Next Article in Journal
R-Spondin 2 and WNT/CTNNB1 Signaling Pathways Are Required for Porcine Follicle Development and In Vitro Maturation
Next Article in Special Issue
Housing, Husbandry and Welfare of a “Classic” Fish Model, the Paradise Fish (Macropodus opercularis)
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of a Partially Perforated Flooring System on Ammonia Emissions in Broiler Housing—Conflict of Objectives between Animal Welfare and Environment?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Changing Human Behavior to Improve Animal Welfare: A Longitudinal Investigation of Training Laboratory Animal Personnel about Heterospecific Play or “Rat Tickling”
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Reviewing the Review: A Pilot Study of the Ethical Review Process of Animal Research in Sweden

by Svea Jörgensen 1, Johan Lindsjö 1, Elin M. Weber 2 and Helena Röcklinsberg 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 17 February 2021 / Revised: 24 February 2021 / Accepted: 28 February 2021 / Published: 5 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Laboratory Animals)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

pleas find my comments in the document attached

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see attachment for response.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Excellent paper. I only caught some typos that ought to be corrected:

347: delete "Third bullet" 

428: "judged as I for this criteria": add "inadequate" in parentheses as this is the first occurrence 

454: "Seven" shouldn't be capitalized 

464" "Neither that applications failing to account for one R did so to a greater extent for the other Rs" This sentence is missing some words though I'm not sure how the authors want it fixed.

1095: "given the weak performance of many researches" should be "researchers" 

1118: "to fulfil legal and ethical criteria through review of 3R and performance of HBA" should be "fulfill" and "3Rs" 

1125: "impact of animal welfare organs are strengthened" should be "organizations" 

Author Response

Please see attachment for response.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop