Next Article in Journal
Antibiotics Self Medication among Children: A Systematic Review
Next Article in Special Issue
In Vitro Activity of Imipenem-Relebactam, Meropenem-Vaborbactam, Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Comparators on Carbapenem-Resistant Non-Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacterales
Previous Article in Journal
Evaluation of Fosfomycin-Sulbactam Combination Therapy against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates in a Hollow-Fibre Infection Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Whole-Genome Sequencing of ST2 A. baumannii Causing Bloodstream Infections in COVID-19 Patients
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 11
Issue 11
10.3390/antibiotics11111585
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Controlling of Bacterial Virulence: Evaluation of Anti-Virulence Activities of Prazosin against Salmonella enterica

by
Mahmoud A. Elfaky
1,2,
Abrar K. Thabit
3,*,
Khalid Eljaaly
3,
Ayat Zawawi
4,5,
Ahmed S. Abdelkhalek
6,
Ahmad J. Almalki
7,
Tarek S. Ibrahim
7 and
Wael A. H. Hegazy
8,9,*
1
Department of Natural Products, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
2
Centre for Artificial Intelligence in Precision Medicines, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
3
Pharmacy Practice Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
4
Department of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
5
Vaccines and Immunotherapy Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
6
Medicinal Chemistry Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt
7
Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
8
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44519, Egypt
9
Pharmacy Program, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Oman College of Health Sciences, Muscat 113, Oman
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2022, 11(11), 1585; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics11111585
Submission received: 18 October 2022 / Revised: 3 November 2022 / Accepted: 5 November 2022 / Published: 9 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bacterial Pathogenesis and Antimicrobial Strategy)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Salmonella enterica is a Gram-negative orofecal transmitted pathogen that causes a wide diversity of local and systemic illnesses. Salmonella enterica utilizes several interplayed systems to regulate its invasion and pathogenesis: namely, quorum sensing (QS) and type three secretion system (T3SS). In addition, S. enterica could sense the adrenergic hormones in the surroundings that enhance its virulence. The current study aimed to evaluate the ability of α-adrenoreceptor antagonist prazosin to mitigate the virulence of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium. The prazosin effect on biofilm formation and the expression of sdiA, qseC, qseE, and T3SS-type II encoding genes was evaluated. Furthermore, the prazosin intracellular replication inside macrophage and anti-virulence activity was evaluated in vivo against S. typhimurium. The current finding showed a marked prazosin ability to compete on SdiA and QseC and downregulate their encoding genes. Prazosin significantly downregulated the virulence factors encoding genes and diminished the biofilm formation, intracellular replication inside macrophages, and in vivo protected mice. To sum up, prazosin showed significant inhibitory activities against QS, T3SS, and bacterial espionage, which documents its considered anti-virulence activities.

1. Introduction

Salmonella enterica is a facultative intracellular, invasive, gastrointestinal pathogen, and it causes diverse human diseases ranging from local gastroenteritis to systemic typhoid fever [1,2]. Salmonella species are classified into typhoidal and nontyphoidal, and both cause invasive infections and critical enteric fever if not treated properly, leading to higher mortality rates [3,4]. Quorum sensing (QS) is the cell-to-cell communication system in which bacteria employ autoinducers (AIs), such as N-acylhomoserine lactones (AHLs) to play a key role in bacterial virulence [5,6]. S. enterica comprises at least two QS types, one is induced by AHLs and the other is induced by autoinducer-2 (AI-2) [6,7,8,9]. QS regulates several bacterial physiological activities including bacterial motility, the expression of virulence factors, and biofilm formation that enhances bacterial virulence and pathogenesis [10,11,12]. However, S. enterica does not produce an AHL synthase; instead, it encodes a Lux-type QS receptor homolog SdiA which senses AHLs’ different acyl chain lengths [5,6]. Interestingly, SdiA senses exclusively AHLs synthesized by other bacterial species playing significant roles in controlling valence [6,8].
S. enterica employs two different types of type III secretion systems (T3SS), which mediate separate functions [2]. Several important S. enterica virulence factors are located in definite loci called Salmonella Pathogenicity Islands (SPI) [1,13,14]. Two main SPI encode T3SS to translocate their effectors in different phases of pathogenesis [15,16,17]. In the early phase, SPI1-T3SS translocates T3SS-type-1 effectors to modify the cellular G-proteins facilitating the invasion. Later, SPI2-T3SS mediates the translocation of effectors needed for intracellular survival [17]. In addition to QS and T3SS, S. enterica senses neuroendocrine hormones and other catechol amines in a phenomenon called bacterial espionage [18,19,20,21,22]. Bacterial espionage was observed particularly in gut pathogens, where bacterial sensors sense the surrounding chemical changes, easing their accommodation and enhancing bacterial virulence [23,24]. As a cross-talk between bacteria and host cells, the AIs detected by QS receptors cross-talk with the adrenergic hormones triggering the same signaling pathway to enhance bacterial virulence [20,21,24,25]. Furthermore, bacterial AIs induce neuroendocrine hormone production in host cells, which results in increased bacterial sensation to neuroendocrine hormones exaggerating bacterial virulence [20,26]. There is cumulative evidence that S. enterica senses the host neuroendocrine stress hormones, enhancing bacterial virulence [20,21,22,24].
The increasing resistance development is one of the main health issues, especially in serious infections such as S. enterica enteric fevers [4,27,28]. The elevated resistance of S. enterica to several antibiotics that were assumed effective is observed around the world [28,29]. The dwindled supply of new efficient antibiotics complicates the situation and dictates the innovation of new approaches. As an interesting approach, alleviating bacterial virulence is assumed to help the immune system in the complete eradication of invading bacteria without affecting their growth, avoiding resistance development [30,31,32,33]. For this purpose, several approved drugs were repurposed to serve as efficient anti-virulence agents [34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. Despite the obvious merits of drug repurposing, there are critical concerns that must be resolved to avoid adverse effects before their use as anti-virulence agents [10,41,42,43].
Salmonella has a two-component regulatory system PhoP/PhoQ that regulates the expression of genes involved in virulence and resistance to host defense antimicrobial peptides. Furthermore, the PhoP/PhoQ system promotes the Salmonella internalization inside host immune cells [44]. It was shown that targeting the sensor kinase PhoQ results in the inhibition of S. typhimurium. Moreover, Salmonella can sense the adrenergic hormones and other catecholamines via membranal sensor kinases as QseC, which results in the augmentation of its virulence [20,22]. Carabajal et al. documented the anti-virulence activity of quinazoline-containing compounds via targeting S. typhimurium PhoQ sensor kinase [45]. In this context, several approaches were proposed to synthesize pharmacophores that can target bacterial histidine kinases to be employed as anti-virulence agents [45,46,47,48]. Prazosin is an α-adrenoreceptor antagonist that is used widely in the treatment of hypertension and related diseases [49]. Interestingly, prazosin possesses the quinazoline moiety that may indicate its anti-virulence activity (Figure 1).
Bearing in mind the virulence behavior of S. enterica, hindering the adrenergic receptor could reduce the bacterial spy on host cells that results in the mitigation of bacterial virulence [20,21]. It was hypothesized that adrenoreceptor blockers are suitable candidates to reduce bacterial espionage [31,32]. Furthermore, α-adrenoreceptor blocker terazosin showed significant anti-QS activities against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and S. enterica serovar Typhimurium [19]. That is inspiring to further evaluate the anti-virulence activities of other α-adrenoreceptor blockers. It is aimed to in vitro and in vivo evaluate the anti-virulence activities of prazosin against S. enterica serovar Typhimurium and Escherichia coli K-12, exploring its effects on QS, T3SS, and bacterial espionage.

2. Results

2.1. Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) of Prazosin on S. typhimurium and E. coli K-12

A broth microdilution method was employed to determine the MICs of prazosin against the tested bacterial stains. The lowest concentrations of the prazosin that inhibited the growth of S. Typhimurium and E. coli K-12 were 4 and 2 mg/mL, respectively. To avoid any prazosin effect on bacterial growth, all the subsequent tests were performed using prazosin at sub−MIC (1/4 MIC). Furthermore, the bacterial strains were overnight cultured in the presence of prazosin at sub−MIC, and the optical densities and bacterial counts were compared to untreated cultures. Significant differences between treated and untreated cultures with prazosin at sub−MIC were not observed (Figure 2).

2.2. Anti-QS and Anti-Biofilm Activities of Prazosin

2.2.1. Prazosin Downregulated the Expression of sdiA Gene

The expression of sdiA gene in Salmonella was quantified in the presence and absence of prazosin at sub−MIC. Prazosin significantly reduced the expression of the sdiA gene (Figure 3).

2.2.2. Prazosin’s Anti-Biofilm Activity

The QS system plays a key role in the regulation of the bacterial virulence and controls the production of several virulence factors as biofilm formation. In this context, the effects of prazosin on the S. typhimurium and E. coli K-12 adhesion biofilm formation were evaluated. Interestingly, prazosin at sub−MIC diminished bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces (Figure 4).

2.3. Prazosin Likely Silences the Bacterial Espionage

Prazosin Downregulated the Expression of qseC and qseE
For attesting the possible inhibitory effect of prazosin at sub−MIC on bacterial espionage, the expression levels of norepinephrine membranal sensors encoding genes qseC and qesE were evaluated in the presence of prazosin. Prazosin significantly decreased the expression of both qseC and qseE in S. Typhimurium (Figure 5).

2.4. Prazosin Interfered with the Intracellular Replication of S. typhimurium

2.4.1. Prazosin Interfered with the S. typhimurium Intracellular Replication in Macrophages

S. typhimurium is described as intracellular bacteria that can survive and replicate inside the macrophage phagosome [1,2]. The gentamicin protection assay was employed to evaluate the Salmonella internalization within macrophages. The counts of intracellular bacterial replication were calculated as x-fold (16 h against 2 h). Prazosin at sub−MIC significantly decreased the number of surviving bacteria (Figure 6B). For visualization, Salmonella cells were immune stained inside macrophage cells (Figure 6A). Clearly, prazosin decreased the intracellular Salmonella.

2.4.2. Prazosin Downregulated the Expression of T3SS-Type 2 Encoding Genes

S. Typhimurium T3SS-type 2 plays a crucial role in its survival inside the phagosome of antigen-presenting cells [15,50]. Interfering with the T3SS-type 2 could lead to the possible inhibition of Salmonella intracellular replication. The expression of different T3SS-Type 2 encoding genes in the presence of prazosin at sub−MIC was evaluated in comparison to untreated control. Prazosin significantly diminished the expression of the tested genes (Figure 7).

2.5. Prazosin In Vivo Anti-Virulence Activity

In order to evaluate the anti-virulence activity of prazosin, the ability of prazosin at sub−MIC to protect mice against S. typhimurium was assessed by employing in vivo protection assay. To further support the hypothesis, the effect of norepinephrine on S. typhimurium was also evaluated. There were no deaths observed in the mice groups injected with sterile PBS or kept uninfected. In the mice groups that were injected with untreated Salmonella or norepinephrine-treated Salmonella, the survival rate was 50% (5 deaths out of 10 mice). Meanwhile, in the mice injected with prazosin-treated Salmonella, the survival rate increased to 80% (2 deaths out 10 mice). These findings support that prazosin significantly diminished the S. typhimurium capacity to kill mice (p = 0.0048) (Figure 8).

3. Discussion

Despite the success of antibiotics at lessening the mortality and morbidity of bacterial infections, bacteria have acquired the ability to become resistant to antibiotics, diminishing their impact [51,52,53,54]. This situation of bacterial resistance increment to antibiotics requires solutions expanding from the discovery of new antibiotics, improving the clinical practice to innovative approaches [52,53,55,56]. Among the proven efficient approaches, the attenuation of bacterial virulence is considered a promising one [57,58]. Several studies have been conducted to mitigate bacterial virulence by a wide diversity of chemical and natural compounds [30,31,32,34,59]. Particularly, the anti-virulence activities of several approved safe drugs were investigated prior to their repurposing to serve as adjuvants to antibiotics [31,32,34]. In previous studies, adrenoreceptor antagonists were screened for their anti-QS and anti-virulence activities [31,32]. Interestingly, β-adrenoreceptor antagonists atenolol and metoprolol diminished the virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, Serratia marcescens, Salmonella enterica, and E. coli [32,60,61]. In addition, α-adrenoreceptor blocker antagonist terazosin showed significant in vitro and in vivo reduction in S. enterica and P. aeruginosa pathogenesis [19,31]. Furthermore, the anti-QS activities of prazosin were screened against P. aeruginosa, P. mirabilis, S. marcescens; it diminished the biofilm formation and reduced the bacterial pathogenesis in vitro and in vivo [62]. As the virulence behavior of S. enterica is quite different from P. aeruginosa, P. mirabilis, and S. marcescens, the current study aimed to evaluate the anti-virulence activities of prazosin against S. enterica and E. coli K12, investigating the possible mechanisms and discovering more bacterial targets. The basis of this approach is diminishing bacterial virulence without affecting the growth that helps the immune system to completely kill the invaders without allowing them to develop resistance [10,35]. In this context and to avoid any effect of prazosin alone on bacterial growth, the anti-virulence activities of prazosin were evaluated at sub−MIC concentrations. Furthermore, the prazosin effect at sub−MIC on bacterial growth was evaluated, and there was no significant effect of prazosin at sub−MIC on the growth of tested strains. That ensures all the prazosin effects will be due to its interplay with bacterial virulence not due to inhibition of the growth.
S. enterica is one of the most clinically important gut pathogens that cause a wide array of infections from local gastroenteritis to systemic enteric fever [2,15]. However, chloramphenicol was known as the drug of choice for S. enterica infection, the increased resistance to it besides adverse effects limits its use [4,63]. Furthermore, the resistance increment to several other antibiotic classes was observed around the world constituting a problem for public health especially in developing countries [3]. E. coli K-12 is innately defective as a pathogen, but it represents the genetically best understood Enterobacteriaceae [64].
Salmonella employs QS systems to regulate its virulence such as motility, biofilm formation, and the production of virulence factors [5,6,9]. However, Salmonella does not produce its own AHLs autoinducers; it senses the AHLs produced by other species on Lux-analogs SdiA [6]. It is worthwhile to mention that a variety of AHLs with variable acyl chain lengths and C-3 substitutes are recognized by SdiA [5,6]. Askoura et al. showed the very essential role of SdiA in S. typhimurium adhesion and biofilm formation where the sdiA mutant strain was not able to adhere or form biofilm. Furthermore, they proved that the invasiveness and intracellular replication of sdiA mutants were significantly diminished in comparison to wild type [5]. In the current study, prazosin showed considered ability to alter SdiA, significantly downregulating the expression of the sdiA gene. In agreement with these findings, prazosin significantly diminished the E. coli and S. Typhimurium adhesion and biofilm formation.
Virulence genes are arranged in specific loci on the S. enterica chromosome called Salmonella Pathogenicity Islands (SPIs). However, several SPIs are recognized; SPI-1 and SPI-2 encode the expression of two types of T3SS [16,17]. The S. enterica T3SS is characterized by its injectosome-like structure, which injects the effectors to modulate its invasion and intracellular replication [13,14,17]. T3SS-type I translocates its effectors to modify the G-protein and cellular skeleton of the host cell facilitating the invasion in the early stages of infection [2,15,17]. After the entry of Salmonella into the host cells, they are engulfed in vacuole and phagosomes inside the immune cells. In this stage, the second type of T3SS translocates its effectors to permit Salmonella survival and intracellular replication inside the phagosome of immune cells [2,50]. While the present findings revealed the anti-QS activities of prazosin, it is worthwhile to draw the attention to roles of QS in the activation of the T3SS expression as reviewed in [65]. Furthermore, prazosin at sub−MIC significantly downregulated the expression of SPI-2 T3SS genes, which is responsible for Salmonella intracellular survival and replication. The intracellular replication of sdiA mutants was shown deficient in comparison to wild type [5,9]. In agreement with the downregulation of T3SS type II and sdiA downregulation, prazosin decreased the intracellular replication of Salmonella inside macrophages.
The interkingdom cross-talk is observed between bacterial and host cells, particularly gut pathogens such as Salmonella and E. coli K-12 [18,22]. Salmonella senses adrenergic hormones using sensor kinases such as QseC and QseE, resulting in enhancing the pathogenesis [20,21]. The norepinephrine effect on augmentation of the virulence of Salmonella in vitro and in vivo was documented [23]. Meanwhile, QS autoinducers (AIs) cross-talk with the adrenergic hormones, initiating the same signaling pathway in the host cells [20,21,22]. The AIs stimulate the production of norepinephrine in host cells that results in augmenting virulence [20,22]. Interestingly, prazosin showed a considered affinity to QseC competing with norepinephrine and downregulated the expression of qseC and qseE genes at its sub−MIC. In compliance with in vitro results, prazosin at sub−MIC significantly decreased the S. Typhimurium killing capacity against mice conferring 30% protection. The current findings support the efficient anti-virulence activities of prazosin against S. typhimurium and the potential to be used as adjuvant to antibiotics. The correlation between the stress and establishing of microbial infection in general was widely documented [66,67]. The release of adrenergic hormones was accompanied with induction of inflammation and vice versa is correct, as the microbial infection induces stress and inflammation, which results in an increase in adrenergic hormones release [66,68]. In addition to the prazosin anti-QS and anti-virulence effects, as an adrenergic receptor blocker, it will antagonize the norepinephrine, decreasing its induction to inflammation and bacterial virulence. Furthermore, the controlling of inflammation will greatly decrease the bacterial pathogenesis, and hence, the correlating between the use of prazosin and production of cytokine should be fulfilled before the clinical use of prazosin as anti-virulence. Despite the potent anti-virulence activities of prazosin, the new use as anti-virulence mandates further pharmacological investigation to evaluate the suitable route of administration and doses to reduce the adverse effects.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemicals and Microbiological Media

All the used chemicals were of pharmaceutical grade. The microbiological media were purchased from Oxoid (Hampshire, UK). N-hexanoyl-DL-homoserine lactone (AHL) (CAS Number: 106983-28-2), prazosin (CAS number: 19237-84-4), DL-norepinephrine hydrochloride (CAS Number: 55-27-6), thiamine (CAS number: 67-03-8) and Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) medium were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

4.2. Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (NCTC 12023) and Escherichia coli K-12 MG1655 were used in this study. For S. Typhimurium, fresh overnight cultures were cultivated in Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB) or Luria–Bertani (LB) broth provided with 0.001 μM AHL [5]. For E. coli K-12, fresh overnight cultures were cultivated in AB minimal media [69] supplemented with 0.5% glucose and provided with 2.5 mg/mL thiamine [70]. The bacterial cell cultures were adjusted to cell density 1 × 106 CFU/mL (OD600 = 0.4) prior to each experiment.

4.3. Determination of Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) and Prazosin Effect on Bacterial Growth

The MICs of prazosin against S. typhimurium and E. coli K-12 were detected by the broth microdilution method according to the Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute Guidelines (CLSI, 2020) [34].
The effect of prazosin at sub−MIC (1/4 MIC) on bacterial growth was examined as described earlier [35]. Briefly, the bacterial viable counts and optical densities of cultures provided or not with prazosin at 1/4 MIC was performed.

4.4. Quantitative RT-PCR

The RNA of prazosin at sub−MIC treated or untreated S. Typhimurium was isolated as formerly described [19,71]. The obtained RNA was used to synthesize cDNA, RT-PCR was performed to assess the genes’ expressions, and the relative expression was calculated by the comparative threshold cycle (∆∆Ct) method [72]. The used primers are listed in Table 1.

4.5. Evaluation of Biofilm Formation

The tested bacterial strains S. typhimurium and E. coli K-12 were cultivated in the growth conditions mentioned above prior to evaluation of the biofilm formation in the presence or absence of prazosin at sub−MIC. As described previously, the crystal violet method was used to quantify the biofilm formation [5]. For visualization of the prazosin inhibitory effect on biofilm formation, the bacterial biofilms were allowed to be formed on cover slips in the presence or absence of prazosin at sub−MIC, as described before [35].

4.6. Evaluation of the S. typhimurium Intracellular Replication

A gentamicin protection assay was used to evaluate the S. Typhimurium intracellular replication within macrophages in the presence or absence of prazosin at sub−MIC, as previously described [5,16]. Briefly, 24-well polystyrene plates were seeded with macrophages RAW264.7 at cell densities of 2 × 105 cells/well. S. Typhimurium were grown overnight in the LB broth provided with 0.001 μM AHL in the presence or absence of prazosin at sub−MIC, and then, fresh overnight cultures were incubated with shaking for 3 h at 37 °C. A master-mix (1 × 105 bacteria/well) was prepared with multiplicity of infection (MOI 1) in DMEM and distributed in wells. The non-internalized S. Typhimurium cells were washed out with pre-warmed phosphate buffer saline (PBS) after a half hour. Furthermore, gentamicin (100 μg/mL) was used to kill extracellular adhered S. Typhimurium cells for 1 h. The infected macrophages were washed with PBS and lysed with TritonX-100 (0.1%) for 20 min at room temperature at 2 and 16 h post infection. The initial inoculum and the lysates were viably counted onto MH plates. The phagocytosed cell numbers/relative untaken cells (2 h against inoculum) and x-fold intracellular replication (16 h against 2 h) were calculated.
To visualize the Salmonella-infected macrophages, bacterial cells were immune-stained as earlier described [4,5]. The macrophage infection was performed as described above; then, the infected macrophages were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde for 30 min. After washing with PBS, 2% of bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used as a blocking agent for 1 h. After washing with PBS, rabbit anti-Salmonella O antigen (Difco, BD; San Joes, CA, USA) were added to stain Salmonella cells for 4 h; then, they were washed with PBS. Anti-rabbit tagged with green fluorescent protein (GFP) secondary antibody (green fluorescent protein) (Abcam; Eugene, OR, USA) was added for 1 h. Finally, the macrophages were counter-stained with blue fluorescent diamidino-2-phenylindole dye (DAPI) (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Bothell, WA, USA) for 1 h, then washed with PBS. A LSM780 confocal laser scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) was used to capture images.

4.7. Evaluation In Vivo Anti-Virulence Activity

The mice survival model was employed to assess the in vivo anti-virulence activity of prazosin against S. Typhimurium, as formerly described [19,31]. Briefly, adjusted overnight S. Typhimurium cultures (1 × 106 CFU/mL) were treated or not with prazosin at sub−MIC in PBS. Twenty female Mus three-week-old musculus BALB/c mice were distributed in two groups (n = 10) to be intraperitoneally (ip) injected with 100 μL S. Typhimurium treated or not with prazosin. Another mice group was injected with S. Typhimurium treated with norepinephrine (50 μg/mL). Two mice groups were injected with sterile PBS or kept uninfected. Death and survival were recorded for 5 days using the Kaplan–Meier method. To comply with the ARRIVE guidelines and in accordance with the U.K. Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and associated guidelines; at the end of the experiment, mice suffered from pathological conditions, and/or loss of weight and appetite were anesthetized by thiopental and euthanized by cervical dislocation.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

Student’s t-test was used to evaluate the statistical significance (unless mentioned), where p value < 0.05 is considered significant (GraphPad Prism Software, v.8, San Diego, CA, USA). The assessments were performed in triplicate, and the data are presented as the means ± standard error.

5. Conclusions

S. enterica is one of the most clinically important gut pathogens. S. enterica employs QS systems to regulate its virulence and to activate its T3SS. Additionally, S. enterica eavesdrop on the host cells, sensing noradrenergic hormones to facilitate its infection and enhance pathogenesis. The present findings preliminary evaluated the in vitro and in vivo anti-virulence activities of prazosin against S. Typhimurium. Prazosin downregulated the QS receptor SdiA and norepinephrine sensor QseC encoding genes. Prazosin diminished the bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation and protected the mice against S. typhimurium. Furthermore, prazosin downregulated the SPI2-T3SS encoding genes and decreased the intracellular replication of S. typhimurium in macrophages. These findings support the potent anti-virulence activities of prazosin to be used in treatments of resistant S. typhimurium infections; however, it requires further pharmacological assessments before its clinical application.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.A.H.H.; A.K.T. and M.A.E.; methodology, A.S.A., A.J.A. and W.A.H.H.; software, T.S.I.; validation, K.E. and A.Z.; formal analysis, T.S.I.; investigation, A.S.A., A.J.A. and W.A.H.H.; resources, A.K.T. and M.A.E.; data curation, K.E. and A.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S.A., A.J.A. and W.A.H.H.; writing—review and editing, W.A.H.H.; A.K.T. and M.A.E.; visualization, K.E. and A.Z.; supervision, A.K.T. and M.A.E.; project administration, A.K.T. and M.A.E.; funding acquisition, A.K.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project number IFPRC-002-249-2020 and King Abdulaziz University, DSR, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Ethical Committee of the at Faculty of Pharmacy, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia approved the protocol of the in vivo experiments in this study. The experiments were conducted in compliance with according to guidelines of the decla-ration of Helsinki (Code # PH-1442-13).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data included in the main text.

Acknowledgments

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research & Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work through the project number IFPRC-002-249-2020 and King Abdulaziz University, DSR, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gerlach, R.G.; Hensel, M. Salmonella pathogenicity islands in host specificity, host pathogen-interactions and antibiotics resistance of Salmonella enterica. Berl. Munch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr. 2007, 120, 317–332. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Hegazy, W.A.H.; Hensel, M. Salmonella enterica as a vaccine carrier. Future Microbiol. 2012, 7, 111–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Harish, B.; Menezes, G. Antimicrobial resistance in typhoidal salmonellae. Indian J. Med. Microbiol. 2011, 29, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Askoura, M.; Hegazy, W.A.H. Ciprofloxacin interferes with Salmonella Typhimurium intracellular survival and host virulence through repression of Salmonella pathogenicity island-2 (SPI-2) genes expression. Pathog. Dis. 2020, 78, ftaa011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Askoura, M.; Almalki, A.J.; Abu Lila, A.S.; Almansour, K.; Alshammari, F.; Khafagy, E.-S.; Ibrahim, T.S.; Hegazy, W.A.H. Alteration of Salmonella enterica Virulence and Host Pathogenesis through Targeting sdiA by Using the CRISPR-Cas9 System. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Michael, B.; Smith, J.N.; Swift, S.; Heffron, F.; Ahmer, B.M.M. SdiA of Salmonella enterica Is a LuxR Homolog That Detects Mixed Microbial Communities. J. Bacteriol. 2001, 183, 5733–5742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Janssens, J.C.A.; Metzger, K.; Daniels, R.; Ptacek, D.; Verhoeven, T.; Habel, L.W.; Vanderleyden, J.; De Vos, D.E.; De Keersmaecker, S.C.J. Synthesis of N-Acyl Homoserine Lactone Analogues Reveals Strong Activators of SdiA, the Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium LuxR Homologue. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007, 73, 535–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Smith, J.N.; Ahmer, B.M.M. Detection of Other Microbial Species by Salmonella: Expression of the SdiA Regulon. J. Bacteriol. 2003, 185, 1357–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Smith, J.N.; Dyszel, J.L.; Soares, J.A.; Ellermeier, C.D.; Altier, C.; Lawhon, S.D.; Adams, L.G.; Konjufca, V.; Curtiss, R., 3rd; Slauch, J.M.; et al. SdiA, an N-Acylhomoserine Lactone Receptor, Becomes Active during the Transit of Salmonella enterica through the Gastrointestinal Tract of Turtles. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, G.; Swem, L.R.; Swem, D.L.; Stauff, D.L.; O’Loughlin, C.T.; Jeffrey, P.D.; Bassler, B.L.; Hughson, F.M. A Strategy for Antagonizing Quorum Sensing. Mol. Cell 2011, 42, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jiang, Q.; Chen, J.; Yang, C.; Yin, Y.; Yao, K. Quorum Sensing: A Prospective Therapeutic Target for Bacterial Diseases. BioMed Res. Int. 2019, 2019, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Khayyat, A.N.; Abbas, H.A.; Khayat, M.T.; Shaldam, M.A.; Askoura, M.; Asfour, H.Z.; Khafagy, E.-S.; Abu Lila, A.S.; Allam, A.N.; Hegazy, W.A.H. Secnidazole Is a Promising Imidazole Mitigator of Serratia marcescens Virulence. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Deiwick, J.; Nikolaus, T.; Erdogan, S.; Hensel, M. Environmental regulation of Salmonella pathogenicity island 2 gene expression. Mol. Microbiol. 1999, 31, 1759–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Wael, A.H.H.; Hisham, A.A. Evaluation of the role of SsaV Salmonella pathogenicity island-2 dependent type III secretion system components on the virulence behavior of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2017, 16, 718–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Hegazy, W.A.H.; Xu, X.; Metelitsa, L.; Hensel, M. Evaluation of Salmonella enterica Type III Secretion System Effector Proteins as Carriers for Heterologous Vaccine Antigens. Infect. Immun. 2012, 80, 1193–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Hölzer, S.U.; Hensel, M. Divergent Roles of Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 2 and Metabolic Traits during Interaction of S. enterica Serovar Typhimurium with Host Cells. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kuhle, V.; Hensel, M. Cellular microbiology of intracellular Salmonella enterica: Functions of the type III secretion system encoded by Salmonella pathogenicity island 2. Experientia 2004, 61, 2812–2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Karavolos, M.H.; Winzer, K.; Williams, P.; Khan, C.M.A. Pathogen espionage: Multiple bacterial adrenergic sensors eavesdrop on host communication systems. Mol. Microbiol. 2012, 87, 455–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hegazy, W.A.H.; Salem, I.M.; Alotaibi, H.F.; Khafagy, E.-S.; Ibrahim, D. Terazosin Interferes with Quorum Sensing and Type Three Secretion System and Diminishes the Bacterial Espionage to Mitigate the Salmonella Typhimurium Pathogenesis. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moreira, C.G.; Sperandio, V. Interplay between the QseC and QseE Bacterial Adrenergic Sensor Kinases in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium Pathogenesis. Infect. Immun. 2012, 80, 4344–4353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rasko, D.A.; Moreira, C.G.; Li, D.R.; Reading, N.C.; Ritchie, J.M.; Waldor, M.K.; Williams, N.; Taussig, R.; Wei, S.; Roth, M.; et al. Targeting QseC Signaling and Virulence for Antibiotic Development. Science 2008, 321, 1078–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Xie, W.; Dickson, C.; Kwiatkowski, W.; Choe, S. Structure of the cytoplasmic segment of histidine kinase receptor QseC, a key player in bacterial virulence. Protein Pept. Lett. 2010, 17, 1383–1391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Methner, U.; Rabsch, W.; Reissbrodt, R.; Williams, P.H. Effect of norepinephrine on colonisation and systemic spread of Salmonella enterica in infected animals: Role of catecholate siderophore precursors and degradation products. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2008, 298, 429–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Moreira, C.G.; Russell, R.; Mishra, A.A.; Narayanan, S.; Ritchie, J.M.; Waldor, M.K.; Curtis, M.M.; Winter, S.E.; Weinshenker, D.; Sperandio, V. Bacterial Adrenergic Sensors Regulate Virulence of Enteric Pathogens in the Gut. mBio 2016, 7, e00826-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Ang, S.; Horng, Y.-T.; Shu, J.-C.; Soo, P.-C.; Liu, J.-H.; Yi, W.-C.; Lai, H.-C.; Luh, K.-T.; Ho, S.-W.; Swift, S. The role of RsmA in the regulation of swarming motility inSerratia marcescens. J. Biomed. Sci. 2001, 8, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, W.; Surette, M.G. Coordinated Regulation of Two Independent Cell-Cell Signaling Systems and Swarmer Differentiation in Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Alandiyjany, M.N.; Abdelaziz, A.S.; Abdelfattah-Hassan, A.; Hegazy, W.A.H.; Hassan, A.A.; Elazab, S.T.; Mohamed, E.A.A.; El-Shetry, E.S.; Saleh, A.A.; ElSawy, N.A.; et al. Novel In Vivo Assessment of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Ciprofloxacin Loaded Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles against Salmonella typhimurium Infection. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Crump, J.A.; Sjölund-Karlsson, M.; Gordon, M.; Parry, C.M. Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, Laboratory Diagnosis, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Antimicrobial Management of Invasive Salmonella Infections. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2015, 28, 901–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Correia, S.; Hébraud, M.; Chafsey, I.; Chambon, C.; Viala, D.; Sáenz, Y.; Capelo, J.L.; Poeta, P.; Igrejas, G. Comparative subproteomic analysis of clinically acquired fluoroquinolone resistance and ciprofloxacin stress in Salmonella Typhimurium DT104B. Proteom.—Clin. Appl. 2017, 11, 1600107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Aldawsari, M.F.; Khafagy, E.-S.; Al Saqr, A.; Alalaiwe, A.; Abbas, H.A.; Shaldam, M.A.; Hegazy, W.A.H.; Goda, R.M. Tackling Virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by the Natural Furanone Sotolon. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Almalki, A.J.; Ibrahim, T.S.; Elhady, S.S.; Darwish, K.M.; Hegazy, W.A.H. Repurposing α-Adrenoreceptor Blockers as Promising Anti-Virulence Agents in Gram-Negative Bacteria. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Almalki, A.J.; Ibrahim, T.S.; Elhady, S.S.; Hegazy, W.A.H.; Darwish, K.M. Computational and Biological Evaluation of β-Adrenoreceptor Blockers as Promising Bacterial Anti-Virulence Agents. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hegazy, W.A.; Khayat, M.T.; Ibrahim, T.S.; Youns, M.; Mosbah, R.; Soliman, W.E. Repurposing of antidiabetics as Serratia marcescens virulence inhibitors. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2021, 52, 627–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Khayat, M.T.; Abbas, H.A.; Ibrahim, T.S.; Khayyat, A.N.; Alharbi, M.; Darwish, K.M.; Elhady, S.S.; Khafagy, E.-S.; Safo, M.K.; Hegazy, W.A.H. Anti-Quorum Sensing Activities of Gliptins against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Biomedicines 2022, 10, 1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Al Saqr, A.; Aldawsari, M.F.; Khafagy, E.-S.; Shaldam, M.A.; Hegazy, W.A.H.; Abbas, H.A. A Novel Use of Allopurinol as A Quorum-Sensing Inhibitor in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Abbas, H.A.; Hegazy, W.A.H. Targeting the virulence factors of Serratia marcescens by ambroxol. Roum. Arch. Microbiol. Immunol. 2017, 76, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  37. Almalki, A.J.; Ibrahim, T.S.; Taher, E.S.; Mohamed, M.F.A.; Youns, M.; Hegazy, W.A.H.; Al-Mahmoudy, A.M.M. Synthesis, Antimicrobial, Anti-Virulence and Anticancer Evaluation of New 5(4H)-Oxazolone-Based Sulfonamides. Molecules 2022, 27, 671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Khayyat, A.; Hegazy, W.; Shaldam, M.; Mosbah, R.; Almalki, A.; Ibrahim, T.; Khayat, M.; Khafagy, E.-S.; Soliman, W.; Abbas, H. Xylitol Inhibits Growth and Blocks Virulence in Serratia marcescens. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hegazy, W.A.H.; Rajab, A.A.H.; Abu Lila, A.S.; A Abbas, H. Anti-diabetics and antimicrobials: Harmony of mutual interplay. World J. Diabetes 2021, 12, 1832–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Aldawsari, M.; Alalaiwe, A.; Khafagy, E.-S.; Al Saqr, A.; Alshahrani, S.; Alsulays, B.; Alshehri, S.; Abu Lila, A.; Rizvi, S.D.; Hegazy, W. Efficacy of SPG-ODN 1826 Nanovehicles in Inducing M1 Phenotype through TLR-9 Activation in Murine Alveolar J774A.1 Cells: Plausible Nano-Immunotherapy for Lung Carcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 6833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. García-Contreras, R. Is Quorum Sensing Interference a Viable Alternative to Treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections? Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Kellici, T.F.; Liapakis, G.; Tzakos, A.G.; Mavromoustakos, T. Pharmaceutical Compositions for Antihypertensive Treatments: A Patent Review. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2015, 25, 1305–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Rutherford, S.T.; Bassler, B.L. Bacterial Quorum Sensing: Its Role in Virulence and Possibilities for Its Control. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2012, 2, a012427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Groisman, E.A.; Duprey, A.; Choi, J. How the PhoP/PhoQ System Controls Virulence and Mg2+ Homeostasis: Lessons in Signal Transduction, Pathogenesis, Physiology, and Evolution. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2021, 85, e0017620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Carabajal, M.A.; Asquith, C.R.M.; Laitinen, T.; Tizzard, G.J.; Yim, L.; Rial, A.; Chabalgoity, J.A.; Zuercher, W.J.; Véscovi, E.G. Quinazoline-Based Antivirulence Compounds Selectively Target Salmonella PhoP/PhoQ Signal Transduction System. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 64, e01744-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Guarnieri, M.T.; Zhang, L.; Shen, J.; Zhao, R. The Hsp90 Inhibitor Radicicol Interacts with the ATP-Binding Pocket of Bacterial Sensor Kinase PhoQ. J. Mol. Biol. 2008, 379, 82–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Boibessot, T.; Zschiedrich, C.P.; Lebeau, A.; Bénimèlis, D.; Dunyach-Rémy, C.; Lavigne, J.-P.; Szurmant, H.; Benfodda, Z.; Meffre, P. The Rational Design, Synthesis, and Antimicrobial Properties of Thiophene Derivatives That Inhibit Bacterial Histidine Kinases. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 8830–8847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Gilmour, R.; Foster, J.E.; Sheng, Q.; McClain, J.R.; Riley, A.; Sun, P.-M.; Ng, W.-L.; Yan, D.; Nicas, T.I.; Henry, K.; et al. New Class of Competitive Inhibitor of Bacterial Histidine Kinases. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 8196–8200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Aykac, A.; Şehirli, A.; Gören, M.Z. Evaluation of the Effect of Prazosin Treatment on α-2c Adrenoceptor and Apoptosis Protein Levels in the Predator Scent-Induced Rat Model of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2020, 70, 1120–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xu, X.; Hegazy, W.A.; Guo, L.; Gao, X.; Courtney, A.N.; Kurbanov, S.; Liu, D.; Tian, G.; Manuel, E.R.; Diamond, D.J.; et al. Effective Cancer Vaccine Platform Based on Attenuated Salmonella and a Type III Secretion System. Cancer Res. 2014, 74, 6260–6270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Khayyat, A.; Abbas, H.; Mohamed, M.; Asfour, H.; Khayat, M.; Ibrahim, T.; Youns, M.; Khafagy, E.-S.; Abu Lila, A.; Safo, M.; et al. Not Only Antimicrobial: Metronidazole Mitigates the Virulence of Proteus mirabilis Isolated from Macerated Diabetic Foot Ulcer. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 6847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Mohr, K.I. History of Antibiotics Research. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2016, 398, 237–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Livermore, D.M.; British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Working Party on The Urgent Need: Regenerating Antibacterial Drug Discovery and Development; Blaser, M.; Carrs, O.; Cassell, G.; Fishman, N.; Guidos, R.; Levy, S.; Powers, J.; Norrby, R.; et al. Discovery research: The scientific challenge of finding new antibiotics. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2011, 66, 1941–1944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. El-Hamid, M.I.A.; Sewid, A.H.; Samir, M.; Hegazy, W.A.H.; Bahnass, M.M.; Mosbah, R.A.; Ghaith, D.M.; Khalifa, E.; Ramadan, H.; Alshareef, W.A.; et al. Clonal Diversity and Epidemiological Characteristics of ST239-MRSA Strains. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 782045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Brackman, G.; Cos, P.; Maes, L.; Nelis, H.J.; Coenye, T. Quorum Sensing Inhibitors Increase the Susceptibility of Bacterial Biofilms to Antibiotics In Vitro and In Vivo. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 2655–2661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Khayat, M.T.; Ibrahim, T.S.; Khayyat, A.N.; Alharbi, M.; Shaldam, M.A.; Mohammad, K.A.; Khafagy, E.-S.; El-Damasy, D.A.; Hegazy, W.A.H.; Abbas, H.A. Sodium Citrate Alleviates Virulence in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kalia, V.C.; Purohit, H.J. Quenching the quorum sensing system: Potential antibacterial drug targets. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 37, 121–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Papenfort, K.; Bassler, B.L. Quorum sensing signal–response systems in Gram-negative bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 576–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Agha, K.A.; Abo-Dya, N.E.; Ibrahim, T.S.; Abdel-Aal, E.H.; Hegazy, W.A. Benzotriazole-Mediated Synthesis and Antibacterial Activity of Novel N-Acylcephalexins. Sci. Pharm. 2016, 84, 484–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Cavalu, S.; Elbaramawi, S.S.; Eissa, A.G.; Radwan, M.F.; Ibrahim, S.T.; Khafagy, E.-S.; Lopes, B.S.; Ali, M.A.M.; Hegazy, W.A.H.; Elfaky, M.A. Characterization of the Anti-Biofilm and Anti-Quorum Sensing Activities of the β-Adrenoreceptor Antagonist Atenolol against Gram-Negative Bacterial Pathogens. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 13088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Thabit, A.K.; Eljaaly, K.; Zawawi, A.; Ibrahim, T.S.; Eissa, A.G.; Elbaramawi, S.S.; Hegazy, W.A.H.; Elfaky, M.A. Silencing of Salmonella typhimurium Pathogenesis: Atenolol Acquires Efficient Anti-Virulence Activities. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Thabit, A.K.; Eljaaly, K.; Zawawi, A.; Ibrahim, T.S.; Eissa, A.G.; Elbaramawi, S.S.; Hegazy, W.A.H.; Elfaky, M.A. Muting Bacterial Communication: Evaluation of Prazosin Anti-Quorum Sensing Activities against Gram-Negative Bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis, and Serratia marcescens. Biology 2022, 11, 1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. John, J.; Britto, C.D.; Verghese, V.P.; Pollard, A.J. A systematic review of antimicrobial resistance of typhoidal Salmonella in India. Indian J. Med. Res. 2019, 149, 151–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ahmer, B.M.M. Cell-to-cell signalling in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica. Mol. Microbiol. 2004, 52, 933–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Pena, R.T.; Blasco, L.; Ambroa, A.; González-Pedrajo, B.; Fernández-García, L.; López, M.; Bleriot, I.; Bou, G.; García-Contreras, R.; Wood, T.K.; et al. Relationship Between Quorum Sensing and Secretion Systems. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Flierl, M.A.; Rittirsch, D.; Nadeau, B.A.; Sarma, J.V.; Day, D.E.; Lentsch, A.B.; Huber-Lang, M.S.; Ward, P.A. Upregulation of Phagocyte-Derived Catecholamines Augments the Acute Inflammatory Response. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e4414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Daviu, N.; Bruchas, M.R.; Moghaddam, B.; Sandi, C.; Beyeler, A. Neurobiological links between stress and anxiety. Neurobiol. Stress 2019, 11, 100191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sandrini, S.M.; Shergill, R.; Woodward, J.; Muralikuttan, R.; Haigh, R.D.; Lyte, M.; Freestone, P.P. Elucidation of the Mechanism by Which Catecholamine Stress Hormones Liberate Iron from the Innate Immune Defense Proteins Transferrin and Lactoferrin. J. Bacteriol. 2010, 192, 587–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Clark, D.J.; Maaløe, O.D.N.A. DNA replication and the division cycle in Escherichia coli. J. Mol. Biol. 1967, 23, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Reisner, A.; Krogfelt, K.A.; Klein, B.M.; Zechner, E.L.; Molin, S. In Vitro Biofilm Formation of Commensal and Pathogenic Escherichia coli Strains: Impact of Environmental and Genetic Factors. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 3572–3581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Askoura, M.; Abbas, H.A.; Al Sadoun, H.; Abdulaal, W.H.; Abu Lila, A.S.; Almansour, K.; Alshammari, F.; Khafagy, E.-S.; Ibrahim, T.S.; Hegazy, W.A.H. Elevated Levels of IL-33, IL-17 and IL-25 Indicate the Progression from Chronicity to Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Hepatitis C Virus Patients. Pathogens 2022, 11, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Youns, M.; Askoura, M.; A Abbas, H.; Attia, G.H.; Khayyat, A.N.; Goda, R.M.; Almalki, A.J.; Khafagy, E.-S.; Hegazy, W.A. Celastrol Modulates Multiple Signaling Pathways to Inhibit Proliferation of Pancreatic Cancer via DDIT3 and ATF3 Up-Regulation and RRM2 and MCM4 Down-Regulation. OncoTargets Ther. 2021, 14, 3849–3860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Halatsi, K.; Oikonomou, I.; Lambiri, M.; Mandilara, G.; Vatopoulos, A.; Kyriacou, A. PCR detection of Salmonellaspp. using primers targeting the quorum sensing gene sdiA. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2006, 259, 201–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Antibiotics 11 01585 g001 550
Figure 1. Salmonella employs different systems to regulate its virulence. The Salmonella PhoP/PhoQ regulatory system and quorum sensing system (QS) regulate the expression of virulence encoding genes, and their targeting could dramatically diminish the bacterial virulence. In addition to bacterial systems, Salmonella pathogenesis is enhanced by its ability to spy on the host systems, sensing adrenergic hormones using membranal receptors. It was shown that compounds GI262866A and GI261520A exhibit anti-virulence activities via targeting the Salmonella PhoP/PhoQ regulatory system [45]. In the current study, prazosin shares quinazoline moiety with compounds GI262866A and GI261520A, and it can significantly diminish bacterial virulence via targeting QS and preventing bacterial espionage.
Figure 1. Salmonella employs different systems to regulate its virulence. The Salmonella PhoP/PhoQ regulatory system and quorum sensing system (QS) regulate the expression of virulence encoding genes, and their targeting could dramatically diminish the bacterial virulence. In addition to bacterial systems, Salmonella pathogenesis is enhanced by its ability to spy on the host systems, sensing adrenergic hormones using membranal receptors. It was shown that compounds GI262866A and GI261520A exhibit anti-virulence activities via targeting the Salmonella PhoP/PhoQ regulatory system [45]. In the current study, prazosin shares quinazoline moiety with compounds GI262866A and GI261520A, and it can significantly diminish bacterial virulence via targeting QS and preventing bacterial espionage.
Antibiotics 11 01585 g001
Antibiotics 11 01585 g002 550
Figure 2. Prazosin at sub−MIC has no effect on bacterial growth. The bacterial cultures were grown in the presence or absence of prazosin. (A) The optical densities, (B) Bacterial counts were determined, and there were no significant differences between the growth in the presence or absence of prazosin. ns: non-significant.
Figure 2. Prazosin at sub−MIC has no effect on bacterial growth. The bacterial cultures were grown in the presence or absence of prazosin. (A) The optical densities, (B) Bacterial counts were determined, and there were no significant differences between the growth in the presence or absence of prazosin. ns: non-significant.
Antibiotics 11 01585 g002
Antibiotics 11 01585 g003 550
Figure 3. Prazosin downregulated the expression of LuxR homolog QS receptor SdiA. Prazosin significantly reduced the expression of Salmonella sdiA gene (*** = p < 0.0001).
Figure 3. Prazosin downregulated the expression of LuxR homolog QS receptor SdiA. Prazosin significantly reduced the expression of Salmonella sdiA gene (*** = p < 0.0001).
Antibiotics 11 01585 g003
Antibiotics 11 01585 g004 550
Figure 4. Prazosin diminished bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. (A) Light microscope images represent the anti-biofilm activity of prazosin at sub−MIC. The crystal violet method was employed to evaluate bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. The percent change in adhered and biofilm-forming (B) E. coli and (C) S. Typhimurium was significantly reduced in the presence of prazosin at sub−MIC (*** = p < 0.0001).
Figure 4. Prazosin diminished bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. (A) Light microscope images represent the anti-biofilm activity of prazosin at sub−MIC. The crystal violet method was employed to evaluate bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation. The percent change in adhered and biofilm-forming (B) E. coli and (C) S. Typhimurium was significantly reduced in the presence of prazosin at sub−MIC (*** = p < 0.0001).
Antibiotics 11 01585 g004
Antibiotics 11 01585 g005 550
Figure 5. Prazosin interferes with Salmonella adrenoreceptor sensors. Prazosin at sub−MIC significantly reduced the expression of membranal adrenoreceptor sensors qseC and qseE (*** = p <0.0001).
Figure 5. Prazosin interferes with Salmonella adrenoreceptor sensors. Prazosin at sub−MIC significantly reduced the expression of membranal adrenoreceptor sensors qseC and qseE (*** = p <0.0001).
Antibiotics 11 01585 g005
Antibiotics 11 01585 g006 550
Figure 6. Prazosin decreased S. Typhimurium intracellular replication. (A) Microscopic images of S. Typhimurium in macrophages. Prazosin markedly decreased the intracellular replication of Salmonella inside macrophages. (B) The phagocytosed cell/relative untaken cell percentage and x-fold intracellular replication were calculated. Prazosin at sub−MIC significantly decreased the intracellular replication of Salmonella (*** = p < 0.0001). Scale bars correspond to 100 μm.
Figure 6. Prazosin decreased S. Typhimurium intracellular replication. (A) Microscopic images of S. Typhimurium in macrophages. Prazosin markedly decreased the intracellular replication of Salmonella inside macrophages. (B) The phagocytosed cell/relative untaken cell percentage and x-fold intracellular replication were calculated. Prazosin at sub−MIC significantly decreased the intracellular replication of Salmonella (*** = p < 0.0001). Scale bars correspond to 100 μm.
Antibiotics 11 01585 g006
Antibiotics 11 01585 g007 550
Figure 7. Prazosin decreased the T3SS-type 2 encoding gene expression. Prazosin at sub−MIC significantly decreased the expression of T3SS-type 2 encoding genes (*** = p < 0.0001; ** = p < 0.001).
Figure 7. Prazosin decreased the T3SS-type 2 encoding gene expression. Prazosin at sub−MIC significantly decreased the expression of T3SS-type 2 encoding genes (*** = p < 0.0001; ** = p < 0.001).
Antibiotics 11 01585 g007
Antibiotics 11 01585 g008 550
Figure 8. Prazosin in vivo anti-virulence activity. Five mice groups were injected with untreated S. Typhimurium, norepinephrine-treated S. typhimurium, Prazosin-treated S. typhimurium, PBS, or kept non-injected. Prazosin significantly decreased the capacity of S. typhimurium to kill mice (from 50% to 20%), Log-rank test for trend p = 0.0048 (** = p < 0.001).
Figure 8. Prazosin in vivo anti-virulence activity. Five mice groups were injected with untreated S. Typhimurium, norepinephrine-treated S. typhimurium, Prazosin-treated S. typhimurium, PBS, or kept non-injected. Prazosin significantly decreased the capacity of S. typhimurium to kill mice (from 50% to 20%), Log-rank test for trend p = 0.0048 (** = p < 0.001).
Antibiotics 11 01585 g008
Table
Table 1. The primers used in this study.
Table 1. The primers used in this study.
Target GenePrimer Sequence: 5′- 3′Gene SignificanceReference
gyrBF: GTGATCAGCGTCGCCACTR: GCGCGGTGATCAGCGTCHousekeeping[4]
sdiAF: AAT ATC GCT TCG TAC CACR: GTA GGT AAA CGA GGA GCA GAdhesion[73]
qseCF: GGTACCAAATTGACGCAACGTCTCAGR: GAATTCGCCCAACTTACTACGGCCTCSensor to adrenergic hormones[20]
qseEF: GGTACCAGCGACACGTTGAAGCGCR: GAATTCGCGTGTTTGTCAGATGCAGGSensor to adrenergic hormones[20]
ssrBF: CGCAGGTGCTAATGGCTATGR: TTTGCAATGCCGCTAACAGASPI2-expression regulation[4]
ssaEF: CCGCAGCAATATCAGCAAAAR: AAGTGCGCTGTTATGGTAACGASPI2-intracellular replication[4]
ssaJF: TGTCGAGCAGTCGCAGTTTATTAR: TGCCTATGCGGATAACCGTTASPI2-intracellular replication[4]
sseFF: TCAGGAATCGCTATTTCTATGR: GTCAGGCTAACGGAGGTAASPI2-intracellular replication[4]
sseJF: AATAAATCACATCCCAAGCR: ACTCAGTCCAGGTAAATCCSPI2-intracellular replication[4]
sseIF: GATACCCCCCCTGAAATGAGTTR: GTGACAAATCGTCCAGATGCASPI2-intracellular replication[4]
sifAF: TACCACCACCGCATACCCAR: ACGAGGAACGCCTGAAACGSalmonella-inducing filaments (SPI2)[4]
SifBF: TGATACTCAGCCTGCCCACR: GCTCAGGGAACAAGCAACSalmonella-inducing filaments (SPI2)[4]
sscAF: GGCTCGCTGCGTATGTTGTTR: GCCGGCGAATTCTTTTACCTSPI2 chaperon intracellular replication[4]
qseCF: GGTACCAAATTGACGCAACGTCTCAGR: GAATTCGCCCAACTTACTACGGCCTCSensor to adrenergic hormones[20]
qseEF: GGTACCAGCGACACGTTGAAGCGCR: GAATTCGCGTGTTTGTCAGATGCAGGSensor to adrenergic hormones[20]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Elfaky, M.A.; Thabit, A.K.; Eljaaly, K.; Zawawi, A.; Abdelkhalek, A.S.; Almalki, A.J.; Ibrahim, T.S.; Hegazy, W.A.H. Controlling of Bacterial Virulence: Evaluation of Anti-Virulence Activities of Prazosin against Salmonella enterica. Antibiotics 2022, 11, 1585. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics11111585

AMA Style

Elfaky MA, Thabit AK, Eljaaly K, Zawawi A, Abdelkhalek AS, Almalki AJ, Ibrahim TS, Hegazy WAH. Controlling of Bacterial Virulence: Evaluation of Anti-Virulence Activities of Prazosin against Salmonella enterica. Antibiotics. 2022; 11(11):1585. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics11111585

Chicago/Turabian Style

Elfaky, Mahmoud A., Abrar K. Thabit, Khalid Eljaaly, Ayat Zawawi, Ahmed S. Abdelkhalek, Ahmad J. Almalki, Tarek S. Ibrahim, and Wael A. H. Hegazy. 2022. "Controlling of Bacterial Virulence: Evaluation of Anti-Virulence Activities of Prazosin against Salmonella enterica" Antibiotics 11, no. 11: 1585. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics11111585

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop