Next Article in Journal
Kinetics of HCP-BCC Phase Transition Boundary in Magnesium at High Pressure
Previous Article in Journal
Biocompatibility and Corrosion Resistance of Si/ZrO2 Bioceramic Coating on AZ91D Using Electron Beam Physical Vapor Deposition (EB-PVD) for Advanced Biomedical Applications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Metals
Volume 14
Issue 6
10.3390/met14060608
metals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Microstructure Dependence of Magnetic Properties for Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 Multi-Principal-Element Alloy

by
Shaoheng Sun
1,*,
Yaxia Qiao
1,
Hao Zhang
1,
Dejun Tu
1,
Guojun Wang
1,
Zhenhua Wang
2,* and
Qing Wang
2
1
China Electric Power Research Institute, Beijing 100192, China
2
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Engineering Research Center of High Entropy Alloy Materials (Liaoning Province), Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metals 2024, 14(6), 608; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/met14060608
Submission received: 24 April 2024 / Revised: 4 May 2024 / Accepted: 13 May 2024 / Published: 21 May 2024
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study focuses on the microstructures and soft-magnetic properties of the Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 multi-principal-element alloy (MPEA) in different states. The MPEA was prepared using arc melting and suction-casting, followed by various heat treatments. The crystal structures were analyzed using X-ray diffraction (XRD), while the microstructures were characterized by means of transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results reveal that the MPEA consists mainly of coherent body-centered cubic (BCC) and B2 phases, with a moderate lattice misfit (ε = 0.14~0.21%) between them. The homogenized alloy shows the presence of coarse equiaxed grains and micro-scale cells, and it has good soft-magnetic properties with MS = 127 emu/g and HC = 143.3 A/m (1.8 Oe). The thermal stability of the alloy is found to be optimal after aging at 873 K, as there are no significant changes in microstructures and soft-magnetic properties. However, when the aging temperature increases to 973 K, the BCC nanoprecipitates are coarsened, leading to a decrease in the soft-magnetic properties.

1. Introduction

Soft-magnetic materials are widely applied in various fields because of their low coercivity (Hc), high magnetic conductivity, and high saturation magnetization (Ms or Bs), such as power transformers, electronic circuits, and information storage [1,2]. High-temperature soft-magnetic materials (operating temperature range from 673 K to 1073 K) are especially critical for developing advanced weapon systems and aerospace and aviation industries. They can be utilized as stable power switches, high-frequency inductors, transformer cores, engine rotors, magnetic shafts, or magnetic material devices [3,4]. Traditional soft-magnetic materials, such as silicon steel sheets, Fe–Ni/Fe–Co alloys, amorphous and nanocrystalline soft-magnetic alloys, and soft-magnetic ferrites, suffer from brittleness, complex manufacturing processes, low electrical resistivities resulting in very high eddy current losses, and poor thermal stability resulting in low operating temperatures [5,6]. With the increasing demand for high-performance soft-magnetic materials in harsh environments such as high-speed rotation, torsion, and vibration, it is vital to develop new soft-magnetic materials with high electric resistance, saturation magnetization, low loss, low coercivity, high thermal stability, and prominent strength and ductility [7,8,9]. However, traditional alloy design methods cannot meet these requirements due to the difficulty in achieving both high strength and excellent soft-magnetic properties simultaneously [10].
In recent years, multi-principal-element alloys (MPEAs), also named high-entropy alloys (HEAs), have obtained significant attraction due to their unique properties and potential applications [11,12]. Unlike traditional alloys, which typically consist of one or two dominant alloying elements, MPEAs can achieve a synergistic design of mechanical and functional properties by utilizing what seems like an infinite composition space, such as high hardness and wear resistance, good corrosion resistance, excellent radiation resistance, and damping properties [13,14,15]. MPEAs enriched in 3D transition metal elements, such as Co, Fe, Ni, Cu, or Mn, have demonstrated considerable potential for soft-magnetic applications [11,14,15,16]. In the realm of such alloys, a series of FeCoNi-based MPEAs has been developed in recent years and is notably significant, exhibiting superior mechanical and ferromagnetic properties [16,17,18,19]. Among them, FeCoNi(AlSi)x alloys achieved a saturation magnetization of MS = 125 emu/g and a coercivity of Hc = 1400 A/m [20,21], whereas the FeCoNi(CrAl)x composite exhibited saturation magnetization values ranging from 13 to 64 emu/g and a coercivity of 1416 A/m [16]. In addition, a large amount of L12 nanoparticles was precipitated into the FCC matrix in the Fe32.6Co27.7Ni27.7Ta5.0Al7.0 alloy, which is regulated to a particle size of 91 nm, providing relatively low coercivity since the size of these L12 nanoparticles is less than that of the domain wall, and yet sufficiently large to reduce coherency distortions on ultrafine nanoparticles [22,23].
Although the above research has illuminated the remarkable promise of MPEAs in soft-magnetic devices, there are still important scientific questions that remain to be answered. In our previous work, we designed a soft-magnetic Al1.5Co4Fe2Cr alloy through the cluster-formula approach, adopting the formula of Al3M14, where M can be set and represents different combinations of Co, Cr, and Fe. This alloy exhibited the marked properties of MS = 135.3 emu/g, HC = 127.3 A/m, TC = 1061 K, and ρ = 244 μΩ·cm, respectively [24,25,26]. Its prominent soft-magnetic properties could be attributed to its distinct coherent microstructure, characterized by spherical, ultrafine, and ferromagnetic body-centered-cubic (BCC) particles with a size of 4~8 nm, homogeneously dispersed within the B2 matrix. Nevertheless, once the BCC/B2 coherent microstructure was in reverse, i.e., large cuboidal B2 nanoprecipitates (~100 nm) were precipitated into the BCC matrix in the Al0.7NiCoFeCr2 alloy developed via the cluster formula of Al2M14, the soft-magnetic property was severely deteriorated, indicated by a reduced saturation magnetization of MS = 28.9 emu/g and an increased coercivity of HC = 947 A/m. Furthermore, the presence of a weave-like BCC/B2 coherent microstructure in Al0.57NiCoFeCr alloy leads to an almost loss of the soft-magnetic feature, as evidenced by the much higher HC = 4035 A/m and very low MS = 11.7 emu/g [24,26]. These findings showed that the magnetic properties of MPEAs are critically sensitive to the microstructure. Moreover, the influence of the microstructural evolution of BCC/B2 with heat treatment on the soft-magnetic properties should be further investigated in depth. Therefore, in this study, we adopt the cluster formula of Al3M14 to design a new MPEA in the Al–Co–Cr–Fe system. The cluster formula approach has been used to design alloy compositions in complex composition systems, enabling rational matching of the alloying elements and thus determining the amount of each element [24,25,26]. More importantly, the BCC/B2 coherent microstructure with spherical or cuboidal nanoparticles could be well governed by the cluster formula in a complex composition alloy containing Al and transition metal elements to obtain outstanding mechanical and functional properties simultaneously [17,25,26,27]. Under the above considerations, the Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 MPEA was obtained, and the microstructure and magnetic properties of this alloy in different treatments were examined and tested to investigate the influences of microstructural evolution (including phase constitutions and particle morphologies) on the soft-magnetic properties.

2. Materials and Methods

The Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 MPEA was prepared through arc melting and suction-casting into a copper mold with a dimension of 2 mm × 9 mm × 60 mm under an argon atmosphere. The purity of raw metals exceeds 99.99 in weight percent (wt. %). To achieve chemical uniformity, approximately 10 g of the alloy ingots was melted and remelted at least five times prior to being cast by suction. Following this process, the cast alloy sheets underwent a homogenization treatment at 1573 K for 2 h and were then subjected to aging for 24 h at varying temperatures (773, 873, and 973 K). In a particular set of experiments aimed at investigating the microstructure’s thermal stability, selected alloys were aged at temperatures between 873 K and 973 K for an extended period of 480 h. All specimens were rapidly cooled in water subsequent to the thermal treatments.
Investigations into the crystal structures of the homogenized and aged alloys were conducted employing a Bruker D8 X-ray diffractometer (XRD) (Bruker Ltd., Fremont, CA, USA) with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 0.15406 nm) at a scanning speed of 2 °/min, during which the lattice constants of phases were calculated via an external standard method [28]. The detailed characterization of microstructures was carried out by means of a Zeiss Supra 55 scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Zeiss Ltd., Jena, Germany) with an electron acceleration voltage of 15 kV and JEOL-JEM-2100F field-emission transmission electron microscope (TEM) (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with an electron acceleration voltage of 120 kV. To further analyze the morphology of ultrafine nanoprecipitates and elemental distribution, an aberration-corrected JEM-ARM300F TEM (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) detector with an electron acceleration voltage of 200 kV was employed. Sample preparation for SEM analysis involved a series of mechanical processes: initial grinding followed by polishing, and a final etching in a solution consisting of 5 g FeCl3·6H2O, 25 mL HCl, and 25 mL C2H5OH. TEM specimens were prepared using an FEI Helios NanoLab 600 Dual-Beam focused ion beam (DB-FIB) instrument (FEI Ltd., Hillsboro, OR, USA), the detailed procedure being described elsewhere [29]. The statistical analysis of the particle size of nanoparticles was performed with at least six SEM or TEM morphology images using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software. Magnetic properties, specifically saturation magnetization and coercivity of the alloys in different states at room temperature, were measured using a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM, Lake Shore 7410) (Lake Shore Ltd., Columbus, OH, USA) with a maximum applied field of 15,000 Oe. Compared to other techniques like Alternative Current Magnetic Susceptibility [30] or Magnetic Force Microscopy [31], VSM can not only measure non-contact magnetic field strength, avoiding the problem of electromagnetic interference in traditional measurement methods but also requires less of a sample and is not limited by the shape and size of the sample.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Microstructure of Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 MPEA in Different States

Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of the Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 MPEA in homogenized and aged conditions. The XRD analysis reveals that all the different heat-treated alloys are mainly constituted of BCC and B2 phases. The B2 phase is characterized by a weak peak (100) diffraction plane appearing at 2θ~31° after homogenizing, which becomes much more markedly pronounced when the alloy undergoes aging at 773, 873, and 973 K for 24 h. The lattice misfits between BCC and B2 phases in both solid-solutioned and aged alloys are calculated by the equation ε = 2 × (aB2 − aBCC)/(aB2 + aBCC), as presented in Table 1. The lattice misfits of these RHEAs in different states are in the range from 0.14% to 0.21%. It is worth noting that these ε values are relatively smaller, compared with those (ε = 0.2~0.6%) in previous studies on Al–Ni–Co–Fe–Cr MPEAs exhibiting BCC/B2 coherent microstructures [25,26].
Microstructures of these homogenized MPEAs were characterized by Optical Micrograph (OM) and SEM. Figure 2a shows the OM morphology of Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 alloys, which are composed of coarse equiaxed grains with an average size ranging from 200 to 400 μm. Further examination using SEM in a homogenized state, as shown in Figure 2b, demonstrates that each grain comprises micro-scale cells measuring between 120 and 400 nm. The emergence of micro-scale cells in this alloy can be attributed to the preferential segregation of Fe and Co elements along the cell boundaries [24].
Figure 2c–e presents the SEM images of the aged Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 alloy. After aging at 773 and 873 K for 24 h, the sizes of both macro-scaled grains and micro-scaled cells do not show significant changes for the Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 alloy, which are comparable to that in the homogenized state, as shown in Figure 2c,d. With the aging temperature increasing to 973 K, the previously observed micro-scale cells disappear, as shown in Figure 2e. Moreover, it is found that cuboidal BCC nanoparticles with a size of 90 ± 12 nm are precipitated in the B2 matrix. Figure 2f displays the TEM analysis of this alloy aged at 973 K for 24 h. The TEM-DF image and the SAED pattern along the [100]BCC direction indicate that the coarse BCC nanoprecipitates, exhibiting a size of ~90 nm, are dispersed uniformly in the B2 matrix, indicating the significant microstructural evolution at 973 K.
Figure 3a,b shows the SEM micrographs of this alloy after aging at 873 and 973 K for 480 h, respectively. It is found that in an 873 K-aged state, both macro-scaled grains and micro-scaled cells do not show significant changes, which indicates that the Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 alloy exhibits the optimal thermal stability in 873 K. However, upon aging at 973 K, a significant coarsening of the BCC nanoprecipitates was found, as seen in Figure 3b. Multiple BCC nanoprecipitates are merged together during coarsening, resulting in the formation of ellipsoidal particles with a size of ~150 nm or short rod-shaped particles with a length of ~500 nm and a width of ~190 nm. Further analysis shown in Figure 3c displays the TEM examination of the alloy after aging at 973 K for 480 h. The TEM-DF image and the SAED pattern obtained along the [110]BCC direction also reveal that the BCC nanoprecipitates are precipitated within the B2 matrix. Furthermore, the 480 h-aged sample was characterized by STEM, and the HAADF-STEM image and corresponding TEM-EDS mapping of the BCC and B2 phases are shown in Figure 4. Obviously, the B2 matrix is segregated in Fe and Al, while Co and Cr partition mainly within the BCC nanoprecipitates. The average compositions of BCC nanoprecipitates and B2 matrix are Al5.6Co20.9Fe29.2Cr44.3 and Al19.8Co34.4Fe27.9Cr17.9 (at. %), respectively.

3.2. Soft-Magnetic Properties of Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 MPEA in Different States

The room temperature (RT) hysteresis loops of the Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 MPEA, both in the homogenized and aged conditions, are displayed in Figure 5, and from these, the magnetic properties, i.e., coercivity HC and saturation magnetization MS, were determined, and these resulting data are given in Table 1. It can be clearly seen that this homogenized alloy demonstrated prominent soft-magnetic properties with MS = 127 emu/g and HC = 143.3 A/m (1.8 Oe). To further study the effect of aging temperature on the soft-magnetic properties, the hysteresis loops of the aged alloys at different temperatures are also presented in Figure 5. It is found that the MS of the aged Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 alloy remains unmodified (~129 emu/g), and its coercivity increases slightly as the aging temperature increases, as demonstrated by HC~150 A/m (1.9 Oe) in 773~873 K-aged states and HC = 270~374 A/m (3.4~4.7 Oe) in 973~1073 K-aged states. Moreover, after long-term (480 h) aging at 973 K, the soft-magnetic properties of the alloy deteriorated significantly, resulting in an increase in the coercivity to HC = 1950.2 A/m (24.5 Oe). In contrast, after long-term aging at 873 K, this alloy still has good soft-magnetic properties with a moderate MS = 132.0 emu/g and a low MS = 159.2 A/m (2.0 Oe). This would be due to the coarsening of the BCC nanoparticles, which gradually raises the coercivity to HC = 1950 A/m (in the 480 h-aged state) (Figure 5 and Table 1). Consequently, the soft-magnetic properties of the 773~873 K-aged specimens are similar to those in the homogenized sample, which could imply that the microstructure in the aged state is similar to that at the homogenized state, i.e., the uniform distribution of ultrafine BCC nanoprecipitates within the B2 matrix.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 MPEA exhibits a unique microstructure consisting of coherent BCC and B2 phases. The alloy shows excellent soft-magnetic properties in the homogenized state, characterized by high saturation magnetization (MS = 127 emu/g) and low coercivity (HC = 143.3 A/m). The aging temperature plays a significant role in the microstructure and magnetic properties. Aging at temperatures below 873 K has negligible effects on the microstructure and magnetic properties, indicating good thermal stability. However, at higher temperatures (973 K) and longer aging times, the coarsening of BCC nanoprecipitates occurs, leading to a decrease in the soft-magnetic properties. The coercivity increases with aging temperature, and after long-term aging at 973 K, the alloy’s soft-magnetic properties deteriorate significantly. In contrast, the alloy aged at 873 K maintains its prominent soft-magnetic properties. These results demonstrate the importance of microstructure control in optimizing the soft-magnetic properties of the Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 MPEA. The design of coherent microstructure provides a new development in high-performance soft magnets for high temperatures.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.W. and Q.W.; methodology, S.S. and Z.W.; validation, Y.Q. and H.Z.; formal analysis, S.S., Y.Q. and D.T.; investigation, S.S., H.Z. and G.W.; data curation, S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, S.S.; writing—review and editing, Z.W. and Q.W.; visualization, S.S., D.T. and G.W.; supervision, S.S. and Z.W.; funding acquisition, S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Science and Technology Foundation of State Grid Corporation of China, grant number 5500-202255297A-2-0-QZ.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors Shaoheng Sun, Yaxia Qiao, Hao Zhang, Dejun Tu and Guojun Wang were employed by the company China Electric Power Research Institute. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chau, K.T.; Li, W. Overview of electric machines for electric and hybrid vehicles. Int. J. Veh. Des. 2014, 64, 46–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ongena, J.; Ogawa, Y. Nuclear fusion: Status report and future prospects. Energy Policy 2021, 96, 770–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Galea, M. High Performance, Direct Drive Machines for Aerospace Applications. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Nottingam, Nottingham, UK, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  4. Varga, L.K. Soft magnetic nanocomposites for high-frequency and high-temperature applications. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2007, 316, 442–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Barret, W.F.; Brown, W.; Hadffeld, R.A. Researches on the electrical conductivity and magnetic properties of upwards of one hundred different alloys of iron. J. Inst. Electr. Eng. 1902, 156, 674–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gercsi, Z.; Mazaleyrat, F.; Varga, L.K. High-temperature soft magnetic properties of Co-doped nanocrystalline alloys. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2006, 302, 454–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yu, W.; Hua, W.; Zhang, Z. High-frequency core loss analysis of high-speed flux-switching permanent magnet machines. Electronics 2021, 10, 1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Silveyra, J.M.; Xu, P.; Keylin, V.; DeGeorge, V.; Leary, A.; McHenry, M.E. Amorphous and nanocomposite materials for energy-efficient electric motors. J. Electron. Mater. 2016, 45, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Clark, T.; Mathaudhu, S.N. Microstructure and magnetic properties of dilute nanocrystalline Fe-Si prepared by high energy ball milling. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 484, 350–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Senda, K.; Namikawa, M.; Hayakawa, Y. Electrical steels for advanced automobiles-core materials for moters, generators and high-frequency reactors. JEF Tech. Rep. 2004, 4, 67–73. [Google Scholar]
  11. George, E.P.; Raabe, D.; Ritchie, R.O. High-entropy alloys. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2019, 4, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Miracle, D.B.; Senkov, O.N.; Wilks, J. A critical review of high entropy alloys and related concepts. Acta Mater. 2017, 122, 448–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gao, M.C.; Miracle, D.B.; Maurice, D.; Yan, X.; Zhang, Y.; Hawk, J.A. High-entropy functional materials. J. Mater. Res. 2018, 33, 3138–3155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, H.; He, Q.F.; Gao, X.; Shang, Y.H.; Zhu, W.Q.; Zhao, W.J.; Chen, Z.Q.; Gong, H.; Yang, Y. Multifunctional high entropy alloys enabled by severe lattice distortion. Adv. Mater. 2023, 2305453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, Y.; Zuo, T.T.; Tang, Z.; Gao, M.C.; Dahmen, K.A.; Liaw, P.K.; Lu, Z.P. Microstructures and properties of high-entropy alloys. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2014, 61, 1–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chaudhary, V.; Chaudhary, R.; Banerjee, R.; Ramanujan, R. Accelerated and conventional development of magnetic high entropy alloys. Mater. Today 2021, 49, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gong, P.; Leong, Z.Y.; Qi, J.H.; Kwok, T.W.J.; Nutter, J.; Azakli, Y.; Zhou, L.; Palacin, R.; Davis, C.; Goodall, R.; et al. Composition and phase structure dependence of magnetic properties for Co2FeCr0.5Alx (x = 0.9, 1.2) multi principal component alloys. Acta Mater. 2023, 256, 119113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, Z.; Zhang, Z.H.; Liu, X.L.; Li, H.X.; Zhang, E.; Bai, G.; Xu, H.; Liu, X.G.; Zhang, X.F. Strength, plasticity and coercivity tradeoff in soft magnetic high-entropy alloys by multiple coherent interfaces. Acta Mater. 2023, 254, 118970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, H.Y.; Gou, J.M.; Jia, W.T.; Song, X.; Ma, T.Y. Origin of hard magnetism in Fe-Co-Ni-Al-Ti-Cu high-entropy alloy: Chemical shape anisotropy. Acta Mater. 2023, 246, 118702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, Y.; Zuo, T.; Cheng, Y.; Liaw, P.K. High-entropy alloys with high saturation magnetization. Electric. Resist. Malleab. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1455. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhou, K.X.; Sun, B.R.; Liu, G.Y.; Li, X.W.; Xin, S.W.; Liaw, P.K.; Shen, T.D. FeCoNiAlSi high entropy alloys with exceptional fundamental and application-oriented magnetism. Intermetallics 2020, 122, 106801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Han, L.L.; Maccari, F.; Filho, I.R.S.; Peter, N.J.; Wei, Y.; Gault, B.; Gutfleisch, O.; Li, Z.M.; Raabe, D. A mechanically strong and ductile soft magnet with ultralow coercivity. Nature 2022, 608, 310–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Han, L.L.; Rao, Z.Y.; Filho, I.R.S.; Maccari, F.; Wei, Y.; Wu, G.; Ahmadian, A.; Zhou, X.Y.; Gutfleisch, O.; Ponge, D.; et al. Ultrastrong and ductile soft magnetic high-entropy alloys via coherent ordered nanoprecipitates. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2102139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ma, Y.; Wang, Q.; Zhou, X.Y.; Hao, J.M.; Gault, B.; Zhang, Q.Y.; Dong, C.; Nieh, T.G. A novel soft-magnetic B2-based multiprincipal-element alloy with a uniform distribution of coherent body-centered-cubic nanoprecipitates. Adv. Mater. 2021, 33, 2006723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ma, Y.; Wang, Q.; Jiang, B.B.; Li, C.L.; Hao, J.M.; Li, X.N.; Dong, C.; Nieh, T.G. Controlled formation of coherent cuboidal nanoprecipitates in body-centered cubic high-entropy alloys based on Al2(Ni,Co,Fe,Cr)14 compositions. Acta Mater. 2018, 147, 213–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, Z.H.; Yuan, J.H.; Wang, Q.; Li, Z.; Zhou, X.Y.; Luan, J.H.; Wang, J.; Zheng, S.J.; Jiao, Z.B.; Dong, C.; et al. Developing novel high-temperature soft-magnetic B2-based multi-principal-element alloys with coherent body-centered-cubic nanoprecipitates. Acta Mater. 2024, 266, 119686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Jung, C.W.; Kang, K.; Marshal, A.; Pradeep, K.G.; Seol, J.B.; Lee, H.M.; Choi, P.P. Effects of phase composition and elemental partitioning on soft magnetic properties of AlFeCoCrMn high entropy alloys. Acta Mater. 2019, 171, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cullity, D.B.; Stock, S.R. Elements of X-ray Diffraction, 3rd ed.; Prentice Hall: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  29. Sosa, J.M.; Jensen, J.K.; Huber, D.E.; Viswanathan, G.B.; Gibson, M.A.; Fraser, H.L. Three-dimensional characterization of the microstructure of a high entropy alloy using STEM/HAADF tomograph. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2015, 31, 1250–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Buchkov, K.; Galluzzi, A.; Nazarova, E.; Polichetti, M. Complex AC Magnetic Susceptibility as a Tool for Exploring Nonlinear Magnetic Phenomena and Pinning Properties in Superconductors. Materials 2023, 16, 4896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Winkler, R.; Ciria, M.; Ahmad, M.; Plank, H.; Marcuello, C. A Review of the Current State of Magnetic Force Microscopy to Unravel the Magnetic Properties of Nanomaterials Applied in biological Systems and Future Directions for Quantum Technologies. Nanomaterials 2023, 13, 2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Metals 14 00608 g001
Figure 1. The XRD patterns of the Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 MPEA in homogenized and aged states.
Figure 1. The XRD patterns of the Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 MPEA in homogenized and aged states.
Metals 14 00608 g001
Metals 14 00608 g002
Figure 2. Microstructural characterization of the Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 MPEA in the homogenized and aged states. (a) OM image in the homogenized states; (b) SEM observations in the homogenized states; (c–f) SEM observations of the alloy after aging at 773, 873, and 973 K for 24 h; (e) the TEM dark-field (DF) image and the corresponding selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of alloy after aging at 973 K for 24 h.
Figure 2. Microstructural characterization of the Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 MPEA in the homogenized and aged states. (a) OM image in the homogenized states; (b) SEM observations in the homogenized states; (c–f) SEM observations of the alloy after aging at 773, 873, and 973 K for 24 h; (e) the TEM dark-field (DF) image and the corresponding selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of alloy after aging at 973 K for 24 h.
Metals 14 00608 g002
Metals 14 00608 g003
Figure 3. (a,b) SEM observations of the Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 alloy after aging at 873 K (a) and 973 K (b) for 480 h respectively; (c) the TEM dark-field (DF) image and the corresponding selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of alloy after aging at 973 K for 480 h, where the diffraction spot, from which DF image are obtained, is marked by the red circle.
Figure 3. (a,b) SEM observations of the Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 alloy after aging at 873 K (a) and 973 K (b) for 480 h respectively; (c) the TEM dark-field (DF) image and the corresponding selected-area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern of alloy after aging at 973 K for 480 h, where the diffraction spot, from which DF image are obtained, is marked by the red circle.
Metals 14 00608 g003
Metals 14 00608 g004
Figure 4. HAADF-STEM micrograph and corresponding EDS mapping of Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 alloy aged at 973 K for 480 h.
Figure 4. HAADF-STEM micrograph and corresponding EDS mapping of Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 alloy aged at 973 K for 480 h.
Metals 14 00608 g004
Metals 14 00608 g005
Figure 5. RT hysteresis loops of the Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 MPEA in different states.
Figure 5. RT hysteresis loops of the Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 MPEA in different states.
Metals 14 00608 g005
Table 1. Data summary for the Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 MPEA, including the chemical compositions in atomic percent (at. %) and magnetic properties (characterized with the saturation magnetization MS and coercivity HC) in different heat-treated states.
Table 1. Data summary for the Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 MPEA, including the chemical compositions in atomic percent (at. %) and magnetic properties (characterized with the saturation magnetization MS and coercivity HC) in different heat-treated states.
AlloyComposition
(at. %)		Heat TreatmentMs
(emu/g)		Hc
(Oe)(A/m)
Al1.5Co3Fe3Cr1Al17.65Co35.29Fe35.29Cr11.76Homogenized at 1573 K127.01.8143.3
773 K-aged for 24 h129.61.8143.3
873 K-aged for 24 h127.81.9151.2
873 K-aged for 480 h132.02.0159.2
973 K-aged for 24 h129.23.4270.6
973 K-aged for 480 h120.024.51950.2
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, S.; Qiao, Y.; Zhang, H.; Tu, D.; Wang, G.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Q. Microstructure Dependence of Magnetic Properties for Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 Multi-Principal-Element Alloy. Metals 2024, 14, 608. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/met14060608

AMA Style

Sun S, Qiao Y, Zhang H, Tu D, Wang G, Wang Z, Wang Q. Microstructure Dependence of Magnetic Properties for Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 Multi-Principal-Element Alloy. Metals. 2024; 14(6):608. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/met14060608

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Shaoheng, Yaxia Qiao, Hao Zhang, Dejun Tu, Guojun Wang, Zhenhua Wang, and Qing Wang. 2024. "Microstructure Dependence of Magnetic Properties for Al1.5Fe3Co3Cr1 Multi-Principal-Element Alloy" Metals 14, no. 6: 608. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/met14060608

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop