Next Article in Journal
Spiritual Needs of Older Adults during Hospitalization: An Integrative Review
Next Article in Special Issue
Controversies, Complexities and Contexts: Teaching Islam through Internal Feminist Critique of the Religion
Previous Article in Journal
Is the Board of Directors’ Religion Related to Tax Avoidance? Empirical Evidence in South Korea
Previous Article in Special Issue
Conspiracy Theories in the Classroom: Problems and Potential Solutions
Article

Controversial Issues and the Rhetoric of Common Values

MF Norwegian School of Theology, Religion and Society, 0302 Oslo, Norway
Received: 14 July 2020 / Revised: 25 September 2020 / Accepted: 1 October 2020 / Published: 14 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Teaching Controversial Issues and Religion)
In this article, I identify a broad, international ‘rhetoric of common values’, which hinges on the poorly supported assumption that values should be promoted because the sharing of values are the basis for social cohesion in groups. Through discussing two cases, I identify, analyse and critique key features of the empirical phenomenon that I call the rhetoric of common values. The two cases are the British government response to the so-called ’Trojan Horse’ incident in 2014, and Norwegian core curricula since 1974. Previous research has critiqued the use of the term ’fundamental British values’ as being unhelpful when schools teach controversial issues. The results of my analysis provide international breadth, some historical depth and metaphorical structure to our understanding of how the rhetoric of common values is used in education policy today. The article focusses less on dilemmas faced by teachers and more on the context of choice established ‘upstream’ by education policy. I argue that it is timely and important for teachers in religious education to understand the rhetoric of common values. It is a contemporary and politically relevant way in which religion is mobilised and politicised for exclusionary forms of national identity. Avoiding the rhetoric of common values does not mean avoiding values in education policy. The rhetoric of common values identitizes values. This causes the terms ‘values’ to be mobilised in boundary work separating ‘us’ from ‘them’, thus undercutting a better role of values in education policy: to reflect upon, and make relevant in life, guidelines for future action. View Full-Text
Keywords: controversial issues; religious education; rhetoric of common values; communities of disagreement; safe space controversial issues; religious education; rhetoric of common values; communities of disagreement; safe space
MDPI and ACS Style

Iversen, L.L. Controversial Issues and the Rhetoric of Common Values. Religions 2020, 11, 528. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rel11100528

AMA Style

Iversen LL. Controversial Issues and the Rhetoric of Common Values. Religions. 2020; 11(10):528. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rel11100528

Chicago/Turabian Style

Iversen, Lars L. 2020. "Controversial Issues and the Rhetoric of Common Values" Religions 11, no. 10: 528. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rel11100528

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop