Next Article in Journal
Point-of-Care Testing for Pharyngitis in the Pharmacy
Previous Article in Journal
Pitfalls Associated with Discriminating Mixed-Species Biofilms by Flow Cytometry
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Antibiotics
Volume 9
Issue 11
10.3390/antibiotics9110742
antibiotics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Positive and Negative Effects of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles on Antibiotic Resistance Genes Transfer

by
Georgy D. Otinov
,
Alina V. Lokteva
,
Anastasia D. Petrova
,
Irina V. Zinchenko
,
Maria V. Isaeva
,
Evgeny A. Kovtunov
and
Elena I. Koshel
*
Microbiology Lab of SCAMT Institute, ITMO University, 197101 St. Petersburg, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antibiotics 2020, 9(11), 742; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics9110742
Submission received: 9 September 2020 / Revised: 22 October 2020 / Accepted: 23 October 2020 / Published: 27 October 2020
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Rapid development of antibiotic resistance in bacteria is a critical public health problem in the world. One of the main routes of resistance development is the transfer of genes containing antibiotic resistance cassettes. Gene transfer can be done through horizontal transfer of genes: transduction, conjugation, and transformation. Many factors in the environment influence these processes, and one of them is the action of metal oxide nanoparticles (MONPs), which can appear in the milieu through both biological synthesis and the release of engineered nanomaterial. In this study, the effect of AlOOH, CuO, Fe3O4, TiO2, and ZnO MONPs on the transformation (heat shock transformation) of bacteria Escherichia coli K12, and the conjugation between E. coli cc118 and E. coli Nova Blue were studied. The MONPs were synthesized by one method and fully characterized. ZnO nanoparticles (NPs) have significantly increased the efficiency of transformation (more than 9-fold), while the other NPs have reduced it to 31 times (TiO2 NPs). AlOOH NPs increased the number of transconjugants more than 1.5-fold, while CuO and Fe3O4 NPs did not have a significant effect on transformation and conjugation. Thus, the data shows that different types of MONPs can enhance or inhibit different gene transfer mechanisms, affecting the spread of antibiotic resistance genes.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The development of microbial resistance to antimicrobial agents is a complex and urgent problem of biomedicine. The emergence and spread of antibiotic-resistant bacterial strains are among the most acute public health problems globally, as identified by the World Health Organization [1]. This rapid development of the resistance is associated with the increased use of antibiotics in medicine, agriculture, and animal feedstuffs [2].
The primary way of antibiotic resistance development is the transport of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in the environment (such as soil [3], water [4], and air [5]), which can be provided by mobile genetics elements, such as plasmids [6]. ARGs can be transferred by lateral gene transfer (or horizontal gene transfer (HGT)) [7]. There are several HGT processes, namely conjugation, transduction, and transformation [8,9]. In the process of conjugation, DNA is transferred from cell to cell; during the transduction, DNA is provided by bacteriophage; in the process of the transformation, extracellular DNA is introduced from the environment, for which the cells should be competent [10].
The significant factors that influence HGT are environmental, which, for example, can affect the natural competence of bacteria [10]. One of them is metal oxides nanoparticles (MONPs), which are one of the most reactive phases in the natural environment and could originate extensively through either natural processes or the release of engineered nanomaterials [11].
A few papers have shown the effect of MONPs on increasing or decreasing HGT [12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Thus, mainly the effect of MONPs on gene transfer is associated with the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [13,14,15], as well as with the direct interaction of MONPs with the DNA matrix, which plays an important role when the matrix is in the environment [11]. MONPs can also affect central metabolism, the respiration process [16,17,18], and ROS active production can lead to DNA damage, which causes the SOS response, which may also promote HGT [19]. Existing data is contradictable and does not clearly understand the MONPs action mechanisms due to the significant differences between particles parameters. These differences occur mainly because of variations in synthesis [11,13,20,21,22]. Our study used MONPs, which were synthesized under the identical condition by the sol-gel method and fully characterized to avoid variation issues. This allows for a relevant comparison of the effects of MONPs on HGT.
In this study, we consider the following nanoparticles (NPs): boehmite (AlOOH), copper oxide (CuO), magnetite (Fe3O4), titanium dioxide (TiO2), and zinc oxide (ZnO) as representative MONPs since they are the most widely produced and used NPs worldwide. For example, ZnO NPs and CuO NPs are widely used in medicine as antibacterial agents [23,24,25]; Fe3O4 NPs for targeting drug delivery and diagnostic application [26,27]; and aluminum compounds are used in vaccine development, for example, aluminum adjuvants [28]. TiO2 NPs has found wide application in cosmetology [29].
Thus, objective of this study was to examine whether MONPs influence horizontal ARGs transfer. For transformation by a pGEM-T plasmid, we chose Escherichia coli K12 wild type, which does not have mutations that increase the efficiency of transformation (for example, in the rec− and endA− genes [10,30]) as the model organism. Moreover, we used heat-shock transformation as the laboratory model of the natural transformation process, as it was previously applied by other researchers [11,13,22]. The conjugation was investigated by the transfer of plasmid pKNG101 from E. coli cc118 to E. coli Nova Blue. The MONPs were added to the E. coli cultivation medium for transformation and conjugation. As a result, the different types of MONPs can enhance or inhibit different gene transfer mechanisms, affecting the spread of antibiotic resistance genes.

2. Results

2.1. MONPs Antibacterial Activity

Some MONPs have a significant antibacterial activity that can be compared to antibiotics [31,32,33,34], and this ability may influence HGT.
As shown in Figure 1, the majority of MONPs, namely AlOOH, Fe3O4, and TiO2, do not inhibit E. coli K12 growth. However, CuO and ZnO NPs have a significant antibacterial effect when their concentration is above 100 µg/mL for ZnO and 125 µg/mL for CuO. ZnO inhibits growth at 250 µg/mL. At the same time, the value for CuO NPs are 500 µg/mL. Thus, to further investigate the effect of NPs on HGT, we consider concentrations for ZnO and CuO NPs less than their inhibitory concentrations.

2.2. Effect of MONPs on Transformation

MONPs have been added to the cultures in concentrations 50 µg/mL for the transformation of E. coli K12 by pGEM-T plasmid containing cassette resistance to ampicillin (AmpR).
The transformation resulted in the production of bacteria resistant to ampicillin through the transfer of a pGEM-T plasmid containing an ampicillin-resistant cassette (Figure 2A). Even though TiO2 NPs do not influence on bacterial growth (Figure 2B), they significantly reduced the efficiency of transformation by more than 31 times (Figure 2A,C). At the same time, in the presence of ZnO, the colony-forming units (CFU) number of transformants was more than 9-fold higher compared to the control group without NPs (Figure 2A,C). AlOOH, CuO, and Fe3O4 NPs do not have a significant effect on the transformation (Figure 2C and Table 1).

2.3. Effect of MONPs on Conjugation

To study conjugation, E. coli cc118 with a plasmid containing a cassette resistance to streptomycin SmR was chosen as a donor and E. coli Nova Blue with a cassette resistance to tetracycline TetR as a recipient. MONPs were used in two concentrations –50 µg/mL for AlOOH, CuO, Fe3O4, TiO2, and ZnO, 500 µg/mL for AlOOH, Fe3O4, and TiO2, because CuO and ZnO are toxic for cells at concentrations 500 µg/mL, as shown above.
E. coli cultures resistant to two antibiotics: tetracycline and streptomycin, were obtained in this experiment (Figure 3A). As presented in Figure 3B and Table 1, MONPs in concentrations of 50 µg/mL do not significantly affect conjugation. In concentrations of 500 µg/mL (Figure 3A,C), AlOOH had a significant effect on the conjugation—increasing the number of transconjugants by 1.8 times. In the case of other MONPs, they do not have a statistically significant effect on the conjugation process (Figure 3C and Table 1).

3. Discussion

In this study, we have shown that MONPs can have different effects on antibiotic resistance gene transfer. We studied the effect of MONPs on a wide-spreading line of MONPs, which were synthesized using one method, identical conditions, and fully characterized (Table 2). This is important as the synthesis method affects the physical and chemical characteristics of MONPs, which, in turn, determine the biological properties of the particles [13,21,35]. Thus, in this study, we were able to correctly compare the influence of different MONPs on gene transfer.
During the transformation, DNA should pass through the cell wall, which plays a semi-permeable barrier. One of the properties of MONPs is to induce the generation of ROS. These agents can cause disorganizing and damaging of bacterial cell walls and membranes [14,20,36]. Moreover, possibly due to the long-term interaction of NPs with bacteria, their metabolism changes [17,18]. Subsequent processing of bacteria by transformation buffer (TB) leads to even more significant changes in the cell wall and, as a result, increased ability to absorb extracellular DNA. As a result, this leads to the altering cell membrane penetration and increased uptake of ARGs [13].
Our data showed that ZnO NPs enhances the transformation up to 9.1 times. These results are consistent with data by Wang et al. [13] but contradict with results by Hu et al. [11]. The difference may be due to the use of another protocol in our study. We used overnight pre-incubation of bacteria with MONPs before the transformation, and that did not affect the cell viability, but, perhaps, appears to have affected bacterial competence. The increase in competence may be related to the release of zinc ions in lysogeny broth (LB). It is shown that the effect of zinc ions on the number of transformants is higher than that of NPs; however, in that study, NPs were contained in LB agar, and they could not release cations sufficiently [16]. In our work, cultivation was conducted in a liquid medium that provided enough zinc ions production. The positive influence of ZnO on transformants CFU may also be explained by the ability to increase cell membrane permeability, leading to increased transformant CFU [13].
TiO2 NPs have reduced the efficiency of transformation up to 31 times. The decrease in the number of transformants is most probably determined by the interaction of NPs with external DNA. This binding is achieved through non-covalent bonds, i.e., the attraction of positively charged particles and a negatively charged phosphate backbone [11]. However, the suppression of transformation by TiO2 is much more significant than by AlOOH (Table 1), while zeta potential AlOOH is several times higher than TiO2 (Table 2). The possible differences in the number of transformants can also be attributed to the more active production of ROS by TiO2 particles. It can also be assumed that TiO2 NPs have a substantial effect on changing metabolism [17]. It was shown that long incubation Bacillus subtilis with TiO2 NPs significantly reduces the number of transformants [16]. The impact of all factors (DNA bindings, ROS products, metabolic changes) is certainly possible, which leads to such a significant reduction in CFU transformants.
In the case of AlOOH, the NPs effect might have an electrostatic interaction with the E. coli K12 cell wall [37] due to its high zeta potential (Table 2). AlOOH on the surface of the cell wall can also interact with DNA, leading to the formation of NPs-DNA agglomerates. During heat-shock transformation, these agglomerates cannot enter the cell due to their large size [11]. This may lead to a reduction of CFU transformation.
Earlier, it was shown by us [31] and colleagues [14,15,20] that aluminum and copper oxide NPs have a positive effect on the number of transconjugants. It can be explained as AlOOH NPs have high zeta potential (Table 2), because conjugation efficiency can be improved by adsorption of NPs on the bacterial membrane surface, reducing the distance between donor and recipient, thereby increasing the conjugation frequency [38].
Thus, the comparison analysis showed differences in the influence of MONPs on different gene transfer mechanisms. MONPs have different effects on transformation and conjugation, most likely due to their physical and chemical characteristics. The exact mechanisms of these effects have to be clarified.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Chemicals

MONPs (AlOOH, CuO, Fe3O4, TiO2, and ZnO) were obtained by sol-gel synthesis. The synthesis process of the MONPs and their characteristics were previously described [21]. Hydrodynamic size, zeta potential, and surface parameters of NPs are presented in Table 2.

4.2. Bacterial Strains

E. coli K12 wild type, E. coli Nova Blue (endA1 hsdR17 (rK12– mK12+) supE44 thi-1 recA1gyrA96 relA1 lac Fʹ[proA+B+lacIqZΔM15::Tn10]) (TetR) (Novagen, Darmstadt, Germany) and E. coli cc118 ∆(ara, leu) araD ∆lacX 74 galE galK PhoA20 thi-1 rpsE rpoB argE (am) recA1, SmR with plasmid pKNG 101 (6986 bp) contains a streptomycin cassette resistance (SmR) [39]. E. coli strains were grown at 37 °C in lysogeny broth (LB) medium supplemented with appropriate antibiotics: 100 μg/mL of ampicillin, 12.5 μg/mL of tetracycline, 100 μg/mL of streptomycin (all used antibiotics were provided by PanReac AppliChem, Barcelona, Spain).

4.3. MONPs Antibacterial Activity

To select the optimal MONPs concentrations that are non-toxic to E. coli, we first studied the antibacterial properties of the particles. For this CFU 109 overnight culture of E. coli K12 was diluted ten times in a suitable media with AlOOH, CuO, Fe3O4, TiO2, and ZnO in concentrations from 15.6 µg/mL to 1 mg/mL, and 200 µL of each solution was inoculated into 96-well plates. Samples were incubated for 24 h. Optical density at a wavelength of 600 nm (OD600) was measured using a microplate reader Infinite F50 (TECAN, Mennedorf, Switzerland)); the bactericidal properties of the particles were evaluated. The positive control was a strain in a nutrient medium without the addition of particles. Negative controls were the medium with appropriate concentrations of MONPs without the addition of bacterial cells.

4.4. Transformation Test

E. coli K12 was cultivated in LB broth under 250 rpm at 37 °C overnight. After the bacteria cells were diluted in ratio 1:1000 into fresh LB broths with AlOOH, CuO, Fe3O4, TiO2, and ZnO NPs in concentrations 50 µg/mL and cultivated under the conditions described below for 16–18 h.
A total of 1 mL of each culture was transferred to a sterile ice-cold 1.5 mL polypropylene tube, centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C, and re-suspended in 1 mL ice-cold transformation buffer (2.4 g/L HEPES; 10.8 g/L MnCl2∙4H2O; 1.74 g/L CaCl2; and 18.6 g/L KCl). Then cells were kept on an ice-bath for 10 min, recovered by centrifugation under subsequently described conditions, re-suspended in 50 µL TB buffer. All of the cells volume was mixed with 213 ng of the pGEM-T plasmid containing cassette resistance to ampicillin (AmpR) (Promega, Madison, Wisconsin, USA), the size of which is 3000 bp, and the plasmid contains the cassette resistance to ampicillin. The suspension incubated on an ice-bath for 15–20 min, then the tubes were transferred to a rack placed in preheated 42 °C Biosan CH-100 (Biosan, Riga, Latvia) and stored for 30 s. After tubes were returned to the ice bath and left to chill for 2 min, 250 µL of super optimal broth with catabolite repression (SOC) medium was added to the tubes. The cells were incubated for one hour at 37 °C, transformed competent cells were seeded on the LB agar containing 100 µg/mL ampicillin to determine CFU.

4.5. Conjugation Test

E. coli cc118 with conjugative plasmid pKNG101 was chosen as a donor. The plasmid contains a cassette resistance to streptomycin (SmR). The recipient is E. coli Nova Blue with the tetracycline resistance (TetR). The strains were incubated in LB broth containing specific antibiotics and shaken overnight under conditions described below. The donor and recipient were then diluted in ratio 1:1000 into fresh LB broth and cultivated at the same conditions for 16–18 h. The cells were washed twice by physiological solution and re-suspended. The conjugation mating system contained the same amount of donor and recipient cells (mixed at 1:1 ratio). The mixes were added to different concentrations of AlOOH, CuO, Fe3O4, TiO2, and ZnO (50 µg/mL and 500 µg/mL each) and incubated with shaking (250 rpm) at 37 °C for 2 h. After that, the tubes were incubated without shaking for 24 h. The number of conjugants was considered by seeding on the LB agar with streptomycin (100 µg/mL) and tetracycline (12.5 µg/mL).

4.6. Statistics

Each experiment for the study of antibacterial activity, transformation, and conjugation was carried out three times. Statistical analyses were performed in GraphPad Prism 7.0 software. Statistical significance was considered at p < 0.05 and was defined by Kruskal–Wallis test. Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we have shown differences in the effect of MONPs synthesized by one method and fully characterized on ARGs transfer. ZnO NPs increased transformation up to 9.1 times. In the case of TiO2 was observed the 31-fold reduction of the transformants number. Other NPs do not significantly influence the transformation process. AlOOH NPs enhanced the conjugation by 1.8 times at 500 µg/mL concentration. Whereas CuO, Fe3O4, TiO2, and ZnO NPs did not have a statistically significant effect on the conjugation. Differences in effects by different MONPs are most likely due to their chemical and physical properties, which is still to be clarified in future studies.
The described double action of MONPs can have both negative consequences and benefits in different areas. On the one hand, considering their active use in various industries, one should reflect on the possible subsequent spread of ARGs. On the other hand, some MONPs have a negative impact on gene transfer and can potentially reduce the risk of antibiotic-resistant strains. Moreover, the protocols described for the MONPs application may also be useful in laboratory practice for transformation and conjugation.
Thus, the data presented in this paper, on the one hand, demonstrate the potential negative consequences of mass application of certain nanomaterials, which is due to the spread of ARGs. On the other hand, our data suggested new possible applications for MONPs in genetic engineering due to their unique properties.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.I.K.; data curation, G.D.O., A.V.L., A.D.P. and E.A.K.; formal analysis, A.D.P.; funding acquisition, E.I.K.; investigation, E.I.K.; methodology, G.D.O., A.V.L., A.D.P., I.V.Z., M.V.I., E.A.K. and E.I.K.; project administration, E.I.K.; resources, A.V.L., A.D.P. and I.V.Z.; software, G.D.O., A.V.L., A.D.P., I.V.Z. and M.V.I.; validation, G.D.O., A.V.L. and E.A.K.; writing—original draft, G.D.O. and E.A.K.; writing—review and editing, E.I.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant number 19-74-00125).

Acknowledgments

We thank the Nanopharmacy Lab (Head of Lab–Vinogradov V.V.) and the Ceramic and Natural Nanomaterials Lab (Head of Lab–Krivoshapkin P.V.) for support in synthesis and characterization of MONPs.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance. Microbe Mag. 2015, 10, 354–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Davies, J. Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Microbiologia 1996, 12, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Nwosu, V.C. Antibiotic resistance with particular reference to soil microorganisms. Res. Microbiol. 2001, 152, 421–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhang, X.X.; Zhang, T.; Fang, H.H.P. Antibiotic resistance genes in water environment. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 82, 397–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, J.; Cao, J.; Zhu, Y.G.; Chen, Q.L.; Shen, F.; Wu, Y.; Xu, S.; Fan, H.; Da, G.; Huang, R.J.; et al. Global Survey of Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Air. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 10975–10984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Stokes, H.W.; Gillings, M.R. Gene flow, mobile genetic elements and the recruitment of antibiotic resistance genes into Gram-negative pathogens. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2011, 35, 790–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lerminiaux, N.A.; Cameron, A.D.S. Horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in clinical environments. Can. J. Microbiol. 2019, 65, 34–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ochman, H.; Lawrence, J.G.; Grolsman, E.A. Lateral gene transfer and the nature of bacterial innovation. Nature 2000, 405, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Canchaya, C.; Fournous, G.; Chibani-Chennoufi, S.; Dillmann, M.L.; Brüssow, H. Phage as agents of lateral gene transfer. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2003, 6, 417–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Håvarstein, L.S. Bacterial gene transfer by natural genetic transformation. APMIS 1998, 106, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Hu, X.; Yang, B.; Zhang, W.; Qin, C.; Sheng, X.; Oleszczuk, P.; Gao, Y. Plasmid binding to metal oxide nanoparticles inhibited lateral transfer of antibiotic resistance genes. Environ. Sci. Nano 2019, 6, 1310–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Beyth, N.; Houri-haddad, Y.; Domb, A.; Khan, W.; Hazan, R. Alternative Antimicrobial Approach: Nano-Antimicrobial Materials. Evid. Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2015, 2015, 246012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Wang, X.; Yang, F.; Zhao, J.; Xu, Y.; Mao, D.; Zhu, X.; Luo, Y.; Alvarez, P.J.J. Bacterial exposure to ZnO nanoparticles facilitates horizontal transfer of antibiotic resistance genes. NanoImpact 2018, 10, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, S.; Wang, Y.; Song, H.; Lu, J.; Yuan, Z.; Guo, J. Copper nanoparticles and copper ions promote horizontal transfer of plasmid-mediated multi-antibiotic resistance genes across bacterial genera. Environ. Int. 2019, 129, 478–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Qiu, Z.; Yu, Y.; Chen, Z.; Jin, M.; Yang, D.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, J.; Shen, Z.; Wang, X.; Qian, D.; et al. Nanoalumina promotes the horizontal transfer of multiresistance genes mediated by plasmids across genera. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 4944–4949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Eymard-Vernain, E.; Luche, S.; Rabilloud, T.; Lelong, C. Impact of nanoparticles on the Bacillus subtilis (3610) competence. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 2978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Planchon, M.; Leger, T.; Spalla, O.; Huber, G.; Ferrari, R. Metabolomic and proteomic investigations of impacts of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on Escherichia coli. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0178437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zheng, X.; Su, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wan, R.; Liu, K.; Li, M.; Yin, D. Zinc oxide nanoparticles cause inhibition of microbial denitrification by affecting transcriptional regulation and enzyme activity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 13800–13807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Beaber, J.W.; Hochhut, B.; Waldor, M.K. SOS response promotes horizontal dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes. Nature 2004, 427, 72–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, X.; Tang, J.; Song, B.; Zhen, M.; Wang, L.; Giesy, J.P. Exposure to Al2O3 nanoparticles facilitates conjugative transfer of antibiotic resistance genes from Escherichia coli to Streptomyces. Nanotoxicology 2019, 13, 1422–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Vasilichin, V.A.; Tsymbal, S.A.; Fakhardo, A.F.; Anastasova, E.I.; Marchenko, A.S.; Shtil, A.A.; Vinogradov, V.V.; Koshel, E.I. Effects of metal oxide nanoparticles on toll-like receptor mRNAs in human monocytes. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Ding, C.; Pan, J.; Jin, M.; Yang, D.; Shen, Z.; Wang, J.; Zhang, B.; Liu, W.; Fu, J.; Guo, X.; et al. Enhanced uptake of antibiotic resistance genes in the presence of nanoalumina. Nanotoxicology 2016, 10, 1051–1060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ren, G.; Hu, D.; Cheng, E.W.C.; Vargas-Reus, M.A.; Reip, P.; Allaker, R.P. Characterisation of copper oxide nanoparticles for antimicrobial applications. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2009, 33, 587–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Mishra, P.K.; Mishra, H.; Ekielski, A.; Talegaonkar, S.; Vaidya, B. Zinc oxide nanoparticles: A promising nanomaterial for biomedical applications. Drug Discov. Today 2017, 22, 1825–1834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Imani, M.M.; Safaei, M.; Moradpoor, H.; Rezaei, R.; Golshah, A.; Rezaei, F. Optimum synthesis of CuO nanoparticles with the highest antifungal activity against oral pathogen Candida albicans. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2020, 10, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Dadfar, S.M.; Roemhild, K.; Drude, N.I.; Von, S. Europe PMC Funders Group Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Diagnostic, Therapeutic and Theranostic Applications. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2020, 138, 302–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wallyn, J.; Anton, N.; Vandamme, T.F. Synthesis, Principles, and Properties of Magnetite Nanoparticles for In Vivo Imaging Applications—A Review. Pharmaceutics 2019, 11, 601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Lindblad, E.B.; Biosector, B.; Frederikssund, D. Aluminium compounds for use in vaccines. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2004, 82, 497–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Huang, Y.; Lenaghan, S.C.; Xia, L.; Burris, J.N.; Stewart, C.N.J.; Zhang, M. Characterization of physicochemical properties of ivy nanoparticles for cosmetic application. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2013, 11, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Hanahan, D.; Bloom, F.R. Mechanisms of DNA Transformation. In Escherihia coli and Salmonella: Cellular and Molecular Biology, 2nd ed.; Neidhardt, F.C., Curtiss, R., Ingraham, J.L., Lin, E.C.C., Low, K.B., Magasanik, B., Reznikoff, W., Riley, M., Schaechter, M., Umbarger, H.E., Eds.; American Socity for Microbiology: Washington, DC, USA, 1996; pp. 2449–2459. [Google Scholar]
  31. Solovev, Y.V.; Prilepskii, A.Y.; Krivoshapkina, E.F.; Fakhardo, A.F.; Bryushkova, E.A.; Kalikina, P.A.; Koshel, E.I.; Vinogradov, V.V. Sol-gel derived boehmite nanostructures is a versatile nanoplatform for biomedical applications. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Stanić, V.; Tanasković, S.B. Antibacterial activity of metal oxide nanoparticles. In Nanotoxicity; Rajendran, S., Mukherjee, A., Nguyen, T.A., Godugu, C., Shukla, R.K., Eds.; Micro and Nano Technologies; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 241–274. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kim, J.Y.; Park, H.J.; Lee, C.; Nelson, K.L.; Sedlak, D.L.; Yoon, J. Inactivation of escherichia coli by nanoparticulate zerovalent iron and ferrous ion. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 7668–7670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Handral, C.A.K.; Nileshkumar, H.; Kelmani, D.R. Antibiofilm activity of biogenic copper and zinc oxide nanoparticles-antimicrobials collegiate against multiple drug resistant bacteria: A nanoscale approach. J. Nanostruct. Chem. 2016, 6, 329–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Shkodenko, L.; Kassirov, I. Metal Oxide Nanoparticles Against Bacterial Biofilms: Perspectives and Limitations. Microorganisms 2020, 2, 1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Qiu, Z.; Shen, Z.; Qian, D.; Jin, M.; Yang, D.; Wang, J.; Zhang, B.; Yang, Z.; Chen, Z.; Wang, X.; et al. Effects of nano-TiO2 on antibiotic resistance transfer mediated by RP4 plasmid. Nanotoxicology 2015, 9, 895–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sadiq, I.M.; Chowdhury, B.; Chandrasekaran, N.; Mukherjee, A. Antimicrobial sensitivity of Escherichia coli to alumina nanoparticles. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2009, 5, 282–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Han, X.; Lv, P.; Wang, L.-G.; Long, F.; Ma, X.-L.; Liu, C.; Feng, Y.-J.; Yang, M.-F.; Xiao, X. Impact of nano-TiO2 on horizontal transfer of resistance genes mediated by filamentous phage transduction. Environ. Sci. Nano 2020, 7, 1214–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kaniga, K.; Delor, I.; Cornelis, G.R. A wide-host-range suicide vector for improving reverse genetics in Gram-negative bacteria: Inactivation of the blaA gene of Yersinia enterocolitica. Gene 1991, 109, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Antibiotics 09 00742 g001 550
Figure 1. Metal oxide nanoparticles (MONPs) antibacterial activity against E. coli K12. The presented results are the mean of three independent experiments (three replicates in each) ± standard deviation. * p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Metal oxide nanoparticles (MONPs) antibacterial activity against E. coli K12. The presented results are the mean of three independent experiments (three replicates in each) ± standard deviation. * p < 0.05.
Antibiotics 09 00742 g001
Antibiotics 09 00742 g002 550
Figure 2. Effect of MONPs on transformation. (A) Images of bacteria colony-forming units (CFU) of transformants on lysogeny broth (LB)-agar plates with ampicillin (100 µg/mL) after transformation by pGEM-T plasmid in MONPs presence (50 µg/mL). (B,C) Statistical analysis of the CFU number in the presence of MONPs (50 µg/mL) before transformation (B) and after transformation (C). The presented results are the mean of three independent experiments (three replicates in each) ± standard deviation. * p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Effect of MONPs on transformation. (A) Images of bacteria colony-forming units (CFU) of transformants on lysogeny broth (LB)-agar plates with ampicillin (100 µg/mL) after transformation by pGEM-T plasmid in MONPs presence (50 µg/mL). (B,C) Statistical analysis of the CFU number in the presence of MONPs (50 µg/mL) before transformation (B) and after transformation (C). The presented results are the mean of three independent experiments (three replicates in each) ± standard deviation. * p < 0.05.
Antibiotics 09 00742 g002
Antibiotics 09 00742 g003 550
Figure 3. Effect of MONPs on conjugation. (A) Images of bacteria CFU of transconjugants on LB-agar plates with streptomycin (100 µg/mL) and tetracycline (12.5 µg/mL) after conjugation in MONPs presence (500 µg/mL). (B,C) Statistical analysis of the CFU number after conjugation in the presence of MONPs in concentration (B) 50 µg/mL, (C) 500 µg/mL. The presented results are the mean of three independent experiments (three replicates in each) ± standard deviation. * p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Effect of MONPs on conjugation. (A) Images of bacteria CFU of transconjugants on LB-agar plates with streptomycin (100 µg/mL) and tetracycline (12.5 µg/mL) after conjugation in MONPs presence (500 µg/mL). (B,C) Statistical analysis of the CFU number after conjugation in the presence of MONPs in concentration (B) 50 µg/mL, (C) 500 µg/mL. The presented results are the mean of three independent experiments (three replicates in each) ± standard deviation. * p < 0.05.
Antibiotics 09 00742 g003
Table
Table 1. The effects of MONPs on antibiotic resistance genes transfer calculated as a ratio between experimental and control colony-forming units (CFU) number.
Table 1. The effects of MONPs on antibiotic resistance genes transfer calculated as a ratio between experimental and control colony-forming units (CFU) number.
NPsConcentration, µg/mLEffect on TransformationEffect on Conjugation
AlOOH50↓ 3.8 times↑ 1.3 times
500-↑ 1.8 times **
CuO50↓ 1.6 times↓ 1.6 times
Fe3O450↑ 1.2 timesNo effect *
500-↓ 1.3 times
TiO250↓ 31.1 times **↑ 1.2 times
500-↑ 1.3 times
ZnO50↑ 9.1 times **↑ 1.2 times
* The effect is less than 1.1 time. ** Statistically significant difference compared to control (p < 0.05).
Table
Table 2. Hydrodynamic size, zeta potential, and surface parameters of MONPs.
Table 2. Hydrodynamic size, zeta potential, and surface parameters of MONPs.
MONPsHydrosol ParametersSurface Parameters
Hydrodynamic Diameter, nmZeta Potential, mVSBET, m2/gPore Size, nm
AlOOH90 ± 10+42.0 ± 0.51703.5
CuO500 ± 50+10.8 ± 0.4423.3
Fe3O460 ± 20+30.0 ± 1.21209
TiO240 ± 7+7.2 ± 0.31675
ZnO500 ± 70+18.0 ± 0.3203
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Otinov, G.D.; Lokteva, A.V.; Petrova, A.D.; Zinchenko, I.V.; Isaeva, M.V.; Kovtunov, E.A.; Koshel, E.I. Positive and Negative Effects of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles on Antibiotic Resistance Genes Transfer. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 742. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics9110742

AMA Style

Otinov GD, Lokteva AV, Petrova AD, Zinchenko IV, Isaeva MV, Kovtunov EA, Koshel EI. Positive and Negative Effects of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles on Antibiotic Resistance Genes Transfer. Antibiotics. 2020; 9(11):742. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics9110742

Chicago/Turabian Style

Otinov, Georgy D., Alina V. Lokteva, Anastasia D. Petrova, Irina V. Zinchenko, Maria V. Isaeva, Evgeny A. Kovtunov, and Elena I. Koshel. 2020. "Positive and Negative Effects of Metal Oxide Nanoparticles on Antibiotic Resistance Genes Transfer" Antibiotics 9, no. 11: 742. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antibiotics9110742

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop