Next Article in Journal
Characterization of the Endometrial Microbiome in Patients with Recurrent Implantation Failure
Previous Article in Journal
Clinicopathological and Radiological Features of Cats Presented with Infectious Respiratory Disease Signs: A Focus on Rhodococcus equi and Klebsiella pneumoniae
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characteristics of the Gut Bacterial Composition in People of Different Nationalities and Religions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue “Gut Microbioma Structure and Functions in Human Health and Disease 2.0”: Editorial

by
Francesco Di Pierro
Scientific Department, Velleja Research, 20124 Milan, Italy
Submission received: 2 March 2023 / Revised: 8 March 2023 / Accepted: 10 March 2023 / Published: 14 March 2023
Recent technical advances in the analysis of human colonic bacterial consortia have led to a considerable explosion of research on the gut microbiota [1]. These advances have also generated intense interest among those clinicians motivated to apply these results to their patients [2]. As complex as it is translating the results of such investigations into something useful from a clinical perspective, we are however rather certain that there is a noticeable decrease in the alpha biodiversity of microbiota in people affected by certain pathologies (obesity, diabetes, cancer, immune diseases, etc.) [3] and that a strong correlation does exist between a phylum (e.g., Proteobacteria) or taxon (e.g., Fusobacterium) with these diseases [4,5]. Similarly, in these contexts, the positive role played by some genera (e.g., Akkermansia or Faecalibacterium) cannot be denied [6]. Despite this advance in knowledge, much remains unclear. With this Special Issue “Gut Microbiome Structure and Functions in Human Health and Disease 2.0”, some authors have tried to propose their perspectives on this topic.
Various parameters obtainable via the analysis of the human gut microbiota have been investigated to develop applications for clinical medicine. Among these parameters, the enterotypes, Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratio, Prevotella-to-Bacteroides ratio, Gram-positive-to-Gram-negative ratio and Fusobacterium-to-Faecalibacterium ratio are the most widely used [7,8]. For example, the enterotype B2, especially in the presence of high calprotectin and C reactive protein, has been strongly correlated with primary sclerosing cholangitis, Crohn’s disease and, to a lesser extent, ulcerative colitis [9]. Characterized by a low proportion of butyrate producers, enterotype B2 has also been associated with depression [10]. The Bacteroides-dominant enterotype has been correlated with liver inflammation, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, colon cancer and celiac disease, while the Prevotella-dominant enterotype is associated with rheumatoid arthritis and hypertension and the Ruminococcus-dominant enterotype with cardiovascular disease and cognitive decline [11]. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B) ratio was initially discovered and proposed by Ley et al. and has been frequently cited in the scientific literature as a measure of obesity [12]; however, it has been recently challenged due to several contradictory results [13]. These discrepancies are likely due to the impact of ignoring lifestyle-associated confounders and oversimplification as Firmicutes are often considered as a group of bacteria possessing the same types of characteristics, which is incorrect [6]. From a caloric perspective, it has been calculated that with a 20% increase in Firmicutes, the gut microbiota can “capture” an additional 150 kcal in the colon [14]. Thus, the F/B ratio cannot be considered a marker of obesity, but it could be used to evaluate a predisposition to lose “colonic” calories. In addition, in longitudinal studies, it could be used to follow the changes in the gut microbiota during a low-calorie diet, since this ratio correlates with the performance of colonic microbiota in regard to the exhaustive absorption of calories. Less investigated than the F/B ratio, the Prevotella/Bacteroides ratio has been proposed to predict the ease with which people can lose weight when subjected to a low-calorie, fibre-rich diet. Finally, the Gram-positive/Gram-negative ratio has been proposed to identify patients with severe fragility, and the Fusobacterium/Faecalibacterium ratio has been proposed for diagnosing patients who are at a high risk of developing colon cancer [7].
The gut microbiota of people of different nationalities and religions are strongly influenced by food preferences. After confirming the well-known different microbiota profiles according to the different countries, Syromyatnikov and his colleagues investigated the possible role played by different religions. They demonstrated that among Buddhists and Muslims, the Prevotella enterotype dominates the gut microbiome, while in people of other religions, including Christians, the Bacteroides enterotype is the most common [15]. This is mainly due to the food components that characterize the different diets, especially based on their fibre content, which was also confirmed by the review proposed by Bertuccioli et al. [16].
Last but not the least, the study of Baltazar-Díaz et al. [17] focused on the relative presence of the OUT belonging to the Escherichia/Shigella group. They found that the gut’s short-chain fatty acids content and the associated metabolic pathways could be used to better characterize the intestinal dysbiosis typically observed in patients with decompensated alcoholic cirrhosis [17].

Acknowledgments

We are deeply thankful to all authors and reviewers who provided their contribution to this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The editor declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. de Vos, W.M.; Tilg, H.; Van Hul, M.; Cani, P.D. Gut microbiome and health: Mechanistic insights. Gut 2022, 71, 1020–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Ma, X.; Lu, X.; Zhang, W.; Yang, L.; Wang, D.; Xu, J.; Jia, Y.; Wang, X.; Xie, H.; Li, S.; et al. Gut microbiota in the early stage of Crohn’s disease has unique characteristics. Gut Pathog. 2022, 14, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Le Chatelier, E.; Nielsen, T.; Qin, J.; Prifti, E.; Hildebrand, F.; Falony, G.; Almeida, M.; Arumugam, M.; Batto, J.M.; Kennedy, S.; et al. Richness of human gut microbiome correlates with metabolic markers. Nature 2013, 500, 541–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Galazzo, G.; van Best, N.; Bervoets, L.; Dapaah, I.O.; Savelkoul, P.H.; Hornef, M.W.; GI-MDH consortium; Lau, S.; Hamelmann, E.; Penders, J. Development of the Microbiota and Associations with Birth Mode, Diet, and Atopic Disorders in a Longitudinal Analysis of Stool Samples, Collected from Infancy through Early Childhood. Gastroenterology 2020, 158, 1584–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. McIlvanna, E.; Linden, G.J.; Craig, S.G.; Lundy, F.T.; James, J.A. Fusobacterium nucleatum and oral cancer: A critical review. BMC Cancer 2021, 21, 1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Cani, P.D.; Moens de Hase, E.; Van Hul, M. Gut Microbiota and Host Metabolism: From Proof of Concept to Therapeutic Intervention. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Di Pierro, F. Gut Microbiota Parameters Potentially Useful in Clinical Perspective. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Di Pierro, F. A Possible Perspective about the Compositional Models, Evolution, and Clinical Meaning of Human Enterotypes. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Vieira-Silva, S.; Sabino, J.; Valles-Colomer, M.; Falony, G.; Kathagen, G.; Caenepeel, C.; Cleynen, I.; van der Merwe, S.; Vermeire, S.; Raes, J. Quantitative microbiome profiling disentangles inflammation- and bile duct obstruction-associated microbiota alterations across PSC/IBD diagnoses. Nat. Microbiol. 2019, 4, 1826–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Valles-Colomer, M.; Falony, G.; Darzi, Y.; Tigchelaar, E.F.; Wang, J.; Tito, R.Y.; Schiweck, C.; Kurilshikov, A.; Joossens, M.; Wijmenga, C. The neuroactive potential of the human gut microbiota in quality of life and depression. Nat. Microbiol. 2019, 4, 623–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Costea, P.I.; Hildebrand, F.; Arumugam, M.; Bäckhed, F.; Blaser, M.J.; Bushman, F.D.; de Vos, W.M.; Ehrlich, S.D.; Fraser, C.M.; Hattori, M.; et al. Enterotypes in the landscape of gut microbial community composition. Nat. Microbiol. 2018, 3, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Ley, R.E.; Turnbaugh, P.J.; Klein, S.; Gordon, J.I. Microbial ecology: Human gut microbes associated with obesity. Nature 2006, 444, 1022–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Magne, F.; Gotteland, M.; Gauthier, L.; Zazueta, A.; Pesoa, S.; Navarrete, P.; Balamurugan, R. The Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes Ratio: A Relevant Marker of Gut Dysbiosis in Obese Patients? Nutrients 2020, 12, 1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jumpertz, R.; Le, D.S.; Turnbaugh, P.J.; Trinidad, C.; Bogardus, C.; Gordon, J.I.; Krakoff, J. Energy-balance studies reveal associations between gut microbes, caloric load, and nutrient absorption in humans. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2011, 94, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Syromyatnikov, M.; Nesterova, E.; Gladkikh, M.; Smirnova, Y.; Gryaznova, M.; Popov, V. Characteristics of the Gut Bacterial Composition in People of Different Nationalities and Religions. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Bertuccioli, A.; Cardinali, M.; Biagi, M.; Moricoli, S.; Morganti, I.; Zonzini, G.B.; Rigillo, G. Nutraceuticals and Herbal Food Supplements for Weight Loss: Is There a Prebiotic Role in the Mechanism of Action? Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Baltazar-Díaz, T.A.; González-Hernández, L.A.; Aldana-Ledesma, J.M.; Peña-Rodríguez, M.; Vega-Magaña, A.N.; Zepeda-Morales, A.S.M.; López-Roa, R.I.; del Toro-Arreola, S.; Martínez-López, E.; Salazar-Montes, A.M.; et al. Escherichia/Shigella, SCFAs, and Metabolic Pathways—The Triad That Orchestrates Intestinal Dysbiosis in Patients with Decompensated Alcoholic Cirrhosis fromWestern Mexico. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Di Pierro, F. Special Issue “Gut Microbioma Structure and Functions in Human Health and Disease 2.0”: Editorial. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 740. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms11030740

AMA Style

Di Pierro F. Special Issue “Gut Microbioma Structure and Functions in Human Health and Disease 2.0”: Editorial. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(3):740. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms11030740

Chicago/Turabian Style

Di Pierro, Francesco. 2023. "Special Issue “Gut Microbioma Structure and Functions in Human Health and Disease 2.0”: Editorial" Microorganisms 11, no. 3: 740. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms11030740

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop