Next Article in Journal
Determining the Target Population That Would Most Benefit from Screening for Hepatic Fibrosis in a Primary Care Setting
Next Article in Special Issue
Automatic Meniscus Segmentation Using Adversarial Learning-Based Segmentation Network with Object-Aware Map in Knee MR Images
Previous Article in Journal
Validation and Optimization of Proximal Femurs Microstructure Analysis Using High Field and Ultra-High Field MRI
Previous Article in Special Issue
Deep Learning-Based Prediction of Paresthesia after Third Molar Extraction: A Preliminary Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Artificial Intelligence Is Reshaping Healthcare amid COVID-19: A Review in the Context of Diagnosis & Prognosis

1
School of Biotechnology, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar 751024, Odisha, India
2
Wellmatix Corporation Limited, Changwon 51395, Korea
3
School of Mechanical Engineering, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar 751024, Odisha, India
4
Institute of Digital Anti-Aging Healthcare, College of AI Convergence, u-AHRC, Inje University, Gimhae 50834, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 23 July 2021 / Revised: 28 August 2021 / Accepted: 1 September 2021 / Published: 2 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Medical Diagnostics in Korea)

Abstract

:
Preventing respiratory failure is crucial in a large proportion of COVID-19 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus pneumonia termed as Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (NCP). Rapid diagnosis and detection of high-risk patients for effective interventions have been shown to be troublesome. Using a large, computed tomography (CT) database, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI) parameter to diagnose NCP and distinguish it from other kinds of pneumonia and traditional controls. The literature was studied and analyzed from diverse assets which include Scopus, Nature medicine, IEEE, Google scholar, Wiley Library, and PubMed. The search terms used were ‘COVID-19’, ‘AI’, ‘diagnosis’, and ‘prognosis’. To strengthen the overall performance of AI in COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis, we segregated several components to perceive threats and opportunities, as well as their inter-dependencies that affect the healthcare sector. This paper seeks to pick out the crucial fulfillment of factors for AI with inside the healthcare sector in the Indian context. Using critical literature review and experts’ opinion, a total of 11 factors affecting COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis were detected, and we eventually used an interpretive structural model (ISM) to build a framework of interrelationships among the identified factors. Finally, the matrice d’impacts croisés multiplication appliquée á un classment (MICMAC) analysis resulted the driving and dependence powers of these identified factors. Our analysis will help healthcare stakeholders to realize the requirements for successful implementation of AI.

1. Introduction

This manuscript emphasizes potential areas of academic studies that are possible to be impacted via COVID-19. The aim of this paper is to develop diagnostic and prognostic models via Computed Tomography to deal with COVID-19 patients tormented by pneumonia and to come to be privy to the research regions associated with COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis. It may help enhance the information of this disorder and describe the psychological effects of this pandemic and how these could trade as the ailment spreads.
The novel coronavirus, specifically SARS-CoV-2, emerged in December 2019 to cause a respiratory sickness known as COVID-19, which has shown to be a difficult illness with severity levels ranging from moderate to severe, as well as the risk of organ failure and death. Around 213 countries and territories have been affected with a hard dependency on 386,600 deaths worldwide [1,2]. COVID-19 has triggered a global health catastrophe that has had a profound impact on how we perceive our global and everyday lives. Not only does the cost of contagion and the different types of transmission endanger our sense of entity, but the protection safeguards to cease the virus from spreading also necessitate social distancing by refraining from doing what is inherently human, which is to seek solace in the ventures of others. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the most common result of elevated COVID-19 is severe pneumonia [3]. COVID-19 can be fatal for people who develop symptoms in their lungs [4,5]. Doctors use imaging studies to search for swelling, inflammation, or fluid inside the lungs to diagnose pneumonia. X-ray or CT (computed tomography) scans is recommended to identify pneumonia [3,6].
AI plays a key role in drug repurposing. Bioinformatics is a powerful tool for accelerating drug discovery. Given the current circumstances, applying bioinformatics methods to solve the problem is critical [7]. AI approaches are increasingly being used in drug discovery to solve previously tough problems such as predicting characteristics, creating compounds, and optimizing synthetic routes. Tools such as binding simulations, protein modeling, and computational chemistry are commonly employed in related fields; nevertheless, they should be used with caution because the conformational space is complicated and entropic contributions from the surrounding solvent are significant. Various types of AI are utilized to create compounds and models, which are then used for training and supervised learning [8].
AI is being used to help fight the viral pandemic that has overtaken the entire world since the year 2020 began. The press and scientific community are echoing the high hopes that data science and AI may be utilized to combat the coronavirus and “fill in the blanks” left by science [9,10,11]. AI technology enables radiologists and physicians make faster diagnosis. Importantly, our AI tool revealed crucial scientific markers that were linked to the features of the Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia (NCP) disease. Our AI machine was able to deliver accurate medical prognosis using medical data, allowing physicians to focus on proper early medical control and spend resources correctly. Outbreaks result in a significant increase in the number of people seeking medical help. To lessen the strain on the health-care system, high-quality diagnosis and prognosis metrics have been implemented. Prediction models, which use a few predictors (variables or features) to assess the probability of infection or poor infection outcomes, may help the scientific team screen patients while allocating limited healthcare resources. Prediction models have already been developed and worked on, starting with rule-based scoring systems and progressing to deep learning; however, the results are not rewarding enough [10,12]. A layout of diagnostic and prognostic management in the context of the AI-based healthcare sector is shown in Figure 1.
The framework for the application of AI in diagnosis and prognosis is shown in Figure 2. This paper is structured as follows: Section 2 entails the significance of diagnosis and prognosis and how AI can tame the diagnosis and prognosis through CNN procedure. Section 3 focuses on the proposed models to estimate the clinical diagnosis and prognosis. Section 4 highlights the results and discussion. Section 5 discusses the managerial implications. Section 6 discusses the practical implications. Section 7 delves into the findings based on the AI in COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis.

2. Related Work

This section is classified into four subsections. The first subsection presents the factors related to COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis. The second part focuses the application of AI in healthcare and the third section entails the role of AI in diagnosis and prognosis. Finally, subsection four implies the significance of statistical analysis of AI in healthcare.

2.1. Factors Related to COVID-19 Diagnosis and Prognosis

AI refers to the simulation of human intelligence in computers that are trained to think and act like humans. The phrase can also refer to any computer that has features akin to a human mind, such as learning and problem-solving abilities. An advanced technology that is helpful to tackle the COVID-19 pandemic is AI. This technology helps to screen, monitor, and forecast patients today and in the future. Early detection and diagnosis of infection are the main applications of this AI. AI is used for medication and vaccine production and workload reduction in health staff [6,13]. A Computerized Tomography (CT) scan combines a series of X-ray images taken from different angles across the body to create cross-sectional images (slices) of your bones, blood vessels, and soft tissues. X-rays are less informative than CT scan images. Imaging may help to determine the severity of the disease in patients with extreme symptoms. CT scans or X-rays can help assess a patient care plan by using laboratory testing, detailed medical history, and a physical examination [2,10,14].
NCP (Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia) is an inflammatory lung infection in small airbags. It makes it difficult to breathe because their lungs gets filled with so much fluid and pus. Significant shortness of breath, cough, fever, chest pain, chills, or weariness can be present. The majority of people with COVID-19 have moderate to mild symptoms such as cough, fever, and shortness of respiration. However, some people who capture new coronaviruses develop extreme pneumonia. The pneumonia of COVID-19 is a dangerous and deadly disease [3,15].
Medical advice suggests a positive test result can only be reported nearly a week after exposure to COVID-19. Evidence shows that the experiment is generally less effective within the three days of exposure, and the safest time to get checked is five to seven days after you have been exposed. The advice is also to put the used mask fabric in a closed bin and wash your hands immediately [13,16]. Contract data COVID-19 lists a set of complications for ongoing clinical trials, including a higher probability of missing outcome details. Trial experts should examine the management plans for missing facts and statistical analysis, according to international standards on clinical studies, although there are no clear suggestions. [10,17,18]. Physical examination, pneumonia is the most common severe type of COVID-19 after the initial surgery. In these conditions, fever, cough, dyspnea, and chest imaging anomalies are recurrent [11,19]. The swift consultation by experts responds to the request made in connection with a temperature, humidity, and possible seasonal reduction and re-emergence of the SARS-CoV2 virus by the Office of the Science and Technology Pacific (OSTP) [20,21].
In older people, the risk of serious COVID-19 disease is increased. In their 50s, for instance, people are more at risk for serious illness than in their 40s. Similarly, in general, persons in their 60s or 70s are more vulnerable than persons in their 50s to serious disease [11,22]. Regarding gender, evidence from previous epidemics, such as the outbreak in 2002–2003 of SARS coronavirus, suggests that both men and women are vulnerable to the virus as well as to the infection due to gender and sexual factors [16,23]. When it comes to body temperature, regardless of the outside temperature or weather, the average human body temperature remains between 36.5 °C and 37 °C. Temperature screening alone is not an efficient means to avoid the spread globally, as the infected person may be in the incubation phase, may not express noticeable symptoms early in the course of the disease, and may dissimulate fever using antipyretic agents. To ensure that a proper risk assessment and future contact monitoring for incoming travelers is feasible, it is better to provide prevention advice to passengers and to obtain health declarations at arrival with contact information [15,23].
There is growing uunderlying disease evidence for the increased risk of death due to COVID-19 in people with established chronic conditions or affected immune systems due to disability. Elderly people and those with underlying medical disorders such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic respiratory illness, and cancer are more likely to develop the disease [17,24].

2.2. Past Studies Regarding the Application of AI in Healthcare

The objective of AI is to emulate cognitive abilities. The increasing quality of healthcare data, combined with the rapid advancement of analysis methodologies, is causing a paradigm shift in healthcare. AI may be used on a variety of healthcare data sets (structured and unstructured). Popular AI methodologies include structured data machine learning methods such as the classic support vector machine and neural network, as well as unstructured data deep learning and natural language processing [25,26]. Cancer, neurology, and cardiology are three major illness areas that use AI techniques. In certain areas of healthcare, professionals can use AI to help them make better healthcare decisions, and it may even be able to replace human judgments (e.g., radiology). The rapid development of big data analytic methodologies, as well as the rising availability of healthcare data, has made recent effective uses of AI in healthcare possible. When used in conjunction with the right clinical questions, substantial results can be achieved systems can reveal therapeutically important information hidden in large amounts of data, allowing clinicians to make better decisions [9,13,27].
CNN (Convolutional Neural Network) is a deep neural network type, most frequently used for the analysis of visual imagery. Nanoparticles and deep neural networks are used to detect viruses [20,28]. Radiologists employ medical imaging to diagnose and treat illnesses. Chest X-rays are now commonly acknowledged as the first-line imaging technology, with chest CT reserved for the most severely ill patients or when chest X-rays and clinical presentation are inconclusive [6,29].
AI systems must be “trained” utilizing data generated by clinical activities such as screening, diagnosis, and therapy assignment in order to understand similar groups of subjects, relationships between subject features, and desired outcomes. Demographics, medical notes, electronic records from medical equipment, physical examinations, clinical laboratory tests, and photographs are just some of the types of clinical data [30].
Physical examination reports and clinical laboratory findings are the other two key data sources. They differ from imaging, genetic, and electrocardiography (EP) data in that they contain a large amount of unstructured narrative content, such as clinical notes, that is difficult to interpret [16,31]. As a result, AI applications focused on converting unstructured data into machine-readable electronic medical records (EMR).
There are two types of AI devices available. The first category includes machine learning (ML) approaches for analyzing structured data such as imaging, genomics, and EP data. Machine learning algorithms are used in medical applications to classify people’s characteristics and predict disease consequences. Natural language processing (NLP) technologies, on the other hand, extract information from unstructured data sources like clinical notes and medical journals to supplement and augment organized medical data. Machine learning techniques are used to convert texts into machine-readable structured data that can subsequently be studied [32,33].

2.3. AI in Diagnosis and Prognosis

The diagnosis is the medical name for the patient’s illness based on its symptoms. The initial step in the diagnostic process is to gather information about the patient’s medical history. The patient is next subjected to a scientific evaluation. Prognosis is a term used to describe the methodical assessment of an illness’s anticipated progression and outcome. The study is based on statistics from the average course of an effective disease, the patient’s physical and mental state, any associated diseases (if any), the prescribed medications, and case-specific circumstances. The full analysis covers the expected duration, outcome, and outline of the disease’s spread [9,11,34].
The maximum probable disease that is in all likelihood to occur through COVID-19 is pneumonia. Many COVID-19 sufferers infected by using the SARS-Cov-2 virus increase pneumonia and swiftly develop respiratory failure. Eventually, they may increase multiorgan failure [35]. A COVID-19 prognosis is confirmed via an advantageous molecular PCR (polymerase chain reaction) check. CT (computed tomography) [13,36] has to function as a crucial tool in the analysis process. It has the fastest turnaround time than a molecular diagnostic test and offers more specified info related to pathology. It proves to be a higher qualitative measurement of the lesion (vicinity of the lung tissue) and the seriousness of the lung volume inclusion may furthermore have prognostic involvement [10,14,37].
By generating an AI parameter utilizing both clinical data and CT characteristics, an accurate clinical prognostic model is established, allowing physicians to devise strategies for early tracking and care of these patients. The COVID-19 diagnostic parameter is a combination of lung lesion segmentation and diagnosis analysis [38]. The respiratory organ lesions taken are manually annotated identification is confirmed by PCR check and quantified respiratory organ lesions are confirmed via CT scans. To recognize the patterns of interstitial lung disease (ILD), the CNN (Convolutional neural network) model came into action [39]. It is regarded as a deep learning technique with the ability to differentiate between certain respiratory organ parenchyma image patches and non-lung parenchyma image patches. CNNs represent a significant advancement in image recognition. CNN is employed in the study of visual imagery [40,41].
The procedure of CNN is as follows:
  • It begins with inserting an image.
  • A function map is created by administering particular filters to it.
  • To increase non-linearity, ReLU (Rectified Linear Unit) feature is used.
  • Each feature map is carried out by a pooling layer.
  • The pooled images are flattened into one prolonged vector.
  • The vector is exerted into a completely related artificial neural network.
  • The very last layer offers the “voting” of the classes. Processes the competencies via the community.
  • The training is done via forwarding propagation and back-propagation for a certain period. The practice continues until a well-defined neural network with illustrated weights and function detectors is achieved.
The CT scans are segmented into 32 patches for segmentation, and each voxel is victimized for the primary aim of entering into the practiced CNN. Each patch is labeled with a 1 or 0, denoting lung parenchyma (LP) or non-lung parenchyma (NLP), at the same time (NLP). To reap the segmentation impacts of lung parenchyma, the hollow amid the platter volume is eventually packed [28]. Therefore, the early analysis for planning, monitoring, and remedy to establish the reference for longitudinal follow-ups can be carried out by an explicit CT-based AI system [29,42].
A COVID-19 diagnostic tool, the CT scan is used in China to observe affected people having fever and suspected contamination via CT lung scan as a medium of AI to examine infection in patients and require clinical imaging. Lesions within the lungs of NCP patients are perceptible from those resulting from bacteria. The chest CT scans can identify the difference. For example, shards of glass or reticular lines in the opaque lesions that look like abnormal paving tiles resemble the cloudy lesion motifs that occur across the peripheries of both lungs. Bacterial pneumonia lesions are generally concentrated in a single lung. They do not resemble shards of glass [20,43].

2.4. Significance of Statistical Analysis of AI in Healthcare

There are several studies presenting the statistical analysis of AI in healthcare. The significance of AI has been measured by perceived benefits with perceived risks using structural equation modeling [44]. The technological concern has occupied more weightage in perceived risk. Similarly, a survey report has emphasized three aspects of AI such as technological implementation, policy setting, and economic impact measurement by statistical survey [45]. As per the analysis of WHO, 70% countries of the globe have pointed out the lack of integration is the principal barrier to AI [46]. A real-time analysis of digital technologies in healthcare has been focused on early detection and diagnosis of diseases [47].

3. Methodology

3.1. Significance of ISM Methodology

ISM is a process for identifying and summarising linkages between several components that form a problem or issue. It is an interactive technique for building the interrelationships between the elements of a complicated system that incorporates expert input [48,49]. The advantages of ISM include that it requires fewer specialists than other methods such as the Delphi method and structural equation modelling, and it produces a structured model from unstructured and ambiguous raw data. ISM transforms an unstructured and ambiguous model into a well-defined, structured model [50]. It emphasises the components’ direct and indirect relationships and provides a clear picture of the problem [51]. It also emphasises both the long-term and short-term aspects of a problem [48]. ISM combines the opinions of professionals with their in-depth knowledge in the most efficient manner possible. As a result, this practical technique can provide a quick managerial perspective [52]. The interdependencies of the elements affecting the AI in healthcare sector during COVID-19 are highlighted in this study. As a result, ISM is an appropriate instrument for this task.
In the first phase, we identified the critical factors affecting the diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19; we reviewed the past literature and sought 20 expert opinions. The 20 experts included 15 medical doctors with at least 10 years of experience in a related field and working in the esteemed hospitals, and 5 experts who are working as chief medical officers in reputed companies that work in the field of medical image analysis using AI. Next, Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) was used to build a standard model of associations among critical factors, and MICMAC analysis was performed to categorize the factors. A total of 11 factors were taken which are responsible for the COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis as shown in Table 1. The flowchart of the solution methodology is mentioned in Figure 3. Table 2 lists the ISM steps.

3.2. The ISM Methodology

Steps of ISM methodology are as follows:
  • Step 1: Development of a structural self-interaction matrix (SSIM);
  • Step 2: Construction of a reachability matrix;
  • Step 3: Level partitions;
  • Step 4: Classification of factors; and
  • Step 5: Formation of Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM).

3.3. Development of Structural Self-Interaction Matrix (SSIM)

The relationship between different critical factors of COVID-19 used for the diagnosis are given by four symbols. This shows the direction of causality between the parameters x and y (in this case x y):
(1)
V: x leads to y.
(2)
A: y leads to x.
(3)
X: x and y are related or lead to one another.
(4)
O: the x and y parameters are independent.
The SSIM is constructed based on the relationship. SSIM is shown in Table 3.

3.4. Construction of Reachability Matrix

The structural self-interaction matrix (SSIM) was turned into a binary matrix termed reachability by inserting 1 and 0 for V, A, X, and O. The following rules govern the substitution of 1 and 0:
  • Rule 1: If the SSIM entry for (x, y) is V, the reachability matrix entry for (x, y) is 1 and the (y, x) entry is 0.
  • Rule 2: If the SSIM entry for (x, y) is A, the reachability matrix entry for (x, y) is 0 and the (y, x) entry is 1.
  • Rule 3: If the SSIM’s (x, y) entry is X, the reachability matrix’s (x, y) entry will be 1 as well, as will the (y, x) entry
  • Rule 4: If the SSIM’s (x, y) entry is O, the reachability matrix’s (x, y) entry will be 0 as well, as will the (y, x) entry.
The reachability matrix is shown in Table 4.

3.5. Carrying out Level Partitions

The reachability set and antecedent set for each factor are derived from the final reachability matrix. The reachability set contains other elements that may help achieve the element as well as the element itself, whereas the antecedent set includes other elements that may help achieve the element as well as the element itself. The intersection of these sets is then calculated for all elements. The top-level element in the hierarchy would not assist in achieving any element above their own, and the top-level element in the ISM hierarchy is the one with the same reachability and intersection sets. When the hierarchy’s top-level element is discovered, it is separated from other components, and the next level of elements is discovered using the same method. The digraph and final model are made by identified models. Level partitions are shown in Table 5.

3.6. Classification of Factors

On the basis of driving strength and dependability, the factors influencing the COVID-19 verdict are divided into four categories. These factors are relatively separated from the system, with which they have only a few weak links:
  • C1: Autonomous factors: low driving force and low reliance.
  • C2: Dependent aspects include a lack of driving power and a high level of reliance.
  • C3: Significant driving power and strong reliance are linkage factors.
  • C4: Self-contained factors with high driving power and little reliance.
Figure 4 shows the driving and dependence power of the critical factors

3.7. Formation of the Interpretive Structural Model

The ISM is constructed from the final reachability matrix’s vertices or nodes, as well as the lines of edges. An arrow pointing from x to y depicts the relationship between the variables x and y.
A digraph or directed graph is the name given to this type of graph. The directed-graph is finally turned into ISM when the transitiveness is eliminated as shown in Figure 5.

4. Result and Discussion

There is not a single autonomous variable. These show up as the weak driver and weak dependent in most cases. Other system variables are unaffected by these variables. There are no autonomous factors discovered, and the system appears to be somewhat detached. There are only a few links in this, and none of the other variables are affected. Recognizing the factors that influence the early diagnosis of new diseases. We can observe from the digraph that there are no linking variables with a high driving force and a high degree of dependence. These variables are volatile because any changes they undergo will undoubtedly have an impact on others. As a result, there is no reason to believe that any of the variables included in this study are unstable. Independent variables are variables that have a high driving power and will assist companies in achieving their goals. Because the driving variables have a more strategic direction, performance can be improved by continuously enhancing them.
(1) There are no autonomous factors, and they appear as a weak driver and weak dependent. These variables have no effect on other variables and have only a few weak linkages.
(2) The contract data, combined data, early detection of NCP, diagnosis analysis, prognosis analysis, and accurate detection are the six factors categorized under weak drivers and strongly dependent, called the dependent category. They are the highest-ranking members of the ISM. These factors, which are categorized as dependent factors, constitute the goal of any company.
(3) Linkage variables have a high driving force as well as a high degree of reliance. These variables are volatile because any changes they undergo will undoubtedly have an impact on others. As a result, there is no reason to assume that any of the variables used in this study are volatile.
(4) Age, pre-existing conditions, gender, digital phenotyping, and AI are five elements that are grouped together as drivers. These components are classified as independent variables since they are at the bottom of the model and have a strong driving force that helps companies achieve their goals. Because the driving variables have a more strategic direction, performance can be improved by continuously enhancing them.
The result shows that the short-term factors i.e., age, sex, and pre-existing condition are the key factors and has a hold on more driving power for other factors to achieve the the long-term goal i.e., accurate detection of NCP.
The analysis of ISM result illustrates that early detection of NCP (EDN) depends on combined speed (CS) with contract data (CD) which is governed by AI and validates the outcome of past researcher’s work [44,47]. Similarly, the technological implementation through diagnosis and prognosis analysis helps to achieve the accurate detection of NCP (ADN) and it supports the previous research [45]. The result of ISM points out that a lack of integration among AI, CD, and CS results in a lack of EDN to achieve ADN in the long term, which confirms the analysis derived previously [46].

5. Managerial Implications

Regulators, governments, healthcare industry executives, and consumers will be able to understand the essential aspects that affect AI in the healthcare sector as a result of our research. Managers and decision-makers should concentrate on the ISM model’s inputs and outputs. A literature review and expert opinions were used to form the inputs. The outputs identify interdependencies as well as the importance of various aspects in the short and long run. In numerous industries, the model will be deployed and assessed in a cross-sectional approach. The outcomes will stimulate managers’ curiosity, and they should plan the resources necessary for successful execution. Managers must conduct workshops and training on AI and its benefits to their employees. Existing educational institutions and specific training schools may be involved. Managers must be vigilant when sharing knowledge to avoid losing a competitive advantage. With technological advancements, there is a significant possibility for using this data to analyze healthcare. Knowledge of technical aspects will be useful during organizational preparation. All firms must now implement cutting-edge AI technologies [7,53]. Smart contracts, privacy, and data security are among its essential features, and switching to new (better) future platforms is simple. Existing open-source platforms are prohibitively expensive when used as proprietary infrastructure. AI technology should be implemented immediately, as early adoption of the technology will give us a massive head start. The use of AI detects the presence of patterns and correlations, resulting in predictive analytics for enhancing healthcare delivery [8,18,44].

6. Practical Implications

To secure the privacy of healthcare data, healthcare decision-makers must use AI. This level of anonymity facilitates the use of AI and federated learning, which improves organizational efficiency. In the era of coronavirus disease in 2019, AI can better predict infection and is applicable globally. As data digitization advances, so does the demand for privacy, as well as the desire for societal improvement. The requisite systems can be built on edge of AI technology. Researchers, developers, scientists, healthcare experts, and policymakers must strike a balance between the need to innovate and measures to ensure that AI’s societal and economic benefits are widely distributed. The innovations emerging from AI will radically impact society for the better in the next decades if humanity embraces AI with a more inquisitive mind [27,45,46].

7. Conclusions and Future Work

COVID-19 diagnostic and prognostic models are accessible and seem to show incredible top-notch performance. These models provide: (1) improved remedy consistency and selection making by developing useful algorithms; (2) proper treatment regimens; (3) the destiny direction of the disease and its reappearance; (4) digital approaches used to provide treatment at an early stage. Additional diagnostic checks are going to be useful to ultimately halt the pandemic, restrict the economic damage from lockdowns, and avoid a rebound as soon as the restriction is relaxed. The whole situation makes a case for extensive diagnostic testing of the populace to permit people to come back to figure out situations that they may no longer be infectious. They conjointly require extra arbitrarily sampled tests to boost our estimates of the share of the population with the virus that lives well.
The value of AI comes into play with the aid of decreasing the weight of clinicians in a situation along with the current COVID-19 trends. Therefore, these AI models can serve as worthwhile yet accessible parameters to combat COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis. The consequences display that the accurate detection of NCP (ADN) is being monitored, initially through the short-term factors, i.e., age, gender, and pre-existing conditions. The primarily hierarchy- based ISM further defines both the long-time period and short-time period factors. In the future, the research can be extended with more factors to find more clarity in the relationship, and the study of latent variables will add causal relationship among them.
Furthermore, the proposed ISM version serves as a good guiding principle for improving the overall performance of the diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19 with the integration of AI. The paper provides an interpretive structural model to widen the skeleton of the complex interactions and significance amongst identified critical elements.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.S., S.A., and S.T.; methodology, R.S., S.A., and S.T.; validation, R.S., S.A., and S.T.; formal analysis, R.S., S.A., and S.T.; data curation, R.S., S.A., and S.T.; writing—original draft preparation, R.S., S.A., and S.T.; writing—review and editing, R.S., S.A., and S.T.; supervision, S.A. and S.T.; project administration, S.A. and H.-C.K.; funding acquisition, H.-C.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Commercializations Promotion Agency for R&D Outcomes (COMPA) grant funded by the Korean Government(Ministry of Science and ICT)" (R&D project No.1711139492).

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Zhang, K.; Liu, X.; Shen, J.; Li, Z.; Sang, Y.; Wu, X.; Zha, Y.; Liang, W.; Wang, C.; Wang, K. Clinically applicable AI system for accurate diagnosis, quantitative measurements, and prognosis of COVID-19 pneumonia using computed tomography. Cell 2020, 181, 1423–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Peng, M.; Yang, J.; Shi, Q.; Ying, L.; Zhu, H.; Zhu, G.; Yan, H. Artificial Intelligence Application in COVID-19 Diagnosis and Prediction; 2020; Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3541119 (accessed on 22 July 2021).
  3. Vaishya, R.; Javaid, M.; Khan, I.H.; Haleem, A. Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications for COVID-19 pandemic. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 2020, 14, 337–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Jin, C.; Cheny, W.; Cao, Y.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Deng, L.; Zheng., C.; Zhou, J.; Shi, H.; Feng, J. Development and evaluation of an AI system for COVID-19 diagnosis. MedRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Mei, X.; Lee, H.-C.; Diao, K.-Y.; Huang, M.; Lin, B.; Liu, C.; Xie, Z.; Ma, Y.; Robson, P.M.; Chung, M.; et al. Artificial intelligence–enabled rapid diagnosis of patients with COVID-19. Nat. Med. 2020, 26, 1224–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Laghi, A. Cautions about radiologic diagnosis of COVID-19 infection driven by artificial intelligence. Lancet Digit. Health 2020, 2, e225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jamshidi, M.B.; Lalbakhsh, A.; Talla, J.; Peroutka, Z.; Roshani, S.; Matousek, V.; Saeed, R.; Mirhamed, M.; Zahra, M.; la Spada, L.; et al. Deep Learning Techniques and COVID-19 Drug Discovery: Fundamentals, State-of-the-Art and Future Directions. In Emerging Technologies During the Era of COVID-19 Pandemic. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control; Arpaci, I., Al-Emran, M., Al-Sharafi, M.A., Marques, G., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; Volume 348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Roshani, S.; Jamshidi, M.B.; Mohebi, F.; Roshani, S. Design and Modeling of a Compact Power Divider with Squared ResonatorsUsing Artificial Intelligence. Wirel. Pers. Commun. 2021, 117, 2085–2096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Salman, F.M.; Abu-Naser, S.S. Expert System for COVID-19 Diagnosis. Int. J. Acad. Inf. Syst. Res. (IJAISR) 2020, 4, 1–13. Available online: http://dspace.alazhar.edu.ps/xmlui/handle/123456789/588 (accessed on 20 July 2021).
  10. Wynants, L.; Van Calster, B.; Collins, G.S.; Riley, R.D.; Heinze, G.; Schuit, E.; Bonten, M.M.J.; Dahly, D.L.; Damen, J.A.; Debray, T.P.A.; et al. Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19 infection: Systematic review and critical appraisal. BMJ 2020, 369, m1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Aydemir, D.; Nuriye, N. Correspondence: Importance of the validated serum biochemistry and hemogram parameters for rapid diagnosis and to prevent false negative results during COVID-19 pandemic. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2021, 68, 390–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wang, S.; Zha, Y.; Li, W.; Wu, Q.; Li, X.; Niu, M.; Wang, M.; Qiu, X.; Li, H.; Yu, H.; et al. A Fully Automatic Deep Learning System for COVID-19 Diagnostic and Prognostic Analysis. Eur. Respir. J. 2020, 56, 2000775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sperrin, M.; Grant, S.W.; Peek, N. Prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis in COVID-19. BMJ 2020, 369, m1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Ludvigsson, J.F. Systematic review of COVID-19 in children show milder cases and a better prognosis than adults. Acta Paediatr. 2020, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yi, Y.; Lagniton, P.N.; Ye, S.; Li, E.; Xu, R.-H. COVID-19: What has been learned and to be learned about the novel coronavirus disease. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 16, 1753–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Elghamrawy, S.M. Diagnosis and prediction model for COVID19 patient’s response to treatment based on convolutional neural network and whale optimization algorithm using CT images. MedRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Castiglioni, I.; Ippolito, D.; Interlenghi, M.; Monti, C.B.; Salvatore, C.; Schiaffino, S.; Polidori, A.; Gandola, D.; Messa, C.; Sardanelli, F. Artificial intelligence applied on chest X-ray can aid in the diagnosis of COVID-19 infection: A first experience from Lombardy, Italy. MedRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wynants, L.; Van Calster, B.; Bonten, M.M.J.; Collins, G.S.; Debray, T.P.A.; De Vos, M.; Haller, M.C.; Heinze, G.; Moons, K.G.M.; Riley, R.D.; et al. Systematic review and critical appraisal of prediction models for diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19 infection. MedRxiv 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ghoshal, B.; Tucker, A. Estimating uncertainty and interpretability in deep learning for coronavirus (COVID-19) detection. arXiv 2020. Available online: https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.10769 (accessed on 22 July 2021).
  20. Jamshidi, M.B.; Lalbakhsh, A.; Talla, J.; Peroutka, Z.; Hadjilooei, F.; Lalbakhsh, P.; Jamshidi, M.; La Spada, L.; Mirmozafari, M.; Dehghani, M.; et al. Artificial Intelligence and COVID-19: Deep Learning Approaches for Diagnosis and Treatment. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 109581–109595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bansal, A.; Padappayil, R.P.; Garg, C.; Singal, A. Utility of Artificial Intelligence Amidst the COVID 19 Pandemic: A Review. Mohak Gupta Allan Klein J. 2020, 44, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jones, K.; Patel, N.; Levy, M.; Storeygard, A.; Balk, D.; Gittleman, J.L.; Daszak, P. Global trends in emerging infectious diseases. Nature 2008, 451, 990–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Al-Garadi, M.A.; Khan, M.S.; Varathan, K.D.; Mujtaba, G.; Al-Kabsi, A.M. Using online social networks to track a pandemic: A systematic review. J. Biomed. Inform. 2016, 62, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bogoch, I.I.; Watts, A.; Thomas-Bachli, A.; Huber, C.; Kraemer, M.U.G.; Khan, K. Pneumonia of unknown aetiology in Wuhan, China: Potential for international spread via commercial air travel. J. Travel. Med. 2020, 27. Available online: https://0-academic-oup-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/jtm/article/27/2/taaa008/5704418 (accessed on 26 April 2020).
  25. Xia, W.; Shao, J.; Guo, Y.; Peng, X.; Li, Z.; Hu, D. Clinical and CT features in pediatric patients with COVID-19 infection: Different points from adults. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2020, 55, 1169–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Funk, S.; Camacho, A.; Kucharski, A.J.; Eggo, R.M.; Edmunds, W.J. Real-time forecasting of infectious disease dynamics with a stochastic semi-mechanistic model. Epidemics 2018, 22, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kucharski, A.J.; Russell, T.W.; Diamond, C.; Liu, Y.; Edmunds, J.; Funk, S.; Eggo, R.M.; Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases COVID-19 Working Group. Early dynamics of transmission and control of COVID-19: A mathematical modelling study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 553–558. Available online: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(20)30144-4/abstract (accessed on 28 March 2020). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Qin, Q. Unique epidemiological and clinical features of the emerging 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) implicate special control measures. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 568–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Shi, F.; Wang, J.; Shi, J.; Wu, Z.; Wang, Q.; Tang, Z.; He, K.; Shi, Y.; Shen, D. Review of Artificial Intelligence Techniques in Imaging Data Acquisition, Segmentation and Diagnosis for COVID-19. IEEE Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2021, 14, 4–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. World Health Organization. Transforming and Scaling up Health Professionals’ Education and Training; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2013; Available online: https://www.who.int/hrh/resources/transf_scaling_hpet/en/ (accessed on 14 September 2020).
  31. Ye, J. The role of health technology and informatics in a global public health emergency: Practices and implications from the COVID-19 pandemic. JMIR Med Inform. 2020, 8, e19866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Agbehadji, I.E.; Awuzie, B.O.; Ngowi, A.B.; Millham, R.C. Review of big data analytics, artificial intelligence and nature-inspired computing models towards accurate detection of COVID-19 pandemic cases and contact tracing. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 5330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mahmood, S.; Hasan, K.; Carras, M.C.; Labrique, A. Global preparedness against COVID-19: We must leverage the power of digital health. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020, 6, e18980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Uohara, M.Y.; Weinstein, J.N.; Rhew, D.C. The essential role of technology in the public health battle against COVID-19. Popul. Health Manag. 2020, 23, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Badawy, S.M.; Radovic, A. Digital approaches to remote pediatric health care delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic: Existing evidence and a call for further research. JMIR Pediatr. Parent. 2020, 3, e20049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wahl, B.; Cossy-Gantner, A.; Germann, S.; Schwalbe, N.R. Artificial intelligence (AI) and global health: How can AI contribute to health in resource-poor settings? BMJ Glob. Health 2018, 3, e000798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Huang, M.-H.; Rust, R.T. Artificial intelligence in service. J. Serv. Res. 2018, 21, 155–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Davenport, T.; Kalakota, R. The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Futur. Healthc. J. 2019, 6, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Bhaskar, S.; Bradley, S.; Israeli-Korn, S.; Menon, B.; Chattu, V.K.; Thomas, P.; Chawla, J.; Kumar, R.; Prandi, P.; Ray, D.; et al. Chronic neurology in COVID-19 era: Clinical considerations and recommendations from the REPROGRAM consortium. Front. Neurol. 2020, 11, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Li, Y.; Xia, L. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Role of chest CT in diagnosis and management. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2020, 214, 1280–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Lucey, C.R.; Johnston, S.C. The transformational effects of COVID-19 on medical education. JAMA 2020, 324, 1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hassanien, A.E.; Salam, A.; Darwish, A. Artificial Intelligence Approach to Predict the COVID-19 Patient’s Recovery. 2020. Available online: https://easychair.org/publications/preprint/4bf1 (accessed on 20 May 2020).
  43. Kwok, C.S.; Loke, Y.K.; Woo, K.; Myint, P.K. Risk Prediction Models for Mortality in Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Systematic Review. BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Esmaeilzadeh, P. Use of AI-based tools for healthcare purposes: A survey study from consumers’ perspectives. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2020, 20, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wolff, J.; Pauling, J.; Keck, A.; Baumbach, J. Success Factors of Artificial Intelligence Implementation in Healthcare. Front. Digit. Health 2021, 3, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. World Health Organization. Global Diffusion of EHealth: Making Universal Health Coverage Achievable. In Report of the Third Global Survey on EHealth; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  47. Jagadeeswari, V.; Vairavasundaram, S.; Logesh, R.; Vijayakumar, V. A study on medical Internet of Things and Big Data in personalized healthcare system. Health Inf. Sci. Syst. 2018, 6, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tripathy, S.; Sahu, S.; Ray, P.K.; Vijayakumar, V. Interpretive structural modelling for critical success factors of R&D performance in Indian manufacturing firms. J. Model. Manag. 2013, 8, 212–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Diabat, A.; Govindan, K. An analysis of the drivers affecting the implementation of green supply chain management. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2011, 55, 659–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Chakraborty, K.; Mondal, S.; Mukherjee, K. Critical analysis of enablersand barriers in extension of useful life of automotive products throughremanufacturing. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 227, 1117–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Sushil, S. Interpreting the Interpretive Structural Model. Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag. 2012, 13, 87–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Thakkar, J.; Deshmukh, S.G.; Gupta, A.D.; Shankar, R. Development of balanced scorecard: An integrated approach of interpretive structural modeling (ISM) and analytic network process (ANP). Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 2007, 56, 25–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Rahman, T.; Chowdhury, M.E.H.; Khandakar, A.; Islam, K.R.; Mahbub, Z.B.; Kadir, M.A.; Kashem, S. Transfer Learning with Deep Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for Pneumonia Detection using Chest X-ray. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Diagnostic and prognostic management.
Figure 1. Diagnostic and prognostic management.
Diagnostics 11 01604 g001
Figure 2. Framework of the paper.
Figure 2. Framework of the paper.
Diagnostics 11 01604 g002
Figure 3. Flowchart of solution methodology.
Figure 3. Flowchart of solution methodology.
Diagnostics 11 01604 g003
Figure 4. Driving power and dependence diagram.
Figure 4. Driving power and dependence diagram.
Diagnostics 11 01604 g004
Figure 5. ISM Model.
Figure 5. ISM Model.
Diagnostics 11 01604 g005
Table 1. Factors responsible for the COVID-19 diagnosis and Prognosis.
Table 1. Factors responsible for the COVID-19 diagnosis and Prognosis.
FactorsNameNotation
F1Early detection of NCPEDN
F2AgeAG
F3Artificial IntelligenceAI
F4Accurate detection of NCPADN
F5Diagnosis analysisDA
F6Diagnosis phenotypingDP
F7Contract dataCD
F8Pre-existing conditionPEC
F9Prognosis AnalysisPA
F10Combine spendCS
F11GenderGE
Table 2. ISM steps.
Table 2. ISM steps.
Sl. NoSTEPSFOCUS
1Establishment of a structural self-interaction matrix (SSIM)Define pairwise relationships among identified critical dimensions of AI in healthcare sector
2Create a reachability matrixDetermining driving & dependent powers
3Level Partitioning Define structural levels (factor level partitioning)
4ISM ModellingDevelop an ISM model using reachability matrix & level partitioning
5MICMAC analysisClassify critical dimensions of AI in healthcare sector into four categories (drivers, dependence, autonomous factors, and linked factors) via MICMAC analysis.
Table 3. Structural self-interaction matrix.
Table 3. Structural self-interaction matrix.
EDNAGAIADNDADPCDPECPACSGE
EDN AAVVAAAVAA
AG VVVVVOVVO
AI VVAVVVVA
ADN AAAVAAA
DA AAVOAA
DP VVVVA
CD VVOA
PEC VVO
PA AA
CS A
GE
Table 4. Reachability matrix.
Table 4. Reachability matrix.
F. NoF1F2F3F4F5F6F7F8F9F10F11Driving
F1100110001004
F2111111101109
F3101110101107
F4000100000001
F5000110000002
F6101111101108
F7100110101005
F8101111111109
F9000100001002
F10100110001105
F11101111101119
Dependance815119461961
Table 5. Carrying out level partitions.
Table 5. Carrying out level partitions.
Factor NoReachability SetAntecedent SetIntersection SetLevel
11,4,5,91,2,3,6,7,8,10,111Third
21,2,3,4,5,6,7,9,1022Seventh
31,3,4,5,7,9,102,3,6,8,113Fifth
441,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,114First
54,51,2,3,5,6,7,8,10,115Second
61,3,4,5,6,7,9,102,6,8,116Sixth
71,4,5,7,92,3,6,7,8,117Fourth
81,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1088Seventh
94,91,2,3,6,7,8,9,10,119Second
101,4,5,9,102,3,6,8,10,1110Fourth
111,3,4,5,6,7,9,10,111111Seventh
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Saha, R.; Aich, S.; Tripathy, S.; Kim, H.-C. Artificial Intelligence Is Reshaping Healthcare amid COVID-19: A Review in the Context of Diagnosis & Prognosis. Diagnostics 2021, 11, 1604. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics11091604

AMA Style

Saha R, Aich S, Tripathy S, Kim H-C. Artificial Intelligence Is Reshaping Healthcare amid COVID-19: A Review in the Context of Diagnosis & Prognosis. Diagnostics. 2021; 11(9):1604. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics11091604

Chicago/Turabian Style

Saha, Rajnandini, Satyabrata Aich, Sushanta Tripathy, and Hee-Cheol Kim. 2021. "Artificial Intelligence Is Reshaping Healthcare amid COVID-19: A Review in the Context of Diagnosis & Prognosis" Diagnostics 11, no. 9: 1604. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics11091604

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop