Next Article in Journal
NonToxic Silver/Poly-1-Vinyl-1,2,4-Triazole Nanocomposite Materials with Antibacterial Activity
Previous Article in Journal
Green Graphene–Chitosan Sorbent Materials for Mercury Water Remediation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Dual-Wavelength Excited Intense Red Upconversion Luminescence from Er3+-Sensitized Y2O3 Nanocrystals Fabricated by Spray Flame Synthesis

1
College of Advanced Interdisciplinary Studies, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
2
Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of High Energy Laser Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
3
Department of Energy and Power Engineering, Key Laboratory for Thermal Science and Power Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
4
Key Laboratory of Advanced Reactor Engineering and Safety of Ministry of Education, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology, Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
5
Department of Physics and Chemistry, PLA Army Academy of Special Operations, Guangzhou 510507, China
6
State Key Laboratory of Pulsed Power Laser Technology, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Submission received: 8 July 2020 / Revised: 27 July 2020 / Accepted: 27 July 2020 / Published: 28 July 2020

Abstract

:
Er3+-sensitized upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs) have attracted great attention due to their tunable upconversion (UC) emissions, low cytotoxicity, high resistance to photobleaching and especially multiple effective excitation wavelengths. However, detailed energy conversion between Er3+ and Tm3+ ions in Y2O3 UCNPs is still a problem, especially under multi-wavelength and variable pulse width excitation. In this work, we successfully fabricated a series of Er3+-sensitized Y2O3 nanocrystals by a spray flame synthesis method with a production rate of 40.5 g h−1. The as-prepared UCNPs are a pure cubic phase with a mean size of 14 nm. Excited by both 980 and 808 nm lasers, the tunable upconversion luminescence (UCL) from Er3+ ions was achieved by increasing the Er3+ doping concentration, co-doping Tm3+ ions and extending excitation pulse-width. The investigations of the lifetimes and the laser power dependence of UC emissions further support the proposed mechanism, which provides guidance for achieving effective color control in anticounterfeiting and multiplexed labeling applications. In addition, the red UC emission at about 5 mm beneath the tissue surface was observed in an ex vivo imaging experiment under the excitation of 808 nm laser, indicating that the Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ UCNPs have great prospects in further biological applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Lanthanide-doped upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs), which can convert a long wavelength excitation into an anti-Stokes emission [1], have shown great advantages in anticounterfeiting, photodynamic therapy and bioimaging [2,3,4,5,6], because of their outstanding properties like tunable upconversion (UC) emissions, low cytotoxicity, large Stokes shifts, high resistance to photobleaching and photochemical degradation [7].
Generally, in order to achieve bright specific upconversion luminescence (UCL) in these UCNPs, the host materials are simultaneously doped with two types of lanthanide ions as a so-called sensitizer and activator. The sensitizer ions absorb the near-infrared light and then transfer the energy to activator ions, which accept the energy and generate visible UCL. The excitation wavelength and UCL efficiency of the UCNPs are greatly dominated by the sensitizer ions [8]. Benefited from the large absorption cross-section at 980 nm and the efficient energy transfer (ET) processes with activator ions, Yb3+ ions have become the most commonly used sensitizer [9,10,11]. However, for living tissue applications, due to the high absorption coefficient of water molecules at 980 nm, Yb3+-sensitized UCNPs are facing severe challenges of a laser-induced overheating problem and thus a decrease in the depth of penetration [12]. Obviously, this limitation of single efficient excitation wavelength largely impedes the future development of Yb3+-sensitized UCNPs.
To meet diverse application needs, great efforts have been done to find new sensitizers with multiple effective excitation wavelengths. With the recent 808 and 980 nm lasers showing efficient excitations, Er3+ sensitizers have become promising candidates [13,14,15]. For instance, under the excitation of 980 nm laser, the various emission wavelengths of Er3+-sensitized UCNPs provide the ability of multicolor tuning from green to red, which is important for anticounterfeiting and multiplexed labeling applications [4]. Further, under the excitation of 808 nm lasers, Er3+-sensitized UCNPs can shift the excitation wavelength from 980 nm to the near infrared (NIR) biological window (NIR-I, 700–900 nm) [16], making them suitable for photodynamic therapy, bioimaging and in vivo biosensing [17,18,19]. In particular, the red UC emission (650 nm) of Er3+ locates in the visible biological window (600–700 nm), indicating the superiority of Er3+-sensitized UCNPs with intense red UCL in the deep living tissue biological applications [20]. To efficiently obtain intense red UCL in Er3+-sensitized UCNPs, Tm3+ ions are usually chosen as the co-doped ions to enhance the population of the red-emitting state through building an ET and back energy transfer (BET) route [21,22,23,24].
For the fabrication of co-doped (e.g., Er3+/Tm3+) UCNPs with high crystallinity and quantum efficiency, liquid-phase synthesis methods (solvothermal and hydrothermal) were demonstrated to be effective [7,25]. However, in liquid-phase synthesis strategies, the governing parameters including shielding gas, reaction time, temperature, pressure and concentration must be controlled strictly and the synthesis process always takes tens of hours with a low production rate [26,27]. It greatly restricts the practical applications of the high quality UCNPs. So far, the continuous large-scale synthesis of ultra-small UCNPs is still a challenge to be solved. It is worth noting that gas-phase synthesis technology (e.g., flame aerosol synthesis) has become a potential approach due to its rapid manufacture, high-throughput production and continuous synthesis capabilities [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Recently Ju et al. successfully synthesized Yb3+/Er3+ co-doped UCNPs through flame spray synthesis method [36]. However, there is still no relevant literature on the flame synthesis of Er3+-sensitized UCNPs with relatively large production rates. Therefore, both the fundamental and experimental investigations are still needed.
In this paper, we describe a class of Er3+-sensitized Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ UCNPs fabricated by the spray flame synthesis method using a self-built swirl-stabilized spray flame reactor. Under the excitation of both 980 and 808 nm lasers, we investigated the color tuning ability of the as-prepared UCNPs and further discussed the UCL mechanism. Moreover, in order to estimate their applied potential in biological applications, we examined the UCL penetration ability of Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ UCNPs in fresh pork.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Y(NO3)3·6H2O (99.9% metals basis), Er(NO3)3·5H2O (99.9% metals basis), Tm(NO3)3·6H2O (99.9% metals basis) and n-Butanol (98% CP) were purchased from Aladdin Industrial Corporation (Shanghai, China). 2-Ethylhexanoic acid (99%) was purchased from Alfa (Shanghai, China). All the chemicals were used as received, without further purification.

2.2. Synthesis of the Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ UCNPs

A self-built swirl-stabilized spray flame reactor, as illustrated in Figure 1, was used to fabricate the Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ UCNPs. This reactor contains two main parts: the swirl-stabilized flame burner and the spray atomizer. The swirl-stabilized flame burner has eight tangential slits, 1 mm in width and 15 mm in length. The fuel (CH4, 3 L min−1) and the oxidant (Air, 30 L min−1) were separately injected into the burner from neighboring slits to prevent flame flashback. Due to the small cross-sectional area of the tangential slit and the large swirl number of burner (32.72), a strong heat recirculating flow of high-temperature burned gas establishes a rapidly mixed combustion zone [37]. Particularly, under the turbulent condition, the stabilization effect becomes more significant and helps to achieve the large production rate of UCNPs [38,39].
For the preparation of the precursor solution, firstly, 7.5 mmol Y(NO3)3, Er(NO3)3 and Tm(NO3)3 were mixed at their respective stoichiometric amounts in a beaker. Then, 22.5 mmol 2-Ethylhexanoic acid (2-EHA) was added to the beaker, ensuring that the molar ratio of Ln3+ and 2-EHA is 1:3. By adding 2-EHA, the precursor becomes easily volatile through ligand exchange, and the synthesis process will follow the gas-to-particle route, which favors the uniform small-sized and solid nanoparticles rather than large hollow particles [40]. Then the solution was fixed to 50 mL by adding corresponding volume of n-Butanol. Finally, the precursors were well mixed by an ultrasonic water bath for 1 h.
The spray atomizer has a dual fluid structure, the liquid precursor was injected by a syringe pump (LD-P2020II) at 1200 mL h−1 and the atomizing gas (air, 15 L min−1) was delivered to shred the liquid precursor into micron droplets. It was installed at the central bottom of burner and sprayed micron aerosols into the rapidly mixed swirl flame from the vertical direction to form a core spray flame. Then, the Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ UCNPs nucleate and grow in the core spray flame region. A water-cooling plate was fixed above the reactor to collect the UCNPs by thermophoresis, and the as-prepared UCNPs are shown in Figure S1.

2.3. Instruments and Measurements

The crystallographic features of the as-prepared UCNPs were examined by an X-ray diffractometer (XRD) with Cu K radiation at 40 kV and 40 mA (Bruke D8 Advance, Hangzhou, China). The morphology and size of the Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ UCNPs were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM; Tecnai G2 F20, FEI, Changsha, China). The compositional elements of the UCNPs were measured by an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS). For photoluminescence experiments, the 808 and 980 nm fiber coupled diode lasers (BWT K808DAHFN-25.00W, BWT K976DA3RN-30.00W, Changsha, China) were used as the excitation sources. Additionally, the generated UCL was collected and detected by a monochromator (Zolix Omni-λ300i, Changsha, China) and a photomultiplier (PMT). The photos of the UCL color were taken by a Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor (CMOS) sensor (Sony IMX519, Changsha, China). All the above photoluminescence measurements were performed at room temperature, and the test samples were prepared by dissolving the UCNPs in ethanol solution with a mass concentration of 0.5 mg mL−1.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structure and Morphology

The XRD patterns of Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ UCNPs doped with different Tm3+ concentrations are demonstrated in Figure 2a. All the diffraction peaks corresponded to the standard pure cubic-phase Y2O3 (JCPDS no. 43-1036), and no heterogeneous diffraction peak was observed. The results indicate that the doping of Er3+ and Tm3+ ions had no significant influence on the phase purity of the Y2O3 hosts. Additionally, it also revealed that the high-temperature flame environment of this reactor was suitable for forming high crystallinity Y2O3 nanoparticles.
The morphology images of the single-doped Y2O3:Er3+ and the co-doped Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ UCNPs are shown in Figure 2b,c. All of them have a rectangle-shape morphology, which agreed well with the cubic crystalline phases. The particle size distribution of these UCNPs was uniform, with a mean size of 14 nm. The compositional elements of the UCNPs were examined by EDS, as shown in Figure S2. The Y, O and Er elements are clearly shown in the EDS analysis result. Additionally, detailed elemental composition of the Y2O3:Er3+ (8 mol%) UCNPs is also shown in Table S1. It can be found that the doping ratio of the Er3+ ions was 9.55 mol%, which is close to the nominal doping concentration (8 mol%). This indicates that the lanthanide ions could be effectively doped into the Y2O3 hosts through the spray flame synthesis method.

3.2. Color Tuning under 980 nm Excitation

As is well-known, the luminescence intensity of Er3+-sensitized UCNPs will reduce when the Er3+ doping concentration is too high, mainly caused by the cross-relaxations (CRs) between Er3+ ions leading to the concentration quenching [41]. In order to determine the inflection point of concentration quenching, we varied the Er3+ doping concentrations gradually from 0.5 to 15 mol%. Under the excitation of 980 nm laser, the absolute luminescence spectra of the Y2O3:Er3+ UCNPs doped with different Er3+ concentrations are shown in Figure S3. The green (550 nm) and red (650 nm) UC emissions could be clearly observed, which were ascribed to the (2H11/2, 4S3/2)→4I15/2 and 4F9/24I15/2 transitions from the Er3+ ions, respectively. Both the green and red UC emissions will increase when the doping concentrations of Er3+ ions rise from 0.5 to 8 mol%. However, when the doping concentration of Er3+ ions further increases to 15 mol%, all UC emissions start to decrease gradually due to the significant concentration quenching effect [41,42,43]. Hence, we selected the Er3+ doping concentration range from 0 to 8 mol% as the focus of further investigation.
Then, we continued to investigate the influence of Tm3+ ions on the color tuning of UC emissions. The UC emission spectra of Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ UCNPs is shown in Figure 3a. As the Tm3+ concentration increased from 0 to 4 mol%, the red-to-green (R/G) UC emission intensity ratio dramatically increased from 1.59 to 12.59. Furthermore, the tendencies of integral UCL intensities and R/G ratios are illustrated in Figure 3b. Obviously, the integral luminescence intensities monotonically decreased with the doping concentrations of Tm3+ ions. On the contrary, the R/G ratios continuously increased. When the doping concentration of Tm3+ was 1 mol%, the R/G ratio reached 8.5. A further increase of the doping concentration will largely reduce the integral luminescence intensity and the R/G ratio only slightly increases. Therefore, the optimal doping concentration of Tm3+ is acceptable when fixed at 1 mol%.
To explore the principle of color tuning more clearly, we fixed the Tm3+ doping concentrations at 0 and 1 mol%, and simultaneously varied the Er3+ doping concentrations from 0 to 8 mol%. Under the excitation intensity of 341 W cm−2, the corresponding UCL spectra and the simplified ET mechanism are displayed in Figure 4. For Er3+ single-doped Y2O3 UCNPs, the UCL color changes from green to yellow as the Er3+ doping concentrations increase from 0.5 to 8 mol%, which is shown in the inserts of Figure 4a. Additionally, the R/G ratios rise from 0.09 to 1.59 correspondingly. After co-doping 1 mol% Tm3+ ions into the Y2O3:Er3+ UCNPs, the luminescence color can be tuned from green to red, as shown in the inserts of Figure 4b. The R/G ratios increase from 0.55 to 8.50. Figure 4c shows a comparison of the R/G ratios of these Y2O3:Er3+ UCNPs doped with and without Tm3+ ions. The R/G ratios of Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ UCNPs were at least 4.4 times larger than Er3+ single-doped UCNPs, indicating that the introduction of Tm3+ ions had a strong enhancement on the UCL color tuning ability. To explain the above results, the simplified mechanism for color tuning is illustrated in Figure 4d. When low concentration of Er3+ is single-doped, the distance between adjacent Er3+ ions is relatively far. It is difficult to transfer energy between each other and thus the UCL color is more inclined to green. When the Er3+ doping concentration increased, the average distance between two Er3+ ions became smaller, which promoted the CRs. This effect enhanced the population of the red-emitting state and suppressed the population of green-emitting states, inducing the UCL color to turn yellow [41]. However, the CRs between two Er3+ ions were reversible and it will limit the increase of the R/G ratio, where it only reached 1.59. When introducing Tm3+ ions, besides the CR processes between adjacent Er3+ ions, there were also other processes between Er3+ and Tm3+ ions (ET and BET) that can effectively improve the proportion of red UCL. Notably, based on these processes, the UCL color can be tuned from green to red, which is quite useful for anticounterfeiting and multiplexed labeling applications [4].
To further understand the color tuning mechanism, the possible ET and BET processes, non-radiative transitions and UC emissions are depicted in Figure 5. When the Er3+ doping concentration was low, the ground-state absorption (GSA) and the excited-state absorption (ESA) were the main population processes, where the electrons in the ground state of Er3+ were excited to 4I11/2 by GSA, then excited to 4F7/2 by ESA and finally populated the emitting states (2H11/2, 4S3/2 and 4F9/2) through non-radiative transitions (left part of Figure 5). These processes result in the proportion of green-emitting states being relatively higher than the red one [41], which is consistent with the observed results (Figure 4d).
When the Y2O3 UCNPs were highly doped with Er3+ ions, besides the GSA and ESA processes mentioned above, the adjacent Er3+ ions could transfer energy to each other through energy transfer upconversion (ETU) and CR processes (middle part of Figure 5) [41,44,45,46,47]. After absorbing a 980 nm photon, the electrons in the ground state of Er3+ will reach the 4I11/2 state. Except the ESA process, sectional electrons in the 4I11/2 state reach the 4I13/2 state by non-radiative transition, and then populate the 4F9/2 state by an ETU process: 4I11/2(adjacent Er3+) + 4I13/2(Er3+)→4I15/2(adjacent Er3+) + 4F9/2(Er3+) between the adjacent Er3+ ions. Other electrons in the 4I11/2 state are excited to the 4F9/2 state through the resonant CR transitions of 4F7/24F9/2 and 4I9/24I13/2 in adjacent Er3+ ions (CR1 and CR3). In addition, the electrons in the ground state of Er3+ can be excited to the 4I13/2 state, corresponding to the resonant CR transition of 2H11/2, 4S3/24I9/2 in adjacent Er3+ ions (CR2). CR1 and CR2 can reduce electrons pumped to the 2H11/2 and 4S3/2 states. CR1 and CR3 can populate the 4F9/2 state of Er3+, and CR2 will increase electrons in 4I13/2 state of Er3+, which can be further pumped to the 4F9/2 state by ETU. All the ETU and CR processes mentioned above can promote the transfer of electrons from green-emitting states (2H11/2 and 4S3/2) to red-emitting state (4F9/2), which greatly increased the proportion of red UC emission. The energy gaps of CR1, CR2 and CR3 were 151 cm−1, 377 cm−1 and 742 cm−1, respectively, which were comparable with intrinsic phonons of Y2O3 hosts (597 cm−1) [48,49]. It means that phonon assisted CRs can easily occur, and the R/G ratio can be enhanced by simply increasing the Er3+ doping concentration.
However, although the color of UCL can be tuned from green to yellow by increasing the Er3+ doping concentration, it is still difficult to achieve pure red UC emission only relying on the CRs between the adjacent Er3+ ions. Since the CRs between two Er3+ ions are reversible and it will limit the increase of R/G ratios. Besides CRs, we can also increase the proportion of red UC emission through ETU process. However, there is a large energy gap between the 4I13/2 and 4I11/2 states (3609 cm−1), which essentially limits the population of red-emitting state (4F9/2) through ETU. To solve this problem, Tm3+ ions were added into the Y2O3:Er3+ UCNPs, and the possible ET processes are shown in the right part of Figure 5. Here the key energy state involved is 3H5 of Tm3+ ions, which is an intermediate energy state between the 4I13/2 and 4I11/2 states of Er3+ ions. The electrons in the 4I11/2 state can easily be transferred to the 3H5 state by ET process, and then be transferred from the 3H5 state to the 4I13/2 state by the BET process. These two processes are more likely to happen because their energy gaps (1829 cm−1 and 1780 cm−1 respectively) were much smaller than the energy gap between the 4I13/2 and 4I11/2 states (3609 cm−1). Therefore, the introduction of Tm3+ ions can help electrons to be transferred from the 4I11/2 state to the 4I13/2 state, which increases the proportion of the red UC emission significantly. However, it is noteworthy that the wavenumber of the 3F4 state of Tm3+ is close to the 4I13/2 state of Er3+, the electrons on the 4I13/2 state can also be transferred to the 3F4 state simultaneously. Consequently, the introduction of Tm3+ ions will slightly decrease the absolute intensity and lifetime of the red UCL.
To further support the proposed transition mechanism, we measured the time–decay curves and the power dependence lines of the green (564 nm) and red (661 nm) UC emissions, as shown in Figure 6. The results in Figure 6a,b show that both the green and red UCL intensities show exponential decay after being excited by a 980 nm pulsed laser. When the Tm3+ doping concentrations increased from 0 to 4 mol%, the lifetimes of 564 nm UC emission decreased from 268.3 to 100.1 µs, and the lifetimes of 661 nm UC emission decreased from 322.7 to 117.3 µs. The detailed lifetime trends of 564 and 661 nm UC emissions as a function of the Tm3+ doping concentrations are depicted in Figure 6c. These two lifetime curves had a similar decline trend, which was mainly due to the existing ET processes between Tm3+ and Er3+ ions (as illustrated in Figure 5). Two double-logarithmic plots of the luminescence intensities of Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (8/1 mol%) UCNPs versus the excitation intensity are illustrated in Figure 6d. The slopes of the red (661 nm) and green (564 nm) UCL were 1.6 and 2.0, respectively, indicating that these two UC emissions were ascribed to a two-photon absorption process [50]. All the above results were in good agreement with the assumed transition processes.

3.3. Color Tuning under 808 nm Excitation

In order to meet the need of biological applications where the 980 nm excitation source is no longer applicable due to the heavy absorption of water molecules, the UCL properties of the as-prepared UCNPs were evaluated under 808 nm excitation.
Figure 7a,b shows the normalized UC emission spectra of Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ UCNPs at an excitation intensity of 297 W cm−2. For Tm3+-free Y2O3:Er3+ UCNPs (Figure 7a), the UCL color changed from green to yellow as the Er3+ doping concentrations increased from 0.5 to 8 mol%, and the corresponding R/G ratios enhanced from 0.05 to 1.55. When 1 mol% Tm3+ ions were co-doped into the Y2O3:Er3+ UCNPs (Figure 7b), the UCL color can be tuned from yellow to red, and the R/G ratios rose from 0.95 to 6.80. Figure 7c illustrates the comparison of R/G ratios of these two series of UCNPs doped with or without Tm3+ ions. Obviously, by introducing 1 mol% Tm3+ ions, the R/G ratios have a 4.4-fold enhancement at least, which is similar to the trend under the 980 nm excitation. Additionally, the achieved bright pure red UC emission is much needed for biological applications. Furthermore, we also demonstrated the possible mechanism of ET and BET processes, non-radiative transitions, and UC emissions under 808 nm excitation, as depicted in Figure 7d. Unlike the processes under 980 nm excitation, firstly, the electrons in the ground state of Er3+ were excited to the 4I9/2 state by GSA after absorbing an 808 nm photon, then reached the 4I11/2 state through a non-radiative transition. After that, the emitting states (2H11/2, 4S3/2 and 4F9/2) could be populated by ETU, CR and BET processes, which were elaborated in Figure 5 [51]. In addition, the power dependence tendencies of the UCL in Y2O3:Er3+ (8 mol%) and Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (8/1 mol%) UCNPs are given in Figure S4a,b, which indicates that all the UC emissions also exhibited a two-photon absorption process under 808 nm excitation.

3.4. Color Tuning under Pulsed Laser Excitation

Importantly, in addition to the doping concentrations of Er3+ and Tm3+ ions, the excitation pulse-width will also influence the UC emissions of the UCNPs, which has been reported in previous studies [52,53]. As shown in Figure 8, the R/G ratios of Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (8/1 mol%) and Y2O3:Er3+ (8 mol%) UCNPs were examined under the excitation of both a 980 and 808 nm laser with different excitation pulse-widths, and the corresponding detailed spectra are illustrated in Figure S5. In Figure 8a, it can be seen that when the pulse-width of 980 nm laser increased from 0.2 to 4 ms, the R/G ratio of Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (8/1 mol%) UCNPs improved greatly from 3.32 to 8.50, indicating that the green UC emission proportion decreased significantly, which is due to the non-steady-state process [52,53]. However, for the Tm3+-free UCNPs, the R/G ratio improved slightly from 1.42 to 1.59. Since for Tm3+-free UCNPs, the main channels to achieve red emission were the energy transferred from the green-emitting sate by CR1, CR2 and CR3 (Figure 5). The time scales of these processes were short compared to the laser pulse [53], so that the excitation pulse-width basically had no influence on the R/G ratio. However, for Er3+/Tm3+ co-doped UCNPs, the red-emitting state (4F9/2) was mainly populated through two fast transition processes (GSA: 4I15/24I11/2 and ETU: 4I13/24F9/2) and two slow processes (ET: 4I11/23H5 and BET: 3H54I13/2). For the shorter excitation pulse-width, the green-emitting states could still be populated by fast processes (GSA: 4I15/24I11/2, ESA: 4I11/24F7/2 and non-radiative transitions: 4F7/22H11/2 and 4S3/2), but the red-emitting state (4F9/2) had not enough time to be populated, which caused the large decline of the R/G ratio.
Additionally, the non-steady-state UCL process was also observed under the excitation of an 808 nm laser, as shown in Figure 8b. For Tm3+-free UCNPs, the R/G ratio slightly increased from 1.28 to 1.61, but it enhanced greatly from 2.35 to 6.80 in Er3+/Tm3+ co-doped UCNPs as the excitation pulse-width increased from 0.2 to 4 ms. The relevant mechanism of this phenomenon is the same as that under 980 nm excitation. Based on the study of the relationship between the R/G ratio and the excitation pulse-width, the ET and BET processes between Er3+ and Tm3+ ions are further confirmed, and it also offers a guidance for better access to pure red UCL under the excitation of both a 980 and 808 nm pulsed laser.

3.5. Ex Vivo Imaging in Biological Tissue

To estimate the potential of the as-prepared Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (8/1 mol%) UCNPs in biological applications, its tissue penetration ability was also studied by the ex vivo imaging experiment, as illustrated in Figure 9a. The Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (8/1 mol%) UCNPs were dispersed in alcohol solution with a mass concentration of 0.5 mg mL−1. Then the solution was injected into a cuboid fresh pork with the size of 6 cm × 2 cm × 2 cm (Figure S6), and the injection points were 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 mm away from the left edge of the pork, which were marked in red in Figure S6b. The excitation laser incident from the left, and the laser power density was 1.2 W cm−2 during imaging. The UC emissions were recorded by a CMOS sensor (Samsung ISOCELL HMX, Changsha, China), with the same exposure time of 1 s for each image. A 785 nm short-pass emission filter was applied to prevent the interference of excitation laser to the CMOS sensor.
As shown in Figure 9g,m, there was no UC emission observed from the fresh pork without UCNPs under the excitation of both 808 and 980 nm lasers. After injecting UCNPs, the bright red UC emission from the pork could be observed under the excitation of an 808 nm laser. The UC emission decreased as the tissue thickness increased from 1 to 5 mm (Figure 9b–d). Particularly, when the tissue depths increased larger than 5 mm, the red UC emissions became extremely weak, which were difficult to detect (Figure 9e,f). In comparison, under the excitation of a 980 nm laser, no red UC emission was observed (Figure 9h–l) due to the great absorption of tissue, which makes a 980 nm laser hard to penetrate the biological tissue. The ex vivo imaging experiment shows that these flame-made UCNPs could be detected easily at about 5 mm beneath the tissue surface.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, we successfully prepared Er3+-sensitized Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ UCNPs through the spray flame synthesis method using a swirl-stabilized spray flame reactor with a high-production rate of 40.5 g h−1. The fabrication process was continuous, fast, environment-friendly and scalable. After introducing Tm3+ ions, the UCL color of the as-synthesized UCNPs could be efficiently tuned from green to red by increasing the Er3+ doping concentration from 0.5 to 8 mol% under the excitation of both a 980 nm and 808 nm laser. Here the 3H5 state of Tm3+ ions play the significant role of an intermediate energy state, which help electrons to move from the 4I11/2 state to the 4I13/2 state of Er3+ ions by the ET and BET processes, and then promote the proportion of red UC emission greatly. A related mechanism was further demonstrated by investigating the lifetimes, the laser power dependence and the excitation pulse-width effect of the UC emissions, which offers a guidance for achieving effective color control in anticounterfeiting and multiplexed labeling applications. Moreover, under the excitation of 808 nm laser, a strong red UC emission was observed in the ex vivo imaging experiment, and the UCNPs can be detected easily at about 5 mm beneath the tissue surface, indicating their great prospects in further biological applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/2079-4991/10/8/1475/s1, Figure S1: The synthesized Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ UCNPs, Figure S2: The EDS spectra of the synthesized Y2O3 nanoparticles doped with 8 mol% Er3+ ions, Figure S3: The absolute luminescence spectra of the Y2O3:Er3+ UCNPs doped with different concentration of Er3+ ions. The inset shows the tendency of the integral luminescence intensities (from 500 to 700 nm). All excitation wavelengths are at 980 nm, Figure S4: UC emission intensities of Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (8/x mol%) UCNPs as a function of excitation intensities. (a) x = 0, (b) x = 1. All excitation wavelengths are at 808 nm, Figure S5: Normalized UC emission spectra of Y2O3: Er3+/Tm3+ (8/x mol%) UCNPs under the excitation of lasers operated at different pulse width. (a) x = 0, 980 nm excitation, (b) x = 1, 980 nm excitation, (c) x = 0, 808 nm excitation, (d) x = 1, 808 nm excitation, Figure S6: Cuboid fresh pork with the size of 6 cm × 2 cm × 2 cm, Table S1: The experimental elemental composition of the Y2O3:Er3+ (8 mol%) UCNPs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.W. and Z.Y.; Formal analysis, M.Y.; Funding acquisition, M.Y. and X.Y.; Investigation, X.Z.; Methodology, X.Z.; Project administration, M.Y.; Resources, Y.Z.; Supervision, H.W.; Validation, X.Y., K.H. and C.S.; Visualization, M.Y.; Writing—original draft, X.Z.; Writing—review and editing, Z.J., H.W., S.L. and X.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the State Key Laboratory of Laser Interaction with Matter Foundation, grant number SKLLIM1708 and the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 51676109.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, F.; Han, Y.; Lim, C.S.; Lu, Y.; Wang, J.; Xu, J.; Chen, H.; Zhang, C.; Hong, M.; Liu, X. Simultaneous phase and size control of upconversion nanocrystals through lanthanide doping. Nature 2010, 463, 1061–1065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Xu, J.; Han, W.; Jia, T.; Dong, S.; Bi, H.; Yang, D.; He, F.; Dai, Y.; Gai, S.; Yang, P. Bioresponsive upconversion nanostructure for combinatorial bioimaging and chemo-photothermal synergistic therapy. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 342, 446–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lucky, S.S.; Soo, K.C.; Zhang, Y. Nanoparticles in photodynamic therapy. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 1990–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Deng, R.; Tian, J.; Zong, Y.; Jin, D.; Liu, X. Multicolor barcoding in a single upconversion crystal. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 4893–4896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ren, W.; Lin, G.; Clarke, C.; Zhou, J.; Jin, D. Optical nanomaterials and enabling technologies for high-security-level anticounterfeiting. Adv. Mater. 2020, 32, 1901430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shan, J.; Budijono, S.J.; Hu, G.; Yao, N.; Kang, Y.; Ju, Y.; Prud’homme, R.K. Pegylated composite nanoparticles containing upconverting phosphors and meso-tetraphenyl porphine (TPP) for photodynamic therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2011, 21, 2488–2495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, F.; Deng, R.; Liu, X. Preparation of core-shell NaGdF4 nanoparticles doped with luminescent lanthanide ions to be used as upconversion-based probes. Nat. Protoc. 2014, 9, 1634–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cheng, X.; Pan, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Wang, X.; Su, W.; Yin, L.; Xie, X.; Huang, L. Er3+ sensitized photon upconversion nanocrystals. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2018, 28, 1800208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tu, L.; Liu, X.; Wu, F.; Zhang, H. Excitation energy migration dynamics in upconversion nanomaterials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 1331–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wang, T.; Yu, H.; Siu, C.K.; Qiu, J.; Xu, X.; Yu, S.F. White-light whispering-gallery-mode lasing from lanthanide-doped upconversion NaYF4 hexagonal microrods. ACS Photonics 2017, 4, 1539–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, B.; Wang, F. Recent advances in the synthesis and application of Yb-based fluoride upconversion nanoparticles. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2020, 7, 1067–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, Y.F.; Liu, G.Y.; Sun, L.D.; Xiao, J.W.; Zhou, J.C.; Yan, C.H. Nd3+-sensitized upconversion nanophosphors: Efficient in vivo bioimaging probes with minimized heating effect. ACS Nano 2013, 7, 7200–7206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zuo, J.; Li, Q.; Xue, B.; Li, C.; Chang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Tu, L.; Zhang, H.; Kong, X. Employing shells to eliminate concentration quenching in photonic upconversion nanostructure. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 7941–7946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Yan, L.; Zhou, B.; Song, N.; Liu, X.; Huang, J.; Wang, T.; Tao, L.; Zhang, Q. Self-sensitization induced upconversion of Er3+ in core–shell nanoparticles. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 17949–17957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Li, Y.; Wang, T.; Ren, W.; Han, J.; Yin, Z.; Qiu, J.; Yang, Z.; Song, Z. BiOCl:Er3+ nanosheets with tunable thickness for photon avalanche phosphors. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2, 7652–7660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, J.; Gulzar, A.; Yang, P.; Bi, H.; Yang, D.; Gai, S.; He, F.; Lin, J.; Xing, B.; Jin, D. Recent advances in near-infrared emitting lanthanide-doped nanoconstructs: Mechanism, design and application for bioimaging. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 381, 104–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Q.; Li, X.; Zhang, L.; Zuo, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Tu, L.; Xue, B.; Chang, Y.; Kong, X. An 800 nm driven NaErF4@NaLuF4 upconversion platform for multimodality imaging and photodynamic therapy. Nanoscale 2018, 10, 12356–12363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, X.; Yakovliev, A.; Ohulchanskyy, T.Y.; Wu, L.; Zeng, S.; Han, X.; Qu, J.; Chen, G. Efficient erbium-sensitized core/shell nanocrystals for short wave infrared bioimaging. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2018, 6, 1800690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Liu, L.; Wang, S.; Zhao, B.; Pei, P.; Fan, Y.; Li, X.; Zhang, F. Er3+ sensitized 1530 nm to 1180 nm second near-infrared window upconversion nanocrystals for in vivo biosensing. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 7518–7522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lin, H.; Xu, D.; Li, Y.; Yao, L.; Xu, L.; Ma, Y.; Yang, S.; Zhang, Y. Intense red upconversion luminescence in Er3+-sensitized particles through confining the 1532 nm excitation energy. J. Lumin. 2019, 216, 116731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Xu, J.; Yang, D.; Han, W.; Dong, S.; Jia, T.; He, F.; Bi, H.; Gai, S.; Li, L.; Yang, P. A novel strategy for markedly enhancing the red upconversion emission in Er3+/Tm3+ cooperated nanoparticles. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 7533–7540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, Q.; Xie, X.; Huang, B.; Liang, L.; Han, S.; Yi, Z.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Fan, D.; Huang, L.; et al. Confining excitation energy in Er3+-sensitized upconversion nanocrystals through Tm3+-mediated transient energy trapping. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 7605–7609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shang, Y.; Hao, S.; Lv, W.; Chen, T.; Tian, L.; Lei, Z.; Yang, C. Confining excitation energy of Er3+-sensitized upconversion nanoparticles through introducing various energy trapping centers. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 3869–3875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rivera, V.A.G.; Ledemi, Y.; El-Amraoui, M.; Messaddeq, Y.; Marega, E., Jr. Green-to-red light tuning by up-conversion emission via energy transfer in Er3+-Tm3+-codoped germanium-tellurite glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2014, 392, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gu, Z.; Yan, L.; Tian, G.; Li, S.; Chai, Z.; Zhao, Y. Recent advances in design and fabrication of upconversion nanoparticles and their safe theranostic applications. Adv. Mater. 2013, 25, 3758–3779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ma, Y.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Qiu, J.; Song, Z. Preparation, Growth Mechanism, Upconversion, and near-infrared photoluminescence properties of convex-lens-like NaYF4 microcrystals doped with various rare earth ions excited at 808 nm. Cryst. Growth Des. 2018, 18, 1758–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, T.; Lin, Y.; Lu, W.; Guo, X.; Qiu, J.; Yu, X.; Zhan, Q.; Yu, S.F.; Xu, X. Growth processes of LuF3 upconversion nanoflakes with the assistance of amorphous nanoclusters. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2, 5254–5259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Li, S.; Ren, Y.; Biswas, P.; Tse, S.D. Flame aerosol synthesis of nanostructured materials and functional devices: Processing, modeling, and diagnostics. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2016, 55, 1–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Liu, C.; Pokhrel, S.; Tessarek, C.; Li, H.; Schowalter, M.; Rosenauer, A.; Eickhoff, M.; Li, S.; Mädler, L. Rare-earth-doped Y4Al2O9 nanoparticles for stable light-converting phosphors. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2020, 3, 699–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hammad, M.; Hardt, S.; Mues, B.; Salamon, S.; Landers, J.; Slabu, I.; Wende, H.; Schulz, C.; Wiggers, H. Gas-phase synthesis of iron oxide nanoparticles for improved magnetic hyperthermia performance. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 824, 153814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Angel, S.; Neises, J.; Dreyer, M.; Friedel Ortega, K.; Behrens, M.; Wang, Y.; Arandiyan, H.; Schulz, C.; Wiggers, H. Spray-flame synthesis of La(Fe, Co)O3 nano-perovskites from metal nitrates. AIChE J. 2020, 66, e16748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Meierhofer, F.; Mädler, L.; Fritsching, U. Nanoparticle evolution in flame spray pyrolysis—Process design via experimental and computational analysis. AIChE J. 2020, 66, e16885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hong, H.; Memon, N.K.; Dong, Z.; Kear, B.H.; Tse, S.D. Flame synthesis of gamma-iron-oxide (γ-Fe2O3) nanocrystal films and carbon nanotubes on stainless-steel substrates. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2019, 37, 1249–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mädler, L.; Kammler, H.K.; Mueller, R.; Pratsinis, S.E. Controlled synthesis of nanostructured particles by flame spray pyrolysis. J. Aerosol Sci. 2002, 33, 369–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Strobel, R.; Pratsinis, S.E. Flame aerosol synthesis of smart nanostructured materials. J. Mater. Chem. 2007, 17, 4743–4756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kong, W.; Shan, J.; Ju, Y. Flame synthesis and effects of host materials on Yb3+/Er3+ co-doped upconversion nanophosphors. Mater. Lett. 2010, 64, 688–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wei, J.; Ren, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Shi, B.; Li, S. Effects of temperature-time history on the flame synthesis of nanoparticles in a swirl-stabilized tubular burner with two feeding modes. J. Aerosol Sci. 2019, 133, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, J.; Li, S.; Yan, W.; Tse, S.D.; Yao, Q. Synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles by premixed stagnation swirl flames. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2011, 33, 1925–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zong, Y.; Li, S.; Niu, F.; Yao, Q. Direct synthesis of supported palladium catalysts for methane combustion by stagnation swirl flame. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2015, 35, 2249–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wei, J.; Li, S.; Ren, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Tse, S.D. Investigating the role of solvent formulations in temperature-controlled liquid-fed aerosol flame synthesis of YAG-based nanoparticles. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2019, 37, 1193–1201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lu, H.; Gillin, W.P.; Hernández, I. Concentration dependence of the up- and down-conversion emission colours of Er3+-doped Y2O3: A time-resolved spectroscopy analysis. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 20957–20963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Liu, X.; Kong, X.; Zhang, Y.; Tu, L.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, Q.; Li, C.; Shi, Z.; Zhang, H. Breakthrough in concentration quenching threshold of upconversion luminescence via spatial separation of the emitter doping area for bio-applications. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 11957–11959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wen, S.; Zhou, J.; Zheng, K.; Bednarkiewicz, A.; Liu, X.; Jin, D. Advances in highly doped upconversion nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Li, P.; Guo, L.; Zhang, Z.; Li, T.; Chen, P. Enhanced dual-wavelength sensitive red upconversion luminescence in Bi2O3:Yb3+/Er3+ phosphors via optical-inert ions doping. Dyes Pigments 2018, 154, 242–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Luo, L.; Du, P.; Li, W.; Tao, W.; Chen, H. Effects of Er doping site and concentration on piezoelectric, ferroelectric, and optical properties of ferroelectric Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3. J. Appl. Phys. 2013, 114, 124104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Tabanli, S.; Bilir, G.; Eryurek, G. Color tunable up-conversion emission from Er3+:Y2O3 nanoparticles embedded in PMMA matrix. J. Lumin. 2017, 182, 146–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Qiao, Y.; Guo, H. Upconversion properties of Y2O3:Er films prepared by sol-gel method. J. Rare Earths 2009, 27, 406–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. De, G.; Qin, W.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.; Cao, C.; Cui, Y. Upconversion luminescence properties of Y2O3:Yb3+, Er3+ nanostructures. J. Lumin. 2006, 119, 258–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Capobianco, J.A.; Vetrone, F.; D’Alesio, T.; Tessari, G.; Speghini, A.; Bettinelli, M. Optical spectroscopy of nanocrystalline cubic Y2O3: Er3+ obtained by combustion synthesis. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2000, 2, 3203–3207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Pollnau, M.; Gamelin, D.R.; Lüthi, S.R.; Güdel, H.U.; Hehlen, M.P. Power dependence of upconversion luminescence in lanthanide and transition-metal-ion systems. Phys. Rev. B 2000, 61, 3337–3346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lin, H.; Xu, D.; Li, Y.; Yao, L.; Xu, L.; Ma, Y.; Yang, S.; Zhang, Y. Enhanced Red Emission in Er3+-sensitized NaLuF4 upconversion crystals via energy trapping. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 15361–15369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Deng, R.; Qin, F.; Chen, R.; Huang, W.; Hong, M.; Liu, X. Temporal full-colour tuning through non-steady-state upconversion. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zhao, X.; Suo, H.; Zhang, Z.; Guo, C. Cross-relaxation and non-steady-state processes induced up-conversion color modulation in Gd2O3: Ln3+/Er3+ (Ln = Tm, Ho). Dyes Pigments 2018, 151, 335–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the swirl flame assisted gas-phase synthesis method.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the swirl flame assisted gas-phase synthesis method.
Nanomaterials 10 01475 g001
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns of Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (8/x mol%) upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs). TEM images of (b) Y2O3:Er3+ (8 mol%) and (c) Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (8/1 mol%) UCNPs.
Figure 2. (a) XRD patterns of Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (8/x mol%) upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs). TEM images of (b) Y2O3:Er3+ (8 mol%) and (c) Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (8/1 mol%) UCNPs.
Nanomaterials 10 01475 g002
Figure 3. (a) Normalized upconversion (UC) emission spectra of Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (8/x mol%) UCNPs. (b) Integral luminescence intensities (from 500 to 700 nm) and red-to-green (R/G) ratios of the Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ UCNPs doped with different concentrations of Tm3+ ions. All excited by a 980 nm laser at an excitation intensity of 341 W cm−2.
Figure 3. (a) Normalized upconversion (UC) emission spectra of Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (8/x mol%) UCNPs. (b) Integral luminescence intensities (from 500 to 700 nm) and red-to-green (R/G) ratios of the Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ UCNPs doped with different concentrations of Tm3+ ions. All excited by a 980 nm laser at an excitation intensity of 341 W cm−2.
Nanomaterials 10 01475 g003
Figure 4. Normalized UC emission spectra of Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (x/y mol%) UCNPs, x = 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, (a) y = 0, (b) y = 1. (c) R/G ratios of the Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ UCNPs doped with different concentrations of Er3+ and Tm3+ ions. (d) Simplified cross-relaxation (CR), energy transfer (ET) and back energy transfer (BET) mechanism. All excited by a 980 nm laser at an excitation intensity of 341 W cm−2.
Figure 4. Normalized UC emission spectra of Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (x/y mol%) UCNPs, x = 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, (a) y = 0, (b) y = 1. (c) R/G ratios of the Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ UCNPs doped with different concentrations of Er3+ and Tm3+ ions. (d) Simplified cross-relaxation (CR), energy transfer (ET) and back energy transfer (BET) mechanism. All excited by a 980 nm laser at an excitation intensity of 341 W cm−2.
Nanomaterials 10 01475 g004
Figure 5. The energy states diagram for Er3+ and Tm3+ ions under the excitation of the 980 nm laser. The principle of the ET and BET processes, non-radiative transitions, upconversion luminescence (UCL), energy transfer upconversion (ETU) and CR transitions are also presented in the diagram.
Figure 5. The energy states diagram for Er3+ and Tm3+ ions under the excitation of the 980 nm laser. The principle of the ET and BET processes, non-radiative transitions, upconversion luminescence (UCL), energy transfer upconversion (ETU) and CR transitions are also presented in the diagram.
Nanomaterials 10 01475 g005
Figure 6. Time–decay curves of the (a) 564 nm and (b) 661 nm UCL for the UCNPs doped with different concentration of Tm3+ ions (the vertical axis is in log scale). (c) The lifetime trends of 4S3/2 and 4F9/2 states as a function of the Tm3+ doping concentrations. (d) UCL intensities of Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (8/1 mol%) UCNPs as a function of excitation intensity. All excited by a 980 nm laser.
Figure 6. Time–decay curves of the (a) 564 nm and (b) 661 nm UCL for the UCNPs doped with different concentration of Tm3+ ions (the vertical axis is in log scale). (c) The lifetime trends of 4S3/2 and 4F9/2 states as a function of the Tm3+ doping concentrations. (d) UCL intensities of Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (8/1 mol%) UCNPs as a function of excitation intensity. All excited by a 980 nm laser.
Nanomaterials 10 01475 g006
Figure 7. Normalized UC emission spectra of Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (x/y mol%) UCNPs, x = 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, (a) y = 0, (b) y = 1. (c) R/G ratios of the Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ UCNPs doped with different concentrations of Er3+ and Tm3+ ions. (d) ET and BET mechanism between Er3+ and Tm3+ ions. All excited by an 808 nm laser at an excitation intensity of 297 W cm−2.
Figure 7. Normalized UC emission spectra of Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (x/y mol%) UCNPs, x = 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, (a) y = 0, (b) y = 1. (c) R/G ratios of the Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ UCNPs doped with different concentrations of Er3+ and Tm3+ ions. (d) ET and BET mechanism between Er3+ and Tm3+ ions. All excited by an 808 nm laser at an excitation intensity of 297 W cm−2.
Nanomaterials 10 01475 g007
Figure 8. (a) R/G ratios of the Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (8/x mol%) UCNPs under the excitation of a 980 nm laser operated at different excitation pulse-width, x = 0 and 1. (b) R/G ratios of the Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (8/x mol%) UCNPs under the excitation of 808 nm laser operated at different excitation pulse-width, x = 0 and 1.
Figure 8. (a) R/G ratios of the Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (8/x mol%) UCNPs under the excitation of a 980 nm laser operated at different excitation pulse-width, x = 0 and 1. (b) R/G ratios of the Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (8/x mol%) UCNPs under the excitation of 808 nm laser operated at different excitation pulse-width, x = 0 and 1.
Nanomaterials 10 01475 g008
Figure 9. The UC luminescence image of the different depths of pork tissue injected with Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (8/1 mol%) UCNPs under the excitation of both 808 and 980 nm laser. (a) Experiment setup of the ex vivo imaging experiment. The pork injected with (bf) and without (g) UCNPs under the excitation of 808 nm laser, respectively. The pork injected with (hl) and without (m) UCNPs under the excitation of a 980 nm laser, respectively.
Figure 9. The UC luminescence image of the different depths of pork tissue injected with Y2O3:Er3+/Tm3+ (8/1 mol%) UCNPs under the excitation of both 808 and 980 nm laser. (a) Experiment setup of the ex vivo imaging experiment. The pork injected with (bf) and without (g) UCNPs under the excitation of 808 nm laser, respectively. The pork injected with (hl) and without (m) UCNPs under the excitation of a 980 nm laser, respectively.
Nanomaterials 10 01475 g009

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, X.; Wu, Z.; Yang, Z.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Yuan, M.; Han, K.; Song, C.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, H.; et al. Dual-Wavelength Excited Intense Red Upconversion Luminescence from Er3+-Sensitized Y2O3 Nanocrystals Fabricated by Spray Flame Synthesis. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1475. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano10081475

AMA Style

Zhao X, Wu Z, Yang Z, Yang X, Zhang Y, Yuan M, Han K, Song C, Jiang Z, Wang H, et al. Dual-Wavelength Excited Intense Red Upconversion Luminescence from Er3+-Sensitized Y2O3 Nanocrystals Fabricated by Spray Flame Synthesis. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(8):1475. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano10081475

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Xiaofan, Zeyun Wu, Zining Yang, Xu Yang, Yiyang Zhang, Maohui Yuan, Kai Han, Changqing Song, Zongfu Jiang, Hongyan Wang, and et al. 2020. "Dual-Wavelength Excited Intense Red Upconversion Luminescence from Er3+-Sensitized Y2O3 Nanocrystals Fabricated by Spray Flame Synthesis" Nanomaterials 10, no. 8: 1475. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/nano10081475

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop