Next Article in Journal
The Application of an Iterative Structure to the Delay-and-Sum and the Delay-Multiply-and-Sum Beamformers in Breast Microwave Imaging
Next Article in Special Issue
Monostotic Fibrous Dysplasia Mimicking Metastasis in the Femoral Neck on Bone Scintigraphy and 18F-FDG PET/CT
Previous Article in Journal
COVID-19 Diagnostics, Tools, and Prevention
Previous Article in Special Issue
Dural Metastases of Advanced Prostate Cancer Detected by 18F-Fluorocholine
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Interesting Images

Brain Metastases Unresponsive to Immunotherapy Detected by 18F-FDG-PET/CT in a Patient with Melanoma

1
Institute of Biostructures and Bioimages, National Research Council, Via Tommaso De Amicis 95, 80145 Naples, Italy
2
Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
3
Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 28 May 2020 / Revised: 10 June 2020 / Accepted: 15 June 2020 / Published: 17 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Interesting Images)

Abstract

:
Recently, newer therapies such as immunotherapy have been increasingly used in the treatment of several tumors, including advanced melanoma. In particular, several studies showed that the combination of ipilimumab, an anti-Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte Associated Protein 4 (CTLA-4) monoclonal antibody and nivolumab, an anti-Programmed Death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody, leads to improved survival in patients with metastatic melanoma. Despite that, immunotherapeutic agents may not reach therapeutic concentration in the brain due to the blood–brain barrier. We report the case of a 50-year-old man with advanced melanoma who underwent whole-body 18F-FDG-PET/CT before and after treatment with immunotherapy showing resistant brain metastases confirmed by subsequent MRI of the brain. Moreover, 18F-FDG-PET/CT was able to detect an immune-related adverse event such as enterocolitis that contributed to the worsening of patient conditions. This case shows how a whole-body methodology such as 18F-FDG-PET/CT can be useful in identifying melanoma cancer patients unresponsive to immunotherapy that may benefit from traditional palliative therapy in the effort to improve their quality of life.

Figure 1. 50-Year-old man diagnosed with nodular melanoma, underwent surgical removal of the lesion in the right dorsal region and biopsy of the sentinel lymph node in the right axilla, that showed no metastatic involvement at histopathological examination. After ten months, a new lesion appeared in the right clavicular region. The patient, therefore, underwent local surgery with lymphadenectomy of right cervical lymph nodes that were metastatic at histology with no mutations of BRAF proto-oncogene by polymerase chain reaction. Thus, the patient could not benefit from therapy with BRAF inhibitors targeting the protein kinase BRAF. This kinase, when mutated, drives neoplastic transformation through the constitutive activation of the downstream signaling pathway regulating cell division and differentiation [1]. Whole-body 18F-FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT of the brain, performed after surgery, showed no evidence of disease. In the following six months, multiple subcutaneous nodules were observed throughout the body and therefore, a 18F-FDG-PET/CT scan was performed. (A) Maximum intensity projection view; (B) Sagittal whole-body CT, PET and fusion images; (C) Transaxial CT, PET and fusion images of the brain. The scan showed multiple sites of metastatic involvement in various districts throughout the body. In particular, focal 18F-FDG uptake was found in a brain lesion of the right parietal lobe; in a lytic lesion of the frontal bone (SUVmax 7.1); in multiple cervical, thoracic and abdomino-pelvic lymph nodes (SUVmax 6.3); in a lytic lesion of the tenth thoracic vertebra (SUVmax 8) and in multiple nodular lesions in the subcutaneous and muscular tissues throughout the body (SUVmax 8.2).
Figure 1. 50-Year-old man diagnosed with nodular melanoma, underwent surgical removal of the lesion in the right dorsal region and biopsy of the sentinel lymph node in the right axilla, that showed no metastatic involvement at histopathological examination. After ten months, a new lesion appeared in the right clavicular region. The patient, therefore, underwent local surgery with lymphadenectomy of right cervical lymph nodes that were metastatic at histology with no mutations of BRAF proto-oncogene by polymerase chain reaction. Thus, the patient could not benefit from therapy with BRAF inhibitors targeting the protein kinase BRAF. This kinase, when mutated, drives neoplastic transformation through the constitutive activation of the downstream signaling pathway regulating cell division and differentiation [1]. Whole-body 18F-FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT of the brain, performed after surgery, showed no evidence of disease. In the following six months, multiple subcutaneous nodules were observed throughout the body and therefore, a 18F-FDG-PET/CT scan was performed. (A) Maximum intensity projection view; (B) Sagittal whole-body CT, PET and fusion images; (C) Transaxial CT, PET and fusion images of the brain. The scan showed multiple sites of metastatic involvement in various districts throughout the body. In particular, focal 18F-FDG uptake was found in a brain lesion of the right parietal lobe; in a lytic lesion of the frontal bone (SUVmax 7.1); in multiple cervical, thoracic and abdomino-pelvic lymph nodes (SUVmax 6.3); in a lytic lesion of the tenth thoracic vertebra (SUVmax 8) and in multiple nodular lesions in the subcutaneous and muscular tissues throughout the body (SUVmax 8.2).
Diagnostics 10 00410 g001
Figure 2. Patient showed no neurologic symptoms nor had been previously treated with steroids, therefore, underwent immunotherapy with ipilimumab in combination with nivolumab [2,3]. During immunotherapy, a reduction of the number and volume of subcutaneous nodules was clinically observed while the patient showed diarrhea, abdominal pain and weight loss likely due to immune-related adverse effects of combined immunotherapy [4]. After the administration of four cycles of immunotherapy with ipilimumab plus nivolumab, a whole-body 18F-FDG-PET/CT scan was performed to evaluate treatment response [5,6]. (A) Maximum intensity projection view; (B) Transaxial CT, PET and fusion images of the brain. The study showed no pathological 18F-FDG uptake in all previously observed sites of disease, with the exception of brain metastases. In fact, the brain lesion in the right parietal lobe, already visible in the pre-immunotherapy 18F-FDG-PET/CT, showed an increase in both size and 18F-FDG uptake, and other smaller brain metastases were detected. Furthermore, intense and diffuse 18F-FDG uptake was visible in the bowel likely due to enterocolitis induced by immunotherapy [5,7]. Based on 18F-FDG-PET/CT results, MRI of the brain was prescribed [8].
Figure 2. Patient showed no neurologic symptoms nor had been previously treated with steroids, therefore, underwent immunotherapy with ipilimumab in combination with nivolumab [2,3]. During immunotherapy, a reduction of the number and volume of subcutaneous nodules was clinically observed while the patient showed diarrhea, abdominal pain and weight loss likely due to immune-related adverse effects of combined immunotherapy [4]. After the administration of four cycles of immunotherapy with ipilimumab plus nivolumab, a whole-body 18F-FDG-PET/CT scan was performed to evaluate treatment response [5,6]. (A) Maximum intensity projection view; (B) Transaxial CT, PET and fusion images of the brain. The study showed no pathological 18F-FDG uptake in all previously observed sites of disease, with the exception of brain metastases. In fact, the brain lesion in the right parietal lobe, already visible in the pre-immunotherapy 18F-FDG-PET/CT, showed an increase in both size and 18F-FDG uptake, and other smaller brain metastases were detected. Furthermore, intense and diffuse 18F-FDG uptake was visible in the bowel likely due to enterocolitis induced by immunotherapy [5,7]. Based on 18F-FDG-PET/CT results, MRI of the brain was prescribed [8].
Diagnostics 10 00410 g002
Figure 3. MRI of the brain performed subsequently to 18F-FDG-PET/CT. (A) Coronal and transaxial T2 images; (B) Sagittal and transaxial T1 TSE images. The study showed multiple metastatic lesions, widespread throughout the brain, hypointense on T2 and hyperintense on T1 images.Moreover, a large edema in the white matter of the right cerebral hemisphere and a lesion in the frontal bone infiltrating the meninx were observed. Therefore, due to extensive brain metastases [9,10,11,12] and worsening of treatment adverse effects [4], immunotherapy was discontinued and the patient was subjected to the best supportive care until his conditions progressively worsened to death after a few months.
Figure 3. MRI of the brain performed subsequently to 18F-FDG-PET/CT. (A) Coronal and transaxial T2 images; (B) Sagittal and transaxial T1 TSE images. The study showed multiple metastatic lesions, widespread throughout the brain, hypointense on T2 and hyperintense on T1 images.Moreover, a large edema in the white matter of the right cerebral hemisphere and a lesion in the frontal bone infiltrating the meninx were observed. Therefore, due to extensive brain metastases [9,10,11,12] and worsening of treatment adverse effects [4], immunotherapy was discontinued and the patient was subjected to the best supportive care until his conditions progressively worsened to death after a few months.
Diagnostics 10 00410 g003

Author Contributions

R.F., S.P., C.G.M.: contributed to conception and design, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data and drafted the case; E.M., S.D.V.: drafted and revised the case critically for important intellectual content and approved the final version for submission and publication. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Informed Consent

Patient signed written informed consent to the processing of his data for scientific purposes.

Funding

This work was partly supported by AIRC, AssociazioneItaliana per la RicercasulCancro (project no. IG-17249) and by POR Campania FESR 2014–2020, SATIN grant.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Margolin, K. The Promise of Molecularly Targeted and Immunotherapy for Advanced Melanoma. Curr. Treat. Options Oncol. 2016, 17, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Long, G.V.; Atkinson, V.; Lo, S.; Sandu, S.; Guminski, A.D.; Brown, M.P.; Wilmott, J.S.; Edwards, J.; Gonzalez, M.; Scolyer, R.A.; et al. Combination nivolumab and ipilimumab or nivolumab alone in melanoma brain metastases: A multicentrerandomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018, 19, 672–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Tawbi, H.A.; Forsyth, P.A.; Algazi, A.; Hamid, O.; Hodi, F.S.; Moschos, S.J.; Khushalani, N.I.; Lewis, K.; Lao, C.D.; Postow, M.A.; et al. Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Melanoma Metastatic to the Brain. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 722–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, D.Y.; Salem, J.E.; Cohen, J.V.; Chandra, S.; Menzer, C.; Ye, F.; Zhao, S.; Das, S.; Beckermann, K.E.; Ha, L.; et al. Fatal Toxic Effects Associated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2018, 4, 1721–1728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Wong, A.N.M.; McArthur, G.A.; Hofman, M.S.; Hicks, R.J. The Advantages and Challenges of Using FDG PET/CT for Response Assessment in Melanoma in the Era of Targeted Agents and Immunotherapy. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 2017, 44, 67–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ciarmiello, A.; Fonti, R.; Giovacchini, G.; Del Vecchio, S. Imaging of immunotherapy response in non small cell lung cancer: Challenges and perspectives. Clin. Transl. Imaging 2018, 6, 483–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Hicks, R.J.; Iravani, A.; Sandhu, S. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Assessing Tumor Response to Immunotherapy in Solid Tumors: Melanoma and Beyond. PET Clin. 2020, 15, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Di Giacomo, A.M.; Valente, M.; Cerase, A.; Lofiego, M.F.; Piazzini, F.; Calabrò, L.; Gambale, E.; Covre, A.; Maio, M. Immunotherapy of brain metastases: Breaking a “dogma”. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019, 38, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. van Opijnen, M.P.; Dirven, L.; Coremans, I.E.M.; Taphoorn, M.J.B.; Kapiteijn, E.H.W. The impact of current treatment modalities on the outcomes of patients with melanoma, brain metastases: A systematic review. Int. J. Cancer 2020, 146, 1479–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lorger, M.; Andreou, T.; Fife, C.; James, F. Immune Checkpoint Blockade—How Does It Work in Brain Metastases? Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2019, 12, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Han, R.H.; Dunn, G.P.; Chheda, M.G.; Kim, A.H. The impact of systemic precision medicine and immunotherapy treatments on brain metastases. Oncotarget 2019, 10, 6739–6753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Schvartsman, G.; Ma, J.; Bassett, R.L., Jr.; Haydu, L.E.; Amaria, R.N.; Hwu, P.; Wong, M.K.; Hwu, W.; Diab, A.; Patel, S.P.; et al. Incidence, patterns of progression, and outcomes of preexisting and newly discovered brain metastases during treatment with anti-PD-1 in patients with metastatic melanoma. Cancer 2019, 125, 4193–4202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fonti, R.; Pellegrino, S.; Mainolfi, C.G.; Matano, E.; Del Vecchio, S. Brain Metastases Unresponsive to Immunotherapy Detected by 18F-FDG-PET/CT in a Patient with Melanoma. Diagnostics 2020, 10, 410. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics10060410

AMA Style

Fonti R, Pellegrino S, Mainolfi CG, Matano E, Del Vecchio S. Brain Metastases Unresponsive to Immunotherapy Detected by 18F-FDG-PET/CT in a Patient with Melanoma. Diagnostics. 2020; 10(6):410. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics10060410

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fonti, Rosa, Sara Pellegrino, Ciro Gabriele Mainolfi, Elide Matano, and Silvana Del Vecchio. 2020. "Brain Metastases Unresponsive to Immunotherapy Detected by 18F-FDG-PET/CT in a Patient with Melanoma" Diagnostics 10, no. 6: 410. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics10060410

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop