Next Article in Journal
Oxidative Status in Adult Anorexia Nervosa Patients and Healthy Controls—Results from a Cross-Sectional Pilot Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Effect of the Consumption of Powdered Concentrate of Sechium edule var. nigrum spinosum in Mexican Older Adults with Metabolic Syndrome
Previous Article in Journal
Oxidative Stress and Exercise
Previous Article in Special Issue
Recent Advances in Drumstick (Moringa oleifera) Leaves Bioactive Compounds: Composition, Health Benefits, Bioaccessibility, and Dietary Applications
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antioxidants
Volume 11
Issue 5
10.3390/antiox11050841
antioxidants-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Brown Algae-Derived Fucoidan Exerts Oxidative Stress-Dependent Antiproliferation on Oral Cancer Cells

by
Jun-Ping Shiau
1,2,†,
Ya-Ting Chuang
3,†,
Kun-Han Yang
4,
Fang-Rong Chang
4,
Jyh-Horng Sheu
5,6,
Ming-Feng Hou
1,2,3,
Jiiang-Huei Jeng
7,8,9,
Jen-Yang Tang
10,11,* and
Hsueh-Wei Chang
3,12,*
1
Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
2
Division of Breast Oncology and Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
3
Department of Biomedical Science and Environmental Biology, College of Life Science, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
4
Graduate Institute of Natural Products, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
5
Department of Marine Biotechnology and Resources, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan
6
Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
7
School of Dentistry, College of Dental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
8
Department of Dentistry, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
9
Department of Dentistry, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100225, Taiwan
10
School of Post-Baccalaureate Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
11
Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaoshiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
12
Center for Cancer Research, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
 
add Show full affiliation list
 
remove Hide full affiliation list
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Antioxidants 2022, 11(5), 841; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antiox11050841
Submission received: 26 March 2022 / Revised: 24 April 2022 / Accepted: 25 April 2022 / Published: 26 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plant-Based Diets and Their Antioxidant Role in Human Health)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Fucoidan is a dietary brown algae-derived fucose-rich polysaccharide. However, the anticancer effects of fucoidan for oral cancer treatment remain unclear, particularly in terms of its preferential antiproliferation ability and oxidative-stress-associated responses. This study first evaluated the effects and mechanisms of the preferential antiproliferation of fucoidan between oral cancer and non-malignant oral cells (S–G). In a 48 h MTS assay, fucoidan showed higher antiproliferation in response to five types of oral cancer cells, but not S–G cells, demonstrating preferential antiproliferation of oral cancer cells. Oral cancer cells (Ca9-22 and CAL 27) showing high sensitivity to fucoidan were selected to explore the antiproliferation mechanism compared to S–G cells. Fucoidan showed subG1 accumulation and an annexin V increase in apoptosis, accompanied by caspase 8, 9, and 3 activations in oral cancer cells, but not in S–G cells. Fucoidan increased reactive oxygen species and mitochondrial superoxide levels and decreased cellular glutathione in oral cancer cells compared with S–G cells. These oxidative stress effects were attributed to the downregulation of antioxidant signaling genes (NRF2, TXN, and HMOX1) in oral cancer cells rather than S–G cells. Fucoidan showed DNA damage-inducible effects (γH2AX and 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine) in oral cancer cells but not in S–G cells. Accordingly, these preferential changes in oral cancer but not in non-malignant cells contribute to the preferential antiproliferation mechanism of fucoidan. Furthermore, these changes were reverted by pretreatment with the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine. Therefore, for the first time, this study provides a detailed understanding of the preferential antiproliferation effects and mechanisms of fucoidan in oral cancer cells.

1. Introduction

Oral cancer is the most common subtype of head and neck malignancy, with a high disease burden [1]. Besides surgical eradication, chemotherapy and radiotherapy are helpful adjuvant therapies in oral cancer treatment, albeit at the cost of severe adverse events [2]. To avoid side effects, preferential antiproliferation agents, which exhibit antiproliferation in cancer cells but spare normal cells, are highly promising candidates as anticancer drugs. Thus, developing natural products with preferential antiproliferation effects is a sensible strategy for anti-oral cancer therapy.
Dietary natural products are commonly non-toxic. Marine algae are popular dietary foods as nutritional and functional resources with non-cytotoxicity [3]. Marine algae are rich in bioactive polysaccharides [4,5]. Sulfated polysaccharides, such as fucoidans, carrageenans, and ulvans, are abundant in brown, red, and green algae [4]. For example, fucoidan is a fucose-rich polysaccharide extracted from brown algae such as Fucus vesiculosus, Fucus evanescens, Alaria esculenta, Ascophyllum nodosum, Macrocystis pyrifera, Sargassum polycystum, and Laminaria japonicia [6].
Fucoidan exhibits anti-inflammatory [7], anticoagulant [8], antibacterial [9], and anticancer [10] effects. Its antitumor and apoptosis effects are regulated by mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) through the upregulation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK1/2) and the downregulation of p38 MAPK and protein kinase B (AKT) [11,12,13]. Moreover, in vivo studies demonstrated that fucoidan inhibits breast tumor growth [14]. Fucoidan was certified as a safe food ingredient by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the GRAS category [15]. Accordingly, fucoidan is a potential anticancer agent without side effects.
Fucoidan-induced apoptosis is validated to depend on oxidative stress in the example of bladder cancer cells [16]. Besides apoptosis, oxidative stress also modulates cellular changes such as DNA damage [17] and antioxidant signaling [18,19,20]. However, the antiproliferation mechanisms exerted by fucoidan involving oxidative stress-associated responses to cancer cells have not been thoroughly investigated. In particular, oxidative stress, DNA damage, apoptosis, and antioxidant signaling in fucoidan-treated oral cancer cells have rarely been examined.
This investigation focused on evaluating the preferential antiproliferation impact of fucoidan against oral cancer cells but not normal cells. The detailed mechanism of fucoidan-exposed oral cancer cells was explored, particularly for preferential apoptosis, oxidative stress, antioxidant signaling, and DNA damage.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Fucoidan derived from Fucus vesiculosus was obtained from Carbosynth (Compton, Berkshire, UK). Oxidative stress inhibitor N-acetylcysteine (NAC) [21,22] (Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, MO, USA) was used for pretreatments (10 mM, 1 h) and co-treatment (10 mM for 36 or 48 h) as indicated in the figure legends. Both fucoidan and NAC were dissolved in 1× PBS buffer before experiments.

2.2. Cell Cultures

CAL 27, HSC-3 (ATCC; Manassas, VA, USA), and Ca9-22 (RIKEN BioResource Research Center; Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan) oral cancer cell lines were included. The OC-2 [23] and OECM-1 [24] oral cancer cell lines were provided by Dr. Wan-Chi Tsai (Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan). They were established from gingival (Ca9-22 and OCEM-1), tongue (CAL 27 and HSC-3), and buccal mucosa (OC-2) oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). A non-malignant normal gingival epithelial Smulow–Glickman (S–G) cell line [25,26], commonly used for examining the safety of anti-oral cancer drugs [27], was chosen as the control. Cells were maintained in a 3:2 medium mixture of DMEM and F12 (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and P/S antibiotics [28]. For all flow cytometry experiments, cells were seeded at a density of 4 × 104/well/12-well plate and incubated overnight before drug treatment.

2.3. Cell Viability Assays

A tetrazolium-based cell viability detecting MTS kit (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA), was applied. Ca9-22, CAL 27, and S–G cells were seeded at a density of 4, 4, and 6 × 103/well/96-well plate for 48 h viability assays, and 2, 2, and 3 × 103/well/96-well plate for 72 h viability assays, respectively. The cells were then incubated overnight before drug treatment. After drug treatment, cells were reacted with an MTS reagent for 1 h. Cell viability is proportional to colored formazan dye and measured by an ELISA reader at 490 nm [29].

2.4. Cell Cycle Assays

Cells were fixed and then mixed with 7-aminoactinmycin D (7AAD) (1 μg/mL) (Biotium; Hayward, CA, USA) for a 30 min staining reaction [30]. DNA content is proportional to the 7AAD staining intensity, measured with a Guava easyCyte flow cytometer (Luminex, TX, USA) (FL3 channel). Finally, Flow Jo 10 software (Becton-Dickinson; Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) was used for cell cycle determination.

2.5. Apoptosis (Annexin V/7AAD) Assays

Cells were double-stained with annexin V (1:1000) and 7AAD (1 μg/mL) [31] (Strong Biotech; Taipei, Taiwan) for 1 h at 37 °C. Apoptotic cells are proportional to the annexin V staining intensity, detected by a Guava easyCyte flow cytometer (FL1/FL3 channels). The annexin V (+) and 7AAD (+ or −) signals were assigned to apoptosis (+) cells.

2.6. Apoptosis (Caspases 3, 8, and 9) Assays

Caspase (Cas) 3, 8, and 9 activations are commonly examined to detect the involvements of the apoptosis executor and the extrinsic and intrinsic apoptosis signaling. Peptide-based kits for flow cytometry (OncoImmunin; Gaithersburg, MD, USA) were applied to detect Cas 3, 8, and 9 [32,33]. Cells were supplemented with a 10 μM peptide mixture (1:1000) and stood at 37 °C for 1 h. Cleavage of substrates such as PhiPhiLux-G1D2, CaspaLux8-L1D2, and CaspaLux9-M1D2 by the activated Cas 3, 8, and 9, respectively, produced green fluorescence for flow cytometry analysis (FL1 channel). The actual setting for the windows is presented in Supplementary Figure S1.

2.7. Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS), Mitochondrial Superoxide (MitoSOX), and Glutathione (GSH) Assays

ROS production, MitoSOX generation, and GSH depletion were used to examine oxidative stress changes, which were detected by 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) (10 μM, 30 min) [28], MitoSOX™ Red (50 nM, 30 min), and 5-chloromethylfluorescein diacetate (CMF-DA) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA) (5 μM, 20 min) [29], for ROS, MitoSOX, and GSH, respectively. After the reaction in darkness at 37 °C, these detecting dyes became fluorescent and were conducive to flow cytometry analysis (FL1, FL2, and FL1 channels for ROS, MitoSOX, and GSH, respectively). The actual setting for the windows is presented in Supplementary Figure S2.

2.8. Quantitative PCR (qPCR)

RNA was extracted for cDNA conversion by Trizol solvent (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA, USA) [34] and an OmniScript RT kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) [35]. Antioxidant signaling and housekeeper genes, including NFE2-like BZIP transcription factor 2 (NRF2; NFE2L2), thioredoxin (TXN), and heme oxygenase 1 (HMOX1) (Table 1), were included for qPCR under the touch-down program [35]. The mRNA expression level was assessed by 2−ΔΔCt criteria compared with the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) gene.

2.9. γH2AX/7AAD and 8-Hydroxy-2-Deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) Detections

DNA damage markers γH2AX and 8-OHdG [36] were examined. For γH2AX measurement, cells were fixed and mixed with an antibody for γH2AX [36] (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; Santa Cruz, CA, USA) (4 °C, 1 h) and Alexa Fluor 488 secondary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). Then, cells were mixed with 7AAD (5 μg/mL, 30 min). In terms of 8-OHdG detection, cells were fixed and incubated with an FITC-8-OHdG antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) (4 °C, 1 h). Finally, they were analyzed by flow cytometry (FL1/FL3 and FL1 channels for γH2AX/7AAD and 8-OHdG, respectively). The actual settings for the windows are presented in Supplementary Figures S3 and S4.

2.10. Statistical Analysis

ANOVA and a post hoc test (JMP 14 software; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) were chosen for statistical evaluation. The post hoc connecting letters are shown in each treatment. Different connecting lowercase letters represent significant differences for multi-comparison. Examples are provided in each figure legend to elucidate the results.

3. Results

3.1. Preferential Antiproliferation Effect of Fucoidan

The 48 h cell viability (%) was dose-dependently decreased by fucoidan in oral cancer cells (Ca9-22, CAL 27, OC-2, HSC-3, and OECM-1) but was maintained in non-malignant oral cells (S–G) (Figure 1A). Similarly, the 72 h cell viability (%) was dose-dependently decreased by fucoidan in oral cancer cells (Ca9-22 and CAL 27), and S–G cells still showed higher viability than oral cancer cells. Hence, fucoidan-treated oral cancer cells exhibited preferential antiproliferation, but non-malignant oral cells did not. Due to their high sensitivity to fucoidan, the oral cancer cells (Ca9-22 and CAL 27) were used to explore the detailed mechanisms in the following experiments. Cisplatin was a positive control for oral cancer cells (Ca9-22) following 24 h treatment (Figure 1B). Moreover, antioxidant NAC reversed the fucoidan-induced antiproliferation in oral cancer cells (Figure 1C), suggesting that oxidative stress was involved.

3.2. Cell Cycle Effect of Fucoidan

After fucoidan incubation, the cell cycle histograms in oral cancer and non-malignant oral cells (S–G) were generated (Figure 2A). For dose and time experiments (Figure 2A,B), fucoidan-incubated oral cancer cells (Ca9-22 and CAL 27) showed higher subG1 and G1 populations and lower G2/M populations than the controls. In contrast, fucoidan-incubated S–G cells showed no subG1 accumulation (Figure 2A,B). Moreover, in the dose experiment, fucoidan-incubated S–G cells showed lower G1 at 800 and 1200 μg/mL and higher G2/M populations at 800 μg/mL, while they showed no G2/M changes at 1200 μg/mL. In the time experiments, fucoidan-incubated S–G cells showed no change of cell cycle phases compared to the controls except for lower G1 at 48 h (Figure 2B).
Furthermore, the impact of oxidative stress on cell cycle progression was concerning, due to the NAC effect on rescuing viability in fucoidan-treated oral cancer cells (Figure 1B). The antioxidant NAC reversed the fucoidan-induced subG1 accumulation in oral cancer cells (Figure 2B). Moreover, NAC decreased the fucoidan-induced G1 increment and increased G2/M phases of oral cancer cells (Ca9-22). In contrast, NAC increased the fucoidan-induced G1 increment and decreased G2/M phases of oral cancer (CAL 27) and S–G cells. These results suggest that oxidative stress is essential to fucoidan-regulated cell cycle progression.

3.3. Preferential Apoptosis Effect of Fucoidan

Annexin V detects phosphatidylserine flipflopping to the outer plasma membrane, proportional to apoptosis. Based on the dose and time experiments for annexin V/7ADD analysis, fucoidan increased the annexin V (+) populations in oral cancer cells (Ca9-22 and CAL 27) more than in non-malignant oral cells (S–G) (Figure 3A,B), indicating that fucoidan causes preferential apoptosis in oral cancer cells.
Furthermore, the impact of oxidative stress in regulating apoptosis was of concern. The antioxidant NAC reversed the fucoidan-induced annexin V increment in oral cancer cells (Figure 3B), suggesting that oxidative stress is essential to fucoidan-induced apoptosis.

3.4. Preferential Apoptosis Signaling Effect of Fucoidan

Cas 3, 8, and 9 activation is detected by peptide cleavage to generate fluorescence, proportional to the activation of these apoptosis signals as detected by flow cytometry. Flow cytometry density plots are presented in Supplementary Figure S1. Based on the dose (Figure 4A,C,E) and time (Figure 4B,D,F) experiments, fucoidan increased Cas 3, 8, and 9 (+) populations more in oral cancer cells (Ca9-22 and CAL 27) than in non-malignant oral cells (S–G), indicating that fucoidan causes the preferential activation of Cas 3, 8, and 9 in oral cancer cells.
Furthermore, the impact of oxidative stress on Cas 3, 8, and 9 activations was of concern. The antioxidant NAC reversed the fucoidan-induced Cas 3, 8, and 9 increments in oral cancer cells (Figure 4B,D,F), suggesting that oxidative stress is essential to fucoidan-induced Cas 3, 8, and 9 activations.

3.5. Preferential ROS and MitoSOX Generations, and GSH Depletion Effects of Fucoidan

Oxidative stress (ROS and MitoSOX) and the cellular antioxidant GSH were detected. Based on the dose (Figure 5A,C) and time (Figure 5B,D) experiments, fucoidan increased ROS and MitoSOX (+) populations more in oral cancer cells (Ca9-22 and CAL 27) than in non-malignant oral cells (S–G). Moreover, fucoidan decreased GSH (+) populations more in oral cancer cells than in S–G cells (Figure 6A,B). After fucoidan treatment, the GSH level remained unchanged in S–G cells. These results indicate that fucoidan causes preferential oxidative stress and GSH depletion in oral cancer cells.
Furthermore, the impact of oxidative stress and GSH changes was of concern. The antioxidant NAC reversed the fucoidan-induced ROS and MitoSOX increments (Figure 5B,D). NAC partly reversed the GSH depletion at 48 h treatment in oral cancer cells (Figure 6B), which indicates that oxidative stress is essential for fucoidan-induced ROS and MitoSOX generation, accompanied by GSH depletion.

3.6. Preferential Antioxidant Signaling Effects of Fucoidan

The inhibition of antioxidant signaling leads to oxidative stress generation [37]. After fucoidan incubation (0, 800, and 1200 μg/mL), the mRNA expression of antioxidant signaling genes, such as NRF2, TXN, and HMOX1, was detected. Fucoidan dramatically downregulated these antioxidant genes in oral cancer cells (Ca9-22 and CAL 27) but not in non-malignant oral cells (S–G) (Figure 7). These antioxidant genes were maintained at a basal level at 800 μg/mL in S–G cells and slightly upregulated at 1200 μg/mL. These results indicate that fucoidan causes the preferential suppression of antioxidant signaling in oral cancer cells.

3.7. Preferential DNA Damage Effect of Fucoidan

DNA damage, such as γH2AX and 8-OHdG, was detected. Fucoidan increased the populations of γH2AX (+) and 8-OHdG (+) in oral cancer cells (Ca9-22 and CAL 27) but not in non-malignant oral cells (S–G) (Figure 8A and Figure 9A), indicating that fucoidan causes preferential DNA damage to oral cancer cells.
Furthermore, the impact of oxidative stress on DNA damage was of concern. The antioxidant NAC reversed the fucoidan-induced γH2AX and 8-OHdG increments in oral cancer cells (Figure 8B and Figure 9B), suggesting that oxidative stress is essential to fucoidan-induced γH2AX and 8-OHdG DNA damage.

4. Discussion

The anticancer functions of fucoidan in oral cancer cells have not been thoroughly investigated. How antioxidant signaling and the DNA damage response are associated with oxidative stress in fucoidan-treated oral cancer cells remains unclear. Moreover, most studies on the anticancer properties of fucoidan focused on the antiproliferation effects without considering their impacts on normal cells. The present investigation used both oral cancer and normal cells to confirm that fucoidan exhibited preferential antiproliferation of oral cancer cells without changing non-malignant oral cells. The detailed preferential antiproliferation mechanisms were discussed, as follows.

4.1. Fucoidan Induces Preferential Antiproliferation Effect

Fucoidan has been applied to several oral cancer studies. For example, fucoidan-based nanoparticles were developed to deliver the phosphoinositide 3-kinase α (PI3Kα) inhibitor BYL719 to head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cells [38]. Fucoidan suppresses the invasion of oral cancer cells [39]. Fucoidan also exhibits anticancer effects against acute leukemia [11], lymphoma [11], and lung [40], breast [15], and bladder cancer [16]. However, their normal cell responses to fucoidan have not been evaluated. Their antiproliferation response to oral cancer cells has rarely been investigated.
Recently, antiproliferation studies were reported in oral cancer cells. For example, IC50 values of fucoidan for oral cancer cells (SCC15 and SCC25) were 218.2 and 508.5 μg/mL in a 24 h MTT assay [41,42]. Moreover, the cytotoxicity of normal cells has rarely been reported. For comparison, we found that the IC50 values of fucoidan for oral cancer cells (Ca9-22, CAL 27, HSC-3, and OC-2) were 856.1, 1096.9, 1193.9, and 1190.6 μg/mL, respectively, in a 48 h MTS assay, but the viability of non-malignant oral cells was unchanged. Accordingly, the present study found that fucoidan exhibited preferential antiproliferation in oral cancer cells but not in non-malignant oral cells.
In almost all tests in the present study, the gingival cancer Ca9-22 cells were more sensitive to fucoidan than the tongue cancer CAL 27 cells following fucoidan treatment. Similarly, dihydrosinularin [43] and sulfonyl chromen-4-ones (CHW09) [44] also show higher sensitivity to Ca9-22 cells than CAL 27 cells. In contrast, burmannic acid [33] and antimycin A [45] are more sensitive to CAL 27 cells than Ca9-22 cells. Therefore, the drug sensitivity of different oral cancer cell lines may depend on the nature of the drugs. The clinical drug cisplatin has IC50 values of 5.6 and 1.20 μg/mL in oral cancer Ca9-22 cells at the 24 h (Figure 1B) and 48 h MTS detection [46], respectively. Although oral cancer cells are more sensitive to cisplatin than fucoidan, cisplatin is frequently associated with adverse effects for clinical therapy [47].

4.2. Fucoidan Causes Preferential Oxidative Stress

Antioxidants show bifunctional effects for suppressing and inducing oxidative stress at physiologic and high concentrations, respectively [48]. Similarly, fucoidan is a potential radical scavenger [49] and protects against peroxide-induced damage in pre-osteoblastic cells [50]. Alternatively, fucoidan induces oxidative stress in breast (MCF-7) [51], bladder (5637) [16], acute myeloid leukemia (SKM-1) [52], colon (Caco-2) [53], liver (SMMC-7721) [54], and tongue (H103) [55] cancer cells. This is a slight paradox as the literature lists the strong antioxidative properties of fucoidan. Perhaps the antioxidative properties only apply to healthy cells. Accordingly, fucoidan may exhibit bifunctional effects, suppressing or inducing oxidative stress in different cell contexts to protect normal cells but damage cancer cells.
Oxidative stress is generated when cellular antioxidants, such as GSH, are downregulated. For example, anticancer drugs such as amygdalin exhibit oxidative stress in breast cancer cells by downregulating GSH levels [56]. Indoxyl sulfate induces GSH depletion, triggering oxidative stress in renal tubular cells [57]. Fucoidan causes oxidative stress, supported by the evidence of ROS and MitoSOX generation, as well as GSH depletion, in oral cancer cells (Figure 5A,C and Figure 6A).
Furthermore, fucoidan stimulated more oxidative stress and induced more antioxidant depletion in oral cancer cells (Figure 5A,C and Figure 6A) than in non-malignant oral cells, demonstrating the preferential induction of oxidative stress in oral cancer cells by fucoidan. Cancer cells generally contain higher oxidative stress than non-malignant cells [58]. The preferential oxidative stress induction of fucoidan may exceed the oxidative stress threshold in oral cancer cells but is tolerated by non-malignant cells, causing preferential antiproliferation of oral cancer cells by fucoidan but not non-malignant cells.

4.3. Fucoidan Causes Preferential Downregulation of Antioxidant Signaling

Cellular redox homeostasis is maintained by balancing pro-oxidant and antioxidant levels [59,60]. NRF2, TXN, and GSH are essential members of cellular antioxidant signaling that diminish the excess of pro-oxidants [61,62]. The inhibition of antioxidant signaling may relatively enhance ROS levels [58].
Several natural products were reported to inhibit NRF2 signaling or directly suppress endogenous antioxidants, causing oxidative stress. For example, parthenolide induces ROS and downregulates NRF2 expression in breast cancer stem-like cells [63]. Diosmetin decreases NFR2 expression to enhance oxidative stress and apoptosis in lung cancer cells [64]. Moreover, TXN is a target of NRF2 [62]. NRF2 activates the TXN-associated antioxidant system [65] and also regulates HMOX1 [66]. Similarly, pomegranate extract (POMx) downregulates mRNA expressions of the NRF2, TXN, and HMOX1 genes to induce oxidative stress in oral cancer Ca9-22 cells [67]. Accordingly, the antioxidant NRF2–TXN–HMOX1 axis is responsible for regulating cellular oxidative stress.
According to this rationale, we examined the antioxidant signaling by mRNA expressions in fucoidan-exposed oral cancer and non-malignant cells. Antioxidant genes (NRF2, TXN, and HMOX1) were downregulated in fucoidan-treated oral cancer cells but not in non-malignant oral cells (Figure 7). Fucoidan seems to downregulate the antioxidant signaling in oral cancer cells and subsequently stimulate oxidative stress by fucoidan, but not in non-malignant oral cells, causing preferential downregulation of antioxidant signaling in oral cancer cells, which may contribute to the preferential upregulation of oxidative stress and lead to preferential antiproliferation.

4.4. Fucoidan Causes Preferential Apoptosis

Oxidative stress modulation is a common strategy to induce apoptosis for cancer treatment [58,68]. Fucoidan triggers apoptosis in breast [51], bladder [16], leukemia [52], colon [53], and liver cancer cells [54]. However, these studies have rarely investigated preferential apoptosis effects and mechanisms. In the present investigation, fucoidan increased subG1 oral cancer cell populations (Figure 2) and annexin V intensities (Figure 3). These apoptosis effects were verified to be associated with fucoidan-triggered apoptosis signals, such as Cas 3, 8, and 9 (Figure 4). Accordingly, fucoidan induces intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis in oral cancer cells.
The preferential apoptosis may be partly attributed to preferential oxidative stress. For example, the mitochondrion-targeted lonidamine-peptide drug induces preferential killing of breast cancer cells but not normal cells, accompanied by inducing higher ROS levels in breast cancer cells than normal cells [69]. Similarly, apoptosis changes such as increases in annexin V and caspase signaling activation (Cas 3, 8, and 9) showed higher expressions in fucoidan-treated oral cancer cells than non-malignant oral cells, leading to preferential apoptosis in oral cancer cells and contributing to preferential antiproliferation.

4.5. Fucoidan Causes Preferential DNA Damage

Oxidative stress causes DNA damage, such as DNA double-strand breaks (γH2AX) and oxidative DNA damage (8-OHdG) [70,71]. Fucoidan generates DNA damage in several cancer cells, such as leukemia, breast [72], and colon [73] cancer cells. Some studies provided evidence of DNA damage using a comet assay [72,74] without investigating the detailed mechanisms. Another fucoidan study showed an increase in γH2AX in colon cancer cells [73], similar to the present study, as detected by flow cytometry (Figure 9).
Moreover, for the first time, we further found that fucoidan induced oxidative 8-OHdG DNA damage in oral cancer cells (Figure 9). Moreover, γH2AX and 8-OHdG DNA damages showed higher expressions in fucoidan-treated oral cancer cells than non-malignant oral cells, leading to preferential DNA damage in oral cancer cells, which may contribute to preferential antiproliferation.
In addition to DNA damage, oxidative stress may act on other macromolecules such as lipids and proteins [70], causing lipid and protein peroxidation. A detailed examination of lipid and protein peroxidation for fucoidan in oral cancer cells is warranted in the future.

4.6. Fucoidan Causes Preferential Cell Cycle Arrest

Fucoidan arrests the cell cycle at G1 in colorectal cancer cells (HCT116) [73] and breast cancer cells (4T1) [14] and also causes arrest at G2 in oral cancer cells (SCC15). In the present investigation, fucoidan induced subG1 accumulation and a minor G1 increase in oral cancer cells (Ca9-22 and CAL 27), but it showed little changes in the cell cycle distribution in non-malignant oral cells. These results suggest that fucoidan exhibits different impacts on cell cycle progression for different cancer cells. Moreover, these subG1 and G1 increments were more remarkable in fucoidan-treated oral cancer cells than non-malignant oral cells, leading to preferential subG1 and G1 increments in oral cancer cells, which may contribute to preferential antiproliferation.

4.7. Preferential Oxidative Stress Plays a Vital Role in Fucoidan-Induced Preferential Antiproliferation Mechanisms

The several responses triggered by oxidative stress warrant a detailed investigation of the role of oxidative stress in fucoidan-treated oral cancer cells by using the oxidative stress inhibitor NAC. NAC has been reported to revert fucoidan-induced apoptosis and downregulations of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), c-myc, Sp1 transcription factor, and AKT expressions in bladder cancer cells [16]. However, the effects of NAC reversion on fucoidan-induced changes have rarely been investigated in other cancer cells.
In the present investigation, we provided a different mechanism for fucoidan and validated the effects of NAC in oral cancer cells. NAC reversed fucoidan-induced preferential impacts on antiproliferation (Figure 1), subG1 accumulation (Figure 2), apoptosis (Figure 3 and Figure 4), oxidative stress (Figure 5 and Figure 6), and DNA damage (Figure 8 and Figure 9) in oral cancer cells but not in non-malignant oral cells. Therefore, fucoidan induces oxidative stress-mediated preferential antiproliferation mechanisms in oral cancer cells.

4.8. Limitation of Our Fucoidan-Treated Oral Cancer Cell Study

Fucoidan shows preferential antiproliferation in oral cancer cells. However, the in vivo role of fucoidan against oral cancer was not examined in the present study. A detailed future assessment of fucoidan using the orthotopic nude mouse model of oral cancer cells is warranted [75,76].
Therefore, the expected next step is to examine fucoidan in preclinical and clinical trials. As recently reviewed, clinical trials have been carried out in other cancer types [39,77]. The problem with clinical trials on fucoidan, according to Lin et al. [39], is its complex structure and different forms; oral absorption appears to be poor, and it cannot be accurately measured in the body. It is approved as a food supplement, but it has not been approved as a drug by the FDA. Luthuli et al. [77] reviewed anticancer effects against several cancer cells such as liver, breast, cervical, and melanoma cancer cells. However, these reviews did not discuss the role of fucoidan in oral cancer treatment [39,77].
Two clinical trials underway are on its safety and biodistribution [78,79], and there is also one on non-small cell lung cancer in which it is added to the patients’ normal chemotherapy [78]. The US Government Clinical Trial register lists a phase 2 study on squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck that should be completed in 2023 [79]. It is necessary to continuously investigate more mechanisms of fucoidan activity to improve its future application in oral cancer treatment.

5. Conclusions

Fucoidan is a brown algae-derived fucose-rich polysaccharide. The anticancer effects of fucoidan on oral cancer cells have rarely been reported, especially with regard to its preferential antiproliferation ability and oxidative-stress-associated responses. The present investigation examined oxidative stress, DNA damage, apoptosis, and antioxidant signaling in fucoidan-treated oral cancer cells. Using oral cancer and non-malignant cells, the preferential antiproliferation effects of fucoidan on oral cancer cells were validated for the first time in the present study.
Our findings demonstrate that fucoidan changed the cell cycle progression, triggered apoptosis, turned on intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis signaling, stimulated oxidative stress, inhibited antioxidant signaling, and improved DNA damage in oral cancer cells. At the same time, non-malignant cells showed a low level of these events. These preferential changes between oral cancer and non-malignant cells contribute to the preferential antiproliferation mechanism of fucoidan (Figure 10).
Antioxidants 11 00841 g010 550
Figure 10. Overview of the preferential antiproliferation mechanism of fucoidan acting on oral cancer cells. In brief, fucoidan makes a preferential choice and then preferentially induces higher oxidative stress (OS) in oral cancer cells than in normal cells. In turn, this oxidative stress triggers a series of preferential responses in oral cancer cells, such as cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and DNA damage. Finally, it causes preferential antiproliferation in oral cancer cells. In contrast, fucoidan only caused low levels of these changes, and normal cells showed healthy proliferation in the presence of fucoidan. Abbreviations: reactive oxygen species (ROS); mitochondrial superoxide (MitoSOX); glutathione (GSH); oxidative stress (OS); subG1 (subG1 phase); caspases 3/8/9 (Cas 3/8/9); 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG).↓, Antioxidants 11 00841 i001, Antioxidants 11 00841 i002 indicate making decision, upregulation, and downregulation, respectively.
Figure 10. Overview of the preferential antiproliferation mechanism of fucoidan acting on oral cancer cells. In brief, fucoidan makes a preferential choice and then preferentially induces higher oxidative stress (OS) in oral cancer cells than in normal cells. In turn, this oxidative stress triggers a series of preferential responses in oral cancer cells, such as cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and DNA damage. Finally, it causes preferential antiproliferation in oral cancer cells. In contrast, fucoidan only caused low levels of these changes, and normal cells showed healthy proliferation in the presence of fucoidan. Abbreviations: reactive oxygen species (ROS); mitochondrial superoxide (MitoSOX); glutathione (GSH); oxidative stress (OS); subG1 (subG1 phase); caspases 3/8/9 (Cas 3/8/9); 8-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG).↓, Antioxidants 11 00841 i001, Antioxidants 11 00841 i002 indicate making decision, upregulation, and downregulation, respectively.
Antioxidants 11 00841 g010
Moreover, the action of this antiproliferation mechanism was suppressed by the antioxidant NAC, indicating that fucoidan-induced antiproliferation in oral cancer cells is dependent on oxidative stress. Therefore, the contributions of the present study shed light on our understanding of preferential antiproliferation effects and the associated mechanism of fucoidan in oral cancer cells.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/antiox11050841/s1, Figure S1: Fucoidan drives Cas 3, 8, and 9 signaling in oral cancer cells; Figure S2: Fucoidan drives ROS and MitoSOX generation in oral cancer cells; Figure S3: Fucoidan increases the γH2AX level of oral cancer cells; Figure S4: Fucoidan increases the 8-OHdG level of oral cancer cells; Figure S5: Positive control patterns for cell cycle analysis; Figure S6: Positive control patterns for apoptosis; Figure S7: Positive control patterns for ROS analysis; Figure S8: Positive control patterns for MitoSOX analysis; Figure S9: Positive control patterns for γH2AX analysis; Figure S10: Positive control patterns for 8-OHdG analysis. The flow cytometry density plots for Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 8 and Figure 9 are shown in Supplementary Figures S1–S4, respectively. The positive controls for cell cycle, annexin V (apoptosis), ROS, MitoSOX, γH2AX, and 8-OHdG are shown in Supplementary Figures S5–S10, respectively.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.-P.S., Y.-T.C., J.-Y.T. and H.-W.C.; data curation, Y.-T.C.; formal analysis, Y.-T.C. and K.-H.Y.; methodology, J.-P.S., F.-R.C., J.-H.S., M.-F.H. and J.-H.J.; supervision, J.-Y.T. and H.-W.C.; writing—original draft, J.-P.S. and H.-W.C.; writing—review and editing, J.-Y.T. and H.-W.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partly supported by funds from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST 108-2320-B-037-015-MY3 and MOST 110-2314-B-037-074-MY3), the Kaohsiung Medical University (KMU-DK(A)111008), the National Sun Yat-sen University–KMU Joint Research Project (#NSYSUKMU 111-P20), and the Kaohsiung Medical University Research Center (KMU-TC108A04).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflict of interest among them.

References

  1. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Silverman, S., Jr. Oral cancer: Complications of therapy. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 1999, 88, 122–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wells, M.L.; Potin, P.; Craigie, J.S.; Raven, J.A.; Merchant, S.S.; Helliwell, K.E.; Smith, A.G.; Camire, M.E.; Brawley, S.H. Algae as nutritional and functional food sources: Revisiting our understanding. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 949–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ngo, D.H.; Kim, S.K. Sulfated polysaccharides as bioactive agents from marine algae. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2013, 62, 70–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hentati, F.; Tounsi, L.; Djomdi, D.; Pierre, G.; Delattre, C.; Ursu, A.V.; Fendri, I.; Abdelkafi, S.; Michaud, P. Bioactive polysaccharides from seaweeds. Molecules 2020, 25, 3152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lin, Y.; Qi, X.; Liu, H.; Xue, K.; Xu, S.; Tian, Z. The anti-cancer effects of fucoidan: A review of both In Vivo and In Vitro investigations. Cancer Cell Int. 2020, 20, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Phull, A.R.; Kim, S.J. Fucoidan as bio-functional molecule: Insights into the anti-inflammatory potential and associated molecular mechanisms. J. Funct. Foods 2017, 38, 415–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Durig, J.; Bruhn, T.; Zurborn, K.H.; Gutensohn, K.; Bruhn, H.D.; Beress, L. Anticoagulant fucoidan fractions from Fucus vesiculosus induce platelet activation In Vitro. Thromb. Res. 1997, 85, 479–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, M.; Liu, Y.; Cao, M.J.; Liu, G.M.; Chen, Q.; Sun, L.; Chen, H. Antibacterial activity and mechanisms of depolymerized fucoidans isolated from Laminaria japonica. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 172, 294–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hsu, H.Y.; Hwang, P.A. Clinical applications of fucoidan in translational medicine for adjuvant cancer therapy. Clin. Transl. Med. 2019, 8, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Boo, H.J.; Hong, J.Y.; Kim, S.C.; Kang, J.I.; Kim, M.K.; Kim, E.J.; Hyun, J.W.; Koh, Y.S.; Yoo, E.S.; Kwon, J.M.; et al. The anticancer effect of fucoidan in PC-3 prostate cancer cells. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 2982–2999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Nagamine, T.; Hayakawa, K.; Kusakabe, T.; Takada, H.; Nakazato, K.; Hisanaga, E.; Iha, M. Inhibitory effect of fucoidan on Huh7 hepatoma cells through downregulation of CXCL12. Nutr. Cancer 2009, 61, 340–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, Z.; Teruya, K.; Eto, H.; Shirahata, S. Fucoidan extract induces apoptosis in MCF-7 cells via a mechanism involving the ROS-dependent JNK activation and mitochondria-mediated pathways. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e27441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Xue, M.; Ge, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Hou, L.; Zheng, Z. Fucoidan inhibited 4T1 mouse breast cancer cell growth in vivo and In Vitro via downregulation of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Nutr. Cancer 2013, 65, 460–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Citkowska, A.; Szekalska, M.; Winnicka, K. Possibilities of fucoidan utilization in the development of pharmaceutical dosage forms. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Han, M.H.; Lee, D.S.; Jeong, J.W.; Hong, S.H.; Choi, I.W.; Cha, H.J.; Kim, S.; Kim, H.S.; Park, C.; Kim, G.Y.; et al. Fucoidan induces ROS-dependent apoptosis in 5637 human bladder cancer cells by downregulating telomerase activity via inactivation of the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Drug Dev. Res. 2017, 78, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Srinivas, U.S.; Tan, B.W.Q.; Vellayappan, B.A.; Jeyasekharan, A.D. ROS and the DNA damage response in cancer. Redox Biol. 2019, 25, 101084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ma, Q. Role of Nrf2 in oxidative stress and toxicity. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2013, 53, 401–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Weber, D.J.; Rutala, W.A.; Anderson, D.J.; Chen, L.F.; Sickbert-Bennett, E.E.; Boyce, J.M. Effectiveness of ultraviolet devices and hydrogen peroxide systems for terminal room decontamination: Focus on clinical trials. Am. J. Infect. Control. 2016, 44, e77–e84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ge, J.; Zhang, C.; Sun, Y.C.; Zhang, Q.; Lv, M.W.; Guo, K.; Li, J.L. Cadmium exposure triggers mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in chicken (Gallus gallus) kidney via mitochondrial UPR inhibition and Nrf2-mediated antioxidant defense activation. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 689, 1160–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, C.H.; Yeh, J.M.; Chan, W.H. Hazardous impacts of silver nanoparticles on mouse oocyte maturation and fertilization and fetal development through induction of apoptotic processes. Environ. Toxicol. 2018, 33, 1039–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Liu, Y.C.; Peng, B.R.; Hsu, K.C.; El-Shazly, M.; Shih, S.P.; Lin, T.E.; Kuo, F.W.; Chou, Y.C.; Lin, H.Y.; Lu, M.C. 13-Acetoxysarcocrassolide exhibits cytotoxic activity against oral cancer cells through the interruption of the Keap1/Nrf2/p62/SQSTM1 pathway: The need to move beyond classical concepts. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wong, D.Y.; Chang, K.W.; Chen, C.F.; Chang, R.C. Characterization of two new cell lines derived from oral cavity human squamous cell carcinomas—OC1 and OC2. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 1990, 48, 385–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, C.Y.; Meng, C.L. Regulation of PG synthase by EGF and PDGF in human oral, breast, stomach, and fibrosarcoma cancer cell lines. J. Dent. Res. 1994, 73, 1407–1415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Kasten, F.H.; Pineda, L.F.; Schneider, P.E.; Rawls, H.R.; Foster, T.A. Biocompatibility testing of an experimental fluoride releasing resin using human gingival epithelial cells In Vitro. Cell Dev. Biol. 1989, 25, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kasten, F.H.; Soileau, K.; Meffert, R.M. Quantitative evaluation of human gingival epithelial cell attachment to implant surfaces In Vitro. Int. J. Periodontics Restor. Dent. 1990, 10, 68–79. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hsieh, P.L.; Liao, Y.W.; Hsieh, C.W.; Chen, P.N.; Yu, C.C. Soy isoflavone genistein impedes cancer stemness and mesenchymal transition in head and neck cancer through activating miR-34a/RTCB axis. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, H.R.; Tang, J.Y.; Wang, Y.Y.; Farooqi, A.A.; Yen, C.Y.; Yuan, S.F.; Huang, H.W.; Chang, H.W. Manoalide preferentially provides antiproliferation of oral cancer cells by oxidative stress-mediated apoptosis and DNA damage. Cancers 2019, 11, 1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Yeh, C.C.; Tseng, C.N.; Yang, J.I.; Huang, H.W.; Fang, Y.; Tang, J.Y.; Chang, F.R.; Chang, H.W. Antiproliferation and induction of apoptosis in Ca9-22 oral cancer cells by ethanolic extract of Gracilaria tenuistipitata. Molecules 2012, 17, 10916–10927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Vignon, C.; Debeissat, C.; Georget, M.T.; Bouscary, D.; Gyan, E.; Rosset, P.; Herault, O. Flow cytometric quantification of all phases of the cell cycle and apoptosis in a two-color fluorescence plot. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Fan, H.C.; Hsieh, Y.C.; Li, L.H.; Chang, C.C.; Janouskova, K.; Ramani, M.V.; Subbaraju, G.V.; Cheng, K.T.; Chang, C.C. Dehydroxyhispolon methyl ether, a hispolon derivative, inhibits WNT/beta-catenin signaling to elicit human colorectal carcinoma cell apoptosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lin, C.H.; Chan, H.S.; Tsay, H.S.; Funayama, S.; Kuo, C.L.; Chung, J.G. Ethyl acetate fraction from methanol extraction of Vitis thunbergii var. taiwaniana induced G0 /G1 phase arrest via inhibition of cyclins D and E and induction of apoptosis through caspase-dependent and -independent pathways in human prostate carcinoma DU145 cells. Environ. Toxicol. 2018, 33, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, S.L.; Yang, K.H.; Yang, C.W.; Lee, M.Y.; Chuang, Y.T.; Chen, Y.N.; Chang, F.R.; Chen, C.Y.; Chang, H.W. Burmannic acid inhibits proliferation and induces oxidative stress response of oral cancer cells. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yang, I.H.; Tsai, Y.T.; Chiu, S.J.; Liu, L.T.; Lee, H.H.; Hou, M.F.; Hsu, W.L.; Chen, B.K.; Chang, W.C. Involvement of STIM1 and Orai1 in EGF-mediated cell growth in retinal pigment epithelial cells. J. Biomed. Sci. 2013, 20, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Chang, H.W.; Yen, C.Y.; Chen, C.H.; Tsai, J.H.; Tang, J.Y.; Chang, Y.T.; Kao, Y.H.; Wang, Y.Y.; Yuan, S.F.; Lee, S.Y. Evaluation of the mRNA expression levels of integrins alpha3, alpha5, beta1 and beta6 as tumor biomarkers of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol. Lett. 2018, 16, 4773–4781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Chiu, C.C.; Huang, J.W.; Chang, F.R.; Huang, K.J.; Huang, H.M.; Huang, H.W.; Chou, C.K.; Wu, Y.C.; Chang, H.W. Golden berry-derived 4beta-hydroxywithanolide E for selectively killing oral cancer cells by generating ROS, DNA damage, and apoptotic pathways. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e64739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Espinosa-Diez, C.; Miguel, V.; Mennerich, D.; Kietzmann, T.; Sanchez-Perez, P.; Cadenas, S.; Lamas, S. Antioxidant responses and cellular adjustments to oxidative stress. Redox Biol 2015, 6, 183–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Mizrachi, A.; Shamay, Y.; Shah, J.; Brook, S.; Soong, J.; Rajasekhar, V.K.; Humm, J.L.; Healey, J.H.; Powell, S.N.; Baselga, J.; et al. Tumour-specific PI3K inhibition via nanoparticle-targeted delivery in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 14292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lin, J.; Wang, K.; Wang, H.; Shao, Q.; Luan, Y.; Xu, Y.; Song, X.; Tan, W.; Liu, S.; Wei, F.; et al. Fucoidan reduced the invasion of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells and modified their effects to macrophages. Med. Oncol. 2017, 34, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Hsu, H.Y.; Lin, T.Y.; Hu, C.H.; Shu, D.T.F.; Lu, M.K. Fucoidan upregulates TLR4/CHOP-mediated caspase-3 and PARP activation to enhance cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity in human lung cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2018, 432, 112–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Chantree, P.; Surarak, T.; Sangpairoj, K.; Aguilar, P.; Hitakomate, E. Antitumor effects of fucoidan via apoptotic and autophagic induction on HSC-3 oral squamous cellcarcinoma. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2020, 21, 2469–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, N.; Gao, L.; Ren, W.; Li, S.; Zhang, D.; Song, X.; Zhao, C.; Zhi, K. Fucoidan affects oral squamous cell carcinoma cell functions in vitro by regulating FLNA-derived circular RNA. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2020, 1462, 65–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yang, K.H.; Lin, Y.S.; Wang, S.C.; Lee, M.Y.; Tang, J.Y.; Chang, F.R.; Chuang, Y.T.; Sheu, J.H.; Chang, H.W. Soft coral-derived dihydrosinularin exhibits antiproliferative effects associated with apoptosis and DNA damage in oral cancer cells. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tang, J.Y.; Wu, C.Y.; Shu, C.W.; Wang, S.C.; Chang, M.Y.; Chang, H.W. A novel sulfonyl chromen-4-ones (CHW09) preferentially kills oral cancer cells showing apoptosis, oxidative stress, and DNA damage. Environ. Toxicol. 2018, 33, 1195–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Yu, T.J.; Hsieh, C.Y.; Tang, J.Y.; Lin, L.C.; Huang, H.W.; Wang, H.R.; Yeh, Y.C.; Chuang, Y.T.; Ou-Yang, F.; Chang, H.W. Antimycin A shows selective antiproliferation to oral cancer cells by oxidative stress-mediated apoptosis and DNA damage. Environ. Toxicol. 2020, 35, 1212–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Tang, J.Y.; Wu, K.H.; Wang, Y.Y.; Farooqi, A.A.; Huang, H.W.; Yuan, S.F.; Jian, R.I.; Tsao, L.Y.; Chen, P.A.; Chang, F.R.; et al. Methanol extract of Usnea barbata induces cell killing, apoptosis, and DNA damage against oral cancer cells through oxidative stress. Antioxidant 2020, 9, 694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Aldossary, S.A. Review on pharmacology of cisplatin: Clinical use, toxicity and mechanism of resistance of cisplatin. Biomed. Pharm. J. 2019, 12, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bouayed, J.; Bohn, T. Exogenous antioxidants--Double-edged swords in cellular redox state: Health beneficial effects at physiologic doses versus deleterious effects at high doses. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2010, 3, 228–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Laeliocattleya, R.A.; Suloi, A.; Gayatri, P.; Putri, N.; Anggraeni, Y. Fucoidan content from brown seaweed (Sargassum filipendula) and its potential as radical scavenger. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2020, 1430, 012023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Fidelis, G.P.; Silva, C.H.F.; Nobre, L.; Medeiros, V.P.; Rocha, H.A.O.; Costa, L.S. Antioxidant fucoidans obtained from tropical seaweed protect pre-osteoblastic cells from hydrogen peroxide-induced damage. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Banafa, A.M.; Roshan, S.; Liu, Y.Y.; Chen, H.J.; Chen, M.J.; Yang, G.X.; He, G.Y. Fucoidan induces G1 phase arrest and apoptosis through caspases-dependent pathway and ROS induction in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells. J. Huazhong Univ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 33, 717–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Wei, C.; Xiao, Q.; Kuang, X.; Zhang, T.; Yang, Z.; Wang, L. Fucoidan inhibits proliferation of the SKM-1 acute myeloid leukaemia cell line via the activation of apoptotic pathways and production of reactive oxygen species. Mol. Med. Rep. 2015, 12, 6649–6655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Narayani, S.S.; Saravanan, S.; Ravindran, J.; Ramasamy, M.S.; Chitra, J. In Vitro anticancer activity of fucoidan extracted from Sargassum cinereum against Caco-2 cells. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 138, 618–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yang, L.; Wang, P.; Wang, H.; Li, Q.; Teng, H.; Liu, Z.; Yang, W.; Hou, L.; Zou, X. Fucoidan derived from Undaria pinnatifida induces apoptosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma SMMC-7721 cells via the ROS-mediated mitochondrial pathway. Mar. Drugs 2013, 11, 1961–1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Blaszczak, W.; Lach, M.S.; Barczak, W.; Suchorska, W.M. Fucoidan exerts anticancer effects against head and neck squamous cell carcinoma In Vitro. Molecules 2018, 23, 3302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Abboud, M.M.; Al Awaida, W.; Alkhateeb, H.H.; Abu-Ayyad, A.N. Antitumor action of amygdalin on human breast cancer cells by selective sensitization to oxidative stress. Nutr. Cancer 2019, 71, 483–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Edamatsu, T.; Fujieda, A.; Itoh, Y. Phenyl sulfate, indoxyl sulfate and p-cresyl sulfate decrease glutathione level to render cells vulnerable to oxidative stress in renal tubular cells. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0193342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Tang, J.Y.; Ou-Yang, F.; Hou, M.F.; Huang, H.W.; Wang, H.R.; Li, K.T.; Fayyaz, S.; Shu, C.W.; Chang, H.W. Oxidative stress-modulating drugs have preferential anticancer effects—Involving the regulation of apoptosis, DNA damage, endoplasmic reticulum stress, autophagy, metabolism, and migration. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2019, 58, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Sies, H. Oxidative stress: Eustress and distress in redox homeostasis. In Stress: Physiology, Biochemistry, and Pathology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 153–163. [Google Scholar]
  60. Ahmad, T.; Suzuki, Y.J. Juglone in oxidative stress and cell signaling. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Jasek-Gajda, E.; Jurkowska, H.; Jasinska, M.; Lis, G.J. Targeting the MAPK/ERK and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways affects NRF2, Trx and GSH antioxidant systems in leukemia cells. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Rostila, A.M.; Anttila, S.L.; Lalowski, M.M.; Vuopala, K.S.; Toljamo, T.I.; Lindstrom, I.; Baumann, M.H.; Puustinen, A.M. Reactive oxygen species-regulating proteins peroxiredoxin 2 and thioredoxin, and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase are differentially abundant in induced sputum from smokers with lung cancer or asbestos exposure. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 2020, 29, 238–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Carlisi, D.; Buttitta, G.; Di Fiore, R.; Scerri, C.; Drago-Ferrante, R.; Vento, R.; Tesoriere, G. Parthenolide and DMAPT exert cytotoxic effects on breast cancer stem-like cells by inducing oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction and necrosis. Cell Death Dis. 2016, 7, e2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Chen, X.; Wu, Q.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, J.; Li, H.; Yang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Deng, Y.; Zhang, L.; Liu, B. Diosmetin induces apoptosis and enhances the chemotherapeutic efficacy of paclitaxel in non-small cell lung cancer cells via Nrf2 inhibition. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2019, 176, 2079–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Hawkes, H.J.; Karlenius, T.C.; Tonissen, K.F. Regulation of the human thioredoxin gene promoter and its key substrates: A study of functional and putative regulatory elements. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gener. Subj. 2014, 1840, 303–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Alam, J.; Stewart, D.; Touchard, C.; Boinapally, S.; Choi, A.M.; Cook, J.L. Nrf2, a Cap’n’Collar transcription factor, regulates induction of the heme oxygenase-1 gene. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 26071–26078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Peng, S.Y.; Lin, L.C.; Chen, S.R.; Farooqi, A.A.; Cheng, Y.B.; Tang, J.Y.; Chang, H.W. Pomegranate extract (POMx) induces mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis of oral cancer cells. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zou, Z.; Chang, H.; Li, H.; Wang, S. Induction of reactive oxygen species: An emerging approach for cancer therapy. Apoptosis Int. J. Program. Cell Death 2017, 22, 1321–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gao, J.; Wang, Z.; Guo, Q.; Tang, H.; Wang, Z.; Yang, C.; Fan, H.; Zhang, W.; Ren, C.; Liu, J. Mitochondrion-targeted supramolecular “nano-boat” simultaneously inhibiting dual energy metabolism for tumor selective and synergistic chemo-radiotherapy. Theranostics 2022, 12, 1286–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Arfin, S.; Jha, N.K.; Jha, S.K.; Kesari, K.K.; Ruokolainen, J.; Roychoudhury, S.; Rathi, B.; Kumar, D. Oxidative stress in cancer cell metabolism. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Safdar, S.; Ali, S.; Fayyaz, H.; Munir, H.; Atif, F.; Majeed, S.; Jabeen, S. Ameliorating effect of zinc on protein supplement induced DNA and sperm damage in male sprague dawley rats. Pak. J. Physiol. 2021, 17, 22–26. [Google Scholar]
  72. Fernando, I.P.S.; Sanjeewa, K.K.A.; Lee, H.G.; Kim, H.S.; Vaas, A.; De Silva, H.I.C.; Nanayakkara, C.M.; Abeytunga, D.T.U.; Lee, D.S.; Lee, J.S.; et al. Fucoidan purified from Sargassum polycystum induces apoptosis through mitochondria-mediated pathway in HL-60 and MCF-7 Cells. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Park, H.Y.; Park, S.H.; Jeong, J.W.; Yoon, D.; Han, M.H.; Lee, D.S.; Choi, G.; Yim, M.J.; Lee, J.M.; Kim, D.H.; et al. Induction of p53-independent apoptosis and G1 cell cycle arrest by fucoidan in HCT116 human colorectal carcinoma cells. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  74. Duan, Y.; Li, J.; Jing, X.; Ding, X.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, Q. Fucoidan induces apoptosis and inhibits proliferation of hepatocellular carcinoma via the p38 MAPK/ERK and PI3K/Akt signal pathways. Cancer Manag. Res. 2020, 12, 1713–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Myers, J.N.; Holsinger, F.C.; Jasser, S.A.; Bekele, B.N.; Fidler, I.J. An orthotopic nude mouse model of oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2002, 8, 293–298. [Google Scholar]
  76. Masood, R.; Hochstim, C.; Cervenka, B.; Zu, S.; Baniwal, S.K.; Patel, V.; Kobielak, A.; Sinha, U.K. A novel orthotopic mouse model of head and neck cancer and lymph node metastasis. Oncogenesis 2013, 2, e68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Luthuli, S.; Wu, S.; Cheng, Y.; Zheng, X.; Wu, M.; Tong, H. Therapeutic effects of fucoidan: A review on recent studies. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Qiu, W.L.; Tseng, A.J.; Hsu, H.Y.; Hsu, W.H.; Lin, Z.H.; Hua, W.J.; Lin, T.Y. Fucoidan increased the sensitivity to gefitinib in lung cancer cells correlates with reduction of TGFbeta-mediated Slug expression. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 153, 796–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. NCT04597476, C.g.I. A Randomized, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate the Clinical Effect and Safety of Fucoidan in Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck. Available online: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04597476 (accessed on 22 April 2022).
Antioxidants 11 00841 g001 550
Figure 1. Fucoidan (FN) decreases the cell viability of oral cancer cells but not non-malignant cells. (A) MTS assay. After exposure to fucoidan (control, 800, 1000, and 1200 μg/mL) for 48 and 72 h, an MTS kit was chosen to determine the cell viability of oral cancer (Ca9-22, CAL 27, OECM-1, HSC-3, and OC-2) and non-malignant oral cells (S–G). (B) Cisplatin was a positive control for oral cancer cells (Ca9-22) following 24 h treatment. (C) The effect of oxidative stress on the cell viability of oral cancer cells following fucoidan treatment. After NAC (10 mM, 1 h) preincubation or not, cells were post-treated with control and fucoidan (0, 800, and 1200 μg/mL) with NAC co-treatment (10 mM) for 48 h. NAC/fucoidan (NAC/FN) represents pretreatment with NAC and post-treatment with FN. Data = mean ± SD (n = 3 experiments). Data of the same cells with non-overlapping letters reveal significant differences (p < 0.05). In the example of Figure 1B (Ca9-22 cells), FN at 0, 800, and 1200 μg/mL labeled with “a, c, and d” has significant results because the letters do not overlap. FN and NAC/FN of Ca9-22 cells at 800 or 1200 μg/mL labeled with “c and b” or “d and b” have significant results.
Figure 1. Fucoidan (FN) decreases the cell viability of oral cancer cells but not non-malignant cells. (A) MTS assay. After exposure to fucoidan (control, 800, 1000, and 1200 μg/mL) for 48 and 72 h, an MTS kit was chosen to determine the cell viability of oral cancer (Ca9-22, CAL 27, OECM-1, HSC-3, and OC-2) and non-malignant oral cells (S–G). (B) Cisplatin was a positive control for oral cancer cells (Ca9-22) following 24 h treatment. (C) The effect of oxidative stress on the cell viability of oral cancer cells following fucoidan treatment. After NAC (10 mM, 1 h) preincubation or not, cells were post-treated with control and fucoidan (0, 800, and 1200 μg/mL) with NAC co-treatment (10 mM) for 48 h. NAC/fucoidan (NAC/FN) represents pretreatment with NAC and post-treatment with FN. Data = mean ± SD (n = 3 experiments). Data of the same cells with non-overlapping letters reveal significant differences (p < 0.05). In the example of Figure 1B (Ca9-22 cells), FN at 0, 800, and 1200 μg/mL labeled with “a, c, and d” has significant results because the letters do not overlap. FN and NAC/FN of Ca9-22 cells at 800 or 1200 μg/mL labeled with “c and b” or “d and b” have significant results.
Antioxidants 11 00841 g001
Antioxidants 11 00841 g002 550
Figure 2. Fucoidan increases subG1 populations of oral cancer cells but not non-malignant cells. (A) Cell cycle distribution and statistical analysis. Oral cancer (Ca9-22 and CAL 27) and non-malignant oral cells (S–G) were treated with fucoidan (control, 800 (FN 800), and 1200 (FN 1200) μg/mL) for 0 and 48 h. (B) The effect of oxidative stress on the cell cycle change of fucoidan-exposed oral cancer cells. After NAC (10 mM, 1 h) preincubation or not, cells were treated with fucoidan (1200 μg/mL) with NAC co-treatment (10 mM) for 0, 36, and 48 h. NAC/fucoidan (NAC/FN) represents pretreatment with NAC and post-treatment with FN. Data = mean ± SD (n = 3 experiments). Data with non-overlapping letters reveal significant differences for each phase (p < 0.05). In the example of Figure 2A (subG1 phase of Ca9-22 cells), FN at 0, 800, and 1200 μg/mL labeled with “d, b, and a” has significant results because the letters do not overlap. In the example of Figure 2B (G1 phase of Ca9-22 cells), control, FN 36 h, and FN 48 h labeled with “d, a, and b” have significant results because the letters do not overlap. In the example of Figure 2B (G2/M phase of Ca9-22 cells), FN 48 h and NAC/FN 48 h labeled with “c and a” have significant results. The positive control of G2/M arrest of the cell cycle is provided in Supplementary Figure S5.
Figure 2. Fucoidan increases subG1 populations of oral cancer cells but not non-malignant cells. (A) Cell cycle distribution and statistical analysis. Oral cancer (Ca9-22 and CAL 27) and non-malignant oral cells (S–G) were treated with fucoidan (control, 800 (FN 800), and 1200 (FN 1200) μg/mL) for 0 and 48 h. (B) The effect of oxidative stress on the cell cycle change of fucoidan-exposed oral cancer cells. After NAC (10 mM, 1 h) preincubation or not, cells were treated with fucoidan (1200 μg/mL) with NAC co-treatment (10 mM) for 0, 36, and 48 h. NAC/fucoidan (NAC/FN) represents pretreatment with NAC and post-treatment with FN. Data = mean ± SD (n = 3 experiments). Data with non-overlapping letters reveal significant differences for each phase (p < 0.05). In the example of Figure 2A (subG1 phase of Ca9-22 cells), FN at 0, 800, and 1200 μg/mL labeled with “d, b, and a” has significant results because the letters do not overlap. In the example of Figure 2B (G1 phase of Ca9-22 cells), control, FN 36 h, and FN 48 h labeled with “d, a, and b” have significant results because the letters do not overlap. In the example of Figure 2B (G2/M phase of Ca9-22 cells), FN 48 h and NAC/FN 48 h labeled with “c and a” have significant results. The positive control of G2/M arrest of the cell cycle is provided in Supplementary Figure S5.
Antioxidants 11 00841 g002
Antioxidants 11 00841 g003a 550Antioxidants 11 00841 g003b 550
Figure 3. Fucoidan drives apoptosis (annexin V) in oral cancer cells. (A) Annexin V histogram and statistical analysis. Oral cancer (Ca9-22 and CAL 27) and non-malignant cells (S–G) were treated with fucoidan (control, 800, and 1200 μg/mL) for 0 and 48 h. Annexin V (+) and 7AAD (+ or −) counts, i.e., Q2 and Q3 quadrants, were regarded as apoptosis (%). It is noted that some of the Q2 cells could be necrotic and not apoptotic. Q4 and Q1 quadrants were regarded as live cells and necrosis (%). For the Q1 quadrant, the DNA staining (7AAD) indicates that the cell membrane has been permeabilized, but Annexin V does not enter and stain the cells; perhaps it is too big (35 kD), whereas 7AAD (1.27 kD) is small enough to enter. (B) The effect of oxidative stress on apoptosis (annexin V) of fucoidan-incubated oral cancer cells. After NAC preincubation or not, cells were treated with fucoidan (1200 μg/mL) with NAC co-treatment (10 mM) for 0, 36, and 48 h. In general, the actual setting for the windows in (A) is based on a similar annexin V intensity (+) (%) to the controls between different cell lines. For NAC pretreatment, the actual setting for the windows in (B) is based on the same annexin V intensity of the controls between different cell lines. NAC/fucoidan (NAC/FN) represents the pretreatment with NAC and post-treatment with FN. Data = mean ± SD (n = 3 experiments). Data with non-overlapping letters reveal significant differences (p < 0.05). In the example of Figure 3B (Ca9-22 cells), FN at 0, 36, and 48 h, labeled with the connecting letters “d, b, and a”, has significant results, because the letters do not overlap. FN and NAC/FN at 48 h labeled with “a and c” have significant results. In contrast, in the example of Figure 3B (S–G cells), FN and NAC/FN at 36 h labeled with “abc and ab” have nonsignificant results because they overlap with “ab”. The positive control of apoptosis is provided in Supplementary Figure S6.
Figure 3. Fucoidan drives apoptosis (annexin V) in oral cancer cells. (A) Annexin V histogram and statistical analysis. Oral cancer (Ca9-22 and CAL 27) and non-malignant cells (S–G) were treated with fucoidan (control, 800, and 1200 μg/mL) for 0 and 48 h. Annexin V (+) and 7AAD (+ or −) counts, i.e., Q2 and Q3 quadrants, were regarded as apoptosis (%). It is noted that some of the Q2 cells could be necrotic and not apoptotic. Q4 and Q1 quadrants were regarded as live cells and necrosis (%). For the Q1 quadrant, the DNA staining (7AAD) indicates that the cell membrane has been permeabilized, but Annexin V does not enter and stain the cells; perhaps it is too big (35 kD), whereas 7AAD (1.27 kD) is small enough to enter. (B) The effect of oxidative stress on apoptosis (annexin V) of fucoidan-incubated oral cancer cells. After NAC preincubation or not, cells were treated with fucoidan (1200 μg/mL) with NAC co-treatment (10 mM) for 0, 36, and 48 h. In general, the actual setting for the windows in (A) is based on a similar annexin V intensity (+) (%) to the controls between different cell lines. For NAC pretreatment, the actual setting for the windows in (B) is based on the same annexin V intensity of the controls between different cell lines. NAC/fucoidan (NAC/FN) represents the pretreatment with NAC and post-treatment with FN. Data = mean ± SD (n = 3 experiments). Data with non-overlapping letters reveal significant differences (p < 0.05). In the example of Figure 3B (Ca9-22 cells), FN at 0, 36, and 48 h, labeled with the connecting letters “d, b, and a”, has significant results, because the letters do not overlap. FN and NAC/FN at 48 h labeled with “a and c” have significant results. In contrast, in the example of Figure 3B (S–G cells), FN and NAC/FN at 36 h labeled with “abc and ab” have nonsignificant results because they overlap with “ab”. The positive control of apoptosis is provided in Supplementary Figure S6.
Antioxidants 11 00841 g003aAntioxidants 11 00841 g003b
Antioxidants 11 00841 g004 550
Figure 4. Fucoidan drives Cas 3, 8, and 9 signaling in oral cancer cells. Summary histograms of the flow cytometry results are presented. The individual density plots are presented in Supplementary Figure S1. (A,C,E) Cas 3, 8, and 9 statistical analysis. Oral cancer (Ca9-22 and CAL 27) and non-malignant cells (S–G) were treated with fucoidan (control, 800, and 1200 μg/mL) for 0 and 48 h. (+) indicates a high level of Cas 3, 8, and 9. (B,D,F) The effect of oxidative stress on Cas 3, 8, and 9 activations of fucoidan-incubated oral cancer cells. After NAC preincubation or not, cells were treated with fucoidan (1200 μg/mL) with NAC co-treatment (10 mM) for 0, 36, and 48 h. NAC/fucoidan (NAC/FN) represents the pretreatment with NAC and post-treatment with FN. Data = mean ± SD (n = 3 experiments). Data with non-overlapping letters reveal significant differences (p < 0.05). In the example of Figure 4B (Ca9-22 cells), FN at 36 and 48 h labeled with “a” has significant results compared with that at 0 h labeled with “bc”, because the letters do not overlap. FN and NAC/FN at 36 and 48 h labeled with “a and bc” and “a and b” have significant results. In contrast, FN at 36 and 48 h labeled with “a” has nonsignificant results because the letters overlap. e is not appeared for statistic analysis in the example.
Figure 4. Fucoidan drives Cas 3, 8, and 9 signaling in oral cancer cells. Summary histograms of the flow cytometry results are presented. The individual density plots are presented in Supplementary Figure S1. (A,C,E) Cas 3, 8, and 9 statistical analysis. Oral cancer (Ca9-22 and CAL 27) and non-malignant cells (S–G) were treated with fucoidan (control, 800, and 1200 μg/mL) for 0 and 48 h. (+) indicates a high level of Cas 3, 8, and 9. (B,D,F) The effect of oxidative stress on Cas 3, 8, and 9 activations of fucoidan-incubated oral cancer cells. After NAC preincubation or not, cells were treated with fucoidan (1200 μg/mL) with NAC co-treatment (10 mM) for 0, 36, and 48 h. NAC/fucoidan (NAC/FN) represents the pretreatment with NAC and post-treatment with FN. Data = mean ± SD (n = 3 experiments). Data with non-overlapping letters reveal significant differences (p < 0.05). In the example of Figure 4B (Ca9-22 cells), FN at 36 and 48 h labeled with “a” has significant results compared with that at 0 h labeled with “bc”, because the letters do not overlap. FN and NAC/FN at 36 and 48 h labeled with “a and bc” and “a and b” have significant results. In contrast, FN at 36 and 48 h labeled with “a” has nonsignificant results because the letters overlap. e is not appeared for statistic analysis in the example.
Antioxidants 11 00841 g004
Antioxidants 11 00841 g005 550
Figure 5. Fucoidan drives ROS and MitoSOX generation in oral cancer cells. Summary histograms of the flow cytometry results are presented. The individual density plots are presented in Supplementary Figure S2. (A,C) ROS and MitoSOX statistical analyses. Oral cancer (Ca9-22 and CAL 27) and non-malignant cells (S–G) were treated with fucoidan (control, 800, and 1200 μg/mL) for 0 and 48 h. (+) indicates high levels of ROS and MitoSOX. (B,D) The effect of oxidative stress on ROS and MitoSOX generation and the GSH depletion of fucoidan-incubated oral cancer cells. After NAC preincubation or not, cells were treated with fucoidan (1200 μg/mL) with NAC co-treatment (10 mM) for 0, 36, and 48 h. NAC/fucoidan (NAC/FN) represents the pretreatment with NAC and post-treatment with FN. Data = mean ± SD (n = 3 experiments). Data with non-overlapping letters reveal significant differences (p < 0.05). In the example of Figure 5D (Ca9-22 cells), FN at 0, 36, and 48 h, labeled with the connecting letters “c, b, and a”, has significant results, because the letters do not overlap. FN and NAC/FN at 48 h labeled with “a and b” have significant results. In contrast, FN and NAC/FN at 36 h labeled with “b” have nonsignificant results because they overlap with “b”. “d” is not appeared for statistic analysis in the example. The positive controls of ROS and MitoSOX are provided in Supplementary Figures S7 and S8.
Figure 5. Fucoidan drives ROS and MitoSOX generation in oral cancer cells. Summary histograms of the flow cytometry results are presented. The individual density plots are presented in Supplementary Figure S2. (A,C) ROS and MitoSOX statistical analyses. Oral cancer (Ca9-22 and CAL 27) and non-malignant cells (S–G) were treated with fucoidan (control, 800, and 1200 μg/mL) for 0 and 48 h. (+) indicates high levels of ROS and MitoSOX. (B,D) The effect of oxidative stress on ROS and MitoSOX generation and the GSH depletion of fucoidan-incubated oral cancer cells. After NAC preincubation or not, cells were treated with fucoidan (1200 μg/mL) with NAC co-treatment (10 mM) for 0, 36, and 48 h. NAC/fucoidan (NAC/FN) represents the pretreatment with NAC and post-treatment with FN. Data = mean ± SD (n = 3 experiments). Data with non-overlapping letters reveal significant differences (p < 0.05). In the example of Figure 5D (Ca9-22 cells), FN at 0, 36, and 48 h, labeled with the connecting letters “c, b, and a”, has significant results, because the letters do not overlap. FN and NAC/FN at 48 h labeled with “a and b” have significant results. In contrast, FN and NAC/FN at 36 h labeled with “b” have nonsignificant results because they overlap with “b”. “d” is not appeared for statistic analysis in the example. The positive controls of ROS and MitoSOX are provided in Supplementary Figures S7 and S8.
Antioxidants 11 00841 g005
Antioxidants 11 00841 g006 550
Figure 6. Fucoidan drives GSH depletion in oral cancer cells. (A) GSH flow cytometry density plots and summary histogram analyses. Oral cancer (Ca9-22 and CAL 27) and non-malignant cells (S–G) were treated with fucoidan (control, 800, and 1200 μg/mL) for 0 and 48 h. (+) indicates high levels of GSH. (B) The effect of oxidative stress on the GSH depletion of fucoidan-incubated oral cancer cells. After NAC preincubation or not, cells were treated with fucoidan (1200 μg/mL) with NAC co-treatment (10 mM) for 0, 36, and 48 h. In general, the actual setting for the windows is based on the same GSH intensity of the controls between different cell lines. NAC/fucoidan (NAC/FN) represents the pretreatment with NAC and post-treatment with FN. Data = mean ± SD (n = 3 experiments). Data with non-overlapping letters reveal significant differences (p < 0.05). In the example of Figure 6A (CAL 27 cells), FN at 0, 800, and 1200 μg/mL, labeled with the connecting letters “a, b, and c”, has significant results, because the letters do not overlap. In contrast, in the example of Figure 6A (S–G cells), FN at 0, 800, and 1200 μg/mL labeled with “a” has nonsignificant results because they overlap with “a”.
Figure 6. Fucoidan drives GSH depletion in oral cancer cells. (A) GSH flow cytometry density plots and summary histogram analyses. Oral cancer (Ca9-22 and CAL 27) and non-malignant cells (S–G) were treated with fucoidan (control, 800, and 1200 μg/mL) for 0 and 48 h. (+) indicates high levels of GSH. (B) The effect of oxidative stress on the GSH depletion of fucoidan-incubated oral cancer cells. After NAC preincubation or not, cells were treated with fucoidan (1200 μg/mL) with NAC co-treatment (10 mM) for 0, 36, and 48 h. In general, the actual setting for the windows is based on the same GSH intensity of the controls between different cell lines. NAC/fucoidan (NAC/FN) represents the pretreatment with NAC and post-treatment with FN. Data = mean ± SD (n = 3 experiments). Data with non-overlapping letters reveal significant differences (p < 0.05). In the example of Figure 6A (CAL 27 cells), FN at 0, 800, and 1200 μg/mL, labeled with the connecting letters “a, b, and c”, has significant results, because the letters do not overlap. In contrast, in the example of Figure 6A (S–G cells), FN at 0, 800, and 1200 μg/mL labeled with “a” has nonsignificant results because they overlap with “a”.
Antioxidants 11 00841 g006
Antioxidants 11 00841 g007 550
Figure 7. Fucoidan stimulates antioxidant signaling in oral cancer cells. Oral cancer (Ca9-22 and CAL 27) and non-malignant cells (S–G) were treated with fucoidan (control, 800 (FN 800), and 1200 (FN 1200) μg/mL) for 0 and 24 h for qPCR analysis. Data = mean ± SD (n = 3 experiments). Data with non-overlapping letters reveal significant differences (p < 0.05). In the example of Ca9-22 cells (HOMX1 gene), control, FN 800, and FN 1200, labeled with the connecting letters “a, b, and c”, have significant results, because the letters do not overlap.
Figure 7. Fucoidan stimulates antioxidant signaling in oral cancer cells. Oral cancer (Ca9-22 and CAL 27) and non-malignant cells (S–G) were treated with fucoidan (control, 800 (FN 800), and 1200 (FN 1200) μg/mL) for 0 and 24 h for qPCR analysis. Data = mean ± SD (n = 3 experiments). Data with non-overlapping letters reveal significant differences (p < 0.05). In the example of Ca9-22 cells (HOMX1 gene), control, FN 800, and FN 1200, labeled with the connecting letters “a, b, and c”, have significant results, because the letters do not overlap.
Antioxidants 11 00841 g007
Antioxidants 11 00841 g008 550
Figure 8. Fucoidan increases the γH2AX level of oral cancer cells. Summary histograms of the flow cytometry results are presented. The individual density plots are presented in Supplementary Figure S3. (A) γH2AX statistical analysis. Oral cancer (Ca9-22 and CAL 27) and non-malignant cells (S–G) were treated with fucoidan (control, 800, and 1200 μg/mL) for 0 and 48 h. (+) indicates a high level of γH2AX. (B) The effect of oxidative stress on the γH2AX increment in fucoidan-incubated oral cancer cells. After NAC preincubation or not, cells were post-treated with fucoidan (1200 μg/mL) with NAC co-treatment (10 mM) for 0, 36, and 48 h. NAC/fucoidan (NAC/FN) represents pretreatment with NAC and post-treatment with FN. Data = mean ± SD (n = 3 experiments). Data with non-overlapping letters reveal significant differences (p < 0.05). In the example of Figure 8B (CAL 27 cells), FN at 0 and 36 h, labeled with the connecting letters “bc and a”, has significant results, because the letters do not overlap. FN and NAC/FN at 36 or 48 h labeled with “a and d” and “a and b” have significant results. In contrast, FN at 36 and 48 h labeled with “a” has nonsignificant results because they overlap with “a”. The positive control of γH2AX is provided in Supplementary Figure S9.
Figure 8. Fucoidan increases the γH2AX level of oral cancer cells. Summary histograms of the flow cytometry results are presented. The individual density plots are presented in Supplementary Figure S3. (A) γH2AX statistical analysis. Oral cancer (Ca9-22 and CAL 27) and non-malignant cells (S–G) were treated with fucoidan (control, 800, and 1200 μg/mL) for 0 and 48 h. (+) indicates a high level of γH2AX. (B) The effect of oxidative stress on the γH2AX increment in fucoidan-incubated oral cancer cells. After NAC preincubation or not, cells were post-treated with fucoidan (1200 μg/mL) with NAC co-treatment (10 mM) for 0, 36, and 48 h. NAC/fucoidan (NAC/FN) represents pretreatment with NAC and post-treatment with FN. Data = mean ± SD (n = 3 experiments). Data with non-overlapping letters reveal significant differences (p < 0.05). In the example of Figure 8B (CAL 27 cells), FN at 0 and 36 h, labeled with the connecting letters “bc and a”, has significant results, because the letters do not overlap. FN and NAC/FN at 36 or 48 h labeled with “a and d” and “a and b” have significant results. In contrast, FN at 36 and 48 h labeled with “a” has nonsignificant results because they overlap with “a”. The positive control of γH2AX is provided in Supplementary Figure S9.
Antioxidants 11 00841 g008
Antioxidants 11 00841 g009 550
Figure 9. Fucoidan increases the 8-OHdG level of oral cancer cells. Summary histograms of the flow cytometry results are presented. The individual density plots are presented in Supplementary Figure S4. (A) 8-OHdG statistical analysis. Oral cancer (Ca9-22 and CAL 27) and non-malignant cells (S–G) were treated with fucoidan (control, 800, and 1200 μg/mL) for 0 and 48 h. (+) indicates a high level of 8-OHdG. (B) The effect of oxidative stress on the 8-OHdG increment in fucoidan-incubated oral cancer cells. After NAC preincubation or not, cells were treated with fucoidan (1200 μg/mL) with NAC co-treatment (10 mM) for 0, 36, and 48 h. NAC/fucoidan (NAC/FN) represents the pretreatment with NAC and post-treatment with FN. Data = mean ± SD (n = 3 experiments). Data with non-overlapping letters reveal significant differences (p < 0.05). In the example of Figure 9B (Ca9-22 cells), FN at 0 and 36 h, labeled with the connecting letters “c and a”, has significant results, because the letters do not overlap. FN and NAC/FN at 36 or 48 h labeled with “a and b” have significant results. In contrast, FN at 36 and 48 h labeled with “a” has nonsignificant results because they overlap with “a”. The positive control of 8-OHdG is provided in Supplementary Figure S10.
Figure 9. Fucoidan increases the 8-OHdG level of oral cancer cells. Summary histograms of the flow cytometry results are presented. The individual density plots are presented in Supplementary Figure S4. (A) 8-OHdG statistical analysis. Oral cancer (Ca9-22 and CAL 27) and non-malignant cells (S–G) were treated with fucoidan (control, 800, and 1200 μg/mL) for 0 and 48 h. (+) indicates a high level of 8-OHdG. (B) The effect of oxidative stress on the 8-OHdG increment in fucoidan-incubated oral cancer cells. After NAC preincubation or not, cells were treated with fucoidan (1200 μg/mL) with NAC co-treatment (10 mM) for 0, 36, and 48 h. NAC/fucoidan (NAC/FN) represents the pretreatment with NAC and post-treatment with FN. Data = mean ± SD (n = 3 experiments). Data with non-overlapping letters reveal significant differences (p < 0.05). In the example of Figure 9B (Ca9-22 cells), FN at 0 and 36 h, labeled with the connecting letters “c and a”, has significant results, because the letters do not overlap. FN and NAC/FN at 36 or 48 h labeled with “a and b” have significant results. In contrast, FN at 36 and 48 h labeled with “a” has nonsignificant results because they overlap with “a”. The positive control of 8-OHdG is provided in Supplementary Figure S10.
Antioxidants 11 00841 g009
Table
Table 1. Primer sequences for antioxidant signaling genes.
Table 1. Primer sequences for antioxidant signaling genes.
GenesForward Primers (5’ → 3’)Reverse Primers (5’ → 3’)Accession
Number
NRF2GATCTGCCAACTACTCCCAGGTTCTGTAACTCAGGAATGGATAATAGCTCCNM_006164.5
TXNGAAGCAGATCGAGAGCAAGACTGGCTCCAGAAAATTCACCCACCTNM_003329.4
HMOX1CCTTCTTCACCTTCCCCAACATGGCAGAATCTTGCACTTTGTTGCNM_002133.3
GAPDHCCTCAACTACATGGTTTACATGTTCCCAAATGAGCCCCAGCCTTCTNM_002046.7
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shiau, J.-P.; Chuang, Y.-T.; Yang, K.-H.; Chang, F.-R.; Sheu, J.-H.; Hou, M.-F.; Jeng, J.-H.; Tang, J.-Y.; Chang, H.-W. Brown Algae-Derived Fucoidan Exerts Oxidative Stress-Dependent Antiproliferation on Oral Cancer Cells. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 841. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antiox11050841

AMA Style

Shiau J-P, Chuang Y-T, Yang K-H, Chang F-R, Sheu J-H, Hou M-F, Jeng J-H, Tang J-Y, Chang H-W. Brown Algae-Derived Fucoidan Exerts Oxidative Stress-Dependent Antiproliferation on Oral Cancer Cells. Antioxidants. 2022; 11(5):841. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antiox11050841

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shiau, Jun-Ping, Ya-Ting Chuang, Kun-Han Yang, Fang-Rong Chang, Jyh-Horng Sheu, Ming-Feng Hou, Jiiang-Huei Jeng, Jen-Yang Tang, and Hsueh-Wei Chang. 2022. "Brown Algae-Derived Fucoidan Exerts Oxidative Stress-Dependent Antiproliferation on Oral Cancer Cells" Antioxidants 11, no. 5: 841. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antiox11050841

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop