Next Article in Journal
Comparative Transcriptome and Phytochemical Analysis Provides Insight into Triterpene Saponin Biosynthesis in Seeds and Flowers of the Tea Plant (Camellia sinensis)
Next Article in Special Issue
Production of Hydroxy Fatty Acids, Precursors of γ-Hexalactone, Contributes to the Characteristic Sweet Aroma of Beef
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Mitochondrial and Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in the Evaluation of Neurocognitive Prognosis Following Acute Carbon Monoxide Poisoning
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Metabolites
Volume 12
Issue 3
10.3390/metabo12030203
metabolites-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Maternal Nutrient Restriction Disrupts Gene Expression and Metabolites Associated with Urea Cycle, Steroid Synthesis, Glucose Homeostasis, and Glucuronidation in Fetal Calf Liver

by
Susumu Muroya
1,*,
Yi Zhang
2,
Kounosuke Otomaru
3,
Kazunaga Oshima
4,
Ichiro Oshima
2,
Mitsue Sano
5,
Sanggun Roh
6,
Koichi Ojima
1 and
Takafumi Gotoh
2,*
1
Division of Animal Products Research, NARO Institute of Livestock and Grassland Science (NILGS), Ibaraki, Tsukuba 305-0901, Japan
2
Department of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Kagoshima University, Korimoto 1-21-24, Kagoshima 890-8580, Japan
3
Joint Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Kagoshima University, Korimoto 1-21-24, Kagoshima 890-8580, Japan
4
Division of Year-Round Grazing Research, NARO Western Region Agricultural Research Center, 60 Yoshinaga, Ohda 694-0013, Shimane, Japan
5
Faculty of Human Culture, University of Shiga Prefecture, 2500 Hassaka-cho, Hikone 522-8533, Shiga, Japan
6
Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, 468-1 Aoba, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8578, Miyagi, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Metabolites 2022, 12(3), 203; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/metabo12030203
Submission received: 27 January 2022 / Revised: 18 February 2022 / Accepted: 22 February 2022 / Published: 24 February 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metabolomic Applications in Animal Science Volume 3)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study aimed to understand the mechanisms underlying the effects of maternal undernutrition (MUN) on liver growth and metabolism in Japanese Black fetal calves (8.5 months in utero) using an approach that integrates metabolomics and transcriptomics. Dams were fed 60% (low-nutrition; LN) or 120% (high-nutrition; HN) of their overall nutritional requirements during gestation. We found that MUN markedly decreased the body and liver weights of the fetuses; metabolomic analysis revealed that aspartate, glycerol, alanine, gluconate 6-phosphate, and ophthalmate levels were decreased, whereas UDP-glucose, UDP-glucuronate, octanoate, and 2-hydroxybutyrate levels were decreased in the LN fetal liver (p ≤ 0.05). According to metabolite set enrichment analysis, the highly different metabolites were associated with metabolisms including the arginine and proline metabolism, nucleotide and sugar metabolism, propanoate metabolism, glutamate metabolism, porphyrin metabolism, and urea cycle. Transcriptomic and qPCR analyses revealed that MUN upregulated QRFPR and downregulated genes associated with the glucose homeostasis (G6PC, PCK1, DPP4), ketogenesis (HMGCS2), glucuronidation (UGT1A1, UGT1A6, UGT2A1), lipid metabolism (ANGPTL4, APOA5, FADS2), cholesterol and steroid homeostasis (FDPS, HSD11B1, HSD17B6), and urea cycle (CPS1, ASS1, ASL, ARG2). These metabolic pathways were extracted as relevant terms in subsequent gene ontology/pathway analyses. Collectively, these results indicate that the citrate cycle was maintained at the expense of activities of the energy metabolism, glucuronidation, steroid hormone homeostasis, and urea cycle in the liver of MUN fetuses.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Maternal undernutrition (MUN) during gestation in mammals causes retardation of fetal development, which is a typical fetal growth restriction (FGR; also known as intrauterine growth restriction) [1]. Low levels of calories, proteins, fats, and/or micronutrients in pregnant maternal diets impair the growth and metabolism of fetal organs in mammals, including humans [1]. MUN results in low birth weight and restricted growth of organs such as the brain, heart, skeletal muscle, liver, thymus, and kidney in rats [2] and sheep [3]. Even if there is no phenotypic impact, gene expression and metabolites in fetal organs are altered due to physiological adaptations in response to low nutrient levels, which are linked to epigenetic changes, including DNA methylation in mise and rats [4]. This epigenetic mechanism is thought to promote the development and growth of MUN fetal organs to establish a thrifty constitution in nutrient-restricted dams during gestation in mammals [5]. MUN predisposes the fetus to metabolic disorders, which cause prolonged disrupted homeostasis in the offspring, such as insulin resistance. Metabolic disruption can lead to obesity, type II diabetes, hypertension, apoplexy, and cardiac infarction in the adulthood of MUN offspring [5]. Although MUN affects fetuses and offspring of nutrient-restricted dams differently, the impact of MUN on FGR depends on the animal species, gestational stage, extent and period of restriction, and types of restricted nutrients such as protein and calories [6]. In livestock production, MUN causes huge economic losses to farm animal producers. It is necessary to avoid MUN, especially in meat animal production, by appropriate management of dams with careful monitoring. In addition, farm animals such as sheep are good models to investigate the impact of MUN on human fetuses and offspring due to the high similarity to human placental and fetal development compared to rodents [7], especially in terms of the developmental origin of metabolic disease in adulthood.
The liver is one of the organs most susceptible to MUN [2]. Disruption of the liver has an adverse impact on the entire body owing to its regulatory role in the systemic metabolism of energy, nutrients, and xenobiotics for homeostasis and physiological adaptation. The liver growth and metabolism of fetuses in global nutrient/calorie-restricted dams are impaired in rats, guinea pigs, and sheep [8,9,10,11]. Based on previous analyses of gene expression and metabolite content, metabolism of energy substrates, including glucose and fatty acids, and the networks of metabolic regulatory factors/receptors, such as insulin-like growth factors (IGFs), leptin, and glucocorticoids, are disrupted in fetuses or offspring of calorie-restricted mice [12], global nutrient-restricted sheep [10,13], protein-restricted pigs [14], and global nutrient- and protein-restricted cattle [15,16]. Elevated oxidative stress and reduced antioxidant activity have also been observed in sheep fetuses of calorie-restricted [11] and global nutrient-restricted dams [17]. In addition, gene expression associated with cholesterol biosynthesis, an essential metabolic process for hormone synthesis in the liver, was reduced in the fetal or offspring liver of protein-restricted rats [18], global nutrient-restricted rats [19], and sheep [20]. Moreover, the phenotypes of the offspring from global nutrient-restricted dams have shown that MUN adversely programmed the metabolism of the fetal liver in utero, and the programmed effect lasted for the long term in sheep, even in adulthood [10,13]. Metabolic disorders in the liver of offspring could also have negative effects on other organs through a disrupted regulatory role in systemic homeostasis. However, the impact of MUN on liver metabolism in fetuses and offspring is poorly understood, especially the genes/metabolism that are most affected by MUN in cattle.
Recently, we demonstrated that amino acid (AA) metabolism and gene expression associated with energy metabolism (apelin receptor, carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1B, uncoupling protein 2, etc.), glucose homeostasis (enolase 3, glucose-6-phosphate isomerase, fructose bisphosphatase 2, etc.), and angiogenesis (angiopoietin-like 4, NO synthetase 2, NO synthetase 3) were decreased in the longissimus muscle of fetal calves from global nutrient-restricted dams during the entire gestation period compared with unrestricted fetuses [21]. This suggests that insufficient energy in MUN fetuses reduced the use of AAs for protein synthesis at the expense of skeletal muscle growth and development. In MUN fetal calves, skeletal muscle development was disrupted based on the analyses of histochemistry and gene expression associated with myogenic regulatory factors (under review). In MUN fetal carcasses, pronounced growth restriction of the liver, kidney, thymus, spleen, heart, lung, rumen, omasum, and large intestine has been observed, as well as restriction of 12 skeletal muscles [22]. Given that glucose and fatty acid metabolism were disrupted in the fetal muscle of low nutrition (LN) dams, we hypothesized that the function of the liver, the central regulator of systemic energy and hormone metabolism, could also be disrupted in response to insufficient energy substrates from dams to the placenta.
In the present study, we aim to elucidate the effects of MUN on fetal liver metabolism in Japanese Black (JB) cattle. To address this, we used a design in which pregnant dams are fed on low nutrient (LN) and high nutrient (HN) diets (based on protein, fat, and energy contents) during the entire gestation (until month 8.5 post-conception). The LN and HN treatments were set to 60% and 120% of the recommended nutrient level, respectively, for the pre-pregnant body weight (BW) of JB cattle as was in the previous studies [21,22]. We analyzed changes in the metabolome and transcriptome in the fetal liver in an integrative approach using capillary electrophoresis time-of-flight mass spectrometry (CE-TOFMS) and microarray analysis. Subsequently, we performed bioinformatic analysis of the metabolomic and transcriptomic data to understand the impact of MUN on fetal liver metabolism.

2. Results

2.1. Fetal Carcass Traits

First, we investigated the effect of MUN on the growth of the whole body and liver of fetal calves. The BW and liver weight of the LN group were lower than those of the HN group (p ≤ 0.05), whereas the percentage of liver weight in the BW group did not differ (p > 0.05) (Table 1). The ratios of BW and liver in the LN group to those in the HN group were 0.72 and 0.78, respectively. Thus, MUN markedly decreased the mass of liver in fetuses of the LN group [22].

2.2. Metabolomic Profile of Fetal Liver

To assess the effect of MUN on fetal liver metabolism, metabolomic differences were analyzed using CE-TOFMS (Table 2). In the CE-TOFMS analysis, four fetuses with the highest BW in the HN group and four with the lowest BW in the LN group were used for the analysis. In total, 278 peaks detected by MS were annotated as metabolites (Table S1). Among these metabolites, the levels of aspartate, betaine aldehyde (BTL), glycerol, 3-aminopropane-1,2-diol (3-APRP-1,2-diol), alanine, 6-phosphogluconate (6-PG), ophthalmate (p ≤ 0.05), N6,N6,N6-trimethyllysine, and γ-Glu-Ser (p ≤ 0.10) were higher in the fetal livers of the LN group than in those of the HN group (Table 2). The levels of 4-amino-3-hydroxybutyrate (4-Amino-3-HBA), 2-aminoethylphosphonate (2-AEP, also known as ciliatine), uridine 5′-diphosphate (UDP)-glucuronate, UDP-glucose (UDP-Glc)/UDP-galactose (UDP-Gal), N5-ethylglutmine, 2-hydroxybutyrate (2-HBA), octanoate, Gly-Leu (p ≤ 0.05), methionine sulfoxide, and gluconate (p ≤ 0.10) were lower in the LN fetal liver than in the HN fetal liver.
The fetal liver samples were classified into LN and HN groups by unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis (HCA) using the top 50 significantly different metabolites between the LN and HN groups. Figure 1 shows that aspartate, BTL, glycerol, 3-APRP-1,2-diol, alanine, 6-PG, ophthalmate, and coenzyme A (CoA) were more abundant in the LN group, whereas 2-AEP, UDP-Glc/UDP-Gal, N5-ethylglutamine, UDP-glucuronate, 2-HBA, octanoate, gluconate, pantothenate, flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD), 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutarate (3-HMGA), 4-amino-3-HBA, cystathionine, dimethylglycine, and succinylhomoserine were more abundant in the HN group. The HCA result indicates that these metabolites highly contribute to the discrimination of the fetal liver samples between the two nutrient levels. Thus, the fetal liver of the LN group was characterized by abundant metabolites (aspartate, BTL, glycerol, alanine, 6-PG, ophthalmate, CoA) and less abundant metabolites (2-AEP, UDP-Glc/UDP-Gal, UDP-glucuronate, gluconate, pantothenate, FAD, and 3-HMGA).
To understand biological processes associated with differentially expressed metabolites between the LN and HN groups, this study performed metabolite set enrichment analysis (MSEA) of the top 50 differentially expressed metabolites. The differentially expressed metabolites were significantly associated with the metabolic pathways of the urea cycle, malate-aspartate shuttle, AAs (arginine, proline, glutamate, tyrosine, aspartate), starch and sucrose, nucleotide sugars, propanoate, β-alanine, purine, porphyrin, betaine, and glycerolipid (p ≤ 0.01) (Table 3). The metabolic pathways associated with the Warburg effect, pantothenate and CoA biosynthesis, lactose synthesis, sphingolipids, androgens, and estrogen (p ≤ 0.05) were also significantly extracted (Table 3).

2.3. Effect of MUN on the Gene Expression Profile of the Fetal Liver

MUN-mediated metabolic alterations in the LN fetal liver may result from disrupted gene expression. To investigate the association between MUN-induced metabolic alterations and gene expression, a microarray-based gene expression analysis was performed using liver RNA samples. RNA was extracted from four fetuses with the highest BW in the HN group and four fetuses with the lowest BW in the LN group. Of the 12,568 unique genes detected, the expression levels of 132 genes in the fetal liver varied > two-fold between the LN and HN groups (63 upregulated and 69 downregulated genes in the LN group). The fetal liver samples were classified into LN and HN groups by HCA using the 237 microarray probe signals of differentially expressed genes (201 unique genes, p ≤ 0.05) between the LN and HN groups (Figure 2).
The top five downregulated genes in the LN group were glucose-6-phosphatase, catalytic subunit (G6PC), phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1 (PCK1, cytoplasmic PEPCK), dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP4), FK506 binding protein 1B (FKBP1B), and IGF like family receptor 1 (IGFLR1). The top five upregulated genes in the LN group were necessary for RNA interference domain-containing (NRDE2), pyroglutamylated RFamide peptide receptor (QRFPR), proteoglycan 3 (LOC520402), hemoglobin subunit mu (HBM), and cathelicidin 4 (CATHL4). The downregulation of G6PC, PCK1, DPP4, FKBP1B, and IGFLR1 (p ≤ 0.05) and the upregulation of QRFPR (p = 0.019) and CATHL4 (p = 0.079) in the fetuses of the LN group were validated using qRT-PCR (Figure 3).
The microarray analysis results suggested that MUN affected the expression of genes associated with glucose homeostasis (G6PC, PCK1, and QRFPR) and fatty acid metabolism (DPP4) in the fetal liver of the LN group. Moreover, MSEA revealed that MUN altered the metabolic pathways associated with the urea cycle, AA metabolism, nucleic acid metabolism, and steroid hormone metabolism, which are specific to the roles of hepatocytes. Therefore, this study focused on the genes related to liver metabolism (Figure 4).
The qPCR results showed that the expression levels of HMGCS2, FADS2 (p ≤ 0.01), FBP1, UGT1A1, UGT1A6, UGT2A1, HSD17B6, HSD11B1, ANGPTL4, APOA5, EHHADH, ASS1, CPS1 (p ≤ 0.05), ENO3, ALDOC, FDPS, ARG2, and ASL (p ≤ 0.10) were downregulated in the LN fetal liver. In contrast, the expression of MT1A, MT1E, and MT2A was upregulated in the LN fetal liver (p ≤ 0.05). Thus, these data indicate that MUN affects the expression of fetal liver genes associated with ketogenesis (HMGCS2), glycolysis (ALDOC, ENO3), gluconeogenesis (G6PC, PCK1, FBP1), glucuronidation (UGT1A1, UGT1A6, UGT2A1), cholesterol synthesis (FDPS, HSD11B1, HSD17B6), lipid metabolism (ANGPTL4, APOA5, EHHADH, FADS), the urea cycle (ARG2, ASL, ASS1, CPS1), bile acid synthesis (ACOX2), and mineral absorption (MT1A, MT1E, MT2A). The expression of DPP4 and QRFPR, genes associated with energy metabolism, was also negatively and positively affected, respectively.

2.4. GO Analysis of MUN-Associated Metabolic Pathways

Analysis of differentially expressed genes between the LN and HN groups revealed that MUN modulated the gene expression associated with hepatic metabolism. To understand the pathways in which the differentially expressed genes were enriched, gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analyses were performed using genes whose expression in the LN fetal liver was > 1.25-fold upregulated (1397 genes) or downregulated (1537 genes) when compared with those in the HN fetal liver (Table 4 and Table 5).
The downregulated genes in the LN fetal liver were significantly enriched in the following KEGG pathways: biosynthesis of antibiotics, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, PPAR signaling pathway, peroxisome, protein digestion and absorption, tyrosine metabolism, metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450, and fatty acid degradation (p ≤ 0.001, Table 4). In addition, the downregulated genes were associated with GO terms (biological process) such as cholesterol biosynthetic process, fatty acid homeostasis, monocyte chemotaxis, cellular response to interferon-gamma, glucose homeostasis, chemokine-mediated signaling pathway, urea cycle, and neutrophil chemotaxis (p ≤ 0.001).
Meanwhile, the upregulated genes in the LN fetal liver were enriched in the following KEGG pathways: ribosome biogenesis in eukaryotes, RNA transport, aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum, HIF-1 signaling pathway, MAPK signaling pathway, and mineral absorption (p ≤ 0.05) (Table 5). The upregulated genes were also associated with the following GO terms (biological process): rRNA processing, protein folding, defense response to bacteria, chaperone-mediated protein folding requiring cofactors, ribosome biogenesis, RNA splicing, and negative regulation of growth (p ≤ 0.01).

3. Discussion

3.1. Levels of Nutrients for Dams to Be Compared in the Present Study

Our study did not include animals that were fed 100% of their nutrient requirement. In a previous study investigating the effect of MUN on fetuses in female baboons, no significant differences in fetal body and liver weight were observed between dams fed on 70% and 100% of nutritional requirements during early-to-mid gestation period [23]. A similar result was obtained from a comparison between providing 85% and 140% of the required metabolic energy for cow feeding [24], suggesting that a relatively small restriction in maternal nutrition level may not lead to significant phenotypic effects on fetal carcasses. According to their results, a nutrient level within the range of 85 to 140% may not lead to significant differences in the fetal liver. Furthermore, a highly broad range of nutrient levels should be taken, employing the lowest level as much as possible. The 60% was considered as a minimum level to avoid accidents of pregnant cows [25]. During the last two months of gestation, Japanese Feeding Standard for Beef Cattle (JFSBC, 2008 ed.) recommends 125% and 141% levels of total TDN and CP, respectively, when the nutrient levels required for maintenance are considered as 100%, for pregnant Japanese Black cows [25,26]. Taking these previous studies into account, we considered that 120% of the requirement was an appropriate option as a counterpart treatment to the low level of 60%.
We considered it necessary to use an experimental design that caused a significant phenotypic alteration to understand the molecular basis underlying the phenotypic effect of MUN on fetal liver development, as discussed in our previous study [21]. Consequently, it was concluded that 120% of the requirement was an appropriate option as a counterpart treatment to the low level of 60%. Under these experimental conditions, a significant reduction in fetal liver mass was observed in the LN group [22]. This enabled us to further investigate the molecular mechanism underlying the effect of MUN on fetal liver growth in this study. Thus, we also focused on 60% and 120% of the nutrient requirement for comparison; however, 100% of the requirement might be the best nutritional standard level and is important to study as a control level to evaluate the nutritional effect, which might differ from cases using 60% and 120% levels.

3.2. Major Impacts of MUN on Fetal Liver

In this study, MUN altered the metabolomic profile of the fetal liver. Among various maternal nutritional restriction conditions, we examined the effects of restriction of global nutrition including protein, fat, and total digestible nutrients (TDNs), during whole gestation. This nutrient-restricted condition markedly decreased BW and liver weight in fetuses, as well as the skeletal muscles, kidney, thymus, spleen, heart, lung, and rumen [22]. The liver plays a pivotal role not only in the biosynthesis of bile acid, cholesterol, and steroid hormones but also in the energy metabolism and excretion of NH3 and xenobiotics, which are essential for the homeostasis of systemic metabolism. Maternal nutrient restriction during gestation adversely affects liver size and metabolism in fetuses [2], the mechanism of which is not fully understood. In the current study, we observed alterations in various metabolite levels and gene expression in the liver of LN fetuses associated with AA metabolism, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, ketogenesis, steroid biosynthesis, the urea cycle, mineral absorption, primary bile acid synthesis, and lipid metabolism (Figure 5). The levels of ATP and AMP and the AMP/ATP ratio were not significantly different between the LN and HN groups. This suggests that energy balance was maintained in the LN fetal liver to the same level as in the HN fetal liver at the expense of whole energy consumption in nutrient-restricted conditions.

3.3. Fetal Liver Metabolites and Metabolisms Affected by MUN

3.3.1. Amino Acid Metabolism and Urea Cycle

Aspartate and alanine levels were significantly increased in the liver of LN fetuses; however, few studies have reported alterations in AA levels in the fetal liver of nutrient-restricted mothers during pregnancy, except for an example of arginine alteration in fetal rats [8]. Aspartate is associated with the urea cycle [27] (Table 3), arginine and proline metabolism, glutamate metabolism, tyrosine metabolism, and purine metabolism [28]. In the initiation step of urea synthesis, aspartate participates in the reaction with ASS to generate argininosuccinate as the donor of the amino group [29]. Aspartate can also be converted to oxaloacetate (OAA), which is further mobilized for energy production through the malate-aspartate shuttle. In the present study, aspartate accumulated in the liver of LN fetuses, indicating that the urea cycle was suppressed (Figure 5). This is consistent with the reduced expression of genes associated with the urea cycle, namely CPS1, ASS1, ASL, and ARG2 (Figure 4) [30]. Suppression of the urea cycle is indicated by the results of the GO analysis (Table 4). Increased aspartate can be used as a precursor of the energy substrate for gluconeogenesis. However, in energy-restricted LN fetuses, as the expression of gluconeogenetic genes was reduced, aspartate could participate in the citrate cycle by being converted to OAA and being introduced into the malate-aspartate shuttle, rather than in gluconeogenesis or the urea cycle.

3.3.2. Metabolisms Associated with Energy Production

Alanine, a major substrate of gluconeogenesis in the liver [31], was one of the AA increased in the LN group. Intriguingly, alanine was significantly increased in the longissimus muscle [21] and plasma (unpublished data) of LN fetuses. In LN fetuses, alanine increased in the muscle and could be transferred to the liver for energy production in the citrate cycle. However, as was the case with aspartate, the increased alanine was not likely to be utilized for gluconeogenesis because the gluconeogenic genes, G6PC, FBP1, and PCK1 [32,33], were significantly suppressed in the LN group (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Genes encoding glycolytic enzymes, ALDOC and ENO3, were also downregulated, which could lead to an increase in gluconate-6P. These results were confirmed by the results of GO and KEGG pathway analyses showing that the downregulated genes were associated with glycolysis and gluconeogenesis (Table 4), which means that glycolysis/gluconeogenesis was suppressed in the liver of LN fetuses.
Furthermore, DPP4 was downregulated by MUN participate in glucose homeostasis. DPP4 is associated with reduced insulin sensitivity and increased hepatic fat accumulation [34,35,36]. In lactating cows with subclinical ketosis, non-esterified fatty acids and triglycerides were decreased by intravenous injection of DPP4 [37]. Our results showed that DPP4 expression was suppressed in the livers of the LN group. In addition, the system of QRFPR (also known as GPR103) and its peptide ligand RFa26 is involved in the regulation of food intake in the hypothalamus, as well as in glucose metabolism and energy metabolism [38], and it is thought to play a role in the development of obesity [38]. The RFa26/QRFPR system enhances the effect of insulin on glucose uptake in L6 myotubes [39] and induces fatty acid uptake and TAG accumulation in 3T3-L1 differentiated cells [40]. Intriguingly, MUN increased QRFPR expression in the livers of the LN group. Taken together, our results suggest that MUN affects liver glucose homeostasis and fatty acid metabolism through DPP4 and QRFPR pathways in the fetuses of the LN group.
The suppressed expression of gluconeogenetic genes G6PC and PCK1 (PEPCK) was also observed in the fetal sheep livers of ewes fed a globally nutrient-restricted diet during gestation [41]. In contrast, in other studies examining fetuses of cows with protein restriction during the first trimester [16] or fetuses of goats with global nutrient restriction during 15 days in mid-gestation [42], expression of G6PC, PCK1, and/or glucose metabolism-related genes was activated in the liver of MUN fetuses compared with the control fetuses. The crucial ketogenic gene HMGCS2 and genes associated with fatty acid metabolism were upregulated in the fetal liver of ewes fed a low-protein diet for 15 days in mid-gestation [20]. Together, these studies suggest that the activation or suppression of genes in MUN fetuses depends on the temporal and nutrient compositional conditions of maternal dietary restriction. Prolonged maternal restriction of global nutrients likely causes suppression of gluconeogenesis in the fetal liver.
In contrast to genes involved in glycolysis/gluconeogenesis and energy substrate homeostasis, genes participating in the citrate cycle (e.g., PC, CS, ACO1, MDH1) were not downregulated in the LN group. Furthermore, ketogenesis was likely suppressed because of the reduced expression of HMGCS2, the key regulator initiating the ketogenic pathway [43] (Figure 4 and Figure 5). Collectively, these results suggest that energy substrates, such as AAs, were exclusively gathered in the citrate cycle, rather than glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, in the liver of the LN group.
The citrate cycle was likely prioritized as the energy production pathway in the fetal liver of the LN group. Hepatic metabolism, including the urea cycle, steroid synthesis, and glucuronidation, was suppressed to save the compounds that can be mobilized for energy production, based on the reduced expression of genes involved in the metabolism of urea, steroids, and glucuronate in the LN group (Figure 5). The energy substrate precursors were thought to be metabolized less in the above-mentioned hepatic pathways and preferentially mobilized into the citrate cycle rather than gluconeogenesis for glucose supply to peripheral tissues. Acetyl-CoA is thought to be a key metabolite for providing resources for glycolysis and energy production (citrate cycle and ketogenesis), AA metabolism, fatty acid metabolism, steroid synthesis, and glucuronidation (Figure 5) [28]. The acetyl-CoA content did not differ between the LN and HN groups, possibly because of the altered distribution that made the limited amount of acetyl-CoA more for the citrate cycle and less for other pathways.

3.3.3. Steroid Biosynthesis

MUN also impacts steroid biosynthesis, a vital metabolism specific to the liver [44], adrenal gland, and placenta in fetuses [45]. Cholesterol synthesis is controlled by HMGCS1 that generates 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) [46] from acetoacetyl-CoA, which has crucial impacts on synthesis of steroid hormone, bile acid, vitamin D, and components involved in plasma lipoproteins and cell membrane [43]. In the liver of LN fetuses, HMGCS1 expression was not suppressed (Figure 5), as in the case of gene expression of the rate-determining enzyme HMG-CoA reductase (p > 0.10). Meanwhile, the gene expression of FDPS, downstream of the mevalonate pathway in cholesterol synthesis, was suppressed. Moreover, the expression of HSD11B1 and HSD17B6, the genes associated with steroid synthesis, were also suppressed. HSD11B1 plays a major role in converting cortisone to cortisol, which reactivates circulating glucocorticoids and regulates fuel metabolism, energy partitioning, and body fat distribution in a tissue-specific manner [47,48]. The expression of ACOX2, a gene involved in primary bile acid synthesis, was also suppressed. These results indicate that MUN resulted in the suppression of steroid and primary bile acid synthesis in fetal liver metabolism, as indicated by MSEA and GO analysis (Table 3 and Table 4). Cholesterol synthesis could be also adversely affected. Suppressed steroid synthesis by MUN potentially leads to disruption of the plasma membrane and systemic hormonal regulation, which are essential for fetal development and growth. In sheep, 30% maternal nutrient restriction for 15 days in mid-gestation suppressed gene expression regulating steroid and cholesterol synthesis, including HMGCS1, in the fetal liver [20]. Meanwhile, global maternal nutrient restriction of 60% level in goats activated hepatic gene expression related to steroid biosynthesis and bile secretion, but not HMGCS1 [49], and increased metabolites related to bile acid metabolism, such as taurochenodeoxycholate and taurocholate [42]. Taken together with the suppression of FDPS, HSD11B1, and HSD17B6 observed in this study, it is likely that MUN disturbs the gene expression and metabolism associated with steroid and bile acid synthesis in the fetal liver. The regulated genes, metabolites, and up/downregulation likely depend on MUN conditions. As mentioned above, energy substrates such as acetyl-CoA might be mobilized into the citrate cycle at the expense of the suppression of steroid and bile acid biosynthesis.

3.3.4. Glucuronidation for Catabolism of Steroid and Drugs

In the fetal liver, glucuronidation-associated gene expression (UGTs) and metabolites such as UDP-glucuronate were lowered by MUN. Glucuronidation is essential for drug metabolism and catabolism that are specific roles of the liver [50]. UDP-glucose is a key metabolite in the synthesis of glucuronate via UDP-glucuronate and is further converted to glucuronate by UGT1A1, UGT1A6, and/or UGT2A1 for subsequent glucuronidation of waste metabolites [50]. Endogenous substrates for glucuronidation include bilirubin, bile acids, and steroids, whereas xenobiotics such as drugs and pollutants are detoxified by UGT enzymes [51]. In the liver of LN fetuses, UDP-glucose/UDP-galactose and UDP-glucuronate levels were decreased, and the expression of UGT1A1, UGT1A6, and UGT2A1 were suppressed (Figure 5). These results indicate that MUN affects glucuronidation, which potentially leads to a deficiency in drug and steroid catabolism. Although the effect of MUN on fetal liver UGT activity has never been examined, the nutrient restriction has been shown to affect UGT activity in the livers of adult cows [52]. For example, alterations in nutritional level and high fat content can affect the expression of UGT1A1 and UGT1A6 in the liver, possibly through proliferator-activated receptor α [53]. The effect of MUN on the metabolism of sugars and nucleotide sugars was indicated in the MSEA results (Table 4), which could have resulted from lowered UGT levels in the disturbed glucuronate pathway in the LN group. As in the case of steroid synthesis, the energy substrates in glucose metabolism might be mobilized into the citrate cycle at the expense of glucuronidation for the metabolism of drugs and waste such as steroid hormones and bilirubin.

3.3.5. Lipid and Fatty Acid Metabolisms

In LN fetuses, gene expression associated with lipid and/or fatty acid metabolism (ANGPTL4, APOA5, EHHADH, FADS2) was suppressed, which was also indicated by the PPAR signaling pathway and fatty acid homeostasis/degradation in the GO and KEGG analyses (Table 4). DPP4, one of the genes suppressed by MUN, is involved in Western-diet-induced hepatic steatosis through hepatic triacylglycerol and diacylglycerol accumulation [35]. Although lipids and fatty acids were not sufficiently profiled by CE-TOFMS metabolomics, the transcriptomic results indicated that lipid and fatty acid metabolism were affected by MUN. In accordance with alterations in gene expression, MSEA results showed that MUN affected the metabolism of propanoate in the liver of the LN group (Table 3), in which 4-amino-3-HBA, 2-HBA, and octanoate were decreased (Table 2). Propanoate metabolism in the ruminant liver is crucial for glucose production in peripheral tissues [31], in which propanoate can be metabolized into propanoyl-CoA by propanoyl-CoA synthetase [54] and further introduced into the citrate cycle. 2-HBA can be mobilized into 2-oxobutanoate by lactate dehydrogenase, then into propionyl-CoA, and finally into the citrate cycle via succinyl-CoA (KEGG pathway: bta00640). Accordingly, in the LN group, the 1.25-fold increase in CoA (p = 0.094) and the decrease in 2-HBA compared with the HN group might be associated with propanoate metabolism.
It is also notable that ANGPTL4 and APOA5 play important roles as regulators of triglyceride metabolism in other tissues, including adipose tissue, through the circulation [55,56,57]. Intriguingly, the expression of the hepatokine ANGPTL4 also decreased in the skeletal muscle of the LN group [57]. This suggests that MUN alters systemic lipid metabolism not only in the liver but also in skeletal muscle and adipose tissues through disruption of ANGPTL4 and APOA5 expression in the fetal liver and/or skeletal muscle. In addition, ANGPTL4 upregulates cholesterol synthesis in the liver secondary to inhibition of LPL- and HL-dependent hepatic cholesterol uptake [58]. Accordingly, decreased ANGPTL4 expression might be associated with suppression of LN hepatic cholesterol synthesis, with which decreased HSD11B1 expression could be associated [59].

3.3.6. Other Metabolites and Gene Expression

In the liver of the LN group, ophthalmate accumulated more than two-fold compared to that in the HN group. Ophthalmate is generated through consecutive reactions with γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase and glutathione synthetase; therefore, it is thought to be a biomarker of oxidative stress caused by a lack of glutathione, especially from liver disorders [60]. Given that ophthalmate generally accumulates in tissues with low cysteine content, our results suggest that the cysteine level in the LN group was relatively low. The increase in glutathione derivatives (lactosylglutathione, methylglutathione) in the LN group (Figure 1) might also be a byproduct of glutathione shortage.
In the LN group, there were fewer upregulated genes in the qPCR results than the downregulated genes. According to GO and KEGG analyses, most of the upregulated genes in the microarray analysis were associated with the cellular translational system and process (Table 5), although a few were confirmed by qPCR. The upregulated genes (MT1A, MT1E, and MT2A) were associated with mineral absorption and negative regulation of growth. Metallothioneins (MTs) comprise MT1-MT4 subgroups and are considered to have multiple roles in the storage of essential metals, capture of toxic heavy metals, and reduction of the toxic effects of free radicals [61]. MTs are induced not only by metals and hormones but also by oxidative stress. Under MUN conditions, the expression of MT1A, MT1E, and MT2A could be induced by a shortage of essential metals, or otherwise by oxidative stress, which is in line with the ophthalmate accumulation observed in the liver of LN fetuses.
As indicated by the increased ophthalmate and MT gene expression, oxidative stress was induced in the liver of the LN group. In the fetal liver of ewes fed diets with restricted calories [11] or global nutrients [17], downregulated gene expression and decreased antioxidant activity were observed, which could lead to increased oxidative stress [17]. The liver of the LN group in the present study could also suffer from oxidative stress caused by a deficiency in energy supply.
In the LN group, 2-AEP levels were decreased in the liver. However, the correlation between FGR and 2-AEP has not yet been elucidated. Rats and other higher vertebrates cannot generate 2-AEP, which contains a carbon-phosphorus bond [62,63]. Ruminant protozoa can synthesize protein-bound and lipid-bound forms of 2-AEP as well as the free form of 2-AEP [64]. Recently, we reported that 2-AEP decreased in the skeletal muscle of LN fetuses [21]. In the rat liver, 2-AEP is incorporated into phosphonolipids, such as diacylglyceryl-AEP [65], which suggests that 2-AEP is a membrane component. Thus, 2-AEP in the bovine fetus may be taken up from pregnant cows through the placenta and utilized as a membrane component. However, the mechanism by which 2-AEP is decreased in the liver and skeletal muscle of LN fetuses remains unknown. Further studies are needed to examine the biological role of dysregulated 2-AEP in the LN fetal liver.
The liver of the LN group also showed a higher level of 3-APRP-1,2-diol than that of the HN group by 2.62-fold of the LN/HN ratio. 3-APRP-1,2-diol is a sphingophospholipid found in the bacterial fraction of sheep rumen contents [66] but has never been reported in vertebrate tissues. In contrast to 2-AEP, which was decreased in both skeletal muscle and liver of the LN group, 3-APRP-1,2-diol was increased in the liver but was not detected in the muscle of the LN group [21]. Although the reason that 3-APRP-1,2-diol was increased in the LN group is unclear, it is likely that it came from the rumen of the pregnant cows through the placenta and that it might be taken up into the liver as an extraneous compound to be excreted.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Animals and Dietary Treatments

This study was performed on 11 multiparous Japanese Black cattle (initial BW 488 ± 9.6 kg) at the Iriki farm of Kagoshima University and the farm of the Western Region Agricultural Research Center, NARO. Animals were maintained according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals [67]. The experimental design was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Kagoshima University (#A18007). Animal management was performed as described previously [21]. Briefly, individual diets were designed for pregnant Japanese Black cows to meet 60% or 120% of the energy requirement and other nutrients based on the standard diet that was calculated for BW before pregnancy, according to the JFSBC (2008 ed.) [25]. The diet comprised formula feed, total mixed ration, and rice straw, as designed previously [22]. The recommended contents of dry matter (DM), neutral detergent fiber, acidic detergent fiber, ash, CP, Ca, and phosphorus in the diet were 68.0%, 56.1%, 36.0%, 11.1%, 8.0%, 0.6%, and 0.3% of DM, respectively. Cows were randomly assigned to the LN (n = 5) and HN (n = 6) diet groups and were fed their respective diets during gestation. The metabolizable energy of the mixture feed for the 100% requirement was estimated as 8.56 MJ/kg DM. Cows were subjected to artificial insemination (AI) using male-sorted semen from an identical sire. In total, 11 fetuses were obtained from cows through cesarean section at the Kagoshima University Veterinary Teaching Hospital.

4.2. Sample Collection

The fetuses were euthanized by exsanguination at day 260 ± 8.3 of gestation, after injecting lidocaine (AstraZeneca, Osaka, Japan) into the jugular vein. Liver samples were collected from the right side of the dissected fetal carcass, frozen with liquid nitrogen or soaked in RNAlater® (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tokyo, Japan), and stored at −80 °C until used for subsequent analyses.

4.3. Sample Preparation for CE-TOFMS

Among the 11 fetuses, those with the lowest BW in the LN group (n = 4) and those with the highest BW in the HN group (n = 4) were selected. Liver samples were subjected to metabolomic analysis. Frozen liver pieces (53.4–90.9 mg) were immediately immersed in a solution containing 50% acetonitrile and 10 μM internal standard solution 1 (Human Metabolome Technologies, Tsuruoka, Japan) at 0 °C and homogenized twice at 1500 rpm for 120 s. The samples were centrifuged at 2300 g at 4 °C for 5 min. The upper layer solution was filtered through a Millipore 5-kDa cutoff membrane. The filtrate was lyophilized, suspended in Milli-Q water, and analyzed using CE-TOFMS.

4.4. CE-TOFMS and the Data Analysis

CE-TOFMS was performed using an Agilent capillary electrophoresis system equipped with an Agilent 6210 time-of-flight mass spectrometer, Agilent 1100 isocratic high-performance liquid chromatography pump, Agilent G1603A CE-MS adapter kit, and Agilent G1607A CE-ESI-MS sprayer kit (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany). The analytical conditions were identical to those used in a previous study [21].
Raw data were processed using MasterHands, as described previously [21]. Briefly, among the detected compounds, those annotated in the Human Metabolome Database (ver. 4.0, http://www.hmdb.ca/, accessed on 27 January 2022) or KEGG database (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/, accessed on 27 January 2022) were further analyzed. The relative contents of the annotated compounds were determined by comparing the peaks of compounds with the same MS properties. To compare the relative content of the compounds between the LN and HN groups, the peak areas were normalized to those of the internal standards and sample weights. The abundance of each compound used for comparative analysis was set to zero when the level of the compound was not detected. The file conversion of raw MS data, peak picking, reduction of noise, and alignment of data for multiple samples was conducted as previously described [21].

4.5. RNA Preparation and Complementary DNA (cDNA) Synthesis

For microarray analysis, total RNA was extracted from liver samples using the mirVanaTM microRNA isolation kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Tokyo, Japan) following the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA quantity and quality were determined using an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 with an RNA 6000 Pico kit (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). For polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis, total RNA was prepared using ISOGEN II (Nippon Gene, Toyama, Japan). cDNA synthesis was performed from total RNA using ReverTra Ace qRT-PCR Master Mix (Toyobo), following the manufacturer’s instructions.

4.6. Microarray Analysis

The fetuses analyzed were those with the lowest BW in the LN group (n = 4) and those with the highest BW in the HN group (n = 4). Total RNA samples from four fetuses from the HN and LN groups were applied to a Bovine (v2) Gene Expression 4 × 44K Microarray (Agilent). The signals of the hybridized probes were detected using an Agilent microarray scanner (Agilent). The results were normalized by the quantile method using GeneSpring GX (Agilent). Array data were deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and can be accessed through the GEO Series accession number GSE191179 (http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/geo, accessed on 27 January 2022).

4.7. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR) Analysis

Gene expression in the LN (n = 5) and HN (n = 6) groups was analyzed by qRT-PCR using a CFX96 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) with the QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR kit (Qiagen) and the primers are listed in Table S2. The ribosomal protein lateral stalk subunit P0 (RPLP0) was used as an internal control. Melting curve analysis was performed to confirm the specificity of amplification reactions.

4.8. Functional Annotation of Target Genes

The genes of interest were analyzed using the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (version 6.7, http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov, accessed on 27 January 2022) with Bos taurus as the background species to enrich GO terms and characterize the KEGG pathway terms defined by KEGG (http://www.genome.jp/kegg/, accessed on 27 January 2022) for the respective biological processes associated with the effect of MUN. Several of the differentially expressed genes involved in the extracted terms were further tested by qRT-PCR.

4.9. Statistical Analyses

The effects of nutrient levels on metabolites and gene expression were tested. The data were analyzed using the two-sided Student’s t-test for metabolomics results or the one-sided Student’s t-test for PCR results, based on the trend of gene expression in microarray analysis. Differences were considered significant at p ≤ 0.05, or a trend at p ≤ 0.10. HCA and MSEA, using KEGG as a metabolite set library, were performed using MetaboAnalyst 5.0 (https://www.metaboanalyst.ca/MetaboAnalyst/faces/home.xhtml, accessed on 27 January 2022).

5. Conclusions

This study examined the effect of whole gestational MUN on fetal liver growth at the late gestational stage and revealed alterations in the expression of genes associated with glucose homeostasis, glucuronidation, steroid synthesis, and the urea cycle in the liver of LN fetuses. The levels of metabolites relevant to glucuronidation, such as UDP-glucuronate and UDP-glucose/UDP-galactose, were also decreased in the LN group. The downregulated glucogenic and ketogenic genes in the LN group suggest that glucose and ketone bodies were not generated in the liver for delivery to peripheral tissues, such as skeletal muscle and adipose tissue. Thus, it is likely that the liver of LN fetuses prioritizes energy saving for survival under MUN conditions at the expense of maintenance of energy homeostasis, hormonal regulation, nitrogen excretion, and waste metabolism.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/metabo12030203/s1, Table S1: Relative levels of detected metabolites in LN and HN fetal liver by CE-TOFMS metabolomics, Table S2: PCR primers used in this study.

Author Contributions

S.M. and T.G. conceived and designed research; Y.Z., K.O. (Kounosuke Otomaru), K.O. (Kazunaga Oshima), I.O. and T.G. performed the trials of maternal nutrition restriction; Y.Z., K.O. (Koichi Ojima), M.S., S.R. and T.G. performed collection and analysis of carcass data; S.M. and K.O. (Koichi Ojima) conducted metabolomics, microarray and PCR analyses; S.M. analyzed the metabolism and transcriptomics data; S.M. drafted manuscript; S.M. edited and revised. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS KAKENHI JP18K05960, JP26310312, and JP19KT0013), the Canon Fund (R15-0089), and the Leave a Nest Co., Ltd.

Institutional Review Board Statement

All experimental procedures followed the Guide for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals (the Kagoshima University Animal Care and Use Committee), which was approved by the committee (#A18007). There was no use of human participants, data, or tissues.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Array data were deposited in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE191179 (http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/geo).

Acknowledgments

We thank the personnel at the farm staff of the Kagoshima University and Western Region Agricultural Research Center, NARO for their great support to manage and feed cattle. We especially thank Okamura, A. Kinoshita, R. Saneshima, Y. Nagao (Kagoshima Univ.), M. Futohashi (Tohoku Univ.), M. Oe, C. Shindo, M. Ichimura, and Y. Eguchi (NILGS) for their technical supports.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

References

  1. Govoni, K.E.; Reed, S.A.; Zinn, S.A. CELL BIOLOGY SYMPOSIUM: METABOLIC RESPONSES TO STRESS: FROM ANIMAL TO CELL: Poor maternal nutrition during gestation: Effects on offspring whole-body and tissue-specific metabolism in livestock species1,2. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 97, 3142–3152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Desai, M.; Crowther, N.J.; Lucas, A.; Hales, C.N. Organ-selective growth in the offspring of protein-restricted mothers. Br. J. Nutr. 1996, 76, 591–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Osgerby, J.C.; Wathes, D.C.; Howard, D.; Gadd, T.S. The effect of maternal undernutrition on ovine fetal growth. J. Endocrinol. 2002, 173, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Godfrey, K.M.; Costello, P.M.; Lillycrop, K.A. The developmental environment, epigenetic biomarkers and long-term health. J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis. 2015, 6, 399–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Lee, H.S. Impact of Maternal Diet on the Epigenome during In Utero Life and the Developmental Programming of Diseases in Childhood and Adulthood. Nutrients 2015, 7, 9492–9507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Sandoval, C.; Wu, G.; Smith, S.B.; Dunlap, K.A.; Satterfield, M.C. Maternal Nutrient Restriction and Skeletal Muscle Development: Consequences for Postnatal Health. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2020, 1265, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Morrison, J.L. Sheep Models of Intrauterine Growth Restriction: Fetal Adaptations and Consequences. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 2008, 35, 730–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gruppuso, P.A.; Boylan, J.M.; Anand, P.; Bienieki, T.C. Effects of maternal starvation on hepatocyte proliferation in the late gestation fetal rat. Pediatr. Res. 2005, 57, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kind, K.L.; Roberts, C.T.; Sohlstrom, A.I.; Katsman, A.; Clifton, P.M.; Robinson, J.S.; Owens, J.A. Chronic maternal feed restriction impairs growth but increases adiposity of the fetal guinea pig. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2005, 288, R119–R126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Hyatt, M.A.; Gopalakrishnan, G.S.; Bispham, J.; Gentili, S.; McMillen, I.C.; Rhind, S.M.; Rae, M.T.; Kyle, C.E.; Brooks, A.N.; Jones, C.; et al. Maternal nutrient restriction in early pregnancy programs hepatic mRNA expression of growth-related genes and liver size in adult male sheep. J. Endocrinol. 2007, 192, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Gao, F.; Liu, Y.; Li, L.; Li, M.; Zhang, C.; Ao, C.; Hou, X. Effects of maternal undernutrition during late pregnancy on the development and function of ovine fetal liver. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2014, 147, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ogawa, T.; Shibato, J.; Rakwal, R.; Saito, T.; Tamura, G.; Kuwagata, M.; Shioda, S. Seeking genes responsible for developmental origins of health and disease from the fetal mouse liver following maternal food restriction. Congenit. Anom. 2014, 54, 195–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. George, L.A.; Zhang, L.; Tuersunjiang, N.; Ma, Y.; Long, N.M.; Uthlaut, A.B.; Smith, D.T.; Nathanielsz, P.W.; Ford, S.P. Early maternal undernutrition programs increased feed intake, altered glucose metabolism and insulin secretion, and liver function in aged female offspring. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2012, 302, R795–R804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Almond, K.; Bikker, P.; Lomax, M.; Symonds, M.E.; Mostyn, A. The influence of maternal protein nutrition on offspring development and metabolism: The role of glucocorticoids. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2012, 71, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Crouse, M.S.; Caton, J.S.; Cushman, R.A.; McLean, K.J.; Dahlen, C.R.; Borowicz, P.P.; Reynolds, L.P.; Ward, A.K. Moderate nutrient restriction of beef heifers alters expression of genes associated with tissue metabolism, accretion, and function in fetal liver, muscle, and cerebrum by day 50 of gestation. Transl. Anim. Sci. 2019, 3, 855–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Copping, K.J.; Hernandez-Medrano, J.; Hoare, A.; Hummitzsch, K.; McMillen, I.C.; Morrison, J.L.; Rodgers, R.J.; Perry, V.E.A. Maternal periconceptional and first trimester protein restriction in beef heifers: Effects on placental parameters and fetal and neonatal calf development. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2020, 32, 495–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Xue, Y.; Guo, C.; Hu, F.; Zhu, W.; Mao, S. Undernutrition-induced lipid metabolism disorder triggers oxidative stress in maternal and fetal livers using a model of pregnant sheep. FASEB J. 2020, 34, 6508–6520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Lillycrop, K.A.; Rodford, J.; Garratt, E.S.; Slater-Jefferies, J.L.; Godfrey, K.M.; Gluckman, P.D.; Hanson, M.A.; Burdge, G.C. Maternal protein restriction with or without folic acid supplementation during pregnancy alters the hepatic transcriptome in adult male rats. Br. J. Nutr. 2010, 103, 1711–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Lecoutre, S.; Montel, V.; Vallez, E.; Pourpe, C.; Delmont, A.; Eury, E.; Verbanck, M.; Dickes-Coopman, A.; Daubersies, P.; Lesage, J.; et al. Transcription profiling in the liver of undernourished male rat offspring reveals altered lipid metabolism pathways and predisposition to hepatic steatosis. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019, 317, E1094–E1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xue, Y.; Guo, C.; Hu, F.; Zhu, W.; Mao, S. Maternal undernutrition induces fetal hepatic lipid metabolism disorder and affects the development of fetal liver in a sheep model. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 9990–10004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Muroya, S.; Zhang, Y.; Kinoshita, A.; Otomaru, K.; Oshima, K.; Gotoh, Y.; Oshima, I.; Sano, M.; Roh, S.; Oe, M.; et al. Maternal Undernutrition during Pregnancy Alters Amino Acid Metabolism and Gene Expression Associated with Energy Metabolism and Angiogenesis in Fetal Calf Muscle. Metabolites 2021, 11, 582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, Y.; Otomaru, K.; Oshima, K.; Goto, Y.; Oshima, I.; Muroya, S.; Sano, M.; Saneshima, R.; Nagao, Y.; Kinoshita, A.; et al. Effects of low and high levels of maternal nutrition consumed for the entirety of gestation on the development of muscle, adipose tissue, bone, and the organs of Wagyu cattle fetuses. Anim. Sci. J. 2021, 92, e13600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Li, C.; Schlabritz-Loutsevitch, N.E.; Hubbard, G.B.; Han, V.; Nygard, K.; Cox, L.A.; McDonald, T.J.; Nathanielsz, P.W. Effects of maternal global nutrient restriction on fetal baboon hepatic insulin-like growth factor system genes and gene products. Endocrinology 2009, 150, 4634–4642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Paradis, F.; Wood, K.M.; Swanson, K.C.; Miller, S.P.; McBride, B.W.; Fitzsimmons, C. Maternal nutrient restriction in mid-to-late gestation influences fetal mRNA expression in muscle tissues in beef cattle. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. National Agriculture and Food Research Organization. Japanese Feeding Standard for Beef Cattle 2008 edn; Japan Livestock Industry Association: Tokyo, Japan, 2009. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  26. Takimoto, E.; Fukushima, N.; Kanetani, T.; Nishimura, S. The Optimum Method for Additional Daily Nutrient Requirements for Pregnant Japanese Black Cattle in Later Pregnancy. Bull. Okayama Prefect. Cent. Anim. Husb. Res. 2019, 9, 11–16. (In Japanese) [Google Scholar]
  27. Reynolds, C.K. Metabolism of Nitrogenous Compounds by Ruminant Liver. J. Nutr. 1992, 122, 850–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chandel, N.S. Navigating Metabolism; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press: Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mew, N.A.; Pappa, M.B.; Gropman, A.L. Chapter 57-Urea Cycle Disorders. In Rosenberg’s Molecular and Genetic Basis of Neurological and Psychiatric Disease, 5th ed.; Rosenberg, R.N., Pascual, J.M., Eds.; Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2015; pp. 633–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chandel, N.S. Amino Acid Metabolism. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2021, 13, a040584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Seal, C.J.; Reynolds, C.K. Nutritional Implications of Gastrointestinal and Liver Metabolism in Ruminants. Nutr. Res. Rev. 1993, 6, 185–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Danfær, A. Nutrient metabolism and utilization in the liver. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1994, 39, 115–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chandel, N.S. Carbohydrate Metabolism. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2021, 13, a040568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Miyazaki, M.; Kato, M.; Tanaka, K.; Tanaka, M.; Kohjima, M.; Nakamura, K.; Enjoji, M.; Nakamuta, M.; Kotoh, K.; Takayanagi, R. Increased hepatic expression of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and its association with insulin resistance and glucose metabolism. Mol. Med. Rep. 2012, 5, 729–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Aroor, A.R.; Habibi, J.; Ford, D.A.; Nistala, R.; Lastra, G.; Manrique, C.; Dunham, M.M.; Ford, K.D.; Thyfault, J.P.; Parks, E.J.; et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibition ameliorates Western diet-induced hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance through hepatic lipid remodeling and modulation of hepatic mitochondrial function. Diabetes 2015, 64, 1988–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Baumeier, C.; Schlüter, L.; Saussenthaler, S.; Laeger, T.; Rödiger, M.; Alaze, S.A.; Fritsche, L.; Häring, H.U.; Stefan, N.; Fritsche, A.; et al. Elevated hepatic DPP4 activity promotes insulin resistance and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Mol. Metab. 2017, 6, 1254–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Schulz, K.; Frahm, J.; Kersten, S.; Meyer, U.; Rehage, J.; Piechotta, M.; Meyerholz, M.; Breves, G.; Reiche, D.; Sauerwein, H.; et al. Effects of Inhibiting Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 (DPP4) in Cows with Subclinical Ketosis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0136078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Chartrel, N.; Picot, M.; El Medhi, M.; Arabo, A.; Berrahmoune, H.; Alexandre, D.; Maucotel, J.; Anouar, Y.; Prévost, G. The Neuropeptide 26RFa (QRFP) and Its Role in the Regulation of Energy Homeostasis: A Mini-Review. Front. Neurosci. 2016, 10, 549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Allerton, T.D.; Primeaux, S.D. QRFP-26 enhances insulin’s effects on glucose uptake in rat skeletal muscle cells. Peptides 2015, 69, 77–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Mulumba, M.; Jossart, C.; Granata, R.; Gallo, D.; Escher, E.; Ghigo, E.; Servant, M.J.; Marleau, S.; Ong, H. GPR103b functions in the peripheral regulation of adipogenesis. Mol. Endocrinol. 2010, 24, 1615–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Lie, S.; Morrison, J.L.; Williams-Wyss, O.; Suter, C.M.; Humphreys, D.T.; Ozanne, S.E.; Zhang, S.; MacLaughlin, S.M.; Kleemann, D.O.; Walker, S.K.; et al. Impact of embryo number and maternal undernutrition around the time of conception on insulin signaling and gluconeogenic factors and microRNAs in the liver of fetal sheep. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 306, E1013–E1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Zhou, X.; Yang, H.; Yan, Q.; Ren, A.; Kong, Z.; Tang, S.; Han, X.; Tan, Z.; Salem, A.Z.M. Evidence for liver energy metabolism programming in offspring subjected to intrauterine undernutrition during midgestation. Nutr. Metab. 2019, 16, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Chandel, N.S. Lipid Metabolism. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2021, 13, a040576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. O’Shaughnessy, P.J.; Monteiro, A.; Bhattacharya, S.; Fraser, M.J.; Fowler, P.A. Steroidogenic enzyme expression in the human fetal liver and potential role in the endocrinology of pregnancy. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2013, 19, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Diczfalusy, E. Steroid metabolism in the human foeto-placental unit. Acta Endocrinol. 1969, 61, 649–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Horton, J.D.; Shimomura, I.; Brown, M.S.; Hammer, R.E.; Goldstein, J.L.; Shimano, H. Activation of cholesterol synthesis in preference to fatty acid synthesis in liver and adipose tissue of transgenic mice overproducing sterol regulatory element-binding protein-2. J. Clin. Investig. 1998, 101, 2331–2339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Walker, B.R. Extra-adrenal regeneration of glucocorticoids by 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1: Physiological regulator and pharmacological target for energy partitioning. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2007, 66, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Morgan, S.A.; McCabe, E.L.; Gathercole, L.L.; Hassan-Smith, Z.K.; Larner, D.P.; Bujalska, I.J.; Stewart, P.M.; Tomlinson, J.W.; Lavery, G.G. 11β-HSD1 is the major regulator of the tissue-specific effects of circulating glucocorticoid excess. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E2482–E2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Yang, C.; Zhou, X.; Yang, H.; Gebeyew, K.; Yan, Q.; Zhou, C.; He, Z.; Tan, Z. Transcriptome analysis reveals liver metabolism programming in kids from nutritional restricted goats during mid-gestation. PeerJ 2021, 9, e10593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Tukey, R.H.; Strassburg, C.P. Human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases: Metabolism, expression, and disease. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2000, 40, 581–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Burchell, B.; Brierley, C.H.; Monaghan, G.; Clarke, D.J. The Structure and Function of the UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase Gene Family. In Advances in Pharmacology; Goldstein, D.S., Eisenhofer, G., McCarty, R., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1997; Volume 42, pp. 335–338. [Google Scholar]
  52. Ono, M.; Ohtaki, T.; Nakahashi, T.; Tsumagari, S. Effect of feed restriction on hepatic estradiol metabolism and liver function in cows. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2019, 81, 1873–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Osabe, M.; Sugatani, J.; Fukuyama, T.; Ikushiro, S.; Ikari, A.; Miwa, M. Expression of hepatic UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 and 1A6 correlated with increased expression of the nuclear constitutive androstane receptor and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha in male rats fed a high-fat and high-sucrose diet. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2008, 36, 294–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Allen, M.S.; Bradford, B.J.; Oba, M. Board Invited Review: The hepatic oxidation theory of the control of feed intake and its application to ruminants. J. Anim. Sci. 2009, 87, 3317–3334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Fernández-Hernando, C.; Suárez, Y. ANGPTL4: A multifunctional protein involved in metabolism and vascular homeostasis. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 2020, 27, 206–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Su, X.; Kong, Y.; Peng, D.-q. New insights into apolipoprotein A5 in controlling lipoprotein metabolism in obesity and the metabolic syndrome patients. Lipids Health Dis. 2018, 17, 174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Muroya, S.; Ogasawara, H.; Nohara, K.; Oe, M.; Ojima, K.; Hojito, M. Coordinated alteration of mRNA-microRNA transcriptomes associated with exosomes and fatty acid metabolism in adipose tissue and skeletal muscle in grazing cattle. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 33, 1824–1836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Lichtenstein, L.; Berbée, J.F.; van Dijk, S.J.; van Dijk, K.W.; Bensadoun, A.; Kema, I.P.; Voshol, P.J.; Müller, M.; Rensen, P.C.; Kersten, S. Angptl4 Upregulates Cholesterol Synthesis in Liver via Inhibition of LPL- and HL-Dependent Hepatic Cholesterol Uptake. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2007, 27, 2420–2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Teratani, T.; Tomita, K.; Wada, A.; Sugihara, N.; Higashiyama, M.; Inaba, K.; Horiuchi, K.; Hanawa, Y.; Nishii, S.; Mizoguchi, A.; et al. Angiopoietin-like protein 4 deficiency augments liver fibrosis in liver diseases such as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in mice through enhanced free cholesterol accumulation in hepatic stellate cells. Hepatol. Res. 2021, 51, 580–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Soga, T.; Baran, R.; Suematsu, M.; Ueno, Y.; Ikeda, S.; Sakurakawa, T.; Kakazu, Y.; Ishikawa, T.; Robert, M.; Nishioka, T.; et al. Differential Metabolomics Reveals Ophthalmic Acid as an Oxidative Stress Biomarker Indicating Hepatic Glutathione Consumption. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 16768–16776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Migliaccio, V.; Lionetti, L.; Putti, R.; Scudiero, R. Exposure to Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethylene (DDE) and Metallothionein Levels in Rats Fed with Normocaloric or High-Fat Diet: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Shimizu, H.; Kakimoto, Y.; Nakajima, T.; Kanazawa, A.; Sano, I. Isolation and identification of 2-aminoethylphosphonic acid from bovine brain. Nature 1965, 207, 1197–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Alhadeff, J.A.; Van Bruggen, J.T.; Doyle Daves, G. Biosynthetic studies on 2-aminoethylphosphonic acid in a mammalian (rat) system. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Gen. Subj. 1972, 286, 103–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hasegawa, S.; Tamari, M.; Kametaka, M. Isolation of diacylglyceryl-2-aminoethylphosphonate from bovine liver. J. Biochem. 1976, 80, 531–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Joseph, J.C.; Henderson, T.O. 2-Aminoethylphosphonic acid metabolism in the rat. Lipids 1977, 12, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Kemp, P.; Dawson, R.M.C.; Klein, R.A. A new bacterial sphingophospholipid containing 3-aminopropane-1,2-diol. Biochem. J. 1972, 130, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Institute of Laboratory Animal Science Research Support Center Kagoshima University. The Guide for the Care and Use of Experimental Animals. Available online: https://www.kufm.kagoshima-u.ac.jp/~animal/tebiki.htm (accessed on 27 January 2022). (In Japanese).
Metabolites 12 00203 g001 550
Figure 1. Heatmap of HCA using the top 50 statistically different liver metabolites between LN (green) and HN (red) fetuses. The row displays the metabolite, and the column represents the sample. Metabolites with relatively low contents are displayed in blue, while metabolites with relatively high contents are displayed in right brown. The brightness of each color corresponds to the magnitude of the difference when compared with the average value. FormiminoGA; formiminoglutamic acid, BTL; betaine aldehyde, 3-APRP-1,2-diol; 3-aminopropane-1,2-diol, N-AcGlu; N-acetyl glutamate, CMP; cytidine monophosphate, CoA; coenzyme A, 3′-AMP; 3′-adenosine monophosphate, GSSG; oxidized glutathione, GlcN/GalN; N-acetylglucosamine/N-acetylgalactosamine, GlcA/GalA; glucosamine/galactosamine, 2-HBA; 2-hydroxybutyrate, GlcNa/GalNa/ManNa; N-acetylglucosamine/N-acetylgalactosamine/N-acetylmannosamine, UDP-glucuronate; uridine 5′-diphosphate-glucuronate, 4-amino-3-HBA; 4-amino-3-hydroxybutyrate, 2-AEP; 2-aminoethylphosphonate, FAD; flavin adenine dinucleotide, 3-hydroxy-3-MGA; 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutarate, UDP-Glc/UDP-Gal; UDP-glucose/UDP-galactose. Amino acids and peptides are shown in three letter code.
Figure 1. Heatmap of HCA using the top 50 statistically different liver metabolites between LN (green) and HN (red) fetuses. The row displays the metabolite, and the column represents the sample. Metabolites with relatively low contents are displayed in blue, while metabolites with relatively high contents are displayed in right brown. The brightness of each color corresponds to the magnitude of the difference when compared with the average value. FormiminoGA; formiminoglutamic acid, BTL; betaine aldehyde, 3-APRP-1,2-diol; 3-aminopropane-1,2-diol, N-AcGlu; N-acetyl glutamate, CMP; cytidine monophosphate, CoA; coenzyme A, 3′-AMP; 3′-adenosine monophosphate, GSSG; oxidized glutathione, GlcN/GalN; N-acetylglucosamine/N-acetylgalactosamine, GlcA/GalA; glucosamine/galactosamine, 2-HBA; 2-hydroxybutyrate, GlcNa/GalNa/ManNa; N-acetylglucosamine/N-acetylgalactosamine/N-acetylmannosamine, UDP-glucuronate; uridine 5′-diphosphate-glucuronate, 4-amino-3-HBA; 4-amino-3-hydroxybutyrate, 2-AEP; 2-aminoethylphosphonate, FAD; flavin adenine dinucleotide, 3-hydroxy-3-MGA; 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutarate, UDP-Glc/UDP-Gal; UDP-glucose/UDP-galactose. Amino acids and peptides are shown in three letter code.
Metabolites 12 00203 g001
Metabolites 12 00203 g002 550
Figure 2. Heatmap of HCA using 201 differentially expressed genes (p ≤ 0.05) between the LN (green) and HN (red) fetal livers. The row displays the gene and the column represents the sample. Genes with relatively low contents are displayed in dark blue, while genes with relatively high contents are displayed in yellow. The brightness of each color corresponds to the magnitude of the difference when compared with the average value.
Figure 2. Heatmap of HCA using 201 differentially expressed genes (p ≤ 0.05) between the LN (green) and HN (red) fetal livers. The row displays the gene and the column represents the sample. Genes with relatively low contents are displayed in dark blue, while genes with relatively high contents are displayed in yellow. The brightness of each color corresponds to the magnitude of the difference when compared with the average value.
Metabolites 12 00203 g002
Metabolites 12 00203 g003 550
Figure 3. qPCR results of highly down- and upregulated fetal liver genes in microarray analysis. The ratios of the normalized gene expression of the LN (green) to HN (red) fetuses are shown as columns. Ribosomal protein lateral stalk subunit P0 (RPLP0) was used as the internal control. Error bars indicate SEM. **, *, and + indicate differences between the LN and HN fetuses at p ≤ 0.01, ≤0.05, and ≤0.10, respectively. IGFLR1; IGF like family receptor 1, DPP4; dipeptidyl-peptidase 4, PCK1; phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1, G6PC; glucose-6-phosphatase, catalytic subunit, FKBP1B; FK506 binding protein 1B, QRFPR; pyroglutamylated RFamide peptide receptor, CATHL4; cathelicidin 4.
Figure 3. qPCR results of highly down- and upregulated fetal liver genes in microarray analysis. The ratios of the normalized gene expression of the LN (green) to HN (red) fetuses are shown as columns. Ribosomal protein lateral stalk subunit P0 (RPLP0) was used as the internal control. Error bars indicate SEM. **, *, and + indicate differences between the LN and HN fetuses at p ≤ 0.01, ≤0.05, and ≤0.10, respectively. IGFLR1; IGF like family receptor 1, DPP4; dipeptidyl-peptidase 4, PCK1; phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1, G6PC; glucose-6-phosphatase, catalytic subunit, FKBP1B; FK506 binding protein 1B, QRFPR; pyroglutamylated RFamide peptide receptor, CATHL4; cathelicidin 4.
Metabolites 12 00203 g003
Metabolites 12 00203 g004 550
Figure 4. qPCR results of down- and upregulated fetal liver genes associated with essential liver metabolisms. The ratios of the normalized gene expression of the LN (green) to HN (red) fetuses are shown as columns. RPLP0 was used as the internal control. Error bars indicate SEM. **, *, and + indicate differences between the LN and HN fetuses at p ≤ 0.01, ≤0.05, and ≤0.10, respectively. HMGCS2; 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase 2, ALDOC; aldolase, fructose-bisphosphate C, ENO3; enolase 3, FBP1; fructose-bisphosphatase 1, UGT1A1/UGT1A6/UGT2A1; UDP glucuronosyltransferase family-1 member A1 complex locus/-1 member A6 complex locus/-2 member A1 complex locus, FDPS; farnesyl diphosphate synthase, HSD11B1; hydroxysteroid (11-β) dehydrogenase 1, HSD17B6; hydroxysteroid (17-β) dehydrogenase 6, ANGPTL4; angiopoietin like 4, APOA5; apolipoprotein A-V, EHHADH; enoyl-CoA, hydratase/3-hydroxyacyl CoA dehydrogenase, FADS2; fatty acid desaturase 2, ARG2; arginase 2, ASL; argininosuccinate lyase, ASS1; argininosuccinate synthase 1, CPS1; carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1, ACOX2; acyl-CoA oxidase 2, branched chain, MT1A/MT1E/MT2A; metallothionein-1A/-1E/-2A.
Figure 4. qPCR results of down- and upregulated fetal liver genes associated with essential liver metabolisms. The ratios of the normalized gene expression of the LN (green) to HN (red) fetuses are shown as columns. RPLP0 was used as the internal control. Error bars indicate SEM. **, *, and + indicate differences between the LN and HN fetuses at p ≤ 0.01, ≤0.05, and ≤0.10, respectively. HMGCS2; 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA synthase 2, ALDOC; aldolase, fructose-bisphosphate C, ENO3; enolase 3, FBP1; fructose-bisphosphatase 1, UGT1A1/UGT1A6/UGT2A1; UDP glucuronosyltransferase family-1 member A1 complex locus/-1 member A6 complex locus/-2 member A1 complex locus, FDPS; farnesyl diphosphate synthase, HSD11B1; hydroxysteroid (11-β) dehydrogenase 1, HSD17B6; hydroxysteroid (17-β) dehydrogenase 6, ANGPTL4; angiopoietin like 4, APOA5; apolipoprotein A-V, EHHADH; enoyl-CoA, hydratase/3-hydroxyacyl CoA dehydrogenase, FADS2; fatty acid desaturase 2, ARG2; arginase 2, ASL; argininosuccinate lyase, ASS1; argininosuccinate synthase 1, CPS1; carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1, ACOX2; acyl-CoA oxidase 2, branched chain, MT1A/MT1E/MT2A; metallothionein-1A/-1E/-2A.
Metabolites 12 00203 g004
Metabolites 12 00203 g005 550
Figure 5. Hypothetic scheme of influences of maternal nutrient restriction on the fetal liver molecular pathways and metabolisms. Genes but not metabolites are italicized. Increased and decreased metabolites in the LN fetuses are indicated in red and blue, respectively. Green genes are downregulated in the LN fetuses. Grayed metabolites were not determined in this study.
Figure 5. Hypothetic scheme of influences of maternal nutrient restriction on the fetal liver molecular pathways and metabolisms. Genes but not metabolites are italicized. Increased and decreased metabolites in the LN fetuses are indicated in red and blue, respectively. Green genes are downregulated in the LN fetuses. Grayed metabolites were not determined in this study.
Metabolites 12 00203 g005
Table
Table 1. Phenotypic effect of maternal nutrient restriction on fetal liver.
Table 1. Phenotypic effect of maternal nutrient restriction on fetal liver.
LN (n = 6) HN (n = 5)
Mean *SE *MeanSEp-Value
Age (d)260.71.6261.61.50.684
BW (kg)23.42.232.50.50.005
Liver (g)487.341.8627.619.80.020
%BW2.10.071.930.030.071
* The values of the LN group were reported previously [21,22].
Table
Table 2. Top 20 differently expressed metabolites in fetal liver between LN and HN groups *.
Table 2. Top 20 differently expressed metabolites in fetal liver between LN and HN groups *.
CompoundLN (n = 4)HN (n = 4)Ratio (LN/HN)p-Value
MeanSEMeanSE
Aspartate16.5000.55911.7500.5451.400.002
4-Amino-3-hydroxybutyrate0.0090.0010.0170.0010.550.012
2-Aminoethylphosphonate0.0430.0050.0970.0130.440.013
Betaine aldehyde0.0880.0080.0450.0071.950.014
UDP-glucose/UDP-galactose0.1330.0140.2250.0190.590.015
N5-Ethylglutamine0.3200.0220.5580.0570.570.015
UDP-glucuronate0.2480.0170.3350.0160.740.019
2-Hydroxybutyrate0.0610.0210.1630.0220.380.028
Glycerol7.9250.8284.9250.3991.610.030
3-Aminopropane-1,2-diol0.0170.0010.0070.0032.620.032
Alanine31.7501.43126.5000.8291.200.033
Octanoate0.0020.0000.0130.0030.190.035
6-Phosphogluconate0.1730.0170.1020.0171.700.044
Gly-Leu0.0210.0010.0290.0020.720.046
Ophthalmate14.2501.2446.8752.2802.070.049
Pantothenate0.1700.0090.2300.0220.740.071
N6,N6,N6-Trimethyllysine0.1300.0090.1030.0061.260.084
γ-Glu-Ser0.0720.0060.0490.0081.480.085
Methionine sulfoxide0.0070.0030.0190.0050.360.091
Gluconate0.3080.0200.4000.0350.770.092
* Values in table are relative content levels (arbitrary unit). LN and HN: Low and high nutrition treatment, respectively.
Table
Table 3. Top 20 fetal liver metabolisms different between LN and HN fetuses *.
Table 3. Top 20 fetal liver metabolisms different between LN and HN fetuses *.
Metabolism/PathwayHits/Total Metabolitesp-ValueIncreased in LNDecreased in LN
Urea Cycle2/290.0013Asp, Ala
Starch and Sucrose Metabolism3/310.0014 Glucuronate, UDP-Glc, UDP-glucuronate
Malate-Aspartate Shuttle1/100.0019Asp
Nucleotide Sugars Metabolism3/200.0024 UDP-Gal, UDP-Glc, UDP-glucuronate
Arginine and Proline Metabolism3/530.0034AspFAD, Phosphocreatine
Propanoate Metabolism3/420.0035CoAFAD, 2-HBA
Glutamate Metabolism5/490.0036Asp, Ala, CoAFAD, GSSG
Beta-Alanine Metabolism5/340.0050Asp, His, CoAFAD, Pantothenate
Tyrosine Metabolism2/720.0065AspFAD
Purine Metabolism2/740.0065AspFAD
Aspartate Metabolism2/350.0065AspFAD
Porphyrin Metabolism2/400.0070 FAD, UDP-glucuronate
Galactose Metabolism3/380.0072GlycerolUDP-Gal, UDP-Glc
Betaine Metabolism4/210.0076BTLDimethylglycine, FAD, Met
Glycerolipid Metabolism3/250.0095CoA, GlycerolFAD
Warburg Effect3/580.01166-Phosphogluconate, CoAFAD
Pantothenate and CoA Biosynthesis3/210.0138CMP, CoAPantothenate
Lactose Synthesis2/200.0148 UDP-Gal, UDP-Glc
Sphingolipid Metabolism2/400.0170SerUDP-Glc
Androgen and Estrogen Metabolism1/330.0186 UDP-glucuronate
* Metabolisms and pathways that were extracted in MSEA using top 50 different metabolites are listed above. BTL; betaine aldehyde, CMP; cytidine monophosphate, CoA; coenzyme A, GSSG; oxidized glutathione, 2-HBA; 2-hydroxybutyrate, FAD; flavin adenine dinucleotide, UDP-glucuronate; uridine 5′-diphosphate-glucuronate, UDP-Glc; UDP-glucose, UDP-Gal; UDP-galactose. Amino acids and peptides are shown in three letter code.
Table
Table 4. Altered fetal liver metabolisms and pathways extracted from downregulated genes *.
Table 4. Altered fetal liver metabolisms and pathways extracted from downregulated genes *.
CategoryTermp-ValueFold EnrichmentDifferentially Expressed Genes **
KEGG Pathway
bta01100:Metabolic pathways<0.0011.698ENO3, G6PC, PIPOX, HSD11B1, ADH4, ASL, PCK1, FDPS, CPS1, TAT, HMGCS2, UGT2A1, ARG2, UGT1A1, ACOX2, EHHADH, ALDOC, FBP1, SAO, HSD17B6, UGT1A6, ASS1
bta01130:Biosynthesis of antibiotics<0.0012.647TAT, ENO3, ASL, HMGCS2, PCK1, FDPS, ARG2, ASS1, EHHADH, ALDOC, FBP1
bta00010:Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis<0.0013.463G6PC, ENO3, ADH4, ALDOC, PCK1, FBP1
bta05204:Chemical carcinogenesis<0.0013.289UGT1A1, HSD11B1, ADH4, UGT2A1, UGT1A6
bta03320:PPAR signaling pathway<0.0013.289APOA5, FADS2, ACOX2, EHHADH, ANGPTL4, PCK1
bta04146:Peroxisome<0.0012.885PIPOX, ACOX2, EHHADH
bta04974:Protein digestion and absorption<0.0012.885PRCP, DPP4, COL1A1, COL1A2,
bta00350:Tyrosine metabolism<0.0013.939SAO, ADH4, TAT
bta00980:Metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450<0.0013.286UGT1A1, HSD11B1, ADH4, UGT2A1, UGT1A6
bta00071:Fatty acid degradation<0.0013.843ADH4, EHHADH
GO: Biological Process
GO:0006695~cholesterol biosynthetic process<0.0017.442FDPS, APOA5, HMGCS2
GO:0006958~complement activation, classical pathway<0.0015.953
GO:0055089~fatty acid homeostasis<0.0017.938
GO:0002548~monocyte chemotaxis<0.0014.106CCL14, CCL21, CCL5
GO:0071346~cellular response to interferon-gamma<0.0013.638CCL14, CCL21, CCL5
GO:0055114~oxidation-reduction process<0.0011.696SAO, HSD17B6, FADS2, PIPOX,
GO:0042593~glucose homeostasis<0.0012.492G6PC, PRCP
GO:0070098~chemokine-mediated signaling pathway<0.0013.247CCL14, CCL21, CCL5
GO:0000050~urea cycle0.0018.505ARG2, CPS1, ASL, ASS1
GO:0030593~neutrophil chemotaxis0.0013.040CCL14, CCL21, CCL5
* Top 10 GO metabolisms and KEGG pathways extracted at p < 0.05 are listed. PIPOX; pipecolic acid oxidase, ADH4; alcohol dehydrogenase 4 (class II), pi polypeptide, TAT; tyrosine aminotransferase, SAO; amine oxidase, copper containing 3, PRCP; prolylcarboxypeptidase, COL1A1; collagen type I alpha 1, COL1A2; collagen type I alpha 2, CCL14; chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 14, CCL21; chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 21, CCL5; chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 5. ** Differential expression of the listed genes was validated by qPCR (p ≤ 0.10).
Table
Table 5. Altered fetal liver metabolisms and pathways extracted from upregulated genes *.
Table 5. Altered fetal liver metabolisms and pathways extracted from upregulated genes *.
CategoryTermp-ValueFold EnrichmentDifferentially Expressed Genes **
KEGG Pathway
bta03008:Ribosome biogenesis in eukaryotes<0.0014.8155
bta03013:RNA transport<0.0012.3926
bta00970:Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis<0.0013.9018
bta05230:Central carbon metabolism in cancer<0.0013.0680FGFR2
bta04141:Protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum0.0012.0779
bta04066:HIF-1 signaling pathway0.0052.2862
bta05200:Pathways in cancer0.0131.4705FGFR2
bta05031:Amphetamine addiction0.0152.4022PPP1R1B, ATF4
bta04010:MAPK signaling pathway0.0251.5492FGFR2, ATF4
bta04978:Mineral absorption0.0282.6603MT2A, MT1A, MT1E
GO: Biological Process
GO:0006364~rRNA processing<0.0014.6384RRP9
GO:0006457~protein folding<0.0012.9962
GO:0000462~maturation of SSU-rRNA from tricistronic rRNA transcript (SSU-rRNA, 5.8S rRNA, LSU-rRNA)<0.0015.0379
GO:0042742~defense response to bacterium<0.0012.8497CATHL4, CATHL3
GO:0008542~visual learning0.0013.6639PPP1R1B
GO:0051085~chaperone mediated protein folding requiring cofactor0.0028.0148
GO:0042254~ribosome biogenesis0.0024.1036
GO:0008380~RNA splicing0.0042.5647
GO:0045926~negative regulation of growth0.0056.4119MT2A, MT1A
GO:0000470~maturation of LSU-rRNA0.0064.8089
* Top 10 GO metabolisms and KEGG pathways extracted at p < 0.05 are listed. FGFR2; fibroblast growth factor receptor 2, PPP1R1B; protein phosphatase 1 regulatory inhibitor subunit 1B, ATF4; activating transcription factor 4, RRP9; ribosomal RNA processing 9, small subunit (SSU) processome component, homolog (yeast), CATHL3; cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide. ** Differential expression of the listed genes was validated by qPCR (p < 0.10).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Muroya, S.; Zhang, Y.; Otomaru, K.; Oshima, K.; Oshima, I.; Sano, M.; Roh, S.; Ojima, K.; Gotoh, T. Maternal Nutrient Restriction Disrupts Gene Expression and Metabolites Associated with Urea Cycle, Steroid Synthesis, Glucose Homeostasis, and Glucuronidation in Fetal Calf Liver. Metabolites 2022, 12, 203. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/metabo12030203

AMA Style

Muroya S, Zhang Y, Otomaru K, Oshima K, Oshima I, Sano M, Roh S, Ojima K, Gotoh T. Maternal Nutrient Restriction Disrupts Gene Expression and Metabolites Associated with Urea Cycle, Steroid Synthesis, Glucose Homeostasis, and Glucuronidation in Fetal Calf Liver. Metabolites. 2022; 12(3):203. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/metabo12030203

Chicago/Turabian Style

Muroya, Susumu, Yi Zhang, Kounosuke Otomaru, Kazunaga Oshima, Ichiro Oshima, Mitsue Sano, Sanggun Roh, Koichi Ojima, and Takafumi Gotoh. 2022. "Maternal Nutrient Restriction Disrupts Gene Expression and Metabolites Associated with Urea Cycle, Steroid Synthesis, Glucose Homeostasis, and Glucuronidation in Fetal Calf Liver" Metabolites 12, no. 3: 203. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/metabo12030203

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop