Next Article in Journal
Simultaneous Suppression of Two Distinct Serotonin N-Acetyltransferase Isogenes by RNA Interference Leads to Severe Decreases in Melatonin and Accelerated Seed Deterioration in Rice
Previous Article in Journal
Oxidative Stress-Induced DNA Damage and Apoptosis in Clove Buds-Treated MCF-7 Cells
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 10
Issue 1
10.3390/biom10010140
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Long-Term Effect of Combination of Creatine Monohydrate Plus β-Hydroxy β-Methylbutyrate (HMB) on Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage and Anabolic/Catabolic Hormones in Elite Male Endurance Athletes

by
Julen Fernández-Landa
1,
Diego Fernández-Lázaro
2,
Julio Calleja-González
1,
Alberto Caballero-García
3,
Alfredo Córdova
4,
Patxi León-Guereño
5 and
Juan Mielgo-Ayuso
4,*
1
Laboratory of Human Performance, Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Education, Sport Section, University of the Basque Country, 01007 Vitoria, Spain
2
Department of Cellular Biology, Histology and Pharmacology. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Valladolid. Campus de Soria, 42003 Soria, Spain
3
Department of Anatomy and Radiology. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Valladolid, Campus de Soria, 42003 Soria, Spain
4
Department of Biochemistry, Molecular Biology and Physiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Campus de Soria, University of Valladolid, 42003 Soria, Spain
5
Faculty of Psychology and Education, University of Deusto, Campus of Donostia-San Sebastián, 20012 San Sebastián, Guipúzcoa, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Biomolecules 2020, 10(1), 140; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biom10010140
Submission received: 13 December 2019 / Revised: 12 January 2020 / Accepted: 13 January 2020 / Published: 15 January 2020
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Creatine monohydrate (CrM) and β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate (HMB) are widely studied ergogenic aids. However, both supplements are usually studied in an isolated manner. The few studies that have investigated the effect of combining both supplements on exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD) and hormone status have reported controversial results. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to determine the effect and degree of potentiation of 10 weeks of CrM plus HMB supplementation on EIMD and anabolic/catabolic hormones. This study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial where participants (n = 28) were randomized into four different groups: placebo group (PLG; n = 7), CrM group (CrMG; 0.04 g/kg/day of CrM; n = 7), HMB group (HMBG; 3 g/day of HMB; n = 7), and CrM-HMB group (CrM-HMBG; 0.04 g/kg/day of CrM plus 3 g/day of HMB; n = 7). Before (baseline, T1) and after 10 weeks of supplementation (T2), blood samples were collected from all rowers. There were no significant differences in the EIMD markers (aspartate aminotransferase, lactate dehydrogenase, and creatine kinase) among groups. However, we observed significant differences in CrM-HMBG with respect to PLG, CrMG, and HMBG on testosterone (p = 0.006; η2p = 0.454) and the testosterone/cortisol ratio (T/C; p = 0.032; η2p = 0.349). Moreover, we found a synergistic effect of combined supplementation on testosterone (CrM-HMBG = −63.85% vs. CrMG + HMBG = −37.89%) and T/C (CrM-HMBG = 680% vs. CrMG + HMBG = 57.68%) and an antagonistic effect on cortisol (CrM-HMBG = 131.55% vs. CrMG + HMBG = 389.99%). In summary, the combination of CrM plus HMB showed an increase in testosterone and T/C compared with the other groups after 10 weeks of supplementation. Moreover, this combination presented a synergistic effect on testosterone and T/C and an antagonistic effect on cortisol compared with the sum of individual or isolated supplementation.

1. Introduction

Elite sports are immensely demanding at the physical and psychological level, and an adequate balance between training load and recovery is needed to achieve maximum performance [1]. Prolonged and excessive training and/or insufficient recovery can result in nonfunctional overreaching or an overtraining syndrome due to increased stress and fatigue and, consequently, impairment or stagnation of performance [1,2,3]. Therefore, recovery processes are determinants in sport performance [4]. In that way, there are different markers to determine stress and fatigue levels due to the imbalance between training load and recovery, among which biochemical markers of exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD) and anabolic/catabolic hormones are often used [5].
In particular, an increase in EIMD markers produced by sarcomeric degeneration from Z-disk fragmentation [6,7], such as creatine kinase (CK) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), may provide information about elevated muscular and/or metabolic stress [1,8]. Further, the peak of CK, which presents the breakpoint between 300 IU/L and 500 IU/L, can increase until 24–96 h after exercise (up to four-fold rest values) [6,9]. Likewise, LDH can increase until 3–5 days (up to two-fold rest values) [6] depending on different types of exercise/sport [6]. Despite the increase in EIMD being dependent on the training level of athletes, the intensity and duration of the exercise and the density and type of sport are also important [6]. In particular, eccentric and impact activities produce more significant EIMD than concentric and nonimpact activities [6].
On the other hand, testosterone and cortisol hormones, such as anabolic and catabolic hormones, are highly useful for monitoring training adaptation [10]. However, chronic hormone concentrations, not acute, are most suggestive of long-term performance changes [11,12]. Testosterone is an androgenic and anabolic hormone secreted by the hypothalamus–pituitary–testicular axis, and an increase indicates an anabolic state [10,13,14]. Likewise, cortisol is a steroid hormone considered to be an indicative factor of accumulated stress intensity, which is secreted by the hypothalamus–pituitary–adrenal axis, and an increase of it indicates stress accumulation (catabolic state) [10,13,14]. Therefore, an increase in testosterone and a decrease in the resting plasma testosterone/cortisol ratio (T/C) has been proposed as an indicator of adaptation to training, indicating that an increase in T/C shows better adaptation [15,16].
In order to reduce EIMD and modify testosterone and T/C, as indicators of better recovery status [1,17,18], different ergogenic aids, such as creatine monohydrate (CrM) and β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate (HMB), have been proposed [19,20]. In this sense, CrM has been shown to potentially reduce CK [21,22,23], LDH [21,23], and cortisol [24] levels and increase testosterone levels [24,25]. The pathway by which CrM may prevent or delay fatigue, reduce EIMD, and improve anabolic/catabolic hormones is that CrM supplementation increases muscle phosphocreatine (PCr) storage [26], and therefore, fatigue-produced muscle degeneration can be prevented or delayed by the CK/PCr system. Likewise, CrM can enhance skeletal muscle glycogen storage [27,28], although the main reason for this increase is unclear [27]. On the other hand, HMB has presented decreases in CK [29,30,31,32], LDH [31], and cortisol [32,33,34] levels and increases in testosterone [35]. The pathway by which HMB could influence the delay of fatigue could be through an enhancement of glycogen synthesis [36] by the inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3), which negatively regulates glycogen synthesis [37]. Moreover, HMB can increase protein synthesis by the stimulation of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), which stimulates the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway (PI3K/Akt) pathway that activates mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) phosphorylation [38].
Although the effects of supplements are usually investigated in isolation, it is very common to combine different ergogenic aids in the sports field in order to achieve maximum performance [39,40,41]. In this sense, it could be considered that the effect of this combination might be better than individual intake. This hypothesis could be supported given that CrM and HMB (both supplements) have shown that they may act in common and in different physiological pathways related to EIMD and anabolic/catabolic hormones status [26,42]. However, it is not clear what the interaction effect (synergistic, multiplicative, antagonistic or nullifying) of multiple treatments given to athletes are [43]. Concretely, CrM plus HMB supplementation has not shown better results than isolated supplementation (CrM alone or HMB alone) on EIMD markers [44,45,46,47] or on anabolic/catabolic hormone status [45]. These results could have been influenced by blood sampling timing [46,47] when the main aim was to determine the long-term effect of CrM plus HMB supplementation and there being insufficient time to avoid prior training effects. Likewise, these controversial results could have been predisposed by short-term treatment (from six days to six weeks) [44,45,46] to achieve particularly an exercise-induced increase in hormone status [11,12].
Thus, the main purpose of this study was to determine the effect and degree of potentiation of long-term (10 weeks) mixing of 3 g/day of HMB plus 0.04 g/kg/day of CrM on EIMD markers (aspartate aminotransferase (AST), LDH, and CK) and anabolic/catabolic hormone status (testosterone, cortisol, and T/C) in elite male traditional rowers during the competitive period. We hypothesized that the mixture of HMB plus CrM could reduce EIMD and enhance endogenous recovery and exercise adaptations more than CRM or HMB separately.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Participants

Twenty-eight elite male traditional rowers (30.43 ± 4.65 years and 59.92 mL/min/kg of VO2 max) belonging to one of the 12 teams that make up the rowing First Trainer League in Spain (ACT) participated in this study (22 rowers from the first team and 6 from the reserve team). Although some rowers had minor injuries and missed some training sessions, all of them completed the entire study rigorously without any drop-out. These rowers performed the same loads and number of training sessions with a daily duration of 1.5 h/day, 6 days/week for 10 weeks during the in-season period (competitive period). Thus, a personal diet was developed for each participant by the certified nutritionist of the rowing club. The diets for adequate athletic performance were suggested using energy and macronutrient guidelines [48] considering the training volume, training load, and individual characteristics of each rower.
All athletes completed a medical history questionnaire and electrocardiographic and cardiopulmonary examinations. No participants had any diseases and they did not smoke, drink alcohol, or take other medications, which would alter the hormone response. Likewise, to avoid the possible interference of other nutritional supplements on the different variables measured in this investigation, a 2-week washout period was introduced.
All rowers were fully informed of all procedures of the study and signed a statement of informed consent. This research was designed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2008) and the Fortaleza update (2013) and was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee at the Basque Country University, Vitoria (M10/2017/247).

2.2. Experimental Protocol and Evaluation Plan

This study was designed as a randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study to evaluate the influence of 10-week oral supplementation of CrM plus HMB on EIMD markers and anabolic/catabolic hormones in this sport population.
The participants were randomly assigned to four groups (placebo group (PLG), CrM group (CrMG), HMB group (HMBG), and CrM-HMB group (CrM-HMBG)) by an independent statistician using a stratified block design: PLG (n = 7; height: 184.9 ± 2.4 cm and body mass: 81.9 ± 6.3 kg), CrMG (n = 7; 0.04 g/kg/day of CrM; height: 183.4 ± 7.8 cm and body mass: 81.2 ± 5.0 kg), HMBG (n = 7; 3 g/day of HMB; height: 185.5 ± 10.1 cm and body mass: 79.9 ± 12.2 kg), and CrM-HMBG (n = 7; 0.04 g/kg/day of CrM plus 3 g/day of HMB; height: 181.6 ± 4.3 cm and body mass: 78.0 ± 4.7 kg). The CrM and HMB supplementation dosages were selected in accordance with a supplementation standard for athletic performance [34,35] and elite rowers [41]. All participants attended the laboratory at 8:30 a.m. for blood collection at two different times during the intervention period: (1) at baseline (T1) and (2) post-treatment after 10 weeks of supplementation (T2).
All rowers performed six exercise sessions per week during the 10 study weeks (which were exactly the same for all participants), with a duration of 1.5 h/day (distributed as 60% aerobic work on a traditional boat, 30% resistance training in a gym, and 10% complementary training: injury prevention, core stability, and articular mobility). These exercise sessions included two rowing official races or equivalent training per week. To homogenize the competition load, rowers who did not participate in the competitions held a training session with the same load as a competition. The athletes completed a total of 96.6 h of exercise during the study.
All participants took either the placebo or supplements during the 6 days of weekly training mixed with a chocolate recovery shake (1 g/kg of carbohydrates and 0.3 g/kg protein) within half an hour of finishing the exercise [49]. No masking substance was added to the PLG, given that athletes were unaware of the recovery shake content. On the off day, all rowers ingested the same dose of supplements 30 min before going to bed in a chocolate shake provided by an independent nutritionist. The athletes and researchers did not know the supplementation (double-blind) that they were taking because an independent nutritionist from the rowing club made the recovery shakes with the individual supplementation and verified that all rowers complied with the protocol of ingesting the supplements. The CrM was acquired from Creapure® powder and the HMB from HMB-Ca FullGas® (Fullgas Sport, S.L, 20115 Astigarraga, Guipúzcoa, Spain).

2.3. Blood Collection

For the evaluation of muscle damage markers and hormonal parameters in T1 and T2, antecubital venous blood samples were collected from all athletes. All samples were taken in basal conditions after, at least, 12 h of fasting and 36 h without exercise. To standardize blood samples in T1 and T2, the rowers performed the same training session in the last training session prior to blood sample collection. This training session consisted predominantly of concentric activity (lower muscle damage) and was of short duration (30 min) during the “regeneration microcycle”. The “regeneration microcycle” is designed to remove fatigue, not only physical, but also mental, and to restore energy that has been used during previous microcycle [50]. On T1 and T2, the rowers arrived at the laboratory at 8:30 a.m. and the blood samples were collected after being at rest for 30 min.
Biochemical EIMD serum markers (AST, CK, and LDH) were measured using Hitachi 917 automatic autoanalyzer (Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
Hormone status was measured in this study (testosterone and cortisol) through different methods. Serum testosterone was measured by commercially available enzyme immunosorbent assay kits (DRG testosterone ELISA kit®, DRG Instruments GmbH, Marburg/Lahn, Germany). The intra-assay coefficient of variation (CV) was 4.3% and the CV between the trials was 9.2%. Otherwise, for serum cortisol measurement, an enzyme-linked fluorescent assay with the aid of a multiparametric analyzer (Minividas®, Biomerieux, Marcy l’Etoile, France) was used. The substrate 4-methylumbelliferone was used and fluorescence emission was performed at 450 nm, and after stimulation, at 370 nm. The intra-assay CV was 5.7% and the CV of the intermediate assay was 6.2%.
Finally, the T/C was calculated from the results of testosterone and cortisol by dividing testosterone by cortisol.

2.4. Anthropometry and Body Composition

The International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK) protocol [51] was used for anthropometrical measures and all participants were measured by the same internationally certified anthropometrist (ISAK Level 3) at both T1 and T2.
All measurements were taken twice and if the difference between both measures exceeded 5% for an individual skinfold, a third measurement was taken. For the analysis, when the measurement was taken twice, the mean was chosen, and when three measurements were taken, the median was chosen. Height (cm) was measured using a SECA® measuring rod (Mod. 220; SECA Medical, Bradford, MA, USA), with 1 mm precision, while body mass (BM) (kg) was assessed by a SECA® model scale (Mod. 220; SECA Medical, Bradford, MA, USA), with 0.1 kg precision. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the equation BM/height2 (kg/m2). Girths (cm) (flexed arm, mid-thigh, and calf girth) were measured with a metallic Lufkin® W606PM measuring tape (Cooper Tools, Apex, NC, USA), with a precision of 1 mm. Finally, the sum of six skinfolds (mm) (triceps, subscapular, suprailiac, abdominal, front thigh, and medial calf) was determined by a Harpenden® skinfold caliber (Harpenden Skinfold Caliber, British Indicators Ltd., London, UK), with 0.2 mm precision. Fat mass and muscle mass percentages were predicted using the Carter [52] and Lee [53] equations, respectively.

2.5. Dietary Assessment

The team nutritionist informed all rowers about proper food tracking and instructed them on two different validated methods of dietary recall [54]. The first method consisted of completing a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) at T2, which has been used previously in other athlete populations [55]. The FFQ, which includes 139 different foods and drinks arranged by food type and meal pattern, asked the participants to recall their food intake based on certain “frequency” categories over the previous 10 weeks. Frequency categories consist of how many times an item was consumed per day, week, or month. Daily energy (kcal) and macronutrient (g) consumption was determined by dividing the reported intake by the frequency in days.
The second method was to complete a seven-day dietary recall before T1 and T2 to check if the results of this recall were similar to the FFQ. When rowers weighed the food, the data were used for the recall; however, if it was not possible to weigh the food, serving sizes consumed were estimated through the standard weight of food items or by determining the portion size by looking at a book containing 500 photographs of food.
Food intake was converted to total energy, macronutrient, and micronutrient values by a validated software package (Easy diet©, online version). Easy diet© is based on Spanish tables of food composition [56] and was developed by the Spanish Center for Higher Studies in Nutrition and Dietetics (CESNID). Thus, the total energy and macronutrient intake of each participant was calculated per kilogram of individual body mass.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

The data are presented as means and standard deviations. Statistical significance was indicated when p < 0.05. Differences from T1 to T2 in each group were assessed by paired t tests after the normality of the data was established with the Shapiro–Wilk test (n < 50) based on parametric or nonparametric data. A two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) test was used to examine interaction effects (time × supplementation group) among supplementation groups (PLG, CrMG, HMBG, and CrM-HMBG) for power output. A Bonferroni post-hoc test was applied for pairwise comparisons among groups. The percentage changes of the variables studied in each study group between the baseline (T1) and post-treatment (T2) tests were calculated as Δ (%): ((T2 − T1)/T1) × 100).
Effect sizes among participants were calculated using partial eta squared (η2p). Since this measure is likely to overestimate the effect sizes, the values were interpreted according to Ferguson [57], which is indicated as having no effect if 0 ≤ η2p < 0.05, a minimum effect if 0.05 ≤ η2p < 0.26, a moderate effect if 0.26 ≤ η2p < 0.64, and a strong effect if η2p ≥ 0.64 [57].
The following calculation was used to express the variables in conditions CrMG, HMBG, and CrM-HMBG as a percentage change from condition PLG [43]:
Normalized change (%) = (treatment (CrMG, HMBG, or CrM-HMBG)/control (PLG) − 1) × 100.
Using the additive model, stressor (in fact, all variables) interactions were categorized as either synergistic or antagonistic. Significant interactions suggest that the effect size of one variable has been reduced (antagonistic) or accentuated (synergistic) by the presence (or effect) of the other, whereas additive effects are shown during net stressor independence (i.e., no interaction) [43]. Interactions are best illustrated using variables A and B: (1) additive = A and B combined = A + B individually; (2) synergistic = A and B combined > A + B individually; (3) antagonistic = A and B combined < A + B individually; (4) nullifying = A and B combined = A or B individually; (5) multiplicative = A and B combined = A × B individually.
The analyses were performed using SPSS® software version 24.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA) and Microsoft Excel® version 19 (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA).

3. Results

During the study, the athletes did not show significant statistical differences (p > 0.05) in energy and macronutrient intake values among groups (Table 1).
Body mass, BMI, muscle mass percentage, and fat mass percentage did not show significant differences (p > 0.05) in the group-by-time interaction (Table 2). However, significant decrements (p < 0.05) were found between the two study moments for body mass in PLG, CrMG, HMBG, and CrM-HMBG and for BMI in HMBG and CrM-HMBG (Table 2).
Table 3 shows significant differences in the group-by-time interaction for testosterone (p = 0.006; η2p = 0.454) and T/C (p = 0.32; η2p = 0.349). Moreover, significant increases between T1 and T2 (p < 0.05) were observed for cortisol in PLG, CrM, HMBG, and CrM-HMBG, for testosterone in CrM-HMBG, and for T/C in CrM and HMBG (Table 3).
Figure 1 shows significant differences in testosterone percentage change (p = 0.006; η2p = 0.457) among PLG and CrMG, HMBG, and CrM-HMBG and among CrM-HMBG and CrMG and HMBG (p > 0.05). In addition, T/C percentage change showed statistical differences (p = 0.029; η2p = 0.399) among CrM-HMBG and PLG as well as CrMG and HMBG. However, there were no significant differences among groups in cortisol percentage change (p = 0.568; η2p = 0.094).
EIMD markers (AST, LDH, and CK) did not present statistically significant differences in the group-by-time interaction between T1 and T2 (Table 4). However, significant increases between T1 and T2 were observed for AST in PLG (T1: 17.83 ± 2.79 vs. T2: 22.00 ± 1.55).
Figure 2 shows that there were no significant differences in the percentage change of any EIMD markers between T1 and T2 (p > 0.05).
Table 5 shows that an antagonistic effect of combined supplementation was found in comparison with the sum of both supplements isolated on cortisol (CrM-HMBG = 131.55% vs. CrMG + HMBG = 389.99%). Likewise, a synergistic effect of combined supplementation was found with respect to the sum of the two supplements separately on testosterone (CrM-HMBG = −63.85% vs. CrMG + HMBG = −37.89%) and on T/C (CrM-HMBG = 680% vs. CrMG + HMBG = 57.68%).

4. Discussion

This study was carried out to determine the effect and degree of potentiation of long-term (10 weeks) combination of 3 g/day of HMB plus 0.04 g/kg/day of CrM supplementation on EIMD markers and testosterone and cortisol status in elite male traditional rowers. The main result revealed an increase in testosterone and a better post-treatment T/C ratio in CrM-HMBG compared with PLG, CrMG, and HMBG after 10 weeks of supplementation. Moreover, the combination of CrM plus HMB presented a synergistic effect on testosterone and T/C and an antagonistic effect on cortisol compared with the sum of individual or isolated supplementation (CrM + HMB). However, the results did not display any differences in EIMD markers (AST, CK, and LDH) among the different supplemented groups.
Maximum performance requires an adequate balance between training loads and recovery that allows improving muscle recovery and avoiding fatigue [58]. To control this balance in order to recover and/or avoid fatigue, there are several variables utilized, such as markers of EIMD and anabolic/catabolic hormones [1,6,17,18]. Although there is an acute increase in EIMD markers after exercise, especially with an eccentric component [6], the maintenance of high EIMD values long term could be indicative of an imbalance between load and recovery, which could reflect chronic fatigue or overtraining [1]. In particular, to better understand this balance, several authors have proposed that anabolic/catabolic hormone status is changed after exercise due to an acute effect [13]. However, in the long term, an increase in testosterone level would indicate better endogenous recovery [59], and an increase in cortisol would indicate increased stress and/or fatigue [10]. Therefore, some authors have indicated that the T/C ratio is an objective indicator of the fatigue status of an athlete [15]. Thus, a decrease in this ratio in the long term would indicate greater stress, while an increase would indicate better recovery [14].
In order to recover faster and delay or avoid fatigue, some supplements have been proposed, such as CrM or HMB [19,20]. Given that CrM increases muscle creatine stores, the creatine-phosphocreatine Cr-PCr shuttle is positively affected. One of the main roles of the Cr-PCr system is the cellular energy transport system (the Cr-PCr shuttle). This shuttle presents a higher energy availability during exercise through free Cr speeding up PCr resynthesis in the mitochondria. In the mitochondria outer membrane, Cr reacts with the mitochondrial isoenzyme of creatine kinase (mi-CK) using adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and turning it in adenosine diphosphate (ADP). The ADP is resynthesized into ATP inside the mitochondrial inner membrane/matrix space after reacting with ATP synthase (consuming protons (H+)). Therefore, the ATP is reused again in the mi-CK and Cr reaction, restarting the shuttle [60]. On the other hand, HMB can augment mitochondrial biogenesis by an increase in the gene expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PGC-1α), which contributes to better oxidative function and hence enhances the aerobic capacity [61]. Mitochondrial biogenesis consists of increasing the quantity and density of muscle cell mitochondria, angiogenesis, and fat oxidation [62]. Therefore, these adaptations could help save glycogen when same training intensities are performed, making them one of the most important limiting factors during exercise [63].
Despite the promising results, the effect on EIMD and hormonal status, and the different metabolic pathways of action of CrM and HMB supplementation, the combination of these supplements has presented controversial results for EIMD and hormone status [64]. These studies did not find differences in CK [44,45,46,47] and LDH [44,47] levels among supplemented groups. In fact, in the study by Jowko et al. (20 g/day for the first seven days and 10 g/day for the rest of the days of CrM and 3 g/day of HMB) [46], CK levels remained elevated following three weeks of CrM/HMBG supplementation, suggesting that CrM antagonized the CK-lowering effect of HMB. However, the results obtained in this study on EIMD did not show an antagonistic effect on EIMD markers. Moreover, there were no differences between T1 and T2 in any of the study groups that could indicate an adequate balance between training loads and recovery [4,20]. These differences could be influenced by blood sampling timing when the objective is to determine the long-term effect of CrM plus HMB supplementation and insufficient time is provided to avoid EIMD acute increases post-exercise [45]. Likewise, these differences might be due to the fact that this type of sport entails short (approximately 20 min) cyclic activity, in contrast to endurance and team sports (high eccentric activity with heavy weights) [44,45,46,47,65] that produce a higher rate of muscle damage [31,66].
Regarding anabolic/catabolic hormones, to our knowledge, only one study has analyzed the anabolic/catabolic hormone status when mixed supplements were ingested. Crowe and O’Connor did not show significant differences in cortisol or testosterone levels after six weeks of CrM plus HMB supplementation despite receiving identical supplementation dosages (3 g/day of CrM and 3 g/day of HMB) [45]. In the present study, although a significant increase in cortisol levels was observed in all study groups between T1 and T2, only a significant increase in testosterone levels was observed in CrM-HMBG. These changes resulted in a significant decrease of the T/C ratio in PLG, CrMG, and HMBG, which indicates greater accumulated stress/fatigue [67]. The differences in testosterone levels could be due to the duration of the intervention (six weeks in Crowe and O’Connor’s study [45] vs. 10 weeks in the present study), given that testosterone requires long-term intervention to produce significant changes [11,12]. Moreover, the results presented on testosterone and T/C could mean better training adaptation/recovery mediated by the combination of CrM and HMB. This result might have facilitated a better aerobic power in CrM-HMBG during an incremental test (related to individual lactate threshold) [68]. These results were corroborated by a synergistic effect of combined supplementation (CrM plus HMB) on testosterone and T/C and an antagonistic effect on cortisol. However, after reviewing the literature, to the best of our knowledge, the mechanisms by which the combination of CrM plus HMB increase testosterone and the T/C ratio are unclear; hence, further investigation is needed.

4.1. Limitations, Strengths, and Future Research

The results of this experimental study should be treated with caution due to the small sample size in total (n = 28) and in each study group (n = 7), which is common in elite sports because it is very difficult to obtain larger samples in this population. However, the methodology of a study is its most important strength. Given that this study was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with nutrition control, it was able to avoid possible factors that could influence the CrM plus HMB combination effect. Moreover, as another strength of this study, the diet ingested by the athletes was controlled as well as the body composition throughout the intervention process, so that these parameters did not influence the final results.
Future research should analyze the cellular signal/gene mechanism by which both combined supplements are synergistic on testosterone level. Moreover, it should analyze how this combination affects the female population or anaerobic sports, given that this study only focused on males and measured aerobic performance.

4.2. Practical Application

This study could be interesting for nutritionists and physicians who want to provide better post-training or post-competition recovery for their athletes. Taking into account that 0.04 g/kg/day of CrM plus 3 g/day of HMB for 10 weeks could improve muscle and endogenous recovery, supplementation phases could be considered in the training phases in which there is a greater load.

5. Conclusions

In summary, the combination of 3 g/day of CrM plus 0.04 g/kg/day of HMB for 10 weeks showed an increase in testosterone and T/C compared with placebo or isolated supplementation. Moreover, this combined supplementation revealed a synergistic effect on testosterone and T/C and an antagonistic effect on cortisol, which are positive results for athletes’ recovery. However, this combination did not present any differences in EIMD. Therefore, the combined use of these two ergogenic supplements could promote faster muscle recovery from high-intensity activity but without preventing muscle damage.

Author Contributions

J.M.-A. and J.F.-L.: conception and design, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting of the paper, critical review, and approval of the final version submitted for publication. D.F.-L., J.C.-G. and P.L.-G.: analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting of the paper, critical review, and approval of the final version submitted for publication. A.C.-G. and A.C.: conception and design, drafting of the paper, critical review, and approval of the final version submitted for publication. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors declare no funding sources.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the rowers, coaches, and research assistants involved in this investigation for their participation, enthusiasm, and cooperation. In addition, the authors also want to thank the Foundation Institute of Studies of Health Sciences of Castilla y León (IECSCYL) for their collaboration on infrastructures and computer support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Meeusen, R.; Duclos, M.; Foster, C.; Fry, A.; Gleeson, M.; Nieman, D.; Raglin, J.; Rietjens, G.; Steinacker, J.; Urhausen, A.; et al. Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of the overtraining syndrome: Joint consensus statement of the european college of sport science and the American College of Sports Medicine. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2013, 45, 186–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Mielgo-Ayuso, J.; Calleja-González, J.; Urdampilleta, A.; León-Guereño, P.; Córdova, A.; Caballero-García, A.; Fernandez-Lázaro, D. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on haematological values and muscle recovery in elite male traditional rowers. Nutrients 2018, 10, 1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Córdova, A.; Mielgo-Ayuso, J.; Fernandez-Lazaro, C.I.; Caballero-García, A.; Roche, E.; Fernández-Lázaro, D. Effect of iron supplementation on the modulation of iron metabolism, muscle damage biomarkers and cortisol in professional cyclists. Nutrients 2019, 11, 500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Terrados, N.; Mielgo-Ayuso, J.; Delextrat, A.; Ostojic, S.M.; Calleja-González, J. Dietetic-nutritional, physical and physiological recovery methods post-competition in team sports. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness 2019, 59, 415–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Djaoui, L.; Haddad, M.; Chamari, K.; Dellal, A. Monitoring training load and fatigue in soccer players with physiological markers. Physiol. Behav. 2017, 181, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Brancaccio, P.; Lippi, G.; Maffulli, N. Biochemical markers of muscular damage. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2010, 48, 757–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Orfanos, Z.; Gödderz, M.P.O.; Soroka, E.; Gödderz, T.; Rumyantseva, A.; van der Ven, P.F.M.; Hawke, T.J.; Fürst, D.O. Breaking sarcomeres by in vitro exercise. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Urhausen, A.; Gabriel, H.; Kindermann, W. Impaired pituitary hormonal response to exhaustive exercise in overtrained endurance athletes. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1998, 30, 407–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Brancaccio, P.; Maffulli, N.; Limongelli, F.M. Creatine kinase monitoring in sport medicine. Br. Med. Bull. 2007, 81–82, 209–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Martínez, A.; Seco Calvo, J.; Tur Marí, J.; Abecia Inchaurregui, L.; Orella, E.; Biescas, A. Testosterone and cortisol changes in professional basketball players through a season competition. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2010, 24, 1102–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Häkkinen, K.; Pakarinen, A.; Alén, M.; Komi, P.V. Serum hormones during prolonged training of neuromuscular performance. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 1985, 53, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mielgo-Ayuso, J.; Zourdos, M.; Urdampilleta, A.; Calleja-González, J.; Seco, J.; Córdova, A. Relationship of long-term macronutrients intake on anabolic-catabolic hormones in female elite volleyball players. Nutr. Hosp. 2017, 34, 1155–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Slimani, M.; Cheoura, F.; Moalla, W.; Baker, J.S. Hormonal responses to a rugby match: A brief review. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness 2018, 58, 707–713. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mastorakos, G.; Pavlatou, M.; Diamanti-Kandarakis, E.; Chrousos, G.P. Exercise and the stress system. Hormones (Athens) 2005, 4, 73–89. [Google Scholar]
  15. Greenham, G.; Buckley, J.D.; Garrett, J.; Eston, R.; Norton, K. Biomarkers of physiological responses to periods of intensified, non-resistance-based exercise training in well-trained male athletes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sport. Med. 2018, 48, 2517–2548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hayes, L.D.; Grace, F.M.; Baker, J.S.; Sculthorpe, N. Exercise-induced responses in salivary testosterone, cortisol, and their ratios in men: A meta-analysis. Sport. Med. 2015, 45, 713–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Vervoorn, C.; Quist, A.; Vermulst, L.; Erich, W.; de Vries, W.; Thijssen, J. The behaviour of the plasma free testosterone/cortisol ratio during a season of elite rowing training. Int. J. Sports Med. 1991, 12, 257–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Urhausen, A.; Gabriel, H.; Kindermann, W. Blood hormones as markers of training stress and overtraining. Sport. Med. 1995, 20, 251–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Thomas, D.T.; Erdman, K.A.; Burke, L.M. American College of Sports Medicine Joint Position Statement. Nutrition and Athletic Performance. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2016, 48, 543–568. [Google Scholar]
  20. Calleja-González, J.; Mielgo-Ayuso, J.; Sampaio, J.; Delextrat, A.; Ostojic, S.M.; Marques-Jiménez, D.; Arratibel, I.; Sánchez-Ureña, B.; Dupont, G.; Schelling, X.; et al. Brief ideas about evidence-based recovery in team sports. J. Exerc. Rehabil. 2018, 14, 545–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cooke, M.B.; Rybalka, E.; Williams, A.D.; Cribb, P.J.; Hayes, A. Creatine supplementation enhances muscle force recovery after eccentrically-induced muscle damage in healthy individuals. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2009, 6, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Veggi, K.F.T.; Machado, M.; Koch, A.J.; Santana, S.C.; Oliveira, S.S.; Stec, M.J. Oral creatine supplementation augments the repeated bout effect. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2013, 23, 378–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bassit, R.; Pinheiro, C.; Vitzel, K.; Sproesser, A.; Silveira, L.; Curi, R. Effect of short-term creatine supplementation on markers of skeletal muscle damage after strenuous contractile activity. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2010, 108, 945–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Arazi, H.; Rahmaninia, F.; Hosseini, K.; Asadi, A. Effects of short term creatine supplementation and resistance exercises on resting hormonal and cardiovascular responses. Sci. Sport. 2015, 30, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vatani, D.S.; Faraji, H.; Soori, R.; Mogharnasi, M. The effects of creatine supplementation on performance and hormonal response in amateur swimmers. Sci. Sport. 2011, 26, 272–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kreider, R.B.; Kalman, D.S.; Antonio, J.; Ziegenfuss, T.N.; Wildman, R.; Collins, R.; Candow, D.G.; Kleiner, S.M.; Almada, A.L.; Lopez, H.L. International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: Safety and efficacy of creatine supplementation in exercise, sport, and medicine. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2017, 14, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Roberts, P.A.; Fox, J.; Peirce, N.; Jones, S.W.; Casey, A.; Greenhaff, P.L. Creatine ingestion augments dietary carbohydrate mediated muscle glycogen supercompensation during the initial 24 h of recovery following prolonged exhaustive exercise in humans. Amino Acids 2016, 48, 1831–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. van Loon, L.J.; Murphy, R.; Oosterlaar, A.M.; Cameron-Smith, D.; Hargreaves, M.; Wagenmakers, A.J.M.; Snow, R. Creatine supplementation increases glycogen storage but not GLUT-4 expression in human skeletal muscle. Clin. Sci. 2004, 106, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Wilson, J.M.; Lowery, R.P.; Joy, J.M.; Walters, J.A.; Baier, S.M.; Fuller, J.C.; Stout, J.R.; Norton, L.E.; Sikorski, E.M.; Wilson, S.M.C.; et al. β-Hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate free acid reduces markers of exercise-induced muscle damage and improves recovery in resistance-trained men. Br. J. Nutr. 2013, 110, 538–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Panton, L.B.; Rathmacher, J.A.; Baier, S.; Nissen, S. Nutritional supplementation of the leucine metabolite beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (hmb) during resistance training. Nutrition 2000, 16, 734–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Knitter, A.E.; Panton, L.; Rathmacher, J.A.; Petersen, A.; Sharp, R. Effects of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate on muscle damage after a prolonged run. J. Appl. Physiol. 2000, 89, 1340–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Wilson, J.M.; Lowery, R.P.; Joy, J.M.; Andersen, J.C.; Wilson, S.M.C.; Stout, J.R.; Duncan, N.; Fuller, J.C.; Baier, S.M.; Naimo, M.A.; et al. The effects of 12 weeks of beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate free acid supplementation on muscle mass, strength, and power in resistance-trained individuals: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2014, 114, 1217–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Asadi, A.; Arazi, H.; Suzuki, K. Effects of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate-free acid supplementation on strength, power and hormonal adaptations following resistance training. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Tinsley, G.M.; Givan, A.H.; Graybeal, A.J.; Villarreal, M.I.; Cross, A.G. β-Hydroxy β-methylbutyrate free acid alters cortisol responses, but not myofibrillar proteolysis, during a 24-h fast. Br. J. Nutr. 2018, 119, 517–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Durkalec-Michalski, K.; Jeszka, J. The effect of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate on aerobic capacity and body composition in trained athletes. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2016, 30, 2617–2626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Pinheiro, C.; Gerlinger-Romero, F.; Guimarães-Ferreira, L.; de Souza, A.J.; Vitzel, K.; Nachbar, R.; Nunes, M.; Curi, R. Metabolic and functional effects of beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (HMB) supplementation in skeletal muscle. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2012, 112, 2531–2537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cross, D.A.E.; Alessi, D.R.; Vandenheede, J.R.; McDowell, H.E.; Hundal, H.S.; Cohen, P. The inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3 by insulin or insulin-like growth factor 1 in the rat skeletal muscle cell line L6 is blocked by wortmannin, but not by rapamycin: Evidence that wortmannin blocks activation of the mitogen-activated protein kin. Biochem. J. 1994, 303, 21–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gerlinger-Romero, F.; Guimarães-Ferreira, L.; Giannocco, G.; Nunes, M.T. Chronic supplementation of beta-hydroxy-beta methylbutyrate (HMβ) increases the activity of the GH/IGF-I axis and induces hyperinsulinemia in rats. Growth Horm. IGF Res. 2011, 21, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kresta, J.Y.; Oliver, J.M.; Jagim, A.R.; Fluckey, J.; Riechman, S.; Kelly, K.; Meininger, C.; Mertens-Talcott, S.U.; Rasmussen, C.; Kreider, R.B. Effects of 28 days of beta-alanine and creatine supplementation on muscle carnosine, body composition and exercise performance in recreationally active females. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2014, 11, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Stout, J.; Cramer, J.; Mielke, M.; O’Kroy, J.; Torok, D.; Zoeller, F. Effects of twenty-eight days of beta-alanine and creatine monohydrate supplementation on the physical working capacity at neuromuscular fatigue threshold. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2006, 20, 928–931. [Google Scholar]
  41. Boegman, S.; Dziedzic, C. Nutrition and supplements for elite open-weight rowing. Curr. Sports Med. Rep. 2016, 15, 252–261. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  42. Wilson, J.M.; Fitschen, P.J.; Campbell, B.; Wilson, G.J.; Zanchi, N.; Taylor, L.; Wilborn, C.; Kalman, D.S.; Stout, J.R.; Hoffman, J.R.; et al. International Society of Sports Nutrition Position Stand: Beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate (HMB). J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2013, 10, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Lloyd, A.; Hodder, S.; Havenith, G. The interactive effect of cooling and hypoxia on forearm fatigue development. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2015, 115, 2007–2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Faramarzi, M.; Nuri, R.; Banitalebi, E.; Sciences, S. The effect of short–term combination of HMB (beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate) and creatine supplementation on anaerobic performance and muscle injury markers in soccer players. Braz. J. Biomotricity 2009, 3, 366–375. [Google Scholar]
  45. Crowe, M.J.; O’Connor, D.M.; Lukins, J.E. The effects of β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB) and HMB/creatine supplementation on indices of health in highly trained athletes. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2003, 13, 184–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Jówko, E.; Ostaszewski, P.; Jank, M.; Sacharuk, J.; Zieniewicz, A.; Wilczak, J.; Nissen, S. Creatine and β-hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate (HMB) additively increase lean body mass and muscle strength during a weight-training program. Nutrition 2001, 17, 558–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zajac, A.; Waskiewicz, Z.; Poprzecki, S.; Cholewa, J. Effects of creatine and HMß supplementation on anaerobic power and body composition in basketball players. J. Hum. Kinet. 2003, 10, 95–108. [Google Scholar]
  48. Thomas, D.T.; Erdman, K.A.; Burke, L.M. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Dietitians of Canada, and the American College of Sports Medicine: Nutrition and Athletic Performance. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2016, 116, 501–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Beelen, M.; Burke, L.M.; Gibala, M.J.; van Loon L, J.C. Nutritional strategies to promote postexercise recovery. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2010, 20, 515–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Bosquet, L.; Montpetit, J.; Arvisais, D.; Mujika, I. Effects of tapering on performance: A meta-analysis. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2007, 39, 1358–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Stewart, A.; Marfell-Jones, M.; Olds, T.; de Ridder, H. International Standards for Anthropometric Assessment, 3rd ed.; ISAK: Lower Hutt, New Zealand, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  52. Carter, J.E.L. Body composition of Montreal Olympic athletes. In Physical Structure of Olympic Athletes. Part I the Montreal Olympic Games Anthropological Project; Karger: Basel, Switzerland, 1982; pp. 107–116. [Google Scholar]
  53. Lee, R.; Wang, Z.; Heo, M.; Ross, R.; Janssen, I.; Heymsfield, S. Total-body skeletal muscle mass: Development and cross-validation of anthropometric prediction models. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000, 72, 796–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Mielgo-Ayuso, J.; Zourdos, M.C.; Calleja-González, J.; Urdampilleta, A.; Ostojic, S.M. Dietary intake habits and controlled training on body composition and strength in elite female volleyball players during the season. Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 2015, 40, 827–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Mielgo-Ayuso, J.; Collado, P.S.; Urdampilleta, A.; Martínez-Sanz, J.M.; Seco, J. Changes induced by diet and nutritional intake in the lipid profile of female professional volleyball players after 11 weeks of training. J. Int. Soc. Sports Nutr. 2013, 10, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Farrán, A.; Zamora, R.; Cervera, P. Tablas de Composición de Alimentos del Centre D’Ensenyament Superior de Nutrició i Dietètica (CESNID), 2nd ed.; McGraw-Hill Interamericana: Barcelona, Spain, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  57. Ferguson, C.J. An Effect Size Primer: A Guide for Clinicians and Researchers. Prof. Psychol. Res. Pract. 2009, 40, 532–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Kellmann, M.; Bertollo, M.; Bosquet, L.; Brink, M.; Coutts, A.J.; Duf, R.; Erlacher, D.; Halson, S.L.; Hecksteden, A.; Heidari, J.; et al. Recovery and performance in sport : Consensus statement. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2018, 13, 240–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Banfi, G.; Dolci, A. Free testosterone/cortisol ratio in soccer: Usefulness of a categorization of values. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness 2006, 46, 611–616. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  60. Saks, V.A.; Kongas, O.; Vendelin, M.; Kay, L. Role of the creatine/phosphocreatine system in the regulation of mitochondrial respiration. Acta. Physiol. Scand. 2000, 168, 635–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. He, X.; Duan, Y.; Yao, K.; Li, F.; Hou, Y.; Wu, G.; Yin, Y. β-Hydroxy-β-methylbutyrate, mitochondrial biogenesis, and skeletal muscle health. Amino Acids 2016, 48, 653–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Baar, K. Nutrition and the adaptation to endurance training. Sport. Med. 2014, 44, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Stallknecht, B.; Vissing, J.; Galbo, H. Lactate production and clearance in exercise. Effects of training. A mini-review. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 1998, 8, 127–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Fernández-Landa, J.; Calleja-González, J.; León-Guereño, P.; Caballero-García, A.; Córdova, A.; Mielgo-Ayuso, J. Effect of the combination of creatine monohydrate plus HMB supplementation on sports performance, body composition, markers of muscle damage and hormone status: A systematic review. Nutrients 2019, 11, 2528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. O’Connor, D.M.; Crowe, M.J. Effects of beta-hydroxy-beta-methylbutyrate and creatine monohydrate supplementation on the aerobic and anaerobic capacity of highly trained athletes. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness 2003, 43, 64–68. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  66. Mcneill, C.; Beaven, C.M.; McMaster, D.T.; Gill, N. Eccentric training interventions and team sport athletes. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2019, 4, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Brownlee, K.K.; Moore, A.W.; Hackney, A.C. Relationship between circulating cortisol and testosterone: Influence of physical exercise. J. Sport. Sci. Med. 2005, 4, 76–83. [Google Scholar]
  68. Fernández-Landa, J.; Fernández-Lázaro, D.; Calleja-González, J.; Caballero-García, A.; Córdova, A.; León-Guereño, P.; Mielgo-Ayuso, J. Effect of ten weeks of creatine monohydrate plus HMB supplementation on athletic performance tests in elite male endurance athletes. Nutrients 2020, 12, 193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Biomolecules 10 00140 g001 550
Figure 1. Percentage changes during the study in cortisol and testosterone hormone status and testosterone/cortisol ratio in the four study groups. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error. Δ: ((T2 − T1)/T1) × 100; differences among groups in each test by ANOVA test (p < 0.05): a: regarding PLG; b: regarding CrMG; c: regarding HMBG.
Figure 1. Percentage changes during the study in cortisol and testosterone hormone status and testosterone/cortisol ratio in the four study groups. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error. Δ: ((T2 − T1)/T1) × 100; differences among groups in each test by ANOVA test (p < 0.05): a: regarding PLG; b: regarding CrMG; c: regarding HMBG.
Biomolecules 10 00140 g001
Biomolecules 10 00140 g002 550
Figure 2. Percentage changes in exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD). Data are expressed as mean ± standard error. Δ: ((T2 − T1)/T1) × 100; differences among groups in each test by ANOVA test.
Figure 2. Percentage changes in exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD). Data are expressed as mean ± standard error. Δ: ((T2 − T1)/T1) × 100; differences among groups in each test by ANOVA test.
Biomolecules 10 00140 g002
Table
Table 1. Energy and macronutrient intake in each study group during 10 weeks of study.
Table 1. Energy and macronutrient intake in each study group during 10 weeks of study.
PLGCrMGHMBGCrM-HMBG
Energy (kcal/kg)44.8 ± 6.245.0 ± 6.644.7 ± 6.345.1 ± 7.0
Protein (g/kg)1.9 ± 0.42.0 ± 0.61.9 ± 0.71.9 ± 0.4
Fat (g/kg)1.5 ± 0.41.6 ± 0.51.5 ± 0.61.6 ± 0.6
Carbohydrates (g/kg)6.0 ± 0.96.1 ± 1.16.1 ± 1.36.0 ± 1.2
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. PLG: placebo group, CrMG: creatine monohydrate group, HMBG: β-hydroxy β-methylbutyrate group.
Table
Table 2. Anthropometry and body composition of participants.
Table 2. Anthropometry and body composition of participants.
GroupT1T2P (T × G)η2p
Body mass (kg)
PLG81.9 ± 6.380.0 ± 5.3 *0.8830.028
CrMG81.2 ± 5.078.6 ± 5.4 *
HMBG79.9 ± 12.277.6 ± 11.1 *
CrM-HMBG78.0 ± 4.775.5 ± 4.5 *
BMI (kg/m2)
PLG24.1 ± 2.423.6 ± 2.00.9510.016
CrMG24.1 ± 1.523.4 ± 1.6 *
HMBG24.1 ± 1.823.3 ± 1.8 *
CrM-HMBG23.7 ± 1.622.9 ± 1.4 *
Muscle mass (%)
PLG40.3 ± 2.541.0 ± 2.30.7890.104
CrMG40.6 ± 2.441.7 ± 2.7
HMBG41.1 ± 2.041.7 ± 2.2
CrM-HMBG41.2 ± 2.442.1 ± 2.3
Fat mass (%)
PLG8.9 ± 1.58.7 ± 1.40.8840.030
CrMG8.6 ± 1.78.4 ± 1.8
HMBG8.7 ± 1.58.4 ± 1.1
CrM-HMBG8.5 ± 1.68.2 ± 1.4
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. P (T × G): group-by-time interaction (p < 0.05, all such occurrences). Two-factor repeated-measures ANOVA. * Significantly different between phases (T1 vs. T2); p < 0.05. BMI: body mass index.
Table
Table 3. Participant’s testosterone and cortisol hormone status.
Table 3. Participant’s testosterone and cortisol hormone status.
GroupT1T2P (T × G)η2p
Testosterone (ng/dL)
PLG5.22 ± 0.564.56 ± 0.840.0060.454
CrMG4.27 ± 0.734.20 ± 1.12
HMBG4.90 ± 0.955.60 ± 1.56
CrM-HMBG4.91 ± 0.875.97 ± 1.23 *
Cortisol (μg/dL)
PLG15.87 ± 2.9917.93 ± 2.08 *0.4510.121
CrMG15.75 ± 2.7820.80 ± 6.13 *
HMBG16.32 ± 1.2923.30 ± 2.97 *
CrM-HMBG18.18 ± 1.1322.95 ± 1.89 *
Testosterone/cortisol ratio
PLG33.77 ± 12.0325.97 ± 6.58 *0.0320.349
CrMG28.04 ± 7.4922.17 ± 9.90 *
HMBG30.19 ± 6.3323.94 ± 4.98 *
CrM-HMBG27.07 ± 5.1226.07 ± 5.29
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. P (T × G): group-by-time interaction (p < 0.05, all such occurrences). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA. * Significantly different between two phases (T1 vs. T2), p < 0.05.
Table
Table 4. Exercise-induced muscle damage markers in the four study groups at baseline (T1) and after 10 weeks (T2).
Table 4. Exercise-induced muscle damage markers in the four study groups at baseline (T1) and after 10 weeks (T2).
GroupT1T2P (T × G)η2p
AST (UI/L)
PLG17.83 ± 2.7922.00 ± 1.55*0.6480.077
CrMG22.33 ± 9.6523.50 ± 8.89
HMBG18.00 ± 3.2919.00 ± 6.96
CrM-HMBG21.33 ± 4.6824.67 ± 7.30
CK (UI/L)
PLG190.50 ± 94.79216.83 ± 97.350.6410.079
CrMG277.00 ± 171.40256.33 ± 130.38
HMBG147.50 ± 63.91243.33 ± 286.42
CrM-HMBG201.67 ± 105.64260.50 ± 159.28
LDH (UI/L)
PLG293.17 ± 36.23310.17 ± 22.980.7920.049
CrMG337.00 ± 47.69337.33 ± 39.20
HMBG340.17 ± 27.64342.17 ± 45.35
CrM-HMBG339.17 ± 24.77337.83 ± 60.72
Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. P (T × G): group-by-time interaction (p < 0.05, all such occurrences). Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA. * Significantly different between two phases (T1 vs. T2), p < 0.05. AST: aspartate aminotransferase, CK: creatine kinase, LDH: lactate dehydrogenase.
Table
Table 5. Determination of the effect of the combination of supplements.
Table 5. Determination of the effect of the combination of supplements.
Group% Change to PlaceboEffect
Cortisol
CrMG145.15%Antagonistic
131.55 < 389.99
HMBG238.84%
CrMG + HMBG389.99%
CrM-HMBG131.55%
Testosterone
CrMG4.21%Synergistic
−63.85 > −37.85
HMBG−42.1%
CrMG + HMBG−37.89%
CrM-HMBG−63.85%
Testosterone/cortisol ratio
CrMG32.88%Synergistic
680 > 57.68
HMBG24.80%
CrMG + HMBG57.68%
CrM-HMBG680%

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fernández-Landa, J.; Fernández-Lázaro, D.; Calleja-González, J.; Caballero-García, A.; Córdova, A.; León-Guereño, P.; Mielgo-Ayuso, J. Long-Term Effect of Combination of Creatine Monohydrate Plus β-Hydroxy β-Methylbutyrate (HMB) on Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage and Anabolic/Catabolic Hormones in Elite Male Endurance Athletes. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 140. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biom10010140

AMA Style

Fernández-Landa J, Fernández-Lázaro D, Calleja-González J, Caballero-García A, Córdova A, León-Guereño P, Mielgo-Ayuso J. Long-Term Effect of Combination of Creatine Monohydrate Plus β-Hydroxy β-Methylbutyrate (HMB) on Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage and Anabolic/Catabolic Hormones in Elite Male Endurance Athletes. Biomolecules. 2020; 10(1):140. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biom10010140

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fernández-Landa, Julen, Diego Fernández-Lázaro, Julio Calleja-González, Alberto Caballero-García, Alfredo Córdova, Patxi León-Guereño, and Juan Mielgo-Ayuso. 2020. "Long-Term Effect of Combination of Creatine Monohydrate Plus β-Hydroxy β-Methylbutyrate (HMB) on Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage and Anabolic/Catabolic Hormones in Elite Male Endurance Athletes" Biomolecules 10, no. 1: 140. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biom10010140

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop