Next Article in Journal
Transcriptome-Wide Identification of Cytochrome P450s and GSTs from Spodoptera exigua Reveals Candidate Genes Involved in Camptothecin Detoxification
Next Article in Special Issue
The Biosurfactants Mannosylerythritol Lipids (MELs) as Stimulant on the Germination of Lactuca sativa L.
Previous Article in Journal
Selected Cultivar-Specific Parameters of Wheat Grain as Factors Influencing Intensity of Development of Grain Weevil Sitophilus granarius (L.)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Use of Bioinoculants Affects Variation in Snap Bean Yield Grown under Deficit Irrigation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Physiological and Molecular Analysis Revealed the Role of Silicon in Modulating Salinity Stress in Mung Bean

1
Horticulture and Molecular Physiology Lab, School of Agricultural Innovations and Advanced Learning, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
2
School of Biosciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, Tamil Nadu, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 17 June 2023 / Revised: 16 July 2023 / Accepted: 25 July 2023 / Published: 27 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Abiotic Stresses, Biostimulant and Plant Activity—Series II)

Abstract

:
Salinity stress acts as a significant deterrent in the course of optimal plant growth and productivity, and mung bean, being a relay crop in the cereal cropping system, is severely affected by salinity. Silicon (Si), on the other hand, has exhibited promising outcomes with regards to alleviating salinity stress. In order to understand the critical mechanisms underlying mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) tolerance towards salt stress, this study examined the effects of different salinity concentrations on antioxidant capacity, proteome level alterations, and influence on Si-transporter and salt-responsive genes. Salinity stress was seen to effect the gaseous exchange machinery, decrease the soluble protein and phenolic content and NR activity, and increase the accumulation of reactive oxygen species. An efficient regulation of stomatal opening upon Si application hints towards proficient stomatal conductance and CO2 fixation, resulting in efficient photosynthesis leading to proficient plant growth. The soluble protein and phenolic content showed improved levels upon Si supplementation, which indicates an optimal solute transport system from source to sink. The content of superoxide radicals showed a surge under salinity stress treatment, but efficient scavenging of superoxide radicles was noted under Si supplementation. Salinity stress exhibited more damaging effects on root NR activity, which was notably enhanced upon Si supplementation. Moreover, the beneficial role of Si was further substantiated as there was notable Si accumulation in the leaves and roots of salinity-stressed mung bean plants. Furthermore, Si stimulated competent ROS scavenging by reinforcing the antioxidant enzyme activity, as well coordinating with their isozyme activity, as expressed by the varying band intensities. Similarly, the Si-mediated increase in peroxidase activity may reveal changes in the mechanical characteristics of the cell wall, which are in turn associated with salinity stress adaptation. Proteomic investigations revealed the upregulation or downregulation of several proteins, which were thereafter identified by LC−MS/MS. About 45 proteins were identified and were functionally classified into photosynthesis (24%), metabolic process (19%), redox homeostasis (12%), transmembrane transport (10%), stress response (7%), and transcription regulation (4%). The gene expression analysis of the silicon transporter genes (Lsi1, Lsi2, and Lsi3) and SOS pathway genes (SOS1, SOS2, and SOS3) indicated the role of silicon in mitigating salinity stress. Hence, the findings of this study can facilitate a profound understanding of the potential mechanisms adopted by mung bean due to exogenous Si application during salinity stress.

1. Introduction

Severe and persistent droughts in various regions of the world have compelled farmers to resort to low-quality irrigation water sources and to exploit unsustainable irrigation and fertilization approaches, which have escalated the problem of soil salinization [1]. Salinity stress negatively affects plant growth, development, and productivity as it reduces the osmotic potential of the rhizosphere, damages cell membranes, causes ionic imbalances and photosynthesis impedance, and creates a significant increase in light-dependent respiration [2]. The interplay of ionic and osmotic stress coupled with nutrient deficiencies paves the way for oxidative stress development [3]. Because of their chemical makeup, ROS are extremely unstable and reactive and can start radical chain reactions that can deactivate proteins, oxidize membrane lipids, and harm nucleic acids [4]. Thus, unraveling the responses of plants towards salinity stress, in order to augment plant production, has been a pressing objective among plant breeders. In this regard, a comprehensive study on the mechanism of the molecular and biochemical responses of plants towards salinity stress tolerance is obligatory.
Mung bean (Vigna radiata L.), a leguminous crop, serves as a significant source of protein, carbohydrates, isoflavones, vitamins, fiber, and minerals [5]. However, salinity stress deleteriously disturbs plant germination, growth, the reproductive stage, and the capacity to biologically fix nitrogen in legumes. In mung bean, salinity has been observed to affect seedling germination and development [6], photosynthesis, nodulation [7], the accumulation of ROS, water status, membrane stability, and the content of pigments [7,8]. Of the various salinity management strategies, we intended to take advantage of the application of exogenous Si to combat salinity stress in mung bean because Si research so far has largely neglected legumes.
The position of silicon (Si) in terms of its “essentiality” for plant growth and development has been a reasonably debated topic among researchers. However, the plethora of research findings that have established Si as a proficient player in the alleviation of various abiotic stresses, such as salinity stress, drought stress, and metal toxicity, cannot be undermined either [7,9,10,11]. The protective role of Si is usually seen in plants due to the polymerization of silicates in the endodermis and exodermis. This leads to the obstruction of the Na+ bypass route, resulting in lignification and suberization, as well as the formation of casparian bands, which disrupt the flow of solutes from roots to shoots by altering the properties of the membrane transport system [12]. Owing to the existence of precise transporters found in the cellular membranes of plant roots, silicon can be rapidly transported [13]. The soil-to-root influx of Si is mediated by the influx transporter Lsi1 and its homolog Lsi6, whereas the efflux transporter Lsi2 dictates the apoplastic release of Si, which is followed by Si-translocation to shoots mediated by a transpiration stream. Moreover, Si transporters Lsi6 and Lsi3 are involved in xylem unloading and re-loading, respectively [14].
Previously, efforts have been made to study the alterations in the protein expression of plants under salinity stress using proteomic approaches in alfalfa [15], maize [16], Halophytes Suaeda maritima (L.), and Salicornia brachiate [17]. However, the fact that very limited research has attempted to elucidate the effect of Si on the protein expression profiles of plants under salinity stress is concerning. Nevertheless, the proteomics analysis of tomato [18], capsicum [19], and rose [20] under salinity stress revealed a downregulation of the functional proteins, which were upregulated under Si supplementation. However, to the best of our knowledge, a proteomic analysis to elucidate Si’s role in providing salinity stress resistance to mung bean is not available.
The orchestration of the multifaceted molecular events regulating the initiation or suppression of various salt-stress responsive genes, such as the salt overly sensitive (SOS) gene, culminate in conferring salt tolerance to plants [21]. Genes encoding the SOS proteins, which play a key role in maintaining a well-adjusted ion level inside the cell and providing salt tolerance, have been found in wheat [22], barley [23], and mustard [24]. Furthermore, plants overexpressing SOS genes have shown an increase in salt tolerance [25]. However, the role of Si in the regulation of SOS genes has not been widely studied as far as legumes are concerned.
It is of paramount importance to scrutinize and comprehend the underlying molecular mechanisms that are involved in the course of salt-stress tolerance in mung bean with Si supplementation, such that the improvement of this important legume crop is conceivable. To this point, proteome and transcriptome level analysis of mung bean under salinity stress and Si supplementation has not been reported, which makes our study all the more indispensable and worth exploring. In this study, we aim to understand the mechanism behind protection against excessive ROS, connect the various dots related to changes in protein expression under salinity stress and Si supplementation using LC−MS/MS, and examine the role of mRNA level regulation of Si-transporter genes and salt-responsive genes in mung bean under salinity stress and Si supplementation. Investigation of mung bean protein expression patterns in response to salt stress will open up new avenues for understanding the regulatory networks of mung bean salt-stress acclimation and aid in the selection of candidate proteins for modification to increase salt-stress tolerance.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

This research was carried out at the polyhouse of School of Agricultural Innovations and Advanced Learning (VAIAL), Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India. The polyhouse’s growing conditions were as follows: temperature regime of 30 °C and 25 °C day and night, lighting period of 16:8 h, and relative humidity of approximately 65 ± 5%. Mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) seeds were subjected to surface sterilization with 5% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite solution for 30 min before being rinsed in distilled water. Three seeds were sown in plastic pots (with a diameter of 13 cm and height of 17 cm). The pots were filled at a 1:1 ratio with sterilized red soil and vermicompost, and the soil salinity and pH were 0.35 dS m−1 and 7.86, respectively.

2.2. Experimental Design

The experiment utilized a completely randomized design (CRD) with four replicates for each treatment. The plants were allowed to grow until they reached the vegetative stage (30 days after germination) and were then divided into eight groups for a combination of silicon (Si) (5 mM) and salinity treatments (10 mM NaCl, 20 mM NaCl, and 50 mM NaCl) for 10 days. The various treatments included the following: (a) control (T1) (b) –NaCl + Si (T2), (c) 10 mM NaCl/-Si (T3), (d) 10 mM NaCl/+Si (T4), (e) 20 mM NaCl/-Si (T5), (f) 20 mM NaCl/+Si (T6), (g) 50 mM NaCl/-Si (T7), and (h) 50 mM NaCl/+Si (T8). For silicon treatment, the plants were irrigated with a sodium silicate (5 mM) solution and intermittently irrigated with water for 10 days. The leaf and root samples were collected after 10 days of treatment and stored at −80 °C until further use.

2.3. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM Analysis)

Fresh leaves were cut into small pieces, treated in 2.5% glutaraldehyde solution (pH7.4), stored at 4 °C, and then dehydrated using a wide range of ethanol concentrations (95–50%) for the SEM analysis. The leaves were further oven dried at 60 °C for 48 h [26]. A scanning electron microscope (model: EVO-18 Research, Carl Zeiss, Birmingham, UK) was used to examine the structure of the stomata.

2.4. Determination of Total Soluble Protein, Total Soluble Sugars and Total Phenolic Content

To determine the total soluble protein content, leaf samples (0.5 g) were homogenized in a mortar and pestle with 200 mM phosphate buffer (pH7), followed by centrifugation at 8000 rpm for 10 min. To 0.5 mL of supernatant, 10% TCA was added, followed by centrifugation at 3300 rpm for 30 min. The supernatant obtained was discarded, the pellets were then washed with water and dissolved in 1 mL of 0.1 N NaOH. Furthermore, 0.2 mL of the supernatant was mixed with 5 mL of Bradford reagent, then incubated for 5 min and the absorbance was read at 595 nm [27]. To determine the total soluble sugar content, the leaf samples (0.5 g) were homogenized in 5 mL of 80% ethanol, followed by centrifugation at 6000 rpm for 15 min. To the supernatant, 12.5 mL of 80% ethanol and 1 mL of 0.2% anthrone solution was added. The reaction was placed in a water bath at 100 °C for 10 min. The absorbance was read at 620 nm [28]. To determine the total phenolics content, 0.1 g of leaf samples were suspended in a test tube containing 1.5 mL of 50% (v/v) methanol and 1% (v/v) HCL. The reaction was placed in a water bath at 80 °C for 15 min. Furthermore, 0.02 mL of leaf extract (diluted in 0.08 mL extraction solution) was mixed with 0.7 mL of Folin−Ciocalteu solution (diluted in 1:10 ratio) and 0.7 mL of 6% (w/v) Na2CO3. The samples were placed in the dark for 1 h and the absorbance was measured at 765 nm [29]. Gallic acid was used as a standard.

2.5. Determination of Nitrate Reductase (NR) Activity

The NR activity was measured according to Lopez-serrano et al. [30]. Briefly, 0.2 g of leaf and root samples were immersed in 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5), 1% (v/v) propanol, and 100 mM KNO3, and then incubated in a hot water bath for 60 min at 30 °C. The reaction was stopped by placing the test tubes in a boiling water bath for 5 min. From this, 1 mL of supernatant was taken, to which 1 mL of 0.02% N-naphthyl ethylenediamine and 1 mL of 1% sulfanilamide were added and the absorbance was measured at 540 nm. To determine the quantity of NO2 in the samples, a standard curve using KNO2 was prepared.

2.6. Estimation of Silicon Concentration

From each pot, approximately 10 expanded leaves and masses of roots were selected at random. Each treatment group had five replications. The leaves were dried in a hot air oven at 80 °C for 48 h and then ground into a fine powder. Approximately 100 mg of leaf and root samples were acidified with HNO3 for 12 h and further digested using the microwave-digestion method. Silicon concentrations were measured with a Perkin Elmer Optimum 5300 DV inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES) [9].

2.7. Determination of Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2) and Superoxide (O2) Content

The content of H2O2 was measured according to Velikova et al. [31] with minor modifications. Fresh leaves (0.25 g) were homogenized in 2 mL of 0.1% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid (TCA), followed by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 8 min at 4 °C. To the supernatant, 0.6 mL of 0.1% (w/v) TCA was added and it was then incubated for 1 h at room temperature in a dark place. Absorbance was read at 390 nm. The H2O2 content was calculated from a H2O2 standard curve. The O2 content was measured according to Muneer et al. [9], with slight modifications.

2.8. Estimation of Antioxidants Enzyme Activity and Their Relative Staining

To measure the antioxidant enzyme activity, the leaf samples (0.1 g) were homogenized in an extraction buffer comprising 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH7.0) with 1 mM EDTA, 0.05% triton X, and 1 mM polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP); centrifugation was then carried out at 10,000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was then utilized to determine the antioxidant enzyme activity. The superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was analyzed using the nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) inhibition method of Giannopolitis and Ries et al. [32]. One unit (U) of SOD activity was defined as the quantity of the enzyme that inhibited the photochemical reduction of NBT by 50%. Catalase (CAT) activity was performed according to Manivannan et al. [19]. One unit of catalase decomposed 1.0 µmole of H2O2 per minute, while the H2O2 concentration declined from 10.3 mM to 9.2 mM. The APX activity was determined according to Nakano and Asada et al. [33]. One unit (U) of APX activity corresponded to the amount of enzyme required to oxidize 1 µmole of ascorbic acid per minute per mg of protein.
For native staining, the antioxidant enzymes (30 µg) were electrophoresed in 10% resolving and 4% stacking gel, respectively, for APX and CAT isozymes, whereas, 15% resolving gel and 5% stacking gel were used for separating the SOD isozymes at 4 °C for 4 h at 80 V in a Tris-Glycine (pH8.3) running buffer. The active staining of isozymes of SOD, CAT, and APX were performed according to Pham et al. [34].

2.9. Native PAGE Profiling of Isozymes of Peroxidases’ Enzyme(s)

The leaf samples (0.5 g) were homogenized in an extraction buffer composed of 100 mM K-PO4 buffer (pH7.0) and 2 mM phenylmethylsulphonyl fluoride, and centrifugation was done at 14,000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C. Active staining of GPOX, SPOX, and BPOX was carried out according to Lee et al. [35].

2.10. Protein Extraction and One-Dimensional Gel Electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)

Protein extraction and SDS-PAGE were performed according to Muneer et al. [36]. The protein content was measured using the Bradford test and a standard curve of bovine serum albumin (BSA). After electrophoresis, the gel was stained with Comassie brilliant blue stain (CBBS), which is commercially available (Bio-Rad).

2.11. In-Gel Digestion of Protein Bands and Mass Spectrometer Analysis

The method of Muneer et al. [37] was used for the protein in gel digestion (for a detailed methodology of the in-gel digestion, please refer to Muneer et al.) [37].
The MS and MS/MS spectra data were analyzed with a mass tolerance of 50 ppm using the NCBI and Protein Pilot V.3.0 database software (with the MASCOT V.2.3.02 database search engine). Oxidation of methionines and carbamidomethylation of cysteines were permitted for database searches of the MS/MS spectra. A statistically significant threshold value of p = 0.05 was used to search for individual peptide ion scores. According to the gene ontology analysis (http://www.geneontology.org, accessed on 1 August 2022), the identified proteins were further categorized on the basis of the biological processes in which they contribute. The identified proteins were also analyzed to observe possible protein−protein interactions using the STRING database.

2.12. RNA Isolation, cDNA Preparation, and RT-PCR

RNA was isolated from the leaves using an RNA isolation Kkit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Hi-Media). Real-time PCR was carried out in Applied Biosystems using SYBR Green Chemistry (Sensifast HiRoxkit Bioline, Memphis, TN, USA) for 5 min at 95 °C, followed by 35 cycles of 20 s at 95 °C, 30 s at 57 °C, and 30 s at 72 °C, followed by 10 min at 72 °C. Actin was utilized to normalize all quantifications. For the RT-PCR reactions and qPCR, three distinct RNA preparations from independently grown plants were utilized. The results were analyzed using qBase plus 13 software. Table 1 lists the gene-specific primers utilized in our investigation.

2.13. Statistical Analysis

For the physiological parameters, a complete randomized design was employed with four replicates. The percentage change was calculated using: [(Treatment−Control)/(Treatment) × 100]. To compare the means of distinct replicates, Tukey’s studentized range test was applied. Unless otherwise noted, the results are based on differences between means, with a level of significance of p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of Salinity Stress on Structure and Opening/Closing of Stomatal Pore of Mung Bean Supplemented with Si

Salinity stress impairs photosynthetic machinery and thus adversely affects the gaseous exchange in plants subjected to abiotic stress conditions by intervening with the opening and closing of the stomata. Hence, in our study, after 10 days of salinity stress treatment, the stomatal structure was found to be affected (Figure 1). It was evident that the stomatal pore was found to be closed when different concentrations (T3, T5, and T7) of salinity stress were provided when compared with the control. On the contrary, the stomatal opening was observed when Si was supplemented to the salinity stress-treated plants in T4, T6, and T8, respectively.

3.2. Effect of Salinity Stress on the Soluble Protein, Sugar, and Phenolic Content of Mung Bean Supplemented with Si

The content of soluble protein was seen to be reduced by 25% in the highest concentration (T7) of salinity stress provided when compared with the control (T1) (Figure 2A). However, Si supplementation increased the levels of soluble protein by 93% in T4 when compared with T3, but reduced the soluble protein content in T6 and did not have many significant changes in T8. The total soluble sugar content in salinity-treated plants was seen to be increased upon Si supplementation in T4, but there was no significant difference in T6 and T8 upon the supplementation of Si (Figure 2B). For the total phenolic content, the phenolics levels were found to be increased through the supplementation of Si to e-salinity-stressed plants (Figure 2C). The phenolic content was increased by 53% and 50% in T6 and T8, respectively, when compared with the salinity treatments. However, no significant change was observed upon Si supplementation in T4.

3.3. Effect of Salinity Stress on the Nitrate Reductase Activity of Mung Bean Supplemented with Si

Salinity stress was seen to affect the NR activity in the leaves in T3 when compared with the control, but it did not show significant changes in the root NR activity (Figure 3A,B). The NR activity in the leaves was seen to be reduced by 38% in T3 when compared with the control (T1). After supplementation with Si, the NR activity in leaves did not show significant changes. However, after Si supplementation, the root NR activity was found to be increased, and the most significant increase was that of 92% in T4 and 59% in T8. However, no significant change was observed in T6 upon Si supplementation.

3.4. Silicon Concentration in Leaves and Roots

The Si content in the leaves was slightly more than the Si content in the roots. In the leaves, the highest Si content was observed in T2 and T8 (Figure 4A). The Si content increased in T4, T6, and T8 by 21%, 49%, and 81%, respectively. The highest change in Si content was observed in T8 compared with T7. In the roots, the Si content was the highest in T4 followed by T6 and T8 (Figure 4B). The root Si content in T6 and T8 did not show a significant difference when compared with the Si alone treatment (T2). The Si content in T3 and T5 did not show significant changes either. However, the highest significant percentage change of 51% was observed in T4 when compared with T3.

3.5. Effects of Salinity Stress on Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2) and Superoxide (O2) Content of Mung Bean Supplemented with Si

Following salinity stress treatments for 10 days, the H2O2 content was found to have increased by 73.2% in T3 compared with the control (Figure 5A). However, the H202 content was found to be decreased in T5 and T7, but only the decrease in T7 was significant. Moreover, after the supplementation of Si, the content of H2O2 did not significantly reduce in T4 and T8, but a significant reduction of 49% was seen in T6 when compared with T5. For the O2 content, the levels increased in salinity treatments T3, T5, and T7 by 238%, 270%, and 217%, respectively, when compared with the control (T1) (Figure 5B). After Si supplementation in T4 and T6, the levels of O2 were found to be reduced significantly by 32% and 31%, respectively, but the levels of O2 increased in T8 when compared with T7 after Si supplementation.

3.6. Effect of Salinity Stress on Antioxidant Activity and Their Isozyme Patterns in Mung Bean Supplemented with Si

The SOD activity was seen to be affected in all of the salinity treatment groups, with the exception of T3 (Figure 6A). Si supplementation was, however, seen to enhance the activity of SOD significantly by 185% and 101% in T6 and T8, respectively, when compared with T5 and T7, respectively. However, a significant difference between SOD activity in the Si-treatment alone and control was missing. Moreover, Si supplementation in T4 was found to have decreased the SOD activity when compared with T3. The isozyme bands of SOD were found to be more intense in the treatment groups where Si was supplemented along with salinity stress (Figure 6D). For the isozymes of SOD, SOD-3 displayed a reduced band intensity in T3, T5, and T6; however, after Si supplementation, SOD-3 had greater band intensities in T4, T6, and T8, respectively. The SOD-2 isozyme bands were also expressed more in T4 compared with T3. The APX activity increased by 120% and 48% in T6 and T8, respectively, when compared with T5 and T7, respectively, upon Si supplementation (Figure 6B). However, there was no significant difference between the APX activity in the Si-treatment alone and the control. Moreover, Si supplementation in T4 was found to have decreased the APX activity when compared with T3. The band intensity of isozyme APX-2 diminished under salinity treatments T3 and T5, whereas Si supplementation in T4 and T6 showed increased band intensities of APX-2 (Figure 6D). The CAT activity followed the same trend as observed in the SOD and APX activity. After Si supplementation, the activity of CAT increased by 241% and 26% in T6 and T8, respectively, when compared with T5 and T7, respectively (Figure 6C). However, the CAT for T3 and T4 were not significant when compared with T2 and T1, respectively. Moreover, Si supplementation in T4 was found to have decreased the CAT activity when compared with T3. Of the two CAT isozymes stained, CAT-2 showed expression changes across salinity stress treatments and Si supplemented groups (Figure 6D). CAT-2 isozyme bands showed lesser band intensity in T3 and were highly expressed in T3 and T5, whereas the expression of CAT-2 was increased in T4 and T6, respectively.

3.7. Effect of Salinity Stress on the Isozymes of Peroxidase Enzymes’ in Mung Bean Supplemented with Si

The active staining of BPOX revealed four isozymes, BPOX-1, BPOX-2, BPOX-3, and BPOX-4, among which the expression pattern on BPOX-4 was seen to be more prominent (Figure 7A). BPOX-4 had a lower band intensity in T5 and T7; however, after Si supplementation in T6 and T8, the band intensities were seen to have increased. Similarly, the GPOX isozyme GPOX-2 was seen to have a higher expression profile under Si supplementation in T6 and T8 when compared with T5 and T7, respectively (Figure 7B). SPOX isozymes did not display many changes in expression among the salinity-treated groups and Si-supplemented groups (Figure 7C). However, under Si supplementation, the band intensity of SPOX-2 was found to be higher in T8 compared with that of T7.

3.8. Changes in the Expression of Proteins

The protein profile was analyzed by one-dimensional gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), and the proteins were observed to be either upregulated or downregulated (Figure 8, graphical representation shown in Figure 9B). Following this, these up or downregulated proteins were identified using a mass spectrometer (LC−MS/MS) (Table 2). Direct gene ontology consortium (http://www.geneontology.org/, accessed on 1 August 2022) was used to determine the percent variation of identified proteins for functional categorization. All of the differentially expressed proteins were grouped into photosynthesis (24%), metabolic process (19%), redox homeostasis (12%), transmembrane transport (10%), stress response (7%), and transcription regulation (4%) (Figure 9A). Additionally, the STRING database was used to examine the identified proteins for any protein−protein interactions (Figure 10). The proteins mostly interacted with cell division, ATP synthase, photosynthesis, transport, metabolism, and other signaling-pathway-related proteins.

3.8.1. Proteins Related to Photosynthesis

Salinity stress was found to have decreased the expression of vital proteins that are involved in photosynthesis, such as ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain (band 3A, 3C, 7A, 7B, and 7C). However, Si supplementation positively influenced the expression of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain (band 6A and 6D), thus restoring the normal functioning of the photosynthetic process.

3.8.2. Proteins Related to Metabolic Processes

Salinity stress was seen to downregulate the enzyme fumarylacetoacetase (band 3B) involved in tyrosine and phenylalanine catabolism, fructose-bisphosphatase (band 3G) and putative phosphoketolase (band 3G) involved in carbohydrate metabolism, and putative phospho-2-dehydro-3-deoxyheptonate aldolase (band 3H) involved in amino acid synthesis. After Si supplementation to the salinity-stressed plants, enzyme 1-phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase (band 7D) involved in lipid metabolism, fructose-bisphosphate aldolase (band 7F) involved in carbohydrate metabolism, cyclase family protein (7F) involved in amino acid metabolism, tRNA(Ile)-lysidine synthetase (band 7F) involved in tRNA metabolic process, and precorrin-2 dehydrogenase (band 7H) involved in porphyrin biosynthesis were observed to be upregulated. Moreover, Si supplementation alone could upregulate various key proteins such as cellulose (band 2C), peptide hydrolase (band 2F), 3-deoxy-7-phosphoheptulonate synthase (band 2G), and UDP-N-acetylglucosamine transferase subunit ALG13 (band 2I) involved in key metabolic processes.

3.8.3. Proteins Having Oxidoreductase Activity

It was observed that proteins such as ferredoxin-NADP reductase (band 3G, 7F), involved in oxidation/reduction reactions; copA family copper-resistance protein (band 7A), which mediates copper resistance via the sequestration of copper in the periplasm along with the copper-binding protein CopC; protoporphyrinogen oxidase (band 7D), which is a precursor to heme and chlorophyll; putative oxidoreductase (band 7E); quinone oxidoreductase putative (band 7G); cytochrome P450 (band 7I), which functions as monooxygenase; and 2,5-diketo-D-gluconate reductase A (band 7H) are all downregulated under salinity stress treatments. However, Si supplementation restored the activities of the proteins involved in oxidoreductase activity, such as the putative oxidoreductase NAD(P)-binding domain (band 6A), ferredoxin-NADP reductase (band 6E), amidase domain-containing protein (band 6G), acyl-CoA reductase-like NAD-dependent aldehyde dehydrogenase (band 6G), 2-keto-3-deoxy-L-fuconate dehydrogenase (band 2I), and precorrin-2 dehydrogenase (band 2D).

3.8.4. Proteins Involved in Stress Response

Proteins involved in defense responses, such as SOS response UmuD protein (band 3F), which is involved in SOS mutagenesis; diacylglycerol kinase iota (band 3F); and superoxide dismutase (band 3H), were shown to be affected by salinity stress, where the upregulation of stress responsive proteins such as superoxide dismutase (bands 6H and 2H) and peroxidase (band 6C) was witnessed when Si was supplemented.

3.8.5. Proteins Responsible for Transmembrane Transport

Transmembrane transport proteins such as DUF4328 domain-containing protein (band 3A); cytochrome b (3); ubiquinol oxidase subunit 1 (band 7D) involved in electron transport; AAHS family benzoate transporter-like MFS transporter (band 7G), which transport a variety of aromatic acids; and cis, cis-muconate, and tonB-dependent receptor plug domain-containing protein (band 7I), which engage in high-affinity binding and energy-dependent uptake with the outer membrane receptor proteins, are downregulated by salinity stress. Meanwhile, Si supplementation upregulated the transmembrane proteins ABC-type branched-subunit amino acid transport system substrate-binding protein (band 2B) involved in amino acid transport, multiple sugar transport system permease protein (band 2C) involved in sugar transport, and acyltransferase (band 2E).

3.8.6. Proteins Involved in Signal Transduction

Salinity stress was seen to downregulate proteins such as PAS domain S-box-containing protein (band 3A), which acts as a molecular sensor for sensing redox changes in the electron transport system; 1-phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase (band 7D), which acts as an early signaling system during abiotic stress in plants; Rho-GAP domain-containing protein (band 7D); and histidine kinase (band 7E). However, treatment with Si alone only showed upregulation of the signal transduction protein histidine kinase (band 2H), whose periplasmic domains act as receptor to transduce a signal through its transmembrane domain to the cytoplasmic enzymatic domains.

3.8.7. Proteins Involved in Metal Binding

Proteins such as ferredoxin-NADP reductase (band 7F), which acts as the electron acceptor associated with photosystem I, and putative K (+)-stimulated pyrophosphate-energized sodium pump (band 7H), which uses the energy of pyrophosphate hydrolysis as the driving force for Na (+), transport across the membrane. Salinity stress also downregulated the ATPase subunit of the ABC transporter with duplicated ATPase domains (band 3D) and ATP-binding protein (band 3E), and Putative phospho-2-dehydro-3-deoxyheptonate aldolase (band 3H), which were upregulated upon Si supplementation.

3.8.8. Proteins Involved in Cell Division

Among the identified proteins, salinity stress was seen to downregulate the protein chromosome partition protein Smc (band 3F). However, silicon treatment alone was seen to upregulate proteins such as TPX2 domain-containing protein (band 2B), which has microtubule binding activity, and shugoshin_C domain-containing protein (band 2F), which is involved in kinetochore attachment. When Si was supplemented to salinity-stressed plants, upregulation of proteins such as ubiquitin-like domain-containing protein (band 6C) and epidermal patterning factor-like protein (band 6I), involved in cell division and differentiation, were seen to be upregulated.

3.8.9. Proteins Responsible for Transcription and DNA Replication

Salinity stress was seen to downregulate protein kinase domain-containing protein (band 3C) methyltransferase family protein (band 3E), chromosome partition protein Smc (band 3F), SOS response UmuD protein (band 3F), GntR family transcriptional regulator (bands 3H and 7I), and replicative DNA helicase (band 7A), all of which are involved in essential process such as transcription, translation, phosphorylation, DNA replication, etc. Furthermore, Si supplementation enhanced the activities of proteins such as pseudouridine synthase (band 6B) involved in Ribosome biogenesis, LacI family transcriptional regulator (band 6E), and two-component system alkaline phosphatase synthesis response regulator PhoP (band 6H) involved in transcription.

3.9. Expression of Si-Transporter and Salt-Responsive Genes

The expression of Lsi2 and Lsi3 genes was increased in the salinity- and Si-supplemented groups (Figure 11A–C). The Si-alone treatment showed the highest expression levels of Si transporters, indicating the efficient uptake and transport of Si in mung bean plants under salinity stress. The Lsi1 gene showed a somewhat increased expression in the salinity plus Si treatment groups. Overall, the expression of Si-transporter genes indicated proficient efflux and influx of Si in plants. Furthermore, salt responsive genes SOS1 and SOS3 showed reduced expression levels in the salinity plus Si treatments, whereas the expression of SOS2 was increased in the salinity plus Si treatment groups (Figure 11C–E).

4. Discussion

Numerous external and internal cues, frequently functioning concurrently, govern the stomata aperture. This comprises of lower soil water potential, water stress-induced abscisic acid (ABA) generation, and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) accumulation in the leaves of plants that are grown in saline soils [38]. Consequently, growth reduction as a result of impairment in photosynthesis may be linked to stomatal closure and the limited CO2 uptake by plants under salinity stress [1]. In our study, we found a similar occurrence of stomatal closure in mung bean exposed to salinity stress, which was also observed in wheat and sweet pepper (Figure 1) [39,40]. However, an efficient regulation of stomatal opening upon Si application hints towards proficient stomatal conductance and CO2 fixation, resulting in superlative photosynthesis leading to proficient plant growth. As far as we are aware, no investigations have been reported on the stomatal opening and closing of plants under salinity stress and Si application; therefore a clear mechanism of Si mediated regulation of stomatal aperture is missing. With the information that ion concentrations of K+, Cl, and Ca2+ mediate the guard cell turgor pressure [41], we may hypothesize that Si application reduced the activity of outward rectifying K+ channels relative to inwardly rectifying K+ channels, and/or reduced Cl release from guard cells and lowered the Ca2+ concentration inside them, resulting in stomatal opening.
Plants rapidly build up osmotic regulatory substances (such as soluble sugars and soluble protein) in response to abiotic stress to increase the cell-fluid concentration. The primary function of these substances involves the maintenance of cell turgor, balancing protoplasm infiltration and the outside environment, and permitting cells to execute routine physiological processes [42]. In our study, we found that salinity stress inflicted a decline in the levels of soluble protein in a low salinity concentration (10 mM NaCl), which was improved upon Si supplementation. However, a significant impact of Si on increasing the soluble sugar content under salinity was not seen (Figure 2A,B). In wheat plants subjected to salinity stress, Si application improved the soluble protein content significantly, which is assumed to be due to enhance protein kinase synthesis and better cell signaling, which resulted in improved soluble protein levels [43]. Si augmentation increased the soluble protein levels in barley plant leaves and roots [44]. This increase in soluble protein accumulation indicates that the endogenous defense system of plants was strengthened in response to salt stress. Si-mediated regulation of osmolytes has also been reported in alfalfa and basil [45,46], where it has been documented that the movement of osmolytes may progressively provide energy for root development and contribute to the correction of the root’s osmotic potential. Thus, Si-mediated accumulation of osmotic regulatory substances in mung bean may be correlated to its enhanced salinity tolerance. Furthermore, secondary metabolites, such as phenolic compounds, are generated in response to adverse environmental circumstances, and are essential for plant growth and reproduction [47]. The buildup of phenolic compounds has been associated with increased ROS scavenging via several mechanisms, including the inhibition of the enzymes involved in ROS generation and quenching [48]. In our study, we observed an increase in the content of phenolic compounds under Si supplementation to intermediate concentrations (20 mM and 50 mM NaCl) of salinity-stressed mung bean plants (Figure 2C). However, the addition of Si to low concentrations of salinity-stressed (10 mM NaCl) plants did not have any considerable impact on the total phenolic content. Comparable observations were also made in alfalfa [45] and tomato [47], where Si supplementation under salinity stress enhanced the plants’ phenolic content. The Si-mediated adjustments to the plant secondary metabolism under oxidative stress could increase the phenolic content.
Nitrogen (N) is an indispensable nutrient for plants as it is a building block for many different biomolecules (including proteins, nucleic acids, amino acids, pigments, and hormones) [49]. NR is a substrate-inducing enzyme that is largely active at the transcriptional level and is induced, among other things, by NO3-N, carbohydrates, and light. [50]. However, salinity stress has been shown to deleteriously disturb these progressions, particularly the inorganic uptake of N and the enzymes required in its assimilation into organic compounds, which is not surprising considering the wide range of roles that N plays in plants and the years of study that have gone into understanding the effect of salinity on N metabolism [51]. In cucumber seedlings, growth inhibition instigated by salinity stress has been linked to changes in nitrogen absorption and enzyme activity involved in nitrogen assimilation [52]. Additionally, salinity stress also inflicts metabolic disorders in compounds of a nitrogenous nature in Arabidopsis thaliana [53]. Our study displayed a disruption of NR activity in the roots of mung bean exposed to salinity stress, when compared with the NR activity in leaves. The NR activity in roots was, however, counteracted by Si application to salinity-stressed (10 mM NaCl and 50 mM NaCl) plants, resulting in an improved NR activity in the roots, hinting towards competent N metabolism and nitrogen fixation by mung bean plants (Figure 3A,B). This is in agreement with the findings reported in licorice [54], sunflower [55], and cucumber [56].
Most of the Si research revolves around drawing a relation between Si accumulation and the defensive role it displays in providing abiotic stress tolerance to plants. However, variations in Si accumulation levels among species have been reported and the status of mung bean with regards to efficient Si translocation from roots to shoots remain unexplored. In our study, we aimed to map out the distribution of Si by tracking its accumulation in different parts of the plants. We observed that Si accumulation was affected under salinity stress in both the roots and leaves of mung bean (Figure 4A,B). Furthermore, the accumulation of Si in leaves was slightly greater than the Si accumulation in the roots. These findings suggest a dissimilarity in Si accumulation between the leaves and roots, which is in agreement with the findings in Glycyrrhiza uralensis where the accumulation of Si was greater in the shoots than the roots [54]. The deposition of Si on root cell walls, which can inhibit salt transfer to the shoots, may explain why mung bean plants exposed to high salinity experience increased silicon buildup. Additionally, biomass formation aided by Si supplementation may also be a reason for the slightly higher Si accumulation in the shoots [19,20]. The favorable effects of Si were highly associated with the level of Si accumulation in mung bean plants, which could serve as an adaptation strategy for mung bean to decrease salt stress by absorbing and transporting more Si, hence increasing plant growth under salt stress.
A higher concentration of NaCl promotes malfunctioning of the cell membranes, which results in the excessive permeability of ions and electrolytes, which tends to exacerbate oxidative burst in the cells [57]. This was evident by the increase in content of ROS, such as H2O2 and O2, in our study. The H2O2 content was found to have increased in a low concentration (10 mM NaCl) for the salinity-stressed plants; however Si supplementation could only efficiently scavenge H2O2 in intermediate concentration (20 mM NaCl) of salinity-stressed mung bean plants. The O2 content was also increased upon salinity stress induction. But a competent scavenging of O2 was seen under Si supplementation to two concentrations (10 mM and 20 mM NaCl) of salinity-stressed mung bean plants (Figure 5A,B). Our results are in agreement with studies conducted in cucumber [57], rose [20], and wheat [58], where Si conveyed protection against oxidative damage by bolstering the structural integrity of the cell membranes, especially under salt stress.
Several studies have found that stress causes increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, and that supplementing the plant with silicon increases the quantitative changes in the activity of antioxidant enzymes to scavenge these ROS. However, the quantitative shifts on their own are not enough to confirm or depict the intricate changes happening at the cellular level. Protein profiles may change as a result of altered enzyme activity, which may be caused by the downregulation or de novo production of stress-specific antioxidant enzyme proteins [59]. In this regard, not many attempts have been made to demonstrate the changes in isozyme expression profiles, as well as the quantitative changes of the antioxidant enzymes in plants under salinity stress and Si supplementation. However, in our study, a tight regulation of Si in ROS metabolism is demonstrated by Si’s constitutive participation in the expression of isozymes of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, CAT, and APX, which was examined by native-PAGE assay (Figure 6A–D). We observed elevated levels of antioxidant enzyme activity for SOD, CAT, and APX under a low salinity concentration, which was in accordance with the results obtained by Yousif et al. [60] in sorghum, Singh et al. [61] in wheat, and Abdelaal et al. [62] in sweet pepper. Nonetheless, Shekari et al. [63] reported that Si treatment for herbal Anethum graveolens plants under salinity stress significantly increased the activities of CAT, APX, and SOD. Similarly, in rapeseed, Si’s participation in increasing the antioxidant enzyme activities was reported by Alam et al. [64]. It is likely that the comprehensive coordination of antioxidant enzymes is indispensable for the redox homeostasis mechanism in mung bean when it is exposed to oxidative stress.
Lignification is a recurrent response of many plant species to several environmental circumstances and mechanical injury, as it reinforces the cell wall for long-distance water transport and gives conducting tissues a structural stiffness and tenacity [65]. The enzymes most directly engaged in lignin production are peroxidases [35]. Previously, it has been demonstrated that salt stress affects secondary cell wall production, as indicated by altered lignification, and that salinity stress is connected with changed anatomical advantageous modifications, such as an increase in lignin deposition in vascular tissues of salt-treated tomato plants and xylem root components in maize [66,67]. However, there are no reports on the role of Si in the lignification of salinity-stressed plants with regards to the expression of peroxidase enzymes. Therefore, in our study, we observed that there was a decreased expression of BPOX, POD, and SPOX in salinity-stressed mung bean, but upon Si supplementation, the expression of these peroxidase enzymes was significantly improved (Figure 7A–C). An increase in the observed peroxidase activity observed may reflect changes in cell wall mechanical properties related to salinity-stress adaption. However, it would be very interesting to find out if there is cross talk between lignin synthesis and Si deposition in salinity-stressed plants, both of which function by providing mechanical protection to the plant cell.
Salinity stress has either direct impacts on photosynthesis, such as stomatal and mesophyll diffusion restrictions and changes in photosynthetic metabolism, or oxidative damage caused by the superimposition of several stressors [68]. Simultaneous stomatal growth redemption and photosynthesis-related protein stimulation indicated Si participation in important carbon fixation processes. Nwugo and Huerta [69] previously demonstrated the augmentation of photosynthesis-related proteins in rice plants exposed to cadmium stress. The primary enzyme required for CO2 fixation during photosynthesis is ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCO). The RuBisCO small subunit (band 6I), in particular, is required for carboxylation catalytic efficiency and CO2/O2 selectivity. Salinity stress reduced the abundance of RuBisCO large subunit (bands 3C and 3D), whereas Si supplementation increased the abundance of the RuBisCO large subunit (band 6D). Our results are similar to those observed in rose and capsicum under salinity stress and Si supply, where an increased abundance of the RuBisCO small and large subunits was reported [19,20]. Enhanced RuBisCO protein accumulation in Si treatments allowed for photoprotection as well as an improvement in the light-harvesting mechanism for plant physiological growth.
In reaction to abiotic stresses, amino acid, carbohydrate, and amine metabolic pathways undergo various modifications. The activation of early metabolic reactions is essential for cellular adaptation and survival, as it helps correct the chemical and energy imbalances caused by stress. Phosphomethylpyrimidine synthase (band 6A), an important enzyme in pyrimidine biosynthesis, was seen to be upregulated after the addition of Si. A similar protein involved in nucleotide metabolism, adenylosuccinate synthase, was also upregulated when Si was added in capsicum under salinity stress [19]. We have observed that salinity stress downregulated the protein fructose-bisphosphatase (band 3G). However, Si addition upregulated the protein fructose-bisphophatase (band 6E), which is involved in sucrose biosynthesis, indicating that the synthesis and transport of solutes from source to sink have been improved under salinity stress. Under salinity stress, the protein 1-phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase (band 7D), an essential enzyme in the salicylic acid mediated signal transduction pathway is downregulated, but the addition of Si was found to have upregulated the protein lipase (band 6E). The large majority of lipid-associated plant defense responses are facilitated by lipase activation that cleave or modify lipid substrates in several subcellular compartments (Lee et al., 2019). Thus, Si supplementation promotes effective regulation of the metabolic processes in plants, allowing them to cope with stress [70]. Thus, Si supplementation mediates the efficient regulation of metabolic processes in the plants, such that the plants can cope up with stress.
During oxidative stress, ROS production is often significantly elevated. The excessive ROS production under conditions of salt stress primarily depletes vital metabolic pathways and protein synthesis [18]. The superoxide dismutase (SODs) is the first line of defense against ROS within a cell [71]. We found the upregulation of SOD (band 2H) after Si supplementation alone as well as when Si was supplemented to salinity-stressed plants (band 6H). Similarly, Si supplementation to salinity-stressed plants also upregulated peroxidases (band 6C), whose functions in ROS scavenging, lignin biosynthesis, and the consequent defense response activity in plants have been well documented. Plant peroxygenase is generally engaged in the H2O2-dependent hydroxyl catalysis of aromatics, sulfoxidation of xenobiotics, and oxidation of unsaturated fatty acids [72]. Our results are in agreement with studies conducted in rice under Cd stress [73], alfalfa under salt stress [15], and rose under salinity stress and Si supply [20], where stress-induced activation of peroxidases and its protective role have been documented. Thus, the presence of a competent balance between ROS formation and its scavenging helps mung bean in ameliorating the negative effects of salinity stress.
Under abiotic stress conditions, plant tissues endure substantial oxygen variations, resulting in a highly hypoxic environment [74]. Furthermore, ROS exposure produces an oxidative environment that alters the redox equilibrium of the cell. As numerous intracellular signaling pathways governing cell division and stress response systems are sensitive to redox conditions, intracellular alterations in redox status also have a significant impact on cell functioning [75]. Several physiological activities, including redox activity, are mediated by electron-transporting oxidoreductases in biological membranes. In our study, we found that salinity stress downregulated the protein Ferredoxin-NADP reductase (band 3G) whereas Si application lead to an upregulation of Ferredoxin-NADP reductase (bands 6A and 6E). During the linear electron transport process of photosynthesis, ferredoxin, NADP (H) oxidoreductase (FNR) transports electrons from ferredoxin (Fd) to NADP+. For reductive assimilation and light/dark activation/inactivation of enzymes, both NADPH and reduced Fd (Fdred) are essential [76]. As a result, FNR acts as a hub that connects electron transport in photosynthesis to redox metabolism in chloroplasts, and Si supplementation positively affects the redox balance in the plants. Reactive aldehydes formed as a by-product of lipid peroxidation are detoxified by reducing their carbonyl group to alcohol or oxidizing it to the corresponding carboxylic acid [77]. This oxidative reaction is known to be catalyzed by NAD(P)+-dependent aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs), whose accumulation was improved under Si supplementation (band 6G); this was similar to the findings on alfalfa under salt stress, where alcohol dehydrogenase activity involved during oxygen deprivation was increased [15]. Our results are also consistent with the findings on redox homeostasis of rose and tomato under salinity stress and Si supplementation [18,20].
The degree to which plants profit from Si depends on its deposition in the tissues, which normally ranges from 0.1% to 10% (by dry weight) and exhibits significant cultivar, species, and wider evolutionary variations [10]. This is made conceivable by the various Si-transporter genes that mediate the coordinated uptake and distribution of Si along the plant parts. The plasma-membrane transporters encoded by these genes are hypothesized to coordinate the symplastic migration of Si to circumvent the apoplastic (casparian band) barriers [78]. The identification of OsLsi1 and OsLsi2 in rice [14], ZmLsi1 and ZmLsi2 in maize [79], CsLsi1 and CsLsi2 in cucumber [80], and HvLsi1 and HvLsi2 in barley [81], has enlightened the research community about the uptake and distribution of Si in plants and its relation with the suppressed or enhanced expression of Lsi (influx and efflux) genes in providing ameliorative benefits to plants under various biotic and abiotic stresses. To the best of our knowledge, the role of Si transporters in mung bean under salinity stress has not been explored before. Consequently, we observed that even under salt stress, Lsi1, Lsi2, and Lsi3 were considerably expressed in Si-treated plants; however under salt stress without Si treatment, the expression levels were lower (Figure 11A–C). Our results are in line with Muneer and Jeong [18], who illustrated an increased expression of LeLsi1, LeLsi2, and LeLsi3 genes in tomato under salinity stress and Si supplementation. This synergistic activation of silicon transporter genes under salt stress implies a role for Si in salt-stress mitigation. The expression of Si transporters is regulated differently in different plant species. The mechanisms that modulate Si transporter gene expression, however, remain unclear.
The SOS pathway is seen as crucial for managing both Na+ efflux out of the root cortex, as well as long-distance transport into the plant tissue via the xylem [82]. SOS machinery, consisting of SOS1, SOS2, and SOS3 proteins, were extensively studied in an effort to comprehend the process of ion homeostasis and salinity tolerance in a vast array of plant species [83]. In Arabidopsis, sos1 mutants subjected to moderate salinity displayed decreased Na accumulation in the leaves, indicating SOS1 involvement in Na+ xylem loading [84]. In salinity-stressed maize plants supplemented with Si, an increased expression of SOS1 and SOS2 genes was observed along with an increase in the Na+ in the xylem and leaf tissues [85]. Transgenic rice overexpressing SOS1 have a significantly higher salt tolerance than wild-type rice when supplemented with Si. This improvement in tolerance is coupled with enhanced Na+ efflux in transgenic roots and greater K+ absorption, resulting in less Na+ buildup in cells and a higher K+/Na+ ratio [86]. This is in agreement with our results where we observed an increased expression of SOS1 and SOS2 in mung bean plants under 50 mM of salinity stress supplemented with Si, indicating competent Na+ efflux from the cell (Figure 11D–F). SOS3 is known to be a Ca2+ regulated SOS pathway upstream regulatory protein that plays critical roles in pathways related to salt-stress response [87]. Kim et al. [88] demonstrated that NaCl treatment induces AtSOS3 expression significantly. Moreover, the overexpression of LeSOS3-1 improves salt-stress tolerance in tobacco through the regulation of stress-related physiological changes. Similarly, we observed an increased expression of SOS3 under Si supplementation in mung bean under salinity stress, indicating the efficient phosphorylation of SOS1, thus leading to competent efflux of Na+ ions from the cells. This is in accordance with another study on sugarcane, where, in response to salt stress, most VviSOS3 genes were regulated similarly in all three organs. These findings imply that VviSOS3 genes may play a role in ionic and osmotic homeostasis establishment and maintenance [89]. Thus, it can be concluded that the Si-mediated expression of SOS genes leads to the sequential efflux, compartmentalization, and blockage of Na+ ions in mung bean plants, thus retaining optimum levels of beneficial ions, which allow the cells to remain viable and hence assist towards tissue growth even under salt stress. The precise methods through which Si assists SOS gene transcription remain unknown; one can only hypothesize that Si indirectly impacts transcription factors, but additional study is required.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, Si-mediated regulation of stomatal aperture, osmoregulatory substances, N metabolism, and ROS homeostasis, provided the physiochemical basis of salinity stress tolerance in mung bean. Although soluble protein and phenolic content were seen to be enhanced under Si supplementation, a convincing improvement in soluble sugar content upon Si supplementation was missing. Similarly, the increase in root NR activity after Si supplementation also shed light on the active N uptake and its metabolism. Antioxidant defense against oxidative-stress-induced damage was maintained by antioxidant enzymes and their isozyme activity. We observed that isozymes and antioxidant molecules appeared to play a significant role in providing competent defense to plants against salinity. Furthermore, the dynamic role of Si in the regulation of proteins engaged in diverse cellular functions and metabolic pathways may benefit from a better understanding of the potential mechanism(s) evolved in plants to ameliorate the adverse effects of salinity stress. Gene expression studies of Si transporter and salt responsive genes revealed an optimum expression of these genes in response to salinity stress and Si supplementation. An optimal expression of Si transporters in plants with inefficient Si absorption systems may result in an increase in Si accumulation, hence boosting the plants’ resilience to numerous stressors. However, investigating probable interaction partners and expression patterns of Si transporter genes will lend evidence to their likely roles in plant stress responses. Our research brings up the possibility of using Si transporters for breeding objectives. However, the roles of this transporter in Si fluxes and plant physiology in general must be clarified if we are to successfully use Si as a preventive measure against environmental stress.

Author Contributions

S.M. conceptualized and supervised the work; M.A.M. performed the experiments and wrote the manuscript. S.M. edited and finalized the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research was funded by VIT Seed Grant (Project no. SG20210182).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy concerns.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Central Instrumentation Facility, Gyeongsang National University, South Korea for mass spectrometer analysis. The authors would also like to acknowledge Scanning Electron Microscopy Facility, School of Biosciences and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology for helping carry out the SEM micrographs.

Conflicts of Interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhu, J.-K. Plant Salt Tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2001, 6, 66–71. [Google Scholar]
  2. Parida, A.K.; Das, A.B. Salt Tolerance and Salinity Effects on Plants: A Review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2005, 60, 324–349. [Google Scholar]
  3. Rehman, S.; Abbas, G.; Shahid, M.; Saqib, M.; Umer Farooq, A.B.; Hussain, M.; Murtaza, B.; Amjad, M.; Naeem, M.A.; Farooq, A. Effect of Salinity on Cadmium Tolerance, Ionic Homeostasis and Oxidative Stress Responses in Conocarpus Exposed to Cadmium Stress: Implications for Phytoremediation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 171, 146–153. [Google Scholar]
  4. Huang, H.; Ullah, F.; Zhou, D.-X.; Yi, M.; Zhao, Y. Mechanisms of ROS Regulation of Plant Development and Stress Responses. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 800. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sehrawat, N.; Bhat, K.V.; Sairam, R.K.; Jaiwal, P.K. Identification of salt resistant wild relatives of mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek). Asian J. Plant Sci. Res. 2013, 3, 41–49. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dutta, P.; Bera, A.K. Effect of NaCl Salinity on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Mungbean Cultivars. Legume Res. Int. J. 2014, 37, 161. [Google Scholar]
  7. Al Murad, M.; Muneer, S. Silicon Supplementation Modulates Physiochemical Characteristics to Balance and Ameliorate Salinity Stress in Mung Bean. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 810991. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Sehrawat, N.; Yadav, M.; Bhat, K.; Sairam, R.; Jaiwal, P. Effect of Salinity Stress on Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] during Consecutive Summer and Spring Seasons. J. Agric. Sci. Belgrade 2015, 60, 23–32. [Google Scholar]
  9. Muneer, S.; Kim, E.; Park, J.; Lee, J. Influence of Green, Red and Blue Light Emitting Diodes on Multiprotein Complex Proteins and Photosynthetic Activity under Different Light Intensities in Lettuce Leaves (Lactuca sativa L.). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 4657–4670. [Google Scholar]
  10. Deshmukh, R.; Sonah, H.; Belanger, R.R. New Evidence Defining the Evolutionary Path of Aquaporins Regulating Silicon Uptake in Land Plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 6775–6788. [Google Scholar]
  11. Tripathi, D.K.; Singh, V.P.; Lux, A.; Vaculik, M. Silicon in Plant Biology: From Past to Present, and Future Challenges. J. Exp. Bot. 2020, 71, 6699–6702. [Google Scholar]
  12. Flam-Shepherd, R.; Huynh, W.Q.; Coskun, D.; Hamam, A.M.; Britto, D.T.; Kronzucker, H.J. Membrane Fluxes, Bypass Flows, and Sodium Stress in Rice: The Influence of Silicon. J. Exp. Bot. 2018, 69, 1679–1692. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ma, J.F.; Yamaji, N. Silicon Uptake and Accumulation in Higher Plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11, 392–397. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ma, J.F.; Yamaji, N.; Mitani, N.; Tamai, K.; Konishi, S.; Fujiwara, T.; Katsuhara, M.; Yano, M. An Efflux Transporter of Silicon in Rice. Nature 2007, 448, 209–212. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Xiong, J.; Sun, Y.; Yang, Q.; Tian, H.; Zhang, H.; Liu, Y.; Chen, M. Proteomic Analysis of Early Salt Stress Responsive Proteins in Alfalfa Roots and Shoots. Proteome Sci. 2017, 15, 19. [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen, F.; Fang, P.; Peng, Y.; Zeng, W.; Zhao, X.; Ding, Y.; Zhuang, Z.; Gao, Q.; Ren, B. Comparative Proteomics of Salt-Tolerant and Salt-Sensitive Maize Inbred Lines to Reveal the Molecular Mechanism of Salt Tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4725. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Benjamin, J.J.; Miras-Moreno, B.; Araniti, F.; Salehi, H.; Bernardo, L.; Parida, A.; Lucini, L. Proteomics Revealed Distinct Responses to Salinity between the Halophytes Suaeda maritima (L.) Dumort and Salicornia brachiata (Roxb). Plants 2020, 9, 227. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Muneer, S.; Jeong, B.R. Proteomic Analysis of Salt-Stress Responsive Proteins in Roots of Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) Plants towards Silicon Efficiency. Plant Growth Regul. 2015, 77, 133–146. [Google Scholar]
  19. Manivannan, A.; Soundararajan, P.; Muneer, S.; Ko, C.H.; Jeong, B.R. Silicon Mitigates Salinity Stress by Regulating the Physiology, Antioxidant Enzyme Activities, and Protein Expression in Capsicum annuum ‘Bugwang’. BioMed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 3076357. [Google Scholar]
  20. Soundararajan, P.; Manivannan, A.; Ko, C.H.; Muneer, S.; Jeong, B.R. Leaf Physiological and Proteomic Analysis to Elucidate Silicon Induced Adaptive Response under Salt Stress in Rosa hybrida ‘Rock Fire’. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1768. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ji, H.; Pardo, J.M.; Batelli, G.; Van Oosten, M.J.; Bressan, R.A.; Li, X. The Salt Overly Sensitive (SOS) Pathway: Established and Emerging Roles. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 275–286. [Google Scholar]
  22. Sathee, L.; Sairam, R.K.; Chinnusamy, V.; Jha, S.K. Differential Transcript Abundance of Salt Overly Sensitive (SOS) Pathway Genes Is a Determinant of Salinity Stress Tolerance of Wheat. Acta Physiol. Plant. 2015, 37, 169. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yousefirad, S.; Soltanloo, H.; Ramezanpour, S.S.; Zaynalinezhad, K.; Shariati, V. Salt Oversensitivity Derived from Mutation Breeding Improves Salinity Tolerance in Barley via Ion Homeostasis. Biol. Plant. 2018, 62, 775–785. [Google Scholar]
  24. Nutan, K.K.; Kumar, G.; Singla-Pareek, S.L.; Pareek, A. A Salt Overly Sensitive Pathway Member from Brassica Juncea BjSOS3 Can Functionally Complement Atsos3 in Arabidopsis. Curr. Genom. 2017, 19, 60–69. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ma, D.-M.; Xu, W.-R.; Li, H.-W.; Jin, F.-X.; Guo, L.-N.; Wang, J.; Dai, H.-J.; Xu, X. Co-Expression of the Arabidopsis SOS Genes Enhances Salt Tolerance in Transgenic Tall Fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.). Protoplasma 2013, 251, 219–231. [Google Scholar]
  26. Razi, K.; Bae, D.-W.; Muneer, S. Target-Based Physiological Modulations and Chloroplast Proteome Reveals a Drought Resilient Rootstock in Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) Genotypes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 12996. [Google Scholar]
  27. Bradford, M.M. A Rapid and Sensitive Method for the Quantitation of Microgram Quantities of Protein Utilizing the Principle of Protein-Dye Binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, H.; Fu, Y.; Hu, D.; Yu, J.; Liu, H. Effect of Green, Yellow and Purple Radiation on Biomass, Photosynthesis, Morphology and Soluble Sugar Content of Leafy Lettuce via Spectral Wavebands “Knock Out”. Sci. Hortic. 2018, 236, 10–17. [Google Scholar]
  29. Song, F.-L.; Gan, R.-Y.; Zhang, Y.; Xiao, Q.; Kuang, L.; Li, H.-B. Total Phenolic Contents and Antioxidant Capacities of Selected Chinese Medicinal Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 2362–2372. [Google Scholar]
  30. López-Serrano, L.; Canet-Sanchis, G.; Vuletin Selak, G.; Penella, C.; San Bautista, A.; López-Galarza, S.; Calatayud, Á. Pepper Rootstock and Scion Physiological Responses Under Drought Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 38. [Google Scholar]
  31. Velikova, V.; Yordanov, I.; Edreva, A. Oxidative Stress and Some Antioxidant Systems in Acid Rain-Treated Bean Plants. Plant Sci. 2000, 151, 59–66. [Google Scholar]
  32. Giannopolitis, C.N.; Ries, S.K. Superoxide Dismutases. Plant Physiol. 1977, 59, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Nakano, Y.; Asada, K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol. 1981, 22, 867–880. [Google Scholar]
  34. Pham, N.-T.; Kim, J.-G.; Jung, S. Differential Antioxidant Responses and Perturbed Porphyrin Biosynthesis after Exposure to Oxyfluorfen and Methyl Viologen in Oryza sativa. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 16529–16544. [Google Scholar]
  35. Lee, B.-R.; Kim, K.-Y.; Jung, W.-J.; Avice, J.-C.; Ourry, A.; Kim, T.-H. Peroxidases and Lignification in Relation to the Intensity of Water-Deficit Stress in White Clover (Trifolium repens L.). J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 1271–1279. [Google Scholar]
  36. Muneer, S.; Jeong, H.K.; Park, Y.G.; Jeong, B.R. Proteomic Analysis of Aphid-Resistant and -Sensitive Rose (Rosa hybrida) Cultivars at Two Developmental Stages. Proteomes 2018, 6, 25. [Google Scholar]
  37. Muneer, S.; Soundararajan, P.; Jeong, B.R. Proteomic and Antioxidant Analysis Elucidates the Underlying Mechanism of Tolerance to Hyperhydricity Stress in In Vitro Shoot Cultures of Dianthus caryophyllus. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2016, 35, 667–679. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hedrich, R.; Shabala, S. Stomata in a Saline World. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2018, 46, 87–95. [Google Scholar]
  39. Zhu, X.; Cao, Q.; Sun, L.; Yang, X.; Yang, W.; Zhang, H. Stomatal Conductance and Morphology of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Wheat Plants Response to Elevated CO2 and NaCl Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1363. [Google Scholar]
  40. Piñero, M.C.; Houdusse, F.; Garcia-Mina, J.M.; Garnica, M.; del Amor, F.M. Regulation of Hormonal Responses of Sweet Pepper as Affected by Salinity and Elevated CO2concentration. Physiol. Plant. 2013, 151, 375–389. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  41. Gamage, D.; Thompson, M.; Sutherland, M.; Hirotsu, N.; Makino, A.; Seneweera, S. New Insights into the Cellular Mechanisms of Plant Growth at Elevated Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 41, 1233–1246. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Liu, Y.; He, Z.; Xie, Y.; Su, L.; Zhang, R.; Wang, H.; Li, C.; Long, S. Drought Resistance Mechanisms of Phedimus aizoon L. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Aouz, A.; Khan, I.; Chattha, M.B.; Ahmad, S.; Ali, M.; Ali, I.; Ali, A.; Alqahtani, F.M.; Hashem, M.; Albishi, T.S.; et al. Silicon Induces Heat and Salinity Tolerance in Wheat by Increasing Antioxidant Activities, Photosynthetic Activity, Nutrient Homeostasis, and Osmo-Protectant Synthesis. Plants 2023, 12, 2606. [Google Scholar]
  44. Akhter, M.S.; Noreen, S.; Ummara, U.; Aqeel, M.; Saleem, N.; Ahmed, M.M.; Mahmood, S.; Athar, H.-u.-R.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Kaushik, P.; et al. Silicon-Induced Mitigation of NaCl Stress in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), Associated with Enhanced Enzymatic and Non-Enzymatic Antioxidant Activities. Plants 2022, 11, 2379. [Google Scholar]
  45. El Moukhtari, A.; Carol, P.; Mouradi, M.; Savoure, A.; Farissi, M. Silicon Improves Physiological, Biochemical, and Morphological Adaptations of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) during Salinity Stress. Symbiosis 2021, 85, 305–324. [Google Scholar]
  46. Farouk, S.; Elhindi, K.M.; Alotaibi, M.A. Silicon Supplementation Mitigates Salinity Stress on Ocimum basilicum L. via Improving Water Balance, Ion Homeostasis, and Antioxidant Defense System. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 206, 111396. [Google Scholar]
  47. Pinedo-Guerrero, Z.H.; Cadenas-Pliego, G.; Ortega-Ortiz, H.; González-Morales, S.; Benavides-Mendoza, A.; Valdés-Reyna, J.; Juárez-Maldonado, A. Form of Silica Improves Yield, Fruit Quality and Antioxidant Defense System of Tomato Plants under Salt Stress. Agriculture 2020, 10, 367. [Google Scholar]
  48. Laxa, M.; Liebthal, M.; Telman, W.; Chibani, K.; Dietz, K.-J. The Role of the Plant Antioxidant System in Drought Tolerance. Antioxidants 2019, 8, 94. [Google Scholar]
  49. Xu, G.; Fan, X.; Miller, A.J. Plant Nitrogen Assimilation and Use Efficiency. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63, 153–182. [Google Scholar]
  50. Ahmad, S.; Wang, G.-Y.; Muhammad, I.; Chi, Y.-X.; Zeeshan, M.; Nasar, J.; Zhou, X.-B. Interactive Effects of Melatonin and Nitrogen Improve Drought Tolerance of Maize Seedlings by Regulating Growth and Physiochemical Attributes. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 359. [Google Scholar]
  51. Ashraf, M.; Shahzad, S.M.; Imtiaz, M.; Rizwan, M.S. Salinity Effects on Nitrogen Metabolism in Plants—Focusing on the Activities of Nitrogen Metabolizing Enzymes: A Review. J. Plant Nutr. 2018, 41, 1065–1081. [Google Scholar]
  52. Shao, Q.S.; Shu, S.; Du, J.; Xing, W.W.; Guo, S.R.; Sun, J. Effects of NaCl Stress on Nitrogen Metabolism of Cucumber Seedlings. Russ. J. Plant Physiol. 2015, 62, 638–646. [Google Scholar]
  53. Irani, S.; Todd, C.D. Ureide Metabolism under Abiotic Stress in Arabidopsis Thaliana. J. Plant Physiol. 2016, 199, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Cui, J.; Zhang, E.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Q. Silicon Alleviates Salinity Stress in Licorice (Glycyrrhiza uralensis) by Regulating Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 1115. [Google Scholar]
  55. Conceição, S.S.; de Oliveira Neto, C.F.; Marques, E.C.; Barbosa, A.V.C.; Galvão, J.R.; de Oliveira, T.B.; Okumura, R.S.; da Silva Martins, J.T.; Costa, T.C.; Gomes-Filho, E. Silicon Modulates the Activity of Antioxidant Enzymes and Nitrogen Compounds in Sunflower Plants under Salt Stress. Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 2019, 65, 1237–1247. [Google Scholar]
  56. Zhu, Y.-X.; Xu, X.-B.; Hu, Y.-H.; Han, W.-H.; Yin, J.-L.; Li, H.-L.; Gong, H.-J. Silicon Improves Salt Tolerance by Increasing Root Water Uptake in Cucumis sativus L. Plant Cell Rep. 2015, 34, 1629–1646. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  57. Zhu, Z.; Wei, G.; Li, J.; Qian, Q.; Yu, J. Silicon Alleviates Salt Stress and Increases Antioxidant Enzymes Activity in Leaves of Salt-Stressed Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). Plant Sci. 2004, 167, 527–533. [Google Scholar]
  58. Alzahrani, Y.; Kuşvuran, A.; Alharby, H.F.; Kuşvuran, S.; Rady, M.M. The Defensive Role of Silicon in Wheat against Stress Conditions Induced by Drought, Salinity or Cadmium. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2018, 154, 187–196. [Google Scholar]
  59. Shah, K.; Nahakpam, S. Heat Exposure Alters the Expression of SOD, POD, APX and CAT Isozymes and Mitigates Low Cadmium Toxicity in Seedlings of Sensitive and Tolerant Rice Cultivars. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 57, 106–113. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Yousif, A.; Ali, A.; Eldeen, M.; Ibrahim, H.; Zhou, G.; Eltyb, N.; Nimir, A.; Mohammed, A.; Elsiddig, I.; Jiao, X.; et al. Gibberellic acid and nitrogen efficiently protect early seedlings growth stage from salt stress damage in Sorghum. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 6672. [Google Scholar]
  61. Singh, P.; Kumar, V.; Sharma, J.; Saini, S.; Sharma, P.; Kumar, S.; Sinhmar, Y.; Kumar, D.; Sharma, A. Silicon Supplementation Alleviates the Salinity Stress in Wheat Plants by Enhancing the Plant Water Status, Photosynthetic Pigments, Proline Content and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities. Plants 2022, 11, 2525. [Google Scholar]
  62. Abdelaal, K.A.A.; Mazrou, Y.S.A.; Hafez, Y.M. Silicon Foliar Application Mitigates Salt Stress in Sweet Pepper Plants by Enhancing Water Status, Photosynthesis, Antioxidant Enzyme Activity and Fruit Yield. Plants 2020, 9, 733. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  63. Shekari, F.; Abbasi, A.; Mustafavi, S.H. Effect of silicon and selenium on enzymatic changes and productivity of dill in saline condition. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 2017, 16, 367–374. [Google Scholar]
  64. Alam, P.; Balawi, T.A.; Qadir, S.U.; Ahmad, P. Gibberellic Acid and Silicon Ameliorate NaCl Toxicity in Brassica juncea: Possible Involvement of Antioxidant System and Ascorbate-Glutathione Cycle. Plants 2023, 12, 1210. [Google Scholar]
  65. Moura, J.C.; Bonine, C.A.; de Oliveira Fernandes, V.J.; Dornelas, M.C.; Mazzafera, P. Abiotic and biotic stresses and changes in the lignin content and composition in plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2010, 52, 360–376. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  66. Jbir, N.; Ammar, S.; Chaïbi, W.; Ayadi, A. PAL activity and ionic contents of two wheat species differing in their sensitivity to NaCl, in response to salt stress. J. Trace Microprobe Tech. 2001, 19, 447–450. [Google Scholar]
  67. Sanchez-Aguayo, I.; Rodriguez-Galan, J.M.; Garcia, R.; Torreblanca, J.; Pardo, J.M. Salt Stress Enhances Xylem Development and Expression of S-Adenosyl-l-Methionine Synthase in Lignifying Tissues of Tomato Plants. Planta 2004, 220, 278–285. [Google Scholar]
  68. Chaves, M.M.; Flexas, J.; Pinheiro, C. Photosynthesis under Drought and Salt Stress: Regulation Mechanisms from Whole Plant to Cell. Ann. Bot. 2008, 103, 551–560. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Nwugo, C.C.; Huerta, A.J. The Effect of Silicon on the Leaf Proteome of Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Plants under Cadmium-Stress. J. Proteome Res. 2010, 10, 518–528. [Google Scholar]
  70. Lee, H.-J.; Park, O.K. Lipases Associated with Plant Defense against Pathogens. Plant Sci. 2019, 279, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  71. Alscher, R.G. Role of Superoxide Dismutases (SODs) in Controlling Oxidative Stress in Plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53, 1331–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Hanano, A.; Burcklen, M.; Flenet, M.; Ivancich, A.; Louwagie, M.; Garin, J.; Blée, E. Plant Seed Peroxygenase Is an Original Heme-Oxygenase with an EF-Hand Calcium Binding Motif. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 33140–33151. [Google Scholar]
  73. Kieffer, P.; Dommes, J.; Hoffmann, L.; Hausman, J.-F.; Renaut, J. Quantitative Changes in Protein Expression of Cadmium-Exposed Poplar Plants. Proteomics 2008, 8, 2514–2530. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  74. Bailey-Serres, J.; Voesenek, L.A.C.J. Flooding Stress: Acclimations and Genetic Diversity. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 313–339. [Google Scholar]
  75. Chiu, J.; Dawes, I.W. Redox Control of Cell Proliferation. Trends Cell Biol. 2012, 22, 592–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Kozuleva, M.; Goss, T.; Twachtmann, M.; Rudi, K.; Trapka, J.; Selinski, J.; Ivanov, B.; Garapati, P.; Steinhoff, H.-J.; Hase, T.; et al. Ferredoxin: NADP(H) Oxidoreductase Abundance and Location Influences Redox Poise and Stress Tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2016, 172, 1480–1493. [Google Scholar]
  77. Tola, A.J.; Jaballi, A.; Germain, H.; Missihoun, T.D. Recent Development on Plant Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Enzymes and Their Functions in Plant Development and Stress Signaling. Genes 2020, 12, 51. [Google Scholar]
  78. Coskun, D.; Deshmukh, R.; Shivaraj, S.M.; Isenring, P.; Bélanger, R.R. Lsi2: A Black Box in Plant Silicon Transport. Plant Soil 2021, 466, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  79. Bokor, B.; Bokorová, S.; Ondoš, S.; Švubová, R.; Lukačová, Z.; Hýblová, M.; Szemes, T.; Lux, A. Ionome and Expression Level of Si Transporter Genes (Lsi1, Lsi2, and Lsi6) Affected by Zn and Si Interaction in Maize. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2014, 22, 6800–6811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Sun, H.; Duan, Y.; Qi, X.; Zhang, L.; Huo, H.; Gong, H. Isolation and Functional Characterization of CsLsi2, a Cucumber Silicon Efflux Transporter Gene. Ann. Bot. 2018, 122, 641–648. [Google Scholar]
  81. Hosseini, S.A.; Maillard, A.; Hajirezaei, M.R.; Ali, N.; Schwarzenberg, A.; Jamois, F.; Yvin, J.-C. Induction of Barley Silicon Transporter HvLsi1 and HvLsi2, Increased Silicon Concentration in the Shoot and Regulated Starch and ABA Homeostasis under Osmotic Stress and Concomitant Potassium Deficiency. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Munns, R.; Tester, M. Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2008, 59, 651–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Kumar, G.; Purty, R.S.; Sharma, M.P.; Singla-Pareek, S.L.; Pareek, A. Physiological Responses among Brassica Species under Salinity Stress Show Strong Correlation with Transcript Abundance for SOS Pathway-Related Genes. J. Plant Physiol. 2009, 166, 507–520. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  84. Shi, H.; Quintero, F.J.; Pardo, J.M.; Zhu, J.-K. The Putative Plasma Membrane Na+/H+ Antiporter SOS1 Controls Long-Distance Na+ Transport in Plants. Plant Cell 2002, 14, 465–477. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Bosnic, P.; Bosnic, D.; Jasnic, J.; Nikolic, M. Silicon Mediates Sodium Transport and Partitioning in Maize under Moderate Salt Stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2018, 155, 681–687. [Google Scholar]
  86. Gupta, B.K.; Sahoo, K.K.; Anwar, K.; Nongpiur, R.C.; Deshmukh, R.; Pareek, A.; Singla-Pareek, S.L. Silicon Nutrition Stimulates Salt-Overly Sensitive (SOS) Pathway to Enhance Salinity Stress Tolerance and Yield in Rice. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2021, 166, 593–604. [Google Scholar]
  87. Yang, Q.; Chen, Z.-Z.; Zhou, X.-F.; Yin, H.-B.; Li, X.; Xin, X.-F.; Hong, X.-H.; Zhu, J.-K.; Gong, Z. Overexpression of SOS (Salt Overly Sensitive) Genes Increases Salt Tolerance in Transgenic Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2009, 2, 22–31. [Google Scholar]
  88. Kim, J.H.; Nguyen, N.H.; Jeong, C.Y.; Nguyen, N.T.; Hong, S.-W.; Lee, H. Loss of the R2R3 MYB, AtMyb73, Causes Hyper-Induction of the SOS1 and SOS3 Genes in Response to High Salinity in Arabidopsis. J. Plant Physiol. 2013, 170, 1461–1465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ma, Y.; Wang, L.; Wang, J.; Zhong, Y.; Cheng, Z.-M. (Max) Isolation and Expression Analysis of Salt Overly Sensitive Gene Family in Grapevine (Vitis vinifera) in Response to Salt and PEG Stress. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0212666. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Representative image of stomatal opening/closing of mung bean (Vigna radiata) under Si supply (5 mM) and salinity stress (a) Control (T1) (b) –NaCl + Si (T2) (c) 10 mM NaCl/-Si (T3) (d) 10 mM NaCl/+Si (T4) (e) 20 mM NaCl/-Si (T5) (f) 20 mM NaCl/+Si (T6) (g) 50 mM NaCl/-Si (T7) (h) 50 mM NaCl/+Si (T8) for a duration of 10 days.
Figure 1. Representative image of stomatal opening/closing of mung bean (Vigna radiata) under Si supply (5 mM) and salinity stress (a) Control (T1) (b) –NaCl + Si (T2) (c) 10 mM NaCl/-Si (T3) (d) 10 mM NaCl/+Si (T4) (e) 20 mM NaCl/-Si (T5) (f) 20 mM NaCl/+Si (T6) (g) 50 mM NaCl/-Si (T7) (h) 50 mM NaCl/+Si (T8) for a duration of 10 days.
Agriculture 13 01493 g001
Figure 2. Changes in content of the (A) total soluble protein, (B) total soluble sugars, and (C) total phenolic contents of mung bean (Vigna radiata) under Si supply (5 mM) and salinity stress: (a) Control (T1), (b) –NaCl + Si (T2), (c) 10 mM NaCl/-Si (T3), (d) 10 mM NaCl/+Si (T4), (e) 20 mM NaCl/-Si (T5), (f) 20 mM NaCl/+Si (T6), (g) 50 mM NaCl/-Si (T7), and (h) 50 mM NaCl/+Si (T8) for a duration of 10 days. Vertical bars indicate mean ± SE of the mean for n = 4. Means denoted by different letter are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to Tukey’s studentized range test.
Figure 2. Changes in content of the (A) total soluble protein, (B) total soluble sugars, and (C) total phenolic contents of mung bean (Vigna radiata) under Si supply (5 mM) and salinity stress: (a) Control (T1), (b) –NaCl + Si (T2), (c) 10 mM NaCl/-Si (T3), (d) 10 mM NaCl/+Si (T4), (e) 20 mM NaCl/-Si (T5), (f) 20 mM NaCl/+Si (T6), (g) 50 mM NaCl/-Si (T7), and (h) 50 mM NaCl/+Si (T8) for a duration of 10 days. Vertical bars indicate mean ± SE of the mean for n = 4. Means denoted by different letter are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to Tukey’s studentized range test.
Agriculture 13 01493 g002
Figure 3. Changes in NR activity for the (A) leaves and (B) roots of mung bean (Vigna radiata) under Si supply (5 mM) and salinity stress: (a) control (T1), (b) –NaCl + Si (T2), (c) 10 mM NaCl/-Si (T3), (d) 10 mM NaCl/+Si (T4), (e) 20 mM NaCl/-Si (T5), (f) 20 mM NaCl/+Si (T6), (g) 50 mM NaCl/-Si (T7), and (h) 50 mM NaCl/+Si (T8) for a duration of 10 days. Vertical bars indicate mean ± SE of the mean for n = 4. Means denoted by a different letter are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to the Tukey’s studentized range test.
Figure 3. Changes in NR activity for the (A) leaves and (B) roots of mung bean (Vigna radiata) under Si supply (5 mM) and salinity stress: (a) control (T1), (b) –NaCl + Si (T2), (c) 10 mM NaCl/-Si (T3), (d) 10 mM NaCl/+Si (T4), (e) 20 mM NaCl/-Si (T5), (f) 20 mM NaCl/+Si (T6), (g) 50 mM NaCl/-Si (T7), and (h) 50 mM NaCl/+Si (T8) for a duration of 10 days. Vertical bars indicate mean ± SE of the mean for n = 4. Means denoted by a different letter are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to the Tukey’s studentized range test.
Agriculture 13 01493 g003
Figure 4. Changes in Si content of (A) leaves and (B) roots of mung bean (Vigna radiata) under Si supply (5 mM) and salinity stress: (a) control (T1), (b) –NaCl+Si (T2), (c) 10 mM NaCl/-Si (T3), (d) 10 mM NaCl/+Si (T4), (e) 20 mM NaCl/-Si (T5), (f) 20 mM NaCl/+Si (T6), (g) 50 mM NaCl/-Si (T7), and (h) 50 mM NaCl/+Si (T8) for a duration of 10 days. Vertical bars indicate mean ± SE of the mean for n = 4. Means denoted by s different letter are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to the Tukey’s studentized range test.
Figure 4. Changes in Si content of (A) leaves and (B) roots of mung bean (Vigna radiata) under Si supply (5 mM) and salinity stress: (a) control (T1), (b) –NaCl+Si (T2), (c) 10 mM NaCl/-Si (T3), (d) 10 mM NaCl/+Si (T4), (e) 20 mM NaCl/-Si (T5), (f) 20 mM NaCl/+Si (T6), (g) 50 mM NaCl/-Si (T7), and (h) 50 mM NaCl/+Si (T8) for a duration of 10 days. Vertical bars indicate mean ± SE of the mean for n = 4. Means denoted by s different letter are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to the Tukey’s studentized range test.
Agriculture 13 01493 g004
Figure 5. Changes in the content of (A) H2O2 and (B) O2 of mung bean (Vigna radiata) under Si supply (5 mM) and salinity stress: (a) control (T1), (b) –NaCl + Si (T2), (c) 10 mM NaCl/-Si (T3), (d) 10 mM NaCl/+Si (T4), (e) 20 mM NaCl/-Si (T5), (f) 20 mM NaCl/+Si (T6), (g) 50 mM NaCl/-Si (T7), and (h) 50 mM NaCl/+Si (T8) for a duration of 10 days. Vertical bars indicate mean ± SE of the mean for n = 4. Means denoted by a different letter are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to the Tukey’s studentized range test.
Figure 5. Changes in the content of (A) H2O2 and (B) O2 of mung bean (Vigna radiata) under Si supply (5 mM) and salinity stress: (a) control (T1), (b) –NaCl + Si (T2), (c) 10 mM NaCl/-Si (T3), (d) 10 mM NaCl/+Si (T4), (e) 20 mM NaCl/-Si (T5), (f) 20 mM NaCl/+Si (T6), (g) 50 mM NaCl/-Si (T7), and (h) 50 mM NaCl/+Si (T8) for a duration of 10 days. Vertical bars indicate mean ± SE of the mean for n = 4. Means denoted by a different letter are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to the Tukey’s studentized range test.
Agriculture 13 01493 g005
Figure 6. Changes in the antioxidant enzyme activity and isozyme profiles of (A,D) superoxide dismutase, (B,D) ascorbate peroxidase, and (C,D) catalase of mung bean (Vigna radiata) under Si supply (5 mM) and salinity stress: (a) control (T1), (b) –NaCl+Si (T2), (c) 10 mM NaCl/-Si (T3), (d) 10 mM NaCl/+Si (T4), (e) 20 mM NaCl/-Si (T5), (f) 20 mM NaCl/+Si (T6), (g) 50 mM NaCl/-Si (T7), and (h) 50 mM NaCl/+Si (T8) for a duration of 10 days. Vertical bars indicate mean ± SE of the mean for n = 4. Means denoted by a different letter are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to Tukey’s studentized range test.
Figure 6. Changes in the antioxidant enzyme activity and isozyme profiles of (A,D) superoxide dismutase, (B,D) ascorbate peroxidase, and (C,D) catalase of mung bean (Vigna radiata) under Si supply (5 mM) and salinity stress: (a) control (T1), (b) –NaCl+Si (T2), (c) 10 mM NaCl/-Si (T3), (d) 10 mM NaCl/+Si (T4), (e) 20 mM NaCl/-Si (T5), (f) 20 mM NaCl/+Si (T6), (g) 50 mM NaCl/-Si (T7), and (h) 50 mM NaCl/+Si (T8) for a duration of 10 days. Vertical bars indicate mean ± SE of the mean for n = 4. Means denoted by a different letter are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to Tukey’s studentized range test.
Agriculture 13 01493 g006
Figure 7. Profiles of peroxidase isozymes: (A) BPOX, (B) POD, and (C) SPOX of mung bean (Vigna radiata) under Si supply (5 mM) and salinity stress: (a) control (T1), (b) –NaCl+Si (T2), (c) 10 mM NaCl/-Si (T3), (d) 10 mM NaCl/+Si (T4), (e) 20 mM NaCl/-Si (T5), (f) 20 mM NaCl/+Si (T6), (g) 50 mM NaCl/-Si (T7), and (h) 50 mM NaCl/+Si (T8) for a duration of 10 days.
Figure 7. Profiles of peroxidase isozymes: (A) BPOX, (B) POD, and (C) SPOX of mung bean (Vigna radiata) under Si supply (5 mM) and salinity stress: (a) control (T1), (b) –NaCl+Si (T2), (c) 10 mM NaCl/-Si (T3), (d) 10 mM NaCl/+Si (T4), (e) 20 mM NaCl/-Si (T5), (f) 20 mM NaCl/+Si (T6), (g) 50 mM NaCl/-Si (T7), and (h) 50 mM NaCl/+Si (T8) for a duration of 10 days.
Agriculture 13 01493 g007
Figure 8. Representative image of protein profiles (SDS-PAGE) of mung bean (Vigna radiata) under Si supply (5 mM) and salinity stress: (a) control (T1), (b) –NaCl+Si (T2), (c) 10 mM NaCl/-Si (T3), (d) 10 mM NaCl/+Si (T4), (e) 20 mM NaCl/-Si (T5), (f) 20 mM NaCl/+Si (T6), (g) 50 mM NaCl/-Si (T7), and (h) 50 mM NaCl/+Si (T8) for a duration of 10 days. Differentially expressed bands excised for protein identification by LC−MS/MS are marked by arrows.
Figure 8. Representative image of protein profiles (SDS-PAGE) of mung bean (Vigna radiata) under Si supply (5 mM) and salinity stress: (a) control (T1), (b) –NaCl+Si (T2), (c) 10 mM NaCl/-Si (T3), (d) 10 mM NaCl/+Si (T4), (e) 20 mM NaCl/-Si (T5), (f) 20 mM NaCl/+Si (T6), (g) 50 mM NaCl/-Si (T7), and (h) 50 mM NaCl/+Si (T8) for a duration of 10 days. Differentially expressed bands excised for protein identification by LC−MS/MS are marked by arrows.
Agriculture 13 01493 g008
Figure 9. Comparative analysis of the proteome profiles between the treatments. (A) Functional classification of the proteins identified by Gene ontology analysis and (B) Venn diagram illustration of the up, down, or non-significantly regulated proteins.
Figure 9. Comparative analysis of the proteome profiles between the treatments. (A) Functional classification of the proteins identified by Gene ontology analysis and (B) Venn diagram illustration of the up, down, or non-significantly regulated proteins.
Agriculture 13 01493 g009
Figure 10. Analysis of the protein identified for protein−protein interaction by STRING 9.1 of mung bean (Vigna radiata) under Si supply (5 mM) and salinity stress.
Figure 10. Analysis of the protein identified for protein−protein interaction by STRING 9.1 of mung bean (Vigna radiata) under Si supply (5 mM) and salinity stress.
Agriculture 13 01493 g010
Figure 11. The relative expression level of the Lsi and SOS-related genes: (A) Lsi1, (B) Lsi2, (C) Lsi3, (D) SOS1, (E) SOS2, and (F) SOS3 of mung bean (Vigna radiata) under Si supply (5 mM) and salinity stress: (a) control (M1), (b) –NaCl + Si (M2), (c) 50 mM NaCl/-Si (M3), (d) 50 mM NaCl/+Si (M4) for a duration of 10 days. Vertical bars indicate mean ± SE of the mean for n = 4. Means denoted by a different letter are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to Tukey’s studentized range test.
Figure 11. The relative expression level of the Lsi and SOS-related genes: (A) Lsi1, (B) Lsi2, (C) Lsi3, (D) SOS1, (E) SOS2, and (F) SOS3 of mung bean (Vigna radiata) under Si supply (5 mM) and salinity stress: (a) control (M1), (b) –NaCl + Si (M2), (c) 50 mM NaCl/-Si (M3), (d) 50 mM NaCl/+Si (M4) for a duration of 10 days. Vertical bars indicate mean ± SE of the mean for n = 4. Means denoted by a different letter are significantly different at p ≤ 0.05 according to Tukey’s studentized range test.
Agriculture 13 01493 g011
Table 1. Primer sequences used for the RT-PCR analysis.
Table 1. Primer sequences used for the RT-PCR analysis.
GeneForward Sequence
(5′---------3′)
Reverse Sequence
(5′---------3′)
Lsi-1ATGGAGAGTGAAGGAGGGAATTAGAGGGTAACACATTGTT
Lsi-2CGATGACTTTGCCCATCGTGGCAATATGAACCTCGTCCGC
Lsi-3TATTTYTTCCTGGCCAACCTTTAAGCTATAGATGAGGGGG
SOS1GCCAGCTATAAGCTAAGCACGCAATCCCTAAAGCAAGACC
SOS2GCATTCATCGTGCAGCATCGTATAGTCTCGCCATCACCTC
SOS3ACGAAGAATTTCAGCTCGCTCACCTAACTCGATGACTCC
ActinATCCTCCGTCTTGACCTTGTGTCCGTCAGGCAACTCAT
Table 2. Identification of differentially-expressed proteins by LC/MS-MS in mung bean (Vigna radiata).
Table 2. Identification of differentially-expressed proteins by LC/MS-MS in mung bean (Vigna radiata).
Band no.Protein NamePlant SpeciesAccession NumberProtein ScoreBiological Function
1AFumarylacetoacetaseCephalotus follicularisA0A1Q3BBE128Metal ion binding, chaperone binding
Uncharacterized proteinApolygus lucorumA0A6A4KDN926Integral component of membrane
Protein kinase domain-containing proteinRhizophagus irregularisU9V62226ATP binding, protein kinase activity
1BRibulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chainAlfaroa guanacastensisA0A068L6A443Photorespiration, photosynthesis
5B protein like proteinArabidopsis thalianaQ9SUZ230Stress response
DHA1 family multidrug resistance protein-like MFS transporter Paenibacillus prosopidisA0A368W0U829Transmembrane transport
1CRibulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chainSoleirolia soleiroliiA0A0F7C9I4101Photosynthesis
Uracil permeasePaludibacterium purpuratumA0A4R7BCH939Transmembrane transport
Putative metallothionein expression activatorDiaporthe ampelinaA0A0G2HMQ035Metal binding
1DRibulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chainTrifolium repensA0A023HPA0186Photosynthesis
Peptidyl-tRNA hydrolaseGlycomyces artemisiaeA0A2T0UIK145Translation
FlavodoxinEggerthella lentaA0A369MMS042Metal binding
1ERibulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chainBerchemia lineataA0A7L8XJV8223Photosynthesis
Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chainPycnarrhena caulifloraB3FWZ0223Photosynthesis
Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chainSoleirolia soleiroliiA0A0F7C9I4193Photosynthesis
1FBiosynthetic peptidoglycan transglycosylaseXanthomonas arboricolaA0A7W9QLL530Peptidoglycan synthesis
LRRNT_2 domain-containing proteinQuercus lobataA0A7N2MTJ230Transmembrane transport
Cell division protein FtsQ Aeromonas veroniiA0A6S4V1U829Cell division
1GRibulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chainAgathis borneensisQ9MVV361Photosynthesis
Lysine-specific demethylase 3ACapsicum chinenseA0A2G3CFW633Methylation
Glucose-1-phosphate adenylyl transferaseRhodospirillaceae bacteriumA0A2E5LIM131Glycogen biosynthetic process
1HLysozymeEnterobacter phage vB_EkoM5VNA0A7I8HQY332Defense response, catabolic process
Putative N-glycosyltransferase Frankia alniQ0RGF932Transferase activity
probable transcription factor KAN4Juglans regiaA0A2I4EQ2731Transcription regulation
1IRibulose bisphosphate carboxylase small subunitArachis duranensisA0A6P4D9J694Photosynthesis
Uncharacterized proteinMarchantia polymorphaA0A2R6WJ3031NIL
Uncharacterized proteinPseudocercospora fijiensisM2ZM5131NIL
2ARibulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain Trifolium repensA0A023HPA039Photosynthesis
Uncharacterized proteinSetaria italicaK4A22832NIL
Endonuclease/exonuclease/phosphatase family metal-dependent hydrolaseRhizobium pisiA0A7W5BJJ327Endonuclease activity
2BtRNA wybutosine-synthesizing protein 4Trichoderma arundinaceumA0A395NCK0 38Endonuclease activity
ABC-type branched-subunit amino acid transport system substrate-binding proteinStreptomyces sp. BK022A0A4Q7Z6F634Transmembrane transport
TPX2 domain-containing protein Marchantia polymorpha subsp. ruderalisA0A176W32933Kinase activity, cell cycle/division
2CUncharacterized proteinKribbella sp. VKM Ac-2527A0A4R6KBE535NIL
CellulaseBosea sp. AK1A0A542B87330Metabolic process
Multiple sugar transport system permease proteinKribbella sp. VKM Ac-2569A0A4Q7QE40 29Transmembrane transport
2DRibulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chainKayea stylosaQ8MCX9213Photosynthesis
Precorrin-2 dehydrogenaseWinogradskyella arenosiA0A368ZJY753Oxidoreductase
Uncharacterized proteinKlebsormidium nitensA0A1Y1HR3747Transmembrane transport
Haemolysin activation/secretion proteinCupriavidus plantarumA0A316F4A643Protein transport
2ERibulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain Cornus eydeanaQ2TV61143Photosynthesis
Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain Crossostylis grandifloraA0ZQX2120Photosynthesis
AcyltransferaseTardiphaga robiniaeA0A7G6TUN441Transmembrane transport, transferase activity
2FUncharacterized proteinSalix brachistaA0A5N5L7N033Electron transport
Peptide hydrolaseTrichoderma arundinaceumA0A395NEC733Catabolic process
Shugoshin_C domain-containing proteinKalanchoe fedtschenkoiA0A7N0U75833Cell cycle/division
2GRibulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chainAloe vera (Aloe)Q6VW1382Photosynthesis/photorespiration
Nitronate monooxygenaseParaburkholderia unamaeA0A328WWJ833Nitronate monooxygenase activity
3-deoxy-7-phosphoheptulonate synthasePaenibacillus peoriaeA0A0K2F5Q830Metabolic process
2HSuperoxide dismutasePhaseolus lunatusQ3S61446Stress response
Histidine kinaseMassilia aureaA0A7W9U5Y534Signaling, protein modification process
Positive regulator of purine utilizationPyrenophora seminiperda CCB06A0A3M7MHM234Transcription, metal binding
2IRibulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chainKalanchoe fedtschenkoiA0A7N0TKL3141Photosynthesis/photorespiration
UDP-N-acetylglucosamine transferase subunit ALG13Botryotinia fuckelianaA0A384JFM830Glycosylation, metabolic process
2-keto-3-deoxy-L-fuconate dehydrogenase Rhizobium sp. PP-F2F-G48A0A4R1X10928Oxidoreductase
3ARibulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chainTrifolium repensA0A023HPA088Photosynthesis/photorespiration
DUF4328 domain-containing proteinStreptomyces violarusA0A7W4ZSR641Transmembrane transport
PAS domain S-box-containing proteinMucilaginibacter sp. E4BP6A0A7Y9HYI938Signaling, kinase activity
3BFumarylacetoacetaseCephalotus follicularisA0A1Q3BBE126Catabolic process
Protein kinase domain-containing proteinPhaeosphaeria nodorumQ0UFQ826Transcription, phosphorylation
Uncharacterized proteinPrunus persicaA0A251QEC725Defense response
3CRibulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chainTrifolium repensA0A023HPA0 96Photosynthesis/photorespiration
Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chainSpirodela polyrhizaA0A0F7EWB696Photosynthesis/photorespiration
Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chainCladopus austro-osumiensisO0304693Photosynthesis/photorespiration
3DRibulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chainVanilla planifoliaA0A0D3M9U3151Photosynthesis/photorespiration
Uncharacterized proteinLactuca sativaA0A2J6KPN633Protein auto phosphorylation
ATPase subunit of ABC transporter with duplicated ATPase domainsRhizobium sp. BK049A0A7W5KML031ATP binding
3EUncharacterized proteinChara brauniiA0A388KU1531Polymerase activity, DNA integration
ATP-binding proteinRaoultella ornithinolyticaA0A225U1S129ATP binding
Methyltransferase family proteinCellulomonas sp. PhB143A0A3N2JFI229Methylation
3FChromosome partition protein SmcCohnella lupiniA0A3D9IW8235DNA replication, chromosome condensation
Long-chain acyl-CoA synthetase Streptomyces sp. BK239A0A4Q7XQB834Aspartic-type endopeptidase activity
SOS response UmuD proteinArthrobacter sp. SLBN-122A0A542G4S132SOS response, DNA repair, transcription
Diacylglycerol kinase iotaAegilops tauschiiN1QUQ432Defense response
3GFructose-bisphosphataseBrassica napus (Rape)A0A078FJK545Metabolic process
Putative phosphoketolase Fusarium culmorumA0A2T4H18838Carbohydrate metabolic process
Ferredoxin-NADP reductaseXanthomonas campestrisA0A7W6KYF234Oxidoreductase
3HSuperoxide dismutaseGlycine maxQ71UA160Stress response
GntR family transcriptional regulatorRathayibacter sp. PhB93A0A3N1NHP137Transcription
Putative phospho-2-dehydro-3-deoxyheptonate aldolase Phaeomoniella chlamydosporaA0A0G2EP8136Amino acid biosynthesis, metal binding
3IRibulose bisphosphate carboxylase small subunit Arachis duranensisA0A6P4D9J680Photosynthesis/photorespiration
Uncharacterized proteinPunica granatumA0A218W2T931Transcription
UDP-N-acetylglucosamine transferase subunit ALG13Botryotinia fuckelianaA0A384JFM831Protein glycosylation, lipid metabolic process
6ARibulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain Psychotria sp. PSN 1D6C638118Photosynthesis/photorespiration
Putative oxidoreductase, NAD(P)-binding domainFrankia alniQ0RJX833Oxidoreductase
Phosphomethylpyrimidine synthaseHalomonas songnenensisA0A2T0V5C031Metabolic process
6BSignal recognition particle subunit SRP68Klebsormidium nitensA0A1Y1IMJ034Transport
Pseudouridine synthase Azospirillum brasilenseA0A560AZY832Ribosome biogenesis
Histidine kinasePseudomonas putidaA0A7D6A9J031Kinase activity
6CAlpha-mannosidasePenicillium expansumA0A0A2JQF232Metabolic process
Cytochrome c domain-containing proteinNitrospirillum amazonenseA0A560G15531Metal binding
Ubiquitin-like domain-containing proteinLupinus angustifoliusA0A1J7GL5431Cell cycle
PeroxidaseHibiscus syriacusA0A6A3AV0728Stress response
PNP_UDP_1 domain-containing proteinFusarium poaeA0A1B8A85927Metabolic process
6DRibulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain Trichocladus crinitusO98531226Photosynthesis/photorespiration
Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain Ceriops tagalO20035201Photosynthesis/photorespiration
Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain Trifolium aureumA0A023HQ08196Photosynthesis/photorespiration
6EFructose-bisphosphataseBrassica napusA0A078FJK545Sucrose biosynthesis
Ferredoxin-NADP reductaseXanthomonas campestrisA0A7W6KYF234Oxidoreductase, metal binding
LacI family transcriptional regulatorCohnella phaseoliA0A3D9INY333Transcription
GDSL esterase/lipaseNoccaea caerulescensA0A1J3D4B7 32Lipid metabolic process
6FFructose-bisphosphate aldolaseSpinacia oleraceaA0A0K9QFF986Glycolytic process
GH43 family beta-xylosidaseNovosphingobium sp. PhB57A0A4R3T5L432Carbohydrate metabolic process
Thioesterase domain-containing proteinMicrobispora sp. GKU 823A0A1V4EJK0 32Biosynthetic process
Protein kinase domain-containing proteinJatropha curcasA0A067L8H132Protein kinase activity, ATP binding
6GPhosphoinositide 5-phosphatasePenicillium italicumA0A0A2KL8939Lipid metabolic process
Amidase domain-containing proteinFusarium poaeA0A1B8AW3339Oxidoreductase
SNF2 domain-containing proteinBradyrhizobium huanghuaihaienseA0A562QI7836ATP binding, helicase activity
Acyl-CoA reductase-like NAD-dependent aldehyde dehydrogenaseHalomonas stenophilaA0A7W5EU6736Oxidoreductase
6HSuperoxide dismutasePhaseolus lunatusQ3S61495Stress response, metal ion binding
Putative phospho-2-dehydro-3-deoxyheptonate aldolasePhaeomoniella chlamydosporaA0A0G2EP81 32Amino acid biosynthesis
Formate dehydrogenase subunit alphaCitrobacter freundiiA0A2S4Q6X531Formate metabolic process
Two-component system alkaline phosphatase synthesis response regulator PhoPStaphylococcus sp. AtHG25A0A318R5E031Transcription
6IRibulose bisphosphate carboxylase small subunitArachis duranensisA0A6P4D9J6 89Photosynthesis/photorespiration
Epidermal patterning factor-like proteinNicotiana tabacumA0A1S3YWQ138Cell differentiation, developmental protein
Predicted proteinHordeum vulgareF2DSS832RNA catabolic process
7ARibulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain Phalaenopsis sp. SH-2010E0D9N8146Photosynthesis/photorespiration
CopA family copper-resistance proteinSphingomonas sp. BK481A0A7W5SGK649Oxidoreductase
Protein TonBBacteroidales bacteriumA0A7Y5A3N034Protein transport
Replicative DNA helicaseCandidatus XiphinematobacterA0A0P0FJI734DNA replication
7BRibulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain Kayea stylosaQ8MCX9216Photosynthesis/photorespiration
Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain Trifolium aureumA0A023HQ08204Photosynthesis/photorespiration
Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain Crossostylis grandifloraA0ZQX2204Photosynthesis/photorespiration
7CRibulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain Mucuna sp. SH-2010E0D986263Photosynthesis/photorespiration
Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain Kayea stylosaQ8MCX9262Photosynthesis/photorespiration
Ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase large chain Adenophora liliifolioidesH6VPA5258Photosynthesis/photorespiration
7DCytochrome bo(3) ubiquinol oxidase subunit 1 Pseudomonas putidaA0A059URU445Transmembrane Transport, respiration
1-phosphatidylinositol 4-kinaseCucurbita maximaA0A6J1I6A043Lipid metabolic process, signal transduction
Protoporphyrinogen oxidase Dothistroma septosporumN1PK3632Oxidoreductase
Rho-GAP domain-containing protein Botryotinia fuckelianaA0A384JQ0030Signal transduction
7EUncharacterized proteinSorghum bicolorA0A1B6QGR037Transmembrane transport
Histidine kinaseCellulomonas cellaseaA0A7W4UJ46 37Signaling
Putative oxidoreductaseClavibacter michiganensisB0RF2537Oxidoreductase
7FFructose-bisphosphate aldolaseSpinacia oleraceaA0A0K9QFF948Carbohydrate metabolic process
Ferredoxin-NADP reductaseXanthomonas campestrisA0A7W6KYF233Metal binding, oxidoreductase activity
tRNA(Ile)-lysidine synthetaseSetosphaeria turcicaR0JM1231tRNA metabolic process
Cyclase family proteinStreptomyces sp. CAI-21A0A7Y6LZ28 29Amino acid metabolic process
7GPeptidylprolyl isomerase Micractinium conductrixA0A2P6V26633Isomerase activity
Quinone oxidoreductase, putativeColletotrichum orbiculareN4V6N533Oxidoreductase
AAHS family benzoate transporter-like MFS transporterArthrobacter sp. SLBN-122A0A542G607 30Transmembrane transport
Protein translocase subunit SecEThermobifida cellulosilytica TB100A0A147KLB0 29Protein transport, translocation
7HPrecorrin-2 dehydrogenaseWinogradskyella arenosiA0A368ZJY7 38Porphyrin biosynthesis, oxidoreductase
Putative K(+)-stimulated pyrophosphate-energized sodium pump Gemmatimonadales bacteriumA0A7Y4VZE737Sodium ion transport, metal binding
BHLH domain-containing proteinPhyscomitrium patensA0A2K1KTX7 36Transcription
2,5-diketo-D-gluconate reductase AMicrobacterium sp. SLBN-154A0A542N56633Oxidoreductase
7IUncharacterized protein Algoriphagus boseongensisA0A4R6T7V443Transmembrane transport
GntR family transcriptional regulator Klebsiella quasipneumoniaeA0A2N4VV9237Transcription
Cytochrome P450 Mycobacterium sp. BK558A0A4Q7PXL037Oxidoreductase
TonB-dependent receptor plug domain-containing proteinNitrospiraceae bacteriumA0A7Y4SCD533Transmembrane transport
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al Murad, M.; Muneer, S. Physiological and Molecular Analysis Revealed the Role of Silicon in Modulating Salinity Stress in Mung Bean. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1493. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agriculture13081493

AMA Style

Al Murad M, Muneer S. Physiological and Molecular Analysis Revealed the Role of Silicon in Modulating Salinity Stress in Mung Bean. Agriculture. 2023; 13(8):1493. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agriculture13081493

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al Murad, Musa, and Sowbiya Muneer. 2023. "Physiological and Molecular Analysis Revealed the Role of Silicon in Modulating Salinity Stress in Mung Bean" Agriculture 13, no. 8: 1493. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agriculture13081493

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop