Next Article in Journal
Yeast Deletomics to Uncover Gadolinium Toxicity Targets and Resistance Mechanisms
Next Article in Special Issue
In Vitro Biofilm-Mediated Biodegradation of Pesticides and Dye-Contaminated Effluents Using Bacterial Biofilms
Previous Article in Journal
Infant Saliva Microbiome Activity Modulates Nutritional Impacts on Neurodevelopment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Extracts from Wallis Sponges Inhibit Vibrio harveyi Biofilm Formation
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Physiological and Transcriptomic Analyses of Escherichia coli Serotype O157:H7 in Response to Rhamnolipid Treatment

by Shuo Yang, Lan Ma, Xiaoqing Xu, Qing Peng, Huiying Zhong, Yuxin Gong, Linbo Shi, Mengxin He, Bo Shi * and Yu Qiao *
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 10 July 2023 / Revised: 13 August 2023 / Accepted: 16 August 2023 / Published: 18 August 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advance Research on Bacterial Biofilm)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is an excellent well conducted and written study, with an original contribution to the knowledge of first report of Physiological and Transcriptomic Analyses of Escherichia Coli Serotype O157:H7 in Response to Rhamnolipid Treatment.

     I encourage it’s acceptance after appropriate minor modifications as outlined below:

 

L31: For a better understanding of these phenomenon and also to ensure an complete and objective overview, I recommend you to cite a few more scientific articles (e.g. Gligor et al., 2022, MICROBIOLOGICAL AIR POLLUTION IN AREAS WHERE PIGEON COLONIES LIVE, IN TIMISOARA, ROMANIA, https://agmv.ro/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/05_12_Gligor_8-c_compressed.pdf).

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The main question addressed by this article is the impact of rhamnolipid on E.coli disinfection. The paper is original and compared to other published material, it adds the analysis of gene expression.

I have a few comments regarding the methodology of the study:

Line 38: specify with which strains E. coli forms multispecies biofilms

Line 78: Specify what was the initial concentration of cells. This is important, since this impact the results.

Section 2.2 again, information on cell concentration is missing. This is vital to interpret results correctly.

Section Methods: For all experiments information on parallels and repetition is missing.

Section 2.5: The authors should describe method Purpad assay more specific. Solely referenced to paper is not scientific standard. 

On the other hand, the conclusions are consistent with the arguments presented and the references are appropriate and most of them recent.

I have no comments on figures or tables.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop