Next Article in Journal
Preliminary Discussion on the Highly Radiogenic Lead in Unalloyed Copper Artifacts of the Eastern Zhou Dynasty: Starting from the Huili Copper Spearheads
Next Article in Special Issue
Assessment of Electric Arc Furnace (EAF) Steel Slag Waste’s Recycling Options into Value Added Green Products: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Substrate Impact on the Structure and Electrocatalyst Properties of Molybdenum Disulfide for HER from Water
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Relationship and Mechanism Analysis of Soft-Melt Dropping Properties and Primary-Slag Formation Behaviors of the Mixed Burden in Increasing Lump Ore Ratio

School of Materials and Metallurgy, University of Science and Technology Liaoning, Anshan 114051, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 28 July 2020 / Revised: 12 September 2020 / Accepted: 14 September 2020 / Published: 17 September 2020

Abstract

:
At present, cost reduction and environmental protection are the mainstream of blast furnace (BF) development and the high lump ore ratio is an effective means. Therefore, it is significant to explore the relationship and mechanism of burden soft-melt dropping and its primary-slag formation behaviors under increasing lump ore ratio. In this paper, the melt–drop test is carried out on the single ore and mixed burden, and obtained primary-slag properties are subjected to analysis. The experimental results show that the primary-slag of lump ore contains a large amount of FeO and SiO2, so it simply produces many low melting point compounds, which cause terrible soft-melt dropping properties and primary-slag formation behaviors. Notably, mixing with sinter and pellet can effectively improve both the properties. With the increase in lump ore ratio, the CaO in the primary-slag decreases, FeO and SiO2 increase, resulting in the melting temperature of the primary-slag sequentially decreasing and the cohesive zone moves to the low temperature zone. In addition, the maximum pressure difference increases, and the gas permeability deteriorates. Increasing the sinter ratio can overcome the defect of high lump ore ratio that can effectively improve the poor softening performance, melting performance and the position and thickness of the cohesive zone. However, because of the pulverization performance, the maximum pressure difference and gas permeability of the burden become worse.

1. Introduction

At present, blast furnace (BF) is a high-efficiency mainstream ironmaking process that cannot be replaced and the problems it faces mainly include cost and environmental protection. The reasonable burden structure and BF slag system optimization play significant roles in stabling BF operation, reducing the production cost and improving the level of productivity [1,2,3,4]. However, increasing the ratio of lump ore into the BF can effectively reduce costs and pollution [5,6,7,8]. However, during the conversion of ferric oxide to trioxide, the unit cell will expand by 21%, resulting in pulverization, which will affect the permeability by increasing the lump ore ratio. What is more, the reduction in high sinter ore ratio will certainly affect the soft-melt dropping behaviors.
The ratio of lump ore used by companies in Japan and other Asian countries generally exceeds 15% and some even exceed 20%, which fully demonstrates that the ratio of high-quality lump ore into the furnace between 10% and 20% will not have a large impact on the operation of the BF. It further proves the feasibility of the high-ratio lump ore into the furnace [5,6,7,8]. In Baosteel and Shougang, the ratio of lump ore directly entering the BF can reach 20%. However, some other domestic BFs find it difficult to reach 15% and some even produce full clinker smelting [9,10,11]. This is due to the lack of high-grade lump ore in our country. In recent years, the quality and grade of imported ore have also decreased, which leads to the reduction in the smelting economy of lump ore resources.
The ratio of lump ore has an important influence on the metallurgical properties of the burden and BF operation. In recent years, there are a large number of researchers exploring the function mechanisms of lump ore on softening–melting behaviors of mixed burden. Wu et al. considered that different types of lump ore have different effects on the soft-melt dropping properties and high-quality lump ore has a small impact on the soft-melt dropping properties of the mixed burden. Simultaneously its high temperature metallurgy can meet the requirements of the BF [12,13]. Zhang et al. found that, compared with a single burden, the reduction properties and low-temperature reduction pulverization properties of the mixed burden are superimposed, but the soft-melt dropping properties are not superimposed. In addition, a proper amount of high-quality lump ore ratio will not have a large impact on the ironmaking process [14,15,16]. Naito et al. revealed that raw materials smelting has a terrible impact on the BF operation, but the metallurgical properties can meet the requirements of BF smelting [17]. Besides, some researchers deem that the temperature range of the single ore primary-slag is wide and the interaction between mixed burden can improve the primary-slag formation behaviors. In addition, others explored the influence of different chemical components on the metallurgical properties of slag [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25]. However, predecessors have not conducted a comprehensive study on the relationship between softening–melting and primary-slag formation behaviors on the cohesive zone under high lump ratio.
It is of great significance to explore the high-temperature metallurgical properties under high ratio lump ore ratio. This work systematically analyzes the soft-melt dropping properties and primary-slag formation behaviors of the charge under the condition of increasing the lump ore ratio and further analyzes their internal relations and the mechanism. It mainly uses large-scale soft-melt dropping equipment to select lump ore ratios of 15%, 20% and 25%, respectively. Then the obtained primary slags are subjected to chemical composition, slag phase composition and melting properties. Finally, the soft-melt dropping properties and primary-slag formation behaviors are explored, as well as their internal connections. This will provide a theoretical basis for exploring the influence of the ratio of lump ore on the whole BF ironmaking process.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The iron ores in the experiment are used in actual BF production, including sinter (S-1) with basicity of 1.80, pellet (P-1) and lump ore (O-1). The specific chemical compositions of the samples are shown in Table 1. The FeT mass fraction of S-1 is 58.51% and SiO2 mass fraction is only 4.84%, which is a typical sinter with high iron, low silicon and high basicity. In addition, for P-1 with the contents of FeT, SiO2 mass fraction sets as 66.54% and 2.03%, respectively. What is more, the FeT mass fraction of O-1 is 63.38% and the content of SiO2 is 3.14%, which has high quality and can satisfy the normal smelting requirements.

2.2. Experimental Procedure

The test uses a large-capacity iron ore soft-melt dropping detection device with independent intellectual property rights, which is shown in Figure 1. At present, the method for measuring iron ore high temperature load reduction soft-melt dropping properties (GB/T 34211—2017) only regulates the relevant operations and parameters of the experimental process of small drip equipment (500 g); this article, however, refers to large drip equipment (2000 g). The experimental dosage is more, the experimental results are more representative, and the reproducibility is better [26]. The test conditions are determined as follows: The specification of graphite crucible is φ95 mm × 210 mm and loads 1 kg/cm2 of iron-bearing burden. In addition, 80 g of coke is laid under the burden layer, 60 g of coke is laid above and the full particle size is 8–12 mm. The heating system and ventilation system of the equipment are shown in Figure 2.

2.3. Melting and Dropping Test Schemes

According to the actual production of BF burden alkalinity (w(CaO)/w(SiO2) is generally 1.3–1.5 [27,28], the melt–drop experiment scheme selected in this work is shown in Table 2. Schemes 1–3 are three kinds of single ore. Schemes 4–6 are the mixed burdens with the sinter ratio unchanged, the pellet ratio decreased, and the lump ore ratio increased. Schemes 7 and 8 keep the lump ore ratio constant at 25% and change other burdens’ ratios.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Analysis of Softening and Melting Behaviors of Iron-Containing Burden after Increasing Lump Ore Ratio

3.1.1. Analysis of the Softening Behaviors

Shrinkage occurs in the softening process of the burden and the shrinkage rate of the burden can be calculated by Equation (1).
Δ H = H 0 H T H 0
where Δ H is the shrinkage rate of the burden at a certain temperature, %; HT is the displacement of the displacement sensor at a certain temperature, mm; H0 is the original height of the burden, mm.
The changes in the softening properties of the burden under different burden are shown in Figure 3.
Comparing the shrinkage curves a, b and c in Figure 3a, it can be seen that for the single ore, the T0 (temperature at which the burden begins to shrink) and T10 (the temperature at which the burden shrinks 10% of the lump O-1) and T40 (the temperature at which the burden shrinks by 40%) are the smallest, and ΔT (the softening temperature range of the burden, ΔT = T40 − T10) is the widest at 169 °C. In comparison, T0 and T10 of sinter are the largest, T40 is similar to pellet at 1300 °C and ΔT is the narrowest at only 94 °C. Pellet has the highest T40 at 1302 °C and T0, T10 and ΔT are between the other two types of single ore. In summary, the softening properties of sinter is the best, pellet is second and lump ore is the worst. This is because lump ore is mainly composed of limonite with loose structure and higher crystal water content. At the same time, it contains higher Al2O3, which causes it to soften at a lower temperature [24]. High-basicity sinter and self-dissolving pellet have excellent metallurgical properties, strong resistance to deformation and relatively high softening temperature [27].
Comparing the shrinkage curves d, e and f in Figure 3b, when the S-1 ratio is constant: the O-1 ratio increases from 15% to 20%; T0 increases by 9 °C; T10 decreases from 1172 °C to 1161 °C; T40 increases from 1290 °C to 1315 °C; ΔT increases by 36 °C. When the O-1 ratio increases from 20% to 25%: T0 rises to 1099 °C; T10, T40, ΔT all decrease, but the change value is small. In summary, as the ratio of lump ore increases, the T0 increases and T10 decreases in turn. Under the influence of lump ore, the softening properties first deteriorate sharply and as the ratio of lump ore further increases, its influence gradually weakens. The first reason is that as the high softening temperature pellet ratio decreases and the low softening temperature lump ore ratio increases; the second is that the SiO2 content of the lump ore is higher. The increasing ratio makes it easier to react with FeO at lower temperatures and generate a large amount of low melting point compounds, resulting in a decrease in the T10 of the mixed burden [22,28].
Comparing the shrinkage curves g, h and i in Figure 3c, it can be seen that when the O-1 ratio is 25%: the S-1 ratio increases from 55% to 65%; T0 changes little; T10 increases by 11 °C; T40 of both is 1305 °C; ΔT is narrowed by 11 °C. When the S-1 ratio increased from 65% to 75%: T0 rises to 1099 °C; T0 drops 7 °C; T10 only increased 3 °C; T40 decreases 14 °C; ΔT reduces from 136 °C to 119 °C. In summary, as the sinter ratio increases successively, the T0 of the mixed burden decreases, but the amplitude is not large; T10 increases; T40, ΔT decreases. Properly increasing the sintering ratio can effectively improve the softening properties of the high lump ore ratio burden. The reason may be that as the high softening temperature sinter increases, the lower softening temperature pellet ratio decreases. The second is that the sinter phase is mainly calcium ferrite, which has better reduction properties. With the increase in its ratio, the FeO content is reduced. At the same time, the sinter contains higher MgO and CaO that can form a large number of high melting point compounds, which leads to the increase in the T10 of the mixed burden [20,21,22,28].
In summary, due to its own defects, lump ore has a lower softening temperature, a wide softening range and poor softening performance. However, the performance can be effectively improved by mixing ores, because the interaction between the burden has a positive effect on the softening performance [12,13]. As the lump ore ratio increases, the T10 gradually decreases due to the increase in low melting point compounds. Under the condition of high lump ore ratio, increasing the high alkalinity sinter ratio can effectively suppress the disadvantages of lump ore.

3.1.2. Analysis of the Melting Behaviors

The changes in melting properties of the three single ore are shown in Figure 4a. O-1 has the lowest Ts (pressure difference steep rise temperature) and Td (temperature at which the slag and iron drips), which are 1247 °C and 1358 °C, respectively. Additionally, ΔTds (burden melting temperature range, ΔTds = Td − Ts) is 111 °C. The maximum Ts of P-1 is 1321 °C, ΔTds is only 69 °C and Td is between the other two. The Td of S-1 is as high as 1439 °C, ΔTds is the largest and Ts is second only to pellet. Lump ore containing low melting point compounds has a lower melting temperature [11,16]. Thus, the charge melts at a lower temperature and blocks the gap of the material layer, causing the pressure difference to rise sharply at a lower temperature. At the same time, the high melting point compounds contained in it make its dropping temperature higher, so its melting range is wider. However, sinter and pellet containing a large amount of high melting point have a higher melting temperature and narrow melting range.
The lump ore ratio increases from 15% to 25% and the melting characteristics of the mixed burdens are shown in Figure 4b. When the O-1 ratio increases from 15% to 20%, the Ts of the mixed burden decreases by 33 °C, the Td decreases from 1430 °C to 1418 °C, the ΔTds increases by 21 °C. Meanwhile, the O-1 ratio increased from 20% to 25%, Ts dropped to 1285 °C, Td dropped by 16 °C, ΔTds dropped from 117 °C to 106 °C. As the proportion increases, due to the increase in low melting point compounds, the melting start temperature decreases and the temperature at which molten iron appears is lower, which in turn leads to lower dropping temperature.
The sinter ratio increases from 55% to 75% and the melting characteristics of the mixed burden are shown in Figure 4c. When the S-1 ratio increases from 55% to 65%, the Ts of the mixed burden rises from 1285 °C to 1302 °C, Td increases by 12 °C, ΔTds decreases by 5 °C and the melting properties improve. When the S-1 ratio increased from 65% to 75%, Ts increased by 13 °C, Td rose to 1417 °C, ΔTds only increased by 1 °C. With the increase in sinter with greater high melting point compounds, the melting temperature and dropping temperature of the mixed charge likewise increased.
In summary, the lump ore phase is complex, and the melting points of the compounds contained are quite different, so it has a lower Ts and a wider ΔTds. Further, mixed charge can also effectively improve its performance. When the O-1 ratio increases, the ΔTds moves to the low temperature area and the melting temperature interval becomes wider. This may be due to the decrease in P-1 with better melting properties and the formation of a large amount of low melting compounds. Under the condition of high lump ore ratio, appropriately increasing the sinter ratio can improve the melting properties of the mixed burden to a certain extent. This may be because the increase in S-1 has better melting properties. At the same time, the sinter contains higher MgO and CaO, forming a large amount of high melting point compounds, which leads to the increasing Td of the mixed burden [27].

3.1.3. Analysis of the Maximum Pressure Difference

The change of ΔPmax (maximum pressure difference) of different burdens is shown in Figure 5. As shown in Figure 5a, the ΔPmax of lump ore is as high as 12.93 kPa, followed by sinter and pellet, which are the smallest at only 3.02 kPa. The thermal explosion performance of lump ore and the low-temperature reduction and pulverization performance of sinter are poor, resulting in more powder produced during the high-temperature reduction process, which seriously affects the air permeability of the ore layer. Meanwhile, the self-dissolving pellet has better metallurgical properties and strong toughness.
As shown in Figure 5b, when the sinter ratio is constant and the lump ore ratio increases from 15% to 20%, the ΔPmax of the mixed burden only increases by 0.69 kPa; while the lump ore ratio rises to 25%, the ΔPmax of the mixed burden further increases by 1.93 kPa. As the lump ore ratio increases, the powder produced by thermal explosion increases, which blocks the gaps in the material layer and increases the maximum pressure difference.
The control of the lump ore ratio at 25%, the sinter ratio increasing from 55% to 75% and the change of the mixed burden ΔPmax is shown in Figure 5c. When the sinter ratio increased from 55% to 65%, ΔPmax increased from 7.04 kPa to 9.45 kPa. However, as the sinter ratio continues to increase to 75%, the change range of ΔPmax becomes smaller—only 0.61 kPa. As the ratio of sinter increases, the powder produced by low-temperature reduction and pulverization increases, which blocks the gaps in the material layer and increases the maximum pressure difference.
To sum up, due to its poor thermal explosion performance, lump ore produces more powder in the high-temperature reduction, resulting in a larger maximum pressure difference. However, the mixture can effectively reduce the maximum pressure difference. As the lump ore ratio increases, more powder is produced by high-temperature reduction and the maximum pressure difference increases sequentially. As the sinter ratio increases, the powder produced by low-temperature reduction powder further increases and the maximum pressure difference further increases.

3.1.4. Analysis of the Comprehensive Air Permeability

The comprehensive air permeability of the cohesive zone can be expressed by its index (S) and its calculation formula is as shown in Equation (2):
S = T s T d ( Δ P T Δ P s ) dT
where ΔPT is the pressure difference at temperature T and ΔPs is the pressure difference at temperature Ts.
The change of the comprehensive air permeability index of different burdens is shown in Figure 6. The S value of the three kinds of single ore is shown in Figure 6a. The maximum S value of lump ore is 680 kPa·°C; the air permeability is the worst. The S value of pellet is only 221 kPa·°C; the air permeability is the best, and sinter is located between pellet and lump ore. Lump ore has a large ΔPmax, while its melting temperature is low and the interval is wide, so its S value is large. Although the ΔPmax of sinter is second only to lump ore, it has a higher Ts, Td and a narrow ΔTds, so its S value is smaller than that of lump ore. However, the ΔPmax of pellet is smaller, the melting performance is higher, and the gas permeability is the best.
As shown in Figure 6b, when the sinter ratio is constant and the lump ore ratio increases from 15% to 20%, the S value changes little, which has little effect on its air permeability. When the lump ore ratio increases from 20% to 25%, the S value increases from 273 kPa·°C to 434 kPa·°C and the air permeability becomes worse. According to the above, as the lump ore ratio increases, the maximum pressure difference increases successively, the melting performance successively deteriorates, and the S value successively increases.
The lump ore ratio is controlled to be 25%, the sinter ratio increases from 55% to 75% and the change of the S value of the mixed burden is shown in Figure 6c. When the sinter ratio increased from 55% to 65%, the S value increased by 93 kPa·°C. As the ratio increases to 75%, the S value continues to increase to 613 kPa·°C. According to the above, as the sinter ratio increases, although the melting performance becomes better, the change range is smaller than the pressure difference and the air permeability worsens.
In summary, because lump ore has a larger pressure difference, a lower melting temperature and a wider melting range, its air permeability is poor. Being mixed with sinter and pellet can effectively improve its air permeability. With the increase in lump ore ratio, the pressure difference gradually increases, the melting temperature decreases, the interval becomes wider and the air permeability becomes worse. When the sinter ratio increases, its influence on the maximum pressure difference is greater than that on the melting performance, so the gas permeability worsens.

3.1.5. Analysis of the Cohesive Zone Position

The position change of the cohesive zone in different burdens is shown in Figure 7. The position of the cohesive zone of the three single ore is shown in Figure 7a. The cohesive zone of the lump ore is the thickest, up to 260 °C. Further, it is in a very low temperature zone, so its air permeability of the burden is very poor. In comparison, the cohesive zone of sinter ranges from 1206 °C to 1439 °C and the temperature zone of the cohesive zone is the highest with a thickness of 233 °C. The cohesive zone of pellet is the thinnest, with a temperature range of 1179 °C−1390 °C and the melting temperature range that has the greatest influence on gas permeability is the smallest and has the best gas permeability. Based on the above, it can be seen that the lump ore contains more complex compounds, has a lower T10 and a higher Td, so the thickness of the cohesive zone is wider.
As shown in Figure 7b, when the sinter ratio is constant and the lump ore ratio increases from 15% to 20%, the thickness of the cohesive zone changes very little. However, the range of melting temperature increases, the air permeability worsens and the cohesive zone moves to the low temperature area. When the lump ore ratio increased from 20% to 25%, although the thickness of the cohesive zone decreased by 24 °C, it moved further to the low temperature zone. As the lump ore ratio increases, due to the increase in low melting point compounds, the T10 is lower. Additionally, the sinter and pellet play leading roles in the Td, so the variation range of Td is less than the T10 and the cohesive zone becomes thicker.
The control of the lump ore ratio is 25%, the sinter ratio increases from 55% to 75% and the change in the mixed burden cohesive zone temperature range is shown in Figure 7c. When the sinter ratio increases from 55% to 65%, the thickness of the cohesive zone changes very little and the melting temperature range only narrows by 5 °C, and the whole cohesive zone moves to the high temperature zone by 8 °C. While the sinter ratio increases to 75%, although the cohesive zone thickens by 11 °C, its melting temperature range only increases by 1 °C, Td increases by 14 °C and the cohesive zone moves to the high temperature zone. Increasing the sinter ratio, the softening performance and melting performance improve, so the performance of the cohesive zone likewise improves.
In summary, the lump ore has a lower soft-melt temperature and a thicker cohesive zone. Mixed charge can effectively improve the performance of lump ore cohesive zone. As the lump ore ratio increases, the performance of the cohesive zone worsens, and increasing the sinter ratio has a certain positive effect on the formation of the cohesive zone.

3.2. Analysis of Primary-Slag Formation Behavior of Iron-Bearing Burden after Increasing Lump Ore Ratio

In order to further explore the change and mechanism of the soft-melt dropping properties of the mixed burden with increasing lump ore ratio, the maximum pressure difference and the temperature at the maximum pressure difference are determined according to the above-mentioned test. Then the test is stopped at this temperature and the graphite crucible is dissected to extract the primary slag. The dissecting result is shown in Figure 8. We used Rigaku D/MAX-2500 X-ray diffractometer (Tokyo, Japan) to analyze its mineral composition; the results are shown in Figure 9. The XRF-1800 X-ray fluorescence analysis equipment is used for chemical composition analysis. The results of the chemical composition of the primary slag formed by six groups of burden are shown in Table 3. At the same time, the melting point was detected by the HRHN-5F melting point equipment. The melting process is shown in Figure 10. Among them, deformation temperature is the temperature at which the tip end of the cone is rounded or the cone begins to tilt; the softening start temperature is when the tip of the cone becomes curved; hemispherical temperature is the time when the cone turns into a hemisphere; when the cone reaches the flow temperature, it is completely flat on the cone holder with no obvious shape. The results of the melting properties are shown in Table 4.
According to the detection results of the primary slag of the single ore, it can be seen that both sinter and pellet are alkaline iron-containing burden; therefore, the formed primary slag has a higher CaO content. At the same time, due to their better reducibility, the formation of primary-slag FeO content is lower than other acid burden [27]. For sinter, the FeO content of the primary slag is relatively low. This is because the sinter is loose and porous and the iron-containing mineral composition is mainly calcium ferrite, which has high reducibility and reduces the FeO content of the primary slag. In addition, due to the addition of more CaO and MgO in the production process of sinter, the content of CaO and MgO in the primary slag is relatively the highest, forming high melting point minerals, such as 2CaO·SiO2, etc., which makes the melting temperature and Td of sinter increase, as well as the melting zone to move to the high temperature zone and the thickness of the cohesive zone to increase. The pellet has a high content of Al2O3, but because it is a self-fluxing pellet, it has better reduction properties and low FeO content in the primary slag, which makes its cohesive zone properties better than the other two.
On the other hand, the content of CaO in lump ore is extremely low and the oxides that begin to form slag are mainly FeO, SiO2, Al2O3. Although the slag phase contains high melting point compounds such as mullite (3Al2O3·2SiO2, 1940 °C) and silicon dioxide (SiO2, 1723 °C). However, the melting point of iron olivine (2FeO·SiO2, 1205 °C) is very low, resulting in lump ore drips having a lower temperature. The sinter and self-fluxing pellet primary-slag phase contain a large amount of CaO and the melting point of the compounds is higher, which makes the upper edge temperature of the cohesive zone of the basic iron-containing burden higher than the lump ore. As the reduction progresses, the FeO content in the slag phase decreases and the mineral composition of the slag phase also changes. The newly produced slag phase is magnesia feldspar (2CaO·MgO·2SiO2, 1454 °C), chrysotile (2CaO·Al2O3·SiO2, 1593 °C), calcium olivine (2CaO·SiO2, 2153 °C), monocalcium silicate (CaO·SiO2, 1550 °C). Therefore, the primary slag of sinter and pellet has a high melting temperature and high viscosity and needs to be able to flow freely and separate from the molten iron at a higher temperature, thus exhibiting a higher lower edge temperature of the cohesive zone.
According to the detection results of the primary slag of the mixed burden, when the sinter is matched with different ratios of pellet and lump ore to form a mixed burden, the main mineral compositions of the primary slag, such as feldspar (2CaO·MgO·2SiO2), calcite (2CaO·Al2O3·SiO2), dicalcium silicate (2CaO·SiO2) and mullite (3Al2O3·2SiO2) change little. However, as the lump ore ratio increases successively, the content of CaO in the primary slag decreases, the contents of FeO and SiO2 increase and the contents of Al2O3 and MgO are similar. Therefore, the high melting point slag phase decreases and the primary-slag melting temperature decreases, resulting in reductions in the softening start temperature, melting temperature and dropping temperature. The cohesive zone moves to the low temperature zone and the properties deteriorates successively.

4. Conclusions

  • The ore phase of lump ore is more complicated and the primary slag contains a large amount of FeO and SiO2. During the high temperature reduction process, it is easy to produce a large amount of low melting point compounds, resulting in lower softening temperature and melting temperature, thicker cohesive zone, larger maximum pressure difference, poor air permeability and poor melting performance of the primary slag. On the other hand, by being mixed with sinter and pellet, all the properties can be effectively improved.
  • With the increase in lump ore ratio, the CaO in the primary slag decreases, and FeO and SiO2 increase, resulting in the decrease in high melting point compounds in the primary slag. The melting temperature of the primary slag sequentially decreases, resulting in the softening temperature and melting temperature being reduced. The cohesive zone moves to the low temperature zone. Meanwhile, the maximum pressure difference increases, and the gas permeability deteriorates.
  • Under the condition of high lump ore ratio, increasing the sinter ratio can raise the high melting point compounds produced during the high temperature reduction process, so it can effectively improve the poor softening performance, melting performance and the position and thickness of the cohesive zone. However, due to its own metallurgical properties that easily produce a large amount of powder, which leads to the deterioration of the maximum pressure difference and gas permeability of the burden.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, Z.-J.H.; Formal analysis, supervision, writing—review & editing, W.-L.Z.; data curation, methodology, writing—original draft, Y.-F.L.; Validation, W.-G.K.; Validation, P.H.; Supervision, J.-H.Z.; Validation, Q.-H.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51874171, 51974154), University of Science and Technology Liaoning Talent Project Grants (No. 601011507-05).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chakravarty, S.; Bhattacharyya, P.; Chatterjee, S.S.; Singh, B.N. Utilisation of Iron ore Fines in Alternative Iron making processes—An Indian perspective. Nature 2000, 334, 338–340. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yu, Y.H.; Feng, G.S.; Su, D.X. Measures of decreasing BF fuel consumption and improving sinter performance in guofeng. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2008, 15, 9–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. An, X.W.; Wang, J.S.; Lan, R.Z.; Han, Y.H.; Xue, Q.G. Softening and Melting Behavior of Mixed Burden for Oxygen BF. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2013, 20, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kawamura, K.; Shui, V.H. Pilot plant experience in electron-beam treatment of iron-ore sintering flue gas and its application to coal boiler flue gas cleanup. Radiat. Physics Chem. 1984, 24, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lu, W.K. The Search for an Economical and Environmentally Friendly Ironmaking Process. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2001, 32B, 757–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Prakash, S. Non-isothermal kinetics of iron-ore reduction. Ironmak. Steelmak. 1994, 21, 237–243. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ellis, B.G.; Loo, C.E.; Witchard, D. Effect of ore properties on sinter bed permeability and strength. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2007, 34, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nagahiro, K.; Okazaki, T.; Nishino, M. Activities and technologies for environmental protection at Nippon Steel: A perspective. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2005, 32, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, S.; Xue, X.; Liu, X.; Duan, P.; Yang, H.; Jiang, T.; Wang, D.; Liu, R. Current situation and comprehensive utilization of iron ore tailing resources. J. Min. Sci. 2006, 42, 403–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liu, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, M.; Zhai, L.W.; Zhang, H.; Xu, L.B. Rational burden structure of BF based on softening and melting property. Iron Steel 2016, 51, 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wu, S.; Han, H.; Liu, X.; Wang, H.; Xue, F. Erratum to: Highly effective use of Australian Pilbara blend lump ore in a BF. Revue Métallurgie 2010, 107, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wu, S.; Han, H.; Xu, H.; Wang, H.; Liu, X. Increasing lump ores ratio in BF based on the high-temperature interactivity of iron bearing materials. ISIJ Int. 2010, 50, 686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Wu, S.L.; Xu, H.F.; Tian, Y.Q. Evaluation of lump ores for use in modern BFs as part of mixed burden practice. Ironmak. Steelmak. 2009, 36, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tao, J.; Yang, G.Q.; Zhang, J.L.; Shao, J.G.; Fu, Y.D.; Wan, D. Effect of Mixed Charge of Ore and Lump Coal on the Softening-Melting Property of the Burden; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  15. Li, X.; Zhang, J.; Su, B.; Yao, C.; Liu, X.; Zhang, C. Performance evaluation of lump ores for BF based on principal component analysis. J. Cent. South Univ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 47, 2943–2950. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wang, X.Z.; Zhang, J.L.; Liu, Z.J.; Liu, X.L.; Wang, R.R.; Xu, Z.T. Influence of lump ore on metallurgical properties of BF burden. Research Iron Steel 2017, 5, 4–8. [Google Scholar]
  17. Nishimura, T.; Higuchi, K.; Naito, M.; Kunitomo, K. Evaluation of Softening, Shrinking and Melting Reduction Behavior of Raw Materials for BF. ISIJ Int. 2011, 51, 1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Stefania, G.; Elżbieta, J.R. The influence of small particle on the fluidity of BF slag cement paste containing superplasticizers. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 26, 411–415. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gan, L.; Zhang, C.; Zhou, J.; Shangguan, F. Continuous cooling crystallization kinetics of a molten BF slag. J. Non Cryst. Solids 2012, 358, 20–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kim, J.R.; Lee, Y.S.; Min, D.J.; Jung, S.M.; Yi, S.H. Influence of MgO and Al2O3 contents on viscosity of BF type slags containing FeO. ISIJ Int. 2004, 44, 1291–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tang, X.L.; Zhang, Z.T.; Guo, M.; Zhang, M.; Wang, X.D. Viscosities Behavior of CaO-SiO2-MgO-Al2O3 Slag with Low Mass Ratio of CaO to SiO2 and Wide Range of Al2O3 Content. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2011, 18, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lee, Y.S.; Min, D.J.; Jung, S.M.; Yi, S.H. Influence of Basicity and FeO Content on Viscosity of BF Type Slags Containing FeO. ISIJ Int. 2004, 44, 1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kumar, S.; Kumar, R.; Mehrotra, S.P. Influence of granulated BF slag on the reaction, structure and properties of fly ash based geopolymer. J. Mater. Sci. 2010, 45, 607–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wu, S.L.; Huang, W.; Kou, M.Y.; Liu, X.L.; Du, K.P.; Zhang, K.F. Influence of Al2O3 Content on Liquid Phase Ratio and Fluidity of Primary-slag and Final Slag in BF. Steel Res. Int. 2015, 86, 550–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhang, J. Coexistence Theory of Slag Structure and Its Application to Calculation of Oxidizing Capability of Slag Melts. J. Iron Steel Res. Int. 2003, 10, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  26. Di, H.; He, Z.-J.; Yan, L.-J.; Qiu, S.; Zhan, W.-L.; Zhang, J.-H. Metallurgical property of mixed burden based on a large scale iron ore droplet testing equipment. Iron Steel 2018, 53, 90–94. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang, F.J.; Lyu, Q.; Chen, S.J.; Liu, R.; Li, F.M. Research on influence of basicity on dropping performance of vanadium-titanium burden. Iron Steel Vanadium Titan. 2015, 36, 92–96. [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, F.G.; Qi, C.L.; Wang, Y. Influence of FeO on soften-melting properties of primary slag under different slag basicity. Iron Steel 2018, 53, 20–26. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of iron ores melting and dropping measuring device.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of iron ores melting and dropping measuring device.
Metals 10 01254 g001
Figure 2. Heating and ventilation program.
Figure 2. Heating and ventilation program.
Metals 10 01254 g002
Figure 3. Changes in the softening properties of different burdens. (a) single ores; (b) 55% sinter ratio; (c) 25% lump ore ratio.
Figure 3. Changes in the softening properties of different burdens. (a) single ores; (b) 55% sinter ratio; (c) 25% lump ore ratio.
Metals 10 01254 g003
Figure 4. ΔTds of the different burdens. (a) single ores; (b) 55% sinter ratio; (c) 25% lump ore ratio.
Figure 4. ΔTds of the different burdens. (a) single ores; (b) 55% sinter ratio; (c) 25% lump ore ratio.
Metals 10 01254 g004
Figure 5. ΔPmax of the different burdens. (a) single ores; (b) 55% sinter ratio; (c) 25% lump ore ratio.
Figure 5. ΔPmax of the different burdens. (a) single ores; (b) 55% sinter ratio; (c) 25% lump ore ratio.
Metals 10 01254 g005
Figure 6. S value of the different burdens. (a) single ores; (b) 55% sinter ratio; (c) 25% lump ore ratio.
Figure 6. S value of the different burdens. (a) single ores; (b) 55% sinter ratio; (c) 25% lump ore ratio.
Metals 10 01254 g006
Figure 7. Temperature range of the cohesive zone in different burdens. (a) single ores; (b) 55% sinter ratio; (c) 25% lump ore ratio.
Figure 7. Temperature range of the cohesive zone in different burdens. (a) single ores; (b) 55% sinter ratio; (c) 25% lump ore ratio.
Metals 10 01254 g007
Figure 8. Morphology of the dissecting crucibles.
Figure 8. Morphology of the dissecting crucibles.
Metals 10 01254 g008
Figure 9. The XRD diffraction pattern of the primary slag. (a) single ores; (b) 55% sinter ratio
Figure 9. The XRD diffraction pattern of the primary slag. (a) single ores; (b) 55% sinter ratio
Metals 10 01254 g009
Figure 10. The change behaviors of sample in the heating process.
Figure 10. The change behaviors of sample in the heating process.
Metals 10 01254 g010
Table 1. Chemical compositions of iron ore samples (mass fraction, %).
Table 1. Chemical compositions of iron ore samples (mass fraction, %).
SampleFeTFeOSiO2CaOAl2O3MgOTiO2MnOS
S-158.519.324.849.051.681.480.100.230.01
P-166.540.312.031.480.580.170.040.130.02
O-163.380.483.140.041.250.060.140.180.02
Table 2. The schemes of melting and dropping experiment.
Table 2. The schemes of melting and dropping experiment.
SchemeS-1 RatioP-1 RatioO-1 RatioBasicity
1100001.87
2010000.73
3001000.01
45530151.44
55525201.40
65520251.36
76510251.45
8750251.54
Table 3. Chemical composition of no dropping slag samples, %.
Table 3. Chemical composition of no dropping slag samples, %.
SampleFeOCaOSiO2Al2O3MgO
18.6146.1727.9212.205.10
28.5245.8727.7511.696.17
348.492.0637.2410.761.45
45.5647.0632.158.586.27
56.6643.0635.088.716.50
68.7839.7436.668.346.48
Table 4. The melting temperature of the slags with different furnace burden.
Table 4. The melting temperature of the slags with different furnace burden.
SchemeDeformation Temperature/°CSoftening Temperature/°CHemispheric Temperature/°CFlow Temperature/°C
11310136713861423
21185120312201235
31089109811071125
41219131313151326
51205130513101328
61185128012861310

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, Y.-F.; He, Z.-J.; Zhan, W.-L.; Kong, W.-G.; Han, P.; Zhang, J.-H.; Pang, Q.-H. Relationship and Mechanism Analysis of Soft-Melt Dropping Properties and Primary-Slag Formation Behaviors of the Mixed Burden in Increasing Lump Ore Ratio. Metals 2020, 10, 1254. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/met10091254

AMA Style

Li Y-F, He Z-J, Zhan W-L, Kong W-G, Han P, Zhang J-H, Pang Q-H. Relationship and Mechanism Analysis of Soft-Melt Dropping Properties and Primary-Slag Formation Behaviors of the Mixed Burden in Increasing Lump Ore Ratio. Metals. 2020; 10(9):1254. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/met10091254

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Yun-Fei, Zhi-Jun He, Wen-Long Zhan, Wei-Guo Kong, Peng Han, Jun-Hong Zhang, and Qing-Hai Pang. 2020. "Relationship and Mechanism Analysis of Soft-Melt Dropping Properties and Primary-Slag Formation Behaviors of the Mixed Burden in Increasing Lump Ore Ratio" Metals 10, no. 9: 1254. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/met10091254

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop