Next Article in Journal
A Promising and Challenging Approach: Radiologists’ Perspective on Deep Learning and Artificial Intelligence for Fighting COVID-19
Previous Article in Journal
Coronary-Pulmonary Artery Fistula Recanalization on Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Images
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 11
Issue 10
10.3390/diagnostics11101923
Review Report
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Review
Peer-Review Record

Features of Mobile Apps for People with Autism in a Post COVID-19 Scenario: Current Status and Recommendations for Apps Using AI

Diagnostics 2021, 11(10), 1923; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics11101923
by Ikram Ur Rehman 1, Drishty Sobnath 2, Moustafa M. Nasralla 3, Maria Winnett 1, Aamir Anwar 1, Waqar Asif 1 and Hafiz Husnain Raza Sherazi 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Diagnostics 2021, 11(10), 1923; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics11101923
Submission received: 22 September 2021 / Revised: 11 October 2021 / Accepted: 14 October 2021 / Published: 17 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Diagnostics)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

 Accept in present form

Author Response

Please find attached the rebuttal in response to each of the reviewers' comments. We sincerely hope, the manuscript has been improved as per the expectations of the reviewers.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The study addresses an important problem about the Features of Mobile Apps for People with Autism.

The introduction presents a good background for the study.

A more critical synthesis of the literature and potential construction of a research agenda will also improve the significance and value of the paper.

The paper needs to explain more clearly and in enough depth the research approach of the study.

Another issue is connected with the terminology used. When referring to a systematic literature review

(SLR), we normally refer to a specific method (Kitchenham, 2007).  I would like to know more elements about your SLR.

Author(s) need to mention ethical issues for their study. I propose to add the following reference:

Petousi, V., & Sifaki, E. (2020). Contextualizing harm in the framework of research misconduct. Findings from a discourse analysis of scientific publications, International Journal of Sustainable Development, 23(3/4), 149-174, https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1504/IJSD.2020.10037655

Overall, the language use is very good.

I wish you the best of luck with the revisions of your manuscript.

Author Response

Please find attached the rebuttal in response to each of the reviewers' comments. We sincerely hope, the manuscript has been improved as per the expectations of the reviewers.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop