Next Article in Journal
Serotonin Levels in the Serum of Persons with Onchocerciasis-Associated Epilepsy: A Case-Control Study
Previous Article in Journal
Antibiotic Susceptibility of Bartonella Grown in Different Culture Conditions
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Integrated Sequencing Approach for Updating the Pseudorabies Virus Transcriptome
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Pseudorabies Virus Infections

Institute of Molecular Virology and Cell Biology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, 17493 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany
Submission received: 3 June 2021 / Accepted: 4 June 2021 / Published: 8 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pseudorabies Virus Infections)
Suid alphaherpesvirus 1 (SuHV-1), better known as Pseudorabies virus (PrV), an alphaherpesvirus of swine, is the causative agent of Aujeszky’s Disease. In the previous century, epidemics of Aujeszky´s disease have led to enormous economic losses in pig farms and an efficient vaccine was urgently needed. The highly attenuated “K61” strain, which was isolated after numerous serial passages on different cell cultures, published by A. Bartha in 1961, proved to be the crucial milestone in the fight against this disastrous disease. The Bartha K61 strain is still one of the best live virus vaccines in use and “celebrates” its 60th anniversary this year (2021). In the concise review by J.L. Delva et al. [1] the history and the molecular characteristics as well as the immunogenic differences to wildtype strains is summarized and the efficacy of PrV Bartha K61 as neuronal tracer as well as vector vaccine is discussed. In combination with suitable serological assays, Bartha K61 was developed into the first marker vaccine differentiating infected from vaccinated animals (DIVA), thereby serving as the blueprint in modern animal vaccinology. In the entertaining review by T.C. Mettenleiter [2], the history of the discovery of PrV as the causative agent of the disease is described, honoring the great achievements of A. Aujeszky and offering vivid insights into former research. Although the natural host of PrV is swine, it can infect a wide variety of different mammals, usually with a fatal outcome. In a comprehensive comparative review article, J. Sehl and J.P. Teifke [3] summarize the clinical–pathological findings of PrV infection in different animal species after natural or experimental infection highlighting the similarities but also differences in the route of infection, clinical presentation, antigen distribution as well as lesion patterns. Although pruritus is the classical sign of PrV infection in non-host species, which led to the term “mad itch disease”, it usually does not occur in infected pigs. However, the molecular basis for this neurological itch is still not well understood. The review of K. Laval and L.W. Enquist [4] provides detailed insights, discussing the recent findings on the neuro-inflammatory responses and their impact on other alphaherpesvirus induced neuropathies, for example those following infection with varicella zoster virus. A better understanding will help to develop new therapeutics and guide research on other neuropathies, such as multiple sclerosis [4].
Although PrV is eradicated from domestic pigs in many Western countries, the virus is still circulating in wild boar populations coupled with infrequent infections of hunting dogs and the risk of reintroduction into farmed animals. Surveillance is thus still an important issue and discussed in three original articles [5,6,7]. Drugs to fight PrV infections are not available but natural compounds, as Germacrone, are tested for their effect as putative therapeutics [8].
PrV is not only prominent as animal pathogen but, together with herpes simplex virus 1, represents the most intensively studied and best understood alphaherpesvirus at the molecular level. Studies on PrV repeatedly pioneered research on basic principles of herpesvirus replication. Data on the complex transcriptome [9], the functional role of N-linked glycans of glycoprotein gB [10] and an unbiased approach to uncover the still unknown signaling network of the pUS3 protein kinase [11] will stimulate further research on the molecular specifics of PrV and other (alpha-)herpesviruses.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Delva, J.L.; Nauwynck, H.J.; Mettenleiter, T.C.; Favoreel, H.W. The Attenuated Pseudorabies Virus Vaccine Strain Bartha K61: A Brief Review on the Knowledge Gathered During 60 Years of Research. Pathogens 2020, 9, 897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mettenleiter, T.C. Aujeszky’s Disease and the Development of the Marker/DIVA Vaccination Concept. Pathogens 2020, 9, 563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sehl, J.; Teifke, J.P. Comparative Pathology of Pseudorabies in Different Naturally and Experimentally Infected Species—A Review. Pathogens 2020, 9, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Laval, K.; Enquist, L.W. The Neuropathic Itch Caused by Pseudorabies Virus. Pathogens 2020, 9, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Deblanc, C.; Oger, A.; Simon, G.; Le Potier, M.F. Genetic Diversity among Pseudorabies Viruses Isolated from Dogs in France from 2006 to 2018. Pathogens 2019, 8, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Ciarello, F.P.; Capucchio, M.T.; Ippolito, D.; Colombino, E.; Gibelli, L.R.M.; Fiasconaro, M.; Moreno Martin, A.M.; Di Marco Lo Presti, V. First Report of a Severe Outbreak of Aujeszky’s Disease in Cattle in Sicily (Italy). Pathogens 2020, 9, 954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Denzin, N.; Conraths, F.J.; Mettenleiter, T.C.; Freuling, C.M.; Muller, T. Monitoring of Pseudorabies in Wild Boar of Germany-A Spatiotemporal Analysis. Pathogens 2020, 9, 276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. He, W.; Zhai, X.; Su, J.; Ye, R.; Zheng, Y.; Su, S. Antiviral Activity of Germacrone against Pseudorabies Virus in Vitro. Pathogens 2019, 8, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Torma, G.; Tombacz, D.; Csabai, Z.; Gobhardter, D.; Deim, Z.; Snyder, M.; Boldogkoi, Z. An Integrated Sequencing Approach for Updating the Pseudorabies Virus Transcriptome. Pathogens 2021, 10, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Vallbracht, M.; Klupp, B.G.; Mettenleiter, T.C. Influence of N-glycosylation on Expression and Function of Pseudorabies Virus Glycoprotein gB. Pathogens 2021, 10, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Jansens, R.J.J.; Marmiroli, S.; Favoreel, H.W. An Unbiased Approach to Mapping the Signaling Network of the Pseudorabies Virus US3 Protein. Pathogens 2020, 9, 916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Klupp, B.G. Pseudorabies Virus Infections. Pathogens 2021, 10, 719. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pathogens10060719

AMA Style

Klupp BG. Pseudorabies Virus Infections. Pathogens. 2021; 10(6):719. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pathogens10060719

Chicago/Turabian Style

Klupp, Barbara G. 2021. "Pseudorabies Virus Infections" Pathogens 10, no. 6: 719. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/pathogens10060719

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop