Next Article in Journal
Reliability of Ulnar Nerve Sensation Tests in Patients with Cubital Tunnel Syndrome and Healthy Subjects
Next Article in Special Issue
Ultrasonographic Measurement of Torsional Side Difference in Proximal Humerus Fractures and Humeral Shaft Fractures: Theoretical Background with Technical Notes for Clinical Implementation
Previous Article in Journal
Radiomic Analysis for Pretreatment Prediction of Recurrence Post-Radiotherapy in Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Association of In-Hospital Mortality and Trauma Team Activation: A 10-Year Study
 
 
Comment published on 22 December 2022, see Diagnostics 2023, 13(1), 25.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessment of Acute Lesions of the Biceps Pulley in Patients with Traumatic Shoulder Dislocation Using MR Imaging

by
Georg C. Feuerriegel
1,*,
Nicolas S. Lenhart
1,
Yannik Leonhardt
1,
Florian T. Gassert
1,
Peter Biberthaler
2,
Sebastian Siebenlist
3,
Chlodwig Kirchhoff
2,
Marcus R. Makowski
1,
Klaus Woertler
1,4,
Alexandra S. Gersing
1,5,
Jan Neumann
1,4,† and
Markus Wurm
2,†
1
Department of Radiology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
2
Department of Trauma Surgery, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
3
Department of Orthopedic Sports Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
4
Musculoskeletal Radiology Section, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, 81675 Munich, Germany
5
Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Munich, LMU Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Submission received: 31 July 2022 / Revised: 19 September 2022 / Accepted: 25 September 2022 / Published: 28 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management in Trauma Surgery)

Abstract

:
Background: Shoulder dislocations represent common injuries and are often combined with rotator cuff tears and potentially damage to the biceps pulley. Purpose: To assess the occurrence and type of biceps pulley lesions in patients after traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation using 3T MRI. Methods: Thirty-three consecutive patients were enrolled between June 2021 and March 2022 (14 women, mean age 48.0 ± 19 years). All patients underwent MR imaging at 3 T within one week. Images were analyzed for the presence and type of pulley tears, subluxation/dislocation of the LHBT, rotator cuff lesions, joint effusion, labral lesions, and osseous defects. Results: Seventeen patients (52%) with traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation demonstrated biceps pulley lesions. Of those, eleven patients (33%) showed a combined tear of the sGHL and CHL. All seventeen patients with lesions of the biceps pulley showed associated partial tearing of the rotator cuff, whereas three patients showed an additional subluxation of the LHBT. Patients with pulley lesions after dislocations were significantly older than those without (mean age 52 ± 12 years vs. 44 ± 14 years, p = 0.023). Conclusion: Our results suggest an increased awareness for lesions of the biceps pulley in acute traumatic shoulder dislocation, particularly in patients over 45 years.

1. Introduction

Lesions of the biceps pulley are a common cause for anterior shoulder pain [1,2]. The biceps pulley is a capsuloligamentous complex which stabilizes the horizontal portion of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) at the anterior aspect of the humerus and is mainly formed by the coracohumeral ligament (CHL), the superior glenohumeral ligament (sGHL) as well as fibers of the supraspinatus (SSP) und subscapularis (SSC) tendons [3,4,5,6,7]. Pulley lesions can be caused by degenerative changes, acute trauma, repetitive micro trauma or in association with rotator cuff tears [8,9]. Different biomechanical patterns have been described to cause a lesion or tear of the biceps pulley including a forcefully stopped overhead throwing motion, repetitive forceful internal rotation above the horizontal plane as well as a fall on the outstretched arm with full external or internal rotation of the humeral head [8,9,10]. Lesions of the biceps pulley can be associated with internal anterosuperior impingement as well as rotator cuff tears (in particular SSP and SSC lesions), lesions of the superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP), LHBT instability, and tears [1,2,4,8,11,12,13]. The subluxation or subluxation of the LHBT which is caused by an insufficient or ruptured biceps pulley is particularly associated with a higher prevalence of SSC and SSP lesions [13].
Anterior traumatic shoulder dislocations are most often caused by a forceful external rotation of the abducted arm which levers the humeral head out of its socket [14]. The extent of damage to the soft tissue is variable and may involve bony, cartilaginous, ligamentous as well as tendinous or muscular structures [15]. Most often, damage to the anteroinferior labro-ligamentous complex (Bankart lesion) is seen with or without osseous avulsion, damage to the capsule as well as a Hill-Sachs lesion [15,16]. So far, the role of the rotator interval and the biceps pulley in anterior shoulder instability remains unclear [17,18,19]. Thiesen et al. found that patients above 40 years showed a greater height and base of the rotator interval after anterior dislocation compared to a control group [17]. It was also shown that elderly patients in particular suffer from injuries to the rotator interval after shoulder dislocation [20,21,22]. To the best of our knowledge, direct damage to the biceps pulley in acute anterior shoulder dislocation has not been assessed yet. Therefore, the aim of our study was to assess the prevalence and degree of pulley lesions as well as lesions of the LHBT and rotator cuff using magnetic resonance imaging in patients after acute traumatic shoulder dislocations.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Study Population and Ethics Statement

Patients presenting with acute traumatic shoulder dislocations (N = 33, 14 women, mean age 48.0 ± 19 years) admitted to the orthopedic and trauma surgery departments between June 2021 and March 2022 were enrolled in the study. Patients with dislocations due to chronic shoulder instability or complex fractures were excluded. All procedures were conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants prior to inclusion. The prospective analysis was approved by our institutional review board (Ethics Commission of the Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich, Germany; Ethics proposal number 42/21S).

2.2. MR Imaging

After clinical examination and thorough anamnesis, each patient underwent a 3T MR imaging examination (Ingenia Elition; Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) of the shoulder using a dedicated 16-channel shoulder coil. A clinical routine imaging protocol was used including triplanar intermediate weighted (IM) turbo-spin echo (TSE) sequences with spectral fat saturation, a sagittal T2-weighted TSE sequence and a coronal T1 weighted TSE sequence. Detailed scan parameters are displayed in (Table 1). In cases where arthroscopy was performed, the intraoperative results were assessed and compared to the findings of MR imaging.

2.3. Treatment

Young and active patients suffering from first-time anterior shoulder dislocation routinely undergo arthroscopic refixation of the antero-inferior labrum at our hospital [23,24]. Concomitant pathologies can also be addressed during this operative intervention. Patients over 40 years of age with or without sportive demand are counseled either to opt for operative or conservative treatment depending on co-morbidities and the type of concomitant injury [24,25,26]. All patients are routinely seen at our outpatient clinic at 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks postoperatively.

2.4. Image Analysis

Image findings were analyzed in consensus by two musculoskeletal radiologists (J.N. with over 10 years and G.C.F. with 4 years of experience) blinded to all clinical information. The images were assessed for the presence and type of pulley lesions defined by discontinuity of the sGHL, the CHL or both as well as displacement of the LHBT (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Furthermore, images were assessed for concomitant injuries including tears and tendinopathy of the rotator cuff, lesions of the glenoidal labrum, bony defects of the glenoid, injury to the surrounding muscles as well as joint effusion. For a detailed description see Table 2. Image quality, diagnostic confidence and the visibility of the of the anatomical landmarks were graded individually and separately by both raters. Gradings were conducted according to a five-point Likert scale (1 = poor, 2 = below average, 3 = fair, 4 = good, 5 = excellent). The following anatomical landmarks were assessed for their visibility: biceps pulley, LHBT, rotator cuff, glenoidal labrum, axillary recess, articular cartilage, and muscle.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistics were performed by G.C.F. (5 years of experience in biostatistics) using IBM SPSS, version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Descriptive statistics were performed using McNemar’s tests (for binary categorical variables) and paired t-tests (for numeric variables). Additionally, box plots were created for better visualization of the age distribution. All statistical tests were performed as two sided, and a level of significance (α) of 0.05 was used for all tests.

3. Results

3.1. MR Assessment of Shoulder Pathologies

In total, 33 shoulders with acute anterior shoulder dislocations were assessed in this study. Seventeen (52%) patients were diagnosed with pulley lesions including sixteen (48%) patients with discontinuity of the sGHL and twelve (36%) patients with discontinuity of the CHL. The mean age of patients with pulley lesions identified on MR imaging was 52 ± 12 years and was significantly higher compared to patients without pulley lesions (mean age 44 ± 14 years, p = 0.023, Figure 3). Thirty-two (97%) patients showed a typical defect of the antero-inferior labor-ligamentous complex, of whom fourteen (42%) patients had an additional osseous Bankart lesion and twenty eight (88%) patients a Hill-Sachs defect of the proximal humerus (Figure 4). A total of twenty rotator cuff lesions were detected; with seventeen (42%) lesions involving the SSP tendon and three (9%) the SSC tendon. Of the seventeen patients with pulley lesions (sGHL, CHL or combined lesions), sixteen (94%) patients were diagnosed with an additional lesion of the SSP (N = 13) or SSC tendon (N = 3). A total of four (12%) patients demonstrated medial subluxation of the LHBT. The mean age of patients who showed a lesion of the rotator cuff was 54 ± 19 years and was not significantly higher compared to the patients without a lesion of the rotator cuff (mean age 43 ± 17 years, p = 0.29, Figure 5). None of the patients exhibited a notable fatty infiltration or atrophy of the rotator cuff muscles. Joint effusion was detected in all 33 patients due to the acute trauma. Detailed description of the pathologies and their frequencies are shown in Table 2.

3.2. Operative Treatment and Correlation with MR Imaging

Seven patients were treated conservatively due to absent clinical signs of apprehension and low sportive demand, and eight patients were lost to follow up. Thus, arthroscopic confirmation of the MR imaging findings could be performed in fifteen patients (46%). All other patients underwent diagnostic shoulder arthroscopy including arthroscopic labral repair using a minimum of three suture anchors ± repair of concomitant pathologies. Upon analyzing the intraoperative reports of the eighteen patients undergoing arthroscopy, six patients were diagnosed with an acute lesion of the biceps pulley and twelve patients did not show injuries to the pulley system. Besides refixation of the ruptured labrum, pulley lesions were treated by either intraarticular or subpectoral tenodesis of the LHBT. When compared to the findings on MR imaging, all six pulley lesions as well as the twelve intact biceps pulleys were accurately identified.

3.3. Image Quality, Anatomical Landmarks

The diagnostic confidence was rated high by both raters using a 5-point Likert scale (rater 1: 4.5 ± 0.4, rater 2: 4.3 ± 0.5). Overall, the image quality was excellent and sufficient to assess all acute pathologies (rater 1: 4.3 ± 0.7, rater 2: 4.5 ± 0.4). The visibility of the anatomical landmarks was overall excellent (rater 1: 4.1 ± 0.6, rater 2: 4.4 ± 0.8) (Table 3 and Table 4).

4. Discussion

In this study, we assessed the prevalence of injuries to the biceps pulley as well as to the LHBT and rotator cuff by means of MR imaging after acute shoulder dislocation in 33 consecutive patients. Up to 52% of the patients assessed in our study showed a lesion of the biceps pulley following anterior shoulder dislocation and of those, up to 94% showed accompanying pathologies of either the SSC or SSP tendon. In 54% of the cases, arthroscopic reports were available for confirmation and all arthroscopic results were consistent with the MR imaging findings.
The association between pulley lesions and rotator cuff tears has been shown by several studies [8,11,30,31]. Previously, Braun et al. showed that pulley lesions had a prevalence of up to 32% in a large cohort of over 200 patients with anterior shoulder pain and found a significant correlation between pulley lesions and subluxation/dislocation of the LHBT, injuries of the rotator cuff and SLAP lesions [1]. Similar observations were made by Martetschläger et al. who classified lesions of the biceps pulley into type 1 to 3 and was able to detect significant correlations between the type of pulley defect and tear of either the SSC or SSP tendon [2]. In our study, we detected a higher incidence of SSP lesions (N = 13) in patients with pulley lesions compared to SSC lesions (N = 3). This might be due to the fact that, in contrast to previously mentioned studies, we assessed a cohort with traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations and the higher incidence might be due to the different trauma mechanisms. MR arthrography is the current gold standard for the MR imaging of pulley lesions [32]. In this study, we used joint effusion after acute trauma as a natural contrast medium to assess the joint structures and were able to assess the biceps pulley, rotator cuff tendons and labrum with high ratings of diagnostic confidence and visibility of the anatomical landmarks. To the best of our knowledge, the aforementioned results have not been reported yet and raise further awareness of lesions of the biceps pulley in acute traumatic shoulder dislocation, particularly in patients over 40 years of age. This is of particular importance as potential late complications to the long head of the biceps such as tendinitis, irritation, subluxation or even luxation could be averted early. In our study, patients with biceps pulley lesions following anterior shoulder dislocation were significantly older compared to patients without pulley lesions. However, similar to tendon deterioration with increasing age, the components of the biceps pulley are prone to age-related degeneration as well [33]. Hence, whether the presented biceps pulley lesions in older patients may be secondary due to pre-existing intrinsic degeneration or acute damage due to trauma is a matter of debate. Although no statistical significance was reached, we found that patients with rotator cuff lesions were also markedly older than the patients without rotator cuff lesion. An increased prevalence of rotator cuff diseases and increased damage to the rotator interval after dislocation in the elderly has been previously reported [17,34].
There are certain limitations of this study which need to be addressed. First, the patient group was relatively small, with only 33 patients included in the study of whom 17 patients presented with a biceps pulley lesion. However, to the best of our knowledge, it was the largest prospectively recruited cohort with acute shoulder dislocations assessed for biceps pulley lesions. Second, arthroscopic confirmation of pulley lesions diagnosed on MR imaging was only available for 54% of the patients. Seven patients were treated conservatively due to a low sportive demand and age of >40 years, respectively [26]. Finally, pre-traumatic MR imaging was not available to rule out potentially pre-existing shoulder pathologies/tendon degeneration. However, in accordance with the negative clinical history of shoulder pain or previous trauma and absence of atrophy/fatty infiltration of rotator cuff muscles on MR imaging, we believe that our findings are most likely a result of acute anterior shoulder dislocation.

5. Conclusions

In this study, a high prevalence of the biceps pulley and rotator cuff lesions was detected in patients following traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation. The aforementioned pathologies might be a frequently unrecognized concomitant injury after traumatic shoulder dislocation. Hence, our results suggest an increased awareness for lesions of the biceps pulley in acute traumatic shoulder dislocation, particularly in patients over 40 years of age.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.W.; data curation, F.T.G. and J.N.; formal analysis, N.S.L. and Y.L.; investigation, K.W.; methodology, K.W. and A.S.G.; project administration, A.S.G.; resources, P.B., S.S., C.K. and M.R.M.; supervision, J.N.; writing—original draft, G.C.F.; writing—review and editing, K.W., J.N. and M.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by our institutional review board (Ethics Commission of the Medical Faculty, Technical University of Munich, Germany; Ethics proposal number 42/21S, approved on 28 January 2021).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy of the study participants.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

sGHLSuperior glenohumeral ligament
CHLCoracohumeral ligament
MRIMagnetic resonance imaging
SSCSubscapularis tendon
SSPSupraspinatus tendon
ISPInfraspinatus tendon
LHBTLong head of the biceps tendon
SLAPLesion of the superior labrum anterior-posterior
IMIntermediate weighted
TSETurbo-spin echo

References

  1. Braun, S.; Horan, M.P.; Elser, F.; Millett, P.J. Lesions of the biceps pulley. Am. J. Sports Med. 2011, 39, 790–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Martetschläger, F.; Zampeli, F.; Tauber, M.; Habermeyer, P. Lesions of the biceps pulley: A prospective study and classification update. JSES Int. 2020, 4, 318–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Petchprapa, C.N.; Beltran, L.S.; Jazrawi, L.M.; Kwon, Y.W.; Babb, J.S.; Recht, M.P. The rotator interval: A review of anatomy, function, and normal and abnormal MRI appearance. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2010, 195, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ahmad, Z.Y.; Diaz, L.E.; Roemer, F.W.; Goud, A.; Guermazi, A. Imaging Review of Subscapularis Tendon and Rotator Interval Pathology. Radiol. Res. Pract. 2022, 2022, 4009829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gohlke, F.; Essigkrug, B.; Schmitz, F. The pattern of the collagen fiber bundles of the capsule of the glenohumeral joint. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1994, 3, 111–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Morag, Y.; Jacobson, J.A.; Shields, G.; Rajani, R.; Jamadar, D.A.; Miller, B.; Hayes, C.W. MR arthrography of rotator interval, long head of the biceps brachii, and biceps pulley of the shoulder. Radiology 2005, 235, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Woertler, K. Rotator interval. Semin. Musculoskelet. Radiol. 2015, 19, 243–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Habermeyer, P.; Magosch, P.; Pritsch, M.; Scheibel, M.T.; Lichtenberg, S. Anterosuperior impingement of the shoulder as a result of pulley lesions: A prospective arthroscopic study. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004, 13, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Le Huec, J.C.; Schaeverbeke, T.; Moinard, M.; Kind, M.; Diard, F.; Dehais, J.; Le Rebeller, A. Traumatic tear of the rotator interval. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996, 5, 41–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gerber, C.; Sebesta, A. Impingement of the deep surface of the subscapularis tendon and the reflection pulley on the anterosuperior glenoid rim: A preliminary report. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2000, 9, 483–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bennett, W.F. Arthroscopic repair of anterosuperior (supraspinatus/subscapularis) rotator cuff tears: A prospective cohort with 2- to 4-year follow-up. Classification of biceps subluxation/instability. Arthroscopy 2003, 19, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Bennett, W.F. Subscapularis, medial, and lateral head coracohumeral ligament insertion anatomy. Arthroscopic appearance and incidence of “hidden” rotator interval lesions. Arthroscopy 2001, 17, 173–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Walch, G.; Nové-Josserand, L.; Boileau, P.; Levigne, C. Subluxations and dislocations of the tendon of the long head of the biceps. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998, 7, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cutts, S.; Prempeh, M.; Drew, S. Anterior shoulder dislocation. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2009, 91, 2–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Braun, C.; McRobert, C.J. Conservative management following closed reduction of traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019, 5, Cd004962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Arner, J.W.; Peebles, L.A.; Bradley, J.P.; Provencher, M.T. Anterior Shoulder Instability Management: Indications, Techniques, and Outcomes. Arthroscopy 2020, 36, 2791–2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Thiesen, D.M.; Ernst, M.; Meyer, J.; Spiro, A.S.; Yamamura, J.; Klatte, T.O. Glenoid and rotator interval dimension in patients older than 40 years after traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation. Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 2019, 139, 181–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Kim, K.C.; Rhee, K.J.; Shin, H.D.; Kim, Y.M. Estimating the dimensions of the rotator interval with use of magnetic resonance arthrography. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2007, 89, 2450–2455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lee, J.C.; Guy, S.; Connell, D.; Saifuddin, A.; Lambert, S. MRI of the rotator interval of the shoulder. Clin. Radiol. 2007, 62, 416–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shin, S.J.; Yun, Y.H.; Kim, D.J.; Yoo, J.D. Treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in patients older than 60 years. Am. J. Sports Med. 2012, 40, 822–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Toolanen, G.; Hildingsson, C.; Hedlund, T.; Knibestöl, M.; Oberg, L. Early complications after anterior dislocation of the shoulder in patients over 40 years. An. ultrasonographic and electromyographic study. Acta Orthop. Scand. 1993, 64, 549–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Owens, B.D.; Campbell, S.E.; Cameron, K.L. Risk Factors for Anterior Glenohumeral Instability. Am. J. Sport. Med. 2014, 42, 2591–2596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. van Spanning, S.H.; Verweij, L.; Priester-Vink, S.; van Deurzen, D.; van den Bekerom, M. Operative Versus Nonoperative Treatment Following First-Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JBJS Rev. 2021, 9, e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Hurley, E.T.; Manjunath, A.K.; Bloom, D.A.; Pauzenberger, L.; Mullett, H.; Alaia, M.J.; Strauss, E.J. Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Conservative Management for First-Time Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Arthroscopy 2020, 36, 2526–2532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Alkhatib, N.; Abdullah, A.; AlNouri, M.; Ahmad Alzobi, O.Z.; Alkaramany, E.; Ishibashi, Y. Short- and long-term outcomes in Bankart repair vs. conservative treatment for first-time anterior shoulder dislocation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022, 31, 1751–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Hovelius, L.; Olofsson, A.; Sandström, B.; Augustini, B.G.; Krantz, L.; Fredin, H.; Tillander, B.; Skoglund, U.; Salomonsson, B.; Nowak, J.; et al. Nonoperative treatment of primary anterior shoulder dislocation in patients forty years of age and younger. A prospective twenty-five-year follow-up. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2008, 90, 945–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Morag, Y.; Jacobson, J.A.; Miller, B.; De Maeseneer, M.; Girish, G.; Jamadar, D. MR Imaging of Rotator Cuff Injury: What the Clinician Needs to Know. RadioGraphics 2006, 26, 1045–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Saliken, D.J.; Bornes, T.D.; Bouliane, M.J.; Sheps, D.M.; Beaupre, L.A. Imaging methods for quantifying glenoid and Hill-Sachs bone loss in traumatic instability of the shoulder: A scoping review. BMC Musculoskeletal. Disord. 2015, 16, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kanatli, U.; Ozturk, B.Y.; Bolukbasi, S. Anatomical variations of the anterosuperior labrum: Prevalence and association with type II superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) lesions. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010, 19, 1199–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bennett, W.F. Arthroscopic bicipital sheath repair: Two-year follow-up with pulley lesions. Arthroscopy 2004, 20, 964–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lafosse, L.; Reiland, Y.; Baier, G.P.; Toussaint, B.; Jost, B. Anterior and posterior instability of the long head of the biceps tendon in rotator cuff tears: A new classification based on arthroscopic observations. Arthroscopy 2007, 23, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Schaeffeler, C.; Waldt, S.; Holzapfel, K.; Kirchhoff, C.; Jungmann, P.M.; Wolf, P.; Stat, D.; Schröder, M.; Rummeny, E.J.; Imhoff, A.B.; et al. Lesions of the biceps pulley: Diagnostic accuracy of MR arthrography of the shoulder and evaluation of previously described and new diagnostic signs. Radiology 2012, 264, 504–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Clement, N.D.; Nie, Y.X.; McBirnie, J.M. Management of degenerative rotator cuff tears: A review and treatment strategy. Sports Med. Arthrosc. Rehabil. Ther. Technol. 2012, 4, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Teunis, T.; Lubberts, B.; Reilly, B.T.; Ring, D. A systematic review and pooled analysis of the prevalence of rotator cuff disease with increasing age. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014, 23, 1913–1921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sagittal IM-weighted TSE sequence with spectral fat saturation. (A) Intact biceps pulley in a 26-year-old patient after anterior shoulder dislocation with normal discrimination of the sGHL (white arrow) and CHL. (B) Insufficient biceps pulley on a 32-year-old patient after shoulder dislocation due to a tear of the sGHL (white arrow). Caudal displacement of the LHBT is seen at the middle of the rotator interval. Note the joint effusion in both patients which causes an arthrographic effect and helps with the discrimination of anatomical structures.
Figure 1. Sagittal IM-weighted TSE sequence with spectral fat saturation. (A) Intact biceps pulley in a 26-year-old patient after anterior shoulder dislocation with normal discrimination of the sGHL (white arrow) and CHL. (B) Insufficient biceps pulley on a 32-year-old patient after shoulder dislocation due to a tear of the sGHL (white arrow). Caudal displacement of the LHBT is seen at the middle of the rotator interval. Note the joint effusion in both patients which causes an arthrographic effect and helps with the discrimination of anatomical structures.
Diagnostics 12 02345 g001
Figure 2. (A) Transversal IM-weighted TSE sequence with spectral fat saturation of a 45-year-old patient after traumatic shoulder dislocation with antero-inferior labral lesion and concomitant medial subluxation of the LHBT (white arrow) due an insufficient biceps pulley and a partial SSC tendon tear. (B) Sagittal IM-weighted TSE sequence with spectral fat saturation. Pulley lesion in a 39-year-old patient after traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation with tear of the sGHL and CHL. Note the displacement of the LHBT (white arrow) as well as the tendinopathic changes which might be due to preexisting degenerative changes.
Figure 2. (A) Transversal IM-weighted TSE sequence with spectral fat saturation of a 45-year-old patient after traumatic shoulder dislocation with antero-inferior labral lesion and concomitant medial subluxation of the LHBT (white arrow) due an insufficient biceps pulley and a partial SSC tendon tear. (B) Sagittal IM-weighted TSE sequence with spectral fat saturation. Pulley lesion in a 39-year-old patient after traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation with tear of the sGHL and CHL. Note the displacement of the LHBT (white arrow) as well as the tendinopathic changes which might be due to preexisting degenerative changes.
Diagnostics 12 02345 g002
Figure 3. Mean age of patients with acute lesions of the biceps pulley (mean age 52 ± 12 years) compared to patients with intact biceps pulley (mean age 44 ± 14 years, p = 0.023). The mean age of patients with acute pulley lesions was significantly higher compared to patients without pulley lesions (p = 0.023).
Figure 3. Mean age of patients with acute lesions of the biceps pulley (mean age 52 ± 12 years) compared to patients with intact biceps pulley (mean age 44 ± 14 years, p = 0.023). The mean age of patients with acute pulley lesions was significantly higher compared to patients without pulley lesions (p = 0.023).
Diagnostics 12 02345 g003
Figure 4. Concomitant injuries after acute anterior shoulder dislocation. (A) Coronal IM-weighted TSE sequence with spectral fat saturation. Complete tear of the proximal SSP tendon. Note the markedly increased joint effusion which fills the joint capsule. (B) Sagittal IM-weighted TSE sequence with spectral fat saturation. Bony Bankart Lesion with avulsion fracture of the anterior glenoid.
Figure 4. Concomitant injuries after acute anterior shoulder dislocation. (A) Coronal IM-weighted TSE sequence with spectral fat saturation. Complete tear of the proximal SSP tendon. Note the markedly increased joint effusion which fills the joint capsule. (B) Sagittal IM-weighted TSE sequence with spectral fat saturation. Bony Bankart Lesion with avulsion fracture of the anterior glenoid.
Diagnostics 12 02345 g004
Figure 5. Mean age of patients who showed a lesion of the rotator cuff which was 54 ± 19 years and was not significantly higher compared to the patients without a lesion of the rotator cuff (mean age 43 ± 17 years, p = 0.29).
Figure 5. Mean age of patients who showed a lesion of the rotator cuff which was 54 ± 19 years and was not significantly higher compared to the patients without a lesion of the rotator cuff (mean age 43 ± 17 years, p = 0.29).
Diagnostics 12 02345 g005
Table 1. Sequence parameters of the sequences used in this study (Ingenia, Elition, Philips).
Table 1. Sequence parameters of the sequences used in this study (Ingenia, Elition, Philips).
SequenceAxial IM/SPIRSagittal IM/SPIRCoronal IM/SPIR Sagittal T2Coronal T1
Echo time (ms)50 50 50 8019
Repetition time (ms)2450240024002500730
TSE factor 16 16 16 165
Field of view (mm3)160 × 160 × 83160 × 160 × 83160 × 160 × 83160 × 160 × 108160 × 160 × 76
Voxel size (acquisition, mm3)0.4 × 0.54 × 3.00.4 × 0.54 × 3.00.4 × 0.54 × 3.00.35 × 0.49 × 3.00.35 × 0.45 × 3.0
Voxel size (reconstructed, mm3)0.28 × 0.28 × 3.00.28 × 0.28 × 3.00.28 × 0.28 × 3.00.24 × 0.24 × 3.00.24 × 0.24 × 3.0
Slice Thickness (mm)33333
Slice number3128263023
Acquisition time (min)3.243.183.393.112.3
Table 2. Assessed pathologies in patients with traumatic dislocations of the shoulder.
Table 2. Assessed pathologies in patients with traumatic dislocations of the shoulder.
Parameters Description Grading and Frequency (n, %)
Biceps pulley Pulley Lesions graded according to Habermeyer et al. [8]sGHLtear: 16 (48%)
CHL tear: 12 (36%)
sGHL and CHL tear: 11 (33%)
LHBTSubluxation/dislocation of the LHBTSubluxation: 4 (12%)
Dislocation: 0 (0%)
Rotator cuff tendons Tendinopathy including: subacromial impingement, rotator cuff tendinitis/tendinosis, calcific tendonitis. No pathology: 10 (30%)
Tendinopathy: 16 (48%)
Partial or complete tear: 20 (61%)
Rotator cuff musclesFatty infiltration assessed according to Goutallier et al. [27]No pathology: 24 (73%)
Fatty infiltration: 0 (0%)
Acute injury: 9 (27%)
BoneAssessment for osseous defects such as osseous/bony Bankart and Hill-Sachs lesions [28]Normal signal: 1 (63%)
Greater tuberosity fracture: 2 (5%)
Hill Sachs defect: 29 (88%),
Osseous/Bony Bankart defect: 14 (42%)
LabrumAssessment for defects of the labrum e.g., antero- inferior after dislocation, anatomical variations of the labrum according to Kanatli et al. [29]Normal Labrum: 1 (3%)
Anatomical normal variant: 0 (3%)
Lesion: 32 (97%)
CartilageVisual grading of signal inhomogeneities or defects of articular cartilageNormal signal: 25 (76%)
Abnormal: 8 (24%)
Table 3. Mean diagnostic confidence, image quality and visibility.
Table 3. Mean diagnostic confidence, image quality and visibility.
Rater 1Rater 2
Diagnostic confidence 14.5 ± 0.44.3 ± 0.5
Overall image quality 24.3 ± 0.74.5 ± 0.4
Overall visibility of anatomical landmarks 34.1 ± 0.64.4 ± 0.8
Data are presented as means ± standard deviations. The 5-point Likert scale (1 = poor, 2 = below average, 3 = fair, 4 = good, 5 = excellent); 1 Diagnostic confidence: describes the level of certainty of the raters regarding the diagnosed pathologies. 2 Image quality ratings include: motion artifacts, images noise and general impression. 3 Visibility of anatomical landmarks was assessed by rating clearness of the evaluated area and overlying motion or noise artifacts.
Table 4. Visibility of anatomical landmarks of the shoulder 1.
Table 4. Visibility of anatomical landmarks of the shoulder 1.
Anatomical RegionsRater 1Rater 2
Biceps pulley4.4 ± 0.44.5 ± 0.3
LHBT4.0 ± 0.44.0 ± 0.4
Rotator cuff4.2 ± 0.34.2 ± 0.3
Labroligamentous complex4.5 ± 0.34.5 ± 0.4
Articular cartilage4.7 ± 0.34.7 ± 0.5
Axillary recess4.0 ± 0.54.1 ± 0.5
Inferior glenohumeral ligament 4.1 ± 0.74.2 ± 0.2
Bone4.2 ± 0.43.9 ± 0.5
Muscle4.3 ± 0.34.3 ± 0.4
Data are presented as means ± standard deviations. The 5-point Likert scale (5 = best; 1 = worst). 1 Visibility was assessed by rating clearness of the evaluated area as well as overlying motion or noise artifacts.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Feuerriegel, G.C.; Lenhart, N.S.; Leonhardt, Y.; Gassert, F.T.; Biberthaler, P.; Siebenlist, S.; Kirchhoff, C.; Makowski, M.R.; Woertler, K.; Gersing, A.S.; et al. Assessment of Acute Lesions of the Biceps Pulley in Patients with Traumatic Shoulder Dislocation Using MR Imaging. Diagnostics 2022, 12, 2345. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics12102345

AMA Style

Feuerriegel GC, Lenhart NS, Leonhardt Y, Gassert FT, Biberthaler P, Siebenlist S, Kirchhoff C, Makowski MR, Woertler K, Gersing AS, et al. Assessment of Acute Lesions of the Biceps Pulley in Patients with Traumatic Shoulder Dislocation Using MR Imaging. Diagnostics. 2022; 12(10):2345. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics12102345

Chicago/Turabian Style

Feuerriegel, Georg C., Nicolas S. Lenhart, Yannik Leonhardt, Florian T. Gassert, Peter Biberthaler, Sebastian Siebenlist, Chlodwig Kirchhoff, Marcus R. Makowski, Klaus Woertler, Alexandra S. Gersing, and et al. 2022. "Assessment of Acute Lesions of the Biceps Pulley in Patients with Traumatic Shoulder Dislocation Using MR Imaging" Diagnostics 12, no. 10: 2345. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics12102345

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop