Next Article in Journal
Mycobacterium abscessus Genetic Determinants Associated with the Intrinsic Resistance to Antibiotics
Next Article in Special Issue
Epidemiology of Toxoplasmosis in SERBIA: A Cross-Sectional Study on Blood Donors
Previous Article in Journal
In Tuber Biocontrol of Potato Late Blight by a Collection of Phenazine-1-Carboxylic Acid-Producing Pseudomonas spp.
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification of Oocyst-Driven Toxoplasma gondii Infections in Humans and Animals through Stage-Specific Serology—Current Status and Future Perspectives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Toxoplasma gondii Genotypes Circulating in Serbia—Insight into the Population Structure and Diversity of the Species in Southeastern Europe, a Region of Intercontinental Strain Exchange

Group for Microbiology and Parasitology, Center of Excellence for Food- and Vector-Borne Zoonoses, Institute for Medical Research, University of Belgrade, National Institute of Republic of Serbia, 11129 Belgrade, Serbia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 5 November 2021 / Revised: 24 November 2021 / Accepted: 1 December 2021 / Published: 7 December 2021

Abstract

:
In Europe, Toxoplasma gondii lineage II is dominant, and ToxoDB#1 the most frequently occurring genotype. The abundance of lineage III genotypes varies geographically and lineage I are rare, yet present in several regions of the continent. Data on the T. gondii population structure in southeastern Europe (SEE) are scarce, yet necessary to appreciate the diversity of the species in Europe. To help fill this gap, we genotyped 67 strains from nine species of intermediate hosts in Serbia by MnPCR-RFLP, determined the population structure, and identified the genotypes using ToxoDB. A neighbor-joining tree was also constructed from the isolates genotyped on nine loci. While 42% of the total genotype population consisted of ToxoDB#1 and ToxoDB#2, variant genotypes of both lineages comprised 46% of the population in wildlife and 28% in domestic animals and humans. One genotype of Africa 4 lineage was detected in a human sample. Interestingly, the findings include one lineage III variant and one II/III recombinant isolate with intercontinental distribution, which appear to be moderately related to South American genotypes. Based on these findings, SEE is a region of underappreciated T. gondii genetic diversity and possible strain exchange between Europe and Africa.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The Apicomplexan protozoan Toxoplasma gondii has been ranked as the fourth food and waterborne parasite of global importance in terms of public health concerns out of 24 candidate organisms, and the first among protozoan agents [1]. In a similar exercise in Europe a few years later, T. gondii was ranked second, only after Echinococcus multilocularis, so again as the first protozoan [2]. T. gondii has three infectious life stages—the tachyzoite, bradyzoite, and sporozoite—all of which are transmissible, either from host to host (tachyzoite and bradyzoite) or from the environment to the host (sporozoite). The dominant mode of horizontal transmission is via ingestion of bradyzoites in tissue cysts or sporozoites in oocysts [3]. Transfer of tissue cysts via donor organs into naive recipients, or extremely rarely of tachyzoites via donor blood, is also possible [4,5]. Tachyzoites can also be vertically (transplacentally) transmitted from the mother to the fetus [4,5]. Major transmission vehicles are meat, as bearers of encysted bradyzoites, and water, which if contaminated with sporulated oocysts, can cause epidemic outbreaks [3,6,7,8]. Soil contaminated with oocysts may be another vehicle for infection for grazers and birds who feed off the ground, while oocysts in both water and soil can also contaminate vegetables and fruits and thus enter the foodweb of humans and animals. T. gondii tachyzoites and bradyzoites replicate by endodyogeny, which allows transmission solely by shuttling between intermediate hosts, that is, all homeothermic species. Sexual reproduction of tachyzoites happens only in the gut of the Felidae, and therefore the definitive hosts, resulting in the formation of oocysts. Oocysts are excreted into the environment along with feces, where they sporulate in appropriate ambient conditions to reach full maturity and infectivity [9,10]. Sexual reproduction also leads to genome recombination and facilitates evolution of the species.
Clinical experience with acquired T. gondii infection in the human immunocompetent population worldwide shows that disease is most often associated with mild pathology, while the infection is mostly asymptomatic and without clearly discernible pathology [4], despite the fact that the natural progression of the infection ends in the development of tissue cysts that are predominantly localized in neurons and myocytes [3,4,5]. Nonetheless, severe cases have been reported sporadically, most often in South America, and in travelers returning from Central America, Asia, and Africa [11,12]. A plausible explanation of these clinical observations may be derived from the growing insight into the global population structure of T. gondii, which has revealed that different genotype populations circulate in different geographical areas [13]. In addition, it has been experimentally demonstrated that infection with a number of isolates from South America results in mortality of laboratory mice, which indicates virulence [14]. Lineages I, II, III and likely Africa 1 circulate globally, while lineages of apparent limited geographical distribution have been detected in North America [15], South America [16], and Africa [17,18]. Differences in the diversity of the genotype population not only appear to be geographical, but also related to the eco-system, that is, the anthropogenic versus the wild environment. This is evident in the highly diverse genotype population which characterizes the non-anthropogenic environment of the Amazon basin, while in North America it has been shown that the diversity of the species increases as the distance to the anthropogenic environment increases [19,20]. In contrast, the lower diversity of the strain population in North America and especially Europe is due to the overwhelmingly high frequency of archetype II (ToxoDB#1), while similarly, the high frequency of China 1 (ToxoDB#9) is responsible for the low diversity in China [13], both genotypes being of low virulence to mice [4,5,21].
However, diversity in much of the world still needs to be interpreted with caution, as the lion’s share of isolates originates from humans and domestic animals, and thus also makes up the majority in the ToxoDB (www.toxodb.org (accessed on 20 June 2021)) and other genotype collections. In fact, strains isolated from pigs, chickens, and sheep are over-represented, while wildlife strains are under-represented. Thus, the reported dichotomy between strain population structure and diversity circulating in the anthropogenic environment versus the sylvatic environment may also reflect the inherent strain origin bias [19,20].
Despite a formidable effort to isolate, genotype, and identify T. gondii strains circulating in various hosts residing in different environments in Europe, particularly in France, there are still major gaps in the data. T. gondii strains originating from wildlife species, such as predatory mammals and birds, have rarely been isolated and/or genotyped, indicating incomplete knowledge regarding the virulence spectrum of the genotype population in Europe. A major spatial gap also includes the region of southeastern Europe (SEE). Thus, to shed some light into the population structure of T. gondii which characterizes SEE, we performed a phylogenetic analysis of 67 strains isolated from and detected in nine species of intermediate hosts from both the domestic and sylvatic environment from Serbia.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

Genotyping was performed directly on strains detected in human fluids including amniotic fluid (AF), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), peripheral or cord blood (PB, CB), and trypsin digested or mechanically homogenized animal tissues (heart, diaphragm) or after isolation by bioassay in Swiss Webster mice or short-term in vitro culture in VERO cells. Direct genotyping was preceded by gDNA concentration by Na-acetate/ethanol precipitation, while isolated gDNA was harvested from mouse brains after 1–2 sub-passages in vivo (3–6 months) or from infected VERO cell cultures (4–6 days).

2.2. T. gondii gDNA Detection

To detect the presence of T. gondii gDNA in the samples, the 529 bp repeat element (AF146527) was amplified using previously published protocol [22,23,24]. Briefly, each PCR reaction contained MaximaProbe Mastermix (Thermofisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) or Taqman Universal Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), specific forward and reverse primers (5′-AGA GAC ACC GGA ATG CGA TCT-3′; 3′-CCC TCT TCT CCA CTC TTC AAT TCT-5′), and TaqMan probe FAM-ACG CTT TCC TCG TGG TGA TGG CG-TAMRA (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The final reaction volume was 20 μL with 3 μL of extracted gDNA as template. After a hold interval of 2 min at 50 °C for UDG treatment and 10 min at 95 °C for polymerase activation according to the manufacturer’s instructions, the amplification was performed using 40–45 cycles of a two-step thermal profile. Fluorescence detection was performed during the annealing/extension step at 60 °C. Amplification and detection were performed in a StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).

2.3. Bioassay in Swiss Webster Mice for Strain Isolation

Strain isolation by bioassay was attempted from human blood, AF, and all animal tissues, except wild canid heart sections, which were frozen on receipt. The bioassay protocol was described in detail in the Refs. [25,26]. A maximum volume of a 500 µL suspension containing human fluids or trypsin-digested animal tissue and gentamycin (4 mg/kg, Galenika, Belgrade, Serbia) was injected into the peritoneum of Swiss Webster female mice weighing 18–20 g (n = 2 per human fluid sample or n = 2–4 per tissue digest). The mice were housed 2–4 per cage and were given water and food ad libitum and kept at a natural light cycle for 6 weeks until sacrifice. After 6 weeks, the mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation, and the brains were removed and homogenized using an insulin syringe and a 21 G hypodermic needle in sterile saline (Hemofarm, Vršac, Serbia). A volume of 100 µL of the suspension was evenly divided on four glass slides and examined for the presence of tissue cysts by microscopy. The number of tissue cysts per brain was estimated as the total count on four slides ×10; a suspension of brain homogenate in sterile saline was then prepared which contained up to 20 tissue cysts/mL. A maximum of 500 µL of the suspension was administered to each mouse by oral gavage. All animals were monitored daily for clinical symptoms, and if symptoms such as a tottering gait or dyskinesia appeared during the first 14 days post-infection, they were treated with sulfadiazine (500 mg/L, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in drinking water for three consecutive days. Animals which developed severe symptoms at any time post-infection were euthanized to prevent unnecessary suffering. Strains were maintained by regular sub-passages in vivo at an interval of 3–6 months.

2.4. Nucleic Acids Extraction

Nucleic acids contained in human fluids were extracted using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue mini kit or the QIAmp DNA mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. gDNA contained in animal tissue digests or organ homogenates was extracted using either the GeneJet Genomic DNA purification kit (Thermofisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions or using the Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

2.5. DNA Precipitation by Na-Acetate/Ethanol

gDNA isolated from samples from which strain isolation was not possible (frozen canid heart tissue), unsuccessful, or not attempted was concentrated up to 20-fold by Na-acetate/ethanol precipitation. Briefly, 2 µL of a co-precipitant, PelletPaint (Merck-Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), was added to each volume (20–100 µL) of gDNA to be concentrated along with 0.1 volumes of 3M Na-acetate (Merck-Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) and mixed well. Next, two volumes of 100% ethanol were added to the sample and after a brief incubation at room temperature, the sample was centrifuged at top speed (16,000× g) in a tabletop centrifuge 5415R (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) for 5 min. Next, the supernatant was discarded, the pellet was washed with 300 µL of 70% ethanol twice, and finally with 100% ethanol, and air-dried for 5–10 min. The pellet was re-suspended in a small volume of RNAse/DNAse free water.

2.6. Genotyping by MnPCR-RFLP and Genotype Identification

The MnPCR-RFLP method was performed as previously described by Su et al. [27] using nine loci: altSAG2, BTUB, GRA6, C-22, C-29, L358, PK1, Apico, and the additional locus CS3 described in the Refs. [16,28]. The multiplex reaction contained 1.5 mM of each external forward and reverse primer, Dreamtaq Green PCR Mastermix or PCR Mastermix (Thermofisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), 2–3 µL of extracted gDNA, and DNAse-/RNAse-free water in a total volume of 20 µL. The nested reaction contained 3 mM of internal forward and reverse primers specific for a particular locus, Mastermix as in the multiplex reaction, and up to 2 µL of the multiplex reaction itself as a template. The reactions were performed in a Veriti thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). Reaction products were visualized on 1.5–2% agarose gels stained with EtBr. Each product was subsequently digested using the appropriate restriction enzymes as described in the Ref. [27], and the restriction fragments were visualized on 1.5% agarose gels stained with EtBr. Reference RH (ToxoDB#10), ME49 (ToxoDB#1), and NED (ToxoDB#2) strains were used as positive controls for each batch of MnPCR-RFLP and to identify allele-specific banding patterns at each locus. Genotypes were identified using the ToxoDB [www.toxodb.org (accessed on 20 June 2021)]. Genotypes were designated as recombinant if a mixture of two allele types was observed and the allele type at the Apico locus was different from the dominant allele type, while other differences from the archetypal genotypes were considered variants [29,30,31]. For the purposes of analysis, even partially obtained genotypes were classified in this manner.

2.7. Phylogenetic Analysis

The NJ tree was constructed using SplitsTree (https://software-ab.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de/download/splitstree4/welcome.html (accessed on 27 July 2021)). Strains were analyzed using all 10 standard genotyping loci according to the Ref. [27] and the additional locus CS3 [16,28]. The allele type on the CS3 locus for the reference genotypes was identified by sequence examination and conversion to the RFLP banding pattern, as described in the Ref. [32]. Included in the tree are only strains from Serbia which represent unique genotypes and have identified alleles on at least nine loci and the ToxoDB genotypes which are the closest match, as well as exemplary Brazilian strains published by the Ref. [16] (TgCatBr39, TgCatBr42, TgCatBr58, TgCatBr64), Spanish isolates (as representative for European strains) published by the Ref. [33] (TgPigSp2-ToxoDB#2, TgPigSp5-ToxoDB#3), and reference genotypes (GT1, ME49, VEG, MAS, TgCatBr5, CAST, FOU, P89, VAND, RUB, TgCtCo5, TgCgCa01/COUG).

3. Results

In total, 67 strains from nine species of intermediate hosts were genotyped and used to infer the total population structure. Isolates (n = 12) were genotyped on nine loci, while direct genotyping from the source material was done for the remaining strains (n = 55), with four loci being the cutoff for inclusion into the population structure. Only four strains were genotyped on just four loci. Three strains from feral pigeons were included into the sylvatic structure, as the area from which the birds originated includes both the city of Belgrade and the surrounding suburbs. In total, 58.3% were strains from hosts residing in the domestic environment, while 41.7% were from hosts from the sylvatic environment. Overall, a little over half of the structure consisted of lineage II genotypes (54%), while lineage III genotypes accounted for nearly one quarter (24%). The lineage II archetype (ToxoDB#1) was the dominant genotype in intermediate hosts with 33% of the total strain population, followed by lineage II variant strains, with 21%. The lineage III archetype (ToxoDB#2) accounted for a mere 9%, and lineage III variant genotypes for 15%. The remaining 22% of the structure included genotypes which could be identified as recombinants of lineages II and III (9%), atypical genotypes (1%), and genotypes which could not be definitively classified into a particular lineage (12%) (Figure 1A).
Analysis according to the environment showed that genotypes which circulated in the domestic environment in humans and animals alike were also dominantly of lineage II with the archetype (ToxoDB#1) representing 36% of the structure, while variant genotypes accounted for only 10%. Lineage III made up 26% of the total structure, but in contrast to lineage II, the lineage III archetype (ToxoDB#2) made up 8%, while variant genotypes made up a significant 18%. Recombinant genotypes and those that could not be assigned to a lineage each made up 13%, and atypical genotypes 2% of the structure (Figure 1B).
In the wild environment, lineage II was dominant with even 68% of the structure, with the archetype (ToxoDB#1) accounting for 29% and variants being dominant with even 39% of the total structure. The archetype of lineage III (ToxoDB#2) represented 11% of the structure, while the variants only represented 7%. The remaining 14% consisted of recombinants and strains for which the lineage could not be precisely determined (Figure 1C).
Comparison of the MnPCR-RFLP results identified 31 distinct allele patterns, possibly indicating distinct genotypes (Table 1). Patterns 11 and 12 (strain IDs: 057-16, 061-16, 062-16, 075-16) which originated from golden jackals may represent the same genotype, which could not be matched in the ToxoDB. Patterns shaded blue (6, 7, 26) indicate genotypes which have been detected in hosts residing in both the domestic and sylvatic environment, while the rose-shaded patterns (3, 18) indicate genotypes which were detected in two host species from the domestic environment.
A NJ tree which included the Serbian isolates typed on nine markers was constructed (Figure 2). On the NJ tree, isolate EQ39 (ToxoDB#54) appears to be more related to ToxoDB#96 than TOXODB#2, while K1 and EQ40 are moderately related to ToxoDB#60—yet slightly more related to ToxoDB#96 than to ToxoDB#2 or TOXODB#8.

4. Discussion

Nearly half of the population structure inferred from 67 T. gondii strains from nine species of intermediate hosts consisted of variants and recombinants of lineages II and III (45%), while archetypes of both lineages represented 42%. The remaining 13% were strains which could not be assigned to a lineage because a full MnPCR-RFLP profile could not be obtained, and a single strain (TgH106019) determined as atypical at the time of detection by MS analysis [34]. This strain is interesting as it originated from an immunocompromised patient who reportedly never left the region, implying that the infection was acquired locally, suggesting that this genotype is possibly in circulation in SEE. However, recent re-evaluation of the MS marker lengths identified this genotype to be of lineage Africa 4, which was also detected in a case of congenital toxoplasmosis from Bulgaria [35], confirming that Africa 4 circulates in SEE. Along with the reports of Africa 1 genotypes in Turkey in humans as well as in animals [36,37], these findings indicate the presence of African lineages in SEE. Global distribution of Africa 1 has been suggested, which gains importance in view of the fact that Africa 1 has been shown to be virulent in mice; Africa 4, on the other hand, may have more limited distribution, and has been shown to be avirulent to mice [18]. No lineage I genotype was detected in Serbia. Lineage I is globally rare, despite reports showing that genotypes of this lineage do circulate in Europe [13], which could indicate that it is of lower frequency in SEE than in other parts of the continent [38,39].
In the domestic environment, ToxoDB#1 represented 36% of the strain population and was most frequent in pigs and humans (11/14). In fact, it represented 75% of the pig isolates and 100% of the human isolates (n = 5), with the remaining two pig isolates and only one strain detected in human AF being ToxoDB#2. Variants and recombinants, including genotypes which could not be assigned to a lineage but were clearly non-archetypal together represented more than half of the structure, and in fact, many of the variant genotypes were detected in but not isolated from human samples. Such a large representation of non-archetypal strains in human samples is not surprising, as a significant proportion variant and or recombinant genotypes (26%) was found in food animals. A certain diversity in human samples is expected and has been previously demonstrated in Europe and North America, that may be partly due to strain importation by travel and/or food globalization [40,41]. While successful strain isolation from human fluids is rather difficult primarily due to the usually low numbers of tachyzoites, it is of note that none of the variant genotypes could be isolated, while ToxoDB#1 was frequently isolated. It is tempting to speculate that there may be an additional bias in the isolate collection due to the inherent properties of tachyzoites of certain genotypes, such as ToxoDB#1, that allow enhanced host-to-host transmission.
In the sylvatic environment, lineage II variant genotypes (39%) were more frequent than ToxoDB#1 (29%). In fact, lineage II variants were also more common in the sylvatic than in the domestic environment. In contrast, lineage III variants represented 18% of the structure in the domestic environment, and a small share (7%) in the sylvatic structure. Recombinant genotypes also represented a very small share of the wildlife genotype population (3%), in contrast to their share in the domestic environment (13%), which may be due to a difference in the abundance of definitive hosts. Felis silvestris, which are distributed across the country, and Lynx lynx, which primarily inhabit forested areas distant from human settlements, are native to Serbia, yet the population size of both species is small and stands in stark contrast to the vast population size of domestic cats and the number of stray and pet cats with outdoor access [42,43]. Given this abundance of definitive hosts in the domestic environment, infections after oocyst ingestion, particularly in free-range animals, are expected to be frequent. In addition, both F. silvestris and L. lynx tend to avoid getting close to human settlements, unlike foxes and golden jackals, which indicates that these felids and canids do not share habitats, and could also explain the low number of recombinant genotypes detected in the canids [44,45].
The significant share of variant genotypes of lineages II and III in the total population structure and the likelihood that they represent 28 distinct genotypes indicates high diversity, which is somewhat surprising for Europe [13], yet may be due to the fact that strains from sylvatic hosts represented 41.7% of the total structure where a more diverse population of genotypes may be expected [14,19,20], and over half of the genotype population from the domestic environment originated from free-range animals. In fact, a recent report of atypical genotypes in wildlife from southern Italy supports the notion that the diversity of T. gondii in the sylvatic environment in southern Europe may be underestimated [46]. In addition, the bias of the population genetics data worldwide inherent to the sample collection strategy and isolation methodology greatly favors strains from food animals residing near human habitats. In light of that, there is a high probability of successful isolation of genotypes of predominantly low virulence to laboratory mice, which needs to be taken into account when interpreting the population structure and diversity in the genotype population circulating in a specific geographical area.
Interestingly, four genotypes (numbers 6, 7, 21, 22, 26 in Table 1) were detected in both the sylvatic and domestic environments, which is indicative of strain exchange between domestic animals, humans and wildlife. This is not unexpected, as habitats for many species of wildlife are fragmented and nestled in-between human settlements in Serbia and in fact most of Europe, while truly remote areas of unbroken, pristine wilderness are scarce.
Another interesting observation is that strains 061-13 detected in a red fox, and K1 isolated from a free-range chicken raised in close proximity to peri-urban hunting grounds, were found to be of identical genotype; we have previously determined, based on cumulative mortality of Swiss Webster mice (38.8%), that this genotype is intermediately virulent [23]. This finding could be of concern as, in fact, many genotypes which circulate in the sylvatic ecosystem have been found to cause serious clinical presentations and even lead to death in people in different parts of the world [47,48,49]. In light of the habitat distribution of wildlife in Serbia, it is evident that more virulent genotypes can be expected in both environments.
The diversity of lineage III in the genotype population in the domestic environment in Serbia is notable. This lineage is thought to be ancestral to Africa, and a significant presence of lineage III variants in humans and domestic animals has not been widely reported in Europe [18,50]. In fact, the intermediately virulent genotype EQ40 is likely endemic in southern Europe, as it has been previously isolated in Portugal and France, but it may have been imported originally from Africa, as the MS marker lengths match a strain from Gabon—over 5000 km away [18,23,50,51]. The intermediately virulent chicken isolate K1 and EQ40 may be more related to ToxoDB#96 than to ToxoDB#2. The other genotype isolated from a horse in Serbia, EQ39 (ToxoDB#54), which is of low virulence, has been detected in several animal species in the U.S.—nearly 9000 km away [52], and appears to be moderately related to ToxoDB#60.
Given the evolutionary history of T. gondii, the worldwide presence of genotypes of African origin and/or of those closely related to them, is not surprising [18,53,54]. It is likely that strain exchange between Europe and Africa facilitated by recurrent and/or historical animal migrations led to the gradual accumulation of T. gondii genotypes of African origin in southern Europe—with recurrent migrations probably being of far greater consequence in terms of the current diversity of the genotype population in SEE. There are several major migratory bird flyways crossing the Mediterranean and southern European countries act as stopover points for vast numbers of birds, estimated at over 2 billion [55], en route to and from Africa. This provides an opportunity, while the fact that they may spend a considerable amount of time on the ground depending on the level of energy reserves [56], exhaustion, and/or possible sickness may increase the probability of predation at the resting grounds, and thus, strain introduction into a new geographical environment. In addition, the golden jackal, a migratory species which is rapidly expanding its range [57,58], with large resident populations in SEE and vagrant populations in other areas of southern Europe, was shown to be a major reservoir for different parasite species, including both Trichinella britovi and Trichinella spiralis, and T. gondii, and may be an instrumental vector for the distribution of genotypes across the continent [58,59].
It is difficult to estimate whether EQ40 and EQ39 (ToxoDB#54) are recent or historical exports from Africa to Europe and Europe to North America, respectively, but their vast geographical distribution and findings in different host species favor the latter. Given the different degrees of virulence, however, the supposed evolutionary trade-off between virulence and transmission, which may explain the low frequency of the virulent lineage I worldwide, is difficult to discern [60,61]. Clearly, virulent genotypes must possess adaptations to allow for increased transmission capacity in order to persist evolutionarily. Yet, this would imply that a number of the more virulent genotypes detected in SEE may persist along with the multitude of genotypes of low virulence. The findings of virulent genotypes in domestic animals in SEE along with the reports from Spain [23,62], where mouse virulent genotypes have also been isolated from pigs and sheep, call for vigilance as the impact of infection with more virulent genotypes may be underappreciated in Europe.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, O.D.-D. and A.U.; methodology, A.U.; software, A.U.; validation, O.D.-D., I.K. and A.U.; formal analysis, A.U.; investigation, A.U., I.K., B.B., V.Ć., T.Š., J.S. and O.L.; data curation, V.Ć. and N.B.; writing—original draft preparation, A.U.; writing—review and editing, O.D.-D., I.K., B.B., T.Š., J.S. and O.L.; visualization, A.U.; supervision, O.D.-D.; project administration, O.D.-D.; funding acquisition, O.D.-D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by grants (no. III 41019 and contract no. 451-03-9/2021-14/200015) from the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia to the Institute for Medical Research.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Council of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management of Serbia Veterinary Directorate (Decision no. 323-07-02446/2014-05/1 of 19 September 2014). The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institute for Medical Research Ethics Committee (Decision no. EO103/2014).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study as outlined in the above Institute for Medical Research Ethics Committee Decision.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Marija Stamenov-Djaković for excellent technical assistance in the laboratory.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO); World Health Organization (WHO). Multicriteria-Based Ranking for Risk Management of Food-Borne Parasites; Microbiological Risk Assessment Series; FAO: Rome, Italy; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014; Volume 23. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bouwknegt, M.; Devleesschauwer, B.; Graham, H.; Robertson, L.J.; van der Giessen, J.W. The Euro-FBP Workshop participants. Prioritisation of food-borne parasites in Europe, 2016. Eurosurveillance 2018, 9, 17-00161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Dubey, J.P.; Lindsay, D.S.; Speer, C.A. Structures of Toxoplasma gondii tachyzoites, bradyzoites, and sporozoites and biology and development of tissue cysts. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1998, 11, 267–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Weiss, L.M.; Dubey, J.P. Toxoplasmosis: A history of clinical observations. Int. J. Parasitol. 2009, 39, 895–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Halonen, S.K.; Weiss, L.M. Toxoplasmosis. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2013, 114, 125–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Bowie, W.R.; King, A.S.; Werker, D.H.; Isaac-Renton, J.L.; Bell, A.; Eng, S.B.; Marion, S.A. Outbreak of toxoplasmosis associated with municipal drinking water. The BC Toxoplasma Investigation Team. Lancet 1997, 350, 173–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Benenson, M.W.; Takafuji, E.T.; Lemon, S.M.; Greenup, R.L.; Sulzer, A.J. Oocyst-transmitted toxoplasmosis associated with ingestion of contaminated water. N. Engl. J. Med. 1982, 307, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Bahia-Oliveira, L.M.; Jones, J.L.; Azevedo-Silva, J.; Alves, C.C.; Orefice, F.; Addiss, D.G. Highly endemic, waterborne toxoplasmosis in north Rio de Janeiro state, Brazil. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2003, 9, 55–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Frenkel, J.K.; Dubey, J.P.; Miller, N.L. Toxoplasma gondii in cats: Fecal stages identified as coccidian oocysts. Science 1970, 6, 893–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dubey, J.P.; Miller, N.L.; Frenkel, J.K. Toxoplasma gondii life cycle in cats. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1970, 157, 1767–1770. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sepúlveda-Arias, J.C.; Gómez-Marin, J.E.; Bobić, B.; Naranjo-Galvis, C.A.; Djurković-Djaković, O. Toxoplasmosis as a travel risk. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2014, 6 Pt A, 592–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Henao-Martínez, A.F.; Franco-Paredes, C.; Palestine, A.G.; Montoya, J.G. Symptomatic Acute Toxoplasmosis in Returning Travelers. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2018, 5, ofy058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Shwab, E.; Zhu, X.; Majumdar, D.; Pena, H.; Gennari, S.; Dubey, J.; Su, C. Geographical patterns of Toxoplasma gondii genetic diversity revealed by multilocus PCR-RFLP genotyping. Parasitology 2014, 141, 453–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Shwab, E.K.; Saraf, P.; Zhu, X.Q.; Zhou, D.H.; McFerrin, B.M.; Ajzenberg, D.; Schares, G.; Hammond-Aryee, K.; van Helden, P.; Higgins, S.A.; et al. Human impact on the diversity and virulence of the ubiquitous zoonotic parasite Toxoplasma gondii. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, E6956–E6963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Khan, A.; Dubey, J.P.; Su, C.; Ajioka, J.W.; Rosenthal, B.M.; Sibley, L.D. Genetic analyses of atypical Toxoplasma gondii strains reveal a fourth clonal lineage in North America. Int. J. Parasitol. 2011, 41, 645–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Pena, H.F.; Gennari, S.M.; Dubey, J.P.; Su, C. Population structure and mouse-virulence of Toxoplasma gondii in Brazil. Int. J. Parasitol. 2008, 38, 561–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mercier, A.; Devillard, S.; Ngoubangoye, B.; Bonnabau, H.; Bañuls, A.L.; Durand, P.; Salle, B.; Ajzenberg, D.; Dardé, M.L. Additional haplogroups of Toxoplasma gondii out of Africa: Population structure and mouse-virulence of strains from Gabon. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2010, 4, e876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Hamidović, A.; Etougbétché, J.R.; Tonouhewa, A.B.N.; Galal, L.; Dobigny, G.; Houémènou, G.; Da Zoclanclounon, H.; Amagbégnon, R.; Laleye, A.; Fievet, N.; et al. A hotspot of Toxoplasma gondii Africa 1 lineage in Benin: How new genotypes from West Africa contribute to understand the parasite genetic diversity worldwide. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2021, 15, e0008980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Galal, L.; Hamidović, A.; Dardé, M.L.; Mercier, M. Diversity of Toxoplasma gondii strains at the global level and its determinants. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2019, 15, e00052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Jiang, T.; Shwab, E.K.; Martin, R.M.; Gerhold, R.W.; Rosenthal, B.M.; Dubey, J.P.; Su, C. A partition of Toxoplasma gondii genotypes across spatial gradients and among host species, and decreased parasite diversity towards areas of human settlement in North America. Int. J. Parasitol. 2018, 48, 611–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, L.; Chen, H.; Liu, D.; Huo, X.; Gao, J.; Song, X.; Xu, X.; Huang, K.; Liu, W.; Wang, Y.; et al. Genotypes and mouse virulence of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from animals and humans in China. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e53483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Lélu, M.; Villena, I.; Dardé, M.L.; Aubert, D.; Geers, R.; Dupuis, E.; Marnef, F.; Poulle, M.L.; Gotteland, C.; Dumètre, A.; et al. Quantitative estimation of the viability of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 5127–5132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Uzelac, A.; Klun, I.; Cirkovic, V.; Djurkovic-Djakovic, O. In Vivo and In Vitro Virulence Analysis of Four Genetically Distinct Toxoplasma gondii Lineage III Isolates. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Marković, M.; Ivović, V.; Štajner, T.; Djokić, V.; Klun, I.; Bobić, B.; Nikolić, A.; Djurković-Djaković, O. Evidence for genetic diversity of Toxoplasma gondii in selected intermediate hosts in Serbia. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2014, 37, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Djurković-Djaković, O.; Nikolić, A.; Bobić, B.; Klun, I.; Aleksić, A. Stage conversion of Toxoplasma gondii RH parasites in mice by treatment with atovaquone and pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate. Microbes Infect. 2005, 7, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Klun, I.; Uzelac, A.; Villena, I.; Mercier, A.; Bobić, B.; Nikolić, A.; Rajnpreht, I.; Opsteegh, M.; Aubert, D.; Blaga, R.; et al. The first isolation and molecular characterization of Toxoplasma gondii from horses in Serbia. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Su, C.; Shwab, E.K.; Zhou, P.; Zhu, X.Q.; Dubey, J.P. Moving towards and integrated approach to molecular detection and identification of Toxoplasma gondii. Parasitology 2010, 137, 413–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Khan, A.; Taylor, S.; Su, C.; Mackey, A.J.; Boyle, J.; Cole, R.; Glover, D.; Tang, K.; Paulsen, I.T.; Berriman, M.; et al. Composite genome map and recombination parameters derived from three archetypal lineages of Toxoplasma gondii. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33, 2980–2992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Howe, D.K.; Sibley, L.D. Toxoplasma gondii comprises three clonal lineages: Correlation of parasite genotype with human disease. J. Infect. Dis. 1995, 172, 1561–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Su, C.; Zhang, X.; Dubey, J.P. Genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii by multilocus PCR-RFLP markers: A high resolution and simple method for identification of parasites. Int. J. Parasitol. 2006, 36, 841–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Genot, S.; Franck, J.; Forel, J.M.; Rebaudet, S.; Ajzenberg, D.; de Paula, A.M.; Dardé, M.L.; Stein, A.; Ranque, S. Severe Toxoplasma gondii I/III recombinant-genotype encephalitis in a human immunodeficiency virus patient. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2007, 45, 3138–3140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Castro, B.B.P.; Gennari, S.M.; Lorenzi, H.; Su, C. A simple method to generate PCR-RFLP typing profiles from DNA sequences in Toxoplasma gondii. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2020, 85, 104590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fernández-Escobar, M.; Calero-Bernal, R.; Regidor-Cerrillo, J.; Vallejo, R.; Benavides, J.; Collantes-Fernández, E.; Ortega-Mora, L.M. Isolation, Genotyping, and Mouse Virulence Characterization of Toxoplasma gondii From Free Ranging Iberian Pigs. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 604782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Štajner, T.; Vasiljević, Z.; Vujić, D.; Marković, M.; Ristić, G.; Mićić, D.; Pasić, S.; Ivović, V.; Ajzenberg, D.; Djurković-Djaković, O. Atypical strain of Toxoplasma gondii causing fatal reactivation after hematopoietic stem cell transplantion in a patient with an underlying immunological deficiency. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 51, 2686–2690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Darde, M.-L.; Passebosc, K.; Durieux, M.-F.; Boumediene, F.; Galal, L.; Mercier, A.; The Network of the French National Reference Center for Toxoplasmosis. Analysing the genetic diversity of Toxoplasma gondii in an European country via human samples. In Programme & Abstract Book of the 13th European Multicolloquium of Parasitology, Belgrade, Serbia, 12–16 October 2021; Klun, I., Djurković-Djaković, O., Eds.; Serbian Society for Parasitology: Belgrade, Serbia, 2021; p. 88. [Google Scholar]
  36. Caner, A.; Ajzenberg, D.; Değirmenci, A.; Darde, M.L.; Can, H.; Erdoğan, D.D.; Korkmaz, M.; Uner, A.; Güngör, C.; Altıntaş, K.; et al. Isolation of Toxoplasma gondii strains similar to Africa 1 genotype in Turkey. Parasitol. Int. 2013, 62, 471–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Can, H.; Doskaya, M.; Ajzenberg, D.; Ozdemir, H.G.; Caner, A.; Iz, S.G.; Doskaya, A.D.; Atalay, E.; Cetinkaya, C.; Urgen, S.; et al. Genetic characterization of Toxoplasma gondii isolates and toxoplasmosis seroprevalence in stray cats of İzmir, Turkey. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e104930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Burrells, A.; Bartley, P.M.; Zimmer, I.A.; Roy, S.; Kitchener, A.C.; Meredith, A.; Wright, S.E.; Innes, E.A.; Katzer, F. Evidence of the three main clonal Toxoplasma gondii lineages from wild mammalian carnivores in the UK. Parasitology 2013, 140, 1768–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Turčeková, L.; Hurníková, Z.; Spišák, F.; Miterpáková, M.; Chovancová, B. Toxoplasma gondii in protected wildlife in the Tatra National Park (TANAP), Slovakia. Ann. Agric. Environ. Med. 2014, 21, 235–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ajzenberg, D.; Yera, H.; Marty, P.; Paris, L.; Dalle, F.; Menotti, J.; Aubert, D.; Franck, J.; Bessières, M.H.; Quinio, D.; et al. Genotype of 88 Toxoplasma gondii isolates associated with toxoplasmosis in immunocompromised patients and correlation with clinical findings. J. Infect. Dis. 2009, 199, 1155–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Pomares, C.; Devillard, S.; Holmes, T.H.; Olariu, T.R.; Press, C.J.; Ramirez, R.; Talucod, J.; Estran, R.; Su, C.; Dubey, J.P.; et al. Genetic Characterization of Toxoplasma gondii DNA Samples Isolated from Humans Living in North America: An Unexpected High Prevalence of Atypical Genotypes. J. Infect. Dis. 2018, 218, 1783–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Paunovic, M.; Cirovic, D.; Milenkovic, M. Status, management and conservation of large carnivores in Serbia. In Conference paper of Coexistence of large carnivores and humans: Threat or benefit? In Proceedings of the International Symposium Preceding the 54th CIC General Assembly, Belgrade, Serbia, 1 May 2007; pp. 111–117. [Google Scholar]
  43. Penezic, A.; Selakovic, S.; Pavlovic, I.; Cirovic, D. First findings and prevalence of adult heartworms (Dirofilaria immitis) in wild carnivores from Serbia. Parasitol. Res. 2014, 113, 3281–3285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lozano, J.; Malo, A.F. Conservation of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris) in Mediterranean environments: A reassessment of current threats. In Mediterranean Ecosystems: Dynamics, Management and Conservation; Williams, G.S., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers, Inc.: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 1–31. [Google Scholar]
  45. Uzelac, A.; Klun, I.; Cirovic, D.; Penezic, A.; Cirkovic, V.; Djurkovic-Djakovic, O. Detection and genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii in wild canids in Serbia. Parasitol. Int. 2019, 73, 101973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sgroi, G.; Viscardi, M.; Santoro, M.; Borriello, G.; D’Alessio, N.; Boccia, F.; Pacifico, L.; Fioretti, A.; Veneziano, V.; Fusco, G. Genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii in wild boar (Sus scrofa) in southern Italy: Epidemiological survey and associated risk for consumers. Zoonoses Public Health 2020, 67, 805–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Schumacher, A.C.; Elbadawi, L.I.; DeSalvo, T.; Straily, A.; Ajzenberg, D.; Letzer, D.; Moldenhauer, E.; Handly, T.L.; Hill, D.; Dardé, M.L.; et al. Toxoplasmosis Outbreak Associated with Toxoplasma gondii-Contaminated Venison—High Attack Rate, Unusual Clinical Presentation, and Atypical Genotype. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 72, 1557–1565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Demar, M.; Ajzenberg, D.; Maubon, D.; Djossou, F.; Panchoe, D.; Punwasi, W.; Valery, N.; Peneau, C.; Daigre, J.L.; Aznar, C.; et al. Fatal outbreak of human toxoplasmosis along the Maroni River: Epidemiological, clinical, and parasitological aspects. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2007, 45, e88–e95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Carme, B.; Demar, M.; Ajzenberg, D.; Dardé, M.L. Severe acquired toxoplasmosis caused by wild cycle of Toxoplasma gondii, French Guiana. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2009, 15, 656–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. De Sousa, S.; Ajzenberg, D.; Canada, N.; Freire, L.; da Costa, J.M.C.; Dardé, M.L.; Thulliez, P.; Dubey, J.P. Biologic and molecular characterization of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from pigs from Portugal. Vet. Parasitol. 2005, 135, 133–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Halos, L.; Thébault, A.; Aubert, D.; Thomas, M.; Perreta, C.; Geers, R.; Alliota, A.; Escotte-Binet, S.; Ajzenberg, D.; Dardé, M.L.; et al. An innovative survey underlining the significant level of contamination by Toxoplasma gondii of ovine meat consumed in France. Int. J. Parasitol. 2010, 40, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dubey, J.P.; VanWhy, K.; Verma, S.K.; Choudhary, S.; Kwok, O.C.; Khan, A.; Behnke, M.S.; Sibley, L.D.; Ferreira, L.R.; Oliveira, S.; et al. Genotyping Toxoplasma gondii from wildlife in Pennsylvania and identification of natural recombinants virulent to mice. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 200, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Lehmann, T.; Marcet, P.L.; Graham, D.H.; Dahl, E.R.; Dubey, J.P. Globalization and the population structure of Toxoplasma gondii. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 11423–11428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Velmurugan, G.V.; Dubey, J.P.; Su, C. Genotyping studies of Toxoplasma gondii isolates from Africa revealed that the archetypal clonal lineages predominate as in North America and Europe. Vet. Parasitol. 2008, 155, 314–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hahn, S.; Bauer, S.; Liechti, F. The Natural Link between Europe and Africa: 2.1 Billion Birds on Migration. Oikos 2009, 118, 624–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Packmor, F.; Klinner, T.; Woodworth, B.K.; Eikenaar, C.; Schmaljohann, H. Stopover departure decisions in songbirds: Do long-distance migrants depart earlier and more independently of weather conditions than medium-distance migrants? Mov. Ecol. 2020, 8, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Arnold, J.; Humer, A.; Heltai, M.; Murariu, D.; Spassov, N.; Hackländer, K. Current status and distribution of golden jackals Canis aureus in Europe. Mamm. Rev. 2012, 42, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Cirovic, D.; Teodorovic, V.; Vasilev, D.; Markovic, M.; Cosic, N.; Dimitrijevic, M.; Klun, I.; Djurkovic-Djakovic, O. A large-scale study of the Trichinella genus in the golden jackal (Canis aureus) population in Serbia. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 212, 253–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gherman, C.M.; Mihalca, A.D. A synoptic overview of golden jackal parasites reveals high diversity of species. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Anderson, R.M.; May, R.M. Coevolution of hosts and parasites. Parasitology 1982, 85 Pt. 2, 411–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ben-Ami, F. The virulence-transmission relationship in an obligate killer holds under diverse epidemiological and ecological conditions, but where is the tradeoff? Ecol. Evol. 2017, 7, 11157–11166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Fernández-Escobar, M.; Calero-Bernal, R.; Regidor-Cerrillo, J.; Vallejo, R.; Benavides, J.; Collantes-Fernández, E.; Ortega-Mora, L.M. In vivo and in vitro models show unexpected degrees of virulence among Toxoplasma gondii type II and III isolates from sheep. Vet. Res. 2021, 52, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (A) Total population structure of T. gondii in intermediate hosts. The structure was inferred from 67 strains of human origin (n = 24), domestic animals (n = 15), and wildlife (n = 28), representing nine species of intermediate hosts; (B) Population structure of T. gondii in the domestic environment. The structure was inferred from 39 strains of human origin (n = 24) and domestic animals (n = 15), representing four species of intermediate hosts. The majority of strains detected in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) originated from confined animals, while the strains isolated and detected in horses (Equus caballus), chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus), and sheep (Ovis aries) originated from free-range animals; (C) Population structure of T. gondii in the sylvatic environment. The structure was inferred from 28 strains from four species of wildlife—feral pigeons (C. livia, n = 3), golden jackals (C. aureus, n = 13), red foxes (V. vulpes, n = 10), and grey wolves (C. lupus, n = 2). Aside from the pigeons, who originated from areas in and around Belgrade, individual animals of the Canidae family originated from suburban, rural, and remote forested areas of Serbia. In (AC), each genotype category is followed by the number of strains and percentage of the total structure.
Figure 1. (A) Total population structure of T. gondii in intermediate hosts. The structure was inferred from 67 strains of human origin (n = 24), domestic animals (n = 15), and wildlife (n = 28), representing nine species of intermediate hosts; (B) Population structure of T. gondii in the domestic environment. The structure was inferred from 39 strains of human origin (n = 24) and domestic animals (n = 15), representing four species of intermediate hosts. The majority of strains detected in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus) originated from confined animals, while the strains isolated and detected in horses (Equus caballus), chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus), and sheep (Ovis aries) originated from free-range animals; (C) Population structure of T. gondii in the sylvatic environment. The structure was inferred from 28 strains from four species of wildlife—feral pigeons (C. livia, n = 3), golden jackals (C. aureus, n = 13), red foxes (V. vulpes, n = 10), and grey wolves (C. lupus, n = 2). Aside from the pigeons, who originated from areas in and around Belgrade, individual animals of the Canidae family originated from suburban, rural, and remote forested areas of Serbia. In (AC), each genotype category is followed by the number of strains and percentage of the total structure.
Microorganisms 09 02526 g001aMicroorganisms 09 02526 g001b
Figure 2. Neighbor-joining tree of T. gondii strains typed on a minimum of nine loci. Blue and red bold type indicates genotypes originating from Serbia, pink indicates reference strains, and black are isolates from Europe (TgPigSp5) and South America.
Figure 2. Neighbor-joining tree of T. gondii strains typed on a minimum of nine loci. Blue and red bold type indicates genotypes originating from Serbia, pink indicates reference strains, and black are isolates from Europe (TgPigSp5) and South America.
Microorganisms 09 02526 g002
Table 1. Distinct T. gondii genotypes detected and/or isolated in intermediate hosts from Serbia.
Table 1. Distinct T. gondii genotypes detected and/or isolated in intermediate hosts from Serbia.
Genotyping Loci
ChromosomeVIIIIXXIbPlastidIIIVVIVIIa
NumberOriginIsolateTissueLineageInternal strain IDAltSAG2BTUBGRA6C22-8ApicoC29-2L358PK1CS3ToxoDB genotype/isolate ID
1Multiple speciesNBlood, AF, HeartIII ARCHvariousIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIToxoDB#2
2Multiple speciesYAF, HeartII ARCHvariousIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIToxoDB#1
3Horse, humanYHeartII/III, recEQ39, 123c20II *IIIIII *IIIIIIIIIIIIII *II *ToxoDB#54
4HorseYHeartIII VAREQ40IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITgPiPr14
5PigeonYHeartIII VARG13IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIINo match
6Chicken, red foxYHeartIII VARK1, 061-13II *II *I *II *IIIIIIIIIIII *III *No match
7Golden jackal, humanNHeart, AFII/III, rec125-16, 46c21II *II *II *IIIII *--III *IINo match
8HumanNAFII or III VAR25c19, 100c16III *III *II *IIIII--I *II *No match
9HumanNAFIII VAR182c19IIIIIIIIIIIII -IIIIIToxoDB#21, #120, #123 (w/o CS3)
10Golden jackalNheartII VAR051-16IIIIIIIII---IIIINo match
11Golden jackalNHeartII VAR057-16, 061-16, 062-16II *III *III *II *II--II *-No match
12Golden jackalNHeartII or III075-16, 061-16, 062-16II *III *III *II *---II *IIINo match
13Red foxNHeartII VAR068-16IIIIIIIIIII--III-No match
14Red fox, grey wolfNHeartII VAR103-16II *III *II *II *---II *IINo match
15Grey wolfNHeartII or III020-16IIIIIIIIIIII--III-No match
16HumanNAFII VAR107AFIIIIIII---IIIIINo match
17HumanNAFII VAR8c21II-IIIIIIII--IIIIINo match
18Horse, humanNHeartII/III, recEQ12, BALII *II *III *-III--II *IINo match
19HumanNAFIII VAR138c18III-IIIIIIII--IIIIIToxoDB#116, #130, #163 #187 (w/o CS3)
20HumanNAFIII VAR108c16IIIIIIII-III--IIIINo match
21Red fox, humanNHeartII VAR113-16, 158c18IIIIIII *----I *II *ToxoDB#45, #142, #149, #150, #203 (w/o CS3)
22Red fox, humanNHeart, AFIII VAR124-16, 82c16III *II *III *III---III *-No match
23Golden jackalNHeartII VAR023-15IIIIIIIII---III-No match
24HumanNCSFII VAR269LIIIIIIIIII---II-No match
25HumanNAFIII VAR132c15III-III-III--IIIINo match
26Human, red foxNAFII or III97c18, 121-16II *III *II *----IIIIIToxoDB#136 (all markers), #93, #105, #107, #135, #136, #137, #139, #172, #173, #174, #202 (w/o CS3)
27HumanNAFIII VAR83c16IIIIIIIIII---III-No match
28HumanNAFIII VAR65c20III-IIIIII--III-No match
* Indicates matching alleles; AF, amniotic fluid.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Uzelac, A.; Klun, I.; Ćirković, V.; Bauman, N.; Bobić, B.; Štajner, T.; Srbljanović, J.; Lijeskić, O.; Djurković-Djaković, O. Toxoplasma gondii Genotypes Circulating in Serbia—Insight into the Population Structure and Diversity of the Species in Southeastern Europe, a Region of Intercontinental Strain Exchange. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2526. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms9122526

AMA Style

Uzelac A, Klun I, Ćirković V, Bauman N, Bobić B, Štajner T, Srbljanović J, Lijeskić O, Djurković-Djaković O. Toxoplasma gondii Genotypes Circulating in Serbia—Insight into the Population Structure and Diversity of the Species in Southeastern Europe, a Region of Intercontinental Strain Exchange. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(12):2526. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms9122526

Chicago/Turabian Style

Uzelac, Aleksandra, Ivana Klun, Vladimir Ćirković, Neda Bauman, Branko Bobić, Tijana Štajner, Jelena Srbljanović, Olivera Lijeskić, and Olgica Djurković-Djaković. 2021. "Toxoplasma gondii Genotypes Circulating in Serbia—Insight into the Population Structure and Diversity of the Species in Southeastern Europe, a Region of Intercontinental Strain Exchange" Microorganisms 9, no. 12: 2526. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms9122526

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop