Next Article in Journal
Changes in Gut Microbiota Correlates with Response to Treatment with Probiotics in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis. A Post Hoc Analysis of a Clinical Trial
Next Article in Special Issue
Ornithobacterium rhinotracheale: MALDI-TOF MS and Whole Genome Sequencing Confirm That Serotypes K, L and M Deviate from Well-Known Reference Strains and Numerous Field Isolates
Previous Article in Journal
SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibodies Seroprevalence and Sera Neutralizing Activity in MEXICO: A National Cross-Sectional Study during 2020
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rapid Classification of Clostridioides difficile Strains Using MALDI-TOF MS Peak-Based Assay in Comparison with PCR-Ribotyping
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 9
Issue 4
10.3390/microorganisms9040853
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Classification of Salmonella enterica of the (Para-)Typhoid Fever Group by Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy

by
Miriam Cordovana
1,
Norman Mauder
1,
Markus Kostrzewa
1,
Andreas Wille
2,
Sandra Rojak
3,
Ralf Matthias Hagen
3,
Simone Ambretti
4,
Stefano Pongolini
5,
Laura Soliani
5,
Ulrik S. Justesen
6,
Hanne M. Holt
6,
Olivier Join-Lambert
7,
Simon Le Hello
7,
Michel Auzou
7,
Alida C. Veloo
8,
Jürgen May
9,10,
Hagen Frickmann
11,12,† and
Denise Dekker
9,13,*,†
1
Bruker Daltonik GmbH, 28359 Bremen, Germany
2
Institute for Hygiene and Environment, 20539 Hamburg, Germany
3
Department of Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Bundeswehr Central Hospital Koblenz, 56070 Koblenz, Germany
4
Operative Unit of Microbiology, IRCCS-Azienda Ospedaliero Policlinico Sant’Orsola-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
5
Risk Analysis and Genomic Epidemiology Unit, Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Della Lombardia e dell’Emilia-Romagna, 43126 Parma, Italy
6
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense C, Denmark
7
Department of Microbiology, Université de Caen, Normandie, CEDEX 5, 14032 Caen, France
8
University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, 9700 AB Groningen, The Netherlands
9
Infectious Disease Department, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine Hamburg, 20359 Hamburg, Germany
10
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Tropical Medicine II Hamburg, 20359 Hamburg, Germany
11
Department of Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Bundeswehr Hospital Hamburg, 20359 Hamburg, Germany
12
Institute for Medical Microbiology, Virology and Hygiene, University Medicine Rostock, 18057 Rostock, Germany
13
German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), Hamburg-Lübeck-Borstel-Riems, 38124 Braunschweig, Germany
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Hagen Frickmann and Denise Dekker contributed equally to this work.
Microorganisms 2021, 9(4), 853; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms9040853
Submission received: 22 March 2021 / Revised: 5 April 2021 / Accepted: 7 April 2021 / Published: 15 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) for the Identification of Pathogenic Microorganisms)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Typhoidal and para-typhoidal Salmonella are major causes of bacteraemia in resource-limited countries. Diagnostic alternatives to laborious and resource-demanding serotyping are essential. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIRS) is a rapidly developing and simple bacterial typing technology. In this study, we assessed the discriminatory power of the FTIRS-based IR Biotyper (Bruker Daltonik GmbH, Bremen, Germany), for the rapid and reliable identification of biochemically confirmed typhoid and paratyphoid fever-associated Salmonella isolates. In total, 359 isolates, comprising 30 S. Typhi, 23 S. Paratyphi A, 23 S. Paratyphi B, and 7 S. Paratyphi C, respectively and other phylogenetically closely related Salmonella serovars belonging to the serogroups O:2, O:4, O:7 and O:9 were tested. The strains were derived from clinical, environmental and food samples collected at different European sites. Applying artificial neural networks, specific automated classifiers were built to discriminate typhoidal serovars from non-typhoidal serovars within each of the four serogroups. The accuracy of the classifiers was 99.9%, 87.0%, 99.5% and 99.0% for Salmonella Typhi, Salmonella Paratyphi A, B and Salmonella Paratyphi C, respectively. The IR Biotyper is a promising tool for fast and reliable detection of typhoidal Salmonella. Hence, IR biotyping may serve as a suitable alternative to conventional approaches for surveillance and diagnostic purposes.

1. Introduction

Salmonella enterica, both typhoidal and nontyphoidal Salmonella are amongst the most important bacteria isolated from patients with bacteraemia in resource-limited countries [1,2,3,4,5]. While severe invasive disease due to enteric Salmonella has frequently been associated with young age and immunocompromised states [4,6], typhoid fever-associated Salmonella are also affecting immunocompetent individuals [7,8] and seem to be more prevalent in adult patients [7,8]. In febrile patients in tropical endemicity settings, typhoid fever is an important differential diagnosis to malaria [9], although co-infections are predominantly observed for non-typhoidal Salmonella [10].
The Paratyphi A-C serovars are typically associated with clinically less severe disease as opposed to infections caused by the serovar Typhi [11]. While Salmonella Typhi (S. Typhi) has a worldwide distribution in tropical areas and is associated with poor hygiene conditions [9], areas of endemicity for paratyphoid fever are mainly Asia and Africa, with a particularly high incidence of 150 cases/100,000 persons years in China [12,13,14,15,16]. Until now, global screening and surveillance efforts still leave room for improvement [17]. S. Paratyphi B, for example, was previously shown to be clonally diverse [18,19,20]. Also, unlike S. Typhi for which the only reservoir are humans, S. Paratyphi A, and S. Paratyphi C have been found in domestic animals [21,22].
Due to the disease severity, both rapid and reliable differentiation are desirable [11]. Serotyping is regarded as the gold standard for differentiation of Salmonella enterica on serovar level [23], but the approach is laborious, requires multiple and expensive sera and experienced personnel. Therefore, attempts towards more easy-to-apply and rapid diagnostic tools have been launched. These include PCR [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32] and loop-mediated isothermal amplification methods [33,34,35,36,37,38,39], both exhibiting sensitivity and specificity issues [38,39]. In addition, cross-reactions with serovars with high sequence homology like S. Paratyphi A and S. Weltevreden, S. Paratyphi B and S. Abony, as well as S. Paratyphi C and S. Choleraesuis [30,40] have been observed. Next to molecular approaches, MALDI-TOF-MS (matrix-assisted laser-desorption-ionization time-of-flight) has been applied to identify Salmonella Typhi [41]. However, MALDI-TOF MS technology is not a suitable tool for the identification of Salmonella on serovar level, as those approaches [41] were based on similarities on a clonal level.
Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIRS) is commonly used in chemistry to determine the molecular composition of a wide range of sample types. As different biomolecules absorb IR radiation in a characteristic range of wavelengths (lipids 3000–2800 cm−1, proteins 1700–1500 cm−1, phospholipids/nucleic acids 1500–1185 cm−1, and polysaccharides 1185–900 cm−1) [42]. From each bacterial cell, a unique absorption spectrum will be produced by FTIR. This represents the bacteria’s specific fingerprint signature, reflecting its biomolecular content in correlation with its genetic information [43,44,45]. FTIRS has been successfully applied in many studies for the discrimination of bacteria at different taxonomic levels (genera, species, serogroup/type, and even at strain level). So far, it has been proven to be a simple, quick, high-throughput and cost-effective bacterial typing technique [46,47,48,49,50,51,52].
Due to high genetic diversity, Salmonella enterica represents a promising species to be investigated by FTIRS. Several research groups investigated FTIRS to discriminate S. enterica serotypes using multivariate analysis and different bacterial collections [53,54,55,56,57,58], but without specific regard to (para-)typhoid Salmonella so far.
In this study, we evaluated the application of the IR Biotyper (IRBT), an FTIRS commercially available system for microbial typing, for the identification of typhoid and paratyphoid fever-associated Salmonella. We analyzed a strain collection comprising S. Typhi, S. Paratyphi A-C, as well as other, partly phylogenetically closely related Salmonella serovars belonging to the serogroups O:2, O:4, O:7 and O:9. Cluster analysis was performed to investigate the potential discrimination between typhoidal and non-typhoidal serovars within the different O-serogroups. Artificial intelligence-based algorithms for the automated classification were developed. The classifiers aimed to discriminate the samples in “Paratyphi (A/B/C)/Typhi”/“non-Paratyphi (A/B/C)/Typhi”. These were built with spectra from cultures grown on Columbia Blood agar and were tested with spectra from cultures on different media.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strain Collection

A total of 359 well characterized isolates (corresponding to 50 serovars) were included in the study. Of these, 26 belonged to the O:2 group, 222 to the O:4 group, 45 to the O:7 group and 66 to the O:9 group (Table 1).
The S. Paratyphi A-C strains were provided by the Bundeswehr Hospital Hamburg, Germany, the Bundeswehr Central Hospital Koblenz, Germany; the Institute for Hygiene and Environment, City of Hamburg, Germany, S. Typhi by the Regional reference Center for Enteropathogens “Istituto Zooprofilattico sperimentale della Lombardia e dell’Emilia-Romagna” (IZSLER), Parma, Italy, the remaining isolates by different centers (University Hospital Policlinico Sant’Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy; Caen Normandie University Hospital, Caen, France; University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands).
All isolates were identified at genus level by MALDI-TOF MS or biochemical methods (API 20E, bioMérieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France), followed by characterization at serotype level by classical methods (serotyping [59], Whole Genome Sequencing [60,61,62], PFGE [63], and PCR for S. Typhimurium [64,65,66]).

2.2. Sample Preparation

Bacterial strains were stored at −80 °C using the microbank system (Microbanks, PRO-LAB DIAGNOSTICS, Richmond Hill, Canada) before they were retrieved on Columbia sheep blood agar (CBA—Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD, USA). Infrared spectra were acquired from strains sub-cultured on a selection of different media (CBA, Tryptose Soy Agar (TSA), Chocolate agar (CHO) and Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA), Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD, USA) for 22 ± 2 h at 35 ± 2 °C.
Sample preparation was performed following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, a 1 µl overloaded loop of bacterial colonies taken from the confluent part of the culture was resuspended in 50 µL of a 70% ethanol solution in an IR Biotyper suspension vial. After vortexing, 50 µL of deionized water was added, and the solution was mixed by pipetting. Fifteen µL of the bacterial suspension were spotted in three technical replicates onto the 96-spots silicon IR Biotyper target and dried for 15–20 min at 35 ± 2 °C. All isolates belonging to typhoidal serovars and to serovars represented by less than five isolates were measured in three independent biological replicates, to achieve a more balanced number of spectra for each serovar.
The quality control Infrared Test Standards (IRTS 1 and IRTS 2) of the IR Biotyper kit were resuspended in 90 µL of deionized water, then 90 µL of absolute ethanol were added and mixed. 12 µL of suspension were spotted in duplicate onto the IR Biotyper target, and let dry as described for the samples.

2.3. Spectra Acquisition and Analysis

IRTS 1 and IRTS 2 were measured as quality controls prior to sample spectra acquisition in each run.
Spectra acquisition, visualization and processing were performed in transmission mode in the spectral range 4000–600 cm−1 (mid-IR). Spectra were smoothed using the Savitzky–Golay algorithm over nine data points, and the second derivative was calculated. Spectra were then cut to 1300–800 cm−1 (the carbohydrates region), and vector-normalized, to amplify differences between isolates, and to correct variations related to spectra acquisition [64].

2.4. Cluster Analysis

The discriminatory power of IR Biotyper regarding the discrimination of (para-) typhoidal S. enterica serovars was investigated for each O-group. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) were performed applying the IR Biotyper Client software version 3.0.

2.5. Development of Automated Classifiers

Automated classifiers were built using machine learning algorithms to allow the automated classification of unknown samples by applying a marker model calculated on a set of training spectra. The classifiers were automated to be automatically applied during the measurement of the isolates’ spectra with predefined characteristics—here belonging to the genus Salmonella.
Artificial neural networks (ANNs), included in the IR Biotyper software, were applied to build the classifiers. Four classifiers were built, one for each O-group that included a typhoidal Salmonella serovar (O:2, O:4, O;7 and O:9) each, using spectra measured from Columbia blood agar cultures. The ANNs were trained with spectra from a minimal number of isolates to explore the robustness of the method (Table 2). The isolates used for training were the more diverse ones among the strains available for each serovar (observed by HCA and PCA) to include the highest spectral variance. For each isolate of the typhoidal serovars, all three biological replicates were included in the training set. In contrast, for the non-typhoidal serovars, only one of the three biological replicates was used (arbitrary selection of the second replicate). This selection was applied in order to have a more balanced number of spectra of the two groups (typhoidal vs. nontyphoidal) to avoid introducing biases in the training phase.
The classifiers were tested using (i) the remaining two biological replicates of the isolates included in the training set; (ii) the remaining isolates of the same serogroup; (iii) all isolates of the same serogroup but taken from different media.
The classifiers provide a result with a scoring system and “traffic light” colour coding, which warns the user about potential outliers or novelties. A “green score” result means that the sample spectrum is located within the spectral space of the training set. A “yellow score” result means that the sample is located at the periphery of the spectral space of the training set. A “red score” value means that the sample spectrum is located far from the samples included in the training set. Results with red scores were counted as “no classification possible”, while results with green or yellow scores, which were incorrectly classified, were counted as “misclassification”. For each classifier/dataset combination, the accuracy (defined as the ratio between the number of spectra correctly classified and the total number of spectra) and the error rate (defined as the ratio between the number of spectra misclassified and the total number of spectra) were calculated, as well as sensitivity (defined as the rate of target isolates correctly classified as target strains), specificity (defined as rate of the non-target strains correctly classified as non-target strains) and positive and negative predictive values.
The accuracy and error rate were calculated, also testing the classifiers with spectra of the same dataset grown on TSA, chocolate agar and Mueller-Hinton agar, in order to evaluate the potential versatility of the automated classifiers.

2.6. Ethical Clearance

Ethical clearance was not required because only reference strains were used, while neither patients nor patient-related data were included in the analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Cluster Analysis

In the serogroups O:2, O:7 and O:9, all the isolates belonging to the typhoidal serovars (S. Paratyphi A, S. Paratyphi C and S. Typhi isolates, respectively) were well separated from the remaining serovars of the respective O-groups. However, in the O:4 group, several sub-clusters among the S. Paratyphi B isolates were observed, with one being located in the same spectral space as a sub-cluster of S. Typhimurium—monophasic variant.
The results of PCA and LDA for the different O-groups are shown in Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8, respectively. The two approaches were chosen to optimally visualize the clustering.

3.2. Automated Classifiers

The automated classifiers for S. Paratyphi A, S. Paratyphi C and S. Typhi showed an accuracy of 99%, and an error rate of 0%. Sensitivity and specificity were 100%.
The automated classifier for S. Paratyphi B showed an accuracy of 87%, and an error rate of 10.8%. Sensitivity was 77.8% (n = 4 S. Paratyphi B isolates were misclassified) and specificity was 94.8% (n = 9 S. Typhimurium monophasic variant and n = 1 S. Saintpaul isolates were misclassified). Three isolates were not classified (n = 1 S. subsp. salamae O:4 and n = 2 S. Typhimurium monophasic variant).
Results of classifiers testing, including the use of other media, are shown in Table 3. Best identifications were achieved with isolates from CBA media. Reliability did not significantly decrease when using TSA and CHO media, but was slightly affected with cultures grown on MHA.

4. Discussion

The study was performed to assess the suitability of IR biotyping for the rapid and easy-to-perform identification of typhoid and paratyphoid Salmonella. The applied algorithms allowed a highly reliable classification of S. Typhi, S. Paratyphi A, and S. Paratyphi C. S. Paratyphi A, which is antigenically closely related other Salmonella serovars such as S. Nitra, S. Kiel, and S. Koessen, did not represent a challenge to the diagnostic algorithm. This is comparable to PCR- and LAMP-based diagnostic assays [30,38,39,40].
In this study, the classifiers for distinguishing (para-)typhoidal from non-(para-)typhoidal serovars were based upon a dataset of already characterized strains. For use with unknown samples, the IR Biotyper classification should be performed hierarchically, i.e., a classifier first identifies the typhoidal O-serogroups, and a secondary layer of classifiers subsequently discriminates between the typhoidal serovar and non-typhoidal serovars, since the spectral features involved in the differentiation of either O-serogroups or serotypes differ. A similar approach was already described in previous studies [54,55,56,57,58]. Individual classifiers can be applied manually, or they can be bundled and automatically applied by dedicated software. However, S. Paratyphi B remains a challenge due to its high clonal diversity and variable associations with either systemic or enteric disease [17,18,19,20,21,22]. The associated diversity was reflected by intense sub-clustering of the assessed S. Paratyphi B isolates within the spectral dimension within the O:4-serogroup. While the majority of the clones were located separate from other serovars, in the spectral space, two sub-clones showed partial overlapping with some of the S. Typhimurium monophasic variant isolates. This resulted in misclassification of isolates of other serovars (mainly restricted to S. Typhimurium monophasic variant), associated with enteric disease in patients [67]. The specificity issues of IR biotyping, in particular for S. Typhimurium, is limiting the applicability of the approach because of the importance and frequency of S. Typhimurium in causing human disease [67]. This would require the confirmation of IR biotyping-based results within the O:4-subgroup using other approaches. Further investigations are needed to understand the underlying mechanisms for this phenomenon.
In spite of this limitation, rapid and easy-to-apply IR biotyping is likely to gain increased importance in the identification of (para-)typhoid Salmonella for diagnostic and surveillance purposes. Compared to expensive and laborious approaches like next-generation sequencing-based typing, the IR biotyping approach allows typing within few minutes at reagents costs of few cents as far as a biotyping device is available. However, as (para-)typhoid fever is predominantly prevalent in resource-limited settings [9,12,13,14,15,16] where biotyping devices are so far not readily available, the broader application of the introduced approach needs to be awaited.
Columbia blood agar, as the most commonly used media in clinical microbiology worldwide, is suitable media for the introduced IR biotyping approach. Based on our method evaluation, the following steps for future diagnostic application in suspected S. Typhi or S. Paratyphi A–C infections should be followed: bacterial material will be subjected to the IR-biotyping approach as outlined in the method. Diagnoses of S. Typhi, S. Paratyphi A, and S. Paratyphi C with a green traffic-light score in the IR-Biotyper software can be considered as confirmed, while profiles with lower scores should make use of alternative assays. Within the O:4-serogroup comprising S. Paratyphi B, identification based on IR-biotyping can only be considered as presumptively identified but would require alternative confirmatory diagnostic approaches.
The study has a number of limitations. The majority of Salmonella strains in this assessment included serovars most frequently found in clinical patient samples. However, we cannot exclude possible misclassifications by the presence of other rare serovars than the ones tested. Secondly, while more than 20 S. Typhi, S. Paratyphi A and S. Paratyphi B were available for the assessments, only seven S. Paratypi C strains were analysed, limiting the interpretation of the data from the O:7-serogroup. Thirdly, lacking information on the origin of the reference strains makes the interpretation of the observed clustering of the S. Paratyphi B strains difficult.

5. Conclusions

IR biotyping of strains proved to be reliable for S. Typhi, S. Paratyphi A and S. Paratyphi C. Within the O:4-serogroup, including S. Paratyphi B, alternative approaches should be added to confirm or exclude S. Paratyphi B in case of clinical suspicion. Therefore, in spite of the limitations, the use of IR-Biotyper spectra for the identification of (para-) typhoid fever-associated Salmonella is a milestone in the rapid and easy-to-apply discrimination within Salmonella serovars and by far exceeds the discriminatory potential of other spectrum-based strategies like MALDI-TOF-MS [41].
Accordingly, future diagnostic implementation of this method can be expected after receiving regulatory approval.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.A., J.M. and H.F.; Data curation, M.C. and R.M.H.; Formal analysis, H.F.; Methodology, M.C., N.M., M.K., A.W., S.P., U.S.J. and H.M.H.; Validation, S.L.H.; Writing–original draft, M.C., N.M., H.F. and D.D.; Writing–review & editing, M.K., A.W., S.R., R.M.H., S.A., S.P., L.S., U.S.J., H.M.H., O.J.-L., S.L.H., M.A. and A.C.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are provided in the manuscript. Raw data can be provided as reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

Annett Michel and Simone Priesnitz are acknowledged for excellent technical assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

Miriam Cordovana, Norman Mauder and Markus Kostrzewa are employees of the company Bruker Daltonic GmbH. There are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Diekema, D.J.; Hsueh, P.R.; Mendes, R.E.; Pfaller, M.A.; Rolston, K.V.; Sader, H.S.; Jones, R.N. The Microbiology of Bloodstream Infection: 20-Year Trends from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 2019, 63, e00355-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Morpeth, S.C.; Ramadhani, H.O.; Crump, J.A. Invasive non-Typhi Salmonella disease in Africa. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 49, 606–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Reddy, E.A.; Shaw, A.V.; Crump, J.A. Community-acquired bloodstream infections in Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2010, 10, 417–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Gordon, M.A. Invasive nontyphoidal Salmonella disease: Epidemiology, pathogenesis and diagnosis. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 24, 484–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Deen, J.; von Seidlein, L.; Andersen, F.; Elle, N.; White, N.J.; Lubell, Y. Community-acquired bacterial bloodstream infections in developing countries in south and southeast Asia: A systematic review. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2012, 12, 480–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fierer, J.; Swancutt, M. Non-typhoid Salmonella: A review. Curr. Clin. Top. Infect. Dis. 2000, 20, 134–157. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wain, J.; Hendriksen, R.S.; Mikoleit, M.L.; Keddy, K.H.; Ochiai, R.L. Typhoid fever. Lancet. 2015, 385, 1136–1145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dougan, G.; Baker, S. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi and the pathogenesis of typhoid fever. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 68, 317–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kim, J.H.; Im, J.; Parajulee, P.; Holm, M.; Cruz Espinoza, L.M.; Poudyal, N.; Mogeni, O.D.; Marks, F. A Systematic Review of Typhoid Fever Occurrence in Africa. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2019, 69 (Suppl. 6), S492–S498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mutua, J.M.; Wang, F.B.; Vaidya, N.K. Modeling malaria and typhoid fever co-infection dynamics. Math. Biosci. 2015, 264, 128–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Gibani, M.M.; Britto, C.; Pollard, A.J. Typhoid and paratyphoid fever: A call to action. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2018, 31, 440–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Fangtham, M.; Wilde, H. Emergence of Salmonella paratyphi A as a major cause of enteric fever: Need for early detection, preventive measures, and effective vaccines. J. Travel Med. 2008, 15, 344–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Sahastrabuddhe, S.; Carbis, R.; Wierzba, T.F.; Ochiai, R.L. Increasing rates of Salmonella Paratyphi A and the current status of its vaccine development. Expert. Rev. Vaccines 2013, 12, 1021–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Arndt, M.B.; Mosites, E.M.; Tian, M.; Forouzanfar, M.H.; Mokhdad, A.H.; Meller, M.; Ochiai, R.L.; Walson, J.L. Estimating the burden of paratyphoid a in Asia and Africa. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2014, 8, e2925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Jacobs, M.R.; Koornhof, H.J.; Crisp, S.I.; Palmhert, H.L.; Fitzstephens, A. Enteric fever caused by Salmonella paratyphi C in South and South West Africa. S. Afr. Med. J. 1978, 54, 434–438. [Google Scholar]
  16. Fuche, F.J.; Sen, S.; Jones, J.A.; Nkeze, J.; Permala-Booth, J.; Tapia, M.D.; Sow, S.O.; Tamboura, B.; Touré, A.; Onwuchekwa, U.; et al. Characterization of Invasive Salmonella Serogroup C1 Infections in Mali. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2018, 98, 589–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Luby, S.P.; Saha, S.; Andrews, J.R. Towards sustainable public health surveillance for enteric fever. Vaccine. 2015, 33 (Suppl. 3), C3–C7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Selander, R.K.; Beltran, P.; Smith, N.H.; Barker, R.M.; Crichton, P.B.; Old, D.C.; Musser, J.M.; Whittam, T.S. Genetic population structure, clonal phylogeny, and pathogenicity of Salmonella paratyphi B. Infect. Immun. 1990, 58, 1891–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Huehn, S.; Helmuth, R.; Bunge, C.; Guerra, B.; Junker, E.; Davies, R.H.; Wattiau, P.; van Pelt, W.; Malorny, B. Characterization of pathogenic and resistant genome repertoire reveals two clonal lines in Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Paratyphi B (+)-tartrate positive. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2009, 6, 431–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Barker, R.M.; Kearney, G.M.; Nicholson, P.; Blair, A.L.; Porter, R.C.; Crichton, P.B. Types of Salmonella paratyphi B and their phylogenetic significance. J. Med. Microbiol. 1988, 26, 285–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Doublet, B.; Praud, K.; Nguyen-Ho-Bao, T.; Argudín, M.A.; Bertrand, S.; Butaye, P.; Cloeckaert, A. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase- and AmpC β-lactamase-producing D-tartrate-positive Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi B from broilers and human patients in Belgium, 2008–2010. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014, 69, 1257–1264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Toboldt, A.; Tietze, E.; Helmuth, R.; Fruth, A.; Junker, E.; Malorny, B. Human infections attributable to the D-tartrate-fermenting variant of Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi B in Germany originate in reptiles and, on rare occasions, poultry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 78, 7347–7357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Andrews, J.R.; Ryan, E.T. Diagnostics for invasive Salmonella infections: Current challenges and future directions. Vaccine 2015, 33 (Suppl. 3), C8–C15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Das, S.; Ray, U.; Akhter, I.; Chattopadhyay, A.; Paul, D.K.; Dutta, S. Evaluation of fliC-d based direct blood PCR assays for typhoid diagnosis. BMC Microbiol. 2016, 16, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Tennant, S.M.; Toema, D.; Qamar, F.; Iqbal, N.; Boyd, M.A.; Marshall, J.M.; Blackwelder, W.C.; Wu, Y.; Quadri, F.; Khan, A.; et al. Detection of Typhoidal and Paratyphoidal Salmonella in Blood by Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015, 61 (Suppl. 4), S241–S250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Hirose, K.; Itoh, K.; Nakajima, H.; Kurazono, T.; Yamaguchi, M.; Moriya, K.; Ezaki, T.; Kawamura, Y.; Tamura, K.; Watanabe, H. Selective amplification of tyv (rfbE), prt (rfbS), viaB, and fliC genes by multiplex PCR for identification of Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi, A.J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002, 40, 633–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Woods, D.F.; Reen, F.J.; Gilroy, D.; Buckley, J.; Frye, J.G.; Boyd, E.F. Rapid multiplex PCR and real-time TaqMan PCR assays for detection of Salmonella enterica and the highly virulent serovars Choleraesuis and Paratyphi, C.J. Clin. Microbiol. 2008, 46, 4018–4022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Ngan, G.J.; Ng, L.M.; Lin, R.T.; Teo, J.W. Development of a novel multiplex PCR for the detection and differentiation of Salmonella enterica serovars Typhi and Paratyphi, A. Res. Microbiol. 2010, 161, 243–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Nga, T.V.; Karkey, A.; Dongol, S.; Thuy, H.N.; Dunstan, S.; Holt, K.; Tu le, T.P.; Campbell, J.I.; Chau, T.T.; Chau, N.V.; et al. The sensitivity of real-time PCR amplification targeting invasive Salmonella serovars in biological specimens. BMC Infect. Dis. 2010, 10, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Lin, Y.; Shi, X.; Zhu, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Li, Y.; Lv, D.; Hu, Q. Development of modified molecular beacon based real-time PCR assay for the rapid detection of Salmonella choleraesuis and Salmonella paratyphi C. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu 2011, 40, 514–516. [Google Scholar]
  31. Xu, L.; Yuan, M.; Sun, W.; Ke, B.; Hong, Y. Taq Man probe-based quadruple real-time PCR for detection of Salmonella paratyphi A/B/C and Salmonella typhi. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu 2017, 46, 298–302. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhai, L.; Yu, Q.; Bie, X.; Lu, Z.; Lv, F.; Zhang, C.; Kong, X.; Zhao, H. Development of a PCR test system for specific detection of Salmonella Paratyphi B in foods. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2014, 355, 83–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Abdullah, J.; Saffie, N.; Sjasri, F.A.; Husin, A.; Abdul-Rahman, Z.; Ismail, A.; Aziah, I.; Mohamed, M. Rapid detection of Salmonella Typhi by loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2015, 45, 1385–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Fan, F.; Du, P.; Kan, B.; Yan, M. The Development and Evaluation of a Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Method for the Rapid Detection of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0124507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Fan, F.; Yan, M.; Du, P.; Chen, C.; Kan, B. Rapid and Sensitive Salmonella Typhi Detection in Blood and Fecal Samples Using Reverse Transcription Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2015, 12, 778–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kaur, A.; Das, R.; Nigam, M.R.; Elangovan, R.; Pandya, D.; Jha, S.; Kalyanasundaram, D. Rapid Detection Device for Salmonella typhi in Milk, Juice, Water and Calf Serum. Indian. J. Microbiol. 2018, 58, 381–392. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kaur, A.; Kapil, A.; Elangovan, R.; Jha, S.; Kalyanasundaram, D. Highly-sensitive detection of Salmonella typhi in clinical blood samples by magnetic nanoparticle-based enrichment and in-situ measurement of isothermal amplification of nucleic acids. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0194817. [Google Scholar]
  38. Rojak, S.; Wiemer, D.F.; Wille, A.; Loderstädt, U.; Wassill, L.; Hinz, R.; Hagen, R.M.; Frickmann, H. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification for paratyphoid fever—A proof-of-principle analysis. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2019, 68, 509–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Frickmann, H.; Wiemer, D.F.; Wassill, L.; Hinz, R.; Rojak, S.; Wille, A.; Loderstädt, U.; Schwarz, N.G.; von Kalckreuth, V.; Im, J.; et al. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification-based detection of typhoid fever on an automated Genie II Mk2 system—A case-control-based approach. Acta Trop. 2019, 190, 293–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Liu, W.Q.; Feng, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zou, Q.H.; Chen, F.; Guo, J.T.; Peng, Y.H.; Jin, Y.; Li, Y.G.; Hu, S.N.; et al. Salmonella paratyphi C: Genetic divergence from Salmonella choleraesuis and pathogenic convergence with Salmonella typhi. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e4510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Kuhns, M.; Zautner, A.E.; Rabsch, W.; Zimmermann, O.; Weig, M.; Bader, O.; Groß, U. Rapid discrimination of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi from other serovars by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e40004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Baker, M.J.; Trevisan, J.; Bassan, P.; Bhargava, R.; Butler, H.J.; Dorling, K.M.; Fielden, P.R.; Fogarty, S.W.; Fullwood, N.J.; Heys, K.A.; et al. Using Fourier transform IR spectroscopy to analyze biological materials. Nat. Protoc. 2014, 1771–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Naumann, D.; Helm, D.; Labischinski, H. Microbiological characterization by FT-IR spectroscopy. Nature 1991, 351, 81–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Helm, D.; Labischinski, H.; Schallehn, G.; Naumann, D. Classification and identification of bacteria by Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1991, 137, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Lasch, P.; Naumann, D. Infrared spectroscopy in microbiology. In Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2015; pp. 1–32. [Google Scholar]
  46. Vogt, S.; Löffler, K.; Dinkelacker, A.G.; Bader, B.; Autenrieth, I.B.; Peter, S.; Liese, J. Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy for Typing of Clinical Enterobacter cloacae Complex Isolates. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Martak, D.; Valot, B.; Sauget, M.; Cholley, P.; Thouverez, M.; Bertrand, X.; Hocquet, D. Fourier-Transform InfraRed Spectroscopy Can Quickly Type Gram-Negative Bacilli Responsible for Hospital Outbreaks. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Dinkelacker, A.G.; Vogt, S.; Oberhettinger, P.; Mauder, N.; Rau, J.; Kostrzewa, M.; Rossen, J.W.A.; Autenrieth, I.B.; Peter, S.; Liese, J. Typing and Species Identification of Clinical Klebsiella Isolates by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2018, 56, e00843-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Burckhardt, I.; Sebastian, K.; Mauder, N.; Kostrzewa, M.; Burckhardt, F.; Zimmermann, S. Analysis of Streptococcus pneumoniae using Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy allows prediction of capsular serotype. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 38, 1883–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  50. Song, J.; Jongmans-Hochschulz, E.; Mauder, N.; Imirzalioglu, C.; Wichels, A.; Gerdts, G. The Travelling Particles: Investigating microplastics as possible transport vectors for multidrug resistant E. coli in the Weser estuary (Germany). Sci. Total. Environ. 2020, 720, 137603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Rodrigues, C.; Sousa, C.; Lopes, J.A.; Novais, Â.; Peixe, L. A Front Line on Klebsiella pneumoniae Capsular Polysaccharide Knowledge: Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy as an Accurate and Fast Typing Tool. mSystems 2020, 5, e00386-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Hu, Y.; Zhou, H.; Lu, J.; Sun, Q.; Liu, C.; Zeng, Y.; Zhang, R. Evaluation of the IR Biotyper for Klebsiella pneumoniae typing and its potentials in hospital hygiene management. Microb. Biotechnol. 2020, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Kim, S.; Kim, H.; Reuhs, B.L.; Mauer, L.J. Differentiation of Outer Membrane Proteins from Salmonella enterica Serotypes Using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy and Chemometrics. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2006, 42, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Männing, A.; Baldauf, N.A.; Rodriguez-Romo, L.A.; Yousef, A.E.; Rodríguez-Saona, L.E. Differentiation of Salmonella Enterica Serovars and Strains in Cultures and Food Using Infrared Spectroscopic and Microspectroscopic Techniques Combined With Soft Independent Modeling of Class Analogy Pattern Recognition Analysis. J. Food Prot. 2008, 71, 2249–2256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. De Lamo-Castellví, S.; Männing, A.; Rodríguez-Saona, L.E. Fourier-transform Infrared Spectroscopy Combined With Immunomagnetic Separation as a Tool to Discriminate Salmonella Serovars. Analyst 2010, 135, 2987–2992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Preisner, O.; Guiomar, R.; Machado, J.; Menezes, J.C.; Lopes, J.A. Application of Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and chemometrics for differentiation of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis phage types. Appl. Environm. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 3538–3544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Sundaram, J.; Park, B.; Hinton, A., Jr.; Yoon, S.C.; Windham, W.R.; Lawrence, K.C. Classification and structural analysis of live and dead Salmonella cells using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and principal component analysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 991–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Campos, J.; Sousa, C.; Mourão, J.; Lopez, J.; Antunes, P.; Peixe, L. Discrimination of non-typhoid Salmonella serogroups and serotypes by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy: A comprehensive analysis. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2018, 285, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Grimont, P.A.; Weill, F.X. Antigenic Formulae of the Salmonella Serovars; WHO Collaborating Center for Reference and Research on Salmonella: Paris, France, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  60. Ashton, P.M.; Nair, S.; Peters, T.M.; Bale, J.A.; Powell, D.G.; Painset, A.; Tewolde, R.; Schaefer, U.; Jenkins, C.; Dallman, T.J.; et al. Salmonella Whole Genome Sequencing Implementation Group. Identification of Salmonella for public health surveillance using whole genome sequencing. PeerJ 2016, 4, e1752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Ibrahim, G.M.; Morin, P.M. Salmonella Serotyping Using Whole Genome Sequencing. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Yachison, C.A.; Yoshida, C.; Robertson, J.; Nash, J.H.E.; Kruczkiewicz, P.; Taboada, E.N.; Walker, M.; Reimer, A.; Christianson, S.; Nichani, A. PulseNet Canada Steering Committee, Nadon, C. The Validation and Implications of Using Whole Genome Sequencing as a Replacement for Traditional Serotyping for a National Salmonella Reference Laboratory. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ribot, E.M.; Fair, M.A.; Gautom, R.; Cameron, D.N.; Hunter, S.B.; Swaminathan, B.; Barret, T.J. Standardization of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis protocols for the subtyping of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and Shigella for PulseNet. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2006, 3, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ). Scientific Opinion on monitoring and assessment of the public health risk of “Salmonella Typhimurium-like” strains. EFSA J. 2010, 8, 1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tennant, S.M.; Diallo, S.; Haim Levy, H.; Livio, S.; Sow, S.O.; Milagritos Tapia, M.; Fields, P.I.; Mikoleit, M.; Tamboura, B.; Kotloff, K.L.; et al. Identification by PCR of non-typhoidal Salmonella enterica serovars associated with invasive infections among febrile patients in Mali. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2010, 4, e621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Barco, L.; Lettini, A.A.; Ramon, E.; Longo, A.; Saccardin, C.; Pozza, M.C.; Ricci, A. A rapid and sensitive method to identify and differentiate Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium and Salmonella enterica serotype 4,[5],12:i:- by combining traditional serotyping and multiplex polymerase chain reaction. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2011, 8, 741–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Rabsch, W.; Tschäpe, H.; Bäumler, A.J. Non-typhoidal salmonellosis: Emerging problems. Microbes Infect. 2001, 3, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Microorganisms 09 00853 g001 550
Figure 1. PCA of the O:2 serogroup (blue = Paratyphi A, yellow = other serovars).
Figure 1. PCA of the O:2 serogroup (blue = Paratyphi A, yellow = other serovars).
Microorganisms 09 00853 g001
Microorganisms 09 00853 g002 550
Figure 2. PCA of the O:4 serogroup (blue = Paratyphi B, yellow = other serovars).
Figure 2. PCA of the O:4 serogroup (blue = Paratyphi B, yellow = other serovars).
Microorganisms 09 00853 g002
Microorganisms 09 00853 g003 550
Figure 3. PCA of the O:7 serogroup (blue = Paratyphi C, yellow = other serovars).
Figure 3. PCA of the O:7 serogroup (blue = Paratyphi C, yellow = other serovars).
Microorganisms 09 00853 g003
Microorganisms 09 00853 g004 550
Figure 4. PCA of the O:8 serogroup (blue = Typhi, yellow = other serovars).
Figure 4. PCA of the O:8 serogroup (blue = Typhi, yellow = other serovars).
Microorganisms 09 00853 g004
Microorganisms 09 00853 g005 550
Figure 5. LDA of the O:2 serogroup (blue = Paratyphi A, yellow = other serovars).
Figure 5. LDA of the O:2 serogroup (blue = Paratyphi A, yellow = other serovars).
Microorganisms 09 00853 g005
Microorganisms 09 00853 g006 550
Figure 6. LDA of the O:4 serogroup (blue = Paratyphi B, yellow = other serovars).
Figure 6. LDA of the O:4 serogroup (blue = Paratyphi B, yellow = other serovars).
Microorganisms 09 00853 g006
Microorganisms 09 00853 g007 550
Figure 7. LDA of the O:7 serogroup (blue = Paratyphi C, yellow = other serovars).
Figure 7. LDA of the O:7 serogroup (blue = Paratyphi C, yellow = other serovars).
Microorganisms 09 00853 g007
Microorganisms 09 00853 g008 550
Figure 8. LDA of the O:9 serogroup (blue = Typhi, yellow = other serovars).
Figure 8. LDA of the O:9 serogroup (blue = Typhi, yellow = other serovars).
Microorganisms 09 00853 g008
Table
Table 1. Salmonella enterica isolates included in the analysis.
Table 1. Salmonella enterica isolates included in the analysis.
O-serogroup SerovarN = 359
O:2Paratyphi A23
Kiel1
Koessen1
Nitra1
O:4Paratyphi B23
Aberdeen1
Abony2
Agona6
Banana1
Brandenburg5
Bredeney1
Chester1
Coeln1
Derby8
Heidelberg2
Hessarek1
Indiana2
Kisangani1
Paratyphi B var. Java1
Saintpaul3
Schleissheim2
Schwarzengrund1
Stanleyville2
Typhimurium59
Typhimurium (monophasic variant)98
Subsp. salamae O:41
O:7Paratyphi C7
Braenderup5
Choleraesuis2
Infantis11
Isangi2
Livingstone2
Mikawasima1
Montevideo3
Ohio2
Oranienburg3
Singapore1
Strathcona2
Thompson1
Virchow1
Subsp. houtanae O:72
O:9 Typhi30
Dublin1
Enteritidis19
Javiana1
Kapemba1
Napoli9
Panama2
Zaiman1
Subsp. salamae O:9,122
Table
Table 2. Characterization of the training and the testing sets.
Table 2. Characterization of the training and the testing sets.
O-groupsTraining Set (N)Testing Set CBA (N)Testing Set TSA (N)Testing Set CHO (N)Testing Set MHA (N)
Paratyphi A (23)518232323
Non-Paratyphi A (3)33333
Paratyphi B (23)518232323
Non-Paratyphi B (199)27199199199199
Paratyphi C (7)25777
Non-Paratyphi C (38)1437383838
Typhi (30)5253030-
Non-Typhi (36)14363636-
Table
Table 3. Performance of the automated classifiers with different testing sets/media.
Table 3. Performance of the automated classifiers with different testing sets/media.
Agar MediumParameterClassifier
S. Paratyphi A		Classifier
S. Paratyphi B		Classifier
S. Paratyphi C		Classifier
S. Typhi
CBAAccuracy99.5%87.0%99%99.9%
Error rate010.8%00
Failed classification0.5%2.2%1%0.1%
Sensitivity100%77.8%100%100%
Specificity100%94.8%100%100%
Positive predictive value #100%77.8%100%100%
Negative predictive value #100%83.1%100%100%
TSAAccuracy97.0%87.8%95.5%99.6%
Error rate1%10.1%2.8%0
Failed classification2%2.1%1.7%0.4%
CHOAccuracy100%86.6%98.8%99.1%
Error rate012.0%1.2%0
Failed classification01.4%00.9%
MHAAccuracy94%84.9%94.7%-
Error rate011.7%0-
Failed classification6%3.4%5.3%-
# positive and negative predictive values are largely affected by prevalence, so these values may vary in other sample collections.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cordovana, M.; Mauder, N.; Kostrzewa, M.; Wille, A.; Rojak, S.; Hagen, R.M.; Ambretti, S.; Pongolini, S.; Soliani, L.; Justesen, U.S.; et al. Classification of Salmonella enterica of the (Para-)Typhoid Fever Group by Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 853. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms9040853

AMA Style

Cordovana M, Mauder N, Kostrzewa M, Wille A, Rojak S, Hagen RM, Ambretti S, Pongolini S, Soliani L, Justesen US, et al. Classification of Salmonella enterica of the (Para-)Typhoid Fever Group by Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(4):853. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms9040853

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cordovana, Miriam, Norman Mauder, Markus Kostrzewa, Andreas Wille, Sandra Rojak, Ralf Matthias Hagen, Simone Ambretti, Stefano Pongolini, Laura Soliani, Ulrik S. Justesen, and et al. 2021. "Classification of Salmonella enterica of the (Para-)Typhoid Fever Group by Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy" Microorganisms 9, no. 4: 853. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/microorganisms9040853

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop