Next Article in Journal
Chemosensory-Related Gene Family Members of the Horn Fly, Haematobia irritans irritans (Diptera: Muscidae), Identified by Transcriptome Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Diversity and Abundance of Potential Vectors of Rift Valley Fever Virus in the North Region of Cameroon
Previous Article in Special Issue
Population Genetic Structure and Demography of the Critically Endangered Chequered Blue Butterfly (Scolitantides orion) in a Highly Isolated Part of Its Distribution Range
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genetic and Ecological Relationships of Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) Populations in Southern Mexico

by
Lorena Ruiz-Montoya
1,*,
Rodrigo Verónica Vallejo
1,
David Haymer
2 and
Pablo Liedo
3
1
Departamento de Conservación de la Biodiversidad, El Colegio de la Frontera sur (ECOSUR), Carretera Panamericana y Periférico Sur s/n, San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chiapas 29290, Mexico
2
Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, 1960 East-West Rd, Biomed T511, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
3
Departamento de Agricultura, Sociedad y Ambiente, El Colegio e la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR), Carretera Antiguo Aeropuerto km 2.5, Tapachula, Chiapas 30700, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 27 September 2020 / Revised: 2 November 2020 / Accepted: 8 November 2020 / Published: 19 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Population Genetics of Insects)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens, causes extensive damage to important agricultural commodities wherever it is found. Any effort to control or limit the damage caused by this pest requires a thorough understanding of the genetic makeup of the populations found in a particular area. Our study focused on flies found in the Soconusco region of southern Mexico. Flies in this region are typically found infesting different types of fruit trees that are either cultivated or naturally occurring. For our study, we collected male and female flies from four different types of fruit trees in several specific localities in the Mexican state of Chiapas. We analyzed the genetic makeup of a total of 725 flies in an attempt to look for differences that might be associated with the sex of the flies, the specific plants they were found on, or specific localities within the study area. We found a lot of genetic differences in flies from the various collections, but these were not strongly associated with different types of fruit trees or the specific collection site. From this, we concluded that the populations of flies from this entire region were largely similar.

Abstract

Knowledge of the influence of evolutionary factors that promote either the differentiation or cohesion of pest insect populations is critical for the improvement of control strategies. Here, we explore the extent to which genetic differentiation occurs between populations of the Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens, in association with four plant hosts (Citrus sinensis, C. paradisi, Mangifera indica and Casimiroa edulis) in the Soconusco region of Chiapas (Mexico). Using variants from six enzymatic loci, we obtained measures of genetic diversity for three sample arrangements: (1) by sex per locality, (2) by locality and (3) by host. The extent of genetic differentiation in populations was assessed using the Analyses of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) method for each array of samples, and moderate to high levels of genetic variation were observed between the sexes, as well as among localities and host plants. A Bayesian approach was then used to assess any population structure underlying the genetic data we obtained, but this analysis showed no significant structuring due to locality or host plant. We also considered whether the observed genotypic frequencies in male and females matched those expected under a hypothesis of random mating. Here we found significant deviations from expected genotypic frequencies, suggesting that sexual selection is acting on these populations. Overall, our results indicate that sexual selection, along with the presence of some heterogeneity in environments provided by both geographical factors and availability of host plants, has influenced the evolution of pest populations in this region of Mexico. Implications for area-wide pest management strategies are discussed.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Both genetic and ecological factors can promote either the differentiation or cohesion of pest insect populations and understanding these phenomena has become increasingly important for the improvement of control strategies in specific areas. For example, Wright’s F statistics can be used to estimate levels of genetic differentiation within and between populations of pest insects [1], and this can be useful to decide on specific management strategies tailored to each locality or region [2].
In Mexico, Anastrepha ludens (Loew) (Diptera: Tephritidae), also known as the Mexican fruit fly, is one of the main pests of cultivated fruit trees, and this species has been the subject of several monitoring and control programs [2]. Currently, this species significantly impacts the production and marketing of several cultivated fruits, including oranges (Citrus sinensis L) and mangoes (Mangifera indica L.) [3,4] in Mexico as well other countries in Central America [5,6].
Plants of the family Rutaceae, such as Casimiroa greggii (S. Watson) F. Chiang and Casimiroa edulis Llave & Lex., have been recognized as the native hosts of A. ludens [7]. Orange and mango were introduced to Mexico during the time of Spanish colonization [4,8,9,10], and A. ludens has shifted to use them as hosts. In addition, plants from at least 22 species from taxonomically distant families have been reported as hosts for this pest [4]. This range of host plant usage may allow this pest to survive by moving from one host species to another, depending on their availability in specific localities [11].
The evolution of A. ludens has probably occurred in close relationship with these host plants, as has been proposed for other species of phytophagous insects [12,13,14]. The colonization of new host plants also promotes a process of population differentiation that can eventually lead to adaptive speciation [15,16]. This has been proposed for Ragholetis pomonela (Tephritidae) in relation to the local host species Crataegus ssp. (Rosaceae) and the introduced Malus pumila (Rosaceae); in this case, the genetic differentiation occurred in relation to asynchrony in the phenology of host plant species [17]. Such specialization to host plants can also be limited by the level of gene flow between populations associated with each host species. This specialization can include factors such as the force of selection that each plant exerts on the pest populations [18] and by the amount of the phenotypic plasticity of the genotypes [19,20].
Genetic exchange in populations of insects associated with specific host plants may also decrease if selection occurs on preferences or recognition of the host plant, and if selection overcomes the effects of gene flow [20]. For A. ludens, under laboratory conditions, studies have shown random mating and a general lack of preferences for specific host plants. However, according to Aluja et al. [21], the host plant or the geographic origin can affect specific parameters such as the time of copulation, and that this is more prolonged in individuals of a common geographic origin. It has also been observed that the larvae of A. ludens have a greater survival rate in mango as a host plant compared to that seen in orange or guava [22]. These results suggest that host plants do exert selection pressures that can impact the genetic structure of populations of this pest.
Previous studies of A. ludens have revealed that this species has high levels of genetic variation and population structuring consistent with the presence of four subpopulations. The subpopulations occur within a distribution range corresponding to: (1) Western Mexico, (2) Eastern Mexico/Texas, (3) Guatemala/Belize/Honduras and (4) Costa Rica/Panama [6]. The Mexican populations in particular have been shown to exhibit moderate population structuring at a broad geographic scale [23], along with a stronger structuring at a narrower geographic scale [24,25]. However, studies exploring the influence of hosts on the genetic structure of A. ludens from Veracruz, Tamaulipas and Nuevo Léon (Mexico) concluded that they did not find that the structuring was attributable to either the geographic origin or the host [26], as had been suggested for other Anasptrepha species, specifically A. fraterculus [27] and A. suspensa [28]. In A. fraterculus, there appears to be an incipient speciation process promoted by factors such as environmental differences, host species preferences and their distribution [29,30,31].
Studies of sex specific genetic variation in A. ludens have also been lacking, even though genetic differentiation between the sexes is likely given its mating behavior or due to differential selection between the sexes [32,33,34]. In A. ludens, matings are known to occur in lek arenas where groups of males gather on plant substrates to display. Females are attracted to these mating leks, and it is here that sexual selection for mate choice takes place [35]. Non-random female choice for mates may involve preferences for specific male genotypes or phenotypes that may in turn promote changes in gene frequencies between the sexes. In this way, female mating success could explain much of the genetic variation seen within populations. Also independent of mating behavior, females and males may also have different genotypic frequencies because of differential selection or patterns of gene flow between populations [33].
Our objective here was to look at possible factors affecting the genetic variation and population structure of A. ludens in the Soconusco region of Chiapas, Mexico. Our first aim was to determine the effect of host plants. A second aim was to look at the possible effect of environmental conditions in different localities, and a third aim was to explore whether there is sex specific genetic variation that might affect the structure of populations.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Environmental Factors

All localities are within a region with environmental characteristics as follows. The Soconusco Region in Chiapas, Mexico, is located at 15°19’ N latitude and 92°44’ W longitude in the so-called Coastal Plain of Chiapas and Guatemala. Elevation data is available per each locality, and overall this ranges from 0 to 4030 m above sea level at the summit of the Tacaná volcano. The predominant climatic conditions are sub-humid and humid–warm with summer rains. During the months of May to October, the average minimum temperature ranges from 21 °C to 22.5 °C, and the maximum from 33 °C to 34.5 °C. During this same period, rainfall ranges from 1200 to more than 3000 mm. In the period from November to April, the average minimum temperature ranges from 18° C to 19.5° C and the maximum goes from 32 °C to 33 °C. Rainfall during this period ranges from 75 mm to 800 mm. Land use is mainly for agriculture (48.76%) and cultivated grassland (26.64%) [36].

2.2. Collection of Anastrepha Ludens Specimens and Host Plant Species

Localities were identified in the Soconusco region where recurrent incidences of A. ludens have been recorded in the host plant species C. sinensis (CC), M. indica (MI), C. paradisi (CP) and C. edulis (CE) [5,37]. Male and female samples of A. ludens associated with these different plant species in various localities were collected for analysis. Three of these plants, C. sinensis, C. paradisi, and M. indica, are introduced species grown commercially. In addition, plants of one native species, C. edulis, were also used. The initial collection effort was aimed at locations where at least two of these host species were present, but this was not feasible. In the end, collections were made at 11 locations, and two of the host species were present in three of these sites (Table 1, Figure 1). The collections were made from January to March. Three fruits showing the presence of fly larvae were collected from each tree and at least four trees of each host species. The fruits were transferred to the laboratory, where third instar fly larvae were recovered. The larvae were placed in containers with vermiculite to induce pupation and later to obtain adults. Once the adults emerged, they were confirmed to be A. ludens, separated by sex and were stored at −70 °C in liquid nitrogen until genetic analysis.

2.3. Genotyping

We assayed 15 enzyme loci following the procedure described by Hebert and Beaton [38]. Of these, only eight showed reproducibility with clear and consistent activity. The genotype of each individual was obtained based on the pattern of bands of these eight enzymes, as revealed by cellulose acetate electrophoresis. The runs were carried out under ambient temperature at 55 V and 30 mA for 90 min in a CAMP [Citric acid, 4-(3-aminopropyl) morpholine] buffer solution, following the protocols of Herbert and Beaton [38]. The eight enzyme loci analyzed were: malate dehydrogenase (1.1.1.37, MDH), malate dehydrogenase NADP (1.1.1.40, ME), isocitrate dehydrogenase (1.1.1.42, IDH), 6-phosphoglucanate dehydrogenase (1.1.1.44, 6PGDH), glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (1.1.1.49, G6PDH), aspartate amino transferase (2.6.1.1, GOT), glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (5.3.1.9, GPI), and phosphoglucomutase (5.4.2.2, PGM). Loci and alleles were recognized through observation of the staining pattern of each enzyme and following the recommendations of Hebert and Beaton [38] for the assignment of genotypes and loci. The GPI and MDH loci were not included in the analysis because they were detected as monomorphic.

2.4. Population Genetic Analysis

2.4.1. Genetic Diversity, Male and Female Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium Tests and Tests for Random Mating

Descriptive parameters of genetic diversity, including the average number of alleles, level of polymorphism (percent of loci that were polymorphic), and observed and expected heterozygosity by sex and by locality were obtained using the GenAlEx software 6.5 package [39]. In some cases, the locality also corresponded directly to specific host plants. A Chi-square test was performed to evaluate whether the genotypic frequencies observed in the samples of males and females by locality fit an expected frequency under the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium assumption using the GenAlEx software described. Also, to analyze the possibility of mating preferences, a comparison was made of the observed genotypic frequencies and those expected assuming random mating (depending on the allelic frequencies observed in the samples of each sex) [32]. The statistical significance of the comparisons between the observed and expected values within sexes were determined using a χ2 test in a spreadsheet from Microsoft Excel version 16.37.

2.4.2. Genetic Diversity by Factors Associated with Host Species and Locality

Diversity parameters (average number of alleles, level of polymorphism, observed and expected heterozygosity) were calculated according to host species without distinction of locality, and to species within locality. We tested whether the observed genotypic frequencies fit the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (HWE) model for each locus in a sample arrangement by species, without distinguishing locality, and by species in each locality. All these analyses were performed using the GenAlEx software 6.5 [39]. A pooled test of χ2 for each host was performed in each cluster to estimate whether the equilibrium conditions were met for the set of loci [40].
We also carried out a linear regression analysis of expected heterozygosity as a function of elevation using the software R v.3 (R Core Development Team, 2013). Elevation was the only variable where data was available to analyze the relationship of genetic diversity to an environmental factor.

2.4.3. Genetic Structure

Two approaches were used to determine the underlying genetic structure in the samples. The first approach was accomplished through the analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) to determine the possible hierarchical distribution of genetic variance (1) between localities and between sexes within each locality, (2) between localities and host species, and (3) between host species. Inbreeding coefficients (Φ) were obtained from each AMOVA to assess the level of differentiation of the sample sets involved. These AMOVA analyses were carry out using the GeneAlex software 6.5 [39].
Additionally, we used a Bayesian approach implemented in the Structure program v. 2.3.4 [41] to reveal the structure that underlies the obtained genetic data. This is a grouping method based on a probabilistic model where K genetic groups characterized by allelic frequencies are inferred from parameters established by probability for a hypothetical base population constructed based on observed allelic frequencies, assuming Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in all loci and linkage equilibrium [42]. We based the choice of K on the on the ∆K method [43], and for this we ran a series of independent runs from K = 1 to K = 14 (using all individuals) based on 100,000 iterations and following a burn-in period of 100,000 iterations and five repetitions per K. We used a model with admixture and correlated allele frequencies. Once the most probable value for K was identified by ∆K, we averaged the ancestry ratios over the repetition, and the results were plotted in terms of host locality and sex. We also used a procedure by Puechmaille et al. [44] which describes the use of a method to discard spurious clusters in any subpopulation sampled. In addition, we carried out a principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) using a covariance matrix of genetic distance values standardized within the GenAlEx version 6.5 software package [39].

3. Results

3.1. Genetic Diversity of Males and Females per Locality

A total of 725 individuals were analyzed using six variable enzyme loci. Among the analyzed individuals, we found two alleles for 6PGDH, Got and ME and three alleles for G6PDH, IDH and PGM. The level of polymorphism was generally greater in females than in males. For all sites, the level of polymorphism was between 66% and 100% for females, while in males it ranged between 33% and 83%, except for two localities in which the level of polymorphism was 100% (Table 2).
Variation was also observed in the average number of alleles between males and females in the different localities. Overall, between 1.3 and 2.5 alleles were recorded on average over nine of the localities, and the number of alleles was slightly higher in females than in males (Table 2). The observed heterozygosity (Ho) ranged between 0.056 and 0.317 in females, while for males it was between 0.0 and 0.467. In eight localities, the Ho was lower in females than in males (Table 2). For both sexes, the expected heterozygosity was always greater than that observed, and in at least seven locations, it was greater in females than in males. The expected heterozygosity (He) interval in females ranged between 0.215 and 0.451 and between 0.083 and 0.517 in males (Table 2). All fixation indexes (f) were positive, indicating a deficiency of heterozygotes (Table 2).
The results of the χ2 tests to assess Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium for each individual locus and for loci combined at each locality are shown in Table 3 (separately for males and females). Different results were obtained for the various localities surveyed. For example, at the Reforma locality, results for individual enzymes showed cases of both significant and nonsignificant departures from expectation in both males and females. For the San Carlos, Toluca and Talquian localities, all of the individual enzyme tests (for both sexes) showed significant departures from expectation. Results from all of the other localities showed significant departures from expectation for all but a small minority of cases. When the results for individual loci were combined, the tests indicated significant departures from expectations at all locations, for both females and males. In addition, some monomorphic loci were observed at all sites sampled here, except the Reforma location.
The frequencies of the observed genotypes were also significantly different from the expected frequencies under the assumption of random mating in each locality for all loci, except for the 6PGDH locus in the samples from Unión de Juárez and Reforma (Table 4).

3.2. Genetic Diversity in Factors Associated with Host and Locality

The percent of polymorphic loci was 100% in samples collected from C. paradisi and M. indica. In samples from C. sinensis and C. edulis, polymorphisms ranged from 83% to 100% (Table 5). The average number of alleles varied between 2.0 and 2.5 for all samples, with the highest numbers of alleles being recorded in samples of A. ludens from M. indica fruits. In terms of heterozygosity, the Ho values were also highest in the samples collected from M. indica, while overall, these values ranged from a low of 0.014 to a high of 0.392. The Ho values were also generally lower than the expected values (He). These values ranged between 0.337 and 0.528 overall. The highest He values were again observed in the collections from M. indica, while the lowest were seen in the collections from C. sinensis (Table 5). All fixation indexes (f) were also positive, indicating a deficiency of heterozygotes. The linear regression of He on elevation was negative, but not significant (Regression coefficient R2 = 0.028, 1/9 degree free; slope = −1048.7, Fisher-statistic = 0.2622; p = 0.621).

3.3. Genetic Structure

The analysis of molecular variance revealed significant genetic differentiation at several levels, including among localities and host species as well as between sexes and individuals (Table 6). The value among the 22 samples, representing a combination of localities and sexes (Φ (total) = 0.243), was 1.3 times greater than the differentiation observed among 14 sets combining localities and host plants (Φ = 0.178) and almost 1.9 times greater than the differentiation among the set of just the four host plants (Φ = 0.13). The differentiation between sexes was greater than that of localities (Φ sex(loc) = 0.386), as well as that of the value seen for differentiation among localities and host plants (Table 6).
Using cluster analysis based on ∆K methods to detect genetic structuring, possible values for genetic groupings were identified (Figure 2A). However, by graphing individuals in proportions corresponding to these possible groupings according to locality and sex, it can be observed that the composition of each sample does not show significant structuring (Figure 2B). Also, using PCoA, (Figure 3) we found that the first two principal coordinates accounted for 39% of the total variation, and here as well, no obvious clustering is visible.

4. Discussion

The results of the present study reveal important new information about genetic variation in populations of A. ludens in the Sococusco region of Chiapas, Southern Mexico, including evidence for a lack of structuring of populations in this region due to host plants or geography. Previous work by Dupuis et al. [6], covering a wide geographic range of A. ludens populations from Western to Eastern Mexico (including samples from Texas), recognized four broadly defined population groups [6]. In another study, Ruiz-Arce et al. [24] observed genetic differentiation between Mexican populations separated by the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. Our populations were located within this region.
Our study confirmed that overall, moderate to high levels of genetic variation are present in A. ludens in the Soconusco region, consistent with results reported by previous studies on this pest species. Our results suggest that the Soconusco population in particular is highly diverse since the overall levels of expected genetic diversity (He) found here ranged from 0.337 to 0.528. These values are above those observed in the Mexican populations on a national scale, where values ranging from 0.199 to 0.330 have been reported [23]. Using the same loci as those reported Molina-Neri et al. [23], we found consistently higher levels of heterozygosity (He = 0.350). Using other markers such as amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), studies of genetic diversity of A. ludens in Northeast Mexico showed He values ranging from 0.28 to 0.76 [24,25]. Using double-digest restriction site-associated DNA sequences (ddRAD-Seq), a study considering samples across the range distribution of the species (Texas, Mexico and Central America) produced He values between 0.126–0.150 (specifically, for samples from Chiapas, the He value was 0.147). In this same study, slightly higher values ranging from 0.162–0.227 were obtained using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) markers [6].
The results we obtained with enzymatic markers might indicate that the Southern populations are more genetically diverse because A. ludens in this part of Mexico maintains comparatively large population sizes and is known to have a wider host range with a high degree of dispersal ability [45]. The constant movement of individuals between subpopulations allows the introduction of new alleles that increase the diversity of populations [1], and this can counter the erosive effects of environmental selections either through natural causes or through pest control activities that can substantially reduce population sizes. It is likely that further studies in the Soconusco region using other types of genetic markers based on genomic DNA sequences will show levels of genetic variation close to or higher than those detected with enzyme markers. Thus, more genetic diversity may be uncovered with other molecular markers [46], but this will have to be validated in futures studies.
One of our aims here was to see whether the host plants had an impact on the genetic variation seen for A. ludens in the Soconusco region. We recorded the highest level of genetic diversity in the samples associated with mango, while the lowest were observed in the samples from orange (He = 0.497 and 0.397, respectively). However, the differences in He values were relatively small between the different host species considered here. This may suggest that all these hosts (C. sinensis, C. paradisi, C. edulis and M. indica), as well as other plant species known to be hosts [4], may represent an environment that supports similar levels of fitness and genetic diversity. Consistent with this, Pecina-Quintero et al. [25] found similar levels of genetic diversity between samples of A. ludens obtained from two different hosts, Casimiroa gregii and Citrus sinensis, in Northeast Mexico using AFLP markers. Genetic differences among hosts were, however, significant in the AMOVA analyses, indicating that host species do have an impact on genetic variation [25]. In our study, a difference of 13% among hosts was detected, and this contrasts sharply with a 3% difference observed between Casimiroa gregii and Citrus sinensis in Northeast Mexico observed in another study [26]. However, we did not detect significant genetic structuring of the populations based on locality.
Other factors associated with host plants can exert selection, promoting the type of genetic differentiation detected in our AMOVA analyses. These include relative abundance [47], nutritional contributions of the host [48], and the occurrence of endosymbionts of the pests [49,50] that might also impact the use of one host or another. The role of these and other factors in shaping the genetic diversity of A. ludens could be addressed in future studies using genetic markers other than enzymatic loci in order to capture more of the genetic variation that might be present here. The use of these other markers could also confirm whether the lack of genetic structuring we saw in subpopulations of A. ludens in relationship to host plant species in the Soconusco region is real.
Regarding our second aim, we were also interested in the possible impact of other environmental factors because of the significant genetic differences we found among localities. However, the only environmental factor with enough data to study here was elevation. Elevation is associated with variation in temperature, relative humidity and rainfall [51]. Overall, a level of genetic differentiation between localities of 17.8% was observed, but the regression analysis did not show a significant relationship of He with elevation. Previous studies, such as that of Molyna-Nery et al. [23], showed that genetic differentiation between geographically distant populations could be attributed to environmental factors such as temperature, but also that interactions with the availability of hosts was always a factor. Pecina-Quintero et al. [25] also reported a relatively high value for Wright’s coefficient of differentiation Fst (0.38) associated with habitat fragmentation, genetic drift, or local selection factors such as climate and pest management.
Our third aim was to explore whether genetic variation can be associated with the sex of the flies. This was based on the knowledge that this species has a lek–polygamous mating system, characterized by non-random mating [52], and in such cases the direction of mating preferences may have an impact on the overall levels of population genetic diversity [53]. A general trend we found was that females showed higher levels of genetic variation than males. In some locations, it was almost twice as high, and this result is not what would be expected based simply on random mating. In several studies, differences in allele frequencies between males and females have been used to look at the issue of sexual conflict between species [34] In leaf beetles, for example, non-random differences in gene frequencies between females and males, attributed to differences in their dispersal behavior, have been observed [54]. In some birds, in particular those where sexual selection has been well documented, levels of heterozygosity were positively correlated with the survival and fitness of females, but not males [55].
For A. ludens, variation in sexual competitiveness has been observed under controlled conditions [56,57,58]. The importance of this is likely to be enhanced in wild populations engaging in leks where females choose the males [59] and some females fail to reproduce due to selection against them [60]. The trend of lower genetic variation (He) in males may also reflect a selective balance on alleles that have a positive effect on the fitness of the female but a negative effect in the male [34], [60,61,62]. In Drosophila, [63] describes how sexually antagonistic variation may promote traits that enhance the reproductive success of one sex, even at a fitness cost to their mating partners.
Overall, of course, multiple factors can contribute to the maintenance of high levels of genetic variation in any population. It is also important to note that we analyzed these loci as autosomal genes. The possibility of X-linked genes cannot be ruled out with the present data, but this situation has been shown to promote similar allelic frequencies in both sexes if random mating occurs [32]. Finally, phenomena such as meiotic drive and linkage disequilibrium may also impact allele frequencies in populations. Meiotic drive has been seen in some Drosophila species [64], but this phenomenon has not been reported for A. ludens. Examination of the effects of linkage disequilibrium on the A. ludens populations studied here, which is recognized to be important in understanding the landscape of genetic variation in other species [65,66], will be left to future studies incorporating additional loci or genetic markers.
As part of our analysis of the relatively high levels of diversity, we also found genetic differences by locality, host and sex with respect to the HWE model. However, given that A. ludens is a species with a high reproductive rate [67], a wide dispersal capacity [68], and random mating (at least among geographically distant populations [21]), the importance of selection may be difficult to distinguish from effects due to drift, recombination, and other factors [32]. It is also true that at each stage of development, A. ludens undergoes natural selection that can differ both in intensity, mode, and direction [69], and this may contribute to patterns of genetic variation.
Overall, our results also suggest that sexual selection can be of great importance in the population genetic structure of these flies. The genetic differences seen between the sexes can arise from non-random mating when mates of specific phenotypes of one or both sexes are preferred. The differential ability of the sexes to transmit genes to the next generation is, by definition, sexual selection [70]. The AMOVA analysis showed that the difference between the sexes was relatively high at 38.6% (Φ sex(loc)), but when localities and hosts were considered, the differentiation fell to 17.8% (Φ loc-host). The genetic differences between males and females may also be due to the way that matings occur. Females are attracted to leks, and it is here that they choose the males to mate with. This could be seen as an example of assortative mating [53]. In addition, females are known to have greater mobility between populations [4,5], and there are also differences in sexual maturation that may reduce the possibility of mating [71]. Furthermore, any selection of host plants may be due to the chemical or nutritional characteristics of the plant species. A demographic study showed that the performance of A. ludens larvae in C. sinensis and M. indica differed significantly and could be attributed to the nutritional contributions of the host plant [22]. In other insect groups, secondary compounds are considered to be a main factor in selection [14].

5. Conclusions

We can conclude that the high levels of genetic diversity of A. ludens seen in the Soconusco region can be shaped by multiple factors in different localities, including various environmental factors and sexual selection. Of course, factors not included in our study may also play a role. In terms of practical applications, the significant but relatively low levels of differentiation overall among locations, and the lack of clear genetic structuring along with the known sexual compatibility of individuals from populations of different geographic origin [52] support the idea that pest control measures can be used effectively at an area-wide or regional level. However, the potential role of the different plant hosts in any management strategies still needs to be taken into account. In the future, it will also be important to know if the application of the sterile insect technique (SIT) modifies the patterns of male/female genetic diversity and the overall structure of the wild populations. Finally, the genetic differentiation between the sexes observed in the present study suggests the need to place greater attention on behavior and fitness parameters for individuals of both sexes. The application of SIT, for example, could increase the ability of females to selectively recognize wild males and produce more offspring, thus reducing the effectiveness of this control measure [72].

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/2075-4450/11/11/815/s1. Table S1. Results of the χ2 analysis for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium by individual loci and over all loci in Anastrepha ludens male and female samples collected at 11 localities of the Soconusco region in Chiapas, México. (Supplement 01) Table S2. Allele frequencies of six locus in samples of males and females of Anastrepha ludens collected from 11 localities in the Soconusco region, in Chiapas, Mexico. (Supplement 02).

Author Contributions

L.R.-M., P.L. conceived and designed research. R.V.V. and L.R.-M. conducted field and laboratory work including data collection and curation, and analysis of data. L.R.-M. wrote original draft of the manuscript. L.R.-M., P.L., D.H. advised on experimental design and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially funded by El Colegio de la Frontera Sur regular core budget, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología CONACYT SEP-2003-2004-CO2-43824 and SEP-CONACYT CB 284668 projets and the APC by the International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Research Contract No: 22676.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Azucena Oropeza Cabrera for the assistance with field collections. Javier Valle Mora gave advice on some statistics analyses. The authors also wish to acknowledge the helpful suggestions of the reviewers to improve the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hartl, D.L.; Clark, A.G. Principles of Populations Genetics, 3rd ed.; Sinauer Associates, Inc.: Sunderland, MA, USA, 1997; pp. 118–119. [Google Scholar]
  2. Pinto Dias, N.; Zotti, M.J.; Montoya, P.; Carvalho, I.R.; Nava, D.E. Fruit fly management research: A systematic review of monitoring and control tactics in the world. Crop Prot. 2018, 112, 187–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Norrbom, A.L.; Kim, K.C. A List of Reported Host Plantas of the Species of Anastrepha Schiner; Plant Protection and Quarantine Program, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service: Riverdale, MD, USA, 1988; Volume 52, pp. 1–114. [Google Scholar]
  4. Hernández-Ortíz, V. El Género Anastrepha en México (Diptera-Tephritidae) Taxonomía, Distribución y Sus Plantas Hospederos; Instituto de Ecología, A.C., Sociedad Mexicana de Entomologia: Xalapa, México, 1992; p. 101. [Google Scholar]
  5. Aluja, M. Bionomics and managemente of Anastrepha. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1994, 39, 155–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dupuis, J.R.; Ruiz-Arce, R.; Barr, N.B.; Thomas, D.B.; Geib, S.M. Range-wide population genomics of the Mexican fruit fly: Toward development of pathway analysis tools. Evol. Appl. 2019, 12, 1641–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Plummer, C.C.; McPhail, M.; Monk, J.W. The yellow chapote, a native host of the Mexican fruit fly. U.S. Dept. Agric. Tech. Bull. 1941, 775, 12. [Google Scholar]
  8. García Dessommes, G.J. El Origen de la Citricultura Moderna en México. In El Cultivo de Los Cítricos en el Estado de Nuevo León No. 1; Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Frestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias: Ciudad de México, México; CIRNE, Campo Experimental General Terán: Terán, México, 2009; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  9. SIAP. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera. Available online: http://infosiap.siap.gob.mx/images/stories/infogramas/100602-reporte-naranja.pdf. (accessed on 6 August 2020).
  10. Vanoye-Eligio, V.; Barrientos-Lozano, L.; Pérez-Castañeda, R.; Gaona-García, G.; Lara-Villalon, M. Population dynamics of Anastrepha ludens (Loew) (Diptera: Tephritidae) on citrus creas in Southern Tamaulipas, Mexico. Neotrop. Entomol. 2015, 44, 565–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vanoye-Eligio, V.; Vázquez-Sauceda, M.L.; Rosas-Mejía, M.; Vera, A.; Cortés-Hernández, D.E.; Rocandio-Rodríguez, M. Analysis of temporal fluctuations in numbers of sexually mature Anastrepha ludens females over an extensive citrus area in northeastern Mexico. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2019, 167, 517–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Futuyma, D.J.; Keese, M.C.; Funk, D.J. Genetic constraints on macroevolution: The evolution of host affiliation in the leaf beetle genus Ophraella. Evolution 1995, 49, 797–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Diehl, S.R.; Bush, G.L. An evolutionary and applied perspective of insect biotypes. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1984, 29, 471–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Farrell, B.D.; Sequeira, A.S. Evolutionary rates in the adaptive radiaton of beetles on plants. Evolution 2004, 49, 1984–2001. [Google Scholar]
  15. Xie, X.; Rull, J.; Michel, A.P.; Velez, S.; Forbes, A.A.; Lobo, N.F.; Aluja, M.; Feder, J.L. Hawthorn-infesting populations of Rhagoletis pomonella in Mexico and speciation mode plurality. Evolution 2007, 61, 1091–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hood, G.R.; Powell, T.H.Q.; Doellman, M.M.; Sim, S.B.; Glover, M.; Yee, W.L.; Goughnour, R.B.; Mattsson, M.; Schwarz, D.; Feder, J.L. Rapid and repeatable host plant shifts drive reproductive isolation following a recent human-mediated introduction of the apple maggot fly, Rhagoletis pomonella. Evolution 2019, 74, 156–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Feder, J.L.; Roethele, J.; Wlazlo, B.; Berlocher, S.H. Selective maintenance of allozyme differences among sympatric host races of the apple maggot fly. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 11417–11421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Bakovic, V.; Schuler, H.; Schebeck, M.; Feder, J.L.; Stauffer, C.; Ragland, G.J. Host plant-related genomic differentiation in the European cherry fruit fly, Rhagoletis cerasi. Mol. Ecol. 2019, 28, 4648–4666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Via, S. The ecological genetics of speciation. Am. Nat. 2002, 159, S1–S7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ruiz-Montoya, L.; Núñez-Farfán, J. Testing local host adaptation and phenotypic plasticity in a herbivore when alternative related host plants occur sympatrically. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e79070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Aluja, M.; Rull, J.; Pérez-Staples, D.; Díaz-Fleischer, F.; Sivinski, J. Random mating among Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) adults of geographically distant and ecologically distinct populations in Mexico. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2009, 99, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Dávila-Jácome, A. Efecto del Cambio de Hospedero Larval Sobre los Parámetros Demográficos de la Mosca Mexicana de la Fruta Anastrepha Ludens (Loew) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Master’s Thesis, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Tapachula, México, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  23. Molina-Nery, M.C.; Ruiz-Montoya, L.; Zepeda-Cisneros, S.; Liedo, P. Genetic structure of populations of Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Mexico. Fla. Entomol. 2014, 97, 1648–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ruiz-Arce, R.; Owen, C.L.; Thomas, D.B.; Barr, N.B.; McPheron, B.A. Phylogeographic structure in Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) populations inferred with mtDNA sequencing. J. Econ. Entomol. 2015, 108, 1324–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Pecina-Quintero, V.; Jiménez-Becerril, M.F.; Ruiz-Salazar, R.; Núñez-Colín, C.A.; Loera-Gallardo, J.L.; Hernández-Delgado, S.; Mayek-Pérez, N. Variability and genetic structure of Anastrepha ludens Loew (Diptera: Tephritidae) populations from Mexico. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci. 2020, 40, 657–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Pecina-Quintero, V.; López Arroyo, J.; Loera Gallardo, J.; Rull, J.; Rosales Robles, E.; Cortez Mondaca, E.; Hernández Delgado, S.; Mayek Perez, N.; Aluja, M. Genetic differences between Anastrepha ludens Loew (Diptera: Tephritidae) populations stemming from a native and an exotic host in NE Mexico. Agric. Téc. Méx. 2009, 35, 323–331. [Google Scholar]
  27. Vera, M.T.; Cáceres, C.; Wornoayporn, V.; Islam, A.; Robinson, A.S.; de La Vega, M.H.; Hendrichs, J.; Cayol, J.P. Mating incompatibility among populations of the South American fruit fly Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2006, 99, 387–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Boykin, L.M.; Shatters, R.G.; Hall, D.G.; Burns, R.E.; Franqui, R.A. Analyisis of host preferences and geographical distribution of Anstrepha suspensa (Diptera Tephritidae) using phylogenetic analyses of mitchondrial cytochrome oxidase I DNA sequence data. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2006, 96, 457–469. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  29. Morgante, J.S.; Malavasi, A. Genetics variability in populations of the South American fruit fly Anastrepha fraterculus (Tephritidae). Rev. Bras. Gen. 1985, 8, 241–247. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hernández-Ortiz, V.; Bartolucci, A.F.; Morales-Valles, P.; Frías, D.; Selivon, D. Cryptic species of the Anastrepha fraterculus complex (Diptera: Tephritidae): A multivariate approach for the recognition of South American morphotypes. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 2012, 105, 305–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Manni, M.; Lima, K.M.; Guglielmino, C.R.; Lanzavecchia, S.B.; Juri, M.; Vera, T.; Cladera, J.; Scolari, F.; Gomulski, L.; Bonizzoni, M.; et al. Relevant genetic differentiation among Brazilian populations of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera, tephritidae). ZooKeys 2015, 540, 157–173. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hedrick, P.W. Genetics of Populations, 2nd ed; Jones and Bartlett Publishers: Sudbury, MA, USA, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wilkinson, G.S.; Breden, F.; Mank, J.E.; Ritchie, M.G.; Higginson, A.D.; Radwan, J.; Jaquiery, J.; Salzburger, W.; Arriero, E.; Barriebeau, S.M.; et al. The locus of sexual selection: Moving sexual selection studies into the post-genomics era. J. Evol. Biol. 2015, 28, 739–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Mank, J.E.; Shu, J.J.; Wright, A.E. Signature of sexual conflict is actually conflict resolved. Mol. Ecol. 2020, 29, 215–217. [Google Scholar]
  35. Burk, T. Signaling and sex in acalyptrate flies. Fla. Entomol. 1981, 64, 30–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Gobierno del Estado de Chiapas. Programa Regional de Desarrollo 2013–2018; Gobierno del Estado de Chiapas: Tuxtla Gutiérrez, México, 2014; p. 75. [Google Scholar]
  37. Aluja, M.; Guillen, J.; De La Rosa, G.; Carrera, M.; Celedonio, H.; Liedo, P.; Hendrichs, J. Natural host plant survey of the economically important fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) of Chiapas, Mexico. Fla. Entomol. 1987, 70, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hebert, P.D.N.; Beaton, M.J. Methodologies for Allozyme Analysis Using Cellulose Acetate Electrophoresis. Technical Manual of Cellulose Acetate Electrophoresis; Helena Laboratories: Beaumont, TX, USA, 1993; p. 32. [Google Scholar]
  39. Peakall, R. GENALEX 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol. Ecol. Notes 2006, 6, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sokal, R.R.; Rohlf, F.J. Biometrics, 2nd ed.; Freeman and Company: New York, NY, USA, 1995; p. 794. [Google Scholar]
  41. Pritchard, J.K.; Stephens, M.; Donnelly, P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 2000, 155, 945–959. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Falush, D.; Stephens, M.; Pritchard, J.K. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: Linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 2003, 164, 1567–1587. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Evanno, G.; Regnaut, S.; Goudet, J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation study. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14, 2611–2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Puechmaille, S.J. The program structure does not reliably recover the correct population structure when sampling is uneven: Subsampling and new estimators alleviate the problem. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2016, 16, 608–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Celedonio-Hurtado, H.; Aluja, M.; Liedo, P. Population fluctuations of Anastrepha species (Diptera: Tephritidae) in tropical orchard habitats of Chiapas, Mexico. Environ. Entomol. 1995, 24, 861–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Behura, S.K. Molecular marker systems in insects: Current trends and future avenues. Mol. Ecol. 2006, 15, 3087–3113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Aluja, M.; Mangan, R.L. Fruit Fly (Dipter: Tephritidae) host status determination: Critical conceptual, methodological, and regulatory considerations. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2008, 53, 473–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Leal-Aguilar, K.; Ruiz-Montoya, L.; Perales, H.; Morales, H. Phenotypic plasticity of Brevicoryne brassicae in responses to nutritional quality of two related host plants. Ecol. Entomol. 2008, 33, 735–741. [Google Scholar]
  49. Chen, E.H.; Hou, Q.L.; Wei, D.D.; Jiang, H.B.; Wang, J.J. Phenotypic plasticity, trade-offs and gene expression changes accompanying dietary restriction and switches in Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Doellman, M.; Schuler, H.; Saint, G.J.; Glen, R.H.; Egan, S.P.; Powell, T.H.Q.; Glover, M.M.; Bruzzese, D.J.; Smith, J.J.; Yee, W.L.; et al. Geographic and ecological dimensions of host plant-associated genetic differentiation and speciation in the Rhagoletis cingulata (Diptera: Tephritidae) sibling species group. Insects 2019, 10, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. ECOSUR. Propuesta Interinstitucional Estatal de Ordenamiento Territorial; Laboratorio de Análisis de Información Geográfica y Estadística. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur: San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas, México, 2001; Available online: http://www.ecosur.mx/sitios/analisis-geografico/galeria/mapas-peot (accessed on 24 September 2020).
  52. Orozco-Dávila, D.; Hernández, R.; Meza, S.; Domínguez, J. Sexual competitiveness and compatibility between mass-reared sterile flies and wild populations of Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) from different regions in Mexico. Fla. Entomol. 2007, 90, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fromhage, L.; Kokko, H.; Reid, J.M. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity. Evolution 2009, 63, 684–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Rowell-Rahier, M. Genetic structure of leaf-beetles populations: Microgeographic and sexual differentiation in Oreina cacaliae and O. speciosissima. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1992, 65, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Foerster, K.; Delhey, K.; Johnsen, A.; Lifjel, T.J.; Kempanaers, B. Females increase offspring heterozygosity and fitness trhough extra-pair matings. Nature 2003, 425, 713–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sánchez-Rosario, M.; Pérez-Staples, D.; Toledo, J.; Valle-Mora, J.; Liedo, P. Artificial selection on mating competitiveness of Anastrepha ludens for sterile insect technique application. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2017, 162, 133–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Quintero-Fong, L.; Toledo, J.; Ruiz-Montoya, L.; Rendón, P.; Orozco-Dávila, D.; Valle-Mora, J.; Liedo, P. Demography of a genetic sexing strain of Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae): Effects of selection based on mating performance. Agric. Entomol. 2018, 20, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bosa, C.F.; Cruz-López, L.; Zepeda-Cisneros, C.S.; Valle-Mora, J.; Guillén-Navarro, K.; Liedo, P. Sexual behavior and male volatile compounds in wild and mass-reared strains of the Mexican fruit fly Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) held under different colony management regimes. Insect Sci. 2014, 23, 105–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Teets, N.M.; Dias, V.S.; Pierce, B.K.; Schetelig, M.F.; Handler, A.M.; Hahn, D.A. Overexpression of an antioxidant enzyme improves male mating performance after stress in a lek-mating fruit fly. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2019, 286, 29190531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Rhainds, M. Ecology of female mating failure/lifelong virginity: A review of causal mechanisms in insects and arachnids. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2019, 167, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Wright, A.E.; Fumagalli, M.; Cooney, C.R.; Bloch, N.I.; Vieira, F.G.; Buechel, S.D.; Kolm, N.; Mank, J.E. Male-biased gene expression resolves sexual conflict through the evolution of sex-specific genetic architecture. Evol. Lett. 2018, 2, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Wright, A.E.; Rogers, T.F.; Fumagalli, M.; Cooney, C.R.; Mank, J.E. Phenotypic sexual dimorphism is associated wih genomic signature or resolved sexual conflict. Mol. Ecol. 2019, 28, 2860–2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Van Doorn, G. Intralocus sexual conflict. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2009, 1168, 52–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Courret, C.; Chang, C.-H.; Wei, K.H.C.; Montchamp-Moreau, C.; Larracuente, A.M. Sexually antagonistic selection promotes genetic divergence between males and females in an ant. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2019, 116, 52–71. [Google Scholar]
  65. Harrison, R.G.; Bogdanowicz, S.M. Patterns of variation and linkage disequilibrium in field cricket hybrid zone. Evolution 1997, 51, 493–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Abdel Moniem, H.E.; Schemerhorn, B.J.; DeWoody, J.A.; Holland, J.D. Landscape genetics of a pollinator longhorn beetle [Typocerus v. velutinus (Olivier)] on a continuous habitat surface. Mol. Ecol. 2016, 25, 5015–5028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Carey, J.R.; Harshman, L.G.; Liedo, P.; Müller, H.G.; Wang, J.L.; Zhang, Z. Longevity-fertility trade-offs in the tephritid fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens, across dietary-restriction gradients. Aging Cell 2008, 7, 470–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Thomas, D.B.; Loera-Gallardo, J. Dispersal and longevity of mass-released, sterilized Mexican fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Environ. Entomol. 1998, 27, 1045–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Arnold, S.J.; Wade, M.J. On the measurement of natural and sexual selection: Applications. Evolution 1984, 38, 720–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Darwin, C. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex; Johen Murray: London, UK, 1871; p. 254. [Google Scholar]
  71. Alberti, A.C.; Calcagno, G.; Saidman, B.O.; Vilardi, J.C. Analysis of the genetic structure of a natural population of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera: Tephritidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1999, 92, 731–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. McInnis, D.O.; Lance, D.R.; Jackson, C.G. Behavioral resistance to the sterile insect technique by Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1996, 89, 739–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Map of sampling sites of Anastrepha ludens in Soconusco, Chiapas, Mexico.
Figure 1. Map of sampling sites of Anastrepha ludens in Soconusco, Chiapas, Mexico.
Insects 11 00815 g001
Figure 2. (A) ∆K calculated following the methods of Evanno et al. [43] and (B) Bayesian grouping of samples of A. ludens in the Soconusco region based on the Q (membership coefficient matrix) ratio of identified genetic groups. Each bar represents an individual, female (F) or male (M) as indicated, and each color represents the proportion of each genetic cluster. The top label indicates the host and locality of the collection.
Figure 2. (A) ∆K calculated following the methods of Evanno et al. [43] and (B) Bayesian grouping of samples of A. ludens in the Soconusco region based on the Q (membership coefficient matrix) ratio of identified genetic groups. Each bar represents an individual, female (F) or male (M) as indicated, and each color represents the proportion of each genetic cluster. The top label indicates the host and locality of the collection.
Insects 11 00815 g002
Figure 3. Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) via covariance matrix with data standardization on genetic distance values.
Figure 3. Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) via covariance matrix with data standardization on genetic distance values.
Insects 11 00815 g003
Table 1. Collection localities and hosts of Anastrepha ludens in the Soconusco region of Chiapas, Mexico. CC, Citrus sinensis; CP, Citrus paradisi; MI, Mangifera indica; CE, Casimiroa edulis.
Table 1. Collection localities and hosts of Anastrepha ludens in the Soconusco region of Chiapas, Mexico. CC, Citrus sinensis; CP, Citrus paradisi; MI, Mangifera indica; CE, Casimiroa edulis.
Locality NameLongitudeLatitudeElevation (m)CCCPMICE
Reforma−92.3285161415.0403897387 x
Guadalupe−92.2744011215.01203335427 x
El Triunfo−92.2240091214.98588244470 xx
San Carlos−92.2617833315.04050278532x
Toluca−92.2456695815.02878192538x
Salvador Urbina−92.2113333315.03722222540x
El Eden−92.3047555615.05781389551x x
Ahuacatlan−92.1752833315.042325719x
Santo Domingo−92.0983694415.03047222918x
Unión Juárez−92.0794207615.066209011386x
Talquian−92.0837916615.086900911696x x
Table 2. Genetic diversity estimators for samples of males and females of Anastrepha ludens per locality and for the whole sample (female and male) from 11 localities in the Soconusco region, Chipas, Mexico. N, sample size; Na, average number of alleles; Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, expected heterozygosity; f, fixation index; P, percentage of polymorphic loci. Mi, Mangifera indica; Cp, Citrus paradisi; Ce, Casimiroa edulis; Cc, Citrus sinensis.
Table 2. Genetic diversity estimators for samples of males and females of Anastrepha ludens per locality and for the whole sample (female and male) from 11 localities in the Soconusco region, Chipas, Mexico. N, sample size; Na, average number of alleles; Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, expected heterozygosity; f, fixation index; P, percentage of polymorphic loci. Mi, Mangifera indica; Cp, Citrus paradisi; Ce, Casimiroa edulis; Cc, Citrus sinensis.
Locality (Host)SexNNaHoHefP
Reforma (Mi)Female202.30.3170.4510.245100.00
Male202.00.4670.434−0.091100.00
2.50.3920.5280.241100.00
Guadalupe (Cp)Female301.80.0560.2150.81266.67
Male302.30.1780.4680.630100.00
2.30.1170.4100.731100.00
El Triunfo (Ce, Mi)Female402.20.1880.3600.45283.33
Male402.30.3290.5170.362100.00
2.30.2580.5170.503100.00
San Carlos (Cc)Female292.20.2410.3690.49083.33
Male302.00.1890.2990.53883.33
2.30.2150.4470.646100.00
Toluca (Cc)Female302.00.0280.4100.93383.33
Male301.20.0000.0831.00016.67
2.20.0140.3790.961100.00
Salvador Urbina (Cc)Female302.00.0890.3540.67183.33
Male301.30.0060.1480.96333.33
2.50.3920.5280.24183.33
Edén (Cc)Female422.50.1900.4450.493100.00
Male492.20.1970.4130.54383.33
2.50.1940.4840.611100.00
Ahuacatlán (Cc)Female272.00.1540.2410.61066.67
Male201.80.2500.3410.30266.67
2.20.1950.3340.56683.33
Santo Domingo (Cc)Female302.30.1170.3910.710100.00
Male302.00.2220.3680.47783.33
2.30.1690.4170.637100.00
Unión Juárez (Cc)Female312.20.1020.2470.64383.33
Male301.80.1060.2490.48166.67
2.30.1040.3390.725100.00
Talquian (Cc, Ce)Female582.20.0750.4120.823100.00
Male502.00.1130.3310.65883.33
2.30.0930.4880.798100.00
Grand mean over loci and populations (22)Mean332.00.3370.3430.54580.30
SE 0.00.0180.0180.0384.61
Table 3. Results of pooled Chi-square analyses of loci to test for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in Anastrepha ludens male and female samples collected at 11 localities of the Soconusco region in Chiapas, Mexico. The analysis of loci is shown in Table S1. (Supplement 01) d.f., degree of freedom.
Table 3. Results of pooled Chi-square analyses of loci to test for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in Anastrepha ludens male and female samples collected at 11 localities of the Soconusco region in Chiapas, Mexico. The analysis of loci is shown in Table S1. (Supplement 01) d.f., degree of freedom.
LocalityFemales Males
χ2pd.f.χ2pd.f.
Reforma38.40.00011225.70.012012
Guadalupe117.6<0.000110101.00.000012
El Triunfo103.9<0.00011059.0<0.000112
San Carlos99.7<0.00018129.7<0.000110
Toluca149.0<0.00011030.0<0.00011
Salvador Urbina124.3<0.00011019.10.00074
Edén128.8<0.00018109.9<0.00015
Ahuacatlán121.1<0.0001850.1<0.00018
Santo Domingo128.8<0.00011289.9<0.000110
Unión Juárez105.1<0.0001840.1<0.000110
Talquian276.9<0.000112134.5<0.000110
Table 4. Results of the χ2 analyses to test for random mating of Anastrepha ludens collected from 11 localities in the Soconusco region, in Chiapas, Mexico: a, loci with only two alleles; b, loci with three alleles; NS, not significant; M, monomorphic locus; p * < 0.05, **; < 0.01, *** < 0.001. Details of the results of this analysis are in Table S2. (Supplement 02) ME, malate dehydrogenase; IDH, isocitrate dehydrogenase; 6PGDH, 6-phosphoglucanate dehydrogenase, G6PDH, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; GOT, aspartate amino transferase; GPI, glucose-6-ghosphate Isomerase; PGM, Phosphoglucomutase.
Table 4. Results of the χ2 analyses to test for random mating of Anastrepha ludens collected from 11 localities in the Soconusco region, in Chiapas, Mexico: a, loci with only two alleles; b, loci with three alleles; NS, not significant; M, monomorphic locus; p * < 0.05, **; < 0.01, *** < 0.001. Details of the results of this analysis are in Table S2. (Supplement 02) ME, malate dehydrogenase; IDH, isocitrate dehydrogenase; 6PGDH, 6-phosphoglucanate dehydrogenase, G6PDH, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; GOT, aspartate amino transferase; GPI, glucose-6-ghosphate Isomerase; PGM, Phosphoglucomutase.
LocalityLocus
6PGDH aG6PDH bGOT aIDH bME aPGM b
Reforma3.96 NS30.37 ***10.97 *30.04 ***16.77 ***28.34 ***
Guadalupe20.18 ***268.97 ***44.90 ***46.24 ***32.49 ***56.30 ***
El Triunfo76.51 ***88.20 ***50.69 ***59.01 ***9.90 ***472.38 ***
San Carlos52.60 ***30.85 ***38.19 ***24.50 ***859.43 ***39.77 ***
Toluca103.56 ***1296.00 ***59.84 ***233.68 ***M317.04 ***
Salvador Urbina344.20 ***2649.05 ***50.44 ***76.92 ***M126.56 ***
Edén27.02 ***61.30 ***60.67 ***44.04 ***64.60 ***287.42 ***
Ahuacatlán25.30 ***15.91 ***39.49 ***34.05 ***161.87 ***M
Santo Domingo29.05 ***22.40 ***55.19 ***16.84 **80.97 ***50.32 ***
Unión Juárez1.00 NS9.38 *44.11 ***69.07 ***595.12 ***147.80 ***
Talquian268.75 ***4071.77 ***89.56 ***44.28 ***97.75 ***671.46 ***
Table 5. Genetic diversity of Anastrepha ludens by host species and locality in the Soconusco region, Chiapas (Mexico). N, sample size; Na, average number of alleles; Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, unbiased heterozygosity; P, percentage of polymorphism; f fixation index as f = 1 − (Ho/He).
Table 5. Genetic diversity of Anastrepha ludens by host species and locality in the Soconusco region, Chiapas (Mexico). N, sample size; Na, average number of alleles; Ho, observed heterozygosity; He, unbiased heterozygosity; P, percentage of polymorphism; f fixation index as f = 1 − (Ho/He).
HostLocalityNPNaHoHefMean
PNNaHoHef
Citrus sinensisSan Carlos59100.02.3330.2150.4470.64691.67562.2710.1180.3970.744
Toluca6083.332.1670.0140.3790.961
Salvador Urbina6083.332.1670.0470.3810.896
Edén4483.332.1670.1100.4090.740
Ahuacatlán4783.332.3330.1910.3370.580
Santo Domingo60100.02.3330.1690.4170.637
Unión Juárez61100.02.3330.1040.3390.725
Talquián60100.02.3330.0940.4700.769
Casimiroa edulisEl Triunfo40100.02.1670.1710.4470.59991.67492.1670.1260.4140.697
Talquián4883.332.0000.0900.3860.761
Citrus paradisiGuadalupe60100.02.3330.1170.4100.731
Mangifera indicaReforma40100.02.5000.3920.5280.241100.0422.4440.3370.4970.911
El Triunfo40100.02.3330.3460.4910.296
Edén47100.02.5000.2730.4740.366
Mean over 14 samples 94.05522.2860.1670.4220.301
Table 6. Analysis of molecular variance for different hierarchical arrangements of samples of A. ludens obtained from 11 localities in the Soconusco region in Chiapas, Mexico. Φ loc, level of differentiation among localities; Φ sex(loc), differentiation between sex in relation to locality; Φ (total), differentiation among all samples (22).
Table 6. Analysis of molecular variance for different hierarchical arrangements of samples of A. ludens obtained from 11 localities in the Soconusco region in Chiapas, Mexico. Φ loc, level of differentiation among localities; Φ sex(loc), differentiation between sex in relation to locality; Φ (total), differentiation among all samples (22).
Hierarchical ArrangementSource of Variationd.f.Sum of SquaresMedium SquareEstimated Variance Variance Component (%)Differentiation Estimation
Locality, sexAmong localities10482.9348.290.000Φ loc = 0.0
Φ sex(loc) = 0.386 *
Φ (total) = 0.243 *
Between sexes (locality)11784.2071.292.06739
Within individuals7042318.503.293.2961
Total7253585.63 5.4100
LocalitiesAmong localities14653.90250.30.89218Φ = 0.178 ***
Within individuals7122931.734.124.1282
Total7253585.63 5.01100
HostsAmong hosts3292.497.470.68313Φ = 0.13 ***
Within individuals7223293.24.564.56187
Total7253585.6 5.244100
*, p = 0.01; ***, p < 0.0001.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ruiz-Montoya, L.; Vallejo, R.V.; Haymer, D.; Liedo, P. Genetic and Ecological Relationships of Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) Populations in Southern Mexico. Insects 2020, 11, 815. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/insects11110815

AMA Style

Ruiz-Montoya L, Vallejo RV, Haymer D, Liedo P. Genetic and Ecological Relationships of Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) Populations in Southern Mexico. Insects. 2020; 11(11):815. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/insects11110815

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ruiz-Montoya, Lorena, Rodrigo Verónica Vallejo, David Haymer, and Pablo Liedo. 2020. "Genetic and Ecological Relationships of Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae) Populations in Southern Mexico" Insects 11, no. 11: 815. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/insects11110815

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop