Next Article in Journal
Unusual Case of Masseter Muscle Hypertrophy in Adolescence—Case Report and Literature Overview
Next Article in Special Issue
Percutaneous Thermal Ablation Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): Microwave Ablation (MWA) versus Laser-Induced Thermotherapy (LITT)
Previous Article in Journal
Factors Associated with Withdrawal Time in European Colonoscopy Practice: Findings of the European Colonoscopy Quality Investigation (ECQI) Group
Previous Article in Special Issue
Role of Combined 68Ga DOTA-Peptides and 18F FDG PET/CT in the Evaluation of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms
 
 
Interesting Images
Peer-Review Record

A Rare Case of Radiation-Induced Liver Disease in Treated Abdominal Lymphoma Showing High [18F]FDG Avidity and Low EOB Uptake Proportional to the Irradiation Dose

by Aya Usami 1, Kota Yokoyama 2,*, Junichi Tsuchiya 2, Yoshihiro Umezawa 3, Kazuma Toda 1, Ukihide Tateishi 2 and Ryoichi Yoshimura 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Submission received: 24 January 2022 / Revised: 14 February 2022 / Accepted: 15 February 2022 / Published: 16 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Image-Guided Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This case approach an interesting and practical issue in the diagnostic follow-up of disease by FDG-PET/CT. Metastases and radiation-induced liver disease may manifest as increased foci of FDG avidity at PET scanning. To be sure, an histological confirmation is the best way to obtain a differential diagnosis, but the evolution and appearance of the cases of radiation hepatitis and metastatic disease seem sufficiently distinctive.

 

The close comparison of PET ann MRI evolutive finding may be interesting to take into account this challenge situation as the authors had ilustrated in this case.

 

A couple of questions for the authors: can be use the ‘pseudoprogression’ concept in the discussion setting? Doeas the authors think a hepatitis may be the potential cause of their finding?

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The case presented can be considered for publication. However, the discussion of the case is not very thorough and would benefit from a better framing of the case in terms of clinical presentation and above all a discussion that would take into consideration the current state of the post-therapy follow-up procedures and the possible implications suggested by the case presented.
It is suggested to present the images with the same color scales

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper has been significantly improved
It can be published

Back to TopTop