Next Article in Journal
Shade Modifies Behavioral and Physiological Responses of Low to Medium Production Dairy Cows at Pasture in an Integrated Crop-Livestock-Forest System
Next Article in Special Issue
Addition of Bamboo Charcoal to Selenium (Se)-Rich Feed Improves Growth and Antioxidant Capacity of Blunt Snout Bream (Megalobrama amblycephala)
Previous Article in Journal
Pilot Investigation of Anti-Salmonella Antibodies in Oral Fluids from Salmonella Typhimurium Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Swine Herds
Previous Article in Special Issue
Response in Growth, Scute Development, and Whole-Body Ion Composition of Acipenser fulvescens Reared in Water of Differing Chemistries
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fecal Excretion and Whole-Body Retention of Macro and Micro Minerals in Atlantic Salmon Fed Torula Yeast Grown on Sugar Kelp Hydrolysate

by
Jon Øvrum Hansen
1,*,
Sandeep Sharma
2,†,
Svein Jarle Horn
2,
Vincent G. H. Eijsink
2,
Margareth Øverland
1 and
Liv Torunn Mydland
1
1
Department of Animal and Aquaculture Sciences, Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), P.O. Box 5003, NO-1432 Aas, Norway
2
Faculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), P.O. Box 5003, NO-1432 Aas, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Current address: Biomar A/S, Havnegata 9, NO-7010 Trondheim, Norway.
Submission received: 11 June 2021 / Revised: 11 August 2021 / Accepted: 11 August 2021 / Published: 14 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mineral Nutrition and Metabolism in Fish)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Cultivation of seaweed for various purposes has gained more focus in Europe during the last decades. Our study demonstrates the potential of seaweed as a substrate for yeast production, uptake of seaweed minerals into the yeast, and the bioavailability of minerals from this yeast in Atlantic salmon. We show that several minerals, especially the microminerals that are normally supplemented to commercial salmon diets, can be provided by yeast produced on seaweed hydrolysate.

Abstract

Yeast is a microbial feed ingredient that can be produced from non-food biomasses. Brown seaweed contains high levels of complex carbohydrates that are not digested to any extent by monogastric animals but can be used as carbon sources for yeast production. The objective of this study was to investigate how minerals originating from brown macroalgae (Saccharina latissima) are incorporated in Cyberlindnera jadinii yeast and to assess the bioavailability of these different minerals as well as their accumulation into different organs of Atlantic salmon. The yeast C. jadinii was produced on a seaweed hydrolysate mixed with a sugar-rich wood hydrolysate in a 9:1 volume ratio and fed to Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in two different experiments: a digestibility experiment with 30% dietary inclusion of yeast and a retention experiment with increasing inclusion of yeast (5, 10, and 20%). Seaweed minerals such as zinc (Zn), copper (Cu), iodine (I), manganese (Mn), and cobalt (Co) were incorporated to a high degree in the yeast. The apparent fecal excretion of minerals was similar in both experiments, in general, with low excretion of, I, bromine (Br), and arsenic (As) (ranging from 18.0% to 63.5%) and high excretion of iron (Fe), Cu, Mn, aluminum (Al), cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) (ranging from 56.9% to <100%), despite the different fish size and fecal sampling method. High levels of Cu, I, Br, and Co in the yeast resulted in a linear decrease (p < 0.05) in retention of these minerals in salmon fed increasing levels of yeast. Despite increasing amounts of these minerals in the feed, whole-body levels of Cu and Mn remained stable, whereas whole-body levels of Co, somewhat unexpectedly, decreased with increased dietary yeast inclusion. The Cd from the yeast had low bioavailability but was concentrated more in the kidney (0.038 mg kg−1) and liver (0.025 mg kg−1) than in muscle (0.0009 mg kg−1). The given Cd level in fish strengthens the indication that it is safe to feed salmon with up to 20% inclusion of seaweed yeast without exceeding the maximum limit for Cd of 0.05 mg kg−1 w.w. in fish meat. The level and retention (p < 0.05) of As were lower in the yeast compared to fishmeal. The high level of iodine in S. latissima (3900 mg kg−1) was partly transferred to the yeast, and salmon fed increasing levels of yeast displayed a linear increase in whole-body I content (p < 0.05). There is, however, a need for a growth experiment with larger fish to draw any firm conclusions regarding food safety. Overall, this study shows that yeast grown on hydrolyzed seaweed can be a suitable mineral source for Atlantic salmon, especially when diets are low in fishmeal.

1. Introduction

Aquaculture can play a major role in meeting the global demand for protein for the growing human population. This may be dependent on sustainable feed resources that do not compete with the global food supply. Microbial ingredients from yeast, bacteria, or microalgae have the potential to fulfill this criterion. There has been increased focus on using organic-rich waste streams, mainly from food-related industries, for microbial ingredients production since this could reduce environmental problems and increase the recovery of nutrients and, thus, the sustainability of the total production chain [1,2,3].
Yeast represents a potential ingredient in aquafeeds due to its high protein content (45–60%) with favorable levels of histidine, isoleucine, and threonine but a lower level of methionine compared to fishmeal [4]. However, the cost of growth media components can constitute more than 50% of the overall cost for fermentative production of microbial biomass [5]. Hence, less expensive feedstocks for the cultivation of yeast need to be explored.
Cyberlindnera jadinii (previously classified as Candida utilis or Torula yeast) is a single-celled, protein-rich yeast belonging to the Saccharomycetes class. It has a status of generally regarded as safe (GRAS) and can metabolize a wide range of organic substrates, and has been widely used as a fodder yeast [6]. Molasses is a cheap by-product from the sugar industry and have been used worldwide for the production of both bioethanol and for the cultivation of C. jadinii [7]. In other studies, the cultivation of C. jadinii was performed using wood hydrolysates and/or sulfite spent liquor [3,8]. In a recent study, cultivation of C. jadinii was carried out using an enzymatic hydrolysate of Saccharina latissima as a source of nutrients and an enzymatic spruce hydrolysate as the main source of sugars for the fermentation [9]. One of the main challenges of using these complex sources of carbon and nutrients to cultivate C. jadinii is the risk of incorporation of unwanted components from the media that could adversely affect the growth performance and the safety and nutritional value of the fish product. Heavy metals and iodine (I) are known to accumulate in growing yeast [10,11]. In addition, yeast cells or cell wall products can absorb heavy metals [12]. Thus, one needs to consider, heavy metals, such as cadmium (Cd) and arsenic (As), as well as I, derived from the seaweed fermentation media, could be assimilated by C. jadinii, and be potentially harmful to fish and consumers [13].
The aim of the present study was to investigate how minerals originating from the brown seaweed S. latissima were incorporated in C. jadinii yeast, to analyze the bioavailability of these minerals in yeast-containing salmon feeds, and to assess their accumulation in different organs of yeast-fed Atlantic salmon. This research will increase the knowledge of using alternative marine substrates for microbial ingredient production and a key factor for increased use of green carbons and alternative mineral supplements in salmon feed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cultivation of Yeast

The present paper describes two fish feeding experiments where the yeast C. jadinii (CJS, LYCC 7549; Lallemand Yeast Culture Collection) was added as a dietary ingredient. The yeast was cultivated on a medium composed of enzymatic hydrolysates of S. latissima and spruce wood (Picea abies) mixed at a volume ratio of 9:1. The concentrated spruce hydrolysate (around 300 g L−1 glucose) was produced by the company Borregaard (Sarpsborg, Norway) in their biorefinery demonstration plant [14]. Upon mixing, the glucose concentration of the final medium was 38 g L−1. The yeast was grown in this medium in a 30 L bioreactor using a fed-batch fermentation procedure as described before [9]. After the completed fermentation, the yeasts cells were heat-inactivated, centrifuged, suspended in water, washed 3 times, and spray-dried [9]. The mineral composition of the yeast used in the digestibility and the retention experiment is given in Table 1. The 2 batches of yeast were produced with the same procedure but with different batches of seaweed hydrolysate, ending with a slight difference in mineral composition.

2.2. Biological Experiment and Facilities

The two fish feed experiments were performed at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway, which is an experimental unit approved by the National Animal Research Authority, Norway (permit no. 174). The experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of animals (the Norwegian Animal Welfare Act and the Norwegian Regulation on Animal Experimentation). In both experiments, each diet was fed to triplicate tanks, in excess of appetite, i.e., 120% of expected feed intake, to ensure maximum voluntary feed consumption. Uneaten feed was collected with a retch wire screen, according to Shomorin et al. [15]. Dissolved oxygen was measured throughout the experiments and was kept above 8.5 mg L−1. Prior to sampling, the fishes were anesthetized with 60 mg L−1 Trikainmesilat (Finquel®, Scan Aqua, Årnes, Norway) in small aerated tanks.

2.2.1. Digestibility Experiment

The digestibility experiment was performed with 240 Atlantic salmon pre-smolts with an average weight of 65 g that was distributed into 6 fiberglass tanks (300 L) and is the same fish experiment presented by Sharma et al. [9]. The average water temperature was 13.9 °C, and the fish were fed the experimental diets for 48 days. Feces were carefully stripped from all 40 fishes in each tank from the posterior as described by Austreng [16]. The stripped feces were immediately weighed and stored at −20 °C prior to freeze-drying.
A fishmeal-based control diet including yttrium oxide as a digestibility marker was mixed in a ratio of 70:30 with CJS according to Bureau and Hua [17]. The diet composition is presented in Sharma et al. [9]. The mineral compositions of the 2 diets are provided in Table 1. The diets were produced using gelatin as a binder, which was mixed in cold water and heated up to 60 °C in a microwave oven before mixing with dry ingredients and fish oil. The mash was cooled down to room temperature before pelleting using a 3 mm die (P35A, Carasco, Italy). The diets were kept frozen at −20 °C until the start of the experiment.

2.2.2. Retention Experiment

In total, 4 diets were evaluated in a retention experiment with Atlantic salmon, where 3 diets with increasing inclusion levels (5%, 10%, 20%) of CJS were tested together with a control diet (Table 2). In these diets, protein from fishmeal, soy protein concentrate, and wheat gluten were substituted with protein from yeast in a ratio related to their protein contribution in the control diet. In addition, the diets were formulated to have a similar ratio of digestible protein to digestible energy by adjusting the level of cellulose and potato starch. The protein digestibility of the yeasts was not available prior to feed production, so an estimated protein digestibility for the yeast was set to 90%. In total, 720 Atlantic salmon with an average weight of 5.4 g and age of 24 weeks post-hatching were distributed into 12 tanks. The 80-L tanks were receiving approximately 4 L recirculated freshwater per min, and oxygen and water temperature were measured daily. The feeding experiment lasted for 42 days with an average water temperature of 14.2 °C.
All fish were pooled and weighed at the start of the experiment and on days 21 and 42. On day 42, the end of the experiment, 20 fish per tank were randomly selected and frozen at −20 °C and were later sampled for kidney, liver, and feces from the distal intestine in semi-frozen conditions. In addition, a transverse section of the muscle between the cranial part of the dorsal fin and the cranial part of the anal fin was taken without skin. These samples were pooled within the tank and freeze-dried prior to analysis. In addition, 15 fish at the start and 5 fish per tank at the end of the experiment were sampled for whole-body composition. The gastrointestinal tract was dissected out and rinsed for content with deionized water and included in the pooled sample of fish, followed by freeze-drying. After freeze-drying, the fish was ground using a Braun Minipimer 3 (MR320, Melsungen, Germany).

2.3. Chemical Analyses

The ingredients and diets were analyzed for dry matter by drying to constant weight at 104 °C, crude protein using Kjeldahl nitrogen × 6.25, and ash by incineration at 550 °C (Commission Regulation (EC) No 152/2009). Crude lipid was analyzed using an Accelerated Solvent Extractor (ASE200, Dionex, CA, USA). Starch content was analyzed enzymatically based on the use of thermostable α-amylase and amylo-glucosidase [18].
The minerals were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma spectrometry with mass spectrometric detection (ICP-MS) (PerkinElmer, MA, USA). For chlorine (Cl), bromine (Br), and I analysis, the samples were digested with concentrated 25% (w/w) tetramethylammonium hydroxide, and for other analyses, samples were digested with 65% HNO3 in a high-performance microwave reactor (UltraClave, MLS Milestone, Sorisole, Italy) [19,20]. The mineral analyses were validated using certified reference materials; NCS DC73349, NCS ZC73013 (National Analysis Center for Iron and Steel, Beijing, China), CRM GBW07603 (National Research Centre for CRM, Beijing, China), BCR 422, DORM-3, DOLT-5 (The European Virtual Institute for Speciation Analysis, EVISA), and 1577b (National Institute of Standards and Technology, MD, USA).

2.4. Calculation and Statistical Analysis

To evaluate the effect of the diets on the performance of the fish, several parameters were estimated. These were:
Apparent fecal excretion = (−100 * ((ab) × a−1)) + 100
a = nutrient in feed × (yttrium oxide in feed)−1.
b = nutrient in feces × (yttrium oxide in feces)−1.
Feed conversion ratio (FCR) = feed consumed × weight gain−1
Specific growth rate (SGR) = 100 × [(ln (final mean body weight) − ln (initial mean body weight)) × day−1]
Apparent retention of minerals = 100 × ((amount of mineral deposited in fish) × (amount of mineral ingested by the fish) −1).
Calculations were based on total biomass increase and total feed intake in each tank
All statistical analyses were performed either using linear and quadratic regressions or one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey HSD as a post-hoc test. Regressions were used to observe the effect of the increased level of dietary yeast on the rate of mineral excretion, retention, and tissue content in Atlantic salmon. The best models were selected based on R2, residual plot, and significance level. All parameters were based on the tank as a statistical unit (n = 3), and the fish performance analyses were conducted with the General Linear Models procedure in the SAS software package (SAS/STAT Version 9.4. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.

3. Results

Table 1 shows the mineral compositions of the ingredients and diets used in the present study, including the mineral compositions of S. latissima, fishmeal, and the C. jadinii yeast grown on S. latissima. Compared to the fish meal, the yeast had a numerically higher content of copper (Cu), I, manganese (Mn), cobalt (Co), nickel (Ni), and chromium (Cr), and lower content of calcium (Ca), phosphorous (P), potassium (K), and As.
Both the digestibility and the retention experiment were performed as planned, and there was no mortality of fish during the experimental period. The fish in the digestibility trial grew from an average of 65 to 95 g during the experiment with an SGR of 0.8. For the retention experiment, the overall performance of the fish was suitable, with an SGR ranging from 3.23 to 3.41 (Table 3). Final weights and SGR of fish fed increased levels of yeast had a trend to follow a quadratic pattern with an optimum of around 5% yeast inclusion. The FCR increased linearly from 0.58 to 0.66 in salmon fed an increased level of yeast.
The apparent fecal mineral excretion from the same experiment is presented in Table 4. The level of I excretion was 23.4% and 23.5% for the control and CJS fed fish, respectively. The fecal excretion of As and Br was low with approximately 15% and 35% for the control and CJS fed fish, respectively. The excretion of iron (Fe), Cu, aluminum (Al), and Cd was generally high (<84.6%) for both dietary treatments. The apparent fecal excretion of the minerals was also analyzed in the retention experiment, showing similarities with the digestibility experiment, namely low excretion of magnesium (Mg) I, Br, and As (ranging from 18.0% to 63.5%) and high excretion of Fe, Cu, Mn, Al, Cd, and lead (Pb) (ranging from 56.9% to <100%) (Table 5).
In-depth analysis of the accumulation of macro minerals in the retention experiment showed that whole-body contents of Ca, P, Cl, and Mg increased linearly with increased levels of dietary CJS inclusion (Table 6). As for the micro minerals, I and Cd content increased linearly, whereas Co and As decreased linearly in the whole body of salmon fed increased yeast inclusion. The level of Fe, Br, and Al followed a quadratic pattern with no clear optimum. The level of Fe and Br was highest in fish fed the 20% yeast inclusion shown by the ANOVA. Studies at the organ level showed that the content of K, sodium (Na), and Mg in the kidney followed a quadratic pattern with R2 values ranging from 0.34 to 0.36 for the macro minerals (Table 7). For the micro minerals in the kidney, Zn, Cu, Se, As, and Cd followed a quadratic curve with an average minimum level for fish fed 5% yeast. The content of I increased linearly from 2.2 to 8.7 mg kg−1, and zinc (Zn) increased linearly from 220 to 280 mg kg−1. In muscle, there was a significant increase in selenium (Se) and I and a decrease in Se and Co with increased dietary yeast inclusion (Table 8). Among the macro minerals in the liver, the content of Ca, P, sulfur (S) and Mg, all fitted a quadratic regression line with a minimum level between 5% and 10% yeast inclusion (Table 9). The level of Zn and I increased linearly while the content of Mn, Br, and Cd followed a quadratic line with a minimum of 5% yeast inclusion. Levels for all analyzed minerals were numerically higher in the liver and kidney compared to muscle, except for As.
The apparent whole-body retention values provided in Table 10 show in percentage how much of the ingested minerals ended up being stored in the fish body. Some of the minerals show high retention levels, sometimes even exceeding 100%, such as P and K. The apparent retention of K and Na both followed a quadratic line with a maximum of around 10% yeast inclusion. The retention of Cl and S decreased, whereas P and Mg increased linearly in salmon fed increased levels of yeast. Regarding the micro minerals, the retention of Cu, I, Co, Br, and As decreased linearly in salmon fed increased yeast levels. Both I, Co, Br, and As had significantly higher retention in the control-fed group compared to the yeast-fed groups, as shown by ANOVA. The retention of Al was generally low (2.79–9.45) and followed a quadratic regression line with a minimum of 5% yeast inclusion. The retention of Mn, Cd, and Pb was generally low (<11.6%) and independent of dietary treatment.

4. Discussion

The present study focused on the accumulation of minerals originating from seaweed hydrolysate into C. jadinii yeast, and further, the bioavailability of these minerals in Atlantic salmon fed this yeast. Sharma et al. [9] showed that relatively high levels of I, Cr, As, Cu, Cd, and Br occur in hydrolyzed seaweed and in the produced yeast post-fermentation. This is in agreement with the known ability of live yeast cells to take up and accumulate a wide range of minerals, especially divalent cations such as Cu2+, Co2+, and Cd2+ [10,21]. Norris and Kelly [22] demonstrated for Saccharomyces cerevisiae that uptake of divalent cations was divided into two processes: first, a metabolism-independent accumulation (cation binding to molecules on the cell surface), followed by progressive, metabolism-dependent uptake. Failla et al. [23] showed that C. jadinii has a similar ability to accumulate cations as S. cerevisiae.
This ability to accumulate and absorb minerals has gained increased focus during the last years, with a focus on the removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewater [24]. The yeasts’ capability to take up minerals is also used to produce organic bound selenium yeast, where sodium selenite is added to the yeast growth medium, and Se is incorporated into the protein as selenomethionine [25]. Other minerals such as Zn, Mg, Cr, Co, I, Cr, and Mo could also be incorporated in yeast [26], and the resulting organically complexed minerals have shown promising bioavailability in chickens [27], rats [28], and for selenium in fish [29].
The protein digestibility of the yeast grown on seaweed and wood hydrolysates was 40.5%, indicating a low availability of the intracellular yeast proteins [9]. The low digestibility of unprocessed yeast can be explained by the intact robust cell walls of the yeast, which limit protein digestion [30,31]. While the bioavailability of minerals bound in the yeast may also be affected by the rigid cell wall, the present study showed that different minerals from the yeast have different bioavailability. When evaluating the performance parameters in the retention experiment, the lower protein digestibility of the yeast is reflected by the increased FCR in fish fed increased levels of yeast.
The level of macro minerals was numerically higher in the FM compared to the yeasts, except for S and Mg. Despite the lower levels of Ca and P in the yeast, there was increased retention and whole-body composition of Ca, P, and Mg in fish fed increasing levels of yeast. This was partly supported by the excretion values, apart from the high excretion levels in fish fed the highest yeast level. It is also worth mentioning that fecal excretion of minerals in fish can be confounded by the ability of fish to use additional minerals from the rearing water. Fecal excretion of Na was higher than 100%, implying that excretion of Na in the feces was greater than the level supplied through the diets. Therefore, the excess minerals in the feces might come from gill and skin uptake, which was not accounted for in the digestibility calculations.
Micro minerals such as Fe, Zn, Cu, Se, Mn, and Co are all essential for Atlantic salmon [32]. Recent research has shown that supplementation of micronutrients needs to be increased when diets high in plant proteins are used during the full production cycle of Atlantic salmon [33]. This is particularly relevant for minerals such as Zn and Se, which can be prevented taken up by phytic acid [34]. In the present experiment, Zn was effectively stored in the yeast, and yeast can thus be a suitable source of Zn in high plant diets. Fecal excretion of Zn varied a lot between the two experiments described above, with very high excretion levels in the retention trial. The reason for this is unclear but could be partly due to the different sizes (age) of fish. However, the level of Zn in the liver (on average 106 mg kg−1), kidney (on average 225 mg kg−1), muscle (on average 25 mg kg−1), and whole body (on average 145 mg kg−1) indicate that some Zn is absorbed and then excreted. Thus, the Zn bioavailability in the retention experiment is not as low as indicated by the fecal excretion values. The level of Mn and Co was high in the yeast compared to the FM. The dietary level of Co in the retention experiment was above the upper limit for fish feed, which is set at 1 mg kg−1. This may be caused by a possible high Co level in the mineral premix used since the screening of mineral premixes used in Norwegian salmon farming showed variation from 2 to 41 mg kg−1 [35]. The bioavailability of Co from this yeast was low, as indicated by a linear increase in fecal excretion and a decrease in retention when feeding increased levels of yeast.
The seaweed used in this study contained 1.1 mg Cd kg−1 DM, which is in line with the average content of 148 samples of S. latissima (0.94 mg kg−1) presented by Duinker et al. [36]. The level of Cd (0.78 mg kg−1) found in the final dried yeast shows that Cd, as a part of the divalent cations, had been taken up and stored by the live yeast as described by Brady et al. [10]. The Cd had low availability for the salmon in the present study, as shown by high fecal excretion and reduced retention with increased yeast inclusion. Despite the low availability, there was a small but significant increased level of Cd in the whole body. Especially the kidney had an increased level of Cd with increased yeast inclusion. This is in line with previous findings describing higher levels of Cd accumulation in the kidney and liver compared to muscle and the whole body of fish fed increased dietary levels of Cd [37,38]. In the present study, the diet with the highest yeast inclusion had a Cd level of 0.3 mg kg−1, which is low, but did lead to a detectable increase in the Cd content of the fish. In stark contrast to these observations, Berntssen et al. [38], when feeding Atlantic salmon with increasing levels of Cd (up to 250 mg kg−1 feed) for 4 months, did not observe significant accumulation in gut, kidney, nor muscle for levels below 5 mg Cd kg−1, which is a considerably higher than the levels used in the present experiment. This, together with the low absolute values of Cd in salmon muscle, strengthen the indication that it is safe to feed salmon with up to 20% inclusion of yeast grown on S. latissima hydrolysate without exceeding the maximum limit for Cd of 0.05 mg kg−1 w.w. in fish meat (EC no. 1881/2006).
The level of Pb and Al was also higher in the final yeast compared to FM, and the average level of Pb in S. latissima was found to be 0.33 mg kg−1 [36], which is twice the amount of what was found in the present yeast. Importantly, the levels of both Pb and Al were generally low, and the availability in the salmon was also low, as shown by high fecal excretion and low retention. The higher Pb level found in the kidney, compared to liver and muscle is in line with a study by Alves et al. [39], who showed that increased dietary Pb levels resulted in increased Pb accumulation in the kidney and liver of rainbow trout. The level of Pb in the muscle of fish fed the highest yeast diet was 0.0021 mg kg−1 w.w. and the maximum level allowed in fish muscle is 0.3 mg kg−1 w.w. (EC no. 1881/2006). It should, however, be specified that the average body weight of the present fish was only 22.5 g at the end of the trial and that a proper growth experiment with larger fish is needed to draw any firm conclusions regarding food safety.
The level of As can be high in S. latissima, ranging from 23 to 60 mg kg−1 in cultivated S. latissima and up to 95 mg kg−1 in the wild seaweed [40,41]. A major part of this As exists as organic forms, and thus, the level of the more toxic inorganic As is low in S. latissima [40,41]. In the present experiment, the level of total As was higher in the FM compared to the produced yeast with 11 and 4.2 mg kg−1, respectively. The level of As in FM was high but within the normal range found in Norwegian high-quality FM [42]. Both of the present experiments showed increased fecal excretion of As in yeast-fed fish compared to FM-fed fish. This indicates that the As in yeast has lower bioavailability compared to As from FM. This is supported by the observed decreased levels of As in both muscle and whole body. In comparison to other minerals, the relative abundance of As was higher in muscle compared to liver and kidney. The latter is in line with Francesconi et al. [43], who found increased levels of As in the muscle of yelloweye mullet after feeding with arsenobetaine, which is the most common form of As found in marine fish.
As expected, the level of I was high in the S. latissima (Table 1), and this led to the presence of 290 mg kg−1 in the yeast. Similarly, high levels of I were found in black soldier fly larvae that had been fed with the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum [44]. In the retention experiment, the I content in the fish feed increased from 6.1 mg kg−1 in the control feed to 63 mg kg−1 for the diet with 20% yeast inclusion. This was reflected in a linear increased I content in all tested tissues, and the whole body of the Atlantic salmon fed increased yeast inclusion levels. The percentage of retained I decreased linearly with increased I intake, which indicates low bioavailability. The I level in both liver and kidney was close to five times higher compared to muscle and whole body. This is in line with Julshamn et al. [45], who described lower incorporation of I in muscle than in liver and kidney of Atlantic salmon that had been raised for 150 days in seawater and fed 54 or 86 mg I kg−1 diet. In accordance with the present results, experiments with rainbow trout in freshwater have shown increased I levels in the fish after feeding different seaweeds and that the I concentration in muscle was dependent on the dietary level of I and the length/percent body weight increase obtained [46,47].
A moderate I deficiency is present in many countries, especially for pregnant women [48]. Due to this, there has been a focus on enriching meat or fish with I, for which seaweed could be a suitable source. Julshamn et al. [45] showed that salmon fed an I level of 86 mg kg−1 obtained an I level in the wet fillet of 0.9 mg kg−1. A 200 g meal of this fillet would thus fulfill the recommended daily intake of 150 µg I [49]. In comparison, the highest I level in muscle in the present paper was 0.7 mg kg−1 w.w. and a 200 g fillet would thus almost fulfill the recommended daily intake of I. Of note, I levels in several wild marine fish, such as cod or pollack, can have much higher I levels, ranging from 3 to 22 mg kg−1 w.w. [50]. It is also worth noting that 40% of the commercial salmon feeds tested in 2019 had lower I contents (0.6–1.1 mg kg−1) than what is recommended for Chinook salmon reared in freshwater [35]. The latter underpins that yeast fermented on seaweed hydrolysate can be a great source of I supplementation to compensate for reduced levels of marine ingredients. If the I levels should become too high, pretreatment of seaweed, such as blanching in hot water [41], can effectively reduce these levels.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, micro minerals such as Zn, Cu, I, Mn, and Co from the seaweed hydrolysate were incorporated to a high degree in the yeast. The apparent fecal excretion of minerals was similar in both experiments with Atlantic salmon, despite different fish sizes and fecal sampling methods. The Cd and As from the yeast had low bioavailability. The Cd was up-concentrated more in kidney and liver than in muscle, whereas it was the opposite for As. The concentration of I was high in both seaweed and yeast, and the I was further deposited in all organs of the salmon fed increased dietary I level. Overall, this study shows that yeast grown on hydrolyzed seaweed can be a suitable mineral source for Atlantic salmon.

Author Contributions

Validation, J.Ø.H. and S.S.; Formal analysis, J.Ø.H. and S.S.; Investigation, J.Ø.H. and S.S.; Project administration, J.Ø.H. and S.S.; Writing—Original draft preparation, J.Ø.H. and S.S.; Supervision, J.Ø.H., S.J.H., V.G.H.E., M.Ø. and L.T.M.; Conceptualization, S.J.H., V.G.H.E., M.Ø. and L.T.M.; Writing—Reviewing and Editing, S.J.H., V.G.H.E., M.Ø. and L.T.M.; Funding acquisition, S.J.H., V.G.H.E., M.Ø. and L.T.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by a Ph.D. fellowship from NMBU, the Norwegian University of Life Sciences, to S.S. and by the Research Council of Norway through grant 239003, BIOFEED- Novel salmon feed by integrated bioprocessing of non-food biomass and grant 237841, Foods of Norway, a center for research-based innovation. Infrastructure was partly funded by the Norwegian Research Council through grants 226247 (NorBioLab) and 208674 (Pilot plant facilities for food processing).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The two fish feed experiments were performed at the Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Ås, Norway, which is an experimental unit approved by the National Animal Research Authority, Norway (permit no. 174). The experimental procedures were performed in accordance with the institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of animals (the Norwegian Animal Welfare Act and the Norwegian Regulation on Animal Experimentation).

Data Availability Statement

Data is available on request from the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Karimi, S.; Soofiani, N.M.; Mahboubi, A.; Taherzadeh, M.J. Use of organic wastes and industrial by-products to produce Filamentous fungi with potential as aqua-feed ingredients. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Lapeña, D.; Olsen, P.M.; Arntzen, M.Ø.; Kosa, G.; Passoth, V.; Eijsink, V.G.H.; Horn, S.J. Spruce sugars and poultry hydrolysate as growth medium in repeated fed-batch fermentation processes for production of yeast biomass. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2019, 43, 723–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Lapeña, D.; Kosa, G.; Hansen, L.D.; Mydland, L.T.; Passoth, V.; Horn, S.J.; Eijsink, V.G.H. Production and characterization of yeasts grown on media composed of spruce-derived sugars and protein hydrolysates from chicken by-products. Microb. Cell Factories 2020, 19, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Øverland, M.; Skrede, A. Yeast derived from lignocellulosic biomass as a sustainable feed resource for use in aquaculture. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 733–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Walker, G.M.; Stewart, G.G. Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the production of fermented beverages. Beverages 2016, 2, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bekatorou, A.; Psarianos, C.; Koutinas, A.A. Production of food grade yeasts. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2006, 44, 407–415. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gönen, F.; Aksu, Z. Use of response surface methodology (RSM) in the evaluation of growth and copper(II) bioaccumulation properties of Candida utilis in molasses medium. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 154, 731–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mikulášová, M.; Vodný, Š.; Pekarovičová, A. Influence of phenolics on biomass production by Candida utilis and Candida albicans. Biomass 1990, 23, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sharma, S.; Hansen, L.D.; Hansen, J.Ø.; Mydland, L.T.; Horn, S.J.; Øverland, M.; Eijsink, V.G.H.; Vuoristo, K.S. Microbial protein produced from brown seaweed and spruce wood as a feed ingredient. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2018, 66, 8328–8335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Brady, D.; Duncan, J. Bioaccumulation of metal cations by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1994, 41, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dolińska, B.; Zieliński, M.; Dobrzański, Z.; Chojnacka, K.; Opaliński, S.; Ryszka, F. Influence of incubation conditions on hydrolysis efficiency and iodine enrichment in baker’s yeast. Biol. Trace Element Res. 2012, 147, 354–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Volesky, B.; Holan, Z. Biosorption of heavy metals. Biotechnol. Prog. 1995, 11, 235–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Duinker, A.; Roiha, I.S.; Amlund, H.; Dahl, L.; Lock, E.-J.; Kögel, T.; Måge, A.; Lunestad, B.T. Potential Risks Posed by Macroalgae for Application as Feed and Food—A Norwegian Perspective; National Institute of Nutrition Seafood Research: Trondheim, Norway, 2016; pp. 1–24. Available online: https://www.mattilsynet.no/mat_og_vann/produksjon_av_mat/fisk_og_sjomat/rapport_makroalger_2016_nifes.23097/binary/Rapport%20makroalger%202016%20Nifes (accessed on 3 February 2021).
  14. Costa, T.H.F.; Kadic’, A.; Chylenski, P.; Várnai, A.; Bengtsson, O.; Lidén, G.; Eijsink, V.G.; Horn, S.J. Demonstration-scale enzymatic saccharification of sulfite-pulped spruce with addition of hydrogen peroxide for LPMO activation. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin. 2020, 14, 734–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Shomorin, G.O.; Storebakken, T.; Kraugerud, O.F.; Øverland, M.; Hansen, B.R.; Hansen, J.Ø.; Oluwaseun, S.G. Evaluation of wedge wire screen as a new tool for faeces collection in digestibility assessment in fish: The impact of nutrient leaching on apparent digestibility of nitrogen, carbon and sulphur from fishmeal, soybean meal and rapeseed meal-based diets in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture 2019, 504, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Austreng, E. Digestibility determination in fish using chromic oxide marking and analysis of contents from different segments of the gastrointestinal tract. Aquaculture 1978, 13, 265–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bureau, D.; Hua, K. Letter to the editor of Aquaculture. Aquaculture 2006, 252, 103–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. McCleary, B.; Solah, V.; Gibson, T. Quantitative measurement of total starch in cereal flours and products. J. Cereal Sci. 1994, 20, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mesko, M.F.; Mello, P.A.; Bizzi, C.A.; Dressler, V.L.; Knapp, G.; Flores, É.M.M. Iodine determination in food by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry after digestion by microwave-induced combustion. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2010, 398, 1125–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bosnak, C.; Pruszkowski, E. The determination of toxic, essential, and nutritional elements in food matrices using an ICP-MS. Am. Lab. 2011, 43, 11–14. [Google Scholar]
  21. Massoud, R.; Hadiani, M.R.; Hamzehlou, P.; Khosravi-Darani, K. Bioremediation of heavy metals in food industry: Application of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2019, 37, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Norris, P.R.; Kelly, D.P. Accumulation of Cadmium and Cobalt by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1977, 99, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Failla, M.L.; Benedict, C.D.; Weinberg, E.D. Accumulation and storage of Zn2+ by Candida utilis. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1976, 94, 23–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Beni, A.A.; Esmaeili, A. Biosorption, an efficient method for removing heavy metals from industrial effluents: A Review. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2020, 17, 100503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Moesgaard, S.; Paulin, H. Selenium yeast product, a method of preparing a selenium yeast product and the use of the product for preparing food, a dietary supplement or a drug. U.S. Patent US20050089530A1, 14 March 2003. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wicking, J.B.; Bian, Y.; Pu, A.; Petersen, K.M. Mineral Enriched Natural Supplements. U.S. Patent 2018/0035704A1, 9 February 2018. [Google Scholar]
  27. Bao, Y.M.; Choct, M.; Iji, P.A.; Bruerton, K. Effect of organically complexed copper, iron, manganese, and zinc on broiler performance, mineral excretion, and accumulation in tissues. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2007, 16, 448–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vinson, J.A.; Tompkins, T.A.; Agbor, G.A. Comparative bioavailability of mineral-enriched gluconates and yeast in rat liver after depletion–repletion feeding. Biol. Trace Element Res. 2007, 118, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Berntssen, M.; Betancor, M.; Caballero, M.J.; Hillestad, M.; Rasinger, J.; Hamre, K.; Sele, V.; Amlund, H.; Ørnsrud, R. Safe limits of selenomethionine and selenite supplementation to plant-based Atlantic salmon feeds. Aquaculture 2018, 495, 617–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rumsey, G.; Hughes, S.; Smith, R.; Kinsella, J.; Shetty, K. Digestibility and energy values of intact, disrupted and extracts from brewer’s dried yeast fed to rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 1991, 33, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hansen, J.Ø.; Lagos, L.; Lei, P.; Reveco-Urzua, F.E.; Morales-Lange, B.; Hansen, L.D.; Schiavone, M.; Mydland, L.T.; Arntzen, M.Ø.; Mercado, L.; et al. Down-stream processing of baker’s yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae)—Effect on nutrient digestibility and immune response in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture 2021, 530, 735707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Watanabe, T.; Kiron, V.; Satoh, S. Trace minerals in fish nutrition. Aquaculture 1997, 151, 185–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Vera, L.M.; Hamre, K.; Espe, M.; Hemre, G.-I.; Skjærven, K.; Lock, E.-J.; Prabhu, A.J.; Leeming, D.; Migaud, H.; Tocher, D.R.; et al. Higher dietary micronutrients are required to maintain optimal performance of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fed a high plant material diet during the full production cycle. Aquaculture 2020, 528, 735551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Silva, M.S.; Kröckel, S.; Prabhu, P.A.J.; Koppe, W.; Ørnsrud, R.; Waagbø, R.; Araujo, P.; Amlund, H. Apparent availability of zinc, selenium and manganese as inorganic metal salts or organic forms in plant-based diets for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture 2019, 503, 562–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ørnsrud, R.; Silva, M.S.; Berntssen, M.H.; Lundebye, A.-K.; Storesund, J.E.; Lie, K.K.; Waagbø, R.; Sele, V. Program for over-Våking av Fiskefôr-Årsrapport for Prøver Innsamlet i 2019. Rapport fra Havforskningen 2020. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2688380 (accessed on 14 March 2021).
  36. Duinker, A.; Kleppe, M.; Fjære, E.; Biancarosa, I.; Heldal, H.E.; Dahl, L.; Lunestad, B.T. Knowledge Update on Macroalgae Food and Feed Safety-Based on Data Generated in the Period 2014–2019 by the Institute of Marine Research, Norway. Rapport fra Havforskningen 2020. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2712528 (accessed on 15 March 2021).
  37. Lundebye, A.-K.; Berntssen, M.; Bonga, S.; Maage, A. Biochemical and physiological responses in Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar) Following dietary exposure to copper and cadmium. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1999, 39, 137–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Berntssen, M.H.; Aspholm, O.Ø.; Hylland, K.; Bonga, S.E.W.; Lundebye, A.-K. Tissue metallothionein, apoptosis and cell proliferation responses in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) parr fed elevated dietary cadmium. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2001, 128, 299–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Alves, L.C.; Glover, C.N.; Wood, C.M. Dietary Pb accumulation in juvenile freshwater rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2006, 51, 615–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Raab, A.; Newcombe, C.; Pitton, D.; Ebel, R.; Feldmann, J. Comprehensive Analysis of lipophilic arsenic species in a brown alga (Saccharina latissima). Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 2817–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Blikra, M.J.; Skipnes, D.; Noriega Fernández, E.; Skåra, T. Utfordringer knyttet til Prosessering og Analyse av Norsk Tare, Med Fokus på Sukkertare og Butare. Nofima Rapportserie 2020. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2674387 (accessed on 10 February 2021).
  42. Lundebye, A.-K.; Bakkejord, J.A.; Nøstbakken, O.J.; Lie, K.K.; Sele, V.; Ørnsrud, R. Program for Fremmedstoffer i Fôrmidler av Fisk-Rapport for Innsamlede Prøver 2019. Rapport fra Havforskningen 2020. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2689507 (accessed on 14 March 2021).
  43. Francesconi, K.A.; Edmonds, J.S.; Stick, R.V. Accumulation of arsenic in yelloweye mullet (Aldrichetta forsteri) following oral administration of organoarsenic compounds and arsenate. Sci. Total Environ. 1989, 79, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Liland, N.S.; Biancarosa, I.; Araujo, P.; Biemans, D.; Bruckner, C.G.; Waagbo, R.; Torstensen, B.E.; Lock, E.-J. Modulation of nutrient composition of black soldier fly (Hermetia illucens) larvae by feeding seaweed-enriched media. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0183188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Julshamn, K.; Maage, A.; Waagbo, R.; Lundebye, A.-K. A preliminary study on tailoring of fillet iodine concentrations in adult Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) through dietary supplementation. Aquac. Nutr. 2006, 12, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ribeiro, A.R.; Gonçalves, A.; Bandarra, N.; Nunes, M.L.; Dinis, M.T.; Dias, J.; Rema, P. Natural fortification of trout with dietary macroalgae and selenised-yeast increases the nutritional contribution in iodine and selenium. Food Res. Int. 2017, 99, 1103–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Granby, K.; Amlund, H.; Valente, L.M.; Dias, J.; Adoff, G.; Sousa, V.; Marques, A.; Sloth, J.J.; Larsen, B.K. Growth performance, bioavailability of toxic and essential elements and nutrients, and biofortification of iodine of rainbow trout (Onchorynchus mykiss) fed blends with sugar kelp (Saccharina latissima). Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 141, 111387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Markhus, M.W.; Hysing, M.; Midtbø, L.K.; Nerhus, I.; Næss, S.; Aakre, I.; Kvestad, I.; Dahl, L.; Kjellevold, M. Effects of two weekly servings of cod for 16 weeks in pregnancy on maternal iodine status and infant neurodevelopment: Mommy’s food, a randomized-controlled trial. Thyroid 2021, 31, 288–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Stagnaro-Green, A.; Abalovich, M.; Alexander, E.K.; Azizi, F.; Mestman, J.H.; Negro, R.; Nixon, A.; Pearce, E.N.; Soldin, O.P.; Sullivan, S.; et al. Guidelines of the American Thyroid Association for the diagnosis and management of thyroid disease during pregnancy and postpartum. Thyroid 2011, 21, 1081–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Nerhus, I.; Markhus, M.W.; Nilsen, B.M.; Øyen, J.; Maage, A.; Ødegård, E.R.; Midtbø, L.K.; Frantzen, S.; Kögel, T.; Graff, I.E.; et al. Iodine content of six fish species, Norwegian dairy products and hen’s egg. Food Nutr. Res. 2018, 62, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Table 1. Macro and micro minerals present in the native Saccharina latissima, Cyberlindnera jadinii (CJS, produced from S. latissima and woody hydrolysates) used in either the digestibility (CJSDig) or the retention experiment (CJSRet) with Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and the fishmeal used in both experiments. Mineral composition of diets used in either the digestibility (Cont and CJS30) or the retention experiment with Atlantic salmon fed increasing level of CJS.
Table 1. Macro and micro minerals present in the native Saccharina latissima, Cyberlindnera jadinii (CJS, produced from S. latissima and woody hydrolysates) used in either the digestibility (CJSDig) or the retention experiment (CJSRet) with Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and the fishmeal used in both experiments. Mineral composition of diets used in either the digestibility (Cont and CJS30) or the retention experiment with Atlantic salmon fed increasing level of CJS.
DigestibilityRetention
Native S. latissimaFMCJSDigCJSRetCont aCJS30Cont5% CJS10% CJS20% CJS
Macro mineralsg kg−1
Ca48352.45.7201718171617
P4.4223.71.0129.812111111
K96137.89.16.87.77.46.97.18.1
Na49117.28.365.46.36.166.3
Cl130181116.0109.1109.79.79.7
S9.98.78.611.05.88.266.77.18.4
Mg7.01.91.11.91.31.11.41.41.41.3
Micro mineralsmg kg−1
Fe120100190140120100120150160170
Zn466112072210150210200200210
Cu2.42.61316121111111214
Se2.12.30.640.581.20.961.41.31.31.3
I39002.54102906.1886.1213563
Mn4.73.27.753263031323438
Co0.120.040.540.351.20.811.41.31.31.3
Ni1.00.572.62.11.21.20.530.660.740.93
Br160082120105385339424652
Cr1.90.943.32.62.11.91.10.951.01.3
Al683.83.18.96737769181 83
As44113.84.26.35.25.74.64.54.7
Cd1.10.180.340.780.100.310.130.180.230.3
Pb0.400.030.0390.160.280.160.160.240.230.22
a Diet composition; fishmeal, 481.8 g kg−1; wheat gluten, 130.0 g kg−1; gelatinized potato starch, 120.0 g kg−1; fish oil, 150.0 g kg−1; vitamin and mineral premix, 70.0 g kg−1; MCP, 0.2 g kg−1; choline chloride, 2.0 g kg−1; yttrium oxide (Y2O3), 1.5 × 10−3 g kg−1. Detailed information on these ingredients can be found under Table 2.
Table 2. Diet formulation and calculated chemical composition of the diets used in the retention experiment with Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): a fishmeal control (FM), and three diets with increasing levels of Cyberlindnera jadinii (CJS).
Table 2. Diet formulation and calculated chemical composition of the diets used in the retention experiment with Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): a fishmeal control (FM), and three diets with increasing levels of Cyberlindnera jadinii (CJS).
Ingredients, g kg−1Control5% CJS10% CJS20% CJS
Fishmeal a450432414379
CJS050100200
Soy protein concentrate b50484642
Wheat gluten c90868376
Potato starch d1201048763
Cellulose e504030
Gelatin f100100100100
Fish oil g130130130130
MCP h2222
Choline i1.51.51.51.5
Mineral and vitamin premix j6.56.56.56.5
Yttrium oxide k0.150.150.150.15
Composition, g kg−1
Dry matter93.093.293.394.2
Crude protein493493494495
Crude lipid177176175173
Starch103927964
Ash22263037
DP: DE ratio l22.622.722.722.7
a LT fishmeal, Norsildmel, Egersund, Norway; b soybean protein concentrate, Lyckeby Culinar, Fjälkinge, Sweden; c wheat gluten, Amilina AB, Panevezys, Lithuania; d Lygel F 60, Lyckeby Culinar, Fjälkinge, Sweden; e Alpha-Cel™ C100, International Fibre Europe NV, Temse, Belgium; f Rousselot® 250 PS, Rousselot SAS, Courbevoie, France; g NorSalmOil, Norsildmel, Egersund, Norway; h monocalsium phosphate, Bolifor® MCP-F, Oslo, Norway Yara; i choline chloride, 70% vegetable, Indukern s.a., Barcelona, Spain; j premix fish, Norsk Mineralnæring AS, Hønefoss, Norway. Per kg feed; retinol 3150.0 IU, cholecalciferol 1890.0 IU, α-tocopherol SD 250 mg, menadione 12.6 mg, thiamin 18.9 mg, riboflavin 31.5 mg, d-Ca-Pantothenate 37.8 mg, niacin 94.5 mg, biotin 0.315 mg, cyanocobalamin 0.025 mg, folic acid 6.3 mg, pyridoxine 37.8 mg, ascorbate monophosphate 157.5 g, Cu: CuSulfate 5H2O 6.3 mg, Zn: ZnSulfate 151.2 mg, Mn: Mn(II)Sulfate 18.9 mg, I: K-Iodide 3.78 mg, Ca 1.4 g; k yttrium oxide, Metal Rare Earth Limited, Shenzhen, China; l DP:DE = digestible protein: digestible energy ratio. Calculated based on internal values.
Table 3. Weights, feed conversion ratio (FCR), and specific growth rate (SGR) for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fed increasing dietary levels of Cyberlindnera jadinii (CJS) in the retention experiment.
Table 3. Weights, feed conversion ratio (FCR), and specific growth rate (SGR) for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fed increasing dietary levels of Cyberlindnera jadinii (CJS) in the retention experiment.
Control5% CJS10% CJS20% CJSSEM 1p-Value 2PR2PR2
ANOVALinearQuadratic
Start weight (g fish−1) 0 d5.4 5.4 5.5 5.4 0.070.220.570.030.91<0.01
Final weight (g fish−1) 42 d22.522.7 22.8 21.2 1.10.380.140.200.0840.27
Feed intake (g fish−1)9.6510.310.210.10.640.600.580.030.83<0.01
FCR 0–42 d0.58 a0.6 ab0.6 ab0.66 b0.020.00840.00070.700.00140.66
SGR 0–42 d3.40 3.413.373.23 0.120.400.0980.250.0720.29
1 Pooled standard error of the mean; 2 p-value is given for ANOVA. Different letters indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among diets within a row. p-value and R2 are given for linear and quadratic regression. n = 3 replicate tanks per treatment.
Table 4. Apparent fecal excretion (% of ingested) of minerals from the digestibility experiment with Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fed 30% Cyberlindnera jadinii (CJS, produced from S. latissima and woody hydrolysates).
Table 4. Apparent fecal excretion (% of ingested) of minerals from the digestibility experiment with Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fed 30% Cyberlindnera jadinii (CJS, produced from S. latissima and woody hydrolysates).
ControlCJS30%SEM 1p-Value
Macro minerals%
Ca95.9 a112 b2.890.0021
P54.9 a51.3 b0.710.0036
K4.8 b7.1 a0.330.0012
Na104 b194 a6.30.0003
Cl23.1 b42.0 a2.60.0009
S32.9 b59.8 a1.56<0.0001
Mg33.7 b43.1 a1.560.0018
Micro minerals%
Fe92.21048.450.17
Zn65.0 a55.5 b1.340.001
Cu84.6 b112 a3.220.0005
Se44.0 b58.2 a1.630.0004
I23.423.50.560.89
Mn88.7 b108 a2.30.0005
Co81.8 b106 a3.90.0015
Ni52.1 b105 a7.10.0008
Br17.3 a34.8 b2.40.0008
Cr51.4 b85.4 a7.20.0045
Al10812022.00.52
As12.8 b34.7 a0.59<0.0001
Cd97.492.52.30.059
Pb68.3 b116.7 a5.70.0005
1 Pooled standard error of the mean. p-value given for the ANOVA where the different superscript indicates significant difference among diets (p < 0.05). n = 3 replicate tanks per treatment.
Table 5. Fecal excretion (% of ingested) of macro and micro minerals from Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in the retention experiment where salmon were fed increasing levels of Cyberlindnera jadinii (CJS).
Table 5. Fecal excretion (% of ingested) of macro and micro minerals from Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in the retention experiment where salmon were fed increasing levels of Cyberlindnera jadinii (CJS).
Control5% CJS10% CJS20% CJSSEM 1p-Value 2PR2PR2
Macro elements, g kg−1 ANOVALinearQuadratic
Ca99.970.770.585.910.60.0370.560.030.93<0.01
P82.567.965.590.08.90.0380.330.100.10 0.25
K76.7 a99.3 ab106 ab138 b17.10.0160.00080.690.0020.62
Na111 a124 a128 ab145 b6.30.002<0.00010.810.00050.72
Cl16.316.617.118.81.880.500.110.230.10.24
S48.958.766.375.810.80.0730.00590.550.0160.45
Mg61.9 ab46.8 a47.3 a77.6 b10.40.0290.120.220.0270.40
Micro elements, mg kg−1
Fe12083.691.894.014.50.110.280.110.560.03
Zn13213814620240.80.2250.0380.360.0270.40
Cu65.810310810220.60.110.120.210.340.09
Se71.010511412320.60.0800.0220.420.0760.28
I22.118.024.622.95.80.590.030.60.600.03
Mn95.076.678.391.410.10.180.94<0.010.530.04
Co59.0 a88.1 ab100 b94.8 ab14.20.0260.040.360.170.17
Ni104 ab84.5 a119 b104 ab11.40.0270.520.040.610.02
Br20.3 a27.7 a38.1 ab52.9 b7.10.0034<0.00010.79<0.00010.80
Cr99.481.013099.224.30.230.700.010.87<0.01
Al109 b56.9 a84.9 ab94.0 ab16.90.0370.650.020.650.02
As29.9 a34.8 a40.6 ab63.5 b8.20.00710.00040.730.00020.75
Cd14924223623953.50.210.150.190.340.09
Pb109 b82.2 a85.3 a98.2 ab6.360.00460.650.020.79<0.01
1 Pooled standard error of the mean; 2 p-value is given for ANOVA. Different letters indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among diets within a row. p-value and R2 are given for linear and quadratic regression. n = 3 replicate tanks per treatment.
Table 6. Macro and micro minerals present in the whole body of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) from the retention experiment where the salmon were fed increasing dietary level of Cyberlindnera jadinii (CJS).
Table 6. Macro and micro minerals present in the whole body of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) from the retention experiment where the salmon were fed increasing dietary level of Cyberlindnera jadinii (CJS).
Control5% CJS10% CJS20% CJSSEM 1p-Value 2PR2PR2
Macro elements 3, g kg−1 ANOVALinearQuadratic
Ca8.8 a10.5 b11.2 b11.5 b0.740.00130.00160.650.0210.42
P11.7 a12.7 b13.3 bc13.7 c0.470.0010.00040.730.0080.52
K11.812.311.812.70.430.0720.0710.290.0540.32
Na2.52.52.52.50.060.970.9>0.010.83<0.01
Cl3.4 a3.2 ab3.1 ab3.1 b0.110.0310.0110.490.0570.31
S6.26.26.36.20.140.750.87>0.010.95<0.01
Mg0.85 a0.89 ab0.91 bc0.94 c0.020.00260.00020.770.0020.62
Micro elements, mg kg−1
Fe22.7 a24.0 a23.5 a27.7 b1.40.00810.00170.640.00070.70
Zn1421421501459.20.680.550.040.710.01
Cu3.02.72.72.70.40.780.470.050.620.02
Se0.860.840.860.850.020.490.510.040.610.02
I0.96 a1.3 b1.5 c2.2 d0.07<0.0001<0.00010.98<0.00010.92
Mn3.23.13.43.10.40.820.96>0.010.94<0.01
Co0.23 a0.22 b0.19 c0.17 d0.008<0.0001<0.00010.910.0030.74
Ni0.0750.0740.0920.0990.020.560.160.180.190.16
Br14.0 a14.0 a15.0 a17.0 b0.50.0001<0.00010.82<0.00010.91
Cr0.110.150.140.150.040.770.40.060.560.03
Al1.151.31.33.60.10.200.0440.350.0240.41
As6.5 a5.4 b5.3 b5.0 b0.38<0.00010.0010.670.0170.45
Cd0.004 a0.007 bc0.005 ab0.009 c0.00150.00110.00290.610.00340.59
Pb0.0080.0130.0120.0080.0060.740.84>0.010.630.02
1 Pooled standard error of the mean; 2 p-value is given for ANOVA. Different letters indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among diets within a row. p-value and R2 are given for linear and quadratic regression. n = 3 replicate tanks per treatment; 3 Values are presented as pr kg freeze-dried material.
Table 7. Macro and micro minerals present in the kidney of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) from the retention experiment where salmon were fed increasing dietary level of Cyberlindnera jadinii (CJS).
Table 7. Macro and micro minerals present in the kidney of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) from the retention experiment where salmon were fed increasing dietary level of Cyberlindnera jadinii (CJS).
Control5% CJS10% CJS20% CJSSEM 1p-Value 2PR2PR2
Macro elements 3, g kg−1 ANOVALinearQuadratic
Ca1.00.820.611.60.5900.270.210.150.100.25
P10.710.09.511.81.1800.220.270.120.110.23
K11.310.210.613.01.3500.170.120.220.0460.34
Na3.73.13.62.70.4000.0540.0480.330.0390.36
Cl4.43.74.64.00.4500.100.8<0.010.750.01
S7.16.56.66.80.3200.110.76<0.010.82<0.01
Mg0.540.510.460.650.0800.0990.140.200.0470.34
Micro elements, mg kg−1
Fe300290340310310.350.50.050.640.02
Zn2202002002804.10.0860.0230.410.0230.42
Cu4.2 a3.7 a4.1 a5.6 b1.60.0020.0040.570.00030.74
Se2.72.72.83.20.240.130.0290.390.0140.47
I2.2 a3.9 b6.5 c8.7 d0.51<0.0001<0.00010.930.0010.79
Mn3.22.62.93.70.560.180.160.190.0640.30
Co0.770.630.740.620.070.0790.140.210.170.18
Ni0.0640.0960.0340.0580.005 0.160.230.140.26
Br211825253.00.0530.0540.320.0720.29
Cr0.450.100.0660.0830.290.450.250.130.430.06
Al0.00490.00070.00080.00110.003 0.320.110.330.10
As2.7 ab2.4 ab2.3 a3.3 b0.320.0420.0850.270.0190.44
Cd0.023 a0.023 a0.025 ab0.038 b0.0050.0230.00320.600.00110.67
Pb0.00810.00470.00630.0130.0037 0.130.230.030.42
1 Pooled standard error of the mean; 2 p-value is given for ANOVA. Different letters indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among diets within a row. p-value and R2 are given for linear and quadratic regression. n = 3 replicate tanks per treatment; 3 Values are presented as pr kg freeze-dried material.
Table 8. Macro and micro minerals present in the muscle of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) from the retention experiment where salmon were fed increasing dietary level of Cyberlindnera jadinii (CJS).
Table 8. Macro and micro minerals present in the muscle of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) from the retention experiment where salmon were fed increasing dietary level of Cyberlindnera jadinii (CJS).
Control5% CJS10% CJS20% CJSSEM 1p-Value 2PR2PR2
Macro elements 3, g kg−1 ANOVALinearQuadratic
Ca0.560.820.560.450.190.280.280.110.200.16
P11.312.011.311.70.520.360.79<0.010.85<0.01
K20.020.319.720.70.930.650.49<0.010.340.07
Na1.91.81.81.80.10.270.150.190.330.09
Cl2.42.22.12.20.140.120.0720.190.210.15
S7.4 ab7.6 a7.2 c7.5 ab0.210.0530.98<0.0010.92<0.01
Mg1.11.21.21.20.060.160.180.170.230.14
Micro elements, mg kg−1
Fe7.26.98.97.01.70.500.96<0.010.81<0.01
Zn262624231.70.300.0570.320.0850.27
Cu1.41.31.41.40.10.560.440.060.280.11
Se0.82 a0.80 ab0.73 b0.74 b0.0260.0180.010.490.0480.33
I0.70 a1.17 b1.63 c2.33 d0.13<0.0001<0.0010.96<0.0010.84
Mn0.680.730.680.630.0670.490.270.120.190.16
Co0.12 a0.11 ab0.10 bc0.083 c0.0070.0007<0.00010.830.0010.67
Nin.d. 4n.d.n.d.0.495
Br9.59.29.111.01.10.210.0580.310.0290.39
Cr0.05 ab0.03 a0.03 a0.07 b0.010.0060.110.230.0170.44
Al0.0006n.d.n.d.0.0005
As10.3 a8.7 b8.2 b7.8 b0.440.00060.0010.670.0190.44
Cd0.00050.00090.00080.00090.00026 0.60.040.780.01
Pb0.0070.003n.d.0.007 0.87<0.010.780.03
1 Pooled standard error of the mean; 2 p-value is given for ANOVA. Different letters indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among diets within a row. p-value and R2 are given for linear and quadratic regression. n = 3 replicate tanks per treatment; 3 Values are presented as pr kg freeze-dried material. 4 Not detected.
Table 9. Macro and micro minerals present in the liver of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) from the retention experiment where salmon were fed increasing dietary level of Cyberlindnera jadinii (CJS).
Table 9. Macro and micro minerals present in the liver of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) from the retention experiment where salmon were fed increasing dietary level of Cyberlindnera jadinii (CJS).
Control5% CJS10% CJS20% CJSSEM 1p-Value 2PR2PR2
Macro elements 3, g kg−1 ANOVALinearQuadratic
Ca0.430.340.281.130.380.0860.0450.340.0130.47
P11.711.711.712.70.580.160.0410.350.0200.43
K12.312.012.712.70.50.360.230.140.240.13
Na4.94.54.74.80.230.250.75<0.010.9<0.01
Cl7.36.76.86.40.410.140.0290.390.0580.31
S9.2 a8.6 b9.1 ab9.5 a0.220.0060.150.370.0480.33
Mg0.6 ab0.6 ab0.5 a0.7 b0.0380.0280.230.140.0650.30
Micro elements, mg kg−1
Fe1401501601770.0380.690.200.160.220.14
Zn102989113317.10.0650.0140.450.0170.45
Cu333031325.30.90.97<0.010.83<0.01
Se3.93.53.53.50.230.210.130.220.280.11
I2.6 a4.9 b7.0 c10.3 d0.45<0.0001<0.00010.97<0.00010.85
Mn5.2 ab4.7 a5.3 ab7.1 b0.890.0450.0130.930.0040.58
Co0.540.480.450.500.0780.530.67<0.010.98<0.01
Ni0.0370.049n.d. 42.427 0.170.290.150.31
Br313033400.0050.170.0280.390.0180.44
Cr0.0490.0290.0500.0930.0430.380.130.210.0840.27
Al0.0010.00040.00060.00520.0040.0590.0940.280.0550.35
As2.62.52.52.70.180.540.410.060.250.13
Cd0.00660.00610.00550.0250.0080.0430.0160.450.0050.57
Pb0.00360.00410.00360.09510.00420.740.150.240.120.26
1 Pooled standard error of the mean; 2 p-value is given for ANOVA. Different letters indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among diets within a row. p-value and R2 are given for linear and quadratic regression. n = 3 replicate tanks per treatment; 3 Values are presented as pr kg freeze-dried material. 4 Not detected.
Table 10. Retention of minerals (% of ingested) in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) from the retention experiment where salmon were fed increasing levels of Cyberlindnera jadinii (CJS).
Table 10. Retention of minerals (% of ingested) in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) from the retention experiment where salmon were fed increasing levels of Cyberlindnera jadinii (CJS).
Control5% CJS10% CJS20% CJSSEM 1p-Value 2PR2PR2
Macro elements, g kg−1 ANOVALinearQuadratic
Ca35.3 a61.4 ab74.5 b64.7 b10.10.0130.0590.310.250.13
P125 a153 ab167 b158 b10.70.0110.0440.350.210.15
K261 ab283 a257 ab233 b16.50.0610.0440.350.0190.43
Na61.6 a60.8 ab61.8 a52.8 b3.10.0310.0190.440.0030.59
Cl56.6 a50.1 ab48.3 ab43.2 b2.80.00670.00050.720.0570.32
S162 a136 b133 b99.3 c6.8<0.0001<0.00010.890.00380.59
Mg87.489.993.096.74.90.260.0350.370.0520.33
Micro elements, mg kg−1
Fe23.620.117.920.82.40.130.350.090.720.01
Zn98.898.210987.813.40.440.410.070.250.13
Cu49.640.037.629.48.20.100.0120.490.0270.40
Se10910611099.35.30.210.0960.250.0590.31
I31.2 a13.0 b9.36 c7.74 c1.8<0.00010.00180.640.0330.38
Mn11.69.6911.27.153.40.470.170.180.140.20
Co43.2 a39.8 b35.9 c31.3 d1.4<0.0001<0.00010.94<0.00010.81
Ni26.920.024.219.88.60.760.460.050.520.04
Br77.8 a68.0 b66.5 b65.6 b2.10.00080.0060.550.0550.32
Cr17.127.625.819.3110.670.97<0.010.710.01
Al2.92.763.179.543.80.210.0530.330.0290.39
As222 a194 b197 b156 c8.40.0001<0.00010.85<0.00010.80
Cd−0.27 a4.24 b1.22 ab4.05 b1.470.00710.0830.270.140.20
Pb9.5811.010.26.566.20.870.490.050.420.07
1 Pooled standard error of the mean; 2 p-value is given for ANOVA. Different letters indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among diets within a row. p-value and R2 are given for linear and quadratic regression. n = 3 replicate tanks per treatment.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hansen, J.Ø.; Sharma, S.; Horn, S.J.; Eijsink, V.G.H.; Øverland, M.; Mydland, L.T. Fecal Excretion and Whole-Body Retention of Macro and Micro Minerals in Atlantic Salmon Fed Torula Yeast Grown on Sugar Kelp Hydrolysate. Animals 2021, 11, 2409. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ani11082409

AMA Style

Hansen JØ, Sharma S, Horn SJ, Eijsink VGH, Øverland M, Mydland LT. Fecal Excretion and Whole-Body Retention of Macro and Micro Minerals in Atlantic Salmon Fed Torula Yeast Grown on Sugar Kelp Hydrolysate. Animals. 2021; 11(8):2409. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ani11082409

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hansen, Jon Øvrum, Sandeep Sharma, Svein Jarle Horn, Vincent G. H. Eijsink, Margareth Øverland, and Liv Torunn Mydland. 2021. "Fecal Excretion and Whole-Body Retention of Macro and Micro Minerals in Atlantic Salmon Fed Torula Yeast Grown on Sugar Kelp Hydrolysate" Animals 11, no. 8: 2409. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ani11082409

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop