Next Article in Journal
An Overview of D7 Protein Structure and Physiological Roles in Blood-Feeding Nematocera
Previous Article in Journal
Immunogenetic Predisposition to SARS-CoV-2 Infection
Previous Article in Special Issue
Response of Terrestrial Net Primary Production to Quadrupled CO2 Forcing: A Comparison between the CAS-ESM2 and CMIP6 Models
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Assessing the Effects of Human Activities on Terrestrial Net Primary Productivity of Grasslands in Typical Ecologically Fragile Areas

1
School of Environmental Science, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing 211171, China
2
School of Public Administration, Nanjing University of Finance and Economics, Nanjing 210023, China
3
School of Geomatics Science and Technology, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
4
State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, China
5
Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
6
School of Geography Science and Geomatics Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 24 November 2022 / Revised: 17 December 2022 / Accepted: 21 December 2022 / Published: 25 December 2022

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Human activities have been found to be the major factor driving the changes in terrestrial ecosystems. However, large uncertainties remain in assessing the impact of human activities on terrestrial ecosystems. In consequence, we established a quantitative indicator based on terrestrial potential and actual net primary productivity (NPP), as well as the forage harvest NPP, to better reveal the spatiotemporal changes of grassland ecosystems in response to human activities in eastern Inner Mongolia, and to further explore the relationship between human activities and grassland degradation in typical ecologically fragile areas. The quantitative indicator showed that NPP loss induced by human activities is weakening in the study area, and a positive relationship between human activities and grassland degradation was found. The results of this study will provide a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of the grassland degradation influenced by human activities, and a method reference for similar research.

Abstract

Global enhanced human activities have deeply influenced grassland ecosystems. Quantifying the impact of human activities on grasslands is crucial to understanding the grassland dynamic change mechanism, such as grassland degradation, and to establishing ecosystem protection measures. In this study, potential net primary productivity (PNPP), actual NPP (ANPP), and the forage harvest NPP (HNPP) were employed to establish the human activities index (HAI) to reveal the spatiotemporal changes of the effects of human activities on grassland ecosystems in eastern Inner Mongolia from 2000 to 2017, and to further explore the relationship between human activities and grassland degradation. The results showed that the total average PNPP, ANPP, and HNPP of grasslands in eastern Inner Mongolia were 187.2 Tg C yr−1, 152.3 Tg C yr−1, and 8.9 Tg C yr−1, respectively, during the period of 2000 to 2017. The HAI exhibited a clear decreasing trend during the study period, with annual mean values ranging from 0.75 to 0.47, which indicates that the NPP loss induced by human activities is weakening, and this trend is dominated by the difference between potential NPP and actual NPP. About 42.4% of the study area was non-degraded grassland, and the declining grassland degradation index (GDI) indicated that the degradation grade in eastern Inner Mongolia improved from moderate to light degradation. A positive relationship was found between HAI and GDI. This relationship was more significant in Xilingol League, which is a typical ecologically fragile area, than that in Xing’an League and Hulunbuir City.

1. Introduction

Net primary productivity (NPP) quantifies the total amount of net carbon fixed by plants through photosynthesis. NPP is the key component of the global carbon cycle [1], and provides a measurable and unified boundary for terrestrial ecosystems [2]. Now, it is identified as a key variable to indicating the change in ecosystem function and vegetation dynamics [3], and is widely used in the study of biodiversity [4] and environmental degradation, such as desertification [5] and grassland degradation [6,7]. Numerous studies have found that human activities have become the major factor driving the changes in terrestrial NPP [7,8,9], and NPP has been used as an indicator to assess the impact of human activities on terrestrial ecosystems [10,11,12].
Most of the studies have used the difference between potential NPP and actual NPP to assess the impact of human activities on terrestrial ecosystems [13,14,15]. The potential NPP (PNPP) is the terrestrial NPP of potential vegetation, assuming that the growth conditions of vegetation are affected only by climate change without interference from human activities. In addition, the actual NPP (ANPP) is the terrestrial NPP of the actual situation of vegetation considering the combined effects of climate change and human activities. For instance, the difference between PNPP and ANPP was employed to estimate the NPP loss in the process of global land degradation caused by human activities [13], and also to assess the situation of grassland degradation [14,15] and desertification [5]. Furthermore, the slope trends of ANPP and PNPP and their difference were used to determine the relative impacts of climate change and human activities on terrestrial dynamics, as well as to assess the progress of desertification [16] and vegetation degradation [17]. In addition, their wide applications in Qinghai–Tibet Plateau [5], Shiyang River Basin [18], Heihe Basin [19], and Northwest China [20] provided useful references for analyzing the adaptability of these methods in different regions.
However, the above methods only considered the changes in terrestrial PNPP and ANPP, while the further impacts of human activities such as grazing and crop harvest on the terrestrial ANPP were ignored. Some researchers [21,22,23] have proposed that the terrestrial NPP loss from human harvests is also a part of the impact of human activities on the terrestrial ecosystems, and the total amount of human impact on the terrestrial NPP is the sum of the difference between the PNPP and ANPP as well as the impact of human harvests. For instance, grazing or mowing for hay and silage can induce NPP loss on grassland, which is similar to harvesting for rice, wheat, and other grain crops and economic crops on cropland. It is necessary to establish a composite indicator by combining the difference between ANPP and PNPP and the impact of human harvests. Therefore, an indicator named the human activities index (HAI) was developed in this study to quantitatively assess the impact of human activities on terrestrial net primary productivity.
Grasslands are one of the most important terrestrial ecosystems, covering approximately 25% of the global terrestrial surface and holding nearly 20% of the global carbon storage [24,25]. It is sensitively fragile and susceptible to human activities [26]. Global warming and human activities, such as overgrazing and land use change, have induced widespread grassland degradation over recent decades [5,7,14]. Grassland degradation is related to the problems of declining productivity, biodiversity loss, and changing vegetation cover, and is usually monitored by these factors. Among them, the vegetation cover was found to have a significant linear correlation with the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) [27], and the grassland degradation index (GDI) based on vegetation cover was regarded as one of the widely used and effective factors to monitor the condition of grassland degradation [28,29]. As mentioned above, some studies employed the PNPP and ANPP for the analysis of the impact of human activities on grassland degradation [14,15,17]; however, the quantitative relationship between human activities (HAI) and grassland degradation (GDI) need to be further researched.
As we know, grasslands are the dominant terrestrial ecosystems in Inner Mongolia and also an important part of China’s northern ecological security barrier. In this study, the HAI was quantified to analyze the spatiotemporal trends of human activities on grassland NPP from 2000 to 2017 in eastern Inner Mongolia, and the GDI index was calculated to obtain the distribution of grassland degradation. Moreover, further discussion about the relationship between the HAI and GDI was performed in eastern Inner Mongolia. This study will provide a deeper understanding of the grassland degradation influenced by human activities, and will also provide a theoretical basis for grassland resource management and sustainable development in Inner Mongolia.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

This study was conducted in eastern Inner Mongolia, which comprises Xilingol League, Xing’an League, and Hulunbuir City. It ranges from an eastern longitude of 110°55′ to 126°23′, and a northern latitude of 41°48′ to 53°02′, and is bounded by Mongolia and Russia to the north, and adjacent to Heilongjiang, Jilin, and Hebei province to the east, with a total area of 51.54 million hectares and a resident population of 4.74 million in 2021.
Over 50% of this region is covered by grasslands, making it the most typical grassland distribution area in China. This region is one of the largest and most important pastures in China, and the continuous growth of the economy and population have promoted increasing consumption of resources, such as meat, milk, and so on. Increasing human activities, including overgrazing, and excessive land use have a significant impact on terrestrial ecosystems of this region. As showed by the Inner Mongolia statistical yearbook (http://tj.nmg.gov.cn/datashow/index.htm (accessed on 30 June 2022)), livestock yield increased from 67.2 thousand to 101.3 thousand heads during 2000–2017.
This region is located in the temperate continental monsoon climate zone, which is characterized by rain and heat in summer, and dry and cold in winter. The precipitation is mainly concentrated from June to September, accounting for 70% of the total amount of annual precipitation. The Greater Khingan Mountains cut through Inner Mongolia from northeast to southwest, representing a natural dividing line. As Figure 1 showed, in the east of the Greater Khingan Mountains, the hills and plains are widely distributed with elevations ranging from 300 to 600 m, ascending from east to west. This area is a semi-humid region, with an annual average precipitation from 500 to 800 mm. The west of the Greater Khingan Mountains, dominated by grasslands, is a typical semi-arid region, with an altitude of about 1000–1100 m and precipitation of 300–500 mm. Eastern Inner Mongolia is one of the main pastures in China, where the terrestrial ecosystems are greatly affected by human activities.

2.2. Data Sources and Processing

The dataset used in this study included Boreal Ecosystems Productivity Simulator (BEPS)-driven data, agricultural statistical data, NDVI data, and land use and land cover data.
Climate forcing data from the year 2000 to 2017 for driving the BEPS model include air temperature, precipitation, relative humidity, surface downward shortwave radiation, and wind speed. These meteorological observing station data were obtained from the China meteorological data service center (http://data.cma.cn/ (accessed on 2 November 2020)), and were used to generate the 500 m meteorological fields by means of the weighted inverse distance. In the interpolation of temperatures, a lapse rate of 0.6 °C per 100 m was assumed. The pattern of the multi-year average temperature and precipitation over eastern Inner Mongolia is shown in Figure 2. Overall, the average temperature and precipitation increase from southwest to northeast, and range from 0.45℃ to 2.9℃ and 262 mm to 535 mm, respectively.
Besides climate datasets, the leaf area index (LAI) and land cover data are also needed. The long-term LAI used in this study was generated from the surface reflectance datasets (MOD09A1) of the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) by driving an LAI inversion algorithm based on a four-scale geometrical optical model [30,31,32]. The yearly land cover data were obtained from the 500 m MODIS land cover data (MCD 12Q1), and reclassified into eight vegetation cover types according to the land cover classification scheme of the International Geosphere Biosphere Programme (IGBP). For the initialization of BEPS, the fractions of clay, silt, and sand in the soil are necessary for determining the physical parameters of the soil, including the wilting point, field capacity, porosity, hydrological conductance, and so on. These characteristics of the soil were retrieved from the harmonized global soil database (http://www.fao.org/, accessed on 1 October 2022). The MODIS 500 m NDVI data (MOD13A1) were obtained from the NASA Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC), and the yearly MOD13A1 datasets are 16-day composites using the maximum value composite (MVC) method. In addition, the numbers of livestock data in the study area were taken from the Inner Mongolia statistical yearbook (http://tj.nmg.gov.cn/datashow/index.htm, accessed on 1 October 2022).

2.3. ActualNPP and PotentialNPP

2.3.1. BEPS Model

The BEPS model is employed to simulate the actual NPP (ANPP) of eastern Inner Mongolia. This model is a two-leaf (sunlit and shaded leaves) model which was developed for boreal ecosystems originally, and has been improved for global carbon cycle simulations [33,34]. Eight plant functional types are defined in the BEPS model to simulate photosynthesis based on an enzyme kinetic FvCB (Farquhar, von Caemmerer, and Berry) model [35], and the actual NPP is calculated as the difference between the GPP and autotrophic respiration. Based on previous studies, the BEPS is capable of simulating both GPPs and NPPs for a wide variety of terrestrial ecosystems at the site and global scale [36,37,38].

2.3.2. Miami Model

The Miami model is used to simulate the potential NPP (PNPP) of eastern Inner Mongolia. This model is an empirical model, and the PNPP in a particular location is calculated as the minimum of the temperature and precipitation regression functions [39]. As we know, the adaptability of the empirical method is affected by different ecosystem structures and climate conditions [40]. The parameters of the classical Miami model were calibrated by fitting the NPP observations with temperature and precipitation data in the early years before the 1970s and must be re-parameterized with new sets of productivity and climate change observations; Zaks [41] collected 3023 global NPP field observations and corresponding meteorological data to calibrate the parameters and develop several statistic models. We chose the new calibrated Miami model to calculate the PNPP in this study.

2.4. Forage Harvest NPP

Forage harvest NPP (HNPP) is the consumed grass biomass by grazing or mowing for hay and silage, which is regarded as one of the human activities affecting the terrestrial ecosystems [21]. HNPP was estimated as the difference between livestock feed demand and feed supply. Among them, feed demand was calculated separately for six livestock species, i.e., cattle and buffaloes, goats and sheep, horses, asses, mules, and camels. The yearly consumed forage was estimated by using species–specific data for daily feed intake, and each livestock type was converted into standard sheep units outlined in Table 1 based on the China Agricultural Industry Standard NY/T 635-2015. The livestock was divided into young livestock and adult livestock in this study, and the coefficient of adult sheep was 1. One sheep unit needed 1.8 kg of dry-matter coarse forage per day. The feed supply consists of crop residues used for feed and other market feeds. Due to the lack of robust data on commercial or supplementary feeds, we assumed that the feed supply of grassland was equal to the crop residues used as feed. The conversion rate of crop residues to feed was assumed to be 25% [42]. The HNPP was spatially allocated to the grasslands by calculating the HNPP as a proportion of the ANPP for each grazing land class as described in Haberl [21].

2.5. Human Activities Index

To assess the impact of human activities on grasslands, a human activities index (HAI) referenced from [22] was developed based on the ANPP, PNPP, and HNPP, according to Equation (1). The difference between the PNPP and ANPP was considered as terrestrial NPP changes resulting from land conversion and land use by human activities. In addition, the HNPP was the terrestrial NPP harvested by humans. A negative HAI suggested that there is a positive effect of human activities such as ecological protection and management on terrestrial NPP, and a positive HAI represented an NPP loss induced by human activities.
H A I = P N P P A N P P + H N P P P N P P

2.6. Grassland Degradation Index

The grassland degradation index (GDI) [28] was calculated to represent the status of grassland degradation as Equation (2). The GDI values were graded into four classes of degradation, i.e., seriously degraded (GDI > 3.0), moderately degraded (2.0 < GDI ≤ 3.0), lightly degraded (1.0 < GDI ≤ 2.0), and not degraded (GDI ≤ 1.0).
G D I = i = 1 4 D i × A i A
where Ai is the distribution area of level i, and A is the total area of grasslands. Di is the level of the degradation class depending on the vegetation cover (Vc), and Di ranges from 1 to 4. According to the significant linear correlation between the Vc and NDVI found by [27], the Vc is calculated as follows:
V c = N D V I N D V I min N D V I max N D V I min
where NDVImin is the minimal NDVI value for bare soil, NDVImax is the maximal NDVI value for pure vegetation of the grasslands, and NDVI is the located NDVI value. Vc is classified into four classes, and the Di is assigned to be 1 to 4 when the Vc value is larger than 0.85, between 0.65 and 0.85, between 0.25 and 0.60, and less than 0.25, respectively.

3. Results

3.1. Actual NPP Simulated by BEPS

The total actual NPP (ANPP) simulated by the BEPS model in eastern Inner Mongolia ranged from 120.6 Tg C yr−1 to 198.5 Tg C yr−1(1 Tg = 1012 g), with an average of 152.3 Tg C yr−1 over the period of 2000–2017 (Figure 3), and increased at a rate of 3.1 Tg C yr−1 since 2000. The grasslands’ total ANPP ranged from 36.3 Tg C yr−1 to 75.6 Tg C yr−1, with an average of 51.9 Tg C yr−1. This ANPP of the grasslands took about 34.1% of the total ANPP in eastern Inner Mongolia, where the grasslands, however, covers 64.9% of the area.
The total ANPP of the grasslands varied significantly in Xilingol League, Xing’an League, and Hulunbuir City, and the average value of the above three regions were 19.9 Tg C yr−1, 12.2 Tg C yr−1, and 19.7 Tg C yr−1, accounting for 96.9%, 68.9%, and 17.3% of the total vegetation ANPP in the corresponding regions, respectively. With over 50% forest coverage, the proportion of the grasslands ANPP to the total vegetation ANPP in Hulunbuir City is the smallest among the three regions.
The average annual ANPP of the grasslands during 2000–2017 in eastern Inner Mongolia is shown in Figure 4a. The annual ANPP showed a gradient increasing from southwest to northeast, and the values were mostly below 200 g C m−2 yr−1 in extensive areas of eastern Inner Mongolia. The annual ANPP of he grasslands in Xilingol League ranged from 74.5 to 146.1 g C m2 yr−1 during 2000–2017, with an average of 102.5 g C m2 yr−1, which was obviously smaller than that of Xing’an League (292.4 g C m2 yr−1) and Hulunbuir City (242.1 g C m2 yr−1)during the same period. As shown in Figure 4b, the annual ANPP showed an increasing trend in most areas of eastern Inner Mongolia, and the average increase rates were 2.3 g C m2 yr−1, 11.6 g C m2 yr−1, and 5.7 g C m2 yr−1 in Xilingol League, Xing’an League, and Hulunbuir City, respectively.

3.2. Potential NPP Calculated by Miami Model

The total potential NPP (PNPP) calculated by the Miami model in eastern Inner Mongolia ranged from 163.5 Tg C yr−1 to 210.2 Tg C yr−1(1 Tg = 1012 g) during the period of 2000–2017, with an average of 187.2 Tg C yr−1. The total PNPP of the grasslands changed with fluctuations from 99.6 Tg C yr−1 to 136.3 Tg C yr−1 in the same period, with an average of 120.5 Tg C yr−1, accounting for 64.3% of the total PNPP. The multi-year (2000–2017) averaged annual PNPP showed a gradient increasing from the west to the east (Figure 5a), which ranged from 74.5 to 146.1 g C m2 yr−1. Compared with Xilingol League and Hulunbuir City, the more abundant precipitation and warmer temperature in Xing’an League (Figure 2) makes the PNPP there larger than that in other regions. Meanwhile, as shown in Figure 5b, the average PNPP showed a slight increase trend in most areas of eastern Inner Mongolia except the west of Xilingol League.

3.3. Forage Harvest NPP Based on the Feed–Supply Balance

The biomass harvest from the grasslands, defined as forage harvest NPP (HNPP), was estimated to be in the range of 6.7–10.2 Tg C yr−1 over the period of 2000 to 2017. The average total HNPP was 8.9 Tg C yr−1, accounting for about 17.1% of the total grasslands ANPP. As shown in Figure 6c, the total grasslands HNPP in Hulunbuir City and Xing’an League presented a clear increasing trend, and the average values were 3.4 Tg C yr−1 and 2.2 Tg C yr−1 in these two regions, respectively. However, the trend in Xinan League was not pronounced, and its average value was 3.3 Tg C yr−1. In most areas of eastern Inner Mongolia, the average annual HNPP was less than 20 g C m2 yr−1, and as shown in Figure 6a, the average HNPP increased from west to east.

3.4. Quantitative Assessment of the Impact of Human Activities on Terrestrial NPP in Eastern Inner Mongolia

The HAI was divided into two parts to better analyze its changing trends. One was the difference between the PNPP and ANPP, defined as NPPLuc, which denotes the impact of human-induced land conversions on terrestrial NPP. The other was the HNPP. As shown in Figure 7c, the annual mean HAI changed with fluctuations from 0.47 to 0.75 during 2000–2017, with an average of 0.63, and the HAI exhibited a clear decreasing trend especially in the period of 2007–2015. The NPPLuc of the grasslands was significantly larger than the HNPP, ranging from 80.9 Tg C yr−1 to 34.8 Tg C yr−1, while the total HNPP changed from 6.7 Tg C yr−1 to 10.1 Tg C yr−1 over the period of 2000–2017. Thus, it is obvious that the changes in HAI was mainly due to the NPPLuc in eastern Inner Mongolia. As shown in Figure 7b, a clear decreasing trend of the NPPLuc, which was similar to that of the HAI, was presented and compared with the gradually increasing trends of the HNPP. The multi-year averaged HAI increased from southwest to northeast (Figure 7a). Due to the low ANPP, the HAI in most areas of the southwest was larger than 0.7. Nevertheless, there were many points scattered in the Greater Khingan Mountains with HAI values less than 0, where the ANPP was significantly larger than thet PNPP because of the misclassification of the forests as grasslands.

3.5. Quantitative Assessment of Grassland Degradation in Eastern Inner Mongolia

The annual mean GDI changes with fluctuations from 2.29 to 1.61 in eastern Inner Mongolia from 2000 to 2017, and presents a weak decreasing trend, which indicates that the grassland degradation situation of the whole region is changing from moderately degraded to lightly degraded. The non-degraded grasslands accounted for about 42.4% of the total area, while the area of lightly degraded, moderately, and seriously degraded grasslands were about 22.0%, 28.8, and 6.8% of the total area respectively. The yearly percentages of different degradation levels are shown in Table S1.
The annual mean GDI in Xilingol League, Xing’an League, and Hulunbuir City were 2.41, 1.18, and 1.50, respectively. The situation of grassland degradation was most serious in Xilingol League, where the seriously and moderately degraded grasslands accounted for about 11.0% and 41.9% of the total area, respectively. Nevertheless, seriously degraded grasslands have little distribution in the other two regions, with proportions less than 1.0%. The situations of grassland degradation in Xing’an League and Hulunbuir City were close to the slight degradation grade, with the slightest degradation in Xing’an League, where 84.9% of the area is at the non-degradation level, and 12.3% was at the slight degradation level. While the grassland degradation in Hulunbuir City was slightly more severe than that in Xing’an League, areas of moderately and lightly degraded grasslands accounted for about 12.1% and 23.4% of its total area, respectively. The spatial distribution of grassland degradation in the year 2017 is shown in Figure 8.

4. Discussion

4.1. Uncertainty in the Calculation of the Human Activity Index

The HAI index is calculated by using the variables ANPP, PNPP, and HNPP in this study. Numerous studies used only the difference between the PNPP and ANPP to assess the impact of human activities on terrestrial NPP [5,16,20]. However, the HNPP sometimes was ignored and should be considered as one part of the HAI [21,22]. The HAI is a comparable indicator in different countries and regions, as shown in Table 2. According to our results, the HAI decreased from 75% to 47% from 2000 to 2017 in the grasslands, which is larger than that in different countries. Previous studies have suggested that the HAI in forest areas is low, as forest areas suffered less disturbance than other land cover types. In contrast, the HAI on cropland and grasslands sometimes is high. The high HNPP from the harvest of crops sometimes leads to a high HAI on cropland [43], and the low ANPP and high HNPP on grasslands resulting from grassland degradation and grazing sometimes lead to a large difference between the ANPP and PNPP and also a high HAI. Therefore, it is reasonable that the value of the HAI in our study is higher than that of other regions, especially with high forest coverage, and being close to the coastal areas of Jiangsu province in China, dominated by cropland [44]. In addition, in the city of Guangzhou, China, as well as the Yangtze River delta, the HAIs are also high, mainly due to the low ANPP and high PNPP in cities.
Although the HAI in this study is reasonable compared with previous studies, uncertainties still exist in our calculation and also in similar studies. For example, the difference between the ANPP and PNPP sometimes brings in errors by different model structures, i.e., the ANPP and PNPP are calculated by different kinds of models or NPP products. For example, Chen et al. [46] used the Zhouguangsheng model and MOD17A3 production to obtain the PNPP and ANPP, respectively. In this study, although the input data are the same, however, principle differences between the BEPS model (process-based ecological model) and Miami model (light energy utilization model) still bring uncertainties to the calculated results.
The annual mean ANPP of the grasslands in eastern Inner Mongolia from 2000 to 2017 ranges from 102.5 g C m−2 yr−1 to 292.4 g C m−2 yr−1, which is close to 281.3 g C m−2 yr−1, calculated by Mu [50] in the same region. Meanwhile, the ANPP was validated with the FLUX data at the sites of NM and XLD (Table 3), summarized by Yu [51]. We assumed that the NPP was half of the GPP, and PRE% in these two sites were only 17.76% and 8.13%, respectively. However, the PNPP is hard to verify using the flux data. We also assumed that the ANPP of the natural forest was equal to the PNPP [21], considering the natural forest is rarely affected by human activities in the Greater Khingan Mountains. For this reason, the PRE% of the PNPP in the flux site of HZ is only 4.76%. On the whole, our results are reasonable.

4.2. Drivers of the Changes of Human Activity Index in Eastern Inner Mongolia

As calculated in Section 3.4, the HAI consists of two parts, i.e., NPPLuc and HNPP. The average total NPPLuc and HNPP of the grasslands was 64.55 Tg C yr−1 and 8.85 Tg C yr−1. Thus, the changes of the HAI was dominated mainly by NPPLuc in eastern Inner Mongolia.
The NPPLuc is the difference between the PNPP and ANPP, and denotes the impact of human-induced land conversions on terrestrial NPP [21,22]. Land cover and land use changes induced by human activities, such as deforestation [52], and desertification due to overgrazing on grasslands [9,16], were considered to be the main drivers of changes in the NPPLuc [21,53]. Moreover, human managements, such as ecosystem protection and irrigation, can effectively improve terrestrial ANPP. For example, irrigation in cultivated land in arid areas can reduce the water stress on crops, and significantly increase the crop yield. In this case, the irrigation land can have a higher ANPP than PNPP [21]. NPPLuc changes driven by these factors can be regarded as a direct impact of human activities.
Some factors indirectly influenced by human activities can also drive the changes of NPPLuc. For example, the continuously increasing CO2 concentration and global warming, resulting from human carbon emission, were found to be of significant impact on terrestrial ANPP [54]. However, these changes, induced by indirect factors, sometimes combined the effects of climate change and human activities and are hard to distinguish, although some studies have tried to separate them by the slope trends of the ANPP and PNPP [16,17].

4.3. Relationship between HAI and Grassland Degradation in Eastern Inner Mongolia

Numerous studies have found that human activities were the main factors in driving grassland degradation by different means [5,7,54]. We established the relationship between the HAI and grassland degradation which was presented in Section 3 in eastern Inner Mongolia (Figure 9a), Xing’an League (Figure 9b), Hulunbuir City (Figure 9c), and Xilingol League (Figure 9d). The R2 in different areas ranges from 0.3067 to 0.5718, and the relationships are statistically significant (p < 0.05). The positive relationship between the HAI and GDI indicated that grassland degradation might worsen owing to the increasing intensity of human activities.
In addition, it is interesting to find that the relationship between the HAI and GDI in Xilingol League was more significant than that in the other regions. According to Figure 2, higher temperatures and less precipitation were distributed in Xilingol League, compared with the other two regions, especially in western Xilingol League. This region is a typical ecologically fragile area, and the dominant type of grassland is desert grasslands. The ANPP was low as shown in Figure 4, and the terrestrial ecosystems is more sensitive to human activities such as grazing or climate change in this region. The negative effects of human activities or climate change are more likely to cause grassland degradation. Therefore, the HAI shows a better correlation with GDI in this region. In contrast, the grasslands in Xing’an League and Hulunbuir City are mostly distributed in the transitional zone from forests to grasslands, and the ANPP in these regions is significantly larger than that in Xilingol League. Due to the stability of grassland ecosystems, the HAI is less sensitive to GDI.
As presented in Section 3.4, the HAI exhibited a clear decreasing trend during the study period. However, the increment of the HNPP calculated by the number of livestock indicates that grazing was increasing from 6.7 to 10.2 Tg C yr−1 in the study area. The decrease in the HAI is mainly due to the increase in the ANPP as shown in Figure 6b. Positive human activities, such as the implementation of a grasslands management policy and ecosystems protection programs, have effectively improved the grasslands ANPP and also reversed the degradation of grasslands [7].

5. Conclusions

In this study, the potential NPP, actual NPP, and forage harvest NPP were employed to define the HAI index to analyze the spatiotemporal trends of human activities on terrestrial NPP in a typical grasslands ecosystem in eastern Inner Mongolia, and to further explore the relationship between the HAI and grassland degradation. The results showed that the HAI exhibited a clear decreasing trend during 2000–2017, especially from 2007 to 2015, with the annual mean values ranging from 0.75 to 0.47. The decreasing trend of the HAI indicates that the NPP loss induced by human activities is weakening, and this trend is mainly due to the difference between the potential NPP and actual NPP. Among them, the total average PNPP and ANPP were 187.2 Tg C yr−1 and 152.3 Tg C yr−1, respectively, during the period of 2000 to 2017, and the difference between the averaged PNPP and ANPP was 34.9 Tg C yr−1, which was significantly higher than the average HNPP (8.9 Tg C yr−1).
Based on the GDI index, the grassland degradation situation in eastern Inner Mongolia was improved from moderately degraded to lightly degraded. The non-degraded grasslands accounted for about 42.4% of the total area, significantly larger than that of lightly degraded (22.0%), moderately (28.8%), and seriously (6.8%) degraded grasslands. A positive relationship was found between the HAI and GDI, and this relationship was more significant in Xilingol League which was a typical ecologically fragile area than that in Xing’an League and Hulunbuir City.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/biology12010038/s1, Table S1: Proportion of the grasslands area of different degradation levels to the total area.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Q.H., F.Z. and Y.J.; methodology, Q.H., Q.Z. and F.Z.; software, X.L. (Xiaoqing Li) and J.L.; validation, Q.H. and X.L. (Xuehe Lu); formal analysis, Q.H., X.L. (Xuehe Lu) and Q.Z.; resources, Q.H. and Y.J.; data curation, X.L. (Xuehe Lu), X.L. (Xiaoqing Li) and J.L.; writing—original draft preparation, Q.H. and F.Z.; writing—review and editing, Q.H., F.Z., Q.Z., X.L. (Xuehe Lu) and Y.J.; visualization, Q.H.; funding acquisition, Q.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 41871334, Grant number. 42071392, and Grant number. 32230065), and the Natural Science Foundation of Nanjing Xiaozhuang University (Grant number. 2020NXY15).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We really appreciate the editors and anonymous reviewers for their meaningful comments for improving our manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Koffi, E.N.; Rayner, P.J.; Scholze, M.; Beer, C. Atmospheric constraints on gross primary productivity and net ecosystem productivity: Results from a carbon-cycle data assimilation system. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2012, 26, GB1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Running, S.W. A Measurable Planetary Boundary for the Biosphere. Science 2012, 337, 1458–1459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Liang, W.; Yang, Y.; Fan, D.; Guan, H.; Zhang, T.; Long, D.; Zhou, Y.; Bai, D. Analysis of spatial and temporal patterns of net primary production and their climate controls in China from 1982 to 2010. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2015, 204, 22–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Costanza, R.; Fisher, B.; Mulder, K.; Liu, S.; Christopher, T. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multi-scale empirical study of the relationship between species richness and net primary production. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 61, 478–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, Q.; Zhang, C.; Shen, Y.; Jia, W.; Li, J. Quantitative assessment of the relative roles of climate change and human activities in desertification processes on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau based on net primary productivity. Catena 2016, 147, 789–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Li, C.; Dou, T.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, T.; Yin, H.; Zhou, M.; Liu, L.; Wu, X. A Method for Quantifying the Impacts of Human Activities on Net Primary Production of Grasslands in Northwest China. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Tong, L.; Khalifa, M.; Wang, Q.; Gang, C.; Wang, Z.; Li, J.; Sun, Z. Assessing the effects of climate variation and human activities on grassland degradation and restoration across the globe. Ecol. Indic. 2019, 106, 105504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. DeFries, R.S.; Field, C.B.; Fung, I.; Collatz, G.J.; Bounoua, L. Combining satellite data and biogeochemical models to estimate global effects of human-induced land cover change on carbon emissions and primary productivity. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 1999, 13, 803–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, T.; Bao, A.; Jiapaer, G.; Guo, H.; Zheng, G.; Jiang, L.; Chang, C.; Tuerhanjiang, L. Disentangling the relative impacts of climate change and human activities on arid and semiarid grasslands in Central Asia during 1982–2015. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 653, 1311–1325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Haberl, H. Human appropriation of net primary production as an environmental indicator: Implications for sustainable development. Ambio 1997, 26, 143–146. [Google Scholar]
  11. Buyantuyev, A.; Wu, J. Urbanization alters spatiotemporal patterns of ecosystem primary production: A case study of the Phoenix metropolitan region, USA. J. Arid. Environ. 2009, 73, 512–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, J.; Wang, Z.; Lai, C.; Wu, X.; Zeng, Z.; Chen, X.; Lian, Y. Response of net primary production to land use and land cover change in mainland China since the late 1980s. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 639, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zika, M.; Erb, K.H. The global loss of net primary production resulting from human-induced soil degradation in dry lands. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 69, 310–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Yang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Li, J.; Gang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Odeh, I.; Qi, J. Comparative assessment of grassland degradation dynamics in response to climate variation and human activities in China, Mongolia, Pakistan and Uzbekistan from 2000 to 2013. J. Arid. Environ. 2016, 135, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhou, W.; Gang, C.; Zhou, L.; Chen, Y.; Li, J.; Ju, W.; Odeh, I. Dynamic of grassland vegetation degradation and its quantitative assessment in the northwest China. Acta Oecologica 2014, 55, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, D.; Song, A.; Li, D.; Ding, X.; Wang, Z. Assessing the relative role of climate change and human activities in desertification of North China from 1981 to 2010. Front. Earth Sci. 2019, 13, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Tong, L.; Wang, Z.; Li, J. Grassland dynamics in responses to climate variation and human activities in China from 2000 to 2013. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 690, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, C.; Wang, X.; Li, J.; Hua, T. Roles of climate changes and human interventions in land degradation: A case study by net primary productivity analysis in China’s Shiyanghe Basin. Environ. Earth Sci. 2011, 64, 2183–2193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhou, W.; Sun, Z.; Li, J.; Gang, C.; Zhang, C. Desertification dynamic and the relative roles of climate change and human activities in desertification in the Heihe River Basin based on NPP. J. Arid. Land 2013, 5, 465–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Zhou, W.; Gang, C.; Zhou, F.; Li, J.; Dong, X.; Zhao, C. Quantitative assessment of the individual contribution of climate and human factors to desertification in northwest China using net primary productivity as an indicator. Ecol. Indic. 2015, 48, 560–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Haberl, H.; Erb, K.H.; Krausmann, F.; Gaube, V.; Bondeau, A.; Plutzar, C.; Gingrich, S.; Lucht, W.; Fischer-Kowalski, M. Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth’s terrestrial ecosystems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 12942–12947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Haberl, H.; Erb, K.H.; Krausmann, F. Human appropriation of net primary production: Patterns, trends, and planetary boundaries. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2014, 39, 363–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Krausmann, F.; Erb, K.H.; Gingrich, S.; Haberl, H.; Bondeau, A.; Gaube, V.; Lauk, C.; Plutzar, C.; Searchinger, T.D. Global human appropriation of net primary production doubled in the 20th century. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 10324–10329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Scurlock, J.M.O.; Johnson, K.; Olson, R.J. Estimating net primary productivity from grassland biomass dynamics measurements. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2002, 8, 736–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Chen, Y.; Mu, S.; Sun, Z.; Gang, C.; Li, J.; Padarian, J.; Groisman, P.; Chen, J.; Li, S. Grassland carbon sequestration ability in China: A new perspective from terrestrial aridity zones. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2016, 69, 84–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, C.; Wang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Gang, C.; An, R.; Li, J. Vegetation dynamics and its driving forces from climate change and human activities in the Three-River Source Region, China from 1982 to 2012. Sci. Total Environ. 2016, 563, 210–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Purevdorj, T.S.; Tateishi, R.; Ishiyama, T.; Honda, Y. Relationships between percent vegetation cover and vegetation indices. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1998, 19, 3519–3535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, Y.; Wang, J.; Chen, Y.; Cheng, F.; Liu, G.; He, Z. Remote-sensing monitoring of grassland degradation based on the GDI in Shangri-La, China. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 3030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Roque, M.P.B.; Neto, J.A.F.; de Faria, A.L.L. Degraded grassland and the conflict of land use in protected areas of hotspot in Brazil. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2022, 24, 1475–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, Y.; Ju, W.; He, H.; Wang, S.; Sun, R.; Zhang, Y. Changes of net primary productivity in China during recent 11 years detected using an ecological model driven by MODIS data. Front. Earth Sci. 2013, 7, 112–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Y.; Liu, R.; Chen, J.M. Retrospective retrieval of long-term consistent global leaf area index (1981–2011) from combined AVHRR and MODIS data. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2012, 117, G04003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Deng, F.; Chen, J.M.; Plummer, S.; Chen, M.; Pisek, J. Algorithm for global leaf area index retrieval using satellite imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2006, 44, 2219–2229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Chen, J.M.; Ju, W.; Ciais, P.; Viovy, N.; Liu, R.G.; Liu, Y.; Lu, X.H. Vegetation structural change since 1981 significantly enhanced the terrestrial carbon sink. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Chen, J.M.; Liu, J.; Cihlar, J.; Goulden, M.L. Daily canopy photosynthesis model through temporal and spatial scaling for remote sensing applications. Ecol. Model. 1999, 124, 99–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Farquhar, G.D.; von Caemmerer, S.; Berry, J.A. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species. Planta 1980, 149, 78–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Amthor, J.S.; Chen, J.M.; Clein, J.S.; Frolking, S.E.; Goulden, M.L.; Grant, R.F.; Kimball, J.S.; King, A.W.; McGuire, A.D.; Nikolov, N.T.; et al. Boreal forest CO2 exchange and evapotranspiration predicted by nine ecosystem process models: Intermodel comparisons and relationships to field measurements. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2001, 106, 33623–33648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Potter, C.S.; Wang, S.; Nikolov, N.T.; McGuire, A.D.; Liu, J.; King, A.W.; Kimball, J.S.; Grant, R.F.; Frolking, S.E.; Clein, J.S.; et al. Comparison of boreal ecosystem model sensitivity to variability in climate and forest site parameters. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2001, 106, 33671–33687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Gonsamo, A.; Chen, J.M.; Price, D.T.; Kurz, W.A.; Liu, J.; Boisvenue, C.; Hember, R.A.; Wu, C.; Chang, K.H. Improved assessment of gross and net primary productivity of Canada’s landmass. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2013, 118, 1546–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lieth, H. Primary production: Terrestrial ecosystems. Hum. Ecol. 1973, 1, 303–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Baldocchi, D.D.; Ryu, Y.; Dechant, B.; Eichelmann, E.; Hemes, K.; Ma, S.; Sanchez, C.R.; Shortt, R.; Szutu, D. and Valach, A.; et al. Outgoing near-infrared radiation from vegetation scales with canopy photosynthesis across a spectrum of function, structure, physiological capacity, and weather. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 2020, 125, e2019JG005534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zaks, D.P.; Ramankutty, N.; Barford, C.C.; Foley, J.A. From Miami to Madison: Investigating the relationship between climate and terrestrial net primary production. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2007, 21, GB3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Pan, L. Analysis on current situation of herbivorous livestock forage supply/demand in China. Chin. J. Anim. Sci 2014, 50, 12–16. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  43. Kohlheb, N.; Krausmann, F. Land use change, biomass production and HANPP: The case of Hungary 1961–2005. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 69, 292–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, F.; Pu, L.; Huang, Q. Quantitative assessment of the human appropriation of net primary production (HANPP) in the coastal areas of Jiangsu, China. Sustainability 2015, 7, 15857–15870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Schwarzlmüller, E. Human appropriation of aboveground net primary production in Spain 1955–2003: An empirical analysis of the industrialization of land use. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 69, 282–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Chen, A.; Li, R.; Wang, H.; He, B. Quantitative assessment of human appropriation of aboveground net primary production in China. Ecol. Model. 2015, 312, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Huang, Q.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, Q.; Ou, H.; Jin, Y. Quantitative assessment of the impact of human activities on terrestrial net primary productivity in the Yangtze River delta. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Wu, Y.; Wu, Z. Quantitative assessment of human-induced impacts based on net primary productivity in Guangzhou, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 11384–11399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mao, D.; Wang, Z.; Li, L.; Song, K.; Jia, M. Quantitative assessment of human-induced impacts on marshes in Northeast China from 2000 to 2011. Ecol. Eng. 2014, 68, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Mu, S.; Zhou, S.; Chen, Y.; Li, J.; Ju, W.; Odeh, I.O.A. Assessing the impact of restoration-induced land conversion and management alternatives on net primary productivity in Inner Mongolian grassland, China. Glob. Planet. Chang. 2013, 108, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yu, G.R.; Zhu, X.J.; Fu, Y.L.; He, H.L.; Wang, Q.F.; Wen, X.F.; Li, X.R.; Zhang, L.M.; Zhang, L.; Su, W.; et al. Spatial patterns and climate drivers of carbon fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems of China. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2013, 19, 798–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kastner, T. Trajectories in human domination of ecosystems: Human appropriation of net primary production in the Philippines during the 20th century. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 69, 260–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. He, C.; Tian, J.; Gao, B.; Zhao, Y. Differentiating climate-and human-induced drivers of grassland degradation in the Liao River Basin, China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2015, 187, 4199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Huang, Q.; Ju, W.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, Q. Roles of climate change and increasing CO2 in driving changes of net primary productivity in China simulated using a dynamic global vegetation model. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The geographical location and topography of eastern Inner Mongolia.
Figure 1. The geographical location and topography of eastern Inner Mongolia.
Biology 12 00038 g001
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of annually averaged temperature (a) and precipitation (b) during 2000–2017 in eastern Inner Mongolia.
Figure 2. Spatial distribution of annually averaged temperature (a) and precipitation (b) during 2000–2017 in eastern Inner Mongolia.
Biology 12 00038 g002
Figure 3. The variation in the total ANPP (blue) and total grasslands NPP (green) of eastern Inner Mon-golia from 2000 to 2017.
Figure 3. The variation in the total ANPP (blue) and total grasslands NPP (green) of eastern Inner Mon-golia from 2000 to 2017.
Biology 12 00038 g003
Figure 4. Spatial distribution of simulated averaged ANPP (a) and its trends (b) over the period of 2000 to 2017 in eastern Inner Mongolia.
Figure 4. Spatial distribution of simulated averaged ANPP (a) and its trends (b) over the period of 2000 to 2017 in eastern Inner Mongolia.
Biology 12 00038 g004
Figure 5. Spatial distribution of simulated averaged PNPP (a) and its trends (b) over the period of 2000 to 2017 in eastern Inner Mongolia.
Figure 5. Spatial distribution of simulated averaged PNPP (a) and its trends (b) over the period of 2000 to 2017 in eastern Inner Mongolia.
Biology 12 00038 g005
Figure 6. Spatial distribution of calculated averaged HNPP (a), variation of total grasslands ANPP and HNPP (b), and variation of total grasslands HNPP in Xilingol League, Hulunbuir City, and Xing’an League (c) over the period of 2000 to 2017 in eastern Inner Mongolia.
Figure 6. Spatial distribution of calculated averaged HNPP (a), variation of total grasslands ANPP and HNPP (b), and variation of total grasslands HNPP in Xilingol League, Hulunbuir City, and Xing’an League (c) over the period of 2000 to 2017 in eastern Inner Mongolia.
Biology 12 00038 g006
Figure 7. Spatial distribution of calculated multi-year averaged HAI (a), variation of total grasslands NPPLuc and HNPP (b), and variation of annual mean HAI (c) over the period of 2000 to 2017 in eastern Inner Mongolia.
Figure 7. Spatial distribution of calculated multi-year averaged HAI (a), variation of total grasslands NPPLuc and HNPP (b), and variation of annual mean HAI (c) over the period of 2000 to 2017 in eastern Inner Mongolia.
Biology 12 00038 g007
Figure 8. Spatial distribution of grassland degradation in the year of 2017 in eastern Inner Mongolia.
Figure 8. Spatial distribution of grassland degradation in the year of 2017 in eastern Inner Mongolia.
Biology 12 00038 g008
Figure 9. Relationship between HAI and grassland degradation in eastern Inner Mongolia (a), Xing’an League (b), Hulunbuir City (c), and Xilingol League (d).
Figure 9. Relationship between HAI and grassland degradation in eastern Inner Mongolia (a), Xing’an League (b), Hulunbuir City (c), and Xilingol League (d).
Biology 12 00038 g009aBiology 12 00038 g009b
Table 1. The coefficient of one sheep unit for livestock.
Table 1. The coefficient of one sheep unit for livestock.
LivestockCowHorseDonkeyMuleCamelSheep
Young livestock2.52.522.53.50.7
Adult livestock555471
Table 2. Comparison of the HAI estimated in this study with previous studies.
Table 2. Comparison of the HAI estimated in this study with previous studies.
AreaPeriodObjectsHAI (%)References
Global1910–2005All land covers13–25 (↑)[23]
Hungary1961–2005All land covers67–49 (↓)[43]
Spain1955–2003All land covers67–61 (↓)[45]
China2001–2010All land covers49–58 (↑)[46]
The Yangtze River Delta2005–2015All land covers59–72 (↑)[47]
Coastal Areas of Jiangsu2000–2010Cropland dominance50–71 (↑)[44]
Guangzhou *2001–2013All land covers31–80 (↑)[48]
Northeast China *2000–2011Marshes6–14 (↑)[49]
Eastern Inner Mongolia2000–2017Grasslands75–47 (↓)this study
Note: * HNPP was not considered in the study.
Table 3. Comparison of ANPP/PNPP with observations.
Table 3. Comparison of ANPP/PNPP with observations.
CodeTypesPeriodGPPobsANPP/PNPPRPE%
NMGrasslands2004–2008231.66 ± 111.13136.3917.76%
XLDGrasslands2006294.44159.208.13%
HZ *Forests2010962.75504.294.76%
Note: RPE means Relative Predictive Error and is calculated as (2*ANPP − GPPobs)/GPPobs × 100%; * value in HZ is PNPP and values in NM, XLD is ANPP.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huang, Q.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, Q.; Jin, Y.; Lu, X.; Li, X.; Liu, J. Assessing the Effects of Human Activities on Terrestrial Net Primary Productivity of Grasslands in Typical Ecologically Fragile Areas. Biology 2023, 12, 38. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biology12010038

AMA Style

Huang Q, Zhang F, Zhang Q, Jin Y, Lu X, Li X, Liu J. Assessing the Effects of Human Activities on Terrestrial Net Primary Productivity of Grasslands in Typical Ecologically Fragile Areas. Biology. 2023; 12(1):38. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biology12010038

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huang, Qing, Fangyi Zhang, Qian Zhang, Yunxiang Jin, Xuehe Lu, Xiaoqing Li, and Jia Liu. 2023. "Assessing the Effects of Human Activities on Terrestrial Net Primary Productivity of Grasslands in Typical Ecologically Fragile Areas" Biology 12, no. 1: 38. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biology12010038

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop