Next Article in Journal
A Multi-Feature Fusion Framework for Automatic Skin Cancer Diagnostics
Next Article in Special Issue
Dark-Blood Late Gadolinium Enhancement MRI Is Noninferior to Bright-Blood LGE in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathies
Previous Article in Journal
The Evaluation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A (VEGFA) and VEGFR2 Receptor as Prognostic Biomarkers in Bladder Cancer
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cardiac MRI: An Alternative Method to Determine the Left Ventricular Function
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Diagnostics
Volume 13
Issue 8
10.3390/diagnostics13081472
diagnostics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluation of Cardiac Function in Young Mdx Mice Using MRI with Feature Tracking and Self-Gated Magnetic Resonance Cine Imaging

by
Junpei Ueda
1 and
Shigeyoshi Saito
1,2,*
1
Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Division of Health Sciences, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita 560-0871, Osaka, Japan
2
Department of Advanced Medical Technologies, National Cardiovascular and Cerebral Research Center, Suita 564-8565, Osaka, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diagnostics 2023, 13(8), 1472; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics13081472
Submission received: 1 March 2023 / Revised: 31 March 2023 / Accepted: 18 April 2023 / Published: 19 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study aimed to evaluate cardiac function in a young mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (mdx) using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with feature tracking and self-gated magnetic resonance cine imaging. Cardiac function was evaluated in mdx and control mice (C57BL/6JJmsSlc mice) at 8 and 12 weeks of age. Preclinical 7-T MRI was used to capture short-axis, longitudinal two-chamber view and longitudinal four-chamber view cine images of mdx and control mice. Strain values were measured and evaluated from cine images acquired using the feature tracking method. The left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly less (p < 0.01 each) in the mdx group at both 8 (control, 56.6 ± 2.3% mdx, 47.2 ± 7.4%) and 12 weeks (control, 53.9 ± 3.3% mdx, 44.1 ± 2.7%). In the strain analysis, all strain value peaks were significantly less in mdx mice, except for the longitudinal strain of the four-chamber view at both 8 and 12 weeks of age. Strain analysis with feature tracking and self-gated magnetic resonance cine imaging is useful for assessing cardiac function in young mdx mice.

1. Introduction

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is an X-linked severe progressive muscle wasting disease caused by a deficiency in dystrophin protein [1,2,3]. A dystrophin deficiency leads to dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), which may occur during adolescence [4,5]. DCM is a myocardial disease characterized by left ventricular or biventricular diastolic and systolic dysfunction in the absence of sufficient pressure/volume loading or coronary artery disease [6,7]. The C57BL/10-mdx (mdx) mouse model of human muscular dystrophy carries a mutation in exon 23 of the Xp21 region of the genome, resulting in the loss of dystrophin protein expression [8]. The DMD research has been conducted using the mdx model, which has a mutation in the dystrophin gene itself like DMD patients [9,10]. DCM is considered to be the main cause of death in DMD, and the mechanism of DCM is not yet fully elucidated [11]. Therefore, it is very important to elucidate the early pathogenesis of DCM by young mdx mice.
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is used to diagnose various cardiac diseases, and its usefulness in DCM has been reported [12,13,14]. The evaluation of cardiac function using CMR in mice is as reproducible as it is in humans [15] and has also been used to evaluate the pathogenesis of DCM [16,17]. In CMR, the evaluation of cardiac function can be quantified, including the left ventricular ejection fraction and strain analysis. In recent years, feature-tracking methods have attracted attention in addition to conventional methods, such as tagging and harmonic phase methods in strain analysis. The feature-tracking method can calculate strain values from standard cine CMR images without additional CMR images [18,19]. The cardiac function of mdx mice has been evaluated with CMR [20,21]; however, these studies evaluated older mice or calculated strain values without using the feature tracking method.
This study aimed to assess cardiac function in young mdx mice, including strain assessment using the feature tracking method, and to observe changes in cardiac function in mdx mice.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animal Preparation

All experimental protocols were approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Osaka University. All experimental procedures involving animals and their care were performed in accordance with the University Guidelines for Animal Experimentation and the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Animal experiments were performed on male C57BL/6JJmsSlc mice (control mice) 8–12 weeks old purchased from Japan SLC (Hamamatsu, Japan) and C57BL/10ScSn-Dmdmdx/JicJcl mice (mdx mice) purchased from CLEA Japan, Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). All mice were housed in a controlled vivarium environment (24 °C; 12:12 h light:dark cycle) and fed a standard pellet diet with water ad libitum. MRI experiments were performed at 2 time points at 8 weeks of age (10 control mice and 10 mdx mice) and 12 weeks of age (10 control mice and 10 mdx mice).

2.2. Magnetic Resonance Imaging

MR images of animal hearts were acquired using a horizontal 7-T scanner (PharmaScan 70/16 US; Bruker Biospin; Ettlingen, Germany) equipped with a volume coil with an inner diameter of 30 mm. For MRI, the mice were positioned with their mouth in a stereotaxic frame to prevent movement in a prone position during acquisition. The mice were maintained at a body temperature of 36.5 °C, with water flow regulated, and continuously monitored using a physiological monitoring system (SA Instruments Inc., Stony Brook, NY, USA). All MRI experiments on mice were performed under general anesthesia with 1.0–2.0% isoflurane in an air–oxygen mixture (Abbott Laboratories; Abbott Park, IL, USA) administered through a mask covering the nose and mouth of the mice.
Short-axis, long-axis two-chamber, and long-axis four-chamber images were obtained using fast low-angle shots (FLASH) with a self-gated magnetic resonance cine imaging system (). For short-axis images, the following parameters were used: repetition time (TR)/echo time (TE) = 44.5/2.5 ms, flip angle = 25°, movie frames = 14 frames per cardiac cycle, field of view (FOV) = 25.6 × 25.6 mm, acquisition time = 23:43 min, in-plane resolution per pixel = 133 µm, matrix = 192 × 192, number of excitations (NEX) = 300, oversampling = 1, and five concomitant slices covering the whole heart from the apex to the base. For the long-axis two- and four-chamber views, the parameters were TR/TE = 6.5/3.1 ms, flip angle = 10°, movie frames = 14 frames/s, FOV = 25.6 mm × 25.6 mm, acquisition time = 3:52 min, in-plane resolution per pixel = 133 µm, matrix = 192 × 192, NEX = 1, and oversampling = 250. The total scan time per animal was approximately 40 min.

2.3. MRI Data Analysis

The cardiac MR images were analyzed using cvi42 software (Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Calgary, AB, Canada). The borders of the epicardium and endocardium were outlined manually on the short-axis images, two- chamber long-axis images and four-chamber long-axis images at both end-diastolic phase and end-systolic phase. The left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), left ventricular stroke volume (LVSV), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and left ventricular mass (LVM) were calculated from cine images. All values were calculated automatically by Cvi42. In addition, strain analysis was performed using feature tracking. For myocardial strain analysis, the global radial strain (RS), global circumferential strain (CS), and longitudinal strain (LS) values were calculated. LS was analyzed from the 2- and 4-chamber long-axis views. The peak value of each strain was used for statistical evaluation.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The LVESV, LVEDV, LVSV, LVEF, LVM, and each strain value calculated from the MR images are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. All statistical analyses were performed using Prism, version 9 (GraphPad Software; San Diego, CA, USA). Differences were compared using a one-way analysis of variance and Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001).

2.5. Histological Analysis and Immunostaining

After completion of the MRI at 12 weeks of age, the mice were sacrificed, and their hearts were removed and fixed in formalin. Fixed hearts were sliced in the direction of the short axis of the left ventricle. Heart specimens were embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 5 μm; some sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and some sections were immunostained. The stained tissues were observed using an optical microscope (Keyence Corporation; Osaka, Japan). H&E staining was performed by immersing samples in a hematoxylin solution (5 min) and alcohol–eosin staining solution (3 min). H&E-stained tissues were dehydrated six times with 100% alcohol and then permeabilized using xylene. Immunostaining was performed using the enzyme–antibody method. Dystrophin rabbit polyclonal antibodies (12715-1-P; Proteintech Group, Inc., Rosemont, IL, USA) were used as the primary antibody; the samples were incubated for 1 h. After washing three times for 5 min each, the samples were incubated with the EnVision+ horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (K4003; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) for 30 min.

3. Results

3.1. Animals’ Characteristics

The characteristics of the animals are summarized in Table 1. No significant difference in body weight or respiratory rate was found between the control and mdx groups of the same age. However, both the 8- and 12-week-old groups showed significant differences between the groups in heart rate.

3.2. Visual Evaluation of Cine Images of Short Axis, Two-Chamber, and Four-Chamber View

In short-axis cine images and the two-chamber view cine images, contraction and expansion of the entire myocardium were observed in the control group at 8 and 12 weeks of age. For LVEDV, no significant difference was observed between the control and mdx groups (Figure 1B,D and Figure 2B,D). However, the myocardial contraction was weaker in the mdx group than in the control group (Figure 1F,H and Figure 2F,H). In the four-chamber view cine images, contraction and expansion of the entire myocardium were observed in the control group at 8 and 12 weeks of age. However, no differences in shrinkage were observed in four-chamber views (Figure 3F,H).

3.3. Cardiac Function in 8- and 12-Week-Old Mdx Mice vs. Age-Matched Controls

Regarding the LVEDV (Figure 4A), no significant difference was found between the control and mdx groups at 8 weeks old (control, 52.6 ± 4.9 μL; mdx, 52.5 ± 7.9 μL) and 12 weeks old (control, 55.9 ± 5.1 μL; mdx, 60.3 ± 9.1 μL). Regarding the LVESV (Figure 4B), no significant difference was found between the control and mdx groups at 8 weeks old (control, 22.8 ± 2.6 μL; mdx, 28.1 ± 7.0 μL). However, at 12 weeks old, LVESV was significantly less in the mdx group compared to the control group (control, 25.8 ± 3.6 μL; mdx, 33.9 ± 5.6 μL, p < 0.01). Regarding the LVSV (Figure 4C), a significant difference was identified between the control and mdx groups at 8 weeks old (control, 29.9 ± 2.8 μL; mdx, 24.3 ± 2.8 μL, p < 0.01). However, at 12 weeks old, no significant difference was found between the control and mdx groups (control, 30.6 ± 3.1 μL; mdx, 26.6 ± 4.2 μL). Regarding the LVEF (Figure 4D), a significant difference was identified between the control and mdx groups at 8 weeks (control, 56.6 ± 2.3%; mdx, 47.2 ± 7.4%, p < 0.01) and 12 weeks (control, 53.9 ± 3.3%; mdx, 44.1 ± 2.7%, p < 0.01). A significant difference was also identified between the 8- and 12-week-old mice in the mdx group (p < 0.05). Regarding the LVM (Figure 4E), no significant difference was found between the control and mdx groups at 8 weeks old (control, 36.3 ± 3.3 mg; mdx, 35.1 ± 3.8 mg) and 12 weeks old (control, 36.7 ± 4.3 mg; mdx, 39.0 ± 4.0 mg).

3.4. Strain Analysis by Feature-Tracking Method in 8- and 12-Week-Old Mdx Mice vs. Age-Matched Controls

In the strain analysis of the 2ch-LS and short-axis images, the peak strain values were lower in the mdx group compared with the control group. The areas of reduction in strain values were diffuse, and no regularity was apparent (Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7). According to statistical analysis of strain values, the global radial strain of the left ventricle was significantly less in the mdx group compared to the control group at 8 weeks old (control, 22.2 ± 1.7%; mdx, 19.0 ± 2.0%, p < 0.05) and 12 weeks old (control, 20.9 ± 2.2%; mdx, 17.2 ± 2.7%, p < 0.01; Figure 8A). The global circumferential strain of the left ventricle was significantly less in the mdx group compared to the control group at 8 weeks old (control, −14.6 ± 0.8%; mdx, −13.2 ± 0.9%, p < 0.05) and 12 weeks old (control, −13.9 ± 1.0%; mdx, −12.1 ± 1.4%, p < 0.01; Figure 8B). The two-chamber-view longitudinal strain of the left ventricle (2ch-LVLS) was significantly less in the mdx group compared with the control group at 8 weeks old (control, −14.1 ± 1.7%; mdx, −11.4 ± 2.0%, p < 0.05) and 12 weeks old (control, −13.5 ± 1.1%; mdx, −11.3 ± 1.9%, p < 0.05; Figure 8C). Regarding the strain values of the global four-chamber-view longitudinal strain of the left ventricle (4ch-LVLS), no significant difference was found between the control and mdx groups at 8 weeks (control, −14.5 ± 2.4%; mdx, −15.0 ± 1.8%) and 12 weeks (control, −15.4 ± 2.4%; mdx, −13.4 ± 1.6%; Figure 8D).

3.5. H&E Staining and Immunostaining of Myocardium Tissue

In the H&E staining results, no differences were observed between the mdx and control groups (Figure 9). However, staining with antibodies against dystrophin showed differences between the mdx and control groups (Figure 10). Staining of the intercellular matrix was observed in the control group (Figure 10A,B) but not in the mdx group (Figure 10C,D).

4. Discussion

In this study, myocardial cine images of mdx mice were acquired using 7-T MRI at 8 and 12 weeks of age to evaluate cardiac function and myocardial strain values. No significant difference was found in the left ventricular end-diastolic volume at 8 and 12 weeks of age. However, both at 8 and 12 weeks of age, the left ventricular ejection fraction showed a decreasing trend in the mdx group compared with the control group. In strain analysis, all peak strain values showed a decreasing trend, except for 4ch-LS at 8 and 12 weeks of age. Previous studies using CMR have reported lower cardiac function in older mdx mice than we found in our study [20,21]. However, these previous studies did not use the feature tracking, ECG, and self-gated magnetic resonance cine imaging used in our study. The present study’s novel strain analysis, ECG, and respiratory-gated methods suggest that young mdx mice have less cardiac function.
Compared to the conventional tagging method, the feature-tracking method does not require additional imaging and can be performed from cine images for strain analysis. Self-gated magnetic resonance cine imaging allows ECG and respiration gating without the need to wear monitoring equipment. Therefore, in addition to the advantage of being able to detect a decline in cardiac function that could not be detected by conventional methods, these novel methods also have the significant advantage of reducing examination time.
Previous studies have reported no change in cardiac function until older age [21,22,23,24]. At the age of 8 months, the contractile and diastolic functions of the left ventricular myocardium decrease, thereby decreasing the left ventricular ejection fraction [20]. However, a previous study showed that CMR taken at a high temporal resolution showed reduced cardiac function in 3-month-old mdx mice [25]. Although the temporal resolution differs from this previous study, our study and other studies [20,26] suggest a decline in cardiac function in young mdx mice. Consistent with a previous study [20], immunostaining showed no staining of the extracellular matrix of cardiomyocytes in mdx mice compared to the control group (Figure 10). Hence, immunostaining showed a difference in cardiomyocytes between the mdx and control groups, and CMR also detected less cardiac function in mdx group. However, the CMR results did not show ventricular enlargement, which is a symptom of dilated cardiomyopathy. In addition, no areas of necrosis were found in the cardiomyocytes of mdx mice in H&E staining unlike previous studies [20]. Thus, our study suggests that mdx mice have impaired cardiac function at a stage prior to DCM diagnosis.
This study had limitations. First, by evaluating cardiac function in 8- and 12-week-old mdx mice, this study demonstrated this methodology’s utility for detecting changes in cardiac function in young mdx mice. However, cardiac function after 12 weeks of age has not been evaluated. Evaluation of cardiac function after 12 weeks of age would provide more details on the transition of cardiac function in mdx mice during aging. Analysis of cardiac function after 12 weeks may reveal some changes in LVEDV, which did not differ significantly in this study. A more detailed cardiac function transition may allow better investigation of cardiac function treatment in mdx mice [27,28], including different genotypes [29,30]. Second, to demonstrate the usefulness of the present method, we evaluated the cardiac function of mdx mice using feature tracking and self-gated magnetic resonance cine imaging and compared them with previous studies. By comparing this study with conventional ECG synchronization and tagging methods, it may be possible to demonstrate the usefulness of the method used in this study in more detail. Third, it is considered that there is an effect of sex difference on the decrease in cardiac function caused by DMD [31]. Since only male mice were used in this study, it is necessary to examine the effects of sex differences on the results in the future. To make evaluating cardiac function in mdx mice more accurate, further studies are needed to evaluate longer-term cardiac function and assess cardiac function using various methods.

5. Conclusions

This study showed that strain analysis with feature tracking and self-gated magnetic resonance cine imaging is useful for assessing cardiac function in young mdx mice. Using these methods, we demonstrated that young mdx mice decline in cardiac function.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.U. and S.S.; methodology, J.U. and S.S.; software, J.U. and S.S.; investigation, J.U. and S.S.; data curation, J.U. and S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, J.U. and S.S.; writing—review and editing, J.U. and S.S.; supervision, S.S.; project administration, S.S.; funding acquisition, S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was the result of using research equipment shared in the MEXT Project for promoting public utilization of advanced research infrastructure (Program for Advanced Research Equipment Platforms MRI Platform), Grant Number JPMXS0450400022 and JPMXS0450400023.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All experimental protocols were approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Osaka University. All experimental procedures involving animals and their care were performed in accordance with the University Guidelines for Animal Experimentation and the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Osaka University (R02-05-0, 20 November 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jelinkova, S.; Sleiman, Y.; Fojtík, P.; Aimond, F.; Finan, A.; Hugon, G.; Scheuermann, V.; Beckerová, D.; Cazorla, O.; Vincenti, M.; et al. Dystrophin Deficiency Causes Progressive Depletion of Cardiovascular Progenitor Cells in the Heart. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Biggar, W.D.; Klamut, H.J.; Demacio, P.C.; Stevens, D.J.; Ray, P.N. Duchenne muscular dystrophy: Current knowledge, treatment, and future prospects. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 2002, 401, 88–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hoffman, E.P.; Kunkel, L.M. Dystrophin abnormalities in Duchenne/Becker muscular dystrophy. Neuron 1989, 2, 1019–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hoogerwaard, E.M.; van der Wouw, P.A.; Wilde, A.A.; Bakker, E.; Ippel, P.F.; Oosterwijk, J.C.; Majoor-Krakauer, D.F.; van Essen, A.J.; Leschot, N.J.; de Visser, M. Cardiac involvement in carriers of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy. Neuromuscul. Disord. 1999, 9, 347–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Schade van Westrum, S.M.; Hoogerwaard, E.M.; Dekker, L.; Standaar, T.S.; Bakker, E.; Ippel, P.F.; Oosterwijk, J.C.; Majoor-Krakauer, D.F.; van Essen, A.J.; Leschot, N.J.; et al. Cardiac abnormalities in a follow-up study on carriers of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy. Neurology 2011, 77, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Merlo, M.; Cannatà, A.; Gobbo, M.; Stolfo, D.; Elliott, P.M.; Sinagra, G. Evolving concepts in dilated cardiomyopathy. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2018, 20, 228–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Elliott, P.; Andersson, B.; Arbustini, E.; Bilinska, Z.; Cecchi, F.; Charron, P.; Dubourg, O.; Kühl, U.; Maisch, B.; McKenna, W.J.; et al. Classification of the cardiomyopathies: A position statement from the European Society Of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur. Heart J. 2008, 29, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sicinski, P.; Geng, Y.; Ryder-Cook, A.S.; Barnard, E.A.; Darlison, M.G.; Barnard, P.J. The molecular basis of muscular dystrophy in the mdx mouse: A point mutation. Science 1989, 244, 1578–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nowak, D.; Kozlowska, H.; Gielecki, J.S.; Rowinski, J.; Zurada, A.; Goralczyk, K.; Bozilow, W. Cardiomyopathy in the mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy caused by disordered secretion of vascular endothelial growth factor. Med. Sci. Monit. 2011, 17, BR332–BR338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lorin, C.; Gueffier, M.; Bois, P.; Faivre, J.-F.; Cognard, C.; Sebille, S. Ultrastructural and functional alterations of EC coupling elements in mdx cardiomyocytes: An analysis from membrane surface to depth. Cell. Biochem. Biophys. 2013, 66, 723–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Law, M.L.; Cohen, H.; Martin, A.A.; Angulski, A.B.B.; Metzger, J.M. Dysregulation of Calcium Handling in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy-Associated Dilated Cardiomyopathy: Mechanisms and Experimental Therapeutic Strategies. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Singla, N.; Mehra, S.; Garga, U.C. Diagnostic Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Dilated Cardiomyopathy. Indian J. Radiol. Imaging 2021, 31, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ziółkowska, L.; Śpiewak, M.; Małek, L.; Boruc, A.; Kawalec, W. The usefulness of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in children with myocardial diseases. Kardiol. Pol. 2015, 73, 419–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pirruccello, J.P.; Bick, A.; Wang, M.; Chaffin, M.; Friedman, S.; Yao, J.; Guo, X.; Venkatesh, B.A.; Taylor, K.D.; Post, W.S.; et al. Analysis of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in 36,000 individuals yields genetic insights into dilated cardiomyopathy. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 2254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Manka, R.; Jahnke, C.; Hucko, T.; Dietrich, T.; Gebker, R.; Schnackenburg, B.; Graf, K.; Paetsch, I. Reproducibility of small animal cine and scar cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using a clinical 3.0 tesla system. BMC Med. Imaging 2013, 13, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Saito, S.; Tanoue, M.; Masuda, K.; Mori, Y.; Nakatani, S.; Yoshioka, Y.; Murase, K. Longitudinal observations of progressive cardiac dysfunction in a cardiomyopathic animal model by self-gated cine imaging based on 11.7-T magnetic resonance imaging. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 9106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vanhoutte, L.; Guilbaud, C.; Martherus, R.; Bouzin, C.; Gallez, B.; Dessy, C.; Balligand, J.-L.; Moniotte, S.; Feron, O. MRI Assessment of Cardiomyopathy Induced by β1-Adrenoreceptor Autoantibodies and Protection Through β3-Adrenoreceptor Overexpression. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 43951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Amzulescu, M.S.; De Craene, M.; Langet, H.; Pasquet, A.; Vancraeynest, D.; Pouleur, A.C.; Vanoverschelde, J.L.; Gerber, B.L. Myocardial strain imaging: Review of general principles, validation, and sources of discrepancies. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 2019, 20, 605–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Claus, P.; Omar, A.M.S.; Pedrizzetti, G.; Sengupta, P.P.; Nagel, E. Tissue Tracking Technology for Assessing Cardiac Mechanics: Principles, Normal Values, and Clinical Applications. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 2015, 8, 1444–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, W.; ten Hove, M.; Schneider, J.E.; Stuckey, D.J.; Sebag-Montefiore, L.; Bia, B.L.; Radda, G.K.; Davies, K.E.; Neubauer, S.; Clarke, K. Abnormal cardiac morphology, function and energy metabolism in the dystrophic mdx mouse: An MRI and MRS study. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2008, 45, 754–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Li, W.; Liu, W.; Zhong, J.; Yu, X. Early manifestation of alteration in cardiac function in dystrophin deficient mdx mouse using 3D CMR tagging. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2009, 11, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Au, C.G.; Butler, T.L.; Sherwood, M.C.; Egan, J.R.; North, K.N.; Winlaw, D.S. Increased connective tissue growth factor associated with cardiac fibrosis in the mdx mouse model of dystrophic cardiomyopathy. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2011, 92, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Crisp, A.; Yin, H.; Goyenvalle, A.; Betts, C.; Moulton, H.M.; Seow, Y.; Babbs, A.; Merritt, T.; Saleh, A.F.; Gait, M.J.; et al. Diaphragm rescue alone prevents heart dysfunction in dystrophic mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2011, 20, 413–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Van Erp, C.; Loch, D.; Laws, N.; Trebbin, A.; Hoey, A.J. Timeline of cardiac dystrophy in 3-18-month-old MDX mice. Muscle Nerve 2010, 42, 504–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Stuckey, D.J.; Carr, C.A.; Camelliti, P.; Tyler, D.J.; Davies, K.E.; Clarke, K. In vivo MRI characterization of progressive cardiac dysfunction in the mdx mouse model of muscular dystrophy. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e28569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Arahata, K.; Ishiura, S.; Ishiguro, T.; Tsukahara, T.; Suhara, Y.; Eguchi, C.; Ishihara, T.; Nonaka, I.; Ozawa, E.; Sugita, H. Immunostaining of skeletal and cardiac muscle surface membrane with antibody against Duchenne muscular dystrophy peptide. Nature 1988, 333, 861–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Potter, R.A.; Griffin, D.A.; Heller, K.N.; Peterson, E.L.; Clark, E.K.; Mendell, J.R.; Rodino-Klapac, L.R. Dose-Escalation Study of Systemically Delivered rAAVrh74.MHCK7.micro-dystrophin in the mdx Mouse Model of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Hum. Gene Ther. 2021, 32, 375–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Salmaninejad, A.; Jafari Abarghan, Y.; Bozorg Qomi, S.; Bayat, H.; Yousefi, M.; Azhdari, S.; Talebi, S.; Mojarrad, M. Common therapeutic advances for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Int. J. Neurosci. 2021, 131, 370–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vohra, R.; Batra, A.; Forbes, S.C.; Vandenborne, K.; Walter, G.A. Magnetic Resonance Monitoring of Disease Progression in mdx Mice on Different Genetic Backgrounds. Am. J. Pathol. 2017, 187, 2060–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Verhaart, I.E.; van Duijn, R.J.; den Adel, B.; Roest, A.A.; Verschuuren, J.J.; Aartsma-Rus, A.; van der Weerd, L. Assessment of cardiac function in three mouse dystrophinopathies by magnetic resonance imaging. Neuromuscul. Disord. 2012, 22, 418–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bostick, B.; Yue, Y.; Duan, D. Gender influences cardiac function in the mdx model of Duchenne cardiomyopathy. Muscle Nerve 2010, 42, 600–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Diagnostics 13 01472 g001 550
Figure 1. Representative short-axis view cine magnetic resonance images: (A,E) 8-week-old control mouse, (B,F) 8-week-old mdx mouse, (C,G) 12-week-old control, (D,H) 12-week-old mdx mouse. (A–D) The end-diastolic phase of a mouse heart; (E–H) the end-systolic phase of a mouse heart.
Figure 1. Representative short-axis view cine magnetic resonance images: (A,E) 8-week-old control mouse, (B,F) 8-week-old mdx mouse, (C,G) 12-week-old control, (D,H) 12-week-old mdx mouse. (A–D) The end-diastolic phase of a mouse heart; (E–H) the end-systolic phase of a mouse heart.
Diagnostics 13 01472 g001
Diagnostics 13 01472 g002 550
Figure 2. Representative two-chamber view cine magnetic resonance images: (A,E) 8-week-old control mouse, (B,F) 8-week-old mdx mouse, (C,G) 12-week-old control, (D,H) 12-week-old mdx mouse. (A–D) The end-diastolic phase of a mouse heart; (E–H) the end-systolic phase of a mouse heart.
Figure 2. Representative two-chamber view cine magnetic resonance images: (A,E) 8-week-old control mouse, (B,F) 8-week-old mdx mouse, (C,G) 12-week-old control, (D,H) 12-week-old mdx mouse. (A–D) The end-diastolic phase of a mouse heart; (E–H) the end-systolic phase of a mouse heart.
Diagnostics 13 01472 g002
Diagnostics 13 01472 g003 550
Figure 3. Representative four-chamber view cine magnetic resonance images: (A,E) 8-week-old control mouse, (B,F) 8-week-old mdx mouse, (C,G) 12-week-old control, (D,H) 12-week-old mdx mouse. (A–D) The end-diastolic phase of a mouse heart; (E–H) the end-systolic phase of a mouse heart.
Figure 3. Representative four-chamber view cine magnetic resonance images: (A,E) 8-week-old control mouse, (B,F) 8-week-old mdx mouse, (C,G) 12-week-old control, (D,H) 12-week-old mdx mouse. (A–D) The end-diastolic phase of a mouse heart; (E–H) the end-systolic phase of a mouse heart.
Diagnostics 13 01472 g003
Diagnostics 13 01472 g004 550
Figure 4. Graphs quantifying LVEDV (A), LVESV (B), LVSV (C), LVEF (D), and LVM (E) in the 8-week-old control mice, 8-week-old mdx mice, 12-week-old control mice, and 12-week-old mdx mice. LVEDV, left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVESV, left ventricular end-systolic volume; LVSV, left ventricular stroke volume; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVM, left ventricular mass. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, respectively.
Figure 4. Graphs quantifying LVEDV (A), LVESV (B), LVSV (C), LVEF (D), and LVM (E) in the 8-week-old control mice, 8-week-old mdx mice, 12-week-old control mice, and 12-week-old mdx mice. LVEDV, left ventricular end-diastolic volume; LVESV, left ventricular end-systolic volume; LVSV, left ventricular stroke volume; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LVM, left ventricular mass. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, respectively.
Diagnostics 13 01472 g004
Diagnostics 13 01472 g005 550
Figure 5. Radial strain-encoded functional magnetic resonance imaging of the end-systolic left ventricle: (A) 8-week-old control mouse, (B) 8-week-old mdx mouse, (C) 12-week-old control mouse, (D) 12-week-old mdx mouse. The color bar shows the scale of the strain based on the end-diastolic left ventricle, with maximum contraction shown in red and minimum contraction in blue.
Figure 5. Radial strain-encoded functional magnetic resonance imaging of the end-systolic left ventricle: (A) 8-week-old control mouse, (B) 8-week-old mdx mouse, (C) 12-week-old control mouse, (D) 12-week-old mdx mouse. The color bar shows the scale of the strain based on the end-diastolic left ventricle, with maximum contraction shown in red and minimum contraction in blue.
Diagnostics 13 01472 g005
Diagnostics 13 01472 g006 550
Figure 6. Circumferential strain-encoded functional magnetic resonance imaging of the end-systolic left ventricle: (A) 8-week-old control mouse, (B) 8-week-old mdx mouse, (C) 12-week-old control mouse, (D) 12-week-old mdx mouse. The color bar shows the scale of the strain based on the end-diastolic left ventricle, with maximum contraction shown in blue and minimum contraction in red.
Figure 6. Circumferential strain-encoded functional magnetic resonance imaging of the end-systolic left ventricle: (A) 8-week-old control mouse, (B) 8-week-old mdx mouse, (C) 12-week-old control mouse, (D) 12-week-old mdx mouse. The color bar shows the scale of the strain based on the end-diastolic left ventricle, with maximum contraction shown in blue and minimum contraction in red.
Diagnostics 13 01472 g006
Diagnostics 13 01472 g007 550
Figure 7. Longitudinal strain-encoded functional magnetic resonance imaging of the end-systolic left ventricle: (A,E) 8-week-old control mouse, (B,F) 8-week-old mdx mouse, (C,G) 12-week-old control mouse, (D,H) 12-week-old mdx mouse. The color bar shows the scale of the strain based on the end-diastolic left ventricle, with maximum contraction shown in blue and minimum contraction in red. 2ch LVLS: two-chamber-view longitudinal strain of left ventricle, 4ch LVLS: four-chamber-view longitudinal strain of left ventricle.
Figure 7. Longitudinal strain-encoded functional magnetic resonance imaging of the end-systolic left ventricle: (A,E) 8-week-old control mouse, (B,F) 8-week-old mdx mouse, (C,G) 12-week-old control mouse, (D,H) 12-week-old mdx mouse. The color bar shows the scale of the strain based on the end-diastolic left ventricle, with maximum contraction shown in blue and minimum contraction in red. 2ch LVLS: two-chamber-view longitudinal strain of left ventricle, 4ch LVLS: four-chamber-view longitudinal strain of left ventricle.
Diagnostics 13 01472 g007
Diagnostics 13 01472 g008 550
Figure 8. Graphs quantifying the strain analysis in the 8-week-old control mice, 8-week-old mdx mice, 12-week-old control mice, and 12-week-old mdx mice. (A) Global radial strain of left ventricle (LvRS global), (B) global circumferential strain of left ventricle (LVCS global), (C) two-chamber-view longitudinal strain of left ventricle (2ch-LVLS), (D) four-chamber-view longitudinal strain of left ventricle (4ch-LVLS). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, respectively.
Figure 8. Graphs quantifying the strain analysis in the 8-week-old control mice, 8-week-old mdx mice, 12-week-old control mice, and 12-week-old mdx mice. (A) Global radial strain of left ventricle (LvRS global), (B) global circumferential strain of left ventricle (LVCS global), (C) two-chamber-view longitudinal strain of left ventricle (2ch-LVLS), (D) four-chamber-view longitudinal strain of left ventricle (4ch-LVLS). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, respectively.
Diagnostics 13 01472 g008
Diagnostics 13 01472 g009 550
Figure 9. Heart sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin from (A,B) control and (C,D) mdx mice. (B,D) Magnified images of the black-circle regions. Scale bars represent 500 µm (A,C) and 100 µm (B,D).
Figure 9. Heart sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin from (A,B) control and (C,D) mdx mice. (B,D) Magnified images of the black-circle regions. Scale bars represent 500 µm (A,C) and 100 µm (B,D).
Diagnostics 13 01472 g009
Diagnostics 13 01472 g010 550
Figure 10. Heart sections stained with antibodies against dystrophin from (A,B) control and (C,D) mdx mice. (B,D) Magnified images of the black-circle regions. Scale bars represent 500 µm (A,C) and 100 µm (B,D).
Figure 10. Heart sections stained with antibodies against dystrophin from (A,B) control and (C,D) mdx mice. (B,D) Magnified images of the black-circle regions. Scale bars represent 500 µm (A,C) and 100 µm (B,D).
Diagnostics 13 01472 g010
Table
Table 1. Animal characteristics.
Table 1. Animal characteristics.
8 Week12 Week
Control (n = 10)Mdx (n = 10)Control (n = 10)Mdx (n = 10)
Body weight (g)25.6 ± 1.326.2 ± 1.228.3 ± 1.129.3 ± 1.6
Heart rate (bpm)321 ± 32275± 23 **334 ± 35277 ± 22 **
Respiratory rate (brpm)73.4 ± 3.465.5 ± 6.676.2 ± 4.670 ± 9.4
** p < 0.01 between mdx mice and age-matched controls.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ueda, J.; Saito, S. Evaluation of Cardiac Function in Young Mdx Mice Using MRI with Feature Tracking and Self-Gated Magnetic Resonance Cine Imaging. Diagnostics 2023, 13, 1472. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics13081472

AMA Style

Ueda J, Saito S. Evaluation of Cardiac Function in Young Mdx Mice Using MRI with Feature Tracking and Self-Gated Magnetic Resonance Cine Imaging. Diagnostics. 2023; 13(8):1472. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics13081472

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ueda, Junpei, and Shigeyoshi Saito. 2023. "Evaluation of Cardiac Function in Young Mdx Mice Using MRI with Feature Tracking and Self-Gated Magnetic Resonance Cine Imaging" Diagnostics 13, no. 8: 1472. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/diagnostics13081472

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop