Next Article in Journal
A Feasibility Study of CSEM in Geological Advance Forecast with Horizontal Casing Well
Next Article in Special Issue
Sericite 40Ar/39Ar Dating and Indosinian Mineralization in the Liushuping Au–Zn Deposit, West Qinling Orogen, China
Previous Article in Journal
Alkali Recovery of Bauxite Residue by Calcification
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chemical Composition and Strontium Isotope Characteristics of Scheelite from the Doranasai Gold Deposit, NW China: Implications for Ore Genesis

1
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Orogenic Belts and Crustal Evolution, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
2
Xinjiang Research Center for Mineral Resources, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Geological Processes and Mineral Resources, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 24 April 2022 / Revised: 7 May 2022 / Accepted: 16 May 2022 / Published: 18 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mineral Resources in North China Craton)

Abstract

:
Scheelite, as a common accessory mineral found in hydrothermal deposits, is an indicator that allows the study of the ore-forming hydrothermal process and the tracing of fluid sources. The Doranasai gold deposit is a large-sized orogenic gold deposit in the South Altai, and orebodies occur as veins in the Devonian Tuokesalei Formation and Permian albite granite dykes. The ores are quartz veins and altered tectonites (rocks). Here, scheelite can be observed in the early-stage milky quartz veins, the middle-stage smoky quartz-polymetallic sulfide veins, and the altered albite granite dykes. In this study, the scheelites of these three types were carefully investigated in terms of texture, element, and isotope geochemistry to understand their ore-forming processes and fluid sources. The results showed that all types of scheelite were rich in Sr and poor in Mo, indicating that their ore-forming fluids had no genetic relation to magmatic–hydrothermal activities. The scheelites were characterized by the enrichment of medium rare earth element (MREE) and positive Eu anomaly in the chondrite-standardized REE patterns. This indicated the REE differentiation between scheelite and fluid, i.e., REE3+ and Na+ were in the form of valence compensation, preferentially replacing Ca2+ and selectively entering the scheelite lattice. The trace element composition of scheelite showed that the ore-forming fluid system was relatively closed, mesothermal, Na-rich, and reductive. The Sr isotope ratio of the scheelite (0.704819–0.70860, average 0.706372) was higher than that of the ore-bearing albite granite dyke (0.704654–0.704735), indicating that the Tuokesalei Formation is the main source for the fluids forming the Doranasai deposit.

1. Introduction

The Doranasai deposit is a large gold deposit located on the southern margin of Altai on the Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB) [1]. Since its discovery, previous studies have focused on the characteristics of its ore geology, ore-controlling structures, ore-forming fluids, and metallogenic ages [1,2,3,4,5,6]. However, there are two contrasting views on the genetic types of the deposit: (1) the Doranasai gold deposit is closely related to albite granite dyke, and ore-forming fluids mainly come from magmatic fluids [4,6]; (2) according to the fact that orebodies are controlled by faults, some scholars have confirmed that the gold deposit belongs to the orogenic type, and the ore-forming fluids mainly come from metamorphic devolatilization [1,7,8,9]. Therefore, identifying the nature and source of the ore-forming fluids in the Doranasai gold deposit is the key to understanding ore genesis.
Scheelite is commonly found in hydrothermal deposits such as porphyry–skarn tungsten–molybdenum deposits, quartz vein tungsten deposits, and orogenic gold deposits [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17], and is widely used as an indicator to study the genesis of hydrothermal deposits and to trace the source of ore-forming fluids [11,13,15,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Scheelite is often rich in REE, Sr, Pb, Mo, and other elements because REE3+ and Sr2+ can substitute Ca2+, and Mo6+ can substitute W6+ as an isomorphic form and enter the scheelite lattice during crystallization. Thus, trace elements of scheelite always provide significant information to understand the ore-forming process and fluid sources [10,11,13,17,27]. For example, Song et al. (2019) carried out a scheelite Sr isotope study of the Gaojiazhuang porphyry–skarn tungsten deposit in the Anhui Province, which showed that the W-Mo-bearing fluids were mainly sourced from the crust [28].
In this contribution, we present new data obtained from detailed petrographic, elemental, and Sr isotope studies of scheelite samples collected from altered albite granite dykes, early-stage milky quartz veins, and middle-stage quartz–polymetallic sulfide veins occurring in the Doranasai gold deposit, and thereby we discuss the source and evolution of ore-forming fluids and the ore-forming process of the Doranasai gold deposit.

2. Regional Geology

Altai Orogen is situated in the core part of the CAOB (Figure 1a) and comprises magmatic, metamorphic rocks, and ore deposits [29]. The Chinese Altai is in the southern part of Altai Orogen. It includes four tectonic units, namely North Altai, Central Altai, South Altai and the Irtysh Belt, which are divided by the Hongshanzui, Abagong and Kezijia’er faults, respectively (Figure 1b) [30]. The stratigraphic units in North Altai include the Upper Devonian Kumasu Formation and the Lower Carboniferous Hongshanzui Formation, which are composed of clastic sedimentary rocks, limestone, and a small proportion of volcanic rocks. The Central Altai is characteristic of the middle–high-grade metamorphic sedimentary rocks of the Sinian- or Neoproterozoic-Middle Ordovician Habahe Group and the low greenschist facies turbidite sequences of Middle Ordovician Kulumuti Formation. The South Altai is composed of volcanic rocks of the Lower Devonian Kangbutiebao Formation and volcanic sedimentary rocks of the Middle Devonian Altay Formation. The Irtysh Belt is covered by the Carboniferous Kala’erqisi Formation [31]. Granitoids account for 40% of the area [32], and are mainly formed at about 400 Ma and 270 Ma [33,34]. Ordovician–Silurian granitoids have calc-alkaline characteristics which are related to oceanic plate subduction, while the Permian alkaline granitoids were mainly formed in the collision to post-collision setting after the closure of the ocean basin [35].
Altai Orogen contains huge amounts of VMS, skarn, and orogenic deposits, and is one of the largest metallogenic belts of Cu-Pb-Zn, Au and rare metals in the CAOB. In the Chinese Altai, Ashele Cu-Pb-Zn deposit, Keketale Pb-Zn deposit, and Mengku Fe skarn deposit were formed in the Paleozoic trench–arc–basin system [30,36,37]. The orogenic gold deposits mainly developed along the 600-kilometre-long Irtysh fault zone and its secondary faults, including the Doranasai, Tokuzbay and Sarbulak deposits [1,38,39] (Figure 1b). These gold deposits are believed to have developed during the Permian continental collision between the Kazakhsta and Mongol–Siberian plates [7,38]. The pegmatite-related rare metal deposits, represented by the Koktokay (Keketuohai) No. 3 Vein, are important ore systems generated during the post-collisional extension setting during the late-stage evolution of the CAOB [40].

3. Deposit Geology

3.1. Local Geology

The Doranasai gold deposit is located in the northeast of the Irtysh Belt and on the west side of the Ma’erkakuli Fault in the south part of the Chinese Altai (Figure 1b). The exposed strata in the Doranasai deposit mainly comprise the third lithologic member of the Middle Devonian Tuokesalei Formation (Figure 2a), which is composed of clastic rocks intercalated with carbonate and siliceous rocks. The Tuokesalei Formation includes four members numbered from the bottom to the top [41]. The first member is composed of dark-gray fine sandstones and siltstones, which mainly distribute in the external contact zone of the Donggele pluton in the east, and minor in the northwest. The second member comprises greenish-gray fine sandstone and siltstone intercalated with sericite–chlorite phyllites; it develops well in the east and west of the deposit and is an important layer hosting gold orebodies. The third member consists of dark-gray carbonaceous bioclastic limestones, and constitutes the northeast and southwest wings of the Aksay syncline, respectively. It is also an ore-bearing layer. The fourth member mainly comprises dark-gray carbonaceous phyllites intercalated with marble and siliceous slate lenses, forming the core of the Aksay syncline (Figure 2a).
The Donggele granodiorite is conspicuous in the Doranasai deposit, intruding into the fine-grained sandstone and siltstone of the third lithologic member of the Middle Devonian Tuokesalei Formation (Figure 2a). In mineralogy terms, it is mainly composed of plagioclase, quartz, amphibole, biotite, and accessory minerals such as magnetite, apatite and zircon. A previous study has reported an Rb-Sr isochron age of 289 ± 5 Ma for granodiorite [42]. In addition, several albite granite dykes occur at the deposit. They are NNE-striking, NW-dipping and closely related to gold mineralization [6].
The structures in the Doranasai deposit (Figure 2a) are characterized by the nearly north-to-south-trending Aksay overturned syncline and its associated faults. The Aksay syncline elongates for more than 15 km with a width of 2–3 km. The core of the syncline is carbonaceous phyllite and the two wings are mainly of carbonaceous bioclastic limestone [3]. The faults in the deposit are mainly NNE-trending, followed by NW-trending and near-EW-trending. The F1 fault, located in the center of the deposit, is an interlayer fault between metamorphic sandstone and siltstone and the bioclastic limestone of the Tuokesalei Formation, which is about 5 km long and 20–50 m wide, dipping to NNW with angles of 60–85°. This fault controls the occurrence of orebodies in three prospects (Nos. I, II, and III) and by the emplacement of albite granite dykes [4]. The F2 fault is also an interlayer fault between carbonaceous phyllite and the metamorphic sandstone–siltstone assemblage of the Tuokesalei Formation. It is 5 km long, dipping to NNW with angles of 70–85°.

3.2. Ore Geology

The 28 orebodies of the Doranasai gold deposit occur along fault F1 in the east wing of the Aksay overturned syncline. The ore-bearing altered tectonite zone is about 3 km long from north to south, and is 50–200 m wide. The orebodies are divided into three prospects from north to south, i.e., No. III, No. I and No. II, respectively. These orebodies yield more than 20 t Au in metal, with an average grade of 5.5 g/t [3].
The No. II prospect of the Doranasai gold deposit contains eight industrial and eight low-grade orebodies controlled by the ductile shear zone [34]. Most orebodies occur in the metamorphic sandstone–siltstone assemblage in the footwall of the shear zone, i.e., the F1 fault (Figure 2b). The main orebody is 260 m long, 0.5–6 m wide, and 250–430 m deep, striking nearly north-to-south and dipping to the west with angles of 78–82°.
The ores of the Doranasai gold deposit mainly include quartz vein and altered rock (tectonite) types [3]. Altered-rock-type ores include altered phyllite, altered sandstone, and altered albite granite dyke. Quartz-vein-type ores mostly occur in the altered albite granite dyke in the form of veins and veinlets. The main ore minerals include pyrite, chalcopyrite, pyrrhotite, galena, sphalerite and scheelite, followed by hematite, cassiterite, molybdenite and tellurite. Gold occurs as natural gold, electrum and calaverite. Gangue minerals include plagioclase, quartz, calcite, dolomite, biotite and rutile. Wall–rock alterations include albitization, pyritization, sericitization, silicification, chloritization and carbonation. Pyritization, sericitization and silicification are the most widespread and closely related to gold mineralization [4], constituting the commonly used term of phyllic alteration.
Based on crosscutting relationships between ore veins and their mineral assemblages, the ore-forming process is divided into three stages [1]: (1) the early-stage quartz–albite vein (Figure 3a–c), in which milky quartz and albite (scheelite ± pyrite ± sericite) occur as veinlets, massive blocks and lenticules; (2) the middle-stage quartz–polymetallic sulfide vein (Figure 3d–f), in which quartz presents as fine veins containing various amount of metal sulfides such as pyrite, chalcopyrite, sphalerite, galena, scheelite, natural gold, electrum and calaverite; (3) the last is the barren quartz–carbonate stage, composed of quartz, calcite, and a small amount of pyrite.

4. Samples and Analytical Methods

4.1. Sample Characteristics

Scheelite samples in this study were collected from the No. II and No. III prospects of the Doranasai gold deposit. Three types of scheelite were distinguished in the samples examined (Figure 3). Type I scheelite occurs as anhedral crystals less than 20 mm in diameter and disseminates in early-stage milky quartz vein (samples 3-19, 3-18, 3-KK-19 and 9001-9) (Figure 3a–c). Type II scheelite occurs as subhedral crystals less than 10 mm in diameter and disseminated in middle-stage smoky quartz–polymetallic sulfide vein, showing intergrowth features with quartz, pyrite and gold (samples 3-KK-13, 3-KK-20, 3-KK-26 and 3-KK-26-6) (Figure 3d–f). Type III scheelite is characterized by relatively fine-grained (0.5 to 2 mm in diameter) crystals in altered albite granite dyke (samples 3-9 and 3-15) (Figure 3g–i).

4.2. Analytical Methods

SEM, cathodoluminescence, and backscatter images were taken in the Guangzhou Tuoyan Testing Technology Co., Ltd., China. The scanning electron microscope model was TESCAN MIRA 3, and the working electric field voltage was 10.0–15.0 kV. The main element content of the mineral was obtained by the energy spectrum. The model was EDAX. The detection voltage of the energy spectrum was 20–25 kV and the working distance was 15–16 mm.
The EMPA data of the scheelite were completed at the Shandong Academy of Geological Sciences, and the instrument model was JEOL JXA8100. The experimental conditions were as follows: accelerating voltage 15 kV; beam current 12 Na; beam spot 5 mm; counting time 10–30 s; and the analytical accuracy of all elements was better than 1.5%. Taking natural minerals and synthetic oxides as standards, the data were corrected based on the ZAF program.
The trace element analysis of scheelite was performed using LA-ICP-MS in the laboratory of Guangzhou Tuoyan Detection Technology Co., Ltd., China. The ArF excimer laser ablation system (193 nm wavelength) was coupled with Agilent 7500a ICP-MS and a 1 m transmission tube. Helium was used as a carrier gas and argon as a make-up gas mixed with a carrier gas through the T-joint before entering the ICP. The maximum signal intensity was obtained by ablating the NIST srm610 test while maintaining a low ratio of ThO/Th (0.1–0.3%) and Ca2+/Ca+ (0.4–0.7%) to reduce the interference of oxides and double-charged ions. When ablating NIST srm610, the 238U/232Th ratio used as a complete vaporization indicator remained around 1. A micro flow PFA-100 self-priming Teflon atomizer was used for solution ICP-MS analysis. Each sample LA-ICP-MS analysis included a background acquisition of about 30 s, and then 50 s of data. NIST SRM 610 analysis was performed for every eight samples of beam spot analyses to correct the time-dependent drift of ICP-MS sensitivity and mass resolution [43]. The reference glass (MPI-DING) detection interluded before and after sample analysis.
The in situ Sr isotope of scheelite was carried out using LA-MC-ICP-MS in the National Geological Experiment Center of the Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences. An excimer laser ablation system (Australian scientific instruments and Resonics) with a resolution of 193 nm was used, which was equipped with an M-50 laser ablation cell (Lauren Technology Ltd. and Australian National University) and coupled with a Nu plasma HR MC-ICP-MS instrument (Nu Instruments, North Wales, UK).

5. Results

The results of the EMPA data for the major elements of the scheelite samples are shown in Table 1. The CaO content ranged from 19.44 to 19.64 wt% (average 19.56 wt%) for type I scheelite, from 19.41 to 19.83 wt% (average 19.62 wt%) for type II scheelite, and from 19.64 to 19.65 wt% (average 19.65 wt%) for type III scheelite. The WO3 content ranged from 79.97 to 80.60 wt% (average 80.24 wt%) for type I scheelite, from 79.67 to 80.75 wt% (average 80.19 wt%) for type II scheelite, and from 80.28 to 81.02 wt% (average 80.65 wt%) for type III scheelite (Table 1). Most of the other components were negligible, except for MoO3, which averaged 0.06 and 0.15 wt% for type I scheelite, 0.06 and 0.29 wt% for type II scheelite, and 0.16 wt% for type III scheelite (Table 1). Therefore, the three types of scheelite had similar EMPA results for the major elements.
The results of the LA-ICP-MS analyses for the REE and trace elements of the scheelite samples are shown in Table 2. Type I scheelite had ranges of ΣREE from 261 to 626 ppm (average 454 ppm), LREE/HREE (note LREE = La to Eu; HREE = Gd to Lu) ratios from 0.79 to 2.05 (average 1.61), δEu from 1.34 to 1.70 (average 1.49), Cr from 0.053 to 83.4 ppm (average 22.7 ppm), Sr from 848 to 1366 ppm (average 1126 ppm), Mo from 56.3 to 268 ppm (average 135 ppm), and Pb from 19.0 to 33.6 ppm (average 24.7 ppm). Type II scheelite had ranges of ΣREE from 350 to 6263 ppm (average 1340 ppm), LREE/HREE ratios from 1.14 to 4.06 (average 2.23), δEu from 1.15 to 2.54 (average 1.74), Cr from 2.65 to 1938 ppm (average 314 ppm), Sr from 742 to 3138 ppm (average 1332 ppm), Mo from 41.8 to 658 ppm (average 144 ppm), and Pb from 25.7 to 310 ppm (average 85.2 ppm). Type III scheelite had ΣREE ranges from 350 to 613 ppm (average 482 ppm), LREE/HREE ratios from 1.28 to 1.49 (average 1.39), δEu from 1.34 to 1.86 (average 1.60), Cr from 0.672 to 62.2 ppm (average 31.4 ppm), Sr from 960 to 1210 ppm (average 1085 ppm), Mo from 29.9 to 222 ppm (average 126 ppm), and Pb from 31.4 to 35.2 ppm (average 33.3 ppm).
The three types of scheelite had seagull-shaped chondrite-normalized [44] REE patterns and positive Eu anomalies (Figure 4). The REE patterns of scheelite were characterized by MREE enrichment, which is similar to Archaean gold deposits from Western Australia but different from Donggele granodiorite in the ore district (Figure 4) [11]. The scheelite from the Doranasai gold deposit had a ΣREY range of 404–7976 ppm, which was higher than that of Donggele granodiorite and albite granite dyke, and also higher than the Woxi Au-Sb-W deposit in Western Hunan (ΣREY = 40.5–124 ppm) [21] and the Nanyangtian W-polymetallic deposit in southeast Yunnan (ΣREY = 96.1–252 ppm) [45], but similar to the Archaean gold deposits in Western Australia (ΣREY = 288–4377 ppm) [11].
The results of the in situ Sr isotope data of the scheelite samples are shown in Table 3. The 87Sr/86Sr ratios of type I scheelite were between 0.704820 and 0.708606 (average 0.706111), while those of type II scheelite were between 0.705041 and 0.708047 (average 0.706582), showing similar 87Sr/86Sr ratios between the early and middle stages. To evaluate the source of the fluids and metals, the Sr isotope ratios of the scheelite were calculated at 291 Ma [5], and reported as ISr(291Ma). The Rb content of scheelite in each stage was very low, while the Sr content was high. The Rb/Sr ratio ranged from 0.00002 to 0.00151. The ISr(291Ma) values of type I scheelite ranged from 0.704820 to 0.708606, with an average of 0.706111, lower than that of type II scheelite, which had ISr(291Ma) values of 0.705041 to 0.708046 (average 0.706580). Thus, the 87Sr/86Sr ratio of scheelite measured in the Doranasai gold deposit was equivalent to the ISr(291Ma).

6. Discussion

6.1. Redox State of Ore-Forming Fluids

The content of Mo in scheelite can indicate the redox properties of ore-forming fluids [24,27,28,46]. Mo6+ can substitute for W6+ in complete solid solution series between scheelite (CaWO4) and powellite (CaMoO4) due to their similar coordination number, ionic radii, and valence states [47]. Mo is transported as Mo6+ and enters scheelite by substituting W6+ under oxidizing conditions; however, when fO2 decreases, Mo6+ is reduced to Mo4+ and precipitates as molybdenite (MoS2) [46,48]. In the Doranasai gold deposit, the average Mo content of type I, II, and III scheelite is 135 ppm, 144 ppm, and 126 ppm, respectively. It is similar to typical orogenic gold deposits such as Sigma, Mt. Charlotte, and Daping gold deposits, which were probably formed under reducing conditions [11,15,26].
The ion radius of Ca2+ is 1.12 Å, while that of Eu2+ and Eu3+ in scheelite is 1.25 Å and 1.066 Å, respectively [47]. Therefore, both Eu2+ and Eu3+ can enter the scheelite lattice to replace Ca2+. However, because Eu2+ and Ca2+ have the same charge, Eu can relatively easily substitute the Ca of scheelite under reduction conditions, resulting in a positive abnormality of Eu. Different types of scheelite in the Doranasai gold deposit show positive Eu anomalies, indicating the relative reduction of ore-forming fluids. The positive Eu anomaly of scheelite in the Doranasai gold deposit may be related to the sericitization of plagioclase in the host-rock, because Eu and Ca are enriched in plagioclase and released during plagioclase sericitization, and are then uptaken by scheelite or carbonate (Figure 3h).

6.2. Ore-Forming Process Indicated by the REE Patterns

Scheelite from different ore systems and even different mineralization stages often show quite different REE compositions [49]. Because the ionic radii of trivalent REE (REY if Y is included) are similar to Ca2+, the REE3+ can substitute for Ca2+ in scheelite [49]. The REE characteristics of scheelite are strongly affected by charge balance and crystal structure. Two most important substitution mechanisms of REEs for Ca in scheelite are [49]:
2Ca2+↔REE3+ + Na+
3Ca2+↔2REE3++□Ca (□Ca stands for site vacancy)
Equation (1) requires the coupling substitution of charge balance compensation (Na+), while Equation (2) involves isomorphic substitution. Different substitution mechanisms affect the REE model of scheelite [24,49,50]. If Na is an element that provides charge balance, the ion radius of REE3+ that preferentially replaces Ca can be calculated according to Equation (1) [49]. Ghaderi et al. (1999) used the ion radius of [47] for coordination, and considered that MREE with ion radii close to 1.06 Å preferentially substituted the Ca position [49], which would cause MREE enrichment mode (bell shape). For Equation (2), Ca2+ in scheelite is replaced by REE3+ with a vacancy [49], which will reduce the hardness of the Ca site in scheelite and eliminate the limitation of the ion radius on the element substitute [24,28,49]. According to Coulomb’s law, when the vacancy Ca is located between two REE substitution sites, the energy level of this substitution is minimized. Therefore, this process does not involve the preferential substitution of Ca2+ by MREE. The rare earth distribution pattern of MREE enrichment of scheelite in the Doranasai gold deposit indicates that REEs enter scheelite mainly through Equation (1). Therefore, REEs enter scheelite through the combination of REE3+ and Na+ to selectively replace Ca2+ in scheelite lattice in the form of valence compensation, indicating that they are mainly formed in Na-rich hydrothermal solutions. This is consistent with the scheelite in the gold deposits of the Kalgoorlie–Northman greenstone belt, Western Australia [49].
Mo, Bi, Sn, Nb and Ta can also enter the scheelite lattice due to their similar electronegativity to W [51]. The contents of Mo, Bi, Sn, Nb and Ta in the scheelite of the Doranasai gold deposit are relatively low, indicating that the ore-forming fluids may not be a high-temperature fluid formed by magmatic crystallization and differentiation. On the contrary, the CL characteristics and REE distribution patterns of scheelite are similar to those of typical metamorphic hydrothermal gold deposits. For example, the Sr content in the scheelite of the gold deposits in Kalgoorlie and the Northman–Cambalda Archean greenstone belts (Western Australia) ranges from 341 to 4280 ppm, and the Mo content mainly ranges from 0.1 to 10 ppm, while the contents of Ba, Bi, Sn, Nb, Ta and other elements are generally less than 1 ppm [11]. Accordingly, the contents of rare elements in scheelite samples indicate that the ore-forming fluids of the Doranasai gold deposit should be metamorphic in origin.

6.3. Source of Ore-Forming Fluids

Based on the geochemical characteristics of fluid inclusions, Ridley and Diamond (2000) proposed that the Sr-Nd-Pb isotope can be used to trace the source of ore-forming fluids [52]. The Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes of ores have been successfully applied to trace the fluid sources of hydrothermal deposits [53,54,55,56,57]. For example, Kempe et al. (2001) studied the Sr-Nd isotopes of scheelite in the Muruntau gold deposit in western Tianshan and concluded that the ore-forming fluids had been sourced from the metamorphic devolatilization of sedimentary rocks [58]. Zhang et al. (2009) believe that the ore-forming fluids of the Yangshan gold deposit in Qinling Orogen are derived from the Bikou Group based on the Sr-Pb isotopic results of ore sulfides [55]; Niu et al. (2018) traced the ore-forming fluids using the Sr-Nd-Pb isotopes of ore sulfides and the wall–rocks of the Sarekuobu orogenic gold deposit and approved that the fluids were mainly derived from the ore-hosting Kangbutiebao Formation [59]. Abulimiti et al. (2021b) constrained the source of ore-forming fluids to the Altai Formation and diorite dykes by using sulfides and wall–rock Sr–Nd–Pb isotopes of the Tokuzbay gold deposit in the South Altai [60].
The ISr(291Ma) averages of type I and type II scheelite from the Doranasai gold deposit were 0.706111 and 0.706580, respectively, which were higher than those of the Donggele granodiorite and the ore-bearing albite granite dyke. The Donggele granodiorite yielded ISr(291Ma) values of 0.705385–0.706105, with an average of 0.705643, and the ore-bearing albite granite dyke yielded ISr(291Ma) values of 0.704654–0.704735, with an average of 0.704695 [4]. Considering that ores are the products of interaction between host rocks and ore fluids, and the ISr(291Ma) value of the ore-hosting albite granite dyke was obviously lower than those of the scheelite, we believe that the initial ore-forming fluids must have had higher ISr(291Ma) values than the scheelite, i.e., higher than 0.706580 (Figure 5).
As mentioned above, the ore-hosting Tuokesalei Formation is composed of sedimentary rocks, intercalated with spilite–keratophyre assemblage whose ISr(291Ma) ratio is up to 0.7100 [7]. As indicated by the Sr isotope system, the fluids forming the Doranasai deposit likely originated from the metamorphic devolatilization of the Tuokesalei Formation.

7. Conclusions

(1)
Three types of scheelite are recognized in the Doranasai gold deposit. They occur in milky quartz vein (type I), smoky quartz–polymetallic sulfide vein (type II), and altered albite granite dyke (type III);
(2)
The three types of scheelite have similar REEs and trace element characteristics, which are characterized by seagull-shaped REE patterns, positive Eu anomalies, high Sr concentrations and low Mo and As concentrations;
(3)
The geochemical characteristics of scheelite indicate that the REEs and other ore metals are derived from metamorphic fluids. The Eu anomalies and Mo concentrations of scheelite are obviously controlled by the redox conditions;
(4)
The gold mineralization may have originated from the metamorphic dehydration of the sedimentary sequence with the spilite–keratoporphyry intercalation of the Tuokesalei Formation in South Altai.

Author Contributions

Field geological survey, X.L., A.A., X.H. and R.T.; writing—original draft, X.L., A.A. and X.H.; writing—review and editing, Y.C.; data analysis, X.L., A.A., X.H. and R.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the following funding agency: National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. U1803242 and 42072106) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC0601203).

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Western Region Gold Co., Ltd. and Habahe Huatai gold Co., Ltd. for their support in fieldwork. We sincerely thank Yanshuang Wu, Wenxiang Liu, Shen Han, Baicheng Huang, and Zhiwei Qiu for their help in the field sampling work. Guangzhou Tuoyan Detection Technology Co., Ltd., and the National Research Center of Geoanalysis have carried out rare earth and strontium isotope analysis of scheelite. Comments from the editor and two anonymous reviewers significantly enhanced the manuscript, which is appreciated very much by the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, X.; Deng, X.H.; Liu, W.X.; Aibai, A.; Chen, X.; Han, S.; Wu, Y.S.; Chen, Y.J. Geology, fluid inclusion and H-O-C isotope geochemistry of the Doranasai gold deposit, Chinese Altai: Implications for ore genesis. Int. J. Earth Sci. 2021, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Nie, F.; Dong, G.C.; Zhang, Z.C. Composition and sulfur isotope characteristics of pyrite in Doranasai gold deposit, Xinjiang, and their significance. J. Donghua Univ. Technol. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2012, 35, 111–118. [Google Scholar]
  3. Wu, F.; Cai, Y.B. Geological characteristics and metallogenic mechanism of Doranasai gold deposit, Xinjiang. Xinjiang Nonferrous Met. 2003, 10, 28–30. [Google Scholar]
  4. Xiao, H.L.; Zhou, J.Y.; Wang, H.N.; Dong, Y.G.; Ji, J.F.; Zhao, Y. Geochemical characteristics and source of ore-forming fluids of Doranasai gold deposit, Xinjiang. Chin. J. Geochem. 2003, 22, 74–82. [Google Scholar]
  5. Yan, S.H.; Chen, W.; Wang, Y.T.; Zhang, Z.C.; Chen, B.L. 40Ar/39Ar age of Irtysh gold metallogenic belt in Xinjiang and its geological significance. J. Geol. 2004, 78, 500–505. [Google Scholar]
  6. Zhou, G.; Dong, L.H.; Qin, J.H.; Zhang, L.W.; Zhao, Z.H.; Li, Y. The formation age of granitoids and its constraints on gold mineralization in the Doranasai gold deposit, Xinjiang. China Geol. 2015, 42, 677–690. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, H.Y.; Chen, Y.J.; Liu, Y.L. Metallogenesis of the Ertix gold belt, Xinjiang and its relationship to Central Asia-type orogenesis. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2001, 44, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Goldfarb, R.J.; Qiu, K.F.; Deng, J.; Chen, Y.J.; Yang, L.Q. Orogenic Gold Deposits of China; SEG Special Publications: Denver, CO, USA, 2019; Volume 22, pp. 263–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yin, Y.Q.; Li, J.X.; Guo, Z.L.; Hu, X.P. Classification of Altai gold deposit in Xinjiang and criteria for prospecting evaluation. J. Guilin Inst. Technol. 2005, 25, 141–145. [Google Scholar]
  10. Bell, K.; Anglin, C.D.; Franklin, J.M. Sm-Nd and Rb-Sr isotope sytematics of scheelites: Possible implications for the age and genesis of vein-hosted gold deposits. Geology 1989, 17, 500–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Brugger, J.; Maas, R.; Lahaye, Y.; McRae, C.; Ghaderi, M.; Costa, S.; Lambert, D.; Bateman, R.; Prince, K. Origins of Nd–Sr–Pb isotopic variations in single scheelite grains from Archaean gold deposits, Western Australia. Chem. Geol. 2002, 182, 203–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chen, L.; Qin, K.; Li, G.; Li, J.; Xiao, B.; Zhao, J. In situ major and trace elements of garnet and scheelite in the Nuri Cu–W–Mo deposit, South Gangdese, Tibet: Implications for mineral genesis and ore-forming fluid records. Ore Geol. Rev. 2020, 122, 103549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Fu, Y.; Sun, X.M.; Zhou, H.Y.; Lin, H.; Jiang, L.Y.; Yang, T.J. In-situ LA-ICP-MS trace elements analysis of scheelites from the giant Beiya gold-polymetallic deposit in Yunnan Province, Southwest China and its metallogenic implications. Ore Geol. Rev. 2017, 80, 828–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. McClenaghan, M.B.; Cabri, L.J. Review of gold and platinum group element (PGE) indicator minerals methods for surficial sediment sampling. Geochem. Explor. Environ. Anal. 2011, 11, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sciuba, M.; Beaudoin, B.; Grzela, D.; Makvandi, S. Trace element composition of scheelite in orogenic gold deposits. Miner. Depos. 2020, 55, 1149–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Toverud, Ö. Dispersal of tungsten in glacial drift and humus in Bergslagen, southern Central Sweden. J. Geochem. Explor. 1984, 21, 261–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Voicu, G.; Bardoux, M.; Stevenson, R.; Jebrak, M. Nd and Sr isotope study of hydrothermal scheelite and host rocks at Omai, Guiana Shield: Implications for ore fluid source and flow path during the formation of orogenic gold deposits. Miner. Depos. 2000, 35, 302–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Frei, R.; Nägler, T.F.; Schönberg, R.; Kramers, J.D. Re-Os, Sm-Nd, U-Pb, and stepwise lead leaching isotope systematics in shear-zone hosted gold mineralization: Genetic tracing and age constraints of crustal hydrothermal activity. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1998, 62, 1925–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Kent, A.J.R.; Campbell, I.H.; McCulloch, M.T. Sm-Nd systematics of hydrothermal scheelite from the Mount Charlotte Mine, Kalgoorlie, Western Australia; an isotopic link between gold mineralization and komatiites. Econ. Geol. 1995, 90, 2329–2335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kozlik, M.; Gerdes, A.; Raith, J.G. Strontium isotope systematics of scheelite and apatite from the Felbertal tungsten deposit, Austria—Results of in-situ LA-MC-ICP-MS analysis. Mineral. Petrol. 2016, 110, 11–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Peng, J.T.; Hu, R.Z.; Zhao, J.H.; Fu, Y.Z.; Yuan, S.D. REE geochemistry of scheelite in Woxi gold antimony tungsten deposit, Western Hunan. Geochemistry 2005, 34, 115–122. [Google Scholar]
  22. Poulin, R.S.; McDonald, A.M.; Kontak, D.J.; McClenaghan, M.B. On the Relationship between Cathodoluminescence and the Chemical Composition of Scheelite from Geologically Diverse Ore-Deposit Environments. Can. Mineral. 2016, 54, 1147–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Poulin, R.S.; Kontak, D.J.; Andrew; McDonald, A.; Beth, M.; McCLenaghan, B.M. Assessing Scheelite as an Ore-deposit Discriminator Using Its Trace-element REE Chemistry. Can. Mineral. 2018, 56, 265–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Song, G.X.; Qin, K.Z.; Li, G.M.; Evans, N.J.; Chen, L. Scheelite elemental and isotopic signatures: Implications for the genesis of skarn-type W-Mo deposits in the Chizhou area, Anhui Province, eastern China. Am. Mineral. 2014, 99, 303–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sun, K.K.; Chen, B. Trace elements and Sr-Nd isotopes of scheelite: Implications for the W-Cu-Mo polymetallic mineralization of the Shimensi deposit, South China. Am. Mineral. 2017, 102, 1114–1128. [Google Scholar]
  26. Xiong, D.X.; Sun, X.M.; Shi, G.Y.; Wang, S.W.; Gao, J.F.; Xue, T. Characteristics and significance of trace elements, rare earth elements and Sr-Nd isotopic compositions of scheelite in Daping gold mine, Yunnan Province. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2006, 22, 733–741. [Google Scholar]
  27. Yuan, L.L.; Chi, G.X.; Wang, M.Q.; Li, Z.H.; Xu, D.R.; Deng, T.; Geng, J.Z.; Hu, M.Y.; Zhang, L. Characteristics of REEs and trace elements in scheelite from the Zhuxi W deposit, South China: Implications for the ore-forming conditions and processes. Ore Geol. Rev. 2019, 109, 585–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Song, G.X.; Cook, N.; Li, G.M.; Qin, K.Z.; Ciobanu, C.; Yang, Y.H.; Xu, Y.X. Scheelite geochemistry in porphyry-skarn W-Mo systems: A case study from the Gaojiabang deposit. East China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2019, 113, 103084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chen, Y.J.; Pirajno, F.; Wu, G.; Qi, J.P.; Xiong, X.L.; Zhang, L. Epithermal deposits in north Xinjiang, NW China. Int. J. Earth Sci. 2012, 101, 889–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, F.; Geng, X.; Wang, R.; Zhang, Z.; Guo, X. A synthesis of mineralization styles and geodynamic settings of the Paleozoic and Mesozoic metallic ore deposits in the Altay Mountains, NW China. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2018, 159, 233–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Windley, B.F.; Kroner, A.; Guo, J.H.; Qu, G.S.; Li, Y.Y.; Zhang, C. Neoproterozoic to Paleozoic geology of the Altai orogeny, NW China: New zircon age data and tectonic evolution. J. Geol. 2002, 110, 719–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zou, T.R.; Cao, H.Z.; Wu, B.Q. Orogenic and anorogenic granitoids of Altai mountains of Xinjiang and their discrimination criteria. Acta Geol. Sin. 1989, 2, 45–64. [Google Scholar]
  33. Tong, Y.; Wang, T.; Jahn, B.M.; Sun, M.; Hong, D.W.; Gao, J.F. Post-accretionary Permian granitoids in the Chinese Altai orogeny: Geochronology, petrogenesis and tectonic implications. Am. J. Sci. 2014, 314, 80–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, T.; Hong, D.W.; Jahn, B.M.; Tong, Y.; Wang, Y.B.; Han, B.F.; Wang, X.X. Timing, petrogenesis, and setting of Paleozoic syn-orogenic intrusions from the Altai Mountains, northwest China: Implications for the Tectonic evolution of an accretionary orogeny. J. Geol. 2006, 114, 735–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Broussolle, A.; Sun, M.; Schulmann, K.; Guy, A.; Aguilar, C.; Štípská, P.; Jiang, Y.; Yu, Y.; Xiao, W. Are the Chinese Altai “terranes” the result of juxtaposition of different crustal levels during Late Devonian and Permian orogenesis? Gondwana Res. 2019, 66, 183–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zheng, Y.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Y.J.; Qin, Y.J.; Liu, C.F. Geology, fluid inclusion geochemistry, and 40Ar/39Ar geochronology of the Wulasigou Cu deposit, and their implications for ore genesis, Altai, Xinjiang, China. Ore Geol. Rev. 2012, 49, 128–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zheng, Y.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Y.J.; Hollings, P.; Chen, H.Y. Metamorphosed Pb-Zn-(Ag) ores of the Keketale VMS deposit, NW China: Evidence from ore textures, fluid inclusions, geochronology and pyrite compositions. Ore Geol. Rev. 2013, 54, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Abulimiti, A.; Deng, X.; Pirajno, F.; Han, S.; Liu, W.; Li, X.; Chen, X.; Wu, Y.; Bao, Z.; Chen, Y. Geology and geochronology of the Tokuzbay gold deposit in the Chinese Altai: A case study of collision-related orogenic gold deposits in Central Asian Orogenic Belt. Ore Geol. Rev. 2021, 136, 104261. [Google Scholar]
  39. Shen, Y.C.; Shen, P.; Li, G.M.; Zeng, Q.D.; Liu, T.B. Study on structural ore control law of Irtysh gold belt in Xinjiang. Deposit Geol. 2007, 26, 33–42. [Google Scholar]
  40. Qin, K.Z.; Shen, M.D.; Tang, D.M. Mineralization type and diagenetic and metallogenic age of pegmatite type rare metals in Altai orogenic belt. Xinjiang Geol. 2013, 31, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  41. Wang, M.; Su, Q.Y.; Ma, J.B. Geological characteristics and genesis of deposit in Doranasai gold ore district. Xinjiang Nonferrous Met. Suppl. 2007, S2, 6–8. [Google Scholar]
  42. Li, H.Q.; Xie, C.F.; Chang, H.L. Geochronology of Mineralization of Nonferrous and Precious Metal Deposits in Northern Xinjiang; Geological Publishing House: Beijing, China, 1998; pp. 1–264. [Google Scholar]
  43. Liu, Y.S.; Hu, Z.C.; Gao, S.; Günther, D.; Xu, J.; Gao, C.G.; Chen, H.H. In situ analysis of major and trace elements of anhydrous minerals by LA-ICP-MS without applying an internal standard. Chem. Geol. 2008, 257, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sun, S.-S.; McDonough, W.F. Chemical and isotopic systematics of oceanic basalts: Implications for mantle composition and processes. In Magmatism in the Ocean Basins; Saunders, A.D., Norry, M.J., Eds.; Geological Society London Special Publications: London, UK, 1989; pp. 313–345. [Google Scholar]
  45. Zeng, Z.G.; Li, C.Y.; Liu, Y.P. REE geochemical characteristics of two scheelite deposits of different genesis in Nanyang, Southeastern Yunnan. Geol. Geochem. 1998, 26, 34–38. [Google Scholar]
  46. Rempel, K.U.; Williams-Jones, A.E.; Migdisov, A.A. The partitioning of molybdenum(VI) between aqueous liquid and vapour at temperatures up to 370 degrees C. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2009, 73, 3381–3392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Shannon, R.D. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Crystallogr. 1976, A32, 751–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Linnen, R.L.; Williams-Jones, A.E. Evolution of aqueous-carbonic Fluids during contact-metamorphism, wall-rock alteration, and molybdenite deposition at Trout Lake, British-Columbia. Econ. Geol. 1990, 85, 1840–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ghaderi, M.J.; Palin, M.; Campbell, I.H. Rare earth systematics in scheelite from hydrothermal gold deposits in the Kalgoolie-Norseman Region, Western Australia. Econ. Geol. 1999, 94, 423–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dostal, J.; Kontak, D.; Chatterjee, A. Trace element geochemistry of scheelite and rutile from metaturbidite-hosted quartz vein gold deposits, Meguma Terrane, Nova Scotia, Canada: Genetic implications. Mineral. Petrol. 2009, 97, 95–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Liu, Y.J.; Ma, D.S. Tungsten Geochemistry; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1987; pp. 45–120. [Google Scholar]
  52. Ridley, J.R.; Diamond, L.W. Fluid chemistry of lode-gold deposits, and implications for genetic models. Econ. Geol. 2000, 13, 141–162. [Google Scholar]
  53. Chen, Y.J.; Pirajno, F.; Sui, Y.H. Isotope geochemistry of the Tieluping silver-lead deposit, Henan, China: A case study of orogenic silver-dominated deposits and related tectonic setting. Miner. Depos. 2004, 39, 560–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Barker, S.L.L.; Bennett, V.C.; Cox, S.F.; Norman, M.D.; Gagan, M.K. Sm-Nd, Sr, C and O isotope systematics in hydrothermal calcite–fluorite veins: Implications for fluid-rock reaction and geochronology. Chem. Geol. 2009, 268, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, L.; Yang, R.S.; Mao, S.D.; Lu, Y.H.; Qin, Y.; Liu, H.J. Sr-Nd isotopic composition characteristics and metallogenic material source of Yangshan gold deposit. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2009, 25, 2811–2822. [Google Scholar]
  56. Ni, Z.Y.; Chen, Y.J.; Li, N.; Zhang, H. Pb-Sr-Nd isotope constraints on the fluid source of the Dahu Au-Mo deposit in Qinling Orogen, central China, and implication for Triassic tectonic setting. Ore Geol. Rev. 2012, 46, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Deng, X.H.; Chen, Y.J.; Santosh, M.; Yao, J.M.; Sun, Y.L. Re-Os and Sr-Nd-Pb isotope constraints on source of fluids in the Zhifang Mo deposit, Qinling Orogen, China. Gondwana Res. 2016, 30, 132–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kempe, U.; Belyatsky, B.V.; Krymsky, R.S.; Kremenetsky, A.A.; Ivanov, P.A. Sm-Nd and Sr isotope systematics of scheelite from the giant Au(-W) deposit Muruntau (Uzbekistan): Implications for the age and sources of Au mineralization. Miner. Depos. 2001, 36, 379–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Niu, J.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, L.; Yu, P.; Wang, Y.; Lai, C. Isotope geochemistry of the Sarekuobu metavolcanic-hosted gold deposit in the Chinese Altai (NW China): Implications for the fluid and metal sources. Ore Geol. Rev. 2018, 100, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Abulimiti, A.; Deng, X.; Pirajno, F.; Han, S.; Liu, W.; Li, X.; Chen, X.; Wu, Y.; Liu, J.; Chen, Y. Origin of ore-forming fluids of Tokuzbay gold deposit in the South Altai, northwest China: Constraints from Sr–Nd–Pb isotopes. Ore Geol. Rev. 2021, 134, 104165. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Geological map of the Chinese Altai Orogen, showing the distribution of ore deposits ((a), modified after [29]; (b), modified after [30], reproduction with permission from F.Q. Yang).
Figure 1. Geological map of the Chinese Altai Orogen, showing the distribution of ore deposits ((a), modified after [29]; (b), modified after [30], reproduction with permission from F.Q. Yang).
Minerals 12 00637 g001
Figure 2. Simplified geological map of the Doranasai gold deposit (reprinted with permission from Ref. [1]). (a) Map showing the spatial relationship of orebodies with syncline, shear zone and granitic rocks; (b) profile showing orebody occurrence in Prospect II; (c) profile showing orebody occurrence in Prospect I.
Figure 2. Simplified geological map of the Doranasai gold deposit (reprinted with permission from Ref. [1]). (a) Map showing the spatial relationship of orebodies with syncline, shear zone and granitic rocks; (b) profile showing orebody occurrence in Prospect II; (c) profile showing orebody occurrence in Prospect I.
Minerals 12 00637 g002
Figure 3. Characteristics of scheelites from different ores of the Doranasai gold deposit. (ac) scheelite in early-stage milky quartz veins; (df) scheelite in middle-stage quartz–polymetallic sulfide veins; (gi) scheelite in altered albite veins; Py—pyrite; Sch—scheelite; Qz—quartz; Chl—chlorite; Ser—sericite; Cal—calcite.
Figure 3. Characteristics of scheelites from different ores of the Doranasai gold deposit. (ac) scheelite in early-stage milky quartz veins; (df) scheelite in middle-stage quartz–polymetallic sulfide veins; (gi) scheelite in altered albite veins; Py—pyrite; Sch—scheelite; Qz—quartz; Chl—chlorite; Ser—sericite; Cal—calcite.
Minerals 12 00637 g003
Figure 4. Chondrite-normalized REE patterns of scheelite from the Doranasai gold deposit. (ac): three types of scheelite. Note: Scheelite from Archean gold deposits, Western Australia is adopted from [11]. The data of Donggele granodiorite and ore-bearing albite granite dyke in Doranasai area are cited from [4]. The values of Chondrite are from [44].
Figure 4. Chondrite-normalized REE patterns of scheelite from the Doranasai gold deposit. (ac): three types of scheelite. Note: Scheelite from Archean gold deposits, Western Australia is adopted from [11]. The data of Donggele granodiorite and ore-bearing albite granite dyke in Doranasai area are cited from [4]. The values of Chondrite are from [44].
Minerals 12 00637 g004
Figure 5. The ISr (t) plot for the Doranasai gold deposit and related lithologies.
Figure 5. The ISr (t) plot for the Doranasai gold deposit and related lithologies.
Minerals 12 00637 g005
Table 1. Contents of major oxides of scheelite samples from the Doranasai gold deposit (wt%).
Table 1. Contents of major oxides of scheelite samples from the Doranasai gold deposit (wt%).
Sample3-19B3-18T3-KK-19B9001-9B3-18B3-kk-13B3-kk-20-2B3-kk-26T3-kk-26-2T3-kk-20-1T3-KK-20-2T3-kk-20-2T-13-kk-26B3-kk-26-6B3-9T3-15T
Ore TypeType IType IIType III
CaO19.5719.6419.4419.5619.6119.5419.5319.7919.8319.7319.5319.6119.6519.4119.6419.65
WO379.9780.6079.9780.1580.5179.6779.7280.7579.9180.0679.9180.5480.4280.7281.0280.28
MoO30.060.090.15-0.100.160.170.06--0.220.29---0.16
FeO-0.03----0.080.010.040.02---0.06--
MnO0.04-0.020.01--0.070.030.02--0.01-0.03-0.01
PbO0.03-----0.130.150.23------0.07
ZnO0.12--0.19---0.050.04-0.07-----
Total99.79100.3699.5799.91100.2399.3799.70100.84100.0899.8199.73100.45100.07100.22100.66100.16
Table 2. Representative trace element compositions of scheelites from the Doranasai gold deposit (ppm).
Table 2. Representative trace element compositions of scheelites from the Doranasai gold deposit (ppm).
Sample No.3-19B3-18T3-KK-19B9001-9B3-18B3-19J3-KK-13B3-KK-20-2B3-KK-26T3-KK-26-2T3-KK-13T3-KK-20-1T3-KK-20-2T3-KK-20-2T-13-KK-26B3-KK-26-6B3-9T3-15T
Ore TypesType IType IIType III
Li0.1190.0700.145--0.1281.210.236-0.6570.6320.3441.360.0890.2232.010.314-
B0.2000.0000.372-0.1360.5980.0530.1160.3200.0810.3420.6350.1140.3110.3254.820.1340.487
V0.1280.1340.8430.4041.560.0940.7950.2830.1350.1590.7221.055.180.7320.42440.50.1390.241
Cr83.40.23424.10.0530.65227.753.518.0-58.723.5--1062.6519380.67262.2
Co0.0240.0190.0510.0650.017-0.0180.113-0.1010.1030.1380.3110.0110.0410.1510.1090.039
Ni0.4110.4460.5750.3970.3000.4800.2750.2410.4670.3830.8080.9692.160.5900.1862.060.2770.436
Cu-0.053--0.0410.0410.0140.056-0.0400.0950.110-0.1020.0400.393-0.007
Zn0.029-0.010-0.0050.051-0.085-0.4640.0930.418-0.204-10.70.0040.127
As4.653.7018.95.577.583.916.133.271.354.259.008.7724.56.8812.72.682.5511.6
Rb0.0110.0030.0170.0130.0070.0120.0180.4920.0390.0220.0110.0280.0430.0430.04237.70.0210.008
Sr8481363105612591366864742950112313348142295313899910159069601210
Y1641082032272641152901392871862657921713163387196246125
Zr2.142.002.371.973.811.862.612.082.112.132.338.8916.81.862.035.122.682.12
Nb0.6150.8590.9580.5020.9930.5180.5610.3850.6331.250.5421.994.600.3801.211.390.4490.715
Mo25498.577.656.358.326852.046.370.055.359.236165856.741.843.029.9222
Ag-0.0030.0120.0090.0030.006--0.0030.009-----0.0240.0130.008
Sn0.0430.0930.1080.0530.1440.0110.0340.0410.1280.0430.1540.3310.6920.125-0.672--
Ba0.1150.0410.8530.2760.3370.2010.0850.3190.0560.0500.8831.210.0991.370.5491150.1630.551
La2.816.7410.317.814.75.4160.317.027.58.3216.669.644917.120.224.410.74.92
Ce15.041.974.587.283.326.417772.997.642.693.5355156584.711095.461.227.0
Pr4.9213.124.121.623.67.9640.317.618.611.726.798.331922.030.115.918.88.89
Nd47.610618614317868.126411610092.0195765188215020669.815683.0
Sm27.455.583.353.170.835.484.843.433.948.372.830550255.088.918.872.647.8
Eu18.228.737.331.937.920.750.323.223.121.443.414632332.648.917.049.325.2
Gd51.267.786.061.378.152.687.145.844.966.578.131143754.111222.190.569.2
Tb9.1010.913.09.9012.58.1613.17.068.6611.612.647.066.47.9219.34.6015.210.2
Dy55.850.766.457.773.744.675.938.457.665.871.726138142.311733.085.252.3
Ho9.176.6410.010.112.66.5813.56.7111.411.512.742.565.57.2020.26.9114.17.27
Er15.210.017.822.126.110.529.515.430.124.329.089.415216.044.819.326.910.8
Tm1.080.711.602.382.710.763.111.773.812.582.989.3418.01.764.612.882.470.77
Yb3.182.155.4611.010.52.0413.68.2921.511.213.042.896.08.0821.017.910.02.48
Lu0.1890.1470.3880.9470.8430.1211.320.8162.451.081.194.108.980.7722.012.040.7700.159
Hf0.0220.0200.0180.0220.0200.0150.0310.0220.0350.0410.0230.0930.1180.0130.0460.1470.0280.026
Ta0.0200.0110.0210.0060.0140.0130.0140.0140.0160.0200.0180.0790.1250.0120.0250.0560.0090.006
Au0.0920.1000.1390.1190.1050.0920.1040.1040.0970.0930.1120.3060.3610.1690.1020.1520.1530.143
Bi0.0040.007-0.0080.004-0.0090.0060.005-0.0150.0380.2580.0120.0160.0180.0100.023
Pb19.024.923.333.626.920.625.747.268.438.627.919131053.235.354.735.231.4
Th0.0230.0100.1570.0300.1890.0400.1460.3080.1290.1210.0190.2660.4690.3200.0241.230.0230.060
U0.0090.0040.0150.0070.0240.0100.0540.0470.0350.0120.0140.1240.1040.0810.0070.3110.0050.011
REE26140161653062628991441448141967025476263499845350613350
REY4255098197578904041204553768605935333979766621232546859475
LREE/HREE0.791.682.051.991.861.302.822.301.631.142.002.134.062.581.462.161.491.28
δEu1.461.431.341.701.551.461.771.581.811.151.751.442.061.801.502.541.861.34
Table 3. Results of in situ Sr isotopic analysis of scheelite from the Doranasai gold deposit.
Table 3. Results of in situ Sr isotopic analysis of scheelite from the Doranasai gold deposit.
Ore TypesSample No.Rb (ppm)Sr (ppm)87Rb/86Sr87Sr/86SrISr (291 Ma)
Type I3-19-10.014 1160 0.000030 0.705380 0.000009 0.705380 0.000009
3-19-20.007 1022 0.000020 0.705392 0.000009 0.705391 0.000009
3-KK-19-10.031 1031 0.000090 0.705173 0.000001 0.705173 0.000001
3-KK-19-20.007 869 0.000020 0.705202 0.000001 0.705202 0.000001
3-KK-19-13-10.024 1096 0.000060 0.708606 0.000001 0.708606 0.000001
3-KK-19-13-20.032 949 0.000100 0.707680 0.000001 0.707680 0.000001
3-KK-19-130.005 775 0.000020 0.707308 0.000001 0.707308 0.000001
3-KK-19-140.011 1018 0.000030 0.704820 0.000001 0.704820 0.000001
3-KK-19-150.015 949 0.000040 0.705809 0.000001 0.705809 0.000001
3-KK-19-160.005 775 0.000020 0.705822 0.000001 0.705822 0.000001
9001-9-20.036 1432 0.000070 0.706475 0.000001 0.706474 0.000001
9001-9-30.008 1077 0.000020 0.705669 0.000001 0.705668 0.000001
Average (N = 12) 0.706111 0.706111
Type II3-KK-13-10.036 782 0.000130 0.705507 0.000001 0.7055060.000001
3-KK-13-40.024 858 0.000080 0.705709 0.000001 0.7057080.000001
3-KK-13-50.018 736 0.000070 0.705041 0.000001 0.7050410.000001
3-KK-20-1-10.339 869 0.001130 0.705501 0.000001 0.7054960.000001
3-KK-20-1-20.492 942 0.001510 0.705617 0.000001 0.7056110.000001
3-KK-20-1-30.034 873 0.000110 0.705635 0.000001 0.7056340.000001
3-KK-20-1-40.086 897 0.000280 0.705419 0.000001 0.7054180.000001
3-KK-26-10.006 857 0.000020 0.706948 0.000001 0.7069480.000001
3-KK-26-20.028 777 0.000100 0.707338 0.000009 0.7073380.000009
3-KK-26-30.025 902 0.000080 0.707768 0.000001 0.7077670.000001
3-KK-26-40.011 923 0.000030 0.706998 0.000001 0.7069980.000001
3-KK-26-6-1-10.014 869 0.000050 0.707740 0.000008 0.7077390.000008
3-KK-26-6-20.033 979 0.000100 0.707518 0.000009 0.7075170.000009
3-KK-26-6-30.042 1011 0.000120 0.707938 0.000008 0.7079370.000008
3-KK-26-6-40.021 1598 0.000040 0.708047 0.000006 0.7080460.000006
Average (N = 15) 0.706582 0.706580
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.; Aibai, A.; He, X.; Tang, R.; Chen, Y. Chemical Composition and Strontium Isotope Characteristics of Scheelite from the Doranasai Gold Deposit, NW China: Implications for Ore Genesis. Minerals 2022, 12, 637. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/min12050637

AMA Style

Li X, Aibai A, He X, Tang R, Chen Y. Chemical Composition and Strontium Isotope Characteristics of Scheelite from the Doranasai Gold Deposit, NW China: Implications for Ore Genesis. Minerals. 2022; 12(5):637. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/min12050637

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xun, Abulimiti Aibai, Xiheng He, Rongzhen Tang, and Yanjing Chen. 2022. "Chemical Composition and Strontium Isotope Characteristics of Scheelite from the Doranasai Gold Deposit, NW China: Implications for Ore Genesis" Minerals 12, no. 5: 637. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/min12050637

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop