Next Article in Journal
A Comprehensive Review on the Efficacy of Several Pharmacologic Agents for the Treatment of COVID-19
Next Article in Special Issue
Characterization of Probiotic Properties of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei L2 Isolated from a Traditional Fermented Food “Lben”
Previous Article in Journal
Changing Landscape of Liver Transplantation in the Post-DAA and Contemporary ART Era
Previous Article in Special Issue
Antibiofilm Activity of LL-37 Peptide and D-Amino Acids Associated with Antibiotics Used in Regenerative Endodontics on an Ex Vivo Multispecies Biofilm Model
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Life
Volume 12
Issue 11
10.3390/life12111756
life-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antibiofilm Potential and Exoenzyme Inhibition by Elattaria cardamomum Essential Oil in Candida spp. Strains

by
Emira Noumi
1,*,
Ghada Salamah Alshammari
1,
Tarek Zmantar
2,
Abdulrahman S. Bazaid
3,
Khulood Fahad Alabbosh
1,
Abdelbaset Mohamed Elasbali
4,
Waleed Abu Al-Soud
5,
Sami Ghazi Alrashidi
6 and
Mejdi Snoussi
1,7
1
Department of Biology, College of Science, University of Hail, Hail 2440, Saudi Arabia
2
Laboratory of Analysis, Treatment and Valorization of Environmental and Product Pollutants, Faculty of Pharmacy of Monastir, Avicenne Street, Monastir 5000, Tunisia
3
Department of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Hail, Hail 55476, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, College of Applied Sciences-Qurayyat, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia
5
Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, College of Applied Sciences-Sakaka, Jouf University, Sakaka 72388, Saudi Arabia
6
Immunology Laboratory, King Salman Specialist Hospital, Hail 55471, Saudi Arabia
7
Laboratory of Genetics, Biodiversity and Valorisation of Bioresources, High Institute of Biotechnology, University of Monastir, Monastir 5000, Tunisia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Life 2022, 12(11), 1756; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/life12111756
Submission received: 15 October 2022 / Revised: 28 October 2022 / Accepted: 31 October 2022 / Published: 1 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antibiotic Resistance in Biofilm)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Fungal infections caused by Candida species have attracted great interest due to their resistance to commercial antifungal agents. Essential oils from aromatic and medicinal plants have many bioactive compounds that are known for their important biological activities, mainly their antimicrobial effects. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the antifungal ability of Elettaria cardamomum essential oil (EO) against different clinical Candida isolates. Then, we investigated the anti-phospholipase, anti-protease, and anti-biofilm activity of E. cardamomum EO against the selected isolates. Twenty-four Candida strains (clinical and reference) were tested for virulence factors such as biofilm formation, protease, and phospholipase activity. The minimum inhibitory (MIC) and fungicidal (MFC) concentrations of E. cardamomum were determined, and their effects were tested against all Candida strains. Our results revealed that E. cardamomum EO was rich in α-terpinyl acetate (56.5%), limonene (12.6%), and mentha-2.4(8)-diene (7.65%). The tested EO showed activity against all tested Candida strains in their planktonic form and against exoenzymes and biofilm production. Based on our findings, we promote the use of E. cardamomum EO as a treatment against clinical Candida isolates active on the virulence factors of this fungus.

1. Introduction

Fungal infections with increasing resistance to conventional therapies are a growing concern. Candida species are major agents of human infections. Candida albicans is a major opportunistic yeast responsible for mucosal and invasive infections [1,2]. Today, Candida species are emerging as major agents of hospital-acquired infections. These species are ranked as the third- or fourth-most isolated bloodstream pathogens. Although C. albicans is recognized as the predominant etiological agent of candidiasis, other Candida species such as C. krusei, C. glabrata, C. lusitaniae, and C. dubliniensis, which tend to be less susceptible to common antifungal drugs, have also emerged as substantial opportunistic pathogens [1,2]. Importantly, yeasts (mainly C. albicans) are the third leading cause of catheter-related infections. C. dubliniensis isolates have usually been recovered from symptomatic HIV-infected individuals and are unidentifiable as any known Candida species using conventional criteria [2]. Biofilm-associated infections are therefore difficult to treat because of their decreased susceptibility to antimicrobial therapy. In fact, resistance has been reported to increase 1000-fold under some conditions. In the case of C. albicans biofilms, our group and others have reported that they are up to 4000 times more resistant to fluconazole when compared with planktonic, free-floating cells [1].
Candida strains have developed resistance to many antifungal agents, and as a result, immense clinical problems have emerged in the treatment of these diseases [3]. The resistance of organisms has increased due to the indiscriminate use of commercial antifungal drugs, commonly used for the treatment of infectious diseases. These fungi possess various virulence factors (like exopolysaccharides production), phospholipase and protease production, hemolysins secretion, surface hydrophobicity, phenotypic switching, biofilm formation, and adherence to epithelial cells [4,5], which promote the dissemination of infections in susceptible hosts. To infect hosts, Candida yeast cells adhere to host cells using adhesins [6]. Biofilms are structured communities [7] that enable fungus attachment to biotic or abiotic surfaces [8], including medical devices [9]. To prevent Candida infection, all these virulence factors can be targeted. Recently, research toward new antifungal agents has aimed at the selective targeting of virulence mechanisms as opposed to the killing of the pathogen, which may increase the selection pressure for development of drug resistance [10].
The emergence and spread of antifungal resistance are growing global threats that have aroused a global interest in limiting antifungal use to treat human candidiasis. Since ancient times, traditional healing systems provided some herbal remedies to treat human diseases. Although phytotherapeutic remedies are available and are used, evidence of their efficacy is currently very limited but is nevertheless still necessary. Researchers have been encouraged to seek new antimicrobial compounds from various sources, including medicinal plants [3]. From natural and medicinal plants, we notice that Elettaria cardamomum (green cardamom) has been used as an aromatic, diuretic, and stimulant agent to treat cardiovascular and gastrointestinal disorders. This herb is used to prevent and treat asthma, bronchitis, kidney stones, and urinary tract disorders [11]. Some studies have demonstrated the antimicrobial effect of this plant [10,11,12]. Many studies have been made on the chemical and antimicrobial properties of E. cardamomum [13,14] against Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Escherichia coli [15].
However, the present study focuses on the antifungal activity of E. cardamomum essential oil (EO) against several Candida strains. The objective of our work was to study the virulence factors and biofilm formation of Candida strains from Hail hospitals and to validate the anti-Candida (enzymes production, planktonic, and biofilm forms) potential of E. cardamomum EO. The results obtained from the current project confirm the therapeutic properties of the selected EO and encourage its therapeutic use as a anti-phospholipase and anti-protease agent.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients, Strains, Media, and Growth Conditions

This study was conducted following the Ethics Committee at Hail Affairs (reference: H-08-L-074). Patient privacy and confidentiality of data were maintained anonymously in accordance with The Declaration of Helsinki. The subjects of the study were twenty-four (24) patients from Hail region, Saudi Arabia with cutaneous infections. A collection of reference and clinical Candida strains was used during this study. Five Candida strains provided from American Type Collection Culture, Candida utilis ATCC 9255 (A1), Candida guillermondii ATCC 6260 (A4), Candida tropicalis ATCC 1362 (A8), Candida albicans ATCC 10231 (A14), Candida albicans ATCC 20402 (A15), and Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC 20407 (A9), were used as control. Thirteen C. albicans strains isolated from different medical services (C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, 104, 104W, 108, 109, 113, 124, 126, and 118) were the subjects of this work. Samples were collected from the patients with a sterile cotton swab (Nippon Menbo, Tokyo, Japan), which were immediately cultured on Sabouraud chloramphenicol agar for 24–48 h at 35 °C.

2.2. Phospholipase Assay

Production of phospholipase by Candida strains was determined as described by Noumi et al. [16]. Cultures were transferred onto Sabouraud Chloramphenicol agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h for enzymatic tests. Following incubation, 1.5 mL of the yeast culture was centrifuged at 2000× g for 5 min. The pellets obtained were washed twice by resuspension in PBS and centrifuged under the same conditions to remove residual culture medium. One microliter (1 µL) of the suspension was then plated in duplicate in phospholipase agar medium [16]. The inoculated plates were incubated at 37 °C for 4 days. The presence of phospholipase was determined by the formation of an opaque zone around the yeast colonies, and it was measured by calculating the ratio of colony diameter to colony diameter with area of precipitation. The value of Pz is inversely proportional to the nature of the activity. Precipitation zone (Pz) reflecting the enzymatic activity was interpreted as phospholipase negative (Pz = 1), phospholipase positive (Pz > 0.63), and phospholipase very strong (Pz < 0.63).

2.3. Proteinase Assay

Determination of proteinase production was performed according to the method described by Noumi et al. [16]. The test medium consisted of agar plates containing bovine serum albumin (BSA, pH 3.5). Each strain was inoculated in triplicate, and the plates were incubated at 37 °C for 7 days. The presence of proteinase was determined by the formation of a transparent halo around the yeast colonies. Proteinase activity was measured by calculating the ratio of colony diameter to colony diameter with area of precipitation. The value of Pz is inversely proportional to the nature of the activity. The Pz coefficients of the Candida strains analyzed were grouped into 4 classes: very low activity (0.9 < Pz < 1), low activity (0.89 < Pz < 0.80), high activity (0.79 < Pz < 0.70), and very high activity (Pz < 0.69).

2.4. Qualitative Detection of Exopolysaccharide Production

2.4.1. Safranin Method

Slime production was determined using the safranin method as described by Davenport et al. [17]. Candida isolates were inoculated into a tube containing 10 mL of Sabouraud broth supplemented with 8% of glucose. The tubes were incubated at 35 °C for 24 h and examined for the presence of a viscid slime layer after removing the cell suspension colored for 30 min with safranin. Slime production by each isolate was scored as negative, weak (+), moderate (++), or strong (+++).

2.4.2. Detection of Slime Production by the Congo Red Agar (CRA) Method

The slime-producing ability of Candida strains was tested according to the protocol described by Noumi et al. [18]. All isolates were cultured on Congo red agar plates. Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h under aerobic conditions and subsequently left overnight at room temperature. After incubation, black colonies were interpreted as slime-positive and unpigmented colonies (white, pinkish red…) were interpreted as slime-negative strains.

2.5. Biofilm Formation on Polystyrene

In the present study, biofilms were produced on commercially available presterilized polystyrene flat-bottom 96-well microtiter plates (Iwaki, Tokyo, Japan) for 48 h on yeast nitrogen-base medium. Batches of medium were inoculated with overnight yeast cultures and incubated at 37 °C in an orbital shaker operating at 150 rpm. Cells were harvested after 24 h (stationary growth phase), washed once with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.2), and standardized to a density at 107 cells/mL. One hundred microliters of a standardized cell suspension (107 cells/mL) was transferred to each well of a microtiter plate, and the plate was incubated for 48 h at 37 °C to allow yeasts to adhere to the well surfaces for 90 min.
As negative controls, three wells of each plate were handled in an identical way, except that no Candida suspensions were added. Following the adhesion phase, non-adherent cells were removed from the wells by being gently washed twice with 200 μL ml PBS. One hundred microliter of yeast nitrogen base medium was transferred into each washed well, and the plates were incubated at 37 °C in a shaker at 75 rpm.
Adherent biofilm was fixed with 95% ethanol and was stained with 100 μL of 1% of crystal violet (Merck, Lyon, France) for 5 min. Then, unbound crystal violet was removed, and the wells were washed three times with sterile distilled water. The water was then absorbed, and the microtiter plate was air-dried for 30 min. Then, the biofilm was dissolved into acetic acid (33%). Next, 125 μL from each well was transferred to a 96-well microtiter plate, and the OD at 570 nm was measured. Biofilm formation was categorized as highly positive (OD570 ≥ 1), low-grade positive (0.1 ≤ OD570 < 1), or negative (OD570 < 0.1) [19].

2.6. Plant Material and Extraction of Essential Oil

Elettaria cardamomum (fruits/seeds) were freshly purchased from a local market (Nabeul, Tunisia) in December 2021. The species was identified by Prof. Abderrezak Smaoui, an expert botanist from the Laboratory of Extremophile Plants, Biotechnology Centre of Borj-Cedria, University of Tunis El Manar, Hammam-Lif, Tunisia; a voucher specimens number NE-GC-001 was attributed to this sample.
The green cardamom was ground to fine powder using a Mettler AE 200 (Dangoumau-type) grinder apparatus (size 20 micrometer). Powdered cardamom (100 g) was subjected to volatile oil extraction for 3 h with 500 mL distilled water using a Clevenger-type apparatus, according to the European Pharmacopoeia (1975) [20]. The obtained oil was dried over anhydrous sodium sulphate and stored in sealed glass vials in a refrigerator at 4 °C prior to analysis.

2.7. Composition of Elattaria Cardamomum Essential Oil

Gas chromatography with electron-impact mass spectrometry (GC-EIMS) analyses were performed according to the protocols previously described by Davies (1990) and Adams (1995) based on the calculation of the retention times using the n-alkanes series (C8–C23) [21,22].

2.8. Effect of Elattaria Cardamomum Essential Oil on Candida strains

2.8.1. Disk Diffusion Assay

The anti-Candida spp. activity was achieved by the agar–well diffusion method and the microdilution method for the determination of minimal inhibition concentration (MIC) and minimal fungicidal concentration (MFC) values.
All Candida strains were adjusted to 107 cells/mL (OD540 nm = 0.5) and then swabbed onto the surface of saboubouraud dextrose agar. Absorbent discs (Whatman disc number 3, 6 mm diameter) were impregnated with 10 μL of the tested EO, and then placed onto the surface of inoculated plates. Discs of standard antifungal agent itraconazole were taken as positive control. Following incubation for 24 h at 37 °C, the zone of inhibition (ZOI, in mm) was recorded, if present. All experiments were performed in triplicate [23].

2.8.2. Minimum Inhibitory and Minimum Fungicidal Concentrations

The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for E. cardamomum EO against all Candida strains were determined by the broth dilution method, according to the standard protocols [23]. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values for E. cardamomum EO against each strain were determined by the broth dilution method [23]. To determine the minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) values, 10μL of each well medium with no visible growth was removed and plated into Sabouraud dextrose agar. After 24 h of incubation at 37 °C, the number of surviving organisms was determined as CFU/mL. MFC was defined as the lowest concentration at which 99% of the bacteria were killed. Itraconazole (12.5–0.003 mg/mL) was used as a positive control [24]. The fungicidal or fungistatic effect of green cardamom EO was determined according to the scheme proposed by Moroh et al. [25]. In fact, the tested EO was considered as fungistatic when the MFC/MIC ratio is greater than 4.

2.9. Effect of E. Cardamomum EO on Enzymatic Activities

Different E. cardamomum EO concentrations (MIC, 2× MIC and 4× MIC) were tested for their effect on phospholipase and proteinase activities against four Candida strains selected due to the result of the enzymatic properties after an initial characterization in Section 2.1 and Section 2.2. For this, Candida isolates incubated in Sabouraud broth combined with different E. cardamomum EO concentrations were cultured on phospholipase and proteinase agar media. Anti-phospholipase and proteinase activities were measured according to the methods described by Noumi et al. [16] by calculating the ratio between the diameter of the colony and that of the colony plus the precipitation zone.

2.10. Anti-Biofilm Activity of E. cardamomum EO

Determination of antibiofilm activity of the tested essential oil was carried out against Candida strains showing high biofilm formation ability. The reduction of biofilm growth and development by E. cardamomum EO was evaluated as previously described [26]. Biofilms were allowed to develop for 48 h at 37 °C in 96-well microtiter plates; this was followed by addition of different concentrations of E. cardamomum EO (1/2× MIC, 1× MIC, 2× MIC and 4× MIC). Then, 100 μL of the EO was dissolved in DMSO and Sabouraud broth was added to yield a concentration range of 1/2× MIC, 1× MIC, 2× MIC, and 4× MIC per well. The plates were further incubated for 24 h, which was followed by assessment of biofilms biomass by CV staining. CV-stained biofilm cells were quantified at 570 nm with the microplate reader, and the percentage of biofilm eradication was obtained by the following formula: ((OD growth control − OD sample)/OD growth control) × 100.

2.11. Statistical Analysis

All measurements were carried out in triplicate and the results were presented as mean values ± SD (standard deviation). Statistical analyses were performed using a one-way analysis of variance ANOVA test, and the significance of the difference between means was determined by Duncan’s multiple range test. Differences of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Enzymatic Characterization

The results of the distribution of the phospholipase and proteinase activities of the various Candida strains are presented in Table 1. Regarding phospholipase activity, 11 strains out of 20 (55%) had very high phospholipase activity (Pz < 0.69), which manifested as an opaque halo around the colonies on egg yolk agar (Figure 1a). Only four clinical strains (A10, 104, 108, and 118) were phospholipase-negative isolates (Table 1). Pz values, which are inversely proportional to the nature of the activity, ranged from 0.44 to 0.67 (Table 1). The activity of phospholipase (Pz values) was variable according to the species, with a maximum of 0.44 detected in the clinical strain of C. albicans (C4).
On the other hand, the incubation of Candida colonies for 7 days at 37 °C on BSA agar showed that only 4 strains out of 20 (20%) had very high protease activity (Pz < 0.69), as revealed by the presence of a clear halo around the colony on this medium (Figure 1a). Two reference strains (A1 and A15) had a high protease activity (Pz = 0.78 and 0.77 respectively). The reference C. tropicalis ATCC 1362 strain (A8) showed a very low protease activity (Figure 1c).

3.2. Chemical Composition of E. cardamomum EO

The chemical composition of E. cardamomum EO is summarized in Table 2.
Twenty-eight components with different percentage were identified using an HP5 capillary column according to their elution time. E. cardamomum EO was rich in α-terpinyl acetate (menthane monoterpenoids) (56.5%), limonene (cyclic monoterpene) (12.6%), and mentha-2,4(8)-diene (menthane monoterpenoids) (7.65%). Other relevant components were bornyl acetate (bicyclic monoterpenoids) (5.56%) and α-terpinene (monoterpene) (3.912%). The structures of the major compounds are represented in Figure 2.

3.3. Antifungal Activity of E. cardamomum EO

The antifungal activity of the E. cardamomum EO against clinical and reference Candida strains is illustrated in Table 3. The results were based on the disk diffusion method, which is based on the determination of the zones of inhibition (ZI) on a solid medium and by the determination of the MICs and MFCs on a liquid medium.
The tested EO had greater activity against all tested Candida strains (two reference strains and seven clinical isolates) compared to the selected antifungal agent, itraconazole. Indeed, at a concentration of 10 mg/mL, the diameters of the zones of inhibition (ZI) measured on agar ranged from 7.33 ± 0.57 mm to 11.66 ± 0.57 mm. The largest inhibition diameter was recorded in the reference strain C. utilis ATCC 9255 (ZI = 11.66 ± 0.57 mm). The clinical isolate C. albicans (C5) was the most resistant strain (ZI = 7.33 ± 0.57 mm) to the activity of E. cardamomum EO at a concentration of 10 mg/mL (Table 3).
The results of MICs and MFCs obtained in our study ranged from 0.097 to 0.78 mg/mL and from 12.5 to 100 mg/mL, respectively. As there is no consensus on the acceptable level of inhibition for natural products compared to standard antibiotics, we considered the classification for plant materials proposed by Duarte et al. [27] based on the results of MICs: strong inhibitors, MIC up to 0.5 mg/mL; moderate inhibitors, MIC between 0.6 and 1.5 mg/mL; weak inhibitors, MIC greater than 1.6 mg/mL. Consequently, the data in Table 3 indicate that the tested EO can be considered a strong inhibitor against Candida strains (MIC= < 0.5 mg/mL). Using the scheme proposed by Moroh et al. [25], the tested EO showed greater fungistatic activity against all tested Candida strains (MFC/MIC ratio higher than 4) compared to the results of the same ratio obtained for the commercialized antifungal agent the itraconazole. These data are summarized in Table 3.

3.4. Anti-Enzymatic Activity of Green Cardamom EO

The results of the study of the effect of different concentrations of E. cardamomum EO on hydrolytic enzymes are represented on Table 4. Our results demonstrated that the tested concentrations of green cardamom EO were not active against phospholipase produced by the reference strain of C. albicans ATCC 20402 (A15) and the clinical strain of C. albicans (113). In fact, the phospholipase activity was still very strong for C. albicans (A15) and strong for C. albicans (113).
Concerning the second tested enzyme, the proteinase, the C. albicans (126) strain could produce this enzyme in the presence of MIC, 2xMIC, and 4xMIC of E. cardamomum EO. The clinical strain of C. albicans (109) could not produce either exoenzyme in the presence of the test EO, showing negative and very low activities for phospholipase and proteinase, respectively, compared to the control cases (Blank) (Table 4).

3.5. Adhesive Properties and Biofilm Formation

Among tested strains, one out of twenty (5%) displayed variable phenotype (red with black center) over CRA plates (Figure 3), indicating slime production (Table 4).
The results of quantitative biofilm formation ability evaluated with CV staining assay revealed that among the tested strains, 8/24 (33.33%) of the strains were strong biofilm producers (OD570 ≥ 1) over polystyrene surfaces (Table 5). All the other strains showed moderate-grade biofilm formation (0.1 ≤ OD570 < 1) (Table 5).
The study of biofilm formation on glass tubes showed that six strains among twenty (30%) were strongly adherent (c, noted +++) and 50% (10 strains) were moderately adherent (b, noted ++) to this material (Figure 4).

3.6. Antibiofilm Activity of E. cardamomum EO

Two reference strains of Candida (A1: C. utilis ATCC 9255 and A15: C. albicans ATCC 20402) and three clinical C. albicans isolates (C4, C5, and 113) were selected according to their strong biofilm production to study the antibiofilm ability of E. cardamomum EO.
At a concentration of 2× MIC, corresponding to 0.78 mg/mL against all Candida strains (except the strain C5), the EO exerted an anti-biofilm effect (OD570 < 1) when compared to the control (untreated cells) (Table 5). E. cardamomum EO was not effective against the clinical strain of C. albicans (C5) at 1/2× MIC, MIC, and 4× MIC (Table 6).
E. cardamomum EO showed anti-biofilm ability on clinical C. albicans strains (A15 and C5) on polystyrene of about 97.5% and 76%, respectively, at the highest tested concentration (4× MIC = 0.624 mg/mL) (Figure 5). The effect of E. cardamomum EO on candidal biofilm formed on polystyrene was variable depending on the concentration. A concentration equivalent to 4× MIC of the tested EO was able to inhibit the growth of the biofilm formed on polystyrene by all Candida strains with percentages of 60 ± 2% for C. albicans (113) to 99.2 ± 1 % for C. albicans ATCC 20402 (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

Fungal infections caused by Candida species are an important cause of mortality. Use of commercial treatment is limited due to the drug resistance, the toxicity of the antifungal agents, and drug–drug interactions [28]. Therefore, it is essential to develop new antifungal molecules with fewer risks and greater efficiency. Medicinal and aromatic plants have been of great importance for human health since ancient times. According to reports from the World Health Organization, 80% of the world’s population continues to use traditional medicines [29].
The Candida genus, particularly C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis, has been described as an important agent that is responsible for nosocomial infections [30,31].
Several virulence factors of this fungus have been extensively investigated, particularly regarding biofilm formation [32]. The results of quantitative biofilm formation investigation showed that all Candida isolates were biofilm producers on polystyrene surfaces but to different degrees. It has been previously demonstrated that Candida species are able to form biofilms on different abiotic surfaces. In fact, Vijayalakshmi [33] reported that C. dubliniensis (75%), followed by C. glabrata (67.9%), C. albicans (58.11%), C. tropicalis (53.33%), and C. parapsilosis (45.45%), were strong biofilm producers. Co-infection with other diseases can increase the biofilm-forming ability of Candida isolates [34].
Candida cells implicated into the biofilm are more resistant to azoles, especially fluconazole and clotrimazole [35]. In our case, a concentration of about 4× MIC of E. cardamomum EO showed anti-biofilm ability on all clinical C. albicans strains on polystyrene, to about 60% to 99.2%. This effect was variable depending on the concentration.
The second virulence factor studied was exoenzyme production. In the current study, phospholipase production was reported in 80% of Candida isolates. In a previous study, 81.6% of C. albicans isolates showed phospholipase activity [36].
Concerning proteinase, the second exoenzyme, production was reported in 30% of the tested strains. Tsang et al. [37] reported that 82.1% of C. albicans strains were able to secrete the proteinase [37].
In our study, we studied the antifungal effect of E. cardamomum EO against the selected strains. Phytotherapy has used cardamom to treat cardiac and digestive disorders, tooth infections, diarrhea, and asthma [38,39,40]. This plant also exhibits antiulcerogenic [41] anti-inflammatory [42], antidiabetic [43], and antimutagenic [38] effects.
Many researchers have demonstrated that E. cardamomum EO is rich in 1,8-cineol and poor in phenolic derivatives [44,45,46]. The chemical composition of the EO varies according to several factors, including harvesting region and time of plant collection. Some studies illustrated that this volatile oil contains 1,8-cineole (36.3%), α-terpinyl acetate (31.3%), limonene (11.6%), linalool (3%), and α-terpineol (2.6%) [47]. The EO of E. cardamomum was monoterpene-dominant. The main compound found in our E. cardamomum EO was α-terpinyl acetate (56.5%), followed by limonene (12.6%) and mentha-2,4(8)-diene (7.65%). Those three compounds represented more than 70% of the oil. Those results are in line with the literature, where terpinyl acetate is the most abundant component [48]. Still, there are other studies that refer to 1,8-cineol as the main compound [49]. It has been also reported that the cardamom aroma is due to the combination of the major components, 1,8-cineole and α-terpinyl acetate [50].
The antimicrobial properties of aromatic and medicinal plants are due to their chemical compounds, such as oils, alkaloids, tannins, and lipids [51,52]. E. cardamomum EO showed an effect when tested on C. utilis and C. albicans reference strains with an 11.66 mm and 10.66 mm zone of inhibition, respectively. This result was illustrated by Emira et al. [15] when they tested the effect of the same EO against C. albicans and C. tropicalis isolates [15]. The antibacterial activity may be the result of the presence of α-terpineol and linalool, compounds that are known to possess antibacterial activity [53]. In fact, terpineol and eugenol affected the morphology of Staphylococcus aureus and Salmonella typhimurium, indicating that the mechanism of action should be related by the rupture or dysfunction of the cell membrane [54].
At 10 µg/mL, the essential oil inhibits elastolytic and proteolytic activities in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. The 1,8-cineole can inhibit violacein production in Chromobacterium violaceum. Moreover, 1,8-cineole attenuated the expression of the tested quorum-sensing-controlled virulence factors (violacein pigment production, elastase and protease production, and motility) [15].
A previous study reported antimicrobial activity against S. aureus in acetonic extracts from E. cardamomum [26]. The same researchers demonstrated that the acetonic extract of cardamom was more active against C. albicans strains than the ethanolic extract [50]. P. aeruginosa was found to be the most resistant bacteria against the cardamom seed. The least inhibitory effects were observed for K. pneumoniae, E. feacalis, and E. coli [13].
The effects of natural substances (EO and plants extracts) on exoenzymes production have been largely described. In a previous study by Brondani et al. [55] the researchers demonstrated that exposure of sub-MICs to antimycotics significantly decreased proteinase production in all the C. albicans isolates tested. In the second study, Lyon et al. [56] reported that different surfactants did not affect phospholipase production. In Origanum vulgare essential oil, the enzymatic activity of C. albicans isolates decreased as the EO concentration increased, indicating the ability of the oil to inhibit such activity. In another study, Lima et al. [57] demonstrated the ability of some essential oils to inhibit the growth of some Candida species, including C. albicans, demonstrating possible disadvantages in the use of fungicides in relation to the use of anti-enzymatic compounds, especially anti-phospholipathics, which would reduce the virulence of the strains.

5. Conclusions

Candida species are normally found in human hosts and can survive in the hospital environment. The resistance of this fungus to commercialized antifungal agents has increased in recent years. Therefore, a new generation of more potent drugs needs to be developed to prevent the increasing threat of emerging azole-resistant Candida species. Modified medicines, such as plant materials and dry fruits, can be and are used for the treatment of these infections.
Within the limitations of this study and based on the methodology used, it may be concluded that the essential oil of Elettaria cardamomum caused significant reductions in the virulence factors of Candida strains (biofilm formation and production of the phospholipase and proteinase enzymes). Thus, tests with green cardamom essential oil should be encouraged, since positive results for the decrease of the virulence of C. albicans with herbal medicines are of general interest, being able to produce medicines with fewer side effects to the users. This plant is recommended as an efficient alternative in medicine for the treatment of fungal infections and for biofilm inhibition.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.N. and G.S.A.; methodology, E.N., T.Z., A.S.B., M.S. and G.S.A.; software, A.M.E., W.A.A.-S., S.G.A. and K.F.A.; validation, E.N., M.S., G.S.A. and T.Z.; formal analysis, E.N. and M.S.; investigation, E.N., M.S., G.S.A. and A.S.B.; resources, E.N., M.S. and G.S.A.; data curation, E.N., T.Z., S.G.A. and A.S.B.; writing—original draft preparation, E.N. and G.S.A.; writing—review and editing, E.N., G.S.A. and M.S.; visualization, E.N. and M.S.; supervision, E.N. and M.S.; project administration, E.N. and G.S.A.; funding acquisition, E.N. and G.S.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been funded by Scientific Research Deanship at University of Ha’il- Saudi Arabia through project number GR- 22 064.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted following the Ethics Committee at Hail Affairs (reference: H-08-L-074).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

References

  1. Ramage, G.; Bachmann, S.; Patterson, T.F.; Wickes, B.L.; Lopez-Ribot, J.L. Investigation of multidrug efflux pumps in relation to fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans biofilms. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2002, 49, 973–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Sullivan, D.; Coleman, D. Candida dubliniensis: An emerging opportunistic pathogen. Curr. Top. Med. Mycol. 1997, 8, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Bauer, A.W.; Kirby, W.M.; Sherris, J.C.; Turck, M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by standardized single disc method. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1996, 45, 493–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mane, A.; Kulkarni, A.; Risbud, A. Biofilm production in oral Candida isolates from HIV-positive individuals from Pune, India. Mycoses 2013, 56, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yigit, N.; Aktas, E.; Dagistan, S.; Ayyildiz, A. Investigating biofilm production, coagulase and haemolytic activity in Candida species isolated from denture stomatitis patients. Eur. J. Med. 2011, 43, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chaffin, W.L. Candida albicans cell wall proteins. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2008, 72, 495–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Antonio, D.; Romani, F.; Pontieri, E.; Fioritoni, G.; Caracciolo, C.; Bianchini, S. Catheter-related candidaemia caused by Candida lipolytica in a patient receiving allogenic bone marrow transplantation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002, 40, 1381–1386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Nobile, C.J.; Johnson, A.D. Candida albicans biofilms and human disease. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 69, 71–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kojic, E.M.; Darouiche, R.O. Candida infections of medical devices. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2004, 17, 255–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Arora, D.S.; Kaur, G.J. Antibacterial activity of some Indian medicinal plants. J. Nat. Med. 2007, 61, 313–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Souissi, M.; Azelmat, J.; Chaieb, K.; Grenier, D. Antibacterial and anti-inflammatory activities of cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum) extracts: Potential therapeutic benefits for periodontal infections. Anaerobe 2020, 61, 102089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ashokkumar, K.; Murugan, M.; Dhanya, M.K.; Warkentin, T.D. Botany, traditional uses, phytochemistry and biological activities of cardamom [Elettaria cardamomum (L.) Maton]—A critical review. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2020, 246, 112244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ashokkumar, K.; Murugan, M.; Dhanya, M.K.; Raj, S.; Kamaraj, D. Phytochemical variations among four distinct varieties of Indian cardamom Elettaria cardamomum (L.) Maton. Nat. Prod. Res. 2020, 34, 1919–1922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kaushik, P.; Goyal, P.; Chauhan, A.; Chauhan, G. In Vitro Evaluation of Antibacterial Potential of Dry Fruit Extracts of Elettaria cardamomum Maton (Chhoti Elaichi). Iran. J. Pharm. Res. 2010, 9, 287–292. [Google Scholar]
  15. Noumi, E.; Snoussi, M.; Alreshidi, M.M.; Rekha, P.D.; Saptami, K.; Caputo, L.; De Martino, L.; Souza, L.F.; Msaada, K.; Mancini, E.; et al. Chemical and Biological Evaluation of Essential Oils from Cardamom Species. Molecules 2018, 23, 2818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Noumi, E.; Snoussi, M.; Hentati, H.; Mahdouani, K.; del Castillo, L.; Valentin, E.; Sentandreu, R.; Bakhrouf, A. Adhesive properties and hydrolytic enzymes of oral Candida albicans strains. Mycopathologia 2010, 169, 269–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Davenport, D.S.; Massanari, R.M.; Pfaller, M.A.; Bale, M.J.; Streed, S.A.; Hierholzer, W.J. Usefulness of a test for slime production as a marker for clinically significant infections with coagulase-negative staphylococci. J. Infect. Dis. 1986, 153, 332–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Noumi, E.; Snoussi, M.; Noumi, I.; Saghrouni, F.; Aouni, M.; Valentin, E. Phenotypic characterization and adhesive properties of vaginal Candida spp. strains provided by the CHU Farhat Hached (Sousse, Tunisia). Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 2015, 32, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Noumi, E.; Snoussi, M.; Kammoun, D.; Bakhrouf, A.; Valentin, E. Comparison of the adhesion ability of Candida albicans strains to biotic and abiotic surfaces. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10, 977–985. [Google Scholar]
  20. Council of Europe. European Pharmacopoeia; Maisonneuve: Sainte-Ruffine, France, 1975; Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
  21. Davies, N.W. Gas chromatographic retention indices of monoterpenes and sesquiterpenes on methyl silicon and carbowax 20M phases. J. Chromatogr. 1990, 503, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Adams, R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectroscopy; Allured Co.: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  23. Badiee, P.; Badali, H.; Diba, K.; Ghadimi Moghadam, A.; Hosseininasab, A.; Jafarian, H. Susceptibility pattern of Candida albicans isolated from Iranian patients to antifungal agents. Curr. Med. Mycol. 2016, 2, 24–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Cuenca-Estrella, M.; Moore, C.B.; Barchiesi, F. Multicenter evaluation of the reproducibility of the proposed antifu gal susceptibility testing method for fermentative yeasts of the Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (AFST-EUCAST). Clin. Microbiol. Infec. 2003, 9, 467–474. [Google Scholar]
  25. Moroh, J.L.; Bahi, C.; Dje, K.; Loukou, Y.G.; Guide Guina, F. Etude de l’activité antibactérienne de l’extrait acétatique de Morinda morindoides (Baker) Milne-Redheat (Rubiaceae) sur la croissance in vitro des souches d’Escherichia coli. Bull. Soc. R. Sci. Liege 2008, 77, 44–61. [Google Scholar]
  26. Aneja, K.R.; Sharma, C. Antimicrobial potential of fruit extracts of Elettaria cardamomum maton (chhoti elaichi) against the pathogens causing ear infection. Pharmacologyonline 2010, 3, 750–756. [Google Scholar]
  27. Duarte, M.C.; Figueira, G.M.; Sartoratto, A.; Rehder, V.L.; Delarmelina, C. Anti-Candida activity of Brazilian medicinal plants. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 97, 305–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Eggimann, P.; Garbino, J.; Pittet, D. Epidemiology of Candida species infections in critically ill non-immunosuppressed patients. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2003, 3, 685–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Anonynous, A. World Health Organization summary of WHO guidelines for the assessment of herbal medicines. Gram 1993, 28, 13–14. [Google Scholar]
  30. Segal, E.; Clad, D. Candida species and Blastoschizomyces capitus. In Topley & Wilson’s Microbiology and Microbial Infections, 9th ed.; Ajello, L., Hay, R.J., Eds.; Arnold Hodder Headline: London, UK, 1998; 423p. [Google Scholar]
  31. Cox, G.M.; Perfect, J.R. Fungal infections. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 1993, 6, 422–426. [Google Scholar]
  32. Inci, M.; Atalay, M.A.; Koç, A.N.; Yula, E.; Evirgen, O.; Durmaz, S. Investigating virulence factors of clinical Candida isolates in relation to atmospheric conditions and genotype. Turk. J. Med. Sci. 2012, 42, 1476–1483. [Google Scholar]
  33. Vijayalakshmi, P.; Thenmozhi, S.; Rajeswari, P. The Evaluation of the virulence factors of clinical Candida isolates and the anti-biofilm activity of Elettaria cardamomum against multi-drug resistant Candida albicans. Curr. Med. Mycol. 2016, 2, 8–15. [Google Scholar]
  34. Katrien, V.D.; Felipe, V.; Marion, M.G.; Liesbeth, D.; Esther, H.; Mary Ann, J.R.; Greetje, V.V.; Yves, F.D.; Bastiaan, P.K.; Patrick, V.D. Adhesion of Staphylococcus aureus to Candida albicans during Co-Infection Promotes Bacterial Dissemination Through the Host Immune Response. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 10, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  35. Jabra-Rizk, M.A.; Falkler, W.A.; Meiller, T.F. Fungal biofilms and drug resistance. J. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2004, 10, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Deorukhkar, S.; Saini, S. Evaluation of phospholipase activity in biofilm forming Candida species isolated from intensive care unit patients. Br. Microbiol. Res. J. 2013, 3, 440–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tsang, C.S.; Chu, F.C.; Leung, W.K.; Jin, L.J.; Samaranayake, L.P.; Siu, S.C. Phospholipase, proteinase and haemolytic activities of Candida albicans isolated from oral cavities of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J. Med. Microbiol. 2007, 56, 1393–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Saeed, A.; Sultana, B.; Anwar, F.; Mushtaq, M.; Alkharfy, K.M.; Gilani, A.H. Antioxidant and antimutagenic potential of seeds and pods of green cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum). Int. J. Pharm. 2014, 10, 461–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Khan, A.U.; Khan, Q.J.; Gilani, A.H. Pharmacological basis for the medicinal use of cardamom in asthma. Bangladesh J. Pharm. 2011, 6, 34–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Jafri, M.A.; Farah; Javed, K.; Singh, S. Evaluation of the Gastric Antiulcerogenic Effect of Large Cardamom (Fruits of Amomum Subulatum Roxb). J. Ethnopharmacol. 2001, 75, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Huang, Y.B.; Fang, J.Y.; Hung, C.H.; Wu, P.C.; Tsai, Y.H. Cyclic monoterpene extract from cardamom oil as a skin permeation enhancer for indometacin; in vitro and in vivo studies. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 1999, 22, 642–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Singh, G.; Kiran, S.; Marimuthu, P.; Isidorov, V.; Vinogorova, V. Antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of essential oil and various oleoresins of Elettaria cardamomum (seeds and pods). J. Sci. Food Agric. 2008, 88, 280–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rahman, T.; Rahman, K.A.; Rajia, S.; Alamgir, M.; Khan, M.T.H.; Choudhuri, M.S.K. Evaluation of Antidiarrhoeal Activity of Cardamom (Elettaria cardamomum) on Mice Models. Adv. Tradit. Med. 2008, 8, 130–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Cherrat, L.; Espina, L.; Bakkali, M.; Garcia-Gonzalo, D.; Pagan, R.; Laglaoui, A. Chemical composition and antioxidant properties of Laurus nobilis L. and Myrtus communis L. essential oils from Morocco and evaluation of their antimicrobial activity acting alone or in combined processes for food preservation. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2013, 94, 1197–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sharma, S.; Sharma, J.; Kaur, G. Therapeutic uses of Elettaria cardamomum. Int. J. Drug. Formul. Res. 2011, 2, 102–108. [Google Scholar]
  46. Masoumi-Ardakani, Y.; Mandegary, A.; Esmaeilpour, K.; Najafipour, H.; Sharififar, F.; Pakravanan, M.; Ghazvini, H. Chemical Composition, Anticonvulsant Activity, and Toxicity of Essential Oil and Methanolic Extract of Elettaria cardamomum. Planta Med. 2016, 82, 1482–1486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Korikontimath, V.S.; Mulge, R.; Zachariah, J.T. Variations in essential oil constituents in high yielding selections of cardamom. J. Plant. Craps 1999, 27, 230–232. [Google Scholar]
  48. Sasidharan, I.; Menon, A.N. Comparative chemical composition and antimicrobial activity fresh & dry ginger oils (zingiber Officinale roscoe). Int. J. Curr. Pharm. Res. 2010, 2, 40–43. [Google Scholar]
  49. Suk, S.; Kwon, G.T.; Lee, E.; Jang, W.J.; Yang, H.; Kim, J.H.; Thimmegowda, N.R.; Chung, M.-Y.; Kwon, J.Y.; Yang, S. Gingerenone A, a Polyphenol Present in Ginger, Suppresses Obesity and Adipose Tissue Inflammation in High-Fat Diet-Fed Mice. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2017, 61, 1700139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Snoussi, M.; Noumi, E.; Dahmani, A.; Flamini, G.; Aouni, M.; Al-Sieni, M.; Al-Sieni, A. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activities of Elettaria cardamomum L.(Manton) Essential Oil: A high activity against a wide range of food borne and medically important bacteria and fungi. J. Chem. Biol. Phy. Sci. Sec. 2015, 6, 248–259. [Google Scholar]
  51. Chegini, S.G.; Abbasipour, H. Chemical composition and insecticidal effects of the essential oil of cardamom, Elettaria cardamomum on the tomato leaf miner Tuta absoluta. Toxin. Rev. 2017, 36, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Ghadeer, F.M.; Khalid, M.I.; Hana’a, M.G.; Richard, A.H. Stability of Cardamom (Elettaria Cardamomum) Essential Oil in Microcapsules Made of Whey Protein Isolate, Guar Gum, and Carrageenan. J. Food. Sci. 2014, 79, C1939–C1949. [Google Scholar]
  53. Oubihi, A.; Tarfaoui, K.; Hajib, A.; Harhar, H.; Ez-Zriouli, R.; Atfaoui, K.; Ouhssine, M.; Guessous, Z. Chemical composition and evaluation of the bioactivity of laurus nobilis essential oil from north-west (Morocco). Pharm. Online 2019, 3, 134–142. [Google Scholar]
  54. Aline, C.G.; Leandra, M.M.; Mayara, F.L.; Marco Cesar, C.G.; Denise, C.E.; Marcio, F.; Rodrigo, S. Antibacterial Activity of Terpenes and Terpenoids Present in Essential Oils. Molecules 2019, 24, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  55. Brondani, L.P.; da Silva Neto, T.A.; Freitag, R.A.; Lund, R.G. Evaluation of anti-enzyme properties of Origanum vulgare essential oil against oral Candida albicans. J. Mycol. Méd. 2018, 28, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lyon, J.P.; dos Santos, F.V.; de Moraes, P.C.; Moreira, L.M. Inhibition of virulence factors of Candida spp. by different surfactants. Mycopath 2011, 171, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Lima, I.O.; Oliveira, R.A.G.; Lima, E.O.; Farias, N.M.P.; de Souza, E.L. Antifungal activity from essential oils on Candida species. Braz. J. Pharm. 2006, 16, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Life 12 01756 g001 550
Figure 1. Appearance of positive (a) and negative (d) phospholipase activity on egg yolk agar; positive protease (b) and negative (c) activities on BSA agar.
Figure 1. Appearance of positive (a) and negative (d) phospholipase activity on egg yolk agar; positive protease (b) and negative (c) activities on BSA agar.
Life 12 01756 g001
Life 12 01756 g002 550
Figure 2. Chemical structure of the main compounds identified in E. cardamomum essential oil by GC-MS technique: (a) α-terpinyl acetate, (b) limonene, and (c) mentha-2,4(8)-diene.
Figure 2. Chemical structure of the main compounds identified in E. cardamomum essential oil by GC-MS technique: (a) α-terpinyl acetate, (b) limonene, and (c) mentha-2,4(8)-diene.
Life 12 01756 g002
Life 12 01756 g003 550
Figure 3. Different morphotypes of pathogenic strains cultivated on CRA: (a) positive morphotype; (b,c) negative morphotype.
Figure 3. Different morphotypes of pathogenic strains cultivated on CRA: (a) positive morphotype; (b,c) negative morphotype.
Life 12 01756 g003
Life 12 01756 g004 550
Figure 4. Adhesive properties on glass tube using safranin staining: (a) low adhesion (strain C4); (b) moderate adhesion (strain C3); (c) strong adhesion (strain 113).
Figure 4. Adhesive properties on glass tube using safranin staining: (a) low adhesion (strain C4); (b) moderate adhesion (strain C3); (c) strong adhesion (strain 113).
Life 12 01756 g004
Life 12 01756 g005 550
Figure 5. Anti-biofilm effect of the E. cardamomum EO against Candida strains using the crystal violet staining assay. Error bars represent standard deviations.
Figure 5. Anti-biofilm effect of the E. cardamomum EO against Candida strains using the crystal violet staining assay. Error bars represent standard deviations.
Life 12 01756 g005
Table
Table 1. Phospholipase and protease activities produced by Candida strains.
Table 1. Phospholipase and protease activities produced by Candida strains.
StrainsSpeciesPhospholipaseProtease
PZ* ± SD*ActivityPZ* ± SD*Activity
A1C. utilis ATCC 92550.67 ± 0.02 aStrong1 ± 0 aVery low
A4C. guillermondii ATCC 62600.55 ± 0.005 aVery strong0.78 ± 0.01 aHigh
A8C. tropicalis ATCC 13620.49 ± 0.05 aVery strong1 ± 0 aVery low
A14C. albicans ATCC 102310.65 ± 0.017 abStrong1 ± 0 aVery low
A15C. albicans ATCC 204020.45 ± 0.069 bcVery strong0.77 ± 0 bHigh
A9S. cerevisiae ATCC 20407 0.62 ± 0.03 cdVery strong1 ± 0 bVery low
A10C. albicans1 ± 0 cdNegative1 ± 0 bVery low
124C. albicans0.75 ± 0.02 cdStrong1 ± 0 bVery low
C3C. albicans0.47 ± 0.05 cdeVery strong1 ± 0 cVery low
C2C. albicans0.58 ± 0.09 cdeVery strong0.84 ± 0.05 cLow
109C. albicans0.76 ± 0.04 cdeStrong0.69 ± 0.09 cVery high
113C. albicans0.6 ± 0.005 deVery strong0.68 ± 0 cVery high
104C. albicans1 ± 0 eNegative1 ± 0 cVery low
126C. albicans0.61 ± 0 fVery strong0.65 ± 0.01 cVery high
104WC. albicans0.58 ± 0.02 fgVery strong0.63 ± 0.12 cVery high
C4C. albicans0.44 ± 0.005 gVery strong0.8 ± 0.05 cLow
108C. albicans1 ± 0 hNegative1 ± 0 cVery low
118C. albicans1 ± 0 hNegative1 ± 0 cVery low
C5C. albicans0.82 ± 0.03 hStrong1 ± 0 cVery low
C1C. albicans0.62 ± 0.03 hVery strong1 ± 0 cVery low
SD*: standard deviation; Pz* = 1 means that the isolate was phospholipase negative, Pz > 0.63 means that the strain was phospholipase positive, and when Pz < 0.63, the phospholipase activity was very strong. Pz between 0.9 and 1 indicates very low protease activity; 0.89–0.80, low proteinase activity; 0.79–0.70, high protease activity, and Pz < 0.69, very high protease activity. The letters (a–h) indicate a significant difference according to Duncan’s test (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 2. Chemical composition of Elattaria cardamomum essential oil by GC-EIMS.
Table 2. Chemical composition of Elattaria cardamomum essential oil by GC-EIMS.
NCompound NameRT*AmountKi* Kr*
1Camphene13.6740.135869.4876954
2Δ-2-carene15.2930.098890.43741002
3α-phellandrene17.6820.856921.35091002
4α-terpinene18.8123.912935.97311017
5Limonene19.86412.598949.58591029
6γ-terpinene21.71.65973.34371059
7Mentha-3,8-diene <p->22.4440.265982.9711072
8Mentha-2,4(8)-diene <p->23.9537.649999.02171088
9Menthatriene <1,3,8-p->25.3480.1661017.7161110
10Camphor27.2880.381043.7151146
11Limonene-1,2-epoxide (Fr.1)30.2410.1511083.289/
12α-terpineol31.0940.2271094.721188
13Fenchyl Acetate32.9040.5391113.4681220
14Mentha-1(7),8-dien-2-ol <cis-p->33.5960.3791123.3721230
15Perilla Aldehyde35.0060.4511143.5521271
16Isopulegol Acetate37.2370.2651175.4831277
17Bornyl Acetate37.6255.5611181.0361288
18Terpinen-4-ol Acetate38.4270.9421192.5151299
19Pinocarvyl Acetate <cis->40.1260.3881211.9811312
20α-Terpinyl Acetate43.0656.4991256.4221349
216,8-nonadien-2-one-6-methyl-5-(1-methylethylidene)-43.220.1691258.846/
22Carvone Hydrate45.1331.7281287.8221423
23Cytronellyl Propanoate46.6020.3951304.1961446
24Trans-p-mentha-2,8-dienol47.061.3931311.586/
25Limonene-1,2-epoxide (Fr.1)49.6760.4541353.8/
26Pulegone51.840.2141388.721237
27Hydroxy-α-terpenyl Acetate52.5490.9871395.047/
28Carvone Acetate54.8780.911434.555/
RT*: retention time; Ki*: Kovats retention index determined relative to the tR of a series of n-alkanes (C10–C35) on an HP-5 MS column; Kr*: Kovats retention index determined relative to the tR of a series of n-alkanes (C10–C35) on HP Innowax.
Table
Table 3. Antifungal activity and MFC/MIC ratio values of E. cardamomum EO and itraconazole against reference and clinical Candida strains.
Table 3. Antifungal activity and MFC/MIC ratio values of E. cardamomum EO and itraconazole against reference and clinical Candida strains.
StrainsSpeciesElattaria cardamomum EO
(10 mg/mL)		MFC/MIC
Ratio		Itraconazole
(10 mg/mL)		MFC/MIC
Ratio
IZ* ± SD* (mm)MIC* (mg/mL)MFC* (mg/mL)IZ ± SD (mm)MIC (mg/mL)MFC (mg/mL)
A1C. utilis ATCC 925511.66 ± 0.57 a0.78100>4;Fungistatic6 ± 0 a0.1562.5>4;Fungistatic
A15C. albicans ATCC 2040210.66 ± 0.57 ab0.156100>4;Fungistatic14.66 ± 0.57 a0.07810>4;Fungistatic
109C. albicans8 ± 0 bc0.097100>4;Fungistatic7.33 ± 0.57 a0.1562.5>4;Fungistatic
113C. albicans8.66 ± 0.57 cd0.156100>4;Fungistatic6 ± 0 b0.31210>4;Fungistatic
126C. albicans9.66 ± 0.57 d0.12612.5>4;Fungistatic11.66 ± 0.57 b0.31210>4;Fungistatic
104WC. albicans9.66 ± 0.57 d0.15650>4;Fungistatic10.33 ± 0.57 c0.31210>4;Fungistatic
C4C. albicans9.66 ± 0.57 d0.156100>4;Fungistatic6 ± 0 c0.31210>4;Fungistatic
C5C. albicans7.33 ± 0.57 e0.15625>4;Fungistatic7.33 ± 0.57 d0.07810>4;Fungistatic
C1C. albicans9 ± 0 f0.15650>4;Fungistatic10.33 ± 0.57 e0.31210>4;Fungistatic
IZ*: inhibition zone; SD*: standard deviation; MIC*: minimal inhibition concentration; MFC*: minimal fungicidal concentration; EO: essential oil. The letters (a–f) indicate a significant difference according to Duncan’s test (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 4. Effect of different concentrations of E. cardamomum EO on exoenzyme production in Candida strains.
Table 4. Effect of different concentrations of E. cardamomum EO on exoenzyme production in Candida strains.
StrainsConcentrationPhospholipaseProteinase
OD*570 nm ± SD*ActivityOD*570 nm ± SD*Activity
A15Blank*0.45 ± 0.069Very strong0.77 ± 0High
MIC0.49 ± 0.05Very strong1 ± 0Very low
2xMIC0.58 ± 0.09Very strong1 ± 0Very low
4xMIC0.62 ± 0.03Very strong1 ± 0Very low
109Blank0.76 ± 0.04Strong0.69 ± 0.09Very high
MIC1 ± 0Negative0.82 ± 0.03Low
2xMIC1 ± 0Negative1 ± 0Very low
4xMIC1 ± 0Negative1 ± 0Very low
113Blank0.6 ± 0.005Very strong0.68 ± 0Very high
MIC0.67 ± 0.03Strong0.87 ± 0.03Low
2xMIC0.69 ± 0.04Strong1 ± 0Very low
4xMIC0.73 ± 0.03Strong1 ± 0Very low
126Blank0.61 ± 0Very strong0.65 ± 0.01Very high
MIC0.9 ± 0Strong0.67 ± 0.02Very high
2xMIC1 ± 0Negative0.75 ± 0.04High
4xMIC1 ± 0Negative0.7 ± 0.03High
OD*: optical density; SD*: standard deviation; MIC*: minimal inhibitory concentration; Blank*: untreated cells with EO.
Table
Table 5. Slime production and qualitative and quantitative adhesive properties of Candida strains on glass and polystyrene.
Table 5. Slime production and qualitative and quantitative adhesive properties of Candida strains on glass and polystyrene.
StrainsAdhesion to GlassSlime on CRA*Biofilm on Polystyrene
MorphotypeS+*/S-*OD*± SD*Biofilm Ability
A1+WhiteS-1.81 ± 0.05 aStrong biofilm
A4++PinkS-0.34 ± 0.07 aModerate biofilm
A8+++RedS-0.81 ± 0.05 bModerate biofilm
A9++RedS-0.7 ± 0.01 bModerate biofilm
A10+++PinkS-0.43 ± 0.03 bcModerate biofilm
A14++RedS-0.77 ± 0.03 bcModerate biofilm
A15++RedS-1.07 ± 0.06 cdStrong biofilm
124+++Red with black centerS+0.56 ± 0.09 cdeModerate biofilm
C3++PinkS-1.55 ± 0.17 defStrong biofilm
C2++PinkS-0.55 ± 0.09 efModerate biofilm
109++PinkS-0.66 ± 0.1 fModerate biofilm
113+++PinkS-1.18 ± 0.06 fStrong biofilm
104+++PinkS-0.66 ± 0.1 gModerate biofilm
126+++RedS-0.92 ± 0.04 hModerate biofilm
104W++PinkS-0.82 ± 0.04 iModerate biofilm
C4+WhiteS-1.66 ± 0.1 jStrong biofilm
108+WhiteS-0.92 ± 0.04 jModerate biofilm
118+PinkS-2.17 ± 0.2 kStrong biofilm
C5++BordeauxS-1.68 ± 0.2 lStrong biofilm
C1++WhiteS-2.33 ± 0.11 mStrong biofilm
CRA*: Congo red agar; S+*: slime-positive: S-*: slime-negative; OD*: optical density; SD*: standard deviation. The letters (a–m) indicate a significant difference according to Duncan’s test (p < 0.05). Weak slime production (+), moderate slime production (++), or strong slime production (+++).
Table
Table 6. Effect of 1/2× MIC, MIC, 2× MIC, and 4× MIC of E. cardamomum EO against Candida strains biofilm formed on polystyrene.
Table 6. Effect of 1/2× MIC, MIC, 2× MIC, and 4× MIC of E. cardamomum EO against Candida strains biofilm formed on polystyrene.
StrainsConcentrationOD*570 nm ± SD*Biofilm Ability
A1Blank*0.81 ± 0.05 aStrong biofilm
1/2× MIC*0.7 ± 0.01 aModerate biofilm
MIC0.43 ± 0.03 bModerate biofilm
2× MIC0.092 ± 0.004 cLow biofilm
4× MIC0.07 ± 0.009 dLow biofilm
A15Blank1.07 ± 0.06 aStrong biofilm
1/2× MIC0.92 ± 0.04 aModerate biofilm
MIC0.82 ± 0.04 bModerate biofilm
2× MIC0.095 ± 0.004 cLow biofilm
4× MIC0.078 ± 0.008 dLow biofilm
C4Blank0.66 ± 0.1 aStrong biofilm
1/2× MIC0.55 ± 0.09 aModerate biofilm
MIC0.08 ± 0 aLow biofilm
2× MIC0.06 ± 0.01 bLow biofilm
4× MIC0.03 ± 0.02 cLow biofilm
C5Blank1.68 ± 0.2 aStrong biofilm
1/2× MIC1.57 ± 0.19 abStrong biofilm
MIC1.33 ± 0.17 bcStrong biofilm
2× MIC1.17 ± 0.19 bdStrong biofilm
4× MIC0.92 ± 0.18 dModerate biofilm
113Blank1.18 ± 0.06 aStrong biofilm
1/2× MIC1.08 ± 0.01 bStrong biofilm
MIC0.942 ± 0.05 cModerate biofilm
2× MIC0.782 ± 0.04 dModerate biofilm
4× MIC0.58 ± 0.03 eModerate biofilm
OD*: optical density; SD*: standard deviation; MIC*: minimal inhibitory concentration. The letters (a–e) indicate a significant difference according to Duncan’s test (p < 0.05); Blank*: untreated cells with EO.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Noumi, E.; Alshammari, G.S.; Zmantar, T.; Bazaid, A.S.; Alabbosh, K.F.; Elasbali, A.M.; Abu Al-Soud, W.; Ghazi Alrashidi, S.; Snoussi, M. Antibiofilm Potential and Exoenzyme Inhibition by Elattaria cardamomum Essential Oil in Candida spp. Strains. Life 2022, 12, 1756. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/life12111756

AMA Style

Noumi E, Alshammari GS, Zmantar T, Bazaid AS, Alabbosh KF, Elasbali AM, Abu Al-Soud W, Ghazi Alrashidi S, Snoussi M. Antibiofilm Potential and Exoenzyme Inhibition by Elattaria cardamomum Essential Oil in Candida spp. Strains. Life. 2022; 12(11):1756. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/life12111756

Chicago/Turabian Style

Noumi, Emira, Ghada Salamah Alshammari, Tarek Zmantar, Abdulrahman S. Bazaid, Khulood Fahad Alabbosh, Abdelbaset Mohamed Elasbali, Waleed Abu Al-Soud, Sami Ghazi Alrashidi, and Mejdi Snoussi. 2022. "Antibiofilm Potential and Exoenzyme Inhibition by Elattaria cardamomum Essential Oil in Candida spp. Strains" Life 12, no. 11: 1756. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/life12111756

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop