Next Article in Journal
Natural Bioactive Cinnamoyltyramine Alkylamides and Co-Metabolites
Next Article in Special Issue
Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG): New Therapeutic Perspectives for Neuroprotection, Aging, and Neuroinflammation for the Modern Age
Previous Article in Journal
High Glucose Concentrations Impair the Processing and Presentation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Antigens In Vitro
Previous Article in Special Issue
Potential Mechanisms of Plant-Derived Natural Products in the Treatment of Cervical Cancer
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 11
Issue 12
10.3390/biom11121764
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Combined Anti-Adipogenic Effects of Hispidulin and p-Synephrine on 3T3-L1 Adipocytes

by
Dahae Lee
1,†,
Hee Jae Kwak
2,†,
Byoung Ha Kim
3,
Seung Hyun Kim
2,
Dong-Wook Kim
4,* and
Ki Sung Kang
1,*
1
College of Korean Medicine, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Korea
2
College of Pharmacy, Yonsei Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Yonsei University, Incheon 21983, Korea
3
D. Nature Co., Ltd., Seongnam 13174, Korea
4
Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering, Cheongju University, Cheongju 28530, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Biomolecules 2021, 11(12), 1764; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biom11121764
Submission received: 30 October 2021 / Revised: 18 November 2021 / Accepted: 22 November 2021 / Published: 25 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Potential Mechanism of Natural-Based Biomolecules for Disease Treatment)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Hispidulin is abundant in Arrabidaea chica, Crossostephium chinense, and Grindelia argentina, among others. p-Synephrine is the main phytochemical constituent of Citrus aurantium. It has been used in combination with various other phytochemicals to determine synergistic effects in studies involving human participants. However, there have been no reports comparing the anti-adipogenic effects of the combination of hispidulin and p-synephrine. The current study explores the anti-adipogenic effects of hispidulin alone and in combination with p-synephrine in a murine preadipocyte cell line, 3T3-L1. Co-treatment resulted in a greater inhibition of the formation of red-labeled lipid droplets than the hispidulin or p-synephrine-alone treatments. Co-treatment with hispidulin and p-synephrine also significantly inhibited adipogenic marker proteins, including Akt, mitogen-activated protein kinases, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha, glucocorticoid receptor, and CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein β. Although further studies are required to assess the effects of each drug on pharmacokinetic parameters, a combination treatment with hispidulin and p-synephrine may be a potential alternative strategy for developing novel anti-obesity drugs.

1. Introduction

Adipogenesis is a process by which preadipocytes differentiate into mature adipocytes [1]. In the development of obesity, an increased adipose tissue size results in an increased adipocyte cell size (adipocyte hypertrophy) and adipocyte cell number (adipocyte hyperplasia) [2]. These mechanisms are implicated in childhood obesity and obesity-related metabolic disturbances [3]. In particular, adipocyte hypertrophy is implicated as the main cause of adult-onset obesity [4], whereas adipocyte hyperplasia in adults occurs when existing adipocytes reach a critical size [5].
Phentermine, diethylpropion, phendimetrazine, and mazindol are drugs used to treat obesity by suppressing the appetite and increasing energy expenditure through the regulation of norepinephrine and dopamine metabolism [6,7,8,9]. In addition, Qsymia®, an FDA-approved combination drug of phentermine and topiramate, demonstrates the addictive and synergistic effects of the individual components, which have different mechanisms of action to treat obesity [10]. However, the use of these drugs is limited due to critical side effects, such as dizziness, dry mouth, anxiety, insomnia, and increased blood pressure [11]. For these reasons, several studies have attempted to find safe phytochemicals from natural products to develop novel drugs or dietary supplements for weight loss [12]. For instance, curcumin, a major component of Curcuma longa (roots), and capsaicin, an alkaloid from Capsicum annuum (fruits), showed anti-obesity effects by suppressing 3T3-L1 adipocyte differentiation [13,14]. In addition, research on various natural resources, such as marine organisms and microorganisms, is being actively conducted to develop therapeutics for obesity [15,16]. As such, the development of alternative obesity drugs from natural products has attracted considerable interest.
p-Synephrine is the main phytochemical constituent of Citrus aurantium (fruits). It is a protoalkaloid, and its chemical structure is similar to ephedrine [17]. The use of ephedrine for weight loss has been banned in some countries, mainly due to adverse effects on the cardiovascular system. Thus, p-synephrine has been used to replace ephedrine in dietary supplements [17,18]. Studies have demonstrated the low or negligible toxicity of p-synephrine in both in vitro and in vivo experimental models [19,20,21,22]. A study involving human participants showed that the combination of p-synephrine with two flavonoids (hesperidin and naringin) increased the thermogenic effects associated with weight loss [23]. In this study, we attempt to identify a flavonoid that exhibits improved effects over other flavonoids (hesperidin and naringin) when treated with p-synephrine.
Hispidulin is a flavonoid derived from plants, including Arrabidaea chica (leaves), Crossostephium chinense (whole plants), Grindelia argentina (aerial parts), and Cirsium japonicum (whole plants) [24]. It has been reported to exhibit various pharmacological effects, such as anti-fungal, neuroprotective, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-cancer, and anti-osteoporotic effects [25,26,27,28,29,30]. Accumulated results demonstrate that hispidulin shows low or negligible toxicity in both in vitro and in vivo experimental models [31,32,33]. Recently, an in vitro study indicated that p-synephrine and hispidulin suppressed adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 adipocytes [34,35]. The agonists of the gamma-aminobutyric acid type A receptor (GABAA-R) expressed in adipose tissues have been shown to be valuable in the treatment of obesity [36]. Hispidulin is known to act as a positive allosteric modulator of the α1,3,5,6β2γ2S GABAA-R subtype [37]. One pharmacokinetic study reported a maximum plasma concentration of 2 ng/mL after an oral administration of 46.9 mg p-synephrine in humans [38]. Another pharmacokinetic study using a rat model showed a maximum hispidulin plasma concentration of 32 ng/mL after an oral administration of 6 mL/kg Cirsium japonicum extract [39]. Both studies suggest that high concentrations of individual compounds cannot be reached in the body by consuming plant-based foods or pure chemical drug substances. A strategy to address this problem is to combine several phytochemical constituents from various plants. In particular, we focused on the common and differing mechanisms of action of p-synephrine and hispidulin.
Network pharmacology has developed rapidly based on the concepts of systems biology and polypharmacology. The concept of “multi-drugs–multi-targets” has expanded in terms of existing drug discovery, in which the concept of a “single drug–single target” was previously predominant [40]. In particular, network pharmacology facilitates the prediction of active ingredients and mechanisms of action of natural products composed of various components [41]. A number of recent studies have used network pharmacology to investigate the mechanisms of action of compounds from natural products. For instance, Zhang et al. isolated oxyepiberberine from Coptis chinensis (rhizomes) and applied a network pharmacology analysis to identify the mechanism underlying its anti-cancer potential [42]. Cui et al. utilized a network pharmacology approach to understand the anti-inflammatory mechanism of phytochemicals from Salvia miltiorrhiza (roots) [43]. As such, network pharmacology plays an important role in overcoming the limitations of studies on conventional natural products by offering a new approach to predict the active ingredients, potential targets, and mechanisms of action.
In this study, we used a network pharmacology-based approach to predict potential targets and mechanisms of action of the anti-obesity effects of p-synephrine and hispidulin. We experimentally assessed the anti-obesity effects of p-synephrine and hispidulin when used alone and in combination to confirm their additive and synergistic effects when used in combination in 3T3-L1 cells.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Network Pharmacology Analysis

2.1.1. Acquisition of Hispidulin, p-Synephrine, and Disease-Related Targets

All the targets of hispidulin and p-synephrine were obtained from the PubChem database (http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed on 19 August 2021)) and SwissTargetPrediction database (http://www.swisstargetprediction.ch/ (accessed on 19 August 2021)) [44]. The SMILES of compounds was obtained from the PubChem database and entered into the SwissTargetPrediction database to obtain the predicted targets. In addition, the GeneCards database (http://www.genecards.org/ (accessed on 19 August 2021)) [45] was used to detect the pathological targets of obesity.

2.1.2. Acquisition of Potential Targets

First, duplicates and false-positive targets of the compounds were removed; second, common targets were obtained by comparing with obesity-related targets. These common targets were selected as potential targets. Potential targets were visualized with a Venn diagram using Venny 2.1 (BioinfoGP, Spanish National Biotechnology Centre (CNB-CSIC), Madrid, Sapin) (http://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html (accessed on 19 August 2021)) [46]. The DisGeNET database (http://disgenet.org/home/ (accessed on 19 August 2021)) [47] was used to retrieve specific protein class information of potential targets.

2.1.3. Construction and Analysis of Protein–Protein Interaction (PPI) Network

The STRING database (http://string-db.org/ (accessed on 19 August 2021)) [48] was used to obtain PPI networks. Protein interactions with a confidence score ≥0.7 were selected in the designed setting after eliminating duplicates. The resultant data were introduced into Cytoscape (3.8.2) (National Resource for Network Biology (NRNB), Bethesda, MD, USA) to establish the PPI network of potential targets. The PPI network of the potential targets was analyzed using Cytoscape. Three parameters, “degree”, “betweenness centrality”, and “closeness centrality”, were used to assess topological features of nodes in the network. Based on the network analysis, targets within the cut-off values were selected as key targets.

2.1.4. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) Pathway Enrichment Analysis

KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the key targets was performed using the DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.8 database (http://david.ncifcrf.gov/home.jsp (accessed on 19 August 2021)) [49]. The false discovery rate (FDR) error control method (FDR < 0.05) was used to correct the p-value. Finally, a threshold value of p < 0.05 was set and signaling pathways were obtained. The KEGG pathway enrichment analysis results were visualized using ImageGP (EHBIO Gene Technology, Beijing, China) (http://www.ehbio.com/ImageGP (accessed on 19 August 2021)).

2.1.5. Construction and Analysis of Compound–Target–Pathway (C–T–P) Networks

The targets associated with this pathway were obtained from the KEGG pathway enrichment analysis. Cytoscape (3.8.2) (NRNB, Bethesda, MD, USA) was used to visualize and analyze the C–T–P network.

2.2. Cell Culture and Adipogenic Differentiation

The mouse preadipocyte cell line (3T3-L1) was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA) and grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Cellgro, Manassas, VA, USA) containing 10% bovine calf serum (BCS; Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin antibiotics (P/S; Gaithersburg, MD, USA). To induce adipogenesis, 3T3-L1 preadipocytes (4 × 104 cells/well) were grown in a 24-well plate for 2 days, and then the culture medium was replaced with the adipogenic differentiation medium containing 0.4 μg/mL dexamethasone (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gaithersburg, MD, USA), 1-methyl-3-isobutylxanthine (IBMX; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 1% P/S antibiotics, and 5 µg/mL insulin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). After incubation for 2 days, the culture medium was replaced with DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 5 µg/mL insulin, and 1% P/S antibiotics every 2 days. Finally, the culture medium was replaced with DMEM containing 10% FBS and 1% P/S antibiotics, which was changed every 2 days, as previously described [50]. Hispidulin (5, 10, 20, and 40 μM) and p-synephrine (5, 10, 20, and 40 μM) were added individually or in combination in the culture medium during adipogenic differentiation. Hispidulin (≥98%) and p-synephrine (≥98%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

2.3. Measurement of Cell Viability

The viability of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes was assessed using a tetrazolium salt (WST-1)-based colorimetric assay kit (Ez-Cytox Cell Viability Assay Kit; Daeil Lab Service, Seoul, Korea). The 3T3-L1 preadipocytes (4 × 104 cells/well, 96-well plate) were grown in 10% BCS and 1% P/S antibiotics for 24 h, and then treated with hispidulin (5, 10, 20, and 40 μM) and p-synephrine (5, 10, 20, and 40 μM) individually or in combination. After treatment for 24 h, EZ-Cytox reagent was added, and the 3T3-L1 preadipocytes were further incubated for 40 min. The spectrophotometric absorbance was measured using a PowerWave XS microplate reader (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA) at 490 nm, as previously described [51].

2.4. Oil Red O Staining

On day 8, differentiated cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 1 h and stained with Oil Red O solution containing 0.5% Oil Red O (ORO; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), 40% distilled water (DW), and 60% isopropanol (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 1 h. After washing with DW, lipid droplets stained with ORO were imaged under an inverted microscope at 20× magnification and eluted with 100% isopropanol. The spectrophotometric absorbance was measured on a PowerWave XS microplate reader at 540 nm, as previously described [52].

2.5. Western Blot Analysis

On day 8 of cell differentiation, whole cell protein lysates from differentiated cells were prepared, resolved by 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Target proteins, including phospho-protein kinase B (P-Akt), Akt, phospho-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (P-ERK), ERK, phospho-c-Jun N-terminal kinase (P-JNK), JNK, phospho-P38 (P-P38), P38, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPAR-γ), CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha (C/EBP-α), C/EBP-β, glucocorticoid receptor (GR), and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH), were detected using primary antibodies and horseradish peroxidase-labeled anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). Target proteins were visualized using ECL Plus Western blotting detection reagents (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Protein levels were determined densitometrically using a chemiluminescence system (FUSION Solo, PEQLAB Biotechnologie GmbH, Erlangen, Germany), as previously described [53].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Statistical significance was determined using one-way analysis of variance and multiple comparisons with Bonferroni correction. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. All analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics ver. 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Network Pharmacology Analysis

3.1.1. Target Prediction and Screening of Potential Targets

The SwissTargetPrediction database was used to predict the targets of hispidulin and p-synephrine. In data preprocessing, 103 and 32 verified targets of hispidulin and p-synephrine, respectively, were screened. In addition, 9489 obesity-related targets were acquired from the GeneCards database, and the relevance score was used as a cut-off value. Based on the relevance score, 1897 obesity-related targets belonging to the top 20% were used for the analysis. As shown in Figure 1, the predicted targets of hispidulin and p-synephrine shared 53 and 23 targets, respectively, with obesity-related targets. Thus, these targets were selected as potential targets (Table 1 and Table 2).

3.1.2. Construction of PPI Network

To further explore the interaction between the potential targets, 53 hispidulin anti-obesity potential targets and 23 p-synephrine anti-obesity potential targets were put into the STRING database. The PPI networks were placed in the Cytoscape software for a visualization and analysis (Figure 2 and Figure 3). The three parameters, (1) degree, (2) betweenness centrality, and (3) closeness centrality, were applied to analyze the PPI networks. These three parameters indicate the importance and influence of the node in a complex network. The degree (degree centrality) is defined as the number of connections owned by a node [54]. Thus, it is the most straightforward and most intuitive indicator of the importance of a node in the network. The betweenness centrality measures the extent to which a node plays a bridging role in a network. Precisely, it measures the node falls on the shortest path between other pairs of nodes in the network [55]. The closeness centrality is related to the distance between nodes. It is calculated as the average of the shortest path length from the node to every other node in the network [56]. The nodes in the networks represent the target genes, and the edges symbolize the connections between target genes. The size and color of a node indicates the intensity of the degree. Thus, the higher the degree of the target, the larger the node, and the color gradually deepens from yellow to red. The width of the edge designates the grade of the correlation between the targets; the larger the combined score, the higher the binding degree between targets and the thicker the edge. As shown in Figure 2A, the PPI network of hispidulin anti-obesity potential targets consisted of 44 nodes and 90 edges. To identify the key targets among the 44 potential targets, three analytical index cut-off values were applied—degree ≥ 4, betweenness centrality ≥ 0.002, and closeness centrality ≥ 0.4, and a total of 15 targets was identified that satisfied the cut-off values. According to the PPI network analysis of hispidulin anti-obesity targets (Figure 2B), SRC (proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase Src), EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor), and AKT1 (AKT serine/threonine kinase 1) were the top three genes based on the degree (Table 3). The network visualization and analysis were also performed for the 23 p-synephrine anti-obesity potential targets. Potential PPI network targets constructed had 16 nodes and 26 edges (Figure 3). As shown in Figure 3, the PPI network of p-synephrine anti-obesity potential targets formed two clusters. One of the two clusters was an adrenergic receptor cluster and the other was a dopamine/serotonin receptor cluster. All targets in the two clusters were selected as key targets. The topological analysis results of the p-synephrine anti-obesity key targets are listed in Table 4.

3.1.3. KEGG Pathway Enrichment Analysis

The DAVID database was used to identify signaling pathways associated with the key targets of hispidulin and p-synephrine. The results of the biological pathways are shown in Figure 4. As shown in Figure 4A, the key anti-obesity targets of hispidulin were primarily related to estrogen, prolactin, CEGF, and Rap1 signaling pathways. In particular, the estrogen signaling pathway exhibited the highest p-value. For p-synephrine, two pathways, the calcium signaling pathway and the cAMP signaling pathway, showed very high p-values.

3.1.4. Construction and Analysis of Compound–Target–Pathway Networks

An integrative network analysis was performed using Cytoscape to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of the compounds, selected key targets, and pathways related to the two drugs. The C–T–P networks are shown in Figure 5. Blue squares represent compounds, reddish circles represent key targets, and green diamonds represent pathways. The size and color of the circles indicate the degree of each target. Through the network analysis, the parameter degree, betweenness centrality, and closeness centrality were calculated. In the network analysis, the degree indicates the direct influence and importance of the node. Therefore, high degree nodes play important roles in the network.
As shown in Figure 5A, the hispidulin C–T–P network consisted of 31 nodes (1 compound node, 15 key target nodes, and 15 pathway nodes) and 74 edges. Among the key target nodes, AKT1, SRC, EGFR, and GSK3B showed high degree values of 15, 9, 9, and 8, respectively. In the pathway nodes, estrogen, prolactin, Rap1, and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways exhibited the degree values of 6, 5, 5, and 5, respectively.
In Figure 5B, the p-synephrine C–T–P network formed 1 compound node, 16 key target nodes, 12 pathway nodes, and 63 edges. In particular, ADRB1, ADRB2, GRIN1, and ADRB3 showed high degree values of 9, 8, 6, and 6, respectively. Among these, ADRB1, ADRB2, and ADRB3 were the key targets that clustered in the PPI network analysis. In addition, these targets were connected to the calcium and cAMP signaling pathways, which had the highest degree values among the pathway nodes.
The combination C–T–P network consisted of 60 nodes (2 compound nodes, 31 key target nodes, and 27 pathway nodes) and 137 edges, as shown in Figure 5C. As shown in the combination network, there were no shared key targets or pathways among the predicted key targets and pathways. These results suggest that hispidulin and p-synephrine might exhibit anti-obesity effects through different mechanisms of action.

3.2. Inhibitory Effects of Hispidulin and p-Synephrine on Adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 Preadipocytes

The cytotoxicity of hispidulin, p-synephrine, and co-treatment with hispidulin and p-synephrine in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes was evaluated using the Ez-Cytox cell viability assay kit. The cell viability assay showed that concentrations up to 40 µM hispidulin and 40 µM p-synephrine, and the co-treatment with up to 40 µM hispidulin and 40 µM p-synephrine, did not affect the viability of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes after 24 h of incubation (Figure 6A–C).
The inhibitory effects of hispidulin and p-synephrine at non-toxic concentrations on adipogenesis were determined using Oil Red O staining of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes (Figure 6D). Treatment with 20 µM and 40 µM hispidulin inhibited the differentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes into mature adipocytes. The cells treated with 20 µM and 40 µM hispidulin showed a slight but not significant inhibition (56.63 ± 0.53% and 37.75 ± 1.81% reduction, respectively) of the formation of red-labeled lipid droplets. Similarly, treatment with 20 µM and 40 µM p-synephrine inhibited the differentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes into mature adipocytes. The cells treated with 20 µM and 40 µM p-synephrine showed a slight but not significant inhibition (46.24 ± 4.53% and 47.59 ± 2.66% reduction, respectively) of the formation of red-labeled lipid droplets. However, co-treatment with 20 µM and 40 µM hispidulin and 20 µM and 40 µM p-synephrine resulted in a greater inhibition of the formation of red-labeled lipid droplets than the hispidulin or p-synephrine-alone treatment. Co-treatment with hispidulin (20 µM and 40 µM) and p-synephrine (20 µM and 40 µM) significantly inhibited the differentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes into mature adipocytes. The cells treated with equal concentrations of hispidulin and p-synephrine (20 µM and 40 µM) showed a significant inhibition (22.28 ± 4.04% and 22.96 ± 1.11% reduction, respectively) of the formation of red-labeled lipid droplets (Figure 6E–G).

3.3. Effect of Hispidulin and p-Synephrine on the Expression of Proteins Involved in Adipogenesis in Differentiated 3T3L-1 Cells

To examine how hispidulin and p-synephrine inhibited adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 cells, we used the Western blot analysis to examine the expression of adipogenic marker proteins, including Akt, ERK, JNK, P38, PPARγ, C/EBPα, GR, and C/EBPβ (Figure 7A). Treatment with either 40 µM hispidulin or 40 µM p-synephrine slightly inhibited the expression of phospho-ERK, phospho-JNK, phospho-P38, PPARγ, C/EBPα, GR, and C/EBPβ in differentiated 3T3L-1 cells compared with the untreated controls. Co-treatment with hispidulin and p-synephrine further suppressed the expression of these proteins. In particular, after treatment with hispidulin, the expression of P-Akt was significantly suppressed, whereas p-synephrine had no effect on the expression of P-Akt compared with the untreated differentiated 3T3L-1 cells. Co-treatment with hispidulin and p-synephrine slightly suppressed the expression of P-Akt (Figure 7A,B). This suggested that the co-treatment of hispidulin and p-synephrine was effective in decreasing adipogenic marker proteins during the eight-day adipocyte differentiation period.

4. Discussion

In this study, we applied a network pharmacology analysis to predict the anti-obesity mechanism of action of hispidulin and p-synephrine. Through a network pharmacology analysis, the anti-obesity effect of hispidulin was predicted to act on estrogen, prolactin, Rap1, and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways by targeting AKT1, SRC, EGFR, and GSK3B. Previous studies have reported that these signaling pathways are related to obesity or adipocyte metabolism [57,58,59,60]. In addition, p-synephrine was predicted to exert its anti-obesity effect via calcium and cAMP signaling pathways by targeting adrenergic receptors, ADRB1, ADRB2, and ADRB3. In particular, a number of studies has provided evidence regarding the relationship between β3-adrenergic receptors (ADRB3) and obesity [61,62,63]. Moreover, recent studies have shown that the calcium signaling pathway specifically plays a key role in reducing obesity by enhancing energy consumption and promoting adipocyte differentiation and metabolism [64,65,66,67]. Based on the results of previous studies, the network pharmacology analysis in the present study predicted a feasible possible mechanism of action of hispidulin and p-synephrine against obesity.
Furthermore, the results of the combination network analysis of the two compounds showed completely different targets and pathways, which suggests that combination treatment with hispidulin and p-synephrine might exhibit additive and synergistic effects through different mechanisms of action. Among the commercially available diet drugs, Qsymia® (phentermine/topiramate) and Contrave® (naltrexone/bupropion) are the combinations of two drugs with different mechanisms of action [10,68]. These drugs show a stronger appetite suppressant effect than single drugs through the additive and synergistic effects of the combined components with different mechanisms of action. Based on this evidence, the combination treatment of hispidulin and p-synephrine has a potential to show stronger effects against obesity than when used alone. Therefore, additional experiments were performed to verify the results of the network pharmacology analysis and further evaluate the efficacy of hispidulin and p-synephrine in single and combination therapies.
Both compounds have already been reported to be effective against adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 cells. A previous study showed that hispidulin at 40 µM exhibited a maximal inhibitory effect (46% reduction) on the formation of red-labeled lipid droplets in 3T3-L1 cells. However, anti-adipogenic effects examined in this study only focused on the protein expression of PPARγ, C/EBPα, and adiponectin [35]. In the same cell lines, p-synephrine at 10 µM exhibited a maximal inhibitory effect (26% reduction) on the formation of red-labeled lipid droplets via the regulation of Akt, glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β), β-catenin, PPARγ, C/EBPα, fatty acid-binding protein 4 (aP2), and glycogen synthase (GS) [34]. However, the detailed mechanisms underlying the anti-adipogenic effects of hispidulin and p-synephrine are not yet completely clear.
The inhibitory effect of hispidulin or p-synephrine on the formation of red-labeled lipid droplets reported in previous studies is in line with our study. In the present study, co-treatment with hispidulin and p-synephrine caused a greater inhibition of the differentiation of 3T3-L1 preadipocytes than hispidulin or p-synephrine alone. In this regard, although we did not test the two compounds at higher concentrations, it is expected that concentrations of 40 µM or higher will further inhibit adipogenesis. However, high concentrations of hispidulin or p-synephrine at the cellular level in the body may not be possible when ingested through plant-based foods or as pure chemical drugs [38,39]. In addition, there are no definitive studies on the toxicity of hispidulin or p-synephrine at high concentrations. Thus, combining hispidulin and p-synephrine at low concentrations may be a potential alternative strategy to prevent obesity via consuming plant-based foods or pure chemical drugs.
Subsequently, a mechanistic study was conducted to observe the changes in the levels of adipogenic marker proteins, including PPARγ and C/EBPα, which were highlighted by two previous studies on the effects of hispidulin or p-synephrine [34,35]. The anti-adipogenic effect of the combination of hispidulin and p-synephrine was accompanied by a decreased protein expression of PPARγ and C/EBPα. These results were consistent with those of the previous studies. PPARγ and C/EBPα are important transcription factors in the terminal differentiation of adipocytes, and their cross-regulation is important in accumulating and storing lipids. In addition to the accumulation and storage of lipids, PPARγ and C/EBPα are important in promoting and maintaining a fully differentiated state in adipocytes [69,70].
Additionally, the combination of hispidulin and p-synephrine resulted in a decreased protein expression of the transcription factor C/EBPβ, which plays a principal role in orchestrating early steps of adipogenesis [71]. During the early stage of adipogenesis, the nuclear localization of C/EBPβ is mediated by the activation of ERK, P38, and GR in response to adipogenic stimuli [72,73,74]. In addition, glucocorticoid hormones affect adipocyte differentiation and the maintenance of adipogenic genes by binding to GR, a ligand-activated transcription factor [75,76]. It has been previously shown that JNK is responsible for the transcriptional activity of PPARγ [77,78]. As little is known about the role of JNK in adipocyte differentiation, its potential as a target appears to be currently limited. In the present study, the combination of hispidulin and p-synephrine compared to hispidulin or p-synephrine caused a stronger inhibition of MAPKs (ERK, JNK, and P38) and GR. These results indicate that hispidulin and p-synephrine share a common mechanism in regulating adipogenesis. In particular, after treatment with hispidulin, the phosphorylation of Akt was significantly suppressed, whereas p-synephrine had no effect on the phosphorylation of Akt compared with the untreated differentiated 3T3L-1 cells. Co-treatment with hispidulin and p-synephrine slightly suppressed Akt phosphorylation. These results suggested that the mechanisms of action of the two compounds had both different and common features. Thus, the target that p-synephrine does not affect may be compensated for by co-treatment with hispidulin.
Taken together, the combination of hispidulin and p-synephrine significantly inhibited adipocyte differentiation by inhibiting PPARγ and C/EBPα via the regulation of C/EBPβ, GR, and MAPKs (ERK, JNK, and P38) during the differentiation of 3T3-L1 adipocytes. Our results may offer an invaluable scientific experimental basis for the application of the combination of hispidulin and p-synephrine for the development of novel anti-obesity drugs. In future, studies identifying pharmacokinetic drug–drug interactions using animal models will be required. In addition, selecting pharmacopuncture as the injection method solves the problem of the concentration of phytochemicals at the physiological level and their stability. Pharmacopuncture is a new method of acupuncture with the injection of chemical ingredients from herbal medicine to the acupoints on the abdomen. Its effect could be observed immediately after injection because chemical ingredients are absorbed directly without going through the gastrointestinal tract. Thus, it is easy to adjust the dosage [79]. Further in vivo studies using pharmacopuncture with standardized methodology should be performed to evaluated the anti-obesity effect of hispidulin and p-synephrine.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we predicted the mechanisms underlying the anti-obesity effects of hispidulin and p-synephrine using a network pharmacology analysis. AKT1, SRC, EGFR, and GSK3B were identified as key anti-obesity target genes of hispidulin, and estrogen, prolactin, Rap1, and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways were predicted to be involved in the anti-obesity effects of hispidulin. For p-synephrine, adrenergic receptors were predicted as key target genes, and calcium and cAMP signaling pathways were predicted to be associated downstream signaling pathways. Our study revealed that the combination treatment with hispidulin and p-synephrine performed better than separate treatments with each compound in suppressing adipogenesis. This additive effect was related to the significant inhibition of protein expression, including MAPKs (ERK, ERK, JNK, and P38), C/EBPα, C/EBPβ, PPARγ, and GR. Specifically, as predicted, the phosphorylation of Akt was suppressed after treatment with hispidulin only. Although further studies are required to assess the pharmacokinetic interactions of the drugs, the combination treatment with hispidulin and p-synephrine may be a potential alternative strategy for developing novel anti-obesity drugs.

Author Contributions

K.S.K., D.L. and D.-W.K. conceived and designed the experiments; D.L., H.J.K., S.H.K. and B.H.K. performed the experiments; D.L. and H.J.K. analyzed the data; D.-W.K. and K.S.K. contributed reagents, materials, and analytical tools; D.L., H.J.K. and K.S.K. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This results was supported by “Regional Innovation Strategy (RIS)” through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (MOE) (2021RIS-001). This research was also supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (2019R1F1A1059173).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Zhang, K.; Yang, X.; Zhao, Q.; Li, Z.; Fu, F.; Zhang, H.; Zheng, M.; Zhang, S. Molecular mechanism of stem cell differentiation into adipocytes and adipocyte differentiation of malignant tumor. Stem Cells Int. 2020, 2020, 8892300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Verboven, K.; Wouters, K.; Gaens, K.; Hansen, D.; Bijnen, M.; Wetzels, S.; Stehouwer, C.; Goossens, G.; Schalkwijk, C.; Blaak, E. Abdominal subcutaneous and visceral adipocyte size, lipolysis and inflammation relate to insulin resistance in male obese humans. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 4677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vukovic, R.; Dos Santos, T.J.; Ybarra, M.; Atar, M. Children with metabolically healthy obesity: A review. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Suwa, A.; Kurama, T.; Shimokawa, T. Adipocyte hyperplasia and RMI1 in the treatment of obesity. FEBS J. 2011, 278, 565–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Longo, M.; Zatterale, F.; Naderi, J.; Parrillo, L.; Formisano, P.; Raciti, G.A.; Beguinot, F.; Miele, C. Adipose tissue dysfunction as determinant of obesity-associated metabolic complications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Kiortsis, D.N. A review of the metabolic effects of controlled-release Phentermine/Topiramate. Hormones 2013, 12, 507–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Arias, H.R.; Santamaría, A.; Ali, S.F. Pharmacological and neurotoxicological actions mediated by bupropion and diethylpropion. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 2009, 88, 223–255. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Rothman, R.B.; Katsnelson, M.; Vu, N.; Partilla, J.S.; Dersch, C.M.; Blough, B.E.; Baumann, M.H. Interaction of the anorectic medication, phendimetrazine, and its metabolites with monoamine transporters in rat brain. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2002, 447, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Johnson, W.G.; Hughes, J.R. Mazindol: Its efficacy and mode of action in generating weight loss. Addict. Behav. 1979, 4, 237–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shin, J.H.; Gadde, K.M. Clinical utility of phentermine/topiramate (Qsymia™) combination for the treatment of obesity. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. Targets Ther. 2013, 6, 131. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kang, J.G.; Park, C.-Y. Anti-obesity drugs: A review about their effects and safety. Diabetes Metab. J. 2012, 36, 13–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Arya, A.; Nahar, L.; Khan, H.U.; Sarker, S.D. Anti-obesity natural products. Med. Nat. Prod. A Dis. Focused Approach 2020, 55, 411. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ahn, J.; Lee, H.; Kim, S.; Ha, T. Curcumin-induced suppression of adipogenic differentiation is accompanied by activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2010, 298, C1510–C1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Baboota, R.K.; Singh, D.P.; Sarma, S.M.; Kaur, J.; Sandhir, R.; Boparai, R.K.; Kondepudi, K.K.; Bishnoi, M. Capsaicin induces “brite” phenotype in differentiating 3T3-L1 preadipocytes. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e103093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Delzenne, N.M.; Neyrinck, A.M.; Bäckhed, F.; Cani, P.D. Targeting gut microbiota in obesity: Effects of prebiotics and probiotics. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2011, 7, 639–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Barde, S.R.; Sakhare, R.S.; Kanthale, S.B.; Chandak, P.G.; Jamkhande, P.G. Marine bioactive agents: A short review on new marine antidiabetic compounds. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Dis. 2015, 5, S209–S213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Schmitt, G.C.; Arbo, M.D.; Lorensi, A.L.; Maciel, E.S.; Krahn, C.L.; Mariotti, K.C.; Dallegrave, E.; Leal, M.B.; Limberger, R.P. Toxicological effects of a mixture used in weight loss products: P-synephrine associated with ephedrine, salicin, and caffeine. Int. J. Toxicol. 2012, 31, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Croitoru, M.D.; Fülöp, I.; Zaharia, M.; Modroiu, A.; Zecheru, L.; Fogarasi, E. Presence of declared and undeclared caffeine and ephedrine in weight-loss herbal supplements. FARMACIA 2017, 65, 968–971. [Google Scholar]
  19. Arbo, M.; Larentis, E.; Linck, V.; Aboy, A.; Pimentel, A.; Henriques, A.; Dallegrave, E.; Garcia, S.; Leal, M.; Limberger, R. Concentrations of p-synephrine in fruits and leaves of Citrus species (Rutaceae) and the acute toxicity testing of Citrus aurantium extract and p-synephrine. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2008, 46, 2770–2775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Arbo, M.D.; Franco, M.T.; Larentis, E.R.; Garcia, S.C.; Sebben, V.C.; Leal, M.B.; Dallegrave, E.; Limberger, R.P. Screening for in vivo (anti) estrogenic activity of ephedrine and p-synephrine and their natural sources Ephedra sinica Stapf. (Ephedraceae) and Citrus aurantium L. (Rutaceae) in rats. Arch. Toxicol. 2009, 83, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Arbo, M.D.; Schmitt, G.C.; Limberger, M.F.; Charão, M.F.; Moro, Â.M.; Ribeiro, G.L.; Dallegrave, E.; Garcia, S.C.; Leal, M.B.; Limberger, R.P. Subchronic toxicity of Citrus aurantium L. (Rutaceae) extract and p-synephrine in mice. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2009, 54, 114–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rossato, L.G.; Costa, V.M.; De Pinho, P.G.; Carvalho, F.; de Lourdes Bastos, M.; Remião, F. Structural isomerization of synephrine influences its uptake and ensuing glutathione depletion in rat-isolated cardiomyocytes. Arch. Toxicol. 2011, 85, 929–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Stohs, S.J.; Preuss, H.G.; Keith, S.C.; Keith, P.L.; Miller, H.; Kaats, G.R. Effects of p-synephrine alone and in combination with selected bioflavonoids on resting metabolism, blood pressure, heart rate and self-reported mood changes. Int. J. Med. Sci. 2011, 8, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Patel, K.; Patel, D.K. Medicinal importance, pharmacological activities, and analytical aspects of hispidulin: A concise report. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2017, 7, 360–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lv, L.; Zhang, W.; Li, T.; Jiang, L.; Lu, X.; Lin, J. Hispidulin exhibits potent anticancer activity in vitro and in vivo through activating ER stress in non-small-cell lung cancer cells. Oncol. Rep. 2020, 43, 1995–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Dai, Y.; Sun, X.; Li, B.; Ma, H.; Wu, P.; Zhang, Y.; Zhu, M.; Li, H.-M.; Qin, M.; Wu, C.-Z. The Effect of Hispidulin, a Flavonoid from Salvia plebeia, on Human Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma CNE-2Z Cell Proliferation, Migration, Invasion, and Apoptosis. Molecules 2021, 26, 1604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gao, H.; Gao, M.-Q.; Peng, J.-J.; Han, M.; Liu, K.-L.; Han, Y.-T. Hispidulin mediates apoptosis in human renal cell carcinoma by inducing ceramide accumulation. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2017, 38, 1618–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. An, P.; Xie, J.; Qiu, S.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J.; Xiu, X.; Li, L.; Tang, M. Hispidulin exhibits neuroprotective activities against cerebral ischemia reperfusion injury through suppressing NLRP3-mediated pyroptosis. Life Sci. 2019, 232, 116599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dabaghi-Barbosa, P.; Mariante Rocha, A.; da Cruz, F.L.A.; de Oliveira, H.B. Hispidulin: Antioxidant properties and effect on mitochondrial energy metabolism. Free Radic. Res. 2005, 39, 1305–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Zhou, R.; Wang, Z.; Ma, C. Hispidulin exerts anti-osteoporotic activity in ovariectomized mice via activating AMPK signaling pathway. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2014, 69, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ashaq, A.; Maqbool, M.F.; Maryam, A.; Khan, M.; Shakir, H.A.; Irfan, M.; Qazi, J.I.; Li, Y.; Ma, T. Hispidulin: A novel natural compound with therapeutic potential against human cancers. Phytother. Res. 2021, 35, 771–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gao, H.; Wang, H.; Peng, J. Hispidulin induces apoptosis through mitochondrial dysfunction and inhibition of P13k/Akt signalling pathway in HepG2 cancer cells. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2014, 69, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Xie, J.; Gao, H.; Peng, J.; Han, Y.; Chen, X.; Jiang, Q.; Wang, C. Hispidulin prevents hypoxia-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human colon carcinoma cells. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2015, 5, 1047. [Google Scholar]
  34. Guo, L.X.; Chen, G.; Yin, Z.Y.; Zhang, Y.H.; Zheng, X.X. p-Synephrine exhibits anti-adipogenic activity by activating the Akt/GSK3β signaling pathway in 3T3-L1 adipocytes. J. Food Biochem. 2019, 43, e13033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lee, S.G.; Kim, J.S.; Min, K.; Kwon, T.K.; Nam, J.-O. Hispidulin inhibits adipogenesis in 3T3-L1 adipocytes through PPARγ pathway. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2018, 293, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tian, J.; Dang, H.N.; Yong, J.; Chui, W.-S.; Dizon, M.P.; Yaw, C.K.; Kaufman, D.L. Oral treatment with γ-aminobutyric acid improves glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity by inhibiting inflammation in high fat diet-fed mice. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e25338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Kavvadias, D.; Sand, P.; Youdim, K.A.; Qaiser, M.Z.; Rice-Evans, C.; Baur, R.; Sigel, E.; Rausch, W.D.; Riederer, P.; Schreier, P. The flavone hispidulin, a benzodiazepine receptor ligand with positive allosteric properties, traverses the blood–brain barrier and exhibits anticonvulsive effects. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2004, 142, 811–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Haller, C.A.; Benowitz, N.L.; Jacob, P., III. Hemodynamic effects of ephedra-free weight-loss supplements in humans. Am. J. Med. 2005, 118, 998–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, Z.; Jia, P.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Yang, H.; Shi, H.; Zhang, L. LC–MS/MS determination and pharmacokinetic study of seven flavonoids in rat plasma after oral administration of Cirsium japonicum DC. extract. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2014, 158, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Hopkins, A.L. Network pharmacology: The next paradigm in drug discovery. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2008, 4, 682–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Li, S.; Fan, T.-P.; Jia, W.; Lu, A.; Zhang, W. Network pharmacology in traditional Chinese medicine. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2014, 2014, 138460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Zhang, Y.; Yao, Y.; Fu, Y.; Yuan, Z.; Wu, X.; Wang, T.; Hong, Z.; Yang, Y.; Wu, H. Inhibition Effect of Oxyepiberberine isolated from Coptis chinensis Franch. on Non-small cell lung cancer Based on a Network Pharmacology Approach and Experimental Validation. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2021, 278, 114267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cui, S.; Chen, S.; Wu, Q.; Chen, T.; Li, S. A network pharmacology approach to investigate the anti-inflammatory mechanism of effective ingredients from Salvia miltiorrhiza. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020, 81, 106040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Daina, A.; Michielin, O.; Zoete, V. Swiss Target Prediction: Updated data and new features for efficient prediction of protein targets of small molecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, W357–W364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Stelzer, G.; Rosen, N.; Plaschkes, I.; Zimmerman, S.; Twik, M.; Fishilevich, S.; Stein, T.I.; Nudel, R.; Lieder, I.; Mazor, Y. The GeneCards suite: From gene data mining to disease genome sequence analyses. Curr. Protoc. Bioinform. 2016, 54, 1.30.1–1.30.33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Oliveros, J.V. An Interactive Tool for Comparing Lists with Venn’s Diagrams. 2007–2015. 2016. Available online: http://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/index.html (accessed on 19 August 2021).
  47. Piñero, J.; Ramírez-Anguita, J.M.; Saüch-Pitarch, J.; Ronzano, F.; Centeno, E.; Sanz, F.; Furlong, L.I. The DisGeNET knowledge platform for disease genomics: 2019 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 48, D845–D855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Szklarczyk, D.; Gable, A.L.; Nastou, K.C.; Lyon, D.; Kirsch, R.; Pyysalo, S.; Doncheva, N.T.; Legeay, M.; Fang, T.; Bork, P. The STRING database in 2021: Customizable protein–protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, D605–D612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Huang, D.W.; Sherman, B.T.; Lempicki, R.A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4, 44–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lee, S.R.; Kang, H.; Yoo, M.J.; Yu, J.S.; Lee, S.; Yi, S.A.; Beemelmanns, C.; Lee, J.; Kim, K.H. Anti-adipogenic pregnane steroid from a Hydractinia-associated fungus, Cladosporium sphaerospermum SW67. Nat. Prod. Sci. 2020, 26, 230–235. [Google Scholar]
  51. Kim, H.; Choi, P.; Kim, T.; Kim, Y.; Song, B.G.; Park, Y.-T.; Choi, S.-J.; Yoon, C.H.; Lim, W.-C.; Ko, H. Ginsenosides Rk1 and Rg5 inhibit transforming growth factor-β1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition and suppress migration, invasion, anoikis resistance, and development of stem-like features in lung cancer. J. Ginseng Res. 2021, 45, 134–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yi, S.A.; Lee, J.; Park, S.K.; Kim, J.Y.; Park, J.W.; Lee, M.G.; Nam, K.H.; Park, J.H.; Oh, H.; Kim, S. Fermented ginseng extract, BST204, disturbs adipogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells through inhibition of S6 kinase 1 signaling. J. Ginseng Res. 2020, 44, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ryu, Y.S.; Hyun, J.W.; Chung, H.S. Fucoidan induces apoptosis in A2058 cells through ROS-exposed activation of MAPKs signaling pathway. Nat. Prod. Sci. 2020, 26, 191–199. [Google Scholar]
  54. Rodrigues, F.A. Network centrality: An introduction. In A Mathematical Modeling Approach from Nonlinear Dynamics to Complex Systems; Macau, E.E.N., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 177–196. [Google Scholar]
  55. Hansen, D.L.; Shneiderman, B.; Smith, M.A.; Himelboim, I. Twitter: Information flows, influencers, and organic communities. In Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL; Morgan Kaufmann: San Mateo, CA, USA, 2020; pp. 161–178. [Google Scholar]
  56. Golbeck, J. Network structure and measures. In Analyzing the Social Web; Newnes: Oxford, UK, 2013; pp. 25–44. [Google Scholar]
  57. Yeung, F.; Ramírez, C.M.; Mateos-Gomez, P.A.; Pinzaru, A.; Ceccarini, G.; Kabir, S.; Fernández-Hernando, C.; Sfeir, A. Nontelomeric role for Rap1 in regulating metabolism and protecting against obesity. Cell Rep. 2013, 3, 1847–1856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Huang, X.; Liu, G.; Guo, J.; Su, Z. The PI3K/AKT pathway in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2018, 14, 1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Le, J.A.; Wilson, H.M.; Shehu, A.; Devi, Y.S.; Aguilar, T.; Gibori, G. Prolactin activation of the long form of its cognate receptor causes increased visceral fat and obesity in males as shown in transgenic mice expressing only this receptor subtype. Horm. Metab. Res. 2011, 43, 931–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Newbold, R.R.; Padilla-Banks, E.; Jefferson, W.N. Environmental estrogens and obesity. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2009, 304, 84–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Muzzin, P.; Revelli, J.; Kuhne, F.; Gocayne, J.; McCombie, W.; Venter, J.; Giacobino, J.; Fraser, C. An adipose tissue-specific beta-adrenergic receptor. Molecular cloning and down-regulation in obesity. J. Biol. Chem. 1991, 266, 24053–24058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Collins, S.; Daniel, K.W.; Rohlfs, E.M.; Ramkumar, V.; Taylor, I.L.; Gettys, T.W. Impaired expression and functional activity of the beta 3-and beta 1-adrenergic receptors in adipose tissue of congenitally obese (C57BL/6J ob/ob) mice. Mol. Endocrinol. 1994, 8, 518–527. [Google Scholar]
  63. Lowell, B.B.; Flier, J.S. Brown adipose tissue, β3-adrenergic receptors, and obesity. Ann. Rev. Med. 1997, 48, 307–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Pramme-Steinwachs, I.; Jastroch, M.; Ussar, S. Extracellular calcium modulates brown adipocyte differentiation and identity. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. He, Y.-H.; He, Y.; Liao, X.-L.; Niu, Y.-C.; Wang, G.; Zhao, C.; Wang, L.; Tian, M.-J.; Li, Y.; Sun, C.-H. The calcium-sensing receptor promotes adipocyte differentiation and adipogenesis through PPARγ pathway. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2012, 361, 321–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Xu, Z.; Huo, J.; Ding, X.; Yang, M.; Li, L.; Dai, J.; Hosoe, K.; Kubo, H.; Mori, M.; Higuchi, K. Coenzyme Q10 improves lipid metabolism and ameliorates obesity by regulating CaMKII-mediated PDE4 inhibition. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Sun, W.; Uchida, K.; Suzuki, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Kim, M.; Takayama, Y.; Takahashi, N.; Goto, T.; Wakabayashi, S.; Kawada, T. Lack of TRPV 2 impairs thermogenesis in mouse brown adipose tissue. EMBO Rep. 2016, 17, 383–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Ornellas, T.; Chavez, B. Naltrexone SR/Bupropion SR (Contrave): A new approach to weight loss in obese adults. Pharm. Ther. 2011, 36, 255. [Google Scholar]
  69. Park, H.; Ju, U.; Park, J.-W.; Song, J.; Shin, D.; Lee, K.; Jeong, L.; Yu, J.; Lee, H.; Cho, J.Y. PPAR γ neddylation essential for adipogenesis is a potential target for treating obesity. Cell Death Differ. 2016, 23, 1296–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Rosen, E.D.; Hsu, C.-H.; Wang, X.; Sakai, S.; Freeman, M.W.; Gonzalez, F.J.; Spiegelman, B.M. C/EBPα induces adipogenesis through PPARγ: A unified pathway. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Guo, L.; Li, X.; Tang, Q.-Q. Transcriptional regulation of adipocyte differentiation: A central role for CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (C/EBP) β. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 755–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Leiva, M.; Matesanz, N.; Pulgarín-Alfaro, M.; Nikolic, I.; Sabio, G. Uncovering the role of p38 family members in adipose tissue physiology. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 572089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ambele, M.A.; Dhanraj, P.; Giles, R.; Pepper, M.S. Adipogenesis: A complex interplay of multiple molecular determinants and pathways. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Li, X.; Kim, J.W.; Grønborg, M.; Urlaub, H.; Lane, M.D.; Tang, Q.-Q. Role of cdk2 in the sequential phosphorylation/activation of C/EBPβ during adipocyte differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 11597–11602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Han, L.; Wang, B.; Wang, R.; Gong, S.; Chen, G.; Xu, W. The shift in the balance between osteoblastogenesis and adipogenesis of mesenchymal stem cells mediated by glucocorticoid receptor. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019, 10, 377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Lee, M.-J.; Pramyothin, P.; Karastergiou, K.; Fried, S.K. Deconstructing the roles of glucocorticoids in adipose tissue biology and the development of central obesity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2014, 1842, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Camp, H.S.; Tafuri, S.R.; Leff, T. c-Jun N-terminal kinase phosphorylates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ1 and negatively regulates its transcriptional activity. Endocrinology 1999, 140, 392–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lee, J.; Jung, E.; Lee, J.; Huh, S.; Kim, Y.-S.; Kim, Y.-W.; Kim, Y.S.; Park, D. Anti-adipogenesis by 6-thioinosine is mediated by downregulation of PPAR γ through JNK-dependent upregulation of iNOS. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2010, 67, 467–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Park, J.; Lee, H.; Shin, B.C.; Lee, M.S.; Kim, B.; Kim, J.I. Pharmacopuncture in Korea: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 2016, 2016, 4683121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Biomolecules 11 01764 g001 550
Figure 1. Venn diagrams of predicted targets of compounds and obesity-related targets. (A) Venn diagram of hispidulin-predicted targets and obesity-related targets. (B) Chemical structure of hispidulin. (C) Venn diagram of p-synephrine-predicted targets and obesity-related targets. (D) Chemical structure of p-synephrine.
Figure 1. Venn diagrams of predicted targets of compounds and obesity-related targets. (A) Venn diagram of hispidulin-predicted targets and obesity-related targets. (B) Chemical structure of hispidulin. (C) Venn diagram of p-synephrine-predicted targets and obesity-related targets. (D) Chemical structure of p-synephrine.
Biomolecules 11 01764 g001
Biomolecules 11 01764 g002 550
Figure 2. Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network of potential targets and key targets. (A) The PPI network of potential anti-obesity target genes of hispidulin. (B) The PPI network of the key anti-obesity target genes of hispidulin. The size and the red hue of a node represent its significance within the network.
Figure 2. Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network of potential targets and key targets. (A) The PPI network of potential anti-obesity target genes of hispidulin. (B) The PPI network of the key anti-obesity target genes of hispidulin. The size and the red hue of a node represent its significance within the network.
Biomolecules 11 01764 g002
Biomolecules 11 01764 g003 550
Figure 3. Protein–protein interaction network of potential anti-obesity target genes of p-synephrine. The size and red hue of a node represent its significance within the network.
Figure 3. Protein–protein interaction network of potential anti-obesity target genes of p-synephrine. The size and red hue of a node represent its significance within the network.
Biomolecules 11 01764 g003
Biomolecules 11 01764 g004a 550Biomolecules 11 01764 g004b 550
Figure 4. Bubble diagrams of the KEGG pathway enrichment analysis. (A) Bubble diagram visualizing KEGG pathway analysis of hispidulin anti-obesity key targets. (B) Bubble diagram visualizing KEGG pathway analysis of p-synephrine anti-obesity key targets.
Figure 4. Bubble diagrams of the KEGG pathway enrichment analysis. (A) Bubble diagram visualizing KEGG pathway analysis of hispidulin anti-obesity key targets. (B) Bubble diagram visualizing KEGG pathway analysis of p-synephrine anti-obesity key targets.
Biomolecules 11 01764 g004aBiomolecules 11 01764 g004b
Biomolecules 11 01764 g005a 550Biomolecules 11 01764 g005b 550
Figure 5. Integrated compound–target–pathway (C–T–P) networks. (A) C–T–P network of hispidulin. (B) C–T–P network of p-synephrine. (C) Combination C–T–P network of hispidulin and p-synephrine.
Figure 5. Integrated compound–target–pathway (C–T–P) networks. (A) C–T–P network of hispidulin. (B) C–T–P network of p-synephrine. (C) Combination C–T–P network of hispidulin and p-synephrine.
Biomolecules 11 01764 g005aBiomolecules 11 01764 g005b
Biomolecules 11 01764 g006 550
Figure 6. Inhibitory effects of hispidulin and p-synephrine on adipogenesis in 3T3L-1 preadipocytes. Effect of (A) hispidulin, (B) p-synephrine, and (C) combination of hispidulin and p-synephrine on the viability of 3T3L-1 preadipocytes for 24 h by Ez-Cytox cell viability assay. (D) Images of the Oil Red O staining of differentiated 3T3L-1 cells imaged under an inverted microscope at 20× magnification on day 8 after treatment with hispidulin and/or p-synephrine. (E–G) Quantification of Oil Red O staining expressed as the percentage of the untreated control (n = 3 independent experiments, * p < 0.05, Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric test). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM.
Figure 6. Inhibitory effects of hispidulin and p-synephrine on adipogenesis in 3T3L-1 preadipocytes. Effect of (A) hispidulin, (B) p-synephrine, and (C) combination of hispidulin and p-synephrine on the viability of 3T3L-1 preadipocytes for 24 h by Ez-Cytox cell viability assay. (D) Images of the Oil Red O staining of differentiated 3T3L-1 cells imaged under an inverted microscope at 20× magnification on day 8 after treatment with hispidulin and/or p-synephrine. (E–G) Quantification of Oil Red O staining expressed as the percentage of the untreated control (n = 3 independent experiments, * p < 0.05, Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric test). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM.
Biomolecules 11 01764 g006
Biomolecules 11 01764 g007 550
Figure 7. Inhibitory effects of hispidulin and p-synephrine on the expression of adipogenesis-related proteins in differentiated 3T3L-1 cells. (A) The protein expression of phospho-Akt (P-Akt), Akt, phospho-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (P-ERK), ERK, phospho-c-Jun-N-terminal kinase (P-JNK), JNK, phospho-P38 (P-P38), P38, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha (C/EBPα), C/EBPβ, glucocorticoid receptor (GR), and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) in differentiated 3T3L-1 cells on day 8 after treatment with hispidulin and/or p-synephrine. (B) Analysis of the ratios of the band intensities of P-ERK, P-JNK, P-P38, PPARγ, C/EBPα, C/EBPβ, and GR in the treated cells compared with those in the untreated differentiated 3T3L-1 cells (n = 3 independent experiments, * p < 0.05, Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric test). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM.
Figure 7. Inhibitory effects of hispidulin and p-synephrine on the expression of adipogenesis-related proteins in differentiated 3T3L-1 cells. (A) The protein expression of phospho-Akt (P-Akt), Akt, phospho-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (P-ERK), ERK, phospho-c-Jun-N-terminal kinase (P-JNK), JNK, phospho-P38 (P-P38), P38, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ), CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha (C/EBPα), C/EBPβ, glucocorticoid receptor (GR), and glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) in differentiated 3T3L-1 cells on day 8 after treatment with hispidulin and/or p-synephrine. (B) Analysis of the ratios of the band intensities of P-ERK, P-JNK, P-P38, PPARγ, C/EBPα, C/EBPβ, and GR in the treated cells compared with those in the untreated differentiated 3T3L-1 cells (n = 3 independent experiments, * p < 0.05, Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric test). Data are presented as the mean ± SEM.
Biomolecules 11 01764 g007
Table
Table 1. Potential targets of hispidulin.
Table 1. Potential targets of hispidulin.
No.Uniprot IDGeneRelevance ScoreTargetProtein Class
1P18031PTPN112.186protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 1-
2P31749AKT111.022AKT serine/threonine kinase 1Kinase
3P14679TYR10.667tyrosinaseEnzyme
4P03372ESR110.026estrogen receptor 1Nuclear receptor
5P11511CYP19A19.307cytochrome P450 family 19 subfamily A member 1Enzyme
6P14416DRD28.109dopamine receptor D2G-protein coupled receptor
7P08069IGF1R7.564insulin-like growth factor 1 receptorKinase
8P00734F26.902coagulation factor II, thrombinEnzyme
9P14780MMP96.393matrix metallopeptidase 9Enzyme
10P10275AR5.830androgen receptorNuclear receptor
11P21397MAOA5.226monoamine oxidase A-
12P09917ALOX55.000arachidonate 5-lipoxygenaseEnzyme
13O14746TERT4.864telomerase reverse transcriptaseEnzyme
14P05177CYP1A24.092cytochrome P450 family 1 subfamily A member 2Enzyme
15P12931SRC4.045SRC proto-oncogene, non-receptor tyrosine kinaseKinase
16P11474ESRRA3.994estrogen-related receptor alphaNuclear receptor
17P08253MMP23.992matrix metallopeptidase 2Enzyme
18P30542ADORA13.818adenosine A1 receptorG-protein coupled receptor
19P15121AKR1B13.658aldo-keto reductase family 1 member BEnzyme
20P00533EGFR3.653epidermal growth factor receptorKinase
21P14061HSD17B13.553hydroxysteroid 17-beta dehydrogenase 1Enzyme
22P35869AHR3.423aryl hydrocarbon receptorTranscription factor
23P35372OPRM13.300opioid receptor mu 1G-protein coupled receptor
24P35228NOS23.298nitric oxide synthase 2-
25P35354PTGS23.209prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2Enzyme
26P08581MET3.161MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinaseKinase
27Q92731ESR23.099estrogen receptor 2Nuclear receptor
28P48736PIK3CG2.973phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit gammaKinase
29P51955NEK22.886NIMA related kinase 2Kinase
30P22748CA42.821carbonic anhydrase 4-
31Q9UNQ0ABCG22.640ATP binding cassette subfamily G member 2 (Junior blood group)Transporter
32P05089ARG12.614arginase 1Enzyme
33P08183ABCB12.514ATP binding cassette subfamily B member 1Transporter
34P49841GSK3B2.512glycogen synthase kinase 3 betaKinase
35P22303ACHE2.449acetylcholinesterase (Cartwright blood group)Enzyme
36O95271TNKS2.335tankyrase-
37P04798CYP1A12.319cytochrome P450 family 1 subfamily A member 1Enzyme
38P02766TTR2.317transthyretinTransporter
39P35968KDR2.128kinase insert domain receptorKinase
40P05067APP2.119amyloid beta precursor proteinEnzyme modulator
41P14555PLA2G2A2.057phospholipase A2 group IIAEnzyme
42Q16875PFKFB31.9026-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 3Kinase
43P47989XDH1.866xanthine dehydrogenaseEnzyme
44P04745AMY1A1.716amylase alpha 1A-
45P39900MMP121.685matrix metallopeptidase 12Enzyme
46P27338MAOB1.649monoamine oxidase B-
47Q00534CDK61.574cyclin dependent kinase 6Kinase
48P36888FLT31.567fms-related receptor tyrosine kinase 3Kinase
49Q96S37SLC22A121.554solute carrier family 22 member 12Transporter
50Q16790CA91.553carbonic anhydrase 9-
51P16050ALOX151.520arachidonate 15-lipoxygenaseEnzyme
52P30530AXL1.459AXL receptor tyrosine kinaseKinase
53P00918CA21.444carbonic anhydrase 2-
Table
Table 2. Potential targets of p-synephrine.
Table 2. Potential targets of p-synephrine.
No.Uniprot IDGeneRelevance ScoreTargetProtein Class
1P18031PTPN112.186protein tyrosine phosphatase non-receptor type 1-
2P31749AKT111.022AKT serine/threonine kinase 1Kinase
3P14679TYR10.667tyrosinaseEnzyme
4P03372ESR110.026estrogen receptor 1Nuclear receptor
5P11511CYP19A19.307cytochrome P450 family 19 subfamily A member 1Enzyme
6P14416DRD28.109dopamine receptor D2G-protein coupled receptor
7P08069IGF1R7.564insulin-like growth factor 1 receptorKinase
8P00734F26.902coagulation factor II, thrombinEnzyme
9P14780MMP96.393matrix metallopeptidase 9Enzyme
10P10275AR5.830androgen receptorNuclear receptor
11P21397MAOA5.226monoamine oxidase A-
12P09917ALOX55.000arachidonate 5-lipoxygenaseEnzyme
13O14746TERT4.864telomerase reverse transcriptaseEnzyme
14P05177CYP1A24.092cytochrome P450 family 1 subfamily A member 2Enzyme
15P12931SRC4.045SRC proto-oncogene, non-receptor tyrosine kinaseKinase
16P11474ESRRA3.994estrogen-related receptor alphaNuclear receptor
17P08253MMP23.992matrix metallopeptidase 2Enzyme
18P30542ADORA13.818adenosine A1 receptorG-protein coupled receptor
19P15121AKR1B13.658aldo-keto reductase family 1 member BEnzyme
20P00533EGFR3.653epidermal growth factor receptorKinase
21P14061HSD17B13.553hydroxysteroid 17-beta dehydrogenase 1Enzyme
22P35869AHR3.423aryl hydrocarbon receptorTranscription factor
23P35372OPRM13.300opioid receptor mu 1G-protein coupled receptor
Table
Table 3. Hispidulin anti-obesity key targets identified based on PPI network topological analysis.
Table 3. Hispidulin anti-obesity key targets identified based on PPI network topological analysis.
No.Uniprot IDGeneDegreeBetweenness CentralityCloseness Centrality
1P12931SRC120.2770.875
2P31749AKT1100.1670.778
3P00533EGFR100.1260.778
4P10275AR60.0470.636
5P03372ESR160.0250.636
6P14780MMP950.0250.609
7P18031PTPN150.0170.609
8P08069IGF1R50.0080.609
9P35354PTGS240.0070.560
10Q92731ESR240.0000.583
11P05067APP30.0100.560
12P49841GSK3B30.0070.538
13P35228NOS230.0040.560
14P35968KDR30.0030.538
15P35869AHR30.0020.538
Table
Table 4. Hispidulin anti-obesity key targets identified based on PPI network topological analysis.
Table 4. Hispidulin anti-obesity key targets identified based on PPI network topological analysis.
No.Uniprot IDGeneDegreeBetweenness CentralityCloseness Centrality
1P14416DRD250.2560.647
2P23975SLC6A350.2110.611
3P31645SLC6A450.1200.611
4P46098HTR3A50.1590.611
5Q05586GRIN140.1880.550
6P08908HTR1A40.0530.579
7P28223HTR2A40.0530.579
8Q13224GRIN2B30.0060.524
9P07550ADRB230.6671.000
10P21917DRD430.0290.458
11P08913SLC6A230.0170.500
12P13945ADRB320.0000.750
13P08588ADRB120.0000.750
14P35462DRD320.0000.423
15P35368ADRA1B10.0000.600
16P35372OPRM110.0000.367
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lee, D.; Kwak, H.J.; Kim, B.H.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, D.-W.; Kang, K.S. Combined Anti-Adipogenic Effects of Hispidulin and p-Synephrine on 3T3-L1 Adipocytes. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1764. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biom11121764

AMA Style

Lee D, Kwak HJ, Kim BH, Kim SH, Kim D-W, Kang KS. Combined Anti-Adipogenic Effects of Hispidulin and p-Synephrine on 3T3-L1 Adipocytes. Biomolecules. 2021; 11(12):1764. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biom11121764

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lee, Dahae, Hee Jae Kwak, Byoung Ha Kim, Seung Hyun Kim, Dong-Wook Kim, and Ki Sung Kang. 2021. "Combined Anti-Adipogenic Effects of Hispidulin and p-Synephrine on 3T3-L1 Adipocytes" Biomolecules 11, no. 12: 1764. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biom11121764

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop