Next Article in Journal
Perceptions of Antibiotic Use and Resistance: Are Antibiotics the Dentists’ Anxiolytics?
Previous Article in Journal
Practices and Challenges of Veterinary Paraprofessionals in Regards to Antimicrobial Use and Resistance in Animals in Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evolution of the Gram-Negative Antibiotic Resistance Spiral over Time: A Time-Series Analysis

1
Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
2
Doctoral School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
3
Ostalb Klinikum, Im Kälblesrain 1, D-73430 Aalen, Germany
4
Central Clinical Pharmacy, Clinical Center, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
5
Department of Metagenomics, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Present address: Department of Pharmacodynamics, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
Submission received: 17 May 2021 / Revised: 10 June 2021 / Accepted: 11 June 2021 / Published: 17 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Antibiotics Use and Antimicrobial Stewardship)

Abstract

:
We followed up the interplay between antibiotic use and resistance over time in a tertiary-care hospital in Hungary. Dynamic relationships between monthly time-series of antibiotic consumption data (defined daily doses per 100 bed-days) and of incidence densities of Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumannii) resistant to cephalosporins or carbapenems were followed using vector autoregressive models sequentially built of time-series ending in 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019. Relationships with Gram-negative bacteria as a group were fairly stable across years. At species level, association of cephalosporin use and cephalosporin resistance of E. coli was shown in 2015–2017, leading to increased carbapenem use in these years. Association of carbapenem use and carbapenem resistance, as well as of carbapenem resistance and colistin use in case of A. baumannii, were consistent throughout; associations in case of Klebsiella spp. were rarely found; associations in case of P. aeruginosa varied highly across years. This highlights the importance of temporal variations in the interplay between changes in selection pressure and occurrence of competing resistant species.

1. Introduction

Antibiotic resistance has been a threat to successful anti-infective therapy ever since antibiotics were initially introduced to clinical practice. Emergence of resistance initially inspired discovery of novel drugs active against resistant strains, but, presently, bacteria seem to be at an advantage in this arms race. This is admittedly caused by antibiotic overuse and misuse [1,2,3].
Carlet et al. [4] hypothesized prescriber concern as the most important factor in the choice of antibiotics in empirical treatment. According to this hypothesis, this concern is the driving force for the antibiotic resistance spiral, the process of ever switching towards broader-spectrum drugs when resistance to presently used ones is felt to be threatening, which leads to overuse of and, consequently, resistance to the replacement drug in a vicious cycle until all therapeutic options are exhausted. Appearance of pandrug-resistant isolates among nosocomial Gram-negative bacteria furnishes this hypothesis with an alarming actuality [5,6,7].
This resistance spiral was shown to involve multiple species; emerging cephalosporin resistance in Escherichia coli induced increasing preference for carbapenem prescribing, which led to increased carbapenem resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and in Acinetobacter baumannii. Concern about carbapenem resistance provoked an increased prescribing of colistin as the last-resort drug [8].
This reflects that hospital ecology is characterized by a complex interplay of emergence, ebbing, and re-emerging of various strains of nosocomial pathogens. Pathogen dynamics are strongly interconnected with bacterial evolution; strains may acquire or lose resistance and virulence genes through horizontal gene transfer [9]. New clones of pathogens that develop at or are imported to healthcare institutions compete with the locally dominant members of the microbiota; some new strains are eliminated, some become established, and eventually may become dominant. Alarmingly, in line with the resistance spiral theory, the newly emerging clones are frequently more resistant than former dominant clones [10,11,12,13], thus the volume and pattern of antibiotic consumption frequently have a major impact on local strain dynamics [14].
This work, as an extension of our abovementioned earlier study reporting a snapshot of the resistance spiral [8], attempts to capture the evolution of the resistance spiral over time by examining relationships among drug consumption and resistance and by comparing the interactions between drugs and drug-resistant bacteria at four additional time points.

2. Results

The relationship between cumulated resistance and antibiotic consumption was stable across the study years. Cephalosporin consumption was associated with resistance to third generation cephalosporins, cephalosporin resistance was linked to increasing carbapenem use, and increased carbapenem use was associated with carbapenem resistance. Carbapenem resistance was linked to colistin consumption, but this was not related to colistin resistance. These associations were found consistently in all model systems, i.e., in data series ending in 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019 (Figure 1, Supplementary Table S1). The only relationship showing changes over time was the reciprocal association, i.e., in data series ending in the last four years, not only was carbapenem use associated with increased colistin use, but the increasing colistin use was linked to decreased carbapenem consumption.
This uniformity disappeared when considering species separately (Figure 2, Supplementary Table S2). In case of E. coli, the link between cephalosporin use and resistance to third generation cephalosporins was consistent across years, except for dataset 2019, but the association between cephalosporin resistance and carbapenem use disappeared in 2017, 2018, and 2019. Curiously, cephalosporin resistance was also associated with increasing cephalosporin use in some years. Testing the resistance spiral further in E. coli was precluded by absence of carbapenem resistance in E. coli throughout the tested period.
In the case of Klebsiella spp. (Figure 2, Supplementary Table S2), the link between cephalosporin use and third generation cephalosporin resistance found in series ending in 2015 disappeared and then reappeared in 2019. The association between cephalosporin resistance of Klebsiella spp. and increasing carbapenem use was absent in 2015–2017, appeared as a weak link in 2018, then was absent again in 2019. Carbapenem consumption was consistently unlinked to carbapenem resistance of Klebsiella spp. in all five datasets. The link between carbapenem resistance of Klebsiella spp. and colistin use was present in earlier series, but not in the 2018 or 2019 datasets; in the latter datasets, colistin use was inversely associated with carbapenem resistance.
The relationships in case of P. aeruginosa were significant only in the earlier datasets (Figure 2, Supplementary Table S2). The only consistent relationship was the absence of association between cephalosporin consumption and ceftazidime resistance of P. aeruginosa. The association between ceftazidime resistance of P. aeruginosa and carbapenem use, between carbapenem use and carbapenem resistance of P. aeruginosa, and between carbapenem resistance and colistin use was only found in the 2015 and 2016 models, but totally absent in other models ( Figure 2; Figure 3, Supplementary Table S2). Moreover, in 2015 and 2016 colistin consumption was also associated with decreasing occurrence of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa ( Figure 2; Figure 3, Supplementary Table S2).
In the case of A. baumannii, the associations were highly consistent (Figure 2, Supplementary Table S2); the links between carbapenem use and carbapenem resistance, as well as carbapenem resistance and colistin use both were present in all model systems across the tested years.
When following the reconstructed resistance spiral over time, many relationships showed changes across the different years’ models (Figure 4, Supplementary Table S3). The initial steps in the tested spiral, the relationships between cephalosporin consumption and cephalosporin resistance of E. coli or of Klebsiella spp. were never present in the composite models, regardless of the dataset. The next step, i.e., the link between cephalosporin resistance and carbapenem use in the case of E. coli was found in datasets 2015 to 2017, but not in datasets 2018 or 2019. Carbapenem resistance was consistently independent of carbapenem use in the case of P. aeruginosa, while in the case of A. baumannii carbapenem use was associated with increasing carbapenem resistance in 2017 to 2019 (but not in earlier years). A reciprocal effect, i.e., association of carbapenem resistance of A. baumannii with decreased carbapenem use, was found in the 2016 and 2017 datasets, but not in the other models. Association of carbapenem resistance with colistin use was variable in the case of P. aeruginosa, i.e., the association was found in 2016, but not in other years. However, a reciprocal effect was detected throughout all models, except 2019. In contrast, the association between carbapenem resistance and colistin use was consistently present and unidirectional in the case of A. baumannii.

3. Discussion

The hospital environment provides a finite number of niches that hospital bacteria may occupy and, consequently, bacteria compete for these. As a result, hospital ecology is frequently characterized by emergence, receding, and re-emergence of different nosocomial strains, creating a complicated interplay of strain dynamics [15]. In this highly competitive environment, any selective advantage may become a major actor in shaping hospital ecology [9,16].
The observation that a shift towards more resistant strains is common in hospitals indicates that antibiotic consumption is a major selective force in hospital ecology and, therefore, is a major driver of strain dynamics in hospitals [17]. This is exemplified convincingly by the success of antibiotic restriction interventions, which lead to a decrease of the resistant strains targeted, [18] (op. cit.) but may result in overuse of replacement drugs and in spreading bacteria resistant to the replacement drugs, i.e., to “squeezing the antibiotic balloon” [19,20,21]. Consequently, understanding how strain dynamics are shaped by the pattern of relationships between drug use and drug resistance is a key information for antimicrobial stewardship efforts aimed at containing antibiotic resistance.
In this particular setting, the resistance spiral was well delineated when examining all major Gram-negative pathogens as one group, but species-by-species analysis revealed differences between them which dynamically evolved over time. These dynamics suggest that the relative importance of a given species may fluctuate, even in the absence of major outbreaks.
The position of A. baumannii as the major problem species was stable during the study period, characterized by endemic occurrence of a few carbapenem-resistant clones [22,23]. It persisted as the main species with carbapenem resistance and, consequently, as the main driver of colistin use throughout the five datasets. This is in line with the extensive literature on carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii, frequently reported as a major emerging threat among multiresistant nosocomial bacteria. Carbapenem resistance of A. baumannii was also linked to extensive use of carbapenems and provoked colistin use in a number of reports [24,25,26].
All other species exhibit changes in relative importance of various consumption–resistance or reciprocal relationships. The role of P. aeruginosa seems to be confined to the first two years (2015–2016). Though its cephalosporin was associated with increasing carbapenem use in these two years, this was only weakly linked to carbapenem resistance. Moreover, increasing colistin consumption was associated with decreasing carbapenem resistance. When analyzing the complete resistance spiral, the effect of carbapenem use disappeared and reciprocal associations were the more marked, suggesting that carbapenem resistance of P. aeruginosa is less strongly linked to antibiotic consumption than that of A. baumannii.
The population structure of P. aeruginosa is reported as multiclonal in most studies [27,28]; even when major clones were present, the population was characterized by high diversity and by the presence of several different clones. Similarly, multiple versatile P. aeruginosa clones may be circulating in our hospital, as reported in a previous study with a more limited scope conducted in a ward of the same hospital [29]. Apparently, the persistence of one or a few successful clones is unlikely, in contrast to A. baumannii [22,23].
Klebsiella spp., in contrast to situations in many European countries, were not major players in the resistance spiral in this study. The expected effect of cephalosporin consumption on cephalosporin-resistant Klebsiella spp. and its influence on carbapenem use was only detected in the earliest 2015 and latest 2019 datasets. The decreasing importance was foreshadowed in the findings on asymptomatic carriers in the same hospital, where a slow receding was found in parallel with slow emergence of E. coli as the major ESBL producing species [30]. Carbapenem resistance has not yet emerged in Klebsiella spp. as a major problem in this setting; sporadic occurrence of resistant isolates has been detected, but the incidence is still low. It is tempting to assume a link with the high prevalence of carbapenem-resistant non-fermenters, which may have occupied the niches created by high carbapenem use and may hinder the spread of Klebsiella. Increasing use of colistin, which in the 2019 dataset was associated with decreasing carbapenem resistance in Klebsiella spp., may also have contributed to this.
In the case of E. coli, cephalosporin use was associated with cephalosporin resistance in all datasets but 2019, which, in turn, was the major driver of carbapenem use in 2015 and 2016. This is in line with the emergence of ESBL-producing E. coli as one of the main nosocomial threats in our setting [30] and worldwide [31], but, at the same time, suggests its decreasing importance as the driver of carbapenem use. After using carbapenems in fear of multiresistant E. coli, carbapenem prescription may have become a prescribing habit or even practice, decoupling from the increasing prevalence of cephalosporin resistance.
The models of the complete spiral supported the above assumption, while in later models carbapenem use seems to be partially substituted by colistin use. This is in line with usage of colistin, i.e., colistin is used primarily when carbapenems are, or are thought to be, ineffective. This was driven primarily by carbapenem resistance of A. baumannii, as shown by the steadily observable relationship between carbapenem resistance in A. baumannii and colistin use in all datasets. This again points towards the importance of resistance as a provoker of the use of drugs perceived as more efficacious [32]. Colistin resistance was infrequent in the study period, similarly to another University clinic in Hungary [33], and thus was not analyzed.
The presented results lend support to our earlier observation that different species play different roles in the spiral. These roles were dynamic and may change over even as short a time period as one year. Furthermore, these changes in incidence of resistance in a species were linked to changes in antibiotic use, in line with previous findings [14,15]. The present study concentrated on Gram-negative bacteria of major importance, and an important limitation of the study is that Gram-positive bacteria were not investigated, though they are definitely important players in hospital ecology. However, the number of variables which may be used in a single effective model is limited; this shortcoming of the statistical methodology precluded a fully comprehensive analysis incorporating Gram-positive bacteria and the drugs used against them.
We believe that differences detected across the models in this study using the consecutive data series are consequent to the recent changes in the time series compared to the former year’s series, either in the antibiotic consumption or in the resistance series or in their relation. Thus, the present study represents an attempt to track the changes in the resistance spiral over time. The temporally stable dynamics of the Gram-negative resistance spiral supports that antibiotic resistance is shifting towards increasing resistance in Gram-negative bacteria continuously, as extensively documented both at local [8,34,35] and global [36,37,38] scales. This spread of resistance is driven, at least partly, by the turning of the prescribers’ preference towards broader and broader spectrum antibiotics, as concluded earlier [4,8,32].

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, the interplay between antibiotic use and resistance in different species was dynamically changing over time. This points out that analyses targeting such relationships provide insight into a momentary situation; assumptions that these relationships are lasting may be misleading. For a more complete and firmer understanding of these relationships and, consequently, to keep stewardship efforts built on these data well-directed, periodic reanalysis of such datasets is advisable.

5. Materials and Methods

The study was conducted in a University-affiliated tertiary teaching hospital with 1667 beds between October 2004 and December 2019. We collected monthly consumption data (drugs drawn by wards from the clinical pharmacy) of all cephalosporins, carbapenems, aminoglycosides, quinolones, and colistin in defined daily doses (DDD) per 100 occupied bed-days (OBDs) [39]. Resistance was measured in incidence density of infections per 1000 OBDs by bacteria resistant to cephalosporins, carbapenems, and colistin among E. coli, Klebsiella spp. (K. pneumoniae and K. oxytoca together), P. aeruginosa, and A. baumannii isolated from inpatients. Resistance burden was calculated for all major Gram-negative bacteria by summing up incidence densities of the studied species for each drug group, further referred to as cumulated resistance of Gram-negative bacteria. Multiple isolates from the same patients were included only once.
Five groups of time-series were constituted, the first from October 2004 to December 2015 (dataset 2015), the second from October 2004 to December 2016 (dataset 2016; this dataset is the closest in time to the dataset used in our former study [8]), the third from October 2004 to December 2017 (dataset 2017), the fourth from October 2004 to December 2018 (dataset 2018), and the fifth from October 2004 to December 2019 (dataset 2019).
All five datasets were analyzed using the same modelling strategy as earlier; VAR models were built with all five datasets using the same R script [8]. In unit root determination, lag selection, model building, and model diagnostic, we followed the former protocol, including the rolling window strategy. The association was accepted as existing if it was found in more than 6 of the 12 rolling windows. If the association was significant in only one or two lags, it was termed weak. This rigorously identical modelling strategy allows for robust comparison of results between the five time-series datasets. First, the cumulated resistance of all Gram-negative bacteria was modelled, then models of a single species were built, and, finally, a model capturing the complete resistance spiral was constructed. The models also contained aminoglycoside and quinolone consumption variables in order to represent their effect, but their involvement in the resistance spiral was not tested directly. All corresponding models were compared using the five sets of time-series, i.e., between the five endpoint years.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/antibiotics10060734/s1, Table S1. Changes in relationships found between drug use and cumulated drug resistance of all Gram-negative bacteria over time in vector autoregressive (VAR) models. These models also inclulde use of other drug groups (fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides as well as cephalosporins and carbapenems where applicable.); Table S2. Relationships found between drug use and drug resistance of different Gram-negative bacteria by species; Table S3. Changes in relationships found over the complete resistance spiral over time. Light shading marks significant relationships, dark shading marks significant reciprocal associations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.T. and G.K.; methodology, H.T., L.M., K.S. and G.K.; software, H.T. and G.K.; validation L.M. and K.S.; formal analysis, H.T. and G.K.; investigation, G.B., A.F., B.B. and J.B.N.; resources, L.M., K.S. and G.K.; data curation, G.B., A.F., B.B. and J.B.N.; writing—original draft preparation, H.T. and G.K.; writing—review and editing, H.T., G.B., L.M., K.S. and G.K.; visualization, H.T. and G.K.; supervision, G.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding. ÚNKP-17-2 and ÚNKP-19-3-I New National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities supported H.T. and B.B., respectively. K.S. and G.K. were supported by BOLYAI research scholarships of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences. 2019-2.1.11-TÉT-2019-00020 travel grant supported H.T., A.F. and G.K.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The expert opinion of Márton Kormanik on VAR models is gratefully acknowledged, as well as inspiring discussions in the THRESHOLDS study group.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Bell, B.G.; Schellevis, F.; Stobberingh, E.; Goossens, H.; Pringle, M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of antibiotic consumption on antibiotic resistance. BMC Infect. Dis. 2014, 14, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Holmes, A.H.; Moore, L.S.P.; Sundsfjord, A.; Steinbakk, M.; Regmi, S.; Karkey, A.; Guerin, P.J.; Piddock, L.J.V. Understanding the mechanisms and drivers of antimicrobial resistance. Lancet 2016, 387, 176–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Laxminarayan, R.; Duse, A.; Wattal, C.; Zaidi, A.K.M.; Wertheim, H.F.L.; Sumpradit, N.; Vlieghe, E.; Hara, G.L.; Gould, I.M.; Goossens, H.; et al. Antibiotic resistance—the need for global solutions. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2013, 13, 1057–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Carlet, J.; Ben Ali, A.; Chalfine, A. Epidemiology and control of antibiotic resistance in the intensive care unit. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2004, 17, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Lázaro-Perona, F.; Sotillo, A.; Troyano-Hernáez, P.; Gómez-Gil, R.; de la Vega-Bueno, Á.; Mingorance, J. Genomic path to pandrug resistance in a clinical isolate of Klebsiella pneumoniae. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2018, 52, 713–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Nowak, J.; Zander, E.; Stefanik, D.; Higgins, P.G.; Roca, I.; Vila, J.; McConnell, M.J.; Cisneros, J.M.; Seifert, H.; MagicBullet Working Group WP4. High incidence of pandrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates collected from patients with ventilator-associated pneumonia in Greece, Italy and Spain as part of the MagicBullet clinical trial. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72, 3277–3282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zowawi, H.M.; Forde, B.M.; Alfaresi, M.; Alzarouni, A.; Farahat, Y.; Chong, T.-M.; Yin, W.-F.; Chan, K.G.; Li, J.; Schembri, M.; et al. Stepwise evolution of pandrug-resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 15082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Tóth, H.; Fésűs, A.; Kungler-Gorácz, O.; Balázs, B.; Majoros, L.; Szarka, K.; Kardos, G. Utilization of Vector Autoregressive and Linear Transfer Models to Follow Up the Antibiotic Resistance Spiral in Gram-negative Bacteria From Cephalosporin Consumption to Colistin Resistance. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2018, 69, 1410–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Baquero, F.; Alvarez-Ortega, C.; Martinez, J.L. Ecology and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2009, 1, 469–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ahmad, A.; Zachariasen, C.; Christiansen, L.E.; Græsbøll, K.; Toft, N.; Matthews, L.; Nielsen, S.S.; Olsen, J.E. Modeling the growth dynamics of multiple Escherichia coli strains in the pig intestine following intramuscular ampicillin treatment. BMC Microbiol. 2016, 16, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Diancourt, L.; Passet, V.; Nemec, A.; Dijkshoorn, L.; Brisse, S. The Population Structure of Acinetobacter baumannii: Expanding Multiresistant Clones from an Ancestral Susceptible Genetic Pool. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e10034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Duong, J.; Booth, S.; McCartney, N.K.; Rabin, H.R.; Parkins, M.D.; Storey, D.G. Phenotypic and Genotypic Comparison of Epidemic and Non-Epidemic Strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Individuals with Cystic Fibrosis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Park, Y.K.; Jung, S.-I.; Park, K.-H.; Kim, D.H.; Choi, J.Y.; Kim, S.H.; Ko, K.S. Changes in antimicrobial susceptibility and major clones of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus–baumannii complex isolates from a single hospital in Korea over 7 years. J. Med. Microbiol. 2012, 61, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Lawes, T.; Lopez-Lozano, J.-M.; Nebot, C.; Macartney, G.; Subbarao-Sharma, R.; Dare, C.; Edwards, G.F.S.; Gould, I.M. Turning the tide or riding the waves? Impacts of antibiotic stewardship and infection control on MRSA strain dynamics in a Scottish region over 16 years: Non-linear time series analysis. BMJ Open 2015, 5, e006596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, J.; Foxman, B.; Mody, L.; Snitkin, E.S. Network of microbial and antibiotic interactions drive colonization and infection with multidrug-resistant organisms. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 10467–10472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Tenover, F.C.; McGowan, J.E. Reasons for the Emergence of Antibiotic Resistance. Am. J. Med. Sci. 1996, 311, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tacconelli, E.; De Angelis, G.; Cataldo, M.A.; Mantengoli, E.; Spanu, T.; Pan, A.; Corti, G.; Radice, A.; Stolzuoli, L.; Antinori, S.; et al. Antibiotic Usage and Risk of Colonization and Infection with Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria: A Hospital Population-Based Study. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 4264–4269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kaki, R.; Elligsen, M.; Walker, S.; Simor, A.; Palmay, L.; Daneman, N. Impact of antimicrobial stewardship in critical care: A systematic review. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011, 66, 1223–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ntagiopoulos, P.G.; Paramythiotou, E.; Antoniadou, A.; Giamarellou, H.; Karabinis, A. Impact of an antibiotic restriction policy on the antibiotic resistance patterns of Gram-negative microorganisms in an Intensive Care Unit in Greece. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2007, 30, 360–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Peterson, L. Squeezing the antibiotic balloon: The impact of antimicrobial classes on emerging resistance. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2005, 11, 4–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Rahal, J.J.; Urban, C.; Horn, D.; Freeman, K.; Segal-Maurer, S.; Maurer, J.; Mariano, N.; Marks, S.; Burns, J.M.; Dominick, D.; et al. Class Restriction of Cephalosporin Use to Control Total Cephalosporin Resistance in Nosocomial Klebsiella. JAMA 1998, 280, 1233–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Mózes, J.; Ebrahimi, F.; Gorácz, O.; Miszti, C.; Kardos, G. Effect of carbapenem consumption patterns on the molecular epidemiology and carbapenem resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Med. Microbiol. 2014, 63, 1654–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Balázs, B.; Tóth, Z.; Nagy, F.; Kovács, R.; Tóth, H.; Nagy, J.; Tóth, Á.; Szarka, K.; Majoros, L.; Kardos, G. The Role of Uniform Meropenem Usage in Acinetobacter baumannii Clone Replacement. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Agodi, A.; Voulgari, E.; Barchitta, M.; Quattrocchi, A.; Bellocchi, P.; Poulou, A.; Santangelo, C.; Castiglione, G.; Giaquinta, L.; Romeo, M.; et al. Spread of a carbapenem- and colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii ST2 clonal strain causing outbreaks in two Sicilian hospitals. J. Hosp. Infect. 2014, 86, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ben-Chetrit, E.; Wiener-Well, Y.; Lesho, E.; Kopuit, P.; Broyer, C.; Bier, L.; Assous, M.V.; Benenson, S.; Cohen, M.J.; McGann, P.T.; et al. An intervention to control an ICU outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: Long-term impact for the ICU and hospital. Crit. Care 2018, 22, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Yilmaz, G.R.; Dizbay, M.; Güven, T.; Pullukçu, H.; Taşbakan, M.; Guzel, O.T.; Tekce, Y.T.; Ozden, M.; Turhan, O.; Güner, R.; et al. Risk factors for infection with colistin-resistant gram-negative microorganisms: A multicenter study. Ann. Saudi Med. 2016, 36, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Santos, I.; de Andrade, N.F.P.; Neto, O.C.D.C.; da Costa, B.S.; Marques, E.D.A.; Rocha-De-Souza, C.M.; Asensi, M.D.; Carvalho-Assef, A.P.D. Epidemiology and antibiotic resistance trends in clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Rio de janeiro-Brazil: Importance of mutational mechanisms over the years (1995–2015). Infect. Genet. Evol. 2019, 73, 411–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. McCarthy, K.L.; Kidd, T.; Paterson, D. Molecular epidemiology of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infection isolates in a non-outbreak setting. J. Med. Microbiol. 2017, 66, 154–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mózes, J.; Szűcs, I.; Molnar, D.; Jakab, P.; Fatemeh, E.; Szilasi, M.; Majoros, L.; Orosi, P.; Kardos, G. A potential role of aminoglycoside resistance in endemic occurrence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains in lower airways of mechanically ventilated patients. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2014, 78, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ebrahimi, F.; Mózes, J.; Monostori, J.; Gorácz, O.; Fésűs, A.; Majoros, L.; Szarka, K.; Kardos, G. Comparison of the faecal colonization rates with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing enterobacteria among patients in different wards, outpatients and screened medical students. Microbiol. Immunol. 2016, 60, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Cassini, A.; Högberg, L.D.; Plachouras, D.; Quattrocchi, A.; Hoxha, A.; Simonsen, G.S.; Colomb-Cotinat, M.; Kretzschmar, M.E.; Devleesschauwer, B.; Cecchini, M.; et al. Attributable deaths and disability-adjusted life-years caused by infections with antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the EU and the European Economic Area in 2015: A population-level modelling analysis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2019, 19, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Livorsi, D.; Comer, A.R.; Matthias, M.S.; Perencevich, E.; Bair, M.J. Factors Influencing Antibiotic-Prescribing Decisions Among Inpatient Physicians: A Qualitative Investigation. Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol. 2015, 36, 1065–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Juhász, E.; Iván, M.; Pintér, E.; Pongrácz, J.; Kristóf, K. Colistin resistance among blood culture isolates at a tertiary care centre in Hungary. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2017, 11, 167–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Freeman, R.; Moore, L.S.P.; Charlett, A.; Donaldson, H.; Holmes, A.H. Exploring the epidemiology of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in west London and the utility of routinely collected hospital microbiology data. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2014, 70, 1212–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Goel, N.; Wattal, C.; Oberoi, J.K.; Raveendran, R.; Datta, S.; Prasad, K.J. Trend analysis of antimicrobial consumption and development of resistance in non-fermenters in a tertiary care hospital in Delhi, India. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011, 66, 1625–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance in Europe–Annual Report of the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network [EARS-Net] 2017; ECDC: Stockholm, Sweden, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  37. Jean, S.-S.; Hsueh, P.-R. Distribution of ESBLs, AmpC ?-lactamases and carbapenemases among Enterobacteriaceae isolates causing intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections in the Asia-Pacific region during 2008–14: Results from the Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends (SMART). J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2016, 72, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zellweger, R.M.; Carrique-Mas, J.; Limmathurotsakul, D.; Day, N.P.J.; E Thwaites, G.; Baker, S.; Ashley, E.; De Balogh, K.; Baird, K.; Basnyat, B.; et al. A current perspective on antimicrobial resistance in Southeast Asia. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72, 2963–2972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Monnet, D.L. ABC Calc—Antibiotic Consumption Calculator [Microsoft Excel Application]. Version 3.0; Statens Serum Institut: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2005. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Relationships between antibiotic use and resistance in case of all Gram-negative bacteria together. Filled arrows: positive relationship (effect on response is directly proportionate to the impulse), open arrows: negative relationship (effect on response is inversely proportionate to the impulse), directions of arrows show the direction of the relationship, i.e., arrows pointing right show that the left variable is the impulse and the right variable is the response, arrows pointing left mark the opposite. In this manner, the black-left-white-right arrows mark that carbapenem resistance is associated with increased colistin use, and, at the same time, increasing colistin use is associated with decreasing carbapenem resistance.
Figure 1. Relationships between antibiotic use and resistance in case of all Gram-negative bacteria together. Filled arrows: positive relationship (effect on response is directly proportionate to the impulse), open arrows: negative relationship (effect on response is inversely proportionate to the impulse), directions of arrows show the direction of the relationship, i.e., arrows pointing right show that the left variable is the impulse and the right variable is the response, arrows pointing left mark the opposite. In this manner, the black-left-white-right arrows mark that carbapenem resistance is associated with increased colistin use, and, at the same time, increasing colistin use is associated with decreasing carbapenem resistance.
Antibiotics 10 00734 g001
Figure 2. Relationships between antibiotic use and resistance in case of different species analyzed separately. X symbol: no significant relationship; filled arrows: positive relationship (effect on response is directly proportionate to the impulse), open arrows: negative relationship (effect on response is inversely proportionate to the impulse), directions of arrows show the direction of the relationship, i.e., arrows pointing right show that the left variable is the impulse and the right variable is the response, arrows pointing left mark the opposite.
Figure 2. Relationships between antibiotic use and resistance in case of different species analyzed separately. X symbol: no significant relationship; filled arrows: positive relationship (effect on response is directly proportionate to the impulse), open arrows: negative relationship (effect on response is inversely proportionate to the impulse), directions of arrows show the direction of the relationship, i.e., arrows pointing right show that the left variable is the impulse and the right variable is the response, arrows pointing left mark the opposite.
Antibiotics 10 00734 g002
Figure 3. Changes in the relationships between antibiotic use and resistance over time: the example of the relationship between carbapenem resistance in P. aeruginosa and colistin use. Left panel: impulse response functions with incidence densities of infections by carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa per 1000 occupied bed-days as impulses and colistin consumption (defined daily doses per 100 occupied bed-days) as responses. Right panel: impulse functions of the reciprocal relationships with colistin use as impulses and incidence densities of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa as responses. Response horizon is shown in the X axis (in months following the impulse), Y axis shows the magnitude of the response. Solid lines are the estimates, dashed lines are the 95% confidence intervals determined by bootstrapping of 100 repetitions. Note that the scales are different. The 2019 results, being similar to 2017 and 2018 results, are not shown due to space constraints.
Figure 3. Changes in the relationships between antibiotic use and resistance over time: the example of the relationship between carbapenem resistance in P. aeruginosa and colistin use. Left panel: impulse response functions with incidence densities of infections by carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa per 1000 occupied bed-days as impulses and colistin consumption (defined daily doses per 100 occupied bed-days) as responses. Right panel: impulse functions of the reciprocal relationships with colistin use as impulses and incidence densities of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa as responses. Response horizon is shown in the X axis (in months following the impulse), Y axis shows the magnitude of the response. Solid lines are the estimates, dashed lines are the 95% confidence intervals determined by bootstrapping of 100 repetitions. Note that the scales are different. The 2019 results, being similar to 2017 and 2018 results, are not shown due to space constraints.
Antibiotics 10 00734 g003
Figure 4. Relationships between antibiotic use and resistance in the model containing the whole resistance spiral. Shaded cells show relationships proved to be unimportant in the species-by-species models and, therefore, not included in the model of the spiral. X symbol: no significant relationship; filled arrows: positive relationship (effect on response is directly proportionate to the impulse), open arrows: negative relationship (effect on response is inversely proportionate to the impulse), directions of arrows show the direction of the relationship, i.e., arrows pointing right show that the left variable is the impulse and the right variable is the response, arrows pointing left mark the opposite.
Figure 4. Relationships between antibiotic use and resistance in the model containing the whole resistance spiral. Shaded cells show relationships proved to be unimportant in the species-by-species models and, therefore, not included in the model of the spiral. X symbol: no significant relationship; filled arrows: positive relationship (effect on response is directly proportionate to the impulse), open arrows: negative relationship (effect on response is inversely proportionate to the impulse), directions of arrows show the direction of the relationship, i.e., arrows pointing right show that the left variable is the impulse and the right variable is the response, arrows pointing left mark the opposite.
Antibiotics 10 00734 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tóth, H.; Buchholcz, G.; Fésüs, A.; Balázs, B.; Nagy, J.B.; Majoros, L.; Szarka, K.; Kardos, G. Evolution of the Gram-Negative Antibiotic Resistance Spiral over Time: A Time-Series Analysis. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 734. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics10060734

AMA Style

Tóth H, Buchholcz G, Fésüs A, Balázs B, Nagy JB, Majoros L, Szarka K, Kardos G. Evolution of the Gram-Negative Antibiotic Resistance Spiral over Time: A Time-Series Analysis. Antibiotics. 2021; 10(6):734. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics10060734

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tóth, Hajnalka, Gyula Buchholcz, Adina Fésüs, Bence Balázs, József Bálint Nagy, László Majoros, Krisztina Szarka, and Gábor Kardos. 2021. "Evolution of the Gram-Negative Antibiotic Resistance Spiral over Time: A Time-Series Analysis" Antibiotics 10, no. 6: 734. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics10060734

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop