Characterization, Calcination and Pre-Reduction of Polymetallic Manganese Nodules by Hydrogen and Methane
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Raw Material and Preparation
2.2. Calcination
2.3. Reduction by Hydrogen and Methane
2.3.1. Hydrogen Reduction Using Thermogravimetry
2.3.2. Reduction in a Stationary Bed Reactor
2.4. Characterization Techniques
3. Results
3.1. Characteristics of the Ore
3.1.1. Chemical Analysis (XRF)
3.1.2. Phase Analysis (XRD)
3.1.3. Microstructural Analysis
3.2. Calcination and Reduction Behavior of the Ore
3.2.1. Mass Changes
3.2.2. Phase Changes
3.2.3. Microstructural Changes
4. Discussion
4.1. Raw Ore Characteristics
4.2. Phase and Structural Changes in Calcination
4.3. Reduction of Oxides
4.3.1. Gas Composition Effect
4.3.2. Products Characteristics
4.3.3. Thermochemistry of the Process
5. Conclusions
- The polymetallic manganese nodules were found to have a highly complex microstructure consisting of several phases.
- In the polymetallic nodules, manganese and iron were found to mostly reside in different phases of lithiphorite (Al0.65H2Li0.33MnO4), manganese oxide (MnO2), vernadite (Mn(OH)4), chalcophanite (H6Mn3O10Zn), and birnessite (MnO2), and geothite (α-FeO(OH)).
- The valuable Co, Cu, and Ni elements are homogenously distributed in the main ore components (Fe- and Mn-containing phases) and no known minerals of these metals were found.
- Polymetallic manganese nodules reduction using H2 and CH4 and their mixtures yields metallic iron, nickel, copper, and cobalt. While Mn is reduced mostly to MnO state.
- No carbide was found in the samples reduced under methane-containing H2-CH4 gas mixtures.
- Silicon content of the ore greatly affected the reduced samples, binding elements of manganese and iron into phases of fayalite and tephorite; they do not affect the pre-reduction extent significantly.
- The silicon contribution in the polymetallic nodules appear to originate from quartz and silicate phases in the nodules.
- The porosity of the manganese nodules during calcination is increased and allows for proper mass transport of reactants and gaseous reduction products.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Halada, K.; Shimada, M.; Kiyoshi, I. Forecasting of the consumption of metals up to 2050. J. Jpn. Inst. Metal. 2007, 71, 831–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Monhemius, J. The extractive metallurgy of deep-sea manganese nodules. In Topics in Non-Ferrous Extractive Metallurgy, 2nd ed.; Burkin, A.R., Ed.; Blackwell Scientific Publications: Oxford, UK, 1980; pp. 42–69. ISBN 0-632-00648-X. [Google Scholar]
- Kuhn, T.; Wegorzewski, A.; Rühlemann, C.; Vink, A. Composition, Formation, and Occurrence of Polymetallic Nodules. In Deep-Sea Mining, 1st ed.; Sharma, R., Ed.; Springer: Dona Paula, India, 2017; pp. 23–64. [Google Scholar]
- Randhawa, N.; Hait, J.; Jana, R. A brief overview on manganese nodules processing signifying the detail in the Indian context highlighting the international scenario. Hydrometallurgy 2016, 165, 166–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agarwal, S.; Jaña, R.; Randhawa, N.; Sahu, K. Carbothermic reduction smelting of manganese nodules to recover valuable metals. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Frontiers of Metallurgy and Materials Technology, Hyderabad, India, 29–31 January 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Ochromowicz, K.; Aasly, K.; Kowalczuk, P.B. Recent advancements in metallurgical processing of marine minerals. Minerals 2021, 11, 1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Drakshayani, D.N.; Sankar, C.; Mallya, R.M. The reduction of manganese nodules by hydrogen. Thermochim. Acta 1989, 144, 313–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, F.; Jiang, X.; Wang, S.; Feng, L.; Li, D. The recovery of valuable metals from ocean polymetallic nodules using solid-state metalized reduction technology. Minerals 2020, 10, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sommerfeld, M.; Friedmann, D.; Kuhn, T.; Friedrich, B. “Zero-Waste”: A sustainable approach on pyrometallurgical processing of manganese nodule slags. Minerals 2018, 8, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Anacleto, N.; Ostrovski, O.; Ganguly, S. Reduction of Manganese Oxides by Methane-containing Gas. ISIJ 2004, 44, 1480–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheraghi, A.; Ringdalen, E.; Safarian, J. Kinetics and Mechanism of Low-Grade Manganese Ore Reduction by Natural Gas. Metall. Mater. Trans. B 2019, 50, 1566–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheraghi, A.; Yoozbashizadeh, H.; Safarian, J. Gaseous Reduction of Manganese Ores: A Review and Theoretical Insight. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2019, 41, 198–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tangstad, M.; Safarian, S.; Bao, S.; Ringdalen, E.; Valderhaug, A. Reaction Rates of 2SiO2 + SiC = 3SiO + CO in Pellets at Elevated Temperatures. Asp. Min. Miner. Sci. 2019, 3, AMMS.000558.2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mindat.org. Available online: https://www.mindat.org/min-96.html (accessed on 6 June 2022).
- Lewis, D.B. Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-ray Microanalysis. Trans. IMF 1992, 70, 198–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Speakman, S.A. Introduction to X-ray Powder Diffraction Data Analysis. Available online: http://prism.mit.edu/xray/documents/2%20Introduction%20to%20XRPD%20Data%20Analysis.pdf (accessed on 6 June 2022).
- Crum, J.V.; Riley, B.J.; Vienna, J.D. Binary Phase Diagram of the Manganese Oxide-Iron Oxide System. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 92, 2378–2384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coats, A.W.; Redfern, J.P. Thermogravimetric analysis. A review. Analyst 1963, 88, 906–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Materials Today. Available online: https://materials-today.com/effect-of-alloying-elements-in-steel/ (accessed on 18 May 2022).
- Gleeson, B. Thermodynamics and Theory of External and Internal Oxidation of Alloys. In Shreir’s Corrosion; Cottis, B., Graham, M., Lyon, S., Ruchardson, T., Scantlebury, D., Stott, H., Eds.; Elsevier: Oxford, UK, 2010; pp. 180–194. [Google Scholar]
- Barnett, S.J.; Macphee, D.E.; Lachowski, E.E.; Crammond, N.J. XRD, EDX and IR analysis of solid solutions between thaumasite and ettringite. Cem. Concr. Res. 2002, 32, 719–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Peng, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, D.; Peng, N.; Wang, D.; He, Y.; Liang, Y.; Liu, H. Study on Formation Mechanism of Fayalite (Fe2SiO4) by Solid State Reaction in Sintering Process. JOM 2017, 70, 539–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Winkler, H.G.F. On the synthesis of nepheline. Am. Mineral. 1947, 32, 131–136. [Google Scholar]
Experiment | Ar/CH4/H2 [vol%] | Sample Weight [g] | Temperature [K] |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 0/0/100 | 49.72 | 1288 |
2 | 10/50/40 | 50.19 | 1133 |
3 | 40/50/10 | 49.18 | 1133 |
4 | 50/50/0 | 50.41 | 1133 |
Element | Raw (Supplier) | Raw (Measured) | Calcined (Measured) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(wt%) | (wt%) | Normalized(wt%) | (wt%) | Normalized (wt%) | |
CaO | 2.22 | 3.45 | 2.95 | 3.05 | 2.89 |
MgO | 3.44 | 3.83 | 3.28 | 4.96 | 4.71 |
SiO2 | 17.92 | 34.6 | 29.60 | 16.2 | 15.37 |
Al2O3 | 6.73 | 12.1 | 10.35 | 6.73 | 6.39 |
Fe2O3 | 4.18 | 7.00 | 5.99 | 8.84 | 8.39 |
MnxOy * | 40.03 | 23.3 | 24.43 | 48 | 50.69 |
Cr2O3 | - | 0.02 | 0.02 | - | - |
V2O5 | - | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.1 | 0.09 |
TiO2 | 0.38 | 0.87 | 0.74 | 0.68 | 0.65 |
NiO | 1.00 | 1.14 | 0.98 | 2.4 | 2.28 |
Na2O | - | 2.57 | 2.20 | 3.29 | 3.12 |
K2O | - | 2.56 | 2.19 | 1.26 | 1.20 |
P2O5 | - | 0.41 | 0.35 | 0.39 | 0.37 |
SO3 | - | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.22 | 0.21 |
ZnO | - | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.29 | 0.28 |
MoO3 | - | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.1 | 0.09 |
CuO | 1.00 | 0.84 | 0.72 | 1.72 | 1.63 |
PbO | - | - | - | 0.06 | 0.06 |
ZrO2 | - | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
SrO | - | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.08 | 0.08 |
BaO | 0.3 | 0.20 | 0.17 | 0.28 | 0.27 |
Cl | - | 0.22 | 0.19 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
Co3O4 | 0.2 | 0.17 | 0.15 | 0.36 | 0.34 |
CeO2 | - | 0.01 | 0.01 | - | - |
Y2O3 | - | - | - | 0.03 | 0.03 |
LOI | - | 6.26 | 15.4 | 0.81 | 0.81 |
Sample | Mass Before [g] | Mass After [g] | Mass Loss [g] | Mass Loss [wt%] |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucible 1 | 37.52 | 27.09 | 10.42 | 27.8 |
Crucible 2 | 84.57 | 61.34 | 23.23 | 27.5 |
Crucible 3 | 26.83 | 19.48 | 7.35 | 27.4 |
Crucible 4 | 169.45 | 123.25 | 46.20 | 27.3 |
Crucible 5 | 170.21 | 124.05 | 46.16 | 27.1 |
Sum | 488.58 | 355.21 | 133.37 | 27.3 |
Sample | Mass Pre [g] | Mass Post [g] | Mass Loss [g] | Mass Loss [wt%] | Temperature [K] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
100% H2 | 49.72 | 45.58 | 4.14 | 8.33 | 1288 |
50%CH4 40%H2 | 50.19 | 48.02 | 2.17 | 4.32 | 1133 |
50%CH4 10%H2 | 49.18 | 47.26 | 1.92 | 3.90 | 1133 |
50%CH4 | 51.41 | 46.47 | 3.94 | 7.82 | 1133 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Brustad, O.K.; Låstad, J.; Hoseinpur, A.; Safarian, J. Characterization, Calcination and Pre-Reduction of Polymetallic Manganese Nodules by Hydrogen and Methane. Metals 2022, 12, 2013. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/met12122013
Brustad OK, Låstad J, Hoseinpur A, Safarian J. Characterization, Calcination and Pre-Reduction of Polymetallic Manganese Nodules by Hydrogen and Methane. Metals. 2022; 12(12):2013. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/met12122013
Chicago/Turabian StyleBrustad, Ole Kristian, Jonas Låstad, Arman Hoseinpur, and Jafar Safarian. 2022. "Characterization, Calcination and Pre-Reduction of Polymetallic Manganese Nodules by Hydrogen and Methane" Metals 12, no. 12: 2013. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/met12122013