Next Article in Journal
Human and Non-Human Primate Coexistence in Argentina: Conflicts and Solutions
Next Article in Special Issue
iTRAQ-Based Phosphoproteomic Analysis Exposes Molecular Changes in the Small Intestinal Epithelia of Cats after Toxoplasma gondii Infection
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Individual Rate of Inbreeding, Recent and Ancestral Inbreeding on Wool Quality, Muscling Conformation and Exterior in German Sheep Breeds
Previous Article in Special Issue
Assessment Heartworm Disease in the Canary Islands (Spain): Risk of Transmission in a Hyperendemic Area by Ecological Niche Modeling and Its Future Projection
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Epidemiological Investigation of Yak (Bos grunniens) Fascioliasis in the Pastoral Area of Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, China

1
Key Laboratory of Animal Parasitology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shanghai Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai 200241, China
2
Qinghai Academy of Animal Science and Veterinary Sciences, Xining 810016, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 21 August 2023 / Revised: 7 October 2023 / Accepted: 16 October 2023 / Published: 26 October 2023

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Infection of humans and animals with Fasciola spp. poses a threat to both the health of humans and animals and the animal industry. In the pastoral areas of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, yak is the most important economic animal, especially for the herdsmen and their animal products. However, the infection of yaks with Fasciola spp. is often underestimated. In this study, we investigated a total of 1784 yaks in 16 administrative counties in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau region by fecal examination and autopsy of yaks after slaughter, and the differences in infection rates between different age groups and regions were analyzed. The clustering characteristics of the infection rates in spatial statistics were summarized. This investigation revealed that yaks on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau had a high Fasciola spp. prevalence (17.32%), age was a risk factor for Fasciola spp. infection, and regional differences were the other risk factor for Fasciola spp. infection.

Abstract

The objective of this investigation was to understand the epidemiology of fascioliasis in yaks in the alpine pastoral areas of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, China. The prevalence of Fasciola hepatica infection was estimated by examining eggs in the feces of yaks and by autopsy after the slaughter. Yaks were sampled from a total of 16 representative counties in Qinghai province, and risk factors were assessed based on regional and age characteristics. Fecal samples were obtained from 1542 yaks aged 0–1 (<1 year old), 1–2 (≥1 year old and <3 years old), and over 3 years (≥3 years old). In addition, 242 yaks over 3 years old who had not undergone fecal examinations were randomly selected for autopsy. A total of 267 fecal samples were positive for Fasciola spp. eggs. The average infection rate was 17.32% (0–60.61%), and the average infection intensity was 51.9 eggs per gram (epg) of feces, with intensities ranging from 18 to 112 epg. In Maduo, Dari, Zhiduo, Chengduo, and Datong counties, the Fasciola spp. eggs infection rate was zero. Fasciola spp. adult flukes were detected in 66 out of 242 yaks at autopsy, with a total infection rate of 27.27% and an average infection intensity of 21.2 (adult worms), with intensities ranging from 3 to 46 worms. Logistic regression model analysis showed that age was a significant risk factor for yak infection with Fasciola spp. In addition, the risk varied between regions: Haiyan, Gangcha, Duran, and Wulan were all high-risk areas for yak infection with Fasciola spp. The spatial distribution of the Fasciola spp. infection rate in each region showed a very weak negative correlation (Moran’s I = −0.062), Duran formed a spatial distribution of high–low clusters with surrounding areas, and Datong formed a low–high clustering distribution characteristic with the surrounding areas. This investigation revealed that the infection rate of Fasciola spp. in yaks was higher on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau. Increasing age was a risk factor for infection with Fasciola spp.; different regions also have a different risk of Fasciola spp. infection. Only two regions showed clustering characteristics in the spatial distribution of infection rates. These findings extend the epidemiological information on Fasciola spp. infection in yaks and provide baseline data for the execution of control measures against Fasciola spp. infection.

1. Introduction

The yak is a unique cattle species produced by severe natural selection and self-adaptation in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau and its adjacent areas. The yak is a unique biological resource of the plateau in China and cannot be replaced by other animal species. Yaks are mainly distributed on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau and its adjacent areas, with a population of more than 14 million [1,2]. Yaks provide local herdsmen with production and daily necessities, such as milk, meat, wool, labor, and fuel, which are closely related to production and the daily lives of the local people [3].
Fascioliasis is an emerging neglected infection caused by Fasciola spp. that affects animals and human health and well-being [4]. Fasciola infection is caused by ingestion of encysted metacercariae; the infected hosts show acute symptoms (fever and abdominal pain) or chronic symptoms (intermittent pain, jaundice and anemia, pancreatitis, liver fibrosis or abscess or cirrhosis, cholangitis, cholecystitis, obstruction of bile flow, and gallstones), and even death [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. Several studies have shown that Fasciola spp. is the dominant species of yak parasites [12,13,14,15,16]. After yaks are infected with Fasciola spp., their working ability is reduced, their growth is slowed, their development is blocked, production performance and commercial value decrease significantly, and large quantities of slaughtered yak livers that cannot be sold as livestock products are wasted. In particular, this can lead to the death of a large number of young yaks, causing great economic loss to the yak breeding industry while posing a threat to human health.
Qinghai province of the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau is the source region of China’s Three Rivers and has a low air pressure, a low temperature, a large temperature difference between day and night, little but concentrated rainfall, a long period of sunshine, strong solar radiation, and a low oxygen content [17,18]. Winter is cold and long, while summer is cool and short. There are clear differences in climate among the different regions. The altitude is above 3000 m, and there are many rivers, streams, and marshes in most regions, which is suitable for the survival and reproduction of the intermediate hosts of Fasciola spp. Yaks rely on natural pastures for feeding. Due to the lack of infrastructure, herdsmen and yaks drink water from nearby rivers and are vulnerable to parasitic diseases with a variety of pathogens, including Fasciola spp. This phenomenon becomes a favorable condition for the life cycle of Fasciola spp.
Fasciola spp. are the major species of yak parasites, presenting a regional epidemic fascioliasis; however, information on the epidemiology of Fasciola spp. infection in yaks in the pastoral areas of Qinghai province is limited. The objective of this study was to investigate the prevalence of yak fascioliasis in pastoral areas of the Qinghai Plateau through fecal and necropsy examinations, aiming to provide baseline data for the prevention and control of yak fascioliasis in China.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Origin of Experimental Animals

From March to April 2020, 1784 yaks were selected as a random subset from yak farms in 16 counties in Qinghai Province, comprising 1542 yaks for fecal tests and 242 yaks for autopsy. All yaks were over 3 years old at autopsy, and the detailed sample collection information is shown in Table 1.

2.2. Examination of Fasciola spp. Eggs in Feces

The random sampling method was adopted. Fresh fecal samples of the yaks were collected through the rectum before grazing in the morning; they were numbered, and their genders, ages, and geographic locations were recorded. The samples collected (each sample was ≥50 g) were placed in zip-locked bags, placed into refrigerated boxes, taken back to the laboratory, and placed in a 4 °C refrigerator until examination.
The fecal sedimentation technique was used for examining Fasciola spp. eggs; the number of eggs observed was counted under a microscope, and the number of eggs per gram (epg) of feces was calculated [19,20,21].

2.3. Examination and Identification of Adult Worms

We randomly selected 242 yaks over 3 years old without fecal examination from 16 different localities to be autopsied. These autopsy samples were all collected from 16 different regional slaughterhouses; they are shown in Table 2. The flukes recovered from the liver and cholecyst were washed immediately in saline and preserved in 70% ethanol. The identification of Fasciola spp. was based on morphological characteristics [19].

2.4. Molecular Identification of Adult Worms

According to the published sequences of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of F. hepatica that are available in the GenBank (accession number: AJ628432, AJ628431), primers for the amplification of ITS-1 and ITS-2 of F. hepatica were designed: ITS-1 primers: F1: CTCATTGAGGTCACAGCAT, F2: CAATGGCAAAGAATGGCAAG; ITS-2 primers: F3: ATATTGCGGCCATGGGTTAG, F4: CCAATGACAAAGTGACAGCG. PCR amplifications of the above regions were performed in 50 µL of a reaction mixture containing 22 L of 2×Taq Mastermix (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), 0.5 µL of each primer (50 pmol/µL), and 4 µL of template DNA; DNase/RNase-free deionized water was added to bring the volume to 50 µL. A negative control (without DNA) was included in each PCR reaction. The PCR amplification conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 98 °C for 5 min, followed by 30 cycles consisting of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 52 °C for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 30 s. A final elongation step was conducted at 72 °C for 5 min at the end of the amplification procedure.

2.5. Prevalence of Fasciola spp.

The following calculations were made using the appropriate formulas: infection rate = (number of infected animals/number of examined animals) × 100%. Mean infection intensity = number of detected (eggs or worms)/number of infected animals examined. Range of infection = minimum positive infections − maximum positive infections. Fasciola spp. eggs were all counted as epg, the number of epg in the fecal sample. Subsequent representations of the egg infection intensity were used in the following format: epg of feces (minimum number of infected epg of feces − maximum number of infected epg of feces).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The differences in prevalence between regions were analyzed using the Bonferroni chi-squared test, and the differences in prevalence between age groups were analyzed using the same method. Variables that were significant (p ≤ 0.1) at the 95% confidence level were tested for collinearity and selected for inclusion in the multivariate logistic regression models. The local spatial autocorrelation test was used to analyze the spatial clustering characteristics of infection rates in different regions, and the results are shown as Moran scatter plots and clustering maps. All data were analyzed using the SPSS statistical package (version 26), and the spatial characteristics data were analyzed using GeoDa software. All plots were generated using GraphPad Prism 9.0 and RStudio software (version 4.2.0).

3. Results

3.1. Identification of Eggs

Eggs of Fasciola spp. from yaks are broadly ellipsoidal, operculated, yellow–brown, measuring 136.43–155.14 µm long by 69.39–87.52 µm wide, and are shedded unembryonated in feces (Figure 1).

3.2. Morphological and Molecular Identification of Adult Worms

Fresh worms were fleshy red and became gray–white after fixation. The size of the worms was 20–75 mm × 8–20 mm. The collected fresh worms were fixed and shown below (Figure 2a), and an adult worm stained by German hematoxylin is shown below (Figure 2b). The sequences of PCR-amplified ITS-1 and ITS-2 were completely consistent with the corresponding F. hepatica sequences available in GenBank.

3.3. Results of the Fecal Examination

3.3.1. Infection of Fasciola spp. by Fecal Examination

The results of fecal examination of Fasciola spp. eggs in yaks from different areas are shown in Table 3. A total of 1542 yak fecal samples were collected from 16 regions, and 267 were positive for Fasciola spp. eggs. The average infection rate was 17.32% (0–40.21%), and the average infection intensity was 51.9 epg (18–112).

3.3.2. Fasciola spp. Infection in Yaks of Different Ages

Table 4 shows the intensity of Fasciola spp. infection in yaks of different ages. The infection rate was 9.90% (0–25.00%) in 0–1 year old yaks, 16.18% (0–37.50%) in 1–2 year old yaks, and 25.88% (0–60.61%) in yaks over 3 years old. A comparison of infection rates between field subgroups using a multigroup Bonferroni chi-squared test revealed significant differences in the infection rates of yaks among the three different age groups (p < 0.0167). The infection rate was significantly lower in the group of 0–1 year olds than in the other two age groups and significantly higher in the over 3 year olds group than in the other two age groups (Figure 3). The mean infection intensity was 51.9 epg (18–112), comprising 45.5 (18–92) in yaks aged 0–1 year, 52.0 (23–93) in yaks aged 1–2 years, and 58.1 (28–112) in yaks aged over 3 years. The results showed that the fecal infection rate and infection intensity of Fasciola spp. increased with the increase in yak age.

3.3.3. Differences in Fasciola spp. Egg Infection in Yaks from Different Areas

The areas with positive yak fecal samples infected with Fasciola spp. are shown in Figure 4a. A comparison of infection rates across site subgroups using a multigroup Bonferroni chi-squared test revealed that Gonghe and Qilian counties had significantly lower infection rates than the other sampling sites, while Wulan had a significantly higher infection rate than the other sites, p < 0.001 (Figure 4b).

3.3.4. Spatial Characteristics of Fasciola spp. Infection in Yaks

The geographical distribution of Fasciola spp. infection in yaks is shown in Figure 5a. The spatial correlation of Fasciola spp. infection rates was explored based on yak infection rates in different regions as a single variable to derive correlations of yak infection rates in different regions. Spatial autocorrelation tests yielded a Moran index of −0.062 and Moran scatter plots distributed in quadrants two and four, indicating that yak infection rates showed a negative spatial correlation (Figure 5b). Regions with high infection rates showed mutual exclusion from other areas with high infection rates, tending to be closer to areas with low infection rates. The significantly spatially linked areas are Datong (p < 0.05) and Duran (p < 0.05) (Figure 5c); Duran formed a spatial distribution of high–low clusters with surrounding areas, and Datong formed a low–high clustering distribution characteristic with the surrounding areas (Figure 5d).

3.4. Autopsy Results

The autopsy results of the yak Fasciola spp. infection are shown in Table 5. A total of 242 yaks were examined, comprising 210 slaughtered yaks and 32 dissected yaks. A total of 66 yaks were found to be infected with Fasciola spp. The average infection rate was 27.27% (0–39.13%), and the average infection intensity was 21.2 worms (3–46).

3.5. Assessment of Risk Factors for Fasciola spp. Infection of Yaks Based on Areas and Age Groups

Logistic regression analysis of high-risk factors for Fasciola spp. infection in yaks was carried out using the presence of Fasciola spp. infection in yaks as the dependent variable and the age group and region as the independent variables. The results showed that both factors are included in the logistic model. In particular, the 2 year old group showed an increased risk of being infected with Fasciola spp. (odds ratio (OR) = 2.816; p < 0.01), and the risk was higher for the over 3 year old group (OR = 3.921; p < 0.001). Being from Haiyan (OR = 2.334; p < 0.05) increased the risk of Fasciola spp. infection in yaks, while yaks from Gangcha (OR = 2.985; p = 0.002), Duran (OR = 3.130; p = 0.001), and Wulan (OR = 3.348; p = 0.001) had a high risk of Fasciola spp. infection (Table 6). An optimized multiple logistic regression of the two factors, age and area, was conducted to obtain a risk assessment model. It was found that Qilan had the lowest risk score among the areas with Fasciola spp. infection, while Wulan had the highest risk score, with the lowest score for the 1 year old age group and the highest score for the over 3 year old age group among the different age groups. The two-factor combination with the highest risk score was the over 3 year old age group, with a combined total score of over 180 for Wulan, which corresponds to a risk of disease greater than 0.5, while the 1 year old age group achieved a combined total score close to 0 in Qilian, which corresponds to a risk of disease of less than 0.1, the two-factor combination with the lowest risk score (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

Of the 1542 tested yak fecal samples from 16 regions, 267 (17.32%) were positive for Fasciola spp. with a mean intensity of 51.9 epg, and the regional prevalence ranged from 0% (Maduo, Dari, Zhiduo, Chengduo, Zeku, and the Datong yak farm) to 40.21% (Wulan). Among different age groups of yaks, the prevalence of Fasciola spp. ranged from 9.90% to 25.88%. By autopsy, the prevalence of Fasciola spp. infection in yaks was 27.27% (66/242) with a mean intensity of 21.16 worms. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first investigation of Fasciola spp. infection in yaks in Guinan, Gangcha, Dulan, Wulan, Dari, Maduo, Zhiduo, Chengduo, Henan, Zeku, and Datong counties in Qinghai province, China. In the previous traditional studies, most researchers showed that yaks were infected with F. hepatica. During 1996 to 2020, the prevalence of F. hepatica was reported in major yak-producing areas in China such as the Tibetan Autonomous Region (18.33–100%) [16,22,23], some counties in Qinghai province (16.7–97%) [24,25,26,27,28,29], the northwest of Sichuan province (23%) [30], and Gansu province (6.55–42.5%) [15,31]. In addition, the prevalence of Fasciola was 10% in India and 16.67% in Nepal [32,33]. These studies indicated that F. hepatica infection is common in yaks in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau regions, although the prevalence varied across different geographical localities.
Recently, Kong Xiangying et al. [34] found the first Fasciola gigantica in yaks in Haibei, Qinghai Province. Gao Xing et al. [35] isolated the Fasciola intermediate and characterized the mitochondrial genome in yaks from Haibei, Qinghai province. In this study, we identified the morphology of the adult worms and selected some adult samples for molecular biological identification. The PCR amplification and sequencing results of these samples were consistent with the sequences of F. hepatica, which did not exclude the possibility of F. gigantica and F. intermediate in the remaining samples.
In the present study, the location and age of yaks were associated with Fasciola spp. infection in yaks in the investigated areas. The trend of Fasciola spp. prevalence increased with the age of yaks, which was in accordance with previous reports [15,16]. Under the same grazing mode, the difference in Fasciola spp. prevalence may be caused by a difference in immunity, feeding conditions, management measures (e.g., prevention and control measures; degrees of repeated grazing; and types, frequency of use, and dosage of anthelmintic), regional ecological environment (e.g., number of rivers, mountains, low-lying swamps, altitude, moisture, temperature, and Lymnaea stagnalis), and sampling season. For example, in the survey areas with a high positive rate, there were more wetlands and grasslands that closely border marshes; these areas have similar water environmental conditions and many wild animals that drink water from the same nearby rivers that domestic animals drink from. The infected yaks could shed Fasciola spp. eggs into the environment. The intermediate host of Fasciola spp. is L. stagnalis, which becomes infected by swallowing the Fasciola spp. eggs excreted by yaks. Then, the infected L. Stagnalis sheds cercariae into the environment from July to October. The cercariae then develop into cysticerci and infect hosts, such as yaks and sheep, in rivers and grasslands. This creates a vicious cycle of persistent Fasciola spp. infection. It is interesting to note that the yaks sampled at the Datong yak farm had no Fasciola spp. infection. This is because the Datong yak farm is located in the interlacing zone of agriculture and pasture, the disinfection procedures are more standardized, and the deworming frequency is more intensive; thus, Fasciola spp. infection is better controlled.
In addition, the current study found that the infection rate of Fasciola spp. in yaks did not show obvious spatial characteristics, and the regions occasionally show a pattern of low–high clustering and high–low clustering. The regions showing this local clustering are Datong and Duran counties. It is speculated that the reason for this cluster pattern is the difference in the natural geography and grazing characteristics between the two places and the surrounding bordering areas. In other words, the disease flow factors in the regions and the surrounding areas are not continuous, and the epidemic factors are discontinuous in the geographical pattern. The distribution of disease epidemic factors tends to be discrete.

5. Conclusions

This survey showed a high Fasciola spp. prevalence (17.32% by fecal test and 27.27% by autopsy) in yaks in 16 counties of Qinghai province in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, which causes economic losses to the local yak industry and poses a potential threat to the health of the native population. Moreover, the location and age of yaks in the surveyed area are related to the Fasciola spp. infection. These findings not only extend the epidemiological information on Fasciola spp. infection in yaks but also provide useful baseline data for the prevention and control of fascioliasis in yaks.

Author Contributions

Sample collection, J.C., M.L., C.L., Q.C. and D.M.; data curation and statistical analysis, Q.C. and D.M.; formal analysis, J.C. and C.L.; methodology, J.C.; writing—original draft, Q.C.; writing—review and editing, M.L. and H.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No.2017YFE0108600), the National Key R&D Plan Special Project (2018YFD0502305), and the Qinghai Province Science and Technology Achievements Transformation Project (2022-NK-118).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Qinghai University (protocol code 2023-QHMKY-008, date of approval: 5 April 2023).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the staff, workers, and herdsmen who assisted us in sample collection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sun, H.M. The WTO accession and China’s yak industry. J. Int. Trade 2002, 28, 16–18. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. Niu, C.E.; Zhang, L.P.; Sun, J.F.; Gao, Y.Q.; Cao, J.M. Analysis on the current situation of yak resources and its product development and utilization. J. Anhui Agric. Sci. 2009, 37, 8003–8005. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. Ma, J.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Yu, X.; Hu, R.; Wang, X.; Cao, G.; Zou, H.; Shah, A.M.; Peng, Q.; et al. Comparing the bacterial community in the gastrointestinal tracts between growth-retarded and normal yaks on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 600516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Caravedo, M.A.; Cabada, M.M. Human fascioliasis: Current epidemiological status and strategies for diagnosis, treatment, and control. Res. Rep. Trop. Med. 2020, 11, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Arias, M.S.; Piñeiro, P.; Sánchez-Andrade, R.; Suárez, J.L.; Hillyer, G.V.; Díez-Baños, P.; Paz-Silva, A.; Morrondo, P. Relationship between exposure to Fasciola hepatica in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) and cattle extensively reared in an endemic area. Res. Vet. Sci. 2013, 95, 1031–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Torres, G.B.; Iwashita, A.T.; Vargas, C.M.; Luján, L.V.; Bianchi, H.A.; Casanova, R.T. Human fasciolasis and gastrointestinal compromise: Study of 277 patients in the Cayetano Heredia national hospital (1970–2002). Rev. Gastroenterol. Peru 2004, 24, 143–157. [Google Scholar]
  7. Krsak, M.; Patel, N.U.; Poeschla, E.M. Case report: Hepatic fascioliasis in a young Afghani woman with severe wheezing, high-grade peripheral eosinophilia, and liver lesions: A brief literature review. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2019, 100, 88–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Changwong, M.R.; Pinto, E.J.O.; Guzman, R.P.; Terashima, I.A.; Samalvides, C.F. Demographic and clinical aspects of hepatic fascioliasis between 2013–2010 in National Hospital Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru. Rev. Gastroenterol. Peru 2016, 36, 23–28. [Google Scholar]
  9. Machicado, C.; Machicado, J.D.; Maco, V.; Terashima, A.; Marcos, L.A. Association of Fasciola hepatica infection with liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and cancer: A systematic review. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2016, 9, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Fentie, T.; Erqou, S.; Gedefaw, M.; Desta, A. Epidemiology of human fascioliasis and intestinal parasitosis among schoolchildren in Lake Tana Basin, northwest Ethiopia. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2013, 107, 480–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Alemayehu, T.; Tariku, S.; Tesfaye, K. Fascioliasis complicated by acute necrotizing pancreatitis in an Ethiopian child—A case report on a rare complication of a rarely reported emerging disease. IJID Reg. 2022, 3, 135–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Liu, W.D. Study of dynamics and control of nematodes and trematodes in young yaks. Chin. Qinghai J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 1992, 22, 6–10. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. Wu, F.; Li, T.M.; Guo, Y.C. Investigation of yak parasites in Suhurima region. Chin. Qinghai J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 1984, 5, 116. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  14. Ma, C. Study on sustainable development strategie of Tianzhu white yak industry. Domest. Anim. Ecol. 2008, 29, 133–135. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang, X.X.; Feng, S.Y.; Ma, J.G.; Zheng, W.B.; Yin, M.Y.; Qin, S.Y.; Zhou, D.H.; Zhao, Q.; Zhu, X.Q. Seroprevalence and risk factors of fascioliasis in yaks, Bos grunniens, from three counties of Gansu province, China. Korean J. Parasitol. 2017, 55, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gao, X.; Zhang, L.H.; Tong, X.L.; Zhang, H.; Mehmood, K.; Jiang, X.; Li, J.K. Epidemiological survey of fasciolosis in yaks and sheep living on the Qinghai-Tibet plateau, China. Acta Trop. 2020, 201, 105212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Li, P.; Zhu, Q.; Peng, C.; Zhang, J.; Wang, M.; Zhang, J.J.; Ding, J.H.; Zhou, X.L. Change in autumn vegetation phenology and the climate controls from 1982 to 2012 on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 10, 1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhan, N.; Liu, W.; Ye, T.; Li, H.; Chen, S.; Ma, H. High-resolution livestock seasonal distribution data on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in 2020. Sci. Data 2023, 10, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. NY/T1950-2010; Technical Specification for the Diagnosis of Fasciolosis. Agricultural Industry Standard of the People’s Republic of China, Ministry of Agriculture: Beijing, China, 2010. (In Chinese)
  20. Nielsen, M.K. What makes a good fecal egg count technique? Vet. Parasitol. 2021, 296, 109509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Bam, J.; Thüer, S.; Holinger, M.; Oberhansli, T.; Leubin, M.; Leiber, F.; Werne, S. Performance and parasitological parameters of steers sequentially grazed with lambs. Vet. Parasitol. 2022, 302, 109645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, C.A.; Wang, D.W.; Wei, F.Q. Preliminary investigation on the infection of Fasciola hepatica in yak in Nyingchi region. Tibet. Med. J. 1996, 17, 62–63. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  23. Mima, D.Z.; She, Y.X.; Qiong, R. Parasitoid fauna of yak in Nyingchi, Tibet. Chin. J. Vet. Med. 2001, 37, 23. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  24. Ma, R.L.; Cai, J.S.; Li, L.F.; Ma, Z.Q.; Zhao, Q.B.; He, S.D.; Che, F.M.; Ni, M. Investigation on the parasite flora of Haiyan yak in Qinghai Province. Chin. J. Vet. Med. 2011, 47, 52–53. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  25. Chai, Z.M. Investigation of fluke infection in yak liver in Xinghai County. Ani. Hus. Vet. Med. 2013, 45, 112. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  26. Cai, J.S.; Li, L.F.; Ma, R.l.; Zhao, Q.B.; Ma, Z.Q.; Hu, G.W.; Li, J.; Yang, Q.X.; Wen, J.M.; Cao, X.F.; et al. Qinghai qilian area of cattle and sheep parasite fauna investigation report. Chin. J. Vet. Med. 2013, 49, 48–49. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  27. He, F.F.; Li, C.H.; Lei, M.T.; Tong, X.J.; Cai, J.Z. Investigation on parasitic diseases of yaks in Xinghai County, Hainan Prefecture, Qinghai Province. Anim. Husb. Vet. Med. 2015, 47, 107–111. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  28. Lei, M.T.; Cai, J.Z.; Li, C.H.; Li, J.; Li, Z.X.C.R.; Huang, B.; Chen, Z.G. Investigation on parasitic diseases of Qilian Yak in Qinghai Province. Chin. J. Vet. Med. 2016, 52, 44–46. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  29. Chai, Z.M. Prevalence of Fasciola hepatica infection in yaks in Xinghai. Anim. Husb. Vet. Med. 2013, 2, 112. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  30. Yang, Y.F.; Wang, H.N.; Yang, G.Y.; Luo, G.R.; Yuan, B.; Yang, F. Epidemiological survey and cotrol method on parasitic diseases of yak and Tibet sheep on the West-North Sichuan grassland. Chin. Sichuan Anim. Vet. Sci. 2003, S1, 33–34. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  31. Qin, S.Y.; Yin, M.Y.; Song, G.Y.; Tan, Q.D.; Wang, J.L.; Zhou, D.H. Prevalence of gastrointestinal parasites in free-range yaks (Bos grunniens) in Gansu Province, Northwest China. BMC Vet. Res. 2019, 15, 410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. RangaRao, G.S.; Sharma, R.L.; Hemaprasanth. Parasitic infections of Indian yak Bos (poephagus) grunniens—An overview. Vet. Parasitol. 1994, 53, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Acharya, K.P.; Nirmal, B.K.; Kaphle, K.; Mahato, M.K.; Yadav, G.P.; Rana, H.B.; Kaphle, K. Prevalence of gastrointestinal and liver parasites in yaks in the cold desert area of lower Mustang, Nepal. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Dis. 2016, 6, 147–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kong, X.Y.; Gan, F.B.; Gao, X.; Zhang, W.H.; Cai, J.S.; Li, J.K. Yak fasciola gigantica observation and PCR identification of trematode. Chin. Hubei Anim. Vet. Sci. 2019, 40, 5–6. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  35. Gao, X.; Wang, D.; Zhang, Z.; Quan, C.; Zhou, S.; Li, K.; Li, Y.; Zhao, S.; Kong, X.; Kulyar, M.F.; et al. Genetic characterization and phylogenetic analysis of fasciola species isolated from yaks on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Front. Vet. Sci. 2022, 12, 824785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Identification of Fasciola spp. eggs isolated from feces. The complete Fasciola spp. egg form is visible, golden-yellow, long elliptic or oval, narrow at one end, and blunt at the other end (multiple: 10 × 10).
Figure 1. Identification of Fasciola spp. eggs isolated from feces. The complete Fasciola spp. egg form is visible, golden-yellow, long elliptic or oval, narrow at one end, and blunt at the other end (multiple: 10 × 10).
Animals 13 03330 g001
Figure 2. Morphology of Fasciola spp.; (a) sample of collected worm; and (b) an adult worm stained with German hematoxylin.
Figure 2. Morphology of Fasciola spp.; (a) sample of collected worm; and (b) an adult worm stained with German hematoxylin.
Animals 13 03330 g002
Figure 3. Bar chart and differences in infection rate in yaks by age group (groups marked with the same letter are not significantly different).
Figure 3. Bar chart and differences in infection rate in yaks by age group (groups marked with the same letter are not significantly different).
Animals 13 03330 g003
Figure 4. Examination results of Fasciola spp. infection in yaks from different areas; (a) regional composition of positive samples; and (b) group bar charts of regional infection conditions (groups marked with the same letter are not significantly different).
Figure 4. Examination results of Fasciola spp. infection in yaks from different areas; (a) regional composition of positive samples; and (b) group bar charts of regional infection conditions (groups marked with the same letter are not significantly different).
Animals 13 03330 g004
Figure 5. Examination results of Fasciola spp. infection rate in yaks in different areas spatial features: (a) map of the regional distribution of Fasciola spp. infection rates in yaks; (b) univariate Moran scatter plots of Fasciola spp. infection in yaks in different regions; (c) spatially relevant areas with significance; and (d) areas where clustering characteristics of infection rates are spatially significantly correlated.
Figure 5. Examination results of Fasciola spp. infection rate in yaks in different areas spatial features: (a) map of the regional distribution of Fasciola spp. infection rates in yaks; (b) univariate Moran scatter plots of Fasciola spp. infection in yaks in different regions; (c) spatially relevant areas with significance; and (d) areas where clustering characteristics of infection rates are spatially significantly correlated.
Animals 13 03330 g005
Figure 6. A disease risk assessment graph (nomogram) generated using a logistic regression model based on sample regions and yak age. The positions of the scales for different ages and regions correspond to the first row. For each factor, one can take the score for the corresponding position in the top row, add up the scores for all factors, find the scale for the corresponding total score in the fourth row, and then observe the risk of disease below the total points relative position.
Figure 6. A disease risk assessment graph (nomogram) generated using a logistic regression model based on sample regions and yak age. The positions of the scales for different ages and regions correspond to the first row. For each factor, one can take the score for the corresponding position in the top row, add up the scores for all factors, find the scale for the corresponding total score in the fourth row, and then observe the risk of disease below the total points relative position.
Animals 13 03330 g006
Table 1. The information about the samples collected in this study.
Table 1. The information about the samples collected in this study.
AreasGeographic CoordinatesAltitude (m)Annual Precipitation (mm)Fecal Test
(Number)
Autopsy
(Number)
GongheE 100°62′66.23″, N 36°28′87.03″above 3200371.09622
XinghaiE 99°58′57.18″, N 35°35′18.25″above 3306360.09821
GuinanE 100°13′–101°31′, N 35°09′–36°08′about 3100488.09622
QilianE 100°26′40.41″, N 38°03′44.15″above 2717406.79726
GangchaE 100°08′45.00″, N 37°19′31.69″above 3700345.09623
HaiyanE 100°59′39.95″, N 36°53′40.81″above 3008447.49622
DulanE 98°06′09.74″, N 36°18′27.40″above 3041213.49624
WulanE 98°48′67.39″, N 36°93′57.48″above 3100210.49726
DariE 99°39′3.99″, N 33°45′12.55″above 3900531.59620
MaduoE 97°19′15.99″, N 34°57′10.55″above 4290585.59620
YushuE 97°00′87.85″, N 32°99′31.07″above 3681487.09722
ChengduoE 97°06′39.00″, N 33°22′09.18″above 3851500.09620
NangqianE 96°48′58″, N31°32′20″above 3650527.39622
HenanE 102°08′56.36″, N 34°29′16.96″above 3520597.19620
ZekuE 100°34′–102°08′, N 34°45′–35°32′above 3650564.99620
DatongE 101°38′00.28″, N 37°25′23.12″above 2950547.29732
Total 1542242
Table 2. The slaughterhouse source of the autopsy samples.
Table 2. The slaughterhouse source of the autopsy samples.
NumberSlaughterhouse
1Qinghai Lake meat industry Co., Ltd., slaughterhouse (Gonghe, China)
2Xinghai County green grass source food Co., Ltd., slaughterhouse (Xinghai, China)
3Guinan County Lvjiayuan cattle and sheep slaughterhouse (Guinan, China)
4Qilian Yida animal products Co., Ltd., slaughterhouse (Qilian, China)
5Gangcha County Yipin animal products Co., Ltd., slaughterhouse (Gangcha, China)
6Haiyan County Huaxia cattle and sheep slaughterhouse (Haiyan, China)
7Qinghai Kaitai agriculture and animal husbandry Co., Ltd., slaughterhouse (Dulan, China)
8Wulan County Hengcheng beef and mutton slaughterhouse (Wulan, China)
9Guoluo Haoyun designated Cattle and Sheep Co., Ltd. (Dari, China)
10Guoluo Jin Grassland yak slaughtering and processing Co., Ltd. (Maduo, China)
11Zhiduo County meat food Co., Ltd., slaughterhouse (Zhiduo, China)
12Chengduo County plateau yak livestock products Co., Ltd., slaughterhouse (Chengduo, China)
13Yushu Muyuan meat industry Co., Ltd., slaughterhouse (Yushu, China)
14Sanjiang Ranch Co., Ltd., slaughterhouse (Henan, China)
15Qinghai Northwest Hong organic resources development Co., Ltd., cattle and sheep slaughterhouse (Zeku, China)
16Qinghai Datong Jinlu Industry and Trade Co., Ltd., slaughterhouse (Datong, China)
Table 3. The fecal worm egg infection of 1542 yaks Fasciola spp. in different areas.
Table 3. The fecal worm egg infection of 1542 yaks Fasciola spp. in different areas.
AreasNumber of Investigated YaksPositive Rate (%)Mean Intensity (epg)
Gonghe9617.71 (17/96)53.3 (29–79)
Xinghai9823.47 (23/98)46.3 (21–66)
Guinan9627.08 (26/96)45.6 (20–70)
Qilian9717.53 (17/97)49.7 (23–76)
Gangcha9637.50 (36/96)57.9 (30–112)
Haiyan9632.29 (31/96)53.8 (28–97)
Dulan9638.54 (37/96)55.7 (27–82)
Wulan9740.21 (39/97)63.1 (36–103)
Dari9600
Maduo9600
Zhiduo9700
Chengduo9600
Nangqian9619.79 (19/96)45.1 (18–84)
Henan9622.92 (22/96)48.1 (32–59)
Zeku9600
Datong 9700
Total154217.32 (267/1542)51.9 (18–112)
Table 4. The intensity and rate of Fasciola spp. infection in yaks of different ages.
Table 4. The intensity and rate of Fasciola spp. infection in yaks of different ages.
Areas0–1 (<1 Year Old)1–2 (≥1 Year Old and <3 Years Old)Over 3 Years (≥3 Years Old)
NumberMean Intensity (Epg)NumberMean Intensity (Epg)NumberMean Intensity (Epg)
Gonghe3247.4 (29–62)3253.2 (37–64)3059.3 (34–79)
Xinghai3342.3 (21–58)3246.6 (30–59)3150.1 (28–66)
Guinan3239.5 (20–62)3244.8 (27–70)3152.6 (36–68)
Qilian3243.9 (23–53)3250.3 (33–68)3054.8 (33–76)
Gangcha3350.2 (30–92)3257.4 (38–89)3166.1 (29–112)
Haiyan3345.7 (28–71)3253.0 (39–82)3262.6 (40–97)
Dulan3248.9 (27–54)3257.7 (31–69)3260.4 (39–82)
Wulan3455.1 (36–79)3263.2 (39–93)3271.0 (43–103)
Dari320320320
Maduo320320320
Zhiduo330320320
Chengduo320320320
Nangqian3238.7 (18–54)3245.5 (25–61)3151.2 (37–84)
Henan3243.5 (32–54)3248.5 (41–58)3252.7 (43–65)
Zeku000000
Datong330330320
Total51545.5 (18–92)51352.0 (23–93)51458.1 (28–112)
Infection rate9.90%16.18%25.88%
Table 5. Investigation of Fasciola spp. infection in yaks in different areas by autopsy.
Table 5. Investigation of Fasciola spp. infection in yaks in different areas by autopsy.
Study AreasNumber of Yaks
Examined
Prevalence (%)Mean Intensity (Number of Worms)
Gonghe2222.73 (5/22)9.2 (3–22)
Xinghai2128.57 (6/21)17.5 (4–37)
Guinan2227.27 (6/22)14.2 (6–26)
Qilian2619.23 (5/26)11.6 (6–18)
Gangcha2339.13 (9/23)30.6 (7–46)
Haiyan2231.82 (7/22)22.7 (3–21)
Dulan2437.50 (9/24)28.3 (4–34)
Wulan2638.46 (10/26)28.6 (9–39)
Dari2000
Maduo2000
Yushu2200
Chengduo2000
Nangqian2222.73 (5/22)20.1 (7–43)
Henan2020.00 (4/20)16.8 (12–36)
Zeku2000
Datong3200
Total242 27.27 (66/242)21.2 (3–46)
Table 6. Risk factors for Fasciola spp. infection in yaks.
Table 6. Risk factors for Fasciola spp. infection in yaks.
FactorGroupnPrevalence (%)OR95% CI for the ORp-Value
Upper LimitLower Limit
Age1 year32215.841.000
2 years32025.94 1.895 1.275 2.816 0.002
Over 3 years32241.30 3.921 2.681 5.736 <0.001
AreasQilian9717.531.000
Gonghe9617.71 1.007 0.472 2.146 0.986
Xinghai9823.47 1.459 0.711 2.993 0.303
Guinan9627.08 1.789 0.881 3.632 0.108
Gangcha9637.50 2.985 1.503 5.927 0.002
Haiyan9632.29 2.334 1.166 4.675 0.017
Dulan9638.54 3.130 1.578 6.207 0.001
Wulan9740.21 3.348 1.693 6.619 0.001
Nangqian9619.79 1.162 0.553 2.440 0.692
Henan9622.92 1.413 0.685 2.917 0.349
Total 96427.70
The results of the analysis are presented as the number of yaks (n), odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cai, Q.; Lei, M.; Li, C.; Cai, J.; Ma, D.; Zhang, H. Epidemiological Investigation of Yak (Bos grunniens) Fascioliasis in the Pastoral Area of Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, China. Animals 2023, 13, 3330. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ani13213330

AMA Style

Cai Q, Lei M, Li C, Cai J, Ma D, Zhang H. Epidemiological Investigation of Yak (Bos grunniens) Fascioliasis in the Pastoral Area of Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, China. Animals. 2023; 13(21):3330. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ani13213330

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cai, Qijian, Mengtong Lei, Chunhua Li, Jinzhong Cai, Doudou Ma, and Houshuang Zhang. 2023. "Epidemiological Investigation of Yak (Bos grunniens) Fascioliasis in the Pastoral Area of Qinghai–Tibet Plateau, China" Animals 13, no. 21: 3330. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ani13213330

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop