Next Article in Journal
Need for a Standardized Translational Drug Development Platform: Lessons Learned from the Repurposing of Drugs for COVID-19
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Intracellular Pulmonary Pathogens during SARS-CoV-2 Infection in the First Pandemic Wave of COVID-19: Clinical and Prognostic Significance in a Case Series of 1200 Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
Lack of Direct Correlation between Biofilm Formation and Antimicrobial Resistance in Clinical Staphylococcus epidermidis Isolates from an Italian Hospital
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Microbial Biofilms: From Molecular Mechanisms and Structure to Antimicrobial Therapy

1
Department of Biosciences, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy
2
Instituto de Agrobiotecnología (Idab), CSIC-Gobierno de Navarra (CSIC-GN), 31192 Navarra, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 10 August 2022 / Accepted: 11 August 2022 / Published: 12 August 2022
The first published observations that microorganisms associate to form microbial communities structured as biofilms in natural environments date back to the first half of the last century [1]. However, despite such early recognition of the ecological importance of microbial biofilms, their study was largely ignored in the following decades, as microbiologists focused mainly on microbial genetics and physiology, which are typically studied using pure cultures growing in a planktonic (i.e., single cell) state. It was only much later that research interest in microbial biofilms was rekindled, especially following the understanding that pathogenic bacteria growing in biofilms showed decreased sensitivity to antibiotics, thus leading to a higher risk of antimicrobial therapy failure [2]. Interest in biofilm studies has resulted in a dramatic acceleration of the research papers published in the field; indeed, according to the PubMed search engine (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/, accessed on 12 August 2022), the number of research articles featuring “biofilm” in their title went from 232 in the years 1981–1990 to 8258 in the year 2021 alone. The applications of genetic, and later genomic, metagenomics and transcriptomic techniques to biofilm studies, begun by work on Escherichia coli surface adhesion factors [3], has greatly advanced our knowledge of microbial biofilm biology, providing a much clearer picture of the differences in gene expression between planktonic and biofilm cells, of the phenotypic, biochemical and morphological properties of the bacterial cell [4], of the signal molecules involved in this process [5], and of how biofilm growth is associated with processes such as horizontal gene transfer and antibiotic resistance [6].
As mentioned above, biofilm growth represents a major concern in microbial infections, since it can lead to tolerance to antimicrobial treatments. This issue is directly connected to the growing emergence of antibiotic resistance as well as to the lack of novel antimicrobial agents. These are issues that, if not addressed, might lead to an estimated staggering amount of 10 million deaths/year caused by pan-antibiotic resistant pathogens by 2050 [7]. Lack of discovery of novel antibiotics has led to the exploration of alternative approaches for the development of antimicrobial therapies, including anti-virulence drugs, namely, molecules that can target virulence factors rather than cell growth. Biofilm formation is considered an essential target in such an approach, as biofilm inhibition would increase antibiotic effectiveness and make pathogens more sensitive to the host immune response. Therefore, novel therapeutic approaches focus on preventing the synthesis or disrupting the biofilm matrix components, thus rendering bacteria more sensitive to antibiotic treatments.
This Special Issue, Microbial Biofilms: From Molecular Mechanisms and Structure to Antimicrobial Therapy, includes research articles tackling crucial issues in the field of microbial biofilms. One paper published in this Special Issue points to the relevance of the pyrimidine biosynthetic gene pyrD as suitable target for anti-virulence and anti-biofilm agents in adherent invasive Escherichia coli (AIEC), an intracellular pathogen implicated in the onset of Crohn’s disease [8]. Another paper proposes a strategy for biofilm inhibition comprising the combinatorial analysis of chemical composition of essential oils from officinal plants and their effects on biofilm formation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients, using a machine learning algorithm aimed at the understanding of those molecules that are more active against biofilm formation [9]. Another interesting approach tackled in this Special Issue is the use of probiotic bacteria as therapeutic agents to inhibit biofilm formation by pathogenic microorganisms, either via the production of diffusible molecules or through direct competition. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum CCFM8724 appears promising in this respect, being able to impair the formation of a Streptococcus mutans-Candida albicans mixed-species biofilm, with supernatants of L. plantarum cultures strongly affecting the expression of C. albicans adhesion and virulence genes [10]. Other works in this Special Issue focus on biofilm formation by Staphylococci—the production of PIA (Polysaccharide intercellular adhesin), also called PNAG (β-1,6 poly-N-acetyl-glucosamine), is a main feature in these bacteria; however, an experimental polymorphism survey performed on Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates from prosthetic joint-associated infections showed the absence of mutations affecting expression of the icaABCD operon, encoding PIA/PNAG biosynthetic genes. Single aminoacid changes in the IcaR regulatory protein resulting in increased PIA/PNAG production led to decreased virulence in a Galleria mellonella model, suggesting that biofilm formation might be detrimental to S. aureus virulence [11]. Surprisingly, a negative correlation was also observed between biofilm formation and resistance to some antibiotics in S. epidermidis clinical isolates, with no apparent role of PIA/PNAG in this process [12]. Thus, these two studies would suggest that, in Staphylococci, a possible trade-off exists between biofilm proficiency on the one hand and both virulence and antibiotic resistance on the other.
Altogether, the papers featured in this Special Issue cover some of the main topics in biofilm studies, mainly focusing on biofilm control. We believe these studies represent an important contribution to our knowledge in this field.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.L. and J.V.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, P.L.; Writing—Review and Editing, J.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all authors for their excellent papers on this Special Issue, “Microbial Biofilms: From Molecular Mechanisms and Structure to Antimicrobial Therapy”. We also thank the reviewers for their valuable recommendations leading to the improvement in all manuscripts before publication. We are also grateful to all members of the Microorganisms Editorial Office for providing us with this opportunity and for continuous support in managing and organizing this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Henrici, A.T. Studies of Freshwater Bacteria: I. A Direct Microscopic Technique. J. Bacteriol. 1933, 25, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Costerton, J.W.; Cheng, K.J.; Geesey, G.G.; Ladd, T.I.; Nickel, J.C.; Dasgupta, M.; Marrie, T.J. Bacterial Biofilms in Nature and Disease. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1987, 41, 435–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pratt, L.A.; Kolter, R. Genetic Analysis of Escherichia coli Biofilm Formation: Roles of Flagella, Motility, Chemotaxis and Type I Pili. Mol. Microbiol. 1998, 30, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Schembri, M.A.; Kjaergaard, K.; Klemm, P. Global Gene Expression in Escherichia coli Biofilms. Mol. Microbiol. 2003, 48, 253–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hengge, R. Principles of c-di-GMP Signaling in Bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ghigo, J.M. Natural Conjugative Plasmids Induce Bacterial Biofilm Development. Nature 2001, 412, 442–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lesho, E.P.; Laguio-Vila, M. The Slow-Motion Catastrophe of Antimicrobial Resistance and Practical Interventions for All Prescribers. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2019, 94, 1040–1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Rossi, E.; Leccese, G.; Baldelli, V.; Bibi, A.; Scalone, E.; Camilloni, C.; Paroni, M.; Landini, P. Inactivation of the Pyrimidine Biosynthesis pyrD Gene Negatively Affects Biofilm Formation and Virulence Determinants in the Crohn’s Disease-Associated Adherent Invasive Escherichia coli LF82 Strain. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Artini, M.; Papa, R.; Sapienza, F.; Božović, M.; Vrenna, G.; Tuccio Guarna Assanti, V.; Sabatino, M.; Garzoli, S.; Fiscarelli, E.V.; Ragno, R.; et al. Essential Oils Biofilm Modulation Activity and Machine Learning Analysis on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from Cystic Fibrosis Patients. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Zhang, Q.; Li, J.; Lu, W.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Chen, W. Multi-Omics Reveals the Inhibition of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum CCFM8724 in Streptococcus mutans-Candida albicans Mixed-Species Biofilms. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Morales-Laverde, L.; Echeverz, M.; Trobos, M.; Solano, C.; Lasa, I. Experimental Polymorphism Survey in Intergenic Regions of the icaADBCR Locus in Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from Periprosthetic Joint Infections. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Carcione, D.; Leccese, G.; Conte, G.; Rossi, E.; Intra, J.; Bonomi, A.; Sabella, S.; Moreo, M.; Landini, P.; Brilli, M.; et al. Lack of Direct Correlation between Biofilm Formation and Antimicrobial Resistance in Clinical Staphylococcus epidermidis Isolates from an Italian Hospital. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Landini, P.; Valle, J. Microbial Biofilms: From Molecular Mechanisms and Structure to Antimicrobial Therapy. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1638. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms10081638

AMA Style

Landini P, Valle J. Microbial Biofilms: From Molecular Mechanisms and Structure to Antimicrobial Therapy. Microorganisms. 2022; 10(8):1638. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms10081638

Chicago/Turabian Style

Landini, Paolo, and Jaione Valle. 2022. "Microbial Biofilms: From Molecular Mechanisms and Structure to Antimicrobial Therapy" Microorganisms 10, no. 8: 1638. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms10081638

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop