite or arsenopyrite, native gold and gold tellurides. With the advent in recent decades of the highly sensitive inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) method and, especially, the local version of this method with laser ablation of the substance directly from the sample, it became possible to determine gold and other trace elements in pyrite [45,46,47,48,49].
The gold and tellurium studies of the Emperor deposit [45] showed that gold is found in three different forms: as “invisible” or submicrometer-size inclusions of gold and tellurium in arsenian pyrite, as visible native gold and tellurium, and as tellurides. The pyrite from Emperor is among the most Au-(up to 11,057 ppm Au), Te-(up to 5796 ppm Te), and As-rich (up to 16.60 wt.% As) yet reported from any mineral deposit type.
In addition, Large, and Maslennikov (2020) [47] report a distinct chemical association of invisible gold in pyrite in the deposits studied. For example, in the Gold Quarry (Carlin type), Mt Olympus, Macraes and Konkera, the invisible gold is principally related to the arsenic content of pyrite. In contrast, in Kumtor and Geita Hill, the invisible gold is principally related to the tellurium content of pyrite. Other deposits (Golden Mile, Bendigo, Spanish Mountain, Witwatersrand Carbon Leader Reef (CLR)) exhibit both the Au-As and Au-Te association in pyrite. Some deposits of the Au-As association have late orogenic Au-As-rich rims on pyrite, which substantially increase the value of the ore. In contrast, deposits of the Au-Te association are not known to have Au-rich rims on pyrite but contain nano- to micro-inclusions of Au-Ag-(Pb-Bi) tellurides.
As a result of the studies conducted by Belogub [21] at the deposits of the Aldan Shield, it was found that fine-grained aggregates of iron disulfides are significantly enriched with impurities compared to idiomorphic pyrite. This may be due to both the higher growth rate of fine-grained aggregates and their more significant specific surface area, which contributes to the capture of impurities, and the defectiveness of the disulfides themselves, which contain submicron or nano-inclusions of minerals that concentrate of impurities, since the association of impurities observed for fine-grained aggregates of iron disulfides, in general, corresponds to the set of rare mineral species found in ores. In larger idiomorphic crystals, the impurity content is significantly lower, that is related to a lower growth rate, which does not contribute to the capture of incoherent (non-structural) impurities.
Au-Ag tellurides are important accessory minerals, carrying a significant proportion of the gold endowment in some low to medium temperature hydrothermal vein deposits [50]. At the Kochbulak and Kairagach deposits (Uzbekistan) [51,52,53,54,55], Golden Mile in Kalgoorlie, Western Australia [56] about 20% of Au is in telluride form, Cripple Creek, [57]; Emperor, Fiji—10–50% in the form of tellurides [58]; and Sǎcǎrîmb, Romania [59], at the Bereznyakovskoye deposit (S.Ural) about 80% of gold [60], Sandaowanzi [61] more than 95% of the extracted gold occurs in the form of tellurides. We assume that the tellurides of the gold deposits of the Aldan Shield are also an additional source of at least 20% of the total gold reserve.
The mechanism of formation of native gold from gold and silver tellurides was experimentally shown in the works [62,63,64,65]. The formation of spongy gold as a result of the decomposition of maldonite under supergene conditions was considered in studies [66,67] and hypogenic [68,69,70,71,72,73]. The porous gold in the studied ores is also the result of the decomposition of tellurides, as we have shown by the example of native gold from the Khokhoy deposit of the Verkhneamnginsky node [33]. Thus, the Au-Ag-Bi-Te minerals are one of the most important sources of gold in the world.

5. Conclusions

Systematization and generalization of published and original data on Te mineralization enables us to demonstrated a wide variety of mineral species and significantly expand the territory of distribution of Au-Te mineralization, which indicates its large-scale regional occurrence in the Aldan Shield. At the same time, tellurium minerals are developed in all known types of metasomatic formations. Gold is not only in an invisible state in sulfides and in the form of native particles of different fineness, but is also part of a variety of compounds: montbrayite (Au2Te3), calaverite (AuTe2), sylvanite (AuAg)2Te4, krennerite (AuAgTe) and petzite (Ag3AuTe2). Au-Ag-Bi tellurides are important accessory minerals containing a significant proportion of the gold reserve.

Author Contributions

L.A.K. and G.S.A. conceived and designed the study, the paper, provided field work on gold deposits, provided valuable insights, interpreted the results, and wrote the paper. V.N.K. provided field work on gold-ore objects, performed mineralogical description and photographing of polished sections, conducted microthermometric studies. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was carried out within the framework of the state task of the Diamond and Precious Metals Geology Institute of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, project No 0381-2019-0004 and supported by grants of the Russian Foundation for basic Research No 18-45-140045 and No 19-35-90051.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank N. Khristoforova, S. Popova, and S. Karpova for their help in carrying out a large amount of work on the scanning electron microscope and X-ray spectral microanalyzer (Diamond and Precious Metals Geology Institute of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences), V. Bocharov for his help using the Raman Spectroscopy (Saint Petersburg State University) and E. Sokolov for the organization of field work at gold mining facilities (JSC “Yakutskgeologiya”) and for discussing the results of the research. The authors are grateful to anonymous reviewers for their comments and constructive suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bilibin, Y. Fundamentals of Placer Geology; State United Scientific and Technical Publishing House: Moscow, Russia, 1938; 504p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  2. Petrovskaya, N.V.; Fastolovich, A.I. Nature of mineralization in Lebedinoe gold deposit (Aldan). Sov. Geol. 1940, 2–3, 54–65. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  3. Petrovskaya, N.V.; Kazarinov, A.I. Gold deposits of the Central Aldan. In Geology of the Main Gold Deposits of the USSR; TsNIGRI: Moscow, Russia, 1951; Volume 2, 154p. [Google Scholar]
  4. Vetluzhskikh, V.G.; Kim, A.A. Geological and commercial types of gold deposits in Southern Yakutia. Otechestvennaya Geol. 1997, 1, 16–24. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  5. Ugriumov, A.N.; Dvornik, G.P. Altered formations and gold mineralization in the ore region of the Mesozoic tectonic-magmatic activation (Aldan Shield). Proc. Ser. Geol. Geophys. 2000, 10, 119–128. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  6. Vetluzhskikh, V.G.; Kazansky, V.I.; Kochetkov, A.Y.; Yanovskiy, V.M. Central Aldan gold deposits. Geol. Ore Depos. 2002, 44, 405–434. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kazansky, V.I. The unique Central Aldan gold-uranium ore district (Russia). Geol. Ore Depos. 2004, 46, 167–181. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kochetkov, A.Y. Mesozoic gold-bearing ore-magmatic systems of the Central Aldan. Geol. Geophys. 2006, 47, 850–864. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  9. Boitsov, V.E.; Pilipenko, G.N.; Dorozhkina, L.A. Gold and gold-uranium deposits of Central Aldan. In Proceedings of the Large and Superlarge Deposits of Ore Minerals; Strategic Types of Ore Raw Materials; IGEM RAS: Moscow, Russia, 2006; Volume 2, pp. 215–240. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  10. Maksimov, E.P.; Uyutov, V.I.; Nikitin, V.M. The Central Aldan gold-uranium ore magmatogenic system, Aldan-Stanovoy shield, Russia. Russ. J. Pac. Geol. 2010, 4, 95–115. [Google Scholar]
  11. Dvornik, G.P. Gold-ore metasomatic formations of the Central Aldan region. Lithosphere 2012, 2, 90–105. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  12. Molchanov, A.V.; Terekhov, V.V.; Shatov, V.V.; Petrov, O.V.; Kukushkin, K.A.; Kozlov, D.S.; Shatova, N.V. Gold ore districts and ore clusters of the Aldanian metallogenic province. Reg. Geol. Metallog. 2017, 71, 93–111. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  13. Yablokova, S.V.; Dubakina, L.S.; Dmitrak, A.L.; Sokolova, T.V. Kuranakhite—New hypergenic mineral of tellurium. Zap. Vsesoyuznogo Mineral. Obs. 1975, 3, 310–313. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  14. Kim, A.A. Gold-telluride-selenide mineralization in the Kuranakh deposit (Central Aldan). Zap. Vserossiyskogo Mineral. Obs. 2000, 5, 51–57. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  15. Kim, A.A.; Zayakina, N.V.; Lavrent’yev, Y.G. Yafsoanite, (Zn1.38Ca1.36Pb0.26)3TeO6, a new tellurium mineral. Zapiski Vsesoyuznogo Mineral. Obshchestva 1982, 111, 118–121. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  16. Kim, A.A.; Zayakina, N.V.; Lavrentiev, Y.G.; Makhotko, V.F. Si-variety of dugganite—The first find in the USSR. Mineral. J. 1988, 10, 85–89. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  17. Kim, A.A.; Zayakina, N.V.; Makhotko, V.F. Kuksite Pb3Zn3TeO6(PO4)2 and cheremnukhite Pb3Zn3TeO6(VO4)2–New tellurates from the Kuranakh gold deposit (Central Aldan, Southern Yakutia). Zap. Vsesoyuznogo Mineral. Obs. 1990, 5, 50–57. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  18. Eluev, V.K.; Kiskin, V.A.; Kislyi, A.V. Report on the Results of the Detailed Exploration of the Samolazovskoe Gold Deposit Conducted in 1999–2000; Book I. The Text of the Report; Aldan, Russia, 2000, Unpublished work.
  19. Dobrovolskaya, M.G.; Razin, M.V.; Prokofiev, V.Y. The Lebedinoe gold deposit (Central Aldan): Mineral paragenesis, stages and conditions of formation. Geol. Ore Depos. 2016, 58, 308–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Grechishnikov, D.N.; Krajyshkin, S.A.; Bugrova, N.S. Russia, 2013 Report on the Completed Exploration Work at the Lunnoe Field for 2008–2013 with the Estimation of Reserves as of 01.01.2013. Unpublished work.
  21. Belogub, E.V.; Novoselov, K.A.; Artemyev, D.A.; Palenova, E.E. Trace contaminations of pyrite from the Elkonsky and Ryabinovsky types of gold deposits in the Central Aldan ore region (Sakha-Yakutia). Metallog. Anc. Mod. Oceans 2018, 1, 146–150. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  22. Novoselov, K.A.; Belogub, E.V.; Blinov, I.A. Te-canfieldite from ores of the Lunnoe Au-U deposit (Aldan region, Republic Sakha of Yakutia). Mineralogy 2019, 5, 49–56. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  23. Leont’ev, V.I.; Platonova, N.V. Features of the occurrence of gold mineralization of the Lebedinsky type in the Dzhekondinsky ore cluster (Central Aldan ore region). Reg. Geol. Metallog. 2016, 65, 84–92. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  24. Leont’ev, V.I.; Bushuev, Y.Y. Ore mineralization in adular-fluorite metasomatites: Evidence of the Podgolechnoe alkalic-type epithermal gold deposit (Central Aldan Ore District, Russia). Key Eng. Mater. 2017, 743, 417–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Krasnov, A.N.; Dorozhkina, L.A.; Trubkin, N.V.; Groznova, E.O.; Myznikov, I.K. Vanadium mineralization of Samolazovsky gold deposit, Central Aldan District. Izv. Vuzov. Geol. I Razved. 2004, 5, 70–72. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  26. Leontiev, V.I.; Bushuev, Y.Y.; Chernigovtsev, K.A. Samolazovskoe gold deposit (Central Aldan ore region): Geological structure and features of deep horizons mineralization. Reg. Geol. Metallog. 2018, 75, 90–103. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  27. Kondratieva, L.A.; Minakov, A.V.; Kravchenko, A.A. Gold-telluride mineralization of the Nimgerkan ore cluster (Aldan shield). In Proceedings of the VNPK; Publishing House of the NEFU: Yakutsk, Russia, 2020; pp. 224–229. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  28. Glushkova, E.G.; Nikiforova, Z.S. Comparative analysis of the proximal wash off placer gold and gold from metasomatites of Tabornoe ore field (West part of Aldan shield). Proc. Russ. Mineral. Soc. 2014, CXLIII, 66–73. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  29. Zubkov, Y.A.; Sagir, A.V.; Chvarova, N.V. “Uguysky” type of large-volume gold deposits formed in the linear weathering crust (South-Western Yakutia). Otechestvennaya Geol. 2020, 2, 32–45. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  30. Terekhov, A.V.; Molchanov, A.V.; Shatov, V.V.; Khorokhorina, E.I.; Soloviev, O.L. Typomorphism of native gold from the Cenozoic deposits of the Gorely creek and its connection with primary sources within the Verkhneamginskiy ore-alluvial cluster (Southern Yakutia). Reg. Geol. Metallog. 2016, 65, 93–103. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  31. Kazhenkina, A.G. Micromineral inclusions in native gold of the Tayakhtakh creek (Khatyrkhaysky ore-alluvial cluster). In Proceedings of the Congress of the Russian Mineralogical Society “200 years of RMO”, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 9–12 October 2017; Volume 1, pp. 229–231. (In Russian). [Google Scholar]
  32. Anisimova, G.S.; Kondratieva, L.A.; Sokolov, E.P.; Kardashevskaya, V.N. Gold mineralization of the Lebedinsky and Kuranakh types in the Verkhneamginsky district (South Yakutia). Otechestvennaya Geol. 2018, 5, 3–13. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  33. Anisimova, G.S.; Kondratieva, L.A.; Kardashevskaia, V.N. Characteristics of Supergene Gold of Karst Cavities of the Khokhoy Gold Ore Field (Aldan Shield, East Russia). Minerals 2020, 10, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Prokopyev, I.R.; Doroshkevich, A.G.; Ponomarchuk, A.V.; Redina, A.A.; Yegitova, I.V.; Ponomarev, J.D.; Sergeev, S.A.; Kravchenko, A.A.; Ivanov, A.I.; Sokolov, E.P.; et al. U-Pb SIMS and Ar-Ar geochronology, petrography, mineralogy and gold mineralization of the late Mesozoic Amga alkaline rocks (Aldan shield, Russia). Ore Geol. Rev. 2019, 109, 520–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Anisimova, G.S.; Sokolov, E.P. The Bodorono deposit—New gold ore object of the Southern Yakutia. Ores Met. 2014, 5, 49–57. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  36. Anisimova, G.S.; Sokolov, E.P. Altan-Chaidakh—Promising object of the Southern Yakutia. Otechestvennaya Geol. 2015, 5, 3–10. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  37. Anisimova, G.S.; Sokolov, E.P.; Kardashevskaya, V.N. Gold-rare-metal (Au-Mo-Te-Bi) mineralization of the Upper-Algominsky gold-bearing region (Southern Yakutia). Otechestvennaya Geol. 2017, 5, 12–22. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  38. Kardashevskaia, V.N.; Anisimova, G.S. Tellurides Pd, Ni, Bi, Pb and Ag from quartz veins of Dyvok ore occurrence (South Yakutia). In Proceedings of the VNPK; Publishing House of the NEFU: Yakutsk, Russia, 2019; pp. 32–35. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  39. MAIK. Tectonics, Geodynamics and Metallogeny of the Territory of the Republic of Sakha (Yakutia); MAIK(International Academic Publishing Company) “Nauka/Interperiodics”: Moscow, Russia, 2001; 571p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  40. Anisimova, G.S.; Kondratieva, L.A.; Kardashevskaya, V.N. Weissbergite (TlSbS2) and avicennite (Tl2O3)—Rare thallium minerals. The first finds in Yakutia. Proc. Russ. Mineral. Soc. 2021, 2, 18–27. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  41. Petrovskaya, N.V.; Fastalovich, A.I.; Ivanov, A.A. Materials on Gold Mineralogy; General Directorate for the Production of Special Non-Ferrous Metals: Moscow, Russia, 1952; 347p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  42. Nikolaeva, L.A.; Gavrilov, A.M.; Nekrasova, A.N.; Yablokova, S.V.; Shatilova, L.V. Native Gold of Ore and Placer Deposits of Russia; TSNIGRI: Moscow, Russia, 2015; 200p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  43. Groves, D.I.; Goldfarb, R.J.; Gebre-Mariam, M.; Hagemann, S.G.; Robert, F. Orogenic gold deposits: A proposed classification in the context of their crustal distribution and relationship to other gold deposit types. Ore Geol. Rev. 1998, 13, 7–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Kovalenker, V.A. Ore-forming systems of epithermal gold and silver deposits: Concepts, reality, models. Probl. Ore Geol. Petrol. Mineral. Geochem. 2004, 39, 160–184. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  45. Pals, D.W.; Spry, P.G.; Chryssoulis, S. Invisible gold and tellurium in arsenic rich pyrite from the Emperor gold deposit, Fiji: Implications for gold distribution and deposition. Econ. Geol. 2003, 98, 479–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Large, R.R.; Maslennikov, V.; Robert, F.; Danyushevsky, L.V.; Chang, Z. Multistage sedimentary and metamorphic origin of pyrite and gold in the giant Sukhoi Log deposit, Lena gold province, Russia. Econ. Geol. 2007, 102, 1233–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Large, R.R.; Maslennikov, V. Invisible Gold Paragenesis and Geochemistry in Pyrite from Orogenic and Sediment-Hosted Gold Deposits. Minerals 2020, 10, 339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Vikentyev, I.V. Invisible and microscopic gold in pyrite: Methods and new data for massive sulfide ores of the Urals. Geol. Ore Depos. 2015, 57, 237–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Gao, F.; Du, Y.; Pang, Z.; Du, Y.; Xin, F.; Xie, J. LA-ICP-MS Trace-Element Analysis of Pyrite from the Huanxiangwa Gold Deposit, Xiong’ershan District, China: Implications for ore genesis. Minerals 2019, 9, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Zhao, J.; Pring, A. Mineral Transformations in Gold–(Silver) Tellurides in the Presence of Fluids: Nature and Experiment. Minerals 2019, 9, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Kovalenker, V.A.; Safonov, Y.G.; Naumov, V.B.; Rusinov, V.L. The Epithermal Gold-Telluride Kochbulak Deposit. Geol. Ore Depos. 1997, 39, 107–128. [Google Scholar]
  52. Kovalenker, V.A.; Plotinskaya, O.Y.; Koneev, R.I. Mineralogy of epithermal gold-sulfide-telluride ores of the Kairagach deposit (Uzbekistan). New Data Miner. 2003, 38, 45–56. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  53. Islamov, F.; Kremenetsky, A.; Minzer, E.; Koneev, R. The Kochbulak-Kairagach ore field. In Au, Ag, and Cu Deposits of Uzbekistan. Excursion Guidebook; GFZ: Potsdam, Germany, 1999; pp. 91–106. [Google Scholar]
  54. Koneev, R.I. Nanomineralogy of Gold in Epithermal Ore Deposits of the Chatkalo-Kuramin Region; Delta: Saint Petersburg, Russia, 2006; 218p. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  55. Koneev, R.I.; Khalmatov, R.A.; Mun, Y.S. Nanomineralogy and nanochemistry of ores from gold deposits of Uzbekistan. Geol. Ore Depos. 2010, 52, 755–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shackleton, J.M.; Spry, P.G.; Bateman, R. Telluride mineralogy of the Golden Mile deposit, Kalgoorlie, Western Australia. Can. Miner. 2003, 41, 1503–1524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Kelley, K.D.; Romberger, S.B.; Beaty, D.W.; Pontius, J.A.; Snee, L.W.; Stein, H.J.; Thompson, T.B. Geochemical and geochronological constraints on the genesis of Au-Te deposits at Cripple Creek, Colorado. Econ. Geol. 1998, 93, 981–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Ahmad, M.; Solomon, M.; Walshe, J.L. Mineralogical and geochemical studies of the Emperor gold telluride deposit, Fiji. Econ. Geol. 1987, 82, 234–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cook, N.J.; Ciobanu, C.L.; Capraru, N.; Damian, G.; Cristea, P. Mineral assemblages from the vein salband at Sacarimb, Golden Quadrilateral, Romania: II. Tellurides. Geochem. Miner. Petrol. 2005, 43, 56–63. [Google Scholar]
  60. Plotinskaya, O.Y.; Novoselov, K.A.; Kovalenker, V.A.; Zeltmann, R. Variations of the Forms of Finding Commercial Components at the Bereznyakovskoye Field (Southern Urals). Materials of the Annual Meeting of the RMO. 2006. Available online: http://www.minsoc.ru/2006-2-51-0 (accessed on 17 October 2006). (In Russian).
  61. Zhai, D.; Liu, J. Gold-telluride-sulfide association in the Sandaowanzi epithermal Au-Ag-Te deposit, NE China: Implications for phase equilibrium and physicochemical conditions. Miner. Petrol. 2014, 108, 853–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhao, J.; Brugger, J.; Xia, F.; Ngothai, Y.; Chen, G.; Pring, A. Dissolution-reprecipitation vs. solid-state diffusion: Mechanism of mineral transformations in sylvanite, (AuAg)2Te4, under hydrothermal conditions. Am. Miner. 2013, 98, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhao, J.; Brugger, J.; Grundler, P.V.; Xia, F.; Chen, G.; Pring, A. Mechanism and kinetics of a mineral transformation under hydrothermal conditions: Calaverite to metallic gold. Am. Miner. 2009, 94, 1541–1555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Xu, W.; Zhao, J.; Brugger, J.; Chen, G.; Pring, A. Mechanism of mineral transformations in krennerite, Au3AgTe8, under hydrothermal conditions. Am. Miner. 2013, 98, 2086–2095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Palyanova, G.A. Gold and Silver Minerals in Sulfide Ore. Geol. Ore Deposits 2020, 62, 383–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Nesterenko, G.V. Forecast of Gold Mineralization by Placers (on the Example of the Regions of Southern Siberia); Nauka: Novosibirsk, Russia, 1991; p. 191. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  67. Murzin, V.V.; Malyugin, A.A. Gold Typomorphism of the Supergene Zone (on the Example of the Urals); Ural Scientific Center AS: Sverdlovsk, Russia, 1987; p. 96. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  68. Gamyanin, G.N.; Nekrasov, I.Y.; Samusikov, V.P. Maldonite from the gold ore occurrences of the Eastern Yakutia. Mineral. J. 1986, 8, 65–71. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  69. Nekrasov, I.Y. Geochemistry, Geology and Genesis of Gold Deposits; Nauka: Moscow, Russia, 1991; p. 302. (In Russian) [Google Scholar]
  70. Ciobanu, C.L.; Cook, N.J.; Pring, A. Bismuth tellurides as gold scavengers. In Mineral Deposit Research: Meeting the Global Challenge; Mao, J.W., Bierlein, F.P., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2005; pp. 1383–1386. [Google Scholar]
  71. Tooth, B.; Brugger, J.; Ciobanu, C.L.; Liu, W. Modelling of gold-scavenging by bismuth melts coexisting with hydrothermal fluids. Geology 2008, 36, 815–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Okrugin, V.M.; Andreeva, E.; Etschmann, B.; Pring, A.; Li, K.; Zhao, J.; Griffiths, G.; Lumpkin, G.R.; Triani, G.; Brugger, J. Microporous gold: Comparison of textures from Nature and experiments. Am. Miner. 2014, 99, 1171–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Tolstykh, N.D.; Palyanova, G.A.; Bobrova, O.V.; Sidorov, E.G. Mustard Gold of the Gaching Ore Deposit (Maletoyvayam Ore Field, Kamchatka, Russia). Minerals 2019, 9, 489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The position of deposits and ore occurrences with telluride mineralization in the structures of the Aldan geoblock of the Aldan-Stanovoy shield. Based on [39]: 1–4—terrains: granite-greenstone (WA—West-Aldan, EBT—Batomgsky, 2—tonalite-trondhjemite gneissic (TN—Tyndinsky), 3—granulite-gneissic (ANM—Nimnyrsky, CG—Chogarsky), 4—granulite-paragneissic (AST—Sutamsky, EUC—Uchursky); 5—zones of tectonic melange (am—Amginskaya, kl—Kalarskaya, tr—Tyrkandinskaya); 6–8—ore districts with Te mineralization: 6—Au-Ag-Te, 7—Au-Bi-Te, 8—mixed.
Figure 1. The position of deposits and ore occurrences with telluride mineralization in the structures of the Aldan geoblock of the Aldan-Stanovoy shield. Based on [39]: 1–4—terrains: granite-greenstone (WA—West-Aldan, EBT—Batomgsky, 2—tonalite-trondhjemite gneissic (TN—Tyndinsky), 3—granulite-gneissic (ANM—Nimnyrsky, CG—Chogarsky), 4—granulite-paragneissic (AST—Sutamsky, EUC—Uchursky); 5—zones of tectonic melange (am—Amginskaya, kl—Kalarskaya, tr—Tyrkandinskaya); 6–8—ore districts with Te mineralization: 6—Au-Ag-Te, 7—Au-Bi-Te, 8—mixed.
Minerals 11 00698 g001
Figure 2. Au-Ag-Te mineralization: (a)—round-oval petzite (Pz) grains in pyrite (Py). Maiskoye ore field of the Tyrkandinsky cluster, (b)—grain of cervelleite (Crv) with hessite (Hs) rim in native gold (Au), Spokoinoye ore field of the Tyrkandinsky cluster, (c)—angular grains of hessite (Hs) and tellurobismuthite (Tbs) in the bornite (Bn)-tennantite (Tnt) matrix, Obman ore occurrence of the Nimgerkansky cluster, (d)—intergrowth of tellurobismuthite (Tbs) with petzite (Pz) and calaverite (Clv) grain in pyrite (Py), Granitnoye ore occurrence of the Nimgerkansky cluster.
Figure 2. Au-Ag-Te mineralization: (a)—round-oval petzite (Pz) grains in pyrite (Py). Maiskoye ore field of the Tyrkandinsky cluster, (b)—grain of cervelleite (Crv) with hessite (Hs) rim in native gold (Au), Spokoinoye ore field of the Tyrkandinsky cluster, (c)—angular grains of hessite (Hs) and tellurobismuthite (Tbs) in the bornite (Bn)-tennantite (Tnt) matrix, Obman ore occurrence of the Nimgerkansky cluster, (d)—intergrowth of tellurobismuthite (Tbs) with petzite (Pz) and calaverite (Clv) grain in pyrite (Py), Granitnoye ore occurrence of the Nimgerkansky cluster.
Minerals 11 00698 g002
Figure 3. Au-Bi-Te mineralization: (a)—particles of native bismuth in bismuthinite (Bim) and Se-hedleyite (Se-Hd) grain in quartz (Qz), the Bodorono deposit of the Verkhnealgominsky cluster, (b)—needle-shaped grain of tellurobismuthite (Tbs) in quartz (Qz), the Bodorono deposit of the Verkhnealgominsky cluster, (c)—merenskyite (Mrk) in в pyrrhotite (Po), the Dyvok ore occurrence of the Verkhnealgominsky cluster, (d)—the relationship of tetradymite (Ttd), bursaite (Brs), sulphotsumoite (Sts) and native gold (Au), the Lagernoye ore occurrence of the Altan-Chaidakhsky ore cluster, (e)—grain of tellurobismuthite (Tbs) in pyrite (Py) among feldspar (Fsp), the Malenkoye ore occurrence of the Guvilgrinsky ore cluster, (f)—tabular grains of tellurobismuthite (Tbs) in quartz (Qz), the Khatyrkhay ore occurrence of the Verkhneamginsky ore cluster.
Figure 3. Au-Bi-Te mineralization: (a)—particles of native bismuth in bismuthinite (Bim) and Se-hedleyite (Se-Hd) grain in quartz (Qz), the Bodorono deposit of the Verkhnealgominsky cluster, (b)—needle-shaped grain of tellurobismuthite (Tbs) in quartz (Qz), the Bodorono deposit of the Verkhnealgominsky cluster, (c)—merenskyite (Mrk) in в pyrrhotite (Po), the Dyvok ore occurrence of the Verkhnealgominsky cluster, (d)—the relationship of tetradymite (Ttd), bursaite (Brs), sulphotsumoite (Sts) and native gold (Au), the Lagernoye ore occurrence of the Altan-Chaidakhsky ore cluster, (e)—grain of tellurobismuthite (Tbs) in pyrite (Py) among feldspar (Fsp), the Malenkoye ore occurrence of the Guvilgrinsky ore cluster, (f)—tabular grains of tellurobismuthite (Tbs) in quartz (Qz), the Khatyrkhay ore occurrence of the Verkhneamginsky ore cluster.
Minerals 11 00698 g003
Figure 4. Native gold: (a)—substitution of tellurobismuthite (Tbs) for smirnite (Sm) and tellurates (TeBiAsO) in porous gold (Au), the Lagernoye ore occurrence of the Altan-Chaidakhsky ore cluster, (b)—replacement of platy grains of tellurobismuthite (Tbs) for native gold (Au) in galenobismutite (Gn-Bim), the Lagernoe ore occurrence of the Altan-Chaidakhsky ore cluster, (c)—spongy gold in goethite (Gth), the Khokhoy ore occurrence of the Verkhneamginsky ore cluster, (d)—porous gold (Au) and tabular grain of tellurobismuthite (Tbs) in quartz (Qz), the Khatyrkhay ore occurrence of the Verkhneamginsky ore cluster; (e)—native gold (Au) in hessite (Hs) and tellurobismuthite (Tbs) grain in bornite (Bn)-tennantite (Tnt) matrix, the Obman ore occurrence of the Nimgercansky ore cluster, (f)—the relationship of native gold (Au), bismuthinite (Bim) and hedleyite (Hd) in quartz (Qz), the Bodorono deposit of the Verkhnealgominsky cluster.
Figure 4. Native gold: (a)—substitution of tellurobismuthite (Tbs) for smirnite (Sm) and tellurates (TeBiAsO) in porous gold (Au), the Lagernoye ore occurrence of the Altan-Chaidakhsky ore cluster, (b)—replacement of platy grains of tellurobismuthite (Tbs) for native gold (Au) in galenobismutite (Gn-Bim), the Lagernoe ore occurrence of the Altan-Chaidakhsky ore cluster, (c)—spongy gold in goethite (Gth), the Khokhoy ore occurrence of the Verkhneamginsky ore cluster, (d)—porous gold (Au) and tabular grain of tellurobismuthite (Tbs) in quartz (Qz), the Khatyrkhay ore occurrence of the Verkhneamginsky ore cluster; (e)—native gold (Au) in hessite (Hs) and tellurobismuthite (Tbs) grain in bornite (Bn)-tennantite (Tnt) matrix, the Obman ore occurrence of the Nimgercansky ore cluster, (f)—the relationship of native gold (Au), bismuthinite (Bim) and hedleyite (Hd) in quartz (Qz), the Bodorono deposit of the Verkhnealgominsky cluster.
Minerals 11 00698 g004
Table 1. Tellurium minerals of the Aldan Shield.
Table 1. Tellurium minerals of the Aldan Shield.
TelluridesSulfotelluridesTellurates
calaverite (AuTe2)Te-canfieldite (Ag8Sn(S,Te)6)smirnite (Bi2TeO5)
montbrayite Au2Te3cervelleite (Ag4TeS)kuranakhite (PbMnTeO6)
krennerite (AuAgTe)tetradymite Bi2Te2Syafsoanite ((Zn,Ca,Pb)3TeO6)
sylvanite (AuAg)2Te4sulphotsumoite (Bi3Te2S)kuksite (Pb3Zn3TeO6(PO4)2)
petzite (Ag3AuTe2)
stutzite (Ag4.7Te)
goldfieldite (Cu12(Te,Sb,As)4S13)cheremnykhite (Pb3Zn3TeO6(VO4)2)
hessite (Ag2Te)
volynskite (AgBiTe2)
V,Si-dugganite (Pb3Zn3Te(As,V,Si)2O4(OH))
tellurobismuthite (Bi2Te3) Unidentified Tl tellurates
hedleyite (Bi7Te3)
tsumoite (BiTe)
Unidentified Tl telluroantimonates
rucklidgeite (PbBi2Te4)
merenskyite ((Pd,Pt)(Bi,Te)2)
melonite (NiTe2)
altaite (PbTe)
coloradoite (HgTe)
Table 2. Types of telluride mineralization of the Aldan shield.
Table 2. Types of telluride mineralization of the Aldan shield.
Ore NodeDeposit, Ore OccurrenceMetasomatitesGeochemical AssociationTe MineralsAssociated MineralsFineness of Native GoldFormation TemperatureReferences
Au-Ag-Te Mineral Type
KuranakhskyBokovoye and DelbeJasperoidsAu-Te in pyrite-quartz metasomatitesAltaite, coloradoite, petzite, krennerite, calaverite, sylvaniteCinnabar, arsenopyrite, stibnite700–900%200–150[14]
Au-Te-Se and Au-tellurates in calcite veinsAltaite, coloradoite, petzite, kuranakhite, yafsoanite, kuksite, cheremnykhite, V,Si-dugganiteClausthalite, naumannite, tiemannite, cinnabar, orpiment, descloizite720–920%120–70[13,14,15,16,17]
YukhtinskySamolazovskoyeJasperoidsAu-Ag-TeHessite, coloradoite, calaveriteCinnabar, tiemannite, acanthite, native Ag, sulvanite, roscoelite [18,21,25,26]
ElkonskyFedorovskoye (Lunnoye)GumbeitesAu-Ag-TeTe-canfieldite, hessite, Ag sulphotellurideNative Ag, acanthite, chlorargyrite, bromargyrite, Ag-Tl sulphosalts [20,21,22]
Ryabinovoye (Muscovitoviy and Noviy)Sericite-microclineAu-Ag-TeHessite, petzite, Pt-Pd telluridesUytenbogaardtite [21]
Dzhekon-
dinsky
PodgolechnoyeSericite-microclineAu-Ag-TeHessite, petzite, montbrayite, stutzite, tellurobismuthiteRoscoelite [24]
Verkhne-TokkinskyGrossGumbeitesAu-Ag-TeHessite, petzite, Te-canfielditeAcanthite [29]
TabornoyeGumbaitesAu-Ag-TeAu and Ag tellurides [28,29]
Verkhneam-
ginsky
KhokhoyJasperoidsAu-Te-Sb-TlTl tellurates and telluroantimonatesWeissbergite, avicennite, acanthite, chlorargyrite, Tl antimonates834–992% [32,33,40]
Complex Au-Ag-Te-Bi Mineral Type
LebedinskyLebedinoye, RadostnoyeJasperoidsAu-Ag-Bi-TeHessite, calaverite, altaite, tetradymiteNative Ag, Bi, cinnabar, aikinite,
lillianite, bursaite, Bi tennantite-annivite, tennantite, arsenosulvanite
[19,41]
Nimger-
kansky
Obman, GranitnoyeArgillizitesAu-Ag-Bi-TeHessite, petzite, calaverite, tellurobismuthite, volynskite, goldfielditeTennantite, jalpaite776–809% [27]
Verkhne-
amginsky
KhatyrkhayGumbeites, beresitesAu-Ag-Bi-TeTellurobismuthite, hessite, petzite, altaite, calaverite, tsumoiteTennantite858–878%230–210[30,31,32,34]
VerkhealgominskyDyvokArgillizites, beresitesAu-Ag-Bi-TeHessite, altaite, volynskite, merenskyite,
melonite, rucklidgeite
650–830%230–200[38] and unpublished authors’ data
TyrkandinskySpokoinoye,
Maiskoye
Argillizites, beresites, sericite-microclineAu-Ag-Bi-TePetzite, hessite, cervelleite, tellurobismuthiteAcanthite, galena, matildite, native Bi and Sn, scheelite761–783% unpublished authors’ data
Au-Bi-Te Mineral Type
Verkhe-
algominsky
BodoronoBeresites, argillizitesAu-Bi-TeTellurobismuthite, tetradymite, hedleyite, Se hedleyite, smirniteNative Bi, bismuthinite,
lillianite, Se galena, laitakarite
830–940%200–150[35,37]
Altan-Chai-dakhskyLagernoyeBeresites, argillizitesAu-Bi-TeTetradymite, tellurobismuthite, sulphotsumoiteBursaite, lillianite, cosalite, galenobismutite862–893%365–276[36]
Guvilgrin-
sky
MalenkoyeArgillizitesAu-Bi-TeTellurobismuthite, petziteGalena, scheelite898–999% unpublished authors’ data
Table 3. Chemical composition of tellurides and sulfotellurides of Au, Ag by EMP analysis.
Table 3. Chemical composition of tellurides and sulfotellurides of Au, Ag by EMP analysis.
MineralTeAuAgBiHgCuFeNiSnSeSReferences
Kuranakh. Pyrite-Quartz Metasomatites
Petzite (7)36.6020.9440.51 1.33 [14]
Krennerite (7)59.0133.127.27
Calaverite (9)57.9141.520.33
Sylvanite (5)63.3325.6210.21 0.30
Kuranakh. Calcite Veins
Petzite (5)33.9020.0541.10 2.00 1.110.09[14]
Maiskoye
Hessite (5)37.60–38.59
38.40
61.61–62.74
62.34
unpublished authors’ data
Cu cervelleite23.12–23.46
23.29
65.32–65.77
65.55
2.64–3.47
3.06
4.63–4.83
4.73
Petzite (13)34.38–37.32
35.60
17.63–24.08
21.71
41.78–45.89
43.17
Spokoinoye
Hessite (4)38.46–40.29
39.33
60.14–61.32
60.59
unpublished authors’ data
Cervelleite (2)25.12–27.37
26.25
65.19-68.23
66.71
4.59–5.07
4.83
Cu cervelleite (3)24.14-24.41
24.31
66.00-66.83
66.32
5.15-5.92
5.53
4.93-5.38
5.22
Dyvok
Hessite (2)37.2–40
38.60
55.88–58.92
57.40
0–0.69
0.35
1.81–2.96
2.39
0–0.99
0.50
unpublished authors’ data
Nimgerkan
Hessite (14)33.99–38.99
36.32
59.27–63.44
61.32
0–2.92
1.77
[27]
Petzite (3)31.73–32.95
32.20
23.68–24.79
24.40
40.96–41.53
41.24
0–3.85
2.46
0–2.41
0.80
Calaverite (2)47.98–48.73
48.35
46.85–46.96
46.9
1.79–2.36
2.07
Podgolechnoye
Montbrayite46.6053.40 [24]
Petzite (8)30.78–34.92
33.54
21.98–27.21
25.29
38.81–42.00
41.25
Stutzite (2)43.21–45.03
44.12
54.97–56.79
55.88
Hessite (13)35.61–40.22
38.06
0-4.4
0.34
58.31–64.39
61.66
Lunnoye
Te-canfieldite (7)18.63–19.17
18.96
62.98–63.65
63.40
7.81–8.20
8.01
9.22–9.56
9.42
[22]
Khatyrkhay
Petzite32.6725.3141.86 [34]
Hessite34.624.9160.71 0.48
Note. The Table 3, Table 4, Table 6 and Table 7 above the line show the minimum and maximum values, below the line–the average value, in parentheses–the number of analyses.
Table 4. Chemical composition of Pb, Hg, Pd and Cu tellurides and sulfotellurides.
Table 4. Chemical composition of Pb, Hg, Pd and Cu tellurides and sulfotellurides.
MineralTeAgBiPbHgCuFeAsNiPdSeSReferences
Kuranakh. Pyrite-Quartz Metasomatites
Altaite39.640.52 59.36 [14]
Coloradoite39.90 0.8258.05
Kuranakh. Calcite Veins
Altaite31.83 63.54 1.352.97[14]
Coloradoite38.58 0.80 1.000.11
Dyvok
Merenskyite66.9 5.44 1.05 4.0124.55 unpublished authors’ data
Altaite37.2 60.25 2.92
Melonite74.34 4.22 20.15 2.58
Nimgerkan
Goldfieldite (2)14.43–15.07
14.75
49.66–50.70
50.18
0–1.08
0.54
8.92–9.53
9.23
26.14–26.58
26.36
[27]
Table 5. Chemical composition of supergene Te minerals of the Kuranakh deposit.
Table 5. Chemical composition of supergene Te minerals of the Kuranakh deposit.
MineralTeO3ZnOCaOPbOAs2O3P2O5V2O5Sb2O5SiO2MnOH2OReferences
Yafsoanite (crystals) (11)42.1124.6516.7912.82 0.21 2.02[14]
Yafsoanite (Concentric-zonal) (15)39.9127.3818.478.86 1.56 2.77
Zn-yafsoanite (5)38.3350.230.609.19 2.13 1.16
Kuksite (9)14.3020.761.4550.59 10.381.81 0.40 [16]
Cheremnykhite (10)13.7618.89 53.042.02 9.25 2.16
V,Si-dugganite (8)14.1518.33 51.947.10 4.300.252.37 0.25[15]
Kuranakhite38.20 45.40 15.40 [13]
Table 6. Chemical composition of supergene Te minerals of the Khokhoy deposit.
Table 6. Chemical composition of supergene Te minerals of the Khokhoy deposit.
MineralTeSbTlOReferences
Tl tellurates (3)20.22–21.89
21.00
60.85–61.77
61.29
17.24–17.45
17.37
unpublished authors’ data
Tl telluroantimonates (4)6.00–6.91
6.45
9.37–11.20
10.30
65.25–67.50
66.25
17.17–18.34
17.73
Table 7. Chemical composition of tellurides and sulfotellurides Bi.
Table 7. Chemical composition of tellurides and sulfotellurides Bi.
MineralTeAgBiPbCuFeSbSeSReferences
Altan-Chaidakhsky
Tellurobismuthite (3)45.25–46.3
45.72
51.46–52.47
51.98
[36]
Tetradymite (19)31.63–35.14
34.36
0–0.5
0.03
56.09–59.55
57.63
0–4.48
1.05
0–0.2
0.07
4.67–5.34
4.95
Pb-tetradymite (7)30.6–31.12
30.90
053.46–55.01
54.53
6.00–7.97
7.06
0.02–0.15
0.09
5.64–5.84
5.72
Sulphotsumoite (2)21.57–22.64
22.11
0–0.02
0.01
71.01–71.86
71.44
0.38–1.45
0.92
0.07–0.08
0.08
2.98–3.19
3.09
Khatyrkhay
Tellurobismuthite (18)47.36–49.67
48.54
0–0.30
0.05
49.27–52.17
50.31
0–0.08
0.01
0–0.11
0.03
0–0.09
0.04
0–0.03
0.00
[32]
Tetradymite (3)36.53–37.50
37.12
0.0056.67–58.02
57.19
0–0.07
0.02
0–0.08
0.03
0.02–0.04
0.03
4.19–4.33
4.27
Tsumoite (3)34.59–38.00
35.75
62.00–65.41
64.25
[30]
Bodorono
Hedleyite19.71 80.14 [37]
Se
hedleyite (2)
13.77–16.59
15.18
80.06–80.89
8.47
3.72–5.17
4.44
Sulphotsumoite22.49 64.864.4 5.59
Tetradymite35.84 59.32 4.84
Guvilgra
Tellurobismuthite48.4 53.41 unpublished authors’ data
Nimgerkan
Tellurobismuthite (10)42.93–46.38
44.91
49.42–55.68
52.57
0–5.81
1.47
0–2.65
0.88
[27]
Volynskite (4)40.01–42.35
40.79
18.02–20.58
19.77
32.11–36.30
34.03
4.00–4.94
4.44
0–1.48
0.37
Dyvok
Volynskite41.4818.5334.481.6 2.69 0.69unpublished authors’ data
Rucklidgeite47.35 36.7812.62 4.49 0.59
Maiskoye
Tellurobismuthite (6)47.69–49.16
48.21
51.17–52.60
51.95
unpublished authors’ data
Podgolechnoye
Tellurobismuthite (2)47.32–48.91
48.00
51.09–52.24
52.00
[24]
Lebedinoye
Tetradymite (2)34.66–35.44
35.05
0.0358.13–58.85
58.49
0–0.61
0.3
0.08–0.18
0.13
0–0.03
0.01
0.25–0.33
0.29
4.55–4.59
4.57
[19]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kondratieva, L.A.; Anisimova, G.S.; Kardashevskaia, V.N. Types of Tellurium Mineralization of Gold Deposits of the Aldan Shield (Southern Yakutia, Russia). Minerals 2021, 11, 698. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/min11070698

AMA Style

Kondratieva LA, Anisimova GS, Kardashevskaia VN. Types of Tellurium Mineralization of Gold Deposits of the Aldan Shield (Southern Yakutia, Russia). Minerals. 2021; 11(7):698. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/min11070698

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kondratieva, Larisa A., Galina S. Anisimova, and Veronika N. Kardashevskaia. 2021. "Types of Tellurium Mineralization of Gold Deposits of the Aldan Shield (Southern Yakutia, Russia)" Minerals 11, no. 7: 698. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/min11070698

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop