Next Article in Journal
Clinical and Functional Predictors of Response to a Comprehensive Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Severe Post-COVID-19 Patients
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Cold-Surge-Induced Nearshore Seawater Icing on the Eukaryotic Microalgal Community in Aoshan Bay, Qingdao
Previous Article in Journal
Safety Evaluation of Weissella cibaria JW15 by Phenotypic and Genotypic Property Analysis
Previous Article in Special Issue
Functional Metabolic Diversity of Bacterioplankton in Maritime Antarctic Lakes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Psychrophilic Bacterial Phosphate-Biofertilizers: A Novel Extremophile for Sustainable Crop Production under Cold Environment

1
Department of Botany, School of Chemical and Life Sciences, Jamia Hamdard, Hamdard Nagar, New Delhi 110062, India
2
School of Chemical Engineering, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Korea
3
Department of Agricultural Microbiology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202002, India
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 28 October 2021 / Revised: 23 November 2021 / Accepted: 24 November 2021 / Published: 28 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Low Temperature Microbiology Meets the Global Challenges of Our Time)

Abstract

:
Abiotic stresses, including low-temperature environments, adversely affect the structure, composition, and physiological activities of soil microbiomes. Also, low temperatures disturb physiological and metabolic processes, leading to major crop losses worldwide. Extreme cold temperature habitats are, however, an interesting source of psychrophilic and psychrotolerant phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) that can ameliorate the low-temperature conditions while maintaining their physiological activities. The production of antifreeze proteins and expression of stress-induced genes at low temperatures favors the survival of such organisms during cold stress. The ability to facilitate plant growth by supplying a major plant nutrient, phosphorus, in P-deficient soil is one of the novel functional properties of cold-tolerant PSB. By contrast, plants growing under stress conditions require cold-tolerant rhizosphere bacteria to enhance their performance. To this end, the use of psychrophilic PSB formulations has been found effective in yield optimization under temperature-stressed conditions. Most of the research has been done on microbial P biofertilizers impacting plant growth under normal cultivation practices but little attention has been paid to the plant growth-promoting activities of cold-tolerant PSB on crops growing in low-temperature environments. This scientific gap formed the basis of the present manuscript and explains the rationale for the introduction of cold-tolerant PSB in competitive agronomic practices, including the mechanism of solubilization/mineralization, release of biosensor active biomolecules, molecular engineering of PSB for increasing both P solubilizing/mineralizing efficiency, and host range. The impact of extreme cold on the physiological activities of plants and how plants overcome such stresses is discussed briefly. It is time to enlarge the prospects of psychrophilic/psychrotolerant phosphate biofertilizers and take advantage of their precious, fundamental, and economical but enormous plant growth augmenting potential to ameliorate stress and facilitate crop production to satisfy the food demands of frighteningly growing human populations. The production and application of cold-tolerant P-biofertilizers will recuperate sustainable agriculture in cold adaptive agrosystems.

1. Introduction

Globally, abiotic stresses, including extremely low temperatures, cause major losses to the growth and productivity of food crops [1,2,3]. Indeed, low temperature is the most vital environmental variable which adversely affects composition, diversity, community structure, and microbial biomass, and decreases the soil nutrient pool [4,5,6,7]. Among soil microbes, the phosphate-solubilizing activities of phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (PSB) are negatively affected by many factors such as temperature, pH, salinity, and dissolved oxygen [8,9,10]. Of these, the low temperature restricts the cellular activities of microbes, where a 10 °C decrease in the temperature has been found to bring a 2–4-fold reduction in microbial enzyme activity [11]. Bacteria belonging to different genera, however, tolerate cold temperatures by synthesizing ice-binding proteins such as antifreeze protein (AFPs) which help them to survive and proliferate under freezing temperatures by regulating the formation and growth of ice crystals [12,13]. Literature in contrast also suggests that temperature, apart from impacting various metabolic activities of bacteria, also affects the P-solubilizing abilities of some psychrotolerant bacteria strains [14,15]. Due to this, attention in recent times has been paid to discovering PSB which can reduce/replace the use of chemical phosphatic fertilizers while protecting the plants from abiotic stresses. Psychrophiles among variously distributed microflora are the organisms that dwell in unpleasant conditions such as low-temperature environments, which, in general, are disastrous for most living organisms. Besides surviving extremely low temperatures, the “psychrophiles” also secrete active biomolecules capable of stimulating plant growth in low-temperature ranges [16,17,18]. Besides microbes, low temperatures negatively affect the morpho-anatomical, chemical, functional, and genetic composition of plants and, hence, decrease crop productivity [12,19]. The use of plant beneficial psychrophiles/psychrotolerant bacteria provides a sustainable option for optimizing agriculture production and offsetting the undesirable impact of cold temperatures [20,21]. The variations in plant growth-regulating abilities permit such organisms to thrive in different ecological habitats. In this regard, psychrophiles/psychrotolerant endowed with phosphate solubilizing ability, together with other plant growth-promoting potentials [22], have received greater attention and have gained impetus due largely to their ability to provide macro nutrients especially P to plants, ability to alleviate cold stress, and ability to modulate phytohormones growing under extreme cold soils [23,24]. Apart from providing P, psychrophilic PSB facilitate the growth of plants by providing phytohormones [12] and siderophores [2], or through phytopathogenic control [25] by secreting various cell wall degrading hydrolytic enzymes, for example, chitinases, proteases, and cellulases [2]. A study by Yadav et al. [17] reported the secretion of cold-active (at 4 °C) lytic enzymes such as amylase, β-glucosidase, pectinase, protease, cellulase, xylanase, β-galactosidase, laccase, chitinase, and lipase by psychrophilic, psychrotrophic, or psychrotolerant bacteria such as Bacillus, Desemzia, Exiguobacterium, Jeotgalicoccus, Lysinibacillus, Paenibacillus, Planococcus, Pontibacillus, Sinobaca, Sporosarcina, Staphylococcus, and Virgibacillus. The complex physiological process of psychrophilic PSB is, however, influenced by biotic or abiotic factors such as soil nutrient pool, soil pH, salt contents, temperature, and humidity [26]. These bacteria, when applied, have been reported to accelerate crop production under a low-temperature environment. For instance, the cold-tolerant PSB Pseudomonas isolates (RT5RP2 and RT6RP) colonizing the rhizoplane of wild grass, growing at 3100 and 3800 m above sea level, grew at a temperature that varied between 4 and 30 °C and when applied with Udaipur rock phosphate (URP) the P uptake of lentil plants under greenhouse conditions was significantly enhanced [27]. Considering these facts, attention in research is growing to discover cold-adapted PSB which could successfully colonize cold habitats and influence the processes of nutrient turnover at low temperatures. Thus, cold-adapted bacteria can be used as biofertilizers, biocontrol agents, and bioremediation for augmenting the growth and yield of crops growing at high altitudes [28]. The work presented is mainly a review of the recent advances in the novel field of cold-tolerant PSB which has direct relevance in crop optimization and yield stability under cold environments. This manuscript focuses on how cold temperatures affect the physiological activities of plants and briefly explains how plants alleviate cold stress. The ability of microorganisms to cope with the cold and to endure low temperatures, the mechanism of solubilization/mineralization of insoluble phosphorus, and how cold-active phosphate solubilizing bacteria promote plant growth under cold environments are discussed. Molecular engineering of phosphate solubilizing/mineralizing bacteria to broaden the host range is discussed. The work presented in this manuscript is likely to generate wide interest within the scientific community concerned for psychrophiles, psychrophilic PSB, and food production in cold regions.

2. Psychrophiles and Psychrotrophs: An Overview

2.1. Definition, Ecological Habitats, and Agronomic Importance

The cold regions cover approximately 71% of the Earth’s surface and 90% of the ocean volume is below 5 °C followed by snow, permafrost, sea ice, and glaciers [29]. Other cold environments are cold-water lakes, cold soils, cold deserts, and caves. Interestingly, these cold habitats are colonized by a variety of extremophiles including those possessing plant growth-promoting activities [16,22]. Such cold adaptive microorganisms have been categorized into two groups. (i) Psychrophiles: microbes which grow at or below 0, 15, and 20 °C (minimum, optimum, and maximum, respectively) and that can thrive well under identical environmental conditions [29,30]. Indeed, the psychrophily explains the capability of an organism to generate higher biomass at 15 °C or below instead of demonstrating better growth rates at temperatures over 20 °C [29]. (ii) Psychrotolerants or psychrotrophs: organisms capable of growing sub-optimally at temperatures below 20 °C or even at 0 °C that repel the negative effect forced by cold environments; such microbiota are recovered most frequently from cold environments. Since both groups of microorganisms can colonize cold habitats, the term “cold-active microorganisms” may be used at places in this manuscript to refer to both these groups. Sadly, efforts to understand the behavior and functional properties of such microbiomes under differing cold environments and the information available on their role in agronomic production in cold agroecosystems have been poorly described. Among agronomically potential organisms, cold-active phosphate solubilizing bacteria, for example, Pseudomonas, have been recovered from glacial ice habitats [18] and other cold ecosystems worldwide such as Andean mountain glaciers [31,32], polar environments [33,34], cold deserts [35,36], Himalayan soils [27,37], and alpine soils [38,39]. Some notable plant growth-promoting bacteria inhabiting the extreme cold environments are Pseudomonas [40,41], Serratia and Staphylococcus [42], Exiguobacterium [43], Rahnella [44], Stenotrophomonas and Leucobacter [45], and Flavobacterium [46]. Cold active microbes have prompted researchers to discover new cold-tolerant bacterial species possessing plant growth-promoting abilities [17,43,47], to produce cold-resistant enzymes [48,49] and mitigation of cold effects in plants in agroecosystem to optimize crop production [45]. Although reports indicating the functional response of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) strains at low temperatures are available, studies on the P dissolving activity of soil microbiome at low temperatures (≤10 °C) are scarce. Despite this, Dolkar et al. [40] documented the potentiality of cold-tolerant P-solubilizing P. simiae, recovered from the Seabuckthorn rhizosphere, in plant growth promotion at low-temperature conditions. They observed a significant increase of 30% and 51% in shoot and root length in P. simiae inoculated tomato grown in pots maintained in the greenhouse, and 9.8% and 19.8% in open field conditions, respectively. The rhizobacterium P. putida GR12-2 recovered from the plant rhizosphere of the Canadian high arctic grew well and enhanced root growth of spring and winter canola at 5 °C at which very few bacteria could grow and function normally. Also, the bacterium had one major protein (32–34 kDa) and several minor proteins which benefit bacteria survival at −20 and −50 °C [50]. Similarly, psychrotolerant PSB Pseudomonas isolates (RT5RP2 and RT6RP) collected from the rhizoplane of wild grass growing at 3100 and 3800 m above sea level survived well between 4 to 30 °C and produced both IAA and siderophores at 4 °C. Under pot culture conditions, the psychrotolerant Pseudomonas strains in the presence of Udaipur rock phosphate (URP) significantly enhanced the vegetative growth (root and shoot), grain yield plant−1 by 20.9% and 13.8%, respectively, and P uptake by lentil plants relative to the sole application of RP [27].

2.2. How Do Cold-Active Bacteria Survive under Cold Stress?

To thrive well under cold extremes and to protect themselves from cellular injuries or to reduce the destructive effects of ice crystal formation, generally termed “Osmoprotection”, microorganisms have developed various structural and functional modifications [51,52]. These adaptations include (i) variation in membrane fluidity [53]; (ii) conformational flexibility; (iii) better enzyme activity associated with essential cellular processes such as transcription and translation [54]; (iv) induction of cold-shock proteins [55]; (v) production of antifreeze proteins (AFPs) [56,57]; (vi) excretion of high amounts of exopolymeric substances with cryoprotection activity [58,59,60,61]; (vii) synthesis and accumulation of various other compatible solutes such as polyamines, sugars, polyols, amino acids, etc. [62,63]. Together, the metabolic adaptation and the capability to grow widely determine the ecological success of psychrophilic bacteria under cold environments [64].
At cold temperatures, the membrane of cold-active bacteria becomes significantly more inflexible, which activates a membrane-bound sensor. The sensor so generated then produce the signals in response to the regulator, which ultimately upregulates the expression of genes associated with membrane fluidity and eventually upregulates different genes that assist bacteria to adapt to cold [65]. The presence of specific lipid constituents in the cytoplasmic membranes of cold-active bacteria helps to sustain fluidity and allows the transport of biomolecules through the membranes under low temperatures [66]. Also, psychrophiles secrete enzymes that can be extremely active at low and moderate temperatures compared to those produced by their mesophilic counterparts. The cold-active enzymes, which are heat labile, preserve the proper movement of the active site even at temperatures at which the molecular motions of mesophilic and thermophilic counterparts are critically limited [67,68]. In addition, psychrophiles/psychrotrophs bacteria enduringly synthesize one set of ice-binding proteins (AFP) at low temperatures whose concentration increases with rising low temperatures [69,70]. The AFPs reduce the freezing point of water without altering its melting point and eluding the formation of ice crystals [69,71]. Conclusively, the AFPs and accumulation of other compatible solutes, for example, glycine betaine as produced by Bacillus subtilis, prohibit ice-crystallization and as an effective cold stress protectant, respectively, and therefore allow bacteria to grow normally at growth-inhibiting temperatures [12,13,62]. Besides such stress alleviation mechanisms, the cold-active bacteria also synthesize and secretes exopolymeric substances, for example by Colwellia psychrerythraea 34H [60], which binds to bacterial cell surfaces and facilitates the production of the biofilms, entraps the nutrients, facilitates biochemical interaction, and guards the cells against hostile conditions [72]. The defense against reactive oxygen species (ROS) is yet another pivotal means by which cold-adapted bacteria thrive well at low temperatures since, if not protected, ROS can damage the bacterial cell structures under cold ecosystems significantly. The psychrophilic strategies to avoid the lethal impact of ROS include the generation of antioxidant enzymes such as catalase, peroxidase, superoxide dismutases, dioxygen-consuming lipid desaturases, or the absence of ROS-producing pathways [73,74,75]. Despite all of this, there is still a greater need to uncover the cold adaptation strategies adopted by cold-active microbes, which of course can be revealed through more and more metagenomic and proteomic technologies. These techniques can decipher the finer details and may provide precious information on the mechanisms of cold adaptation by the psychrophiles/psychrotrophs.

3. Low Temperature Effects on Plants: Physiological Changes and Stress Alleviation

With the consistently growing human populations, there is greater pressure on agrosystems to fulfill human food demands, which, however, are under severe threat due to some aggressive environmental conditions such as extreme low [76,77,78] and high [79,80,81] temperatures, drought [82,83], and salinity [84]. Temperatures below 15 °C (chilling stress) can have a detrimental impact on the growth and development of many food crops, including cereals like rice [19,85], maize [86,87], wheat [88,89], vegetables [90,91,92], legume crops [93,94], and many other plants [77,95]. At low temperatures, the cellular, physiological, and metabolic processes of plants are perturbed due to the induction of morphological and biochemical changes in plant tissues [78,96,97]. During the negative response, cold initially impairs the germination of seeds and causes poor stand establishment [98]. Following this, the critical physiological processes of plants, such as water metabolism [99], photosynthesis [100,101], nutrient metabolism [102,103], membrane lipids [104], proteins, and nucleic acids [105,106], are adversely affected, leading to the death of cells. Mechanistically, the low temperatures damage the cell membranes by blocking the water movement by altering stomata and disrupting the balance of cells metabolism [107,108,109]. Also, low temperatures reduce cellular respiration [110] and produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) in plants [111]. The ROS so generated at low temperatures can destruct the lipid profile of the membrane, proteins, and nucleic acid, which either alone or simultaneously leads to cell death [112,113]. When the membrane is damaged due to osmotic imbalance, the secretion of osmolytes, soluble proteins, and proline is enhanced, which eventually reduces the ability of cells to obviate the cold stress [114] and may cause the death of the cells [115]. As an example, extreme temperatures have been found to negatively upset the growth and many developmental processes of rice, such as germination, emergence and seedling establishment, and reproductive and grain-filling stages. The low (cold) temperature slowed down the vegetative growth; decreased the seedling vigor, number of seedlings, and tillering; and eventually enhanced the chances of plant mortality [116,117]. These results are supported by the findings of other researchers who also observed a similar deleterious impact of low temperatures on many food crops (Table 1).
In order to alleviate cold stress, plants have evolved mechanisms such as the formation of stress proteins [128], organic osmolytes, and phytohormones such as ABA, GA, brassinosteroids (BR), jasmonates (JA), auxin, cytokinin (CK), melatonin, and polyamines [74,129]. Also, they have antioxidant enzymes, for example, SOD, POD, CAT, and APX [130,131], and temperature-induced non-enzymatic active biomolecules to circumvent the ROS-induced damage, which is vital to maintain the redox balance of the cells [132,133,134]. Apart from these, certain compatible solutes generally referred to as “osmotic protectors” secreted under cold stress by plants is yet another imperative strategy adopted by plants to overcome abiotic stress [135,136]. For instance, soluble proteins, proline, and total free amino acids released by plants at low temperatures serve as osmotic protectors and guard plants against stress [101,137]. Of these cold-induced phytocompounds, the function of proline in cold management and its significance in shielding plants from cold stress has been well investigated [138,139]. Physiologically, proline can serve as a rapidly available source of N and C and assist plants during the phase of recovery from cold stress [140]. Proline may also act as a metabolite and a signal molecule and therefore affects plant development. Moreover, proline stimulates the secretion of some vital proteins and plays an important role in maintaining the expansion of cells under stress conditions [141,142]. The impact of temperature, i.e., both chilling (0–15 °C) and freezing (<0 °C), however, vary from genotypes to genotypes of plants.

4. Importance of P and Rationale for Using Cold-Active Bacterial Phosphate Biofertilizers in Low-Temperature Environments

Phosphorus is a vital nutrient that supports the growth and development of plants dramatically but its deficiency limits the crop severely [143,144]. Following uptake by the root systems and translocation to various plant organs, soluble phosphorus influences root morphogenesis, cellular growth, development of new tissues, macromolecular biosynthesis, respiration, signal transduction, energy transfer, and photosynthesis [145,146,147,148]. Although global soils have enough reserves of P (inorganic and organic P), very small amounts of the total soil P are accessible for plants [149] because of its rapid fixation/complex formation ability with Fe and Al in acid and alkaline soils, aggravating the nutrient problems of colder agrosystems [150,151,152]. To balance the P availability and to support the growth and development of plants, phosphatic fertilizers are repeatedly applied in agronomic practices [153,154,155]. However, due to the cost of its production and unpredicted environmental hazards like water eutrophication, sustainability of soil–plant systems, and human health problems, the use of chemical P fertilizers are discouraged [156]. Soil microbiomes having P solubilizing/mineralizing activity—often termed phosphate solubilizing microorganisms (PSM) in this context—have been suggested as a substitute to chemical phosphatic fertilizer [157,158] that transform the locked P into soluble forms which are taken up by plants [159,160]. To harness their potentials, phosphatic, nitrogenous, and potassic biofertilizers [161,162,163] have been produced and are commercially sold worldwide but their use in colder regions have been found to be grossly unproductive [164] due largely to the lethal impact of low temperatures on the functional activity of mesophilic homologs. As an example, the microbial enzyme activity decreases two to four times more when the temperature of any environment drops by 10 °C [11]. In addition, the poor availability of nutrients, low moisture and organic matter, minimal land, and harmful impact of low temperatures on crops are the major constraints that further worsen crop production in colder/high altitude agrosystem conditions that experience chilling temperatures. So, realizing the colder region problems and pressure on the agroecosystems, there is an imperative requirement to produce effective phosphate biofertilizers consisting of plant beneficial psychrotolerant or psychrophiles. The usefulness of such bacterial strains in cold-adapted agroecosystems (e.g., hill and mountain) seems huge due to the exceptional crop-raising conditions and the environmental situations of the high altitude agricultural systems [165,166]. The cold-adapted P biofertilizers could resist/tolerate the extremities of cold and maintain their functional qualities even under cold environments [167]. Considering the vast and varied plant growth-promoting potentials, the application of indigenous phosphate biofertilizers in cold soils can be a central approach to preserve soil fertility, protect microbial diversity, and concomitantly optimize crop production more sustainably.

5. Mechanisms of P-Solubilization in Cold-Adapted Bacteria: An Overview

Generally, the phosphate-solubilizing bacteria including psychrophiles [2,20], mesophiles [168,169], or thermophiles [156,170] convert the inaccessible complex P such as Ca3(PO4)2, Fe3PO4, and Al3PO4 to plant-available forms by acidification, chelation, exchange reactions, and polymeric substance formation [171,172]. On the other hand, the organically bound P (e.g., phytin, phospholipids, nucleic acid, etc.) is transformed into bioavailable forms by microbial enzymes, and, later on, the soluble P is absorbed by plant roots [173,174,175]. Like the mesophilic counterparts, the organic acid (OA) theory of P solubilization by cold-active bacteria is the most widely accepted mechanism of P availability in soil (Table 2). For example, different cold-active bacteria like Pseudomonas sp., P. palleroniana, P. proteolytica, and P. azotoformans while growing at 15 °C and 25 °C released mainly oxalic and malic acids, whereas the culture supernatants of these bacteria had a poor quantity of lactic, citric, and succinic acids [20]. In general, the P solubilization by psychrotolerant Pseudomonas sp. was maximal at 15 °C except for P. azotoformans, which showed maximum P solubilization at 25 °C. Likewise, gluconic acid, acetic acid, oxalic acid, quinic acid, and succinic acid are secreted by other PSB while growing under in vitro conditions [176,177]. The membrane-bound enzyme, for example, glucose dehydrogenase (gcd), mediates the synthesis of gluconic acid [178,179], an important organic acid causing solubilization of insoluble P by such PSB. The OA so released diffuses through the membrane and strongly acidifies the cell surroundings, leading eventually to the discharge of P ions from insoluble inorganic P sources by H+ substitution for Ca2+ [180,181]. The acidic (lowering of pH) environment of the medium suggests the release of OA that occurs on the outer face of the cytoplasmic membrane via the direct oxidation pathway. Many reports have established a positive correlation between pH drop and soluble P concentration in the liquid culture medium. Since the solubilization of inorganic P largely depends on the membrane-bound enzymes, the low temperatures may intensely affect its efficacy under a mesophilic environment. So, such conventional PSB requires urgent bioprospecting especially for solubilizing enzymes so that they remain active and perform efficiently at low temperatures, like those performed by cold-active PSB [167]. The OA secreted either by cold-active PSB or conventional PSB into the culture supernatant can be detected by paper or TLC [182] or by HPLC [20,183]. Besides OA, the release of H+, production of chelating substances, and inorganic acids (sulfuric, nitric, and carbonic acids) have been suggested as some other alternative mechanisms of P solubilization by PSB, as observed in the case of P fixation in acidic soil [184]. To elaborate further, Illmer and Schinner [185] reported that 0 to 5000 µM of gluconic acid at pH 4 to 7 did not affect Ca-P solubility at pH > 6. Moreover, the total amount of P solubilized under in vitro environments did not correlate with the amounts of OA excreted into the supernatant suggesting the involvement of biomolecules other than OA in P solubilization by PSB. The inorganic acids, for instance, hydrochloric acid, can also solubilize insoluble P but in terms of solubilization, they have been poorly effective relative to those solubilized by OA at the same pH [186].
Enzymes like phosphatases, phytases [20,195], and phospholipases [196] produced by many psychrotolerant/conventional PSB induce the release of P from phosphorus-containing organic molecules (e.g., phospholipids, phytin, nucleic acid, etc.) through mineralization process in the rhizosphere soil. As an example, the cold-tolerant Pseudomonas sp. produced maximal amounts of phytase at 15 °C, whereas P. azotoformans excreted the highest quantity of phytase at 25 °C. The phytase so released by both the cold-tolerant PSB transformed the phytate (a natural soil organic P) into plant-available orthophosphate through the mineralization process [20]. Similarly, the genetically engineered root-associated mineral P solubilizing (mps) bacteria, P. simiae WCS417r, Ralstonia sp. strain UNC404CL21Col, and P. putida KT2440 caused the release of plant-available P from phytate [197]. Apart from this, the persistence of mineralizing activities of acid and alkaline phosphatase further confirms the ability of bacterial cultures to release P from organically bound P as also reported in Serratia sp. [198] and Pantoea sp. [173] by other workers.

6. Mechanisms Used by Cold-Adapted PSB to Facilitate Plant Growth

The concept of applying cold-adapted PSB among many cold-active PGPR makes it clear that the cold temperatures and poor growing seasons influence both versatile microbiomes and plants growing under cold/chilling temperatures. So, the discovery of novel cold-active PSB, which maintains their plant growth-promoting traits even under low-temperature environments and counterbalances the damaging effect of cold temperature, is indeed essentially needed to optimize food production in colder areas of the world. The mechanisms used by conventional PSM including bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes to optimize crop production in different agroecosystems have been previously reviewed [172,199,200]. However, the mechanisms adopted by psychrophiles/psychrotrophs PSB to ameliorate crop production in a low-temperature environment have perhaps not been reviewed due largely to scanty literature on this aspect. Despite this, the literature available here and there on cold-active PSB including rhizosphere bacteria, epiphytes, and endophytes able to exhibit direct or indirect ameliorative effects on plants (Figure 1) are reviewed and discussed.

6.1. Direct Mechanisms

Epiphytic, endophytic, and rhizospheric cold-active PSB bacteria promote plant growth directly by the expedition of resource and nutrient acquisition, primarily the solubilization and mineralization of inorganic and organic P, respectively [20], a mechanism also employed by other mesophilic homologs PSM [175,201], fixation of atmospheric N, solubilization of potassium and zinc, secretion of siderophores and phytohormones such as cytokinin, auxin, and gibberellins [12,37,202,203]. The phyto-beneficial active molecules identified in cold-active PSB supporting plant growth, however, differs from organism to organism and from temperature to temperature (Table 3). Cold tolerant PSB, for example P. fluorescens [204], P. lurida M2RH3 [205] and A. chroococcum [206], also produce siderophores that solubilize and form a complex with iron in the rhizosphere and, therefore, offer a survival advantage to both plants and bacteria by removing phytopathogens and other microbial competitors through iron limitation [2,43]. The secondary metabolites released by psychrophilic PSB strains could therefore serve as attractive and useful biotechnological tools in reducing the damage to plants caused by the attack of a variety of pathogens [18].
Nitrogen-fixing microorganisms can transform the atmospheric N2 into ammonia and provide it to plants. Like traditional N2 fixers, the uptake of nitrogen fixed by psychrotolerant bacterial species of Arthrobacter, Bacillus, Bordetella, Providencia, Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, and Stenotrophomonas facilitates plant growth and increases the nutritional value of crop plants [213]. In a similar study, Zhang et al. [217] reported that the rhizobia recovered from the cooler climates of North America markedly affected symbiotic features, such as N2 fixation and nodulation of soybean, relative to the rhizobia isolated from the warmer southern climes. The production of stimulatory phytohormones by cold-active PSB including IAA, cytokinin, gibberellin, abscisic acid, etc. [22,35,36] is yet another direct mechanism of plant growth stimulation. Of these hormones, the IAA directly affects morphogenesis including root primary growth, side root formation, and root hairs. Many cold-tolerant PSB are capable of secreting IAA at low temperatures, including Pantoea dispersa and Serratia marcescens SRM [218] and Pseudomonas jesenii strain MP1 [219], have been isolated from cold environments. Similarly, the psychrotrophic PSB recovered from the cold desert of the Himalayan region produced gibberellic acid (GA) [35,36]. However, some cold-active PSB, for example, Stenotrophomonas, can produce more than one hormone (e.g., IAA and GA) which either alone or simultaneously facilitates the development of plants [213]. The combined effect of such valuable biomolecules on plants is usually measured by evaluating the cumulative plant growth, nutrient uptake, and total biomass production [220].
In addition to producing phytohormones, many cold-tolerant PSB, for instance, Pseudomonas, Serratia, and Flavobacterium, possess the enzyme ACC deaminase [12] which can lower plant ethylene (C2H4 or H2C=CH2) levels [221]. Ethylene, a phytohormone synthesized under biotic/abiotic stress [222] induces senescence, chlorosis, and abscission in plants, thereby aggravating the lethal impact of pathogens [223,224]. The enzyme ACC deaminase cleaves ACC, a precursor of ethylene formation, into α-ketobutyrate and NH3 [225] and, therefore, decreases the levels of ethylene. Once the plants have decreased levels of ethylene, they grow normally under stress. As an example, ACC deaminase-producing psychrotolerant bacterium P. putida UW4 facilitated the bio-performance of canola plants growing at low temperatures [226]. Several studies have validated the efficacy of the ACC deaminase enzyme produced by cold-active PSB to protect plants from attack by the phytopathogens [35,43].

6.2. Indirect Mechanisms

Cold adapted PSB can also stimulate the growth of plants indirectly by restricting the functioning and further multiplication of crop-damaging phytopathogens [203,207,227]. Due to this, the indirect mechanisms become of great practical significance because they avoids the use of synthetic pesticides in agronomic practices. Currently, although the technology for the large-scale production of biopesticides using mesophilic microbes is available, these biocides have not been active at low temperatures due to the destructive effect of cold temperatures on biocontrol agents. Hence, there is great interest in identifying the cold-active PSB possessing biocide activity for application in low-temperature environments [2,228]. Sadly, the reports on such cold-active microbiomes with biocontrol potentials are scanty. In this section, we review the current information available on the antagonistic potentials of cold-active bacteria.
Cold-adapted PSB produce hydrolytic enzymes such as chitinases and proteinase, which degrade the fungal cell walls and therefore protect the crop plants from attack by pathogens, reducing the necessity of using environmentally hazardous chemicals to optimize crop production [17,229,230]. For example, several psychrophilic Pseudomonas spp. strains through lytic enzymes protease have been shown to inhibit the phytopathogens P. ultimum, F. oxysporum, and P. infestans. Other hydrolytic enzymes such as chitinases and cellulases degrade cellulose and chitin, respectively. As a result, the cold-active PSB able to produce such enzymes improves colonization and protects plants from phytopathogens like Phytophthora and Phytium species whose cell walls contain cellulose and other fungi with a chitin cell wall [231]. Some other well-recognized phytopathogenic fungi include the genera like Rhizoctonia, Alternaria, and Verticillium, which cause serious damage to crops. So, the application of cold-adapted plant growth-promoting bacteria to prevent the attack of phytopathogens and hence to limit the progression of the diseases is imperative for the sustainability of agro-ecosystems [25]. In this context, four different strains of psychrophilic Pseudomonas impeded the growth of fungal phytopathogens, Fusarium sp., R. solani, A. solani, and P. capsica, by secreting chitinases and proteases [2]. Likewise, a chitinase-producing Pseudomonas sp. recovered from marine sediments suppressed the growth of two phytopathogenic fungi, V. dahlia and F. oxysporum f. sp. cucumerinum [232]. Production of cyanogenic compounds by cold-active PSB inhabiting various low-temperature environments [18,35,213] is yet another special trait that aids in the management of phytopathogens, although it is harmful to certain plants because it interferes with the cytochrome P450 system [233]. To counteract the cyanogen toxicity, plants possess a cyanide resistant respiratory pathway [234] but microbes do play a critical role in avoiding cyanogenic toxicity. For instance, seed inoculation with HCN positive phosphate solubilizing psychrotolerant P. fragi CS11RH1 had no damaging influence on germination or growth of wheat plants [14]. The ability of the wheat plant to counterattack cyanide action was due to cyanogenesis by P. fragi, which avoided cyanogenic toxicity, as also reported for the take-all disease of wheat caused by the fungal pathogen Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici [235]. Another indirect mechanism of growth stimulation by psychrophilic and psychrotolerant bacteria involves the production of gluconic acid which can control the populations of plant pathogens. Psychrophilic and psychrotolerant bacteria mainly belonging to class actinobacteria and proteobacteria collected from Andean glaciers produced high quantities of gluconic acid [31,32]. The majority of these cold-tolerant bacterial strains limited the growth of phytopathogenic fungi, F. oxysporum and oomycetes, P. infestans, and P. ultimum. Conclusively, the multifarious growth stimulatory activity of cold-tolerant PSB represents one of the most important functional groups of bacteria, which could be developed as suitable bacterial formulations able to endure at extremely low temperatures while retaining their plant growth modulating traits for crops growing in low-temperature environments.

7. Performance of Cold-Active P-Biofertilizers under the Low-Temperature Environment

Plant–microbe interactions are influenced by changes in temperature [22,236] wherein the low temperature among different abiotic stresses poses a major limitation on the growth and reproductive stage of development and grain yield of plants [237]. In this regard, cold-tolerant or low-temperature adapting plant growth-promoting P bacteria have an advantage over their mesophilic counterparts to increase growth and productivity, particularly in the areas perturbed by low temperatures. Also, the cold adaptive bacterial formulations have a greater possibility of substituting agrochemicals used to optimize crop production in nutrient/cold stressed soils. Understanding the crosstalk between cold-active bacteria and crops growing under cold regimes will, therefore, be needed to develop microbial strategies to protect plants from cold stress vis-à-vis augmenting their growth under low-temperature regions.
Psychrophilic and psychrotolerant bacteria recovered from cold environments [238,239] have demonstrated plant growth-enhancing activity both in greenhouse and field conditions that prompted the scientists to apply them in cold agricultural ecosystems also [27,240]. The Antarctic Pseudomonas, a psychrotolerant strain (Da-bac Ti8) possessing plant-growth modifying ability has previously been used as a psychrotolerant biofertilizer formulation and is currently patented as well [215,241]. The bacterial preparation (inoculant) of psychrophilic or psychrotolerant Pseudomonas spp. have demonstrated some promising results in many food crops like mungbean [242], wheat [194,205,216,243], maize [244,245], rice [246], and lentils [37,41]. In addition to the non P solubilizing cold-active plant beneficial bacteria, the low-temperature tolerant PSB applied in P deficient soils of colder regions have been found agronomically useful against many crops (Table 4). The use of cold-tolerant P-solubilizing bacteria in stressed agrosystems is recommended due to reasons such as (i) inexpensive production; (ii) the ability to tolerate other stressor molecules besides cold, without losing functional traits; and (iii) being environment friendly. Some notable phosphate solubilizing bacterial genera possessing stress tolerating ability include Cronobacter [247], Azotobacter [248], Aerococcus, Pseudomonas and Pantoea sp. [173], Achromobacter [249], Bacillus sp. [250,251]. Psychrotrophic PSB, P. jesenii MP1, and Acinetobacter sp. ST02 enhanced the germination of seeds by 92% (MP1) and 85% (STO2) and significantly increased the agronomical and biochemical parameters of chickpea grown under field conditions [252]. Of the two strains, strain MP1 applied with 40 kg P2O5 ha−1 had maximum impact on grain yield and harvesting index, indicating that the use of PSB with a recommended dose of P fertilizers is greatly beneficial for high altitude agriculture. Similarly, the cold-tolerant P. corrugata enhanced the yield of maize grown in greenhouse and fields in rain-fed conditions [244]. Rondón et al. [16] in yet another investigation observed that the Pseudomonas strains recovered from the Andean glacier enhanced the biological performance of wheat plantlets at low temperatures. Conclusively, the use of cold-tolerant PSB, individually or as a mixture, has been found effective in optimizing crop production under low-temperature regimes. Therefore, the cold-active PSB–plant interactions have great agronomic potential and promise to be an efficient tool for bioprospecting food production, even under cold stressed environments.

8. Molecular Engineering of Phosphate-Biofertilizers

Phosphate solubilizing bacteria surviving at mesophilic, thermophilic, or psychrophilic temperatures release plant-available P from both inorganic and organic P stores. Therefore, they may serve as sustainable and inexpensive alternatives to high-cost and environmentally hazardous chemical P fertilizers. However, many plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) colonizing the root surface and thriving around the root systems do not release plant accessible P from soil reserves because they lack the capacity to solubilize/mineralize the soil P. Therefore, the effort is directed to develop a pool of P-solubilizing soil bacteria that grow in the root region and could release plant accessible P. Recombinant technology in this regard offers a viable option to engineer non-P-dissolving soil bacteria to improve their P solubilizing/mineralizing ability that can be applied against wide-ranging crops [255,256]. Also, the engineered bacterial strains could be customized according to the crops and environmental conditions. Considering this, different molecular approaches have been used to genetically modify non-P-solubilizing plant beneficial bacteria to release plant-available orthophosphate from different organic P. Molecular engineering of PSB by insertion and over-expression of genes associated with soil P dissolution into non-solubilizer soil bacteria is indeed a promising approach for enhancing the capability of non-P-solubilizing bacteria and host range to be used as PSB inoculant [257,258]. Furthermore, cloning and transfer of P-solubilizing/mineralizing genes into non-PSB may avoid the need for mixing two phylogenetically and physiologically contrast bacterial populations, for example, nitrogen-fixers and P-solubilizers, as inoculants together, if the technology is successful. Molecular engineering focuses on transferring especially mineral phosphate solubilization (mps) genes or the enzyme encoding genes associated with the dissolution of organic P from solubilizing/mineralizing to non-P-solubilizing/mineralizing PSB. Some of these approaches are briefly discussed.

8.1. Development of mps Positive Bacterial Strains

Goldstein [259] suggested for the first time the existence of mps genes in a Gram-negative epiphyte Erwinia herbicola, currently known as Pantoea agglomerans. Applying the shotgun-cloning technique, Goldstein and Liu [260] cloned gene(s) associated with mps and demonstrated that the pyrroloquinoline quinone-linked glucose dehydrogenase (PQQGDH) mediated dissimilatory bypass system catalyzes the oxidative transformation of glucose to gluconic acid (GA) that occurred in the bacterial periplasmic space. The resulting GA caused the solubilization of mineral P in E. herbicola. Further insertion and subsequent expression of this mps gene into E. coli HB101 led to the synthesis of GA and imparted P solubilizing potentials to the non-PSB to solubilize hydroxyapatite (MPS+ phenotype). The E. coli strains lacking mps (MPS) can produce GDH (encoded by gcd) but they cannot produce the PQQ—a cofactor encoded by the PQQ operon [261] for the GDH and, hence, may not produce GA [262]. In a similar experiment, E. coli produced higher amounts of GA and dissolved hydroxyapatite when the mps gene of Ranella aquatilis was integrated into the non P solubilizing recipient bacterium [263]. However, both bacterial species differed in the regulation of the mps genes. Similar efforts to increase the mps ability in conventional mesophilic plant growth regulators, for example, B. cepacia and P. aeruginosa strains through PQQ synthase genes obtained from E. herbicola, was done using a broad-host-range vector pKT230 [264]. Using the tri-parental conjugation process, the recombinant plasmid was allowed to express in E. coil, and thereafter it was inserted into two recipients cells of B. cepacia and P. aeruginosa. Many of the resulting clones possessing recombinant plasmids displayed a larger P solubilization zone on solid PVK medium containing insoluble TCP. The production of clear halo around the bacterial conjugants suggested a successful expression of mps activity of the E. herbicola mps gene in the non-P solubilizer PGPR strains. Expression of the mps genes in a non-P solubilizer, however, depends on the genetic composition of the recipient bacterial strains, the plasmid copy number, and metabolic reactions.

8.2. Development of Enzyme Engineered Bacterial Strains

8.2.1. Development of Bacterial Strains with Phosphatase Activity

Besides inorganic phosphorus, the organically bound P [265] is mineralized to release free orthophosphate by enzymes acid phosphatase (encoded by olpA), alkaline phosphatase (phoD) [198], phytases (appA), phosphonatase (phnX), and C-P lyase (phnJ) [101,266,267,268]. Of these, phytases and phosphatases are the most common P mineralizing enzymes which have been transferred to non-P mineralizing bacteria. For example, the PhoC acid phosphatase gene of Morganella morganii (phoC gene) cloned using a vector was transferred through chromosomal integration into phoC negative PGPR strains of Azospirillum spp. and B. cepacia [269]. Similarly, a gene expressing phosphatase activity was isolated from B. cepacia. The napA phosphatase gene of M. morganii was integrated into B. cepacia IS-16 using a broad-host-range vector (pRK293). The recombinant strain demonstrated a considerable enhancement in phosphatase activity. In a similar study, the chromosomal insertion of a heterologous gene encoding an acid phosphatase enzyme in a putative PGPB is reported [270]. Briefly, The phoC gene of M. morganii that encodes for the acid phosphatase was cloned in the pJMT6 mini-Tn5 derivative transposon vector and the phoC gene was further integrated into the P. putida N-14 chromosome. The resulting P. putida N-14::Tn5-phoC expressed high levels of the enzyme providing the superfluous ability to the recombinant bacterium to mineralize P from organic compounds. However, even after chromosomal integration, the P. putida N-14 strain retained their original PGP potentials. The phosphatase activity of recombinant P. putida N-14 was also detected by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE). Analysis by SDS-PAGE revealed a band of approximately 25 kDa produced by P. putida N-14::Tn5- phoC, which was closely related to those reported for M. morganii acid phosphatase PhoC [271]. However, no band and, therefore, no phosphatase activity was detected in the native P. putida N-14 strain.

8.2.2. Development of Bacterial Strains with Phytase Activity

Phytate (myo-inositol 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexakisphosphate) among organic P derived from plant, microbes and metazoan biomass predominates in soil [272]. Phosphate mineralizing bacteria such as Advenella spp. and Cellulosimicrobium sp. PB-09 produce phytase and affect the mineralization of organic P [273] while some bacteria may colonize the root surface or inhabit the rhizosphere regions but they can’t mineralize soil organic P and, therefore, fail to supply soluble P to growing plants. Despite this, such bacteria can be molecularly engineered to release P because they are more acquiescent to engineering and can be applied against a range of crops. With these backgrounds, Shulse et al. [197] using a combinatorial synthetic biology-based approach generated numerous plant-colonizing bacteria that could hydrolyze phytate. Overall, they produced 82 biochemically different phytase enzymes (encoded by phytase gene) and transferred them directly into the genomes of P. simiae WCS417r, Ralstonia sp. strain UNC404CL21Col, and P. putida KT2440 using conjugation techniques and observed that the engineered bacterial strains hydrolyzed the phytate very efficiently in liquid culture medium. Also, they released Pi from TCP probably due to the secretion of OA (s). Furthermore, many of these phytases secreting bacterial strains significantly promoted the growth of A. thaliana grown under Pi limited soilless conditions (agar plate assays). In another set of experiments, Arabidopsis plants bacterized with a total of 14 different host/gene combinations were grown using phytate as the only P source. The growth of Arabidopsis in the presence of phytate but without bacterial inoculum was consistently poor and plants showed deposition of anthocyanin. The accumulation of anthocyanin resulted in a dark-colored leaf in Arabidopsis plants, which suggested that the Arabidopsis did not take up sufficient Pi from phytate. In contrast, Arabidopsis plants treated with engineered bacterial strains accumulated greater dry matter and had bigger-sized rosettes relative to the uninoculated plants. The increment in the measured biological properties of A. thaliana was due to the availability of P supplied by the engineered bacteria which caused the enzymatic dissolution of phytate. Considering all of this, molecular engineering provides a promising opportunity to produce bacterial strains with enhanced P solubilization/mineralization ability and broader host range which could serve as efficient microbial inoculants for furthering agricultural production in low P soils under different environmental conditions including cold temperatures. Metagenomic and genomic approaches can help understand the phenotypic features considered important for their growth-promoting abilities at molecular levels [274]. Genomic and proteomic strategies will further help to establish a meaningful correlation between important secondary metabolites such as organic acids, enzymes, and other growth enhancers with genes and proteins that would reveal the overall plant growth modulating and low-temperature meliorative behavior of cold-adapted phosphate biofertilizers.

9. Conclusions and Future Prospects

Cold active phosphate solubilizing bacteria involving different genera like Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Bacillus, Stenotrophomonas, etc. has huge potential for modifying nutrient-deficient soils into nutrient sufficient soils under a low-temperature environment. The production of important food crops such as cereals, vegetables, and legumes can be optimized in colder areas using such cold-adapted PSB strains, thereby reducing the dependence on chemical fertilizers applied in the intensive agrosystems. Future research is required to decipher the molecular basis of growth-enhancing mechanisms and to understand how cold-active PSB strains retain their functional traits while thriving at low temperatures. The development of environmentally friendly cold-active phosphate biofertilizers opens up new horizons for enhancing crop production in colder regions.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.R., M.S.K. and S.U.; software, A.R., B.A. and J.L.; validation, A.R., B.A., S.U., M.S.K. and J.L.; formal analysis, J.L., S.U., M.S.K., A.R. and B.A.; investigation, A.R. and B.A.; resources, A.R., J.L. and B.A.; data curation, A.R., M.S.K., B.A. and S.U.; writing—original draft preparation, A.R., B.A. and M.S.K.; writing—review and editing, A.R., M.S.K., S.U. and J.L.; supervision, S.U., M.S.K. and J.L.; project administration, A.R., B.A. and S.U.; funding acquisition, B.A. and J.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Post-Doctoral Fellowship (PDF/2020/000127) grant from DST-SERB, India. The APC was funded by National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) through grant by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2021R1G1A1094698).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the main manuscript.

Acknowledgments

Asfa Rizvi is thankful to DST-SERB for National Post-Doctoral Fellowship (PDF/2020/000127). This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. 2021R1G1A1094698) to Bilal Ahmed and this work was also supported by the Priority Research Center Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (grant no. 2014R1A6A1031189) to Jintae Lee.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, F.; Lu, K.; Gu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Li, W.; Li, Z. Effects of low-temperature stress and brassinolide application on the photosynthesis and leaf structure of tung tree seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 10, 1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Tapia-Vázquez, I.; Sánchez-Cruz, R.; Arroyo-Domínguez, M.; Lira-Ruan, V.; Sánchez-Reyes, A.; del Rayo Sánchez-Carbente, M.; Padilla-Chacón, D.; Batista-García, R.A.; Folch-Mallol, J.L. Isolation and characterization of psychrophilic and psychrotolerant plant-growth promoting microorganisms from a high-altitude volcano crater in Mexico. Microbiol. Res. 2020, 232, 126394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kumar, R.; Singh, P.C.; Singh, S. A Review Report: Low-temerature Stress for Crop Production. Int. J. Pure Appl. Biosci. 2018, 6, 575–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Muhammad, I.; Khan, F.; Khan, A.; Wang, J. Soil fertility in response to urea and farmyard manure incorporation under different tillage systems in Peshawar, Pakistan. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2018, 20, 1539–1547. [Google Scholar]
  5. Muhammad, I.; Sainju, U.M.; Zhao, F.; Khan, A.; Ghimire, R.; Fu, X.; Wang, J. Regulation of soil CO2 and N2O emissions by cover crops: A meta-analysis. Soil Tillage Res. 2019, 192, 103–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Thant, S.; Aung, N.N.; Aye, O.M. Phosphate solubilization of Bacillus megaterium isolated from non-saline soils under salt stressed conditions. J. Bacteriol. Mycol. Open Access 2018, 6, 335–341. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lin, Y.T.; Jia, Z.; Wang, D.; Chiu, C.Y. Effects of temperature on the composition and diversity of bacterial communities in bamboo soils at different elevations. Biogeosciences 2017, 14, 4879–4889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Rizvi, A.; Zaidi, A.; Ameen, F.; Ahmed, B.; AlKahtani, M.D.; Khan, M.S. Heavy metal induced stress on wheat: Phytotoxicity and microbiological management. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 38379–38403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zeng, Q.; Wu, X.; Wen, X. Identification and characterization of the rhizosphere phosphate-solubilizing bacterium Pseudomonas frederiksbergensis JW-SD2, and its plant growth-promoting effects on poplar seedlings. Ann. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 1343–1354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vassileva, M.; Serrano, M.; Bravo, V.; Jurado, E.; Nikolaeva, I.; Martos, V.; Vassilev, N. Multifunctional properties of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms grown on agro-industrial wastes in fermentation and soil conditions. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 85, 1287–1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Feller, G.; Gerday, C. Psychrophilic enzymes: Hot topics in cold adaptation. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2003, 1, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vega-Celedón, P.; Bravo, G.; Velásquez, A.; Cid, F.P.; Valenzuela, M.; Ramírez, I.; Vasconez, I.N.; Álvarez, I.; Jorquera, M.A.; Seeger, M. Microbial diversity of psychrotolerant bacteria isolated from wild flora of Andes mountains and Patagonia of Chile towards the selection of plant growth-promoting bacterial consortia to alleviate cold stress in plants. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cid, F.P.; Inostroza, N.G.; Graether, S.P.; Bravo, L.A.; Jorquera, M.A. Bacterial community structures and ice recrystallization inhibition activity of bacteria isolated from the phyllosphere of the Antarctic vascular plant Deschampsia antarctica. Polar Biol. 2017, 40, 1319–1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Selvakumar, G.; Joshi, P.; Nazim, S.; Mishra, P.; Bisht, J.; Gupta, H. Phosphate solubilization and growth promotion by Pseudomonas fragi CS11RH1 (MTCC 8984), a psychrotolerant bacterium isolated from a high altitude Himalayan rhizosphere. Biologia 2009, 64, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Negi, Y.K.; Garg, S.K.; Kumar, J. Cold-tolerant fluorescent Pseudomonas isolates from Garhwal Himalayas as potential plant growth promoting and biocontrol agents in pea. Curr. Sci. 2005, 25, 2151–2156. [Google Scholar]
  16. Rondón, J.J.; Ball, M.M.; Castro, L.T.; Yarzábal, L.A. Eurypsychrophilic Pseudomonas spp. Isolated from Venezuelan tropical glaciers as promoters of wheat growth and biocontrol agents of plant pathogens at low-temperatures. Environ. Sustain. 2019, 2, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yadav, A.N.; Sachan, S.G.; Verma, P.; Kaushik, R.; Saxena, A.K. Cold active hydrolytic enzymes production by psychrotrophic bacilli isolated from three sub-glacial lakes of NW Indian Himalayas. J. Basic Microbiol. 2016, 56, 294–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Balcázar, W.; Rondón, J.; Rengifo, M.; Ball, M.M.; Melfo, A.; Gómez, W.; Yarzábal, L.A. Bioprospecting glacial ice for plant growth promoting bacteria. Microbiol. Res. 2015, 177, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Reddy, K.R.; Seghal, A.; Jumaa, S.; Bheemanahalli, R.; Kakar, N.; Redoña, E.D.; Wijewardana, C.; Alsajri, F.A.; Chastain, D.; Gao, W. Morpho-physiological characterization of diverse rice genotypes for seedling stage high-and low-temperature tolerance. Agronomy 2021, 11, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Adhikari, P.; Jain, R.; Sharma, A.; Pandey, A. Plant growth promotion at low-temperature by phosphate-solubilizing Pseudomonas spp. isolated from high-altitude Himalayan soil. Microb. Ecol. 2021, 29, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Patni, B.; Panwar, A.; Negi, P.; Joshi, G.K. Plant growth promoting traits of psychrotolerant bacteria: A boon for agriculture in hilly terrains. Plant Sci. Today 2018, 5, 24–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Meena, R.K.; Singh, R.K.; Singh, N.P.; Meena, S.K.; Meena, V.S. Isolation of low-temperature surviving plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) from pea (Pisum sativum L.) and documentation of their plant growth promoting traits. Biocat. Agric. Biotechnol. 2015, 4, 806–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zubair, M.; Hanif, A.; Farzand, A.; Sheikh, T.M.M.; Khan, A.R.; Suleman, M.; Ayaz, M.; Gao, X. Genetic screening and expression analysis of psychrophilic Bacillus spp. reveal their potential to alleviate cold stress and modulate phytohormones in wheat. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Przemieniecki, S.W.; Kurowski, T.P.; Korzekwa, K.; Karwowska, A. The effect of psychrotrophic bacteria isolated from the root zone of winter wheat on selected biotic and abiotic factors. J. Plant Prot. Res. 2014, 54, 407–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Morel, M.A.; Tapia-Vázquez, I.; Castro-Sowinski, S.; Batista-García, R.A. Fighting plant pathogens with cold-active microorganisms: Biopesticide development and agriculture intensification in cold climates. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 17, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  26. Pal, K.K.; Tilak, K.V.B.R.; Saxena, A.K.; Dey, R.; Singh, C.S. Antifungal characteristics of a fluorescent Pseudomonas strain involved in the biological control of Rhizoctonia solani. Microbiol. Res. 2001, 155, 233–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Selvakumar, G.; Joshi, P.; Suyal, P.; Mishra, P.K.; Joshi, G.K.; Venugopalan, R.; Bisht, J.K.; Bhatt, J.C. Gupta, H.S. Rock phosphate solubilization by psychrotolerant Pseudomonas spp. and their efect on lentil growth and nutrient uptake under polyhouse conditions. Ann. Microbiol. 2013, 63, 1353–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Bhandari, G.; Nautiyal, N.; Sharma, M. Assessment of Genes and Enzymes of Microorganisms of High Altitudes and Their Application in Agriculture. In Microbiological Advancements for Higher Altitude Agro-Ecosystems & Sustainability; Springer: Singapore, 2020; pp. 307–326. [Google Scholar]
  29. Margesin, R.; Miteva, V. Diversity and ecology of psychrophilic microorganisms. Res. Microbiol. 2011, 162, 346–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Morita, R.Y. Psychrophilic bacteria. Bacteriol. Rev. 1975, 39, 146–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Rondón, J.; Gómez, W.; Ball, M.M.; Melfo, A.; Rengifo, M.; Balcázar, W.; Dávila-Vera, D.; Balza-Quintero, A.; Mendoza-Briceño, R.V.; Yarzábal, L.A. Diversity of culturable bacteria recovered from Pico Bolívar’s glacial and subglacial environments, at 4950 m, in Venezuelan tropical Andes. Can. J. Microbiol. 2016, 62, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Ball, M.M.; Gómez, W.; Magallanes, X.; Moreno, R.; Melfo, A.; Yarzábal, L.A. Bacteria recovered from a high-altitude, tropical glacier in Venezuelan Andes. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 30, 931–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Presta, L.; Inzucchi, I.; Bosi, E.; Fondi, M.; Perrin, E.; Maida, I.; Miceli, E.; Tutino, M.L.; Lo Giudice, A.; de Pascale, D. Draft genome sequences of the antimicrobial producers Pseudomonas sp. TAA207 and Pseudomonas sp. TAD18 isolated from Antarctic sediments. Genome Announc. 2016, 4, e00728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. See-Too, W.S.; Lim, Y.L.; Ee, R.; Convey, P.; Pearce, D.A.; Yin, W.F.; Chan, K.G. Complete genome of Pseudomonas sp. strain L10.10, a psychrotolerant biofertilizer that could promote plant growth. J. Biotechnol. 2016, 222, 84–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Yadav, A.N.; Sachan, S.G.; Verma, P.; Saxena, A.K. Prospecting cold deserts of north western Himalayas for microbial diversity and plant growth promoting attributes. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2015, 119, 683–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yadav, A.N.; Sachan, S.G.; Verma, P.; Tyagi, S.P.; Kaushik, R.; Saxena, A.K. Culturable diversity and functional annotation of psychrotrophic bacteria from cold desert of Leh Ladakh (India). World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 31, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bisht, S.C.; Mishra, P.K.; Joshi, G.K. Genetic and functional diversity among root-associated psychrotrophic Pseudomonad’s isolated from the Himalayan plants. Arch. Microbiol. 2013, 195, 605–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Meyer, A.F.; Lipson, D.A.; Schadt, C.W.; Martin, A.P.; Schmidt, S.Z. Molecular and metabolic characterization of cold-tolerant alpine soil Pseudomonas sensustricto. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2004, 70, 483–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Mancinelli, R.L. Population-dynamics of alpine tundra soil bacteria, Niwot Ridge, Colorado Front Range, USA. Arc. Alp. Res. 1984, 16, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dolkar, D.; Dolkar, P.; Stobdan, T.; Chaurasia, O.P.; Katiyar, A.K. Tomato growth promotion induced by stress tolerant phosphate solubilising Pseudomonas simiae in Arid trans-Himalaya. Defence Life Sci. J. 2018, 3, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mishra, P.K.; Bisht, S.C.; Ruwari, P.; Selvakumar, G.; Joshi, G.K.; Bisht, J.K.; Bhatt, J.C.; Gupta, H.S. Alleviation of cold stress in inoculated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings with psychrotolerant Pseudomonads from NW Himalayas. Arch. Microbiol. 2011, 193, 497–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Araya, M.A.; Valenzuela, T.; Inostroza, N.G.; Maruyama, F.; Jorquera, M.A.; Acuña, J.J. Isolation and characterization of cold-tolerant hyper-ACC-degrading bacteria from the rhizosphere, endosphere, and phyllosphere of antarctic vascular plants. Microorganisms 2021, 8, 1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Verma, P.; Yadav, A.N.; Khannam, K.S.; Kumar, S.; Saxena, A.K.; Suman, A. Molecular diversity and multifarious plant growth promoting attributes of Bacilli associated with wheat rhizosphere from six agro-ecological zones of India. J. Basic Microbiol. 2015, 56, 44–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Vyas, P.; Joshi, R.; Sharma, K.C.; Rahi, P.; Gulati, A.; Gulati, A. Cold-adapted and rhizosphere-competent strain of Rahnella sp. with broad-spectrum plant growth-promotion potential. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 20, 1724–1734. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Kadioglu, G.B.; Koseoglu, M.S.; Ozdal, M.U.; Sezen, A.L.; Ozdal, O.G.; Algur, O.F. Isolation of cold tolerant and ACC deaminase producing plant growth promoting rhizobacteria from high altitudes. Rom. Biotechnol. Lett. 2018, 23, 13479–13486. [Google Scholar]
  46. Herbert, R. Psychrophilic organisms. In Microbes in Extreme Environments; Herbert, R., Codd, G., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1986; pp. 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  47. Subramanian, P.; Kim, K.; Krishnamoorthy, R.; Mageswari, A.; Selvakumar, G.; Sa, T. Cold stress tolerance in psychrotolerant soil bacteria and their conferred chilling resistance in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) under low-temperatures. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0161592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Furhan, J. Adaptation, production, and biotechnological potential of cold-adapted proteases from psychrophiles and psychrotrophs: Recent overview. J. Gen. Eng. Biotechnol. 2020, 18, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Feller, G. Psychrophilic enzymes: From folding to function and biotechnology. Scientifica 2013, 2013, 512840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sun, X.; Griffith, M.; Pasternak, J.J.; Glick, B.R. Low-temerature growth, freezing survival, and production of antifreeze protein by the plant growth promoting rhizobacterium Pseudomonas putida GR12-2. Can. J. Microbiol. 1995, 41, 776–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chattopadhyay, M.K.; Reddy, G.S.; Shivaji, S. Psychrophilic bacteria: Biodiversity, molecular basis of cold adaptation and biotechnological implications. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 3, 100–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bej, A.K.; Aislabie, J.; Atlas, R.M. Polar Microbiology: The Ecology, Biodiversity and Bioremediation Potential of Microorganisms in Extremely Cold Environments; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  53. Králová, S. Role of fatty acids in cold adaptation of Antarctic psychrophilic Flavobacterium spp. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 40, 329–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ernst, F.G.; Erber, L.; Sammler, J.; Jühling, F.; Betat, H.; Mörl, M. Cold adaptation of tRNA nucleotidyl transferases: A tradeoff in activity, stability and fidelity. RNA Biol. 2018, 15, 144–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Suyal, D.C.; Soni, R.; Yadav, A.N.; Goel, R. Cold Adapted Microorganisms: Survival Mechanisms and Applications. In Microbiomes of Extreme Environments; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2021; pp. 177–191. [Google Scholar]
  56. Khan, N.M.; Arai, T.; Tsuda, S.; Kondo, H. Characterization of microbial antifreeze protein with intermediate activity suggests that a bound-water network is essential for hyperactivity. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 5971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Muñoz, P.A.; Márquez, S.L.; González-Nilo, F.D.; Márquez-Miranda, V.; Blamey, J.M. Structure and application of antifreeze proteins from Antarctic bacteria. Microb. Cell Factor. 2017, 16, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Ali, P.; Shah, A.A.; Hasan, F.; Hertkorn, N.; Gonsior, M.; Sajjad, W.; Chen, F. A glacier bacterium produces high yield of cryoprotective exopolysaccharide. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 3096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Deming, J.W.; Young, J.N. The role of exopolysaccharides in microbial adaptation to cold habitats. In Psychrophiles: From Biodiversity to Biotechnology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 259–284. [Google Scholar]
  60. Casillo, A.; Parrilli, E.; Sannino, F.; Mitchell, D.E.; Gibson, M.I.; Marino, G.; Lanzetta, R.; Parrilli, M.; Cosconati, S.; Novellino, E.; et al. Structure-activity relationship of the exopolysaccharide from a psychrophilic bacterium: A strategy for cryoprotection. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 156, 364–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Carrion, O.; Delgado, L.; Mercade, E. New emulsifying and cryoprotective exopolysaccharide from Antarctic Pseudomonas sp. ID1. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 117, 1028–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Hoffmann, T.; Bremer, E. Protection of Bacillus subtilis against cold stress via compatible-solute acquisition. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 1552–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Christner, B.C. Bioprospecting for microbial products that affect ice crystal formation and growth. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 85, 481–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Moreno, R.; Rojo, F. Features of Pseudomonads growing at low-temperatures: Another facet of their versatility. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2014, 6, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Shivaji, S.; Prakash, J.S.S. How do bacteria sense and respond to low-temperature? Arch. Microbiol. 2010, 192, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Allen, D.; Huston, A.L.; Wells, L.E.; Deming, J.W. Biotechnological use of psychrophiles. In Psychrophiles: From Biodiversity to Biotechnology; Bitton, G., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2001; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  67. D’Amico, S.; Collins, T.; Marx, J.C.; Feller, G.; Gerday, C. Psychrophilic microorganisms: Challenges for life. EMBO Rep. 2006, 7, 385–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Feller, G. Life at low-temeratures: Is disorder the driving force? Extremophiles 2007, 11, 211–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Eskandari, A.; Leow, T.C.; Rahman, M.B.; Oslan, S.N. Antifreeze proteins and their practical utilization in industry, medicine, and agriculture. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Phadtare, S. Recent developments in bacterial cold-shock response. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2004, 6, 125–136. [Google Scholar]
  71. Gilbert, J.A.; Davies, P.L.; Laybourn−Parry, J. A hyperactive, Ca2+−dependent antifreeze protein in an Antarctic bacterium. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2005, 245, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Nichols, C.A.M.; Guezennec, J.; Bowman, J.P. Bacterial exopolysaccharides from extreme marine environments with special consideration of the southern ocean, sea ice, and deep-sea hydrothermal vents: A review. Mar. Biotechnol. 2005, 7, 253–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Monsalves, M.T.; Ollivet-Besson, G.P.; Amenabar, M.J.; Blamey, J.M. Isolation of a psychrotolerant and UV-C-resistant bacterium from elephant island, antarctica with a highly thermoactive and thermostable catalase. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Wang, D.Z.; Jin, Y.N.; Ding, X.H.; Wang, W.J.; Zhai, S.S.; Bai, L.P.; Guo, Z.F. Gene regulation and signal transduction in the ICE–CBF–COR signaling pathway during cold stress in plants. Biochemistry 2017, 82, 1103–1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Castellano, I.; Di Maro, A.; Ruocco, M.R.; Chambery, A.; Parente, A.; Di Martino, M.T.; Parlato, G.; Masullo, M.; De Vendittis, E. Psychrophilic superoxide dismutase from Pseudoalteromonas haloplanktis: Biochemical characterization and identification of a highly reactive cysteine residue. Biochimie 2006, 88, 1377–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Chi, Y.X.; Yang, L.; Zhao, C.J.; Muhammad, I.; Zhou, X.B.; De Zhu, H. Effects of soaking seeds in exogenous vitamins on active oxygen metabolism and seedling growth under low-temperature stress. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 3254–3261. [Google Scholar]
  77. Sanghera, G.S. Sugarcane disorders associated with temperature extremes and mitigation strategies. East Afr. Sch. J. Agric. Life Sci. 2020, 3, 101–114. [Google Scholar]
  78. Hussain, S.; Khaliq, A.; Ali, B.; Hussain, H.A.; Qadir, T.; Hussain, S. Temperature Extremes: Impact on rice growth and development. In Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; Volume 4, pp. 153–171. [Google Scholar]
  79. Alsamir, M.; Mahmood, T.; Trethowan, R.; Ahmad, N. An overview of heat stress in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 3, 1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Jiang, Y.; Lindsay, D.L.; Davis, A.R.; Wang, Z.; MacLean, D.E.; Warkentin, T.D.; Bueckert, R.A. Impact of heat stress on pod-based yield components in field pea (Pisum sativum L.). J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2020, 206, 76–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Alsajri, F.A.; Singh, B.; Wijewardana, C.; Irby, J.T.; Gao, W.; Reddy, K.R. Evaluating soybean cultivars for low- and high temperature tolerance during the seedling growth stage. Agronomy 2019, 9, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Kapoor, D.; Bhardwaj, S.; Landi, M.; Sharma, A.; Ramakrishnan, M.; Sharma, A. The impact of drought in plant metabolism: How to exploit tolerance mechanisms to increase crop production. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Singhal, P.; Jan, A.T.; Azam, M.; Haq, Q.M.R. Plant abiotic stress: A prospective strategy of exploiting promoters as alternative to overcome the escalating burden. Front. Life Sci. 2016, 9, 52–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Zaheer, A.; Raza, Z.A.; Mahmood, S. Effect of salinity stress on various growth and physiological attributes of two contrasting maize genotypes. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2020, 18, 63. [Google Scholar]
  85. Zhang, H.; Duan, L.; Dai, J.S.; Zhang, C.Q.; Li, J.; Gu, M.H.; Liu, Q.Q.; Zhu, Y. Major QTLs reduce the deleterious effects of high temperature on rice amylose content by increasing splicing efficiency of Wx pre-mRNA. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2014, 127, 273–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sowiński, P.; Fronk, J.; Jończyk, M.; Grzybowski, M.; Kowalec, P.; Sobkowiak, A. Maize response to low-temeratures at the gene expression level: A critical survey of transcriptomic studies. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 576941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Riva-Roveda, L.; Perilleux, C. Effects of cold temperatures on the early stages of maize (Zea mays L.): A review. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 2015, 19, 42–52. [Google Scholar]
  88. Alt, D.S.; Lindsey, A.J.; Sulc, R.M.; Lindsey, L.E. Effect of temperature on survival and yield components of field-acclimated soft red winter wheat. Crop Sci. 2020, 60, 475–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zheng, D.; Yang, X.; Mínguez, M.I.; Mu, C.; He, Q.; Wu, X. Effect of freezing temperature and duration on winter survival and grain yield of winter wheat. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2018, 260, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ayankojo, I.T.; Morgan, K.T. Increasing air temperatures and its effects on growth and productivity of tomato in South Florida. Plants 2020, 9, 1245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. He, F.; Thiele, B.; Watt, M.; Kraska, T.; Ulbrich, A.; Kuhn, A.J. Effects of root cooling on plant growth and fruit quality of cocktail tomato during two consecutive seasons. J. Food Qual. 2019, 2019, 3598172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Scheelbeek, P.F.; Bird, F.A.; Tuomisto, H.L.; Green, R.; Harris, F.B.; Joy, E.J.M.; Chalabi, Z.; Allen, E.; Haines, A.; Dangour, A.D. Effect of environmental changes on vegetable and legume yields and nutritional quality. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 6804–6809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Amini, S.; Maali-Amiri, R.; Kazemi-Shahandashti, S.S.; López-Gómez, M.; Sadeghzadeh, B.; Sobhani-Najafabadi, A.; Kariman, K. Effect of cold stress on polyamine metabolism and antioxidant responses in chickpea. J. Plant Physiol. 2021, 258, 153387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Zhao, S.; Xu, X.; Wei, D.; Lin, X.; Qiu, S.; Ciampitti, I.; He, P. Soybean yield, nutrient uptake and stoichiometry under different climate regions of northeast China. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 8431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Menzel, C.M. Temperature has a greater effect on fruit growth than defoliation or fruit thinning in strawberries in the subtropics. Agriculture 2019, 9, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Vijayakumar, A.; Shaji, S.; Beena, R.; Sarada, S.; Rani, T.S.; Stephen, R.; Manju, R.V.; Viji, M.M. High temperature induced changes in quality and yield parameters of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) and similarity coefficients among genotypes using SSR markers. Heliyon 2021, 7, e05988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Nishad, A.; Mishra, A.N.; Chaudhari, R.; Aryan, R.K.; Katiyar, P. Effect of temperature on growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. Int. J. Chem. Stud. 2018, 6, 1381–1383. [Google Scholar]
  98. Szczerba, A.; Płażek, A.; Pastuszak, J.; Kopeć, P.; Hornyák, M.; Dubert, F. Effect of low-temperature on germination, growth, and seed yield of four soybean (Glycine max L.) cultivars. Agronomy 2021, 11, 800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Savitch, L.V.; Ivanov, A.G.; Gudynaite-Savitch, L.; Huner, N.P.; Simmonds, J. Effects of low-temerature stress on excitation energy partitioning and photoprotection in Zea mays. Funct. Plant Biol. 2009, 36, 37–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhao, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Han, Q.; Ding, C.; Huang, Y.; Liao, J.; Chen, T.; Feng, S.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, Z.; et al. Effect of low-temperature on chlorophyll biosynthesis and chloroplast biogenesis of rice seedlings during greening. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Liu, X.; Zhou, Y.; Xiao, J.; Bao, F. Effects of chilling on the structure, function and development of chloroplasts. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Shan, X.; Qin, W.; Zhang, Z.; Yao, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Zhu, J. Effects of low-temperature on nitrogen metabolism activities and photosynthetic pigments in different cabbage seedlings. J. South. Agric. 2019, 50, 2728–2733. [Google Scholar]
  103. Li, S.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, N.; Xu, Q.; Hu, L. Differential physiological and metabolic response to low-temperature in two zoysiagrass genotypes native to high and low latitude. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0198885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Liang, S.M.; Kuang, J.F.; Ji, S.J.; Chen, Q.F.; Deng, W.; Min, T.; Shan, W.; Chen, J.Y.; Lu, W.J. The membrane lipid metabolism in horticultural products suffering chilling injury. Food Qual. Saf. 2020, 4, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Theocharis, A.; Clément, C.; Barka, E.A. Physiological and molecular changes in plants grown at low-temperatures. Planta 2012, 235, 1091–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Maoyan, W. Effects of low-temperature on the nucleic acid content and the nucleases activities in the leaves of maize seedlings. Acta Agric. Boreali Sin. 1989, 4, 28–33. [Google Scholar]
  107. Göbel, L.; Coners, H.; Hertel, D.; Willinghöfer, S.; Leuschner, C. The role of low soil temperature for photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of three graminoids from different elevations. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Boubakri, H.; Chong, J.; Poutaraud, A.; Schmitt, C.; Bertsch, C.; Mliki, A.; Masson, J.E.; Soustre-Gacougnolle, I. Riboflavin (Vitamin B 2) induces defence responses and resistance to Plasmopara viticola in grapevine. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2013, 136, 837–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Korkmaz, A.; Korkmaz, Y.; Demirkıran, A.R. Enhancing chilling stress tolerance of pepper seedlings by exogenous application of 5-aminolevulinic acid. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2010, 67, 495–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Schortemeyer, M.; Evans, J.R.; Bruhn, D.; Bergstrom, D.M.; Ball, M.C. Temperature responses of photosynthesis and respiration in a sub-Antarctic megaherb from Heard Island. Funct. Plant Biol. 2015, 42, 552–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Hsu, C.H.; Hsu, Y.T. Biochemical responses of rice roots to cold stress. Bot. Stud. 2019, 60, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  112. Gechev, T.; Petrov, V. Reactive oxygen species and abiotic stress in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Apel, K.; Hirt, H. Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 373–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  114. Sarropoulou, V.; Dimassi-Theriou, K.; Therios, I.; Koukourikou-Petridou, M. Melatonin enhances root regeneration, photosynthetic pigments, biomass, total carbohydrates and proline content in the cherry rootstock PHL-C (Prunus avium Prunus cerasus). Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 61, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Turk, H.; Erdal, S.; Genisel, M.; Atici, O.; Demir, Y.; Yanmis, D. The regulatory effect of melatonin on physiological, biochemical and molecular parameters in cold-stressed wheat seedlings. Plant Growth Regul. 2014, 74, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Najeeb, S.; Ali, J.; Mahender, A.; Pang, Y.L.; Zilhas, J.; Murugaiyan, V.; Vemireddy; Lakshminarayana, R.; Li, Z. Identification of main-effect quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for low-temperature stress tolerance germination- and early seedling vigor-related traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Mol. Breed. 2020, 40, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Cong Dien, D.; Yamakawa, T. Phenotypic variation and selection for cold-tolerant rice (Oryza sativa L.) at germination and seedling stages. Agriculture 2019, 9, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  118. Bezirganoglu, I.; Uysal, P.; Yiğit, O.R. Cold stress resistance and the antioxidant enzyme system in Pisum sativum. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2018, 28, 561–567. [Google Scholar]
  119. Kumar, S.; Nayyar, H.; Bhanwara, R.K.; Upadhyaya, H.D. Chilling stress effects on reproductive biology of chickpea. J. SAT Agric. Res. 2010, 8, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  120. Kumar, S.; Malik, J.; Thakur, P.; Kaistha, S.; Sharma, K.D.; Upadhyaya, H.D.; Berger, J.D.; Nayyar, H. Growth and metabolic responses of contrasting chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) genotypes to chilling stress at reproductive phase. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2011, 33, 779–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Nayyar, H.; Kaur, G.; Kumar, S.; Upadhyaya, H.D. Low-temperature effects during seed filling on chickpea genotypes (Cicer arietinum L.): Probing mechanisms affecting seed reserves and yield. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 2007, 193, 336–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Wang, W.; Wang, X.; Huang, M.; Cai, J.; Zhou, Q.; Dai, T.; Jiang, D. Alleviation of field low-temperature stress in winter wheat by exogenous application of salicylic acid. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 40, 811–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Gámez-Vázquez, A.J.; Avila-Perches, M.A.; Virgen-Vargas, J.; Ruiz-Torres, N.A.; Gámez-Vázquez, F.P.; Ascencio-Álvarez, A. Physiological quality of the seed and maize seedlings development at low temperatures. Rev. Mex. Cienc. Agrícolas 2015, 6, 1769–1779. [Google Scholar]
  124. Kayess, M.O.; Hassan, M.M.; Nurhasan, M.; Ahmed, K. Effect of low-temperature on chlorophyll and carotenoid content on the seedlings of some selected boro rice varieties. Am. J. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Ntatsi, G.; Savvas, D.; Kläring, H.P.; Schwarz, D. Growth, yield, and metabolic responses of temperature-stressed tomato to grafting onto rootstocks differing in cold tolerance. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 2014, 139, 230–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  126. Li, H.; Luo, W.; Ji, R.; Xu, Y.; Xu, G.; Qiu, S.; Tang, H.A. Comparative proteomic study of cold responses in potato leaves. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Rodríguez, V.M.; Soengas, P.; Alonso-Villaverde, V.; Sotelo, T.; Cartea, M.E.; Velasco, P. Effect of temperature stress on the early vegetative development of Brassica oleracea L. BMC Plant Biol. 2015, 15, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Chi, Y.H.; Koo, S.S.; Oh, H.T.; Lee, E.S.; Park, J.H.; Phan, K.A.T.; Wi, S.D.; Bae, S.B.; Paeng, S.K.; Chae, H.B.; et al. The physiological functions of universal stress proteins and their molecular mechanism to protect plants from environmental stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  129. Ritonga, F.N.; Chen, S. Physiological and molecular mechanism involved in cold stress tolerance in plants. Plants 2020, 9, 560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Cui, G.; Zhao, X.; Liu, S.; Sun, F.; Zhang, C.; Xi, Y. Beneficial effects of melatonin in overcoming drought stress in wheat seedlings. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2017, 118, 138–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Wang, L.; Liu, J.; Wang, W.; Sun, Y. Exogenous melatonin improves growth and photosynthetic capacity of cucumber under salinity-induced stress. Photosynthetica 2016, 54, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Ahmad, S.; Su, W.; Kamran, M.; Ahmad, I.; Meng, X.; Wu, X.; Javed, T.; Han, Q. Foliar application of melatonin delay leaf senescence in maize by improving the antioxidant defense system and enhancing photosynthetic capacity under semi-arid regions. Protoplasma 2020, 257, 1079–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Ahmad, S.; Cui, W.; Kamran, M.; Ahmad, I.; Meng, X.; Wu, X.; Su, W.; Javed, T.; El-Serehy, H.A.; Jia, Z.; et al. Exogenous application of melatonin induces tolerance to salt stress by improving the photosynthetic efficiency and antioxidant defense system of maize seedling. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2020, 19, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Kamran, M.; Wennan, S.; Ahmad, I.; Xiangping, M.; Wenwen, C.; Xudong, Z.; Siwei, M.; Khan, A.; Qingfang, H.; Tiening, L. Application of paclobutrazol affect maize grain yield by regulating root morphological and physiological characteristics under a semiarid region. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  135. Metwali, E.M.; Abdelmoneim, T.S.; Bakheit, M.A.; Kadasa, N.M. Alleviation of salinity stress in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) plants by inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Plant Omics 2015, 8, 449. [Google Scholar]
  136. Pfannschmidt, T.; Munné-Bosch, S. Plastid signaling during the plant life cycle. In Plastid Development in Leaves During Growth and Senescence; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2013; pp. 503–528. [Google Scholar]
  137. Saleem, M.; Fariduddin, Q.; Janda, T. Multifaceted role of salicylic acid in combating cold stress in plants: A review. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2021, 40, 464–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Szabados, L.; Savouré, A. Proline: A multifunctional amino acid. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 89–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Verbruggen, N.; Hermans, C. Proline accumulation in plants: A review. Amino Acids 2008, 35, 753–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Ahmad, I.; Hellebust, J.A. The Relationship between inorganic nitrogen metabolism and proline accumulation in osmoregulatory responses of two Euryhaline Microalgae. J. Plant Physiol. 1988, 88, 348–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Gavelienė, V.; Pakalniškytė, L.; Novickienė, L. Regulation of proline and ethylene levels in rape seedlings for freezing tolerance. Open Life Sci. 2014, 9, 1099–1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Tiwari, J.K.; Munshi, A.D.; Kumar, R.; Pandey, R.N.; Arora, A.; Bhat, J.S.; Sureja, A.K. Effect of salt stress on cucumber: Na+–K+ ratio, osmolyte concentration, phenols and chlorophyll content. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2010, 32, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Maharajan, T.; Ceasar, S.A.; Ajeesh krishna, T.P.; Ramakrishnan, M.; Duraipandiyan, V.; Naif Abdulla, A.D.; Ignacimuthu, S. Utilization of molecular markers for improving the phosphorus efficiency in crop plants. Plant Breed. 2018, 137, 10–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. Beheshti, M.; Etesami, H.; Alikhani, H.A. Interaction study of biochar with phosphate-solubilizing bacterium on phosphorus availability in calcareous soil. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2017, 60, 1572–1581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Lobo, C.B.; Juárez Tomása, M.S.; Viruel, E.; Ferrero, M.A.; Lucca, M.E. Development of low cost formulations of plant growth-promoting bacteria to be used as inoculants in beneficial agricultural technologies. Microbiol. Res. 2019, 219, 12–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Malhotra, H.; Vandana; Sharma, S.; Pandey, R. Phosphorus nutrition: Plant growth in response to deficiency and excess. In Plant Nutrients and Abiotic Stress Tolerance; Hasanuzzaman, M., Fujita, M., Oku, H., Nahar, K., Hawrylak-Nowak, B., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 171–190. [Google Scholar]
  147. Mukhtar, S.; Shahid, I.; Mehnaz, S.; Malik, K.A. Assessment of two carrier materials for phosphate solubilizing biofertilizers and their effect on growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Microbiol. Res. 2017, 205, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Rychter, A.M.; Rao, I.M.; Cardoso, J.A. Role of phosphorus in photosynthetic carbon assimilation and partitioning. In Handbook of Photosynthesis; Pessarakli, M., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  149. Takahashi, S.; Anwar, M.R. Wheat grain yield, phosphorus uptake and soil phosphorus fraction after 23 years of annual fertilizer application to an Andosol. Field Crop. Res. 2007, 101, 160–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Solankia, M.; Kundub, B.S.; Nehrac, K. Molecular diversity of phosphate solubilizing bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere of chickpea, mustard and wheat. Ann. Agrar. Sci. 2018, 16, 458–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Wei, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Shi, M.; Cao, Z.; Lu, Q.; Yang, T.; Fan, Y.; Wei, Z. Effect of organic acids production and bacterial community on the possible mechanism of phosphorus solubilization during composting with enriched phosphate-solubilizing bacteria inoculation. Biores. Technol. 2018, 247, 190–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Tariq, A.; Sabir, M.; Farooq, M.; Maqsood, M.A.; Ahmad, H.R.; Warraich, E.A. Phosphorus deficiency in plants: Responses, adaptive mechanisms, and signaling. In Plant Signaling: Understanding the Molecular Crosstalk; Springer: New Delhi, India, 2014; pp. 133–148. [Google Scholar]
  153. Blanco-Vargas, A.; Rodríguez-Gacha, L.M.; Sánchez-Castro, N.; Herrera-Carlosama, L.; Poutou-Piñales, R.A.; Díaz-Ariza, L.A.; Gutiérrez-Romero, V.; Rivera-Hoyos, C.M.; Ardila-Leal, L.D.; Pedroza-Rodriguez, A.M. Bioinoculant production composed by Pseudomonas sp., Serratia sp., and Kosakonia sp., preliminary effect on Allium cepa L., growth at plot scale. Univ. Sci. 2021, 26, 79–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Islam, M.K.; Sano, A.; Majumder, M.S.I.; Hossain, M.A.; Sakagami, J.I. Isolation and molecular characterization of phosphate solubilizing filamentous fungi from subtropical soils in Okinawa. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2019, 17, 9145–9157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Alori, E.T.; Glick, B.R.; Babalola, O.O. Microbial phosphorus solubilization and its potential for use in sustainable agriculture. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Khabarov, N.; Obersteiner, M. Global phosphorus fertilizer market and national policies: A case study revisiting the 2008 price peak. Front. Nutr. 2017, 4, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Batool, S.; Iqbal, A. Phosphate solubilizing rhizobacteria as alternative of chemical fertilizer for growth and yield of Triticum aestivum (Var. Galaxy 2013). Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 26, 1400–1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Praveen, K.V.; Singh, A. Realizing the potential of a low-cost technology to enhance crop yields: Evidence from a meta-analysis of biofertilizers in India. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev. 2019, 32, 77–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Haouas, A.; El Modafar, C.; Douira, A.; Ibnsouda-Koraichi, S.; Filali-Maltouf, A.; Moukhli, A.; Amir, S. Alcaligenes aquatilis GTE53: Phosphate solubilizing and bioremediation bacterium isolated from new biotope “phosphate sludge enriched-compost”. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Trivedi, P.; Leach, J.E.; Tringe, S.G.; Sa, T.; Singh, B.K. Plant–microbiome interactions: From community assembly to plant health. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 607–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Nosheen, S.; Ajmal, I.; Song, Y. Microbes as biofertilizers, a potential approach for sustainable crop production. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Asoegwu, C.R.; Awuchi, C.G.; Nelson, K.; Orji, C.G.; Nwosu, O.U.; Egbufor, U.C.; Awuchi, C.G. A review on the role of biofertilizers in reducing soil pollution and increasing soil nutrients. Himal. J. Agric. 2020, 1, 34–38. [Google Scholar]
  163. Sammauria, R.; Kumawat, S.; Kumawat, P.; Singh, J.; Jatwa, T.K. Microbial inoculants: Potential tool for sustainability of agricultural production systems. Arch. Microbiol. 2020, 202, 677–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Trivedi, P.; Pandey, A.; Palni, L.M.S. Bacterial inoculants for field applications under Mountain Ecosystem: Present initiatives and future prospects. In Bacteria in Agrobiology: Plant Probiotics; Maheshwari, D.K., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 15–44. [Google Scholar]
  165. Pandey, A.; Jain, R.; Sharma, A.; Dhakar, K.; Kaira, G.S.; Rahi, P. 16S rRNA gene sequencing and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry based comparative assessment and bioprospection of psychrotolerant bacteria isolates from high altitudes under mountain ecosystem. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  166. Jain, R.; Pandey, A. A phenazine-1 carboxylic acid producing polyextremophilic Pseudomonas chlororaphis (MCC2693) strain, isolated from mountain ecosystem, possesses biocontrol and plant growth promotion abilities. Microbiol. Res. 2016, 190, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Yarzábal, L.A. Cold-tolerant phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms and agriculture development in mountainous regions of the world. In Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms; Khan, M.S., Zaidi, A., Musarrat, J., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 113–135. [Google Scholar]
  168. Gupta, R.; Kumari, A.; Noureldeen, A.; Darwish, H. Rhizosphere mediated growth enhancement using phosphate solubilizing rhizobacteria and their tri-calcium phosphate solubilization activity under pot culture assays in rice (Oryza sativa). Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2021, 28, 3692–3700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Cumpa-Velásquez, L.M.; Moriconi, J.I.; Dip, D.P.; Castagno, L.N.; Puig, M.L.; Maiale, S.J.; Santa-María, G.E.; Sannazzaro, A.I.; Estrella, M.J. Prospecting phosphate solubilizing bacteria in alkaline-sodic environments reveals intra-specific variability in Pantoea eucalypti affecting nutrient acquisition and rhizobial nodulation in Lotus tenuis. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2021, 168, 104125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Hassimi, M.S.; Hamdali, H.; Ouhdouch, Y.; Pinelli, E.; Merlina, G.; Claude, R.J.; Hafidi, M. Moroccan rock phosphate solubilization during a thermo-anaerobic grassland waste biodegradation process. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2013, 12, 6859–6865. [Google Scholar]
  171. Yadav, K.; Kumar, C.; Archana, G.; Kumar, N. Pseudomonas fluorescens ATCC 13525 containing an artificial oxalate operon and vitreoscilla hemoglobin secretes oxalic acid and solubilizes rock phosphate in acidic alfisols. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e92400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Khan, M.S.; Zaidi, A.; Wani, P.A. Role of phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms in sustainable agriculture—A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2007, 27, 29–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Chen, Q.; Liu, S. Identification and characterization of the phosphate-solubilizing bacterium Pantoea sp. S32 in reclamation soil in Shanxi, China. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  174. Pande, A.; Pandey, P.; Mehra, S.; Singh, M.; Kaushik, S. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their efficiency on the growth of maize. J. Gen. Eng. Biotechnol. 2017, 15, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Khan, M.S.; Zaidi, A.; Ahmad, E. Mechanism of phosphate solubilization and physiological functions of phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms. In Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014; pp. 31–62. [Google Scholar]
  176. De Amaral Leite, A.; de Souza Cardoso, A.A.; de Almeida Leite, R.; de Oliveira-Longatti, S.M.; Lustosa Filho, J.F.; de Souza Moreira, F.M.; Melo, L.C.A. Selected bacterial strains enhance phosphorus availability from biochar-based rock phosphate fertilizer. Ann. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Suleman, M.; Yasmin, S.; Rasul, M.; Yahya, M.; Atta, B.M.; Mirza, M.S. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria with glucose dehydrogenase gene for phosphorus uptake and beneficial effects on wheat. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0204408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Chen, W.; Yang, F.; Zhang, L.; Wang, J. Organic acid secretion and phosphate solubilizing efficiency of Pseudomonas sp. PSB12: Effects of phosphorus forms and carbon sources. Geomicrobiol. J. 2016, 33, 870–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Lessie, T.G.; Phibbs, P.V. Alternative pathways of carbohydrate utilization in pseudomonads. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1984, 38, 359–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Goldstein, A.H.; Rogers, R.D.; Mead, G. Mining by microbe. Bio/Technology 1993, 11, 1250–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Cunningham, J.E.; Kuiack, C. Production of citric and oxalic acids and solubilization of calcium phosphate by Penicillium bilaii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1992, 58, 1451–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  182. Mohammed, A.F. Influence of Streptomyces sp. Kp109810 on Solubilization of inorganic phosphate and growth of maize (Zea mays L.). J. Appl. Plant Prot. 2020, 9, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Surapat, W.; Pukahuta, C.; Rattanachaikunsopon, P.; Aimi, T.; Boonlue, S. Characteristics of phosphate solubilization by phosphate-solubilizing bacteria isolated from agricultural chili soil and their efficiency on the growth of chili (Capsicum frutescens L. cv. Hua Rua). Chiang Mai J. Sci. 2013, 40, 11–25. [Google Scholar]
  184. Asea, P.E.A.; Kucey, R.M.N.; Stewart, J.W.B. Inorganic phosphate solubilization by two Penicillium species in solution culture and soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1988, 20, 459–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Illmer, P.; Schinner, F. Solubilization of inorganic phosphates by microorganisms isolated from forest soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 1992, 24, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Kim, K.Y.; McDonald, G.A.; Jordan, D. Solubilization of hydroxyapatite by Enterobacter agglomerans and cloned Escherichia coli in culture medium. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1997, 24, 347–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Borgi, M.A.; Saidi, I.; Moula, A.; Rhimi, S.; Rhimi, M. The attractive Serratia plymuthica BMA1 strain with high rock phosphate-solubilizing activity and its effect on the growth and phosphorus uptake by Vicia faba L. plants. Geomicrobiol. J. 2020, 37, 437–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Chawngthu, L.; Hnamte, R.; Lalfakzuala, R. Isolation and characterization of rhizospheric phosphate solubilizing bacteria from wetland paddy field of Mizoram, India. Geomicrobiol. J. 2020, 37, 366–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Rfaki, A.; Zennouhi, O.; Aliyat, F.Z.; Nassiri, L.; Ibijbijen, J. Isolation, selection and characterization of root-associated rock phosphate solubilizing bacteria in Moroccan wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Geomicrobiol. J. 2020, 37, 230–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Azaroual, S.E.; Hazzoumi, Z.; Mernissi, N.E.; Aasfar, A.; Meftah Kadmiri, I.; Bouizgarne, B. Role of inorganic phosphate solubilizing bacilli isolated from Moroccan phosphate rock mine and rhizosphere soils in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) phosphorus uptake. Curr. Microbiol. 2020, 77, 2391–2404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Zaheer, A.; Malik, A.; Sher, A.; Qaisrani, M.M.; Mehmood, A.; Khan, S.U.; Ashraf, M.; Mirza, Z.; Karim, S.; Rasool, M. Isolation, characterization, and effect of phosphate-zinc-solubilizing bacterial strains on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) growth. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2019, 26, 1061–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Gulati, A.; Sharma, N.; Vyas, P.; Sood, S.; Rahi, P.; Pathania, V.; Prasad, R. Organic acid production and plant growth promotion as a function of phosphate solubilization by Acinetobacter rhizosphaerae strain BIHB 723 isolated from the cold deserts of the trans-Himalayas. Arch. Microbiol. 2010, 192, 975–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Vyas, P.; Gulati, A. Organic acid production in vitro and plant growth promotion in maize under controlled environment by phosphate-solubilizing fluorescent Pseudomonas. BMC Microbiol. 2009, 9, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  194. Trivedi, P.; Sa, T. Pseudomonas corrugata (NRRL B-30409) mutants increased phosphate solubilization, organic acid production and plant growth at lower temperatures. Curr. Microbiol. 2008, 56, 140–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Vinod, K.; Prashant, S.; Punesh, S.; Verma, A.K.; Sanjeev, A. Phytase producing bacteria from Himalayan soil and their tricalcium phosphate solubilizing abilities. Ann. Biol. 2011, 27, 121–128. [Google Scholar]
  196. Zavaleta-Pastor, M.; Sohlenkamp, C.; Gao, J.L.; Guan, Z.; Zaheer, R.; Finan, T.M.; Raetz, C.R.H.; López-Lara, I.M.; Geiger, O. Sinorhizobium meliloti phospholipase C required for lipid remodeling during phosphorus limitation. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 302–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  197. Shulse, C.N.; Chovatia, M.; Agosto, C.; Wang, G.; Hamilton, M.; Deutsch, S.; Yoshikuni, Y.; Blow, M.J. Engineered root bacteria release plant-available phosphate from phytate. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, e01210–e01219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  198. Behera, B.C.; Yadav, H.; Singh, S.K.; Mishra, R.R.; Sethi, B.K.; Dutta, S.K.; Thatoi, H.N. Phosphate solubilization and acid phosphatase activity of Serratia sp. isolated from mangrove soil of Mahanadi river delta, Odisha, India. J. Gen. Eng. Biotechnol. 2017, 15, 169–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Zaidi, A.; Khan, M.S.; Ahemad, M.; Oves, M.; Wani, P.A. Recent advances in plant growth promotion by phosphate-solubilizing microbes. In Microbial Strategies for Crop Improvement; Khan, M.S., Zaidi, A., Musarrat, J., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 23–50. [Google Scholar]
  200. Khan, M.S.; Zaidi, A.; Ahemad, M.; Oves, M.; Wani, P.A. Plant growth promotion by phosphate solubilizing fungi—Current perspective. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2010, 56, 73–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Shahid, M.; Ahmed, B.; Khan, M.S. Evaluation of microbiological management strategy of herbicide toxicity to greengram plants. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 14, 96–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Kour, D.; Rana, K.L.; Yadav, N.; Yadav, A.N. Bioprospecting of phosphorus solubilizing bacteria from Renuka Lake ecosystems, lesser Himalayas. J. Appl. Biol. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  203. Verma, P.; Yadav, A.N.; Kazy, S.K.; Saxena, A.K.; Suman, A. Evaluating the diversity and phylogeny of plant growth promoting bacteria associated with wheat (Triticum aestivum) growing in central zone of India. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 2014, 3, 432–447. [Google Scholar]
  204. Katiyar, V.; Goel, R. Siderophore mediated plant growth promotion at low-temperature by mutant of fluorescent Pseudomonads. Plant Growth Regul. 2004, 42, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Selvakumar, G.; Joshi, P.; Suyal, P.; Mishra, P.K.; Joshi, G.K.; Bisht, J.K.; Bhatt, J.C.; Gupta, H.S. Pseudomonas lurida M2RH3 (MTCC 9245), a psychrotolerant bacterium from the Uttarakhand Himalayas, solubilizes phosphate and promotes wheat seedling growth. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 27, 1129–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Rajaee, S.; Alikhani, H.A.; Raiesi, F. Effect of plant growth promoting potentials of Azotobacter chroococcum native strains on growth, yield and uptake of nutrients in wheat. JWSS Isfahan Univ. Technol. 2017, 11, 285–297. [Google Scholar]
  207. Gautam, N.; Sharma, P.; Rana, J.C.; Singh, M. Characterization of Bacillus weihenstephanensis AGII: A psychrotolerant bacteria isolated from rhizosphere of medicinal plant Gentiana kurroo Royle. Acta Sci. Agric. 2021, 5, 52–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Srivastava, A.K.; Saxena, P.; Sharma, A.; Srivastava, R.; Jamali, H.; Bharati, A.P.; Yadav, J.; Srivastava, A.K.; Kumar, M.; Chakdar, H. Draft genome sequence of a cold-adapted phosphorous-solubilizing Pseudomonas koreensis P2 isolated from Sela Lake, India. 3 Biotech 2019, 9, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Yarzábal, L.A.; Monserrate, L.; Buela, L.; Chica, E. Antarctic Pseudomonas spp. promote wheat germination and growth at low-temperatures. Polar Biol. 2018, 41, 2343–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  210. Ortiz-Ojeda, P.; Ogata-Gutiérrez, K.; Zúñiga-Dávila, D. Evaluation of plant growth promoting activity and heavy metal tolerance of psychrotrophic bacteria associated with maca (Lepidium meyenii Walp.) rhizosphere. AIMS Microbiol. 2017, 3, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Yadav, A.N.; Sachan, S.G.; Verma, P.; Saxena, A.K. Bioprospecting of plant growth promoting psychrotrophic bacilli from the cold desert of north western Indian Himalayas. Ind. J. Exp. Biol. 2016, 54, 142–150. [Google Scholar]
  212. Gusain, Y.S.; Kamal, R.; Mehta, C.M.; Singh, U.S.; Sharma, A.K. Phosphate solubilizing and indole-3-acetic acid producing bacteria from the soil of Garhwal Himalaya aimed to improve the growth of rice. J. Environ. Biol. 2015, 36, 301. [Google Scholar]
  213. Verma, P.; Yadav, A.N.; Khannam, K.S.; Panjiar, N.; Kumar, S.; Saxena, A.K.; Suman, A. Assessment of genetic diversity and plant growth promoting attributes of psychrotolerant bacteria allied with wheat (Triticum aestivum) from the northern hills zone of India. Ann. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 1885–1899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Beatriz Sánchez, D.; Gómez, R.M.; García, A.M.; Bonilla, R.R. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria isolated from Pennisetum clandestinum associate to livestock systems in the andean area. Rev. UDCA Actual. Divulg. Cient. 2014, 17, 423–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  215. Berríos, G.; Cabrera, G.; Gidekel, M.; Gutiérrez-Moraga, A. Characterization of a novel Antarctic plant growth-promoting bacterial strain and its interaction with Antarctic hair grass (Deschampsia antarctica Desv). Polar Biol. 2013, 36, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Selvakumar, G.; Kundu, S.; Joshi, P.; Nazim, S.; Gupta, A.D.; Gupta, H.S. Growth promotion of wheat seedlings by Exiguobacterium acetylicum 1P (MTCC 8707) a cold tolerant bacterial strain from the Uttarakhand Himalayas. Ind. J. Microbiol. 2010, 50, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  217. Zhang, H.; Prithiviraj, B.; Charles, T.C.; Driscoll, B.T.; Smith, D.L. Low-temperature tolerant Bradyrhizobium japonicum strains allowing improved nodulation and nitrogen fixation of soybean in a short season (cool spring) area. Eur. J. Agron. 2003, 19, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Selvakumar, G.; Kundu, S.; Joshi, P.; Nazim, S.; Gupta, A.D.; Mishra, P.K.; Gupta, H.S. Characterization of a cold tolerant plant growth-promoting bacterium Pantoea dispersa 1A isolated from a sub-alpine soil in the North Western Indian Himalayas. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 24, 955–960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Kumar, S.; Suyal, D.C.; Dhauni, N.; Bhoriyal, M.; Goel, R. Relative plant growth promoting potential of Himalayan Psychrotolerant Pseudomonas jesenii strain MP1 against native Cicer arietinum (L.)., Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper; Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek., Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. and Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2014, 8, 3931–3943. [Google Scholar]
  220. Bhattacharyya, P.N.; Jha, D.K. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): Emergence in agriculture. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012, 28, 1327–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Glick, B.R. Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world. Microbiol. Res. 2014, 169, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Sharma, A.; Kumar, V.; Sidhu, G.P.S.; Kumar, R.; Kohli, S.K.; Yadav, P.; Kapoor, D.; Bali, A.S.; Shahzad, B.; Khanna, K. Abiotic stress management in plants: Role of ethylene. Mol. Plant Abiotic Stress Biol. Biotechnol. 2019, 185–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Etesami, H.; Glick, B.R. Halotolerant plant growth–promoting bacteria: Prospects for alleviating salinity stress in plants. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2020, 178, 104124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Dubois, M.; Van den Broeck, L.; Inzé, D. The pivotal role of ethylene in plant growth. Trends Plant Sci. 2018, 23, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  225. Del Carmen Orozco-Mosqueda, M.; Glick, B.R.; Santoyo, G. ACC deaminase in plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB): An efficient mechanism to counter salt stress in crops. Microbiol. Res. 2020, 235, 126439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Cheng, Z.; Park, E.; Glick, B.R. 1-Aminocyclopropane-1- carboxylate (ACC) deaminase from Pseudomonas putida UW4 facilitates the growth of canola in the presence of salt. Can. J. Microbiol. 2007, 53, 912–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Yarzábal, L.A.; Chica, E. Potential for developing low-input sustainable agriculture in the tropical Andes by making use of native microbial resources. In Plantmicrobe Interactions in Agro-Ecological Perspectives; Singh, D., Singh, H., Prabha, R., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2017; Volume 2, pp. 29–54. [Google Scholar]
  228. Pandey, A.; Yarzábal, L.A. Bioprospecting cold-adapted plant growth promoting microorganisms from mountain environments. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 643–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  229. Melo, I.S.; Souza, W.R.; Silva, L.J.; Santos, S.N.; Assalin, M.A.; Zucchi, T.D.; Queiroz, S.C.N. Antifungal activity of Pseudomonas frederiksbergensis CMAA 1323 isolated from the Antarctic hair grass Deschampsia antarctica. Br. Microbiol. Res. J. 2016, 14, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  230. Hu, H.; Yan, F.; Wilson, C.; Shen, Q.; Zheng, X. The ability of a cold adapted Rhodotorula mucilaginosa strain from Tibet to control blue mold in pear fruit. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2015, 108, 1391–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  231. Behera, B.C.; Sethi, B.K.; Mishra, R.R.; Dutta, S.K.; Thatoi, H.N. Microbial cellulases–Diversity qnd biotechnology with reference to mangrove environment: A review. J. Gen. Eng. Biotechnol. 2017, 15, 197–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Liu, K.; Ding, H.; Yu, Y.; Chen, B. A cold-adapted chitinase-producing bacterium from Antarctica and its potential in biocontrol of plant pathogenic fungi. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  233. Kremer, R.J.; Souissi, T. Cyanide production by rhizobacteria and potential for suppression of wheat seedling growth. Curr. Microbiol. 2001, 43, 182–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Lambers, H. Cyanide-resistant respiration: A non-phosphorylating electron transport pathway acts as an energy overflow. Physiol. Plant. 1982, 55, 478–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Sarniguet, A.; Lucas, P.; Lucas, M.; Samson, R. Soil conduciveness to take all of wheat: Influence of the nitrogen fertilizers on the structure of populations of fluorescent pseudomonads. Plant Soil 1992, 145, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Meena, V.S.; Maurya, B.R.; Verma, J.P. Does a rhizospheric microorganism enhance K+ availability in agricultural soils? Microbiol. Res. 2014, 169, 337–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  237. Hatfield, J.L.; Prueger, J.H. Temperature extremes: Effect on plant growth and development. Weather Clim. Extrem. 2015, 10, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  238. Da Silva, A.C.; da Costa Rachid, C.T.C.; de Jesus, H.E.; Rosado, A.S.; Peixoto, R.S. Predicting the biotechnological potential of bacteria isolated from Antarctic soils, including the rhizosphere of vascular plants. Polar Biol. 2017, 40, 1393–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Canion, A.; Prakash, O.; Green, S.J.; Jahnke, L.; Kuypers, M.M.; Kostka, J.E. Isolation and physiological characterization of psychrophilic denitrifying bacteria from permanently cold Arctic ford sediments (Svalbard, Norway). Environ. Microbiol. 2013, 15, 1606–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  240. De Curtis, F.; Lima, G.; Vitullo, D.; De Cicco, V. Biocontrol of Rhizoctonia solani and Sclerotium rolfsii on tomato by delivering antagonistic bacteria through a drip irrigation system. Crop Prot. 2010, 29, 663–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Barrientos-Diaz, L.; Gidekel, M.; Gutierrez, A. Characterization of rhizospheric bacteria isolated from Deschampsia antarctica Desv. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 24, 2289–2296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Katiyar, V.; Goel, R. Solubilization of inorganic phosphate and plant growth promotion by cold tolerant mutants of Pseudomonas fluorescens. Microbiol. Res. 2003, 158, 163–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  243. Mishra, P.K.; Mishra, S.; Bisht, S.C.; Selvakumar, G.; Kundu, S.; Bisht, J.K.; Gupta, H.S. Isolation, molecular characterization and growth-promotion activities of a cold tolerant bacterium Pseudomonas sp. NARs9 (MTCC9002) from the Indian Himalayas. Biol. Res. 2009, 42, 305–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  244. Kumar, B.; Trivedi, P.; Pandey, A. Pseudomonas corrugata: A suitable bioinoculant for maize grown under rainfed conditions of Himalayan region. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2007, 39, 3093–3100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Pandey, A.; Trivedi, P.; Kumar, B.; Palni, L.M.S. Characteristics of a phosphate solubilizing and antagonistic strain of Pseudomonas putida (B0) isolated from a sub-alpine location in the Indian central Himalaya. Curr. Microbiol. 2006, 53, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Trivedi, P.; Pandey, A. Low-temperature phosphate solubilization and plant growth promotion by psychrotrophic bacteria, isolated from Indian Himalayan Region. Res. J. Microbiol. 2007, 2, 454–461. [Google Scholar]
  247. Saranya, K.; Sundaramanickam, A.; Shekhar, S.; Meena, M.; Sathishkumar, R.S.; Balasubramanian, T. Biosorption of multi-heavy metals by coral associated phosphate solubilising bacteria Cronobacter muytjensii KSCAS2. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 222, 396–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Rizvi, A.; Ahmed, B.; Zaidi, A.; Khan, M.S. Bioreduction of toxicity influenced by bioactive molecules secreted under metal stress by Azotobacter chroococcum. Ecotoxicology 2019, 28, 302–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Oves, M.; Khan, M.S.; Qari, H.A. Chromium-reducing and phosphate-solubilizing Achromobacter xylosoxidans bacteria from the heavy metal-contaminated soil of the Brass city, Moradabad, India. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 16, 6967–6984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Shao, W.; Li, M.; Teng, Z.; Qiu, B.; Huo, Y.; Zhang, K. Effects of Pb (II) and Cr (VI) stress on phosphate-solubilizing bacteria (Bacillus sp. strain mrp-3): Oxidative stress and bioaccumulation potential. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  251. Paul, D.; Sinha, S.N. Isolation and characterization of a phosphate solubilizing heavy metal tolerant bacterium from River Ganga, West Bengal, India. Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol. 2015, 37, 651–657. [Google Scholar]
  252. Rajwar, J.; Chandra, R.; Suyal, D.C.; Tomer, S.; Kumar, S.; Goel, R. Comparative phosphate solubilizing efficiency of psychrotolerant Pseudomonas jesenii MP1 and Acinetobacter sp. ST02 against chickpea for sustainable hill agriculture. Biologia 2018, 73, 793–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Tomer, S.; Suyal, D.C.; Shukla, A.; Rajwar, J.; Yadav, A.; Shouche, Y.; Goel, R. Isolation and characterization of phosphate solubilizing bacteria from Western Indian Himalayan soils. 3 Biotech 2017, 7, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Mishra, P.K.; Mishra, S.; Selvakumar, G.; Bisht, S.C.; Kundu, S.; Bisht, J.K.; Gupta, H.S. Characterization of a psychrotrophic plant growth promoting Pseudomonas PGERs17 (MTCC 9000) isolated from North Western Indian Himalayas. Ann. Microbiol. 2008, 58, 561–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Fraga, R.; Rodríguez, H.; González, T. Transfer of the gene encoding the NapA acid phosphatase of Morganell morganii to a Burkholderia cepacia strain. Acta Biotechnol. 2001, 21, 359–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Rodriguez, H.; Fraga, R. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion. Biotechnol. Adv. 1999, 17, 319–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Fraga-Vidal, R.; Rodriguez, H.M.; De Villegas, T.G. Vector for chromosomal integration of the phoC gene in plant growth-promoting bacteria. In First International Meeting on Microbial Phosphate Solubilization; Velazquez, E.C., Rodríguez-Barrueco, R., Eds.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003; pp. 239–244. [Google Scholar]
  258. Krishnaraj, P.U.; Goldstein, A.H. Cloning of a Serratia marcescens DNA fragment that induces quinoprotein glucose dehydrogenase-mediated gluconic acid production in Escherichia coli in the presence of stationary phase Serratia marcescens. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2001, 205, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Goldstein, A.H. Bacterial solubilization of mineral phosphates: Historical perspectives and future prospects. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 1986, 1, 57–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Goldstein, A.H.; Liu, S.T. Molecular cloning and regulation of a mineral phosphate solubilizing gene from Erwinia herbicola. Bio/Technology 1987, 5, 72–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Sharma, S.B.; Sayyed, R.Z.; Trivedi, M.H.; Gobi, T.A. Phosphate solubilizing microbes: Sustainable approach for managing phosphorus deficiency in agricultural soils. SpringerPlus 2013, 2, 587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  262. Sashidhar, B.; Podile, A.R. Mineral phosphate solubilization by rhizosphere bacteria and scope for manipulation of the direct oxidation pathway involving glucose dehydrogenase. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 109, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  263. Kim, K.Y.; Jordan, D.; Krishnan, H.B. Expression of genes from Rahnella aquatilis that are necessary for mineral phosphate solubilization in Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1988, 159, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  264. Rodriguez, H.; Rossolini, G.M.; Gonzalez, T.; Li, J.P.; Glick, B.R. Isolation of a gene from Burkholderia cepacia IS-16 encoding a protein that facilitates phosphatase activity. Curr. Microbiol. 2000, 40, 362–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  265. Menezes-Blackburn, D.; Giles, C.; Darch, T.; George, T.S.; Blackwell, M.; Stutter, M.; Shand, C.; Lumsdon, D.; Cooper, P.; Wendler, R. Opportunities for mobilizing recalcitrant phosphorus from agricultural soils: A review. Plant Soil 2018, 427, 5–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  266. Rasul, M.; Yasmin, S.; Suleman, M.; Zaheer, A.; Reitz, T.; Tarkka, M.T.; Islam, E.; Mirza, M.S. Glucose dehydrogenase gene containing phosphobacteria for biofortification of Phosphorus with growth promotion of rice. Microbiol. Res. 2019, 223, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Menezes-Blackburn, D.; Inostroza, N.G.; Gianfreda, L.; Greiner, R.; Mora, M.L.; Jorquera, M.A. Phytase-producing Bacillus sp. inoculation increases phosphorus availability in cattle manure. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2016, 16, 200–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  268. Otieno, N.; Lally, R.D.; Kiwanuka, S.; Lloyd, A.; Ryan, D.; Germaine, K.J.; Dowling, D.N. Plant growth promotion induced by phosphate solubilizing endophytic Pseudomonas isolates. Front. Microbiol. 2015, 6, 745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  269. Rodriguez, H.; Fraga, R.; Gonzalez, T.; Bashan, Y. Genetics of phosphate solubilization and its potential applications for improving plant growth-promoting bacteria. Plant Soil 2006, 287, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  270. Vidal, R.H.; Mesa, H.R.; de Villegas, T.G. Chromosomal integration and heterologous expression of the Morganella morganii PhoC gene in Pseudomonas putida N-14. In Sustainable Agriculture: Technology, Planning; Salazar, A., Rios, I., Eds.; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  271. Thaller, M.C.; Berlutti, F.; Schippa, S.; Lombardi, G.; Rossolini, G.M. Characterization and sequence of PhoC, the principal phosphate-irrepressible acid phosphatase of Morganella morganii. Microbiology 1994, 140, 1341–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  272. Turner, B.L.; Paphazy, M.J.; Haygarth, P.M.; McKelvie, I.D. Inositol phosphates in the environment. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2002, 357, 449–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  273. Singh, P.; Kumar, V.; Agrawal, S. Evaluation of phytase producing bacteria for their plant growth promoting activities. Int. J. Microbiol. 2014, 2014, 426483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  274. Gosal, S.K.; Mehta, A. Molecular approach to study soil bacterial diversity. In Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) and Medicinal Plants, 1st ed.; Egamberdieva, D., Shrivastava, S., Varma, A., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 359–380. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Cold active phosphate biofertilizers: isolation, characterization, P solubilization, and plant growth promotion in the low-temperature environment.
Figure 1. Cold active phosphate biofertilizers: isolation, characterization, P solubilization, and plant growth promotion in the low-temperature environment.
Microorganisms 09 02451 g001
Table 1. Effect of low temperatures on biological and biochemical features of food crops.
Table 1. Effect of low temperatures on biological and biochemical features of food crops.
CropsScientific NameGrowth ConditionsApplied Low TemperaturesCrop ResponsesReferences
SoybeanGlycine maxGrowth chamber25 °C to 10 °CAt 10 °C germination was completely inhibited; very slow at 15 °C but germinated well at 25 °C; highest cell membrane permeability at 10 °C and 15 °C; at 10 °C, the dehydrogenase activity was highest but -α-amylase was poor at 10 °C; photochemical efficiency was higher in Malaga and Petrina plants germinating at 10 °C and 15 °C than at 25 °C; at a lower temperature, dry weight and number of pods reduced but the number of seeds was higher at 10 °C compared to 15 °C and 25°C; seed weight did not differ among temperatures[98]
PeasPisum sativumGreenhouse4 °C to −20 °CProline content and activities of antioxidant enzymes such as APX, SOD, and CAT gradually increased at cold acclimation[118]
ChickpeaCicer arietinumField≤10 °CVegetative growth was reduced and all the phenological stages were delayed; caused vegetative aberrations like chlorosis, necrosis of leaf tips and curling of the whole leaf; damage to reproductive stage involved abscission of juvenile buds and flowers and abortion of pods, pollen development was suppressed and seed formation was inhibited[119]
Pots<20 °C/<10 °C (day/night)Decreased chlorophyll content, relative leaf water content, dry weight, and yield features such as pods, seed number, and seed yield; increased electrolyte leakage, reduced total sugars, and starch, poor β-amylase, invertase and sucrose synthase; greater oxidative stress, poor levels of enzymatic antioxidants and reduction in proline and ascorbic acid[120]
Greenhouse11.7/2.3 °C (day/night)The chilling conditions increased electrolyte leakage, inhibited chlorophyll formation, decreased sucrose content, the water content in leaves, declined total plant weight, reduced the rate and duration of the seed filling, seed size, seed weight, pods per plant and harvest index, reduced the accumulation of starch, proteins, fats, crude fiber, protein fractions like albumins, globulins, prolamins, and glutelins; also, chilling declined the level of sucrose and enzymes such as starch synthase, sucrose synthase, and invertase significantly in the seeds; minerals such as Ca, P and Fe and amino acids were lowered significantly in the stressed seeds[121]
WheatTriticum aestivumField air temperature control system (FATC)5.3 °C to −7.0 °CLow-temperature stress prolonged the growth period significantly decreased net photosynthetic rate, plant height, and biomass production, and reduced grain yield[122]
MaizeZea maysGreenhouse8 °C to 4 °CReduced germination, increased number of dead seeds, reduced plumule dry weight and radicle, declined the rate of metabolic activity[123]
RiceOryza sativaGreenhouse22 °C to 14 °CSignificantly reduced shoot and root growth, physiological attributes, leaf chlorophyll fluorescence associated parameters, and dry matter production[19]
Field conditions<15 °CIncreased the chlorophyll-a, chlorophyll-b, chlorophyll-a/b ratio, and total chlorophyll, increased proline concentration but decreased carotenoid content[124]
TomatoLycopersicon esculentumGreenhouse14.6 °CSuppressed fruit yield, restricted fruit mass, increased soluble carbohydrates, total amino acids, and guaiacol peroxidase activity in roots, leaves, and fruit, and superoxide dismutase in fruit but significantly lower malondialdehyde content[125]
PotatoSolanum tuberosumGrowth chamber4 °C/2 °C (day/night)Soluble protein, MDA, and proline enhanced with low-temperature exposure duration but the chlorophyll content decreased; protein spots (N = 52) identified in proteomic studies were involved in defense response, energy metabolism, photosynthesis, protein degradation, ribosome formation, signal transduction, cell movement, N metabolism, and other physiological processes[126]
CabbageBrassica oleraceaPot trays under controlled conditions12 ± 1 °CLow temperatures affected photosynthesis and fresh weight; stomatal conductance and leaf water content were significantly reduced; plants had smaller but thicker leaves; chilling conditions did not show any reduction in the dry matter[127]
Table 2. Organic acids secreted by cold-active phosphate solubilizing bacteria.
Table 2. Organic acids secreted by cold-active phosphate solubilizing bacteria.
Cold-Active PSBEcological HabitatOrganic AcidsReferences
Pseudomonas sp., Pseudomonas palleroniana, Pseudomonas proteolytica, Pseudomonas azotoformansSoils from high altitudes in Indian HimalayasOxalic, lactic, malic, citric, and succinic acids[20]
Serratia plymuthicaSoilsGluconic acid[187]
Bacillus, Burkholderia, Paenibacillus sp.Paddy fieldGluconic oxalic, citric, tartaric, succinic, formic and acetic acid[188]
Pantoea, Pseudomonas, Serratia, and EnterobacterWheat rhizosphereOxalic, citric, gluconic succinic, and fumaric acids[189]
Bacilli strainsWheat rhizospheres and rock phosphate mineGluconic, lactic, citric, malic, succinic and propionic acids[190]
Pseudomonas sp. strain AZ5, Bacillus sp. strain AZ17Chickpea rhizosphereAcetic, oxalic and gluconic acids, acetic, citric, and lactic acids[191]
PseudomonasGlacial ice samplesGluconic acid[18]
Rahnella sp. BIHB 783Hippophae rhamnoides rhizosphereGluconic, citric, and isocitric acids[44]
Acinetobacter rhizosphaerae strain BIHB 723Cold deserts of the trans-HimalayasGluconic, oxalic, 2-keto gluconic, lactic, malic, and formic acids[192]
Fluorescent Pseudomonas strainsCold deserts of the Himalayas Gluconic acid, oxalic acid, 2-ketogluconic acid, lactic acid, succinic acid, formic acid, citric acid and malic acid[193]
Pseudomonas corrugata (NRRL B-30409)Culture CollectionGluconic and 2-ketogluconic acids[194]
Table 3. Plant growth-promoting active biomolecules released by psychrophilic/psychrotolerant phosphate solubilizing bacteria.
Table 3. Plant growth-promoting active biomolecules released by psychrophilic/psychrotolerant phosphate solubilizing bacteria.
PPSBOriginMedia UsedPlant Growth EnhancersReference
Bacillus weihenstephanensis MF593886Gentiana kurroo Royle rhizospherePVKSiderophore, HCN, ammonia, and proteases[207]
Pseudomonas, Serratia, and FlavobacteriumRhizosphere and phyllosphere of Andes Mountains and Patagonia of ChilePVKIAA, ACC deaminase, anti-phytopathogenic activities[12]
PseudomonasSnow sampleNBRIPSiderophores, cellulases, xylanases, and chitinases[2]
Pseudomonas koreensis P2Sela LakeNBRIPIAA, siderophore, HCN, and iron uptake[208]
Acinetobacter, Bacillus, Enterobacter, Klebsiella, Proteus, Pseudomonas, and StaphylococcusRenuka LakePVKAmmonia, HCN, Zn solubilization, and hydrolytic enzymes[202]
PseudomonasAntarctic soilsNBRIPIAA, siderophores, HCN, microbial volatile organic compounds (MVOCs)[209]
Pseudomonas simiae PS2Seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) rhizospheric soil of high altitude in trans-HimalayaPVKIAA, siderophore and HCN [40]
Pseudomonas, Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Sporosarcina, Cupriavidus and PaenarthrobacterLepidium meyenii Walp. RhizosphereNBRIPIAA[210]
Bacillus licheniformis, Bacillus muralis, Desemzia incerta, Paenibacillus tylopili and Sporosarcina globisporaSoil and water samplesPVKIAA, GA, siderophores, NH3, HCN, ACC deaminase[211]
Pseudomonas koreensis and Arthrobacter nitroguajacolicus strainYB4Rainfed agriculture fieldPVKIAA[212]
PseudomonasRhizospheric soilNBRIPIAA, siderophore, ACC deaminase, ammonia, NF, and antifungal compounds[213]
BacillusHCN, ammonia, and NF
StenotrophomonasIAA, GA, HCN, Siderophore, ACC deaminase, ammonia, NF, and antifungal compounds
ArthrobacterIAA, siderophore, ACC deaminase, ammonia, and NF
AcinetobacterIAA, GA, HCN, siderophore, ACC deaminase, ammonia, NF, and antifungal compounds
ExiguobacteriumSiderophores, ammonia, and antifungal compounds
ProvidenciaIAA, GA, HCN, siderophore, ACC deaminase, ammonia, and NF
FlavobacteriumIAA, HCN, siderophore, ACC deaminase, and ammonia
KocuriaIAA, GA, HCN, and siderophore
PseudomonasGlacial iceNBRIPIAA, HCN, siderophore, proteases amylases and galactosidases[18]
RhizobiaPea nodulesPVKIAA[22]
Azotobacter, Pseudomonas, Micrococcus, and BacillusPennisetum clandestinum rhizospheresPVKIAA and siderophores[214]
Pseudomonas spp.High altitude of the northwest Indian HimalayasNBRIPIAA, siderophore[27]
Pseudomonas sp.Deschampsia antarctica rhizospherePVKIAA and EPS[215]
Exiguobacterium acetylicum strain 1PHigh altitude soilNBRIPIAA, siderophore and HCN[216]
Pseudomonas fragi CS11RH1High altitude garlic rhizosphereNBRIPIAA and HCN[14]
Fluorescent PseudomonasGarhwal Himalayas regionPVKSiderophores, antifungal activity[15]
PPSB, PVK, and NBRIP indicate psychrophilic/psychrotolerant phosphate solubilizing bacteria medium, Pikovskaya medium, and National Botanical Research Institute Phosphate medium, respectively; IAA, HCN, GA, NF, and EPS represents indoleacetic acid, hydrogen cyanide, gibberellic acid, nitrogen fixation, and exopolysaccharides, respectively.
Table 4. Inoculation effect of psychrophilic/psychrotolerant phosphate biofertilizers on different crops.
Table 4. Inoculation effect of psychrophilic/psychrotolerant phosphate biofertilizers on different crops.
Inoculated CropsCold Active PSBConditionsAgronomical TraitsReferences
Arabidopsis thalianaPseudomonas sp., Pseudomonas proteolytica, Pseudomonas azotoformansGrowth ChamberPromoted overall growth such as rosette diameter, leaf area, and biomass[20]
TomatoMixture of Pseudomonas sp. TmR5a and Curtobacterium sp. BmP22c (BC3)Pot assayPromoted the germination by 90% and significantly increased the root lengths[12]
TomatoPseudomonasGreenhouseIncreased germination and plantlets[2]
WheatPseudomonasPaper Roll Towel BioassaySignificantly increased root and shoot-lengths[209]
TomatoPseudomonas simiaePot experiments in green shade net and open field conditionsEnhanced plant growth, increased fruit yield by 9.8% (net house) 19.8% (open field)[40]
Chickpea, green gram, pea, and maizeLysinibaccilus macroides ST-30, P. palleroniana N-26 and P. jessenii MP-1In vitro seed germination assaySignificantly increased the germination efficiency[253]
Red cloverPseudomonas, Bacillus, Paenibacillus, Sporosarcina, Cupriavidus and PaenarthrobacterWater agar platesIncreased seed germination[210]
RicePseudomonas koreensis and Arthrobacter nitroguajacolicus strainYB4GreenhouseEfficiently increased the biomass and P uptake [212]
LentilPseudomonas spp.Temperature controlled polyhouseSignificantly increased the plant growth, grain yield, and P uptake[27]
Barley, chickpea, pea, and maizeRahnella sp.GreenhouseSignificantly increased growth of all crops, microplot testing of the PPSB inoculum also significantly increased growth and yield of pea[44]
WheatPseudomonas fragi CS11RH1 (MTCC 8984)GreenhouseIncreased the percent germination, rate of germination, biomass, and nutrient uptake[14]
Pseudomonas vancouverensisGreenhouseIncreased germination and root and shoot length[254]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rizvi, A.; Ahmed, B.; Khan, M.S.; Umar, S.; Lee, J. Psychrophilic Bacterial Phosphate-Biofertilizers: A Novel Extremophile for Sustainable Crop Production under Cold Environment. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2451. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms9122451

AMA Style

Rizvi A, Ahmed B, Khan MS, Umar S, Lee J. Psychrophilic Bacterial Phosphate-Biofertilizers: A Novel Extremophile for Sustainable Crop Production under Cold Environment. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(12):2451. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms9122451

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rizvi, Asfa, Bilal Ahmed, Mohammad Saghir Khan, Shahid Umar, and Jintae Lee. 2021. "Psychrophilic Bacterial Phosphate-Biofertilizers: A Novel Extremophile for Sustainable Crop Production under Cold Environment" Microorganisms 9, no. 12: 2451. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms9122451

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop