Next Article in Journal
Effects of N-acetylcysteine on Growth, Viability, and Ultrastructure of In Vitro Cultured Bovine Secondary Follicles
Next Article in Special Issue
Immunodetection of P2X2 Receptor in Enteric Nervous System Neurons of the Small Intestine of Pigs
Previous Article in Journal
iPSC Technology: An Innovative Tool for Developing Clean Meat, Livestock, and Frozen Ark
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comparative Histology of C Thyrocytes in Four Domestic Animal Species: Dog, Pig, Horse, and Cattle
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 12
Issue 22
10.3390/ani12223188
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Histology of the Cornea and Palisades of Vogt in the Different Wild Ruminants (Bovidae, Camelidae, Cervidae, Giraffidae, Tragulidae)

by
Joanna Klećkowska-Nawrot
1,*,
Karolina Goździewska-Harłajczuk
1,* and
Karolina Barszcz
2
1
Department of Biostructure and Animal Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Kozuchowska 1, 51-631 Wroclaw, Poland
2
Department of Morphological Sciences, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences—SGGW, Nowoursynowska 159c, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(22), 3188; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ani12223188
Submission received: 14 October 2022 / Revised: 14 November 2022 / Accepted: 15 November 2022 / Published: 17 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Microscopic Structure Research in Animals)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

In this study, for the first time, we performed a detailed histological analysis of the cornea and palisades of Vogt in the different wild ruminant species. The material for the research was taken from 49 adult wild ruminants (Bovidae, Camelidae, Cervidae, Giraffidae and Tragulidae) constituting 13 species coming from the Wroclaw Zoological Garden (Poland), the Warsaw Zoological Garden (Poland) and own collection of the Division of Animal Anatomy (Wroclaw). Our results showed that the number of layers of the cornea, i.e., five layers (anterior corneal epithelium, anterior limiting membrane (Bowman’s layer), the proper substance of the cornea, the posterior limiting membrane (Descemet’s membrane) and posterior corneal epithelium) or four layers (no Bowman’s layer) is not constant within even the same genus that includes the given species of the tested animal. The results of this study can form the basis for further research on the immunohistochemistry of the cornea in the maintenance of structural integrity and fluid balance in wild ruminants that can be used in veterinary ophthalmology diagnostics.

Abstract

In the study, we data concerning the histological and morphometrical examination of the cornea and palisades of Vogt in the different species of ruminants from the families Bovidae, Camelidae, Cervidae, Giraffidae and Tragulidae, coming from the Warsaw Zoological Garden, the Wroclaw Zoological Garden and the Division of Animal Anatomy. The following ruminant species were investigated: common wildebeest, Kirk’s dik-dik, Natal red duiker, scimitar oryx, sitatunga, Philippine spotted deer, Père David’s deer, moose, reindeer, reticulated giraffe, okapi, Balabac mouse-deer and alpaca. The cornea of ruminant species such as the common wildebeest, Kirk’s dik-dik, Natal red duiker, scimitar oryx, reindeer and Balabac mouse-deer consisted of four layers (not found in the Bowman’s layer): the anterior corneal epithelium, the proper substance of the cornea, the posterior limiting membrane (Descemet’s membrane) and the posterior corneal epithelium (endothelium). The anterior corneal epithelium was composed of a multilayer keratinizing squamous epithelium, which was characterized in the studied ruminants with a variable number of cell layers but also with a different thickness both in the central epithelium part and in the peripheral part. Moreover, the proper substance of cornea was thinnest in Balabac mouse-deer, Kirk’s dik-dik, Natal red duiker, scimitar oryx, Philippine spotted deer, alpaca, reindeer and sitatunga and was thickest in the reticulated giraffe. The thickest Descemet’s membrane was observed in the Père David’s deer. The corneal limbus is characterized by a large number of pigment cell clusters in Kirk’s dik-dik, scimitar oryx, moose, Balabac mouse-deer and alpaca. In the common wildebeest, Père David’s deer, moose, reticulated giraffe, okapi and alpaca, the palisades of Vogt were marked in the form of a crypt-like structure. The corneal limbus epithelium in the examined ruminants was characterized by a variable number of cell layers but also a variable number of melanocytes located in different layers of this epithelium. The detailed knowledge of the corneal structure of domestic and wild animals can contribute to the even better development of methods for treating eye diseases in veterinary medicine.

1. Introduction

The cornea is a transparent and mechanical strength structure that covers the anterior part of the eyeball [1,2,3]. Together with the opaque sclera, it forms the fibrous membrane of the eyeball. Its diameter in humans is 1.0 – 11.5 mm on average [4]. A properly developed cornea is completely transparent and has a smooth surface, and its radius of curvature in humans is 7.5 – 7.8 mm on average [5]. The function of the cornea is to protect against injuries and the penetration of foreign bodies into the eye. Moreover, the cornea is an important structure of the optical system of the eye [6]. When the light rays pass through the cornea, they are refracted through it and properly focused on the retina for clear vision. Thanks to it, it is also possible to accommodate the eye, i.e., adjust the vision to different distances. The ciliary muscle is involved in this process. When we look at an object close to us, the muscle tightens, and the lens takes a round shape, thanks to which it has a greater ability to focus light and refract it. By staring at a distant object, the ciliary muscles relax, the lens is flattened, and the light is refracted less. If the cornea is no longer spherical and the refracted light in the vertical plane is not the same as in the horizontal plane, astigmatism (ataxia) will appear. It is a refractive error that leads to a deterioration of visual acuity and a decrease in contrast sensitivity [7,8,9].
The human cornea consists of five layers: the anterior stratified squamous non-keratinized epithelium, an anterior limiting membrane (Bowman’s layer) composed of irregularly spaced collagen fibers, about 8 – 14 µm thick, the proper substance of cornea with its keratocytes embedded in a hydrated matrix, the posterior limiting membrane (Descemet’s membrane) and the posterior corneal epithelium [4,10,11]. Bowman’s membrane is not a characteristic feature of all mammals and is absent in dogs, cats and lemurs [12]. Recent studies have shown, however, that in humans, there is another layer between the corneal core and the posterior border lamina—Dua’s layer (which was defined as a pre-Descemet’s membrane) [13,14]. Even though it is only 15 µm thick, it is really hard and durable (pressures of 1.5–2 bar are not a problem). The existence of Dua’s layer was confirmed during the simulation of a corneal transplant (deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty surgery). The procedure was performed on eyeballs from banks in Bristol and Manchester (Great Britain). To delicately separate the individual layers, fine air bubbles were injected into the cornea and then viewed under an electron microscope [13].
Ruiz-Ederra et al., [15] cited by Nautscher et al., [3] and Brunette et al. [16] report that species-specific differences in structural and physiological properties of the cornea are increasingly the focus of interest because animal corneal tissue is frequently used in human research and for therapeutic purposes. Therefore, basic histological knowledge of the corneal structures of domestic animals is mandatory.
Morphological evaluation of domestic and sparse wild ruminants cornea was described in the ox, the reindeer, the deer, the elk, the camel, the cow, the sheep, the sambar, the red deer, the giraffe, the zebu, the blackbuck, the mouflon, the eland and the mutton [3,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25].
The corneal limbus is the boundary between the cornea and the sclera in which there are conjunctival folds called palisades of Vogt, containing niches for the limbal epithelial stem cell (LESC) [26]. The LESCs are responsible for the regeneration of the corneal surface and help maintain its transparency. These cells are found only in Vogt’s palisades, which create a special microenvironment for their renewal and proliferation. In humans, deficiency of these cells leads to corneal opacification through conjunctivalization and vascularization of the transparent cornea [27,28,29]. The LESC in humans deficit is influenced, in addition to by genetic diseases (aniridia, multiple endocrine deficiencies, erythrokeratodermia), also by chemical, heat or radiation burns, chronic inflammatory disease (Stevens-Johnson syndrome, ocular cicatricial pemphigoid, and infectious keratitis), contact lens-induced keratopathy, and iatrogenic multiple ocular surgeries [30]. However, in the case of domestic, especially wild mammals, the incidence of conjunctivalization in corneal disease is difficult to define because the methods that demonstrate the presence of conjunctivalization, such as impression cytology, are not commonly employed in veterinary ophthalmology [26].
Our research aimed to compare the histological structure and morphometry of individual layers of the cornea in different species of wild ruminants included in the five families constituting the Pecora infraorder and demonstrate revealing similarities and differences among this examined animals and to compare it to the domestic ruminants. This work can also be the basis for further research on the immunohistochemistry of the cornea in the maintenance of structural integrity and fluid balance in wild ruminants that can be used in veterinary ophthalmology diagnostics. In addition, knowledge of the morphology of the corneal limbus area in domestic and wild animals will improve ophthalmic procedures in veterinary medicine, which are limited due to the lack of data on the anatomy of this area of the limbus, the presumed presence of stem cells and their identification in various species of not only domestic animals but also and wild.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Specimen and Conservation Status

The material for the research was taken from 49 adult wild ruminants (Bovidae, Camelidae, Cervidae, Giraffidae, Tragulidae) constituting 13 species coming from the Wroclaw Zoological Garden (Wroclaw, Poland), the Warsaw Zoological Garden (Warsaw, Poland) and own collection of the Division of the Animal Anatomy (Wroclaw, Poland). The research was carried out on common wildebeest (Connochaetes taurinus), Kirk’s dik-dik (Madoqua kirkii), Natal red duiker (Cephalophus natalensis), scimitar oryx (Oryx dammah), sitatunga (Tragelaphus spekii), Philippine spotted deer (Rusa alfredi), Père David’s deer (Elapharus davidanus), moose (Alces alces), reindeer (Rangifer tarandus), reticulated giraffe (Camelopardalis reticulate), okapi (Okapia johnstoni), Balabac mouse-deer (Tragulus nigricans) and alpaca (Vicugna vicugna). These animals were collected from 2013 to 2022. The characteristics of the species of examined ruminants (status to the –International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species (2022-1) [31], the number of specimens tested and the date of material collection) are given in Table 1.

2.2. Ethical Statement

According to Polish and European law, studies on tissues obtained post-mortem do not require the approval of the Ethics Committee (2010/63/EU Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes) and The Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland, the Act of 15 January 2015, on the protection of animals used for scientific or educational purposes). Post-mortem animal material was obtained with personal permits issued by the District Veterinary Officer in Wroclaw (Poland) (No. PIW Wroc. UT-45/5/16—Dr. Joanna Klećkowska-Nawrot; No. PIW Wroc. UT-45/6)/16—Dr. Karolina Goździewska-Harłajczuk).

2.3. Histological Study

The eyeballs retrieved from all examined animals were placed in 4% buffered formaldehyde for at least 72 h and then rinsed in running water for 24 h. Then they were processed in a vacuum tissue processor—ETP (RVG3, Intelsint, Villarbasse, Italy) and embedded in paraffin. The specimens were cut using a Slide 2003 (Pfm A.g., Köln, Germany) sliding microtome into 4 µm sections. The hematoxylin & eosin and Picro-Mallory trichrome staining methods were applied. The slides obtained were then observed using the Zeiss Axio Scope A1 light microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and were rated using scoring systems based on a standard protocol previously described [32,33]. NAV [34] and NHV [35] were used for the histological description of the examined structures. Histometric measurements of the corneal structures (anterior corneal epithelium, anterior limiting membrane, proper substance of cornea and posterior limiting membrane) were performed in the Axio Vision Rel. 4.8. (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany).

3. Results

Our research showed that cornea in ruminant species such as common wildebeest, Kirk’s dik-dik, Natal red duiker, scimitar oryx, reindeer and Balabac mouse-deer consisted of four layers: anterior corneal epithelium, the proper substance of cornea, posterior limiting membrane (Descemet’s membrane) and posterior corneal epithelium (endothelium). However, in the sitatunga, Philippine spotted deer, Père David’s deer, moose, reticulated giraffe, okapi and alpaca, the cornea consisted of five layers because there was an anterior limiting membrane (Bowman’s layer) located between the anterior corneal epithelium and the proper substance of cornea (Figure 1).
The anterior corneal epithelium is the stratified squamous non-keratinized epithelium, which in examined ruminants was characterized by a variable number of cell layers in the central epithelium part: the lowest number of cell layers was in Philippine spotted deer (three to four) and Balabac mouse-deer (four to five), while the highest number of cell layers was found in the okapi (15–16), but the epithelium was also characterized by a variable number of cell layers in the peripheral epithelium part, where the lowest number of cell layers was found in Natal red duiker (three to four) and Balabac mouse-deer (three to four), while the highest number of cell layers was found in alpaca (13–14) and moose and okapi after 14–15 (Table 2). In addition, the anterior corneal epithelium was also characterized by different sizes in the central epithelium part and peripheral epithelium part in the examined ruminants (the thinnest anterior corneal epithelium was in the Philippine spotted deer 15.456 (±2.2) µm, the thickest was in okapi 130.315 (±7.6) µm in the central epithelium part, similarly in the peripheral epithelium part was also thinnest in Philippine spotted deer 16.891 (±2.7) µm, and thickest was in okapi 115.923 (±6.9) µm (Table 2). The cells of the wart were: superficial cells, intermediate cells and basal cells. The superficial cells were polygonal with flattened nuclei and clear cytoplasm, and where many of the cells underwent a desquamation process. The intermediate layers in the examined ruminants consist of cells with a wing-like appearance, where the cell nuclei were flattened in Kirk’s dik-dik, sitatunga, Philippine spotted deer and alpaca, while in the other studied species, the animals’ cell nuclei were large and round. The basal cells in all ruminants were isoprismatic/cylindrical with oval and big nuclei (Figure 1).
The Bowman’s layer in the examined ruminants was observed only in the sitatunga, Philippine spotted deer, Père David’s deer, moose, reticulated giraffe, okapi and alpaca, where Philippine spotted deer was the thinnest among these species, and its thickness was 2.5 ( ± 0.4) µm and in moose where its thickness was 3.286 ( ± 0.7) µm, and the thickest was at Père David’s deer where its thickness was 8.401 ( ± 1.1) µm (Table 3). The Bowman’s layer is made of thin collagen fibers.
The proper substance of the cornea is the thickest layer of the cornea in the tested animals (the thinnest was in Balabac mouse-deer, Kirk’s dik-dik, Natal red duiker, scimitar oryx, Philippine spotted deer, alpaca, reindeer and sitatunga, where it was in the range from 571.808 (±47.5) µm to 885.483 (±20.5) µm; intermediate values were observed in Père David’s deer, okapi and common wildebeest, where its thickness ranged from 1347.154 (±30.7) µm to 1461.735 (±57.7) µm, while the thickest the proper substance of cornea was in reticulated giraffe where its thickness was 1971.646 (±194.1) µm (Table 3). The corneal stroma was composed of a uniform collagen fibril matrix. Between this matrix of collagen fibers, the flattened and elongated keratocytes were observed (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Our studies have shown that the proper substance of cornea of the common wildebeest, Père David’s deer, moose and reticulated giraffes had very few keratocytes (Figure 1 and Figure 2).
The deep proper substance of cornea rested on the posterior limiting membrane, which was thinnest in Philippine spotted deer, scimitar oryx, Kirk’s dik-dik, sitatunga, reindeer and alpaca where the thickness of the Descemet’s membrane was in the range of 4.32 (±0.4) µm–8.097 (±0.6) µm; intermediate values were observed in alpaca, Balabac mouse-deer, reticulated giraffe, okapi, common wildebeest and moose, where the thickness of this membrane ranged from 4.922 (±0.7) µm–47.366 (±2.3) µm, while the thickest was in Père David’s deer 118.571 (±3.3) µm (Figure 2 and Table 3).
The posterior surface of the cornea was a single-layer squamous epithelium, also called the posterior corneal epithelium or the endothelium of the anterior chamber of the eyeball.
The corneal limbus was located at the junction of the cornea and sclera and characterized by the loss of the anterior limiting membrane (examined ruminants with Bowman’s layer in those species) and organization of the collagen fibers with large numbers of pigment cells present in Kirk’s dik-dik, scimitar oryx, moose, Balabac mouse-deer and alpaca. Pod corneal limbus epithelium within the superficial stroma of corneal limbus was observed in blood and lymphatic vessels (Figure 3 and Figure 4).
The corneal limbus epithelium in the examined animals was composed of a different number of cell layers (Table 4). The smallest number of cell layers forming corneal limbus epithelium was in Balabac mouse-deer (3–4) and Philippine spotted deer (4–6), while the largest number of cell layers was in the sitatunga (15–19–20), reticulated giraffe (17–18) and okapi (18–19; Table 4). The superficial layer was composed of squamous epithelium flattened nuclei, intermediate layers to wing cells with an oval nucleus, and a layer of basal cells with cylindrical shape (Natal red duiker, scimitar oryx, sitatunga, Philippine spotted deer, moose, reticulated giraffe and okapi) or is prismatic shape (common wildebeest, Kirk’s dik-dik, Père David’s deer, reindeer, Balabac mouse-deer and alpaca) with round nuclei (Figure 3 and Figure 4). Moreover, in the examined ruminants (except alpaca—no melanocytes in all cell layers), the corneal limbus epithelium is characterized by a variable amount of melanocytes located in different layers of the epithelium (Table 4, Figure 3 and Figure 4).

4. Discussion

The cornea is primarily a protective eye (resistance against external hazards) but also plays an important role in the optical system of the eye, which is primarily influenced by its transparency as well as its ability to refract and focus light rays. Most of the research on the structure and function of the cornea to create more and more perfect methods of treating the diseases of the cornea itself is most often conducted on laboratory animals (mice, rats, rabbits, and hens) which are animal models for human resources [36,37,38,39,40,41]. Corneal morphology studies in domestic animals, such as dogs, cats, equine, porcine, cows, goats or sheep, which also become animal models [3,12,17,42,43,44,45,46,47]. However, there are few publications on a comparative morphological examination of the cornea in wild animals, including ruminants.
The present study demonstrated a multilayered cornea, which was composed in all examined animals of the stratified squamous non-keratinized epithelium, the proper substance of cornea with an attached posterior limiting membrane (Descemet’s membrane) and posterior corneal epithelium. On the other hand, the situation with the presence or absence of an anterior limiting membrane, also known as Bowman’s layer, located under the anterior corneal epithelium is interesting. Our research showed a clear presence of Bowman’s layer in the sitatunga, Philippine spotted deer, Père David’s deer, moose, reticulated giraffe, okapi and alpaca, but no such presence in the field of view of common wildebeest, Kirk’s dik-dik, Natal red duiker, scimitar oryx, reindeer and Balabac mouse-deer. Bowman’s layer was first described in humans by William Bowman in 1947 [48], quoted by Merindano et al., [12] whereas a 9.7 ± 1.7 µm thick, acellular structure that consists of three to four collagen layers [49] cited by Nautscher et al., [3]. Mindanao et al. [12], in a study on 40 different species of mammals (Carnivores, Primates and Herbivores), showed that Bowman’s layer does not occur in Carnivores, Lepilemur mustelinus (Primates) (similarly to Macaca mulata Wislocki, [50]) as well as in Tapirus terrestris, Equus caballus, Equus caballus przewalskii, Cervus elaphus, Rangifer tarandus, Antilope cervicapra, Ovis musimon, Ovis aries, Sus Domestica, Sus scrofa and Loxodonta africana. However, regarding only ruminants, according to Merindano et al. [12], This layer occurred in Dama dama, Cervus unicolor, Giraffa camelopardalis, Bos primigenius, Bos indicus and Taurotragus oryx. Comparing our research and that of Merindano et al. [12], it can be seen that the presence or absence of the Bowman’s layer is a species feature. According to Nautscher et al., [3] his research showed that this layer does not occur in domestic animals (pig, cow, goat, horse, dog and cat); however, there is a disagreement about the existence of a Bowman’s layer in domestic animals. However, the above-mentioned authors suggest that this layer is not developed in domestic animals to a similar dimension as humans and other primates. However, Cafaro et al. [17] report that in the merino sheep occurs a relatively thin Bowman’s layer. It is, therefore, worth explaining in the future to clarify this morphological detail using electron microscopic methods, but it is also interesting that some electron and in vivo confocal microscopy studies in dogs and horses also failed to address the existence of a specific Bowman’s layer within the corneal layers [51,52]. Moreover, our research and the research of Merindano et al. [12] showed that Bowman’s layer in examined ruminants had a different thickness between different species, which may indicate a species characteristic of animals. However, the explanation in detail as to whether the presence of Bowman’s layer gives any evolutionary advantage to the different species needs future studies.
The anterior corneal epithelium in our examination of ruminants showed clear variations in the size of the epithelium (thick) both in the central and peripheral epithelium part and also a different number of cell layers between different animal species. High variations in the number of cell layers were found, especially in the superficial and intermediate layers. Also, large differences in their research were presented in some wild ruminants by Merindano et al. [21], where there were significant differences between animal species both in the thickness of the anterior corneal epithelium but also in the number of cell layers and the central part and peripheral part of this epithelium. Nautscher et al. [3] demonstrated in their studies that the number of cell rows correlates with the corneal thickness, while the thickness of the cornea changes with the age of the subject [53]. Nautscher et al. [3] also report that the physiological reason for the different number of cell layers in the anterior corneal epithelium remains unclear, but they suggest that corneal thickness is related to the habitat and environment of animals (the herbivores living in open grasslands are more likely exposed to rough environmental conditions than carnivores) [1,42]. Almubrad and Akhtar [1], in a study carried out on camels, showed that the anterior corneal epithelium was extraordinarily thick, which was justified by the fact that they attributed it to the hot and dry climate where camels normally live. By analyzing our corneal epithelial measurements and comparing them with those performed in domestic animals by Nautscher et al. [3], we find that in pigs, cows, goats, horses, dogs and cats, this epithelium was thickness than our ruminants tested. In addition, our research also showed large differences in the thickness of the proper substance of the cornea and Descemet’s membrane between the investigated ruminant species.
At the junction of the cornea and sclera, there is a corneal limbus, which has meridian-oriented conjunctival folds known as Vogt palisades. Vogt’s palisades contain niches for corneal limbal stem cells, which can regenerate the cornea [54,55]. According to Patruno et al. [55], corneal limbal stem cell therapies in veterinary medicine are limited due to the lacking of knowledge about the anatomy of the limbal area, the putative presence of stem cells and their identification in domestic species. Schermer et al., [56] cited by Patruno et al., [55] proposed that the corneal epithelial stem cells are not uniformly distributed throughout the entire corneal epithelial basal layer but are preferentially located in the limbal epithelial basal layer and the basal layer of the limbus was described as the corneal stem cells niche [57]. The corneal limbal stem cells are responsible for the regeneration of the corneal surface and are involved in maintaining its transparency. In the case of their insufficiency, usually caused by deficiency or damage, the cornea is covered with the conjunctival epithelium, which leads to its cloudiness and the formation of a vascularized endosperm. Such a situation often occurs after severe burns of the eyeball or in the case of congenital diseases such as keratitis ichthyosis deafness (KID) syndrome or aniridia, but it can also be an iatrogenic cause [58]. The corneal limbus epithelium was composed of the three cell layers (the superficial cells, intermediate cells and basal cells) in all examined ruminants as well as in domestic animals [55]. Our research and the research of Patruno et al. [55] showed that the epithelium was characterized by a variable total (total) number of cell layers in the tested animals, but also by the number of individual cell layers. The most interesting were basal cell alleys, where it turned out in our research that the cells that make up this layer, depending on the ruminant species, may take a typical cylindrical or isoprismatic shape. Similarly, in their studies on domestic animals, Patruno et al. [55] observed that in cats and dogs, the basal layer cells were cubic in shape as opposed to pigs, cows, sheep and horses, where they were cylindrical in shape. The situation is similar in the case of pigment accumulation within the individual three layers of the corneal limbus epithelium. Here, too, we observed differences between the ruminant species studied, where melanin was either located in all three cell layers, in only one or two layers, or there was no pigment vogue. Again, similar results were observed in domestic animals by Patruno et al. [55]. Another characteristic feature of our research and in the studies of Patruno et al. [55] we observed the presence of clearly marked crypt-like structures within the corneal limbus epithelium, or their absence or insignificant presence.

5. Conclusions

Our research and studies of other authors carried out on domestic animals as well as on a few species of wild animals showed that the number of layers of the cornea, i.e., 5 layers (anterior corneal epithelium, anterior limiting membrane (Bowman’s layer), proper substance of cornea, posterior limiting membrane (Descemet’s membrane) and posterior corneal epithelium) or 4 layers (no Bowman’s layer) is not constant within even the same genus that includes the given species of the tested animal. Moreover, it was observed that the thickness of individual layers of the cornea is also variable, but also the number of layers of cells forming the anterior corneal epithelium between given species, which may already constitute an individual feature. The presence of palisades of Vogt and limbal epithelial stem cells gathered there is an important feature of the cornea, not only in humans and domestic animals but also in wild animals, which in the case of wild animals requires further and very detailed research because it should be assumed that the specific habitat of such animals also requires corneal surface regeneration. It is also interesting whether wild animals have a very specific Dua’s layer—the answer to this question requires a great deal of commitment from histologists, veterinary ophthalmologists as well as biologists using numerous research techniques. Summing up, getting to know the detailed structure of the cornea in domestic and wild animals can contribute to the even better development of methods of treating eye diseases in veterinary medicine.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.K.-N.; methodology, J.K.-N.; validation, K.B. and K.G.-H.; investigation, J.K.-N. and K.G.-H.; writing—original draft preparation, J.K.-N. and K.G.-H.; writing—review and editing, J.K.-N., K.G.-H. and K.B.; visualization, J.K.-N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The translation and publication costs were supported by statutory research and development activity funds assigned to the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences. The APC/BPC is financed/co-financed by Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences.

Institutional Review Board Statement

According to Polish and European law, studies on tissues obtained from post-mortem material do not require approval of the Ethics Committee (2010/63/EU Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes and The Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland, the Act of 15 January 2015, on the protection of animals used for scientific or educational purposes).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Material available by request to the corresponding authors ([email protected]; [email protected]).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Radosław Ratajszczak—the former chairman of the Wroclaw Zoological Garden, and the new President of the Wroclaw Zoological Garden—Joanna Kasprzak, Ewa Piasecka, Mirosław Piasecki from the Wroclaw Zoological Garden for providing valuable study material. We would also like to thank DVM Wojciech Paszta and DVM Krzysztof Zagórski from the Wroclaw Zoological Garden for providing valuable study material.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Almubrad, T.; Akhtar, S. Ultrastructure features of camel cornea—Collagen fibril and proteoglycans. Vet. Ophthalmol. 2012, 15, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Doughty, M.J. A physiological perspective on the swelling properties of the mammalian corneal stroma. Contact Lens Anterior Eye 2003, 26, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Nautscher, N.; Bauer, A.; Steffl, M.; Amselgruber, W.M. Comparative morphological evaluation of domestic animal cornea. Vet. Ophthalmol. 2016, 19, 297–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ostrowski, K. Histology; PZWL: Warszawa, Poland, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  5. Marciniak, T.; Ziółkowski, M. Anatomia Prawidłowa Człowieka; RU ZSP AM: Wrocław, Poland, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  6. Meek, K.M.; Fullwood, N.J. Corneal and scleral collagens—A microscopist’s perspective. Micron 2001, 32, 261–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Czaińska, M. Astygmatyzm—Charakterystyka wady. Optyka 2016, 5, 28–31. [Google Scholar]
  8. Roszkowska, A.M. Aktualności w diagnostyce i leczeniu stożka rogówki. Okul. Dyplomie 2013, 4, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Szaflik, J.; Izdebska, J. Choroby Aparatu Cchronnego Oka i Rogówki; American Academy of Ophthalmology: Wrocław, Poland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  10. Maurice, D.M. The structure and transparency of the cornea. J. Physiol. 1957, 136, 263–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pedler, C. The fine structure of the corneal epithelium. Exp. Eye Res. 1962, 1, 286–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Merindano, M.D.; Costa, J.; Canals, M.; Potau, J.M.; Ruano, D. A comparative study of Bowman’s layer in some mammals: Relationships with other constituent corneal structures. Eur. J. Anat. 2002, 6, 133–139. [Google Scholar]
  13. Dua, H.S.; Faraj, L.A.; Said, D.G.; Gray, T.; Lowe, J. Human corneal anatomy redefined: A novel pre-Descemet’s layer (Dua’s layer). Ophthalmol. 2013, 120, 1778–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Koçluk, Y.; Burcu, A.; Sukgen, E.A. Demonstration of cornea Dua’s layer at a deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty surgery. Oman J. Ophthalmol. 2016, 9, 179–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ruiz-Ederra, J.; Garcıa, M.; Hernandez, M.; Urcola, H.; Hernández-Barbáchano, E.; Araiz, J.; Vecino, E. The pig eye as a novel model of glaucoma. Exp. Eye Res. 2005, 81, 561–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Brunette, I.; Rosolen, S.G.; Carrier, M.; Abderrahman, M.; Nada, O.; Germain, L.; Proulx, S. Comparison of the pig and feline models for full thickness corneal transplantation. Vet. Ophthalmol. 2011, 14, 365–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cafaro, T.A.; Suarez, M.F.; Maldonado, C.; Croxatto, J.O.; Insfran, C.; Urrets-Zavalıa, J.A.; Serra, H.M. On the Cornea of Healthy Merino Sheep: A Detailed Ex Vivo Confocal, Histological and Ultrastructural Study. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 2015, 44, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Calmettes, L.; Deodati, F.; Pianel, H.; Bec, C. Etude Histologque de L’Epithelium Anterieure de a1 Cornee et de ses Basales. Arch. Ophtal. Paris 1956, 16, 481–506. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ehlers, N. Some Comparative Studies on the mammalian corneal epithelium. Acta Ophthalmol. 1970, 48, 821–828. [Google Scholar]
  20. Lee, R.E.; Davison, P.F. Collagen composition and turnover in ocular tissues of the rabbit. Exp. Eye Res. 1984, 32, 737–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Merindano, M.D.; Canals, M.; Potau, J.M.; Costa, J.; Ruan, D. Morphometrical features of the corneal epithelium in mammals. Anat. Histol. Embryol. 1998, 27, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rahi, A.H.S.; Sheikh, H.; Morgan, G. Histology of the camel eye. Acta Anat. 1980, 106, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rehbinder, C.; Winquist, G.; Roos, C. Structure of the cornea in some cervidae. Acta Vet. Scand. 1977, 18, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Reichard, M.; Hovakimyan, M.; Wree, A.; Meyer-Lindenberg, A.; Nolte, I.; Junghans, C.; Guthoff, R.; Stachs, O. Comparative in vivo confocal microscopical study of the cornea anatomy of different laboratory animals. Curr. Eye Res. 2010, 35, 1072–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Winquist, G.; Rehbinder, C. Fine structure of the reindeer cornea in normal conditions and in keratitis. Acta Vet. Scand. 1973, 14, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sanchez, R.F.; Daniels, J.T. Mini-Review: Limbal stem cells deficiency in companion animals: Time to give something back? Curr. Eye Res. 2016, 41, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Dua, H.S. The conjunctiva in corneal epithelial wound healing. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 1998, 82, 1407–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Dua, H.S.; Saini, J.S.; Azuara-Blanco, A.; Gupta, P. Limbal stem cell deficiency: Concept, aetiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis and management. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2000, 48, 83–92. [Google Scholar]
  29. Kenyon, K.R.; Tseng, S.C.G. Limbal autograft transplantation for ocular surface disorder. Ophthalmology 1989, 96, 709–723. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Kruse, F.E. Classification of ocular surface disease. In Ocular Surface Disease. Medical and Surgical Management; Holland, E.J., Mannis, M.J., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  31. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. 2022. Available online: https://www.iucnredlist.org (accessed on 23 September 2022).
  32. Burck, N.C. Technika Histologiczna; PZWL: Warszawa, Poland, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  33. Movat, H.Z. Demonstration of all connective tissue elements in a single section. AMA Arch. Pathol. 1955, 60, 289. [Google Scholar]
  34. International Committee on Veterinary Gross Anatomical Nomenclature (ICVGAN). Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria, 6th ed.; Editoral Committee: Hanover, Germany; Ghent, Belgium; Columbia, MO, USA; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  35. Nomina Histologica Veterinaria. Submitted by the International Committee on Veterinary Histological Nomenclature (ICVHN) to the World Association Veterinary Anatomists. 2017. Available online: https://www.wava-amav.org/downloads/NHV_2017.pdf (accessed on 13 October 2022).
  36. Ang, M.; Konstantopoulos, A.; Goh, G.; Htoon, H.M.; Seah, X.; Lwin, N.C.; Liu, X.; Chen, S.; Liu, L.; Mehta, J.S. Evaluation of a micro-optical coherence tomography for the corneal endothelium in an animal model. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 29769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ibares-Fríasa, L.; Gallego, P.; Cantalapiedra-Rodriguezc, R.; Merayo-Llovesa, J.; Martínez-García, M.C. Clinical, refractive and histological reversibility of corneal additive surgery in deep stroma in an animal model. Curr. Eye Res. 2016, 41, 1192–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Kethiria, A.R.; Rajua, E.; Bokarac, K.K.; Mishrad, D.K.; Basua, S.; Raoc, C.M.; Sangwana, V.S.; Singha, V. Inflammation, vascularization and goblet cell differences in LSCD: Validating animal models of corneal alkali burns. Exp. Eye Res. 2019, 185, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kim, W.-J.; Marco, C.H.; Mohan, R.R.; Wilson, E.E. Changes in corneal morphology associated with chronic epithelial injury. IOVS 1999, 40, 35–42. [Google Scholar]
  40. Rodriguez-Ramos, F.J.; Dubielzig, R.R. Ocular comparative anatomy of the family Rodentia. Vet. Ophthalmol. 2013, 16, 94–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Sitalakshmi, G.; Sudha, B.; Madhavan, H.N.; Vinay, S.; Krishnakumar, S.; Mori, Y.; Yoshioka, H.; Abraham, S. Ex vivo cultivation of corneal limbal epithelial cells in a thermoreversible Polymer (Mebiol Gel) and Their Transplantation in Rabbits: An Animal Model. Tissue Eng. 2009, 15, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Buck, R.C. Ultrastructural characteristics associated with the anchoring of corneal epithelium in several classes of vertebrates. J. Anat. 1983, 137, 743–756. [Google Scholar]
  43. Gronkiewicz, K.M.; Giuliano, E.A.; Kuroki, K.; Bunyak, F.; Sharma, A.; Teixeira, L.B.C.; Hamm, C.W.; Mohan, R.R. Development of a novel in vivo corneal fibrosis model in the dog. Exp. Eye Res. 2016, 14375, e88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Marlo, T.L.; Giuliano, E.A.; Sharma, A.; Mohan, R.R. Development of a novel ex vivo equine corneal model. Vet. Ophthalmol. 2017, 20, 288–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Napoli, P.E.; Nioi, M.; d’Aloja, E.; Loy, F.; Fossarello, M. The architecture of corneal stromal striae on optical coherence tomography and histology in an animal model and in humans. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 19861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Proulx, S.; Bensaoula, T.; Nada, O.; Audet, C.; d’Arc Uwamaliya, J.; Devaux, A.; Allaire, G.; Germain, L.; Brunette, I. Transplantation of a Tissue-Engineered Corneal Endothelium Reconstructed on a Devitalized Carrier in the Feline Model. IOVS 2009, 50, 2686–2694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Subasinghe, S.K.; Ogbuehi, K.C.; Mitchell, L.; Dias, G.J. Animal model with structural similarity to human corneal collagen fibrillar arrangement. Anat. Sci. Int. 2021, 96, 286–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Jacobsen, I.E.; Jensen, O.A.; Prause, J.U. Structure and composition of Bowman‘s membrane: Study by frozen resin cracking. Acta Ophthalmol. 1984, 62, 39–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Germundsson, J.; Fagerholm, P.; Koulikovska, M.; Lagali, N.S. An accurate method to determine Bowman’s layer thickness in vivo in the human cornea. IOVS 2012, 53, 2354–2359. [Google Scholar]
  50. Wislocki, G.B. The anterior segment of the eye of the rhesus monkey investigated by histochemical means. Am. J. Anat. 1951, 91, 233–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Abrams, G.A.; Bentley, E.; Nealey, P.F.; Murphy, C.J. Electron microscopy of the canine corneal basement membranes. Cells Tissues Organs 2002, 170, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ledbetter, E.C.; Scarlett, J.M. In vivo confocal microscopy of the normal equine cornea and limbus. Vet. Ophthalmol. 2009, 12, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Gwin, R.M.; Lerner, I.; Warren, J.K.; Gum, G. Decrease in canine endothelial cell density and increase in corneal thickness with age. IOVS 1982, 22, 267–271. [Google Scholar]
  54. Lavker, R.M.; Tseng, S.C.G.; Sun, T.T. Corneal epithelial stem cells at the limbus: Looking at some old problems from a new angle. Exp. Eye Res. 2004, 78, 433–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Patruno, M.; Perazzi, A.; Martinello, T.; Blaseotto, A.; Di Iorio, E.; Iacopetti, I. Morphological description of limbal epithelium: Searching for steam cells crypts in the dog, cat, pig, cow, sheep and horse. Vet. Res. Commun. 2017, 41, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Schermer, A.; Galvin, S.; Sun, T.T. Differentiation-related expression of a major 64K corneal keratin in vivo and in culture suggests limbal location of corneal epithelial stem cells. J. Cell Biol. 1986, 103, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Di Iorio, E.; Barbaro, V.; Ruzza, A.; Ponzin, D.; Pellegrini, G.; De Luca, M. Isoforms of DeltaNp63 and the migration of ocular limbal cells in human corneal regeneration. Proc. Natl. Acad, Sci. USA 2005, 102, 9523–9528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Haagdorens, M.; Behaegel, J.; Rozema, J.; Van Gerwen, V.; Michiels, S.; Dhubhghaill, S.N.; Tassignon, M.-J.; Zakaria, N. A method for quantifying limbal stem cell niches using OCT imaging. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 101, 1250–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 12 03188 g001 550
Figure 1. The photomicrograph of the cornea in the examined ruminants. H&E stain. (a)—common wildebeest, (b)—Kirk’s dik-dik, (c)—Natal red duiker, (d)—scimitar oryx, (e)—sitatunga, (f)—Philippine spotted deer, (g)—Père David’s deer, (h)—moose, (i)—reindeer, (j)—reticulated giraffe, (k)—okapi, (l)—Balabac mouse-deer, (m)—alpaca. Scale bar: (a,k) = 20 µm; (b–j,l–m) = 10 µm. ace—anterior corneal epithelium, alm—anterior limiting membrane (Bowman layer—blue arrow), ker—keratocytes (black arrow), psc—the proper substance of the cornea.
Figure 1. The photomicrograph of the cornea in the examined ruminants. H&E stain. (a)—common wildebeest, (b)—Kirk’s dik-dik, (c)—Natal red duiker, (d)—scimitar oryx, (e)—sitatunga, (f)—Philippine spotted deer, (g)—Père David’s deer, (h)—moose, (i)—reindeer, (j)—reticulated giraffe, (k)—okapi, (l)—Balabac mouse-deer, (m)—alpaca. Scale bar: (a,k) = 20 µm; (b–j,l–m) = 10 µm. ace—anterior corneal epithelium, alm—anterior limiting membrane (Bowman layer—blue arrow), ker—keratocytes (black arrow), psc—the proper substance of the cornea.
Animals 12 03188 g001
Animals 12 03188 g002 550
Figure 2. The photomicrograph of the cornea in the examined ruminants. H&E stain. (a)—common wildebeest, (b)—Kirk’s dik-dik, (c)—Natal red duiker, (d)—scimitar oryx, (e)—sitatunga, (f)—Philippine spotted deer, (g)—Père David’s deer, (h)—moose, (i)—reindeer, (j)—reticulated giraffe, (k)—okapi, (l)—Balabac mouse-deer, (m)—alpaca. Scale bar: (a,h) = 50 µm; (d,f–m) = 20 µm; (b,c,e) = 10 µm. plm—posterior limiting membrane (Descemet’s membrane), psc—proper substance of cornea.
Figure 2. The photomicrograph of the cornea in the examined ruminants. H&E stain. (a)—common wildebeest, (b)—Kirk’s dik-dik, (c)—Natal red duiker, (d)—scimitar oryx, (e)—sitatunga, (f)—Philippine spotted deer, (g)—Père David’s deer, (h)—moose, (i)—reindeer, (j)—reticulated giraffe, (k)—okapi, (l)—Balabac mouse-deer, (m)—alpaca. Scale bar: (a,h) = 50 µm; (d,f–m) = 20 µm; (b,c,e) = 10 µm. plm—posterior limiting membrane (Descemet’s membrane), psc—proper substance of cornea.
Animals 12 03188 g002
Animals 12 03188 g003 550
Figure 3. The photomicrograph of the palisades of Vogt in the examined ruminants. H&E stain. (a,b)—common wildebeest; (c,d)—Kirk’s dik-dik; (e,f)—Natal red duiker; (g,h)—scimitar oryx; (i,j)—sitatunga; (k,l)—Philippine spotted deer. Scale bar: (a,c,e,g,i,k) = 50 µm; (b,d,f,h,j,l) = 10 µm. cle—corneal limbus epithelium, psc—the proper substance of the cornea, pss—the proper substance of the sclera, pV—palisades of Vogt (black arrows).
Figure 3. The photomicrograph of the palisades of Vogt in the examined ruminants. H&E stain. (a,b)—common wildebeest; (c,d)—Kirk’s dik-dik; (e,f)—Natal red duiker; (g,h)—scimitar oryx; (i,j)—sitatunga; (k,l)—Philippine spotted deer. Scale bar: (a,c,e,g,i,k) = 50 µm; (b,d,f,h,j,l) = 10 µm. cle—corneal limbus epithelium, psc—the proper substance of the cornea, pss—the proper substance of the sclera, pV—palisades of Vogt (black arrows).
Animals 12 03188 g003
Animals 12 03188 g004 550
Figure 4. The photomicrograph of the palisades of Vogt in the examined ruminants. H&E stain (c–h,k–n); Picro-Mallory stain (a,b,i,j). (a,b)—Père David’s deer; (c,d)—moose; (e,f)—reindeer; (g,h)—reticulated giraffe; (i,j)—okapi; (k,l)—Balabac mouse-deer; (m,n)—alpaca. Scale bar: (a,c,e,g,i,k,m) = 50 µm; (b,d,j,h) = 20 µm; (f,l,n) = 10 µm. cle—corneal limbus epithelium, psc—the proper substance of the cornea, pss—the proper substance of the sclera, pV—palisades of Vogt (black arrows).
Figure 4. The photomicrograph of the palisades of Vogt in the examined ruminants. H&E stain (c–h,k–n); Picro-Mallory stain (a,b,i,j). (a,b)—Père David’s deer; (c,d)—moose; (e,f)—reindeer; (g,h)—reticulated giraffe; (i,j)—okapi; (k,l)—Balabac mouse-deer; (m,n)—alpaca. Scale bar: (a,c,e,g,i,k,m) = 50 µm; (b,d,j,h) = 20 µm; (f,l,n) = 10 µm. cle—corneal limbus epithelium, psc—the proper substance of the cornea, pss—the proper substance of the sclera, pV—palisades of Vogt (black arrows).
Animals 12 03188 g004
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of the examined ruminants.
Table 1. Characteristics of the examined ruminants.
InfraorderFamilySubfamilyTribusGenusSpecies/
Subspecies		IUCN
(2022-1)		Number of Collection/
Date of Collection		Source of Collection
PecoraBovidaeAntilopinaeAlcelaphiniConnochaetescommon wildebeest
Connochaetes taurinus		LC
stable		2
/2017		Wroclaw Zoological
Garden
AntilopiniMadoquaKirk’s dik-dik
Madoqua kirkii		LC
stable		7
/2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2021		Wroclaw Zoological
Garden
CephalophiniCephalophusNatal red duiker
Cephalophus natalensis		LC
decreasing		6
/2016, 2017, 2020, 2021		Wroclaw Zoological
Garden
HippotraginiOryxscimitar oryx Oryx dammahEW2
/2017		Wroclaw Zoological
Garden
BovinaeTragelaphiniTragelaphussitatunga
Tragelaphus spekii		LC
decreasing		11
/2016, 2017, 2018, 2019		Wroclaw Zoological
Garden
CervidaeCervinaeCerviniRusaPhilippine spotted deer
Rusa alfredi		EN
decreasing		1
/2016		Wroclaw Zoological
Garden
ElaphurusPère David’s deer
Elaphurus davidianus		EW1
/2017		Wroclaw Zoological
Garden
CapreolinaeAlceiniAlcesmoose
Alces alces		LC
increasing		1
/2017		Warsaw Zoological
Garden
OdocoileiniRangiferreindeer
Rangifer tarandus		VU
decreasing		3
/2018, 2019		Wroclaw Zoological
Garden
GiraffidaeGiraffinae–Giraffareticulated giraffe
Giraffa Camelopardalis
reticulata		VU
decreasing		1
/2016		Wroclaw Zoological
Garden
–Okapiaokapi
Okapia johnstoni		EN
decreasing		1
/2017		Wroclaw Zoological
Garden
TragulinaTragulidae––TragulusBalabac mouse-deer
Tragulus nigricans		EN
decreasing		8
/2016, 2018, 2019, 2022		Wroclaw Zoological
Garden
CameliformesCamelidae–LaminiVicunia
pacos		alpaca
Vicugna pacos		LC
MD
increasing		6
/2013, 2014		Wroclaw Zoological
Garden, Own collection of Division of Animal Anatomy
EN—endangered, EW—extinct in the wild, MD—moderately depleted, LC—last concern, VU—vulnerable.
Table
Table 2. Morphometrical features of the anterior corneal epithelium in the examined ruminants.
Table 2. Morphometrical features of the anterior corneal epithelium in the examined ruminants.
Anterior Corneal Epithelium
Number of Cellular Layers in the Central CorneaNumber of the Superficial Cell LayersNumber of the Intermediate Cell LayersNumber of the Basal Cell LayersThickness of the Central PartNumber of Cellular Layers in the Peripheral CorneaNumber of the Superficial Cell LayersNumber of the Intermediate Cell LayersNumber of the Basal Cell LayersThickness of the Peripheral Part
common wildebeest8 – 934 – 5147.493 ( ± 4.9)7 – 81 – 25135.948 ( ± 4.1)
Kirk’s dik-dik6 – 72 – 33128.873 ( ± 3.2)6 – 72 – 33129.596 ( ± 4.6)
Natal red duiker5 – 613235.208 ( ± 3.3)3 – 411 – 2119.255 ( ± 2.2)
scimitar oryx5 – 62 – 32135.606 ( ± 3.2)5 – 62 – 32135.577 ( ± 4.4)
sitatunga8 – 93 – 42 – 5151.218 ( ± 5.7)9 – 1016–7342.712 (±4.2)
Philippine spotted deer3 – 41 – 31115.456 ( ± 2.2)6 – 731 – 21 – 216.891 ( ± 2.7)
Père David’s deer12 – 131 – 27 – 82 – 380.99 ( ± 1.8)11 – 121 – 26 – 72 – 374.163 ( ± 3.7)
moose10 – 111 – 27 – 8142.073 ( ± 1.3)14 – 151 – 3121 – 275.63 ( ± 3.0)
reindeer7 – 81 – 25 – 6133.461 ( ± 3.1)4 – 512 – 3121.712 ( ± 3.4)
reticulated giraffe9 – 102 – 36 – 7142.93 ( ± 3.1)10 – 112 – 36 – 7242.072 ( ± 3.4)
okapi15 – 16211 – 121 – 2130.315 ( ± 7.6)14 – 152–3102115.923 ( ± 6.9)
Balabac mouse-deer4 – 51 – 22124.778 ( ± 3.8)3 – 411 – 2113.127 ( ± 0.9)
alpaca7 – 82 – 34 – 5150.563 ( ± 3.5)13 – 141 – 292 – 355.651 ( ± 4.1)
Table
Table 3. Thickness (µm) of the Bowman’s layer, the proper substance of the cornea and Descemet’s membrane in the examined ruminants.
Table 3. Thickness (µm) of the Bowman’s layer, the proper substance of the cornea and Descemet’s membrane in the examined ruminants.
SpeciesBowman’s LayerProper Substance of CorneaDescemet’s Membrane
common wildebeest–1461.735 (±57.7)43.181 (±2.3)
Kirk’s dik-dik–651.772 (±19.4)4.563 (±0.8)
Natal red duiker–669.987 (±34.9)8.097 (±0.6)
scimitar oryx–697.172 (±17.7)4.487 (±1.1)
sitatunga4.04 (±0.5)885.483 (±20.5)5.028 (±0.8)
Philippine spotted deer2.5 (±0.4)645.331 (±14.6)4.32 (±0.4)
Père David’s deer8.401 (±1.1)1347.154 (±30.7)118.571 (±3.3)
moose3.286 (±0.7)1668.633 (±36.5)47.366 (±2.3)
reindeer–869.367 (±33.1)7.14 (±0.6)
reticulated giraffe5.055 (±0.7)1971.645 (±194.1)20.387 (±2.1)
okapi4.691 (±0.9)1417.026 (±46.1)27.661 (±1.3)
Balabac mouse-deer–571.808 (±47.5)19.458 (±1.2)
alpaca4.295 (±1.1)679.217 (±19.2)14.922 (±0.7)
Table
Table 4. Characteristic of the corneal limbus epithelium (palisades of Vogt) in the examined ruminants.
Table 4. Characteristic of the corneal limbus epithelium (palisades of Vogt) in the examined ruminants.
Corneal Limbus Epithelium
Total Number of Cell LayersNumber of Superficial Cell LayersNumber of Intermediate Cell LayersNumber of Basal Cell LayersObecność
Melanocytes
common wildebeest 15–1633–4–66–7+++
(basal cell layers)
Kirk’s dik-dik 7–832–32–3+
(all cell layers)
Natal red duiker 7–91–242–3+
(basal cell layers)
scimitar oryx7–82–332++
(all cell layers)
sitatunga 15–19–20113–161–2–3+
(all cell layers)
Philippine spotted deer 4–61–22–31−/+
(all cell layers)
Père David’s deer 17–183–412–131–2++
(intermediate and basal cell layers)
moose 17 –182–3132+++
(all cell layers)
reindeer 8–915–62+
(basal cell layers)
reticulated giraffe 17–18214–151–2−/+
(intermediate and basal cell layers)
okapi 19–201–213–161–2−/+
(basal cell layers)
Balabac mouse-deer 3–4111–2+
(all cell layers)
alpaca 13–14110–112–3–
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Klećkowska-Nawrot, J.; Goździewska-Harłajczuk, K.; Barszcz, K. Comparative Histology of the Cornea and Palisades of Vogt in the Different Wild Ruminants (Bovidae, Camelidae, Cervidae, Giraffidae, Tragulidae). Animals 2022, 12, 3188. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ani12223188

AMA Style

Klećkowska-Nawrot J, Goździewska-Harłajczuk K, Barszcz K. Comparative Histology of the Cornea and Palisades of Vogt in the Different Wild Ruminants (Bovidae, Camelidae, Cervidae, Giraffidae, Tragulidae). Animals. 2022; 12(22):3188. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ani12223188

Chicago/Turabian Style

Klećkowska-Nawrot, Joanna, Karolina Goździewska-Harłajczuk, and Karolina Barszcz. 2022. "Comparative Histology of the Cornea and Palisades of Vogt in the Different Wild Ruminants (Bovidae, Camelidae, Cervidae, Giraffidae, Tragulidae)" Animals 12, no. 22: 3188. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ani12223188

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop