Next Article in Journal
Self-Selection of Agricultural By-Products and Food Ingredients by Tenebrio molitor (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) and Impact on Food Utilization and Nutrient Intake
Next Article in Special Issue
Coffee Berry Borer (Hypothenemus hampei), a Global Pest of Coffee: Perspectives from Historical and Recent Invasions, and Future Priorities
Previous Article in Journal
Side Effects of Sulfur Dust on the European Grapevine Moth Lobesia botrana and the Predatory Mite Kampimodromus aberrans in Vineyards
Previous Article in Special Issue
Tracking Red Palm Mite Damage in the Western Hemisphere Invasion with Landsat Remote Sensing Data
 
 
Communication
Peer-Review Record

Invasive Agricultural Pest Drosophila suzukii (Diptera, Drosophilidae) Appeared in the Russian Caucasus

by Andrzej O. Bieńkowski and Marina J. Orlova-Bienkowskaja *
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 22 October 2020 / Revised: 18 November 2020 / Accepted: 19 November 2020 / Published: 23 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Invasive Arthropod Pests)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript "Invasive agricultural pest Drosophila suzukii
Diptera, Drosophilidae) appeared in the Russian Caucasus" aimed at
"report the first records of D. suzukii in European Russia, namely
in Sochi". The manuscript reports for the first time the occurrence
of Drosophila suzukii in the region of the Russian Caucasus.
The manuscript is important for the local authorities to take
the necessary measures and shows the great worldwide distribution
of this pest. Some suggestions were made in the text that contribute
to qualify the work.
 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Author's Reply to the Review Report (Reviewer 1)

Thank you very much for the quick review of our manuscript and your valuable corrections. We have accepted all of them:

  1. Delete fruit fly and put drosophila.The common name is Spotted wing drosophila.
  • Yes. Fruit fly is deleted and spotted wing drosophila is added.
  1. “49 flies” is replaced by “49 adults”
  2. “wings by males” – is replaced by “wings of males”
  3. “list A2” is replaced by “A2 list”
  4. Scientific names and families of the fruit crops are provided.
  5. “eyes red” is replaced by “red eyes”
  6. “it indicates, that” – the comma is deleted

The main text is extended to 2000 words according to the editor’s request.

Reviewer 2 Report

This is a very straightforward and well-written manuscript. I like the figure in which authors highlighted the main diagnostic characters of D. suzukii. Methods section is very well written. Very minor things are embedded directly into the PDF attached (e.g., I do not like "etc." very much in the text, although it is maybe a matter of choice).

Congratulations to authors for a nice contribution.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Author's Reply to the Review Report (Reviewer 2)

Thank you very much! We have corrected the manuscript according to your suggestions.

  1. “etc.” is replaced by “and other soft fruits”.
  2. “10-20” is replaced by “10–20”
  3. “Since 2011” is replaced by “Since 2011,”
  4. “16-26” is replaced by “16–26”.
  5. “So” is replaced by “Therefore”
  6. The sections Funding is written according to the journal template. The section Acknowledgments is corrected to avoid repetition of “Funding”.
  7. Journal’s names are abbreviated.

The main text is extended to 2000 words according to the editor’s request.

Back to TopTop