Next Article in Journal
A Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Anti-Spike Immunoglobulin G Assay: A Robust Method for Evaluation of Vaccine Immunogenicity Using an Established Correlate of Protection
Next Article in Special Issue
The Relative Positioning of Genotyping and Phenotyping for Tuberculosis Resistance Screening in Two EU National Reference Laboratories in 2023
Previous Article in Journal
In Vivo Functional Properties of Dairy Bacteria
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design of a Multi-Epitope Vaccine against Tuberculosis from Mycobacterium tuberculosis PE_PGRS49 and PE_PGRS56 Proteins by Reverse Vaccinology
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 11
Issue 7
10.3390/microorganisms11071788
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Detection of Mycobacterial DNA in Human Bone Marrow

by
Alba González-Escalada
1,
María José Rebollo
2,
Jorge Barrios Payan
3,
Rogelio Hernández-Pando
3 and
María Jesús García
2,*
1
Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Area of Medical Microbiology, Rey Juan Carlos University, 28922 Alcorcon, Spain
2
Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health and Microbiology, School of Medicine, Autonoma University of Madrid, 28029 Madrid, Spain
3
Experimental Pathology Section, Department of Pathology, National Institute of Medical Sciences and Nutrition Salvador Zubirán, México City 14080, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(7), 1788; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms11071788
Submission received: 20 June 2023 / Revised: 4 July 2023 / Accepted: 6 July 2023 / Published: 11 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Prevention, Treatment and Diagnosis of Tuberculosis)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Bone marrow is a cell-rich tissue of the reticuloendothelial system essential in the homeostasis and accurate functioning of hematopoiesis and of the immune system; moreover, it is also rich in lipids because it contains marrow adipocytes. This work aimed to evaluate the detection of mycobacterial DNA in human bone marrow as a tool to understand the complex pathology caused by the main pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb). Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded human bone marrow samples were studied using both conventional PCR + hybridization and in situ PCR to figure out the cell distribution of the targeted DNA. Samples were retrospectively collected from HIV+ patients with microbiologically proved mycobacterial infection and from subjects without evidence of infection. Mycobacterium avium (Mav) as well as Mtb DNA was detected in both settings, including tissues with and without granulomas. We detected DNA from both mycobacterial species, using in situ PCR, inside bone marrow macrophages. Other cell types, including adipocytes, showed positive signals only for Mtb DNA. This result suggested, for the first time, that marrow adipocytes could constitute an ideal reservoir for the persistence of Mtb, allowing the bacilli to establish long-lasting latent infection within a suitable lipid environment. This fact might differentiate pathogenic behavior of non-specialized pathogens such as Mav from that of specialized pathogens such as Mtb.

1. Introduction

Infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) rarely leads to disease, the asymptomatic infection being the most frequent early result [1]. According to clinical and epidemiological data, it is considered that this infection without symptoms is not a single stage but a continuum of stages ranging from latent to incipient, then to subclinical, and ending in tuberculosis (TB) disease [2]. During the latent stage, the bacteria are in a dormant condition, mainly inside granulomas [3]. Nowadays, in accordance with the main role of lipids in the crosstalk host–pathogens [4], the relevance of the lipid environment in the establishment and maintenance of that dormant stage by the tubercle bacilli is clear [5]. In humans, lipids mostly concentrate in the adipose tissue distributed in several regions, as, for example, surrounding inner organs or in the skin [6]. Moreover, bone marrow (BM) also holds its own adipose tissue, with characteristic marrow adipocytes, different from the white, brown, or beige adipocytes found in other body locations. In fact, the marrow adipose tissue has a functional specific activity, including secretion of adipokines [7].
BM is a complex cell-rich tissue of the reticuloendothelial system essential in the homeostasis and accurate functioning of hematopoiesis and of the immune system. Mtb is an intracellular pathogen with a predilection for invading cells of the reticuloendothelial system and, consequently, for invading organs rich in these cell types, such as BM. In recent years, several studies have been published focused on the study of BM and its role in the persistence and survival of different infectious agents including Mtb [8,9,10,11,12,13]. Therefore, BM might be the reservoir in which some microorganisms could set up undetected or chronic infections [5,6,9,14]. For this reason, BM is not only considered a very useful sample for the diagnosis of disseminated infections from Mtb or other mycobacteria [15,16], but also its study seems essential to understand mycobacterial pathogenicity, as well as the circumstances that allow those bacilli to establish a successful silent infection [10,11,12,13,17,18].
Despite the known association to lipid environment, marrow adipocytes have not been directly related to Mtb infection yet. On the contrary, adipose tissue has been considered an extrapulmonary location for Mtb and a potential niche for persistent infection of the bacilli [14,19]. Thus, the high content of triacylglycerol and other lipids would facilitate the survival of Mtb inside any type of adipocytes as well as the establishment of latent infection in all those locations [14,20] regardless of the presence of granulomas as described [13].
In the case of Mtb infection, it seems that resident stem cells in the BM could constitute an important reservoir for the bacterium, due to the hypoxic, immunoprivileged and antibiotic impermeable environment that exists within them [10,12,17,18]. From this location, and thanks to the close contact between these cells and the extensive network of arterial capillaries in the BM, Mycobacterium dissemination may occur to other extramedullary sites where reactivation of the disease may be built up [13,17,18,21]. Dissemination of infections is a relevant issue for immunocompromised patients, as it could happen in people infected with HIV [22]. Co-infection with HIV–mycobacteria remains a main clinical problem, and in many cases, other mycobacteria, such as Mycobacterium avium (Mav) could employ strategies similar to Mtb, as adaptation to hypoxia, to remain inside the host for extended periods of time [23]. Mav is one of the most common non-tuberculous mycobacteria found in clinical samples, mainly causing disseminated or extrapulmonary infection in HIV+ people [24]. Similar to Mtb, Mav also invade and replicate in non-professional phagocyte cells, such as fibroblast or endothelial cells [24]. Furthermore, the pathophysiology of Mav-disseminated disease includes its transport through the endothelial reticulum system (particularly the BM), and hence, this organ may play a key role in the development of disseminated infections caused by this bacterium.
In this work, we aimed to perform a retrospective analysis of bone marrow biopsies (BMBs) from subjects putatively infected with mycobacteria, most of them HIV+. We tested those tissue samples for Mtb and Mav infection to determine the presence of DNA of these two mycobacteria and to figure out their intracellular location by using in situ PCR. We detected DNA from the two species, both in people with and without suspicion of mycobacterial infection; moreover, mycobacterial DNA was detected inside different BM cells. Interestingly, only Mtb DNA was detected inside marrow adipocytes, stressing the role of lipid environments in the infection of this main pathogen compared to opportunistic pathogens.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients and Samples

A total of 54 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) BMBs from patients treated at Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre (Madrid, Spain) were analyzed. All BMBs were taken from the posterosuperior iliac spine using clinical standard procedures.
Samples were separated in two groups: group A included 28 biopsies (26 of them HIV positive, 18 with CD4 lymphocyte count <50/mm3) with clinical and either positive culture or compatible histology for mycobacterial infection (Table 1); group B comprised 26 control biopsies from HIV negative patients, without any suspicions of mycobacterial infection, whose samples were obtained during monitoring of hematological diseases or solid tumors (Table 2).

2.2. Histological and Microbiological Analysis

All BMBs included in the study were fixed in 4% buffered formaldehyde for 24 h, dehydrated in alcohol, cleared in xylene and embedded in paraffin. Three to ten four-micron thick sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histological analysis. As mentioned, biopsies were distributed in group A (from patients suspected of mycobacterial infection) and group B (from patients without suspicion of mycobacterial infection).
Biopsies from group A were cultured using microbiological methods before being embedded. In brief, 0.5–1 mL of fresh BM was incubated in liquid culture media (Mycobacteria Blood bottle, BacT-Alert, Bio-Merieux, Madrid, Spain); positive cultures were confirmed using rhodamine acid-fast stain, and mycobacteria were identified using standard tests including specific molecular probes for both Mtb and Mav (AccuProbe, GenProbe, San Diego, CA, USA). Samples from group B were not included in the microbiological routine analysis because they came from onco-hematological patients without suspicion of mycobacterial infection; therefore, they were embedded directly after collection.

2.3. DNA Isolation, Conventional PCR, and Hybridization

DNA was isolated from 10 mm fragments of FFPE biopsies by using the non-ionic detergent procedure [25]. Strict procedures and controls were followed to avoid cross-contamination between samples during DNA extraction. Presence of amplifiable DNA or inhibitors was depicted by amplification of the eukaryotic gene β-globin [26]; only those samples with a positive result for this gene were further considered. Primers used for PCR + hybridization are summarized next: eukaryotic gene β-globin [26] 5′-GAAGAGCCAAGGACAGGTAC-3′ (forward) and 5′-CAACTTCATCCACGTTCACC-3′ (reverse); Mtb insertion sequence IS6110 [27] 5′-CTCGTCCAGCGCCGCTTCGG-3′ (forward) and 5′-CCTGCGAGCGTAGGCGTCGG-3′ (reverse); Mav insertion sequence IS1311 [28] 5′-GGTGCAGCTGGTGATCTCTGA-3′ (forward) and 5′-GTCGGGTTGGGCGAAGAT-3′ (reverse). PCR conditions were applied, as described in the references indicated.
Amplification reactions included the use of dUTP and uracyl-DNA-glycosylase to avoid the contamination carry-over. Contamination at the DNA level was ruled out by using standard procedures of manipulations and by performing PCR analysis in control samples without DNA as a template. All samples were analyzed by standard PCR followed by Southern blot transfer of agarose gels and hybridization (PCR + H) [29]. Amplified products were agarose electrophoresed and Southern blot transferred to nylon membranes (Bio-Rad, Alcobendas, Spain). Membranes were further hybridized by using the following internal oligonucleotides radioactively labeled as probes: IS6110, 5′-CACCTATGTGTCGACCTGGGCAGGGTTCGCC-3′; IS1311, 5′-GCCGGGTGCACTTCCTGCGCAACGTGCTCG-3′. Stringent conditions were applied for hybridization and washes [29]. Labeled bands were detected using autoradiography (see Results, Figure 1). Amplification and hybridization were performed at least three times per sample. Samples were considered positive when results were positive at least twice.

2.4. In Situ PCR

Out of the 54 biopsies in the study, 43 of them were analyzed using in situ PCR to detect the cellular location of IS6110 (20 and 23, respectively, from groups A and B) and 23 were studied for IS1311 (16 and 17, respectively, from groups A and B) (Table 1 and Table 2). Remaining BMB samples could not be analyzed using in situ PCR due to the inability to obtain sufficient histological material.
The in situ PCR conditions applied were performed as described previously [30] for detection of IS6110 and IS1311 insertion sequences [27,28]. A negative control consisted of performing the whole procedure with non-infected mouse BMBs. Further parallel controls for each test reaction included Taq-polymerase negative and primer negative reactions.

2.5. Ethics Statement

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee for Clinical Research of the Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre (Madrid, Spain).

3. Results

Mtb DNA was detected by PCR + H in 24 of the 28 group A biopsies. Nine of them corresponded to BM samples in which Mtb was isolated by culture, thirteen were biopsies positive for Mav in culture (five of them with known previous history of tuberculosis), and two biopsies had negative microbiological culture but granulomas compatible with mycobacterial infection on histological analysis. These two patients had a previous history of tuberculosis or recent contact with a tuberculous patient. Regarding detection of Mav DNA, PCR + H was positive in 14 bone marrow samples of group A; in 11 of them, this bacterium had also been isolated using microbiological culture (Table 1).
Some discrepant results were observed when comparing culture and PCR results in group A (Table 1). These results could indicate multiple infections, variable distribution of bacilli in the tissue, or the presence of latent bacilli in the BM of these patients. In some cases, detection of non-culturable bacilli cannot be ruled out (such as BM18 or BM20).
No mycobacterial DNA was detected in three of the samples in group A (BM8, BM24, and BM37) although the histological study suggested tuberculous infection (presence of granulomas), or they belonged to patients with a known previous history of tuberculosis. The culture was negative in two of them (Table 1).
Patients included in group B had no sign or symptom of mycobacterial infection at the time of sample collection. Positive detection of mycobacterial DNA, either Mtb or Mav (8/26 for each), was obtained in these samples using PCR + H. A review of the clinical records of these patients revealed that five of them have had previous history of tuberculosis, although PCR was positive for Mtb in only two (Table 2).
Autoradiography of Southern blots after PCR and hybridization was performed by using insertion sequences IS6110 of Mtb (a) and IS1311 of Mav (b) as probes (see Methods for more explanation). (a) Line C+ corresponds to positive control (Mtb strain 79500 DNA), line C- corresponds to negative control (distilled sterile water), lines 2 (BM2), 4 (BM4), 5 (BM5), 7 (BM7), 9 (BM9), and 11 (BM12) showed positive results; lines 3, 6, 8, 10 (BM8, BM24, BM27, BM37), and 12 showed negative results. (b) Line (C+) corresponds to positive control (Mav ATCC 25291T DNA), line (C-) corresponds to negative control (distilled sterile water), lines 2 to 6 (BM26, BM27, BM28, BM29, and BM31), 8 (BM4), and 11 (BM9) showed positive results; lines 1, 7, 9 (BM 24, BM 33 and BM 5), and 10 (BM7) showed negative results.
Regarding the results obtained using in situ PCR, the Mtb genome was detected in 7 of the 20 biopsies of group A (PCR + H positive in all of them) and in 11 of the 23 from group B (8 of them were PCR + H positive) (Table 2). None of group A (0/16) and 7/17 of group B were positive for Mav DNA using this procedure (Table 1 and Table 2). The discrepancies detected when comparing conventional versus in situ PCR using the same target are a frequent finding in the literature and are usually explained by the differential distribution of the bacilli inside the tissues [31]. The involvement of BM in the course of asymptomatic mycobacterial infections could also explain these results at some stages.
A positive label denoted by in situ PCR was characterized by the presence of blue dots in the cellular cytoplasm. Mtb was detected mainly inside macrophages and macrophage precursors, although not as part of a granuloma. Positive DNA signals from this bacterium were also visualized inside non-professional phagocytes, such as fibroblasts and endothelial cells (Figure 2a). Furthermore, we detected Mtb DNA positive signals inside adipocytes (Figure 2b) in 3/7 and 4/11 positive samples, respectively, from groups A and B (Table 1 and Table 2). By contrast, the positive signals of Mav DNA were located only inside macrophages and its precursors (Figure 2c). Interestingly, in all cases, in situ PCR positive cells were found in areas of normal histology, without visible granulomas or necrotic areas by histological analysis.

4. Discussion

Tuberculosis is, globally, the leading cause of mortality due to a single bacterial infectious agent in humans [32]. In addition, it is estimated that one-fourth of the world’s population is latently infected, with a high percentage of them at risk of developing active tuberculosis (and transmitting it) at some point in their lifetime [33]. To prevent this, it is necessary to understand all the events that occur during tuberculosis infection, which would allow us to develop more effective diagnostic and therapeutic tools in the fight against this disease.
Although many aspects of tuberculosis infection remain to be elucidated, it seems clear that both BM and adipose tissue play an important role in the development of this infection. More studies are needed to understand the involvement of these tissues in this process, which would allow to develop new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to control this disease. A recent study described the presence of Mtb in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in different patients, including asymptomatic HIV-infected patients. In this study, the authors found that the profile of infected cells was different in HIV-infected subjects compared to non-HIV-infected ones [34]. From these results, it seems relevant to study the role of BM tissue both in immunocompetent and immunocompromised patients to improve our understanding of the several phases of the spectrum of the Mtb infection.
In this work, we have analyzed FFPE-BMBs from subjects with and without active Mtb infection by using a technique of high sensitivity and specificity, such as conventional PCR + H with specific internal probes [35]. Moreover, we have determined the intracellular location of signaled DNA within BMBs. We detected the Mtb genome in more than half of the BMBs (32/54; Table 1 and Table 2). Eleven of these biopsies belonged to patients without suspected or active tuberculosis.
Although some of the patients in the study could not be followed up, because they died shortly after bone marrow sampling due to an HIV-related advanced state of immunosuppression, a later review of the medical records of the rest of the participants showed that they had not developed clinical tuberculosis during their lifetime, meaning that they putatively had latent infection in their BM at the time that the sample was taken. These results are consistent with findings published by other authors and reinforce the idea that BM might play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of tuberculosis [10,11,12,13,17,18].
Studies published so far also suggest that BM stem cells are the immunoprivileged cellular niche in which the mycobacterium would remain undetected in a dormant state and from which, through the bloodstream, it could reach other tissues after reactivation under certain circumstances such as immunosuppression [10,11,12,13,17,18,34,36]. Some studies, devoted to diagnostic purposes in tuberculosis, included BM as a sample to test PCR. From those, Mtb DNA was detected in a higher proportion in culture/smear negative BM samples compared to other extrapulmonary samples [37,38,39]. This result also suggests that the tubercle bacilli could have BM as a relevant place during their infective process.
A significant proportion of samples in our series belonged to patients with HIV infection (26 out of 54; Table 1). Many of those samples were biopsies positive for Mav in culture; for this reason, we also searched for the presence of DNA from the opportunistic mycobacterial pathogen Mav. We detected Mav DNA in BMBs from both immunocompromised patients as well as from immunocompetent patients with no apparent infection. Mav is a microorganism with an environmental reservoir, such as tap water, that implies a constant human contact. It is not surprising that this mycobacterium was the most frequent non-tuberculous mycobacterium causing extrapulmonary infections in patients with or without immunosuppression [40]. Detection of mycobacterial DNA in samples included within group B could be explained by the fact that pathogens with known hematological spread capability could reach bone marrow tissue and then be detected by chance throughout their processing and eventual clearance inside the host. To rule out this possibility, we checked for the detection of DNA from two other common human pathogens, such as Klebsiella pneumoniae and Salmonella enterica, by using a similar methodology (detection of specific insertion sequences using PCR + hybridization). We detected DNA only in one sample for each pathogen within group B (see Supplementary Data). Therefore, the detection of mycobacterial DNA could putatively comprise some mycobacterium-specific pathophysiological pathway in the bone marrow tissue. As mentioned, previous results suggested that bone marrow could also play some role in the pathogenesis of Mav infection [24]. Further studies are deserved on BMBs from patients infected with this bacterium to understand their physiopathology more comprehensively.
To determine the intracellular localization of Mtb inside BM, we performed in situ PCR on 43 of the 54 BMBs in the study, showing a positive result in 18 of them (Table 1 and Table 2). In these samples, Mtb DNA was detected in areas of apparently normal histology without granulomas, not only inside macrophages, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells but also inside adipocytes. Detection of Mtb DNA in non-professional phagocytes and reticuloendothelial cells is in accordance with other results previously reported [12,13,18], showing that cells of different lineages might be simultaneously infected by Mtb also in the BM. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported time that Mtb DNA was detected inside marrow adipocytes. Furthermore, Mav DNA was detected only inside macrophages and macrophage precursors, suggesting that detection in other BM cells might mean some more specific intracellular behavior in the Mtb pathogenicity. Because our study was carried out on paraffin-embedded biopsies in which there are no viable microorganisms, it is impossible for us to confirm or reject the hypothesis of Mtb migration between cells of different lineages.
Studies published so far have demonstrated the presence of putatively latent Mtb in peripheral adipose tissue [5,14], but there were no previous reports on the detection of Mtb inside marrow adipocytes. Given that this organ contains a high proportion of adipose tissue, it would not be surprising that this location could represent a suitable place to establish a dormant phenotype by the tubercle bacilli. Actually, adipocytes could constitute an ideal reservoir for the persistence of mycobacteria as they constitute specialized cells where Mtb could find a lipid environment suitable to establish long-lasting latent infection [14,20,41,42]. It has also been postulated that, inside these cells, Mtb could modulate the expression of different inflammatory mediators with a direct effect on the physiology of adipose tissue and on its energy balance [6,7]. All these facts might differentiate the pathogenic behavior of non-specialized pathogens, such as Mav, from that of specialized pathogens, such as Mtb. As previously mentioned, by means of working with paraffin-embedded BMB, we have not been able to study the effects of the bacteria on the function and homeostasis of the different types of infected cells, the relationships between them, or the aftermath of these circumstances on the persistence of Mtb in the bone marrow.
In agreement with previous data, our results are adding the marrow adipocytes to other previously described stakeholders which play some role during tuberculosis, thus reinforcing the complex pathology of this deadly disease.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/microorganisms11071788/s1, Figure S1: Other Insertion sequences tested in samples from group B.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation and methodology, A.G.-E.; methodology, M.J.R. and J.B.P.; conceptualization and preparation of the manuscript, A.G.-E. and M.J.G.; supervision, M.J.G. and R.H.-P.; funding acquisition and resources, M.J.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by AES (Instituto Carlos III) grant number PI19/00666, support of FEDER (A way to construct Europe).

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge E. Palenque for giving advice and providing microbiological data and M.A. Martinez for providing clinical samples and histological data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare this research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Santucci, P.; Johansen, M.D.; Point, V.; Poncin, I.; Viljoen, A.; Cavalier, J.-F.; Kremer, L.; Canaan, S. Nitrogen deprivation induces triacylglycerol accumulation, drug tolerance and hypervirulence in mycobacteria. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 8667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Migliori, G.B.; Ong, C.W.; Petrone, L.; D’Ambrosio, L.; Centis, R.; Goletti, D. The definition of tuberculosis infection based on the spectrum of tuberculosis disease. Breathe 2021, 17, 210079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Lin, P.L.; Ford, C.B.; Coleman, M.T.; Myers, A.J.; Gawande, R.; Ioerger, T.R.; Sacchettini, J.C.; Fortune, S.M.; Flynn, J.L. Sterilization of granulomas is common in active and latent tuberculosis despite within-host variability in bacterial killing. Nat. Med. 2013, 20, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Walpole, G.F.W.; Grinstein, S.; Westman, J. The role of lipids in host-pathogen interactions. IUBMB Life 2018, 70, 384–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Neyrolles, O.; Hernández-Pando, R.; Pietri-Rouxel, F.; Fornès, P.; Tailleux, L.; Payán, J.A.B.; Pivert, E.; Bordat, Y.; Aguilar, D.; Prévost, M.-C.; et al. Is Adipose Tissue a Place for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Persistence? PLoS ONE 2006, 1, e43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Ayyappan, J.P.; Vinnard, C.; Subbian, S.; Nagajyothi, J.F. Effect of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection on adipocyte physiology. Microbes Infect. 2018, 20, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Horowitz, M.C.; Berry, R.; Holtrup, B.; Sebo, Z.; Nelson, T.; Fretz, J.; Lindskog, D.; Kaplan, J.L.; Ables, G.; Rodeheffer, M.S.; et al. Bone marrow adipocytes. Adipocyte 2017, 6, 193–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Toppinen, M.; Sajantila, A.; Pratas, D.; Hedman, K.; Perdomo, M.F. The Human Bone Marrow Is Host to the DNAs of Several Viruses. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 657245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. González-Espinoza, G.; Arce-Gorvel, V.; Mémet, S.; Gorvel, J.-P. Brucella: Reservoirs and Niches in Animals and Humans. Pathogens 2021, 10, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Das, B.; Kashino, S.S.; Pulu, I.; Kalita, D.; Swami, V.; Yeger, H.; Felsher, D.W.; Campos-Neto, A. CD271(+) Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells May Provide a Niche for Dormant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013, 5, 170ra13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Tornack, J.; Reece, S.T.; Bauer, W.M.; Vogelzang, A.; Bandermann, S.; Zedler, U.; Stingl, G.; Kaufmann, S.H.E.; Melchers, F. Human and Mouse Hematopoietic Stem Cells Are a Depot for Dormant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0169119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Garhyan, J.; Bhuyan, S.; Pulu, I.; Kalita, D.; Das, B.; Bhatnagar, R. Preclinical and Clinical Evidence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Persistence in the Hypoxic Niche of Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells after Therapy. Am. J. Pathol. 2015, 185, 1924–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Mayito, J.; Andia, I.; Belay, M.; Jolliffe, D.A.; Kateete, D.P.; Reece, S.T.; Martineau, A.R. Anatomic and Cellular Niches for Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Latent Tuberculosis Infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 219, 685–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Beigier-Bompadre, M.; Montagna, G.N.; Kühl, A.A.; Lozza, L.; Weiner, J.; Kupz, A.; Vogelzang, A.; Mollenkopf, H.-J.; Löwe, D.; Bandermann, S.; et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection modulates adipose tissue biology. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Bharuthram, N.; Feldman, C. The diagnostic utility of bone marrow examination in an infectious disease ward. S. Afr. J. HIV Med. 2019, 20, 974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lin, S.-H.; Lai, C.-C.; Huang, S.-H.; Hung, C.-C.; Hsueh, P.-R. Mycobacterial bone marrow infections at a medical centre in Taiwan, 2001–2009. Epidemiol. Infect. 2013, 142, 1524–1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Pathak, L.; Das, B. Initiation of Post-Primary Tuberculosis of the Lungs: Exploring the Secret Role of Bone Marrow Derived Stem Cells. Front. Immunol. 2021, 11, 594572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Beamer, G.; Major, S.; Das, B.; Campos-Neto, A. Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Provide an Antibiotic-Protective Niche for Persistent Viable Mycobacterium tuberculosis that Survive Antibiotic Treatment. Am. J. Pathol. 2014, 184, 3170–3175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Barrios-Payán, J.; Saqui-Salces, M.; Jeyanathan, M.; Alcántara-Vazquez, A.; Castañon-Arreola, M.; Rook, G.; Hernandez-Pando, R. Extrapulmonary Locations of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA during Latent Infection. J. Infect. Dis. 2012, 206, 1194–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Gago, G.; Diacovich, L.; Gramajo, H. Lipid metabolism and its implication in mycobacteria-host interaction. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2017, 41, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tamburini, B.; Badami, G.D.; Azgomi, M.S.; Dieli, F.; La Manna, M.P.; Caccamo, N. Role of hematopoietic cells in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Tuberculosis 2021, 130, 102109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Bwanga, F.; Disqué, C.; Lorenz, M.G.; Allerheiligen, V.; Worodria, W.; Luyombya, A.; Najjingo, I.; Weizenegger, M. Higher blood volumes improve the sensitivity of direct PCR diagnosis of blood stream tuberculosis among HIV-positive patients: An observation study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2015, 15, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Cosma, C.L.; Sherman, D.R.; Ramakrishnan, L. The Secret Lives of the Pathogenic Mycobacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2003, 57, 641–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chiang, C.-H.; Lee, G.-H.; Tang, P.-U.; Fang, C.-T. Disseminated Mycobacterium avium complex infection as a differential diagnosis of tuberculosis in HIV patients. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2020, 24, 922–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Qian, L.; Van Embden, J.D.A.; Van Der Zanden, A.G.M.; Weltevreden, E.F.; Duanmu, H.; Douglas, J.T. Retrospective Analysis of the Beijing Family of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Preserved Lung Tissues. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999, 37, 471–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Bauer, H.M.; Ting, Y.; Greer, C.E.; Chambers, J.C.; Tashiro, C.J.; Chimera, J.; Reingold, A.; Manos, M.M. Genital human papillomavirus infection in female university students as determined by a PCR-based method. JAMA 1991, 265, 472–477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Eisenach, K.D.; Cave, M.D.; Bates, J.H.; Crawford, J.T. Polymerase Chain Reaction Amplification of a Repetitive DNA Sequence Specific for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Infect. Dis. 1990, 161, 977–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Roiz, M.P.; Palenque, E.; Guerrero, C.; Garcia, M.J. Use of restriction fragment length polymorphism as a genetic marker for typing Mycobacterium avium strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1995, 33, 1389–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Sambrook, J.; Fritsch, E.F.; Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning. In A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: New York, NY, USA, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hernández-Pando, R.; Jeyanathan, M.; Mengistu, G.; Aguilar, D.; Orozco, H.; Harboe, M.; Rook, G.; Bjune, G. Persistence of DNA from Mycobacterium tuberculosis in superficially normal lung tissue during latent infection. Lancet 2000, 356, 2133–2138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Piersimoni, C.; Scarparo, C. Relevance of Commercial Amplification Methods for Direct Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex in Clinical Samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 5355–5365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2022; Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  33. Houben, R.M.G.J.; Dodd, P.J. The Global Burden of Latent Tuberculosis Infection: A Re-Estimation Using Mathematical Modelling. PLoS Med. 2016, 13, e1002152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Belay, M.; Tulu, B.; Younis, S.; Jolliffe, D.A.; Tayachew, D.; Manwandu, H.; Abozen, T.; Tirfie, E.A.; Tegegn, M.; Zewude, A.; et al. Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex DNA in CD34-positive peripheral blood mononuclear cells of asymptomatic tuberculosis contacts: An observational study. Lancet Microbe 2021, 2, e267–e275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Harirzadeh, S.; Kazemi, M.J.; Babakhani, S. Identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated from culture-negative pulmonary and extra-pulmonary samples in cases of suspected tuberculosis. GMS Hyg. Infect. Control 2019, 14, Doc09. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Reece, S.T.; Vogelzang, A.; Tornack, J.; Bauer, W.; Zedler, U.; Schommer-Leitner, S.; Stingl, G.; Melchers, F.; Kaufmann, S.H.E. Mycobacterium tuberculosis-Infected Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells Unable to Express Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Propagate Tuberculosis in Mice. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 217, 1667–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Escobedo-Jaimes, L.; Cicero-Sabido, R.; Criales-Cortez, J.L.; Ramirez, E.; Romero, M.; Rivero, V.; Islas, F.; Olivera, H.; Gonzalez, S.; Escobar-Gutierrez, A. Evaluation of the polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of miliary tuberculosis in bone marrow smear. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2003, 7, 580–586. [Google Scholar]
  38. Honoré-Bouakline, S.; Vincensini, J.P.; Giacuzzo, V.; Lagrange, P.H.; Herrmann, J.L. Rapid Diagnosis of Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis by PCR: Impact of Sample Preparation and DNA Extraction. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2003, 41, 2323–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Magana-Arachchi, D.; Perera, J.; Gamage, S.; Chandrasekharan, V. Low cost in-house PCR for the routine diagnosis of ex-tra-pulmonary tuberculosis. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2008, 12, 275–280. [Google Scholar]
  40. Daley, C.L. Mycobacterium avium Complex Disease. Microbiol. Spectr. 2017, 5, 663–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Santucci, P.; Bouzid, F.; Smichi, N.; Poncin, I.; Kremer, L.; De Chastellier, C.; Drancourt, M.; Canaan, S. Experimental Models of Foamy Macrophages and Approaches for Dissecting the Mechanisms of Lipid Accumulation and Consumption during Dormancy and Reactivation of Tuberculosis. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2016, 6, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Maurya, R.K.; Bharti, S.; Krishnan, M.Y. Triacylglycerols: Fuelling the Hibernating Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2019, 8, 450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Microorganisms 11 01788 g001 550
Figure 1. Detection of mycobacterial DNA in bone marrow samples using PCR + hybridization. Autoradiography of southern blots after PCR and hybridization, by using insertion sequences IS6110 of Mtb (a) and IS1311 of Mav (b) as probes (see Methods for more explanation). (a) Line C+ corresponds to positive control (Mtb strain 79500 DNA), line C- corresponds to negative control (distilled sterile water), lines 2 (BM2), 4 (BM4), 5 (BM5), 7 (BM7), 9 (BM9) and 11 (BM12) showed positive results; lines 3, 6, 8, 10 (BM8, BM24, BM27, BM37) and 12 showed negative results. (b) Line (C+) corresponds to positive control (Mav ATCC 25291T DNA), line (C-) corresponds to negative control (distilled sterile water), lines 2 to 6 (BM26, BM27, BM28, BM29 and BM31) 8 (BM4) and 11 (BM9) showed positive results; lines 1, 7, 9 (BM 24, BM 33 and BM 5) and 10 (BM7) showed negative results.
Figure 1. Detection of mycobacterial DNA in bone marrow samples using PCR + hybridization. Autoradiography of southern blots after PCR and hybridization, by using insertion sequences IS6110 of Mtb (a) and IS1311 of Mav (b) as probes (see Methods for more explanation). (a) Line C+ corresponds to positive control (Mtb strain 79500 DNA), line C- corresponds to negative control (distilled sterile water), lines 2 (BM2), 4 (BM4), 5 (BM5), 7 (BM7), 9 (BM9) and 11 (BM12) showed positive results; lines 3, 6, 8, 10 (BM8, BM24, BM27, BM37) and 12 showed negative results. (b) Line (C+) corresponds to positive control (Mav ATCC 25291T DNA), line (C-) corresponds to negative control (distilled sterile water), lines 2 to 6 (BM26, BM27, BM28, BM29 and BM31) 8 (BM4) and 11 (BM9) showed positive results; lines 1, 7, 9 (BM 24, BM 33 and BM 5) and 10 (BM7) showed negative results.
Microorganisms 11 01788 g001
Microorganisms 11 01788 g002 550
Figure 2. Detection of mycobacterial DNA in bone marrow samples using in situ PCR. Representative micrographs on detection of IS6110 (corresponding to Mtb DNA) and IS1311 (corresponding to Mav DNA) using in situ PCR in BMBs. (a) Macrophages (arrows) and sinusoidal endothelial cells (arrow heads) were the most common IS6110 positive cells denoted by the cytoplasmic blue dots that contrasted with the nucleus stained by nuclear fast red. (b) Adipose cells also showed IS6110 positivity (arrow), manifested by blue dots located in the cytoplasm pushed by large lipid vacuole. (c) Only occasional macrophages showed IS1311 positivity (arrow), identified by cytoplasmic large dark-blue dot that contrasted with the red-stained nucleus. All micrographs are ×1000 magnification.
Figure 2. Detection of mycobacterial DNA in bone marrow samples using in situ PCR. Representative micrographs on detection of IS6110 (corresponding to Mtb DNA) and IS1311 (corresponding to Mav DNA) using in situ PCR in BMBs. (a) Macrophages (arrows) and sinusoidal endothelial cells (arrow heads) were the most common IS6110 positive cells denoted by the cytoplasmic blue dots that contrasted with the nucleus stained by nuclear fast red. (b) Adipose cells also showed IS6110 positivity (arrow), manifested by blue dots located in the cytoplasm pushed by large lipid vacuole. (c) Only occasional macrophages showed IS1311 positivity (arrow), identified by cytoplasmic large dark-blue dot that contrasted with the red-stained nucleus. All micrographs are ×1000 magnification.
Microorganisms 11 01788 g002
Table
Table 1. Clinical data and results from group A biopsies.
Table 1. Clinical data and results from group A biopsies.
Clinical Records IS6110IS1311
TB History 1HIVHistology 2Culture 3SP + His-PSP + His-P
BM1 +NSMav+−+−
BM2 +GM/AFBMtb+−−nd
BM4 +NSMav+nd+nd
BM5 −NSMtb+−−nd
BM7 +NSMtb+−−−
BM8history+GM−−nd−nd
BM9history+GMMav+−+−
BM10 +NSMav+++−
BM12history+AFBMav+−+−
BM14history+ndMav+−−−
BM16history+GMMav+++−
BM18history+GM−+nd−nd
BM19 +NSMav+−+−
BM20contact+GM−+nd−nd
BM21 +NSMtb+nd+nd
BM23 a +NSMtb++−−
BM24history+GM−−nd−nd
BM26history+GM/AFBMav+−+−
BM27 +NSMav−nd+nd
BM28 +GM/AFBMtb+−+−
BM29 a +GMMav+++−
BM31 a +NSMtb+++−
BM33 +MGMMav+−−−
BM34 +NSMav+−−−
BM35 +GMMav+++−
BM36 b −GMMtb++−nd
BM37 +GMMav−nd−nd
BM38 +GMMtb+−−nd
1 Data relating to previous history of tuberculosis or recent contact with tuberculosis patients. 2 Histology: GM, granuloma; AFB, acid-fast bacilli; MGM, microgranuloma; NS, non-specific findings. 3 Culture: Mav, M. avium; Mtb, M. tuberculosis; −, negative. a Samples with M. tuberculosis DNA inside adipocytes using in situ PCR. b Patients on corticosteroid treatment at the time of sample collection. SP + H, standard PCR plus hybridization; is-P, in situ PCR. Results for PCR positive (+), negative (−), and not done (nd) are indicated.
Table
Table 2. Clinical data and results from group B biopsies.
Table 2. Clinical data and results from group B biopsies.
IS6110IS1311
SampleTB History 1Histology 2SP + His-PSP + His-P
C1 a AML+++nd
C2 a,b AML−+++
C3 AML−−−nd
C4 AML−−++
C5a AML−+++
C6 LS−nd−nd
C7 AML−−+−
C8 AML++−+
C9historyAML++−−
C11 LS−−+−
C12historyHA−−+−
C13 HA++−+
C14historyLS−−−−
C15historyHA−−−nd
C16 HA−−−nd
C17 a HA−+−nd
C18 HA−−−nd
C19 b AML−−+−
C30 ST−nd−nd
C31 ST−nd−nd
C32 ST++−+
C33historyST++−−
C34 ST++−+
C35 ST++−−
C36 ST−−−−
C37 ST−−−−
1 Data related to previous history of tuberculosis. 2 Histology: AML, acute myeloid leukemia; LS, lymphoproliferative syndrome; HA, hematopoiesis alterations; ST, solid tumor. a Samples with M. tuberculosis DNA inside adipocytes using in situ PCR. b Patients on corticosteroid treatment at the time of sample collection. SP + H, standard PCR plus hybridization; is-P, in situ PCR. Results for PCR positive (+), negative (−), and not done (nd) are indicated.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

González-Escalada, A.; Rebollo, M.J.; Barrios Payan, J.; Hernández-Pando, R.; García, M.J. Detection of Mycobacterial DNA in Human Bone Marrow. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1788. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms11071788

AMA Style

González-Escalada A, Rebollo MJ, Barrios Payan J, Hernández-Pando R, García MJ. Detection of Mycobacterial DNA in Human Bone Marrow. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(7):1788. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms11071788

Chicago/Turabian Style

González-Escalada, Alba, María José Rebollo, Jorge Barrios Payan, Rogelio Hernández-Pando, and María Jesús García. 2023. "Detection of Mycobacterial DNA in Human Bone Marrow" Microorganisms 11, no. 7: 1788. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms11071788

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop