Adsorption of the Herbicide Endosulfan by Newly Discovered Zeolitic Tuffs in Mexico
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
2.2. Methodology of Chemical Treatment of Mordenite, HMOR, and AgMOR
2.3. Experimental Measurement Techniques
- (i)
- X-ray diffraction (XRD) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) (Bruker Corp. Billerica, MA, USA): To identify the crystalline phases present in each sample, a Bruker model D8 Discover diffractometer was used with nickel-filtered Cu Kα (λ = 0.154 nm) radiation operated at 40 kV and 30 mA. The High Score Plus 3.0e computer program was used to quantify the percentages of the phases present in each sample [13]. Chemical analysis by X-ray energy dispersion (XPS) was also performed on each zeolite.
- (ii)
- SEM (JEOL LTD. Tokyo, Japan): The size and shapes of the zeolite crystals under study were obtained with a JEOL model JSM-7800F high-resolution scanning electron microscope at 5 kV. The samples were mounted on aluminum stub holders and subsequently coated with Au using a sputtering coater.
- (iii)
- FT-IR (Perkin-Elmer, Inc., Shelton, CT, USA): Changes in intensities and positions of the bands corresponding to the characteristic ring and Me single-bond O vibrations were observed by FT-IR study of the adsorption of endosulfan on zeolites. These FT-IR study spectra of endosulfan were collected and injected into a 1725X Perkin-Elmer spectrometer by co-adding 100 scans in the wavenumber range 4000–400 cm−1.
- (iv)
2.4. Adsorption of Endosulfan
3. Results
3.1. SEM
3.2. FTIR Studies of Natural Zeolites
3.3. N2 Adsorption–Desorption
3.4. Adsorption of Endosulfan
Thermodynamic Parameters
4. Discussion
4.1. XRD Analysis
4.2. N2 Adsorption
- (i)
- At very low relative pressures, there is an increase in adsorption capacity due to the presence of micropores. In the case of MORN, there is a step at p/p0 = 0.56.
- (ii)
- These isotherms also show the effect of low-pressure hysteresis at relative pressures, which is associated with the presence of pores of molecular dimensions and irreversible adsorption [22].
Pore Size Distribution, BJH Equation
4.3. Endosulfan Adsorption
Thermodynamics Parameters
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Mudhoo Amit, M.; Amit, B.; Rantalankila, B.M.; Sillanpää, M.; Sillanpää, M. Endosulfan removal through bioremediation, photocatalytic degradation, adsorption and membrane separation processes: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 360, 912–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernandez, M.A. El ABC de las Zeolitas Naturales en México; Sextil Online; Publica por Gandhi: México City, México, 2020; pp. 26–39. [Google Scholar]
- Database of Zeolite Structures. Available online: http://www.iza-structure.org/databases/ (accessed on 4 November 2022).
- Gürkan, R.; Ceylan, H.; Şahan, T.; Savran, A.; Kubilay, S. Evaluation of the Thermodynamic Parameters for the Adsorption of Some Hydrocarbons on Chemically Treated-Bentonites by Inverse Gas Chromatography. Adsorption 2005, 11, 603–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patočka, J.; Wu, Q.; França, T.C.C.; Pitah, R.; Kuča, K. Clinical LINICAL Aspects of the poisoning by the pesticide endosulfan, Quim. Nova 2016, 39, 987–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, G.; Ramadass, K.; Sooriyakumar, P.; Hettithanthri, O.; Vithange, M.; Bolan, N.; Tavakkoli, E.; Van Zwieten, L.; Vinu, A. Nanoporous materials for pesticide formulation and delivery in the agricultural sector. J. Control. Release 2022, 343, 187–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hernandez, M.A.; Corona, L.; Gonzalez, A.I.; Rojas, F.; Lara, V.H.; Silva, F. Quantitative Study of the Adsorption of Aromatic Hydrocarbons (Benzene, Toluene, and p-Xylene) on Dealuminated Clinoptilolites. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 2908–2916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sathishkumar, P.; Mohan, K.; Ganesan, A.R.; Govarthanan, M.; Yusoff, A.R.M.; Gu, F.L. Persistence, toxicological effect and ecological issues of endosulfan—A review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 416, 125779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohan, B.; Kamboj, A.; Singh, K.; Singh, G.; Pombeiro, A.J.; Ren, P. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) materials for pesticides, heavy metals, drugs removal: Environmental safety. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2023, 310, 123175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ponce-Velez, G.; Botello, A.V. Organochlorine pesticides in coastal and marine organisms of the Mexican coasts, a review. Rev. Int. Contam. Ambie. 2018, 34, 81–98. [Google Scholar]
- Romero, J.A.; Amaya, A.; Miranda, M.G.; García, M.M. Chromatographic methods for the determination of endosulfan in foods. Rev. Int. Contam. Ambie. 2018, 34, 81–94. [Google Scholar]
- González, F.B.; Casadinho, C.J.; Weber, J.M.; Zugasti, C.G.; Prado, E.E.; Ruiz, B.B.; Acosta, M.; Cárcamo, M.I.; Muñoz, F.R. El Endosulfán y sus Alternativas en América Latina; Resumen, Capitulo 8.-Alternativas al Endosulfán en México; Centro Regional Universitario Oriente de la Universidad Autónoma Chapingo (UACH): Valdivia, Chile; Fernando Bejarano (RAPAM): Santiago, Chile, 2009; pp. 21–23. [Google Scholar]
- Hernandez, M.A.; Salgado, M.A.; Portillo, R.; Petranovskii, V.; Hernández, G.I.; Santamaria, D.; Rubio, E. γ-sitoesteroal Ag Nanoparticles of γ-Sitoesterol and Ag on Clinoptilolite Zeolites. J. Nanomater. 2021, 2021, 9959552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.Y.; Park, S.J. A review on solid adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 23, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lastoskie, C.; Gubbins, K.E.; Quirke, N. Pore Size Distribution Analysis of Microporous Carbons: A Density Functional Theory Approach. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 4786–4796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, H.J.; Suh, M.P. Enhanced isosteric heat, selectivity, and uptake capacity of CO2 adsorption in a metal-organic framework by impregnated metal ions. Chem. Sci. 2013, 2013, 685–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schlumberger, C.; Thommes, M. Characterization of Hierarchically Ordered Porous Materials by Physisorption and Mercury Porosimetry—A Tutorial Review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 23, 2002181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diaz, E.; Ordoñez, S.; Vega, A.; Coca, L. Adsorption characterization of different volatile organic compounds over alumina, zeolites and activated carbon using gas chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2009, 1049, 139–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jagiello, J.; Bandosz, T.J.; Schwarz, J.A. Application of inverse gas chromatography at infinite dilution to study the effects of oxidation of activated carbons. Carbon 2002, 30, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Young, R.A. Introduction to the Rietveld Method. In The Rietveld Method; Young, R.A., Ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK; New York, NY, USA, 1993; p. 298. [Google Scholar]
- Król, M.; Mozgawa, W.; Jastrzębski, W.; Barczyk, K. Application of IR spectra in the studies of zeolites from D4R and D6R structural groups. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2012, 156, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thommes, M.; Kaneko, K.; Neimark, A.V.; Olivier, J.P.; Rodriguez-Reinoso, F.; Rouquerol, J.; Sing, K.S. Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC technical report). Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 1051–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tzabar, N.; Brake, H.J.M.T. Adsorption isotherms and Sips models of nitrogen, methane, ethane, and propane on commercial activated carbons and polyvinylidene chloride. Adsorption 2016, 22, 901–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, M.; Phillip, L. Adsorption and desorption characteristics of hydrophobic pesticide endosulfan in four Indian soils. Chemosphere 2006, 62, 1064–1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yakimov, A.V.; Ravi, M.; Verel, R.; Sushkevich, V.L.; van Bokhoven, J.A.; Coperet, C. Structure and Framework Association of Lewis Acid Sites in MOR Zeolite. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022, 144, 10377–10385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sample | Town, State | Card Number Mineralogical Phases | Present Crystalline Phases, %, XRD |
---|---|---|---|
NMOR | La Magdalena Apasco, Oaxaca | 04-017-1315 Na3Si21048(H2O)9.2 01-086-4509 Na2.55Ca1.67K0.37 (H2O)23.2(Al6.21S29.7) 00-005-0490 SiO2 | Na–Mordenite (≈45) Na–Clinoptilolite (≈45) <<Quartz, low |
NCH NSTI | Divisaderos, Sonora Teotlalco, Puebla | 01-056-679 (Ca3.64K1.91Mg1.2Na1.15) [Al2.81Si9.19O23.92]•24.27H2O 01-070-1859 Ca3.16Si36O72(H2O)21.80 00-0013-0135 Ca0.2(Al;Mg)2Si4O10(OH)2 4H2O 00-005-0490 SiO2 04-013-6125 K0.55Na0.57 Ca0.77Mg0.36Al3.38Si14.62O36 (H2O)10.32 | Ca–Chabazite (≈50)> Ca–Clinoptilolite (≈40)> Montmorillonite (≈5–8) >>Quartz (≈0.2, low) Ca–Clinoptilolite (≈55) |
00-026-0584 Ca1.5Na0.32(Si,Al)9O18·8.5H2O 00-005-0490 SiO2 | >Ca–Stilbite (≈40) >Quartz (≈5) |
Classification Name | Name Equation | Model Equation | Linear Form |
---|---|---|---|
Physical adsorption models | Henry’s law | ||
Freundlich | |||
Chemical adsorption models | Langmuir | ||
Thermodynamic parameters | Clausius–Clapeyron | ||
Free Energy of Gibbs | (5) | ||
Entropy change | (6) |
Sample | O | Na | Mg | Al | Si | K | Ca | Ti | Fe | Ag | Cl | Si/Al | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMOR | 54.73 | 2.50 | 0.31 | 6.22 | 31.19 | 2.94 | 0.60 | 0.13 | 1.38 | 5.014 | 100 | ||
HMOR | 55.05 | 0.51 | 0.27 | 6.48 | 32.47 | 2.86 | 0.81 | 1.55 | 5.010 | 100 | |||
AgMOR | 52.88 | 0.21 | 0.29 | 5.89 | 28.29 | 2.04 | 0.52 | 2.13 | 8.17 | 0.08 | 4.803 | 100 | |
NSTI | 47.26 | 0.30 | 0.56 | 13.28 | 36.38 | 0.70 | 1.18 | 0.35 | 2.739 | 100 | |||
NCHA | 57.88 | 0.50 | 1.56 | 7.676 | 27.81 | 0.96 | 2.54 | 0.23 | 0.84 | 4.11 | 100 |
Sample | ASL m2/g | ASB m2/g | ASt m2/g | CB | V∑ cm3/g | W0t cm3/g | W0DA cm3/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMOR | 217 | 154 | 37 | −95 | 0.0147 | 0.057 | 0.10 |
HMOR | 134 | 93 | 7 | −80 | 0.033 | 0.011 | 0.02 |
AgHMOR | 116 | 81 | 6 | −32 | 0.021 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
NCHA | 429 | 380 | 71 | 420 | 0.219 | 0.14 | 0.15 |
NSTI | 52 | 45 | 37 | 372 | 0.018 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
T/K | Sample | KFx 103 | N | RF | KHx 103 | am | RL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
573 | NMOR | 5.74 | 1.224 | 0.995 | 4.9 | 0.207 | 0.999 |
HMOR | 1.57 | 1.261 | 0.991 | 8.8 | 0.210 | 0.999 | |
AgMOR | 0.847 | 1.187 | 0.995 | 9.2 | 0.223 | 0.999 | |
NSTI | 0.946 | 1.177 | 0.993 | 1.08 | 0.022 | 0.999 | |
NCHA | 1.17 | 1.284 | 0.993 | 0.79 | 0.012 | 0.999 | |
533 | NMOR | 5.47 | 1.615 | 0.990 | 6.3 | 0.174 | 0.999 |
HMOR | 2.04 | 1.283 | 0.996 | 5.9 | 0.247 | 0.999 | |
AgMOR | 0.207 | 1.664 | 0.994 | 10 | 0.223 | 0.999 | |
NSTI | 1.86 | 1.581 | 0.999 | 0.402 | 0.008 | 0.985 | |
NCHA | 1.13 | 1.342 | 0.992 | 0.856 | 0.011 | 0.999 | |
493 | NMOR | 6.07 | 1.615 | 0.989 | 6.6 | 0.173 | 0.999 |
HMOR | 2.04 | 1.283 | 0.994 | 9.8 | 0.223 | 0.999 | |
AgMOR | 2.07 | 1.664 | 0.993 | 11.4 | 0.212 | 0.998 | |
NSTI | 1.66 | 1.400 | 0.990 | 0.524 | 0.011 | 0.999 | |
NCHA | 1.06 | 1.289 | 0.991 | 0.932 | 0.013 | 0.999 | |
453 | NMOR | 6.47 | 1.958 | 0.993 | 7.6 | 0.162 | 0.999 |
HMOR | 2.24 | 1.370 | 0.991 | 11.7 | 0.220 | 0.999 | |
AgMOR | 1.6 | 1.538 | 0.996 | 15.8 | 0.185 | 0.995 | |
NSTI | 2.24 | 1.542 | 0.994 | 0.321 | 0.009 | 0.996 | |
NCHA | 1.01 | 1.210 | 0.996 | 0.968 | 0.016 | 0.999 | |
413 | NMOR | 5.46 | 1.596 | 0.991 | 6.1 | 0.312 | 0.999 |
HMOR | 2.44 | 1.362 | 0.994 | 14.7 | 0.189 | 0.996 | |
AgMOR | 1.9 | 1.631 | 0.985 | 14.6 | 0.200 | 0.999 | |
NSTI | 3.13 | 1.579 | 0.989 | 0.226 | 0.012 | 0.999 | |
NCHA | 1.34 | 1.288 | 0.997 | 0.668 | 0.012 | 0.999 |
Sample | T/K | −∆G | −∆H | −∆S 103 |
---|---|---|---|---|
NMOR | 573 | 2.145 | 3.846 | |
533 | 1.768 | 4.345 | ||
493 | 1.610 | 5.555 | ||
453 | 1.385 | 4.349 | 6.719 | |
413 | 1.625 | 6.595 | ||
HMOR | 573 | 1.817 | 1.488 | |
533 | 1.990 | 1.275 | ||
493 | 1.540 | 2.292 | ||
453 | 1.329 | 2.670 | 2.296 | |
413 | 1.054 | 3.912 | ||
AgHMOR | 573 | 1.826 | 4.366 | |
533 | 1.654 | 5.016 | ||
493 | 1.441 | 5.851 | ||
453 | 1.114 | 4.328 | 7.094 | |
413 | 1.080 | 7.859 | ||
NCHA | 573 | 1.558 | 4.799 | |
533 | 1.360 | 0.887 | ||
493 | 1.299 | 1.083 | ||
453 | 1.270 | 1.833 | 1.242 | |
413 | 1.192 | 1.552 | ||
NSTI | 573 | 1.727 | 9.492 | |
533 | 1.594 | 10.45 | ||
493 | 1.500 | 11.492 | ||
453 | 1.510 | 7.166 | 12.485 | |
413 | 1.640 | 13.380 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Santamaria-Juarez, J.D.; Hernández, M.Á.; Hernández, G.I.; Álvarez, K.M.; Rubio, E.; Portillo, R.; Velasco, M.d.l.Á.; Aquino, J.F.; Petranovskii, V. Adsorption of the Herbicide Endosulfan by Newly Discovered Zeolitic Tuffs in Mexico. Minerals 2024, 14, 643. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/min14070643
Santamaria-Juarez JD, Hernández MÁ, Hernández GI, Álvarez KM, Rubio E, Portillo R, Velasco MdlÁ, Aquino JF, Petranovskii V. Adsorption of the Herbicide Endosulfan by Newly Discovered Zeolitic Tuffs in Mexico. Minerals. 2024; 14(7):643. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/min14070643
Chicago/Turabian StyleSantamaria-Juarez, Juana Deisy, Miguel Ángel Hernández, Gabriela Itzel Hernández, Karin Monserrat Álvarez, Efraín Rubio, Roberto Portillo, María de los Ángeles Velasco, Josue Fernando Aquino, and Vitalii Petranovskii. 2024. "Adsorption of the Herbicide Endosulfan by Newly Discovered Zeolitic Tuffs in Mexico" Minerals 14, no. 7: 643. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/min14070643