Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Transport Properties and Mechanical Features of Sulfonated Polyether Ether Ketone/Organosilica Layered Materials Nanocomposite Membranes for Fuel Cell Applications
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Industrial Wastewater Treatment by Nanofiltration—A Case Study on the Anodizing Industry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Strongly Selective Polymer Membranes Modified with Heteroarm Stars for the Ethylene Glycol Dehydration by Pervaporation

by
Valeriia Rostovtseva
1,
Alexandra Pulyalina
1,*,
Daria Rudakova
1,
Ludmila Vinogradova
2 and
Galina Polotskaya
1,2
1
Institute of Chemistry, Saint Petersburg State University, Universitetskiy pr. 26, Saint Petersburg 198504, Russia
2
Institute of Macromolecular Compounds, Russian Academy of Sciences, Bolshoy pr. 31, Saint Petersburg 199004, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 30 March 2020 / Revised: 16 April 2020 / Accepted: 27 April 2020 / Published: 29 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Membranes: 10th Anniversary)

Abstract

:
Hybrid membranes based on poly (2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) modified with heteroarm stars (HAS) were developed to separate ethylene glycol/water mixtures by pervaporation. The HAS consist of a small branching center fullerene C 60 and twelve arms of different nature, six arms of nonpolar polystyrene and six arms of polar poly-tert-butyl methacrylate. The changes of structure and physical properties with HAS inclusion were systematically studied using SEM, X-ray diffraction analysis, TGA, and contact angle measurements. Mass transfer of ethylene glycol and water through membranes was studied by sorption and pervaporation tests. It was found that the growth of HAS content up to 5 wt% in the membrane leads to an increase in the total flux and a strong increase in the separation factor. To evaluate intrinsic properties of the penetrant–membrane system, permeability and selectivity were calculated. Overall, utilizing star-shaped macromolecules as a filler can be a promising way to improve the separation performance of diffusion membranes.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Ethylene glycol has been widely used in various economic and industrial fields, and great demand for it is constantly increasing. Among the major applications, it can be distinguished in the manufacture of polyethylene glycol, polyethylene terephthalate, polyester, cellophane, polyurethane [1], manufacture of non-volatile antifreeze, brake fluids, and anti-icing fluids. Annual world ethylene glycol (EG) production and consumption are about 30 million tons with an estimated increase of 5–10% per year.
The production of EG is commonly carried out by hydrolysis of ethylene oxide in the presence of a water excess [2]; the resulting product is 70 wt% EG aqueous solution, therefore, an additional stage of EG dehydration is required [3]. For several applications, especially in chemical processes, EG is required as a reagent of high purity. EG has a very high boiling point (197.3 °C), so the separation of EG/water mixture using traditional methods, such as multi-stage evaporation and distillation, is very complex and energy consuming [2,3,4]. The utilization of EG is complicated by its high toxicity and also due to problems of waste regeneration and disposal. Therefore, the search for an alternative method of EG dehydration and regeneration remains an urgent issue.
Pervaporation as a membrane-based separation method has attracted much attention due to its high efficiency, low energy consumption, and environmental friendliness [5,6,7,8]. Currently, researchers have highlighted the use of pervaporation for the purification of EG from water impurities, opening up great potential for highly pure EG production using membranes from poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA)/zeolite 4A mixed matrix composite [9], chitosan/polysulfone composite membrane [10], dual-layer polybenzimidazole/polyetherimide membranes [11], membranes based on 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate (Bmim)(BF40 infiltrated into a buckypaper [12].
Application of hybrid materials for membrane fabrication improves operational performance, as well as mechanical and chemical stability, for instance, PVA-GPTMS/TEOS hybrid pervaporation membrane [13], PVA-silica nanocomposite membrane [14], NaA zeolite membranes [15], carbon nanotubes [16], polydopamine-coated metal-organic framework [17]. It has been shown that interfacial modification of inorganic fillers can be an effective way to increase both permeability and selectivity of membranes [17].
Among numerous membrane materials, poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO) has great potential for gas separation [18,19,20] and pervaporation [21,22] being an aromatic glassy polymer with high mechanical and thermal stability and good resistance to chemical agents. There are only a few known cases when PPO-based membranes had been applied for the dehydration of organic solvents [23,24,25]. PPO membranes modified with fullerene C60 (up to 2 wt%) are selective to water in the separation of ethanol/water and ethyl acetate/water binary mixtures [24,25].
The modernization of fullerene C60 by methods of anionic polymerization creates star-shaped macromolecules that are unique modifiers for membranes. The star-shaped macromolecule consists of a small fullerene C60 core and twelve polymer arms. Hybrid PPO membranes modified with star macromolecules composed of a C60 core and six polystyrene (PS) arms and six poly-2-vinylpyridine (P2VP) arms have provided enhanced selectivity in dehydration of acetic acid [26] and separation of the quaternary mixture (n-propanol/acetic acid/propyl acetate/water) [27]. It has been reported [27,28,29,30,31] that PPO membranes modified with star macromolecules exhibited enhanced pervaporation performance, presumably due to the presence of polymer arms with a different chemical nature (nonpolar and polar) in a modifier. The PS arms are fully compatible with the PPO matrix and a phase separation does not occur up to the temperatures of their thermal destruction [32]. Star modifiers significantly affect the internal structure and the free volume of the membranes [27].
In this study, heteroarm stars (HAS) containing six nonpolar arms of PS and six polar arms of poly-tert-butyl methacrylate (PTBMA) on a C60 core were selected as a modifier of the PPO matrix. The main aims of this work were the preparation and research of PPO/HAS hybrid membranes. The influence of a novel type of modifier on the transport properties of PPO-based membranes in the pervaporation of EG/water mixture was thoroughly discussed. Special emphasis was placed on studying membrane morphology and physicochemical parameters characterized by SEM, X-ray spectroscopy, TGA, and sorption studies.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO) with a molecular weight 172,000 Da and density 1.06 g/cm3 (Polymer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic) was used. Chloroform and EG were obtained from Vecton (Saint Petersburg, Russia). All the chemicals were used without further purification.
Heteroarm stars (HAS) (Figure 1) composed of a C60 core covalently bonded with six PS arms and six PTBMA arms were synthesized by methods of the anionic polymerization [33]. Individual PS arms were characterized by size exclusion chromatography (Mn = 6.9 × 103 Da and Mw/Mn = 1.04). The molecular weight of the PTBMA arm was equal to that of PS arm.

2.2. Membrane Preparation

For PPO/HAS membranes preparation, a solution-casting method was used. Firstly, solutions of PPO and HAS were prepared by dissolving in chloroform with a concentration of 3 wt%, and then sonicated for 30 min (ultrasonic bath Sapphire, Moscow, Russia). After that, these solutions were mixed in appropriate amounts to obtain the required content of the modifier in the membrane (2 and 5 wt%). The resulting solution was stirred for 2 h and left for 2–3 days to complete the interaction between PPO and HAS. Then, the mixture was stirred for 40 min and filtered. It was cast onto the cellophane support and the solvent was slowly evaporated at 40 °C. The membranes were peeled off from the cellophane and put in the vacuum oven at 40 °C to remove traces of the solvent for at least one week. The thickness of the membranes was about 40 μm. The residual solvent content in the film was 0.3 ± 0.1 wt%.

2.3. Membrane Characterization

Images of surface and cross-sections of membranes were observed by a Zeiss SUPRA 55VP scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) equipped with In-lens SE and SE2 secondary electron detectors, a secondary electron detector for low vacuum mode (VPSE), and a four-quadrant backscattered electron detector (AsB). Before tests, samples were coated with a 20 nm thick carbon layer using the Quorum 150 cathode sputtering installation (Quorum Technologies Ltd., Lewes, UK).
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of the PPO composite membranes was performed using a TG 209 F3 Iris thermo-microbalance (Netzsch, Selb, Germany) at a heating rate of 10 °C/min from room temperature to 800 °C in a nitrogen atmosphere.
X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis was carried out on an X-ray diffractometer D8 DISCOVER (Bruker, Bremen, Germany) using CuKa radiation with a wavelength of 1.54 Å. Scans were made with a step size of 0.058 ranging from 5 to 50°.
The density measurements were performed using the flotation method with a laboratory-made unit and water/saccharose solutions. At least two samples of each membrane (0.05–0.10 g) and five measurements were used to calculate the average density with a minimal error.
The contact angles of water and EG on the membrane surfaces were measured via the sessile drop technique using a Drop Shape Analyzer DSA 10 (Krüss, Hamburg, Germany) at room temperature and atmospheric pressure.

2.4. Sorption Study

The sorption experiment was carried out by the immersion of the samples in a pure liquid at atmospheric pressure and room temperature 25 °C. Samples were removed from the liquid at regular intervals and blotted with a tissue paper, and then they were weighed on an analytical balance with an accuracy of 10−4 g. The experiment continued until the equilibrium state was achieved.
The total amount of liquid sorbed was determined using the following equation:
S = M S M D M D × 100 %
where Ms is the weight of the swollen membrane and Md is the weight of the dry membrane.
The Hildebrand solubility parameters of the membrane polymers were calculated using the cohesion energy Ecoh, and the molar volume Vm, of individual groups constituting the polymer molecules, as given by the following equation [34]:
δ i = E c o h , i V m , i 1 2

2.5. Pervaporation

Pervaporation experiments were conducted via a lab-scale apparatus with stirring. The effective area of the membrane supported by a metal disk with small gaps was approximately 14.8 cm2. Downstream pressure below 10−2 mm Hg was maintained on the permeate side with vacuum pump MD 1C (Vacuubrand GMBH, Wertheim, Germany). The ethylene glycol concentration in the feed ranged from 80 to 95 wt%. The permeate was collected into a trap immersed in liquid nitrogen and weighted with the balance Mettler Toledo ME204 (Mettler Toledo, Columbus, OH, USA). The feed and product concentrations were analyzed using a gas chromatograph Chromatec Crystal 5000.2 (Chromatec, Yoshkar-Ola, Russia) with a thermal conductivity detector. The experiments were repeated 3 times and the average value of the results was considered.
Total flux through the membrane was determined as follows:
J = Q A × t
where Q is the amount of product (g), A is the effective membrane area (m2), and t is the operating time (h).
The separation factor βWater/EG was defined according to the equation [35]:
β W a t e r / E G = Y W a t e r / Y E G X W a t e r / X E G
where Y and X are the weight fraction of component in the permeate and feed, respectively.
Pervaporation separation index, PSI, was calculated as:
P S I = J · β 1
In addition, the membrane intrinsic properties can be evaluated in terms of the permeability, Pi, and the membrane selectivity, α, which were calculated using the following equations [36]:
P i = j i l p i 0 p i
α W a t e r / E G = P W a t e r P E G
where pi0 and pi are the vapor pressures of component i in feed and permeate, respectively; l is the membrane thickness; and ji is the molar flux of component i.

3. Results

3.1. Membrane Characterization

PPO/HAS membranes were prepared by a solution-casting method. The HAS modifier consists of C60 core and six nonpolar arms of PS and six polar arms of PTBMA. The peculiarity of HAS macromolecules is their ability to form clusters. It has been shown [37] that mutual penetration of PS and PTBMA arms took place in solutions, and supramolecular structures containing up to 12 HAS macromolecules with a diameter of ~50 nm were generated. These clusters interact with the PPO matrix mainly due to the affinity of PS arms and PPO, which are completely intersoluble and the phase separation does not occur until the temperature of their thermal destruction [38]; this fact determines uniform distribution of HSM in PPO matrix.
The volume of HAS clusters and their interaction with PPO matrix affect the fine morphology and the free volume of the membrane. Therefore, when preparing PPO/HAS membranes from the solution in chloroform, the changes of membrane structure was expected as a result of polar arms segregation.
The effects of HAS inclusion on the structure of PPO-based membranes were studied by SEM and X-ray diffraction analysis. Figure 2 shows SEM microphotographs of the surface and cross-sections for PPO and PPO/HAS (5%) samples. The surface structure of the membranes does not noticeably change after HAS inclusion into the PPO matrix. In contrast, when comparing cross-sectional images (Figure 2c,d), a significant change in the membrane morphology is observed. The relatively homogeneous morphology of the PPO membrane (Figure 2c) transforms into a pronounced cellular structure after its modification (Figure 2d).
X-ray phase analysis was used to gain insight into the effect of the HAS modifier on membrane crystallinity. Figure 3 shows the XRD patterns of pristine PPO and modified PPO/HAS membranes. The broad peaks appearing at 2Θ~12° and 23° indicate a small content of the crystalline phase in the samples of our PPO-based membranes. A similar result on low crystallinity for PPO films prepared from a solution in chloroform was reported in [39]. For PPO/HAS (2 and 5 wt%) membranes, a slight shift of the peaks to the region of higher values of 2Θ is observed relative to the peak position of the PPO sample. But in general, the character of the XRD patterns does not change, which is explained by the preservation of the crystal lattice type during membrane modification.
The thermal stability of the membranes was examined by the thermogravimetric analysis. Figure 4 shows the TG curves for PPO and PPO/HAS (2%, 5%) membranes during isothermal heating from 25 to 575 °C. All membranes showed almost the same tendency for the weight loss at heating. In the region up to 400 °C, a small weight loss ~4 wt% was recorded which is a result of the release of moisture and low molecular weight impurities sorbed on the surface of the membranes, as well as a result of the destruction of HAS arms. Thermal decomposition of the PS arms is possible at ~450 °C. PTBMA is another arm of HAS which is prone to depolymerization at heating, and destruction of PTBMA arms is observed at ~300 °C [40]. Some difference in the position of the destruction curves for PPO/HAS with different content of the modifier can be explained by the contribution of destructive processes of the star macromolecules. The highest weight loss up to 400 °C (~4 wt%) and at the region from 400 to 500 °C (up to 50 wt%) was recorded for PPO/HAS (5%).
Usually, 10% weight loss (τ10) serves as criterion for the thermal stability of the polymer samples; it is observed on the TG curves at ~435 °C for PPO/HAS samples. These data indicate the high thermal stability of PPO-based membranes in the temperature range at which pervaporation experiments are carried out. It is seen that the inclusion of a star-shaped modifier does not significantly affect the thermal properties of the membranes.
Several physical properties of membranes such as density, contact angles, and surface tension were determined and presented in Table 1. The density of the pristine PPO membrane is equal to 1.057 g/cm3 which is consistent with the literature data [29]. After modification, the density of the PPO/HAS membranes slightly increases. This trend in the density changing suggests good interaction between the HAS macromolecules and the PPO matrix.
Table 1 shows data on the contact angle of water and EG on the surface of the PPO and PPO/HAS (2%, 5%) membranes. Inclusion of a modifier and growth of the HAS content in the membrane increase values of the contact angles making the membrane more hydrophobic. The increase in hydrophobic quality of the surface is attributed to the nonpolar PS arms of the HAS. The values of critical surface tension for the membranes were calculated by the Owens–Wendt method using data on contact angles [41]. The polar contribution of surface tension σps, as well as dispersive contribution σds, decreases with the growth of HAS concentration up to 5 wt%. The total critical surface tension, σs, decreases for modified PPO/HAS membranes as compared with pristine PPO, which can be related to inhibiting the movement of polymer chains.

3.2. Transport Properties

The process of mass transfer through PPO and PPO/HAS (2%, 5%) membranes was studied relative to organic liquids of a different chemical nature, i.e., EG and water. Table 2 lists some physicochemical properties of these liquids. The problem of EG and water separation arises from the industrial process for its synthesis by hydrolysis of ethylene oxide in the presence of a water excess [2]; the resulting product is 70 wt% EG aqueous solution. The application of membrane technology of pervaporation is a more effective way to solve the problem of EG dehydration.
Parameters of EG and water mass transfer through the PPO-based membranes were determined in sorption and pervaporation experiments.
Sorption experiments were carried out by immersion of membrane samples in the individual liquids to determine the amount of liquid sorbed by the polymer. Table 3 lists data on the equilibrium sorption degree of EG and water in PPO and PPO/HAS (2, 5%) membranes. The sorption capability of all membranes in both water and EG increases with the growth of the HAS content in the membrane. The equilibrium sorption degree of EG in the membranes is approximately two times higher than that of water. This result is in agreement with the solubility theory and correlation of Hildebrand solubility parameters (δ) of liquids and membrane polymer.
Data on solubility parameters of EG and water are given in Table 2. The δ value of PPO is equal to 18.2 (J/cm3)1/2 [42], and δ values of HAS composing polymers, namely PS and PTBMA, are equal to 18.6 and 19.2 (J/cm3)1/2, respectively. According to the solubility theory [34], the smaller the difference in solubility parameters of polymer and liquid |Δδ|, the better the solubility of this liquid in the polymer. Therefore, the solubility of EG in PPO and PPO/HAS membranes is preferential as compared to water.
The main transport parameters of the PPO/HAS (0, 2, 5 wt%) membranes were determined in the pervaporation of EG/water mixtures at 50 °C. The influence of water concentration in the feed on the performance was investigated by carrying out experiments in the range of feed water concentrations from 5 to 12 wt% which serve the particular industrial interest, namely, the regeneration of ethylene glycol related to natural gas dehydration by ethylene glycol [4].
Figure 5 shows the dependencies of the total flux and the separation factor on water concentration in the feed. It was found that all membranes are preferably permeable to water. According to the data in Figure 5a, the total flux increases with water concentration in the feed. The growth of HAS content in the PPO matrix leads to an increase in the total flux. It can be attributed to an altered packing of PPO chains by including aggregates of HAS macromolecules. Hence, a transformation of membrane structure and, in particular, the geometry of transport channels provides a facilitated transport of penetrant molecules through the polymer matrix of hybrid membranes.
As seen from Figure 5b, the separation factor (βwater/EG) decreases with increasing water concentration in the feed. The inclusion of modifier up to 5 wt% HAS led to a more efficient separation of the EG/water mixture as compared with that of the PPO membrane.
It is taken to represent the transport properties of membranes in pervaporation not only in terms of total flux and separation factor but also in terms of permeability and selectivity [36]. The calculation of permeability and selectivity permits to normalize the membrane properties on driving forces and to reveal intrinsic properties of the studied penetrant-membrane system.
Figure 6 shows driving force normalized properties of the PPO-based membranes as the dependencies of water and EG permeability and membrane selectivity (αwater/EG) on water concentration in the feed. The permeability of the hybrid membranes depends on the concentration of water in the feed, even when the driving force contribution is removed. The level of water permeability is much higher than EG permeability. Furthermore, permeability decreases with increasing water concentration in the feed, in contrast with the course of the total flux (Figure 5a). Water permeability increases rapidly with HAS inclusion, as shown in Figure 6a. These results could be due to the significant difference between the sizes of water molecules and EG molecules. This should lead to improved membrane selectivity. Figure 6b shows that the selectivity (αwater/EG) increases with the growth of HAS content up to 5 wt%.
The membrane efficiency was evaluated using the pervaporation separation index (PSI) which includes magnitudes of both total flux and separation factor. Figure 7 shows data on PSI for three membranes PPO, PPO/HAS (2%), and PPO/HAS (5%) in pervaporation of EG/water mixture containing 5 wt% water. The optimal transport properties were found for PPO/HAS membrane containing 5 wt% HAS.
The transport properties of the PPO/HAS (5%) membrane was compared with literature data for pervaporation separation of the EG/water mixture (10 wt% water). Table 4 lists data on PSI, total flux, and separation factor that had been obtained for different polymer membranes [7,8,9,36,37,38,39,40,41]. The PPO/HAS (5%) membrane shows higher separation efficiency in the EG dehydration as compared with most published data, but it has moderate flux. Although several membranes show higher fluxes, their separation factors are much lower as compared with the PPO/HAS membrane. The presented results indicate the promising application of PPO/HAS (5%) for the EG dehydration. To improve the performance of the membrane for industrial application, it would be necessary to produce composite or hollow fiber membranes with a thin selective layer. Composite bilayer membranes can be prepared by casting a PPO/HAS solution in chloroform onto the surface of a porous substrate, which can be an ultrafiltration polysulfonamide membrane (UPM) produced by Vladipor, Russia, similar to [43,44].

4. Conclusions

In the present work, hybrid membranes based on PPO modified with heteroarm stars (HAS) were prepared and studied. The HAS consist of a small branching center fullerene C60 and twelve arms of different nature, six arms of non-polar PS and six arms of PTBMA. The morphology, physical and transport properties of membranes in the pervaporation of water/EG mixtures were examined. It was shown that the inclusion of star macromolecules into the PPO leads to a change in the membrane structure due to a disturbance of the initial packing of polymer chains. As such, it can contribute to the formation of a unique transport channel system. Inclusion of HAS macromolecules containing polar arms (PTBMA) leads to the formation of supramolecular clusters due to the intra- and intermolecular segregation of polar chains, which in turn create zones in the membranes that provide selective migration of separated molecules.
The transport properties were studied in the pervaporation of EG/water mixtures containing up to 12 wt% water in the feed; all PPO/HAS membranes produce permeate enriched with water. The growth of HAS content up to 5 wt% in the PPO matrix leads to an increase in the total flux and a prominent increase in the separation factor. The PPO/HAS (5%) membrane exhibits strongly selective properties in the EG dehydration as compared with reported data. The high-water selectivity of the modified membranes is ascribed to the fact that the EG sorption changes the internal structure of the walls in the transport channels. Moreover, water diffusion is facilitated due to the hydrogen bonding with the hydroxyl groups of EG. The data on the transport properties of PPO membranes modified with small amounts of heteroarm star macromolecules give grounds to classify HAS as promising fillers for diffusion membranes.

Author Contributions

Membrane preparation, physicochemical investigations, analysis of transport properties in pervaporation were carried out by V.R., A.P., and G.P., D.R. also participated in membrane preparation and pervaporation tests. L.V. was involved in scientific discussions and analysis of experimental data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Russian Science Foundation (RSF), grant number 18-79-10116.

Acknowledgments

Equipment of Resource Centers of St. Petersburg State University, namely, the Interdisciplinary Resource Center “Nanotechnologies”, “Thermogravimetric and calorimetric methods of investigation”, “Centre for X-ray Diffraction Studies”, “Cryogenic Department”, and the Education Resource Centre in the direction of chemistry were used for membrane investigations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xi, J.; Ding, D.; Shao, Y.; Liu, X.; Lu, G.; Wang, Y. Production of Ethylene Glycol and Its Monoether Derivative from Cellulose. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 2355–2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yue, H.; Zhao, Y.; Ma, X.; Gong, J. Ethylene glycol: Properties, synthesis, and applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 4218–4244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Huang, R.Y.M.; Shao, P.; Feng, X.; Anderson, W.A. Separation of Ethylene Glycol−Water Mixtures Using Sulfonated Poly(ether ether ketone) Pervaporation Membranes: Membrane Relaxation and Separation Performance Analysis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41, 2957–2965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Dye, R.F. Ethylene Glycols Technology. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2001, 18, 571–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chapman, P.D.; Oliveira, T.; Livingston, A.G.; Li, K. Membranes for the dehydration of solvents by pervaporation. J. Memb. Sci. 2008, 318, 5–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Otvagina, K.; Penkova, A.; Dmitrenko, M.; Kuzminova, A.; Sazanova, T.; Vorotyntsev, A.; Vorotyntsev, I. Novel Composite Membranes Based on Chitosan Copolymers with Polyacrylonitrile and Polystyrene: Physicochemical Properties and Application for Pervaporation Dehydration of Tetrahydrofuran. Membranes 2019, 9, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Azimi, H.; Ebneyamini, A.; Tezel, F.; Thibault, J. Separation of Organic Compounds from ABE Model Solutions via Pervaporation Using Activated Carbon/PDMS Mixed Matrix Membranes. Membranes 2018, 8, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Roy, S.; Singha, N. Polymeric Nanocomposite Membranes for Next Generation Pervaporation Process: Strategies, Challenges and Future Prospects. Membranes 2017, 7, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Shahverdi, M.; Baheri, B.; Rezakazemi, M.; Motaee, E.; Mohammadi, T. Pervaporation study of ethylene glycol dehydration through synthesized (PVA-4A)/polypropylene mixed matrix composite membranes. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2013, 53, 1487–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Feng, X.; Huang, R.Y.M. Pervaporation with chitosan membranes. I. Separation of water from ethylene glycol by a chitosan/polysulfone composite membrane. J. Memb. Sci. 1996, 116, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, Y.; Chung, T.S.; Neo, B.W.; Gruender, M. Processing and engineering of pervaporation dehydration of ethylene glycol via dual-layer polybenzimidazole (PBI)/polyetherimide (PEI) membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 2011, 378, 339–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ong, Y.T.; Tan, S.H. Synthesis of the novel symmetric buckypaper supported ionic liquid membrane for the dehydration of ethylene glycol by pervaporation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 143, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Guo, R.; Hu, C.; Pan, F.; Wu, H.; Jiang, Z. PVA-GPTMS/TEOS hybrid pervaporation membrane for dehydration of ethylene glycol aqueous solution. J. Memb. Sci. 2006, 281, 454–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Guo, R.; Ma, X.; Hu, C.; Jiang, Z. Novel PVA-silica nanocomposite membrane for pervaporative dehydration of ethylene glycol aqueous solution. Polymer 2007, 48, 2939–2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yu, C.; Zhong, C.; Liu, Y.; Gu, X.; Yang, G.; Xing, W.; Xu, N. Pervaporation dehydration of ethylene glycol by NaA zeolite membranes. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2012, 90, 1372–1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hu, S.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Lawless, D.; Feng, X. Composite membranes comprising of polyvinylamine-poly(vinyl alcohol) incorporated with carbon nanotubes for dehydration of ethylene glycol by pervaporation. J. Memb. Sci. 2012, 417–418, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, W.; Ying, Y.; Ma, J.; Guo, X.; Huang, H.; Liu, D.; Zhong, C. Mixed matrix membranes incorporated with polydopamine-coated metal-organic framework for dehydration of ethylene glycol by pervaporation. J. Memb. Sci. 2017, 527, 8–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Chowdhury, G.; Kruczek, B.; Matsuura, T. Polyphenylene Oxide and Modified Polyphenylene Oxide Membranes: Gas, Vapor, and Liquid Separation; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013; ISBN 9781461514831. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sridhar, S.; Smitha, B.; Ramakrishna, M.; Aminabhavi, T.M. Modified poly(phenylene oxide) membranes for the separation of carbon dioxide from methane. J. Memb. Sci. 2006, 280, 202–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhuang, G.L.; Tseng, H.H.; Wey, M.Y. Preparation of PPO-silica mixed matrix membranes by in-situ sol-gel method for H2/CO2 separation. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2014, 39, 17178–17190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Khayet, M.; Villaluenga, J.P.G.; Godino, M.P.; Mengual, J.I.; Seoane, B.; Khulbe, K.C.; Matsuura, T. Preparation and application of dense poly(phenylene oxide) membranes in pervaporation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2004, 278, 410–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Polotskaya, G.A.; Penkova, A.V.; Toikka, A.M. Fullerene-containing polyphenylene oxide membranes for pervaporation. Desalination 2006, 200, 400–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fu, Y.-J.; Lai, C.-L.; Chen, J.-T.; Liu, C.-T.; Huang, S.-H.; Hung, W.-S.; Hu, C.-C.; Lee, K.-R. Hydrophobic composite membranes for separating of water–alcohol mixture by pervaporation at high temperature. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2014, 111, 203–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Polotskaya, G.A.; Gladchenko, S.V.; Pen’kova, A.V.; Kuznetsov, V.M.; Toikka, A.M. Synthesis of Fullerene-Polyphenylene Oxide Membranes for Separating Aqueous-Organic Mixtures. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2005, 78, 1468–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Polotskaya, G.A.; Penkova, A.V.; Toikka, A.M.; Pientka, Z.; Brozova, L.; Bleha, M. Transport of small molecules through polyphenylene oxide membranes modified by fullerene. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2007, 42, 333–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Polotskaya, G.; Pulyalina, A.; Lebedev, V.; Török, G.; Rudakova, D.; Vinogradova, L. Novel view at hybrid membranes containing star macromolecules using neutron scattering and pervaporation dehydration of acetic acid. Mater. Des. 2020, 186, 108352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pulyalina, A.; Porotnikov, D.; Rudakova, D.; Faykov, I.; Chislova, I.; Rostovtseva, V.; Vinogradova, L.; Toikka, A.; Polotskaya, G. Advanced membranes containing star macromolecules with C 60 core for intensification of propyl acetate production. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2018, 135, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Polotskaya, G.A.; Krasnopeeva, E.L.; Kalyuzhnaya, L.M.; Saprykina, N.N.; Vinogradova, L.V. Mixed matrix membranes with hybrid star-shaped macromolecules for mono- and dihydric alcohols pervaporation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 143, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Polotskaya, G.A.; Pulyalina, A.Y.; Rostovtseva, V.A.; Toikka, A.M.; Saprykina, N.N.; Vinogradova, L.V. Effect of polystyrene stars with fullerene C 60 cores on pervaporation properties of poly(phenylene oxide) membrane. Polym. Int. 2016, 65, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Polotskaya, G.A.; Lebedev, V.T.; Pulyalina, A.Y.; Vinogradova, L.V. Structure and transport properties of pervaporation membranes based on polyphenylene oxide and heteroarm star polymers. Pet. Chem. 2016, 56, 920–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pulyalina, A.Y.; Tataurov, M.V.; Larkina, A.A.; Faykov, I.I.; Rostovtseva, V.A.; Vinogradova, L.V.; Polotskaya, G.A. Pervaporation Desulfurization of a Thiophene/n-Octane Mixture Using PPO Membranes Modified with Hybrid Star-Shaped Macromolecules. Membr. Membr. Technol. 2019, 1, 238–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Paul, D.R.; Newman, S. Polymer Blends; Media Wiley Com; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  33. Vinogradova, L.V.; Lavrenko, P.N.; Amsharov, K.Y.; Zgonnik, V.N. New Star-Shaped Fullerene-Core Hybrid Polymers Based on Styrene and tert-Butyl Methacrylate. Polym. Sci. Ser. A 2002, 44, 447–453. [Google Scholar]
  34. Belmares, M.; Blanco, M.; Goddard, W.A.; Ross, R.B.; Caldwell, G.; Chou, S.H.; Pham, J.; Olofson, P.M.; Thomas, C. Hildebrand and hansen solubility parameters from molecular dynamics with applications to electronic nose polymer sensors. J. Comput. Chem. 2004, 25, 1814–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Wijmans, J.G.; Baker, R.W. A simple predictive treatment of the permeation process in pervaporation. J. Memb. Sci. 1993, 79, 101–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Baker, R.W.; Wijmans, J.G.; Huang, Y. Permeability, permeance and selectivity: A preferred way of reporting pervaporation performance data. J. Memb. Sci. 2010, 348, 346–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lebedev, V.T.; Torok, G.; Vinogradova, L.V. Structure and Supramolecular Structures of Star-Shaped Fullerene-Containing Heteroarm Polymers in Deuterotoluene. Polym. Sci. Ser. A 2011, 53, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Paul, D.R.; Newman, S. Polymer Blends; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; Volume 1, ISBN 9780471248255. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ilinitch, O.M.; Fenelonov, V.B.; Lapkin, A.A.; Okkel, L.G.; Terskikh, V.V.; Zamaraev, K.I. Intrinsic microporosity and gas transport in polyphenylene oxide polymers. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 1999, 31, 97–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Pulyalina, A.; Rostovtseva, V.; Polotskaya, G.; Vinogradova, L.; Zoolshoev, Z.; Simonova, M.; Hairullin, A.; Toikka, A.; Pientka, Z. Hybrid macromolecular stars incorporated poly(phenylene oxide) membranes: Organization, physical, and gas separation properties. Polymer 2019, 172, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Owens, D.K.; Wendt, R.C. Estimation of the surface free energy of polymers. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1969, 13, 1741–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Penkova, A.; Polotskaya, G.; Toikka, A. Pervaporation composite membranes for ethyl acetate production. Chem. Eng. Process. Process. Intensif. 2015, 87, 81–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Polotskaya, G.A.; Agranova, S.A.; Gazdina, N.V.; Kuznetsov, Y.P.; Nesterov, V.V. Effect of molecular weight parameters on gas transport properties of poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide). J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1996, 62, 2215–2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Polotsky, A.E.; Polotskaya, G.A. Study on top layer structure of composite membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 1998, 140, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, Y.; Rhim, J.W.; Feng, X. Improving the stability of layer-by-layer self-assembled membranes for dehydration of alcohol and diol. J. Memb. Sci. 2013, 444, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hyder, M.N.; Huang, R.Y.M.; Chen, P. Composite poly(vinyl alcohol)-poly(sulfone) membranes crosslinked by trimesoyl chloride: Characterization and dehydration of ethylene glycol-water mixtures. J. Memb. Sci. 2009, 326, 363–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wu, J.K.; Ye, C.C.; Zhang, W.H.; Wang, N.X.; Lee, K.R.; An, Q.F. Construction of well-arranged graphene oxide/polyelectrolyte complex nanoparticles membranes for pervaporation ethylene glycol dehydration. J. Memb. Sci. 2019, 577, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nam, S.Y.; Lee, Y.M. Pervaporation of ethylene glycol-water mixtures. I. Pervaporation performance of surface crosslinked chitosan membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 1999, 153, 155–162. [Google Scholar]
  49. Wu, X.M.; Guo, H.; Soyekwo, F.; Zhang, Q.G.; Lin, C.X.; Liu, Q.L.; Zhu, A.M. Pervaporation Purification of Ethylene Glycol Using the Highly Permeable PIM-1 Membrane. J. Chem. Eng. Data 2016, 61, 579–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The synthesis of heteroarm stars (HAS), where DPE is 1,1-diphenylethylene, THF is tetrahydrofurane, and TBMA is tert-butylmethacrylate.
Figure 1. The synthesis of heteroarm stars (HAS), where DPE is 1,1-diphenylethylene, THF is tetrahydrofurane, and TBMA is tert-butylmethacrylate.
Membranes 10 00086 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of (a,b) surface and (c,d) cross-section for (a,c) poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO) and (b,d) PPO/HAS (5%) membranes.
Figure 2. SEM images of (a,b) surface and (c,d) cross-section for (a,c) poly(2,6-dimethyl-1,4-phenylene oxide) (PPO) and (b,d) PPO/HAS (5%) membranes.
Membranes 10 00086 g002
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction patterns of PPO/heteroarm stars (HAS) (0, 2, 5 wt%) membranes.
Figure 3. X-ray diffraction patterns of PPO/heteroarm stars (HAS) (0, 2, 5 wt%) membranes.
Membranes 10 00086 g003
Figure 4. TG curves of PPO/HAS (0, 2, 5 wt%) membranes.
Figure 4. TG curves of PPO/HAS (0, 2, 5 wt%) membranes.
Membranes 10 00086 g004
Figure 5. Dependences of (a) the total flux and (b) the separation factor (βwater/EG) on water concentration in the feed for the pervaporation of ethylene glycol (EG)/water mixture using the PPO-based membranes, 50 °C.
Figure 5. Dependences of (a) the total flux and (b) the separation factor (βwater/EG) on water concentration in the feed for the pervaporation of ethylene glycol (EG)/water mixture using the PPO-based membranes, 50 °C.
Membranes 10 00086 g005
Figure 6. Dependence of (a) water and EG permeability and (b) selectivity (αwater/EG) on water concentration in the feed for the pervaporation of EG/water mixture using the PPO-based membranes, 50 °C.
Figure 6. Dependence of (a) water and EG permeability and (b) selectivity (αwater/EG) on water concentration in the feed for the pervaporation of EG/water mixture using the PPO-based membranes, 50 °C.
Membranes 10 00086 g006
Figure 7. Pervaporation separation index of PPO-based membranes in pervaporation of EG/water mixture containing 5 wt% water, 50 °C.
Figure 7. Pervaporation separation index of PPO-based membranes in pervaporation of EG/water mixture containing 5 wt% water, 50 °C.
Membranes 10 00086 g007
Table 1. Physical parameters of membranes.
Table 1. Physical parameters of membranes.
MembraneDensity, g cm−3Water Contact Angle, °EG Contact Angle, °Critical Surface Tension, mJ/m2
σpsσdsσs
PPO1.05789633.924.027.9
PPO/HAS (2%)1.06091653.224.127.3
PPO/HAS (5%)1.06493682.922.625.5
Table 2. Physicochemical properties of liquids.
Table 2. Physicochemical properties of liquids.
LiquidMol.
Weight
Density,
g/cm3
Mol.
Volume,
cm3/mol
Dynamic
Viscosity,
mPa·s
Solubility
Parameter
δ, (J/cm3)1/2
Water18.00.99718.01.049.6
Ethylene glycol62.11.11455.626.032.9
Table 3. Equilibrium sorption degree of liquids by membranes.
Table 3. Equilibrium sorption degree of liquids by membranes.
MembraneEquilibrium Sorption Degree, g Liquid/100 g Polymer
WaterEthylene Glycol
PPO04.2
PPO/HAS (2%)1.24.9
PPO/HAS (5%)2.95.4
Table 4. Comparison of transport properties of polymer membranes in the pervaporation of the EG/water mixture (water content 10 wt%).
Table 4. Comparison of transport properties of polymer membranes in the pervaporation of the EG/water mixture (water content 10 wt%).
MembraneT, °CPSI,
kg/m2 h
Separation Factor
βwater/EG
Flux,
g/m2 h
Ref.
CS/PS3531104300[10]
PBI/PEI602031763115[11]
PVA3020880226[12]
BP-SILM-70301031014102[12]
SO3H-MIL-101-Cr@PD-PVA7015662900540[17]
PA-polyelectrolytes22541512[45]
PVA/PS60355987360[46]
PEC NPM606814701453[47]
GFT1001(PVA/PAN)752491116224[48]
DEG167(PVA/PAN)75495991500[48]
PIM-1301792186[49]
PPO/HAS (5 wt%)5023111,24020.6This work
CS, chitosan; PS, polysulfone; PA, polyamide; PVA, poly(vinyl alcohol); SO3H-MIL-101-Cr, a MOF with SO3H groups; BP-SILM-70, buckypaper supported ionic liquid membrane; PEC NPM, polyelectrolyte complex nanoparticles; GFT1001 and DEG167, commercial composite membranes with an active layer of crosslinked PVA and a substrate of polyacrylonitrile microporous membrane; PIM-1, polymer of intrinsic microporosity; PBI, polybenzimidazole; PEI, polyethyleneimine.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rostovtseva, V.; Pulyalina, A.; Rudakova, D.; Vinogradova, L.; Polotskaya, G. Strongly Selective Polymer Membranes Modified with Heteroarm Stars for the Ethylene Glycol Dehydration by Pervaporation. Membranes 2020, 10, 86. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/membranes10050086

AMA Style

Rostovtseva V, Pulyalina A, Rudakova D, Vinogradova L, Polotskaya G. Strongly Selective Polymer Membranes Modified with Heteroarm Stars for the Ethylene Glycol Dehydration by Pervaporation. Membranes. 2020; 10(5):86. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/membranes10050086

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rostovtseva, Valeriia, Alexandra Pulyalina, Daria Rudakova, Ludmila Vinogradova, and Galina Polotskaya. 2020. "Strongly Selective Polymer Membranes Modified with Heteroarm Stars for the Ethylene Glycol Dehydration by Pervaporation" Membranes 10, no. 5: 86. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/membranes10050086

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop