Next Article in Journal
Extra-Nuclear Functions of the Transcription Factor Grainyhead-Like 3 in the Endothelium—Interaction with Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase
Next Article in Special Issue
Aesculetin Inhibits Airway Thickening and Mucus Overproduction Induced by Urban Particulate Matter through Blocking Inflammation and Oxidative Stress Involving TLR4 and EGFR
Previous Article in Journal
Fate of β-Carotene within Loaded Delivery Systems in Food: State of Knowledge
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Positive Allosteric Modulation of alpha7-Nicotinic Cholinergic Receptors by GAT107 Increases Bacterial Lung Clearance in Hyperoxic Mice by Decreasing Oxidative Stress in Macrophages
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design and Comprehensive Characterization of Tetramethylpyrazine (TMP) for Targeted Lung Delivery as Inhalation Aerosols in Pulmonary Hypertension (PH): In Vitro Human Lung Cell Culture and In Vivo Efficacy

1
College of Pharmacy, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
2
Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ 85287, USA
3
Department of Medicine, Division of Translational & Regenerative Medicine, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
4
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
5
The BIO5 Research Institute, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
6
Institute of the Environment, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 7 February 2021 / Revised: 3 March 2021 / Accepted: 5 March 2021 / Published: 11 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antioxidants and Lung Diseases)

Abstract

:
This is the first study reporting on the design and development innovative inhaled formulations of the novel natural product antioxidant therapeutic, tetramethylpyrazine (TMP), also known as ligustrazine. TMP is obtained from Chinese herbs belonging to the class of Ligusticum. It is known to have antioxidant properties. It can act as a Nrf2/ARE activator and a Rho/ROCK inhibitor. The present study reports for the first time on the comprehensive characterization of raw TMP (non-spray dried) and spray dried TMP in a systematic manner using thermal analysis, electron microscopy, optical microscopy, and Raman spectroscopy. The in vitro aerosol dispersion performance of spray dried TMP was tested using three different FDA-approved unit-dose capsule-based human dry powder inhaler devices. In vitro human cellular studies were conducted on pulmonary cells from different regions of the human lung to examine the biocompatibility and non-cytotoxicity of TMP. Furthermore, the efficacy of inhaled TMP as both liquid and dry powder inhalation aerosols was tested in vivo using the monocrotaline (MCT)-induced PH rat model.

1. Introduction

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a serious life-threatening disease of the pulmonary and cardiovascular system [1]. It is one of the most devastating chronic diseases of the pulmonary circulation, which can be encountered by healthy individuals living in higher altitude, divers, mountain climber, athletes, and during exercise and rehabilitation [2]. It can also be found in patients in the setting of collagen vascular disease (e.g., localized cutaneous systemic sclerosis), portal hypertension, congenital left-to-right intracardiac shunts, infections with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), and persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn [3]. PAH can be defined clinically as a mean pulmonary arterial pressure of ≥25 mmHg at rest or ≥30 mmHg during exercise [4,5]. It can be attributed to combined effects of sustained vasoconstriction, concentric vascular remodeling, in situ thrombosis, and arterial wall stiffening, resulting in elevated pulmonary vascular resistance [5]. As a consequence, elevated pulmonary vascular resistance increases the right heart afterload and in the fullness of time results in right ventricular hypertrophy and eventually right heart failure and death [5].
The current therapies fall into several classes, including vasodilators, anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents, anti-inflammatory, and vascular-remodeling therapies [1,3]. Among these are vasodilative and antiproliferative drugs such as nitric oxide (NO), NO-donors, adenosine, calcium channel blockers (e.g., nifedipine, diltiazem), endothelin receptor antagonist (e.g., ambrisentan, bosentan, macitentan), phosphodiesterase inhibitors (sildenafil, tadalafil, vardenafil), prostacyclin and prostacyclin analogs (e.g., beraprost, epoprostenol, iloprost, and 2reprostinil), and guanylate cyclase stimulators (e.g., riociguat) [6]. Most of these drugs are administered to the patient either orally or intravenously leading to systemic side effects such systemic hypotension. The exceptions are two drugs, iloprost and 2reprostinil, which are inhaled therapies FDA-approved for human use in marketed pharmaceutical products as liquid inhalation aerosols delivered by nebulization [7]. There is a great unmet need to have more inhalation aerosol therapeutic drug delivery systems for targeted pulmonary delivery for the treatment of PH.
Tetramethylpyrazine (TMP) (also known as Ligustrazine) is an active alkaloid contained in the rhizome of Ligusticum chuanxiong Hort, an herb that has been used for many years in China and Japan as an intravenous (i.v.) infusion solution for the treatment of occlusive cerebral arteriolar disease [8] and PAH [8,9]. It is a vasodilator [10] and its mechanism of action include calcium antagonism, cAMP production, and endothelium-dependent NO-mediated relaxation [9]. Furthermore, it has been reported that TMP could significantly decrease pulmonary hypertension caused by acute and chronic hypoxia in rats and ferrets in ex vivo isolated perfused lung model [11,12]. TMP has been shown to possess neuroprotective [13,14] and anti-platelet functions [15]. The anti-inflammatory effect of TMP resulted in alleviating asthma in rodent models [15,16]. TMP has been shown to have protective lung effects against injury in acute lung injury (ALI) in a rat model of ALI [17]. The inhibitory effect of TMP on the RhoA/ROCK pathway [17,18] is a uniquely distinct pharmacological mechanistic advantage in using TMP to treat PH. The protective effect of TMP on endothelial dysfunction has been reported based on studying oxidative damage and mitochondrial dysfunction [19]. This antioxidant was shown to penetrate the skin when formulated for transdermal drug delivery for Alzheimer’s treatment [20]. In addition, it has been shown to act as a Nrf2 activator (i.e., activates the Nrf/ARE pathway) in oxidative stress injury in vivo in rats [21]. Ligustrazine’s antioxidant effects on lung fibrosis and ROS-related autophagy in an in vivo lung fibrosis model has been reported [22]. The antioxidant effects of ligustrazine in a pulmonary damage burn model has been studied [23].
Off-target systemic side effects are therapeutic-limiting due to systemic administration of the drug as an intravenous (i.v.) infusion acting on the systemic vascular circulatory system. Hence, a targeted approach to PH therapy would be to deliver the drug locally to the airways targeting the lung directly. Whereas i.v. drug administration is invasive, not patient-friendly, and causes a systemic high concentration in a short period of time leading to adverse side effects, localized pulmonary delivery by inhalation aerosols is non-invasive, patient-friendly, and would inherently require a reduced amount of drug to bring about the same therapeutic response [24,25]. Currently, Ventavis® (nebulized iloprost inhalation solution) and Tyvaso® (nebulized treprostinil inhalation solution) are the only FDA-approved inhalation products indicated for the treatment of PH. Ventavis® is delivered as a liquid aerosol through the I-neb nebulizer system and is used to treat both adult and pediatric populations [26]. Relatively long administration times for reaching the needed dose and the high frequency of dosing administration can lead to patient non-compliance with nebulized liquid inhalation products.
Hence, targeted pulmonary drug delivery by inhalation aerosol delivery is not only non-invasive but offers many significant advantages such as a large surface area for high drug absorption [27,28,29], a rapid onset of therapeutic action [24,30], low enzymatic activity [28,29,31], extensive blood supply [32], avoidance of first-pass metabolism [27,28,32], reduced dosing frequency [28], and reduced side effects [27,29,32]. There are added advantages unique to dry powder inhalers which are reduced administration time, reduced frequency of dosing administration, better physicochemical drug stability, more devices available that are versatile, small, lightweight, and portable without needing a power supply. Marketed DPI pharmaceutical products are approved by the FDA for use in children as young as 4 years old. In addition, the top-performing inhalation products on the market are dry powder inhalers due to clinically superior efficacy and high patient acceptance.
In this study, we report on the comprehensive characterization of the solid-state physicochemical properties of raw TMP and advanced spray dried TMP particles. In addition, this study reports on the in vitro aerosol dispersion properties of TMP dry powder aerosols using three different human dry powder inhaler devices varying in shear stress properties and in vitro cellular studies using human lung cells from different regions of the lung. Moreover, this study reports for the first time on the in vivo safety of inhaled TMP in healthy rats and in vivo efficacy of both liquid and dry powder inhalation aerosols in reducing the pulmonary arterial pressure in the validated monocrotaline (MCT) rat model of PH.

2. Experimental: Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

TMP (≥98% purity) (C8H12N2; molecular weight (MW): 136.19), shown in Figure 1 (ChemDraw™ Ultra Ver. 10.0; CambridgeSoft, Cambridge, MA, USA), was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Methanol (HPLC grade, ACS-certified grade, purity 99.9%) was obtained from Fisher Scientific (Fair Lawn, NJ, USA). Hydranal®-Coulomat AD was from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Resazurin sodium salt and DMSO LC-MS grade were from Thermo Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). The nitrogen gas used was ultra-high purity (UHP) (Cryogenics and gas facility, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA).

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Advanced Closed-Mode Spray Drying from Organic Solution

Spray drying (SD) was carried out using a B-290 Buchi mini spray dryer coupled with a B-295 inert loop and high-performance cyclone (Buchi Labortechnik AG, Flawil, Switzerland) in a closed-mode using compressed UHP dry nitrogen as the atomizing gas. The feed solution was prepared by dissolving 1% w/v drug TMP in methanol. A stainless steel nozzle with a diameter of 0.7 mm was used to atomize the drug solution. As listed in Table 1, the following conditions were used: atomization gas flow rate 670 L/h (55 mm), aspirator rate of 38 m3/h (100%), inlet temperature of 100 °C and feed rate of 27 mL/min. Spray-dried powders were stored in desiccators at −20 °C until further analysis.

2.2.2. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

Using similar conditions reported in previous studies [24,33], the drug particles as supplied (raw) and spray dried particles were imaged using SEM FEI Inspect S (Brno, Czech Republic) scanning electron microscope. Briefly, the samples were sputter coated with gold for 1.5 min and 15 mAmps current using Anatech Hummer 6.2 (Union City, CA, USA) gold coater and imaged using 30 kV accelerating voltage electron beam.

2.2.3. Laser Diffraction Particle Sizing and Size Distribution

Particle size and size distributions of the particles were determined by laser diffraction with the SALD-7101 (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Columbia, MD, USA) using conditions previously reported [34,35,36,37] for measurement of the mean size and size distribution of SD particles in aqueous suspension. Samples were dispersed in ultrapure water and ultrasonicated for 10 s in a water bath ultrasonicator (Branson 7500, Branson Ultrasonics, Danbury, CT, USA) before measuring particle size. The sample particle dispersion was immediately transferred to particle size measuring cell and kept stirring during measurement in nanoparticle size analyzer. The low refractive index of 1.50–0.00 i was used. Volume-based measurements obtained DV10, DV50, and DV90 were used as particle size characterization parameters. The Span value was calculated using the Equation (1) defined as:
Span = [(DV90 − DV10)/DV50]

2.2.4. X-ray Powder Diffraction (XRPD)

Using similar conditions reported by previous studies [24,33], X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD) patterns of samples were collected with Cu Kα radiation (45 kV, 40 mA, and λ = 1.5406 Å) between 10.0° and 80.0° (2θ) with a scan rate of 2.00° per minute at ambient temperature using PanAnalytical X’pert diffractometer (PANalytical Inc., Westborough, MA, USA).

2.2.5. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

Thermal analysis and phase transitions measurements were performed using differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) TA Q1000 differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) (TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) with RSC90 automated cooling system similar to previous conditions [24,33]. Samples weighing 1–3 mg of the test powder were used with a hermetic T-Zero® DSC pans for melting (Tm) and enthalpy (ΔH) measurements. The pans were heated between 0 °C to 150 °C at a heating scanning rate of 5.00 °C/min. All measurements were made in triplicate.

2.2.6. Hot-Stage Microscopy (HSM) under Cross-Polarizers

Using similar conditions reported previously [24,33], hot-stage microscopy (HSM) was performed using Leica DMLP cross-polarized microscope (Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with a Mettler FP 80 central processor heating unit and Mettler FP82 hot stage (Columbus, OH, USA). Powder samples were mounted on a cover glass slide and heated from 25.0 °C to 100.0 °C at a heating rate of 5.00 °C/min. Images were captured periodically.

2.2.7. Karl Fischer Titration (KFT)

The residual water content of spray dried powder was analytically quantified by Karl Fisher (KF) coulometric titration using a TitroLine 7500 trace titrator (SI Analytics, Yellow Springs, OH, USA) similar to previous studies [24,33]. Approximately 1–10 mg of powder was added directly into the reaction cell that contained Hydranal® coulomat AD reagent.

2.2.8. Raman Spectroscopy

Spectroscopy of the raw and spray-dried powders was carried by-non-invasive and non-destructive Raman spectroscopy for molecular fingerprinting with a Renishaw InVia Reflex (Gloucestershire, UK) at the surface using a 20× magnification objective on a Leica DM2700 optical microscope (Wetzlar, Germany) and equipped with a Renishaw inVia Raman system (Gloucestershire, UK) using similar conditions previously reported [24,33,38,39]. Raman spectra were obtained at 514 nm laser excitation using a 20× magnification objective lens.

2.2.9. In Vitro Aerosol Dispersion Performance

In vitro aerosol dispersion study was conducted in accordance with US Pharmacopeia (USP) Chapter <601> specification [40] on aerosols and using conditions similar to those previously reported [24,33]. The Next-Generation Impactor® (NGI®) (Copley Scientific, Nottingham, UK) with a stainless steel induction port (USP throat) attachment was used at a flow rate of 60 L/min with an actuation time of 10 s through the inhaler device. The aerosol dispersion performance was tested using three different FDA-approved human unit-dose capsule-based inhaler devices varying in shear stress properties. These three human DPI devices are namely: a low-shear stress device, the Aerolizer® (Merck, Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA); a medium-shear stress device, the Neohaler® (Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc, Marlborough, MA, USA); and a high-shear stress device, the HandiHaler® (Boehringer Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany). Quali-V clear HPMC size 3 inhalation-grade capsules (Qualicaps, RTP, NC, USA) were filled with about 10 mg of powder. Critical quality attributes of aerosols such as fine particle dose (FPD), fine particle fraction with respect to nominal dose (FPFND), fine particle fraction with respect to emitted dose (FPFED), and emitted dose (ED) were calculated using the following Equations (2)–(5):
FPD = Mass   of   particles   deposited   on   stages   2   to   7
FPFND =   FPD Initial   particle   mass   loaded   in   capsules   ×   100 %
FPFED =   FPD Total   particle   mass   on   all   stages   ×   100 %
ED = Initial   mass   in   capsules     Final   mass   remaining   in   capsules Initial   mass   in   capsules     ×   100 %

2.2.10. In Vitro Human Cell Viability

Human pulmonary cell lines for cellular studies were purchased from the American type culture collection ATCC® A549 (ATCC® CCL-185™), H358 (ATCC® CRL-5807™) and Calu-3 (ATCC® HTB-55™). A549 and H358 were grown in Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (DMEM) Advanced 1X supplemented with fetal bovine serum (FBS), Pen-Strep, Fungizone®, and L-glutamine obtained from Gibco® by Life Technologies (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Hanover Park, IL, USA). Calu-3 cell line was grown in Eagle’s minimum essential medium (EMEM) obtained from ATCC supplemented with FBS, Pen-Strep and Fungizone® obtained from Gibco® by Life Technologies (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., USA).
Cell-based assays are often used to determine if test molecules have effects on cell proliferation or cell death. The A549 pulmonary cell line is a human alveolar epithelial lung adenocarcinoma cell line for the deep lung small airways (respiratory region) and often used as an in vitro human cellular model of the alveolar type II pneumocyte cell in in vitro pulmonary drug delivery and metabolism studies. The H348 pulmonary cell line is a human bronchioalveolar epithelial cell line from the deep lung small airways (respiratory region) and expresses lung surfactant-associated protein A (SP-A) [25]. Both cell lines were grown in a growth medium including Dulbecco’s modified eagle’s medium (DMEM) advanced 1×, 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS), Pen-Strep (100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL), Fungizone (0.5 μg/mL amphotericin B, 0.41 μg/mL sodium deoxycholate), and 2 mM L-Glutamine in a humidified incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2.
As previously reported [41], both cell lines were seeded in 96-well plates at 5000 cells/well and 100 μL/well and allowed to attach for 48 h. Then, the cells were exposed to 100 μL of TMP dissolved in media at different concentrations and incubated for 72 h after exposure. Continuously, 20 μL of 10 μM resazurin sodium salt dissolved in 1% DMSO in media was added to each well and incubated for 4 h. At this point, the fluorescence intensity was detected at 544 nm (excitation) and 590 nm (emission) using a Synergy H1 Multi-Mode Reader (BioTek Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). The relative viability of each sample was calculated as follows:
Relative   viability   ( % ) =   Sample   fluorescence   intensity   Control   fluorescence   intensity   ×   100 %

2.2.11. In Vitro Transepithelial Electrical Resistance (TEER)

Calu-3 lung epithelial cells, a human lung adenocarcinoma cell line derived from the bronchial submucosal large airway region, were grown in a growth medium including Eagle’s minimum essential medium (EMEM) (obtained from ATCC), 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS), Pen-Strep (100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL), Fungizone (0.5 μg/mL amphotericin B, 0.41 μg/mL sodium deoxycholate) in a humidified incubator at 37 °C and 5% CO2, as previously reported [24]. The cells were seeded at 500,000 cells/mL in Costar Transwells® (0.4 μm polyester membrane, 12 mm for a 12-well plate, Corning, NY, USA) with 0.5 mL of media on the apical side and 1.5 mL of media on the basolateral side. Media was changed every other day from the basolateral and apical side. After 10 days of growth, when the cells reached a TEER value of about 1000 Ω/cm2 which is an indicator of a confluent monolayer at liquid covered culture (LCC) the media was removed from both sides and 800 μL of media was added to the basolateral side of the transwells to facilitate air-interface culture (AIC) conditions. The TEER responses of the cells were measured with an Endohom 12 mm Culture Cup (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL, USA). For TEER measurement, 0.5 mL of media was added to the apical side of the Transwell 5 min before measurement and then immediately removed to return the cells to AIC conditions. After the TEER values reached 500 Ω/cm2 (indicating a confluent monolayer at AIC conditions), the cells were exposed to 100 μM of SD TMP and representative co-SD formulations dissolved in non-supplemented EMEM media. The liquid aerosol formulations were delivered to the Calu-3 cells at AIC using the Penn Century MicroSprayer® Aerosolizer-Model IA-1B. TEER values were then recorded for up to 7 days after aerosol treatment, as previously reported [24,42].

2.2.12. In Vivo Efficacy in PH-Induced Rats

In vivo studies were conducted in the monocrotaline (MCT) rat model of PH, a validated in vivo PH disease animal model, for testing inhaled TMP efficacy in decreasing PH. TMP was administered as an inhaled liquid aerosol in one study and as an inhaled spray-dried powder aerosol in a separate study. All rats were purchased from Charles River Laboratories International Inc. (Wilmington, MA, USA) and were weighed weekly to monitor their health. PH was induced by injecting 60 mg/kg of MCT dissolved in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) intraperitoneally (IP injection).
Inhaled liquid aerosol study description: A total of 25 male Sprague Dawley rats, each weighing in the range of 260–294 g, were used in this study. The animals were divided into 5 groups (n = 5) into the following categories: Group 1 Naïve (control); Group 2 Naïve + TMP; Group 3 Naïve + vehicle (drug-free solvent); Group 4 MCT (PH-induced); and Group 5 MCT + treated with TMP. Two weeks after MCT administration, the rats began inhaled aerosol treatment of an aerosolized liquid formulation of TMP using the Penn-Century MicroSprayer® Aerosolizer-Model IA-1B (Penn-Century, Inc, Wyndmoor, PA, USA) for 14 days. Each animal received 500 microliters of liquid TMP formulation. For the first few days, the animals received a dose of 100 mg/kg of TMP dissolved in 100% ethanol vehicle, but there were some unforeseen death in the study. Hence from day 4, the remaining animals received a dose of 10 mg/kg of TMP dissolved in a vehicle comprised of 10% ethanol + 90% PBS. The vehicle group animals received the respective solvent systems used to dissolved TMP. Right ventricle systolic pressure (RVSP) hemodynamics were performed at the end of 14 days drug treatment by inserting a customized pressure transducer catheter (SPR-513, Millar Instruments, Houston, TX, USA), into the right ventricle (RV) via the right jugular vein and right atrium. The transducer was connected to a Millar Transducer Control Unit TC-510 and PL3504 PowerLab 4/35 data acquisition system (AD Instruments, Inc., Colorado Springs, CO, USA). At the end of pressure recording, the animals were euthanized.
Inhaled spray-dried powder aerosol study description: A total of 30 male Sprague Dawley rats, each weighing in the range of 280–350 g, were used in this study. The animals were divided into 5 groups (n = 5) into the following categories: Group 1 Naïve (control); Group 2 Naïve + TMP; Group 3 MCT (PH-induced); Group 4 MCT+ treated with vehicle (air); and Group 5 MCT + treated with TMP. Two weeks after MCT IP injection, the rats started to receive treatment via aerosolization of a dry powder formulation of SD TMP (10 mg/kg dose) using the Penn-Century Dry Powder Insufflator™-Model DP-4R (Penn Century Inc., Wyndmoor, PA, USA), the dry powder inhaler delivery device customized for the respiratory tract of the rat, for 14 days. RVSP hemodynamics measurements were made similar to the liquid aerosol study. However, the measurements were performed at 2 weeks and 4 weeks after MCT administration to establish that the disease was induced. At the end of pressure recording, the animals were euthanized.
All animal studies were performed in accordance with Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee (IACUC) guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals under the protocol approved by University of Arizona Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee.

2.2.13. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed in at least triplicate (n = 3) unless otherwise mentioned. All data were statistically analyzed using Sigma Plot 13.0 (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). Unpaired student t-test and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were performed to compare the statistical significance of the test groups. p value ≤ 0.050 was considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

The particle shape and surface morphology were visualized by SEM as shown in Figure 2 for raw TMP and SD TMP. SD TMP exhibited oblong and relatively smooth morphology compared to raw TMP.

3.2. Laser Diffraction Particle Sizing

Laser diffraction sizing experiments were carried out on spray dried particles. The particles size distribution from the laser diffraction was in the range of 4–14 μm. The average values of Dv10, Dv50 and Dv90 were 4.186 ± 0.701, 6.156 ± 1.47 and 14.552 ± 4.928 μm, respectively. The Span value was calculated to be 1.684 ± 0.645.

3.3. X-ray Powder Diffraction (XRPD)

The XRPD pattern of raw TMP showed sharp and intensive peaks at 2θ-degree values of 16.36°, 24.78°, 36.35°, 37.37°, 40.75°, 45.03°, 48.58° and 50.89° characteristic of long-range molecular order (i.e., crystallinity) as shown in Figure 3. SD TMP had intensive peaks at 16.56°, 19.00°, 24.83°, and 27.56° indicative of the retention of crystallinity following spray drying. It is notable that the SD TMP particles, unlike raw TMP, did not exhibit any peak in the 2θ region of 30–60°. This is suggestive of a possible polymorphic conversion from the raw TMP crystalline form following spray drying under these conditions.

3.4. Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)

DSC of the raw TMP and spray dried TMP showed in Figure 4 has a single transition at around 85 °C. The single endotherm seen in the thermogram suggests that TMP is crystalline with a melting point around 85 °C.

3.5. Hot-Stage Microscopy (HSM) under Cross-Polarizer Lens

Raw TMP and SD TMP particles were visualized under cross-polarized light, as seen in Figure 5, and both exhibited birefringence, which is a characteristic feature of crystals. Upon heating the particles at a constant heating rate, raw TMP particles started melting at approximately 62 °C and completely melted at approximately 86 °C. While the SD TMP particles started melting around 60 °C and completely melted around 86 °C. This is consistent with DSC thermal analysis.

3.6. Karl Fischer Titration (KFT)

The residual water content in the powder using Karl Fischer titration was 0.633 ± 0.251% w/w for raw TMP. However, the SD TMP had a lower water content of 0.368 ± 0.103% w/w which can be attributed to the spray drying process. Table 2 lists the KFT values for raw and SD TMP powders.

3.7. Raman Spectroscopy

From Figure 6, the raw TMP and SD TMP have similar molecular fingerprinting spectra suggesting that the TMP molecule remained the same before and after spray drying. Prominent peaks were seen at 714 cm−1, 1286 cm−1, 1547 cm−1 and between 2900–3000 cm−1 wavenumbers. The sharp peaks seen in this spectra concurs with the inference of TMP crystallinity before and after spray drying.

3.8. In Vitro Aerosol Dispersion Performance

The aerosol dispersion performance of SD TMP using the three unit-dose capsule-based inhaler devices with varying shear stress properties is listed in Table 3. The NGI stage deposition using different human DPI devices is exhibited in Figure 7. The ED from the high-resistance HandiHaler®, (Boerhinger Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany) device was 100%, while the other two devices emitted 88% of the loaded powder from the capsules. The FPFND values were 1.41%, 4.36% and 3.33% for the Aerolizer® (Novartis AG, Basel, Switzerland), Neohaler® (Novartis Pharma Stein AG, Stein, Switzerland), and HandiHaler® (Boerhinger Ingelheim, Ingelheim, Germany), respectively.

3.9. In Vitro Human Cell Viability

In vitro cell viability assay was performed on pulmonary cell lines A549 and H358. Molar concentrations of 1 μM, 10 μM, 100 μM, and 1000 μM of raw TMP and SD TMP were tested after dissolving the drug in media. The relative cell viability of A549 cell line was 100% for both raw TMP and SD TMP at all concentrations. The relative viability of H358 cell line was 100% for SD TMP, however, at higher concentrations, the viability was decreased. The cell viability using different drug concentrations is shown in Figure 8.

3.10. In Vitro Transepithelial Electrical Resistance (TEER)

It can be seen from Figure 9 that three hours after treatment of the cells with 100 μM of SD TMP as a liquid aerosol using the Microsprayer® Aerosolizer (Penn-Century, Wyndmoor, PA, USA), the electrical resistance decreased, however on continuous culturing for seven days following the treatment, the resistance was regained. Calu-3 cells treated with the vehicle (10% ethanol + 90% EMEM non-supplemented media) had a similar trend of decreased resistance three hours after liquid aerosol treatment, followed by gradual increase in the resistance over a period of time.

3.11. In Vivo Efficacy Study

The rat’s body weight plots in Figure 10 shows a loss of weight with time for the Groups 4 and 5 that received MCT. In contrast, the Group 1 (Naïve) rats showed a steady increase in body weight with time (Figure 10). As it is presented in Figure 11 and Table 4, the RVSP measurements in Group 1 (Naïve), Group 2 (Naïve+ TMP) and Group 3 (Naïve+ vehicle) are ranging between 20–25 mmHg (normal RV pressure in rats). Four weeks after MCT administration, the RVSP increased more to 80–100 mmHg in the untreated Group 4 suggesting that the animals had severe PH. As can be seen from Figure 11, after four weeks of treatment with TMP as liquid aerosol (Group 5) the RVSP significantly decreased by 20–30 units of mmHg relative to Group 5 (4 weeks).
The rat body weight plots in Figure 12 clearly show a significant loss of weight with time for the Groups 4 and 5 that received MCT. In contrast, Group 1 (Naive) rats showed a steady increase in body weight with time (Figure 12). As shown in Figure 13 and Table 5, the RVSP hemodynamic measurements in Groups 1 (Naïve) and 2 (Naïve+ TMP) are ranging between 20–25 mmHg (normal RV pressure in rats). Two weeks after MCT administration, the RVSP considerably increased to a range of 40–50 mmHg, as can be seen in Figure 13B. Four weeks after MCT administration, the RVSP increased even more to a range of 80–100 mmHg in the untreated Group 3. It is evident from the Figure 13B hat after two weeks of aerosol treatment with SD TMP (Group 5) the RVSP significantly decreased by ~20–30 mmHg relative to Group 3 (4 weeks). It is important to note that the insufflator device used to administer the powder had no effect on the RVSP of Group 4 rats (data not shown).

4. Discussion

This is the first report on TMP development and formulation as dry powder aerosols using advanced organic closed-mode spray drying process (Table 1). The spray dried particles were comprehensively characterized to test their suitability for pulmonary drug delivery. From the results obtained in the in vitro human cellular studies on cell viability and TEER seen in Figure 8 and Figure 9, respectively, it is seen that the spray-dried TMP formulation at various concentrations is non-cytotoxic and biocompatible with human pulmonary cells from different regions of the lungs including the respiratory deep lung region. It was observed that possibly a polymorphic conversion occurred following spray drying based on XRPD analysis (Figure 3). This is evident from the lack of peaks in the XRPD diffractogram (Figure 3) between 2θ-degree values of 30–50°. Previously Zhang et al., reported [43] the X-ray diffraction pattern of ligustrazine that is similar to the raw TMP diffraction pattern reported in our present study. However, when TMP was formulated with a PLGA diblock polymeric carrier, the crystallinity changed depending on the extent of miscibility of TMP with PLGA diblock copolymer. Hence, other crystal forms of TMP (i.e., polymorphs) may possibly exist.
In our study, advanced spray drying under the described conditions generally caused a disruption in the crystallinity of TMP often rendering it non-crystalline (i.e., amorphous). Our group has previously reported crystallinity retention by polymorphic interconversion following advanced spray drying [44]. Spray drying is a high-throughput engineering technology that designed and produces the particles tailored for pulmonary inhalation aerosols to be in the desired size range, shape and surface property [27,34,35,39,45,46,47,48]. The particle sizing data using laser diffraction (Table 2) and in vitro NGI aerosol dispersion performance (Figure 7) show that the size range of SD TMP particles readily aerosolize and are in the inhalable size range. The particle morphology is non-spherical and surface morphology is smooth for TMP particles, as seen in the SEM micrographs (Figure 2).
The aerosol dispersion of such particles is expected to be influenced by the shear stress property of the DPI device that is used to generate the aerosol [49,50,51,52,53] and the dry powder interparticulate interactions [30,54]. The DPI device design, specific resistance and shear stress caused by the device have a great impact on the improved or diminished performance of the aerosol formulation [55]. We tested three different FDA-approved human DPI devices to examine the influence of the device type (low-, medium-, or high-shear stress) on in vitro aerosol performance of SD TMP particles. From the NGI impactor data (Figure 7 and Table 3), it can be seen in Figure 7 that the particle deposition in the early stages of NGI is higher than the later stages. One-way ANOVA tests showed statistical significance between the FPFND of Aerolizer® versus HandiHaler® (p = 0.006) and Aerolizer® versus Neohaler® (p = 0.010). The same test showed no statistical significant difference between the FPFND of Neohaler® when compared with HandiHaler® (p = 0.378). Similarly, the ED from the three devices had no statistically significant (p = 0.103) differences.
It can be inferred from the mass deposition data that the maximum fine particle dose that can be achieved using this formulation will be 3.48 mg using Neohaler®, a medium-shear stress DPI device. The high-shear stress DPI device (HandiHaler®) and the medium-shear stress DPI device (Neohaler®) achieved similar fine particle doses while the low-shear stress device (Aerolizer®) gave a relatively lower FPD. This suggests that, in addition to the turbulence created in the dry powder inhaler, there are other inhaler device factors that can influence the aerosolization and deaggregation of the SD TMP particles.
SD TMP did not significantly affect the cell viability of both A549 and H358 human pulmonary cell lines (Figure 7 and Figure 8) representing the deep lung respiratory region of the lungs. Hence, this suggests that the drug over a wide dose range is non-cytotoxic and biocompatible on these cells. The TEER analysis (Figure 8) showed that the TMP-treated Calu-3 cells regained resistance similarly as the cells treated with the vehicle. There was no statistical difference between the vehicle and the SD TMP. After 7 days, the final resistance reached by all untreated (naïve), vehicle-treated and SD TMP-treated cells were statistically similar. This finding showed that the monolayer recovery happens as early as six days. The loss of electrical resistance and recovery suggests a reversible process, which in turn, ensures the integrity of the cellular barrier and further suggesting non-cytotoxicity and biocompatibility on these cells.
The in vivo data (Table 4 and Table 5, and Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12 and Figure 13) showed that the MCT model successfully achieved PH in the rodent after two weeks of administration via intraperitoneal (IP) injection. The RVSP significantly increased after four weeks of MCT administration as it was reported previously [37]. In general, the results from both the insufflator and microsprayer study suggest that TMP is effective in preventing the progression of PH. The study design included a liquid aerosol, in addition to powder, since the dissolution of TMP powder in airway fluids had not been previously reported. Moreover, the influence of the liquid state vs. dry powder state on inhalation treatment efficacy is important.
The body weight plots of the rats showed development of the disease, as can be seen in Figure 10 and Figure 12, where MCT-induced PH rats lost weight with time. In contrast, naïve rats gained weight with time and maintained the weight as it was expected. Regarding the RVSP values (Table 4 and Table 5, Figure 11 and Figure 13), it was noticed that groups 1 and 2 rats with and without drug (TMP) treatment maintained a pressure of ~25 mmHg after four weeks, which is normal in naïve rats. After two weeks of the MCT injection, an increase in the RVSP pressure is observed. After four weeks, the increase in the RVSP reveals severe PH. This was observed in both the liquid and powder aerosol studies indicating that MCT is a suitable model for PH therapeutics study. It is seen in Figure 10 and Figure 12 that the treatment of the rats with inhaled TMP as both powder and liquid aerosols for 2 weeks has a remarkable impact on the significant decrease of RVSP pressure. For both the inhaled liquid aerosol of TMP and the advanced spray-dried DPI of TMP, the RVSP measurements of the drug-treated groups were in the range of 60 mmHg, while the diseased animal model was 80 mmHg. For the first time, this study demonstrates that TMP, when administered as an inhaled aerosol targeting the lungs, can prevent the progression of PH in the MCT-induced PH rat model.

5. Conclusions

The physicochemical properties of TMP are reported comprehensively. The in vitro aerosol dispersion performance of spray dried TMP was tested using three different FDA-approved human dry powder inhaler devices. In vitro human cellular studies conducted on pulmonary cells from different regions of the human lung demonstrated biocompatibility and non-cytotoxicity of TMP. The in vivo healthy rat study demonstrated safety of inhaled TMP formulations as liquid aerosols and advanced dry powder aerosols. The in vivo diseased rat MCT model of PH study demonstrated that inhaled TMP aerosols, both as an inhaled liquid and dry powder, are efficacious in the attenuation of PH.

Author Contributions

H.M.M. and J.X.-J.Y., Study Project Conception, Study Project Design, Experiments, Data Analysis, Interpretation, Manuscript Write-Up/Review/Editing; P.M., M.F.A., A.I.G., C.G., and H.T., Experiments, Data Analysis, Interpretation, Manuscript Write-Up/Review/Editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partially supported by NIH NHLBI 1R01HL137282 (H.M.M.), NIH NIA R21AG054766 (H.M.M.), and a CONACyT Fellowship awarded to M.F.A. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number #0619599 and Arizona Proposition 301: Technology and Research Initiative Fund (A.R.S.§15-1648).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was approved by University of Arizona Institutional Animal Care & Use Committee.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the Corresponding Author.

Acknowledgments

SEM images and data were collected in the W.M. Keck Center for Nano-Scale Imaging in the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry at the University of Arizona with funding from the W.M. Keck Foundation Grant. All Raman data was collected in the Imaging Cores Materials Imaging and Characterization Facility supported by the Office of Research, Discovery and Innovation at The University of Arizona. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Number #0619599 and Arizona Proposition 301: Technology and Research Initiative Fund (A.R.S.§15-1648). X-ray diffraction data were collected in the X-ray Diffraction Facility of the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Arizona. The authors thank Brooke Beam Masani (SEM), Sue Roberts (XRPD), Paul Wallace (Raman), and Chad Park (ATR-FTIR) at The University of Arizona for access to core facilities. The authors thank Nathan Cherrington for access to the microplate reader. The authors also thank Arlette Gladys Cordery for her assistance in the in vivo rodent study. This work was partially supported by NIH NHLBI 1R01HL137282 (HMM), NIH NIA R21AG054766 (HMM), and a CONACyT Fellowship awarded to M.F.A.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Acosta, M.F.; Hayes, D.J.; Fineman, J.R.; Yuan, J.X.-J.; Black, S.M.; Mansour, H.M. Book Chapter 19: Therapeutics in Pulmonary Hypertension. In Inhalation Aerosols: Physical and Biological Basis for Therapy, 3rd ed.; Hickey, A.J., Mansour, H.M., Eds.; CRC Press/Taylor & Francis: London, UK, 2019; pp. 313–322. [Google Scholar]
  2. Stenmark, K.; Mecham, R. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of pulmonary vascular remodeling. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 1997, 59, 89–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Farber, H.W.; Loscalzo, J. Pulmonary arterial hypertension. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 351, 1655–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hill, N.S.; Preston, I.R.; Roberts, K.E. Inhaled Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension. Respir. Care 2015, 60, 794–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Kuhr, F.K.; Smith, K.A.; Song, M.Y.; Levitan, I.; Yuan, J.X. New mechanisms of pulmonary arterial hypertension: Role of Ca2+ signaling. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2012, 302, H1546–H1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Gessler, T.; Seeger, W.; Schmehl, T. Inhaled prostanoids in the therapy of pulmonary hypertension. J. Aerosol Med. Pulm. Drug Deliv. 2008, 21, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Mansour, H.M. Inhaled Medical Aerosols by Nebulizer Delivery in Pulmonary Hypertension. Pulm. Circ. 2018, 8, 1–2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Kwan, C.Y. Plant-derived drugs acting on cellular ca2+ mobilization in vascular smooth muscle: Tetramethylpyrazine and tetrandrine. Stem Cells 1994, 12, 64–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chang, F.C.; Chen, K.J.; Lin, J.G.; Hong, C.Y.; Huang, Y.T. Effects of tetramethylpyrazine on portal hypertensive rats. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1998, 50, 881–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Liu, S.; Cai, Y.; Evans, T.W.; McCormack, D.G.; Barer, G.R.; Barnes, P.J. Ligustrazine is a vasodilator of human pulmonary and bronchial arteries. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1990, 191, 345–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cai, Y.; Bee, D.; Barer, G. Pulmonary vasodilator action of ligustrazine, active principle of a traditional Chinese remedy, in rats and ferrets. Proc. Chin. Acad. Med. Sci. Peking Union Med. Coll. 1988, 4, 147–152. [Google Scholar]
  12. Oddoy, A.; Bee, D.; Emery, C.; Barer, G. Effects of ligustrazine on the pressure/flow relationship in isolated perfused rat lungs. Eur. Respir. J. 1991, 4, 1223–1227. [Google Scholar]
  13. Li, S.Y.; Jia, Y.H.; Sun, W.G.; Tang, Y.; An, G.S.; Ni, J.H.; Jia, H.T. Stabilization of mitochondrial function by tetramethylpyrazine protects against kainate-induced oxidative lesions in the rat hippocampus. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2010, 48, 597–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tan, F.; Fu, W.; Cheng, N.; Meng, D.I.; Gu, Y. Ligustrazine reduces blood-brain barrier permeability in a rat model of focal cerebral ischemia and reperfusion. Exp. Ther. Med. 2015, 9, 1757–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Wang, Y.; Zhu, H.; Tong, J.; Li, Z. Ligustrazine improves blood circulation by suppressing Platelet activation in a rat model of allergic asthma. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2016, 45, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wei, Y.; Liu, J.; Zhang, H.; Du, X.; Luo, Q.; Sun, J. Ligustrazine Attenuates Inflammation and the Associated Chemokines and Receptors in Ovalbumin-Induced Mouse Asthma Model. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2016, 46, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhao, S.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Q.; Dong, S.; Zhang, G.; Li, J. A Modified “Double-Hit” Induced Acute Lung Injury Model in Rats and Protective Effects of Tetramethylpyrazine on the Injury via Rho/ROCK Pathway. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 8, 4581–4588. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Luo, Y.; Xiang, Q.; Wang, Q. Effect of Ligustrazine on Expression of RhoA mRNA, ROCK-II Protein in the Lung and Airway Inflammation of Allergic Asthma Model Mice. Chin. J. Pediatr. 2008, 46, 868–869. [Google Scholar]
  19. Fan, X.; Wang, E.; He, J.; Zhang, L.; Zeng, X.; Gui, Y.; Sun, Q.; Song, Y.; Yuan, H. Ligustrazine Protects Homocysteine-Induced Apoptosis in Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cells by Modulating Mitochondrial Dysfunction. J. Cardiovasc. Transl. Res. 2019, 12, 591–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Shi, J.; Wang, Y.; Luo, G. Ligustrazine Phosphate Ethosomes for Treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease, In Vitro and in Animal Model Studies. AAPS Pharmscitech 2012, 13, 485–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Yan, S.; Yue, Y.; Zeng, L.; Jiang, C.; Li, W.; Li, H.; Qian, Y. Ligustrazine nanoparticles nano spray’s activation on Nrf2/ARE pathway in oxidative stress injury in rats with postoperative abdominal adhesion. Ann. Transl. Med. 2019, 7, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, M.-W.; Su, M.-X.; Tang, D.-y.; Hao, L.; Xun, X.-H.; Huang, Y.-Q. Ligustrazin increases lung cell autophagy and ameliorates paraquat-induced pulmonary fibrosis by inhibiting PI3K/Akt/mTOR and hedgehog signalling via increasing miR-193a expression. BMC Pulm. Med. 2019, 19, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Gao, C.; Liu, Y.; Ma, L.; Zhang, X.; Wang, S. Effects of Ligustrazine on pulmonary damage in rats following scald injury. Burns 2012, 38, 743–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Meenach, S.A.; Anderson, K.W.; Hilt, J.Z.; McGarry, R.C.; Mansour, H.M. High-Performing Dry Powder Inhalers of Paclitaxel DPPC/DPPG Lung Surfactant-Mimic Multifunctional Particles in Lung Cancer: Physicochemical Characterization, In Vitro Aerosol Dispersion, and Cellular Studies. AAPS Pharmscitech 2014, 15, 1574–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Olschewski, H.; Simonneau, G.; Galie, N.; Higenbottam, T.; Naeije, R.; Rubin, L.J.; Nikkho, S.; Speich, R.; Hoeper, M.M.; Behr, J.; et al. Inhaled iloprost for severe pulmonary hypertension. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 347, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tissot, C.; Beghetti, M. Review of inhaled iloprost for the control of pulmonary artery hypertension in children. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 2009, 5, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Mansour, H.M.; Rhee, Y.-S.; Wu, X. Nanomedicine in pulmonary delivery. Int. J. Nanomed. 2009, 4, 299–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Muralidharan, P.; Mallory, E.; Malapit, M.; Hayes, D.; Mansour, H.M. Inhalable PEGylated phospholipid nanocarriers and PEGylated therapeutics for respiratory delivery as aerosolized colloidal dispersions and dry powder inhalers. Pharmaceutics 2014, 6, 333–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Muralidharan, P.; Malapit, M.; Mallory, E.; Hayes, D.; Mansour, H.M. Inhalable nanoparticulate powders for respiratory delivery. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2015, 11, 1189–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Xu, Z.; Mansour, H.M.; Hickey, A.J. Particle interactions in dry powder inhaler unit processes: A review. J. Adhes. Sci. Technol. 2011, 25, 451–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Stocke, N.A.; Meenach, S.A.; Arnold, S.M.; Mansour, H.M.; Hilt, J.Z. Formulation and characterization of inhalable magnetic nanocomposite microparticles (MnMs) for targeted pulmonary delivery via spray drying. Int. J. Pharm. 2015, 479, 320–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Mansour, H.M.; Rhee, Y.-S.; Park, C.-W.; De Luca, P.P. Lipid nanoparticulate drug delivery and nanomedicine. In Lipids in Nanotechnology; American Oil Chemists Society Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2011; pp. 221–268. [Google Scholar]
  33. Muralidharan, P.; Hayes, D.; Black, S.M.; Mansour, H.M. Microparticulate/nanoparticulate powders of a novel Nrf2 activator and an aerosol performance enhancer for pulmonary delivery targeting the lung Nrf2/Keap-1 pathway. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. 2016, 1, 48–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Li, X.; Mansour, H.M. Physicochemical characterization and water vapor sorption of organic solution advanced spray-dried inhalable trehalose microparticles and nanoparticles for targeted dry powder pulmonary inhalation delivery. AAPS Pharmscitech 2011, 12, 1420–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Meenach, S.A.; Vogt, F.G.; Anderson, K.W.; Hilt, J.Z.; McGarry, R.C.; Mansour, H.M. Design, physicochemical characterization, and optimization of organic solution advanced spray-dried inhalable dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC) and dipalmitoylphosphatidylethanolamine poly(ethylene glycol) (DPPE-PEG) microparticles and nanoparticles for targeted respiratory nanomedicine delivery as dry powder inhalation aerosols. Int. J. Nanomed. 2013, 8, 275–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Wu, X.; Hayes, D., Jr.; Zwischenberger, J.B.; Kuhn, R.J.; Mansour, H.M. Design and physicochemical characterization of advanced spray-dried tacrolimus multifunctional particles for inhalation. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2013, 7, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Wu, X.; Zhang, W.; Hayes, D., Jr.; Mansour, H.M. Physicochemical characterization and aerosol dispersion performance of organic solution advanced spray-dried cyclosporine A multifunctional particles for dry powder inhalation aerosol delivery. Int. J. Nanomed. 2013, 8, 1269–1283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Li, X.; Vogt, F.G.; Hayes, D.; Mansour, H.M. Physicochemical characterization and aerosol dispersion performance of organic solution advanced spray-dried microparticulate/nanoparticulate antibiotic dry powders of tobramycin and azithromycin for pulmonary inhalation aerosol delivery. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 52, 191–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Meenach, S.A.; Anderson, K.W.; Hilt, J.Z.; McGarry, R.C.; Mansour, H.M. Characterization and aerosol dispersion performance of advanced spray-dried chemotherapeutic PEGylated phospholipid particles for dry powder inhalation delivery in lung cancer. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2013, 49, 699–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Aerosols, Nasal Sprays, Metered-Dose Inhalers, and Dry Powder Inhalers Monograph. In USP 29-NF 24 The United States Pharmacopoeia and The National Formulary: The Official Compendia of Standards. 29/24; The United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc.: Rockville, MD, USA, 2006; pp. 2617–2636.
  41. Acosta, M.F.; Muralidharan, P.; Meenach, S.A.; Hayes, D.; M-Black, S.; Mansour, H.M. In Vitro Pulmonary Cell Culture in Pharmaceutical Inhalation Aerosol Delivery: 2-D, 3-D, and In Situ Bioimpactor Models. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2016, 22, 2522–2531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Meenach, S.A.; Tsoras, A.N.; McGarry, R.C.; Mansour, H.M.; Hilt, J.Z.; Anderson, K.W. Development of three-dimensional lung multicellular spheroids in air- and liquid-interface culture for the evaluation of anticancer therapeutics. Int. J. Oncol. 2016, 48, 1701–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Zhang, X.; Wei, J.; Ma, P.; Mu, H.; Wang, A.; Zhang, L.; Wu, Z.; Sun, K. Preparation and evaluation of a novel biodegradable long-acting intravitreal implant containing ligustrazine for the treatment of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2015, 67, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Li, X.; Vogt, F.; Hayes, D.J.; Mansour, H. Design, Characterization, and Aerosol Dispersion Performance Modeling of Advanced Spray-Dried Microparticulate/Nanoparticulate Mannitol Powders for Targeted Pulmonary Delivery as Dry Powder Inhalers. J. Aerosol Med. Pulm. Drug Deliv. 2014, 27, 81–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lee, H.J.; Kang, J.H.; Lee, H.G.; Kim, D.W.; Rhee, Y.S.; Kim, J.Y.; Park, E.S.; Park, C.W. Preparation and physicochemical characterization of spray-dried and jet-milled microparticles containing bosentan hydrate for dry powder inhalation aerosols. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2016, 10, 4017–4030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Martinelli, F.; Balducci, A.G.; Kumar, A.; Sonvico, F.; Forbes, B.; Bettini, R.; Buttini, F. Engineered sodium hyaluronate respirable dry powders for pulmonary drug delivery. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 517, 286–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Hickey, A.J.; Mansour, H.M. Formulation Challenges of Powders for the Delivery of Small Molecular Weight Molecules as Aerosols. Drugs Pharm. Sci. 2003, 126, 835–848. [Google Scholar]
  48. Park, C.W.; Li, X.; Vogt, F.G.; Hayes, D., Jr.; Zwischenberger, J.B.; Park, E.S.; Mansour, H.M. Advanced spray-dried design, physicochemical characterization, and aerosol dispersion performance of vancomycin and clarithromycin multifunctional controlled release particles for targeted respiratory delivery as dry powder inhalation aerosols. Int. J. Pharm. 2013, 455, 374–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Longest, P.W.; Son, Y.J.; Holbrook, L.; Hindle, M. Aerodynamic factors responsible for the deaggregation of carrier-free drug powders to form micrometer and submicrometer aerosols. Pharm. Res. 2013, 30, 1608–1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Mansour, H.M.; Xu, Z.; Hickey, A.J. Dry powder aerosols generated by standardized entrainment tubes from alternative sugar blends: 3. Trehalose dihydrate and D-mannitol carriers. J. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 99, 3430–3441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Xu, Z.; Mansour, H.M.; Mulder, T.; McLean, R.; Langridge, J.; Hickey, A.J. Comparative Dispersion Study of Dry Powder Aerosols of Albuterol Sulfate/Lactose Monohydrate and Cromolyn Sodium/Lactose Monohydrate Delivered by Standardized Entrainment Tubes. In Respiratory Drug Delivery XI; Dalby, R.N., Bryon, P.R., Suman, J.D., Peart, J., Farr, S.J., Eds.; Davis Healthcare International Publishing, LLC: Scotsdale, AZ, USA, 2008; Volume 3, pp. 897–900. [Google Scholar]
  52. Xu, Z.; Mansour, H.M.; Mulder, T.; McLean, R.; Langridge, J.; Hickey, A.J. Dry powder aerosols generated by standardized entrainment tubes from drug blends with lactose monohydrate: 2. Ipratropium bromide monohydrate and fluticasone propionate. J. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 99, 3415–3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Xu, Z.; Mansour, H.M.; Mulder, T.; McLean, R.; Langridge, J.; Hickey, A.J. Dry powder aerosols generated by standardized entrainment tubes from drug blends with lactose monohydrate: 1. albuterol sulfate and disodium cromoglycate. J. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 99, 3398–3414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xu, Z.; Mansour, H.M.; Mulder, T.; McLean, R.; Langridge, J.; Hickey, A.J. Heterogeneous particle deaggregation and its implication for therapeutic aerosol performance. J. Pharm. Sci. 2010, 99, 3442–3461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Muralidharan, P.; Hayes, D., Jr.; Mansour, H.M. Dry powder inhalers in COPD, lung inflammation and pulmonary infections. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2015, 12, 947–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Chemical structure of tetramethylpyrazine (TMP) (ChemDraw® Ultra Ver. 10.0; CambridgeSoft, Cambridge, MA, USA).
Figure 1. Chemical structure of tetramethylpyrazine (TMP) (ChemDraw® Ultra Ver. 10.0; CambridgeSoft, Cambridge, MA, USA).
Antioxidants 10 00427 g001
Figure 2. Scanning electron micrographs of: (a). raw TMP (magnification 2000×) and (b). SD TMP (magnification 10,000×).
Figure 2. Scanning electron micrographs of: (a). raw TMP (magnification 2000×) and (b). SD TMP (magnification 10,000×).
Antioxidants 10 00427 g002
Figure 3. X-ray powder diffractograms of raw TMP and SD TMP.
Figure 3. X-ray powder diffractograms of raw TMP and SD TMP.
Antioxidants 10 00427 g003
Figure 4. DSC thermograms of: (a) Raw TMP and (b) SD TMP (Exothermic peak is upward; Endothermic peak is downward).
Figure 4. DSC thermograms of: (a) Raw TMP and (b) SD TMP (Exothermic peak is upward; Endothermic peak is downward).
Antioxidants 10 00427 g004aAntioxidants 10 00427 g004b
Figure 5. Hot-stage micrographs of (a) Raw TMP and (b) Spray Dried (SD) TMP.
Figure 5. Hot-stage micrographs of (a) Raw TMP and (b) Spray Dried (SD) TMP.
Antioxidants 10 00427 g005aAntioxidants 10 00427 g005b
Figure 6. Raman spectra of raw TMP and spray dried (SD) TMP.
Figure 6. Raman spectra of raw TMP and spray dried (SD) TMP.
Antioxidants 10 00427 g006
Figure 7. In vitro aerosol deposition of spray dried TMP particles using human dry powder inhaler (DPI) devices Aerolizer®, Neohaler® and Handihaler® using NGI® at 60 L/min flow rate. (n = 3, mean ± SD).
Figure 7. In vitro aerosol deposition of spray dried TMP particles using human dry powder inhaler (DPI) devices Aerolizer®, Neohaler® and Handihaler® using NGI® at 60 L/min flow rate. (n = 3, mean ± SD).
Antioxidants 10 00427 g007
Figure 8. In Vitro Vell Viability of: (a). A549 and (b). H358 human pulmonary cell lines. * p value < 0.001, ** p value 0.010, *** p value 0.015. (n = 6, Mean ± SD).
Figure 8. In Vitro Vell Viability of: (a). A549 and (b). H358 human pulmonary cell lines. * p value < 0.001, ** p value 0.010, *** p value 0.015. (n = 6, Mean ± SD).
Antioxidants 10 00427 g008
Figure 9. In Vitro transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) measurements using human Calu-3 bronchial epithelial cell line exposed to representative liquid aerosol formulations in air-interface culture (AIC) conditions using Microsprayer® Aerosolizer. (n = 3, mean ± SD).
Figure 9. In Vitro transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) measurements using human Calu-3 bronchial epithelial cell line exposed to representative liquid aerosol formulations in air-interface culture (AIC) conditions using Microsprayer® Aerosolizer. (n = 3, mean ± SD).
Antioxidants 10 00427 g009
Figure 10. Body weights of rats measured weekly for Groups 1, 4 and 5 from Microsprayer® Aerosolizer (liquid aerosol) study.
Figure 10. Body weights of rats measured weekly for Groups 1, 4 and 5 from Microsprayer® Aerosolizer (liquid aerosol) study.
Antioxidants 10 00427 g010
Figure 11. Representative in vivo right ventricle systolic pressure (RVSP) measurements of different rat groups from Microsprayer® Aerosolizer (liquid aerosol) study.
Figure 11. Representative in vivo right ventricle systolic pressure (RVSP) measurements of different rat groups from Microsprayer® Aerosolizer (liquid aerosol) study.
Antioxidants 10 00427 g011
Figure 12. Body weights of rats measured weekly for: (A) Group 1; (B) Group 4; and (C) Group 5 from insufflator (dry powder aerosol) study.
Figure 12. Body weights of rats measured weekly for: (A) Group 1; (B) Group 4; and (C) Group 5 from insufflator (dry powder aerosol) study.
Antioxidants 10 00427 g012
Figure 13. Representative in vivo right ventricle systolic pressure (RVSP) measurements of: (A). Groups 1 & 2; (B) Groups 3 & 5; and (C) pressure measurement comparison between different rat groups from insufflator (dry powder aerosol) study.
Figure 13. Representative in vivo right ventricle systolic pressure (RVSP) measurements of: (A). Groups 1 & 2; (B) Groups 3 & 5; and (C) pressure measurement comparison between different rat groups from insufflator (dry powder aerosol) study.
Antioxidants 10 00427 g013
Table 1. Advanced spray drying parameters for spray dried (SD) TMP powders using methanol (MeOH).
Table 1. Advanced spray drying parameters for spray dried (SD) TMP powders using methanol (MeOH).
Feed Concentration (%w/v)Pump Rate (% and mL/min)Inlet T (°C)Outlet T (°C)
190/27149–15218–25
Table 2. Physical properties of raw TMP and spray dried (SD) TMP. (n = 3, Mean ± SD).
Table 2. Physical properties of raw TMP and spray dried (SD) TMP. (n = 3, Mean ± SD).
Physical PropertiesRaw TMPSD TMP
Particle SizesN/ADv10 = 4.186 ± 0.701 μm
Dv50 = 6.156 ± 1.147 μm
Dv90 = 14.552 ± 4.928 μm
(Dv)Span = 1.684 ± 0.645 μm
Phase TransitionsTm = 85.93 ± 0.71 °CTm = 85.11 ± 0.36 °C
(Tm and ΔH)ΔH = 152.5 ± 5.27 J/gΔH = 149.2 ± 7.91 J/g
Residual Water Content0.633 ± 0.251% w/w0.368 ± 0.103% w/w
Table 3. In vitro aerosol dispersion performance parameters for spray dried TMP particles using human dry powder inhaler (DPI) devices Aerolizer®, Neohaler® and Handihaler® at 60 L/min. (n = 3, Mean ± SD).
Table 3. In vitro aerosol dispersion performance parameters for spray dried TMP particles using human dry powder inhaler (DPI) devices Aerolizer®, Neohaler® and Handihaler® at 60 L/min. (n = 3, Mean ± SD).
Inhaler DeviceEmitted Dose (%)Fine Particle Dose with Respect to Nominal Dose (mg) Fine Particle Fraction with Respect to Nominal Dose (FPFND) (%)Fine Particle Dose with Respect to Emitted Dose (mg) Fine Particle Fraction with Respect to Emitted Dose (FPFED) (%)
Handihaler®100 ± 2.033.3337.24
3.83 ± 0.428.9 ± 3.87
Neohaler®88.41 ± 6.703.4825.19
4.36 ± 0.6514.87 ± 7.30
Aerolizer®88.76 ± 7.271.158.16
1.41 ± 0.5714.86 ± 8.0
Table 4. In vivo right ventricle pressure hemodynamic measurements from microsprayer (liquid aerosol) study.
Table 4. In vivo right ventricle pressure hemodynamic measurements from microsprayer (liquid aerosol) study.
Control + Vehicle Group (mm Hg)Control + TMP Group (mm Hg)MCT Group (mm Hg)MCT + TMP Group (mm Hg)
23.656723.894794.169761.1996
23.751322.955860.278343.1133
20.662219.099778.064560.1284
24.087924.603678.5773N/A
23.6379N/AN/AN/A
Table 5. In vivo right ventricle pressure hemodynamic measurements from insufflator (powder aerosol) study.
Table 5. In vivo right ventricle pressure hemodynamic measurements from insufflator (powder aerosol) study.
Control (mm Hg)Control + TMP Group (mm Hg)MCT (2 Weeks) Group (mm Hg)MCT (4 Weeks) Group (mm Hg)MCT + TMP Group (mm Hg)
22.533020.811039.408097.672078.2010
21.902024.241052.039095.792070.5310
20.995023.899038.488090.036058.6830
19.352024.703041.064095.161062.4200
22.322026.055040.381079.891043.3890
23.689019.6940N/A78.378059.8200
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Muralidharan, P.; Acosta, M.F.; Gomez, A.I.; Grijalva, C.; Tang, H.; Yuan, J.X.-J.; Mansour, H.M. Design and Comprehensive Characterization of Tetramethylpyrazine (TMP) for Targeted Lung Delivery as Inhalation Aerosols in Pulmonary Hypertension (PH): In Vitro Human Lung Cell Culture and In Vivo Efficacy. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 427. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antiox10030427

AMA Style

Muralidharan P, Acosta MF, Gomez AI, Grijalva C, Tang H, Yuan JX-J, Mansour HM. Design and Comprehensive Characterization of Tetramethylpyrazine (TMP) for Targeted Lung Delivery as Inhalation Aerosols in Pulmonary Hypertension (PH): In Vitro Human Lung Cell Culture and In Vivo Efficacy. Antioxidants. 2021; 10(3):427. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antiox10030427

Chicago/Turabian Style

Muralidharan, Priya, Maria F. Acosta, Alexan I. Gomez, Carissa Grijalva, Haiyang Tang, Jason X.-J. Yuan, and Heidi M. Mansour. 2021. "Design and Comprehensive Characterization of Tetramethylpyrazine (TMP) for Targeted Lung Delivery as Inhalation Aerosols in Pulmonary Hypertension (PH): In Vitro Human Lung Cell Culture and In Vivo Efficacy" Antioxidants 10, no. 3: 427. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antiox10030427

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop