Reviewing the Review: A Pilot Study of the Ethical Review Process of Animal Research in Sweden
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
pleas find my comments in the document attached
Comments for author File: Comments.pdf
Author Response
Please see attachment for response.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
Excellent paper. I only caught some typos that ought to be corrected:
347: delete "Third bullet"
428: "judged as I for this criteria": add "inadequate" in parentheses as this is the first occurrence454: "Seven" shouldn't be capitalized
464" "Neither that applications failing to account for one R did so to a greater extent for the other Rs" This sentence is missing some words though I'm not sure how the authors want it fixed.
1095: "given the weak performance of many researches" should be "researchers"
1118: "to fulfil legal and ethical criteria through review of 3R and performance of HBA" should be "fulfill" and "3Rs"
1125: "impact of animal welfare organs are strengthened" should be "organizations"
Author Response
Please see attachment for response.
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf