Series-Biased Micro-LED Array for Lighting, Detection, and Optical Communication

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report (Previous Reviewer 1)

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear authors, thank you for taking into account all my previous comments.

Reviewer 2 Report (Previous Reviewer 2)

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I recommend the publicartion of the manuscript.

This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I attach my review on the document. However, I recommend to re-write the whole paper, paying attention to:

- English and repetition

- Motivation of the research and applications.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

This manuscript reports the fabrication of micro LED array of nitride layer with multi-quantum wells 16 epitaxial on the sapphire substrate. Oveall, the text is written well, but the novelty of this work is unclear. The authors should be clear the difference in scientific finding between this work and published work. The authors should address the below.

1) In this work, the device was epitaxially formed on the sapphire substrate, but there is no evidence such as cross-sectional TEM image supporting the formation.

2) In Figure 7(a), the values of output power sounds low. What is the area? Usually, the values of output power is presented by density.

3) The size of the letters on the Y-axis scale in Figures 8a nd 11 is too small to read.

Reviewer 3 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Please refer to the attached review report.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf