Next Article in Journal
Radical Dehalogenation and Purine Nucleoside Phosphorylase E. coli: How Does an Admixture of 2′,3′-Anhydroinosine Hinder 2-fluoro-cordycepin Synthesis
Next Article in Special Issue
Gene Polymorphisms of the Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System as Risk Factors for the Development of In-Stent Restenosis in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease
Previous Article in Journal
Role of Cdkn2a in the Emery–Dreifuss Muscular Dystrophy Cardiac Phenotype
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Biomolecules
Volume 11
Issue 4
10.3390/biom11040537
biomolecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Expression of Components of the Renin-Angiotensin System by Cancer Stem Cells in Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma

by
Sam Siljee
1,†,
Bridget Milne
1,†,
Helen D. Brasch
1,
Nicholas Bockett
1,
Josie Patel
1,
Paul F. Davis
1,
Andrew Kennedy-Smith
2,
Tinte Itinteang
1 and
Swee T. Tan
1,3,4,*
1
Gillies McIndoe Research Institute, Wellington 6242, New Zealand
2
Department of Urology, Wellington Regional Hospital, Wellington 6021, New Zealand
3
Wellington Regional Plastic, Maxillofacial and Burns Unit, Hutt Hospital, Lower Hutt 5010, New Zealand
4
Department of Surgery, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Equal first authors.
Biomolecules 2021, 11(4), 537; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biom11040537
Submission received: 3 February 2021 / Revised: 31 March 2021 / Accepted: 3 April 2021 / Published: 7 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Renin-Angiotensin System in Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study investigated the expression of components of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) by cancer stem cells (CSCs) we have recently demonstrated in renal clear cell carcinoma (RCCC). Fifteen RCCC tissue samples underwent immunohistochemical staining for components of the RAS: renin, pro-renin receptor (PRR), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), and angiotensin II receptor 2 (AT2R). Immunofluorescence co-staining or double immunohistochemical staining of these components of the RAS with stemness-associated markers OCT4 or KLF4 was performed on two of the samples. Protein and transcript expression of these components of the RAS in six RCCC tissue samples was investigated using western blotting and reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR), respectively. In addition, angiotensin II receptor 1 (AT1R) was investigated using RT-qPCR only. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated expression of renin, PRR, and ACE2 in 11, 13, and 13 out of 15 RCCC samples, respectively, while AT2R was expressed in all 15 samples. ACE was detected in the endothelium of normal vasculature only. Double immunohistochemical staining demonstrated localization of ACE2, but not renin, to the KLF4+ CSCs. Immunofluorescence staining showed localization of PRR and AT2R to the OCT4+ CSCs. Western blotting confirmed protein expression of all components of the RAS except renin. RT-qPCR demonstrated transcript expression of all components of the RAS including AT1R, but not AT2R, in all six RCCC tissue samples. This study demonstrated expression of PRR, ACE2, and AT2R by the CSCs within RCCC. Further studies may lead to novel therapeutic targeting of CSCs by manipulation of the RAS in the treatment of this aggressive cancer.

1. Introduction

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the 9th most common cancer worldwide, with renal clear cell carcinoma (RCCC) being the most common, contributing to approximately 70% of all RCCs [1]. RCCC arises from the epithelial cells lining the proximal convoluted tubules of the kidney [2]. It presents with a variety of symptoms, but is often asymptomatic in early stages [1,3]. This is significant in the light of stage-dependent prognosis, with the 5-year survival rate decreasing from 91.7% for localized disease, to 12.3% for metastatic disease [4]. The incidence of RCCC increases with age, and is highest in developed countries due to incidental diagnosis secondary to the availability of imaging [1,5]. The current understanding of the pathogenesis of RCCC relates to both genetics and environmental exposure [4]. Deletions in the short arm of chromosome 3 occur in 95% of RCCC [6]. Specifically, this involves loss of the VHL gene, the normal product of which is a tumor suppressor protein [6,7]. Loss of the VHL gene translates to increased cellular growth factors which in turn facilitates cancer development [6,7]. Known risk factors for RCCC include smoking, obesity and hypertension [8].
Treatment for RCCC depends on disease stage, localized disease may be cured by partial or total nephrectomy. There is minimal role for traditional chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Targeted systemic therapies such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors or immunotherapy may be used for advanced disease [3,9]. However, disease response is variable and relatively unpredictable; survival of patients with metastatic RCCC remains poor [4].
Cancer stem cells (CSCs), the proposed origins of cancer, possess self-renewal and multi-potent potential, and drive tumor growth [10]. CSCs have been previously demonstrated in RCCC [5,11,12,13,14], and are responsible for radiotherapy and chemotherapy resistance of RCCC [3]. We have recently demonstrated subpopulations of CSCs in RCCC expressing the transcription factors NANOG, OCT4, SOX2, KLF4, and c-MYC [5]—stemness-associated markers involved in the generation of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) [15,16]. The expression of these markers has been shown to confer worse prognosis in RCCC [17].
The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) classically regulates blood pressure and body fluid homeostasis [18]. We have demonstrated the expression of components of the RAS by CSCs in many cancer types including glioblastoma [19], oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma of different subsites [20,21,22], primary head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (HNcSCC) [23] and metastatic HNcSCC (mHNcSCC) [24], metastatic malignant melanoma (MM) to the brain [25] and regional lymph nodes [26], and metastatic colon adenocarcinoma [27]. We have also demonstrated expression of cathepsins B, D and G which constitute bypass loops of the RAS [28], in a number of cancer types [29,30,31,32]. This underscores the critical role of the RAS in the development and progression of cancer [28,33].
Components of the RAS, i.e., renin, pro-renin receptor (PRR), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE), ACE2, angiotensin II receptor 1 (AT1R), and angiotensin II receptor 2 (AT2R), have been associated with the development of cancer [28,33]. Renin is activated from its inactive form, pro-renin by PRR, and converts angiotensinogen to angiotensin I (ATI). Renin has been implicated in carcinogenesis through Wnt/β-catenin signaling [28,34], with PRR over-expression also being linked to increased cellular proliferation [28,35]. Additionally, initial PRR over-expression has been linked to early stages of tumorigenesis [28,35]. ACE further converts ATI to angiotensin II (ATII), both of which act on AT1R and AT2R. ACE inhibitors (ACEIs) confer a protective effect against cancer [33,36,37]. ACE2 counteracts the action of ACE, by cleaving ATII downstream to form angiotensin (1–7) [38] which has anti-angiogenic and anti-metastatic actions, in addition to reducing endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition [39,40,41]. Over-expression of AT1R is associated with tumor invasiveness [36]. AT2R generally attenuates the effects of AT1R and consequently has a protective role against cancer development [40,42].
There is increasing evidence showing that RAS inhibitors (RASIs), specifically ACEIs and AT1R blockers (ARBs), significantly improve the overall survival of patients with RCCC, and enhance the efficacy of vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapies [43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. A recent meta-analysis demonstrates survival benefits for both ACEIs and ARBs in RCC [37].
This study investigated the expression of components of the RAS: renin, PRR, ACE, ACE2, AT1R, and AT2R in relation to the CSC subpopulations which we have recently identified in RCCC [5], using immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence staining, western blotting (WB), and reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. RCCC Tissue Samples

RCCC tissue samples from eight female and seven male patients, aged 37–88 (mean 66.6) years, including those used in our previous study [5] (Table S1), were sourced from the Gillies McIndoe Research Institute Tissue Bank. This study was approved by the Northern B Health and Disability Ethics Committee (Ref. 16/NTB/10) with written informed consent from all participants.

2.2. Histology and Immunohistochemical Staining

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining was performed on 4 µm-thick formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded consecutive sections of the 15 RCCC tissue samples to confirm the presence of the tumor on the slides. Immunohistochemical staining of sections of RCCC was then performed on the Leica BONDTM RX auto-stainer (Leica, Nussloch, Germany) using primary antibodies for renin (1:500; cat#14291-1-AP, Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA), PRR (1:500; cat#ab40790, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), ACE (1:30; cat#ab11734, Abcam), ACE2 (1:200; cat#MAB933 R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), and AT2R (1:2000; cat#NBP1-77368, Novus Biologicals, Littleton, CO, USA) with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine as the chromogen. Immunohistochemical staining was completed using the BOND polymer refine detection kit (cat#DS9800, Leica).
For the co-localization of renin and ACE2 to CSCs, double immunohistochemical staining was undertaken using the same antibody and concentration as above, with KLF4 (1:100; cat#AF3640, R&D Systems), using 3,3′-diaminobenzidine as the chromogen alongside the BOND Polymer Refine Red Detection kit (ready-to-use, cat#DS9390, Leica). KLF4 combinations used a rabbit anti-goat linker antibody (1:500; cat#305-005-045, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA, USA). Double immunohistochemical staining was used to co-localize ACE2 as this antibody was not optimized for immunofluorescence staining.
Human tissues used for positive controls in immunohistochemical staining were placenta for PRR, and normal kidney for renin, ACE, ACE2, and AT2R. Human tissue negative controls used were salivary gland for renin and AT2R, colon for PRR, and skin for ACE and ACE2. Isotype negative controls were prepared on sections of RCCC tissue samples using a primary isotype rabbit antibody (ready-to-use, cat#IR600, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) for renin, PRR, and AT2R, isotype mouse antibody (ready-to-use, cat#IR750, Dako) for ACE and ACE2, or isotype goat antibody (1:250, cat#02-6202, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for KLF4. Immunohistochemical staining was not performed for AT1R due to a lack of specific antibodies [50,51,52,53].

2.3. Immunofluorescence Staining

Immunofluorescence staining was performed on sections of two RCCC samples from the original cohort of 15 patients. Localization of the components of the RAS in relation to the CSCs we have previously identified [5] was achieved by co-staining with the stemness-associated marker OCT4. The primary antibodies and concentrations used for detection of the components of the RAS were identical to those used for immunohistochemical staining, in addition to OCT4 (1:30; cat#309M-16, Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA, USA). Immunofluorescence staining was completed using VectaFluor Excel anti-mouse DyLight 488 (ready-to-use; cat#DK-2488, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) and Alexa Fluor anti-rabbit 594 (1:500; cat# A21207, Invitrogen). Isotype negative controls were prepared as described for immunohistochemical staining.

2.4. Image Analysis

Immunohistochemical-stained slides were visualized and imaged using the Olympus BX53 light microscope, fitted with an Olympus SC100 digital camera (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), and processed with cellSens 2.0 software (Olympus). Immunofluorescence-stained slides were viewed and imaged with the Olympus FV1200 biological confocal laser-scanning microscope and processed with cellSens Dimension 1.11 (Olympus).

2.5. RT-qPCR

Total RNA was isolated from six available snap-frozen RCCC tissue samples of the original cohort of 15 patients. From each sample, approximately 20 mg of snap-frozen tissue was homogenized using the Omni Tissue Homogenizer (Omni International, Kennesaw, GA, USA). Total RNA was then extracted using the RNeasy Mini kit (cat#74104, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. An on-column DNase digest (cat#79254, Qiagen) step was included. RNA was quantified using a NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Transcript expression was analyzed in triplicate using the Rotor-Gene Q (Qiagen), Rotor-Gene Multiplex RT-PCR Kit (cat#204974, Qiagen), and TaqMan Gene Expression Assay primer probes (cat#4331182, Thermo Fisher Scientific) on 40 ng of RNA. The TaqMan primer probes used were renin (Hs00982555_m1), PRR (Hs00997145_m1), ACE (Hs00174179_m1), ACE2 (Hs01085333_m1), AT1R (Hs00258938_m1), and AT2R (Hs00169126_m1) (cat#4331182, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Gene expression was normalized to the reference genes GAPDH (Hs99999905_m1) and PUM1 (Hs00206469_m1) (cat#4331182, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Universal human reference RNA (UHR; cat#CLT636690, Takara, Shiga, Japan)—total RNA from a range of healthy human adult tissues—was used as the calibrator for the 2∆∆Ct analysis. Nuclease-free water was run as the no template control, and RNA from PC3 cells (renin), uterine fibroid tissue (PRR, ACE, AT1R, and AT2R), or HepG2 cells (ACE2) were used as positive controls. End-point amplification product specificity was confirmed with 2% agarose gel (cat#G402002, Thermo Fisher Scientific) electrophoresis and imaged using the ChemiDoc MP (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and Image Lab 6.0 software (Bio-Rad). Graphs were generated using GraphPad Prism (v8.0.2, San Diego, CA, USA) and results expressed as fold-change relative to UHR. A biologically significant fold-change cut off was set at 2.0 for up-regulated and 0.5 for down-regulated genes.

2.6. Western Blotting

Total protein, from the same six snap-frozen RCCC samples used for RT-qPCR, was extracted by pestle homogenization (cat#PES-15-B-SI, Corning, Tewsksbury, MA, USA) in ice-cold Radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer (cat#89900, Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA) supplemented with a protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (cat#78440, Pierce Biotechnology). Protein was quantified using a BCA assay (cat#23227, Pierce Biotechnology), and diluted in an equal volume of 2× LDS (cat#B0007, Invitrogen). Protein was separated by one-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (20 µg total protein per sample), prior to being transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (cat#IB24001, Invitrogen). Protein detection was performed on the iBind flex (cat#SLF2000, Thermo Fisher Scientific) using primary antibodies for PRR (1:250; cat#ab40790, Abcam), ACE (1:200; cat#sc-12184, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), ACE2 (1:500, cat#MAB933, R&D Systems), AT2R (1:500; cat#ab92445, Abcam), and α-tubulin (1:2000; cat#62204, Invitrogen). Appropriate secondary antibodies were goat anti-rabbit horse radish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate (1:1000, cat#111-035-045, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) for PRR, goat anti-mouse HRP (1:2000; cat#ab6789, Abcam) for ACE and ACE2, donkey anti-rabbit HRP (1:1000; cat#SA1-200, Thermo Fisher Scientific) for AT2R, and donkey anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 (1:1000, cat#A21202, Invitrogen) for α-tubulin. Clarity Western ECL (cat#1705061, Bio-Rad) was used as the substrate for visualizing HRP probed protein bands and the ChemiDoc MP Imaging System (Bio-Rad) and Image Lab 6.0 software (Bio-Rad) were used for band detection and analysis. Positive controls were human tonsil for PRR, mouse lung for ACE, human kidney for ACE2, and HepG2 cell line for AT2R. WB for renin was abandoned after multiple antibodies failed to produce a single specific band.

3. Results

3.1. Renin, ACE2, PRR and AT2R Were Expressed in RCCC Tissue Samples

H&E staining confirmed the presence of RCCC for all 15 tissue samples (Figure S1A). Patient demographic details are summarized in Table 1, with additional details presented in Table S1. Immunohistochemical staining demonstrated weak to moderate cytoplasmic staining of renin in 11 RCCC samples (Figure 1A). PRR showed cytoplasmic expression in 13 cases, with variable strength of staining (Figure 1B). ACE was present on the endothelium of normal vessels (Figure S1B) in all samples but was not present within the tumor (Figure 1C) in all 15 samples. ACE2 demonstrated a heterogenous membranous staining in 13 cases, with granular cytoplasmic staining in eight cases (Figure 1D). The staining pattern for AT2R demonstrated cytoplasmic staining of tumor cells in all samples, and variable nuclear staining of 13 cases (Figure 1E). Results of immunohistochemical staining are summarized in Table S3.
Positive human control tissues demonstrated the expected staining pattern for renin (Figure S1C) in normal kidney; PRR (Figure S1D) in placenta; and ACE (Figure S1E), ACE2 (Figure S1F), and AT2R (Figure S1G) in normal kidney. No staining was present in the isotype negative control (Figure S1H), or tissue negative controls (Figure S2A–E).

3.2. ACE2, PRR and AT2R but Not Renin Were Expressed by CSCs in RCCC Tissue Samples

Double immunohistochemical staining did not show renin (Figure 2A, red) on the KLF4+ (Figure 2A, brown) CSCs in the RCCC tissue samples. ACE2 (Figure 2B, red) was expressed by the KLF4+ (Figure 2B, brown) CSCs. Positive controls for double immunohistochemical staining showed appropriate cytoplasmic staining for renin (Figure S3A, red) in the bronchus, ACE2 (Figure S3B, red) in the kidney, with nuclear staining of KLF4 (Figure S3C, brown) in the colon epithelium. There was no staining on the isotype negative controls in the bronchus (Figure S3D), the kidney (Figure S3E), or the colon (Figure S3F).
Immunofluorescence staining showed cytoplasmic expression of PRR (Figure 3A, red) on the OCT4+ (Figure 3A, green) CSCs and AT2R (Figure 3B, red) predominantly expressed within the nuclei of the OCT4+ (Figure 3B, green) CSCs in the RCCC tissue samples. Split images of immunofluorescence staining presented in Figure 3 are shown in Figure S4. The negative controls demonstrated minimal staining (Figure S4E).

3.3. Renin, PRR, ACE, ACE2, and AT1R Transcripts Were Expressed in RCCC Tissue Samples

Expression of PRR, ACE, ACE2, and AT1R was detected by RT-qPCR, at levels similar to healthy UHR, with renin detected at increased levels (Figure 4). Renin was detected in five of the six RCCC tissue samples, with expression split into two groups. Two samples showed expression comparable to that of healthy UHR, while the other three were highly up-regulated relative to healthy UHR. AT1R was detected in only three of the samples. AT2R was detected in healthy UHR, but not in any of the RCCC samples. Fold-change values are presented in Table S2, and specific amplification was confirmed by gel electrophoresis of PCR products (Figure S5). The expected sized amplicons were observed, with no products visible in the no template control lanes. Subset analysis of PCR data is presented in Figure S6. Statistical significance determined by un-paired t-test showed no significant differences found with gender, age at diagnosis, or tumor grade. Tumor stage showed significantly increased ACE2 expression at stage T2a, however, there was no significant difference with any of the other markers.

3.4. Western Blotting Confirmed the Presence of PRR, ACE, ACE2 and AT2R Proteins in RCCC Tissue Samples

WB performed on the six snap-frozen RCCC samples demonstrated bands at the expected molecular weights for PRR, ACE, ACE2 and AT2R (Figure 5). PRR was present in all six samples with the soluble 21 kDa form detected in all six samples and the full-length 35 kDa transmembrane isoform detected in three of the six samples (Figure 5A, red). ACE was detected at the appropriate molecular weight of 195 kDa in five of the six samples (Figure 5B, red). ACE2 was detected at the expected molecular weight of 110 kDa in four of six samples (Figure 5C, red). AT2R was detected at the molecular weight of approximately 48 kDa in four of the six samples (Figure 5D, red). Blotting for renin with various antibodies failed to produce a single specific band. WB results are summarized in Table S2. Full-length images of all blots are available in Figure S7A–D. α-Tubulin confirmed similar total protein loading for each sample (Figure S6E, red). Rabbit IgG isotype controls confirmed an instance of nonspecific staining on the blot for AT2R (Figure S6F, red).

4. Discussion

This study demonstrated the expression of five components of the RAS: renin, PRR, ACE2, AT1R, and AT2R in RCCC with PRR, ACE2, and AT2R localized to the CSCs in RCCC which express the transcription factors OCT4, NANOG, SOX2, KLF4, and c-MYC [5]. These results contribute to the growing evidence linking the RAS to carcinogenesis. Immunohistochemical staining showed that AT2R was expressed in all 15 RCCC tissue samples examined, with renin, PRR, and ACE2 expressed in the majority of samples. The detection of PRR and ACE2 by immunohistochemical staining was confirmed by WB and RT-qPCR performed on six of the RCCC samples. WB confirmed expression of AT2R in four samples, however, RT-qPCR did not show expression of AT2R. WB was not available for renin, but its expression was confirmed by RT-qPCR. It is interesting that all of the three patients with up-regulated renin mRNA were female, with the others being male. However, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.2074) (Welch two sample t-test, R version 4.0.3). Further subset analysis of the RT-qPCR data was also non-significant (Figure S6). The other components of the RAS were detected at levels similar to UHR, however, the significance of this relative expression is difficult to interpret as UHR may not necessarily reflect expression levels in normal kidney. Expected WB bands for PRR include the transmembrane form at 35 kDa and the soluble isoform at approximately 28 kDa [28]. As a 21 kDa band was not detected in either the negative control or the rabbit IgG isotype control (Figure S5F), the 21 kDa band detected by WB suggests the presence of a degraded form of the PRR protein. Detection of ACE by WB and RT-qPCR likely reflects the normal vasculature as seen in immunohistochemical staining, rather than expression by the tumor itself. Those samples which expressed ACE, as demonstrated by WB, also expressed ACE2. The co-expression of these two components of the RAS has been noted previously [54]. AT2R was detected at 48 kDa by WB which is larger than the theoretical size of 41 kDa, suggesting the presence of a glycosylated form [22], with additional non-specific banding as confirmed by the isotype control (Figure S5F).
Double immunohistochemical staining demonstrated expression of ACE2 by the KLF4+ CSCs. Immunofluorescence co-staining demonstrated localization of PRR and AT2R to the OCT4+ CSCs we have previously identified in RCCC [5]. However, expression of renin was not demonstrated by double immunohistochemical staining. This could be due to overstaining of the KLF4 which might have masked the weak renin staining shown on single immunohistochemical staining. Alternatively, this may be due to antibody interaction relative to single immunohistochemical staining. Due to a lack of specific antibodies for AT1R [50,51,52,53], we were unable to demonstrate its protein expression and localization to the CSCs in this tumor.
Renin is a secreted protein with an isoform lacking exon 1 which encodes for a non-secreted form [55]. The membranous isoform has a function distinct from secreted renin, and has been demonstrated to protect cells from necrotic death [56], suggesting a local effect of this non-secreted renin in RCCC.
PRR has not been studied in-depth in the context of RCCC. However, it is known to play a role in renal injury and fibrosis as a critical element in Wnt/β-catenin signaling [57], which is a known pathway in renal carcinogenesis [58,59,60].
We did not detect ACE within the tumor; however, it was detected in surrounding normal vasculature, consistent with other work [61,62]. This suggests a loss of function of ACE in RCCC, however, this does not preclude local conversion of ATI to ATII. There are enzymes such as chymase that constitute bypass loops of the RAS [63] which could catalyze this conversion. Chymase has been demonstrated in other cancer types including gastric [64], lung [65], and uterine cervical [66] carcinoma.
The finding of ACE2 expression in RCCC is consistent with work by Errarte et al. [62], which demonstrates no significant correlation between ACE or ACE2 expression with survival. Unfortunately, our limited sample size prevents us studying a similar correlation with survival. A recent pan-cancer bio-informatics study also identifies increased ACE2 expression in RCCC [67], with increased expression correlating with improved survival [67]. These findings are reflected by other studies using data from the TCGA, where downregulation of ACE2 in RCCC is associated with worse survival [68,69]. Further associations include tumor progression, response to immunotherapy, stemness, and endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition [68]. The role of ACE2 in diverting signaling away from the ACE/ATII/AT1R axis may explain its seeming protective role in malignancy. The cleavage product of ACE2, angiotensin(1–7), has been trialed in a phase I clinical trial as anti-angiogenic treatment for solid tumors [70]. In contrast, it has also been suggested that angiotensin(1–7) promotes malignant cell migration and invasion in RCC [71].
The role of AT1R has been previously investigated in RCC, with increased expression of both AT1R and AT2R being associated with increased aggressiveness and reduced progression-free survival [72]. Captopril, an ACEI, significantly reduces tumor development in a xenograft model, although the exact mechanism has not been elucidated [73]. Reduced tumor growth and metastasis [49] and inhibited tumor angiogenesis and metastasis [47] have been demonstrated with AT1R antagonism in murine models. Epidemiological studies have demonstrated that administration of RASIs is associated with increased survival in patients with metastatic RCC [46,74,75,76], with beneficial responses in a phase II clinical trial for advanced RCC [77].
Interestingly, AT2R, a G-coupled transmembrane protein, was demonstrated within both the cytoplasm and the nuclei of the CSCs by immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence staining. This suggests the presence of functionally distinct localizations of AT2R–as both a transmembrane protein and nuclear receptor [78,79]. It has been suggested that the nuclear location of AT2R may either amplify the actions initiated by membranous AT2R [80] or modulate activation of the membranous location, possibly through transcription regulation [78,79]. AT2R was detected weakly by WB, and it was not detected by RT-qPCR. This may be due to the possibility that the RT-qPCR primers used in this study may not fully cover all possible splice variants of AT2R [81]. Alternatively, mRNA degradation might have resulted in the lack of detectable AT2R mRNA. Low levels of AT2R detected in RCCC is also consistent with the proposed protective role of AT2R against cancer [40,42], although this remains a topic of further investigation.
Our finding of the presence of components of the RAS by the CSCs within RCCC is consistent with findings of our previous studies of buccal mucosal [22], lip [21] and oral tongue [20] SCC, glioblastoma [19], primary HNcSCC [23], and mHNcSCC [24], metastatic MM to the braPLin [25] and regional lymph nodes [26], and metastatic colon adenocarcinoma to the liver [27]. We propose CSCs may be a potential novel therapeutic target by manipulation of the RAS [82,83]. Further study with a larger sample size to enable subset analysis, and functional investigations, are needed to determine the precise role of the RAS in CSCs in RCCC, and the therapeutic potential of RASIs in the treatment of this aggressive cancer.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/biom11040537/s1, Table S1: Additional demographic details of the 15 patients with renal clear cell carcinoma, Table S2: RT-qPCR and WB results summarized by patient, Table S3: immunohistochemical staining results summarized by patient, Figure S1: Hematoxylin and eosin stained sections and controls for immunohistochemical staining with normal vasculature staining for ACE, Figure S2: Tissue negative controls for immunohistochemical staining, Figure S3: Controls for double immunohistochemical staining, Figure S4: Split images and negative control for immunofluorescence staining, Figure S5: Gel electrophoresis of RT-qPCR products, Figure S6: Subset analysis of RT-qPCR data, Figure S7: Full-length WB images.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.I., A.K.-S., and S.T.T.; methodology, T.I., N.B., J.P., S.S., B.M., and H.D.B.; validation, N.B., J.P., H.D.B., and S.T.T.; formal analysis, H.D.B., N.B., J.P., S.S., B.M., T.I., and S.T.T.; investigation, S.S., B.M., N.B., J.P., and H.D.B.; resources, S.T.T.; data curation, P.F.D.; writing—original draft preparation, S.S.; writing—review and editing, S.T.T.; supervision, S.T.T.; project administration, S.T.T.; funding acquisition, S.T.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Northern B Health and Disability Ethics Committee (Ref. 16/NTB/10).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Liz Jones of the Gillies McIndoe Research Institute for her assistance with the H&E, immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence staining. BM was supported by a scholarship from the Dean Endowment Trust.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. TI, PD and ST are inventors of the provisional patents Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy (PCT/NZ2015/050108) and Cancer Therapeutic (PCT/NZ2018/050006), and Novel Pharmaceutical Compositions for Cancer Therapy (PCT/NZ2015/050108) and Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy (United States Patent No. 10281472).

References

  1. Jonasch, E.; Gao, J.; Rathmell, W.K. Renal cell carcinoma. BMJ 2014, 349, g4797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Muglia, V.F.; Prando, A. Renal cell carcinoma: Histological classification and correlation with imaging findings. Radiol. Bras. 2015, 48, 166–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Koul, H.; Huh, J.-S.; Rove, K.O.; Crompton, L.; Koul, S.; Meacham, R.B.; Kim, F.J. Molecular aspects of renal cell carcinoma: A review. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2011, 1, 240–254. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  4. Ridge, C.; Pua, B.; Madoff, D. Epidemiology and Staging of Renal Cell Carcinoma. Semin. Intervent. Radiol. 2014, 31, 003–008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Cane, R.; Kennedy-Smith, A.; Brasch, H.D.; Savage, S.; Marsh, R.W.; Itinteang, T.; Tan, S.T.; Itinteang, T. Characterization of Cancer Stem Cells in Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma. J. Stem Cell Regen. Biol. 2019, 5, 6–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nabi, S.; Kessler, E.R.; Bernard, B.; Flaig, T.W.; Lam, E.T. Renal cell carcinoma: A review of biology and pathophysiology. F1000 Research 2018, 7, 307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Maher, E. Von Hippel-Lindau Disease. Curr. Mol. Med. 2004, 4, 833–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chow, W.-H.; Dong, L.M.; Devesa, S.S. Epidemiology and risk factors for kidney cancer. Nat. Rev. Urol. 2010, 7, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Escudier, B.; Porta, C.; Schmidinger, M.; Rioux-Leclercq, N.; Bex, A.; Khoo, V.; Gruenvald, V.; Horwich, A. Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann. Oncol. 2016, 27, 58–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kreso, A.; Dick, J.E. Evolution of the cancer stem cell model. Cell Stem Cell 2014, 14, 275–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Huang, B.; Huang, Y.J.; Yao, Z.J.; Chen, X.; Guo, S.J.; Mao, X.P.; Wang, D.H.; Chen, J.X.; Qiu, S.P. Cancer Stem Cell-Like Side Population Cells in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Cell Line 769P. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e68293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Bussolati, B.; Camussi, G. Cancer Stem Cells and Renal Carcinoma. In Advances in Cancer Stem Cell Biology; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 211–220. [Google Scholar]
  13. Peired, A.J.; Sisti, A.; Romagnani, P. Renal cancer stem cells: Characterization and targeted therapies. Stem Cells Int. 2016, 2016, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Myszczyszyn, A.; Czarnecka, A.M.; Matak, D.; Szymanski, L.; Lian, F.; Kornakiewicz, A.; Bartnik, E.; Kukwa, W.; Kieda, C.; Szczylik, C. The role of hypoxia and cancer stem cells in renal cell carcinoma pathogenesis. Stem Cell Rev. Rep. 2015, 11, 919–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Takahashi, K.; Yamanaka, S. Induction of Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Embryonic and Adult Fibroblast Cultures by Defined Factors. Cell 2006, 126, 663–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Yu, J.; Vodyanik, M.A.; Smuga-Otto, K.; Antosiewicz-Bourget, J.; Frane, J.L.; Tian, S.; Nie, J.; Jonsdottir, G.A.; Ruotti, V.; Stewart, R.; et al. Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines Derived from Human Somatic Cells. Science 2007, 318, 1917–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cheng, B.; Yang, G.; Jiang, R.; Cheng, Y.; Yang, H.; Pei, L.; Qiu, X. Cancer stem cell markers predict a poor prognosis in renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 65862–65875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Peach, M.J. Renin-angiotensin system: Biochemistry and mechanisms of action. Physiol. Rev. 1977, 57, 313–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bradshaw, A.R.; Wickremesekera, A.C.; Brasch, H.D.; Chibnall, A.M.; Davis, P.F.; Tan, S.T.; Itinteang, T. Glioblastoma Multiforme Cancer Stem Cells Express Components of the Renin–Angiotensin System. Front. Surg. 2016, 3, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Itinteang, T.; Dunne, J.C.; Chibnall, A.M.; Brasch, H.D.; Davis, P.F.; Tan, S.T. Cancer stem cells in moderately differentiated oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma express components of the renin–angiotensin system. J. Clin. Pathol. 2016, 69, 942–945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Ram, R.S.; Brasch, H.D.; Dunne, J.C.; Davis, P.F.; Tan, S.T.; Itinteang, T. Cancer Stem Cells in Moderately Differentiated Lip Squamous Cell Carcinoma Express Components of the Renin–Angiotensin System. Front. Surg. 2017, 4, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Featherston, T.; Yu, H.H.; Dunne, J.C.; Chibnall, A.M.; Brasch, H.D.; Davis, P.F.; Tan, S.T.; Itinteang, T. Cancer Stem Cells in Moderately Differentiated Buccal Mucosal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Express Components of the Renin–Angiotensin System. Front. Surg. 2016, 3, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Nallaiah, S.; Lee, V.M.Y.; Brasch, H.D.; de Jongh, J.; van Schaijik, B.; Marsh, R.; Tan, S.T.; Itinteang, T. Cancer stem cells within moderately differentiated head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma express components of the renin-angiotensin system. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthetic Surg. 2019, 72, 1484–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Siljee, S.; Buchanan, O.; Brasch, H.D.; Bockett, N.; Patel, J.; Paterson, E.; Purdie, G.L.; Davis, P.F.; Itinteang, T.; Tan, S.T. Cancer Stem Cells in Metastatic Head and Neck Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Express Components of the Renin-Angiotensin System. Cells 2021, 10, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wickremesekera, A.C.; Brasch, H.D.; Lee, V.M.; Davis, P.F.; Parker, A.; Koeck, H.; Itinteang, T.; Tan, S.T.; Wickremesekera, A.R.; Brasch, H.D.; et al. Cancer stem cell subpopulations in metastatic melanoma to the brain express components of the renin-angiotensin system. J. Cancer Metastasis Treat. 2019, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Siljee, S.; Pilkington, T.; Brasch, H.D.; Bockett, N.; Patel, J.; Paterson, E.; Davis, P.F.; Tan, S.T. Cancer Stem Cells in Head and Neck Metastatic Malignant Melanoma Express Components of the Renin-Angiotensin System. Life 2020, 10, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Narayanan, A.; Wickremesekera, S.K.; Van Schaijik, B.; Marsh, R.W.; Brasch, H.D.; Tan, S.T.; Itinteang, T. Cancer stem cells in liver metastasis from colon adenocarcinoma express components of the renin-angiotensin system. J. Cancer Metastasis Treat. 2019, 2019, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Munro, M.J.; Wickremesekera, A.C.; Davis, P.F.; Marsh, R.; Tan, S.T.; Itinteang, T. Renin-angiotensin system and cancer: A review. Integr. Cancer Sci. Ther. 2017, 4, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Koh, S.P.; Wickremesekera, A.C.; Brasch, H.D.; Marsh, R.; Tan, S.T.; Itinteang, T. Expression of Cathepsins B, D, and G in Isocitrate Dehydrogenase-Wildtype Glioblastoma. Front. Surg. 2017, 4, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Featherston, T.; Marsh, R.W.; van Schaijik, B.; Brasch, H.D.; Tan, S.T.; Itinteang, T. Expression and Localization of Cathepsins B, D, and G in Two Cancer Stem Cell Subpopulations in Moderately Differentiated Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Front. Med. 2017, 4, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Mehrotra, S.; Wickremesekera, S.K.; Brasch, H.D.; Van Schaijik, B.; Marsh, R.W.; Tan, S.T.; Itinteang, T. Expression and Localization of Cathepsins B, D and G in Cancer Stem Cells in Liver Metastasis From Colon Adenocarcinoma. Front. Surg. 2018, 5, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Featherston, T.; Brasch, H.D.; Siljee, S.; van Schaijik, B.; Patel, J.; de Jongh, J.; Marsh, R.; Itinteang, T.; Tan, S. Cancer Stem Cells in Head and Neck Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Express Cathepsins. PRS Glob. Open 2020, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. George, A.J.; Thomas, W.G.; Hannan, R.D. The renin–angiotensin system and cancer: Old dog, new tricks. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2010, 10, 745–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Polakis, P. The many ways of Wnt in cancer. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2007, 17, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shibayama, Y.; Fujimori, T.; Nguyen, G.; Hirose, T.; Totsune, K.; Ichihara, A.; Kitada, K.; Nakano, D.; Kobori, H.; Kohno, M.; et al. (Pro)renin receptor is crucial for Wnt/β-catenin-dependent genesis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Deshayes, F.; Nahmias, C. Angiotensin receptors: A new role in cancer? Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 16, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Asgharzadeh, F.; Hashemzehi, M.; Moradi-Marjaneh, R.; Hassanian, S.M.; Ferns, G.A.; Khazaei, M.; Avan, A. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers as therapeutic options in the treatment of renal cancer: A meta-analysis. Life Sci. 2020, 242, 117181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Tikellis, C.; Thomas, M.C. Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) Is a Key Modulator of the Renin Angiotensin System in Health and Disease. Int. J. Pept. 2012, 2012, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Santos, R.A.S.; Simoes e Silva, A.C.; Maric, C.; Silva, D.M.R.; Machado, R.P.; de Buhr, I.; Heringer-Walther, S.; Pinheiro, S.V.B.; Lopes, M.T.; Bader, M.; et al. Angiotensin-(1-7) is an endogenous ligand for the G protein-coupled receptor Mas. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 8258–8263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Ager, E.I.; Neo, J.; Christophi, C. The renin-angiotensin system and malignancy. Carcinogenesis 2008, 29, 1675–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Xu, J.; Fan, J.; Wu, F.; Huang, Q.; Guo, M.; Lv, Z.; Han, J.; Duan, L.; Hu, G.; Chen, L.; et al. The ACE2/angiotensin-(1-7)/Mas receptor axis: Pleiotropic roles in cancer. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Doi, C.; Egashira, N.; Kawabata, A.; Maurya, D.K.; Ohta, N.; Uppalapati, D.; Ayuzawa, R.; Pickel, L.; Isayama, Y.; Troyer, D.; et al. Angiotensin II type 2 receptor signaling significantly attenuates growth of murine pancreatic carcinoma grafts in syngeneic mice. BMC Cancer 2010, 10, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Sun, H.; Li, T.; Zhuang, R.; Cai, W.; Zheng, Y. Do renin-angiotensin system inhibitors influence the recurrence, metastasis, and survival in cancer patients?: Evidence from a meta-analysis including 55 studies. Medicine 2017, 96, e6394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Derosa, L.; Izzedine, H.; Albiges, L.; Escudier, B. Hypertension and angiotensin system inhibitors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Oncol. Rev. 2016, 10, 54–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Sobczuk, P.; Szczylik, C.; Porta, C.; Czarnecka, A. Renin angiotensin system deregulation as renal cancer risk factor (Review). Oncol. Lett. 2017, 14, 5059–5068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. McKay, R.R.; Rodriguez, G.E.; Lin, X.; Kaymakcalan, M.D.; Hamnvik, O.-P.R.; Sabbisetti, V.S.; Bhatt, R.S.; Simantov, R.; Choueiri, T.K. Angiotensin System Inhibitors and Survival Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2015, 21, 2471–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Miyajima, A.; Kosaka, T.; Asano, T.; Asano, T.; Seta, K.; Kawai, T.; Hayakawa, M. Angiotensin II type I antagonist prevents pulmonary metastasis of murine renal cancer by inhibiting tumor angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 2002, 62, 4176–4179. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Pinter, M.; Jain, R.K. Targeting the renin-angiotensin system to improve cancer treatment: Implications for immunotherapy. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017, 9, eaan5616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Araújo, W.F.; Naves, M.A.; Ravanini, J.N.; Schor, N.; Teixeira, V.P.C. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade attenuates growth and metastatic potential of renal cell carcinoma in mice. Urol. Oncol. Semin. Orig. Investig. 2015, 33, 389.e1–389.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Michel, M.C.; Wieland, T.; Tsujimoto, G. How reliable are G-protein-coupled receptor antibodies? Naunyn. Schmiedebergs. Arch. Pharmacol. 2009, 379, 385–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Benicky, J.; Hafko, R.; Sanchez-Lemus, E.; Aguilera, G.; Saavedra, J.M. Six commercially available angiotensin II AT1 receptor antibodies are non-specific. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2012, 32, 1353–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Herrera, M.; Sparks, M.A.; Alfonso-Pecchio, A.R.; Harrison-Bernard, L.M.; Coffman, T.M. Lack of specificity of commercial antibodies leads to misidentification of angiotensin type 1 receptor protein. Hypertension 2013, 61, 253–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Elliott, K.J.; Kimura, K.; Eguchi, S. Lack of specificity of commercial antibodies leads to misidentification of angiotensin type-1 receptor protein. Hypertension 2013, 61, e31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Wakahara, S.; Konoshita, T.; Mizuno, S.; Motomura, M.; Aoyama, C.; Makino, Y.; Kato, N.; Koni, I.; Miyamori, I. Synergistic expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) and ACE2 in human renal tissue and confounding effects of hypertension on the ACE to ACE2 ratio. Endocrinology 2007, 148, 2453–2457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Peters, J.; Wanka, H.; Peters, B.; Hoffmann, S. A renin transcript lacking exon 1 encodes for a non-secretory intracellular renin that increases aldosterone production in transgenic rats. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2008, 12, 1229–1237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Peters, J. Cytosolic pro renin and the matter of intracellular renin actions. Front. Biosci. 2013, S5, S366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Li, Z.; Zhou, L.; Wang, Y.; Miao, J.; Hong, X.; Hou, F.F.; Liu, Y. (Pro)renin receptor is an amplifier of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in kidney injury and fibrosis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2017, 28, 2393–2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Kojima, T.; Shimazui, T.; Hinotsu, S.; Joraku, A.; Oikawa, T.; Kawai, K.; Horie, R.; Suzuki, H.; Nagashima, R.; Yoshikawa, K.; et al. Decreased expression of CXXC4 promotes a malignant phenotype in renal cell carcinoma by activating Wnt signaling. Oncogene 2009, 28, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Li, D.; Wang, P.; Yu, Y.; Huang, B.; Zhang, X.; Xu, C.; Zhao, X.; Yin, Z.; He, Z.; Jin, M.; et al. Tumor-preventing activity of aspirin in multiple cancers based on bioinformatic analyses. PeerJ 2018, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Majid, S.; Saini, S.; Dahiya, R. Wnt signaling pathways in urological cancers: Past decades and still growing. Mol. Cancer 2012, 11, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Larrinaga, G.; Pérez, I.; Sanz, B.; Blanco, L.; López, J.I.; Cándenas, M.L.; Pinto, F.M.; Gil, J.; Irazusta, J.; Varona, A. Angiotensin-converting enzymes (ACE and ACE2) are downregulated in renal tumors. Regul. Pept. 2010, 165, 218–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Errarte, P.; Beitia, M.; Perez, I.; Manterola, L.; Lawrie, C.H.; Solano-Iturri, J.D.; Calvete-Candenas, J.; Unda, M.; López, J.I.; Larrinaga, G. Expression and activity of angiotensin-regulating enzymes is associated with prognostic outcome in clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0181711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Urata, H.; Kinoshita, A.; Misono, K.S.; Bumpus, F.M.; Husain, A. Identification of a highly specific chymase as the major angiotensin II-forming enzyme in the human heart. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 265, 22348–22357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Sugimoto, M.; Yamaoka, Y.; Shirai, N.; Furuta, T. Role of renin-angiotensin system in gastric oncogenesis. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2012, 27, 442–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Ibaraki, T.; Muramatsu, M.; Takai, S.; Jin, D.; Maruyama, H.; Orino, T.; Katsumata, T.; Miyazaki, M. The relationship of tryptase- and chymase-positive mast cells to angiogenesis in stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Eur. J. Cardio-Thoracic Surg. 2005, 28, 617–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Diaconu, N.-C.; Rummukainen, J.; Naukkarinen, A.; Mättö, M.; Harvima, R.J.; Pelkonen, J.; Harvima, I.T. Mast cell chymase is present in uterine cervical carcinoma and it detaches viable and growing cervical squamous carcinoma cells from substratum in vitro. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2011, 303, 499–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Feng, H.; Wei, X.; Pang, L.; Wu, Y.; Hu, B.; Ruan, Y.; Liu, Z.; Liu, J.; Wang, T. Prognostic and Immunological Value of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 in Pan-Cancer. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2020, 7, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, Z.; Li, L.; Li, M.; Wang, X. The SARS-CoV-2 host cell receptor ACE2 correlates positively with immunotherapy response and is a potential protective factor for cancer progression. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 2438–2444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chai, P.; Yu, J.; Ge, S.; Jia, R.; Fan, X. Genetic alteration, RNA expression, and DNA methylation profiling of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) receptor ACE2 in malignancies: A pan-cancer analysis. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2020, 13, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Petty, W.J.; Miller, A.A.; Mccoy, T.P.; Gallagher, P.E.; Tallant, E.A.; Torti, F.M. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of angiotensin-(1-7), an endogenous antiangiogenic hormone. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 7398–7404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Zheng, S.; Yang, Y.; Song, R.; Yang, X.; Liu, H.; Ma, Q.; Yang, L.; Meng, R.; Tao, T.; Wang, S.; et al. Ang-(1-7) promotes the migration and invasion of human renal cell carcinoma cells via Mas-mediated AKT signaling pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 460, 333–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Dolley-Hitze, T.; Jouan, F.; Martin, B.; Mottier, S.; Edeline, J.; Moranne, O.; Le Pogamp, P.; Belaud-Rotureau, M.-A.; Patard, J.-J.; Rioux-Leclercq, N.; et al. Angiotensin-2 receptors (AT1-R and AT2-R), new prognostic factors for renal clear-cell carcinoma? Br. J. Cancer 2010, 103, 1698–1705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Hii, S.-I.I.; Nicol, D.L.D.; Gotley, D.C.; Thompson, L.C.; Green, M.K.; Jonsson, J.R.J. Captopril inhibits tumour growth in a xenograft model of human renal cell carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer 1998, 77, 880–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Izzedine, H.; Derosa, L.; Le Teuff, G.; Albiges, L.; Escudier, B. Hypertension and angiotensin system inhibitors: Impact on outcome in sunitinib-treated patients for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Ann. Oncol. 2015, 26, 1128–1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Keizman, D.; Huang, P.; Eisenberger, M.A.; Pili, R.; Kim, J.J.; Antonarakis, E.S.; Hammers, H.; Carducci, M.A. Angiotensin system inhibitors and outcome of sunitinib treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective examination. Eur. J. Cancer 2011, 47, 1955–1961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Miyajima, A.; Yazawa, S.; Kosaka, T.; Tanaka, N.; Shirotake, S.; Mizuno, R.; Kikuchi, E.; Oya, M. Prognostic Impact of Renin–Angiotensin System Blockade on Renal Cell Carcinoma After Surgery. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2015, 22, 3751–3759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Tatokoro, M.; Fujii, Y.; Kawakami, S.; Saito, K.; Koga, F.; Matsuoka, Y.; Iimura, Y.; Masuda, H.; Kihara, K. Phase-II trial of combination treatment of interferon-α, cimetidine, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor and renin-angiotensin-system inhibitor (I-CCA therapy) for advanced renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2011, 102, 137–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Villar-Cheda, B.; Costa-Besada, M.A.; Valenzuela, R.; Perez-Costas, E.; Melendez-Ferro, M.; Labandeira-Garcia, J.L. The intracellular angiotensin system buffers deleterious effects of the extracellular paracrine system. Cell Death Dis. 2017, 8, e3044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  79. Tadevosyan, A.; Xiao, J.; Surinkaew, S.; Naud, P.; Merlen, C.; Harada, M.; Qi, X.; Chatenet, D.; Fournier, A.; Allen, B.G.; et al. Intracellular Angiotensin-II Interacts With Nuclear Angiotensin Receptors in Cardiac Fibroblasts and Regulates RNA Synthesis, Cell Proliferation, and Collagen Secretion. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2017, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Cook, J.L.; Re, R.N. Review: Lessons from in vitro studies and a related intracellular angiotensin II transgenic mouse model. Am. J. Physiol. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2012, 302, R482–R493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Warnecke, C.; Sürder, D.; Curth, R.; Fleck, E.; Regitz-Zagrosek, V. Analysis and functional characterization of alternatively spliced angiotensin II type 1 and 2 receptor transcripts in the human heart. J. Mol. Med. 1999, 77, 718–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Roth, I.M.; Wickremesekera, A.C.; Wickremesekera, S.K.; Davis, P.F.; Tan, S.T. Therapeutic Targeting of Cancer Stem Cells via Modulation of the Renin-Angiotensin System. Front. Oncol. 2019, 9, 745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  83. Tan, D.; Roth, I.; Wickremesekera, A.; Davis, P.; Kaye, A.; Mantamadiotis, T.; Stylli, S.; Tan, S. Therapeutic Targeting of Cancer Stem Cells in Human Glioblastoma by Manipulating the Renin-Angiotensin System. Cells 2019, 8, 1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Biomolecules 11 00537 g001 550
Figure 1. Representative immunohistochemical-stained images of renal clear cell carcinoma tissue samples. Renin (A, brown) and PRR (B, brown) showed cytoplasmic staining of the tumor cells. ACE (C, brown) was not present within the tumor. ACE2 (D, brown) showed mostly membranous, with some cytoplasmic, staining of the tumor cells. AT2R (E, brown) was expressed in the cytoplasm and nucleus of the cells within the tumor. Nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin (A–E, blue). Original magnification: 400×. Scale bar: 20 µm.
Figure 1. Representative immunohistochemical-stained images of renal clear cell carcinoma tissue samples. Renin (A, brown) and PRR (B, brown) showed cytoplasmic staining of the tumor cells. ACE (C, brown) was not present within the tumor. ACE2 (D, brown) showed mostly membranous, with some cytoplasmic, staining of the tumor cells. AT2R (E, brown) was expressed in the cytoplasm and nucleus of the cells within the tumor. Nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin (A–E, blue). Original magnification: 400×. Scale bar: 20 µm.
Biomolecules 11 00537 g001
Biomolecules 11 00537 g002 550
Figure 2. Representative double immunohistochemical stained images demonstrating no expression of renin (A, red) and expression of ACE2 (B, red) on the KLF4+ (A,B, brown) CSCs. Nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin (A,B, blue). Original magnification: 400×. Scale bar: 20 µm.
Figure 2. Representative double immunohistochemical stained images demonstrating no expression of renin (A, red) and expression of ACE2 (B, red) on the KLF4+ (A,B, brown) CSCs. Nuclei were counterstained with hematoxylin (A,B, blue). Original magnification: 400×. Scale bar: 20 µm.
Biomolecules 11 00537 g002
Biomolecules 11 00537 g003 550
Figure 3. Representative immunofluorescence-stained sections of renal clear cell carcinoma tissue stained for of AT2R (A, red) with OCT4 (A, green). AT2R (B, red) was detected on the OCT4+ (B, green) CSCs. Cell nuclei were counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (A,B, blue). Original magnification 400×. Scale bar: 20 µm.
Figure 3. Representative immunofluorescence-stained sections of renal clear cell carcinoma tissue stained for of AT2R (A, red) with OCT4 (A, green). AT2R (B, red) was detected on the OCT4+ (B, green) CSCs. Cell nuclei were counterstained with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (A,B, blue). Original magnification 400×. Scale bar: 20 µm.
Biomolecules 11 00537 g003
Biomolecules 11 00537 g004 550
Figure 4. Fold-change (2ΔΔCT) in gene expression of the components of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS): renin, PRR, ACE, ACE2, AT1R, and AT2R, determined by RT-qPCR on total RNA extracted from six renal clear cell carcinoma tissue samples. CT values were normalized to the reference genes GAPDH and PUM1 and displayed as expression relative to universal human reference RNA (UHR). Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals of the mean.
Figure 4. Fold-change (2ΔΔCT) in gene expression of the components of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS): renin, PRR, ACE, ACE2, AT1R, and AT2R, determined by RT-qPCR on total RNA extracted from six renal clear cell carcinoma tissue samples. CT values were normalized to the reference genes GAPDH and PUM1 and displayed as expression relative to universal human reference RNA (UHR). Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals of the mean.
Biomolecules 11 00537 g004
Biomolecules 11 00537 g005 550
Figure 5. Representative cropped images of western blot analysis of total protein extracted from six renal clear cell carcinoma tissue samples demonstrating the presence of PRR (A, red), ACE (B, red), ACE2 (C, red), and AT2R (D, red). Full-length blots are presented in Figure S7.
Figure 5. Representative cropped images of western blot analysis of total protein extracted from six renal clear cell carcinoma tissue samples demonstrating the presence of PRR (A, red), ACE (B, red), ACE2 (C, red), and AT2R (D, red). Full-length blots are presented in Figure S7.
Biomolecules 11 00537 g005
Table
Table 1. Demographic details of the 15 patients with renal clear cell carcinoma.
Table 1. Demographic details of the 15 patients with renal clear cell carcinoma.
Gender
Male7 (46.7%)
Female8 (53.3%)
Mean age (range)66.6 (36.6–87.5) years
ISUP Grade
Grade 28 (53.3%)
Grade 37 (46.7%)
Tumor stage
Stage pT1x2 (13.3%)
Stage pT1a5 (33.3%)
Stage pT1b1 (6.7%)
Stage pT2a2 (13.3%)
Stage pT3a5 (33.3%)
Status
Alive11 (73.3%)
Deceased4 (26.7%)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Siljee, S.; Milne, B.; Brasch, H.D.; Bockett, N.; Patel, J.; Davis, P.F.; Kennedy-Smith, A.; Itinteang, T.; Tan, S.T. Expression of Components of the Renin-Angiotensin System by Cancer Stem Cells in Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 537. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biom11040537

AMA Style

Siljee S, Milne B, Brasch HD, Bockett N, Patel J, Davis PF, Kennedy-Smith A, Itinteang T, Tan ST. Expression of Components of the Renin-Angiotensin System by Cancer Stem Cells in Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma. Biomolecules. 2021; 11(4):537. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biom11040537

Chicago/Turabian Style

Siljee, Sam, Bridget Milne, Helen D. Brasch, Nicholas Bockett, Josie Patel, Paul F. Davis, Andrew Kennedy-Smith, Tinte Itinteang, and Swee T. Tan. 2021. "Expression of Components of the Renin-Angiotensin System by Cancer Stem Cells in Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma" Biomolecules 11, no. 4: 537. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/biom11040537

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop