Next Article in Journal
Evolution of Physico-Chemical Properties, Microbial Biomass and Microbial Activity of an Urban Soil after De-Sealing
Next Article in Special Issue
Animal Welfare Programs in Germany—An Empirical Study on the Attitudes of Pig Farmers
Previous Article in Journal
Equipment Development for Small and Urban Conservation Farming Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mycotoxin Contamination of Selected Organic Enrichment Materials Used in Pig Farming
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Influence of Different LED Light Colour Temperatures on the Preference Behaviour of Weaned Piglets

by Sven Götz 1,2,*, Camille M. C. Raoult 1, Klaus Reiter 2, Monika Wensch-Dorendorf 3, Daniel Werner 4,5 and Eberhard von Borell 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 9 November 2020 / Revised: 27 November 2020 / Accepted: 30 November 2020 / Published: 2 December 2020

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors describe the influence of different LED lights on the behaviour of 4-to-9 weeks old piglets.

The article is well-written and very clear with preliminary interesting results concerning the piglets welfare. 

I have only a very few recommendations to suggest:

  • Line 23: add the age of the piglets
  • Line 90: add some precision about this passageway: the size, the separation between the two compartments? Have you a sort of curtain? thus, briefly, could you suspect some influence coming from this passage? 
  • Figure 1, the difference in black and white printing papers shows no difference between the food through and the plate.
  • Figures 2: idem, it woulb be better to use some dots or other systems to differenciate between the lines (in black and white)
  • In general, the mean +/- SD: one chiffer after the dot 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

This study evaluated pig preference for two different LED lighting color temperatures. This is a relevant study that could have implications for pig husbandry and welfare. Overall, the study was well designed and the paper was well written. Minor suggestions for improvement are outlined below-

L145- What 3 days were observed? Were these 3 consecutive days throughout the week? Alternating days? etc. 

L146- How long was the 5 min time sampling method used for each day? Was this every 5 minutes throughout the entirety of the light period? Every 5 minutes for the entire 24 hour period? etc. 

Figure 3 & 4- SE bars should be included in these figures. Since week 3 is also explained in the text, including week 3 visualizations would also be helpful. 

L218- An explanation of this effect should be included.

L249 & 264- A visualization of the eating and active behavior data should also be included.

L282- I believe the Figure 3 reference here should actually be referring to Figure 5. 

L285- This should be labeled as Figure 5. 

L327- Was body weight collected after the study began? Thus, could a change in stocking density be calculated for this study? 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop