Next Article in Journal
Trypanosoma cruzi Parasite Load Modulates the Circadian Activity Pattern of Triatoma infestans
Next Article in Special Issue
Use of Pyriproxyfen to Induce Oogenesis in Diapausing Megacopta cribraria (Heteroptera: Plataspidae), and Evaluation of Pyriproxyfen-Induced Eggs for Rearing the Parasitoid Paratelenomus saccharalis (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae)
Previous Article in Journal
Hidden Diversity—A New Speciose Gall Midge Genus (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) Associated with Succulent Aizoaceae in South Africa
Previous Article in Special Issue
Advancements in Mass Rearing the Air Potato Beetle Lilioceris cheni
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Insects
Volume 13
Issue 1
10.3390/insects13010077
insects-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Basic Studies Aiming at Orius minutus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) Mass-Rearing

by
Hye-Jeong Jun
1,
Kyoung-Su Kim
2 and
Eun-Hye Ham
1,*
1
Institute for Bioresources, Osangkinsect Co., Ltd., Guri 11921, Korea
2
Division of Bioresource Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon 24341, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Insects 2022, 13(1), 77; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/insects13010077
Submission received: 23 November 2021 / Revised: 6 January 2022 / Accepted: 7 January 2022 / Published: 10 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Rearing Techniques for Biocontrol Agents of Insects, Mites, and Weeds)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The rapid growth of the biocontrol market is increasing the research into the usefulness of native natural enemies. For the commercial use of native natural enemies, economical mass-rearing technology must be developed. This study was conducted to establish a mass-rearing technique for improving the usability of Orius minutus in Korea. This species uses plants for moisture intake, nutritional supplementation, and oviposition substrates. However, the use of plants in mass production systems significantly increases the cost of production. Eggs of stored grain insect pests used as food in rearing Orius spp., are the most nutritionally balanced food source, but their high market price necessitates the selection of an economical food source to replace them. In this study, Ephestia cautella eggs and iron-coated brine shrimp eggs were selected as diet, and cork sheets were selected as an artificial oviposition substrate to obtain basic data for establishing a plant-free rearing system. The plant-free model developed in our study can reduce rearing costs by 70.5% compared to the conventional mass-rearing model.

Abstract

This study presented biological and economic data for the mass-rearing of Orius minutus in Korea. Simplifying the mass-rearing process through an alternative diet and an artificial oviposition substrate is a prerequisite for enhancing the usability of this insect as a biological control agent. We compare the hatch rate of O. minutus eggs deposited on a plant substrate with that of eggs deposited on two artificial substrates, cork sheets and rubber. The results indicate that cork sheet is the most cost-effective artificial oviposition substrate for the mass-rearing of O. minutus. We also examine five feeding treatments that included two types of brine shrimp eggs and eggs of Ephestia cautella to compare the number of eggs laid in the fifth generation. We found no significant difference between the two treatment groups; 61.3 eggs were laid in the treatment group fed iron-coated brine shrimp and moth eggs, and 67.4 eggs were laid in the control group. The plant-free model developed in our study can reduce rearing costs by 70.5% compared to the conventional mass-rearing model.

1. Introduction

The commercial use of biological control has developed quickly and created the need for advanced rearing techniques, cost-effective substitute diets, and reliable methods of field application to improve the utilization of biological control agents (BCAs) [1,2]. According to van Lenteren et al. [3], approximately 500 commercial producers world-wide supply about 350 species of BCAs. About 30 of them are mass producers, and about 20 are located in Europe [4]. In the international biological control market, the top 25 BCAs originate from Europe and are imported for domestic use [4]. Imported foreign species are associated with an ecological risk of eliminating native species or reducing the population in a specific region, possibly changing the entire biological community [5,6]. Thus, the development of indigenous-insect resource technologies is imperative for the preservation of biodiversity and sustainable use.
The polyphagous predators, Orius spp. (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), came into use with O. insidiosus (Say) in 1985; various product species, such as O. laevigatus (Fieber) and O. strigicollis (Poppius), developed in 1993 and 2000, respectively, are now widely used for controlling insect pests [7,8,9]. According to van Lenteren [4], O. laevigatus belongs to the group of 12 most economically important BCAs, and it is being increasingly used. O. laevigatus is also one of eight BCAs registered with the National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service in Korea [10]. Although the first efforts to use natural predators of pests occurred more than 20 years ago, a system-level connection of breeding-circulation-consumption is scarce [11]. More than 35 BCAs are imported to Korea for use in biological control [12].
The present study was conducted to establish a mass-rearing technique for improving the usability of Orius minutus (L.), an indigenous Asian species that is expected to show effective control in agriculture, because it is already adapted to domestic environments. Previous studies reported the potential of O. minutus as a biological control of aphids, leaf mites, and diamondback moths (Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae)) [13,14,15,16]. We also verified the predatory ability of the two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae)), which was 1.39 times higher than that of O. laevigatus [17]. Other studies have examined reproductive diapause due to photoperiod [18], field applications [19], ecological characteristics [20], temperature-dependent growth characteristics [21], sex pheromones [22], and mating and morphological characteristics [23]. However, few studies of mass-rearing have been conducted [24].
Orius spp. is zoophytophagous, feeding on a variety of prey, plants, and plant products, and takes advantage of plants for moisture intake, nutrition supplements, and oviposition substrates [25]. Thus, the need for researching substitute oviposition substrates has been discussed [26,27,28]. The elimination of plant materials may help rationalize the production of Orius spp. However, some studies focused on substituting less common hosts with more common plants such as green beans, kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), and peppers (Capsicum annuum L.) [29,30]. Castañe and Zalom [31] used gelatin coated with parafilm as an oviposition substrate for O. insidiosus. De Puysseleyr et al. [30,32] employed a parafilm dome (1.5 cm diameter, 1 cm high) utilizing a diet encapsulation device as an oviposition substrate for Nesidiocoris tenuis Reuter (Heteroptera: Miridae) and O. laevigatus. The parafilm layer must be cut as soon as the eggs hatch to allow the nymphs to escape. However, most of the nymphs stick to the surface of the parafilm and cannot escape. Therefore, although the parafilm can be cut manually in small-scale rearing, this technique is impractical for a large-scale rearing system [30].
In insect rearing, food sources have a significant impact not only on normal growth and healthy reproduction, but also on product price formation [33,34]. Eggs of stored grain insect pests, such as Ephestia kuehniella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and E. cautella (Walker), used as food in rearing Orius spp., are the most nutritionally balanced food source, but their high market price necessitates the selection of an economical food source to replace them [35,36]. Artificial feeding techniques using a liver and egg yolk combination, the brine shrimp Artmia franciscana Kellogg (Anostraca: Artemiidae), and a whole-pupa homogenate of the Antheraea paphia (L.) (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae) have been reported [28,29,30,37,38]. Among them, brine shrimp has been studied abroad as an alternative food for various insects, such as Harmonia axyridis (Pallas) (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) [39], O. laevigatus [37], Iphiseius degenerans (Berlese) (Acari: Phytoseiidae) [40], and Coleomegilla maculata De Geer (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) [41], but it has not yet been studied in Korea. Arijs and De Clercq [37] confirmed that when brine shrimp cysts dried at 50 °C for 24 h were supplied to O. laevigatus, ecological characteristics such as the preoviposition period, lifespan, and hatching rate were similar to the control group in which E. kuehniella eggs were supplied.
This study was conducted to stabilize mass-rearing O. minutus through alternative feeds and artificial oviposition substrates. We selected an artificial oviposition substrate as a substitute for plants in order to simplify the production process and establish an economical mass-rearing system. Furthermore, we performed an economic analysis and confirmed a reduction in costs when our model is compared with the conventional mass-rearing model.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Insect and Experimental Conditions

O. minutus adults that developed on Metasequoia glyptostroboides Hu and W.C. Cheng (Pinales: Cupressaceae), in Osan, Gyunggi-do, in 2016, were received by Gyeonggi-do Forest Environment Research Center and used for the experiments. The insects were reared in a 10 L container (22 cm diameter, 32.6 cm height, Newpack Co., Ltd., Pocheon, Korea) with a ventilation mesh attached on one side (13 × 15 cm). Frozen eggs of E. cautella, a food source, and organic Sedum sarmentosum Bunge (Saxifragales: Crassulaceae), the plants for oviposition, were replaced every other day. The rearing and experiments were conducted in the laboratory under conditions of 25 ± 1 °C, at 60 to 75% relative humidity and a 16L:8D photoperiod.

2.2. Effect of Moisture on Development

Six different treatments were compared to assess the effect of the moisture source on the development of O. minutus. In the first to third treatments, the stems of S. samentosum were cut at 2 cm intervals and used. In the second to fifth treatments, 0.4 mL of water or honey-water was supplied on filter paper using a pipette. No moisture source was provided in the sixth treatment (control). Newly hatched nymphs (<24 h old) from the laboratory culture were transferred individually to insect-breeding dishes (5 cm diameter, 1.5 cm height, 310050, SPL Life Science Co., Ltd., Pocheon, Korea) with a mesh-screened vent hole in the lid (1 cm diameter) (n = 15). Each dish contained a filter paper (5 cm diameter) on the bottom, and 200 frozen eggs of E. cautella were provided every other day. Moisture sources were replaced every day. The developmental time to reach the adult stage and the nymph survival rate were recorded.

2.3. Selection of Artificial Oviposition Substrates

We selected cork sheets (30 × 20 × 3 cm, E612, Bluewin Co., Ltd., Paju, Korea) and rubber bands (1.3 × 7 × 1.3 cm, Hyup Jin Company, Seoul, Korea) as candidate oviposition substrates for O. minutus. The fecundity and egg hatch on cork sheet and rubber were compared with plants (stems of S. samentosum cut at 2 cm intervals). The cork sheets were cut into squares (1.5 × 1 × 0.5 cm) and placed on the bottom of insect-breeding dishes (10 cm diameter, 4 cm height, 310102, SPL Life Science Co., Ltd., Korea). Each dish had a ventilation mesh (4 cm diameter) on the lid and was provided with diet (frozen eggs of E. cautella) and a kitchen towel (580517, Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Atlanta, GA, USA) soaked with honey water. The kitchen towel was cut into squares (18 × 14 cm) and folded into small pieces (4.5 × 3.5 cm). Three pairs of adults (10 days post emergence) were placed in each dish, and their fecundity was observed under a microscope after 24 h. In total, 120 pairs of adults were used in each experiment. The hatching rate was recorded after transferring the counted eggs to a breeding dish (5 cm diameter, 1.5 cm height, 310050, SPL Life Science Co., Ltd., Pocheon, Korea) for five days and was compared to that of plants.

2.4. Oviposition Substrate Preference Using Cork Sheets

We examined both the thickness and the texture of a cross-section of cork sheets—selected as a substitute for live plants—using the choice test. To examine thickness, 1-mm, 3-mm, and 5-mm thick cork pieces were cut from a 5-cm × 0.5-cm corkboard (E712, E612, E912, Bluewin Co., Ltd., Paju, Korea). The cork pieces and five pairs of adults (10 days post emergence) were placed in the breeding dish (10 cm diameter, 4 cm height, 310102, SPL Life Science Co., Ltd., Pocheon, Korea) with a ventilation mesh (4 cm diameter) on the lid. The number of eggs was observed under a microscope (Dimis-ME, SIWON, Anyang, Korea) after 24 h. In total, 60 pairs of adults were used in each experiment.
To examine texture, the experiment was conducted using the same breeding dish and the same methods as above, and the top of the cork (5 cm in length) was smooth, whereas the sides were rough (n = 12). Because few eggs were oviposited on 1-mm thick cork pieces in the thickness experiment, we excluded these pieces from the texture experiment.

2.5. Hatch Rate and Moisture Supply of Artificial Oviposition Substrate

We examined methods to improve the moisture content of the cork sheets, which is dry compared to the moisture-containing plants. An improved moisture content was anticipated to improve the hatch rate. Six treatments were investigated: T1 (cork with wet oasis attached + vermiculite and buckwheat husk with water), T2 (cork + vermiculite and buckwheat husk with water), T3 (cork with wet oasis attached), T4 (cork with oasis attached + water (only after egg-laying)), T5 (cork) and control (plant). Briefly, the treatments were categorized by the attachment of an oasis (6 × 2 × 2 cm, Floral foam, Smithers-Oasis Korea Co., Ltd., Cheonan, Korea), distilled water immersion, or the presence of moisture-retaining material (100 mL of vermiculite, 225 mL of buckwheat shells, and 30 mL of distilled water). For each treatment, three pairs of O. minutus adults (8 days post emergence), 200 eggs of E. cautella, and a kitchen towel soaked in honey water were placed in the breeding dish (10 cm diameter, 4 cm height, 310102, SPL Life Science Co., Ltd., Pocheon, Korea). After 24 h, the eggs were counted under a microscope and placed in a new breeding dish (5 cm diameter, 1.5 cm height, 310050, SPL Life Science Co., Ltd., Pocheon, Korea). In each treatment, 144–233 eggs were used. The hatch rate was recorded for five days and compared to that of plants.

2.6. Effect of Diet on Development and Reproduction

This experiment was conducted to select an economical candidate diet that could replace the eggs of E. cautella used as food for Orius spp. In a breeding dish (5 cm diameter, 1.5 cm height, 310050, SPL Life Science Co., Ltd., Pocheon, Korea), a newly hatched nymph of O. minutus (<24 h old) and 3 cm of S. samentosum stems were placed, and the developmental time to reach the adult stage according to the different diets was recorded (n = 15–16). In the same way as above, in a breeding dish (10 cm diameter, 4 cm height, 310102, SPL Life Science Co., Ltd., Pocheon, Korea), 10 eggs of O. minutus (<24 h old) and 3 cm of S. samentosum stems were placed, and the survival rate was recorded (n = 167–174). Adult individuals were placed in a breeding dish (10 cm diameter, 4 cm height, 310102) in pairs, and the ratio of egg-laying females and the number of eggs per day were confirmed (n = 19–28). The diets consisted of 0.1 g of eggs of E. cautella (E), iron-coated brine shrimp eggs (I) (Sep-art®, Myungsun Co., Ltd., Seoul, Korea), or granular brine shrimp eggs (G) (Artemia®, PSP Co., Yongin, Korea) supplied in each container.
In order to select the optimal food combination, the diet sources (E/E, fed E to nymphs and adults, I/I, fed I to nymphs and adults, G/G, fed G to nymphs and adults, E/I, fed E to nymphs and I to adults, E/G, fed E to nymphs and G to adults, E+I/E+I, fed E+I to nymphs and adults, E+G/E+G, fed E+G to nymphs and adults) were fed up to the fifth generation. The number of eggs laid in the treatment groups for 10 days after the first egg laying commenced was compared with the control group fed E. cautella eggs. In each treatment, 150 eggs of O. minutus and kitchen towels soaked in honey water were placed in a 5 L round container with ventilation holes (10 × 8 cm) on the side, and different combinations of food were supplied. The second generation was moved to a small dish (12 cm diameter, 8 cm height, 310122, SPL Life Science Co., Ltd., Pocheon, Korea) and provided food and honey-water every two days. The time elapsed from the egg to the adult stage in each treatment group, and the number of eggs laid was investigated (n = 17–72).

2.7. Cost Analysis of Plant-Free Rearing System

The survival rate, developmental time (egg to adult), fecundity, and hatching rate of the plant-free rearing system constructed through the above experiments were compared with the existing rearing system with plants [24,41]. The experimental method was carried out in the same manner as above (n = 25–166). We then derived the costs to produce 40 bottles (500 adults per bottle) of O. minutus using the plant-free rearing system and compared the costs to those of the conventional mass-rearing system.

2.8. Statistical Analysis

The results were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA test [42]. Additionally, the oviposition substrate preference of O. minutus and the effect of diet on development and reproduction were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA test. Statistical differences of the resulting values were assessed using the Tukey’s Studentized Range test (Type I error = 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Moisture on Development

The nymphs in the control group (no moisture source) experienced 0% survival (Table 1). No statistically significant differences in the developmental time were observed in the treatment groups (df = 4,10, F = 3.46, p = 0.0506). A high survival rate of 86% or more was confirmed in all treatment groups (df = 5,12, F = 33.47, p < 0.0001).

3.2. Selection of Artificial Oviposition Substrates

Table 2 compares the daily average number of eggs in each of three treatments: cork, rubber, and plants, the latter being the natural oviposition material. The cork treatment, unlike the rubber band treatment, was confirmed to be statistically similar to plants (df = 2,9, F = 8.79, p = 0.0077). Although egg laying by O. minutus was confirmed in the cork, no individual hatching occurred in the cork kept in an extremely dry condition (df = 2,11, F = 16,970.8, p < 0.0001).

3.3. Oviposition Substrate Preference Using Cork Sheets

The results of the experiments to determine oviposition substrate preference based on cork thickness and texture are displayed in Figure 1. Based on the number of eggs laid, O. minutus preferred the cork sheet of 3-mm thickness for oviposition (Figure 2) (df = 2,6, F = 8.61, p = 0.0173). When offered the same cork thickness with variable texture, O. minutus preferred ovipositing on a rough surface rather than a smooth surface (Figure 1, Figure 3) (3-mm: df = 1,6, F = 7.99, p = 0.03; 5-mm: df = 1,6, F = 10.8, p = 0.0117). An interaction between thickness and texture was noted, with O. minutus preferring the 3-mm thick rough cork over the 5-mm thick rough cork (thickness: df = 1,12, F = 7.68, p = 0.0169; texture: df = 1,12, F = 51.77, p < 0.0001; thickness × texture: df = 1,12, F = 7.26, p = 0.0195).

3.4. Hatch Rate and Moisture Supply of Artificial Oviposition Substrates

Table 3 shows six treatments used to examine the effects of moisture on the hatch rate. The treatment where an oasis and moisture-retaining material (vermiculite and buckwheat husk with water) were used to improve moisture showed a high hatch rate (df = 5,18, F = 211.60, p < 0.0001) that was not statistically different from the hatch rate on plants. The hatch rate was 72.8% in the mixed treatment of wet oasis and vermiculite and buckwheat husk with water, which is higher by 5.8% than that in the treatment with oasis only, but this difference is not statistically significant. The treatment where a wet oasis was attached to the cork throughout the entire developmental time of O. minutus eggs also showed a high hatch rate that was not statistically different from the hatch rate on plants (see Figure 4 for photos of cork with oasis attached and hatched eggs).

3.5. Effect of Diet on Development and Reproduction

To select an alternative diet for O. minutus, the developmental time and survival rate were recorded while supplying candidate diets (Table 4). We confirmed that the group treated with brine shrimp eggs had a longer developmental time, of 5.9–7.8 days, compared to other treatment groups (df = 2,6, F = 27.5, p = 0.01). The survival rate of the treatment group fed iron-coated brine shrimp eggs was 67.5%, which was 5.9 times higher than that of granular brine shrimp eggs, confirming the statistically significant results (df = 2,6, F = 233.16, p < 0.0001). In the fecundity experiment, the treatment group fed granular brine shrimp eggs produced no females to lay eggs, and therefore the fecundity could not be assessed. The fecundity in the groups fed eggs of E. cautella and iron-coated brine shrimp eggs was high (df = 2,6, F = 686.02, p < 0.0001). The mean number of eggs deposited per day in the E and I treatment groups was similar (df = 1,4, F = 4.68, p = 0.0757).
The results of analyzing the growth period by feeding six different diet combinations and breeding them continuously for five generations are shown in the Figure 5. In each treatment group, although a slight difference was observed in the developmental time according to the diet source and generation (I/I: df = 4,10, F = 2.71, p = 0.0915; E/I: df = 4,10, F = 9.96, p = 0.0016; E/G: df = 4,10, F = 11.45, p = 0.0009; I+E/I+E: df = 4,10, F = 4.65, p = 0.0222; G+E/G+E: df = 4,10, F = 22.69, p < 0.0001), as a result of a two-way analysis, no statistically significant difference was identified (diet source: df = 5,48, F = 0.92, p = 0.4788; generation: df = 3,48, F = 1.34, p = 0.2721; diet source × generation: df = 15,48, F = 0.84, p = 0.6011).
In the intergenerational fecundity experiment, the treatment group fed granular brine shrimp eggs produced only one adult due to cannibalism, and therefore the fecundity could not be assessed. In the two treatment groups supplied with a mixture of E. cautella eggs and two types of brine shrimp eggs, the fecundity up to the fourth generation was similar to that of the control group supplied with E. cautella eggs (1st: df = 5,17, F = 50.54, p < 0.0001; 2nd: df = 5,17, F = 32.91, p < 0.0001; 3rd: df = 5,17, F = 11.34, p = 0.0003; 4th: df = 5,17, F = 50.90, p < 0.0001; 5th: df = 5,17, F = 89.25, p < 0.0001) (Table 5). The mean fecundity was found to be statistically different by diet source and generation (diet source: df = 5,60, F = 89.24, p < 0.0001; generation: df = 4,60, F = 4.01, p = 0.006; diet source × generation: df = 20,60, F = 3.12, p = 0.0003).

3.6. Cost Analysis of the Plant-Free Rearing System

Both the plant-free rearing system and the conventional mass-rearing system using plants showed similar results in survival rate (df = 1,5, F = 0.42, p = 0.5516), developmental time (df = 1,5, F = 1.13, p = 0.3481), fecundity (df = 1,5, F = 0.66, p = 0.4630), and hatching rate (df = 1,7, F = 0.27, p = 0.6193) (Table 6). In this study, we established a plant-free rearing system by selecting cork sheets as an oviposition substrate for O. minutus, a predatory insect that normally oviposits on plants (Figure 6). A cost analysis of our proposed system was performed and compared to the conventional mass-rearing system (Table 7). We derived the egg-harvesting cost of the conventional mass-rearing model by referring to the “industrial standards of insect breeding and specification II,” published in the Rural Development Administration [43] and Korea Forest Service [24], for the production method for O. laevigatus. Compared with the conventional mass-rearing model, the egg-harvesting cost was reduced by 98.2% and the diet cost by 48.3%, thereby reducing the total production cost by 70.5%.

4. Discussion

In this study, we presented biological and economic data for the development of O. minutus, an indigenous insect species, using a plant-free rearing system for the localization of biological control agents, which are increasingly dependent on imports.
Insects are known to replenish moisture by taking in fluids from the xylem of plants [44]. According to a study by Bonte and De Clercq [25], insects can grow successfully without plants if other sources are available to replenish moisture and nutrients, which was also confirmed in this study (Table 1).
The establishment of mass-rearing techniques to manage natural predators stably is a crucial element in biological control [45,46]. This study investigated the preference of artificial oviposition substrates in O. minutus; substrate preference based on thickness and texture; and hatch rate related to the moisture supply. The artificial substrate preferred by O. minutus is a 3-mm-thick cork sheet with a rough texture (Figure 1, Figure 2 and Figure 3). The oviposition by O. minutus was confirmed in the cork sheet, but typical hatching was not probable in the chemically stable cork sheet because the water could not seep through (Table 2). Delobel [47] reported that maintaining a low humidity reduces the metabolic activities of eggs of Atherigona soccata Rondani (Diptera: Muscidae), prolonging the egg stage and leading to a failure in hatching. When Delia radicum (L.) (Diptera: Anthomyiidae) eggs were exposed to a 20–29 °C temperature and 5–100% relative humidity, Lepage et al. [48] reported that the temperature did not affect survival significantly, whereas humidity caused egg mortality. Bonte and De Clercq [25] reported that the moisture supply affects the development and breeding of O. laevigatus greatly in indoor rearing. In our study, a low hatch rate of 34.7% was recorded for the mixed treatment of vermiculite and buckwheat husk with water and cork sheet, which confirmed that the moisture content external to the cork does not affect the egg hatch inside the cork (Table 3). A high hatch rate (68.8%, 72.8%) similar to the hatch rate on plants (71.6) was observed in the treatment where a wet oasis was attached consistently during the developmental time.
Coll [49] reported that plants are an essential element for breeding—an element for oviposition and a food substitute for development—to O. insidiosus, which is zoophytophagous. In this study, we observed a slightly greater average number of eggs with the cork substrate (13.1) than with plants (12.3) (Table 2). Although these averages are not significantly different, we suspect that the honey-water supplied with the cork treatment induced a positive effect. De Puysseleyr et al. [30] reported a successful oviposition by O. laevigatus when using wet cotton wrapped with parafilm. Bonte and De Clercq [25] succeeded in breeding 90% of the nymphs into adults with only food substitute and without plants. However, the weight of female and male adults was reduced by 9.1% and 14%, respectively, compared to using food substitute and plants. De Puysseleyr et al. [32] also reported that the weight of the fifth-generation female and male adults decreased by 4% and 6%, respectively, when Nesidiocoris tenuis (Reuter) (Hemiptera: Miridae) was bred without plants. Conversely, Cohen and Debolt [50] reported that the presence or absence of plants does not affect adult weight in Geocoris punctipes (Say) (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) breeding. Similarly, in De Puysseleyr et al. [30], a weight reduction of male adult O. laevigatus was not observed up to the fourth generation when reared indoors. Weight was slightly reduced for females, but the authors reported no influence on the number of oocytes and eggs. The presence or absence of plants can affect omnivorous insects that are reared indoors differently according to the species and breeding methods, leading to disparate findings. Therefore, further study is necessary to clarify the influence of the plant-free rearing system on the development and continual breeding of O. minutus [32,50].
For a predator to be able to compete with the main biological control agents in the biological control market, economical mass-rearing techniques have to be established. However, the need for host plants or natural food for breeding can more than double production costs compared to those of the species produced with food substitutes and without plants [46]. In the case of conventional Orius spp. breeding, the eggs of moths supplied as food have a high nutritional value, but also a high production cost [51]. Therefore, in this study, iron-coated brine shrimp eggs, which can replace moth eggs, were selected as an alternative diet for O. minutus (Table 4). In the case of granular brine shrimp eggs, the survival rate of O. minutus decreased due to an increase in cannibalism as compensation for the nutritional deficiency [52,53,54,55]. Nutrient imbalances tend to be expressed after several generations of breeding [51]. Taking this tendency into consideration, seven diet combinations were fed continuously for five generations, and the developmental time and number of eggs were compared and analyzed (Table 5, Figure 5). The number of eggs decreased in all treatment groups fed brine shrimp eggs, which are not coated with iron, up to the fifth generation. We attribute this effect over the generations to the lack of fatty acids in the brine shrimp eggs. De Clercq et al. [51] reported that flour moth eggs were almost three times richer in fatty acids than brine shrimp cysts. Most of the fatty acids consumed by insects are stored in triglycerides as an energy source, and the rest are known to play an important role as phospholipid membrane structures or signaling molecules [56]. De Clercq et al. [51] reported that brine shrimp cysts can be used as supplementary food for the mass production of O. laviegatus, but brine shrimp cysts are not suitable for long-term breeding because the developmental time is 18% lower and the number of eggs is 60% lower in the third generation compared to feeding E. cautella eggs. Based on our results, mixing E. cautella eggs and iron-coated brine shrimp eggs for rearing O. minutus will be beneficial in terms of nutrition and economics. Iron is required for oxygen transport and catalytic roles in oxidative metabolism and is essential for living organisms [57]. Many aspects of the iron metabolism in insects remain poorly understood [58]. Tang and Zhou [58] reported the first genetic evidence that secretory ferritin directly participates in dietary iron absorption in Drosophila melanogaster Meigen (Diptera: Drosophilieae). Ferritin is considered to be an anti-oxidant protein and the major iron storage site at the molecular level [59]. It has long been hypothesized that ferritin is involved in dietary iron absorption and transport in insects due to the secretory character of insect ferritin [58]. In mammals, the exported iron from enterocytes is mostly bound and transported by serum transferrin (Tsf) [60]. The Tsf delivery of iron via a receptor has not been shown in any insects because no homologue of the mammalian Tsf receptor has been identified so far from the published genome sequences of insects [61,62]. This suggests that insects could have a different class of Tsf receptors or that iron is taken up by an alternate transport mechanism [61]. More research is needed on how O. minutus consumes iron and uses it for development and survival.
In this study, E. cautella eggs and iron-coated brine shrimp eggs as diet and cork sheets as an artificial oviposition substrate were used to obtain basic data for establishing a plant-free rearing system (Table 6, Figure 6). We calculated the actual cost for the materials that were used in this study and the materials necessary for conventional mass-rearing (Table 7). After adding the cost of the workforce, facility, and equipment for growing plants, we anticipate a reduction of more that 70% in costs with the plant-free rearing model compared to the costs with the conventional model. The “Orius spp. plant-free rearing system” proposed in this study has been patented (Patent registration number: 10-2209388).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.-H.H.; methodology, E.-H.H. and H.-J.J.; validation, all authors; investigation, E.-H.H. and H.-J.J.; resources, all authors; data curation, K.-S.K. and E.-H.H.; writing—original draft preparation, E.-H.H. and H.-J.J.; writing—review and editing, K.-S.K. and E.-H.H.; visualization, all authors; supervision, E.-H.H.; project administration, E.-H.H.; funding acquisition, E.-H.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Korean Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (IPET) through the Agri-Bio industry Technology Development Program, funded by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (grant number: 318024-3) and Rural Development Administration (RDA) (grant number: PJ01578904).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets and the images in this study are still being used in ongoing research, they will only be available upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We express our sincere appreciation to Patrick De Clercq and Veronic De Puysseleyr at Ghent University for their assistance in initiating this study, and to the editor and reviewers who helped complete this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nishimori, T.; Miura, K.; Seko, T. Rearing Orius strigicollis (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) on an alternative diet of brine shrimp, Artemia salina (Anostraca: Artemiidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 2016, 51, 321–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Silva, D.B.; Bueno, V.H.P.; Montes, F.C.; van Lenteren, J.C. Population growth of three mirid predatory bugs feeding on eggs and larvae of Tuta absoluta on tomato. BioControl 2016, 61, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Van Lenteren, J.C.; Bolckmans, K.; Köhl, J.; Ravensberg, W.J.; Urbaneja, A. Biological control using invertebrates and microorganisms: Plenty of new opportunities. Entomophaga 2018, 63, 39–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Van Lenteren, J.C. The state of commercial augmentative biological control: Plenty of natural enemies, but a frustrating lack of uptake. Entomophaga 2012, 57, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Berg, C.L.R.-V.D.; Hemerik, L.; Van Der Werf, W.; De Jong, P.W.; Van Lenteren, J.C. Life history of the harlequin ladybird, Harmonia axyridis: A global meta-analysis. BioControl 2017, 62, 283–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ceryngier, P.; Nedvěd, O.; Grez, A.A.; Riddick, E.W.; Roy, H.E.; Martin, G.S.; Steenberg, T.; Vesely, P.; Zaviezo, T.; Zúñiga-Reinoso, Á.; et al. Predators and parasitoids of the harlequin ladybird, Harmonia axyridis, in its native range and invaded areas. Biol. Invasions 2018, 20, 1009–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kohno, K.; Kashio, T. Development and prey consumption of Orius sauteri (Poppius) and O. minutus (L.) (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) fed on Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1998, 33, 227–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Silveira, L.C.P.; Paes Bueno, V.H.; van Lenteren, J.C. Orius insidiosus as biological control agent of thrips in greenhouse chry-santhemums in the tropics. Bull. Insectology 2004, 57, 103–109. [Google Scholar]
  9. Jeong, T.S.; Hwang, M.R.; Hwang, S.J.; Lee, J.H.; Lee, A.S.; Won, H.S.; Hong, D.K.; Cho, J.R.; Ham, E.H. Greenhouse whitefly and thrips management model using natural enemies in semi-forcing culture of Tamato. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 2017, 56, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service Home Page. Available online: https://www.naqs.go.kr/contents/contentsTab.do?menuId=MN50068 (accessed on 18 November 2020).
  11. Ham, E.H.; Jun, H.J.; Lim, U.T.; Lee, Y.S. Biological control effect of “Natural Enemy in First method” by growers: Potential applications in pest management without monitoring. In Proceedings of the Second International Congress of Biological Control, Davos, Switzerland, 26–30 April 2021. [Google Scholar]
  12. Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency Home Page. Available online: https://www.qia.go.kr/bbs/lawAnn/viewLawWebAction.do?id=180550&type=0 (accessed on 5 April 2021).
  13. Honda, J.Y.; Nakashima, Y.; Hirose, Y. Development, reproduction and longevity of Orius minutus and Orius sauteri (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) when reared on Ephestia kuehniella eggs. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1998, 33, 449–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fathi, S.A.A.; Nouri-Ganbalani, G. Assessing the potential for biological control of potato field pests in Ardabil, Iran: Functional responses of Orius niger (Wolf.) and O. minutus (L.) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). J. Pest Sci. 2010, 83, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fathi, S.A.A. Efficiency of Orius minutus for control of Tetranychus urticaeon selected potato cultivars. Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2014, 24, 936–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sun, L.J.; Yi, W.X.; Zheng, C.Y. Predatory and control ability of Orius minutus to the diamindback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutelli-dae). Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao 2017, 28, 3403–3408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rahman, A.; Sarker, S.; Ham, E.; Lee, J.-S.; Lim, U.T. Development and Fecundity of Orius minutus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) and O. laevigatus Reared on Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 2020, 113, 1735–1740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ito, K.; Nakata, T. Effect of photoperiod on reproductive diapause in the predatory bugs, Orius sauteri (Poppius) and O. minutus (Linnaeus) (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1998, 33, 115–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Tuda, M.; Shima, K. Relative importance of weather and density dependence on the dispersal and on-plant activity of the predator Orius minutus. Popul. Ecol. 2002, 44, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Toyoshima, S. Development, Prey Consumption, and Fecundity of Orius minutus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) when Fed on Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae). J. Acarol. Soc. Jpn. 2006, 15, 151–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ding, Y.; Yang, Q.F.; Li, Q.; Jiang, C.X.; Wang, H.J. Effects of temperature on the development and reproduction of Orius minutus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Acta Entomol. Sin. 2016, 59, 647–653. [Google Scholar]
  22. Maeda, T.; Fujiwara-Tsujii, N.; Yasui, H.; Matsuyama, S. Female Sex Pheromone in Trails of the Minute Pirate Bug, Orius minutus (L). J. Chem. Ecol. 2016, 42, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Arakawa, T.; Taniai, K.; Maeda, T. The mating systems of three species of minute pirate bug, Orius sauteri, O. minutus, and O. strigicollis. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2019, 167, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Korea Forest Service (KFS). Development of Environment-Friendly Garden Pest Management Tactics and Its Application Method, 1st ed.; R202000077; Korea Forest Service: Daejeon, Korea, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bonte, M.; De Clercq, P. Impact of Artificial Rearing Systems on the Developmental and Reproductive Fitness of the Predatory Bug, Orius laevigatus. J. Insect Sci. 2010, 10, 104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. De Clercq, P.; Degheele, D. A meat-based diet for rearing the predatory stinkbugs Podisus maculiventris and Podisus sagitta [Het.: Pentatomidae]. BioControl 1992, 37, 149–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Constant, B.; Grenier, S.; Bonnot, G. Artificial Substrate for Egg Laying and Embryonic Development by the Predatory Bug Macrolophus caliginosus (Heteroptera: Miridae). Biol. Control. 1996, 7, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kim, J.H.; Kim, Y.H.; Gho, H.G.; Han, M.W.; Lee, G.S. Biological characteristics and mass rearing system for Cadra cautella (Walker) as a substitute diet for natural enemies. Korean J. Appl. Entomol. 2003, 42, 203–209. [Google Scholar]
  29. Schmidt, J.; Richards, P.; Nadel, H.; Ferguson, G. A rearing method for the production of large numbers of the insidious flower bug, Orius insidiosus (say) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Can. Entomol. 1995, 127, 445–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. De Puysseleyr, V.; Höfte, M.; De Clercq, P. Continuous rearing of the predatory anthocorid Orius laevigatus without plant materials. J. Appl. Entomol. 2014, 138, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Castañé, C.; Zalom, F. Artificial Oviposition Substrate for Rearing Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera, Anthocoridae). Biol. Control. 1994, 4, 88–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. De Puysseleyr, V.; De Man, S.; Höfte, M.; De Clercq, P. Plantless rearing of the zoophytophagous bug Nesidiocoris tenuis. BioControl 2012, 58, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Lundgren, J.G. Reproductive ecology of predaceous Heteroptera. Biol. Control. 2011, 59, 37–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. John, C. Insect Bioecology and Nutrition for Integrated Pest Management, 1st ed.; Panizzi, A.R., Parra, J.R.P., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2012; ISBN 978-1-4398-3708-5. [Google Scholar]
  35. Arijs, Y.; De Clercq, P. Liver-based artificial diets for the production of Orius laevigatus. BioControl 2004, 49, 505–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tommasini, M.G.; van Lenteren, J.C.; Burgio, G. Biological traits and predation capacity of four Orius species on two prey spe-cies. Bull. Insectology 2004, 57, 79–93. [Google Scholar]
  37. Arijs, Y.; De Clercq, P. Rearing Orius laevigatus on Cysts of the Brine Shrimp Artemia franciscana. Biol. Control. 2001, 21, 79–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tan, X.-L.; Wang, S.; Zhang, F. Optimization an Optimal Artificial Diet for the Predatory Bug Orius sauteri (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Hongo, T.; Obayashi, N. Use of Diapause Eggs of Brine Shrimp, Artemia salina (Linne) for Artificial Diet of Coccinelid Beetle, Harmonia axyridis (Pallas). Jpn. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1997, 41, 101–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vantornhout, I.; Minnaert, H.; Tirry, L.; de Clercq, P. Effect of pollen, natural prey and factitious prey on the development of Iphiseius degenerans. BioControl 2004, 49, 627–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Riddick, E.W.; Wu, Z.; Rojas, G. Potential utilization of Artemia franciscana eggs as food for Coleomegilla maculata. BioControl 2014, 59, 575–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. SAS Institute. The SAS System for Windows 9.4; SAS Institute: Cary, NC, USA, 2015; Available online: https://welcome.oda.sas.com (accessed on 30 May 2020).
  43. Rural Development Administration (RDA). Rearing Standard and Specifications for Beneficial Insect (II), 1st ed.; Rural Development Administration: Jeonju-si, Korea, 2014; pp. 8–23. ISBN 978-894-802-785-3. [Google Scholar]
  44. Armer, C.A.; Wiedenmann, R.N.; Bush, D.R. Plant feeding site selection on soybean by the facultatively phytophagous predator Orius insidiosus. Èntomol. Exp. Appl. 1998, 86, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Leopold, R.A. Colony maintenance and mass-rearing: Using cold storage technology for extending the shelf-life of insects. In Area-Wide Control of Insect Pests; Vreysen, M.J.B., Robinson, A.S., Hendrichs, J., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 149–162. ISBN 978-1-4020-6059-5. [Google Scholar]
  46. Morales-Ramos, J.A. Mass Production of Beneficial Organisms; Morales-Ramos, J.A., Rojas, M.G., Shapiro-Ilan, D.I., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 711–742. ISBN 978-0-12-391453-8. [Google Scholar]
  47. Delobel, A.G.L. Humidity effects on Atherigona soccata: Egg development and hatch. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 1983, 33, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lepage, M.P.; Bourgeois, G.; Brodeur, J.; Boivin, G. Effect of Soil Temperature and Moisture on Survival of Eggs and First-Instar Larvae of Delia radicum. Environ. Entomol. 2012, 41, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Coll, M. Feeding and ovipositing on plants by an omnivorous insect predator. Oecologia 1996, 105, 214–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Cohen, A.C.; Debolt, J.W. Rearing Geocoris punctipes (Heteroptera, Lygaeidae) on insect eggs. Southwest. Entomology 1983, 8, 61–64. [Google Scholar]
  51. De Clercq, P.; Arijs, Y.; Van Meir, T.; Van Stappen, G.; Sorgeloos, P.; Dewettinck, K.; Rey, M.; Grenier, S.; Febvay, G. Nutritional value of brine shrimp cysts as a factitious food for Orius laevigatus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae). Biocontrol Sci. Technol. 2005, 15, 467–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Fox, L.R. Cannibalism in Natural Populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1975, 6, 87–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Polis, G.A. The Evolution and Dynamics of Intraspecific Predation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1981, 12, 225–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Elgar, M.A.; Crespi, B.J. Cannibalism: Ecology and Evolution among Diverse Taxa; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  55. Schausberger, P. Cannibalism among phytoseiid mites: A review. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 2003, 29, 173–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Vandekerkhove, B.; Parmentier, L.; Van Stappen, G.; Grenier, S.; Febvay, G.; Rey, M.; De Clercq, P. Artemiacysts as an alternative food for the predatory bug Macrolophus pygmaeus. J. Appl. Entomol. 2009, 133, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Nichol, H.; Law, J.H.; Winzerling, J.J. Iron Metabolism in Insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2002, 47, 535–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Tang, X.; Zhou, B. Iron homeostasis in insects: Insights from Drosophila studies. IUBMB Life 2013, 65, 863–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pham, D.Q.; Winzerling, J.J. Insect ferritins: Typical or atypical? Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Gen. Subj. 2010, 1800, 824–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Hentze, M.W.; Muckenthaler, M.U.; Galy, B.; Camaschella, C. Two to Tango: Regulation of Mammalian Iron Metabolism. Cell 2010, 142, 24–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Geiser, D.L.; Winzerling, J.J. Insect transferrins: Multifunctional proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Gen. Subj. 2011, 1820, 437–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Dunkov, B.; Georgieva, T. Insect iron binding proteins: Insights from the genomes. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2006, 36, 300–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Insects 13 00077 g001 550
Figure 1. Oviposition preference of Orius minutus. (A) The analysis was conducted using 1-mm, 3-mm, and 5-mm thick cork substrates. (B) Thickness and texture were analyzed together using 3-mm and 5-mm thick, smooth and rough cork substrates. In total, 60 pairs of adults were used in each experiment. The different letters on the standard error bars indicate significant differences between means at Type I error = 0.05.
Figure 1. Oviposition preference of Orius minutus. (A) The analysis was conducted using 1-mm, 3-mm, and 5-mm thick cork substrates. (B) Thickness and texture were analyzed together using 3-mm and 5-mm thick, smooth and rough cork substrates. In total, 60 pairs of adults were used in each experiment. The different letters on the standard error bars indicate significant differences between means at Type I error = 0.05.
Insects 13 00077 g001
Insects 13 00077 g002 550
Figure 2. Eggs of Orius minutus on rough cork substrates of different thickness ((A) 1 mm, (B) 3 mm, (C) 5 mm) and eggs on plant substrate (D).
Figure 2. Eggs of Orius minutus on rough cork substrates of different thickness ((A) 1 mm, (B) 3 mm, (C) 5 mm) and eggs on plant substrate (D).
Insects 13 00077 g002
Insects 13 00077 g003 550
Figure 3. Smooth cork substrate without eggs of Orius minutus (A) and rough cork substrate with eggs (B).
Figure 3. Smooth cork substrate without eggs of Orius minutus (A) and rough cork substrate with eggs (B).
Insects 13 00077 g003
Insects 13 00077 g004 550
Figure 4. Wet rough cork with oasis attached (A) and hatched eggs of Orius minutus on rough cork substrate with oasis attached (B).
Figure 4. Wet rough cork with oasis attached (A) and hatched eggs of Orius minutus on rough cork substrate with oasis attached (B).
Insects 13 00077 g004
Insects 13 00077 g005 550
Figure 5. Mean developmental time (days) of Orius minutus by generation (2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th) and diet type (I/I, fed I to nymphs and adults, E/I, fed E to nymphs and I to adults, E/G, fed E to nymphs and G to adults, E+I/E+I, fed E+I to nymphs and adults, E+G/E+G, fed E+G to nymphs and adults, E/E, fed E to nymphs and adults). Different letters on the standard error bars for each diet category indicate significant differences between means at Type I error = 0.05.
Figure 5. Mean developmental time (days) of Orius minutus by generation (2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th) and diet type (I/I, fed I to nymphs and adults, E/I, fed E to nymphs and I to adults, E/G, fed E to nymphs and G to adults, E+I/E+I, fed E+I to nymphs and adults, E+G/E+G, fed E+G to nymphs and adults, E/E, fed E to nymphs and adults). Different letters on the standard error bars for each diet category indicate significant differences between means at Type I error = 0.05.
Insects 13 00077 g005
Insects 13 00077 g006 550
Figure 6. Flow chart of mass-rearing of Orius minutus. Y means passing the quality control result, and n means failing the quality control result.
Figure 6. Flow chart of mass-rearing of Orius minutus. Y means passing the quality control result, and n means failing the quality control result.
Insects 13 00077 g006
Table
Table 1. The effect of moisture source on the development of Orius minutus reared on Ephestiea cautella eggs 1.
Table 1. The effect of moisture source on the development of Orius minutus reared on Ephestiea cautella eggs 1.
TreatmentDevelopmental Time (Days)Nymphal Survival (%)
Plant11.7 ± 0.693.3 ± 9.4
Plant and water dome11.9 ± 0.99100.0 ± 0.0
Plant and honey-water dome12.1 ± 0.4100.0 ± 0.0
Water dome12.9 ± 0.186.7 ± 9.4
Honey-water dome12.7 ± 0.186.7 ± 18.9
Control (no moisture source) 0
1 Values represent means ± standard deviation; n = 15 for each treatment. No significant differences were found among the first five treatments for developmental time or nymphal survival (p > 0.05).
Table
Table 2. Number of oviposited eggs per three pairs of Orius minutus and egg hatch (%) on different oviposition schemes 1.
Table 2. Number of oviposited eggs per three pairs of Orius minutus and egg hatch (%) on different oviposition schemes 1.
Oviposition SubstrateNo. of EggsEgg Hatch (%)
Cork13.1 ± 2.4 a0 b
Rubber band4.1 ± 4.7 b0 b
Plant12.3 ± 4.1 a71.6 ± 0.9 a
1 Values represent means ± standard deviation; n = 40 sets of three pairs for each substrate. Values followed by the same letter in each column are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Table
Table 3. Hatching rate of Orius minutus using six different moisture sources.
Table 3. Hatching rate of Orius minutus using six different moisture sources.
TreatmentOviposition Substrate 1n 2Moisture Source 3Egg Hatch (%) 4
T1Cork sheet149Oasis, vermiculite, and buckwheat husk with water72.8 ± 3.6 a
T2Cork sheet144Vermiculite and buckwheat husk with water34.7 ± 4.6 c
T3Cork sheet 233Oasis with water68.8 ± 4.1 a
T4Cork sheet157Oasis with water (only after egg-laying)51.5 ± 4.1 b
T5Cork sheet213 0 d
ControlPlant166 71.6 ± 0.9 a
1 Cork sheet size: 5 × 0.5 cm. 2 n: number of eggs per treatment. 3 Oasis size: 6 × 2 × 2 cm; volume of vermiculite, buckwheat husk and water: 100, 225, and 30 mL, respectively. 4 Values represent means ± standard deviation, values followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Table
Table 4. Developmental time and survival rate experienced by Orius minutus under three different diet sources 1.
Table 4. Developmental time and survival rate experienced by Orius minutus under three different diet sources 1.
Diet 2Developmental Time
(Days)		Survival (%)% Egg Laying FemalesNo. of Eggs Deposited
per Day
E12.1 ± 0.4 (15) a72.7 ± 3.8 (167) a92.6 ± 6.4 (27) a3.8 ± 0.7 (25) a
I14.0 ± 0.2 (15) a67.5 ± 3.7 (167) a100.0 ± 0.0 (28) a4.8 ± 0.2 (28) a
G19.9 ± 2.2 (16) b11.4 ± 1.3 (174) b0 (19) b-
1 Numbers in parentheses refer to the number of individuals per treatment group. Values represent means ± standard deviation, values followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05). 2 E, Ephestia cautella egg; I, Iron-coated brine shrimp eggs; G, Granular brine shrimp eggs.
Table
Table 5. Mean fecundity of Orius minutus by generations and diets 1.
Table 5. Mean fecundity of Orius minutus by generations and diets 1.
Diets
(for Nymph/Adult) 2		Fecundity (± S.D.) for Ten Days after Egg Laying/Generation
1st 2nd3rd4th5th
E/E 62.9 ± 9.3 (27) a63.7 ± 7.5 (25) a63.6 ± 12.2 (21) a68.8 ± 12.7 (17) a76.9 ± 5.7 (18) a
I/I 36.4 ± 6.2 (64) b25.3 ± 9.8 (26) b39.3 ± 7.1 (24) b27.2 ± 0.9 (48) b22.4 ± 3.2 (56) c
G/G-----
E/I44.7 ± 3.6 (64) b36.1 ± 2.8 (66) b31.6 ± 4.1 (62) b32.5 ± 3.9 (50) b21.6 ± 4.1 (70) c
E/G13.2 ± 2.0 (62) c21.8 ± 4.2 (62) b28.8 ± 5.4 (42) b11.4 ± 2.7 (48) c9.0 ± 0.6 (64) c
E+I/E+I69.0 ± 0.2 (70) a68.7 ± 5.5 (62) a62.4 ± 4.1 (70) a60.5 ± 2.3 (62) a53.5 ± 6.2 (70) b
E+G/E+G73.9 ± 3.7 (72) a74.0 ± 2.2 (68) a44.4 ± 5.5 (66) ab66.5 ± 2.1 (70) a63.2 ± 3.4 (22) b
1 Numbers in parentheses refer to the number of individuals per treatment group. Values (means ± standard deviation) followed by the same letter on the same column are not significantly different (p > 0.05). 2 The diets consisted of 0.1 g of eggs of Ephestia cautella (E), iron-coated brine shrimp eggs (I), or granular brine shrimp eggs (G). (E/E, fed E to nymphs and adults, I/I, fed I to nymphs and adults, G/G, fed G to nymphs and adults, E/I, fed E to nymphs and I to adults, E/G, fed E to nymphs and G to adults, E+I/E+I, fed E+I to nymphs and adults, E+G/E+G, fed E+G to nymphs and adults).
Table
Table 6. Comparison of ecological characteristics according to two different rearing systems of Orius minutus 1.
Table 6. Comparison of ecological characteristics according to two different rearing systems of Orius minutus 1.
TreatmentSurvival (%)Developmental
Time (Days)		Fecundity/DayHatching Rate (%)
Rearing on plants92.3 ± 4.7 (109) a19.6 ± 0.6 (109) a73.1 ± 8.3 (35) a71.6 ± 0.9 (166) a
Plant-free rearing90.1 ± 5.1 (33) a19.2 ± 0.2 (33) a78.3 ± 7.1 (25) a72.8 ± 3.6 (149) a
1 Numbers in parentheses refer to the number of individuals per treatment group. Values (means ± standard deviation) followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Table
Table 7. Economic analysis of two different oviposition materials to make 40 products of Orius minutus (500 pieces per product).
Table 7. Economic analysis of two different oviposition materials to make 40 products of Orius minutus (500 pieces per product).
Mass-Rearing Model of RDA (2014) 1Plant-Free Rearing Model
Total Cost $507.42Total Cost $149.67
-
Oviposition Plant-Related Costs = $222.65
Plant (pot): $16.78 × 2 ea. = $33.55
-
Oviposition Plant-Related Costs = $4.03
Cork sheet (20 × 30 × 0.3 cm): $1.38 × 2 ea. = $2.77
Soil (50 L): $8.22 × 1 ea. = $8.22Oasis (23 × 11 × 8 cm): $0.63 × 2 ea. = $1.26
Rearing box (49 × 38 × 8 cm): $3.02 × 2 ea. = $6.04
Cage (50 × 47 × 37 cm): $83.89 × 2 ea. = $167.77
Compound fertilizer (1 kg): $10.07 × 1 ea. = $10.07
-
Food-related costs 2 = $281.86
Ephestia cautella egg: $4.70 × 60 g = $281.86
-
Food-related costs = $145.65
Ephestia cautella egg: $4.7 × 30 g = $140.96
Iron-coated Brine Shrimp eggs: $0.16 × 30 g = $4.68
1 Source: Rural Development Administration [43]. 2 Source: Korea Forest Service [24].
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jun, H.-J.; Kim, K.-S.; Ham, E.-H. Basic Studies Aiming at Orius minutus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) Mass-Rearing. Insects 2022, 13, 77. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/insects13010077

AMA Style

Jun H-J, Kim K-S, Ham E-H. Basic Studies Aiming at Orius minutus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) Mass-Rearing. Insects. 2022; 13(1):77. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/insects13010077

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jun, Hye-Jeong, Kyoung-Su Kim, and Eun-Hye Ham. 2022. "Basic Studies Aiming at Orius minutus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) Mass-Rearing" Insects 13, no. 1: 77. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/insects13010077

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop